The document discusses trends in urbanization in Thrissur District, Kerala between 1971-2001. Some key points:
1) Urban population in Thrissur District increased 236% between 1971-2001, compared to a 315% increase in urban area extent.
2) Urban population growth rate declined from 39.9% between 1981-1991 to 16.55% between 1991-2001, indicating reduced migration to urban areas.
3) Kunnamkulam Municipal Council saw the highest population growth rate, while Thrissur Municipal Corporation growth was lower than surrounding areas which include 11 census towns.
This document discusses urbanization trends in the Marathwada region of Maharashtra, India from 1971 to 2001. Some key findings include:
1) Urbanization in Marathwada has grown slowly, with just 24.3% of the population living in urban areas in 2001, compared to 42.4% for Maharashtra as a whole.
2) Within Marathwada, the districts of Aurangabad, Nanded, Parbhani, and Jalna had higher levels of urbanization than the regional average in 1971 and 1981. By 2001, only Aurangabad and Parbhani remained above average.
3) Urban population in Marathwada increased over 6 times
Age and Sex Structure of Uttar Pradesh & Kerala: A comparative StudyNandlal Mishra
The document compares the age and sex structure of Uttar Pradesh and Kerala based on 2011 Census data. It finds that Kerala has higher sex ratios, lower youth dependency, and an older population compared to Uttar Pradesh. Over time, both regions showed a transition to lower fertility and mortality, though Kerala transitioned earlier and more rapidly as indicated by its older population structure in 2011.
Demographic Profile of Punjab (India, 2011)Nandlal Mishra
This document provides a demographic profile of Punjab based on census and survey data. It summarizes population trends over time, including total population size and growth rates, distribution by age, sex, rural/urban residence, and religion. Vital rates like birth, death, and fertility are presented. Literacy rates and workforce participation by sector are also reviewed. Key findings include that Punjab's population in 2011 was 27.7 million with a decadal growth rate of 13.9%, and that the majority of residents are rural, Sikh, and engaged in agriculture.
The document provides population data highlights from the 2011 census for India and the state of Kerala. Some key points:
- Kerala's population in 2011 was 33.4 million with a decadal growth rate of 4.9%, lower than the national average of 17.7%.
- Malappuram district had the highest population of 41.1 million and the highest growth rate of 13.4%.
- The sex ratio of Kerala is 1084 females per 1000 males, higher than the national average of 943. Kannur district had the highest sex ratio of 1136.
The 2011 Census of India found:
1) India's total population was 1,21,01,93,422 with a 17.64% increase over the past decade.
2) The population density was 382 people per square kilometer.
3) 13.12% of the population, or 15,87,89,287 people, were between ages 0-6.
4) Literacy rates increased to 74.04% of the population over 10 years prior.
1. The document outlines development directives for Thrissur District based on analysis conducted as part of the District Spatial Plan.
2. It divides the district into 8 development zones and identifies the nature of developments suggested for each zone, such as agriculture, industries, services etc.
3. It also defines the major functions of settlements in the district by integrating their existing activity patterns and the development zones they fall within. Functions include various primary, secondary and tertiary economic activities.
The document summarizes the spatial structure of Thrissur district in Kerala, India. It analyzes the hierarchy of settlements, nodes, and activity patterns to develop the spatial structure. Key points:
1) Thrissur Municipal Corporation is the highest order settlement, followed by 5 second order and 7 third order settlements.
2) Thrissur round is the primary node, with 20 suggested second order and 43 third order nodes.
3) Activity patterns of urban, primary, secondary, agriculture, and forest activities are analyzed.
4) A proposed road network is developed with 5 types of roads.
5) Considering settlements, nodes, activity patterns and roads, the overall spatial structure of
This document discusses the functional characterization of settlements in the Thrissur district of Kerala, India. It analyzes settlements based on their primary land uses and average plot sizes to classify them as urban, rural, semi-urban or semi-rural. The district's settlements exhibit a unique combination of urban and rural characteristics. Based on this analysis, the document maps and lists the functional character of all the local self-government (LSG) areas in the district. It finds a clear spatial demarcation between urban, rural and transitional semi-urban/semi-rural areas.
This document discusses urbanization trends in the Marathwada region of Maharashtra, India from 1971 to 2001. Some key findings include:
1) Urbanization in Marathwada has grown slowly, with just 24.3% of the population living in urban areas in 2001, compared to 42.4% for Maharashtra as a whole.
2) Within Marathwada, the districts of Aurangabad, Nanded, Parbhani, and Jalna had higher levels of urbanization than the regional average in 1971 and 1981. By 2001, only Aurangabad and Parbhani remained above average.
3) Urban population in Marathwada increased over 6 times
Age and Sex Structure of Uttar Pradesh & Kerala: A comparative StudyNandlal Mishra
The document compares the age and sex structure of Uttar Pradesh and Kerala based on 2011 Census data. It finds that Kerala has higher sex ratios, lower youth dependency, and an older population compared to Uttar Pradesh. Over time, both regions showed a transition to lower fertility and mortality, though Kerala transitioned earlier and more rapidly as indicated by its older population structure in 2011.
Demographic Profile of Punjab (India, 2011)Nandlal Mishra
This document provides a demographic profile of Punjab based on census and survey data. It summarizes population trends over time, including total population size and growth rates, distribution by age, sex, rural/urban residence, and religion. Vital rates like birth, death, and fertility are presented. Literacy rates and workforce participation by sector are also reviewed. Key findings include that Punjab's population in 2011 was 27.7 million with a decadal growth rate of 13.9%, and that the majority of residents are rural, Sikh, and engaged in agriculture.
The document provides population data highlights from the 2011 census for India and the state of Kerala. Some key points:
- Kerala's population in 2011 was 33.4 million with a decadal growth rate of 4.9%, lower than the national average of 17.7%.
- Malappuram district had the highest population of 41.1 million and the highest growth rate of 13.4%.
- The sex ratio of Kerala is 1084 females per 1000 males, higher than the national average of 943. Kannur district had the highest sex ratio of 1136.
The 2011 Census of India found:
1) India's total population was 1,21,01,93,422 with a 17.64% increase over the past decade.
2) The population density was 382 people per square kilometer.
3) 13.12% of the population, or 15,87,89,287 people, were between ages 0-6.
4) Literacy rates increased to 74.04% of the population over 10 years prior.
1. The document outlines development directives for Thrissur District based on analysis conducted as part of the District Spatial Plan.
2. It divides the district into 8 development zones and identifies the nature of developments suggested for each zone, such as agriculture, industries, services etc.
3. It also defines the major functions of settlements in the district by integrating their existing activity patterns and the development zones they fall within. Functions include various primary, secondary and tertiary economic activities.
The document summarizes the spatial structure of Thrissur district in Kerala, India. It analyzes the hierarchy of settlements, nodes, and activity patterns to develop the spatial structure. Key points:
1) Thrissur Municipal Corporation is the highest order settlement, followed by 5 second order and 7 third order settlements.
2) Thrissur round is the primary node, with 20 suggested second order and 43 third order nodes.
3) Activity patterns of urban, primary, secondary, agriculture, and forest activities are analyzed.
4) A proposed road network is developed with 5 types of roads.
5) Considering settlements, nodes, activity patterns and roads, the overall spatial structure of
This document discusses the functional characterization of settlements in the Thrissur district of Kerala, India. It analyzes settlements based on their primary land uses and average plot sizes to classify them as urban, rural, semi-urban or semi-rural. The district's settlements exhibit a unique combination of urban and rural characteristics. Based on this analysis, the document maps and lists the functional character of all the local self-government (LSG) areas in the district. It finds a clear spatial demarcation between urban, rural and transitional semi-urban/semi-rural areas.
This document discusses connectivity in Thrissur District, Kerala, India. It describes the hierarchy of settlements and nodes in the district. Thrissur Municipal Corporation is identified as the primary settlement. The document then analyzes the existing road, highway and railway network. It proposes upgrading national highways and conceptualizes a suggested road network to better connect settlements and nodes based on the identified hierarchies. Key aspects of the proposed network include ring roads, radial roads connecting primary and secondary settlements, and loop roads connecting secondary settlements.
1. Thrissur district has a rich cultural heritage and is known for festivals, art institutions, and historic temples.
2. The district has 5 physiographic regions and is blessed with forest land and resourceful hill areas in the east. It has 4 major rivers and reservoirs.
3. The population density is higher than the state average and growth is concentrated near urban areas, coasts, and eastern highlands have the lowest density.
The document provides background information on Thrissur district in Kerala, India. It discusses the district's historical role in fostering trade relations between Kerala and the outside world. It notes that Thrissur played an important political role under various rulers and was an administrative center for the British. The document outlines the district's regional linkages and location relative to other major cities in Kerala. It also briefly describes some important cultural and religious sites located in Thrissur district.
The document outlines the goals and objectives of the District Spatial Plan for Thrissur, Kerala, India. The 3 main development goals are: 1) Develop Thrissur as an eco-friendly and economically vibrant region, 2) Utilize resources for economic development with social justice in a sustainable manner, and 3) Enhance local economic growth and job opportunities. 7 major objectives are then outlined to achieve these goals, including improving the Thrissur-Kochi economic corridor, concentrating urban and rural economic activities, developing key sectors to trigger socio-economic growth, and conserving cultural/heritage sites and ecologically sensitive areas.
1. The document outlines development directives for Thrissur District based on analysis conducted as part of the District Spatial Plan.
2. It divides the district into 8 development zones and identifies the nature of developments suggested for each zone, such as agriculture, industries, services etc.
3. It also defines the major functions of settlements in the district by integrating their existing activity patterns and the development zones they fall within. Functions include various primary, secondary and tertiary economic activities.
Thrissur district has a population of around 3 million people distributed across 17 blocks and 92 villages. The district has diverse topography ranging from low-lying coastal areas to hilly regions in the east. Major rivers include the Bharathappuzha, Kecheri, Karuvannur, and Chalakkudy rivers. Notable features include the Athirappilly waterfall and a network of backwaters. The economy relies on agriculture including crops like rice, tapioca, rubber and industries like handloom, food processing and coir. Thrissur has a literacy rate above 90% and is considered the cultural capital of Kerala with historical and religious sites that attract tourism.
This chapter discusses the tentative development concept for Thrissur District in Kerala, India.
1) The concept is based on analysis of the district's spatial structure, environmentally sensitive areas, resources, and relationship to the larger macro region.
2) Key elements of the spatial structure include a hierarchy of settlements with Thrissur City as the highest order settlement and 5 other municipalities and 7 panchayats as second and third order settlements.
3) Environmentally sensitive areas that require protection for sustainable development include eastern forests, central kole lands, coastal areas, and inland water bodies.
This document discusses domestic workers in India, particularly children working as domestic help. It notes that an estimated 20% of domestic workers are children under 14, who are employed illegally. While labour laws protect workers over 18, children slip through legal cracks. It also discusses how domestic workers, especially those working full-time, are often in conditions similar to slavery - in debt and unable to leave their employer. The document argues that attitudes must change among employers - they should recognize domestic workers as valued individuals with rights, rather than as servants.
1. The Mattanchery Palace area is impacted by multiple development regulations from various authorities due to its cultural heritage designation.
2. The AMSAR Act prohibits new construction within 100m of the palace and limits development within 300m.
3. This conflicts with plans to promote tourism and development in the area.
4. A unified development plan is needed to balance heritage conservation with equitable development rights.
The medieval city of Jodhpur, India was founded in 1459 by Rao Jodha, a Rajput chief, as the new capital of the Marwar state after moving from Mandore. Jodha established the settlement atop a rocky hill and built the strong Mehrangarh fort there to provide safety. The city grew around the fort and over time expanded with new walls and gates built. Jodhpur became a prosperous trading center located along a key route between Delhi and Gujarat. In later centuries, it came under the suzerainty of the Mughal Empire while still retaining some autonomy.
1. The document discusses the traditional planning of ancient cities, describing how early human settlements evolved from nomadic tribes to small hamlets and villages as agriculture and other skills developed. It outlines how religious, social, and governing institutions then emerged to manage these early urban areas.
2. Key aspects of traditional city planning are summarized, including the use of grid networks, definition of land uses, drainage systems, fortifications, and responsive architecture. Examples are provided of the Indus Valley civilization and ancient cities like Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro that exhibited such planning through features like their layout, infrastructure, and buildings.
3. Possible reasons for the decline of the Indus civilization are then debated, such
The population of Thrissur district has grown from 2.74 million in 1991 to 2.97 million in 2001, an increase of 8.66%. While the population growth rate is declining overall, some local self government areas adjacent to urban areas have seen higher growth rates, likely due to urban migration. The coastal region saw declining growth rates from 1981-2001, indicating weakening economic opportunities. Three grama panchayats showed negative growth rates when comparing 1991 and 2001 census data, though this was due to reductions in geographical area rather than actual population decline.
The document summarizes the urban population growth and socio-economic status of Karur Town in Tamil Nadu, India. It analyzes census data from 1951-2001 which shows the total population of Karur Town gradually increasing from 14,273 in 1951 to 45,437 in 2001. The population growth rate was highest between 1971-1981 at 6.86% per year. SC/ST population distribution is also mapped out across the town's 39 wards, with the highest concentrations in Wards 5, 10, and 25. Literacy rates in Karur Town are 78% overall, higher than the national average of 60%, though male literacy is higher than female. The economy is based around the textile and bus body manufacturing
The document provides a summary of key population statistics from the 2011 Indian census:
- India's total population in 2011 was 1.21 billion with a decadal growth rate of 17.67%
- The rural population was 83.35 crores and urban was 37.71 crores, with equal growth of 91 million each
- Uttar Pradesh had the largest rural population of 155.3 million and Maharashtra the largest urban of 50.8 million
This document discusses urbanization trends in the Marathwada region of Maharashtra, India from 1971 to 2001. Some key findings include:
1) Urbanization levels in Marathwada have historically been lower than the state and national averages, increasing from 14.63% in 1971 to 24.30% in 2001.
2) Within Marathwada, the districts of Aurangabad, Nanded, Parbhani, and Jalna had higher urbanization rates than the regional average in 1971 and 1981. By 2001, only Aurangabad and Parbhani remained above average.
3) Urban populations in Marathwada grew over six times from 1901 to 2001, increasing
06 chapter 4 demographic profile and settlement pattern 26 july 2013neerajishere11
The document provides demographic information about the National Capital Region (NCR) of India based on census data:
1) The population of the NCR has grown from 198 million in 1981 to 460 million in 2011, with the population share of Delhi increasing from 31% to 36% during this period.
2) Urbanization in the NCR has increased significantly, with the urban population rising from 50% in 1991 to 63% in 2011. Delhi has the highest level of urbanization at 98%.
3) Population density in the NCR has more than doubled over the last 3 decades, reaching 1,349 persons/sqkm in 2011, compared to the national average of 382 persons/sqkm.
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) is an open access online peer reviewed international journal that publishes research and review articles in the fields of Computer Science, Neural Networks, Electrical Engineering, Software Engineering, Information Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Plastic Engineering, Food Technology, Textile Engineering, Nano Technology & science, Power Electronics, Electronics & Communication Engineering, Computational mathematics, Image processing, Civil Engineering, Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering, VLSI Testing & Low Power VLSI Design etc.
06 demographic indicators of indian populationRavi Nayak
National Health Profile 2011 provides demographic indicators for India and its states/union territories based on census and other data. Some key points:
- India's population as of March 2011 was 1.21 billion with 940 females per 1000 males. 31.4% of the population is aged 0-14 years and only 7.4% is aged 60+.
- The birth rate declined from 25.8 per 1000 in 2000 to 22.1 in 2010 while the death rate declined from 8.5 to 7.2 over the same period, reducing the natural growth rate.
- Infant mortality has declined to 47 per 1000 live births in 2010 but rural (51) and urban (31) rates still show high
The document summarizes key findings from the 2011 Indian census:
- India's total population grew 17.6% to 121.02 crore, while urban population grew 31.8% to 37.71 crore. The percentage of urban population increased from 27.8% to 31.16%.
- 18 new cities were added to the 53 million-plus cities, with Mumbai, Delhi, and Kolkata having over 1 crore population each.
- The number of towns increased significantly from 5161 in 2001 to 7935 in 2011, with 3894 classified as census towns that lack formal urban governance.
This points to both rapid urbanization across India as well as the need to formally classify and plan
Urbanization in India refers to the increasing percentage of people living in urban areas. According to the 2011 census, India's urban population was 31.16% of the total population. The three states with the largest urban populations were Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, and Tamil Nadu, while the states with the smallest urban populations were Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, and Mizoram. Between 2001-2011, India's population grew by 181 million people, with 90 million in rural areas and 91 million in urban areas, showing nearly equal growth rates in rural and urban populations for the first time. Problems of rapid urbanization in India include unemployment, lack of adequate housing, pollution, and insufficient infrastructure
A Study Of Urbanization In Pune District Using Geoinformatics ApproachHannah Baker
This document summarizes a study on urbanization in Pune district, India using geospatial techniques. Some key points:
- Pune district has experienced rapid urbanization, with 60.99% of its population living in urban areas as of 2011, higher than the state average.
- Between 1901-2011, Pune's urban population increased from 2.2 million to 57.51 million, with the highest decadal growth rate of 107.5% occurring from 1941-1951.
- Within Pune district, tahsils like Haveli and Pune City have urbanization levels above the district average due to factors like IT development and industrialization.
- The study aims to analyze
The document provides key highlights from the Census of India 2011 regarding urbanization trends. Some of the main points covered include:
- India had a total of 7,935 towns in 2011, a significant increase from 5,161 towns in 2001. The majority of new towns were classified as census towns rather than statutory towns.
- The urban population of India grew at a faster rate than the rural population from 2001-2011, at 31.8% compared to 12.18%. However, rural areas still account for over two-thirds of India's total population.
- States like Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, and West Bengal have high urban populations both in terms of numbers and percentage
This document discusses connectivity in Thrissur District, Kerala, India. It describes the hierarchy of settlements and nodes in the district. Thrissur Municipal Corporation is identified as the primary settlement. The document then analyzes the existing road, highway and railway network. It proposes upgrading national highways and conceptualizes a suggested road network to better connect settlements and nodes based on the identified hierarchies. Key aspects of the proposed network include ring roads, radial roads connecting primary and secondary settlements, and loop roads connecting secondary settlements.
1. Thrissur district has a rich cultural heritage and is known for festivals, art institutions, and historic temples.
2. The district has 5 physiographic regions and is blessed with forest land and resourceful hill areas in the east. It has 4 major rivers and reservoirs.
3. The population density is higher than the state average and growth is concentrated near urban areas, coasts, and eastern highlands have the lowest density.
The document provides background information on Thrissur district in Kerala, India. It discusses the district's historical role in fostering trade relations between Kerala and the outside world. It notes that Thrissur played an important political role under various rulers and was an administrative center for the British. The document outlines the district's regional linkages and location relative to other major cities in Kerala. It also briefly describes some important cultural and religious sites located in Thrissur district.
The document outlines the goals and objectives of the District Spatial Plan for Thrissur, Kerala, India. The 3 main development goals are: 1) Develop Thrissur as an eco-friendly and economically vibrant region, 2) Utilize resources for economic development with social justice in a sustainable manner, and 3) Enhance local economic growth and job opportunities. 7 major objectives are then outlined to achieve these goals, including improving the Thrissur-Kochi economic corridor, concentrating urban and rural economic activities, developing key sectors to trigger socio-economic growth, and conserving cultural/heritage sites and ecologically sensitive areas.
1. The document outlines development directives for Thrissur District based on analysis conducted as part of the District Spatial Plan.
2. It divides the district into 8 development zones and identifies the nature of developments suggested for each zone, such as agriculture, industries, services etc.
3. It also defines the major functions of settlements in the district by integrating their existing activity patterns and the development zones they fall within. Functions include various primary, secondary and tertiary economic activities.
Thrissur district has a population of around 3 million people distributed across 17 blocks and 92 villages. The district has diverse topography ranging from low-lying coastal areas to hilly regions in the east. Major rivers include the Bharathappuzha, Kecheri, Karuvannur, and Chalakkudy rivers. Notable features include the Athirappilly waterfall and a network of backwaters. The economy relies on agriculture including crops like rice, tapioca, rubber and industries like handloom, food processing and coir. Thrissur has a literacy rate above 90% and is considered the cultural capital of Kerala with historical and religious sites that attract tourism.
This chapter discusses the tentative development concept for Thrissur District in Kerala, India.
1) The concept is based on analysis of the district's spatial structure, environmentally sensitive areas, resources, and relationship to the larger macro region.
2) Key elements of the spatial structure include a hierarchy of settlements with Thrissur City as the highest order settlement and 5 other municipalities and 7 panchayats as second and third order settlements.
3) Environmentally sensitive areas that require protection for sustainable development include eastern forests, central kole lands, coastal areas, and inland water bodies.
This document discusses domestic workers in India, particularly children working as domestic help. It notes that an estimated 20% of domestic workers are children under 14, who are employed illegally. While labour laws protect workers over 18, children slip through legal cracks. It also discusses how domestic workers, especially those working full-time, are often in conditions similar to slavery - in debt and unable to leave their employer. The document argues that attitudes must change among employers - they should recognize domestic workers as valued individuals with rights, rather than as servants.
1. The Mattanchery Palace area is impacted by multiple development regulations from various authorities due to its cultural heritage designation.
2. The AMSAR Act prohibits new construction within 100m of the palace and limits development within 300m.
3. This conflicts with plans to promote tourism and development in the area.
4. A unified development plan is needed to balance heritage conservation with equitable development rights.
The medieval city of Jodhpur, India was founded in 1459 by Rao Jodha, a Rajput chief, as the new capital of the Marwar state after moving from Mandore. Jodha established the settlement atop a rocky hill and built the strong Mehrangarh fort there to provide safety. The city grew around the fort and over time expanded with new walls and gates built. Jodhpur became a prosperous trading center located along a key route between Delhi and Gujarat. In later centuries, it came under the suzerainty of the Mughal Empire while still retaining some autonomy.
1. The document discusses the traditional planning of ancient cities, describing how early human settlements evolved from nomadic tribes to small hamlets and villages as agriculture and other skills developed. It outlines how religious, social, and governing institutions then emerged to manage these early urban areas.
2. Key aspects of traditional city planning are summarized, including the use of grid networks, definition of land uses, drainage systems, fortifications, and responsive architecture. Examples are provided of the Indus Valley civilization and ancient cities like Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro that exhibited such planning through features like their layout, infrastructure, and buildings.
3. Possible reasons for the decline of the Indus civilization are then debated, such
The population of Thrissur district has grown from 2.74 million in 1991 to 2.97 million in 2001, an increase of 8.66%. While the population growth rate is declining overall, some local self government areas adjacent to urban areas have seen higher growth rates, likely due to urban migration. The coastal region saw declining growth rates from 1981-2001, indicating weakening economic opportunities. Three grama panchayats showed negative growth rates when comparing 1991 and 2001 census data, though this was due to reductions in geographical area rather than actual population decline.
The document summarizes the urban population growth and socio-economic status of Karur Town in Tamil Nadu, India. It analyzes census data from 1951-2001 which shows the total population of Karur Town gradually increasing from 14,273 in 1951 to 45,437 in 2001. The population growth rate was highest between 1971-1981 at 6.86% per year. SC/ST population distribution is also mapped out across the town's 39 wards, with the highest concentrations in Wards 5, 10, and 25. Literacy rates in Karur Town are 78% overall, higher than the national average of 60%, though male literacy is higher than female. The economy is based around the textile and bus body manufacturing
The document provides a summary of key population statistics from the 2011 Indian census:
- India's total population in 2011 was 1.21 billion with a decadal growth rate of 17.67%
- The rural population was 83.35 crores and urban was 37.71 crores, with equal growth of 91 million each
- Uttar Pradesh had the largest rural population of 155.3 million and Maharashtra the largest urban of 50.8 million
This document discusses urbanization trends in the Marathwada region of Maharashtra, India from 1971 to 2001. Some key findings include:
1) Urbanization levels in Marathwada have historically been lower than the state and national averages, increasing from 14.63% in 1971 to 24.30% in 2001.
2) Within Marathwada, the districts of Aurangabad, Nanded, Parbhani, and Jalna had higher urbanization rates than the regional average in 1971 and 1981. By 2001, only Aurangabad and Parbhani remained above average.
3) Urban populations in Marathwada grew over six times from 1901 to 2001, increasing
06 chapter 4 demographic profile and settlement pattern 26 july 2013neerajishere11
The document provides demographic information about the National Capital Region (NCR) of India based on census data:
1) The population of the NCR has grown from 198 million in 1981 to 460 million in 2011, with the population share of Delhi increasing from 31% to 36% during this period.
2) Urbanization in the NCR has increased significantly, with the urban population rising from 50% in 1991 to 63% in 2011. Delhi has the highest level of urbanization at 98%.
3) Population density in the NCR has more than doubled over the last 3 decades, reaching 1,349 persons/sqkm in 2011, compared to the national average of 382 persons/sqkm.
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) is an open access online peer reviewed international journal that publishes research and review articles in the fields of Computer Science, Neural Networks, Electrical Engineering, Software Engineering, Information Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Plastic Engineering, Food Technology, Textile Engineering, Nano Technology & science, Power Electronics, Electronics & Communication Engineering, Computational mathematics, Image processing, Civil Engineering, Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering, VLSI Testing & Low Power VLSI Design etc.
06 demographic indicators of indian populationRavi Nayak
National Health Profile 2011 provides demographic indicators for India and its states/union territories based on census and other data. Some key points:
- India's population as of March 2011 was 1.21 billion with 940 females per 1000 males. 31.4% of the population is aged 0-14 years and only 7.4% is aged 60+.
- The birth rate declined from 25.8 per 1000 in 2000 to 22.1 in 2010 while the death rate declined from 8.5 to 7.2 over the same period, reducing the natural growth rate.
- Infant mortality has declined to 47 per 1000 live births in 2010 but rural (51) and urban (31) rates still show high
The document summarizes key findings from the 2011 Indian census:
- India's total population grew 17.6% to 121.02 crore, while urban population grew 31.8% to 37.71 crore. The percentage of urban population increased from 27.8% to 31.16%.
- 18 new cities were added to the 53 million-plus cities, with Mumbai, Delhi, and Kolkata having over 1 crore population each.
- The number of towns increased significantly from 5161 in 2001 to 7935 in 2011, with 3894 classified as census towns that lack formal urban governance.
This points to both rapid urbanization across India as well as the need to formally classify and plan
Urbanization in India refers to the increasing percentage of people living in urban areas. According to the 2011 census, India's urban population was 31.16% of the total population. The three states with the largest urban populations were Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, and Tamil Nadu, while the states with the smallest urban populations were Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, and Mizoram. Between 2001-2011, India's population grew by 181 million people, with 90 million in rural areas and 91 million in urban areas, showing nearly equal growth rates in rural and urban populations for the first time. Problems of rapid urbanization in India include unemployment, lack of adequate housing, pollution, and insufficient infrastructure
A Study Of Urbanization In Pune District Using Geoinformatics ApproachHannah Baker
This document summarizes a study on urbanization in Pune district, India using geospatial techniques. Some key points:
- Pune district has experienced rapid urbanization, with 60.99% of its population living in urban areas as of 2011, higher than the state average.
- Between 1901-2011, Pune's urban population increased from 2.2 million to 57.51 million, with the highest decadal growth rate of 107.5% occurring from 1941-1951.
- Within Pune district, tahsils like Haveli and Pune City have urbanization levels above the district average due to factors like IT development and industrialization.
- The study aims to analyze
The document provides key highlights from the Census of India 2011 regarding urbanization trends. Some of the main points covered include:
- India had a total of 7,935 towns in 2011, a significant increase from 5,161 towns in 2001. The majority of new towns were classified as census towns rather than statutory towns.
- The urban population of India grew at a faster rate than the rural population from 2001-2011, at 31.8% compared to 12.18%. However, rural areas still account for over two-thirds of India's total population.
- States like Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, and West Bengal have high urban populations both in terms of numbers and percentage
This document discusses strategy for urban infrastructure development in identified towns of Manipur State, India. It begins by noting the rapid pace of urbanization globally and infrastructure constraints faced by many urban centers, including in sectors like water, waste management, drainage, and social infrastructure. It then identifies towns in Manipur based on 2001 census data and examines their physical and social infrastructure status. The research methodology involved analyzing statistical reports and data from Manipur government agencies. Key findings include most towns facing major problems in water supply, waste management, drainage, and education/health facilities. Infrastructure services are often inefficient, inadequate and lack proper planning, operation and maintenance. The document concludes by noting most smaller and medium towns in Manipur do not have proper infrastructure
This document summarizes a study on the transformation of rural settlements in Basudebpur and Jemari villages in West Bengal, India from 1971 to 2018. The study analyzes changes in the spatial area and patterns of settlements, demographic shifts in the population, and socio-economic transformations, including changes in infrastructure, employment, and lifestyle. The researchers conducted field surveys and interviews with villagers to assess satisfaction with current services and identify priorities for further transformation. GIS software was used to analyze land use maps and satellite images over time to measure changes in the size and layout of the rural settlements. Key findings from the study will be discussed in the results and discussion section.
Census of India 2011-Rural Urban Distribution of Population.pptssuser8592c5
The document provides provisional data from the 2011 Census of India on rural-urban distribution of population. Some key highlights:
- 68.8% of India's population of 1.21 billion lives in rural areas, while 31.2% lives in urban areas.
- Between 2001-2011, the rural population grew 12.2% while urban population grew 31.8%.
- The child population (0-6 years) declined 3% overall, with a 7% decline in rural areas but 11% growth in urban areas.
- Sex ratios improved slightly in rural (946-947) and more sharply in urban (900-926) areas, but the child sex ratio declined in both rural and urban
1) The document analyzes the impact of demographic transition on key development variables in Karnataka, India over time.
2) It finds that the Southern Maidan region, which reached a 'low stationary' transition stage earliest, showed the strongest correlations between variables like income, literacy, and life expectancy.
3) In contrast, the Northern Maidan region, still in a 'late expanding' stage of transition, exhibited weaker relationships among development variables and negative correlations with income.
4) Overall, regions like the Southern Maidan that experienced an earlier and more complete demographic transition saw more positive impacts on socioeconomic development outcomes.
Measuring Rural-Urban Disparity Toward Promoting Integrated Development Prosp...Dr.Choen Krainara
This document summarizes and analyzes rural-urban disparity in Thailand using economic, social, and environmental indicators from 1997-2006. It finds that while progress has been made in reducing disparities, gaps remain, particularly in poverty levels, internet access, literacy rates, health access, and solid waste management. The document also outlines four large-scale policy measures and projects implemented from 2002-2004 aimed at bridging rural-urban gaps, including universal healthcare, agricultural debt relief, job training, and expanded access to credit. While these programs achieved some successes, challenges remained around coordination, sustainability, and addressing the root causes of disparities. Recommendations are made for further promoting integrated rural-urban development in Thailand.
Evolution of Urbanization: A Comprehensive Investigation from 2001 -2015 in T...inventionjournals
Urbanization is a concomitant of a combination of factors such as broad- based industrialization, growing real per capita income, division of labour, specialization, economies of scale, technological advancement, upgradation of skills, well-knit market network, and emerging service sector. Thus, urbanization is the outcome of “economic” and “demographic” growth process. Tamil Nadu occupies the number one slot in terms of degree of urbanization among major states. The proportion of urban population in the state at 48.5 percent as per 2011 Census was significantly higher than that of all India 31.2%. Among the major states, Tamil Nadu ranks first in the proportion of urban population in the country. The process of urbanization is a natural process associated with growth. The degree of urbanization in Tamil Nadu has progressively on the increase over a long span of period. Tamil Nadu accounted for 10.5 percent of the urban workers at all India. The work participation rate in urban areas of the state at 40.2 percent was higher than that of all India 35.3 percent in 2011.Tamil Nadu has 12 Municipal Corporations all under the administrative control of the Commissioner of Municipal Administration. The increase in urban population in Tamil Nadu has no doubt built pressure on housing demand particularly to the economically weaker sections and low income groups. Urban Water Supply, Lighting, Sanitation, Solid Waste Management, Urban Poverty, Drainage are in focus livelihood security for the urban poor by enhancing the employment opportunities, housing and basic amenities, universal education, ensuring towards women destitute and differently abled persons. Thus Tamil Nadu urbanization trend is expected to intensify. In this way this article shows the growth of urbanization in Tamil Nadu by indicating various table and grape.
This document summarizes key population data from the 2011 Indian Census regarding urban areas in India. Some of the key points include:
- There are over 377 million people living in urban areas in India, comprising 31.16% of the total population.
- The largest urban areas are the three mega cities of Greater Mumbai, Delhi, and Kolkata, with populations over 10 million each.
- 53 urban areas have populations over 1 million each, known as Million Plus Cities, containing 42.6% of India's urban population.
- Literacy rates are higher in urban versus rural areas of India, though there is still a gap between male and female literacy nationally.
International Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science (IRJES)irjes
International Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science (IRJES) is a leading international journal for publication of new ideas, the state of the art research results and fundamental advances in all aspects of Engineering and Science. IRJES is a open access, peer reviewed international journal with a primary objective to provide the academic community and industry for the submission of half of original research and applications
As part of our India Marketing course by Mr. Harish Bijoor, here are various insights on Census 2011 based on certain parameters as specified in the course.
The document discusses trends in urbanization in Thrissur District, Kerala between 1971-2001. Some key points:
1) Urban population in Thrissur District increased 236% between 1971-2001, compared to a 315% increase in urban area extent.
2) Urban population growth rate declined from 39.9% between 1981-1991 to 16.55% between 1991-2001, indicating reduced migration to urban areas.
3) Kunnamkulam Municipal Council saw the highest population growth rate, while Thrissur Municipal Corporation growth was lower than surrounding villages. Census towns also saw higher growth than surrounding rural areas.
This document discusses the functional characterization of settlements in the Thrissur district of Kerala, India. It analyzes settlements based on their primary land uses and average plot sizes to classify them as urban, rural, semi-urban or semi-rural. The district's settlements exhibit a unique combination of urban and rural characteristics. Based on this analysis, the document maps and lists the functional characterization of all the local self-government (LSG) areas in the district. It finds a clear spatial demarcation between urban, rural and transitional semi-urban/semi-rural areas.
1) The chapter analyzes land use patterns in Thrissur district of Kerala, India using satellite data.
2) It finds that the predominant land uses are residential/agricultural mix (50.89%) and forest (25.46%).
3) A comparison of Thrissur's land use with neighboring districts and Kerala state shows it has a higher percentage of marshy land and lower percentage of residential land than most areas.
This document contains four annexes related to local governments and socioeconomic data for Thrissur district, Kerala. Annexe 1 lists the 76 local self governments in Thrissur district. Annexe 2 shows the gross domestic product by primary, secondary and tertiary sectors for Thrissur and other districts in Kerala for 2008-2009. Annexe 3 contains population projections for Kerala up to 2021. Annexe 4 lists concentration indexes for agricultural laborers, household industrial workers and cultivators in 37 local self governments in Thrissur district.
The document acknowledges those who contributed to the "District Spatial Plan for Thrissur". It thanks the department head for their leadership and support in completing the plan quickly. It also thanks a senior town planner for their creative advice. Finally, it expresses gratitude to the dedicated team who participated in discussions, revisions, data analysis, and monitoring to successfully complete the plan.
The document is a spatial plan for the Thrissur district in Kerala, India created by the Department of Town and Country Planning in January 2011. It outlines zoning and development plans to guide infrastructure projects and regulate land use across the district over the coming years. The full document contains detailed maps and policies for managing growth in a sustainable manner across Thrissur's urban and rural areas.
The document discusses district planning in India and introduces the District Spatial Plan prepared for Thrissur District. It notes that integrated planning at the district level is mandated by the Indian Constitution to harmonize urban and rural development. The District Spatial Plan establishes a framework for the orderly development and future planning of Thrissur District by defining its spatial structure and development goals. The Chief Town Planner expresses appreciation for the officials involved in preparing the District Spatial Plan for Thrissur.
This document provides a summary of the contents of a district spatial plan for Thrissur District in Kerala, India. It outlines 15 chapters that will be covered in the plan, including profiles of population, occupational structure, land use, functional character of settlements, hierarchy of settlements, urban profile, connectivity, activity patterns, and spatial structure. It also includes goals and objectives, a tentative development concept, and development directives. Tables and figures are listed to provide data and illustrations for each chapter. The document aims to analyze the current status and plan future development for Thrissur District based on trends in various socio-economic factors.
1. << CHAPTER 7 < CONTENTS >
District Spatial Plan - Thrissur URBAN PROFILE 113
Chapter – 8
URBAN PROFILE
In this chapter the trend of urbanization of 2001. The population figures of the State as per census
Thrissur District is assessed and is compared with the 2001 are shown in the Table 8.1.
level of Urbanization of the State so as to ascertain the
There is an increase of about 400% in the total
position of the District in the State scenario.
population of Kerala within a century. During this pe-
8.1 TREND OF URBANIZATION – KERALA riod rural population has increased by 300 %. Rural
population content in Kerala has declined from 92.89%
At the turn of the 21st century, Kerala had a popu-
to 74% of the total population within a century. This is
lation of 63.96 lakhs, of which 59.42 lakhs were in its
an indication on the trend of urbanization in Kerala that
rural areas as per Census 2001. This constituted 92.89%
has happened in a century.
of the total population of the state. At the end of the
Table 8.1: Population (2001) of Kerala at a glance
2001
Person Males Females Growth rate
Total 31838619 15468664 16369955 9.42
Rural 23571484 11450785 12120699 10.05
Urban 8267135 4017879 4249256 7.64
Source: Census of India - 2001
20th century the total population in Kerala has in- The population figures of the immediate past, ie
creased to 3.18 crores (31838619) of which rural popu- last three decades are analyzed here (see table 8.2).
lation is 2.35 crores. This means that the rural popula-
There is a steady decline in the population growth
tion constitutes about 74% of the total population in
rate over the last three decades. Population growth rate
Table 8.2: Trends of population growth of Kerala - 1981-2001
Year Total population Growth rate of Growth rate in urban
total population population
1981 25453680 19.24% 37.64%
1991 29098518 14.32% 60.97%
2001 31838619 9.42% 7.64%
Source: Census of India - 2001
Department of Town & Country Planning, Kerala
2. 114 URBAN PROFILE District Spatial Plan - Thrissur
was 19.24% in 1981 and it reduced to 9.42% in 2001. But the urban population growth rate has drasti-
During the period 1981-91 population of 36.45 lakhs cally declined to 7.64% in 2001 with a decrease of 87.5
were added to the previous decades population, % over the preceding decadal urban population growth
whereas during the period 1991-2001, population of rate. At the same time the growth rate in total popula-
only 27.4 lakhs were added within. The growth rate of tion has decreased from 14.32 % to 9.42% only with a
urban population of Kerala over the last three de- decrease rate of 34.2%. This indicates that over the last
cades shows that it is in a transition phase. Over the three decades there is spread effect of population into
last two decades (1971-81 and 1981-91) growth rate in the rural area. This is an indication to the planners to
urban population was on the rise, 37.64% in 1981 and take the planning of rural areas seriously than before
60.97% in 1991. (see table 8.3). and subsequently address the reasons for the spread
Table 8.3: Trends in urbanization of Kerala - 1981-2001
Percentage of Growth rate of Growth rate in
Year Total Urban urban total urban
Polpulation Population Population Population Population
1981 25453680 4771275 18.74 19.24 37.64
1991 29098518 7680294 26.39 14.32 60.97
2001 31838619 8267135 25.97 9.42 7.64
Source: Census of India - 2001
Fig 8.1: Urban area of Thrissur District
Department of Town & Country Planning, Kerala
3. District Spatial Plan - Thrissur URBAN PROFILE 115
effect of population to rural areas. Census Town, Iringapurom Census Town, Thaikkad Cen-
sus Town, Paluvai Census Town, Pavaratty Census Town,
8.2 CENSUS URBAN AREAS IN THRISSUR DISTRICT Brahmakulam Census Town, Venmanad Census Town,
As per the 2001 census, the population of Thrissur Kolazhy Census Town, Pottore Census Town,
District is 2,974,232 which constitute about 9.34 % of Puranattukara Census Town, Nadathara Census Town,
the total population of the State. Of the total popula- Marathakkara Census Town, Avinissery Census Town,
tion of the district, 839433 is urban population. That is Palissery Census Town, Chevvoor Census Town,
28.2 % of the total population of the District is in the Vallachira Census Town, Methala Census Town,
urban areas of the District. There are thirty urban areas Nenmenikkara Census Town, Puthukkad Census Town,
viz, Thrissur Municipal Corporation, Kunnamkulam Koratty Census Town, Pookode Out Growth, and Eriyad
Municipal Council, Chavakkad Municipal Council, Out Growth, in the District as per 2001 census. The de-
Guruvayoor Municipal Council, Kodungallur Municipal tails are shown in figure 8.1 The details of census towns
Council, Irinjalakuda Municipal Council, Chalakudy is shown in table 8.4.
Municipal Council, Akathiyoor Census Town, Perakam
Table 8.4: Census Towns & Out growth in Thrissur District - 2001
Sl.No Name of Census Town Name of Grama Panchayat/ Wards numbers
Muncipal council
1 Akathiyyoor(C.T) Porkulam Ward No.4,5,6,7
2 Perakam(C.T) Pookode Ward No.8,9,10,11,12,13
3 Iringaprom(C.T) Pookode Ward No.3,4,5,6,7,8
4 Thaikkad(C.T) Thaikkad Ward No.2,3,4,5,6,7
5 Paluvai(C.T) Pavaratty Ward No.1,2,7,8,9,10
6 Pavaratty(C.T) Pavaratty Ward No.1,2,3,4,7,8,9,10
7 Brahmakulam(C.T) Elavally Ward No.1,2,9,10,11,12
8 Venmanad(C.T) Pavaratty Ward No. 4,5,6,7,8,9,10, 11, 12
9 Kolazhy(C.T) Kolazhy Ward No. 4,5,6,7,8
10 Pottore(C.T) Kolazhy Ward No. 2,3,4,8,12,13
11 Puranattukkara(C.T) Adat Ward No. 7,8,9,12,13
12 Nadathara(C.T) Nadathara Ward No. 1,3,8,9,10,11
13 Marathakkara(C.T) Puthur Ward No. 12,13,14,15,16, 17,19
14 Avinissery(C.T) Avinissery Ward No.3,4,5,6,7,10
15 Palissery(C.T) Avinissery Ward No.1,2,8,9
16 Chevvoor(C.T) Cherpu Ward No.1,2,3,4,5,10, 11, 13
17 Vallachira(C.T) Vallachira Ward No.1,2,3,4,8,9,10
18 Methala(C.T) Methala Ward No.1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,
9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17
19 Nenmanikkara(C.T) Nenmanikkara Ward No. 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10, 11
20 Pudukkad(C.T) Pudukkad Ward No. 1,2,3,8,9,10,11
21 Koratty(C.T) Koratty Ward No. 1,2,3,4,5,12,
13,14,15,16
22 Pookode(O.G) Guruvayur Ward No.21
23 Eriyad(O.G) Kodungallur Ward No.25
Source: Census of India - 2001 Department of Town & Country Planning, Kerala
4. 116 URBAN PROFILE District Spatial Plan - Thrissur
8.3 URBAN POPULATION CONTENT (EXISTING) It can be summarized that urban population has
The process of urbanization of an area can be as- increased by 236 % against an increment of 315% in the
sessed in relation to its urban population content. The extent of urban area. Urban population and urban area
urban population content of Kerala state is 26%, of the district increased during 1971-2001 period. But
whereas that of the District is 28.2%, which clearly points the increase in population is less than the increase in
out the fact that the process of urbanization in Thrissur the urban area. This indicates that there is a chance of
district is slightly more than that of average state fig- migration of further densification of the urban areas of
ure. On comparing the urban content of all the 14 Dis- Thrissur.
trict of the State, it can be seen that Thrissur District is
8.4 GROWTH RATE OF URBAN POPULATION
positioned in the 6th rank.
The graph (see fig 8.3) shows the decadal varia-
There is a steep increase (From 11.74% to 21.1%)
tion in the urban population of Thrissur District from
in the urban content of the total population for a pe-
1971 to 2001. The total urban population of the District
riod from 1971 to 1981. The urban area of the district
has increased from 249845 to 839433 in a period of four
during this period (1971-1981) shows an increase of
decades. The variation during this period was not uni-
131.87 sq km. The sudden surge in the urban popula-
form. A steady increase in the urban population is ob-
tion during this period correspond to this increase in
served from 1971 to 1991, but during the period from
area. A slight increase in the urban population and ur-
1991 to 2001 there is comparatively less increase in the
ban area is noted during the period from 1991 to 2001.
urban population.
(Table 8.5).
Table 8.5: Thrissur District - variation in urban content 1991-2001
Year Total Population Urban Population Percent of urban Urban area in
Population Sq. km
1971 2,128,877 249,845 11.74 83.43
1981 2,439,633 514,783 21.1 215.3
1991 2,737,311 720,216 26.31 301.2
2001 2,974,232 839,433 28.2 345.85
Source: Census of India - 2001
The increase in urban areas of the District as indi- The graph (see fig 8.4) shown below depicts the
cated in the corresponding years census figures, is growth rate of urban population against the growth rate
showed the fig 8.2. In 1971 the extent of urban area in of population over the last two decades in the District.
Thrissur District was 83.43 sq km, which has increased When the population growth rate of the District has
to 301.2 sq km in 1991. The increase of urban area of the declined from 12.21 to 8.66, the urban population
district was not uniform from 1971 to 2001, but the in- growth rate has declined from 39.9 to 16.55 during the
crease was high during the period from 1971 to 1981 same time period (1981 to 2001), indicating a possibil-
and from 1981 to 1991. There is only slight increase of ity of considerable reduction in the migration of popu-
urban area during the last decade, i.e. during the pe- lation to the urban areas of the District. The growth
riod 1991 –2001. rate of urban population is more than the growth rate
Department of Town & Country Planning, Kerala
5. District Spatial Plan - Thrissur URBAN PROFILE 117
Fig 8.2: Extent of urban area of the District
of the district. There is a reduction in growth rate the Figure (fig 8.5) depicts the variation of popula-
rural and urban scenario, but it is found that the urban tion growth rate of various local government of Thrissur
areas exhibit faster growth indicating a constant mi- district. From the figure it is clear that growth rate is
gration to urban area. This may be due to the educa- maximum at Kunnamkulam Muncipal Council. Growth
tional, medical and Infrastructural facilities available rate of population of Thrissur Municipal Corporation is
in the urban areas of the district. less than the surrounding Grama Panchayats. But the
Source: Census of India - 2001
Fig 8.3: Total urban population during various decades
Table 8.6 compares the growth rate of urban popu- Grama Panchayats that are census towns show more
lation of the State and the District. This shows that there growth rate than the surrounding Grama Panchayats.
is a huge decline in the growth rate of urban popula- There are 11 census towns located near Thrissur Mu-
tion of Kerala; more or less the same decreasing pat- nicipal Corporation. Guruvayur Muncipal council and
tern is seen in Thrissur also, but the rate of decrease is Chavakkad Muncipal council show less growth rate than
just half that of the state. the surrounding Grama Panchayats. Grama Panchayat
parts of which are census towns via Akathiyoor Census
Department of Town & Country Planning, Kerala
6. 118 URBAN PROFILE District Spatial Plan - Thrissur
Table 8.6: Growth rate of urban population – Comparison with state
1981-91 1991-01
Kerala 60.89 % 7.69 %
Thrissur 39.9 % 16.55 %
Source: Census of India - 2001
Fig 8.4: Population Growth Rate- Comparison with District
Fig 8.5: Growth rate of population 2001- Local Govt. wise variation
Department of Town & Country Planning, Kerala
7. District Spatial Plan - Thrissur URBAN PROFILE 119
Town, Perakam Census Town, Iringapuram Census slowly withdrawing from the primary sector and started
Town, Thaikkad Census Town, Paluvai Census Town, depending more on the service sector. Because of this
Brahmakulam Census Town, Kolazhy Census Town, shift in the occupational structure some of the rural
Pottore Census Town, Puranattukara Census Town, areas will be having more than 75% of the male work-
Marathakkara Census Town, Avinissery Census Town, ers in the non-agricultural category in the near future
Palissery Census Town, Vallachira Census Town, and hence will fall in the category of census urban.
Methala Census Town, Nenmenikkara Census Town, Hence there may be significant increase in the urban
Koratty Census Town, Pookode Out Growth and Eriyad population as well as in the extent of urban areas of
Out Growth show greater population growth rate. In the District in the future. In the following paragraphs,
general there is a chance of in migration of people to the future urban LSGs are delineated based on the
the urban areas from the rural areas. three fold census classification as per census 2001, and
the result is further iterated with the factors like im-
8.5 URBAN SETTLEMENTS – FROM 1971 TO 2001 pact of proposed urban development projects, grade
The number of urban settlements of the district of the LSGs and hierarchy of settlements.
was increasing from 1971 to 1991 (see table 8.7). In 2001,
Thrissur Municipal Corporation has been upgraded to CRITERIA-1: CENSUS URBAN AREA
Thrissur Municipal Corporation appending the adjoin- A study on the existing occupational structure in
ing the census urban settlements, thus there is decrease various settlements of the District will throw light on
in the total number of urban settlements of district the future urban profile of the district. The workers of
compared to the previous decade. But area wise there each settlement which are classified in to four fold clas-
Table 8.7: Urban settlements in different period of time
Census year Total number of Muncipal Muncipal Census Urban out Total urban
urban centres Corporation Towns Towns Growths area (Sq. Km)
1971 9 4 4 1 83.43
1981 26 6 19 1 215.3
1991 44 6 34 4 301.2
2001 30 1 6 21 2 345.85
Source: Census 2001
is an increase from 1991 to 2001 in the urban area. sification as per census 2001 are divided in to the fol-
lowing nine categories based on the workers classifica-
8.6 FUTURE URBANIZATION PROFILE OF THE DIS- tion in the 1991 census.
TRICT
1. Main Cultivators
The analysis of the occupational structure of the
2. Main Agricultural Labourers
District shows that the primary sector i.e., the agricul-
3. Livestock, Forestry, Fishing, Hunting, Planta-
ture sector, shows declining trend in the district. The
tion, Orchards, and allied activates
sectors, which show growth, are industrial and the ser-
4. Mining and Quarrying
vice sectors. More than 50% of the total urban popula-
5. Manufacturing, Processing, Servicing and
tion depends on the service sector for their lively hood.
repairs in Household industries
It is observed that rural areas of the district are also
6. Manufacturing, Processing, servicing and
Department of Town & Country Planning, Kerala
8. 120 URBAN PROFILE District Spatial Plan - Thrissur
repairs in other than household industries vicing and repairs in other than house hold industries,
7. Trade and commerce trade & commerce, transport, storage & communica-
8. Transport storage and Communications tion and others are totaled to calculate the percentage
of male workers in non-agricultural activities in each of
9. Others
the LSGs of the District. The details are shown in
The methodology adopted for the extrapolation Annexe-21. In order to avoid the possibility of errors,
to get the nine fold classification of workers in 2001 i.e. exclusion of some of the actual urban area, the ex-
based on the workers classification in census 1991 is trapolation of the data to get classification of workers
described briefly here. The only two types of workers based on 1991 census, is attempted only for the LSGs
included in both 1991 and 2001 census are the cultiva- with non-agricultural male workers more than 90% (in-
tors and agricultural laborers. The remaining two types stead of 75%) is taken for the study. Based on this, there
of workers in the 2001 census, house hold industrial are 45 LSGs identified in the District, which are satisfy-
workers and other workers are totaled together and ing the three-fold census criteria to be urban in imme-
this total is divided in to 7 classes of workers in the diate future. The list of which is given below and the
same proportion as these 7 classes of workers as there spatial location of these LSGs is shown in fig 8.6.
in the 1991 census. Then the number of male workers
1. Thrissur Municipal Corporation
in manufacturing, processing, servicing and repairs in
2. Methala
House hold industries, manufacturing, processing, ser- 3. Edavilangu
Fig 8.6: Urban Centers based on 3 fold Census Criteria
Department of Town & Country Planning, Kerala
9. District Spatial Plan - Thrissur URBAN PROFILE 121
4. Eriyad 28. Pudukkad
5. Guruvayur Municipal Council 29. Thaikkad
6. Avinissery 30. Alagappanagar
7. Chavakkad Municipal Council 31. Edathiruthy
8. Irinjalakkuda Municipal Council 32. Kaiparamba
9. Kaipamangalam 33. Punnayur
10. Sreenarayanapuram 34. Kandanissery
11. Mathilakam 35. Elavally
12. Nenmanikkara 36. Vadakkekad
13. Pookode 37. Kadukkutty
14. Kodungallur Municipal Council 38. Adat
15. Perinjanam 39. Vellangallur
16. Kolazhy 40. Engandiyur
17. Chalakkudy Municipal Council 41. Mala
18. Valappad 42. Venkitangu
19. Thalikulam 43. Poyya
20. Cherpu 44. Mulamkkunnathukkavu
21. Nattika 45. Nadathara
22. Manalur
The classification of an area into urban depending
23. Kadapuram
24. Vadanappilly upon 9 fold classification of workers obtained out of a
25. Pavaratty mere extrapolation of the census 2001 data based on
26. Kunnamkulam Municipal Council the previous decades data can’t be taken as very accu-
27. Orumanayur
Fig 8.7: Urban Centers Based on Census Criteria & Grade of LSGs
Department of Town & Country Planning, Kerala
10. 122 URBAN PROFILE District Spatial Plan - Thrissur
rate. Though it gives a near accurate picture about the 19. Perinjanam
trend of urbanization, some other factors like the ex- 20. Mathilakam
tent of physical and economic development, future 21. Sreenarayanapuram
urban development projects and existing hierarchy of
22. Methala
settlements need to be considered.
23. Nenmanikkara
CRITERIA 2: GRADE OF LSGs
24. Alagappanagar
The grading of LSGs is done previously compar-
25. Vadanappilly
ing their physical and economical development. So, in
the absence of direct data to assess the physical and 26. Pudukkad
economic development, the grade of Grama Panchayat 27. Vellangallur
can be taken as a proxy indicator to measure the physi- 28. Mala
cal and economic development of the LSGs
29. Kadukkutty
Out of the 45 Grama Panchayats listed based on 30. Nadathara
criteria one, 24 are Special grade Grama Panchayts and
31. Vadakkekad
14 are first grade Grama Panchayats. The first grade
Grama Panchayats are excluded from the list. The re- Figure 8.7, shows the spatial location of these 31
maining LSGs are: LSGs. Before finalizing the future urban LSGs of the Dis-
trict, the urban development Projects of the District
1. Thrissur Municipal Corporation
and their possible impacts are also to be studied.
2. Guruvayur Municipal Council
3. Chavakkad Municipal Council CRITERIA: 3: PERSPECTIVES IN URBAN DEVELOP-
MENT
4. Irinjalakkuda Municipal Council
The major urban development projects envis-
5. Kodungallur Municipal Council
aged in the District as of now are the proposal for a
6. Chalakkudy Municipal Council Medical University in the Avanoor Grama Panchayat
7. Kunnamkulam Municipal Council where part of the existing medical college is function-
8. Valappad ing. This will obviously induce a tremendous develop-
ment impulse in this area.
9. Engandiyur
10. Edavilangu It is to be noted that Avanoor Grama Panchayat is
not included in the 31 LSGs listed as probable urban
11. Edathiruthy
LSGs of the District. So this local body is to be consid-
12. Venkitangu ered while listing the future urban LSGs. After the in-
13. Nattika clusion of this LSGs the number of LSGs in the select list
14. Pavaratty will increase to 32 as listed below and also shown in Fig
8.8.
15. Adat
1. Thrissur Municipal Corporation
16. Manalur
2. Guruvayur Municipal Council
17. Cherpu
3. Chavakkad Municipal Council
18. Eriyad
4. Irinjalakkuda Municipal Council
Department of Town & Country Planning, Kerala
11. District Spatial Plan - Thrissur URBAN PROFILE 123
5. Kodungallur Municipal Council 21. Sreenarayanapuram
6. Chalakkudy Municipal Council 22. Methala
7. Kunnamkulam Municipal Council 23. Nenmanikkara
8. Valappad 24. Alagappanagar
9. Engandiyur 25. Vadanappilly
10. Edavilangu
26. Pudukkad
11. Edathiruthy
27. Vellangallur
12. Venkitangu
28. Mala
13. Nattika
29. Kadukkutty
14. Pavaratty
30. Nadathara
15. Adat
31. Vadakkekad
16. Manalur
32. Avanoor
17. Cherpu
18. Eriyad CRITERIA: 4: HIERARCHY OF SETTLEMENT
19. Perinjanam The hierarchy of the above 32 LSGs in the overall
context of the District are also to be taken in to account
20. Mathilakam
before finalizing the LSGs with urban character, be-
cause it is an indicator of the type and number of facili-
Fig 8.8: Urban Centers Based on Census Criteria, Grade of LSGs & Perspectives in Urban Development
Department of Town & Country Planning, Kerala
12. 124 URBAN PROFILE District Spatial Plan - Thrissur
ties in the LSGs. Annexe 10 shows the hierarchy of the lists of the probable urban LSGs are given below.
settlements and according to this, out of the 32 LSGs
1. Thrissur Municipal Corporation
listed above the following are in the category of LSGs
having the lowest hierarchy. 2. Guruvayur Municipal Council
1. Engandiyur 3. Chavakkad Municipal Council
2. Edathiruthy 4. Irinjalakkuda Municipal Council
3. Venkitangu
4. Nattika 5. Kodungallur Municipal Council
5. Perinjanam 6. Chalakkudy Municipal Council
6. Mathilakam
7. Kunnamkulam Municipal Council
7. Nenmanikkara
8. Alagappanagar 8. Valappad
9. Vadanappilly 9. Edavilangu
10. Vellangallur
10. Pavaratty
11. Kadukkutty
12. Nadathara 11. Adat
13. Vadakkekad 12. Manalur
14. Avanoor 13. Cherpu
These fourteen LSGs are to be excluded from the 14. Eriyad
list of the selected list of likely urban LSGs. The final
Table 8.8: Future urban profile of the District
Existing Urban area Future probable urban area
1. Thrissur Municipal Corporation 1. Valappad
2 Kunnamkulam Municipal Council 2. Edavilangu
3 Chalakkudy Municipal Council 3. Pavaratty
4 Irinjalakkuda Municipal Council 4 . Adat
5 Kodungallur Municipal Council 5. Manalur
6 Guruvayur Municipal Council 6. Cherpu
7 Chavakkad Municipal Council 7. Eriyad
8. Sreenarayanapuram
9. Methala
10. Pudukkad
11. Mala
Department of Town & Country Planning, Kerala
13. District Spatial Plan - Thrissur URBAN PROFILE 125
15. Sreenarayanapuram ture.
16. Methala The pattern of growth rate of population among
the LSGs of the District as per census 2001 shows that
17. Pudukkad
the growth rate is the highest among those LSGs adja-
18. Mala cent to the Thrissur Municipal Corporation. And hence
Clearly the above local governments define the it can be presumed that those LSGs adjacent to the
future urban profile of the District. The likely future Thrissur Municipal Corporation and those along the
urban profile of the district evolved is shown in the National high way can be assumed to attain urban sta-
table 8.8 and the same is shown in fig 8.9 tus in the next 10 years and the remaining LSGs to be-
come urban within the next 20 years. In the study of
8.7 URBAN PROFILE the hierarchy of settlements Adat is positioned next to
All the 11 LSGs listed as probable future urban Thrissur Municipal Corporation. So this LSGs can be as-
LSGs can’t be expected to attain urban character in next sumed to attain urban nature in the first phase itself.
decade (2011) but only some of these will attain urban That means Adat, Pavaratty, Eriyad, Mala and Methala
character by the next decade and the remaining will will attain the status of urban LSGs in the next 10 years
attain urban character in the succeeding decade after where as all the other 6 LSGs will attain the urban sta-
that. The growth rate of population can be taken as tus within the next 20 years.
deciding criteria by how fast a LSGs attains urban na-
This is shown in Table 8.9.
Fig 8.9: Urban Future urbanization profile – Thrissur District
Department of Town & Country Planning, Kerala
14. 126 URBAN PROFILE District Spatial Plan - Thrissur
Table 8.9: Urban profile - Phasing
Sl No In the next 10 years In the next 20 years
1 Adat Edavilangu
2 Pavaratty Valappad
3 Eriyad Sreenarayanapuram
4 Mala Pudukkad
5 Methala Manalur
6 Cherpu
Table 8.10: Facilities in general to be provided
Order Name of the settlement Projected
Administrative status Facilities
1 Thrissur Municipal Corporation Urban LSG Higher order urban and
rural facilities
2 Irinjalakuda Municipal Council Urban LSG Higher order rural facilities
and middle order urban facilities
2 Chalakkudy Municipal Council Urban LSG Higher order rural facilities and
middle order urban facilities
2 Kunnamkulam Municipal Council Urban LSG Higher order rural facilities
and middle order urban facilities
2 Mattathur Rural LSG Higher order rural facilities
and middle order urban facilities
2 Chelakkara Rural LSG Higher order rural facilities
and middle order urban facilities
3 Kodungallur Municipal Council Urban LSG Higher order rural facilities
and middle order urban facilities
3 Wadakkanchery Rural LSG Middle order rural facilities
and Lower order urban facilities
3 Valappad Urban LSG Middle order rural facilities
and Lower order urban facilities
3 Guruvayur Municipal Council Urban LSG Higher order rural facilities
and middle order urban facilities
Department of Town & Country Planning, Kerala
15. District Spatial Plan - Thrissur URBAN PROFILE 127
3 Venkidangu Rural LSG Middle order rural facilities
and Lower order urban facilities
3 Pananchery Rural LSG Middle order rural facilities
and Lower order urban facilities
3 Alagappanagar Rural LSG Middle order rural facilities
and Lower order urban facilities
8.8 FUNCTIONS (PROPOSED) TO BE PER- 8.9 INFERENCE
FORMED BY VARIOUS HIGHER ORDER SETTLE-
Thrissur District is more urbanized when com-
MENTS.
pared to the State. However the level of urbanization
The functions to be performed by various higher shows an inclining trend within the District. The urban
order settlements are derived based on their order, areas of the district show higher growth rate of popula-
administrative status, character of the settlements and tion whereas the rural areas surrounding the urban ar-
the service area. The result is summarized in table 8.10. eas show significantly lower growth rate indicating pos-
All the other LSGs will act as basic service cen- sible in migration of people to the urban areas from
ters. the surrounding rural settlements.
Department of Town & Country Planning, Kerala
< CONTENTS > CHAPTER 9 >>