Maintrac®
Maintrac liquid biopsy
cell staining allows
quantitative detection
of vital circulating
tumor cells
NO fixation.
NO isolation.
NO enrichment.
Fluorochrome
labeled antibody
FITC
Circulating
tumor cell
Surface
antigen
EpCAM
Cellsearch®
Fixation and enrichment
procedures leads to
LOSS of cells
LOSS of antigenicity.
Cells are DEAD
Magnetic beads –
(cells with low
EpCAM expression
can not be cought
by magnet)
Circulating
tumor cell
(dead cell
due to
fixation)
Fixation -
(destroys part of
surface antigens,
including EpCAM)
Comparison Maintrac vs CellSave
y = 0,1898x - 450,44
R
2
= 0,9191
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000
total events Maintrac
totaleventsCellSave
Duplicate analysis in
one patient, one blood sample
Maintrac®
results
Cellsearch
results
Cellsearch results
S poor and good prognosis
derived from the same blood sample
from the same patient
at the same time
...
Comparison
WebmedCentral CANCER
2011;2(2):WMC001490
Comparing Sequential Steps
For Detection Of Circulating
Tumor Cells: More Specific
Or Just Less Sensitive?
Other CTC technologies
Technique Problems
Magnetic beat enrichment Is EpCam expression sufficent for
enrichment?
Microfiltration Are all circulating tumor cells larger
than blood cells?
Negative Depletion Are all circulating tumor cells CD45
negative?
Adhesion to micropoles Technical problems?
CETC comparison to ctDNA
Technique Problems
Isolation from plasma DNA derived from destroyed cells.
Chemosensitivity on vital cells not
possible.
Derived from dead cells Stability of tumor DNA
Mutation analysis Additional mutations due to DNA
degradation

CTC Methods in comparison

  • 1.
    Maintrac® Maintrac liquid biopsy cellstaining allows quantitative detection of vital circulating tumor cells NO fixation. NO isolation. NO enrichment. Fluorochrome labeled antibody FITC Circulating tumor cell Surface antigen EpCAM
  • 2.
    Cellsearch® Fixation and enrichment proceduresleads to LOSS of cells LOSS of antigenicity. Cells are DEAD Magnetic beads – (cells with low EpCAM expression can not be cought by magnet) Circulating tumor cell (dead cell due to fixation) Fixation - (destroys part of surface antigens, including EpCAM)
  • 3.
    Comparison Maintrac vsCellSave y = 0,1898x - 450,44 R 2 = 0,9191 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 total events Maintrac totaleventsCellSave
  • 4.
    Duplicate analysis in onepatient, one blood sample Maintrac® results Cellsearch results
  • 5.
    Cellsearch results S poor andgood prognosis derived from the same blood sample from the same patient at the same time ...
  • 6.
    Comparison WebmedCentral CANCER 2011;2(2):WMC001490 Comparing SequentialSteps For Detection Of Circulating Tumor Cells: More Specific Or Just Less Sensitive?
  • 7.
    Other CTC technologies TechniqueProblems Magnetic beat enrichment Is EpCam expression sufficent for enrichment? Microfiltration Are all circulating tumor cells larger than blood cells? Negative Depletion Are all circulating tumor cells CD45 negative? Adhesion to micropoles Technical problems?
  • 8.
    CETC comparison toctDNA Technique Problems Isolation from plasma DNA derived from destroyed cells. Chemosensitivity on vital cells not possible. Derived from dead cells Stability of tumor DNA Mutation analysis Additional mutations due to DNA degradation