Information on IPSA 2017 Conference "Looking Beyond the Crisis: Impact of Mass Migrations on the Local, Regional, National and EU Governance", 11-14 May 2017, Dubrovnik, Croatia
Information on IPSA 2017 Conference "Looking Beyond the Crisis: Impact of Mass Migrations on the Local, Regional, National and EU Governance", 11-14 May 2017, Dubrovnik, Croatia
This document announces an international conference on decentralization policies to be held from May 7-10, 2015 in Dubrovnik, Croatia. The conference is organized by several Croatian and international organizations and will explore recent decentralization reforms, including territorial restructuring, the democratizing effects of decentralization, and evaluations of current reforms. Accepted papers will be considered for publication in an international journal. The deadline for abstract submissions is January 31, 2015. The conference will take place at the Centre for Advanced Academic Studies in Dubrovnik and accommodation will be provided to invited speakers.
Tom Christensen - "The Norwegian Central Administrative System: Development F...Institut za javnu upravu
The Norwegian central administrative system has developed gradually over time. Key developments include the establishment of ministries in 1814 and the introduction of agencies in the 1850s based on Swedish and Danish models. Since 1945, the system has grown significantly with increased specialization and more regulatory agencies. Reforms since the 1980s have aimed for more efficiency through structural changes, but also increased coordination. Maintaining political control while the system is decentralized and balancing autonomy with coordination are ongoing challenges. Typical Norwegian features include shared norms between political and administrative leaders, modified hierarchies, and autonomy for agencies within set goals.
Tom Christensen - "Comparative Public Sector Reforms - Perspectives and Exper...Institut za javnu upravu
This document discusses perspectives on comparative public sector reform. It covers the instrumental perspective that sees reform as achievable through reorganization, the cultural perspective that reform is an evolutionary process, and the myth perspective where reforms spread due to norms. New Public Management aimed for efficiency but faced challenges around political control and coordination. Post-NPM reforms emphasize strengthening central control and coordination in response to problems with NPM and a more insecure world. Future government may blend old, NPM, and post-NPM approaches, with both potential positive and negative effects.
This document announces an international conference on decentralization policies to be held from May 7-10, 2015 in Dubrovnik, Croatia. The conference is organized by several Croatian and international organizations and will explore recent decentralization reforms, including territorial restructuring, the democratizing effects of decentralization, and evaluations of current reforms. Accepted papers will be considered for publication in an international journal. The deadline for abstract submissions is January 31, 2015. The conference will take place at the Centre for Advanced Academic Studies in Dubrovnik and accommodation will be provided to invited speakers.
Tom Christensen - "The Norwegian Central Administrative System: Development F...Institut za javnu upravu
The Norwegian central administrative system has developed gradually over time. Key developments include the establishment of ministries in 1814 and the introduction of agencies in the 1850s based on Swedish and Danish models. Since 1945, the system has grown significantly with increased specialization and more regulatory agencies. Reforms since the 1980s have aimed for more efficiency through structural changes, but also increased coordination. Maintaining political control while the system is decentralized and balancing autonomy with coordination are ongoing challenges. Typical Norwegian features include shared norms between political and administrative leaders, modified hierarchies, and autonomy for agencies within set goals.
Tom Christensen - "Comparative Public Sector Reforms - Perspectives and Exper...Institut za javnu upravu
This document discusses perspectives on comparative public sector reform. It covers the instrumental perspective that sees reform as achievable through reorganization, the cultural perspective that reform is an evolutionary process, and the myth perspective where reforms spread due to norms. New Public Management aimed for efficiency but faced challenges around political control and coordination. Post-NPM reforms emphasize strengthening central control and coordination in response to problems with NPM and a more insecure world. Future government may blend old, NPM, and post-NPM approaches, with both potential positive and negative effects.
Ivan Koprić: "Kuda plovi ovaj brod? Agencije od popularnog rješenja do sveopć...
mr.sc. Vedran Đulabić: Primjena upravnih ugovora u lokalnoj i regionalnoj samoupravi
1. PRIMJENA UPRAVNIH UGOVORA
U LOKALNOJ I REGIONALNOJ
SAMOUPRAVI
Mr. sc. Vedran Đulabić
Pravni fakultet u Zagrebu
Savjetovanje Instituta za javnu upravu i Narodnih novina
Novi Zakon o općem upravnom postupku – praktična pitanja i
problemi primjene, Zagreb, 25. studenoga 2009.
3. Komparativna iskustva
Francuska Njemačka
Sudska praksa i upravna Savezni Zakon o općem
doktrina upravnom postupku (VwVfG,
Temeljna načela 1976.) – IV. Glava (§ 54.-62.)
Cilj Dopušta široku primjenu
Stranke upravnog ugovora
Realizacija Subordinirani/koordinirani
Ugovor između Kompromisni/recipročni
neravnopravnih strana Ograničenost načelom
Mogućnost ekstenzivnog zakonitosti rada uprave
tumačenja odgovara Primjereno suvremenom
zahtjevima vremena upravnom razvoju
Praksa Državnog savjeta
kontinuirano širi područje
primjene i inovira institute
4. Upravni ugovori u lokalnoj i regionalnoj
samoupravi
Široka primjena
Afirmacija lokalne samouprave
Decentralizacija
Regionalizacija, itd.
Ekonomska aktivnost lokalnih jedinica
Javno-privatna suradnja (tzv. Betreibermodel u Njemačkoj)
Suradnja
Horizontalna – između različitih samoupravnih jedinica
(raspodjela sredstava radi realizacije javnih ciljeva, obavljanje
komunalnih i drugih javnih službi)
Vertikalna – s tijelima državne uprave (razvojni ugovor,
ugovori o decentralizaciji, itd.)
5. Upravni ugovor i ZUP – (d)evolucija
shvaćanja
I. Nacrt ZUP-a (rujan 2007.): II. Nacrt ZUP-a (rujan – siječanj
1. Priroda upravne stvari dopušta 2009.):
sklapanje ugovora Upravni ugovor može se sklopiti
2. Diskrecijska ocjena samo u slučaju ako je sklapanje
3. Nije posebnim zakonom izričito propisano posebnim zakonom
isključen Upravni ugovor “ … sklapa se i
Mogućnost upravnog ugovora zbog izvršenja prava i obveza
umjesto upravnog akta (rješenja) utvrđenih u izreci rješenja.” (čl.
147/2)
Vrlo široko područje primjene
Redukcija primjene:
Vezanost uz izričito dopuštenje
posebnog zakona
Pretpostavka upravnog ugovora
je postojanje upravnog akta
(siječanj 2009.)
6. Upravni ugovor prema ZUP-u iz 2009.
Upravni ugovor nije ušao u definiciju upravne stvari iz
čl. 2.
Primjena zakona „… na odgovarajući način na sklapanje
upravnih ugovora …“ (čl. 3/2.)
Glava VI. – čl. 150.-154.
Značajna redukcija primjene (čl. 150/1.)
Javnopravno tijelo (čl. 1.) i stranka (čl. 4.) sklopit će upravni
ugovor
Upravni ugovor smatra se instrumentom realizacije izreke
rješenja (“… o izvršenju prava i obveza utvrđenih u rješenju
kojim je riješena upravna stvar …”)
Samo “… ako je zakonom propisano sklapanje takvog
ugovora.”
7. Otvorena pitanja
Koje značajne efekte će polučiti sadašnje uređenje upravnog ugovora?
Primjena samo u nekim tradicionalnim područjima (koncesije, javne nabave, JPP)
Hoće li odredbe o upravnom ugovoru ostati mrtvo slovo na papiru?
Bez izmjene posebnih zakona nema primjene
Može li se primjenjivati u širokom spektru modernog upravnog djelovanja?
Suradnja javnopravnih tijela (komunalne službe, zajednička realizacija razvojnih
projekata, razvojni ugovori, itd.)
Suradnja javnopravnog tijela i stranke (porezne, građevinske stvari, itd.)
Što znači da se na sklapanje upravnih ugovora ZUP primjenjuje “na
odgovarajući način”?
Je li riječ o “hibridnom” postupku koji će uslijediti nakon okončanja postupka u
kojem je doneseno rješenje?
Je li uvijek potrebno imati dva akta u istoj stvari?
Rješenje i ugovor
Što ako rješenje bude poništeno, ukinuto, izmijenjeno?
Omogućava li se primjerena zaštita javnog interesa?
Čl. 152. – izmjena zbog promijenjenih okolnosti – ako se ne suglase javnopravno
tijelo može jednostrano raskinuti ugovor (čl. 153/1.)
Dugotrajni postupci naknade štete, izbor novog ugovornog partnera, itd
8. Hvala na pažnji!
Mr. sc. Đulabić Vedran
Pravni fakultet u Zagrebu
Trg maršala Tita 14, 10 000 Zagreb
@: vedran.dulabic@pravo.hr