This document provides interim guidance from the Diocese of Exeter (DBE) on the Academies Bill 2010 for voluntary aided (VA) and voluntary controlled (VC) church schools in the diocese. It outlines some key considerations and uncertainties around the bill, including that the DBE's agreement will be required before a church school can become an academy. It advises schools to thoroughly consider the implications and consult stakeholders before applying for academy status. The guidance emphasizes maintaining collaboration within the diocesan family of church schools and ensuring changes are in the interest of students, communities, and the schools' Christian mission.
In this webinar, Hayley and Katie explored re-brokerage arrangements including the Regional School Commissioners’ legal powers and the circumstances in which an academy may be at risk of being re-brokered, as well as the potential consequences of refusing to consent to such an arrangement. They also look at this topic from the perspective of a trust being asked to accept a re-brokered academy and give an overview of the legal process that this entails.
Accountability regulation and leadership in our school system - exploring a t...Browne Jacobson LLP
This report highlights a series of recommendations for consideration by stakeholders on delivering an effective accountability and regulatory regime and about what the sector needs to do to support the development of the next generation of leaders. Download the full report today!
https://www.brownejacobson.com/landing-pages/ten-year-vision
Case StudyThis chapter provided a general summary of the missi.docxmichelljubborjudd
Case Study
This chapter provided a general summary of the mission of the community colleges in light of current and emerging trends facing these institutions (e.g., minority student initiatives, part-time faculty, bachelor’s degrees, and Obama administrations initiatives). Our goal has been to convey to leaders that all trends, in one way or another, relate directly to the mission of these institutions. These trends challenge community college leaders to serve as mavericks in realizing and advancing the mission of the community college.
Below, we present a case study that requires leaders to utilize their understanding of the historical, current, and future trajectory of these institutions in responding to a leadership dilemma. In addressing the case study scenario, pay particular attention to the role of emerging trends (presented in this chapter) in resolving the case. President Cathryn Addy Tunxis Community College Farmington, Connecticut Converging Issues as an Opportunity for Change Background Doe Community College, located in an eastern city of 100,000, was founded in 1952. It has an enrollment of 6,780 FTE (full-time equivalent) and a headcount enrollment of slightly over 8,000 in credit classes. Noncredit enrollment is around 3,000 annually. There are 100 full-time faculty who ← 286 | 287 → teach a 12 credit load on average, 280 adjunct faculty, and approximately 60 other professionals and administrators. There is one campus of approximately 300,000 square feet on 10 acres of land, and one satellite campus 50 miles away in a rural area that opened in a renovated high school 20 years ago. Doe CC is one of 14 publicly supported community colleges in the state but gets one-third of its funding locally, drawn proportionately from each of the 17 school districts in its service area. Another one-third comes from the state according to a long established allocation formula, and the remaining one-third comes from tuition, fees, and auxiliary income from grants, noncredit enrollments, and other enterprises such as the bookstore and a small restaurant on campus run by the culinary students. Over the last three years, the local districts have become more and more vocal about no longer being able to afford to provide funding to Doe, and have been threatening to withdraw from the partnership. The college has just been given an 18-month window in which to develop an alternate plan for the funding its needs at the local level. The state has made it clear that it does not intend to make up the difference, and has also limited the amount that can be raised from a tuition increase. Programmatically, Doe CC has always been strong in the applied technology and science areas, and its students have reflected that: 80 percent (60 percent male) are enrolled in Associate of Applied Science programs, while the remaining 20 percent (80 percent female) are in Associate of Arts program areas. Recently the college has struggled to maintain its enrollment levels ...
Breaking Down "The Chartered Course: Can Private School Choice Proponents Lea...EdChoice
In this report by the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice, author Andy Smarick breaks down some of the top performing charter schools and charter school networks to see what has contributed to their success and growth. This report opens the doors to discourse on the supply of alternative schooling options and the need for growth in the private sector.
In this webinar, Hayley and Katie explored re-brokerage arrangements including the Regional School Commissioners’ legal powers and the circumstances in which an academy may be at risk of being re-brokered, as well as the potential consequences of refusing to consent to such an arrangement. They also look at this topic from the perspective of a trust being asked to accept a re-brokered academy and give an overview of the legal process that this entails.
Accountability regulation and leadership in our school system - exploring a t...Browne Jacobson LLP
This report highlights a series of recommendations for consideration by stakeholders on delivering an effective accountability and regulatory regime and about what the sector needs to do to support the development of the next generation of leaders. Download the full report today!
https://www.brownejacobson.com/landing-pages/ten-year-vision
Case StudyThis chapter provided a general summary of the missi.docxmichelljubborjudd
Case Study
This chapter provided a general summary of the mission of the community colleges in light of current and emerging trends facing these institutions (e.g., minority student initiatives, part-time faculty, bachelor’s degrees, and Obama administrations initiatives). Our goal has been to convey to leaders that all trends, in one way or another, relate directly to the mission of these institutions. These trends challenge community college leaders to serve as mavericks in realizing and advancing the mission of the community college.
Below, we present a case study that requires leaders to utilize their understanding of the historical, current, and future trajectory of these institutions in responding to a leadership dilemma. In addressing the case study scenario, pay particular attention to the role of emerging trends (presented in this chapter) in resolving the case. President Cathryn Addy Tunxis Community College Farmington, Connecticut Converging Issues as an Opportunity for Change Background Doe Community College, located in an eastern city of 100,000, was founded in 1952. It has an enrollment of 6,780 FTE (full-time equivalent) and a headcount enrollment of slightly over 8,000 in credit classes. Noncredit enrollment is around 3,000 annually. There are 100 full-time faculty who ← 286 | 287 → teach a 12 credit load on average, 280 adjunct faculty, and approximately 60 other professionals and administrators. There is one campus of approximately 300,000 square feet on 10 acres of land, and one satellite campus 50 miles away in a rural area that opened in a renovated high school 20 years ago. Doe CC is one of 14 publicly supported community colleges in the state but gets one-third of its funding locally, drawn proportionately from each of the 17 school districts in its service area. Another one-third comes from the state according to a long established allocation formula, and the remaining one-third comes from tuition, fees, and auxiliary income from grants, noncredit enrollments, and other enterprises such as the bookstore and a small restaurant on campus run by the culinary students. Over the last three years, the local districts have become more and more vocal about no longer being able to afford to provide funding to Doe, and have been threatening to withdraw from the partnership. The college has just been given an 18-month window in which to develop an alternate plan for the funding its needs at the local level. The state has made it clear that it does not intend to make up the difference, and has also limited the amount that can be raised from a tuition increase. Programmatically, Doe CC has always been strong in the applied technology and science areas, and its students have reflected that: 80 percent (60 percent male) are enrolled in Associate of Applied Science programs, while the remaining 20 percent (80 percent female) are in Associate of Arts program areas. Recently the college has struggled to maintain its enrollment levels ...
Breaking Down "The Chartered Course: Can Private School Choice Proponents Lea...EdChoice
In this report by the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice, author Andy Smarick breaks down some of the top performing charter schools and charter school networks to see what has contributed to their success and growth. This report opens the doors to discourse on the supply of alternative schooling options and the need for growth in the private sector.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
1. THE NATIONAL SOCIETY AND THE DIOCESE OF EXETER (DBE)
INTERIM GUIDANCE ON THE ACADEMIES BILL 2010
FOR VA AND VC CHURCH SCHOOLS IN THE DIOCESE OF EXETER.
Introduction
1. This guidance follows discussion at the National DDE’s conference, a National
Society (NS) meeting with the DFE Bill Managers on Friday 11th June and advice on
the proposed legislation from the National Society’s legal advisers. The guidance
has been written by the Director of Education, Youth and Children's Work on
behalf of the DBE, using the NS guidance and advice from other Dioceses.
2. All guidance is still interim. There is insufficient information on many aspects of
the new Academies Bill to provide firm advice at this stage. Substantive guidance
will be issued as more information becomes available. Schools are advised to keep
in contact with the DBE and are requested to contact the DBE for more advice and
support; and also to advise the DBE of any intention to register their interest in
this programme and before applying to become an academy.
The new Academies Bill
3. The new Academies Bill (2010) will enable all maintained schools to apply to the
Secretary of State to become an academy. All schools that have been judged as
‘outstanding’ by Ofsted are likely to be approved for academy status, should they
wish to convert. The governing body of ‘outstanding’ schools will be able to
convert to an academy from September 2010; however, if a school has a deficit
budget (more then £100,000) the Secretary of State is unlikely to agree the
academy order. Schools in special measures or are eligible for intervention may be
required to convert to an academy from September 2011.
The current proposals significantly change the rationale for academies and hence
raise questions for the Church. The Secretary of State’s clear aim is to encourage
1
2. greater ‘freedom’ for schools with a good track record instead of using academies
as a primary vehicle to instigate school improvement. There will be an expectation
that academies will incorporate the following characteristics: have a broad and
balanced curriculum; provide education for mainly local pupils, of all abilities and
partner a low-achieving school and help it improve.
An academy cannot charge for admissions or attendance or for education provided
by the institution. If a school converts to an academy, it will automatically be
treated as having met the independent school standards. This means that the
academy will not need to be inspected before being registered as an independent
school or prior to opening.
What is the political process from now on?
4. The Bill will most likely become law by the end of July. The House of Lords will
discuss the Bill in Committee for two days in late June. The Bill will be discussed
at length on these days and amendments may be agreed. The NS will engage
with this process as required.
What are the administrative processes?
5. The DFE web site now contains the application form and further details of how to
apply. In the next two weeks, model documentation and exemplar funding
agreements will be posted. The government hopes to announce the first tranche
of new academies in September, but legal and technical complications with land
transfers and trust arrangements may slow the process. Whereas all schools can
apply now, ‘outstanding’ (Ofsted) school applications will be fast tracked.
Timescales for other schools are not clear yet. Schools deemed to be failing will
be subject to direction to become academies. The criteria to determine how this
will work will be published before the end of July.
What powers will schools have?
6. School heads and governors can make the decision to apply to become an
academy. The NS and DBE strongly advise that all stakeholders, including parents
and staff, should be involved in open consultation on a proposal. Heads,
governors and other stakeholders should ensure that they are fully familiar with
the implications, accountabilities and full impact of academy status, before
agreeing to a proposal.
What powers does the Diocesan Board of Education have?
7. The ‘foundation’ (i.e. the foundation governors) must agree with a decision to
apply for academy status. The precise definition of the ‘foundation’ is not clear yet,
but it is anticipated that the agreement of the Diocesan Board of
Education (DBE) will be required before an application can be made.
8. It is highly likely that the DBE, as the ‘religious authority’, will become the sponsors
and will therefore have considerable powers and responsibilities as defined in
2
3. current academy legislation. In this event, the DBE will need to be fully assured
that the proposed academy has the capacity to succeed. This applies to issues
such as governance, leadership, management, school improvement, finance and
ethos.
9. Thus, the DBE will not wish to enter lightly into agreement. The responsibility for
the academy still sits with the Church and all parties will need reassurance that
academy status is an appropriate way forward. See below under ‘conditional
agreement’.
What are the ‘headline’ issues which schools and the DBE should consider?
10. The religious designation of the church school is not affected, and cannot be
changed without re-designation, involving complex consultation, closure and re-
opening and the approval of the DBE. Therefore becoming an academy does not
alter your church school VA / VC status.
11. Church schools are a key part of national provision and are bound together by
many aspects of Christian principle and foundation. The Church does not wish to
see this undermined by fragmentation or loss of a sense of ‘family’. Diocesan
structures and ways of working have, over many years, developed collegially and
collaboratively and this has brought great strength to the reputation and
achievements of Church schools. It is important that this is maintained and
developed, not negated by the creation of a new wave of academies.
12. The Church academies established so far all serve deprived areas. This is a key
part of the church’s mission. This raises questions:
• Will the new wave of academies, especially those already judged outstanding,
compromise this aspect of mission?
• Will giving academy status to a school undermine equitable distribution of
resources to the remaining schools?
• Will small rural schools be able to cope with the additional burdens?
• Will academy status directly benefit students?
• How will the family of Church schools work together in the future?
In relation to these and related questions schools are urged to think beyond the
implications for just one school. It is essential to consider the role and function of
the school in both its local and wider community and the creation of an academy
would be unacceptable if the key principles are compromised.
13. The DBE will wish to consider a possible ‘backlash’ effect of (say) several C of E
schools becoming academies. If this leads to other schools loosing resource,
through reduced LA capacity, it could be seen as working against the Church
mission for equity of provision.
14. The snapshot Ofsted judgement of ‘outstanding’ will be the only criteria for fast
tracking. It cannot be presumed that this judgement still holds good if the
inspection was a while ago. Circumstances can change rapidly and heads and
governors must be aware of the arising implications. It is therefore essential to
thoroughly check the school’s current and future capacity to benefit from academy
status.
3
4. Questions to consider:
There are a number of key questions that emerge at this stage which should be
considered, and many more will be raised in the weeks ahead.
• What are the benefits for the school and community of becoming an academy?
• What are the ‘downsides’ of becoming an academy – how will you manage
payroll, personnel and other services provided now by the LA?
• Is the change in the best interest of the children, their families and the
community?
• How will the change of status impact on the school’s mission and purpose?
• Will inclusive Christian distinctiveness be enhanced or reduced by the change?
• How will the change affect relationships with other local schools?
• Where will the school get the support it needs?
• How will the family of Church schools, both nationally and locally, be affected
by the change?
• What are the long term considerations for:
a. Governance
b. The land and the trust
c. Staff employment and conditions
d. The Christian ethos?
(Taken from the Diocese of Chester web-site)
4
5. Differences between categories of schools:
Many of the “freedoms” of academy status already exist in voluntary aided schools,
though clearly there are some fundamental differences; there are also differences in
the way the new academies will be set up compared with the current academies. The
table below attempts to highlight the differences.
Abbreviations: GB = governing body; LA = Local Authority; Secretary of State = Secretary of
State; TUPE = Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations.
VA School VC school Foundation Current academy New academy
school
Governing Foundation Foundation Foundation Sponsor majority of 1 Academy Trust
Body majority of 2 minority minority determines, to be
agreed by SOS
Employer of GB LA GB Academy Trust Academy Trust
staff
Staff pay & National National National GB determines, GB determines (subject
conditions (subject to TUPE) to TUPE)
Charitable Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt charity Exempt charity
status charity charity charity
Sponsors None None None Yes required None required for
required required required outstanding schools
Admission GB LA GB GB, but agreed by SOS GB but agreed by SOS
Curriculum National National National GB determines, GB determines subject
Curriculum Curriculum Curriculum subject to Funding to Funding Agreement
Agreement
Funding LA LA LA DfE via funding DfE via funding
agreement agreement
Buildings 10% capital/ 100% LA 100% LA 100% DfE 100% DfE
maintenance
-GB
Lines of OFSTED/LA OFSTED/LA OFSTED/LA OFSTED/DBE/ OFSTED/DBE/
accountab- DBE DBE DBE Secretary of State Secretary of State
ility
Closure May be May be May be Agreement is Agreement is
proposed by proposed by proposed by terminable by the SOS terminable by the SOS
GB; needs LA or GB LA or GB with 7 years’ notice. with 7 years’ notice.
DBE The SOS may The SOS may
agreement. terminate the terminate the
LA may cease Agreement with 12 Agreement with 12
to maintain months notice if the months notice if the
conditions of the conditions of the
Agreement are not Agreement are not
being met. being met.
With thanks to the Diocese of Southwark for the above table.
5
6. Next Steps and Further Guidance:
The many complex issues involved suggest the need for a nationally agreed protocol
and checklist for DBEs to work through with schools considering applying for academy
status. The NS will begin work on this immediately and hope to have it available by
the end of June.
Further guidance from the NS on a range of issues is also enclosed at the end of this
briefing paper.
While the religious character of our schools is preserved in regulations through the
process of becoming an academy, the DBE is concerned to ensure that the role and
purpose of church schools and the collegiality of the Diocesan family of Church Schools
is secured. The DBE is also concerned, as governors and Headteachers will be, to
ensure that the education and well-being of children is at the forefront of our decision-
making.
We would ask all schools considering academy status to contact the Diocese through
the main office:
ccyp@exeter.anglican.org 013092 294950
or by contacting your Diocesan Education Officer.
Letters sent to Schools by the DFE:
http://www.education.gov.uk/~/media/Files/lacuna/news/lettertoheadteacherscog.ash
x
http://www.education.gov.uk/~/media/Files/lacuna/news/lettertoheadtoutstand.ashx
Link to DFE web site:
http://www.education.gov.uk/academies
Diocese of Exeter web-site:
www.exeterccyp.org
6
7. What National Society advice is offered on other key issues?
15. The Legal Basis. New Academies, created under the 2010 legislation, will have
the same legal basis as existing academies.
16. Conditional Agreement. Resulting from the NS protocol and checklist, it will be
possible for a diocese to give conditional agreement to an academy proposal. This
may be necessary to ensure that risks and accountability are appropriately covered.
17. Accountability and sponsorship. The DBE will most likely be the sponsoring
and accountable body. It is therefore essential that the DBE is satisfied that all
requirements are met either absolutely or conditionally. The ‘foundation’ can, of
course, exercise its power of veto should they not be satisfied about the proposal.
The government also intend to ensure that the diocese must be consulted on all
relevant issues both before and after the funding agreement. Guidance on this is
expected soon.
18. Admissions. Existing admissions arrangements will be retained once the school
becomes an academy. The academy will become its own admissions authority and,
as a Church school, still subject to the requirements of the religious authority as
set out in the Admissions Code. The academy will have to comply with all aspects
of the Admissions code.
19. Governance. Existing academy legislation will be used to determine governance
structures. In brief, this means that the sponsors will shape the governing body.
20. Land Transfer and Trusts. The DFE acknowledge that a lot more work is
needed in this area and that it will be a while before full details become clear. The
NS has offered to work closely with the DFE on this complex area as it affects
Church schools. No further guidance can be offered at present.
21. Religious Designation. This will automatically be transferred to the new
academy. The NS will wish to support DBEs in ensuring that all new academies
continue to be full members of the Church family and will make this should be a
condition for support. The DFE is currently considering the mechanism by which a
school could change designation and further advice will be provided, but the
interim guidance is that an academy can only be de-designated by complex
consultation, closure and re-opening.
22. Funding Agreement and Memorandum and Articles. These will be the key
legal documents. The funding agreement is the five year contract between DFE
and the sponsors and the memorandum and articles is the constitutional device.
These two documents establish the basis of and the accountabilities for the
academy. Specimen documents will be available shortly. They will most likely
include key expectations related to both standards and religious designation. DBEs
must be fully involved in the drafting of these documents and may require legal
advice. It is understood that a set up grant will be available to schools and this
should be used, in part, to pay for legal support.
23. The involvement of the Diocesan Board of Education. As stated earlier, the
DBE will have the right to be consulted on all major issues even after the school
becomes an academy.
24. RE and Collective Worship. The funding agreement will make expectations
clear on these matters. There is a potential loophole in the proposed legislation
which will be dealt with during the final drafting, but it is expected that all
academies will teach RE and engage in collective worship.
7
8. 25. Inspections. The arrangement will be as for existing academies and section 48
inspections for C of E academies will be required.
26. TUPE and Pensions. Transfer of employment and pension arrangements are
covered by existing academy legislation. NS guidance is that all employees should
transfer and that existing pension arrangements should continue.
27. Capital and Funding. Schools need to be advised that academy status is most
unlikely to produce new capital for buildings. Also, taking into account the extra
duties in relation to extra income (deriving from the academies share of LA central
costs) the school is unlikely to be better off. VA schools becoming academies will
not have to pay the 10% towards capital projects and LCVAP and DFC will be
subsumed into the annual revenue budget.
28. Charity Status. There are some unresolved aspects of accountabilities arising
from academy charity status. Further advice will be given when more detail
becomes known.
29. VAT. The DFE intends to create special grants to academies in order to refund the
extra VAT incurred on goods and services compared to ordinary schools.
30. Federations. A federation of schools can apply together for each school to
become an academy. Further guidance on the position of one school becoming an
academy is awaited, as current arrangements do not allow academies to formally
federate with other schools.
31. Failing Schools. There will be a lot of new guidance on this. From the Church
perspective, it will be critical that failing schools are not passed to other providers.
This will be dealt with via the accreditation process which is currently on hold
pending ministerial decisions on the way forward. It is understood that future
accreditation arrangements will be simplified to enable more organisations to
become accredited. The NS will continue to strive for system-wide accreditation
covering all dioceses.
32. Extra Portfolio of duties and work. Schools and DBEs must be mindful of the
many extra tasks and responsibilities which academies carry. This could make it
impossible for small schools to cope and a careful risk analysis must be undertaken.
Arrangements for local trusts, embracing several schools, are under consideration.
Dr Rob Gwynne
Deputy General Secretary, National Society
Head of School Development, Church of England
14th June 2010
8