General overview of important insurance coverage and indemnification issues impacting the energy/oil & gas industry from a 2014 presentation to an industry group.
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
Energy Insurance, Indemnities, & Risk Management 2014 Presentation
1. Important Insurance Coverage &
Indemnification Issues
Impacting Energy Industry
Sarah E. Stogner
Carver, Darden, Koretzky, Tessier, Finn, Blossman & Areaux, LLC
Energy Centre - 1100 Poydras Street - Suite 3100
New Orleans, Louisiana 70163
Telephone: (504) 585-3845 Cell: (504) 201-0140
stogner@carverdarden.com - www.carverdarden.com
2. The next 45 minutes…
Some practical tips to make your business less susceptible
to litigation
Short lecture on ineffective indemnification provisions
Insurance policy fundamentals relevant for oil and gas
industry
4. The Parties
Hutch Henry
property owner
Chevaco
operator
Atapaz
drilling sub
Joe Nimrod
negligent employee
Clumsy’s
Tool Rent-All
tool sub
Floyd’s of
Florence
EED Insurer
Aries Ins.
Co.
CGL Insurer
Bill
Deceased
dead employee
5. principal action
indemnity
tender & 3rd
party demand
3rd party
demand on
separate
indemnity
insurance &
indemnity issues
Mrs. Deceased Atapaz Chevaco
Clumsy’s Tool
Rent-All
Insurance
Companies
The Drama
6. Insurance
READ THE POLICY
– Policy anatomy
– 1st party vs. 3rd party
• Well control & CGL
– Claims vs. occurrence policy
– Burden of proof – coverage, exclusions, exceptions
– Other insurance
– overlapping layers & prolonged events
7. Indemnity Generally
• Simply a right to reimbursement
– indemnifying party = indemnitor (pays)
– indemnified party = indemnitee (receives payment)
• Generally indemnity where indemnitee is
indemnified against own negligence is strictly
construed and will not be construed to indemnify
an indemnitee against losses resulting to him
unless “express” or “clear and unequivocal.”
8.
9. knock for knock
Each party shall defend any third party claim against the
other party arising from the death of or physical injury to
any person or damage to the indemnified party's
property to the extent caused, in whole or in part, by the
negligence or intentional conduct of the indemnifying
party or its agents or employees, and indemnify and hold
harmless the other party and its respective officers,
directors and employees from and against damages,
liabilities and reasonable costs and expenses, including
reasonable legal fees incurred in connection therewith.
• Look closely at what types of liabilities are covered –
torts, contracts, any and all…
10. Indemnity
• Goal - reduce litigation expenses by agreeing to allocate
certain risks between the parties ahead of time
– All risk of losses to a defined group’s people and things in
exchange for the other party doing similarly for a different
group
– Leveraged party has other party agree to assume all risk of loss
arising out of the event
– Consider anti-indemnity legislation
– Exceptions or carve-outs tend to reduce efficacy
• Reality – usually more litigation
11. Anti-Indemnity Statutes
Louisiana
• indemnification generally allowed – strict
construction
• Louisiana Oilfield Indemnity Act
– La. R.S. 9:2780 (any agreement for mineral
exploration)
– statutory prohibition against the enforcement in a
personal injury/wrongful death for indemnitee’s own
negligence
– exceptions
12. • Texas
– indemnification generally allowed
• must be express and conspicuous
– Texas Oilfield Anti-Indemnity Statute
• Tex. CPRC § 127.001-127.007
• prohibits agreement to indemnify a person against
liability that is caused by their sole or concurrent
negligence for an agreement pertaining to a well for oil,
gas, or water or to a mine for a mineral
• exceptions
13. Insurance & Indemnity collide
• As part of the ongoing insurance coverage dispute following the sinking of the
Transocean offshore drilling unit Deepwater Horizon, the United States Court
of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has issued, and the Texas Supreme Court has
accepted, two certified questions that have the potential to tremendously
impact every business in Texas.
• On August 29, 2013, the Fifth Circuit, by unanimous decision, withdrew its
March 1, 2013 opinion that had awarded "additional insured" coverage to BP
under Transocean’s excess insurance policies. In re Deepwater Horizon, Case
No. 12-30230, Slip Op. (5th Cir. Aug. 29, 2013). In its place, the Fifth Circuit
certified two questions to the Texas Supreme Court:
1. Whether BP is covered as an additional insured, based solely on the
language of the insurance policies; and
2. Whether the contra proferentum doctrine of requiring insurance policies
to be interpreted against insurers and in favor of insureds applies to
sophisticated parties.
• Still waiting for the Texas Supreme Court decision.
14. Concluding Words of Wisdom
• READ your policy
• READ your contracts
• make sure congruent
• eliminate vague language
• avoid carve-outs
• invest on the front end to avoid costly
disputes after an incident
policyholder has burden of proving loss covered, burden then shifts to insurer to prove exclusion or some other justification to deny coverage, then back to policyholder to prove exception
anatomy of the policy
declarations page – usually first page (basic summary of insured, broker, policy limits, deductible) but NOT the policy
schedule of forms – lists form numbers and names of each form included in the policy (this is where a certified copy comes into play – certified that all forms included)
insuring agreement (aka coverage) – advises what is covered
first party: protection against loss caused by physical loss or damage to policyholder’s property
all risk & named-perils (e.g. well control)
business interruption & contingent business interruption
CGL coverage B
third party: protect policyholder from liability to others, e.g. bodily injury or property damage
definitions – defines terms either in quotation marks, bold, all caps
insurance is a contract, follows general contract principles
apply common and ordinary meaning of terms
do not create ambiguity where none exists
ambiguity construed in favor or insured
reasonable expectations
if both parties give reasonable interpretation the policyholder’s interpretation will be adopted even if insurer’s more reasonable
who is an insured – may include names not on declarations, and lists other additional named insureds (such as other parties involved in a project)
important that “who is an insured” coincides with contractual obligations from JOA, MSA, drilling contracts
do not assume you are an additional insured under another entity’s insurance
many policies contain endorsements with additional insured information
all subsidiaries should be named
employees, volunteers, lessors, independent contractors
limits of insurance – specifies how the policy limits apply as to each occurrence/claim, as well as event limit and aggregate limit
exclusions
well control – unintended or uncontrolled flow
pollution vs. absolute pollution (is there buy-back or separate policy?)
evolution of pollution from “accidental” to “sudden and unintended” to “abrupt and instantaneous”
plethora of litigation and still not clear
care, custody or control (personal [as opposed to real, e.g. buildings] property in care, custody, or control of insured)
e.g. rented equipment damaged during blow-out
intentional acts, workers’ comp, employee indemnification/liability, fellow employee
completed operations
war
aircraft, auto, watercraft
damage to insured’s property
what is the insured’s property?
scope of exclusion – e.g. drilling bit vs. casing vs. entire well
damage to your product, work, impaired property or property not physically injured
loss in progress
crime/fraud
conditions – prerequisites for coverage, including notice, and other obligations of the policyholder
other insurance – states how the policy’s coverage is prioritized against the coverage of other applicable policies under which the named insured or the additional insured is also covered
both primary
excess
true excess/umbrella policies
supplementary payments – monies insurer will pay in addition to the policy limits
endorsements – change the policy – can add new coverage, conditions, restrictions, or exclusions – they can affect every provision of the policy
care has reference to temporary charge, custody implies a keeping or guarding and a necessity for an accounting, and control refers to power or authority to manage, superintend, direct or oversee Hardware Mut. Cas. Co. v. Crafton, 350 S.W. 2d 506 (Ark. 1961).
The term "agreement," as it pertains to a well for oil, gas, or water, or drilling for minerals which occur in a solid, liquid, gaseous, or other state, as used in this Section, means any agreement or understanding, written or oral, concerning any operations related to the exploration, development, production, or transportation of oil, gas, or water, or drilling for minerals which occur in a solid, liquid, gaseous, or other state, including but not limited to drilling, deepening, reworking, repairing, improving, testing, treating, perforating, acidizing, logging, conditioning, altering, plugging, or otherwise rendering services in or in connection with any well drilled for the purpose of producing or excavating, constructing, improving, or otherwise rendering services in connection with any mine shaft, drift, or other structure intended for use in the exploration for or production of any mineral, or an agreement to perform any portion of any such work or services or any act collateral thereto, including the furnishing or rental of equipment, incidental transportation, and other goods and services furnished in connection with any such service or operation.