This document provides clarifications and corrections to witness statements, exhibits, and procedural questions for the mock trial case of State of Harmony v. Riley Green. Key points include: - Witness Pat Sweeney's reference to "they" on line 158 exclusively refers to Officer Green. - All roles in the trial can be played by either male or female students regardless of witness statements. - The defense is seeking a ruling that Riley Green's actions were legally justified, as stated in the court order. - The prosecution, as the party opponent for the defense, is the State of Harmony. - Due to the defense having the burden of proof this year, the official timekeeper will still be provided

1. High School Mock Trial 2016
State of Harmony v. Riley Green
Errata Sheet
11/24
1. On line 158 of Pat Sweeney's statement, he refers to Officer Green as "they."
Does this imply many officers at the scene or simply Officer Green?
On line 158, “They” exclusively refers to Officer Green.
2. Justice Smith's statement says that he was hired in 1994 and retired in 2014
(20 years of service), But on line 198 of his own statement, he says that he has more
than 25 years’ experience. That would take him back to 1990 (when he was still in
high school). Is it 20 or 25 years of experience?
No further elaboration needed.
3. Exhibit A states that a call came in at 1820 (6:20 pm) reporting the robbery
and identifying both of the subjects as male. Does that mean that AJ and Sam can
only be played by male students?
All roles can be played by male or female students, regardless of any exhibits or witness
statements.
4. There is a conflict between the Defendant's pre-trial brief and the court
order regarding the relief. Defendant requests a finding of "Not Guilty." But, the
court order states that the Court must determine whether Riley Green's actions
were "legally justified." A "Not Guilty" finding should be reserved for the jury
trial stage. So, isn't Riley Green requesting the Court to find that his/her actions
were "legally justified" at this stage?
No further elaboration needed. Please refer to the judge’s order.
5. My students (and the attorneys) want to know who is the party opponent for
Defense since the prosecution is the State of Harmony? Is it AJ Bryant?
No further response needed.
6. What are the dimensions of the bow?
No further elaboration is needed.
7. Is it possible for us print the exhibit larger than the 8 1/2 x 11 document?

2. Procedural rule 13, section D offers guidance on our policies for exhibits. In the rules, it
states that “the exact page from the case materials may be reproduced on 8 ½ x 11 paper,
but not bound in plastic or modified in any way.” This year, you may print off a copy of
exhibit B in color if you do not already have one, but it cannot be modified to be larger
than 8 ½ X 11.
8. Due to the defense having the burden of proof this year, will the defense also
supply the official timekeeper?
Pursuant to the rules, the official timekeeper is provided by the plaintiff/prosecution.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11/10
1. When AJ Bryant shoots the female in the convenience store, what is the jar that is
knocked over and looks like blood? Is it Sauce or Salsa?
No further elaboration is needed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10/27
1. Given the affirmative defense, what relief is the defendant seeking?
See the defendant’s pre-trial brief and the order of the court. No further elaboration
needed.
2. Will the timekeeper’s sheet (p. 142 in materials packet) be updated to show that
the Defense goes first and that the Prosecution (not “Plaintiff”) goes second? If so,
will those sheets be posted someplace?
The timekeeper materials have been updated, and the timekeeper documents can now be
found on the website under “competition documents” on the 2016 competition page,
found here: http://www.oclre.org/documents/2016-timekeeper-sheets

3. 3. Officer Smith references the City of Buckeye dispatch log. Is this the document
referenced as Exhibit A, the Police Incident Log on page 112?
At a few different points in the case, witnesses refer to a “Dispatch log.” This is in
reference to Exhibit A, the Police Incident Log, which can be found on page 112 of the
case.
10/13
I noticed that the exhibits are printed in black and white in the paper case file, but
are offered in color for the digital case. Will we be able to use the color exhibit or
black and white exhibit in trial for the bow and arrow?
For the purposes of the trial, you will be able to use the exhibit in color. The exhibit is
available on the website, and in the digital case file. You can also email
csmith@oclre.org and we will send you a pdf file of the image.
The special instructions of the case state that this is a burden shifting case, can you
explain that further?
For the purposes of the case, Riley Green will be presenting the affirmative defense of
legal justification for the use of force, and the trial will not address the underlying charge
of felonious assault. Therefore, the Defendant will go first in this mock trial and will
present evidence in support of the affirmative defense of legal justification of use of
force. Then, the Prosecution State of Harmony will present evidence in opposition to the
affirmative defense. The scoresheets and judges’ materials will reflect this change, and it
means that the defense will present opening statements first, call witnesses first, and have
the optional two minute rebuttal.