Not ready for the EPA's new Title VI TSCA Regulations for Wood Product Fabricators? The rules take effect June 1, 2018. DSI has done the research and we're here to help you learn how to come into compliance. Plus, DSI guarantees that the products you buy from us will meet the regulations' requirements. There are only three points you need to cover.
3 Things You Need to Do
1. Purchase Title VI TSCA Compliant Materials
*Panels made before June 1, 2018, may be sold at any time and used in finished goods
2. Keep records for 3 years documenting material compliance
*DSI documents TSCA on order confirmations, delivery tickets & invoices
3. Label finished goods with name, date and compliance
*Fabricators must label every finished good or every box or bundle containing finished goods
OECD Global Forum on the Environment dedicated to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Su...OECD Environment
PFAS, which stands for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a diverse group of chemicals that include PFCAs, PFOA, PFSAs, PFHxS, and thousands of others. These chemicals have been in commercial production since the 1950s and are now widely used in consumer and industrial applications. One characteristic of PFAS is their persistence in the environment, as they are extremely resistant to degradation. PFAS have emerged as contaminants of global concern because of their potential to accumulate in the human body and food chains.
On 12-13 February 2024, a wide range of stakeholders, including governments, industry, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), and academics came together to discuss various topics related to PFAS. These topics covered areas such as country risk management approaches, innovation challenges for finding safer alternatives, effective risk communication strategies, monitoring techniques, waste management, and approaches to managing contamination.
Webinar: The Radio Equipment Directive and European StandardstechUK
Three new Directives were adopted in 2014 to harmonize regulations for radio equipment, electromagnetic compatibility, and low voltage equipment across the EU. The Radio Equipment Directive (RED) of 2014 replaced the 1999 Radio and Telecommunications Terminal Equipment Directive and expanded its scope to cover all equipment transmitting or receiving radio waves. It places new emphasis on efficient spectrum use and improving radio receivers. Manufacturers will need to ensure their equipment meets the essential requirements for health and safety, electromagnetic compatibility and avoidance of interference laid out in the RED. ETSI develops harmonized standards that define technical requirements and allows manufacturers to demonstrate compliance, helping to allow interoperability while protecting spectrum use.
This document provides an overview of medical device regulations in the European Union. It discusses the 27 EU member states and 3 additional EFTA states. It describes the EU directives for medical devices and how they differ from US regulations. The document outlines the classification system for medical devices in the EU and the conformity assessment procedures required for each class. It also discusses technical documentation requirements, CE marking, post-market surveillance, and the role of the Authorized European Representative.
Japan Medical Device Regulatory Approval ProcessKate Jablonski
Before deciding to sell your device in the Japanese market, it is important to understand how the regulations apply to your device, which steps to take, and what resources are required to complete the process. In this presentation, Ann Marie Boullie, Vice President of Business Development for EMERGO, outlines some of the most complex aspects of the Japanese registration process, including:
JMDN codes: device classification and predicates
Clinical data requirements and PMDA pre-submission meetings
Registration routes (Todokede, Ninsho, Shonin)
QMS (Ordinance 169) requirements
Role of the Marketing Authorization Holder (MAH)
Medical device approval chart for Mexico - Emergo EMERGO
In Mexico, medical devices and in-vitro diagnostic devices are regulated by COFEPRIS, a division of the Mexican Ministry of Health. The regulatory process involves classifying the device, appointing a Mexico Registration Holder representative, preparing a registration dossier in Spanish including documentation of quality management and technical specifications, and submitting the application to COFEPRIS for review. Approval time ranges from 1-10 months depending on the device class and review process. Registrations are valid for 5 years and must be renewed in advance of the expiration date.
This presentation from the Association of Equipment Manufacturers’ provides an overview of what conflict minerals are and where they come from. It also describes the legislation affecting conflict minerals reporting and why everyone in the supply chain is affected.
The document provides information on regulatory submissions in Japan. It discusses:
- Japan's pharmaceutical market size and aging population trends.
- The Ministry of Health and Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) oversee drug regulation. Applications are submitted to PMDA for approval.
- The Common Technical Document (CTD) format is used for submissions, which organizes information into five modules covering administrative data, summaries, quality, nonclinical studies, and clinical studies.
Japan PMDA Medical Device Regulatory Approval ProcessEMERGO
Watch the recorded webinar: https://www.emergogroup.com/resources/video-webinar-japan-registration-process
Japan's medical device market is one of the most robust markets in Asia, but its regulatory system can be confusing. Before deciding to sell your device in the Japanese market, it is important to understand how the regulations apply to your device, which steps to take, and what resources are required to complete the process. In this presentation, Ann Marie Boullie, Vice President of Business Development for EMERGO, will discuss some of the most complex aspects of the Japanese registration process, including:
JMDN codes: device classification and predicates
Clinical data requirements and PMDA pre-submission meetings
Registration routes (Todokede, Ninsho, Shonin)
QMS (Ordinance 169) requirements
Role of the Marketing Authorization Holder (MAH)
Plus more ...
OECD Global Forum on the Environment dedicated to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Su...OECD Environment
PFAS, which stands for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a diverse group of chemicals that include PFCAs, PFOA, PFSAs, PFHxS, and thousands of others. These chemicals have been in commercial production since the 1950s and are now widely used in consumer and industrial applications. One characteristic of PFAS is their persistence in the environment, as they are extremely resistant to degradation. PFAS have emerged as contaminants of global concern because of their potential to accumulate in the human body and food chains.
On 12-13 February 2024, a wide range of stakeholders, including governments, industry, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), and academics came together to discuss various topics related to PFAS. These topics covered areas such as country risk management approaches, innovation challenges for finding safer alternatives, effective risk communication strategies, monitoring techniques, waste management, and approaches to managing contamination.
Webinar: The Radio Equipment Directive and European StandardstechUK
Three new Directives were adopted in 2014 to harmonize regulations for radio equipment, electromagnetic compatibility, and low voltage equipment across the EU. The Radio Equipment Directive (RED) of 2014 replaced the 1999 Radio and Telecommunications Terminal Equipment Directive and expanded its scope to cover all equipment transmitting or receiving radio waves. It places new emphasis on efficient spectrum use and improving radio receivers. Manufacturers will need to ensure their equipment meets the essential requirements for health and safety, electromagnetic compatibility and avoidance of interference laid out in the RED. ETSI develops harmonized standards that define technical requirements and allows manufacturers to demonstrate compliance, helping to allow interoperability while protecting spectrum use.
This document provides an overview of medical device regulations in the European Union. It discusses the 27 EU member states and 3 additional EFTA states. It describes the EU directives for medical devices and how they differ from US regulations. The document outlines the classification system for medical devices in the EU and the conformity assessment procedures required for each class. It also discusses technical documentation requirements, CE marking, post-market surveillance, and the role of the Authorized European Representative.
Japan Medical Device Regulatory Approval ProcessKate Jablonski
Before deciding to sell your device in the Japanese market, it is important to understand how the regulations apply to your device, which steps to take, and what resources are required to complete the process. In this presentation, Ann Marie Boullie, Vice President of Business Development for EMERGO, outlines some of the most complex aspects of the Japanese registration process, including:
JMDN codes: device classification and predicates
Clinical data requirements and PMDA pre-submission meetings
Registration routes (Todokede, Ninsho, Shonin)
QMS (Ordinance 169) requirements
Role of the Marketing Authorization Holder (MAH)
Medical device approval chart for Mexico - Emergo EMERGO
In Mexico, medical devices and in-vitro diagnostic devices are regulated by COFEPRIS, a division of the Mexican Ministry of Health. The regulatory process involves classifying the device, appointing a Mexico Registration Holder representative, preparing a registration dossier in Spanish including documentation of quality management and technical specifications, and submitting the application to COFEPRIS for review. Approval time ranges from 1-10 months depending on the device class and review process. Registrations are valid for 5 years and must be renewed in advance of the expiration date.
This presentation from the Association of Equipment Manufacturers’ provides an overview of what conflict minerals are and where they come from. It also describes the legislation affecting conflict minerals reporting and why everyone in the supply chain is affected.
The document provides information on regulatory submissions in Japan. It discusses:
- Japan's pharmaceutical market size and aging population trends.
- The Ministry of Health and Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) oversee drug regulation. Applications are submitted to PMDA for approval.
- The Common Technical Document (CTD) format is used for submissions, which organizes information into five modules covering administrative data, summaries, quality, nonclinical studies, and clinical studies.
Japan PMDA Medical Device Regulatory Approval ProcessEMERGO
Watch the recorded webinar: https://www.emergogroup.com/resources/video-webinar-japan-registration-process
Japan's medical device market is one of the most robust markets in Asia, but its regulatory system can be confusing. Before deciding to sell your device in the Japanese market, it is important to understand how the regulations apply to your device, which steps to take, and what resources are required to complete the process. In this presentation, Ann Marie Boullie, Vice President of Business Development for EMERGO, will discuss some of the most complex aspects of the Japanese registration process, including:
JMDN codes: device classification and predicates
Clinical data requirements and PMDA pre-submission meetings
Registration routes (Todokede, Ninsho, Shonin)
QMS (Ordinance 169) requirements
Role of the Marketing Authorization Holder (MAH)
Plus more ...
Presentation at the 1st Summit of the Organic Fertiliser Industry in Europe (SOFIE), 5 - 6 June 2019, organized by the European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform (ESPP, www.phosphorusplatform.eu).
All outcomes of the conference can be found at http://www.phosphorusplatform.eu/SOFIE2019
Презентація вебінару "Вимоги MDR до технічного файлу. Вимоги до технічного фа...Improve Medical LLC
ПЛАН ВЕБІНАРУ:
• що таке технічна документація і технічний файл?
• які вимоги до технічної документації були введені на території ЄС та як вони вплинуть на формування технічного файлу?
• які обовязкові питання повинен містити технічний файл?
• на що звертає орган з оцінки відповідності під час аналізу технічної документації?
• вимога до технічної документації при поданні заявки до органу з оцінки відповідності.
Toward a comprehensive global database of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance...OECD Environment
This document summarizes the creation of an updated, comprehensive list of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) that may have been on the global market. Over 4,700 CAS numbers were identified from various sources and categorized. There are limitations due to information gaps and challenges in categorization. Opportunities for developing this list further include creating an online database that can be regularly updated, addressing knowledge gaps, and expanding the PFAS terminology through cooperation.
This document discusses orphan diseases, orphan drugs, and regulatory aspects of orphan drugs in the US and Europe. It defines orphan diseases as those affecting fewer than 200,000 people in the US or 1 in 2000 people in Europe. Despite affecting a small percentage of the population, over 55 million people in the US and EU have orphan diseases. The document outlines regulations in the US and EU to incentivize development of orphan drugs, including market exclusivity periods. Key incentives include clinical trial cost subsidies and expedited FDA review in the US, as well as free orphan designation review by the EMA in Europe.
It contains details rules and regulations /legislation of Pharmaceuticals, Cosmetics, Active Substance Masters File, Investigational Medicinal Product Dossier for European Union
The Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) is an intergovernmental organization formed in 1991 by countries of the former Soviet Union. The document discusses pharmaceutical regulations and drug registration procedures in several CIS countries, including Russia, Ukraine, and Kazakhstan. Key aspects summarized include the regulatory authorities responsible for drug approval in each country, the typical registration process and requirements, and post-marketing pharmacovigilance obligations.
LTE is a 4G wireless technology developed by 3GPP to provide high-speed data and media transport, as well as high-capacity voice support into the next decade. It combines OFDM and MIMO to significantly increase peak data rates while improving spectral efficiency and lowering costs. LTE aims to meet carrier needs through flexible scalable bandwidth, support for FDD and TDD spectrum, and simplified network architecture. It is designed to evolve GSM, WCDMA and CDMA networks towards an all-IP packet-switched system.
UK REACH vs EU REACH, UK RoHS vs EU RoHS: Emerging Differencesraj takhar
The document summarizes key differences that are emerging between UK and EU chemical regulations, specifically UK REACH vs EU REACH and UK RoHS vs EU RoHS. It notes that while the UK systems initially mirrored the EU systems, divergence is occurring as the UK establishes its own independent framework. Differences highlighted include candidate substance lists, authorization processes, restricted substances, and obligations for companies. It also discusses areas of UK RoHS that are lagging updates from the EU, such as exemptions and product marking requirements, and that the UK will no longer be part of EU reviews and changes to RoHS.
Combination Products, Orphan Drugs, and OTC DrugsMichael Swit
Presentation to the San Diego Regulatory Affairs Network (SDRAN) Regulatory Affairs Certification (RAC) Exam review course on FDA regulation of combination products, orphan drugs, and OTC drugs.
The Safe Drinking and Toxic Enforcement Act, also known as California Proposition 65 (Prop 65), is a California law passed in 1986. Its purpose is to protect drinking water sources from substances known to cause canncer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm and to warn the general public when such substances are present in consumer products or may be present in a specific area at a place of business or employment. The requirements of the law appear in Title 27 of the California Code of Regulations and are administered by The California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA).
The document compares US Drug Master Files (DMFs) and European Union Drug Master Files (EDMFs), which include Certificates of Suitability (CEPs) and Active Substance Master Files (ASMFs). Some key differences include:
- EDMFs allow protection of intellectual property while providing complete information to regulators, whereas DMF submission is optional in the US.
- CEP and ASMF review processes in the EU can include multiple rounds of evaluation and inspections, whereas the FDA only reviews a DMF when referenced in an application.
- EDMF submissions must follow eCTD format and include modules on quality, nonclinical and clinical information, while DMFs can still
Taiwan medical device registration and approval chart - EMERGOEMERGO
Taiwan regulates medical devices through the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act and Regulations for Governing the Management of Medical Devices. The process involves classifying the device, appointing a Taiwan agent, preparing quality system documentation for submission, and obtaining approval. Device classification and complexity of approval requirements vary, with Class I generally having the simplest process taking 1-2 months, Class II taking 10-12 months, and Class III taking 10-12 months and requiring a committee review.
PharmaReady ECTD is a fully integrated web-based electronic common technical document publishing system designed for intuitive content assembly and management of regulatory submissions. It supports submissions to major global health authorities and features automated processes, drag-and-drop functionality, simultaneous multi-agency submissions, and comprehensive validation documentation. Services include implementation support, training, and validation documentation to ensure a smooth rollout. PharmaReady is used by over 110 clients worldwide.
Best Practices for Preparing and Conducting Pre-Submission MeetingsGreenlight Guru
This presentation covers everything you need to know about Q-Subs, how to create the best packet possible, common pitfalls, strategies for conducting pre sub meetings, and observed differences between divisions.
This session took place live at the Greenlight Guru True Quality Virtual Summit, a three-day event for medical device professionals to learn to get their devices to market faster, stay ahead of regulatory changes, and use quality as their multiplier to grow their device business.
This whitepaper provides an overview of Chinese Medical Device Regulations. This includes an overview of the Chinese medical device market, medical device regulatory authorities, medical device registration procedure and medical device classification. It also provides information on regulations regarding product standard, type testing, and clinical trials. This paper is meant for anyone within the regulatory affairs industry who is looking to learn more about medical device regulations and product registration in China.
For more information, contact us for a free 15 minute consultation at http://www.pacificbridgemedical.com/contact-us/.
The document outlines the steps for preparing a premarket notification submission or 510(k) for a medical device. The first step is to identify the product code, regulation number and review panel by searching the FDA classification database. The second step is identifying a predicate device that is already legally marketed and determining substantial equivalence by comparing the intended use, materials, and other characteristics. The third step is preparing the submission file which should refer to any special control guidance documents and take the format of an abbreviated or traditional 510(k) depending on guidance availability.
Formaldehyde and New Wood Product RulesDan Petrosini
The EPA published new rules in December 2016 to reduce formaldehyde emissions from domestically produced and imported composite wood products, consistent with California's standards. As of June 2018, composite wood products must be certified and labeled as compliant with TSCA Title VI or CARB emission standards by an approved third-party certifier. Exemptions include certain hardwood plywood, structural wood panels, and wood packaging. Additional requirements begin in March 2019 including more detailed labeling and import certification. Records must be kept for three years to document compliance.
The document discusses regulations for formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products in California and at the federal level. It provides an overview of the:
- California Airborne Toxic Control Measure (ATCM) and the new Federal Formaldehyde Standards for Composite Wood Products Act (FSA) that adopts California's standards nationally.
- Products that are covered (composite wood panels and finished goods containing them) and exemptions.
- Emission standards and compliance dates that manufacturers must meet when producing various composite wood products.
- Duties of manufacturers, importers, distributors, fabricators, and retailers to ensure compliance, including testing, certification, recordkeeping, labeling, and statements of compliance.
Presentation at the 1st Summit of the Organic Fertiliser Industry in Europe (SOFIE), 5 - 6 June 2019, organized by the European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform (ESPP, www.phosphorusplatform.eu).
All outcomes of the conference can be found at http://www.phosphorusplatform.eu/SOFIE2019
Презентація вебінару "Вимоги MDR до технічного файлу. Вимоги до технічного фа...Improve Medical LLC
ПЛАН ВЕБІНАРУ:
• що таке технічна документація і технічний файл?
• які вимоги до технічної документації були введені на території ЄС та як вони вплинуть на формування технічного файлу?
• які обовязкові питання повинен містити технічний файл?
• на що звертає орган з оцінки відповідності під час аналізу технічної документації?
• вимога до технічної документації при поданні заявки до органу з оцінки відповідності.
Toward a comprehensive global database of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance...OECD Environment
This document summarizes the creation of an updated, comprehensive list of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) that may have been on the global market. Over 4,700 CAS numbers were identified from various sources and categorized. There are limitations due to information gaps and challenges in categorization. Opportunities for developing this list further include creating an online database that can be regularly updated, addressing knowledge gaps, and expanding the PFAS terminology through cooperation.
This document discusses orphan diseases, orphan drugs, and regulatory aspects of orphan drugs in the US and Europe. It defines orphan diseases as those affecting fewer than 200,000 people in the US or 1 in 2000 people in Europe. Despite affecting a small percentage of the population, over 55 million people in the US and EU have orphan diseases. The document outlines regulations in the US and EU to incentivize development of orphan drugs, including market exclusivity periods. Key incentives include clinical trial cost subsidies and expedited FDA review in the US, as well as free orphan designation review by the EMA in Europe.
It contains details rules and regulations /legislation of Pharmaceuticals, Cosmetics, Active Substance Masters File, Investigational Medicinal Product Dossier for European Union
The Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) is an intergovernmental organization formed in 1991 by countries of the former Soviet Union. The document discusses pharmaceutical regulations and drug registration procedures in several CIS countries, including Russia, Ukraine, and Kazakhstan. Key aspects summarized include the regulatory authorities responsible for drug approval in each country, the typical registration process and requirements, and post-marketing pharmacovigilance obligations.
LTE is a 4G wireless technology developed by 3GPP to provide high-speed data and media transport, as well as high-capacity voice support into the next decade. It combines OFDM and MIMO to significantly increase peak data rates while improving spectral efficiency and lowering costs. LTE aims to meet carrier needs through flexible scalable bandwidth, support for FDD and TDD spectrum, and simplified network architecture. It is designed to evolve GSM, WCDMA and CDMA networks towards an all-IP packet-switched system.
UK REACH vs EU REACH, UK RoHS vs EU RoHS: Emerging Differencesraj takhar
The document summarizes key differences that are emerging between UK and EU chemical regulations, specifically UK REACH vs EU REACH and UK RoHS vs EU RoHS. It notes that while the UK systems initially mirrored the EU systems, divergence is occurring as the UK establishes its own independent framework. Differences highlighted include candidate substance lists, authorization processes, restricted substances, and obligations for companies. It also discusses areas of UK RoHS that are lagging updates from the EU, such as exemptions and product marking requirements, and that the UK will no longer be part of EU reviews and changes to RoHS.
Combination Products, Orphan Drugs, and OTC DrugsMichael Swit
Presentation to the San Diego Regulatory Affairs Network (SDRAN) Regulatory Affairs Certification (RAC) Exam review course on FDA regulation of combination products, orphan drugs, and OTC drugs.
The Safe Drinking and Toxic Enforcement Act, also known as California Proposition 65 (Prop 65), is a California law passed in 1986. Its purpose is to protect drinking water sources from substances known to cause canncer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm and to warn the general public when such substances are present in consumer products or may be present in a specific area at a place of business or employment. The requirements of the law appear in Title 27 of the California Code of Regulations and are administered by The California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA).
The document compares US Drug Master Files (DMFs) and European Union Drug Master Files (EDMFs), which include Certificates of Suitability (CEPs) and Active Substance Master Files (ASMFs). Some key differences include:
- EDMFs allow protection of intellectual property while providing complete information to regulators, whereas DMF submission is optional in the US.
- CEP and ASMF review processes in the EU can include multiple rounds of evaluation and inspections, whereas the FDA only reviews a DMF when referenced in an application.
- EDMF submissions must follow eCTD format and include modules on quality, nonclinical and clinical information, while DMFs can still
Taiwan medical device registration and approval chart - EMERGOEMERGO
Taiwan regulates medical devices through the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act and Regulations for Governing the Management of Medical Devices. The process involves classifying the device, appointing a Taiwan agent, preparing quality system documentation for submission, and obtaining approval. Device classification and complexity of approval requirements vary, with Class I generally having the simplest process taking 1-2 months, Class II taking 10-12 months, and Class III taking 10-12 months and requiring a committee review.
PharmaReady ECTD is a fully integrated web-based electronic common technical document publishing system designed for intuitive content assembly and management of regulatory submissions. It supports submissions to major global health authorities and features automated processes, drag-and-drop functionality, simultaneous multi-agency submissions, and comprehensive validation documentation. Services include implementation support, training, and validation documentation to ensure a smooth rollout. PharmaReady is used by over 110 clients worldwide.
Best Practices for Preparing and Conducting Pre-Submission MeetingsGreenlight Guru
This presentation covers everything you need to know about Q-Subs, how to create the best packet possible, common pitfalls, strategies for conducting pre sub meetings, and observed differences between divisions.
This session took place live at the Greenlight Guru True Quality Virtual Summit, a three-day event for medical device professionals to learn to get their devices to market faster, stay ahead of regulatory changes, and use quality as their multiplier to grow their device business.
This whitepaper provides an overview of Chinese Medical Device Regulations. This includes an overview of the Chinese medical device market, medical device regulatory authorities, medical device registration procedure and medical device classification. It also provides information on regulations regarding product standard, type testing, and clinical trials. This paper is meant for anyone within the regulatory affairs industry who is looking to learn more about medical device regulations and product registration in China.
For more information, contact us for a free 15 minute consultation at http://www.pacificbridgemedical.com/contact-us/.
The document outlines the steps for preparing a premarket notification submission or 510(k) for a medical device. The first step is to identify the product code, regulation number and review panel by searching the FDA classification database. The second step is identifying a predicate device that is already legally marketed and determining substantial equivalence by comparing the intended use, materials, and other characteristics. The third step is preparing the submission file which should refer to any special control guidance documents and take the format of an abbreviated or traditional 510(k) depending on guidance availability.
Formaldehyde and New Wood Product RulesDan Petrosini
The EPA published new rules in December 2016 to reduce formaldehyde emissions from domestically produced and imported composite wood products, consistent with California's standards. As of June 2018, composite wood products must be certified and labeled as compliant with TSCA Title VI or CARB emission standards by an approved third-party certifier. Exemptions include certain hardwood plywood, structural wood panels, and wood packaging. Additional requirements begin in March 2019 including more detailed labeling and import certification. Records must be kept for three years to document compliance.
The document discusses regulations for formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products in California and at the federal level. It provides an overview of the:
- California Airborne Toxic Control Measure (ATCM) and the new Federal Formaldehyde Standards for Composite Wood Products Act (FSA) that adopts California's standards nationally.
- Products that are covered (composite wood panels and finished goods containing them) and exemptions.
- Emission standards and compliance dates that manufacturers must meet when producing various composite wood products.
- Duties of manufacturers, importers, distributors, fabricators, and retailers to ensure compliance, including testing, certification, recordkeeping, labeling, and statements of compliance.
The document discusses formaldehyde regulations in California known as CARB. It provides an overview of CARB phases 1 and 2, which establish new formaldehyde emission standards for wood panels to be implemented between 2009-2012. The standards are significantly lower than current US standards. It notes the presentation will discuss Genesis' role in supporting industry transition to more stringent standards. Compliance will require use of compliant wood panels and documentation of sourcing by fabricators.
Kingdom of Bahrain | Single Use Plastic Products Licensing GuideRashed Isa
The document summarizes the plastic products licensing procedure in Bahrain, including:
- Applicants must submit an application form and documents like ISO 14001 certification and lab test reports to the Environmental Licensing Section at the Supreme Council for Environment.
- Plastic product licenses are valid for one year, and the council issues a serial number for each product.
- Manufacturers must affix the conformity marking on products and print the serial number with the marking at a clear, readable resolution according to standards.
The document then provides application forms, license templates, and appendices specifying requirements like marking dimensions, permitted heavy metal limits, and labeling information.
Overview of the timber industry in Vietnam
New international regulations about timber legality and legal timber sources
VPA and negotiations results to-date
Verification system and FLEGT licensing
Challenges faced during negotiations
Spray Polyurethane Foam Roof: An Incredibly Easy Method That Works For Allweathertightsystemsinc
Visit http://www.weathertightroof.com/ for more details. Do you require a roof system for a building with wind uplift concerns? Spray-Polyurethane-foam or SPF is an excellent system for areas where wind is a concern. Contact WeatherTight Systems to learn more about SPF and it's application.
Arauco provides information about its CARB compliant composite panel products. The letter states that Arauco products are third party certified to meet the CARB Airborne Toxic Control Measure regulation and the CPA 4-11 Eco-Certified Composites Sustainability Standard. Arauco complies with all applicable requirements of the CARB regulation including emissions testing, labeling, record keeping and statements of compliance on invoices. Arauco's CARB certificates can be accessed on its website under the certifications section.
iMovR Flakeboard Compliance with CARB Phase 2 Emissionsworkwhilewalking
The document provides an environmental product declaration for medium density fiberboard (MDF) produced in North America. It summarizes the life cycle assessment results showing the environmental impacts from cradle-to-gate, including forest management, logging, sawmilling, transportation of wood residues to MDF plants, and MDF production. The declaration was developed by the American Wood Council and Canadian Wood Council in accordance with international standards and was verified by an independent third party.
iMovR Environmental Product Declaration, American Wood Councilworkwhilewalking
The document provides an environmental product declaration for medium density fiberboard (MDF) produced in North America. It summarizes the life cycle assessment results showing the environmental impacts from cradle-to-gate, including forest management, logging, sawmilling, transportation of wood residues to MDF plants, and MDF production. The declaration was developed by the American Wood Council and Canadian Wood Council in accordance with international standards and was verified by an independent third party.
This document provides an environmental product declaration for medium density fiberboard (MDF) produced in North America according to ISO standards. It summarizes the life cycle assessment of MDF from forest management and logging through production. The assessment finds that MDF production utilizes wood residues from lumber mills that would otherwise be wasted, and the North American MDF industry has improved efficiency. The declaration covers the cradle-to-gate impacts up to packaging for shipment.
Discover the different methods of gaining Green Star credits using wood and wood products in the built environment. Topics of interest include chain of custody and forestry management certification schemes: indoor air quality issues for composite wood products, and easy ways of specifying and obtaining appropriate documentation for wood and wood products, in order to obtain credits.
Multi Category Sourcing in China, India, Vietnam and TurkeyDragon Sourcing
This document summarizes a sourcing trial conducted across 5 product categories in China, India, Vietnam and Turkey. The objectives were to analyze demand, identify suppliers, conduct a request for information process, evaluate responses, audit shortlisted suppliers, and secure contracts. Over 200 potential suppliers were identified for barrier fencing, with 74 participating in the RFI/RFQ process. 24 suppliers responded and 7 were recommended for on-site audits based on their competitiveness and capabilities. The full process included demand analysis, supplier screening, RFI/RFQ distribution and evaluation, supplier audits, sampling, and contract negotiation.
This document summarizes a sourcing trial conducted across 5 product categories in China, India, Vietnam and Turkey to identify competitive suppliers. The categories included barrier fencing, caulking guns, bulk bags, scaffolding and screw fittings. For barrier fencing, 204 suppliers were initially identified and 74 were included in the RFI/RFQ process. 24 suppliers responded and 7 are recommended for audits based on their competitiveness. Price evaluations show the top Chinese suppliers can deliver barrier fencing at a DDP price of $8,641 to $12,341 per 20' container, with the lowest price from Supplier 1 at $9,528 per 40' HC container.
Case Study - Desalination Unit ProjectJohn William
This case study focuses on providing necessary information regarding Desalination unit project. Get more insights about this project here: http://www.dragonsourcing.com/global-sourcing-services/
Case Study: Multi Category Sourcing in China, India, Vietnam and TurkeyJohn William
The document provides a case study report on multi-category sourcing in China, India, Vietnam and Turkey. It outlines the objectives, approach and timeline which included demand analysis of 5 product categories, conducting RFI/RFQs with suppliers, and summarizing results. For barrier fencing, 204 suppliers were identified initially and 74 were included in the RFI/RFQ process, with responses from 24 suppliers. 7 suppliers in China are recommended to move forward with audits and sampling based on their competitiveness and capabilities.
SPLC 2018 Summit: Strategies for specifying sustainable products services SPLCouncil
Slides from Anastasia O'Rourke, Special Consultant, Industrial Economics, Inc., Stacey Foreman, Manager Sustainable Procurement Program, City of Portland & Holly Elwood, Senior Advisor, US EPA presented at the Sustainable Purchasing Leadership Council's 2018 Summit in Minneapolis, MN.
Customer Bulletin 0410 A Comparison of ISO-C1 and HT-300Joe Hughes
This Customer Bulletin is part of a series of white papers aimed at providing our clients, engineers, contractors, fabricators, and friends with objective information on competitive products. Marketing literature on the internet and in printed media address the physical and performance characteristics of competing polyisocyanurate rigid foam insulations fabricated from bunstock. As is often the case, some literature can be misleading and/or in some cases there may not be sufficient information to credibly compare products. This Customer Bulletin provides factual, clarifying information which should allow for an objective comparison of Dyplast’s ISO-C1® with HiTherm’s HT-300 (each 2 lb/ft3 density).
Customer Bulletin 0515 A Comparison of ISO ISO-C1 and HT-300Dyplast Products
This document provides a comparison of two polyisocyanurate insulation materials, ISO-C1 and HT-300. ISO-C1 is manufactured in the US using pentane blowing agent, while HT-300 is manufactured outside the US using HCFC blowing agent. Physical properties of ISO-C1 have been independently verified, while verification of HT-300 properties could not be found. ISO-C1 generally has better properties such as lower water vapor permeability, higher flame/smoke ratings, and better dimensional stability. The document concludes that while HiTherm claims HT-300 meets standards, its published data shows it does not meet all requirements of ASTM C591-13.
Customer Bulletin 05-15 A Comparison of ISO-C1 and HT-300 Polyisocyanurate In...Joe Hughes
This document provides a comparison of two polyisocyanurate insulation materials, ISO-C1 and HT-300. It finds that ISO-C1 is manufactured in the US using pentane as a blowing agent, while HT-300 is manufactured outside the US likely using HCFCs. ISO-C1 has lower water vapor permeability, better dimensional stability, and independently verified physical properties compared to HT-300. The document concludes HT-300 does not fully comply with ASTM standards according to its published data.
This document provides an overview and summary of a training on green (sustainable) procurement conducted at Fort Buchanan in Puerto Rico. The training covered topics like mandatory preference programs from the EPA and USDA that designate green products, finding green products, and the roles and responsibilities of procurers in implementing green procurement policies. It discussed laws and policies like EO 13693 that require considering environmental factors in procurement and buying designated green products when possible.
Similar to EPA Title VI TSCA Regulations for Wood Fabricators (20)
Kinetic studies on malachite green dye adsorption from aqueous solutions by A...Open Access Research Paper
Water polluted by dyestuffs compounds is a global threat to health and the environment; accordingly, we prepared a green novel sorbent chemical and Physical system from an algae, chitosan and chitosan nanoparticle and impregnated with algae with chitosan nanocomposite for the sorption of Malachite green dye from water. The algae with chitosan nanocomposite by a simple method and used as a recyclable and effective adsorbent for the removal of malachite green dye from aqueous solutions. Algae, chitosan, chitosan nanoparticle and algae with chitosan nanocomposite were characterized using different physicochemical methods. The functional groups and chemical compounds found in algae, chitosan, chitosan algae, chitosan nanoparticle, and chitosan nanoparticle with algae were identified using FTIR, SEM, and TGADTA/DTG techniques. The optimal adsorption conditions, different dosages, pH and Temperature the amount of algae with chitosan nanocomposite were determined. At optimized conditions and the batch equilibrium studies more than 99% of the dye was removed. The adsorption process data matched well kinetics showed that the reaction order for dye varied with pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order. Furthermore, the maximum adsorption capacity of the algae with chitosan nanocomposite toward malachite green dye reached as high as 15.5mg/g, respectively. Finally, multiple times reusing of algae with chitosan nanocomposite and removing dye from a real wastewater has made it a promising and attractive option for further practical applications.
Improving the viability of probiotics by encapsulation methods for developmen...Open Access Research Paper
The popularity of functional foods among scientists and common people has been increasing day by day. Awareness and modernization make the consumer think better regarding food and nutrition. Now a day’s individual knows very well about the relation between food consumption and disease prevalence. Humans have a diversity of microbes in the gut that together form the gut microflora. Probiotics are the health-promoting live microbial cells improve host health through gut and brain connection and fighting against harmful bacteria. Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus are the two bacterial genera which are considered to be probiotic. These good bacteria are facing challenges of viability. There are so many factors such as sensitivity to heat, pH, acidity, osmotic effect, mechanical shear, chemical components, freezing and storage time as well which affects the viability of probiotics in the dairy food matrix as well as in the gut. Multiple efforts have been done in the past and ongoing in present for these beneficial microbial population stability until their destination in the gut. One of a useful technique known as microencapsulation makes the probiotic effective in the diversified conditions and maintain these microbe’s community to the optimum level for achieving targeted benefits. Dairy products are found to be an ideal vehicle for probiotic incorporation. It has been seen that the encapsulated microbial cells show higher viability than the free cells in different processing and storage conditions as well as against bile salts in the gut. They make the food functional when incorporated, without affecting the product sensory characteristics.
Optimizing Post Remediation Groundwater Performance with Enhanced Microbiolog...Joshua Orris
Results of geophysics and pneumatic injection pilot tests during 2003 – 2007 yielded significant positive results for injection delivery design and contaminant mass treatment, resulting in permanent shut-down of an existing groundwater Pump & Treat system.
Accessible source areas were subsequently removed (2011) by soil excavation and treated with the placement of Emulsified Vegetable Oil EVO and zero-valent iron ZVI to accelerate treatment of impacted groundwater in overburden and weathered fractured bedrock. Post pilot test and post remediation groundwater monitoring has included analyses of CVOCs, organic fatty acids, dissolved gases and QuantArray® -Chlor to quantify key microorganisms (e.g., Dehalococcoides, Dehalobacter, etc.) and functional genes (e.g., vinyl chloride reductase, methane monooxygenase, etc.) to assess potential for reductive dechlorination and aerobic cometabolism of CVOCs.
In 2022, the first commercial application of MetaArray™ was performed at the site. MetaArray™ utilizes statistical analysis, such as principal component analysis and multivariate analysis to provide evidence that reductive dechlorination is active or even that it is slowing. This creates actionable data allowing users to save money by making important site management decisions earlier.
The results of the MetaArray™ analysis’ support vector machine (SVM) identified groundwater monitoring wells with a 80% confidence that were characterized as either Limited for Reductive Decholorination or had a High Reductive Reduction Dechlorination potential. The results of MetaArray™ will be used to further optimize the site’s post remediation monitoring program for monitored natural attenuation.
Evolving Lifecycles with High Resolution Site Characterization (HRSC) and 3-D...Joshua Orris
The incorporation of a 3DCSM and completion of HRSC provided a tool for enhanced, data-driven, decisions to support a change in remediation closure strategies. Currently, an approved pilot study has been obtained to shut-down the remediation systems (ISCO, P&T) and conduct a hydraulic study under non-pumping conditions. A separate micro-biological bench scale treatability study was competed that yielded positive results for an emerging innovative technology. As a result, a field pilot study has commenced with results expected in nine-twelve months. With the results of the hydraulic study, field pilot studies and an updated risk assessment leading site monitoring optimization cost lifecycle savings upwards of $15MM towards an alternatively evolved best available technology remediation closure strategy.
RoHS stands for Restriction of Hazardous Substances, which is also known as t...vijaykumar292010
RoHS stands for Restriction of Hazardous Substances, which is also known as the Directive 2002/95/EC. It includes the restrictions for the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. RoHS is a WEEE (Waste of Electrical and Electronic Equipment).
EPA Title VI TSCA Regulations for Wood Fabricators
1. 800-745-1778 www.distributorserviceinc.com
Distributor Service, Inc.
What You Need to Know About
New Title VI TSCA Regulations
Information Obtained from: distributorserviceinc.com/PDF/CPA-TSCA-Title-VI-Brochure.pdf
Beginning June 1, 2018, Title VI Regulations
require finished wood products made from Plywood
Panels, Particleboard, MDF and TFL Melamine
to be labeled as compliant with the EPA’s Toxic
Substance Control Act (TSCA). Composite wood
panels made or imported before June 1, 2018,
may be sold at any time and may be used in finished
goods and components at any time.
FABRICATORS
DSI documents TSCA compliance information
on customer order confirmation slips, delivery
tickets and invoices. Any customer with
questions about Title VI regulations should
contact their DSI sales rep.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
• More Info at www.epa.gov/formaldehyde
• EPA TSCA Hotline: (202) 554-1404
MO
RE INFORMAT
ION
Fabricators must label every finished good
they produce or every box or bundle containing
finished goods. Finished goods must be labeled
or stamped with the producer’s name, the date
the good was produced, and a statement of TSCA
Title VI compliance. Bills of lading, invoices, or
comparable documents must be obtained and
maintained for 3 years.
LABEL EXAMPL
E
COMPANY NAME
_____ MONTH _____ YEAR
TSCA TITLE VI COMPLIANT
New EPA Regs for Fabricators
Begin June 1, 2018
2. T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S
SECTION # PAGE
At-A-Glance 2
TSCA Title VI Requirements and Compliance Dates
1 Composite Wood Products Covered 3
2 Regulated Businesses 3
3 Specific Product Exemptions 3
4 Laminated Products Requirements 4
5 Manufactured by Date and Sell Through 4
6 De Minimis Exemption 4
7 Certification Requirements 4
8 Testing Requirements 5
9 Exemptions to Third-Party Certification and 5
Testing Requirements and Reduced Testing
10 Labeling Requirements 6
11 Recordkeeping Requirements 6
12 Reporting 7
13 Non-Complying Lots 7
14 Certification and Testing Services 7
15 Resources 8
EPA
Formaldehyde
RuleMEANS TO YOU
WHAT THE
AN UPDATED QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE
U.S. EPA’s Formaldehyde
Emissions Standards for
Composite Wood Products,
Title VI of the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA Title VI)
3. 2
What the U.S. EPA Formaldehyde Rule Means To You
At-A-Glance
Visit www.CompositePanel.org
TSCA Title VI Requirements and Compliance Dates
R EQU I R E M E NTS COM PLIANCE DATE S
PANEL PRODUCERS
Obtain certification by EPA-recognized third-party certifier for covered panel product
types, including those eligible for NAF/ULEF exemptions or reduced testing
Comply with the following emissions limits (if no exemption):
• Hardwood Plywood = 0.05 parts per million(ppm)
• Particleboard = 0.09 ppm
• MDF = 0.11 ppm
• Thin MDF = 0.13 ppm
Quarterly testing and quality control testing
Labeling and record-keeping (bills of lading, invoices, etc.)
FABRICATORS
Source only TSCA Title VI compliant composite wood panels
(sell-through permitted for pre-compliance date panel inventory)
Record-keeping (bills of lading, invoices, etc.)
Finished goods labeling
IMPORTERS
Comply with certification requirements
Labeling and record-keeping (bills of lading, invoices, etc.)
Import certification required under TSCA Section 13
DISTRIBUTORS & RETAILERS
Record-keeping (bills of lading, invoices, etc.)
Retain labels if bundles of panels are broken or finished goods are removed
from boxes and the product itself does not bear a label
NON-EXEMPT LAMINATED PRODUCT PRODUCERS
Source only TSCA Title VI compliant composite wood core panels
Record-keeping (bills of lading, invoices, etc.)
Meet all of the requirements for hardwood plywood, including 0.05 ppm emission
limit and all certification, recordkeeping and testing requirements.
EXEMPT LAMINATED PRODUCT PRODUCERS
Source only TSCA Title VI compliant composite wood core panels
Record-keeping (bills of lading, invoices, etc.)
Record-keeping demonstrating purchase/ use of NAF/PF resins
June 1, 2018
June 1, 2018
June 1, 2018
June 1, 2018
June 1, 2018
June 1, 2018
June 1, 2018
June 1, 2018
June 1, 2018
March 22, 2019
June 1, 2018
June 1, 2018
June 1, 2018
June 1, 2018
March 22, 2024
June 1, 2018
June 1, 2018
March 22, 2024
This Guide reflects changes in the EPA Formaldehyde Rule effected by an agreed Order dated March 13, 2018 in litigation in the
United States District Court in the Northern District of California (Sierra Club v. Pruitt). The Order changed many compliance dates
from December 12, 2018 to June 1, 2018. It also provided that products certified to the CARB standard (17 CCR §93120) would
be considered certified to TSCA Title VI until March 22, 2019 and may be labeled as such.
4. 3
SECTION #1
Composite Wood Products Covered
n Particleboard
n Medium Density Fiberboard (MDF)
n Thin MDF (≤8 mm in thickness)
n Hardwood Plywood made with a composite wood
(particleboard or MDF), lumber, hardboard, veneer, or any
other special core material.
n Laminated products, defined by EPA as composite or
veneer core with attached wood or woody grass veneer
(e.g., bamboo) made by a fabricator as a component part
used in the construction or assembly of a finished good.
SECTION #2
Regulated Businesses
n Panel Producer: Manufacturer of regulated composite
wood panels (hardwood plywood, particleboard or MDF).
n Importer: Importer of regulated composite wood panels,
component parts or finished goods. This includes entity
primarily liable for payment of duties and authorized agent.
n Fabricator: Manufacturer of domestic or imported
component parts or finished goods made with regulated
composite wood panels.
n Distributor: Distributor of regulated composite panels,
component parts or finished goods made with regulated
composite panels for purposes of resale or distribution in
commerce.
n Retailer: A company that sells, offers for sale or supplies
directly to consumers regulated composite panels,
component parts or finished goods made with regulated
composite panels.
SECTION #3
Specific Product Exemptions
• Hardboard as specified in ANSI 135.4, 135.5, 135.6 and
135.7 (2012 versions);
º Rebuttable presumption that panels emitting more than
0.06 ppm are not hardboard;
• Structural plywood as specified in PS 1-07;
• Military-specified plywood;
• Curved plywood;
• Structural panels as specified in PS 2-04;
• Structural composite lumber
as specified in ASTM D5456-06;
• Oriented strand board;
• Glued laminated lumber as specified in
ANSI/AITC A190.1-2002;
• Prefabricated wood I-joists as specified in
ASTM D5055-05;
• Finger-jointed lumber;
• Wood packaging (pallets, crates, spools, dunnage);
• Composite wood products used inside a new vehicle,
other than a recreational vehicle, including rail cars,
boats, and aircraft;
• Windows that contain composite wood products, if the
windows contain less than five (5) percent composite
wood product by volume;
• Exterior doors and garage doors that contain composite
wood products, if:
º Doors are made from composite wood products
manufactured with no-added formaldehyde-based
(NAF) resins or ultra low-emitting formaldehyde
(ULEF) resins; or
º Doors contain less than three (3) percent composite
wood product by volume; and
• Goods owned by consumers that are subsequently resold
on a secondary market.
Eco-Certified CompositeTM
(ECC) Sustainability Standard is a third-party audited program for
composite wood panels that requires compliance with the world’s most stringent formaldehyde
emissions standards – EPA TSCA Title VI and CARB Phase 2 – and meets three of the five
following rigorous environmental criteria: cradle-to-gate offsets resulting in a carbon sink/net
carbon storage; local and renewable sourcing; use of recycled/recovered fiber; sustainable and
efficient use of wood resources; and certified wood sourcing practices.
Visit www.CompositePanel.org
5. 4
SECTION #4
Laminated Products Requirements
• Regulatory requirements for fabricators that make
laminated products are dictated by the type of resin (or
glue) that is used to attach the veneer to the core, and
are divided into two types.
º NAF or Phenol Formaldehyde (PF) Resins: must
use compliant composite wood substrates and keep
records, but are exempt from other requirements.
º Urea Formaldehyde and Other Formaldehyde-
Based Resins: must meet all of the requirements
for hardwood plywood, including use of compliant
core, 0.05 ppm emission limit, and all certification,
recordkeeping and testing requirements.
• Both exempt and non-exempt laminated panels must
meet recordkeeping requirements, contain TSCA Title VI
compliant core and must be labeled if sold separately as
of June 1, 2018.
• Non-exempt laminated products must meet all hardwood
plywood requirements by March 22, 2024.
• Exempt laminated products must meet recordkeeping
requirements for resin use by March 22, 2024.
• Composite wood using other non-wood veneers, papers,
etc. are not laminated products, but rather are treated as
“finished goods.”
º The only requirements are to use compliant core by
June 1, 2018 and meet recordkeeping and labeling
requirements.
SECTION #5
Manufactured by Date and Sell Through
• Any composite wood panel that is manufactured or
imported after June 1, 2018 must meet the regulatory
requirements.
• Composite wood panels made or imported before June 1,
2018, may be sold at any time and may be used in
finished goods and component parts at any time.
º Notably, the regulation places limits on stockpiling non-
compliant material before June 1, 2018, so product
manufacturers will need to review this carefully in
preparing for the compliance date. (See §770.12).
SECTION #6
De Minimis Exemption
• There is a limited de minimis exemption for finished
goods or component parts sold directly to end users if its
composite wood content does not exceed 144 square
inches on its largest face. This exemption applies only
to labeling; products such as small picture frames and
others that meet the de minimis definition must still be
made with compliant composite wood and comply with
recordkeeping requirements.
SECTION #7
Certification Requirements
Panel and Non-Exempt
Laminated Products Requirements
• For particleboard, MDF, hardwood plywood and non-
exempt laminated panels, compliance with emissions
standards must be verified by an approved third-party
certification agency (TPC) (see exemptions below).
• Panel producers are responsible for the emissions
performance of all products certified.
• Each certified mill’s compliance program must include
a quality control manual describing quality systems,
specified facilities and trained personnel.
TPC Certification
• Mills must be certified by an EPA TSCA Title VI
recognized TPC, conduct regular quality tests and
quarterly third-party audits/emission verifications by
the TPC. Certification by a CARB-approved TPC will be
acceptable until March 22, 2019.
º Mills that are certified by a CARB-approved TPC do
not need to requalify when applying for EPA Title VI
recognition.
º Mills not previously certified under CARB need to
undertake additional verification testing in order to
qualify with EPA and receive recognition.
• Mills must follow specific procedures for products
found to be out of compliance with the standard,
outlined in section #13.
• Quality control records must be retained for three (3) years.
CARB Reciprocity
• Products certified as compliant with the CARB Air Toxic
Control Measure will be considered certified under
TSCA Title VI until March 22, 2019 and may be labeled
as such.
Visit www.CompositePanel.org
6. 5
SECTION #8
Testing Requirements
• Compliance chamber testing
º Initial and quarterly compliance chamber testing shall
be conducted by an approved TPC using either ASTM
E1333 (Large Chamber) or ASTM D 6007 (Small
Scale Chamber) test. If D 6007 is used, equivalency to
E1333 must be demonstrated.
• Quality control testing.
º Testing must be conducted using methods approved by
EPA and the TPC.
º The regulation provides detailed requirements for
testing frequency. (See §770.20(b)(2).)
º Additional quality control tests must be conducted
when there is a change in resin formulation, increase by
more than 10% in resin amount or decrease in press
time by more than 20%.
º Frequency may be decreased if the plant shows
prescribed levels of consistent operations and low
variability of test values. (See § 770.20(b)(2)(ii)
SECTION #9
Exemptions to Third-Party Certification and
Testing Requirements and Reduced Testing
Exemption
Approved ULEF and NAF composite wood panels are
exempt from third-party certification and testing, but must
make a regular demonstration of ongoing compliance.
• NAF panel producers must apply to EPA Title VI TPC
and/or CARB to obtain an exemption and must provide
(1) test results from one chamber test and three
consecutive months of routine quality control tests for
NAF products, or (2) test results from two chamber tests
and six consecutive months of routine quality control
tests for ULEF products.
º NAF/ULEF hardwood plywood test values cannot
exceed 0.05 ppm, and NAF/ULEF particleboard, MDF
and thin MDF test values cannot exceed 0.06 ppm.
º NAF products must also demonstrate a 90% or
better compliance with a 0.04 ppm limit for the three
consecutive months of quality control testing.
º ULEF products must also demonstrate 90% or
better compliance with a 0.04 ppm limit for the six
consecutive months of quality control testing.
SECTION #9 CONTINUED
Reduced ULEF Testing
• Application procedures and data submission requirements
are the same as above.
• ULEF panels test values cannot exceed
the following limits:
º Hardwood plywood - 0.05 ppm
º Particleboard – 0.08 ppm
º MDF – 0.09 ppm
º Thin MDF – 0.11 ppm
• ULEF panels must also demonstrate 90% or better
compliance through six (6) months of quality control
testing with the following emissions levels:
º Particleboard – 0.05 ppm
º MDF – 0.06 ppm
º Thin MDF – 0.08 ppm
Provisions Applying to
Exemptions and Reduced Testing
A change in resin system invalidates an exemption or
reduced testing approval and requires submission of new
data for reapproval.
Changes in operational parameters require submission of
additional test results showing compliance.
• Exemptions and reduced testing privileges run for two
(2) years, at which time panel producers must reapply to
an EPA Title VI TPC and/or CARB and submit at least
one chamber test result for NAF products and two results
of ULEF products confirming compliance with emission
requirements.
• As noted above, laminated panels made with NAF or PF
resins are exempt from third-party certification.
Qualification for Exemption/Reduced Testing
CARB and TSCA Title VI call for different emission level
requirements to qualify for NAF/ULEF exemptions and
ULEF reduced testing. For example, primary/secondary
tests that must be submitted to qualify for an exemption
are as follows:
• 0.04 ppm for CARB
• 0.06 ppm for TSCA Title VI
Renewals and process changes would similarly trigger
different emissions requirements. Panel producers seeking
to meet both California and federal requirements would be
advised to meet the lower CARB standard.
Visit www.CompositePanel.org
7. 6
SECTION #10
Labeling Requirements
Labels may be on individual composite wood panels or on
bundles or packaging and must include the following:
• Panel producer’s name or panel producer number
• Lot number
• EPA TSCA Title VI TPC number
• Statement that products are TSCA Title VI certified
• Optional – can label that panel is made with NAF
or ULEF resins
Panel producers, importers, distributors, fabricators or
retailers must have a method sufficient to identify panels
taken from bundles (e.g., copy of bundle tags) and provide
information on panels to customers upon request. The
regulation’s preamble provides that this requirement applies
to the entity that initially divided or repackaged the bundle.
Labels must be placed on each finished good made with
regulated composite wood, or alternatively on a box or
bundle, and include the following:
• Fabricator’s name, or if written consent obtained by
downstream entity, the name of downstream fabricator,
importer, distributor or retailer
• Date finished good produced
• Statement that finished good is TSCA Title VI compliant
• Optional: can include on label that finished goods made
with composite panels containing NAF or ULEF resins, or
if appropriate, a combination of NAF/ULEF panels and
compliant panels.
If an unlabeled finished good is removed from its marked
packaging, then the importer, distributor or retailer must
keep a copy of the label and make the information available
to customers upon request.
Labels may be applied as stamp, tag or sticker, but not
as a barcode.
Following an amendment, TSCA Title VI now provides that
regulated composite wood panels and finished goods that
meet the required formaldehyde emissions standards and
other requirements can be voluntarily labeled. [Note TSCA
labeling can also be used until March 22, 2019 if the
product is CARB certified.]
CARB has verbally committed to accept panels or finished
goods labeled only as TSCA Title VI compliant under its
program. CPA has requested that CARB put this in writing.
SECTION #11
Recordkeeping Requirements
Panel Producers and Non-Exempt Laminated Panel
Producers must maintain the following records for three
(3)* years:
• Quarterly emissions test results; **
• Ongoing quality control testing; **
• Production records;
• Records of changes in production;
• Records demonstrating initial and continued eligibility for
reduced testing of NAF and ULEF products;
• Purchaser information for each composite wood product;
• Transporter contact information and shipping invoice
number;
• Representative copies of labels; and
• Disposition of any non-complying lots, if applicable.
* Records demonstrating initial and continued eligibility for
reduced testing or NAF/ULEF exemption must be kept
for as long as the panel manufacturer is producing pan-
els under the reduced testing or NAF/ULEF exemption.
** Although testing and certification is not required for
NAF/ULEF exempt panels, records must be kept of
tests that are conducted.
Records of quarterly chamber results must be made
available to direct purchasers upon request.
Exempt laminated product producers must maintain the
following records for three (3) years:
• Resin trade name, resin manufacturer details and
purchase records;
• Panel producer contact information and purchase records;
• If cores made in-house, records showing that they have
been certified by TSCA Title VI TPC; and
• If resins are produced in-house, records that they are
NAF or PF.
Importers, fabricators, distributors and retailers
must maintain the following records for three (3) years
and be able to make them available to EPA upon request
within 30 days:
• Records identifying the panel manufacturer and date
panels were manufactured;
• Records identifying the supplier, if different, and date of
purchase; and
• Bills of lading, invoices or comparable documents that
include a written statement from supplier that the
panels, components or finished goods are TSCA Title VI
compliant or were produced prior to June 1, 2018.
Visit www.CompositePanel.org
8. 7
SECTION #12
Reporting
Panel producers (other than exempt NAF/ULEF producers)
must provide the TSCA Title VI TPC monthly product data
reports for each production facility, line and product type
that includes the Quality Control Limit (QCL), shipping QCL,
results of quality control tests and retest values.
Panel producers must inform the EPA TSCA Title VI TPC
within 72 hours of any quality control test result that
exceeds the established QCL.
Panel producers must also notify the TSCA Title VI TPC
regarding a change in quality control manager, significant
changes to production that could impact emissions and
information related to the disposition of a non-complying lot.
SECTION #13
Non-Complying Lots
• A non-complying lot is any lot represented by a
quarterly chamber test value or quality control test
value that indicates that the lot exceeds the emission
limit for the product.
• All non-complying lots must be isolated from certified lots.
• Panel producers are required to notify recipients of a lot
within 72 hours of becoming aware of a failing chamber
or quality control test result for that lot.
º Panel producers can either recall the non-complying lot
or work with recipients to treat, retest and certify the lot.
º Panel producers must notify the TSCA Title VI TPC
about final disposition of the lot.
• EPA has issued guidance that clarifies in particular the
responsibilities for fabricators, distributors, importers
and retailers in the event they have been supplied with a
non-complying lot, which are as follows:
º If a company has intact non-compliant panels in
inventory, it must work with the panel producer to
isolate, treat and retest those panels as needed.
º If the company has further distributed the panels in
the supply chain, then that company must notify the
purchaser within 72 hours of the time the company
was made aware of the non-complying lot by the panel
producer.
º If a company has already incorporated non-compliant
panels into a component part or finished good, then
that company does not have any obligation to notify
downstream entities in the supply chain.
SECTION #14
Certification and Testing Services
Your best assurance of using EPA compliant products is to
specify those certified by the Composite Panel Association
(CPA). CPA’s expertise is built on over four decades
of formaldehyde testing experience, and has earned
the recognition of the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD), major building codes, and the
composite panel industry as a reliable source of data. It is
also the foundation for CPA’s designation as “TPC-1” – the
first certification agency in the world to be approved as a
Third-Party Certifier by CARB. A list of certified facilities is
available at www.CompositePanel.org.
All CPA certified products are tested at CPA’s International
Testing and Certification Center (ITCC) in Leesburg,
Virginia. The ITCC operates three large chambers
(ASTM E 1333), six small chambers (ASTM D 6007) and
accompanying conditioning room providing the capacity to
offer customers timely test results. The 5,500 square foot
facility has been engineered with today’s ultra-low emitting
products in mind. We have the most experience and best
capabilities of any testing lab in North America.
Certification Services:
Ed Deomano at edeomano@cpamail.org
Testing Services:
Brian Patlen at bpatlen@cpamail.org
Visit www.CompositePanel.org
9. 8
SECTION #15
Resources
Composite Panel Association (CPA)
703.724.1128
www.CompositePanel.org
Hardwood Plywood Veneer
Association (HPVA)
703.435.2900
www.hpva.org
American Home Furnishing
Association (AHFA)
336.884.5000
www.ahfa.us
Kitchen Cabinet Manufacturers
Association (KCMA)
703.264.1690
www.kcma.org
EPA
202-564-6450
www.epa.gov/formaldehyde
CARB
(916) 324-6997
www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/compwood/compwood
The Composite Panel Association (CPA), founded in 1960, represents the North American wood-based composite panel and
decorative surfacing industries on technical standards, industry regulation, and product acceptance. CPA General Members include 30
of the leading manufacturers of particleboard, medium density fiberboard (MDF), engineered wood siding and trim and hardboard in
North America, representing more than 95% of industry manufacturing capacity. CPA’s Associate Members encompass the complete
value chain affiliated with the composite panel industry, including manufacturers of decorative surfaces, furniture, cabinets, and doors
and mouldings, as well as laminators, distributors and equipment suppliers.
CPA also oversees the voluntary Eco-Certified CompositeTM
(ECC) Sustainability Standard and operates the ITCC, an internationally-
accredited Third-Party Certifier (TPC) and the first in the world to be approved by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) for
formaldehyde emissions testing and certification of composite panels. For more info, visit CompositePanel.org.
This brochure is designed to be a quick reference to the EPA formaldehyde regulation.
CPA disclaims any liability for reliance on this guide for readers’ compliance with the EPA regulation or obligation to
update the information. Consult the full text of the regulation and your legal advisors on specific questions.
Updated March 20, 2018