1. Juvenile Law in 30 Minutes
or Less
Otherwise known as “Tom’s Chance to Vent to the Court”
Tom C. Rawlings
Judge, Juvenile Courts, Middle Circuit
Sandersville, GA
www.tomrawlings.com
2. DEPRIVED
• Juvenile Court has jurisdiction over any child alleged to be deprived.
OCGA 15-11-28.
• Deprived means “without proper parental care or control, subsistence,
education as required by law, or other care or control necessary for the
child's physical, mental, or emotional health or morals.” OCGA 15-11-
2(8).
• “The definition of a deprived child focuses upon the needs of the child
regardless of parental fault. The petition is brought on behalf of the
child and it is the child's welfare and not who is responsible for the
conditions which amount to deprivation that is the issue.”
– In the Interest of J.P., 280 Ga. App. 100, 104-105 (2006)
• SO HOW CAN A CHILD BE DEPRIVED “AS TO
ONE PARENT ONLY?” In re: Tidwell, 279 Ga.
App. 734 (2006)
3. OCGA 15-11-58
• § 15-11-58. Reasonable efforts regarding reunification of family; reports and plans;
custody orders when reunification found not to be in child's best interest; duration of
orders; review of determinations; hearings; supplemental orders
(a) A court's order removing a child from the child's home shall be based upon a finding by that
court that continuation in the home would be contrary to the welfare of the child. If the court places
custody of the child in the Division of Family and Children Services of the Department of Human
Resources, the court shall also determine as a finding of fact whether reasonable efforts were
made by the Division of Family and Children Services of the Department of Human Resources
and any other appropriate agencies to preserve and reunify families prior to the placement of a
child in the custody of the Department of Human Resources, to prevent or eliminate the need for
removal of the child from that child's home, and to make it possible for the child to return safely to
the child's home. Such findings shall also be made at every subsequent review of the court's
order under this chapter.
(1) In determining reasonable efforts to be made with respect to a child, as described in this
subsection, and in making such reasonable efforts, the child's health and safety shall be the
paramount concern;
(2) Except as provided in paragraph (4) of this subsection, reasonable efforts shall be made to
preserve and reunify families:
(A) Prior to the placement of a child in the custody of the Department of Human Resources, to
prevent or eliminate the need for removing the child from the child's home; and
(B) To make it possible for a child to return safely to the child's home;
4. Child Abuse Prevention &
Treatment Act of 1974
(CAPTA)
• Made grants available to states that comply with
CAPTA requirements
• Requirements include:
– Coordination of investigation
– Provision of GAL in court proceeding
– Confidentiality of records
– Mandated reporting of abuse by specified
professionals
– Reporting of data
• http://nccanch.acf.hhs.gov
5. Adoption Assistance &
Child Welfare Act of 1980
• Strengthened the role of the state judiciary – all
children in the child welfare system must have
judicial oversight
• Set up a federal dollar system that was triggered
by a judge’s order
– Reasonable efforts findings
– Approved foster home
• Plan was to get significant federal dollars into the
foster care system
• Established adoption assistance program
• http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/laws_policies
/cblaws/public_law/pl105_89/pl105_89.htm
6. Adoption and Safe
Families Act of 1997
• Focus of law is on health and safety of
the child
• Goal = end “foster care drift” and move
children into permanent homes more
quickly
• Limits number of months child can be in
foster care before TPR is filed
• Provides financial incentives to states to
increase number of adoptions
7. • “In all interpretations of statutes, the courts shall look
diligently for the intention of the General Assembly,
keeping in view at all times the old law, the evil, and the
remedy.”O.C.G.A. § 1-3-1
• “The disposition portion of the juvenile court's order
giving temporary legal custody of the child to the
petitioners failed to comply with the requirements of
O.C.G.A. § 15-11-58 because it did not contain
necessary findings about reasonable efforts by DFACS
or any other appropriate agencies to reunify the mother
with the child and foreclosed any consideration of a
DFACS plan to provide reunification services”
– In the Interest of J.W.K., 254 Ga. App. 661 (2002)
What’s the Poipose?
8. • Termination of Parental Rights: Must prove that
continued deprivation “will cause or is likely to cause
serious physical, mental, emotional, or moral harm to
the child.” OCGA § 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(IV).
• “We find that the state failed to present any evidence as
to the effect that such continued deprivation would have
on the child. . . [T]here was no testimony from any
professional, or from any lay witness, that the child
would suffer physical, mental, emotional or moral harm
from the current situation . . . . It is not automatically
true that finding deprivation likely to continue will support
a finding of harm.”
– In the Interest of T.P., 270 Ga. App. 700 (2004)
• In the Int. of J.K., 278 Ga. App. 564 (629 SE2d 529)
(2006)
– Whole Court, not one mention of ASFA
What’s the Poipose?
9. Other Federal Law Worth
Noting
• Foster Care Independence Act (a.k.a.
Chafee Act; ILP)
• Multi-Ethnic Placement Act (MEPA)
• Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA)
• McKinney-Vento Homeless
Assistance Act
• Interstate Compact on the Placement
of Children (I.C.P.C.)
10. New Rights?
• In the Int. of J.L.B., 280 Ga. App. 556 (___
SE2d ___) (7/14/2006).
• In a delinquency case involving their child,
PARENTS have the right to:
–Their own attorney, and their own free
attorney if they can’t afford one;
–If they want to proceed pro se, to call
witnesses, cross-examine witnesses,
argue, make objections, etc.; and
–To file an independent appeal
11. Links
• www.childwelfare.net
– Emory’s Barton Child Policy Clinic
• www.childwelfare.gov
– U.S. Government child welfare information gateway
• www.acf.hhs.gov
– U.S. Administration for Children and Families
• www.tomrawlings.com
– The World’s Greatest Website, a True Fount of
Wisdom and the Closest Thing to A Modern
Recreation of the Oracle at Delphi.
Editor's Notes
Catalyst was Dr. Kemp’s “Battered Child Syndrome” article and fallout
1st law to direct federal funds to states specifically for PREVENTION of child abuse and neglect
GAL has two roles
Obtain first-hand, a clear understanding of the situation and needs of the child, and
Make recommendations to court concerning the best interests of the child
Confidentiality – ’96 reauthorization makes exception for child fatality or near fatality – allows public disclosure
Data – established the National Center on Child Abuse & Neglect
- Clearinghouse for research, collection of data and dissemination of information
Regular amendments/reauthorizations – ’78, 84,88,92,96,03
Catalyst was Dr. Kemp’s “Battered Child Syndrome” article and fallout
1st law to direct federal funds to states specifically for PREVENTION of child abuse and neglect
GAL has two roles
Obtain first-hand, a clear understanding of the situation and needs of the child, and
Make recommendations to court concerning the best interests of the child
Confidentiality – ’96 reauthorization makes exception for child fatality or near fatality – allows public disclosure
Data – established the National Center on Child Abuse & Neglect
- Clearinghouse for research, collection of data and dissemination of information
Regular amendments/reauthorizations – ’78, 84,88,92,96,03
Driving force = too many kids spending too much time in FC (i.e. drift)
“temporary” placements last long periods
Children funneled thru many placements
Goal = end foster care drift by pushing reunification
Goals:
Prevent unnecessary separation of children from families
Protect autonomy of the family
Shift support of federal government away from FC alone and towards placement prevention and reunification
Permanency Planning originated
Brought significant federal dollars into FC system
Federal dollars dependent on:
Case Plans (least restrictive, most family-like setting available)
Confirming that CPS had made “reasonable efforts” to prevent out of home placements and to promote family reunification or identify an alternate permanent home
Case Review system – by judge or administrative panel (every six months)
Dispositional hearing (permanency expected) – occurs at 18 months of child in care
Adoption Assistance:
- Reimbursed states for payments to parents who adopt “special needs” children – children who are difficult to place in adoptive homes
Major philosophical shift – focus is on child safety/welfare over family preservation
- AACWA had failed. “unreasonable efforts” left kids in harm’s way; drift still occurring
Goals/Intent:
Clarify reasonable efforts provision
Scale back the problem of foster care drift
Highlights:
Reasonable Efforts (health and safety of child is paramount)
Some circumstances where RE not required
[add]
Concurrent planning permitted
Timelines
30 days where no RE necessary
TPR is 15 of 22 most recent (but still exceptions)
Earlier, more decisive permanency hearing - 12 months
Financial incentives to promote adoptions
Notice & Opportunity to be Heard to FPs, Preadoptive Parents & Caretaker Relatives
Thoughts:
Is 12 months long enough for all parents – substance abuse timelines
ASFA uses safety language but rather clear message is adoption is preferable – implications for bonding?