Criminal law notes - Sudden fight as a defense
•Download as DOCX, PDF•
0 likes•480 views
Section 300 of the Indian Penal Code discusses the defense of "sudden fight" which can reduce criminal liability for murder to culpable homicide. For the exception to apply, there must not have been premeditation, undue advantage taken, or cruel/unusual actions. Several cases explore the boundaries - in one case, the defense did not apply when an unarmed person was stabbed after asking the accused to stop fighting. In another case, the defense was allowed when both sides were armed during the altercation. For the defense to apply, the fight must be sudden with no premeditation, done in heat of passion, and without undue advantage or cruelty based on established requirements.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
(2) exceptions to section 300
disclaimer - this is just an attempt to answer the question for tutorial/assignment, pls double check with ur own notes for confirmation
Relevancy of evidence under Section 6 of Evidence Act 1950
1) Section 6 of the Evidence Act 1957 incorporates the common law doctrine of res gestae. It allows facts that form part of the same transaction to be admitted as evidence, even if they occurred at different times and places.
2) For a fact to be considered part of the same transaction under Section 6, there must be (i) proximity of time, (ii) unity/proximity of place, and (iii) continuity of action/purpose. The time gap can be expanded to accept facts occurring over several days or months as long as these criteria are met.
3) Both acts and statements can be considered res gestae and admitted under Section 6. Statements of those present like bystanders
Confession under Malaysian Evidence Act 1950
The document discusses the definitions and principles related to confessions and admissions in evidence law. It begins by defining a confession as an admission stating or suggesting that the accused committed the offence. A confession can be plenary (full acknowledgment of guilt) or non-plenary (incriminating statement suggesting guilt). All confessions are admissions but not all admissions are confessions. The document then examines circumstances where confessions may be excluded, such as if they were obtained through inducement, threat or promise by a person in authority. It also discusses exceptions where a confession can still be admitted, such as if the improper influence has been removed. The document analyzes several key court cases related to these principles.
Assault under Section 352 of the Malaysian Penal Code
Abang confronted Bomoh at a coffee shop angrily over a matter involving Abang's sister. Abang lunged threateningly at Bomoh and said he would teach Bomoh a lesson he would never forget. As Abang was about to hit Bomoh, others restrained him. Abang intended to cause Bomoh apprehension of imminent physical force based on his threatening gestures and words. A reasonable person in Bomoh's position would fear immediate force based on Abang's actions. Thus, Abang can likely be found liable under Section 351 of the Penal Code for assault on Bomoh.
Valid marriage
The document discusses the conditions for a valid Islamic marriage according to Islamic law. It outlines the five pillars as (a) the husband, (b) the wife, (c) the wali or guardian, (d) two witnesses, and (e) the acceptance of the proposal (ijab) and acceptance (qabul). The document also examines a court case where a father refused consent for his daughter's marriage and analyzes opinions on when a wali can be overridden by a religious judge.
FAMILY LAW - NULLITY OF MARRIAGE
This document outlines the key distinctions and grounds for void and voidable marriages under Malaysian law. It discusses:
1) The differences between void and voidable marriages, such as the need for a decree and who can bring an action. Void marriages are invalid from the start, while voidable marriages can be annulled.
2) The jurisdiction of Malaysian courts to hear nullity petitions, which requires the marriage be registered in Malaysia or the parties reside in Malaysia.
3) The grounds for declaring a marriage void under Section 69, such as polygamy, underage parties, prohibited relationships, and same-sex marriages.
4) The grounds for annulling a marriage as void
Prosedur perbicaraan
Prosedur perbicaraan dijelaskan dalam empat tahap: (1) pemeriksaan utama oleh plaintif dengan soal jawab saksi, (2) pemeriksaan balas oleh pihak lawan, (3) pemeriksaan semula oleh plaintif, dan (4) penyediaan hujahan oleh kedua-dua pihak berdasarkan bukti yang dikemukakan. Proses ini memastikan perbicaraan berjalan lancar dan keputusan mahkamah berasask
Recommended
(2) exceptions to section 300
disclaimer - this is just an attempt to answer the question for tutorial/assignment, pls double check with ur own notes for confirmation
Relevancy of evidence under Section 6 of Evidence Act 1950
1) Section 6 of the Evidence Act 1957 incorporates the common law doctrine of res gestae. It allows facts that form part of the same transaction to be admitted as evidence, even if they occurred at different times and places.
2) For a fact to be considered part of the same transaction under Section 6, there must be (i) proximity of time, (ii) unity/proximity of place, and (iii) continuity of action/purpose. The time gap can be expanded to accept facts occurring over several days or months as long as these criteria are met.
3) Both acts and statements can be considered res gestae and admitted under Section 6. Statements of those present like bystanders
Confession under Malaysian Evidence Act 1950
The document discusses the definitions and principles related to confessions and admissions in evidence law. It begins by defining a confession as an admission stating or suggesting that the accused committed the offence. A confession can be plenary (full acknowledgment of guilt) or non-plenary (incriminating statement suggesting guilt). All confessions are admissions but not all admissions are confessions. The document then examines circumstances where confessions may be excluded, such as if they were obtained through inducement, threat or promise by a person in authority. It also discusses exceptions where a confession can still be admitted, such as if the improper influence has been removed. The document analyzes several key court cases related to these principles.
Assault under Section 352 of the Malaysian Penal Code
Abang confronted Bomoh at a coffee shop angrily over a matter involving Abang's sister. Abang lunged threateningly at Bomoh and said he would teach Bomoh a lesson he would never forget. As Abang was about to hit Bomoh, others restrained him. Abang intended to cause Bomoh apprehension of imminent physical force based on his threatening gestures and words. A reasonable person in Bomoh's position would fear immediate force based on Abang's actions. Thus, Abang can likely be found liable under Section 351 of the Penal Code for assault on Bomoh.
Valid marriage
The document discusses the conditions for a valid Islamic marriage according to Islamic law. It outlines the five pillars as (a) the husband, (b) the wife, (c) the wali or guardian, (d) two witnesses, and (e) the acceptance of the proposal (ijab) and acceptance (qabul). The document also examines a court case where a father refused consent for his daughter's marriage and analyzes opinions on when a wali can be overridden by a religious judge.
FAMILY LAW - NULLITY OF MARRIAGE
This document outlines the key distinctions and grounds for void and voidable marriages under Malaysian law. It discusses:
1) The differences between void and voidable marriages, such as the need for a decree and who can bring an action. Void marriages are invalid from the start, while voidable marriages can be annulled.
2) The jurisdiction of Malaysian courts to hear nullity petitions, which requires the marriage be registered in Malaysia or the parties reside in Malaysia.
3) The grounds for declaring a marriage void under Section 69, such as polygamy, underage parties, prohibited relationships, and same-sex marriages.
4) The grounds for annulling a marriage as void
Prosedur perbicaraan
Prosedur perbicaraan dijelaskan dalam empat tahap: (1) pemeriksaan utama oleh plaintif dengan soal jawab saksi, (2) pemeriksaan balas oleh pihak lawan, (3) pemeriksaan semula oleh plaintif, dan (4) penyediaan hujahan oleh kedua-dua pihak berdasarkan bukti yang dikemukakan. Proses ini memastikan perbicaraan berjalan lancar dan keputusan mahkamah berasask
(1) murder
disclaimer - this is just an attempt to answer the question for tutorial/assignment, pls double check with ur own notes for confirmation
(3) res gestae
This document discusses the legal concept of res gestae, which is an exception to the rule against hearsay evidence. It provides that spontaneous statements made during or immediately after an event are admissible in court because the context provides credibility, with little chance of misunderstanding. The document then discusses the development of res gestae in various common law cases, including relaxing the requirement of exact contemporaneity. It also discusses the concept of res gestae under Islamic law and Malaysian evidence law.
Non fatal offences - criminal force
Criminal force requires the intentional or knowing application of force without consent, with the aim of causing an ulterior object. Case law establishes that threatening to harm someone if they advance constitutes criminal force, as does deliberately reversing a vehicle into another. Merely raising a stick threateningly enough to cause someone to flee also meets the standard. Attempting to undress someone against their will equally qualifies as criminal force used to outrage modesty. Words alone do not necessarily constitute criminal force if their meaning is too vague.
(5) section 8
Section 8 of the Evidence Act 1950 provides that evidence of motive, preparation, and previous or subsequent conduct is relevant in legal proceedings. Motive refers to the reason for doing something, while intention refers to consciously shaping conduct to cause a certain event. Evidence of motive is admissible but absence of motive does not prove innocence. Motive cannot be proven through hearsay evidence. Evidence of other crimes can also be relevant to show motive. The document discusses these principles and provides examples of how Malaysian courts have interpreted and applied Section 8 in past cases.
Criminal Law 1 - Punishment and Illegal Omission
Question 1:
- Discuss the function and application of such form of punishment (reformatory) in Malaysia.
- Whether such form of punishment may tackle the issue of sentencing disparity.
Question 2:
- Discuss ‘illegal omission’ which may give rise to criminal liability.
Criminal law notes - Joint liability; common intention
1) Criminal law notes discuss the principles of joint liability and common intention under Malaysian law.
2) For common intention to apply, there must be (1) a criminal act involving several persons, (2) a common intention between the parties, (3) participation in the criminal act, and (4) the act was done in furtherance of the common intention.
3) Common intention refers to the common design or plan to commit a criminal act, and does not require proof of intention for the specific crime charged. A person can be liable if the actual crime was consistent with or a foreseeable consequence of the common intention.
Hearsay
This document discusses hearsay evidence and exceptions to the hearsay rule. It begins by defining hearsay as out-of-court statements offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Hearsay is generally inadmissible due to issues with reliability. Exceptions allow certain hearsay statements, including dying declarations where the declarant is unavailable due to death. The document also discusses different forms of hearsay such as oral, written, and conduct, and exceptions like res gestae and statements of unavailable persons under Section 32 of the Evidence Act 1950. It concludes by mentioning the current issue of potentially abolishing the hearsay rule.
Criminal law notes - Private defence
This document discusses the law around private defence in criminal cases under Indian law. It makes several key points:
1) Private defence is a defensive right that can only be claimed when circumstances clearly justify it for self-defence purposes, not as an excuse for aggressive or retributive acts.
2) There is no right of private defence against acts of public servants acting in good faith while discharging their legal duties.
3) The right of private defence commences when there is a reasonable apprehension of danger to oneself or another and lasts only as long as the threat remains. It must not involve more force than necessary to defend.
4) Private defence can legally extend to causing death in self
Defence of infancy
This document summarizes the laws around criminal liability for minors in Malaysia. It outlines that under Malaysian law, children under 10 cannot be criminally liable, while those between 10-12 may not be liable if they are found to not understand the nature and consequences of their actions. It compares these provisions to English common law. The document also discusses two court cases that further illustrate how these defenses for minors are applied and interpreted.
Defence of necessity
This document discusses and analyzes the legal defense of necessity in response to the quote "Necessity is never a defence to murder." It summarizes the leading case of Dudley and Stephens (1884) where necessity was not accepted as a defense for murder. It argues that the word "never" is too absolute given that future circumstances may warrant allowing necessity as a defense. It provides a hypothetical example where necessity would be a valid defense to save many lives at the cost of one. The document concludes that judges should consider necessity defenses on a case-by-case basis rather than having an absolute rule.
Criminal Law II - General Defences (Part 2)
The document summarizes general defences in criminal law, including consent, duress, and private defence.
Consent is not a defence if given under fear, misconception, unsoundness of mind, or by a minor. Duress is a defence for threats of instant death that reasonably cause apprehension, but not if the accused voluntarily exposed themselves to threats.
Private defence must be used to avert an impending danger, commences with reasonable apprehension of harm, and ends when the apprehension stops. More harm than necessary cannot be inflicted, and recourse to authorities must be attempted if possible.
Extortion
The document discusses the offense of extortion under Malaysian law. It begins by defining extortion and outlining its key elements: (1) putting a person in fear of injury, (2) intentionally inducing that person to deliver property through dishonest means. It elaborates on these elements and related concepts like implied threats and unlawful demands. Case law is discussed that examines how courts have interpreted and applied the elements of extortion. General punishment and differences between extortion and offenses like theft, robbery, and corruption are also outlined. Overall, the document provides a comprehensive overview of the legal definition and requirements to prove the crime of extortion in Malaysia.
LAW OF EVIDENCE - TUTORIAL QUESTION AND ANSWER
1. A witness who is inconsistent in giving evidence, especially if the inconsistencies are material contradictions, cannot generally be regarded as a credible witness. However, not all inconsistencies necessarily undermine credibility.
2. For a witness to refresh their memory by referring to notes, certain conditions must be met under Section 159 of the Evidence Act. The writing must have been made by the witness at the time of the event or soon after.
3. Even if the conditions for refreshing memory are satisfied, the opposing party still has the right to inspect the document and cross-examine the witness on it. Referring to a document alone does not necessarily make the witness credible; it depends on whether the statutory safeguards are
Arrest: Shaaban & Ors v Chong Fook Kam & Anor
The police arrested two men on suspicion of causing a traffic accident that killed one person based on a complaint filed the previous day. The police detained the men overnight without evidence of any wrongdoing. The men sued the police for false imprisonment. The court found that while the police were entitled to make an arrest if reasonable suspicion existed, they did not have grounds to suspect the men were driving recklessly. As such, the arrest and detention were unlawful and the police were liable for false imprisonment. The court ordered judgment accordingly.
5 exceptions provided under Section 300 of Penal Code
The document discusses the differences between murder and culpable homicide under Indian law. It examines the exceptions under Section 300 that may reduce a murder charge to culpable homicide not amounting to murder. These exceptions include provocation, exceeding the right of private defense, a public servant exceeding their powers, sudden fight, and consent. The document analyzes several court cases to illustrate how the exceptions have been applied in practice and the criteria courts consider in determining whether an exception applies.
Murder ACCORDING TO JURISTS VIEWS
LAW OF JURISPRUDENCE. analysis of murder based on views given by few jurist scholars like mile Durkeim. also in Islamic perspective.
Law of Duress in Malaysia and United Kingdom
This document discusses the defense of duress in criminal law in Malaysia, the UK, and Singapore. It begins by defining duress as a defense that excuses criminal liability if the accused committed a crime due to threats that reasonably caused fear of instant death. It then examines the key elements of duress according to Malaysian law, including that the threat must be directed at the accused, involve fear of instant death, and require the physical presence of the coercer. The document also analyzes relevant case law and compares how duress is treated in common law versus under the Malaysian Penal Code.
BURDEN AND STANDARD OF PROOF
This document discusses burden and standard of proof in law of evidence. It defines burden of proof as the obligation to provide sufficient evidence to support one's case, and distinguishes between burden of establishing a case and evidential burden of introducing evidence. The standard of proof refers to the degree of probability required to discharge the burden. For criminal cases, the standard is proof beyond reasonable doubt, while for civil cases it is on a balance of probabilities. The more serious the allegation, the higher the standard of proof required.
PRESUMPTION AND JUDICIAL NOTICE
The document discusses key concepts related to presumption and judicial notice in Malaysian law. It defines presumption as an inference drawn from known facts, and distinguishes between presumption of law and presumption of fact. It explains different types of presumptions under Malaysian law including those that the court "may presume", "shall presume", and those that constitute "conclusive proof". It also defines judicial notice as facts that a judge will notice without proof, and provides examples of facts that courts commonly take judicial notice of, such as identities of government leaders.
More Related Content
What's hot
(1) murder
disclaimer - this is just an attempt to answer the question for tutorial/assignment, pls double check with ur own notes for confirmation
(3) res gestae
This document discusses the legal concept of res gestae, which is an exception to the rule against hearsay evidence. It provides that spontaneous statements made during or immediately after an event are admissible in court because the context provides credibility, with little chance of misunderstanding. The document then discusses the development of res gestae in various common law cases, including relaxing the requirement of exact contemporaneity. It also discusses the concept of res gestae under Islamic law and Malaysian evidence law.
Non fatal offences - criminal force
Criminal force requires the intentional or knowing application of force without consent, with the aim of causing an ulterior object. Case law establishes that threatening to harm someone if they advance constitutes criminal force, as does deliberately reversing a vehicle into another. Merely raising a stick threateningly enough to cause someone to flee also meets the standard. Attempting to undress someone against their will equally qualifies as criminal force used to outrage modesty. Words alone do not necessarily constitute criminal force if their meaning is too vague.
(5) section 8
Section 8 of the Evidence Act 1950 provides that evidence of motive, preparation, and previous or subsequent conduct is relevant in legal proceedings. Motive refers to the reason for doing something, while intention refers to consciously shaping conduct to cause a certain event. Evidence of motive is admissible but absence of motive does not prove innocence. Motive cannot be proven through hearsay evidence. Evidence of other crimes can also be relevant to show motive. The document discusses these principles and provides examples of how Malaysian courts have interpreted and applied Section 8 in past cases.
Criminal Law 1 - Punishment and Illegal Omission
Question 1:
- Discuss the function and application of such form of punishment (reformatory) in Malaysia.
- Whether such form of punishment may tackle the issue of sentencing disparity.
Question 2:
- Discuss ‘illegal omission’ which may give rise to criminal liability.
Criminal law notes - Joint liability; common intention
1) Criminal law notes discuss the principles of joint liability and common intention under Malaysian law.
2) For common intention to apply, there must be (1) a criminal act involving several persons, (2) a common intention between the parties, (3) participation in the criminal act, and (4) the act was done in furtherance of the common intention.
3) Common intention refers to the common design or plan to commit a criminal act, and does not require proof of intention for the specific crime charged. A person can be liable if the actual crime was consistent with or a foreseeable consequence of the common intention.
Hearsay
This document discusses hearsay evidence and exceptions to the hearsay rule. It begins by defining hearsay as out-of-court statements offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Hearsay is generally inadmissible due to issues with reliability. Exceptions allow certain hearsay statements, including dying declarations where the declarant is unavailable due to death. The document also discusses different forms of hearsay such as oral, written, and conduct, and exceptions like res gestae and statements of unavailable persons under Section 32 of the Evidence Act 1950. It concludes by mentioning the current issue of potentially abolishing the hearsay rule.
Criminal law notes - Private defence
This document discusses the law around private defence in criminal cases under Indian law. It makes several key points:
1) Private defence is a defensive right that can only be claimed when circumstances clearly justify it for self-defence purposes, not as an excuse for aggressive or retributive acts.
2) There is no right of private defence against acts of public servants acting in good faith while discharging their legal duties.
3) The right of private defence commences when there is a reasonable apprehension of danger to oneself or another and lasts only as long as the threat remains. It must not involve more force than necessary to defend.
4) Private defence can legally extend to causing death in self
Defence of infancy
This document summarizes the laws around criminal liability for minors in Malaysia. It outlines that under Malaysian law, children under 10 cannot be criminally liable, while those between 10-12 may not be liable if they are found to not understand the nature and consequences of their actions. It compares these provisions to English common law. The document also discusses two court cases that further illustrate how these defenses for minors are applied and interpreted.
Defence of necessity
This document discusses and analyzes the legal defense of necessity in response to the quote "Necessity is never a defence to murder." It summarizes the leading case of Dudley and Stephens (1884) where necessity was not accepted as a defense for murder. It argues that the word "never" is too absolute given that future circumstances may warrant allowing necessity as a defense. It provides a hypothetical example where necessity would be a valid defense to save many lives at the cost of one. The document concludes that judges should consider necessity defenses on a case-by-case basis rather than having an absolute rule.
Criminal Law II - General Defences (Part 2)
The document summarizes general defences in criminal law, including consent, duress, and private defence.
Consent is not a defence if given under fear, misconception, unsoundness of mind, or by a minor. Duress is a defence for threats of instant death that reasonably cause apprehension, but not if the accused voluntarily exposed themselves to threats.
Private defence must be used to avert an impending danger, commences with reasonable apprehension of harm, and ends when the apprehension stops. More harm than necessary cannot be inflicted, and recourse to authorities must be attempted if possible.
Extortion
The document discusses the offense of extortion under Malaysian law. It begins by defining extortion and outlining its key elements: (1) putting a person in fear of injury, (2) intentionally inducing that person to deliver property through dishonest means. It elaborates on these elements and related concepts like implied threats and unlawful demands. Case law is discussed that examines how courts have interpreted and applied the elements of extortion. General punishment and differences between extortion and offenses like theft, robbery, and corruption are also outlined. Overall, the document provides a comprehensive overview of the legal definition and requirements to prove the crime of extortion in Malaysia.
LAW OF EVIDENCE - TUTORIAL QUESTION AND ANSWER
1. A witness who is inconsistent in giving evidence, especially if the inconsistencies are material contradictions, cannot generally be regarded as a credible witness. However, not all inconsistencies necessarily undermine credibility.
2. For a witness to refresh their memory by referring to notes, certain conditions must be met under Section 159 of the Evidence Act. The writing must have been made by the witness at the time of the event or soon after.
3. Even if the conditions for refreshing memory are satisfied, the opposing party still has the right to inspect the document and cross-examine the witness on it. Referring to a document alone does not necessarily make the witness credible; it depends on whether the statutory safeguards are
Arrest: Shaaban & Ors v Chong Fook Kam & Anor
The police arrested two men on suspicion of causing a traffic accident that killed one person based on a complaint filed the previous day. The police detained the men overnight without evidence of any wrongdoing. The men sued the police for false imprisonment. The court found that while the police were entitled to make an arrest if reasonable suspicion existed, they did not have grounds to suspect the men were driving recklessly. As such, the arrest and detention were unlawful and the police were liable for false imprisonment. The court ordered judgment accordingly.
5 exceptions provided under Section 300 of Penal Code
The document discusses the differences between murder and culpable homicide under Indian law. It examines the exceptions under Section 300 that may reduce a murder charge to culpable homicide not amounting to murder. These exceptions include provocation, exceeding the right of private defense, a public servant exceeding their powers, sudden fight, and consent. The document analyzes several court cases to illustrate how the exceptions have been applied in practice and the criteria courts consider in determining whether an exception applies.
Murder ACCORDING TO JURISTS VIEWS
LAW OF JURISPRUDENCE. analysis of murder based on views given by few jurist scholars like mile Durkeim. also in Islamic perspective.
Law of Duress in Malaysia and United Kingdom
This document discusses the defense of duress in criminal law in Malaysia, the UK, and Singapore. It begins by defining duress as a defense that excuses criminal liability if the accused committed a crime due to threats that reasonably caused fear of instant death. It then examines the key elements of duress according to Malaysian law, including that the threat must be directed at the accused, involve fear of instant death, and require the physical presence of the coercer. The document also analyzes relevant case law and compares how duress is treated in common law versus under the Malaysian Penal Code.
What's hot (20)
Criminal law notes - Joint liability; common intention
Criminal law notes - Joint liability; common intention
5 exceptions provided under Section 300 of Penal Code
5 exceptions provided under Section 300 of Penal Code
More from surrenderyourthrone
BURDEN AND STANDARD OF PROOF
This document discusses burden and standard of proof in law of evidence. It defines burden of proof as the obligation to provide sufficient evidence to support one's case, and distinguishes between burden of establishing a case and evidential burden of introducing evidence. The standard of proof refers to the degree of probability required to discharge the burden. For criminal cases, the standard is proof beyond reasonable doubt, while for civil cases it is on a balance of probabilities. The more serious the allegation, the higher the standard of proof required.
PRESUMPTION AND JUDICIAL NOTICE
The document discusses key concepts related to presumption and judicial notice in Malaysian law. It defines presumption as an inference drawn from known facts, and distinguishes between presumption of law and presumption of fact. It explains different types of presumptions under Malaysian law including those that the court "may presume", "shall presume", and those that constitute "conclusive proof". It also defines judicial notice as facts that a judge will notice without proof, and provides examples of facts that courts commonly take judicial notice of, such as identities of government leaders.
AGGRAVATE ME - SAMPLE SENIOR
1. Samad Tuah bin Jebat was charged with stealing a motorbike under Section 379A of the Penal Code.
2. The prosecution argued for a heavier punishment to deter the increasing number of motorbike thefts in the area.
3. The defense pleaded for leniency as it was the accused's first offense, and he needed the motorbike due to desperation and intended to return it.
4. The magistrate found the accused guilty but discharged him with a bond for good behavior for 2 years, taking into account it was a first offense due to necessity, and that imprisonment may not be the solution.
CHILD ACT 2001
This document provides the text of Malaysia's Child Act 2001, which consolidates and amends laws relating to the care, protection and rehabilitation of children. Some key points:
- It establishes the National Council for Children to oversee child welfare issues.
- It defines terms like "child", "Court for Children", and types of institutions like places of safety, refuge, detention, and approved schools.
- It covers issues like children in need of care/protection, criminal procedures for children, placing children in institutions, and the roles of protectors, probation officers, and other officials.
- It has transitional provisions to continue existing councils, rules, and childcare institutions established under previous laws.
THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN MALAYSIA
This document provides an overview of the juvenile justice system in Malaysia. It discusses that 60% of Malaysia's population is under 30 years old, and that while perceptions are that juvenile crime is increasing, data is limited and inconsistent. For children accused of crimes, the Child Act of 2001 established specialized procedures and the Court for Children to handle their cases separately from adult procedures. The document outlines the key stages of handling a child in conflict with the law, from arrest to sentencing. It also discusses exceptions for serious crimes and status offenses. Overall, the document presents background on juvenile justice in Malaysia and the legal framework established in the Child Act.
PRINCIPLE OF PRIMA FACIE CASE AND MAXIMUM EVALUATION AT THE CLOSE OF PROSECUT...
This document discusses the standard of proof required at the close of the prosecution's case in Malaysian criminal trials. It summarizes the key cases that addressed this issue, including Haw Tua Tau v Public Prosecutor, Khoo Hi Chiang v Public Prosecutor, and Public Prosecutor v Ong Cheng Heong. Public Prosecutor v Ong Cheng Heong established that only a prima facie case, not proof beyond reasonable doubt, is required at this stage. It clarified that a prima facie case means credible evidence for each essential element of the charge, subject to maximum evaluation but not equating to proof beyond reasonable doubt. This standard was affirmed in subsequent cases and resolved the long-
Capital and Corporal Punishment
1) Several laws in Malaysia carry mandatory death penalties for offenses such as murder, drug trafficking, and treason. Between 1970-1996, 349 people were executed, mostly for drug offenses.
2) While the number of executions has decreased in recent years, official statistics show the death penalty has been ineffective in reducing drug addiction and the number of known addicts has risen.
3) Caning is a supplementary punishment to imprisonment for around 40 crimes including drug offenses, rape, and firearms offenses. However, caning violates international human rights standards against cruel or degrading treatment or punishment.
Baldah Toyyibah (Prasarana) Kelantan Sdn Bhd v Dae Hanguru Infra Sdn Bhd and ...
The Court of Appeal was determining two appeals regarding a dispute over a construction agreement for the Kota Bharu-Kuala Krai Highway Project. The plaintiff had sued the defendants for breach of contract. The key issues were whether there was an enforceable contract and whether the plaintiff was entitled to compensation. The Court of Appeal allowed the first defendant's appeal and dismissed the plaintiff's appeal. It found that there was no valid contract between the parties due to a lack of consensus ad idem. While the plaintiff was later nominated as the contractor, this did not remedy the lack of consensus needed to form a valid contract. As the plaintiff did not prove a valid enforceable contract existed, it was not entitled to compensation for breach
PERSONAL INSOLVENCY INFOGRAPHIC
The bankrupt appealed the dismissal of their application for discharge from bankruptcy. The creditor opposed the appeal, arguing that the Director General of Insolvency's (DGI) report was incomplete and unreliable. The court agreed that the DGI report failed to undertake a comprehensive investigation of the bankrupt's assets. As the DGI report is a main piece of evidence in bankruptcy cases, it should have been more detailed. The court dismissed the appeal, as it was not bound to accept an incomplete or unreliable report.
JUSTIFIKASI KEPERLUAN PENAHANAN REMAN MENURUT PERUNDANGAN ISLAM DAN SIVIL
Dokumen tersebut membahasakan justifikasi keperluan penahanan reman menurut hukum Islam dan perundangan sivil. Penahanan reman dipraktikkan sejak zaman Nabi Muhammad sebagai salah satu prosedur penyiasatan untuk mencegah tertuduh melarikan diri dan menghancurkan bukti. Kebanyakan ulama Islam mengizinkan penahanan reman yang bersifat sementara untuk tujuan investigasi, bukan hukuman. Tempoh penahanan bervariasi menurut
CONTRACTS ACT 1950
The document is the Contracts Act 1950 of Malaysia. It contains 191 sections organized into 10 Parts that establish rules and principles related to contracts. Some key details include:
- The Act relates to contracts and was first enacted in 1950, with revisions in 1974 and 2006.
- Part I establishes preliminary definitions for terms used in the Act like proposal, acceptance, promisor, promisee, consideration, agreement, void, contract, and reciprocal promises.
- Parts II through IX cover topics like communication and revocation of proposals, void and voidable contracts, contingent contracts, performance of contracts, consequences of breach, indemnity and guarantee, bailment, and agency.
- Part X addresses the
The Legal Profession in Malaysia
The document summarizes the history and current state of the legal profession in Malaysia. It discusses:
- The legal profession in Malaysia is a fused profession with no distinction between solicitors and barristers.
- The earliest lawyers were known as "law agents" or "advocates and attornies", with the first admission recorded in 1808.
- Various ordinances established regulatory bodies for lawyers in different states, which were consolidated by the Legal Profession Act 1976, establishing the Malaysian Bar and Bar Council. However, Sabah and Sarawak continue to have their own separate legislation and professional bodies.
AN INTRODUCTION TO ISLAMIC LAW OF PROPERTY IN MALAYSIA
This document provides an overview of Islamic law of property in Malaysia. It discusses several key topics:
1) The administration of Muslim estates, which can be testate (with a will) or intestate (without a will). Small estates valued under RM600,000 are distributed by land administrators according to Islamic inheritance law. Non-small estates are distributed by civil courts, who require a certificate from the sharia court.
2) Wills made by Muslims must comply with sharia principles and are adjudicated by sharia courts. Some states have enacted Muslim Wills Enactments to govern this.
3) Nominations in insurance policies and savings accounts are treated differently by different state fatwas regarding
WRITTEN AND ORAL IN ISLAMIC LAW - DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE AND NON-MUSLIMS IN MOR...
This document discusses a case from 1881 in which a Jewish merchant named Ya'akov b. Shalom Assarraf sued a Muslim associate in a shari'a court in Fez, Morocco. Ya'akov presented a legal document as evidence that the defendant owed him money, and the judge ruled in Ya'akov's favor based solely on this documentary evidence, contradicting the common understanding that Islamic law privileged oral testimony over written documents. The document analyzes this case in the context of scholarship on evidentiary standards in Islamic law and the role of non-Muslims in shari'a courts, arguing it highlights the need to reexamine assumptions about the probative value of documents and legal interactions between religious groups in
More from surrenderyourthrone (20)
PRINCIPLE OF PRIMA FACIE CASE AND MAXIMUM EVALUATION AT THE CLOSE OF PROSECUT...
PRINCIPLE OF PRIMA FACIE CASE AND MAXIMUM EVALUATION AT THE CLOSE OF PROSECUT...
Baldah Toyyibah (Prasarana) Kelantan Sdn Bhd v Dae Hanguru Infra Sdn Bhd and ...
Baldah Toyyibah (Prasarana) Kelantan Sdn Bhd v Dae Hanguru Infra Sdn Bhd and ...
JUSTIFIKASI KEPERLUAN PENAHANAN REMAN MENURUT PERUNDANGAN ISLAM DAN SIVIL
JUSTIFIKASI KEPERLUAN PENAHANAN REMAN MENURUT PERUNDANGAN ISLAM DAN SIVIL
AN INTRODUCTION TO ISLAMIC LAW OF PROPERTY IN MALAYSIA
AN INTRODUCTION TO ISLAMIC LAW OF PROPERTY IN MALAYSIA
KEPERLUAN SAKSI DALAM PERMOHONAN PENGESAHAN KES HIBAH DI MAHKAMAH SYARIAH
KEPERLUAN SAKSI DALAM PERMOHONAN PENGESAHAN KES HIBAH DI MAHKAMAH SYARIAH
FUNG KEONG RUBBER MANUFACTURING (M) SDN BHD v LEE ENG KIAT & ORS
FUNG KEONG RUBBER MANUFACTURING (M) SDN BHD v LEE ENG KIAT & ORS
WRITTEN AND ORAL IN ISLAMIC LAW - DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE AND NON-MUSLIMS IN MOR...
WRITTEN AND ORAL IN ISLAMIC LAW - DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE AND NON-MUSLIMS IN MOR...
PEMBUKTIAN MELALUI DOKUMEN DALAM KES-KES PENGESAHAN HIBAH DI MAHKAMAH SYARIAH...
PEMBUKTIAN MELALUI DOKUMEN DALAM KES-KES PENGESAHAN HIBAH DI MAHKAMAH SYARIAH...
KAEDAH-KAEDAH PEMBUKTIAN DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG KETERANGAN MAHKAMAH SYARIAH DAN ...
KAEDAH-KAEDAH PEMBUKTIAN DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG KETERANGAN MAHKAMAH SYARIAH DAN ...
Recently uploaded
在线办理(UNE毕业证书)新英格兰大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(UNE毕业证书)新英格兰大学毕业证成绩单》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
一比一原版(trent毕业证书)加拿大特伦特大学毕业证如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【(trent毕业证书)加拿大特伦特大学毕业证成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理(trent毕业证书)加拿大特伦特大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理(trent毕业证书)加拿大特伦特大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理(trent毕业证书)加拿大特伦特大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理(trent毕业证书)加拿大特伦特大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
一比一原版(ua毕业证书)加拿大阿尔伯塔大学毕业证如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【(ua毕业证书)加拿大阿尔伯塔大学毕业证成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理(ua毕业证书)加拿大阿尔伯塔大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理(ua毕业证书)加拿大阿尔伯塔大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理(ua毕业证书)加拿大阿尔伯塔大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理(ua毕业证书)加拿大阿尔伯塔大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
一比一原版(uwlc毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学拉克罗斯分校毕业证如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【(uwlc毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学拉克罗斯分校毕业证成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理(uwlc毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学拉克罗斯分校毕业证【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理(uwlc毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学拉克罗斯分校毕业证【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理(uwlc毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学拉克罗斯分校毕业证【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理(uwlc毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学拉克罗斯分校毕业证【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
Business Laws Sunita saha
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
一比一原版(uottawa毕业证书)加拿大渥太华大学毕业证如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【(uottawa毕业证书)加拿大渥太华大学毕业证成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理(uottawa毕业证书)加拿大渥太华大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理(uottawa毕业证书)加拿大渥太华大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理(uottawa毕业证书)加拿大渥太华大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理(uottawa毕业证书)加拿大渥太华大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
快速办理(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Corporate Governance : Scope and Legal Framework
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
MEANING
Corporate Governance refers to the way in which companies are governed and to what purpose. It identifies who has power and accountability, and who makes decisions. It is, in essence, a toolkit that enables management and the board to deal more effectively with the challenges of running a company.
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
Presentation by Justin Ordoyo
University of the Philippines College of Law
一比一原版(liverpool毕业证书)利物浦大学毕业证如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【(liverpool毕业证书)利物浦大学毕业证成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理(liverpool毕业证书)利物浦大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理(liverpool毕业证书)利物浦大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理(liverpool毕业证书)利物浦大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理(liverpool毕业证书)利物浦大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
Safeguarding Against Financial Crime: AML Compliance Regulations Demystified
Safeguarding Against Financial Crime: AML Compliance Regulations DemystifiedPROF. PAUL ALLIEU KAMARA
To ensure the integrity of financial systems and combat illicit financial activities, understanding AML (Anti-Money Laundering) compliance regulations is crucial for financial institutions and businesses. AML compliance regulations are designed to prevent money laundering and the financing of terrorist activities by imposing specific requirements on financial institutions, including customer due diligence, monitoring, and reporting of suspicious activities (GitHub Docs).一比一原版牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证（牛布毕业证）如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证（牛布毕业证）成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证（牛布毕业证）【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证（牛布毕业证）【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证（牛布毕业证）【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证（牛布毕业证）【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
Indonesian Manpower Regulation on Severance Pay for Retiring Private Sector E...
Law Number 13 of 2003 on Manpower has been partially revoked and amended several times, with the latest amendment made through Law Number 6 of 2023. Attention is drawn to a specific part of the Manpower Law concerning severance pay. This aspect is undoubtedly one of the most crucial parts regulated by the Manpower Law. It is essential for both employers and employees to abide by the law, fulfill their obligations, and retain their rights regarding this matter.
一比一原版加拿大多伦多大学毕业证（uoft毕业证书）如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【加拿大多伦多大学毕业证（uoft毕业证书）成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理加拿大多伦多大学毕业证（uoft毕业证书）【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理加拿大多伦多大学毕业证（uoft毕业证书）【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理加拿大多伦多大学毕业证（uoft毕业证书）【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理加拿大多伦多大学毕业证（uoft毕业证书）【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
一比一原版新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕）ntu学位证书如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕）ntu学位证书成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕）ntu学位证书【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕）ntu学位证书【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕）ntu学位证书【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕）ntu学位证书【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
一比一原版英国伦敦商学院毕业证（lbs毕业证书）如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【英国伦敦商学院毕业证（lbs毕业证书）成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理英国伦敦商学院毕业证（lbs毕业证书）【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理英国伦敦商学院毕业证（lbs毕业证书）【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理英国伦敦商学院毕业证（lbs毕业证书）【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理英国伦敦商学院毕业证（lbs毕业证书）【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
Recently uploaded (20)
production-orders-under-article-18-of-the-budapest-convention-on-cybercrime-a...
production-orders-under-article-18-of-the-budapest-convention-on-cybercrime-a...
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
Safeguarding Against Financial Crime: AML Compliance Regulations Demystified
Safeguarding Against Financial Crime: AML Compliance Regulations Demystified
Indonesian Manpower Regulation on Severance Pay for Retiring Private Sector E...
Indonesian Manpower Regulation on Severance Pay for Retiring Private Sector E...
Comparative analysis of ipc and bharitye Naya sahinta
Comparative analysis of ipc and bharitye Naya sahinta
Criminal law notes - Sudden fight as a defense
- 1. Sudden fight as a defense Section 300 of PC speaks of situations in which if a murder is committed, it is treated as ‘culpable homicide not amounting to murder’. One of the situations relevant to the current discussion is, situation of ‘sudden fight’. It can be used as a defense to reduce criminal liability from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to muder. Exception 4. – Culpable homicide is not muder if it is committed without premeditation in a sudden fight, in the heat of passion upon a sudden quarrel and without the offendor’s having taken undue advantage or acted in a cruel or unusual manner. Explanation. – It is immaterial in such cases which party offers the provocation or commits the first assault. In Narayan Nair Raghavan v State of Travancore-Cochin, this exception requires that no undue advantage be taken of the other side. It is impossible to state that there is no undue advantage when a man stabs an unarmed person who makes no threatening gestures and merely asks the accused to stop fighting. In these circumstances, the exception does not apply. In the case of Amrithalinga Nadar v State of Tamil Nadu, the exception is invoked successfully as in this case both sides of parties were not taking undue advantage over each other as the deceased was armed with a knife while the accused who was enraged by the injuries from the deceased, inflicted a blow on him. The case Surinder Kumar v Union Territory of Chandigarh lays down the requirement that must be satisfied to invoke this exception which include, (i) it was a sudden fight; (ii) there was no premeditation; (iii) the act was done in a heat of passion, and (iv) the assailant had not taken any undue advantage or acted in a cruel manner. This case also explains that the cause of the quarrel is not relevant nor is it relevant who offered the provocation or started the assault. The number of wounds caused during the occurrence is not a decisive factor but what is important is that the occurrence must have been sudden and unpremeditated and the offendor must have acted in a fit of anger.