DRUG TREATMENT OF
RESISTANT DEPRESSION
DR SUSHIL KUMAR S V,
MB BS, MD (PSYCHIATRY), MHA, FIPS,
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, DEPT. OF
PSYCHIATRY
SS INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES,
DAVANGERE, INDIA
INTRODUCTION
• Degree of symptom reduction is related to functioning
• Partial responders with residual symptoms have a poorer
prognosis compared to complete remitters
CATEGORIES OF RESPONSE
• Response without remission (< 50% but > 25% from baseline
scores)
• Non-response
• Relapse (< 6 months of acute response)
• Recurrences ( > 6 months)
• Recovery (8 week period)
• Breakthrough (Poop out)
CATEGORIES OF RESPONSE
• Residual symptoms: irritability, social functioning, dysfunctional
attitudes, depressive cognitions
• Complete remission is the optimal goal (Trivedi &Kleiber, 2001)
• HAMD Score of < 7
DEFINITION OF TRD
• Failure to respond to 2 adequate trials of different chemical
classes (Sourey et al, 1999)
• Several Staging Methods
-- CPMP Guidelines
-- Thase & Rush (1997)
-- Massachusetts General Hospital
DEFINITION OF TRD
• Adequate dose & adequate duration
• Treatment intolerance (Schatzberg et al, 1983)
• 20% are treatment intolerant
FACTORS RELATED TO TRD
• Patient and Treatment related factors
• Diagnosis
-- Bipolarity
-- Psychotic depression
-- Atypical depression
-- Co-morbid conditions
STRATEGIES FOR TRD
• Optimizing the dose
• Augmentation
• Combination
• Switching
• No conclusive data identifies the optimal strategy (Nelson,
2003)
OPTIMIZING DOSE
• Most do not receive adequate trial (Keller et al, 1986; Dawson et
al, 1999)
• Pseudo Resistant (Sackeim, 2001)
• Failure to use adequate dose for adequate duration have an
iatrogenic effect in increasing resistance
OPTIMIZING DOSE
• Dose- 300 mg / day of imipramine
• SSRI- Flat dose response curve
• Duration- 4-6 weeks ; Extending to 10-12 weeks ( Nemeroff,
2001; Thase & Rush, 1995)
OPTIMIZING DOSE
• Structured Antidepressant Treatment History Form (Sackeim,
2001)
• Initial Choice of medication may depend on depressive
symptoms
• Mirtazapine for insomnia; Venlafaxine for anxious depression
(Meoni et al, 2004)
• Venlafaxine > SSRI
AUGMENTATION
• Adding an agent that is not a standard antidepressant
• Lithium (Joffe et al, 1993; Nierenberg et al, 2003)
• Triiodothyronine (T3 > T4) (Joffe et al, 1993)
AUGMENTATION
• Mood Stabilizers ( Lamotrigine, Valproic acid, Carbamazepine)
• Pindolol (Nelson 2003; Fava 2001)
• Buspirone (Dimitriou & Dimitriou, 1998; Landen et al, 1998)
AUGMENTATION
• Atypical antipsychotics (Olanzapine, clozapine, Risperidone,
Aripiprazole)
• Psychostimulants (Methylphenidate) (Thase & Rush, 1995)
• Lithium has been best studied
COMBINATION STRATEGIES
• Combining one antidepressant with another antidepressant
• SSRI+ Mirtazapine (de la Gandara et al, 2005)
• SSRI+ Reboxetine ( Fava, 2001)
• SSRI+ Bupropion (STAR‫٭‬D)
• SSRI+ TCA (Nelson et al, 1991)
COMBINATION STRATEGIES
• Venlafaxine + Bupropion (Keller, 2005)
• Fluoxetine + Olanzapine (Nemeroff, 2005)
• SSRI + Risperidone (Nemeroff, 2005)
• AD + Antipsychotic at 400 mg/ day ofCPZ
SWITCHING STRATEGIES
• TCA ►TCA (Thase & Rush, 1995; Nierenberg et al, 1990;
Shelton, 1999)
• TCA ►Newer Heterocyclics (Thase & Rush,1995)
• TCA►SSRI (Thase & Rush, 1995)
SWITCHING STRATEGIES
• SSRI►TCA (Fava, 2001)
• SSRI►SNRI (Fava,2001, Poirier&Boyer,1999)
• SSRI►Bupropion (Fava et al, 2003)
• SSRI►SSRI (Zarate et al, 1996)
• SSRI►MAOI (Thase & Rush, 1995)
SWITCHING STRATEGIES
• SSRI→SNRI------- 30-60% (Poirier & Boyer, 1999)
• SSRI→ SSRI------ 40-50% (Zarate et al, 1996)
• TCA → SSRI------ 30-50% (Thase & Rush,1995)
• TCA → TCA------- Poorer Response
ALGORITHM
• STAR‫٭‬D (Rush et al, 2003)
• Level 1- Citalopram
• Level 2- Switch to Bupropion, Sertraline,
Venlafaxine
Augment -Bupropion,Buspirone
ALGORITHM
• Level 3- Switch to Mirtazapine, TCA
Augment- Lithium / T3
• Level 4- Switch to Tranylcypromine
Augment- Mirtazapine + SNRI
ALGORITHM
• Level 1- SSRI
• Level 2- SSRI or SNRI
• Level 3- Augment with Bupropion, Lithium
• Treatment with MAOI or Lithium before ECT (Keller, 1995)
CONCLUSIONS
• Correct Diagnosis
• Therapeutic Goal– Full Remission
• Optimizing initial treatment
• Augmenting and Combination strategies in development
• Factors resulting in TRD

Drug Treatment of Resistant Depression

  • 1.
    DRUG TREATMENT OF RESISTANTDEPRESSION DR SUSHIL KUMAR S V, MB BS, MD (PSYCHIATRY), MHA, FIPS, ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, DEPT. OF PSYCHIATRY SS INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, DAVANGERE, INDIA
  • 2.
    INTRODUCTION • Degree ofsymptom reduction is related to functioning • Partial responders with residual symptoms have a poorer prognosis compared to complete remitters
  • 3.
    CATEGORIES OF RESPONSE •Response without remission (< 50% but > 25% from baseline scores) • Non-response • Relapse (< 6 months of acute response) • Recurrences ( > 6 months) • Recovery (8 week period) • Breakthrough (Poop out)
  • 4.
    CATEGORIES OF RESPONSE •Residual symptoms: irritability, social functioning, dysfunctional attitudes, depressive cognitions • Complete remission is the optimal goal (Trivedi &Kleiber, 2001) • HAMD Score of < 7
  • 5.
    DEFINITION OF TRD •Failure to respond to 2 adequate trials of different chemical classes (Sourey et al, 1999) • Several Staging Methods -- CPMP Guidelines -- Thase & Rush (1997) -- Massachusetts General Hospital
  • 6.
    DEFINITION OF TRD •Adequate dose & adequate duration • Treatment intolerance (Schatzberg et al, 1983) • 20% are treatment intolerant
  • 7.
    FACTORS RELATED TOTRD • Patient and Treatment related factors • Diagnosis -- Bipolarity -- Psychotic depression -- Atypical depression -- Co-morbid conditions
  • 8.
    STRATEGIES FOR TRD •Optimizing the dose • Augmentation • Combination • Switching • No conclusive data identifies the optimal strategy (Nelson, 2003)
  • 9.
    OPTIMIZING DOSE • Mostdo not receive adequate trial (Keller et al, 1986; Dawson et al, 1999) • Pseudo Resistant (Sackeim, 2001) • Failure to use adequate dose for adequate duration have an iatrogenic effect in increasing resistance
  • 10.
    OPTIMIZING DOSE • Dose-300 mg / day of imipramine • SSRI- Flat dose response curve • Duration- 4-6 weeks ; Extending to 10-12 weeks ( Nemeroff, 2001; Thase & Rush, 1995)
  • 11.
    OPTIMIZING DOSE • StructuredAntidepressant Treatment History Form (Sackeim, 2001) • Initial Choice of medication may depend on depressive symptoms • Mirtazapine for insomnia; Venlafaxine for anxious depression (Meoni et al, 2004) • Venlafaxine > SSRI
  • 12.
    AUGMENTATION • Adding anagent that is not a standard antidepressant • Lithium (Joffe et al, 1993; Nierenberg et al, 2003) • Triiodothyronine (T3 > T4) (Joffe et al, 1993)
  • 13.
    AUGMENTATION • Mood Stabilizers( Lamotrigine, Valproic acid, Carbamazepine) • Pindolol (Nelson 2003; Fava 2001) • Buspirone (Dimitriou & Dimitriou, 1998; Landen et al, 1998)
  • 14.
    AUGMENTATION • Atypical antipsychotics(Olanzapine, clozapine, Risperidone, Aripiprazole) • Psychostimulants (Methylphenidate) (Thase & Rush, 1995) • Lithium has been best studied
  • 15.
    COMBINATION STRATEGIES • Combiningone antidepressant with another antidepressant • SSRI+ Mirtazapine (de la Gandara et al, 2005) • SSRI+ Reboxetine ( Fava, 2001) • SSRI+ Bupropion (STAR‫٭‬D) • SSRI+ TCA (Nelson et al, 1991)
  • 16.
    COMBINATION STRATEGIES • Venlafaxine+ Bupropion (Keller, 2005) • Fluoxetine + Olanzapine (Nemeroff, 2005) • SSRI + Risperidone (Nemeroff, 2005) • AD + Antipsychotic at 400 mg/ day ofCPZ
  • 17.
    SWITCHING STRATEGIES • TCA►TCA (Thase & Rush, 1995; Nierenberg et al, 1990; Shelton, 1999) • TCA ►Newer Heterocyclics (Thase & Rush,1995) • TCA►SSRI (Thase & Rush, 1995)
  • 18.
    SWITCHING STRATEGIES • SSRI►TCA(Fava, 2001) • SSRI►SNRI (Fava,2001, Poirier&Boyer,1999) • SSRI►Bupropion (Fava et al, 2003) • SSRI►SSRI (Zarate et al, 1996) • SSRI►MAOI (Thase & Rush, 1995)
  • 19.
    SWITCHING STRATEGIES • SSRI→SNRI-------30-60% (Poirier & Boyer, 1999) • SSRI→ SSRI------ 40-50% (Zarate et al, 1996) • TCA → SSRI------ 30-50% (Thase & Rush,1995) • TCA → TCA------- Poorer Response
  • 20.
    ALGORITHM • STAR‫٭‬D (Rushet al, 2003) • Level 1- Citalopram • Level 2- Switch to Bupropion, Sertraline, Venlafaxine Augment -Bupropion,Buspirone
  • 21.
    ALGORITHM • Level 3-Switch to Mirtazapine, TCA Augment- Lithium / T3 • Level 4- Switch to Tranylcypromine Augment- Mirtazapine + SNRI
  • 22.
    ALGORITHM • Level 1-SSRI • Level 2- SSRI or SNRI • Level 3- Augment with Bupropion, Lithium • Treatment with MAOI or Lithium before ECT (Keller, 1995)
  • 23.
    CONCLUSIONS • Correct Diagnosis •Therapeutic Goal– Full Remission • Optimizing initial treatment • Augmenting and Combination strategies in development • Factors resulting in TRD