This document contains information about performance evaluation forms and methods for evaluating the performance of an education welfare officer. It includes a sample performance evaluation form with sections for reviewing performance factors, strengths, areas for improvement, and signatures. It also provides examples of performance review phrases for different evaluation criteria and describes several common performance appraisal methods like management by objectives, critical incident method, and 360-degree feedback. The methods section explains the process and advantages of different approaches to performance evaluation.
Training supervisor perfomance appraisal 2tonychoper1804
This document provides information and resources for training supervisor performance evaluations, including:
- A 4-page sample performance evaluation form with rating scales for evaluating various performance factors.
- Links to free eBooks and resources on performance appraisal phrases, forms, key performance indicators (KPIs), and tips for writing self-appraisals.
- Sections describing the top 12 methods for performance appraisal, including examples of phrases for evaluating skills like problem-solving, teamwork, and decision-making.
The document is intended as a comprehensive guide for supervisors to conduct effective, objective performance evaluations of training supervisors.
This document provides information and resources for evaluating the performance of a senior consultant. It includes a 4-page job performance evaluation form with sections for reviewing performance factors, employee strengths and accomplishments, areas for improvement, and signatures. It also lists phrases that can be used in a performance review for a senior consultant and describes the top 12 methods for performance appraisal, such as management by objectives, critical incident method, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback. The resources are intended to help structure a thorough performance review process for a senior consultant.
The document provides information on performance evaluation methods for associate managers. It discusses 12 methods including management by objectives, critical incident method, behaviorally anchored rating scales, behavioral observation scales, 360 degree appraisal, and checklist and weighted checklist method. For each method, it provides a definition and overview, as well as examples of advantages and disadvantages. The document aims to inform on different approaches that can be used to evaluate associate manager performance.
This document contains materials for evaluating the performance of a sponsorship manager, including:
1) A 4-page job performance evaluation form with ratings for various performance factors like administration, communication, decision making, and an overall performance rating.
2) Examples of performance review phrases for evaluating a sponsorship manager's attitude, creativity, decision making, interpersonal skills, and other qualities.
3) An overview of the top 12 methods for sponsorship manager performance appraisal, including management by objectives, critical incident method, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback.
This document contains materials for evaluating the job performance of an assurance associate, including:
1) A 4-page performance evaluation form with ratings for various job criteria like administration, communication, teamwork, and decision making.
2) A list of 6 performance appraisal resources from a website.
3) 3 sections of performance review phrases for an assurance associate, focusing on attitudes, creativity/innovation, and decision making.
This document contains a job performance evaluation form for an account specialist. It includes sections to rate an employee's performance on various factors such as administration, communication, teamwork, and customer service. It also includes spaces for noting employee strengths, areas for improvement, and signatures. The subsequent pages provide additional resources for performance evaluations, including example phrases to use in evaluations and descriptions of key performance indicators and job responsibilities for an account specialist.
This document contains information about performance evaluation forms and methods for evaluating the performance of an education welfare officer. It includes a sample performance evaluation form with sections for reviewing performance factors, strengths, areas for improvement, and signatures. It also provides examples of performance review phrases for different evaluation criteria and describes several common performance appraisal methods like management by objectives, critical incident method, and 360-degree feedback. The methods section explains the process and advantages of different approaches to performance evaluation.
Training supervisor perfomance appraisal 2tonychoper1804
This document provides information and resources for training supervisor performance evaluations, including:
- A 4-page sample performance evaluation form with rating scales for evaluating various performance factors.
- Links to free eBooks and resources on performance appraisal phrases, forms, key performance indicators (KPIs), and tips for writing self-appraisals.
- Sections describing the top 12 methods for performance appraisal, including examples of phrases for evaluating skills like problem-solving, teamwork, and decision-making.
The document is intended as a comprehensive guide for supervisors to conduct effective, objective performance evaluations of training supervisors.
This document provides information and resources for evaluating the performance of a senior consultant. It includes a 4-page job performance evaluation form with sections for reviewing performance factors, employee strengths and accomplishments, areas for improvement, and signatures. It also lists phrases that can be used in a performance review for a senior consultant and describes the top 12 methods for performance appraisal, such as management by objectives, critical incident method, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback. The resources are intended to help structure a thorough performance review process for a senior consultant.
The document provides information on performance evaluation methods for associate managers. It discusses 12 methods including management by objectives, critical incident method, behaviorally anchored rating scales, behavioral observation scales, 360 degree appraisal, and checklist and weighted checklist method. For each method, it provides a definition and overview, as well as examples of advantages and disadvantages. The document aims to inform on different approaches that can be used to evaluate associate manager performance.
This document contains materials for evaluating the performance of a sponsorship manager, including:
1) A 4-page job performance evaluation form with ratings for various performance factors like administration, communication, decision making, and an overall performance rating.
2) Examples of performance review phrases for evaluating a sponsorship manager's attitude, creativity, decision making, interpersonal skills, and other qualities.
3) An overview of the top 12 methods for sponsorship manager performance appraisal, including management by objectives, critical incident method, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback.
This document contains materials for evaluating the job performance of an assurance associate, including:
1) A 4-page performance evaluation form with ratings for various job criteria like administration, communication, teamwork, and decision making.
2) A list of 6 performance appraisal resources from a website.
3) 3 sections of performance review phrases for an assurance associate, focusing on attitudes, creativity/innovation, and decision making.
This document contains a job performance evaluation form for an account specialist. It includes sections to rate an employee's performance on various factors such as administration, communication, teamwork, and customer service. It also includes spaces for noting employee strengths, areas for improvement, and signatures. The subsequent pages provide additional resources for performance evaluations, including example phrases to use in evaluations and descriptions of key performance indicators and job responsibilities for an account specialist.
This document contains information about performance evaluation forms and methods for evaluating a dispatch coordinator's job performance. It includes a sample performance evaluation form with rating scales for evaluating an employee on various performance factors. It also lists the top 12 methods for performance appraisal, such as management by objectives, critical incident method, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback. Sample phrases for performance reviews on topics like attitude, decision-making, problem-solving, and teamwork are also provided.
This document provides information and resources for evaluating the performance of a business director, including:
1. A 4-page job performance evaluation form for a business director, with sections to rate their performance on factors like administration, communication, decision-making, and suggest areas for improvement.
2. Examples of positive and negative phrases to use in a performance review for a business director in areas such as attitude, creativity, decision-making, and problem-solving.
3. An overview of the top 12 methods for evaluating a business director's performance, such as management by objectives, critical incident method, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback.
This document contains materials for evaluating the performance of an integration manager, including:
1) A 4-page performance evaluation form with ratings for various job criteria like administration, communication, decision-making, and a section for comments.
2) Several phrases that could be used in a performance review for an integration manager, focusing on attributes like attitude, creativity, problem-solving, and teamwork.
3) An overview of the top 12 methods for conducting a performance appraisal for an integration manager, such as management by objectives, critical incident, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback.
This document contains information related to performance evaluation forms and methods for commissioning managers. It includes a sample job performance evaluation form with sections for reviewing performance factors, employee strengths and accomplishments, performance areas needing improvement, and signatures. It also provides examples of performance review phrases for various factors like attitude, decision-making, problem-solving, and teamwork. Finally, it lists and describes the top 12 methods for performance appraisal, including management by objectives, critical incident, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback. The document aims to provide useful resources and templates for evaluating commissioning manager performance.
This document provides a job performance evaluation form for early childhood assistants. It includes:
- Sections to rate an assistant's performance on factors like administration, communication, teamwork, and safety using ratings of outstanding to unsatisfactory.
- Areas for commenting on an assistant's strengths, performance needing improvement, and a plan for improved performance.
- A section to review the assistant's job description.
- Sample phrases for evaluating an assistant's attitude, creativity, decision-making, and other factors.
The form allows for a thorough annual review of an early childhood assistant's job performance with ratings and comments across various criteria.
This document contains information about performance evaluation forms and methods for preschool assistants. It includes a 4-page sample performance evaluation form with sections for reviewing job performance, employee strengths and accomplishments, performance areas needing improvement, and signatures. It also lists several methods that can be used to evaluate preschool assistant performance, such as management by objectives, critical incident reporting, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback. The document provides details on how to implement some of these performance appraisal techniques.
This document contains information about performance evaluation forms and methods for courtesy officers. It includes a sample performance evaluation form with sections for identifying employee information, rating performance factors, employee strengths and areas for improvement, and signatures. It also lists phrases that can be used in performance reviews for areas such as attitude, creativity, decision-making, and problem-solving. Finally, it outlines the top 12 methods for performance appraisal, including management by objectives, critical incident, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback. The document provides tools and guidance for conducting courtesy officer performance evaluations.
This document provides information and resources for evaluating the performance of a reservations manager, including:
1. A 4-page job performance evaluation form with rating scales for evaluating various performance factors, sections for comments, objectives, and signatures.
2. Several links to free ebooks and resources on performance appraisal phrases, forms, methods, and key performance indicators (KPIs) for reservations managers.
3. Descriptions of the top 12 methods for performance appraisal, including management by objectives, critical incident, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback. Checklists and weighted checklists are also discussed.
This document contains information about performance evaluation forms and methods for specialist employees. It includes a 4-page sample performance evaluation form with sections for reviewing performance factors, employee strengths and accomplishments, areas for improvement, and signatures. It also lists the top 12 performance appraisal methods for specialists: management by objectives, critical incident, behaviorally anchored rating scales, behavioral observation scales, 360 degree feedback, and checklist/weighted checklist. Useful resources on performance phrases and KPI examples are also provided.
This document contains materials for evaluating the performance of a finance associate, including:
1) A 4-page performance evaluation form with ratings scales for evaluating an employee on factors like administration, communication, decision-making, and customer service.
2) A list of positive and negative performance review phrases for evaluating attributes like attitude, creativity, and problem-solving skills.
3) An overview of the top 12 methods for performance appraisal, such as management by objectives, critical incident, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback.
This document provides information and resources for evaluating the performance of a field coordinator. It includes a 4-page sample performance evaluation form with rating scales for evaluating employees on various performance factors. It also lists phrases that can be used in a performance review for areas like attitude, decision-making, problem-solving, and teamwork. Finally, it outlines the top 12 methods that can be used for performance appraisal, such as management by objectives, critical incident method, and 360-degree feedback. The overall document serves as a guide for organizations on how to structure a formal performance evaluation process for field coordinators.
Mohamed Khalid Ali is a mechanical engineer from Sudan with over 10 years of experience in MEP project management and design in Saudi Arabia. He holds a Bachelor's degree in Mechanical Engineering as well as PMP and RMP certifications. Currently he works as a Senior Mechanical Technical Office Engineer for a contracting company in Riyadh, where he oversees MEP project design, cost estimating, tendering, and construction management. Previously he has held roles as an MEP Project Engineer and Site Engineer for other companies.
This document contains information about performance evaluation forms and methods for evaluating a dispatch coordinator's job performance. It includes a sample performance evaluation form with rating scales for evaluating an employee on various performance factors. It also lists the top 12 methods for performance appraisal, such as management by objectives, critical incident method, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback. Sample phrases for performance reviews on topics like attitude, decision-making, problem-solving, and teamwork are also provided.
This document provides information and resources for evaluating the performance of a business director, including:
1. A 4-page job performance evaluation form for a business director, with sections to rate their performance on factors like administration, communication, decision-making, and suggest areas for improvement.
2. Examples of positive and negative phrases to use in a performance review for a business director in areas such as attitude, creativity, decision-making, and problem-solving.
3. An overview of the top 12 methods for evaluating a business director's performance, such as management by objectives, critical incident method, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback.
This document contains materials for evaluating the performance of an integration manager, including:
1) A 4-page performance evaluation form with ratings for various job criteria like administration, communication, decision-making, and a section for comments.
2) Several phrases that could be used in a performance review for an integration manager, focusing on attributes like attitude, creativity, problem-solving, and teamwork.
3) An overview of the top 12 methods for conducting a performance appraisal for an integration manager, such as management by objectives, critical incident, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback.
This document contains information related to performance evaluation forms and methods for commissioning managers. It includes a sample job performance evaluation form with sections for reviewing performance factors, employee strengths and accomplishments, performance areas needing improvement, and signatures. It also provides examples of performance review phrases for various factors like attitude, decision-making, problem-solving, and teamwork. Finally, it lists and describes the top 12 methods for performance appraisal, including management by objectives, critical incident, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback. The document aims to provide useful resources and templates for evaluating commissioning manager performance.
This document provides a job performance evaluation form for early childhood assistants. It includes:
- Sections to rate an assistant's performance on factors like administration, communication, teamwork, and safety using ratings of outstanding to unsatisfactory.
- Areas for commenting on an assistant's strengths, performance needing improvement, and a plan for improved performance.
- A section to review the assistant's job description.
- Sample phrases for evaluating an assistant's attitude, creativity, decision-making, and other factors.
The form allows for a thorough annual review of an early childhood assistant's job performance with ratings and comments across various criteria.
This document contains information about performance evaluation forms and methods for preschool assistants. It includes a 4-page sample performance evaluation form with sections for reviewing job performance, employee strengths and accomplishments, performance areas needing improvement, and signatures. It also lists several methods that can be used to evaluate preschool assistant performance, such as management by objectives, critical incident reporting, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback. The document provides details on how to implement some of these performance appraisal techniques.
This document contains information about performance evaluation forms and methods for courtesy officers. It includes a sample performance evaluation form with sections for identifying employee information, rating performance factors, employee strengths and areas for improvement, and signatures. It also lists phrases that can be used in performance reviews for areas such as attitude, creativity, decision-making, and problem-solving. Finally, it outlines the top 12 methods for performance appraisal, including management by objectives, critical incident, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback. The document provides tools and guidance for conducting courtesy officer performance evaluations.
This document provides information and resources for evaluating the performance of a reservations manager, including:
1. A 4-page job performance evaluation form with rating scales for evaluating various performance factors, sections for comments, objectives, and signatures.
2. Several links to free ebooks and resources on performance appraisal phrases, forms, methods, and key performance indicators (KPIs) for reservations managers.
3. Descriptions of the top 12 methods for performance appraisal, including management by objectives, critical incident, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback. Checklists and weighted checklists are also discussed.
This document contains information about performance evaluation forms and methods for specialist employees. It includes a 4-page sample performance evaluation form with sections for reviewing performance factors, employee strengths and accomplishments, areas for improvement, and signatures. It also lists the top 12 performance appraisal methods for specialists: management by objectives, critical incident, behaviorally anchored rating scales, behavioral observation scales, 360 degree feedback, and checklist/weighted checklist. Useful resources on performance phrases and KPI examples are also provided.
This document contains materials for evaluating the performance of a finance associate, including:
1) A 4-page performance evaluation form with ratings scales for evaluating an employee on factors like administration, communication, decision-making, and customer service.
2) A list of positive and negative performance review phrases for evaluating attributes like attitude, creativity, and problem-solving skills.
3) An overview of the top 12 methods for performance appraisal, such as management by objectives, critical incident, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback.
This document provides information and resources for evaluating the performance of a field coordinator. It includes a 4-page sample performance evaluation form with rating scales for evaluating employees on various performance factors. It also lists phrases that can be used in a performance review for areas like attitude, decision-making, problem-solving, and teamwork. Finally, it outlines the top 12 methods that can be used for performance appraisal, such as management by objectives, critical incident method, and 360-degree feedback. The overall document serves as a guide for organizations on how to structure a formal performance evaluation process for field coordinators.
Mohamed Khalid Ali is a mechanical engineer from Sudan with over 10 years of experience in MEP project management and design in Saudi Arabia. He holds a Bachelor's degree in Mechanical Engineering as well as PMP and RMP certifications. Currently he works as a Senior Mechanical Technical Office Engineer for a contracting company in Riyadh, where he oversees MEP project design, cost estimating, tendering, and construction management. Previously he has held roles as an MEP Project Engineer and Site Engineer for other companies.
This document provides an overview of an independent evaluation of the National Community Hubs Program in Australia. The evaluation aimed to determine if the program was being delivered as intended. It involved interviews, focus groups, site visits to 17 hub sites across 3 states, and a social network analysis. The evaluation found that while hubs faced challenges in their first year, many were succeeding in connecting migrant families to services and improving social inclusion. It provided recommendations to strengthen support for hub leaders, professional development, and evaluation of the program.
The document provides information about pharmaceutical packaging processes and machinery. It discusses tube filling, cartoning, bundling/wrapping, and other packaging processes used in the pharmaceutical industry. Tube filling machines use pneumatic components like cylinders and solenoid valves to automatically fill tubes with creams, gels, or liquids. Cartoning machines similarly use pneumatics to transfer filled products into cartons. Bundling machines wrap groups of cartons in film using cylinders for cutting, heating, and collating. Pneumatic components are critical for automating pharmaceutical packaging operations at high speeds.
Electrical load forecasting using Hijri causal eventsMaged M. ElJazzar
1. M. M. Elgazzar and E. E. Hemayed, "Electrical load forecasting using Hijri causal events," 2016 Eighteenth International Middle East Power Systems Conference (MEPCON), Cairo, Egypt, 2016, pp. 902-906.
This document summarizes the restructuring of the library at The Hills Grammar School in Australia to create a new center called NEXUS. NEXUS combines the library with IT services to focus on new ways of learning through collaboration and integrating information literacy and technology into the curriculum. An action research project was conducted with Year 7 English classes to evaluate the success of collaborative teaching between subject teachers and NEXUS professionals and to assess changes in student information literacy skills.
The pilot evaluation assessed the effectiveness of the National Community Hubs Program's outcomes evaluation framework using surveys, interviews, and focus groups across six hub sites in Victoria and New South Wales. The results indicate the hubs are successfully meeting their objectives of improving outcomes for children, families, schools, and community services. Families reported high satisfaction with the hubs and most felt their children's English, literacy, and attitude toward school had improved. Teachers, principals, and other stakeholders also observed positive impacts on children. The hubs were found to be delivering programs and services effectively according to the place-based, citizen-centric model. Therefore, the evaluation framework was deemed suitable for tracking the progress of the National Community Hubs Program in
This very short document does not contain enough information to generate a meaningful 3 sentence summary. It only contains the word "Link" repeated three times without any other context.
The Slow-Carb Diet document outlines a 6-day per week diet plan that aims to rapidly burn fat by avoiding fatty foods and following metabolism hacking techniques. Key aspects of the plan include sticking to approved low-fat foods, eating the same meals for breakfast and lunch, avoiding drinks with calories, starting the day with protein, and not eating fruit, with a weekly "cheat" day also included for additional weight loss support.
This document discusses organizational justice and its impact on employee performance and reducing conflicts. It begins with an abstract noting that organizational justice plays a significant role in human resources decisions around hiring, promotions, etc. and how this impacts employee motivation and productivity.
The introduction discusses how employees are important assets for organizations and how organizational justice relates to fairness in decisions like hiring, promotions, and compensation. It notes that distributive and procedural justice help motivate employees.
The literature review discusses how strategic human resource management and organizational justice can reduce conflicts between employees by establishing fair policies on rewards and compensation. It also discusses how employee job performance and outcomes relate to their motivation levels and treatment within the organization.
This document is the GNU Library General Public License which grants users freedom to share and modify libraries and any programs that use the library. It allows users to copy and distribute verbatim copies of the license and modify libraries as long as they comply with the terms of distributing the source code and ensuring the same freedoms are granted to others. The license is intended to guarantee users' freedom to use, modify and share libraries and any works based on the library.
This document provides recommendations for websites that are helpful for listening practice. It outlines 5 options that offer authentic listening materials on current topics from around the world. These websites provide opportunities to improve listening skills through online courses, news reports, and tasks at different difficulty levels while also developing note-taking abilities and focusing on various topics. They are suitable for many English levels and allow interacting with others while listening.
Over the past decade, UNDP has supported disaster risk governance (DRG) in 125 countries through projects focused on strengthening institutional and legal frameworks for disaster risk reduction. A review of UNDP's work in 17 countries found that the organization has helped establish national platforms for DRG, supported mainstreaming of DRR into sectoral policies and budgets, and promoted community-based disaster risk management. Key achievements include the adoption of new laws and plans to decentralize DRR responsibilities. However, challenges remain in fully integrating DRR at local levels due to capacity and resource gaps. Going forward, UNDP is well positioned to further disaster risk governance by clarifying its conceptual approach, transforming programming to focus on local implementation, and supporting post-
Refugee Children's Health Forum March 2015 ResourceCallie Miratana
This document provides contact information and relevant web links for speakers at a forum on supporting immigrant and refugee communities. It lists the names, roles, contact details, and websites of representatives from organizations like Best Start, South Eastern Medicare Local, Royal Children's Hospital Monash Refugee Health, Foundation House, VicSeg New Futures, Cardinia Combined Churches Caring, AMES, SMRC HIPPY Program, and Victorian Legal Aid. The websites contain information on programs, services, resources, referrals, and more for working with immigrant and refugee communities.
Freshwater management in China-A case study of the Beijing supplying Miyun re...Jonas Misimi
This document provides background information on a case study of the Miyun Reservoir (MYR) in China, which supplies one-third of Beijing's freshwater. It describes the study site, including the climate, water situation, and administrative system in the region. The document also outlines the objectives of assessing polluting activities and protection measures in the MYR catchment area, and analyzing the organizational framework for freshwater protection. It presents the materials and methods used, including interviews with stakeholders, literature review, and data analysis using a SWOT framework.
City Rail Link sustainabiilty annual review 2015 - 2016Samantha Beneke
The City Rail Link project in Auckland, New Zealand is aiming for sustainability in its construction and operations. It has adopted the Infrastructure Sustainability rating framework to guide its efforts. Some highlights so far include targeting zero waste to landfill, monthly monitoring of resource use, and efficiency initiatives estimated to save hundreds of thousands of litres of diesel. The project also aims to contribute social benefits through training and employment opportunities.
The document is a quarterly newsletter from HEPS Uganda covering January to March 2015. It discusses several of HEPS' projects over this period including capacity building for advocacy, accountability in health services, addressing stockouts of contraceptives, advocating to extend the TRIPS transition period to improve access to medicines, and orienting new staff. It also notes Uganda's heavy reliance on donors for health funding.
Training consultant perfomance appraisal 2tonychoper2204
This document contains materials for evaluating the job performance of a training consultant, including:
1) A 4-page performance evaluation form with ratings for various performance factors and sections for comments.
2) A list of online resources for performance appraisal materials like phrases, forms, and tips.
3) Sample performance review phrases for evaluating a training consultant's attitude, creativity, decision-making, and other skills.
The evaluation form and phrases are intended to help managers objectively assess and document a training consultant's work performance in various areas.
This document contains information about performance evaluation methods for education specialists, including example phrases and a discussion of various appraisal techniques. It provides descriptions of 12 common performance appraisal methods: management by objectives, critical incident method, behaviorally anchored rating scales, behavioral observation scales, 360 degree appraisal, and weighted checklist method. Example phrases for evaluating attitude, creativity, decision-making, interpersonal skills, problem-solving, and teamwork are also included. The document appears to be a reference guide for education specialists and their supervisors on conducting performance reviews.
This document provides information and resources for evaluating the performance of a training coordinator. It includes a 4-page sample performance evaluation form with rating scales for evaluating an employee on various performance factors. It also gives examples of positive and negative phrases for evaluating attributes such as attitude, creativity, decision-making, interpersonal skills, problem-solving, and teamwork. Finally, it outlines the top 12 methods for performance appraisal, including management by objectives, critical incident, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback. The overall document serves as a guide for organizations on how to structure a training coordinator's performance review.
This document contains materials for evaluating the performance of a literacy coordinator, including:
1) A 4-page job performance evaluation form with ratings for various performance factors like administration, communication, decision-making, and an overall performance rating.
2) Examples of performance review phrases for evaluating a literacy coordinator's attitude, creativity, decision-making, interpersonal skills, and other qualities.
3) An overview of the top 12 methods for performance appraisal, including management by objectives, critical incident method, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback.
Principal consultant perfomance appraisal 2tonychoper4604
The document contains a job performance evaluation form for principal consultants. It includes sections to rate employees on various performance factors like administration, communication, teamwork, and decision making. It provides definitions for performance ratings of outstanding, exceeds expectations, meets expectations, below expectations, and unsatisfactory. The form also includes sections for employee strengths, areas for improvement, and a plan of action. Additional pages provide useful links and examples of phrases for performance appraisals focused on attitude, creativity, and decision making.
This document provides information and resources for evaluating the performance of a curriculum specialist. It includes a sample job performance evaluation form with rating scales for evaluating various performance factors such as administration, knowledge, communication, teamwork, and decision-making. It also provides examples of performance review phrases for different evaluation criteria, including attitude, creativity, decision-making, interpersonal skills, and problem-solving. Finally, it outlines the top 12 methods that can be used for performance appraisal, such as management by objectives, critical incident, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback. The resources aim to help managers conduct comprehensive yet structured performance evaluations of curriculum specialists.
This document provides information and resources for evaluating the job performance of an education assistant. It includes a 4-page sample job performance evaluation form with sections for reviewing performance factors, employee strengths and accomplishments, areas for improvement, and signatures. It also lists the top 12 methods for performance appraisal, such as management by objectives, critical incident, behaviorally anchored rating scales, behavioral observation scales, and 360-degree feedback. A variety of phrases for evaluating different job skills like attitude, creativity, decision-making, and teamwork are also presented.
This document provides information and resources for evaluating the job performance of an education administrator. It includes a sample performance evaluation form with rating scales for evaluating an administrator on various performance factors like administration, communication, decision-making, and customer service. It also gives examples of positive and negative phrases for evaluating skills such as attitude, creativity, problem-solving, and teamwork. Finally, it outlines several methods that can be used in performance appraisals, such as management by objectives, critical incident reporting, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and 360-degree feedback. The goal is to help managers properly evaluate and provide feedback to education administrators.
The document provides information on performance evaluation methods for junior consultants. It discusses 12 common methods: management by objectives, critical incident method, behaviorally anchored rating scales, behavioral observation scales, 360 degree appraisal, and checklist and weighted checklist method. For each method, it provides a definition and overview, as well as examples of advantages and disadvantages. The document aims to outline effective approaches for evaluating junior consultant performance.
This document provides information and resources for evaluating the job performance of an employment consultant. It includes a 4-page sample job performance evaluation form with sections for reviewing performance factors, employee strengths and accomplishments, areas for improvement, and signatures. It also lists the top 12 methods for performance appraisal, such as management by objectives, critical incident, behaviorally anchored rating scales, behavioral observation scales, and 360 degree feedback. Examples of performance review phrases are given for various factors like attitude, creativity, decision-making, interpersonal skills, problem-solving, and teamwork.
The document provides materials for evaluating the job performance of a training executive, including:
1) A 4-page performance evaluation form with ratings scales for evaluating an employee's performance on factors like administration, communication, decision-making, and safety.
2) Links to additional online resources for performance appraisals like sample phrases and forms.
3) Sample performance review phrases for evaluating an employee's attitude, creativity, and decision-making skills.
Similar to Educational consultant performance appraisal (20)
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
Thinking of getting a dog? Be aware that breeds like Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds can be loyal and dangerous. Proper training and socialization are crucial to preventing aggressive behaviors. Ensure safety by understanding their needs and always supervising interactions. Stay safe, and enjoy your furry friends!
3. Job Performance Evaluation Form Page 3
I. Educational consultant performance form
Name:
Evaluation Period:
Title: Date:
PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND RESULTS
Performance Review
Use a current job description (job descriptions are available on the HR web page).
Rate the person's level of performance, using the definitions below.
Review with employee each performance factor used to evaluate his/her work performance.
Give an overall rating in the space provided, using the definitions below as a guide.
Performance Rating Definitions
The following ratings must be used to ensure commonality of language and consistency on
overall ratings: (There should be supporting comments to justify ratings of “Outstanding” “Below Expectations,
and “Unsatisfactory”)
Outstanding Performance is consistently superior
Exceeds Expectations Performance is routinely above job requirements
Meets Expectations Performance is regularly competent and dependable
Below Expectations Performance fails to meet job requirements on a frequent basis
Unsatisfactory Performance is consistently unacceptable
A. PERFORMANCE FACTORS(use job description as basis of this evaluation).
Administration - Measures effectiveness in planning,
organizing and efficiently handling activities and eliminating
unnecessary activities
Outstanding
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
BelowExpectations
4. Job Performance Evaluation Form Page 4
Unsatisfactory
NA
Knowledge of Work - Consider employee's skill level,
knowledge and understanding of all phases of the job and
those requiring improved skills and/or experience.
Outstanding
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
BelowExpectations
Unsatisfactory
NA
Communication - Measures effectiveness in listening to
others, expressing ideas, both orally and in writing and
providing relevant and timely information to management,
co-workers, subordinates and customers.
Outstanding
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
BelowExpectations
Unsatisfactory
NA
Teamwork - Measures how well this individual gets along
with fellow employees, respects the rights of other
employees and shows a cooperative spirit.
Outstanding
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
BelowExpectations
Unsatisfactory
NA
Decision Making/Problem Solving - Measures
effectiveness in understanding problems and making timely,
practical decisions.
Outstanding
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
Below Expectations
Unsatisfactory
NA
Expense Management - Measures effectiveness in
establishing appropriate reporting and control procedures;
operating efficiently at lowest cost; staying within
established budgets.
Outstanding
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
BelowExpectations
Unsatisfactory
NA
Human Resource Management - Measures effectiveness in
selecting qualified people; evaluating subordinates'
performance; strengths and development needs; providing
constructive feedback, and taking appropriate and timely
action with marginal or unsatisfactory performers. Also
considers efforts to further the university goal of equal
employment opportunity.
Outstanding
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
BelowExpectations
Unsatisfactory
NA
Independent Action - Measures effectiveness in time
management; initiative and independent action within
prescribed limits.
Outstanding
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
BelowExpectations
Unsatisfactory
NA
Job Knowledge - Measures effectiveness in keeping
knowledgeable of methods, techniques and skills required
in own job and related functions; remaining current on new
Outstanding
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
BelowExpectations
5. Job Performance Evaluation Form Page 5
developments affecting SPSU and its work activities. Unsatisfactory
NA
Leadership - Measures effectiveness in accomplishing
work assignments through subordinates; establishing
challenging goals; delegating and coordinating effectively;
promoting innovation and team effort.
Outstanding
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
BelowExpectations
Unsatisfactory
NA
Managing Change and Improvement - Measures
effectiveness in initiating changes, adapting to necessary
changes from old methods when they are no longer
practical, identifying new methods and generating
improvement in facility's performance.
Outstanding
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
BelowExpectations
Unsatisfactory
NA
Customer Responsiveness - Measures responsiveness and
courtesy in dealing with internal staff, external customers
and vendors; employee projects a courteous manner.
Outstanding
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
BelowExpectations
Unsatisfactory
NA
Personal Appearance - Measures neatness and personal
hygiene appropriate to position.
Outstanding
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
BelowExpectations
Unsatisfactory
NA
Dependability - Measures how well employee complies
with instructions and performs under unusual
circumstances; consider record of attendance and
punctuality.
Outstanding
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
Below Expectations
Unsatisfactory
NA
Safety - Measures individual's work habits and attitudes as
they apply to working safely. Consider their contribution to
accident prevention, safety awareness, ability to care for
SPSU property and keep workspace safe and tidy.
Outstanding
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
BelowExpectations
Unsatisfactory
NA
Employee's Responsiveness - Measures responsiveness in
completing job tasks in a timely manner.
Outstanding
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
Below Expectations
Unsatisfactory
NA
B. EMPLOYEE STRENGTHS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS:Include those which are relevant
during this evaluation period. This should be related to performance or behavioral
aspects you appreciated in their performance.
6. Job Performance Evaluation Form Page 6
C. PERFORMANCE AREAS WHICH NEED IMPROVEMENT:
D. PLAN OF ACTION TOWARD IMPROVED PERFORMANCE:
7. Job Performance Evaluation Form Page 7
E. EMPLOYEE COMMENTS:
F. JOB DESCRIPTION REVIEW SECTION: (Please check the appropriate box.)
Employee job description has been reviewed during this evaluation and no changes
have been made to the job description at this time.
Employee job description has been reviewed during this evaluation and modifications
have been proposed to the job description. The modified job description is attached to
this evaluation.
G. SIGNATURES:
Employee Date
(Signature does not necessarily denote agreement with official review and means only that theemployee was
given theopportunity to discuss theofficial review with thesupervisor.)
Evaluated by Date
Reviewed by Date
8. Job Performance Evaluation Form Page 8
II. Educational consultant performance phrases
1.Attitude Performance Review Examples – educational consultant
Positive review
Holly has one of those attitudes that is always positive. She frequently has a smile on her
face and you can tell she enjoys her job.
Greg is a cheerful guy who always makes you feel delighted when you’re around him.
We are fortunate to have Greg on our team.
Thom has an even demeanor through good times and bad. His constant cheer helps others
keep their “enthusiasm” – both positive and negative – in check.
Negative review
Jim frequently gives off “an air” of superiority to his coworkers. He is not approachable
and is rough to work with.
Bill has a dreadful outlook at times which has a tendency to bring down the entire team.
For the most part, Lenny is a personable guy, but when he gets upset, his attitude turns
shocking. Lenny needs to balance his personality out and not react so much to negative
events.
2.Creativity and Innovation Performance Review Phrases for educational consultant
Positive review
Sally has a creative touch in a sometimes monotonous role within our team – the way she
adds inspiration to the day to day tasks she performs is admirable.
When a major problem arises, we frequently turn to Jon for his creativity in solving
problems. The way he can look at an issue from different sides is a great resource to our
team.
Whenever we need a fresh look at a problem, we know we can turn to Julia for a novel
perspective.
9. Job Performance Evaluation Form Page 9
Negative review
Paul’s team feels discouraged as he often “shoots down” creative ideas without any
explanation. Paul should be more willing to listen to ideas before he rejects them outright.
Jean does not tap into the creative side of her team and consistently overlooks the
innovate employees reporting to her.
Kevin has a difficult time thinking “outside of the box” and creating new and untested
solutions.
3.Performance review phrases for decision making – educational consultant
Positive performance review phrases for decision making
A person with good decision-making skills should be a person:
• Be able to make sound fact-based judgments;
• Be able to work out multiple alternative solutions and determined the most suitable one;
• Be objective in considering a fact or situation;
• Be firm to not let the individual emotion and feeling affect on the made decision;
Negative performance review phrases for decision making
• Be hesitant in making decision and too much cautious in making the final decision which often
results in wrong decision;
• Apply complex and impractical approaches in solving problems;
• Fail to make a short-list of solutions recommended by direct units;
• Be paralyzed and confused when facing tight deadlines to make decisions;
4.Interpersonal Skills Performance ReviewPhrases – educational consultant
Positive review
Ben has a natural rapport with people and does very well at communicating with others.
Sally has a knack for making people feel important when she speaks with them. This
translates into great opportunities for teamwork and connections to form.
10. Job Performance Evaluation Form Page 10
Jack makes people feel at home with him. His natural ability to work with people is a
great asset to our team.
Negative review
Tim does not understand how crucial good working relationships with fellow team
members are.
John has an excellent impression among the management team, yet his fellow team
members cannot stand working with him.
Paula seems to shrink when she’s around others and does not cultivate good relations
with her co-workers.
5.Problem Solving Skills Employee Evaluation Examples – educational consultant
Positive review
Greg’s investigative skills has provided a key resource for a team focused on solving
glitches. His ability to quickly assess a problem and identify potential solutions is key to
his excellent performance.
Frank examines a problem and quickly identifies potential solutions – and then makes a
recommendation as to what solution to pursue.
Rachel understands the testing process and how to discover a solution to a particular
problem.
Negative review
Joan is poor at communicating problem status before it becomes a crisis.
Bill can offer up potential solutions to a problem, but struggles to identify the best
solution.
Unraveling a problem to discuss the core issues is a skill Janet lacks.
Peter resists further training in problem solving, believing he is proficient, yet lacking in
many areas.
In his technical role, we turn to James often to solve problems. He seems slow and
indecisive when presented with a major issue.
11. Job Performance Evaluation Form Page 11
6.Teamwork Skills Performance Appraisal Phrases – educational consultant
Positive review
Harry manages his relationships with his coworkers, managers, and employees in a
professional manner.
Tom contributes to the success of the team on a regular basis.
Ben isn’t concerned about who gets the credit, just that the task gets accomplished.
Mary is a team player and understands how to help others in times of need.
Peter is the consummate team player.
Negative review
Bill does not assist his teammates as required.
Ryan holds on to too much and does not delegate to his team effectively.
Bryan focuses on getting his own work accomplished, but does not take the time to help
those members of his team who are struggling to keep up.
Peter was very good at teamwork when he was just a member of the team, now that he is
in a supervisory role, Peter has lost much of those teamwork skills.
Lyle works with the team well when his own projects are coming due and he needs help,
but once those are accomplished, he does not frequently help others on their projects.
12. Job Performance Evaluation Form Page 12
III.Top 12 methods for educational consultant performance
appraisal:
1.Management by Objectives (MBO) Method
This is one of the best methods for the judgment of an employee's performance, where the
managers and employees set a particular objective for employees and evaluate their performance
periodically. After the goal is achieved, the employees are also rewarded according to the results.
This performance appraisal method of management by objectives depends on accomplishing the
goal rather than how it is accomplished.
-----------------------------
MBO Features
MBO emphasizes participatively set goals that are tangible, verifiable and measurable.
MBO focuses attention on what must be accomplished (goals) rather than how it is to be
accomplished (methods).
MBO, by concentrating on key result areas translates the abstract philosophy of management
into concrete phraseology. The technique can be put to general use (non-specialist technique).
Further it is “a dynamic system which seeks to integrate the company's need to clarify and
achieve its profit and growth targets with the manager's need to contribute and develop
himself”.
MBO is a systematic and rational technique that allows management to attain maximum
results from available resources by focusing on achievable goals. It allows the subordinate
plenty of room to make creative decisions on his own.
-----------------------------
13. Job Performance Evaluation Form Page 13
2.Critical Incident Method
In this method, the manager writes down the positive and negative behavioral performance of the
employees. This is done throughout the performance period and the final report is submitted as
the assessment of the employees. This method helps employees in managing their performance
and improves the quality of their work.
-----------------------------
Disadvantages of critical Incident
This method suffers however from the following limitations:
• Critical incidents technique of evaluation is applied to evaluate the performance of superiors
rather than of peers of subordinates.
• Negative incidents may be more noticeable than positive incidents.
• It results in very close supervision which may not be liked by the employee.
• The recording of incidents may be a chore for the manager concerned, who may be too busy or
forget to do it.
• The supervisors have a tendency to unload a series of complaints about incidents during an
annual performance review session.
-----------------------------
3.Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS)
The BARS method is used to describe a rating of the employee's performance which focuses on
the specific behavior as indicators of effective and ineffective performance. This method is
usually a combination of two other methods namely, the rating scale and critical incident
technique of employee evaluation.
-----------------------------
Rating scales for BARs
Each behavior can rate at one of 7 scales as follows (you can set scales depend on your
requirements)
• Extremely poor (1 points)
• Poor (2 points)
• Below average (3 points)
• Average (4 points)
• Above average (5 points)
• Good (6 points)
• Extremely good (7 points)
-----------------------------
4.Behavioral Observation Scales (BOS)
It is defined as the frequency rating of critical incidents which the employee has performed over
a specific duration in the organization. It was developed because methods like graphic rating
scales and behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) depend on vague judgments made by the
supervisors about employees.
14. Job Performance Evaluation Form Page 14
-----------------------------
5.360 Degree Performance Appraisal Method
The definition of this performance evaluation method is that, it is a system or process wherein
the employees receive some performance feedback examples, which are anonymous and
confidential from co-workers. This process is conducted by managers and subordinates who,
through 360 degrees, measure certain factors about the employees. These are behavior and
competence, skills such as listening, planning and goal-setting, teamwork, character, and
leadership effectiveness.
-----------------------------
Advantages of 360 degree appraisal
• Offer a more comprehensive view towards the performance of employees.
• Improve credibility of performance appraisal.
• Such colleague’s feedback will help strengthen self-development.
• Increases responsibilities of employees to their customers.
• The mix of ideas can give a more accurate assessment.
• Opinions gathered from lots of staff are sure to be more persuasive.
• Not only manager should make assessments on its staff performance but other colleagues
should do, too.
• People who undervalue themselves are often motivated by feedback from others.
• If more staff takes part in the process of performance appraisal, the organizational culture of the
company will become more honest.
-----------------------------
6.Checklist and Weighted Checklist Method
The checklist method comprises a list of set objectives and statements about the employee's
behavior. For example, leadership skills, on-time delivery, innovation, etc. If the appraiser
believes that the employee possesses the trait mentioned in the checklist, he puts a tick in front of
it. If he thinks the employee doesn't have a particular trait he will leave it blank and mentions
about it in the improvement column. Weighted checklist is a variation of the checklist method
where a value is allotted to each question. The value of each question can differ based on its
importance. The total score from the checklist is taken into consideration for evaluating the
employee's performance. It poses a strong threat of bias on the appraiser's end. Though this
method is highly time-consuming and complex, it is widely used for performance evaluation.
-----------------------------
Advantages and disadvantages of weighted checklist
• This method help the manager in evaluation of the performance of the employee.
• The rater may be biased in distinguishing the positive and negative questions. He may assign
biased weights to the questions.
• This method also is expensive and time consuming.
15. Job Performance Evaluation Form Page 15
• It becomes difficult for the manager to assemble, analyze and weigh a number of statements
about the employee’s characteristics, contributions and behaviors.
-----------------------------
7.Graphic Rating Scale Method
Graphic rating scale is one of the most frequently used performance evaluation methods. A
simple printed form enlists the traits of the employees required for completing the task
efficiently. They are then rated based on the degree to which an employee represents a particular
trait that affects the quantity and quality of work. A rating scale is adopted and implemented for
judging each trait of the employee. The merit of using this method is that it is easy to calculate
the rating. However, a major drawback of this method is that each characteristic is given equal
weight and the evaluation may be subjective.
-----------------------------
Advantages and Disadvantage of the rating scales
Advantages of the rating scales
• Graphic rating scales are less time consuming to develop.
• They also allow for quantitative comparison.
Disadvantages of the rating scales
• Different supervisors will use the same graphic scales in slightly different ways.
• One way to get around the ambiguity inherent in graphic rating scales is to use behavior based
scales, in which specific work related behaviors are assessed.
• More validity comparing workers ratings from a single supervisor than comparing two workers
who were rated by different supervisors.
-----------------------------
8.Comparative Evaluation Method
Two ways are used to make a comparative evaluation, namely, the simple ranking method and
the paired comparison method. In the simple or straight ranking method the employee is rated by
the evaluator on a scale of best to worst. However, the evaluator may be biased and may not
judge the overall performance effectively in the absence of fixed criteria. This kind of evaluation
may be more opinion-based than fact-based.
Under the paired comparison method, the overall performance of one individual is directly
compared with that of the other on the basis of a common criterion. This comparison is all
evasive and not job-specific. While some employees emerge as clear front runners, there are
others who seem to be lagging behind. This is not a popular evaluation system as employers do
not want to encourage discrimination. This is useful in companies which have a limited number
of promotions or funds.
-----------------------------
16. Job Performance Evaluation Form Page 16
Steps to conduct paired comparison analysis
• List the options you will compare (elements as A, B, C, D, E for example).
• Create a table 6 rows and 7 column.
• Write down option to column and row; A to row second, cell first from left and A to row first,
cell second from left; B to row third, cell first from left and B to row first, cell third from left etc;
column seventh is total point.
• Identify importance from 0 (no difference) to 3 (major difference).
• Compare element “A” to B, C, D, E and place “point” at each cell.
• Finally, consolidate the results by adding up the total of all the values for each of the options.
You may want to convert these values into a percentage of the total score.
-----------------------------
9.Forced Choice Method
In this method, the appraiser is asked to choose from two pairing statements which may appear
equally positive and negative. However, the statements dictate the performance of the employee.
An excellent example of this can be "works harder" and "works smarter". The appraiser selects a
statement without having knowledge of the favorable or the unfavorable one. This method works
in companies where the appraiser shows a tendency to under-evaluate or over-evaluate the
employees. Also, it is very costly to implement and does not serve the purpose of developing the
employees. It can also frustrate the appraiser as he does not know which is the right option.
-----------------------------
10.Forced Distribution Method
In this method, the appraiser rates employees according to a specific distribution. For example,
out of a set of 5 employees, 2 will get evaluated as high, 2 will get evaluated as average while 1
will be in the low category. This method has several benefits as it tries to eliminate the leniency
and central tendency of the appraiser. However, its biggest drawback is the fact that it
encourages discrimination among the employees. Another major problem with this method is
that it dictates that there will be forced distribution of grades even when all the employees are
doing a good job.
-----------------------------
Advantages and disadvantages of forced Ranking
Advantages:
• They force reluctant managers to make difficult decisions and identify the most and least
talented members of the work group.
• They create and sustain a high performance culture in which the workforce continuously
improves.
Disadvantages
• They increase unhealthy cut-throat competitiveness;
• They discourage collaboration and teamwork;
• They harm morale;
• They are legally suspect giving rise to age discrimination cases.
17. Job Performance Evaluation Form Page 17
-----------------------------
11.Essay Evaluation Method
In the essay method of evaluation the appraiser writes an elaborate statement about the employee
who is being evaluated. He mentions the employee's strengths and weaknesses. He also suggests
ways to improve his performance and appreciates the good qualities. This essay can be prepared
by the appraiser alone or together with the employee. As the criteria for evaluation is not defined,
it helps the appraiser to focus on the areas that actually need improvement. This open-ended
method accords flexibility and eliminates rigidity which is observed in criteria-driven
evaluations. However, it is a highly time-consuming and subjective method, and may not
necessarily work for the benefit of the organization.
-----------------------------
Essay evaluation is a non-quantitative technique
This method is advantageous in at least one sense, i.e., the essay provides a good deal of
information about the employee and also reveals more about the evaluator. The essay evaluation
method however, suffers from the following limitations:
It is highly subjective; the supervisor may write a biased essay. The employees who are
sycophants will be evaluated more favorably then other employees.
Some evaluators may be poor in writing essays on employee performance. Others may be
superficial in explanation and use flowery language which may not reflect the actual
performance of the employee. It is very difficult to find effective writers nowadays.
The appraiser is required to find time to prepare the essay. A busy appraiser may write the
essay hurriedly without properly assessing the actual performance of the worker. On the other
hand, appraiser takes a long time, this becomes uneconomical from the view point of the firm,
because the time of the evaluator (supervisor) is costly.
12.Performance Test and Observation Method
This method deals with testing the knowledge or skills of the employees. It can be implemented
in the form of a written test or can be based on the actual presentation of skills. The test must be
conceived by the human resources department and conducted by a reliable evaluator who has in-
depth knowledge about the field of the test. There can be bias if the performance is evaluated on
the presentation of skills. However, a written test can be a reliable yardstick to measure the
knowledge. Tests will also enable the management to check the potential of employees.
However, if the human resources department decides to outsource the compilation of the test, it
may incur additional cost for the organization.
18. Job Performance Evaluation Form Page 18
Fields/positions related to performance appraisal:
The above performance appraisal can be used for fields as:
construction, manufacturing, healthcare, non profit, advertising, agile, architecture, automotive,
agency, budget, building, business development, consulting, communication, clinical research,
design, software development, product development, interior design, web development,
engineering, education, events, electrical, exhibition, energy, ngo, finance, fashion, green card,
oil gas, hospital, it, marketing, media, mining, nhs, non technical, oil and gas, offshore,
pharmaceutical, real estate, retail, research, human resources, telecommunications, technology,
technical, senior, digital, software, web, clinical, hr, infrastructure, business, erp, creative, ict,
hvac, sales, quality management, uk, implementation, network, operations, architectural,
environmental, crm, website, interactive, security, supply chain, logistics, training, project
management, administrative management…
The above performance appraisal also can be used for job title levels:
entry level, junior, senior, assistant, associate, administrator, clerk, coordinator, consultant,
controller, director, engineer, executive, leader, manager, officer, specialist, supervisor, VP…