The global financial landscape has undergone a profound transformation with the advent of digital payment technologies, influencing monetary policy paradigms and fostering financial inclusion initiatives. This research investigates the interplay between digital payments, financial inclusivity, and their relationship with the overarching objectives of monetary policy. The study delves into the multifaceted impact of digital payment systems on the attainment of monetary policy goals. It scrutinizes the role of digital financial services in fostering greater access to financial resources for underserved populations, thereby addressing issues of financial exclusion. Moreover, it assesses the implications of enhanced financial inclusivity on broader economic variables, such as consumption patterns, savings behavior, and income distribution, which are pivotal concerns for central banks in their pursuit of stability and growth. Furthermore, the research analyzes the efficacy of digital payment infrastructures in influencing the transmission mechanisms of monetary policy. It investigates how these technologies may alter the velocity of money, liquidity preferences, and the effectiveness of policy tools in steering economic variables toward desired targets, such as price stability and sustainable growth. The findings of this research are expected to contribute to policy discourse by providing a nuanced understanding of how leveraging digital payment innovations can potentially align with and augment the efficacy of monetary policy frameworks. Ultimately, it seeks to offer recommendations for policymakers, financial institutions, and regulators to leverage digital finance as a catalyst for advancing both financial inclusion goals and the broader aims of monetary policy in an increasingly digitalized global economy. Dr. J. Suresh Kumar | Dr. D. Shobana "Exploring Digital Payments, Financial Inclusion, and Monetary Policy in India" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-8 | Issue-1 , February 2024, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd63443.pdf Paper Url: https://www.ijtsrd.com/economics/financial-economics/63443/exploring-digital-payments-financial-inclusion-and-monetary-policy-in-india/dr-j-suresh-kumar
2. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD63443 | Volume – 8 | Issue – 1 | Jan-Feb 2024 Page 418
how financial inclusion initiatives influence the
stability of financial systems in this region. This
academic work is important for policymakers,
financial institutions, and other stakeholders who are
interested in building strong and stable financial
ecosystems among the ASEAN-4 countries. It also
deepens our understanding of how financial inclusion
shapes the stability of financial systems.
Le, Chuc, and Taghizadeh-Hesary (2019) present a
comprehensive analysis in the Borsa Istanbul Review
examining the intricate relationship between financial
inclusion and its consequential effects on both
financial efficiency and sustainability, grounded in
empirical evidence drawn from Asian economies.
This empirical study meticulously scrutinizes the
influence of financial inclusion initiatives on the
broader contexts of financial efficiency and
sustainability across diverse Asian settings. By
exploring this nexus, the research delivers insightful
perspectives into the multifaceted impacts of
promoting financial inclusion on the wider financial
landscape. This academic paper makes an important
contribution to our understanding of how financial
inclusion efforts, particularly in the Asian area, might
influence the sustainability and efficiency of financial
systems. Their empirical findings have immediate
consequences for policymakers, financial institutions,
and stakeholders involved in improving the
sustainability and efficiency of financial systems.
They also provide subtle insights into the possible
benefits and drawbacks of increasing financial
inclusion.
Using the PVAR approach, Oanh, T. T. K., Van, L.
T. T., & Dinh, L. Q. (2023, June) examined the
complex relationship between financial stability,
monetary policy, and financial inclusion in 58
countries between 2004 and 2020—that is, 31 high
financial development countries (HFDCs) and 27 low
financial development countries (LFDCs). Different
correlations between these characteristics in HFDCs
and LFDCs are found by the investigation.
Interestingly, in LFDCs, the impulse-response
function shows that financial stability and inclusion
are positively correlated, but inflation and money
supply growth rates are negatively correlated. In
contrast, financial stability shows negative
associations with financial inclusion, inflation, and
money supply growth rates, while a positive
relationship between financial inclusion and both of
these variables develops in HFDCs. These fascinating
results imply that financial inclusion in LFDCs
reduces inflation and acts as a catalyst for financial
stability. On the other hand, it can exacerbate
financial instability in HFDCs and encourage
persistent inflationary tendencies. Variance
decomposition is used in the text to support these
results, highlighting how clearly these correlations
exist—this is especially true for HFDCs. The report
ends with specific policy recommendations for each
unique group of nations that aim to promote financial
stability through monetary policy initiatives and
targeted financial inclusion.
Using data from both developing and established
nations, Shalihin and Safuan (2021) conduct an
incisive investigation of Indonesian Economics and
Finance, examining the effects of financial inclusion
and openness on the stability of banking systems.
This study rigorously examines the interrelationship
between financial inclusion, openness, and their
influence on the stability of banking systems across
diverse economic contexts. By probing this
relationship, the research offers valuable empirical
evidence shedding light on the complex dynamics
that shape banking stability in both developing and
developed nations. This scholarly endeavor
contributes significantly to comprehending the effects
of financial inclusion and openness on banking
stability. Their findings provide nuanced insights into
the intricate interactions among these variables,
presenting implications for policymakers, financial
regulators, and stakeholders keen on fortifying
banking stability amidst evolving global economic
landscapes.
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
The proliferation of digital payment systems has
significantly altered the landscape of financial
transactions globally. Concurrently, the pursuit of
financial inclusion has been a key policy goal for
many economies. However, there exists a gap in
understanding the intricate relationship between
digital payments, financial inclusion, and their impact
on achieving monetary policy objectives. As
highlighted by Arner et al. (2017), the surge in digital
financial services presents opportunities for
enhancing financial inclusion by extending access to
previously underserved populations. Yet, effective
integration of these systems into monetary policy
frameworks remains an understudied area (Mersch,
2018). The challenge lies in comprehending how the
proliferation of digital payment technologies
influences monetary policy goals such as price
stability, efficient payment systems, and the
transmission mechanisms of monetary policy.
Existing literature, while acknowledging the potential
of digital payments to enhance financial inclusion,
lacks a comprehensive analysis of their nuanced
effects on broader macroeconomic indicators and the
efficacy of monetary policy tools. This knowledge
3. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD63443 | Volume – 8 | Issue – 1 | Jan-Feb 2024 Page 419
gap impedes policymakers' ability to harness the full
potential of digital payments in achieving
macroeconomic stability and inclusive growth.
Therefore, this research seeks to investigate the
complex interplay between digital payment adoption,
financial inclusion, and their implications for the
effectiveness of monetary policy. By analyzing
empirical data and employing econometric models,
this study aims to provide insights into how central
banks can leverage digital payment ecosystems to
achieve their monetary policy objectives while
promoting financial inclusion in the contemporary
financial landscape.
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
The study of digital payments, financial inclusion,
and their relationship with monetary policy goals is
significant for several reasons. Firstly, the rise of
digital payments has transformed the financial
landscape, impacting the efficiency and accessibility
of transactions. Understanding this shift is crucial for
adapting monetary policies to the evolving economic
environment. Financial inclusion, which involves
providing access to financial services for all segments
of the population, is closely tied to social and
economic development. Analyzing its relationship
with digital payments helps policymakers identify
ways to leverage technology for broader financial
inclusion, contributing to economic growth and
poverty reduction. Furthermore, the study aids in
assessing how digital payments influence key
monetary policy goals, such as price stability,
economic growth, and employment. The speed and
transparency of digital transactions can impact
inflation, while enhanced financial inclusion may
contribute to economic development. Exploring the
interplay between digital payments, financial
inclusion, and monetary policy goals is essential for
policymakers to make informed decisions that align
with the changing dynamics of the financial
landscape and contribute to overall economic well-
being.
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
To researching India's digital payment system.
To measure how the use of digital payments
affects indicators of financial inclusion.
To assess how improved financial inclusion
through digital payments will affect the
macroeconomic situation.
To evaluate the risks and resilience that digital
payment networks bring to the implementation of
monetary policy.
To investigate how regulatory frameworks might
best optimize the connection between the
objectives of monetary policy and digital
payments.
These goals aim to give policymakers and other
stakeholders in the financial ecosystem a thorough
understanding and practical insights by exploring the
relationship between digital payments, financial
inclusion, and monetary policy goals from a variety
of angles.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This study is conceptual in character, with an
exploratory research foundation. A systematic
technique is usually used in research on the
connections between digital payments, financial
inclusion, and monetary policy objectives. To
comprehend the present level of knowledge about
digital payments, financial inclusions, and monetary
policy objectives, do a thorough review of the body of
available literature. The objective of this
methodology is to offer a methodical and meticulous
way to investigating the complex relationships among
digital payments, financial inclusion, and the
achievement of monetary policy objectives. The
integration of both qualitative and quantitative
methodologies facilitates a comprehensive
comprehension of the intricate dynamics involved.
DIGITAL PAYMENT SYSTEM IN INDIA
Unified Payments Interface (UPI): Users can link
several bank accounts to a single mobile application
using UPI, a real-time payment mechanism. Paytm,
PhonePe, Google Pay, and other popular UPI apps are
available.
Mobile Wallets: With mobile wallets, users may
make payments and keep money online. Paytm,
Mobikwik, and PhonePe are a few well-known
mobile wallet companies.
Bharat Interface for Money (BHIM): The National
Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) is the
organisation behind the government-backed UPI
software BHIM. It seeks to make digital payments
easier for consumers.
National Electronic Funds Transfer (NEFT): One-
to-one money transfers are made easier by the NEFT
electronic funds transfer system. On a deferred net
settlement (DNS) basis, it functions.
Immediate Payment Service (IMPS): Instant
interbank electronic fund transfers are made possible
by IMPS. Both online banking and mobile devices
can access it.
Razorpay: Razorpay is a payment gateway that helps
companies conduct online purchases. It accepts a
number of payment options, including as net banking,
UPI, and credit/debit cards.
4. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD63443 | Volume – 8 | Issue – 1 | Jan-Feb 2024 Page 420
Aadhaar Enabled Payment System (AePS): With
AePS, users can use their fingerprint authentication
and Aadhaar number to conduct financial transactions
at a micro-ATM.
FASTag: Using RFID technology, FASTag is an
electronic toll collection system. On highways, it is
frequently utilised for automated toll collection.
RuPay: An Indian domestic card payment network is
called RuPay. Credit and debit cards are among the
payment solutions it offers.
Banking Apps: Customers in India can conduct
various financial operations, including digital
payments and fund transfers, by utilizing the mobile
banking apps provided by numerous banks.
India's digital payment environment is expanding,
with new features and services being added on a
regular basis. Users can select from a variety of
alternatives according to their needs and tastes. As the
world of digital payments continues to change, it's
advised to stay up to date.
IMPACT OF DIGITAL PAYMENT ADOPTION
ON FINANCIAL INCLUSION METRICS
Quantifying the impact of digital payment adoption
on financial inclusion metrics involves examining
various indicators that measure access to and usage of
financial services.
1. Increase in Account Ownership: Studies have
shown that digital payment adoption leads to
increased account ownership. For instance, the
Global Findex database by the World Bank
indicates that digital payments have contributed to
a rise in the number of adults with bank accounts
globally. (World Bank - Global Findex Database)
2. Rise in Usage of Formal Financial Services:
Digital payment adoption correlates with
increased usage of formal financial services.
Research from the International Monetary Fund
(IMF) suggests that in countries where digital
payments are widely adopted, there's a subsequent
increase in the use of banking services among
previously unbanked populations. (IMF -
Working Paper)
3. Access to Credit and Loans: Enhanced financial
inclusion through digital payments often enables
easier access to credit and loans for previously
underserved populations. According to a report by
the Center for Financial Inclusion, increased
digital payment adoption has led to a rise in credit
access for small businesses and individuals in
certain regions. (Center for Financial Inclusion
Report)
4. Reduction in Gender Disparities: Digital
payments can contribute to reducing gender
disparities in financial access. The Better than
Cash Alliance has observed that digital payments
empower women by giving them control over
their finances, leading to increased financial
inclusion among women. (Better Than Cash
Alliance Report)
5. Impact on Rural Financial Inclusion: Digital
payment adoption significantly affects rural
financial inclusion. Studies by the Consultative
Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP) have
demonstrated that digital financial services have
increased access to financial tools and services in
rural areas, improving financial inclusion metrics
in these regions. (CGAP - Rural and Agricultural
Finance)
6. Change in Transaction Volumes: The shift from
cash to digital payments can be quantified
through transaction volumes. Reports from
payment service providers or government
agencies often track the increase in digital
transactions over time, reflecting the impact of
adoption on financial inclusion metrics. (Various
Payment Service Provider Reports and
Government Publications)
Quantifying the impact of digital payment adoption
on financial inclusion involves assessing changes in
key metrics such as account ownership, usage of
formal financial services, access to credit, gender
disparities, rural financial inclusion, and transaction
volumes. These metrics provide tangible evidence of
the positive effects of digital payment adoption on
enhancing financial inclusion.
MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF
ENHANCED FINANCIAL INCLUSION
THROUGH DIGITAL PAYMENTS
Enhanced financial inclusion through digital
payments has far-reaching macroeconomic
implications that can transform economies in multiple
ways.
1. Increased Economic Growth and Productivity:
Digital payments enable greater financial
inclusion, allowing more people to access
financial services and participate in the formal
economy. This can lead to increased economic
growth and productivity. (World Bank - Global
Findex Database)
2. Reduced Transaction Costs and Increased
Efficiency: Digital payments streamline
transactions, reducing the costs associated with
cash handling and making financial transactions
more efficient. This efficiency can contribute to
GDP growth. (International Monetary Fund - IMF
Working Paper)
5. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD63443 | Volume – 8 | Issue – 1 | Jan-Feb 2024 Page 421
3. Improved Monetary Policy Transmission:
With increased usage of digital payments, central
banks can gather more accurate and timely data
on economic transactions. This enables more
effective monetary policy implementation and
better economic management. (Bank for
International Settlements - BIS Paper)
4. Reduction in Informal Economy: Increased
financial inclusion through digital payments can
reduce the size of the informal economy, leading
to more tax revenues for governments and
improved fiscal policies. (Brookings Institution -
Digital Financial Inclusion)
5. Enhanced Financial Stability: Digital payments
can contribute to increased financial stability by
reducing systemic risks associated with cash-
based transactions. It provides greater
transparency and traceability, reducing
opportunities for illicit activities. (World
Economic Forum - WEF Report)
6. Job Creation and Poverty Alleviation:
Improved financial inclusion can create
employment opportunities, particularly in the
fintech sector, and contribute to poverty
alleviation by enabling access to credit and
savings facilities for underserved populations.
(Center for Financial Inclusion - CFI Report)
7. Enhanced Resilience to Economic Shocks:
Diversification of financial services through
digital platforms can enhance resilience to
economic shocks by providing alternative
payment and banking channels, reducing the
dependency on traditional banking systems.
(Harvard Kennedy School - HKS Working Paper)
Enhanced financial inclusion through digital
payments not only fosters economic growth but also
promotes stability, efficiency, and inclusivity within
economies. As highlighted by various studies and
reports, the macroeconomic implications are
multifaceted, impacting growth, policy effectiveness,
stability, and poverty alleviation.
RESILIENCE AND RISKS INTRODUCED BY
DIGITAL PAYMENT ECOSYSTEMS IN
MONETARY POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
The integration of digital payment ecosystems can
significantly influence the resilience and introduce
new risks to monetary policy implementation.
A. Resilience Introduced by Digital Payment
Ecosystems:
1. Improved Policy Transmission: Digital payment
ecosystems offer real-time data on transactions,
providing central banks with more accurate
information. This can enhance the effectiveness
of monetary policy implementation by improving
the transmission mechanism. (Bank for
International Settlements - BIS)
2. Enhanced Policy Tools: Central banks can
leverage digital payment data to develop more
targeted and effective policy tools. This includes
better liquidity management and the ability to
respond promptly to economic changes.
(International Monetary Fund - IMF)
3. Reduced Informality: Digital payments reduce
cash transactions, which can help in bringing
informal economic activities into the formal
sector. This increased formalization supports
better policy implementation and monitoring.
(World Bank - Global Findex Database)
B. Risks Introduced by Digital Payment
Ecosystems:
1. Operational and Cyber Risks: Increased
reliance on digital payment systems amplifies
operational and cyber risks. Disruptions due to
system failures, cyberattacks, or technical glitches
could hinder monetary policy implementation.
(Financial Stability Board - FSB)
2. Privacy and Data Security Concerns: The
collection and use of vast amounts of transaction
data in digital payments raise privacy concerns.
Mishandling of sensitive data can lead to public
distrust or vulnerabilities that could impact
monetary policy strategies. (World Economic
Forum - WEF)
3. Financial Stability Challenges: The rapid
adoption of digital payments might outpace
regulatory frameworks, posing challenges for
financial stability. The speed and volume of
transactions may create new systemic risks that
require proactive regulation. (Bank for
International Settlements - BIS)
4. Inclusivity Risks: While digital payments can
enhance financial inclusion, there are risks that
certain populations may be excluded due to lack
of access to technology or digital literacy. This
exclusion could affect policy effectiveness and
equitable monetary transmission. (Brookings
Institution - Digital Financial Inclusion)
REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS AND
TECHNOLOGICAL SAFEGUARDS
Digital payment ecosystems offer resilience by
improving policy transmission and providing new
policy tools, but they also introduce risks related to
cyber threats, data privacy, financial stability, and
inclusivity. Regulatory frameworks and technological
6. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD63443 | Volume – 8 | Issue – 1 | Jan-Feb 2024 Page 422
safeguards are crucial in mitigating these risks while
harnessing the potential benefits of digital payments
for effective monetary policy implementation.
Regulatory frameworks play a pivotal role in
optimizing the relationship between digital payments
and achieving monetary policy goals.
1. Facilitating Financial Stability: Regulatory
frameworks help maintain stability within digital
payment systems. They establish standards for
risk management, ensuring the resilience of
payment infrastructures and reducing the potential
for disruptions that might affect monetary policy
transmission. (Bank for International Settlements
(BIS))
2. Enhancing Policy Transmission Mechanisms:
Clear and comprehensive regulations provide a
transparent environment for digital payment
systems. This transparency enhances the ability of
central banks to use payment data for a more
effective monetary policy transmission.
(International Monetary Fund (IMF))
3. Ensuring Inclusivity and Equal Access:
Regulatory frameworks can mandate inclusive
practices, ensuring that digital payment services
are accessible to all segments of society. This
inclusivity aligns with monetary policy goals
aiming for broad-based economic participation.
(World Bank - Global Findex Database)
4. Mitigating Risks and Safeguarding
Consumers: Regulations are essential in
managing risks associated with digital payments.
They establish consumer protection measures,
cybersecurity standards, and mechanisms for
dispute resolution, safeguarding users' interests
and confidence in the financial system. (Financial
Stability Board (FSB))
5. Promoting Innovation and Competition:
Regulatory frameworks should foster an
environment that encourages innovation while
maintaining a level playing field. Regulations that
balance innovation with risk management can
promote healthy competition and diverse digital
payment solutions, contributing to monetary
policy goals. (World Economic Forum (WEF))
Regulatory frameworks are pivotal in optimizing the
relationship between digital payments and achieving
monetary policy objectives. They ensure stability,
enhance policy transmission mechanisms, promote
inclusivity, mitigate risks, and encourage innovation
within digital payment ecosystems. A well-designed
regulatory environment strikes a balance between
fostering innovation and addressing potential risks,
ultimately supporting the alignment of digital
payments with broader monetary policy objectives.
CONCLUSION
The present research study reveals a compelling
connection between these elements. Digital payment
adoption significantly enhances financial inclusion,
offering a pathway to achieve broader monetary
policy objectives. It serves as a catalyst for economic
growth, efficiency, and improved policy transmission
by providing real-time data and fostering a more
inclusive financial landscape. However, this
transformation also introduces risks, necessitating
robust regulatory frameworks to ensure stability,
safeguard consumers, and encourage innovation.
Overall, understanding and leveraging the synergy
between digital payments, financial inclusion, and
monetary policy goals offer a promising avenue for
sustainable economic development and equitable
financial access.
REFERENCES
[1] Ahamed, M. M., Ho, S. J., Mallick, S. K., and
Matousek, R. (2021). Inclusive banking,
financial regulation and bank performance:
Cross-country evidence. Journal of Banking
and Finance, 124, 106055.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106055
[2] Albulescu, C. T. (2015). Banks’ Profitability
and Financial Soundness Indicators: A Macro-
level Investigation in Emerging Countries.
Procedia Economics and Finance, 23(October
2014), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-
5671(15)00551-1
[3] Allen, Franklin, et al. (2018). "The Foundations
of Financial Inclusion: Understanding
Ownership and Use of Formal Accounts."
Journal of Financial Intermediation, vol. 35, pp.
1-23.
[4] Almahadin, H. A., Kaddumi, T., and AL-
Kilani, Q. (2020). Banking soundness financial
stability nexus: Empirical evidence from
Jordan. Banks and Bank Systems, 15(3), 218–
227. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.15(3).2020.19
[5] Aracil, E., Gómez-Bengoechea, G., and
Moreno-de-Tejada, O. (2022). Institutional
quality and the financial inclusion-poverty
alleviation link: Empirical evidence across
countries. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(1), 179–
188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.03.006
[6] Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., and Buckley, R. P.
(2017). The Evolution of Fintech: A New Post-
Crisis Paradigm? Georgetown Journal of
International Law, 48(4), 1271–1319.
7. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD63443 | Volume – 8 | Issue – 1 | Jan-Feb 2024 Page 423
[7] Arun, T., and Kamath, R. (2015). Financial
inclusion: Policies and practices. IIMB
Management Review, 27(4), 267–287.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2015.09.004
[8] Bashiru, S., Bunyaminu, A., Yakubu, I. N., and
Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2023). Drivers of
Financial Inclusion: Insights from Sub-Saharan
Africa. Economies, 11(5), 1–11.
https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11050146
[9] Cahyadin, M. (2020). The linkage between
globalisation and financial inclusion: Do
inequality and institutions matter? Economic
Journal of Emerging Markets, 12(2), 220–233.
https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol12.iss2.art8
[10] Claessens, Stijn, et al. (2018). "The Role of
Financial Inclusion in Monetary Policy
Transmission." IMF Working Papers, No.
18/250.
[11] Cui, L., Weng, S., and Song, M. (2022).
Financial inclusion, renewable energy
consumption, and inclusive growth: cross-
country evidence. Energy Efficiency, 15(6), 1–
19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-022-10051-
y
[12] Datta, S. K., and Singh, K. (2019). Variation
and determinants of financial inclusion and
their association with human development: A
cross-country analysis. IIMB Management
Review, 31(4), 336–349.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2019.07.013
[13] Determinants of financial inclusion: Evidence
from Tanzania. (2023, May 30). Journal of
Economic Research & Reviews, 3(2).
https://doi.org/10.33140/jerr.03.02.04
[14] Erlando, A., Riyanto, F. D., and Masakazu, S.
(2020). Financial inclusion, economic growth,
and poverty alleviation: evidence from eastern
Indonesia. Heliyon, 6(10), e05235.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05235
[15] Fauzan, I. F., Firdaus, M., and Sahara, S.
(2020). Regional financial inclusion and
poverty: Evidence from Indonesia. Economic
Journal of Emerging Markets, 12(1), 25–38.
https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol12.iss1.art3
[16] Financial Stability Board. (2020). "Enhancing
Cross-Border Payments: Building Blocks of a
Global Roadmap." Report to the G20.
[17] Fraymovich, D. Y., Gundorova, M. A.,
Mischenko, Z. V., Guzhov, A. M., and
Sultanova, A. V. (2021). Small business
development and resource use in Russian
regions. R-Economy, 7(2), 88–99.
https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2021.7.2.008
[18] G20. (2016). "G20 High-Level Principles for
Digital Financial Inclusion." G20 Summit,
Hangzhou.
[19] Geng, Z., and He, G. (2021). Digital financial
inclusion and sustainable employment:
Evidence from countries along the belt and
road. Borsa Istanbul Review, 21(3), 307–316.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.04.004
[20] Gutiérrez-Romero, R., and Ahamed, M. (2021).
COVID-19 response needs to broaden financial
inclusion to curb the rise in poverty. World
Development, 138.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105229
[21] Ha, N. T. T., and Quyen, P. G. (2018).
Monetary policy, bank competitiveness and
bank risk-taking: Empirical evidence from
Vietnam. Asian Academy of Management
Journal of Accounting and Finance, 14(2), 137–
156.
https://doi.org/10.21315/aamjaf2018.14.2.6
[22] Hadi, N., Wayan, S., Wibowo, R., and
Wardhono, A. (2021). An Empirical Study of
Financial Inclusion and Financial System
Stability in ASEAN-4. Journal of Asian
Finance, 8(7), 139–150.
https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no7.01
39
[23] Iqbal, B. A., and Sami, S. (2017). Papel de los
bancos en la inclusión financiera en la India.
Contaduria y Administracion, 62(2), 644–656.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cya.2017.01.007
[24] Koomson, I., Koomson, P., and Abdul-
Mumuni, A. (2023). Trust in banks, financial
inclusion and the mediating role of borrower
discouragement. International Review of
Economics and Finance, 88(July), 1418–1431.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.07.090
[25] Le, T. H., Chuc, A. T., and Taghizadeh-Hesary,
F. (2019). Financial inclusion and its impact on
financial efficiency and sustainability:
Empirical evidence from Asia. Borsa Istanbul
Review, 19(4), 310–322.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2019.07.002
[26] Malik, A. H., Md Isa, A. H. bin, Jais, M. bin,
Ur Rehman, A., and Ali Khan, M. (2022).
Financial stability of Asian Nations:
Governance quality and financial inclusion.
Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(2), 377–387.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.05.005
8. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD63443 | Volume – 8 | Issue – 1 | Jan-Feb 2024 Page 424
[27] McKinnon, R. I. (1973). Money and capital in
economic development. Brookings Institution.
[28] Mersch, Y. (2018). Digital Currencies and the
Future of the Monetary System. Speech at the
Official Monetary and Financial Institutions
Forum (OMFIF) City Lecture, London.
[29] Morgan, P. J. and V. P. (2014). ADBI Working
Paper Financial Stability and Financial
Inclusion. 488, 75–75.
[30] Oanh, T. T. K., Van, L. T. T., and Dinh, L. Q.
(2023). Relationship between financial
inclusion, monetary policy and financial
stability: An analysis in high financial
development and low financial development
countries. Heliyon, 9(6), e16647.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16647
[31] Ozili, P. K. (2018). Impact of digital finance on
financial inclusion and stability. Borsa Istanbul
Review, 18(4), 329–340.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2017.12.003
[32] Pietrzak, M., and Espinosa-Vega, M. (2021).
Can Financial Soundness Indicators Help
Predict Financial Sector Distress? IMF
Working Paper Statistics Department Can
Financial Soundness Indicators Help Predict
Financial Sector Distress? Authorized for
distribution by.
[33] Reserve Bank of India. (2021). "Monetary
Policy Report." RBI Publications.
[34] Salina, A. P., Zhang, X., and Hassan, O. A. G.
(2020). An assessment of the financial
soundness of the Kazakh banks. Asian Journal
of Accounting Research, 6(1), 23–37.
https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-03-2019-0022
[35] Sedera, R. M. H., Risfandy, T., and Futri, I. N.
(2022). Financial Inclusion and Bank
Profitability: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal
of Accounting and Investment, 23(3), 398–412.
https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v23i3.14721
[36] Shalihin, M. A., and Safuan, S. (2021). Effects
of Financial Inclusion and Openness on
Banking Stability: Evidence from Developing
and Developed Countries. Economics and
Finance in Indonesia, 67(2), 212.
https://doi.org/10.47291/efi.v67i2.967
[37] Shaw, E. S. (1973). Financial deepening in
economic development. Oxford University
Press.
[38] Siddik, M. N. A., and Kabiraj, S. (2018). Does
financial inclusion induce financial stability?
Evidence from cross-country analysis.
Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance
Journal, 12(1), 33–46.
https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v12i1.3
[39] ŞİT, A. (2022). The Effect of The Financial
Soundness Index on The Financial Performance
of Banks: An Application in Turkey. İktisadi
İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7, 129–
140. https://doi.org/10.25204/iktisad.1023782
[40] Susilowati, E., and Leonnard, L. (2019).
Factors Influence Financial Inclusion: Evidence
from Indonesian Micro Data. Etikonomi, 18(1),
121–132.
https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v18i1.9070
[41] Úbeda, F., Mendez, A., and Martínez, F. J. F.
(2022). The Sustainable Practices of
Multinational Banks As Drivers of Financial
Inclusion in Developing Countries. Finance
Research Letters, 103278.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103278
[42] Viswanathan, R., and Telukdarie, A. (2021). A
systems dynamics approach to SME
digitalization. Procedia Computer Science,
180(2019), 816–824.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.331
[43] Vo, D. H., Nguyen, N. T., and Thi-Hong Van,
L. (2021). Financial inclusion and stability in
the Asian region using bank-level data. Borsa
Istanbul Review, 21(1), 36–43.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2020.06.003
[44] World Bank. (2019). "The Global Findex
Database 2017: Measuring Financial Inclusion
and the Fintech Revolution." World Bank
Group.
[45] Zheng, H., and Li, X. (2022). The impact of
digital financial inclusion on carbon dioxide
emissions: Empirical evidence from Chinese
provinces data. Energy Reports, 8, 9431–9440.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.07.050
[46] Zins, A., and Weill, L. (2016). The
determinants of financial inclusion in Africa.
Review of Development Finance, 6(1), 46–57.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2016.05.001
