SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 13
Download to read offline
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN LEGISLATION PREPARATION PROCEDURES

GOVERNMENT MIRROR
WWW.OGLEDALONAVLADATA.MK
Marija Sazdevski, Project Officer, MCIC
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
• Article 71, of Rules of Procedure for Operation of the
  Government of the Republic of Macedonia:
  “Allstakeholders may submit their opinions, commentaries and proposals
  in the Unique National Electronic Register of Regulation regarding the
  published proposal for legislation and draft laws within 10 days from the
  day of publication.”

  “The Responsible Ministry prepares report for received opinions in which
  states the reasons why notes and proposals have not been adopted and
  publish them on ministries website and on the Unique National Electronic
  Register of Regulation”

• Instructions for involving stakeholders in legislation
  preparation procedures, adopted in 2011
  Increased number of days for consultations to 30 (Article 5)
GOVERNMENT MIRROR – MONITORING
• Monitoring period:
  March 1, 2012 – October 31, 2012
• Monitoring the public participation through the available e-
  tools
• Questionnaire 1 - communication environment provided
  by the proposer of the act for participation of civil society in
  its activity (general mechanisms for public participation)
• Questionnaire 2 - preparation of acts
  - 30 acts selected from the Annual Programme of Work of the
  Government of Republic of Macedonia
COMMUNICATION AND SUPPORT
ENVIRONMENT – QUESTIONNAIRE 1
• Indicators are formulated as statements that represent the
  standards of good public involvement
• Total of 35 indicators (15+20) - Compared to Slovenia 3 new
  indicators included
• Grades:
Grade 1 (the lowest score) (a score of 20% or less)
Grade 2                              (a score of 21% to 40%)

Grade 3                               (a score of 41% to 60%)
Grade 4                               (a score of 61% to 80%)
Grade 5 (the highest score)   (a score of 81% to 100%)
COMMUNICATION AND SUPPORT
ENVIRONMENT
• Questionnaire 1: Distributed to 23 state institutions
• Responses received from 16:
  - Ministry of Defence, Ministry of Environment and Urban Planning,
  Ministry of Local Self-Government, Ministry of Culture, Ministry of Labour
  and Social Affairs, Ministry of Transportation and Communications,
  Ministry of Internal Affairs, Ministry of Education and Science, Secretariat
  for European Affaires, Agency for Youth and Sports, Commission for
  protection against discrimination, the Secretariat for the implementation
  of the Ohrid Framework Agreement (SIOFA), Commission for Relations
  with Religious Communities, State Commission for the prevention of
  corruption (DKSK)
• No reply from 6:
  Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
  Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Health, Department for Cooperation
  with NGO; Finds itself as non-competent 1: Agency for Emigration
COMMUNICATION ENVIRONMENT -
RESULTS
    General mechanisms for public participation employed by the government body
A
    proposing the legislation
The government body                                         Points    Score     Grade
     Appoints a named person authorised to give
 1                                                           16      100%        5
     information of public character on CSOs
     Appoints coordinator to estimate the impact of
 2                                                           9       69%         4
     regulations
     Disseminates publications (periodicals / newsletters)
 3                                                           10      63%         4
     about its work
   Publishes forecasts of the start dates of preparations/
 4                                                           5       38%         2
   procedures for legislation in daily newspapers
   Publishes forecasts of the start dates of preparations/
   procedures for legislation on relevant websites (E.g..
 5                                                           11      85%         5
   ENER, the e-democracy portal, government body web-
   site)

 6 Uses other media for informing the public                 14      88%         5
COMMUNICATION ENVIRONMENT -
 RESULTS
The government body proposing the legislation wither on its web-site
                                                                          Points   Score   Grade
or via an e-newsletter:
     Publishes details and information about public participation in
 7
     specific procedures (laws, strategies etc.)                           13      81%      5
 8 Uses structured e-questionnaires to gauge public opinion                 5      31%      2
   Publishes the proposals and comments made by the public about
 9
   the work of the proposing government body                                5      31%      2
   Uses structured e-questionnaires to gauge public opinion prepared
10
   for specific legislation processes                                       5      38%      2
   Publishes answers and explanations with regard to the proposals put
11
   forward by the interested members of public                              7      54%      3
   Publishes a list of frequently asked questions and answers
12
   concerning public participation in specific cases                        3      23%      2
13
     Enables interested members of the public to sign up to a registry      2      13%      1
14 Emails interested members of the public with electronic news            12      75%      4
   Organises e-public debates (via forums, blogs, web conferences etc.)
15
   and prepares and publishes the outcomes of these debates                 8      50%      3
COMMUNICATION ENVIRONMENT -
    RESULTS
     The support environment conducive to the inclusion of civil society in the government body
B
     proposing the legislation
    • Primary bullets are 24-point
The government body proposing the legislation:                                Points   Score      Grade
      – Secondary bullets (press tab with CSOs
16 Appoints a named person authorised to cooperatekey) are            20-point
                                                                             14        88%         5
            • Tertiary bullets (press tab key again) are 16-point
17 Enables CSOs to sign up to a registry (for regular information sharing)
                                                                                4      25%         2
 • All bulleted text is non-bold
18 Invites interested CSOs to sign up/ register for receiving information
                                                                           5 31%                   2
 • Has a prepared written document (guidelines) for the inclusion of civil 4
19 All bulleted text is sentence case (capitalize first
   society organizations                                                     25%                   2
   Includes the representatives of civilonly) the governments
      letter of first word society on
20 councils or on the expert councils and commissions working with the
 • government body, even if it is not legally required to do so text 12
      Use e-Democracy red for highlight                                      75%                   4
   Includes represents of civil society in its delegations to international
21
   events                                                                       6      38%         2
   Lays down in advance a method of selecting civil society
22 representatives in instances in which the number of civil society
   representatives must be limited                                              3      19%         1
   Trains its staff about the participation of civil society in the work of
23
   government departments                                                      12      75%         4
COMMUNICATION ENVIRONMENT -
 RESULTS
      The financial support environment for the inclusion of NGOs and civil society in the procedure
      of legislation preparation
The government body proposing the legislation:                      Points        Score       Grade
  24 Finances CSOs programmes (institutional support)
                                                                       7          54%          3
  25 Finances CSOs projects (project activities)
                                                                       7          54%          3
     Has dedicated a fund available to cover the costs of CSOs
  26 representatives participating on government commissions
     etc.                                                              3          19%          1
     Has dedicated funds available for support services for the
  27 inclusion (legal consultation and information support) and
     advocacy of CSOs
                                                                       0          0%           1
  28 Offers CSOs use of premises, free of charge or subsidised
                                                                       3          19%          1
       Offers additional forms of support (hiring equipment,
  29
       training etc.)                                                  8          50%          3
COMMUNICATION ENVIRONMENT -
     RESULTS
Monitoring and evaluating the implementation of legislation
     • Primary bullets are 24-point
The government body proposing the legislation:                  Points    Score   Grade
        – Secondary bullets (press tab key) are 20-point
      Monitors and evaluates legislation implementation in its own
30
               • Tertiary
      area of operation bullets (press tab key again) are 16-point   13   81%       5
      Includes representatives of civil society in the monitoring
31
   • All bulleted text is non-bold
      and evaluation of legislation                 44%               7             3
      Publishes reports on the monitoring and evaluation of
   • All bulleted text is sentence case (capitalize first
      legislation:
32                                                  25%
      In electronic form on its web site (web site URL)               4             2
33
     letter of first word only)                     25%
      In printed hardcopy (e.g.. publication,.. etc.)                 4             2

34
   • Use e-Democracy red for highlight text
      Publishes reports on the extent to which the public has been
      included in the legislation preparation, and the impact of the
      public’s inclusion                                              1    6%       1
      At the end of the preparation of the legislation in the
35    memorandum the government body always informs the
      public on the public`s inclusion and cooperation
                                                                  8       53%       3
COMMUNICATION AND SUPPORT
ENVIRONMENT
Results by Institution (max 35 points)                      Set 1   Set 2   Total   Grade
Ministry of Labour and Social Affaires                       10      14      24       4
Agency for Youth and Sports                                  10      14      24       4
Ministry of Culture                                          11      12      23       4
Ministry of Education and Science                            11      11      22       4
Ministry of Environment and Urban Planning                   9       12      21      3
Commission for protection against discrimination*            7       7       14      3
Ministry of Local Self-Government                            10      6       16      3
Ministry of Information Society and Administration           9       7       16      3
Ministry of Defence                                          6       9       15      3
Secretariat for European Affaires*                           6       7       13      3
Secretariat for the implementation of the Ohrid Framework
                                                             3       7       11      3
Agreement (SIOFA)*
Ministry of Transport and Communications                     9       5       14      2
Ministry of Internal Affaires                                9       4       13      2
State Commission for the prevention of corruption (DKSK)*    3       6        9      2
Ministry of Economy                                          7       4       11      2
Commission for Relations with Religious Communities*         4       2       6       2
INTERNET BASED MONITORING
www.ogledalonavladata.mk
THANK YOU!
Marija Sazdevski
+389 2 3088 983
msz@mcms.mk

More Related Content

What's hot

Project results “Strengthening the role of civil society in facilitating demo...
Project results “Strengthening the role of civil society in facilitating demo...Project results “Strengthening the role of civil society in facilitating demo...
Project results “Strengthening the role of civil society in facilitating demo...Centre of Policy and Legal Reform
 
Observing local and regional elections (2016)
Observing local and regional elections (2016)Observing local and regional elections (2016)
Observing local and regional elections (2016)Council of Europe (CoE)
 
Philippine Administrative System by HCZS
Philippine Administrative System  by HCZSPhilippine Administrative System  by HCZS
Philippine Administrative System by HCZSJo Balucanag - Bitonio
 
WSIS+10 Country Reporting - LATVIA
WSIS+10 Country Reporting - LATVIAWSIS+10 Country Reporting - LATVIA
WSIS+10 Country Reporting - LATVIADr Lendy Spires
 
Local government presentation
Local    government presentationLocal    government presentation
Local government presentationFaizan Shabbir
 
Smart practices rev
Smart practices   revSmart practices   rev
Smart practices revOlena Ursu
 

What's hot (7)

Project results “Strengthening the role of civil society in facilitating demo...
Project results “Strengthening the role of civil society in facilitating demo...Project results “Strengthening the role of civil society in facilitating demo...
Project results “Strengthening the role of civil society in facilitating demo...
 
Observing local and regional elections (2016)
Observing local and regional elections (2016)Observing local and regional elections (2016)
Observing local and regional elections (2016)
 
Philippine Administrative System by HCZS
Philippine Administrative System  by HCZSPhilippine Administrative System  by HCZS
Philippine Administrative System by HCZS
 
WSIS+10 Country Reporting - LATVIA
WSIS+10 Country Reporting - LATVIAWSIS+10 Country Reporting - LATVIA
WSIS+10 Country Reporting - LATVIA
 
Devolution
DevolutionDevolution
Devolution
 
Local government presentation
Local    government presentationLocal    government presentation
Local government presentation
 
Smart practices rev
Smart practices   revSmart practices   rev
Smart practices rev
 

Similar to eDemocracy2012 Marija Sazdevski_Government_mirror_public_participation_in_legislation_preparation_procedures

Catching the deliberative wave
Catching the deliberative waveCatching the deliberative wave
Catching the deliberative waveOECD Berlin Centre
 
Gov 2.0 in Australia (WebNetowork presentation)
Gov 2.0 in Australia (WebNetowork presentation)Gov 2.0 in Australia (WebNetowork presentation)
Gov 2.0 in Australia (WebNetowork presentation)Craig Thomler
 
Blockchain for Social Impact - Moving Beyond the Hype
Blockchain for Social Impact - Moving Beyond the HypeBlockchain for Social Impact - Moving Beyond the Hype
Blockchain for Social Impact - Moving Beyond the HypeCelestial Light
 
Opportunities and challenges in e-democracy
Opportunities and challenges in e-democracyOpportunities and challenges in e-democracy
Opportunities and challenges in e-democracycarol hayward
 
Top Ideas for Governance and Institutions
Top Ideas for Governance and Institutions Top Ideas for Governance and Institutions
Top Ideas for Governance and Institutions Copenhagen_Consensus
 
Presentation at COMPACT Project event in Riga - Disinformation, Media literac...
Presentation at COMPACT Project event in Riga - Disinformation, Media literac...Presentation at COMPACT Project event in Riga - Disinformation, Media literac...
Presentation at COMPACT Project event in Riga - Disinformation, Media literac...Oles Kulchytskyy
 
Report on current policies and regulatory frameworks
Report on current policies and regulatory frameworksReport on current policies and regulatory frameworks
Report on current policies and regulatory frameworksOles Kulchytskyy
 
Trigger.eu: Cocteau game for policy making - introduction and demo
Trigger.eu: Cocteau game for policy making - introduction and demoTrigger.eu: Cocteau game for policy making - introduction and demo
Trigger.eu: Cocteau game for policy making - introduction and demoMarco Brambilla
 
20121024 measuring e government takeup
20121024 measuring e government takeup20121024 measuring e government takeup
20121024 measuring e government takeupEmilioGarciaGarcia
 
PUBLIC SECTOR &SOCIAL MOBLIZATION- nudrat mufti
 PUBLIC SECTOR &SOCIAL MOBLIZATION- nudrat mufti PUBLIC SECTOR &SOCIAL MOBLIZATION- nudrat mufti
PUBLIC SECTOR &SOCIAL MOBLIZATION- nudrat muftiNUDRAT MUFTI
 
European Policies from Open Data to Civic Engagement
European Policies from Open Data to Civic EngagementEuropean Policies from Open Data to Civic Engagement
European Policies from Open Data to Civic EngagementLuigi Reggi
 
Social watch workshop uganda
Social watch workshop  ugandaSocial watch workshop  uganda
Social watch workshop ugandaSonnie Kibz
 
Social watch workshop uganda
Social watch workshop  ugandaSocial watch workshop  uganda
Social watch workshop ugandaSonnie Kibz
 
Dismantling Mutual Mistrust
Dismantling Mutual MistrustDismantling Mutual Mistrust
Dismantling Mutual MistrustArnout Ponsioen
 
Formalization of collective rights of native communities in Peru, the perspec...
Formalization of collective rights of native communities in Peru, the perspec...Formalization of collective rights of native communities in Peru, the perspec...
Formalization of collective rights of native communities in Peru, the perspec...CIFOR-ICRAF
 

Similar to eDemocracy2012 Marija Sazdevski_Government_mirror_public_participation_in_legislation_preparation_procedures (20)

Servicios en línea y Gobierno 3.0 en la República de Corea
Servicios en línea y Gobierno 3.0 en la República de CoreaServicios en línea y Gobierno 3.0 en la República de Corea
Servicios en línea y Gobierno 3.0 en la República de Corea
 
Catching the deliberative wave
Catching the deliberative waveCatching the deliberative wave
Catching the deliberative wave
 
Gov 2.0 in Australia (WebNetowork presentation)
Gov 2.0 in Australia (WebNetowork presentation)Gov 2.0 in Australia (WebNetowork presentation)
Gov 2.0 in Australia (WebNetowork presentation)
 
Blockchain for Social Impact - Moving Beyond the Hype
Blockchain for Social Impact - Moving Beyond the HypeBlockchain for Social Impact - Moving Beyond the Hype
Blockchain for Social Impact - Moving Beyond the Hype
 
Opportunities and challenges in e-democracy
Opportunities and challenges in e-democracyOpportunities and challenges in e-democracy
Opportunities and challenges in e-democracy
 
Top Ideas for Governance and Institutions
Top Ideas for Governance and Institutions Top Ideas for Governance and Institutions
Top Ideas for Governance and Institutions
 
Determine the workload of the structural implementation of e-democracy: local...
Determine the workload of the structural implementation of e-democracy: local...Determine the workload of the structural implementation of e-democracy: local...
Determine the workload of the structural implementation of e-democracy: local...
 
Blasters
BlastersBlasters
Blasters
 
Presentation at COMPACT Project event in Riga - Disinformation, Media literac...
Presentation at COMPACT Project event in Riga - Disinformation, Media literac...Presentation at COMPACT Project event in Riga - Disinformation, Media literac...
Presentation at COMPACT Project event in Riga - Disinformation, Media literac...
 
Beyond the Radar: Love, Passion and Fun
Beyond the Radar: Love, Passion and Fun Beyond the Radar: Love, Passion and Fun
Beyond the Radar: Love, Passion and Fun
 
Report on current policies and regulatory frameworks
Report on current policies and regulatory frameworksReport on current policies and regulatory frameworks
Report on current policies and regulatory frameworks
 
Trigger.eu: Cocteau game for policy making - introduction and demo
Trigger.eu: Cocteau game for policy making - introduction and demoTrigger.eu: Cocteau game for policy making - introduction and demo
Trigger.eu: Cocteau game for policy making - introduction and demo
 
20121024 measuring e government takeup
20121024 measuring e government takeup20121024 measuring e government takeup
20121024 measuring e government takeup
 
PUBLIC SECTOR &SOCIAL MOBLIZATION- nudrat mufti
 PUBLIC SECTOR &SOCIAL MOBLIZATION- nudrat mufti PUBLIC SECTOR &SOCIAL MOBLIZATION- nudrat mufti
PUBLIC SECTOR &SOCIAL MOBLIZATION- nudrat mufti
 
Urban infrastructure insights 2015
Urban infrastructure insights 2015Urban infrastructure insights 2015
Urban infrastructure insights 2015
 
European Policies from Open Data to Civic Engagement
European Policies from Open Data to Civic EngagementEuropean Policies from Open Data to Civic Engagement
European Policies from Open Data to Civic Engagement
 
Social watch workshop uganda
Social watch workshop  ugandaSocial watch workshop  uganda
Social watch workshop uganda
 
Social watch workshop uganda
Social watch workshop  ugandaSocial watch workshop  uganda
Social watch workshop uganda
 
Dismantling Mutual Mistrust
Dismantling Mutual MistrustDismantling Mutual Mistrust
Dismantling Mutual Mistrust
 
Formalization of collective rights of native communities in Peru, the perspec...
Formalization of collective rights of native communities in Peru, the perspec...Formalization of collective rights of native communities in Peru, the perspec...
Formalization of collective rights of native communities in Peru, the perspec...
 

More from e-Democracy Conference

eDemocracy2012 Savica Pop Toneva Social_media-closer_to_the_civic
eDemocracy2012  Savica Pop Toneva Social_media-closer_to_the_civiceDemocracy2012  Savica Pop Toneva Social_media-closer_to_the_civic
eDemocracy2012 Savica Pop Toneva Social_media-closer_to_the_civice-Democracy Conference
 
eDemocracy 2012 Valbona Karakaci Developing ICT strategy to increase transpar...
eDemocracy 2012 Valbona Karakaci Developing ICT strategy to increase transpar...eDemocracy 2012 Valbona Karakaci Developing ICT strategy to increase transpar...
eDemocracy 2012 Valbona Karakaci Developing ICT strategy to increase transpar...e-Democracy Conference
 
eDemocracy2012 Simon Delakorda Political_informatics-how_should_civil_society...
eDemocracy2012 Simon Delakorda Political_informatics-how_should_civil_society...eDemocracy2012 Simon Delakorda Political_informatics-how_should_civil_society...
eDemocracy2012 Simon Delakorda Political_informatics-how_should_civil_society...e-Democracy Conference
 
eDemocracy2012 Pavle Sazdov_Social_media_from_my_perspective
eDemocracy2012 Pavle Sazdov_Social_media_from_my_perspectiveeDemocracy2012 Pavle Sazdov_Social_media_from_my_perspective
eDemocracy2012 Pavle Sazdov_Social_media_from_my_perspectivee-Democracy Conference
 
eDemocracy2012 Mile Grujovski Using_parliamentary_open_data_for_R&D_purpose
eDemocracy2012 Mile Grujovski Using_parliamentary_open_data_for_R&D_purposeeDemocracy2012 Mile Grujovski Using_parliamentary_open_data_for_R&D_purpose
eDemocracy2012 Mile Grujovski Using_parliamentary_open_data_for_R&D_purposee-Democracy Conference
 
eDemocracy2012 Kiril Nejkov_The_importance_of_compliance_for_companies_and_in...
eDemocracy2012 Kiril Nejkov_The_importance_of_compliance_for_companies_and_in...eDemocracy2012 Kiril Nejkov_The_importance_of_compliance_for_companies_and_in...
eDemocracy2012 Kiril Nejkov_The_importance_of_compliance_for_companies_and_in...e-Democracy Conference
 
eDemocracy2012 Jani Makraduli Policy_and_program_life-cycle_management
eDemocracy2012 Jani Makraduli Policy_and_program_life-cycle_managementeDemocracy2012 Jani Makraduli Policy_and_program_life-cycle_management
eDemocracy2012 Jani Makraduli Policy_and_program_life-cycle_managemente-Democracy Conference
 
eDemocracy2012 Jani Makraduli_Keynote_speech
eDemocracy2012 Jani Makraduli_Keynote_speecheDemocracy2012 Jani Makraduli_Keynote_speech
eDemocracy2012 Jani Makraduli_Keynote_speeche-Democracy Conference
 
eDemocracy2012 Igor Andonovski_Policy_and_program_life-cycle_management
eDemocracy2012 Igor Andonovski_Policy_and_program_life-cycle_managementeDemocracy2012 Igor Andonovski_Policy_and_program_life-cycle_management
eDemocracy2012 Igor Andonovski_Policy_and_program_life-cycle_managemente-Democracy Conference
 
eDemocracy2012 Gezim Jashari_myRepresentative
eDemocracy2012 Gezim Jashari_myRepresentativeeDemocracy2012 Gezim Jashari_myRepresentative
eDemocracy2012 Gezim Jashari_myRepresentativee-Democracy Conference
 
eDemocracy2012 Chris Henshaw_Keynote_speech
eDemocracy2012 Chris Henshaw_Keynote_speecheDemocracy2012 Chris Henshaw_Keynote_speech
eDemocracy2012 Chris Henshaw_Keynote_speeche-Democracy Conference
 
eDemocracy2012 Alexander Prosser_Legal_compliance_in_a_united_europe
eDemocracy2012 Alexander Prosser_Legal_compliance_in_a_united_europeeDemocracy2012 Alexander Prosser_Legal_compliance_in_a_united_europe
eDemocracy2012 Alexander Prosser_Legal_compliance_in_a_united_europee-Democracy Conference
 
eDemocracy2012 Vasko Kronevski myLegislative compliance
eDemocracy2012 Vasko Kronevski myLegislative complianceeDemocracy2012 Vasko Kronevski myLegislative compliance
eDemocracy2012 Vasko Kronevski myLegislative compliancee-Democracy Conference
 
[2011] Opening of the e-Democracy Conference 2011 - Vasko Kronevski
[2011] Opening of the e-Democracy Conference 2011 - Vasko Kronevski[2011] Opening of the e-Democracy Conference 2011 - Vasko Kronevski
[2011] Opening of the e-Democracy Conference 2011 - Vasko Kronevskie-Democracy Conference
 
[2011] e-Participation - Simon Delakorda
[2011] e-Participation - Simon Delakorda [2011] e-Participation - Simon Delakorda
[2011] e-Participation - Simon Delakorda e-Democracy Conference
 
[2011] Next Generation e-Government: Transformation into Open Government - Ol...
[2011] Next Generation e-Government: Transformation into Open Government - Ol...[2011] Next Generation e-Government: Transformation into Open Government - Ol...
[2011] Next Generation e-Government: Transformation into Open Government - Ol...e-Democracy Conference
 
[2011] Open Government is here - Jeff Kaplan
[2011] Open Government is here - Jeff Kaplan[2011] Open Government is here - Jeff Kaplan
[2011] Open Government is here - Jeff Kaplane-Democracy Conference
 
[2011] Citizen techology & Open Government - Jared Ford
[2011] Citizen techology & Open Government - Jared Ford [2011] Citizen techology & Open Government - Jared Ford
[2011] Citizen techology & Open Government - Jared Ford e-Democracy Conference
 
[2011] Integrated Legislation Information Management System - Igor Andonovski
[2011] Integrated Legislation Information Management System - Igor Andonovski[2011] Integrated Legislation Information Management System - Igor Andonovski
[2011] Integrated Legislation Information Management System - Igor Andonovskie-Democracy Conference
 
[2011] Citizen services and collaboration in the 21st Century - Holger Schreyer
[2011] Citizen services and collaboration in the 21st Century - Holger Schreyer[2011] Citizen services and collaboration in the 21st Century - Holger Schreyer
[2011] Citizen services and collaboration in the 21st Century - Holger Schreyere-Democracy Conference
 

More from e-Democracy Conference (20)

eDemocracy2012 Savica Pop Toneva Social_media-closer_to_the_civic
eDemocracy2012  Savica Pop Toneva Social_media-closer_to_the_civiceDemocracy2012  Savica Pop Toneva Social_media-closer_to_the_civic
eDemocracy2012 Savica Pop Toneva Social_media-closer_to_the_civic
 
eDemocracy 2012 Valbona Karakaci Developing ICT strategy to increase transpar...
eDemocracy 2012 Valbona Karakaci Developing ICT strategy to increase transpar...eDemocracy 2012 Valbona Karakaci Developing ICT strategy to increase transpar...
eDemocracy 2012 Valbona Karakaci Developing ICT strategy to increase transpar...
 
eDemocracy2012 Simon Delakorda Political_informatics-how_should_civil_society...
eDemocracy2012 Simon Delakorda Political_informatics-how_should_civil_society...eDemocracy2012 Simon Delakorda Political_informatics-how_should_civil_society...
eDemocracy2012 Simon Delakorda Political_informatics-how_should_civil_society...
 
eDemocracy2012 Pavle Sazdov_Social_media_from_my_perspective
eDemocracy2012 Pavle Sazdov_Social_media_from_my_perspectiveeDemocracy2012 Pavle Sazdov_Social_media_from_my_perspective
eDemocracy2012 Pavle Sazdov_Social_media_from_my_perspective
 
eDemocracy2012 Mile Grujovski Using_parliamentary_open_data_for_R&D_purpose
eDemocracy2012 Mile Grujovski Using_parliamentary_open_data_for_R&D_purposeeDemocracy2012 Mile Grujovski Using_parliamentary_open_data_for_R&D_purpose
eDemocracy2012 Mile Grujovski Using_parliamentary_open_data_for_R&D_purpose
 
eDemocracy2012 Kiril Nejkov_The_importance_of_compliance_for_companies_and_in...
eDemocracy2012 Kiril Nejkov_The_importance_of_compliance_for_companies_and_in...eDemocracy2012 Kiril Nejkov_The_importance_of_compliance_for_companies_and_in...
eDemocracy2012 Kiril Nejkov_The_importance_of_compliance_for_companies_and_in...
 
eDemocracy2012 Jani Makraduli Policy_and_program_life-cycle_management
eDemocracy2012 Jani Makraduli Policy_and_program_life-cycle_managementeDemocracy2012 Jani Makraduli Policy_and_program_life-cycle_management
eDemocracy2012 Jani Makraduli Policy_and_program_life-cycle_management
 
eDemocracy2012 Jani Makraduli_Keynote_speech
eDemocracy2012 Jani Makraduli_Keynote_speecheDemocracy2012 Jani Makraduli_Keynote_speech
eDemocracy2012 Jani Makraduli_Keynote_speech
 
eDemocracy2012 Igor Andonovski_Policy_and_program_life-cycle_management
eDemocracy2012 Igor Andonovski_Policy_and_program_life-cycle_managementeDemocracy2012 Igor Andonovski_Policy_and_program_life-cycle_management
eDemocracy2012 Igor Andonovski_Policy_and_program_life-cycle_management
 
eDemocracy2012 Gezim Jashari_myRepresentative
eDemocracy2012 Gezim Jashari_myRepresentativeeDemocracy2012 Gezim Jashari_myRepresentative
eDemocracy2012 Gezim Jashari_myRepresentative
 
eDemocracy2012 Chris Henshaw_Keynote_speech
eDemocracy2012 Chris Henshaw_Keynote_speecheDemocracy2012 Chris Henshaw_Keynote_speech
eDemocracy2012 Chris Henshaw_Keynote_speech
 
eDemocracy2012 Alexander Prosser_Legal_compliance_in_a_united_europe
eDemocracy2012 Alexander Prosser_Legal_compliance_in_a_united_europeeDemocracy2012 Alexander Prosser_Legal_compliance_in_a_united_europe
eDemocracy2012 Alexander Prosser_Legal_compliance_in_a_united_europe
 
eDemocracy2012 Vasko Kronevski myLegislative compliance
eDemocracy2012 Vasko Kronevski myLegislative complianceeDemocracy2012 Vasko Kronevski myLegislative compliance
eDemocracy2012 Vasko Kronevski myLegislative compliance
 
[2011] Opening of the e-Democracy Conference 2011 - Vasko Kronevski
[2011] Opening of the e-Democracy Conference 2011 - Vasko Kronevski[2011] Opening of the e-Democracy Conference 2011 - Vasko Kronevski
[2011] Opening of the e-Democracy Conference 2011 - Vasko Kronevski
 
[2011] e-Participation - Simon Delakorda
[2011] e-Participation - Simon Delakorda [2011] e-Participation - Simon Delakorda
[2011] e-Participation - Simon Delakorda
 
[2011] Next Generation e-Government: Transformation into Open Government - Ol...
[2011] Next Generation e-Government: Transformation into Open Government - Ol...[2011] Next Generation e-Government: Transformation into Open Government - Ol...
[2011] Next Generation e-Government: Transformation into Open Government - Ol...
 
[2011] Open Government is here - Jeff Kaplan
[2011] Open Government is here - Jeff Kaplan[2011] Open Government is here - Jeff Kaplan
[2011] Open Government is here - Jeff Kaplan
 
[2011] Citizen techology & Open Government - Jared Ford
[2011] Citizen techology & Open Government - Jared Ford [2011] Citizen techology & Open Government - Jared Ford
[2011] Citizen techology & Open Government - Jared Ford
 
[2011] Integrated Legislation Information Management System - Igor Andonovski
[2011] Integrated Legislation Information Management System - Igor Andonovski[2011] Integrated Legislation Information Management System - Igor Andonovski
[2011] Integrated Legislation Information Management System - Igor Andonovski
 
[2011] Citizen services and collaboration in the 21st Century - Holger Schreyer
[2011] Citizen services and collaboration in the 21st Century - Holger Schreyer[2011] Citizen services and collaboration in the 21st Century - Holger Schreyer
[2011] Citizen services and collaboration in the 21st Century - Holger Schreyer
 

eDemocracy2012 Marija Sazdevski_Government_mirror_public_participation_in_legislation_preparation_procedures

  • 1. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN LEGISLATION PREPARATION PROCEDURES GOVERNMENT MIRROR WWW.OGLEDALONAVLADATA.MK Marija Sazdevski, Project Officer, MCIC
  • 2. LEGAL FRAMEWORK • Article 71, of Rules of Procedure for Operation of the Government of the Republic of Macedonia: “Allstakeholders may submit their opinions, commentaries and proposals in the Unique National Electronic Register of Regulation regarding the published proposal for legislation and draft laws within 10 days from the day of publication.” “The Responsible Ministry prepares report for received opinions in which states the reasons why notes and proposals have not been adopted and publish them on ministries website and on the Unique National Electronic Register of Regulation” • Instructions for involving stakeholders in legislation preparation procedures, adopted in 2011 Increased number of days for consultations to 30 (Article 5)
  • 3. GOVERNMENT MIRROR – MONITORING • Monitoring period: March 1, 2012 – October 31, 2012 • Monitoring the public participation through the available e- tools • Questionnaire 1 - communication environment provided by the proposer of the act for participation of civil society in its activity (general mechanisms for public participation) • Questionnaire 2 - preparation of acts - 30 acts selected from the Annual Programme of Work of the Government of Republic of Macedonia
  • 4. COMMUNICATION AND SUPPORT ENVIRONMENT – QUESTIONNAIRE 1 • Indicators are formulated as statements that represent the standards of good public involvement • Total of 35 indicators (15+20) - Compared to Slovenia 3 new indicators included • Grades: Grade 1 (the lowest score) (a score of 20% or less) Grade 2 (a score of 21% to 40%) Grade 3 (a score of 41% to 60%) Grade 4 (a score of 61% to 80%) Grade 5 (the highest score) (a score of 81% to 100%)
  • 5. COMMUNICATION AND SUPPORT ENVIRONMENT • Questionnaire 1: Distributed to 23 state institutions • Responses received from 16: - Ministry of Defence, Ministry of Environment and Urban Planning, Ministry of Local Self-Government, Ministry of Culture, Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs, Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Ministry of Internal Affairs, Ministry of Education and Science, Secretariat for European Affaires, Agency for Youth and Sports, Commission for protection against discrimination, the Secretariat for the implementation of the Ohrid Framework Agreement (SIOFA), Commission for Relations with Religious Communities, State Commission for the prevention of corruption (DKSK) • No reply from 6: Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Health, Department for Cooperation with NGO; Finds itself as non-competent 1: Agency for Emigration
  • 6. COMMUNICATION ENVIRONMENT - RESULTS General mechanisms for public participation employed by the government body A proposing the legislation The government body Points Score Grade Appoints a named person authorised to give 1 16 100% 5 information of public character on CSOs Appoints coordinator to estimate the impact of 2 9 69% 4 regulations Disseminates publications (periodicals / newsletters) 3 10 63% 4 about its work Publishes forecasts of the start dates of preparations/ 4 5 38% 2 procedures for legislation in daily newspapers Publishes forecasts of the start dates of preparations/ procedures for legislation on relevant websites (E.g.. 5 11 85% 5 ENER, the e-democracy portal, government body web- site) 6 Uses other media for informing the public 14 88% 5
  • 7. COMMUNICATION ENVIRONMENT - RESULTS The government body proposing the legislation wither on its web-site Points Score Grade or via an e-newsletter: Publishes details and information about public participation in 7 specific procedures (laws, strategies etc.) 13 81% 5 8 Uses structured e-questionnaires to gauge public opinion 5 31% 2 Publishes the proposals and comments made by the public about 9 the work of the proposing government body 5 31% 2 Uses structured e-questionnaires to gauge public opinion prepared 10 for specific legislation processes 5 38% 2 Publishes answers and explanations with regard to the proposals put 11 forward by the interested members of public 7 54% 3 Publishes a list of frequently asked questions and answers 12 concerning public participation in specific cases 3 23% 2 13 Enables interested members of the public to sign up to a registry 2 13% 1 14 Emails interested members of the public with electronic news 12 75% 4 Organises e-public debates (via forums, blogs, web conferences etc.) 15 and prepares and publishes the outcomes of these debates 8 50% 3
  • 8. COMMUNICATION ENVIRONMENT - RESULTS The support environment conducive to the inclusion of civil society in the government body B proposing the legislation • Primary bullets are 24-point The government body proposing the legislation: Points Score Grade – Secondary bullets (press tab with CSOs 16 Appoints a named person authorised to cooperatekey) are 20-point 14 88% 5 • Tertiary bullets (press tab key again) are 16-point 17 Enables CSOs to sign up to a registry (for regular information sharing) 4 25% 2 • All bulleted text is non-bold 18 Invites interested CSOs to sign up/ register for receiving information 5 31% 2 • Has a prepared written document (guidelines) for the inclusion of civil 4 19 All bulleted text is sentence case (capitalize first society organizations 25% 2 Includes the representatives of civilonly) the governments letter of first word society on 20 councils or on the expert councils and commissions working with the • government body, even if it is not legally required to do so text 12 Use e-Democracy red for highlight 75% 4 Includes represents of civil society in its delegations to international 21 events 6 38% 2 Lays down in advance a method of selecting civil society 22 representatives in instances in which the number of civil society representatives must be limited 3 19% 1 Trains its staff about the participation of civil society in the work of 23 government departments 12 75% 4
  • 9. COMMUNICATION ENVIRONMENT - RESULTS The financial support environment for the inclusion of NGOs and civil society in the procedure of legislation preparation The government body proposing the legislation: Points Score Grade 24 Finances CSOs programmes (institutional support) 7 54% 3 25 Finances CSOs projects (project activities) 7 54% 3 Has dedicated a fund available to cover the costs of CSOs 26 representatives participating on government commissions etc. 3 19% 1 Has dedicated funds available for support services for the 27 inclusion (legal consultation and information support) and advocacy of CSOs 0 0% 1 28 Offers CSOs use of premises, free of charge or subsidised 3 19% 1 Offers additional forms of support (hiring equipment, 29 training etc.) 8 50% 3
  • 10. COMMUNICATION ENVIRONMENT - RESULTS Monitoring and evaluating the implementation of legislation • Primary bullets are 24-point The government body proposing the legislation: Points Score Grade – Secondary bullets (press tab key) are 20-point Monitors and evaluates legislation implementation in its own 30 • Tertiary area of operation bullets (press tab key again) are 16-point 13 81% 5 Includes representatives of civil society in the monitoring 31 • All bulleted text is non-bold and evaluation of legislation 44% 7 3 Publishes reports on the monitoring and evaluation of • All bulleted text is sentence case (capitalize first legislation: 32 25% In electronic form on its web site (web site URL) 4 2 33 letter of first word only) 25% In printed hardcopy (e.g.. publication,.. etc.) 4 2 34 • Use e-Democracy red for highlight text Publishes reports on the extent to which the public has been included in the legislation preparation, and the impact of the public’s inclusion 1 6% 1 At the end of the preparation of the legislation in the 35 memorandum the government body always informs the public on the public`s inclusion and cooperation 8 53% 3
  • 11. COMMUNICATION AND SUPPORT ENVIRONMENT Results by Institution (max 35 points) Set 1 Set 2 Total Grade Ministry of Labour and Social Affaires 10 14 24 4 Agency for Youth and Sports 10 14 24 4 Ministry of Culture 11 12 23 4 Ministry of Education and Science 11 11 22 4 Ministry of Environment and Urban Planning 9 12 21 3 Commission for protection against discrimination* 7 7 14 3 Ministry of Local Self-Government 10 6 16 3 Ministry of Information Society and Administration 9 7 16 3 Ministry of Defence 6 9 15 3 Secretariat for European Affaires* 6 7 13 3 Secretariat for the implementation of the Ohrid Framework 3 7 11 3 Agreement (SIOFA)* Ministry of Transport and Communications 9 5 14 2 Ministry of Internal Affaires 9 4 13 2 State Commission for the prevention of corruption (DKSK)* 3 6 9 2 Ministry of Economy 7 4 11 2 Commission for Relations with Religious Communities* 4 2 6 2
  • 13. THANK YOU! Marija Sazdevski +389 2 3088 983 msz@mcms.mk