Presentation given at the DINI/Helmholtz Repositories Workshop 30 November 2010.

1. Repositories:
Researcher Perspective
Martin Fenner
Department of Hematology,
Hemostaseology, Oncology and
Stem Cell Transplantation

2. Gargouri 2010. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013636
Do researchers self-archive?
Mandated vs. self-selected

3. Do we need mandates?

4. Why do we publish our work?
f their work (Swan and Brown, 2005). Several reasons are considered very important but the
ne that comes out top is to communicate my results to my peers. Researchers consider it a
op priority to report their results to their peer community so that others can read and build upon
hem. They wish to make an impact.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
%respondents
Communicate
results to peers
Advance career Personal
prestige
Gain funding Financial
reward
nsert Figure 7.1]
igure 7.1: Researchers’ reasons for publishing their workSwan 2006. http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/12428/

5. Should we all become
RoMEOs?

6. Can we easily search
repositories?
Kim 2006. doi: 10.1002/meet.1450420173

7. Peter Murray-Rust
ILI2009: Why scientists can't search
institutional Repositories
http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/blogs/
murrayrust/?p=2125
Can we easily search across
institutional repositories?

8. Shouldn‘t we rather search
disciplinary respositories?

9. Preprint and/or postprint?

10. Are
repositories
silos?

11. Are repositories linked to
institutional bibliographies?

12. !!
!!
!!
!!
Are repositories linked to
journals?

13. Are repositories integrated
in application platforms?

14. Are
repositories
social?

15. Dorothea Salo
This disconnect (from scientists) is the
number-one threat to science librarianship
today.
Are librarians and researchers
talking to each other?

16. August 3, 2010
Too Many Researchers Are Reluctant to
Share Their Data
By Felicia LeClere
And what about data?

17. Will we see the same
discussion all over again?

18. Some suggestions

19. Better integration tools

20. Identifiers for researchers
and their contributions

22. VIVO is a resource that
provides information about:
• people
• departments
• facilities
• courses
• grants
• publications
vivoweb.org

23. Cameron Neylon
Beyond the Impact Factor: Linking funder
needs to the development of new research
metrics
New ideas on how to
evaluate researchers

24. Involve researchers at every step

25. http://www.flickr.com/photos/babycreative/3654840791/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/hildeengwenverbouwen/
4743936514/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/runesteiness/4983827599/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/zoomzoom/304135268/
http://www.slideshare.net/ORCID/cerninspire-perspective-
on-orcid
http://www.flickr.com/photos/msiebuhr/987572658/
http://scienceblogs.com/bookoftrogool/2010/01/
science_online_2010_scientists.php
http://www.nasaimages.org/luna/servlet/detail/
nasaNAS~5~5~24355~127738:Original-Members-of-GIRD
http://cameronneylon.net/blog/three-minutes-of-audio-
hacking-research-reputation/
Credits

26. This presentation can be
copied and distributed
provided that proper
credit is given.