Communication Process: The
Elaboration Likelihood Model
The elaboration likelihood model illustrates the
two routes to message persuasion.
1. central route
2. Peripheral Route
• Given central route processing, factual
messages are likely to be effective. Messages
are remembered because they contain quality
arguments, substantiated by convincing
evidence
• Given peripheral route processing, emotional
appeals may make a positive impact—by
making the consumer feel good, for example.
However, the impression these messages
make is temporary and can be easily forgotten
or changed by competitive messages.
Two conditions affect elaboration
likelihood—motivation and ability.
• Consumers are likely to process cognitively—think
about—a message if they are motivated to do so and if
they are able to clearly distinguish among the product
benefits it promises.
• If consumers are not motivated to process the
message and are not able to distinguish its merits, they
are more likely to absorb it peripherally than centrally.
• Thus, given a highly motivated audience of consumers
who are willing to expend cognitive effort to process
marketing information, factual messages work best.
Low motivation and low cognitive ability mean
emotional appeals will be more effective.
Motivation to process the message
depends on the following three
factors:• message relevance,
• need for cognition,
• purchase responsibility
• Message Relevance
• What is the message relevance to the consumer? Suppose an
engineer who uses various kinds of computer software in her work
sees an advertisement for a new software package. Because it
might help her advance in her career, this consumer is likely to be
motivated to process a factual message about the product. Contrast
the homemaker who uses the computer for little more than paying
bills and personal correspondence. If persuaded to buy the product
at all, this consumer is more likely to respond to an emotional
rather than a factual appeal.
• Need for Cognition
• Does the consumer have a high need for cognition? Continuing the
previous example, the homemaker may be motivated to process a
factual message if she is the type of person who is curious about
computers in general and therefore has a high need to know and
understand.
• Purchase Responsibility
• Who has purchase responsibility? Does the consumer feel that he
or she is ultimately responsible for making an effective decision?
Suppose an organization decides to purchase new computer
software to automate its outdated accounting system. An employee
assigned to evaluate different programs will obviously feel
responsible for the decision and will therefore examine relevant
information very closely and respond well to factual appeals. If the
responsibility is diffused among several employees or to a
committee, motivation to process factual messages weakens. The
lack of personal responsibility leads to peripheral processing,
through which emotional appeals are likely to be more effective.
Some Videos on ELM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XNAPiZMgPQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nd6jveosFCE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcs4Q-4GITA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E94Kz2SpWEw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNXpnKV0Njg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Pk07lQS3gs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqT_dPApj9U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dX7Ec5IvcE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukKBgo6AhwE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A45sjUX7mp0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ts_4vOUDImE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-oVg_Ga4Ks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eekrb4wJl-k

Elm

  • 2.
    Communication Process: The ElaborationLikelihood Model The elaboration likelihood model illustrates the two routes to message persuasion. 1. central route 2. Peripheral Route
  • 3.
    • Given centralroute processing, factual messages are likely to be effective. Messages are remembered because they contain quality arguments, substantiated by convincing evidence • Given peripheral route processing, emotional appeals may make a positive impact—by making the consumer feel good, for example. However, the impression these messages make is temporary and can be easily forgotten or changed by competitive messages.
  • 4.
    Two conditions affectelaboration likelihood—motivation and ability. • Consumers are likely to process cognitively—think about—a message if they are motivated to do so and if they are able to clearly distinguish among the product benefits it promises. • If consumers are not motivated to process the message and are not able to distinguish its merits, they are more likely to absorb it peripherally than centrally. • Thus, given a highly motivated audience of consumers who are willing to expend cognitive effort to process marketing information, factual messages work best. Low motivation and low cognitive ability mean emotional appeals will be more effective.
  • 5.
    Motivation to processthe message depends on the following three factors:• message relevance, • need for cognition, • purchase responsibility • Message Relevance • What is the message relevance to the consumer? Suppose an engineer who uses various kinds of computer software in her work sees an advertisement for a new software package. Because it might help her advance in her career, this consumer is likely to be motivated to process a factual message about the product. Contrast the homemaker who uses the computer for little more than paying bills and personal correspondence. If persuaded to buy the product at all, this consumer is more likely to respond to an emotional rather than a factual appeal.
  • 6.
    • Need forCognition • Does the consumer have a high need for cognition? Continuing the previous example, the homemaker may be motivated to process a factual message if she is the type of person who is curious about computers in general and therefore has a high need to know and understand. • Purchase Responsibility • Who has purchase responsibility? Does the consumer feel that he or she is ultimately responsible for making an effective decision? Suppose an organization decides to purchase new computer software to automate its outdated accounting system. An employee assigned to evaluate different programs will obviously feel responsible for the decision and will therefore examine relevant information very closely and respond well to factual appeals. If the responsibility is diffused among several employees or to a committee, motivation to process factual messages weakens. The lack of personal responsibility leads to peripheral processing, through which emotional appeals are likely to be more effective.
  • 8.
    Some Videos onELM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XNAPiZMgPQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nd6jveosFCE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcs4Q-4GITA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E94Kz2SpWEw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNXpnKV0Njg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Pk07lQS3gs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqT_dPApj9U https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dX7Ec5IvcE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukKBgo6AhwE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A45sjUX7mp0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ts_4vOUDImE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-oVg_Ga4Ks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eekrb4wJl-k