Date
Dravya Vijñāna -Refutation of Tamas as
Dravya
DrSakshi_Bhardwaj NIA,Jaipur Dept:Maulik Siddhanata
1
Concept and description
✤ The attribute Nilatwa and the action Calatwa are present inTama. As Tama
has the above said Guna and Karma, it is an independent Dravya.
2
DrSakshi_Bhardwaj NIA,Jaipur Dept:Maulik Siddhanata
Concept and description
✤ 1. It can not be included in Pṛthvi as Gandha and Sparsa are present in
Prthvi.
✤ 2. It can not be included in Jala as Rasa šita sparsa sukla Rūpa are present in
Jala bhūta.
✤ 3. It can not be included in tejas as the Usna Sparsa, bhaswara swarupa are
present in tejas.
3
DrSakshi_Bhardwaj NIA,Jaipur Dept:Maulik Siddhanata
Concept and description
✤ 4. As the attributes ever mobility, Sparsa are not available in Tamsa, it can
not be included in Väyu bhūta.
✤ 5. As Akāśa is a rūpahina Dravya, as rupa does not exist in Akāśa it can not
be included in Akasa.
✤ 6. It can not be included in Atma, Mana and Käla as the above are rūpa hina
Dravyas.
4
DrSakshi_Bhardwaj NIA,Jaipur Dept:Maulik Siddhanata
Concept and description
✤ Some Acaryas opine that Tamas is an independent Dravya with
significance.
✤ But some acaryas refuted (or contradicted) the above view and did not
accept Tama as additional Dravya.
✤ They say that as dravyatwa is absent in Tama, it can not be a Dravya.
Absence of lighting only is Tama. It is not reasonable that absence of Tama
is lighting. Prakasa is the form of Teja. Teja s perceivable through
cakṣurindriya and twagindriya. The ac tions of Teja, i.c. Dahana and pacana
are perceivable through di rect perception. Tama is perceivable only
through cakṣurindriya.
5
DrSakshi_Bhardwaj NIA,Jaipur Dept:Maulik Siddhanata
Concept and description
✤ The attribute Nilatwa and the action Calatwa are present inTama. As Tama
has the above said Guna and Karma, it is an independent Dravya.
6
DrSakshi_Bhardwaj NIA,Jaipur Dept:Maulik Siddhanata
“THANK YOU”
7
DrSakshi_Bhardwaj NIA,Jaipur Dept:Maulik Siddhanata

Dravya-REFUTATION OF TAMAS as per NCISM syllabus

  • 1.
    Date Dravya Vijñāna -Refutationof Tamas as Dravya DrSakshi_Bhardwaj NIA,Jaipur Dept:Maulik Siddhanata 1
  • 2.
    Concept and description ✤The attribute Nilatwa and the action Calatwa are present inTama. As Tama has the above said Guna and Karma, it is an independent Dravya. 2 DrSakshi_Bhardwaj NIA,Jaipur Dept:Maulik Siddhanata
  • 3.
    Concept and description ✤1. It can not be included in Pṛthvi as Gandha and Sparsa are present in Prthvi. ✤ 2. It can not be included in Jala as Rasa šita sparsa sukla Rūpa are present in Jala bhūta. ✤ 3. It can not be included in tejas as the Usna Sparsa, bhaswara swarupa are present in tejas. 3 DrSakshi_Bhardwaj NIA,Jaipur Dept:Maulik Siddhanata
  • 4.
    Concept and description ✤4. As the attributes ever mobility, Sparsa are not available in Tamsa, it can not be included in Väyu bhūta. ✤ 5. As Akāśa is a rūpahina Dravya, as rupa does not exist in Akāśa it can not be included in Akasa. ✤ 6. It can not be included in Atma, Mana and Käla as the above are rūpa hina Dravyas. 4 DrSakshi_Bhardwaj NIA,Jaipur Dept:Maulik Siddhanata
  • 5.
    Concept and description ✤Some Acaryas opine that Tamas is an independent Dravya with significance. ✤ But some acaryas refuted (or contradicted) the above view and did not accept Tama as additional Dravya. ✤ They say that as dravyatwa is absent in Tama, it can not be a Dravya. Absence of lighting only is Tama. It is not reasonable that absence of Tama is lighting. Prakasa is the form of Teja. Teja s perceivable through cakṣurindriya and twagindriya. The ac tions of Teja, i.c. Dahana and pacana are perceivable through di rect perception. Tama is perceivable only through cakṣurindriya. 5 DrSakshi_Bhardwaj NIA,Jaipur Dept:Maulik Siddhanata
  • 6.
    Concept and description ✤The attribute Nilatwa and the action Calatwa are present inTama. As Tama has the above said Guna and Karma, it is an independent Dravya. 6 DrSakshi_Bhardwaj NIA,Jaipur Dept:Maulik Siddhanata
  • 7.