College Call Girls Hyderabad Sakshi 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyd...
Â
Culture of health care lecture 2 slides
1.
2. The Culture of Health Care
An Overview of the Culture of Health Care
Lecture b
This material (Comp 2 Unit 1) was developed by Oregon Health & Science University, funded by the Department
of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology under
Award Number IU24OC000015. This material was updated in 2016 by Bellevue College under Award
Number 90WT0002.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.
3. Introduction to the Culture of
Health Care Learning Objectives
⢠Distinguish between disease and illness (Lecture a)
⢠Discuss the relationship between health and the health care system
(Lecture a, b)
⢠Define culture in the classic sense, as well as in the modern sense
of the term, and what it means for culture to be partial, plural, and
relative (Lecture a, b)
⢠Explain the concept of cultural competence (Lecture a)
⢠Compare the concepts of culture, cultural safety, and safety culture
in the context of a health care organization (Lecture a)
⢠Describe the impact of multiple cultures in health care delivery
interactions (Lecture a, b)
⢠Define acculturation and how it relates to working in health care
(Lecture a)
⢠Discuss the role of culture in health informatics (Lecture a, b)
3
4. Culture of Health Care
⢠This lecture: Why is health care culture
important, and how can we learn more about it?
⢠Previous lecture: What is meant by the word
âcultureâ when we talk about health care and
health care professionals?
4
5. Defining Terms: Culture
⢠Culture refers to integrated patterns of human
behavior that include the language, thoughts,
communications, actions, customs, beliefs, values,
and institutions of racial, ethnic, religious, or social
groups (U.S. DHHS)
⢠Health care culture: language, thought processes,
styles of communication, customs, beliefs, institutions
that characterize the profession of doctors, nurses,
clinic managers and other allied health worker
⢠Learned in part through participation in customs,
rituals, rules of conduct, often not formal nor explicit
5
6. Culture is Plural and Partial
⢠For any particular kind of person, group, or
situation, more than one culture will always be in
play
⢠No single cultural tradition or reference defines
or explains behaviors or interaction
⢠We have to think of the plural, partial cultures for
a full understanding of any observation
6
7. Ethnography
⢠Ethnography: Anthropologistâs description of what life is
like in a âlocal world,â a specific setting in a societyâ
usually different from that of the anthropologist
⢠Ethnographer visits a foreign place, learns the language,
and, systematically, describes social patterns in a
particular village, neighborhood, or network
⢠Great importance placed on understanding the nativeâs
point of view
⢠Ethnography emphasizes engagement with people and
with the practices they undertake in their local worlds
7
8. Rich Points
⢠Behaviors that highlight cultural differences
⢠Names differ based on interaction:
o doctors & others: âpatientâ
o counselors, others: âclientâ
o business office: âcustomerâ
o medical library: âpatronâ
o IT department: âuserâ
⢠Imply assumptions about status, goals, relationship
⢠May have negative connotations from a different
cultural reference point: âchief complaintâ
8
9. Chasing Rich Points
⢠Exposed to other cultures, we notice ârich pointsâ
⢠The job is to chase rich points that help translate
meaning from one culture to another
⢠Culture is not a property of them or us, it is a
translation between the two. And it is never a
complete translation, always partial.
⢠This applies to traditional cultural translation, e.g.
traditional medicine to Western medicine
⢠It also applies to professional cultural translation:
health professional to HIT professional
9
10. Challenges to Cultural
Competence for Medical Students
⢠Resistance
â âI didnât come to medical school to learn thisâ
â âwe have more important things to worry aboutâ
⢠Ethnocentrism or denial of own culture/bias
⢠Stereotyping and oversimplifying
â Culture not monolithic but is relative, plural,
partial
⢠Othering
â Group defined as different from ânormâ group
â labeled, marginalized, excluded
10
11. Challenges to Cultural Competence
for Informatics Students?
⢠Resistance
â âI didnât come to informatics school to learn thisâ
â âwe have more important things to worry aboutâ
⢠Ethnocentrism or denial of own culture/bias
⢠Stereotyping and oversimplifying
â Culture not monolithic but is relative, plural,
partial
⢠Othering
â Group defined as different from ânormâ group
â labeled, marginalized, excluded (âusersâ)
11
12. Where to Look
⢠People in health care
â Health professionals
â Everyone else
⢠Places of health care
â Clinics, hospitals, etc.
⢠Processes and practices
â What do they do? Why?
⢠Values
â written and unwritten
⢠Interaction with
technology
⢠Policies, regulatory
⢠Symbols â (white coats)
⢠Language â âmedical talkâ
⢠Values - e.g. nursing to
put âpatient at easeâ
⢠Norms â often in
heuristics: âtreat the
patient, not the labâ
⢠Folklore â stories convey
implicit values
⢠Ideology â explicit values
⢠Mass media â public
perception
12
13. Cultural Assumptions May Hinder
Practical Understanding
⢠Modern anthropology rejects the idea of isolated
society with fixed set of beliefs
⢠That idea leads to stereotypingâmay get in the
way of solving the problem
⢠Translate this to HIT and health professional
interaction- reject the idea of an isolated society
with a fixed set of beliefs
⢠Focus on issues, not cultural stereotypes
(professional culture or otherwise)
13
14. Field Studies to Support HIT
Design and Evaluation - Examples
Field Study Examples Researcher & Date
Workstation design based on ethnography of work
practices
Fafchamps 1991 and
Forsythe 1992
Computer supported cooperative work, collaborative
sense making and information use in critical care,
emergency care
Forsyth 1999,
Ho 2007 and
Paul 2010
Bar code medication technology impact, side effects Patterson 2002
Informal information sharing in critical care Vuckovic 2004
Computerized order entry impact on doctor-nurse
cooperation, cognitive analysis
Beuscart-Zephir 2005
Physician patient interaction with exam room
computers, video ethnography
Ventres 2006
Language differences among physicians Bruzzi 2006
1.3 Table: Gorman, 2010. Used with Permission.
14
15. An Overview of the Culture of
Health Care
Summary â Lecture b
⢠Effective HIT requires understanding of health care
culture: clinical settings, processes, and people
⢠Modern concept of cultures as always plural, always
partial, always relational depending on both
observer and observed
⢠Rich points are behaviors that highlight cultural
differences â differences in language, for example
⢠Cultural competence important for health informatics
- avoiding stereotypes, ethnocentrism, âotheringâ
⢠Rich insights can inform design and evaluation of
HIT in clinical settings
15
16. An Overview of the Culture of
Health Care
Summary â Lecture b Continued
⢠Culture: classic sense and modern sense
⢠Culture: partial, plural, and relative
⢠Cultural competence, cultural safety, just culture
⢠Importance of understanding multiple cultures in
context
⢠Rich points, acculturation
⢠Use of health informatics in the study of culture
16
17. An Overview of the Culture of
Health Care
References â Lecture b
References
Agar, M. (1991). The biculture in bilingual. Language in Society 20, 167â182.
doi:10.1017/S0047404500016250
Beuscart-Zephir, M. C., Pelavo, S., Anceaux, F., Meaux, J., Degroisse, M., & Degoulet, P. (2005).
Impact of CPOE on doctor-nurse cooperation for the medication ordering and administration
process. International Journal of Medical Informatics 74(7â8), 629â641.
Boutin-Foster, C., Foster, J. C., & Konopasek, L. (2008). Viewpoint: Physician, know thyself: The
professional culture of medicine as a framework for teaching cultural competence. Academy of
Medicine 83(1), 106â111.
Bruzzi, J. F. (2006). Perspective: The words countâRadiology and medical linguistics. New England
Journal of Medicine 354, 665â667.
Ebright, P. (2014). Culture of safety part one: Moving beyond blame [tutorial]. University of California,
Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching (MERLOT). Retrieved from
https://www.merlot.org/merlot/viewMaterial.htm;jsessionid=466422CC99BC642BA2BE3A6494541
093?id=357170
Fafchamps, D., Young, C. Y., & Tang, P. C. (1991). Modelling work practices: Input to the design of a
physicianâs workstation. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium of Computational Applied Medical
Care 788â792.
Forsyth, D. R. (1999). Group dynamics (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
17
18. An Overview of the Culture of
Health Care
References â Lecture b Continued
Forsythe, D. E., Buchanan, B. G., Osheroff, J. A., & Miller, R. A. (1992). Expanding the concept of
medical information: An observational study of physiciansâ information needs. Computers and
Biomedical Research 25(2), 181â200.
Ho, D., Xiao, Y., Vaidya, V., & Hu, P. (2007). Communication and sense-making in intensive care: An
observation study of multi-disciplinary rounds to design computerized supporting tools. AMIA
Annual Symposium Proceedings Archive, pp. 329â333. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2655920
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kleinman, A., & Benson, P. (2006). Anthropology in the clinic: The problem of cultural competency and
how to fix it. Public Library of Science Medicine 3, 1673â1676. Retrieved from
http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0030294
Patterson, E. S., Cook, R. I., & Render, M. L. (2002). Improving patient safety by identifying side
effects from introducing bar coding in medication administration. Journal of the American Medical
Information Association 9, 540â553. Retrieved from http://jamia.oxfordjournals.org/content/9/5/540
Paul, S. A., & Reddy, M. C. (2010). Understanding together: Sensemaking in collaborative information
seeking. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work,
pp. 321â330. Retrieved from http://research.microsoft.com/en-
us/um/redmond/groups/connect/CSCW_10/docs/p321.pdf
Shaikh, B. T. (n.d.). Society, Culture, and Health Care System [lecture]. Retrieved from
http://pitt.edu/~super1/lecture/lec9321/001.htm
18
19. An Overview of the Culture of
Health Care
References â Lecture b Continued 2
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Minority Health. (2001). National standards
for culturally and linguistically appropriate services in health care. Retrieved from
http://hablamosjuntos.org/pdf_files/National_Standards_finalreport_Mar2001.pdf
Ventres, W., Kooienga, S., Vuckovic, N., Marlin, R., Nygren, P., & Stewart, V. (2006). Physicians,
patients, and the electronic health record: An ethnographic analysis. Annals of Family Medicine
4(2), 124â131. Retrieved from http://www.annfammed.org/content/4/2/124.full.pdf
Vuckovic, N. H., Lavelle, M., & Gorman, P. (2004). Eavesdropping as normative behavior in a cardiac
intensive care unit. National Association for Healthcare Quality, W5-1âW5-6.
Charts, Tables, Figures
1.3 Table: Gorman, P. (n.d.). Field studies to support HIT design and evaluationâExamples. Retrieved
from author. Used with permission.
19
20. The Culture of Health Care
An Overview of the Culture of
Health Care
Lecture b
This material was developed by Oregon Health &
Science University, funded by the Department of
Health and Human Services, Office of the National
Coordinator for Health Information Technology
under Award Number IU24OC000015. This
material was updated in 2016 by Bellevue College
under Award Number 90WT0002.
20
Editor's Notes
No audio. Recording preparation.
Welcome to The Culture of Health Care: An Overview of the Culture of Health Care. This is Lecture b.
The component, The Culture of Health Care, addresses professional expectations in health care settings. The organization of care within a clinical practice setting, privacy laws, and workplace-relevant professional and ethical issues are covered.
The Objectives for An Overview of the Culture of Health Care are:
Distinguish between disease and illness.
Discuss the relationship between health and the health care system.
Define âcultureâ in the classic sense, as well as in the modern sense of the term, and what it means for culture to be partial, plural, and relative.
Explain the concept of âcultural competence.â
Compare the concepts of âculture,â âcultural safety,â and âsafety culture,â in the context of a health care organization.
Describe the impact of multiple cultures in health care delivery
Define âacculturationâ in the context of a health care organization
Discuss the role of culture in health informatics.
Welcome. This is the second of two lectures which serve as an introduction to the culture of health care and health care professionals. The two lectures are meant as an introductory unit for a multi-unit set of curriculum materials on the culture of health care covering the people who work in health care, the settings in which health care is delivered, the practices and processes of health care delivery, some of the professional values, beliefs, and ethics which drive that behavior, and how health information technologies interact with health care professionals in their work. In the first lecture we discussed whatâs meant by the word âcultureâ in reference to health care and health care professionals. In this second lecture weâll discuss why this is important and how we can learn more about it.
This slide presents a view of culture presented in the first lecture. [quote] âCulture refers to integrated patterns of human behavior that include the language, thoughts, communications, actions, customs, beliefs, values, and institutions of racial, ethnic, religious, or social groupsâ [end quote]. This is the definition provided by the United States Department of Health and Human Services Office of Minority Health. In the first lecture, we modified this to describe health care culture as the language, thought processes, styles of communication, customs, beliefs, and institutions that characterize the profession of nurses, doctors, allied health workers, or clinic managers, etc. And we noted that these elements of culture are learned, in part, through participation in the customs, rituals, and rules of conduct, which are often not formal or explicit.
Another aspect of a modern concept of culture is that it is always plural and always partial. Few of us belong to a single cultural group. For any particular type of person, group or situation, thereâs usually more than one culture in play. No single cultural traditional reference can define or explain behaviors or interactions.
Consider a middle-aged nurse from Texas who may participate in a particular religion, whose background may include particular educational or other experiences. The behavior of this nurse is unlikely to be completely explained by any one of these cultural elements. Some behavior may be a reflection of the professional culture of nurses and the type of provider setting the nurse worked in such as a hospital, physician's office or clinic. Other behavior may be a reflection of a Texas upbringing, or a reflection of an MBA degree, or experience as an engineer. The point is, to paraphrase Michael Agar [ah-gahr], culture is always plural and always partial.
Think about how this might relate to understanding culture in health care settings, where so many different professional, organizational, and other cultures interact on a day-to-day basis.
Now weâll turn our attention to ethnography. Ethnography [eth-nawg-ruh-fee] is the anthropologist's practice and description of what life is like in any âlocal worldâ or a specific setting in a specific society, usually one different from that of the anthropologist. Typically, an ethnographer [eth-nawg-ruh-fur] visits a foreign place, learns the language, and systematically describes the social patterns in a particular village, neighborhood, or network. Critical to this work is the great importance placed on understanding the natives' point of view, understanding how the behaviors, practices, and language make sense to the natives themselves, as opposed to what they mean to the outsider doing the observation. Ethnography [eth-nawg-ruh-fee] emphasizes engagement with people and with the practices they undertake in their local worlds.
To understand the culture or cultures of health care, we can adopt the approach of an ethnographer trying to understand language, behaviors, and practices in terms of what they mean to the ânativesââin this case, the nurses, doctors, therapists, clinic managers, and others who make up a modern complex health care system.
Important insights into another culture or differences between two cultures are gained when we pay attention to what Agar [ah-gahr] calls rich points. Rich points are the behaviors that highlight cultural differences.
Consider for example the language used to describe the persons we deal with. A person may be referred to by doctors as âpatient,â by counselors and therapists as âclient,â by the business office as âcustomer," by the medical librarian as âpatron," and by the IT [I-T] department as âuser.â We also find âhealth care consumerâ as another term to describe patients and their families. The differences in language suggest differences in the assumptions about the status of individuals, their goals, their relationship, and so forth. Sometimes terms which may seem neutral in one context or from a particular cultural reference point may be positive or negative when taken from another cultural perspective. An example is the conventional use of the term chief complaint by physicians. To physicians, this is an entirely neutral term which refers to the key symptom(s) or condition(s) that brought the patient to see the doctorâthe problem which the patient would like solved. To others, however, the word complaint may connote [kuh-note] a more negative implication, that the person is complaining or whining.
Not long ago a physician was doing a sabbatical in informatics [in-fer-mat-iks] and worked within the office setting of an informatics [in-fer-mat-iks] department. This physician used the assumptions and behaviors of his profession in the new role. For example, with pager alerts the physician reaches for the nearest desk phone or uses his mobile phone to immediately place a call.
For workers in this particular office setting, this behavior is completely unacceptable since a desk telephone âbelongsâ to a given individual and itâs not okay for anyone to walk up and use the desk phone without first asking. Also, stopping in the middle of a conversation to take or accept a cell phone call is also considered unacceptable. This is a ârich pointâ that can give us insight into differences between the cultures across departments within one organization.
In a clinical department, most equipment, including telephones, is available to everyone. Picking up the nearest phone, if no one is using it, to make a call is normal behavior. This physicianâs behavior, based on a clinical departmentâs beliefs and assumptions, resulted in a conflict with the normal beliefs and assumptions of the new office setting.
This rich point is an example of a behavior that highlights cultural differences. The cultural difference in this case is the assumption in an office setting that pieces of equipment belong to or are assigned to specific individuals, compared with the assumption in a hospital setting that most pieces of equipment belong to no one in particular and are shared by all.
The same difference in assumptions can occur when health information technology, or HIT [H-I-T], implementations in the hospital bring with them office-based assumptions about assignment and ownership. In an office setting, computers are often assigned to specific individuals and âownedâ by themâ an assumption that may be enforced in the way that each machine is configured for a specific individual. This assumption doesnât translate well into the hospital setting where individuals move from ward to ward, from desk to desk, from computer to computer, and all computers must essentially serve all individuals. Configuration for a specific individual simply breaks down.
The point here is that much can be learned by chasing these rich points. By exposing ourselves to other cultures, usually through fieldwork or site visits, we notice these ârich pointsâ or differences in behavior that seem to make no sense, given our own cultural assumptions and values. The job then is to chase these rich points and translate the meaning from one culture to another.
Culture, then, is not a property of them or of us, but rather a translation between the two. And itâs never a complete translation; itâs always partial. This applies to traditional cultural translation, such as translating from traditional healing practices to modern western biomedicine. It can also apply to professional cultural translation, such as translating from the culture of health professionals to that of information technology, or IT, professionals.
At times there may be resistance to the idea of achieving or studying cultural competence, whether weâre talking about health professionals learning cultural competence for their interactions with patients, or about health informatics [in-fer-mat-iks] professionals learning cultural competence for their interactions within the health care system.
When medical students encounter the cultural competence curriculum, we sometimes encounter this resistance expressed in a statement, such as âI didnât come to medical school to learn thisâ and âwe have more important things to worry about.â This resistance also comes from a certain degree of ethnocentrism or denial of oneâs own culture or cultural bias. It also comes from stereotyping and oversimplifying the cultures of others, failing to recall that culture is not monolithic but relative, plural, and partial, as discussed earlier. Finally, it comes from âotheringâ, that is, treating persons in another group thatâs different from oneâs own group, which is taken to be ânormalâ, and then labeling, marginalizing, or excluding those in the âotherâ culture. In health care we sometimes encounter these forms of resistance.
In health informatics [in-fer-mat-iks] we can also encounter the same forms of resistance: The idea that âwe have more important things to worry aboutâ in our informatics [in-fer-mat-iks] training, the ethnocentrism or cultural bias that grounds us in our own culture, the tendency to stereotype and oversimplify members of other cultures such as health professionals, and the tendency toward âotheringâ by defining people who are different (for example, nurses, doctors, therapists, etcetera) and labeling, marginalizing, or excluding them. Perhaps youâve seen examples of this in the organizations in which youâve worked.
Letâs assume youâre convinced that the study of health care culture is important to successful development, implementation, and maintenance of health information technology for patients and clinicians. Also, you believe that understanding people and processes is critical to successful HIT [H-I-T]. How can you learn more? Where should you look?
You are likely to learn more by observing the people in health care, the places where they work, their work processes and practices, their values and beliefs, and their interactions with technologies, including not just computer technology but other technologies as well. When considering the people, you should include not only health professionals but everyone else that participates in the health care processes. Places where health care takes place are varied from modern tertiary [tur-shuh-ree] academic medical centers to small primary care and community clinics, to long-term care facilities and, of course, patientâs own homes. When studying health care processes and practices, itâs not only important to characterize what people do (or their workflow) but also to understand why they do things in the ways that they do them. Understanding values requires not only examination of explicit written and spoken values but also values that seem to be implicit or that can be inferred from behavior, especially when conflicts arise. Finally thereâs much to be learned from examining the interaction of people in the health care system with the technologies that help them do their work. As Ed Hutchins has said, [quote]âWe cannot know what the task is until we know what the tools are.â [end quote]
In learning more about the culture of health care, itâs important that we keep our cultural assumptions from hindering practical understanding. Remember that modern anthropology rejects the idea of isolated societies with fixed sets of beliefs. Thereâ no single âculture of biomedicine.â Rather the culture of health care is the interaction and intersection of many diverse professional, organizational, and other cultures. We need to avoid stereotypingâassuming that individuals always and only exhibit behaviors of a single monolithic cultureâbecause this may get in the way of solving the problem. We can translate these ideas from cultural competency to the interaction between health information technology and health informatics [in-fer-mat-iks] and health professionals, rejecting the idea of an isolated society with a set of beliefs. This helps us focus on issues rather than cultural stereotypes, whether they are stereotypes about professional culture or other cultures.
To wrap up, we can consider several examples of the type of field studies weâve been discussing that have been used in biomedical informatics [in-fer-mat-iks]. This work dates back at least to early ethnographic [eth-nuh-graf-ik] studies of work practices which informed the design of computer workstations, such as the work of Danielle Fafchamps [fahf-shawmp] and the late Diana Forsythe. The American Medical Informatics [in-fer-mat-iks] Association gives an annual Diana Forsythe Award to the best studies of this type at its annual meeting.
Other examples include studies of collaborative sense making and information use in critical care and emergency care, such as those cited here by Forsyth, Ho, and Paul. Many studies of bar code medication technology have looked at its impact and side effects based on how itâs actually used in the field, notably the work of Emily Patterson. Similarly, informal information sharing in critical care settings was described by Nancy Vuckovic [voo-koh-vitch]. The impact of computer order entry systems on doctor-nurse cooperation and cognition was examined by Marie Catherine Beuscart-Zephir [buhs-kart zehf-ear] and physician-patient interaction using exam room computers was studied using video ethnography by Bill Ventres [vehn-treh] and colleagues. These are just a few examples of the ways in which ethnographic approaches to the study of health professionals and their work practices have led to insights about the design and use of health information technology in health care settings.
This concludes Lecture b of An Overview of the Culture of Health Care. In summary, letâs enumerate some take-home points:
First, effective health information technology requires understanding of the health care culture including clinical settings, processes, and people.
Second, a modern concept of culture is that itâs always plural, always partial, and always relative, depending both on the observer and the observed.
Third, ârich pointsâ are behaviors or differences in behavior that give us insight into cultural differences and the âwhyâ of work practices, including workarounds.
Fourth, cultural competence is as important for health informatics [in-fer-mat-iks] as it is for health professionals: Avoiding stereotypes, ethnocentrism, and âothering.â
Finally, rich insights obtained from this kind of study can inform the design and evaluation of health information technology for clinical settings.
This concludes An Overview of the Culture of Health Care. In summary, the unit defined âcultureâ in the classic sense and in the modern sense of the term, and what it means for culture to be partial, plural, and relative. The concept of âcultural competenceâ was examined; the concepts of âcultural safety,â âsafety culture,â and âjust cultureâ as applied to organizations were explained. This unit emphasized the importance of understanding multiple cultures that interact in health care delivery, in the context of the student's own culture. It also looked at ârich pointsâ and how they are used in the study of culture, defined acculturation and how it relates to working in health care settings, and illustrated the use of health informatics applications of the study of culture.