The document discusses the debate around religious slaughter methods and whether animals should be stunned before death. Some religious leaders argue that conventional stunning is torture, while scientific evidence supports stunning. Both sides attempt to support their arguments with examples and opinions. The discussion focuses only on slaughter for consumption and ignores how animals are dealt with during outbreaks, when they have sometimes been bulldozed alive due to a lack of humane solutions. The document suggests investigating whether a new non-gaseous stunning method could help address mass depopulation needs during outbreaks.