SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Technical quality of final product (images, footage, use of sound, editing, layout, composition)
The overall technical qualityof myFinal MajorProjectisgood,I personallybelieve itwouldhave
beena lotbetterif I had justmanagedmytime a lotmore,thisis because the audioandthe video
that I had to synctook a verylongtime,butbecause I was messingaroundanddidn’tdomy workI
fell behindcausingmytonot be able to audiosyncthe footage withbetteraudio.Thismeanswhen
youwatch the FMP, you can notice a dramaticchange in the audioquality.Thismightbe my overall
downfall.
The camera itself wasdecent; thismeansthe shotsIgot were of a good enoughquality.
Production skills you have newly acquired and existing skills you have further developed
The skillsIusedto create thisDocumentary were the standardknowinghow touse a camera and
tripod.I alsoadditionallylearnedhowtouse the audio recorder;thisallowedme togetbetteraudio
for myfootage.WhenI came aroundto actuallyrecordingpeople formyinterview section.Ihadto
ask the Creatorof the programme fora few pointers.Thiswasbecause Ididn’twanttoask questions
that wouldhave made themfeel uncomfortable.Indoingthis,Isatthere forabout an hourlearning
differentquestioningtechniques.Alsobecause Iama masterPractitioner, andI have beenon
several of these programmesandIhave methundredsof P.T.S.D.suffers,Ihada huge
understandingaboutquestioningtechniquesandhow tonot make people feel uncomfortable.AlsoI
askedMick Stott(The Creator andleadpractitioner) if he wouldsitwiththe interviewee’sandjust
run thoughthe questions,makingsure itwasall okay.
AfterI hadcapturedall the footage IneededIthenuploadeditall ontothe computerandopenedup
adobe premiere pro.Ithenuploadedthemone byone intopremierwiththe audiofile;syncingthem
witheachotherand renderingthembackoutintoa differentfolder.Thistookupa HUGE chunk of
my time leftforthisproject.Thiswastakingsolong thatfor a few of the clipsIdidn’thave enough
time to sync.That’swhy whenyouwatchmy documentaryyounotice amajor shiftinaudioquality.
WhenI had themall syncedI thenhadto spendthe time listeningtothemandcuttingkeybits.And
makingsure it all made sense.WhenIcame to clippingthe actual interview itself Ifoundmyself with
a problem.Thiswasbecause altogetherIhad justunder an hourof footage,andthe documentary
couldonlybe about 10 minuteslong.Thisleftme withaproblembecause Ifeltlikeinall the
interviewsIcouldn’tclipthem.Thiswasbecause of the contextandinformation.SoIhad to choose
one interview anduse thatone.Ithencut it downa little,clippedMickStott’sclipsandblended
themtogether.AfterdoingthisIre watchedit,made any correctionsandrenderedthe final product
out. Addingitto YouTube thenuploadingitontomyblog.
How closely your final product matches your original intentions (outlined in your Final Major
Project proposal)
My Final MajorProjectfitsinverynicelywithmy proposal;there isjustone thingthat I had to
change.
Because of the lengthof my interviews,andthe mass volume of sensitive information,Ifound
myself withanhourof footage anda 10 minuetlong documentary;thiswashardfor me because I
feltlike Icouldn’tcutany of the clipsbecause theywere all sogreat.Thismade me change the idea
for myFMP. Insteadof followingpeople through the programme,Idecidedtojustuse footage of
one of the coaches,someone whoIknow verywell andIthinkhisstoryis amazing.Butthe overall
FMP fitsinreallywell withthe projectproposal.I’ve gotmicktalkingabouttreatments,andJezz
talkingabouthimself andhisstory,thenMickat the endgivinga message aboutthe helpoutthere.
Time management and problem solving (scheduling, practical constraints and strategies you
used to overcome constraints)
Time managementwasamajor issue forme inthisproject, thiswas because Ididn’texactlyplanmy
time well andIwastedcountlesshoursof lessontime.Thisonthe overall will impactmyFinal grade
because Ididn’thave the time to doall my renderingandaudiosyncing,bringingthe overall quality
of myDocumentarydowncratingmy grade to go down.
Alsoonmy productionSchedule,Iwrote a few thingsonthere thatI didn’tevencomplete.One of
thembeingmusicformy documentary.Ididn’tcompletethisbecause Ididn’tneedmusicformy
documentary.Thiswasbecause Ihad toomuch footage as itwas,and I feltthat if I addedtime for
musicit wouldhave justcreatedextrahassle formyself. AlsoIdidn’tneedto create draftsformy
script,or gatherfacts, thismeansthat myproductiondiarydata isfaultybecause it’sfull of sections
that I haven’tcompletedbutIdidn’tneedtocomplete.
Reaching your target audience (audience response, your reactions to positive and negative
criticism with reference to audience feedback you have gathered)
I feel thatmydocumentaryhitmytarget audience withperfection.Itrulybelieve thatthe audienceI
was goingfor,and the generaof people thatIaimedat wouldlove mydocumentary,Ithinkitwasa
brilliantbalance of informationandfacts,showingoff someoneelse’sexperiencesandshowinghow
they’ve changedwouldreallyhelppeople whoneedit,alsoif peoplesfamilymemberssee myvideo,
and wantto get involvedinhelpingsomeone theycando.
The onlybit I wouldbe a bitunsure aboutisbecause one of my targetaudienceswouldhave been
the familiesof the P.T.S.DsuffererbutIdidn’tputany clipsinof peoplesfamily’ssoIthinkIcould
have metthat target audience abitbetter.Insayingthat there isa sectionwhere Jezztalksabout
the effecthe washavingon hisfamily.
Survey:
I askeda numberof people towatchmy 10 minute documentaryandtell me whattheythought
aboutit, I asked several questionstodowiththe target audience andthe informationheldinthe
documentary.The resultswere:
QuestionOne:Do you thinkthe Documentaryissuitable formyintendedtargetaudience (P.T.S.D.
sufferersandtheirfriendsandfamily’s)?
7 Outof 10 saidtheythoughtthe documentarywassuitable forthe targetaudience
2 outof the 10 said itwas okayfor the target audience butcouldbe better
1 outof 10 saidit didn’thitthe targetaudience.
Questiontwo: What type of targetaudience do youthinkwouldsuitmydocumentary?
8 outof 10 agreedand saidthat the targetaudience shouldbe the one Iselected.
1 outof 10 saidit shouldhave beenaninformational documentarymeantforawiderrange of
people
1 outof 10 saidthe documentaryshouldhave beenaboutraisingawarenesstodowiththe mental
illness.
Questionthree:Do you think,withthe camerabeingstationary,thatthe documentarygota bit
boring?
6 outof 10 saidalthoughthe documentarydidhave muchmovementtoit,theyagreed thatthe
informationonthe documentarywassointerestingitdidn’treallymatter.
2 outof 10 people saidthatI shouldhave cutto clipsof the programme
2 outof 10 people agreedthatIshouldhave addedinmore interviews.
Questionfour: Do youthink the informationwassuitableformytargetaudience?
8 outof 10 agreedthat the informationwasgoodforthe target audience
1 outof 10 saidthe informationcouldhave beenabitmore illnessfocused
1 outof 10 saidthat the informationdidn’tsuitmytargetaudience althoughthe informationwas
verygoodand interesting.
So outof the informationIgatheredfrommysurveyIbelieve thatthe documentarydidhititstarget
audience,maybe withafewsnagsanda few thigsI couldhave changedto make itbetter.But
overall Ithinkitdidhit the targetaudience.
Summary conclusion of how you would respond to your project brief if you were to do it again
If I gotgiventhisbrief again,andtoldto do itagain,I woulddoso manythingsdifferently.For
startersI wouldn’thave wastedall thattime doingnothing,Iwouldhave done myworkrightfrom
the beginning.Iwouldhave spentalotmore time thinkingandplanning.Ialsowouldhave takenmy
time frame more seriously.
I wouldplanahead,andgetmy planningandpre-productionoutthe wayasquicklyaspossible.And
spenta lotmore time shooting,andgettingbetterqualityfootageandaudio.ThenIwouldhave
spenta much largertime editingitall togethermakingsure Ihad enoughtime tosyncall my footage
withthe audio,andmakingsure that theyblendedincorrectly,givingmydocumentaryalotmore of
a qualityfinish.
ThenI wouldhave askeda fewpeople towatchmyvideoandtell me if there wasanythingmajorly
wrongwithit,and I wouldhave spentthe time editingittohow I got my feedback,makingsure
audience preference iskey.

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Final research document
Final research documentFinal research document
Final research documentskyeeneel
 
Pr7 me and my movies
Pr7 me and my moviesPr7 me and my movies
Pr7 me and my movies
skyeeneel
 
Task 1 ownership case study
Task 1 ownership case studyTask 1 ownership case study
Task 1 ownership case studyskyeeneel
 
Music video analysis_worksheets_ms_word_version
Music video analysis_worksheets_ms_word_versionMusic video analysis_worksheets_ms_word_version
Music video analysis_worksheets_ms_word_versionskyeeneel
 
Introduction
IntroductionIntroduction
Introductionskyeeneel
 
_ig4 assignment landscapes and portraits 2014 to 2015 (1)
    _ig4 assignment landscapes and portraits 2014 to 2015 (1)    _ig4 assignment landscapes and portraits 2014 to 2015 (1)
_ig4 assignment landscapes and portraits 2014 to 2015 (1)skyeeneel
 
Task 1 animal photograpy.
Task 1 animal photograpy.Task 1 animal photograpy.
Task 1 animal photograpy.skyeeneel
 
Donnie lightwood visible , 1st draft script
Donnie lightwood   visible , 1st draft scriptDonnie lightwood   visible , 1st draft script
Donnie lightwood visible , 1st draft scriptskyeeneel
 
Unit 51 pr10 sourcing images
Unit 51 pr10 sourcing imagesUnit 51 pr10 sourcing images
Unit 51 pr10 sourcing imagesskyeeneel
 
Task 1 high street photography
Task 1 high street photographyTask 1 high street photography
Task 1 high street photographyskyeeneel
 
Creative production briefs
Creative production briefsCreative production briefs
Creative production briefsskyeeneel
 
Task 1 fashion photography
Task 1 fashion photographyTask 1 fashion photography
Task 1 fashion photographyskyeeneel
 
Music video risk assesment by shannon orr & skye nel
Music video risk assesment by shannon orr & skye nelMusic video risk assesment by shannon orr & skye nel
Music video risk assesment by shannon orr & skye nelskyeeneel
 
Task 4 landscape photograph evaluation
Task 4   landscape photograph evaluationTask 4   landscape photograph evaluation
Task 4 landscape photograph evaluationskyeeneel
 
Assesment_brief
Assesment_briefAssesment_brief
Assesment_briefskyeeneel
 
Task 3 regulatory bodies
Task 3 regulatory bodiesTask 3 regulatory bodies
Task 3 regulatory bodiesskyeeneel
 
Airlines survey results next era of route development - final
Airlines survey results   next era of route development - finalAirlines survey results   next era of route development - final
Airlines survey results next era of route development - final
Routesonline
 

Viewers also liked (17)

Final research document
Final research documentFinal research document
Final research document
 
Pr7 me and my movies
Pr7 me and my moviesPr7 me and my movies
Pr7 me and my movies
 
Task 1 ownership case study
Task 1 ownership case studyTask 1 ownership case study
Task 1 ownership case study
 
Music video analysis_worksheets_ms_word_version
Music video analysis_worksheets_ms_word_versionMusic video analysis_worksheets_ms_word_version
Music video analysis_worksheets_ms_word_version
 
Introduction
IntroductionIntroduction
Introduction
 
_ig4 assignment landscapes and portraits 2014 to 2015 (1)
    _ig4 assignment landscapes and portraits 2014 to 2015 (1)    _ig4 assignment landscapes and portraits 2014 to 2015 (1)
_ig4 assignment landscapes and portraits 2014 to 2015 (1)
 
Task 1 animal photograpy.
Task 1 animal photograpy.Task 1 animal photograpy.
Task 1 animal photograpy.
 
Donnie lightwood visible , 1st draft script
Donnie lightwood   visible , 1st draft scriptDonnie lightwood   visible , 1st draft script
Donnie lightwood visible , 1st draft script
 
Unit 51 pr10 sourcing images
Unit 51 pr10 sourcing imagesUnit 51 pr10 sourcing images
Unit 51 pr10 sourcing images
 
Task 1 high street photography
Task 1 high street photographyTask 1 high street photography
Task 1 high street photography
 
Creative production briefs
Creative production briefsCreative production briefs
Creative production briefs
 
Task 1 fashion photography
Task 1 fashion photographyTask 1 fashion photography
Task 1 fashion photography
 
Music video risk assesment by shannon orr & skye nel
Music video risk assesment by shannon orr & skye nelMusic video risk assesment by shannon orr & skye nel
Music video risk assesment by shannon orr & skye nel
 
Task 4 landscape photograph evaluation
Task 4   landscape photograph evaluationTask 4   landscape photograph evaluation
Task 4 landscape photograph evaluation
 
Assesment_brief
Assesment_briefAssesment_brief
Assesment_brief
 
Task 3 regulatory bodies
Task 3 regulatory bodiesTask 3 regulatory bodies
Task 3 regulatory bodies
 
Airlines survey results next era of route development - final
Airlines survey results   next era of route development - finalAirlines survey results   next era of route development - final
Airlines survey results next era of route development - final
 

Similar to Evaluation

Final Evaluation
Final EvaluationFinal Evaluation
Final Evaluation
TillyBrown3
 
Final Major Project Evaluation
Final Major Project EvaluationFinal Major Project Evaluation
Final Major Project EvaluationSarahMurrayy
 
7. Evaluation (FMP) .pptx
7. Evaluation (FMP) .pptx7. Evaluation (FMP) .pptx
7. Evaluation (FMP) .pptx
ThomasDickinson16
 
Final Evaluation
Final EvaluationFinal Evaluation
Final Evaluation
TillyBrown3
 
Culture in a digital age Evaluation.pptx
Culture in a digital age Evaluation.pptxCulture in a digital age Evaluation.pptx
Culture in a digital age Evaluation.pptx
SebastianCook3
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
OliverKeppie
 
7. factual evaluation(2)
7. factual evaluation(2)7. factual evaluation(2)
7. factual evaluation(2)
AmyWatson69
 
George a2 evaluation
George a2 evaluationGeorge a2 evaluation
George a2 evaluation
Georgebristol
 
Task 5 evaluation for unit 4, 5, 62
Task 5 evaluation for unit 4, 5, 62Task 5 evaluation for unit 4, 5, 62
Task 5 evaluation for unit 4, 5, 62benhendersoncmedia
 
Documentary Evaluation (1).pptx
Documentary Evaluation (1).pptxDocumentary Evaluation (1).pptx
Documentary Evaluation (1).pptx
Stephen266013
 
Evaluation factual
Evaluation factualEvaluation factual
Evaluation factual
LaurenceArcher1
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
Joseph Haley
 
5. evaluation(1)
5. evaluation(1)5. evaluation(1)
5. evaluation(1)
Ben Wincup
 
6. evaluation sf 2017
6. evaluation sf 20176. evaluation sf 2017
6. evaluation sf 2017
Tommy Lister
 
Performance evaluation
Performance evaluationPerformance evaluation
Performance evaluation
kieran Beal
 
B2 Evaluation.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
B2 Evaluation.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxB2 Evaluation.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
B2 Evaluation.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
ChloeMeadows1
 
Presentation eval
Presentation evalPresentation eval
Presentation eval
jay birkin
 
Evaluation of questions 1, 2, 3 ,4
Evaluation of questions 1, 2, 3 ,4Evaluation of questions 1, 2, 3 ,4
Evaluation of questions 1, 2, 3 ,4JimmyBeaton38
 

Similar to Evaluation (20)

Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
 
Final Evaluation
Final EvaluationFinal Evaluation
Final Evaluation
 
Final Major Project Evaluation
Final Major Project EvaluationFinal Major Project Evaluation
Final Major Project Evaluation
 
7. Evaluation (FMP) .pptx
7. Evaluation (FMP) .pptx7. Evaluation (FMP) .pptx
7. Evaluation (FMP) .pptx
 
Final Evaluation
Final EvaluationFinal Evaluation
Final Evaluation
 
Culture in a digital age Evaluation.pptx
Culture in a digital age Evaluation.pptxCulture in a digital age Evaluation.pptx
Culture in a digital age Evaluation.pptx
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
 
7. factual evaluation(2)
7. factual evaluation(2)7. factual evaluation(2)
7. factual evaluation(2)
 
George a2 evaluation
George a2 evaluationGeorge a2 evaluation
George a2 evaluation
 
Task 5 evaluation for unit 4, 5, 62
Task 5 evaluation for unit 4, 5, 62Task 5 evaluation for unit 4, 5, 62
Task 5 evaluation for unit 4, 5, 62
 
Documentary Evaluation (1).pptx
Documentary Evaluation (1).pptxDocumentary Evaluation (1).pptx
Documentary Evaluation (1).pptx
 
Evaluation factual
Evaluation factualEvaluation factual
Evaluation factual
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
 
5. evaluation(1)
5. evaluation(1)5. evaluation(1)
5. evaluation(1)
 
Final2
Final2Final2
Final2
 
6. evaluation sf 2017
6. evaluation sf 20176. evaluation sf 2017
6. evaluation sf 2017
 
Performance evaluation
Performance evaluationPerformance evaluation
Performance evaluation
 
B2 Evaluation.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
B2 Evaluation.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxB2 Evaluation.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
B2 Evaluation.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
Presentation eval
Presentation evalPresentation eval
Presentation eval
 
Evaluation of questions 1, 2, 3 ,4
Evaluation of questions 1, 2, 3 ,4Evaluation of questions 1, 2, 3 ,4
Evaluation of questions 1, 2, 3 ,4
 

More from skyeeneel

Pr7 me and my movies
Pr7 me and my moviesPr7 me and my movies
Pr7 me and my moviesskyeeneel
 
Unit 51 pr9 sourcing images
Unit 51 pr9 sourcing imagesUnit 51 pr9 sourcing images
Unit 51 pr9 sourcing imagesskyeeneel
 
Pr11 production commentary
Pr11 production commentaryPr11 production commentary
Pr11 production commentaryskyeeneel
 
Preparing my images
Preparing my imagesPreparing my images
Preparing my imagesskyeeneel
 
Unit 51 pr9 sourcing images
Unit 51 pr9 sourcing imagesUnit 51 pr9 sourcing images
Unit 51 pr9 sourcing imagesskyeeneel
 
Target kerrang and vibe
Target kerrang and vibeTarget kerrang and vibe
Target kerrang and vibeskyeeneel
 
Depression and bipolar disorder secondary research
Depression and bipolar disorder secondary researchDepression and bipolar disorder secondary research
Depression and bipolar disorder secondary researchskyeeneel
 
Pr7 me and my movies
Pr7 me and my moviesPr7 me and my movies
Pr7 me and my moviesskyeeneel
 
Review
ReviewReview
Review
skyeeneel
 
Pr7 me and my movies
Pr7 me and my moviesPr7 me and my movies
Pr7 me and my movies
skyeeneel
 
Emma's interview prep sheet
Emma's   interview prep sheetEmma's   interview prep sheet
Emma's interview prep sheet
skyeeneel
 
Emma's research
Emma's researchEmma's research
Emma's research
skyeeneel
 
Pirate bay research
Pirate bay researchPirate bay research
Pirate bay researchskyeeneel
 
Pirate bay research
Pirate bay researchPirate bay research
Pirate bay researchskyeeneel
 
Final pre production document
Final pre production documentFinal pre production document
Final pre production documentskyeeneel
 
Pr6 cinderella
Pr6 cinderellaPr6 cinderella
Pr6 cinderellaskyeeneel
 

More from skyeeneel (20)

Pr7 me and my movies
Pr7 me and my moviesPr7 me and my movies
Pr7 me and my movies
 
Unit 51 pr9 sourcing images
Unit 51 pr9 sourcing imagesUnit 51 pr9 sourcing images
Unit 51 pr9 sourcing images
 
Pr11 production commentary
Pr11 production commentaryPr11 production commentary
Pr11 production commentary
 
Preparing my images
Preparing my imagesPreparing my images
Preparing my images
 
Unit 51 pr9 sourcing images
Unit 51 pr9 sourcing imagesUnit 51 pr9 sourcing images
Unit 51 pr9 sourcing images
 
Target kerrang and vibe
Target kerrang and vibeTarget kerrang and vibe
Target kerrang and vibe
 
Survey
SurveySurvey
Survey
 
Depression and bipolar disorder secondary research
Depression and bipolar disorder secondary researchDepression and bipolar disorder secondary research
Depression and bipolar disorder secondary research
 
Mood board
Mood boardMood board
Mood board
 
Pr7 me and my movies
Pr7 me and my moviesPr7 me and my movies
Pr7 me and my movies
 
Review
ReviewReview
Review
 
Pr7 me and my movies
Pr7 me and my moviesPr7 me and my movies
Pr7 me and my movies
 
Script
ScriptScript
Script
 
Emma's interview prep sheet
Emma's   interview prep sheetEmma's   interview prep sheet
Emma's interview prep sheet
 
Emma's research
Emma's researchEmma's research
Emma's research
 
Pirate bay research
Pirate bay researchPirate bay research
Pirate bay research
 
Pirate bay research
Pirate bay researchPirate bay research
Pirate bay research
 
Final pre production document
Final pre production documentFinal pre production document
Final pre production document
 
Pr6 cinderella
Pr6 cinderellaPr6 cinderella
Pr6 cinderella
 
PR4
PR4 PR4
PR4
 

Evaluation

  • 1. Technical quality of final product (images, footage, use of sound, editing, layout, composition) The overall technical qualityof myFinal MajorProjectisgood,I personallybelieve itwouldhave beena lotbetterif I had justmanagedmytime a lotmore,thisis because the audioandthe video that I had to synctook a verylongtime,butbecause I was messingaroundanddidn’tdomy workI fell behindcausingmytonot be able to audiosyncthe footage withbetteraudio.Thismeanswhen youwatch the FMP, you can notice a dramaticchange in the audioquality.Thismightbe my overall downfall. The camera itself wasdecent; thismeansthe shotsIgot were of a good enoughquality. Production skills you have newly acquired and existing skills you have further developed The skillsIusedto create thisDocumentary were the standardknowinghow touse a camera and tripod.I alsoadditionallylearnedhowtouse the audio recorder;thisallowedme togetbetteraudio for myfootage.WhenI came aroundto actuallyrecordingpeople formyinterview section.Ihadto ask the Creatorof the programme fora few pointers.Thiswasbecause Ididn’twanttoask questions that wouldhave made themfeel uncomfortable.Indoingthis,Isatthere forabout an hourlearning differentquestioningtechniques.Alsobecause Iama masterPractitioner, andI have beenon several of these programmesandIhave methundredsof P.T.S.D.suffers,Ihada huge understandingaboutquestioningtechniquesandhow tonot make people feel uncomfortable.AlsoI askedMick Stott(The Creator andleadpractitioner) if he wouldsitwiththe interviewee’sandjust run thoughthe questions,makingsure itwasall okay. AfterI hadcapturedall the footage IneededIthenuploadeditall ontothe computerandopenedup adobe premiere pro.Ithenuploadedthemone byone intopremierwiththe audiofile;syncingthem witheachotherand renderingthembackoutintoa differentfolder.Thistookupa HUGE chunk of my time leftforthisproject.Thiswastakingsolong thatfor a few of the clipsIdidn’thave enough time to sync.That’swhy whenyouwatchmy documentaryyounotice amajor shiftinaudioquality. WhenI had themall syncedI thenhadto spendthe time listeningtothemandcuttingkeybits.And makingsure it all made sense.WhenIcame to clippingthe actual interview itself Ifoundmyself with a problem.Thiswasbecause altogetherIhad justunder an hourof footage,andthe documentary couldonlybe about 10 minuteslong.Thisleftme withaproblembecause Ifeltlikeinall the interviewsIcouldn’tclipthem.Thiswasbecause of the contextandinformation.SoIhad to choose one interview anduse thatone.Ithencut it downa little,clippedMickStott’sclipsandblended themtogether.AfterdoingthisIre watchedit,made any correctionsandrenderedthe final product out. Addingitto YouTube thenuploadingitontomyblog. How closely your final product matches your original intentions (outlined in your Final Major Project proposal) My Final MajorProjectfitsinverynicelywithmy proposal;there isjustone thingthat I had to change. Because of the lengthof my interviews,andthe mass volume of sensitive information,Ifound myself withanhourof footage anda 10 minuetlong documentary;thiswashardfor me because I feltlike Icouldn’tcutany of the clipsbecause theywere all sogreat.Thismade me change the idea for myFMP. Insteadof followingpeople through the programme,Idecidedtojustuse footage of
  • 2. one of the coaches,someone whoIknow verywell andIthinkhisstoryis amazing.Butthe overall FMP fitsinreallywell withthe projectproposal.I’ve gotmicktalkingabouttreatments,andJezz talkingabouthimself andhisstory,thenMickat the endgivinga message aboutthe helpoutthere. Time management and problem solving (scheduling, practical constraints and strategies you used to overcome constraints) Time managementwasamajor issue forme inthisproject, thiswas because Ididn’texactlyplanmy time well andIwastedcountlesshoursof lessontime.Thisonthe overall will impactmyFinal grade because Ididn’thave the time to doall my renderingandaudiosyncing,bringingthe overall quality of myDocumentarydowncratingmy grade to go down. Alsoonmy productionSchedule,Iwrote a few thingsonthere thatI didn’tevencomplete.One of thembeingmusicformy documentary.Ididn’tcompletethisbecause Ididn’tneedmusicformy documentary.Thiswasbecause Ihad toomuch footage as itwas,and I feltthat if I addedtime for musicit wouldhave justcreatedextrahassle formyself. AlsoIdidn’tneedto create draftsformy script,or gatherfacts, thismeansthat myproductiondiarydata isfaultybecause it’sfull of sections that I haven’tcompletedbutIdidn’tneedtocomplete. Reaching your target audience (audience response, your reactions to positive and negative criticism with reference to audience feedback you have gathered) I feel thatmydocumentaryhitmytarget audience withperfection.Itrulybelieve thatthe audienceI was goingfor,and the generaof people thatIaimedat wouldlove mydocumentary,Ithinkitwasa brilliantbalance of informationandfacts,showingoff someoneelse’sexperiencesandshowinghow they’ve changedwouldreallyhelppeople whoneedit,alsoif peoplesfamilymemberssee myvideo, and wantto get involvedinhelpingsomeone theycando. The onlybit I wouldbe a bitunsure aboutisbecause one of my targetaudienceswouldhave been the familiesof the P.T.S.DsuffererbutIdidn’tputany clipsinof peoplesfamily’ssoIthinkIcould have metthat target audience abitbetter.Insayingthat there isa sectionwhere Jezztalksabout the effecthe washavingon hisfamily. Survey: I askeda numberof people towatchmy 10 minute documentaryandtell me whattheythought aboutit, I asked several questionstodowiththe target audience andthe informationheldinthe documentary.The resultswere: QuestionOne:Do you thinkthe Documentaryissuitable formyintendedtargetaudience (P.T.S.D. sufferersandtheirfriendsandfamily’s)? 7 Outof 10 saidtheythoughtthe documentarywassuitable forthe targetaudience 2 outof the 10 said itwas okayfor the target audience butcouldbe better 1 outof 10 saidit didn’thitthe targetaudience.
  • 3. Questiontwo: What type of targetaudience do youthinkwouldsuitmydocumentary? 8 outof 10 agreedand saidthat the targetaudience shouldbe the one Iselected. 1 outof 10 saidit shouldhave beenaninformational documentarymeantforawiderrange of people 1 outof 10 saidthe documentaryshouldhave beenaboutraisingawarenesstodowiththe mental illness. Questionthree:Do you think,withthe camerabeingstationary,thatthe documentarygota bit boring? 6 outof 10 saidalthoughthe documentarydidhave muchmovementtoit,theyagreed thatthe informationonthe documentarywassointerestingitdidn’treallymatter. 2 outof 10 people saidthatI shouldhave cutto clipsof the programme 2 outof 10 people agreedthatIshouldhave addedinmore interviews. Questionfour: Do youthink the informationwassuitableformytargetaudience? 8 outof 10 agreedthat the informationwasgoodforthe target audience 1 outof 10 saidthe informationcouldhave beenabitmore illnessfocused 1 outof 10 saidthat the informationdidn’tsuitmytargetaudience althoughthe informationwas verygoodand interesting. So outof the informationIgatheredfrommysurveyIbelieve thatthe documentarydidhititstarget audience,maybe withafewsnagsanda few thigsI couldhave changedto make itbetter.But overall Ithinkitdidhit the targetaudience. Summary conclusion of how you would respond to your project brief if you were to do it again If I gotgiventhisbrief again,andtoldto do itagain,I woulddoso manythingsdifferently.For startersI wouldn’thave wastedall thattime doingnothing,Iwouldhave done myworkrightfrom the beginning.Iwouldhave spentalotmore time thinkingandplanning.Ialsowouldhave takenmy time frame more seriously. I wouldplanahead,andgetmy planningandpre-productionoutthe wayasquicklyaspossible.And spenta lotmore time shooting,andgettingbetterqualityfootageandaudio.ThenIwouldhave spenta much largertime editingitall togethermakingsure Ihad enoughtime tosyncall my footage withthe audio,andmakingsure that theyblendedincorrectly,givingmydocumentaryalotmore of a qualityfinish. ThenI wouldhave askeda fewpeople towatchmyvideoandtell me if there wasanythingmajorly wrongwithit,and I wouldhave spentthe time editingittohow I got my feedback,makingsure audience preference iskey.