SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1
City of Evanston
Citywide Performance Measures
2012 CPM Report Overview
November 10, 2012
2
2012 CPM Report Presentation
• Performance Measurement Review
– Background
– Goals
• 2012 CPM Report Overview
• Next Steps
• Questions
3
Performance Measurement Review
Background:
•The 2012 CPM Report was developed in accordance with the City
Council’s goal of “Efficiency and Effectiveness of Services.”
•The 2012 CPM Report was created using measurement and reporting
guidelines provided by ICMA.
•2012 represents the first year of CPM reporting for the City of
Evanston.
4
Performance Measurement Review
Background:
•The draft Comprehensive Performance Measures were introduced
during the May 21, 2012 City Council Meeting.
•The City Council submitted comments and suggestions during the
May 21, 2012 meeting and during individual meetings with staff.
•City Council suggestions were incorporated into the 2012 CPM
Report.
•The 2012 CPM Report is available for viewing on pages 227 – 236 of
the Proposed FY 2013 Budget document.
5
Performance Measurement Review
Goals of Comprehensive Performance Measurement:
•Provide elected officials with detailed information to help make
informed decisions about strategic goals and resource allocation.
•Provide the public with accurate data about the quality and efficiency
of local government services.
•Increase accountability of City staff by enhancing tracking and
reporting of organizational performance.
•Allow for benchmarking of City service provision against other
communities.
6
2012 CPM Report Overview
City Manager’s Office – Pg. 228
# Service Area Performance Measure Description
2012
Target
Target
on
Track
1 Sustainability
Total energy savings Citywide during a specific
period of time calculated in terms of kWh and
Therms
20,000 kWh
100,000
Therms
2 Sustainability Annual grant funding secured. $100,000 ✔
3 Citizen Engagement
Percentage of 311 requests completed within
established service level agreement.
48 Business
Hours
4 Citizen Engagement
Number of administrative services assumed by
311.
4 ✔
5 Citizen Engagement
Change in number of subscribers to City
communication channels annually.
24,000 ✔
6 Events and Activities
Number of citizen engagement events and/or
activities.
72 ✔
7
2012 CPM Report Overview
Law Department – Pg. 228
# Service Area Performance Measure Description
2012
Target
Target
on
Track
7 Ordinance Prosecution
Ordinance cases prosecuted during a specified
period of time (animal, aggressive panhandling,
curfew, disorderly conduct).
500
8 Traffic Prosecution
Traffic prosecution cases during a specific
period of time, including percentage of
successful prosecutions.
6300
9
Ordinances and
Resolutions
Ordinances and resolutions written and/or
reviewed during a specific period of time.
140 ✔
10
Loss Minimization/Risk
Management
Cases tried to verdict. 8 ✔
11 Administrative Adjudication
Number of administrative adjudication cases
tried per year (including appeals).
80 ✔
8
2012 CPM Report Overview
Administrative Services Department - Pg. 229
# Service Area Performance Measure Description
2012
Target
Target
on
Track
12 Purchasing
Calendar days from requisition to purchase
order (formal and informal bids).
3 Days
13
Human Resources -
Recruitment
Calendar days from requisition to
hire/recruitment for internal and external hires.
60 Days ✔
14
Human Resources -
Satisfaction
Percentage of employees who rate training
opportunities, work environment and quality
of HR services as satisfactory.
15
Human Resources -
Retention
Length of time that employees maintain
employment with City.
12 Years ✔
16
Telephone System and
Network Problem
Resolution/Repair
Percentage of telephone system and network
problems corrected within 48 hours during a
specific period of time.
65% ✔
17 Finance / Accounting
Total number of financial reporting documents
published and/or certified during a specific
period of time.
21 ✔
18 Parking - Revenue
Number of parking tickets issued and parking-
related revenue generated during a specific
period of time.
9,484,400 ✔
19 Parking - Compliance
Number of e-mail and text alert subscribers
for street cleaning notifications.
1500 ✔
TBD
9
2012 CPM Report Overview
Community and Economic Development Department – Pg. 230
# Service Area Performance Measure Description
2012
Target
Target
on
Track
20
Property Maintenance
Compliance
Total inspections performed per 1,000 population. 254
21
Property Maintenance
Compliance
% of compliant rental units of the Housing Code
Compliance Program within a calendar year.
98% ✔
22 Plan Reviews
Average number of days to review Single Family &
Accessory Structures and Commercial & Accessory
Structures.
Residential: 14 Days
Commercial: 24 Days
✔
23
Planning & Zoning
Reviews
Plan Commission: Average review time (days) of
rezoning cases in committee.
120 days
24
Planning & Zoning
Reviews
Average review time for Subdivision cases 90 days ✔
Continued…
10
2012 CPM Report Overview
Community and Economic Development Department – Pg. 230 Cont’d
# Service Area Performance Measure Description
2012
Target
Target
on
Track
25
Planning & Zoning
Reviews
Plan Commission: Average review time (days) of
Plan Unit Development cases in committee.
90 days ✔
26
Planning & Zoning
Reviews
Zoning Board of Appeals: Average review time
(days) of Variation & Special Use permit cases in
committee.
30 days
30 days
✔
27
Planning & Zoning
Reviews
Historic Preservation: Average review time (days)
of Certificates of appropriateness cases in
committee
30 days ✔
28 New Businesses No. of new and closing businesses in Evanston.
New Business
Openings: 75
Businesses Closed:
40
29
Affordable Housing
Production/Rehab
Number of housing units (owner and rental) improved
per $100,000 of grant funding.
80 ✔
11
2012 CPM Report Overview
Police Department – Pg. 231
# Service Area Performance Measure Description
2012
Target
Target
on
Track
30 Crime Rates
Benchmark of crime level against that of other
communities.
TBD
31 Calls for Service
Number of police calls per 1,000 residential population
compared with the percentage of dispatched police
calls.
TBD
32
Peacekeeping and
Domestic Quarrels
Number of domestic quarrels, referrals to Victim
Services and follow-on services provided.
TBD
33 Crimes Solved
Percentage of UCR (Uniform Crime Reports) Part I
Crimes Cleared.
TBD
34 Response Time Response time in minutes to Top Priority Calls. TBD
35 Seizure Data
Benchmark of quantity of illicit drugs and firearms
seized against that of other communities.
TBD
36 FTE to Population Sworn and civilian FTE's per 1,000. TBD
37
Proactive Activities by
the Problem Solving
Team
Compare year-to-year volume and results in
reduced in crime opportunities
TBD
38 Complaints
Compare trendlines in citizen comments at Human
Services Committee
TBD
* Performance measures to be added after full year of data collection.
12
2012 CPM Report Overview
Fire Department – Pg. 232
# Service Area Performance Measure Description
2012
Target
Target
on
Track
39 Response Time
Percentage of emergency fire calls with a response
time of five minutes and under from dispatch to arrival
on scene, compared with square miles served per fire
Suppression Station, and compared with population
density.
95% ✔
40 Fire Incidents Fire Incidents confined to room of origin. 65% ✔
41 Injuries
Number of on the Job (OJI) related injuries per 100
members that resulted in time lost from duty in a 1 year
period.
<5 ✔
42 Vehicle Accidents
Job related vehicle crashes, deemed preventable, per
100 members in a 1 year period.
<5
43 FTE to Population Sworn and civilian FTE's per 1,000 population. 1.4 ✔
44 EMS Response Time Emergency responses (in seconds). 240 ✔
45 Alarm Response Time
Turnout Time for emergency and non-emergency
alarms.
Em<70
Non<100
✔
46 Loss Minimization Estimated property value preserved. N/A
13
2012 CPM Report Overview
Health Department – Pg. 232 - 233
# Service Area Performance Measure Description
2012
Target
Target
on
Track
47
Communicable Disease
Epidemiological
Investigations
Number of investigations and complaints. 450 ✔
48 Educational Outreach
Number of individuals reached by educational activities
per 1,000 population.
2,000 ✔
49
Educational Outreach -
Lead Poisoning
Track local trends in testing sites for lead,
childhood blood lead screening rates, and
incidence in childhood lead poisoning rates.
20 ✔
50 Health Inspections
Number of restaurant, temporary food and farmer's
market inspections (cont'd in comment).
1,200 ✔
51 Dental Care
Number of visits to dental clinic for preventative and
restorative care.
1,500
52 Vital Records Number of birth and death certificates issued. 1,500 ✔
53 Pediatric Oral Care
Average time wait time for pediatric oral
restorative and preventative care.
10 ✔
14
2012 CPM Report Overview
Public Works Department – Pg. 233 - 234
# Service Area Performance Measure Description
2012
Target
Target
on
Track
54 Waste Diversion Total waste diversion rate. 19%
55 Road Rehabilitation Road Rehabilitation Expenditures per paved lane mile. $407,007 ✔
56
Timely Capital
Improvements
Percentage of capital improvement projects on time
and under budget.
Complete ✔
57 Resident Satisfaction
Survey of residents impacted by all Public Works
projects.
Satisfied ✔
58
Time to complete
maintenance and minor
repairs
Percent of minor vehicle repairs completed within 2
days and percent of preventative maintenance
completed within 30 days of due date.
1.Total Vehicle
downtime of 5% or
less. 2. P.M.
completion rate of
95%
✔
59
Cost of maintenance and
minor repairs
Average maintenance and repair cost per vehicle.
Less than $3.00 per
mile driven
✔
60 Snow Removal
Snow and ice control expenditures per capita
compared with inches of snowfall.
Snow Cost Per
Capita ($6.50)
Annual Inches of
Snow (20")
61
Timely waste and
recycling collection
Percent of residential and commercial waste and
recycling picked up on schedule.
90% ✔
62
Residential Street
Sweeping
Street-sweeping expenditures per linear mile
swept.
$120 ✔
15
2012 CPM Report Overview
Library – Pg. 234
# Service Area Performance Measure Description
2012
Target
Target
on
Track
63 Customer Satisfaction
Percentage of citizens who rated library service as
satisfactory.
80%
64 Customer Service
Percentage of library users who rated the helpfulness
and the general attitude of library staff as satisfactory.
90%
65 Collection
Percentage of library users who rated the availability of
library materials as satisfactory.
80%
66 Circulation Number of items circulated per resident. 13.8
67 Purchasing Costs
Number of dollars spent for materials acquisition per
resident.
$18.12
68 Facility Usage
Number of meeting room requests and estimated
attendees.
Requests: 4,500
Attendees:
25,000
✔
69 Second Visits
Number of library program participants that enroll
in additional programs.
60% return
visits
70 Outreach Effectiveness
Surveys gathering information on how they
learned about programs.
most cost-
effective means
16
2012 CPM Report Overview
Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department – Pg. 235
# Service Area Performance Measure Description
2012
Target
Target
on
Track
71 Youth Employment
Percentage of applicants for youth employment and
vocational training opportunities who received such
opportunities.
5% increase
year over
year
✔
72 Facilities Management
Total number and response time of completing in-
house work orders.
Historical
Comparison
✔
73 Forestry Response
Total number and response time of completing
Forestry Division requests.
Historical
Comparison
✔
Continued…
17
2012 CPM Report Overview
Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department – Pg. 235
# Service Area Performance Measure Description
2012
Target
Target
on
Track
74 Recreation User Activity
Evaluate total program participation and recreation
services by age and Ward.
Historical
Comparison
75 Youth Engagement
Evaluate employee and employer satisfaction with
youth employment programs.
80% ✔
76 Park Attendance
Attendance at PR&CS special events and park
permits
45,700
77 Park User Experience
User survey of facility conditions, safety and
cleanliness.
TBD
78 The Arts
Number of functional aspects added to
evanstonartsbuzz.com web site
TBD
18
2012 CPM Report Overview
Utilities Department – Pg. 236
# Service Area Performance Measure Description
2012
Target
Target
on
Track
79 Reliable Distribution
Number of customers experiencing an unscheduled
disruption of service.
720 ✔
80 Water Complaints
Number of customer complaints for water's technical
quality.
100 ✔
81 Sewer Complaints
Number of customer complaints for sewers' technical
quality (seepage, backups, overflows, etc.).
200 ✔
82
Employee Health and
Safety
Benchmark days lost from work due to illness or injury
again.
3.6
83 Regulatory Compliance Number of EPA regulatory violations. 0 ✔
84 Water Main Failure Rate Number of known breaks/leaks per mile of water main. 0.3 ✔
85 Water Sales
Millions of gallons of water sold to outside
communities.
11,500 MG ✔
19
Next Steps
Moving Forward with Performance Measurement:
•Collect year-end performance measurement data for 2012.
•Publish the 2012 Performance Measurement Report as part of the
Adopted FY 2013 Budget document.
•Begin tracking performance measures for 2013.
•Obtain CPM information from comparable communities for
benchmarking purposes.
20
Questions?

More Related Content

Similar to Cpm report for 11 10-12 v1

Thesis final presentation.V3
Thesis final presentation.V3Thesis final presentation.V3
Thesis final presentation.V3NISHIMWE Pius
 
Cincinnati's Permits and Inspections Streamlining Initiative
Cincinnati's Permits and Inspections Streamlining InitiativeCincinnati's Permits and Inspections Streamlining Initiative
Cincinnati's Permits and Inspections Streamlining Initiative
Harry Black
 
Construction & Real Estate Sector Supplement Session
Construction & Real Estate Sector Supplement SessionConstruction & Real Estate Sector Supplement Session
Construction & Real Estate Sector Supplement Session
Global Reporting Initiative
 
The use of evidence in performance budgeting - Paula Darville, Chile
The use of evidence in performance budgeting - Paula Darville, ChileThe use of evidence in performance budgeting - Paula Darville, Chile
The use of evidence in performance budgeting - Paula Darville, Chile
OECD Governance
 
IPSASB Update - Ian Carruthers, IPSASB
IPSASB Update - Ian Carruthers, IPSASBIPSASB Update - Ian Carruthers, IPSASB
IPSASB Update - Ian Carruthers, IPSASB
OECD Governance
 
Managing Third Party & Counterparty Relationship Risks
Managing Third Party & Counterparty Relationship RisksManaging Third Party & Counterparty Relationship Risks
Managing Third Party & Counterparty Relationship Risks
C5Live
 
Presentation. Workshop to discuss the joint EC/SIGMA comments to the draft Bi...
Presentation. Workshop to discuss the joint EC/SIGMA comments to the draft Bi...Presentation. Workshop to discuss the joint EC/SIGMA comments to the draft Bi...
Presentation. Workshop to discuss the joint EC/SIGMA comments to the draft Bi...
Support for Improvement in Governance and Management SIGMA
 
ngo-output-funding.ppt
ngo-output-funding.pptngo-output-funding.ppt
ngo-output-funding.ppt
ssuser4f7dd2
 
Greenwich Final Report 2014
Greenwich Final Report 2014Greenwich Final Report 2014
Greenwich Final Report 2014Nancy Lin
 
Presentation - OECD workshop on the performance of utilities for wastewater, WB
Presentation - OECD workshop on the performance of utilities for wastewater, WBPresentation - OECD workshop on the performance of utilities for wastewater, WB
Presentation - OECD workshop on the performance of utilities for wastewater, WB
OECD Environment
 
Grievance Redressal Mechanism - Training Slides .pdf
Grievance Redressal Mechanism - Training Slides .pdfGrievance Redressal Mechanism - Training Slides .pdf
Grievance Redressal Mechanism - Training Slides .pdf
sadiaahmed91
 
John Peters
John PetersJohn Peters
John Peters
CameronOntong
 
05.21.12 council agenda packet
05.21.12 council agenda packet05.21.12 council agenda packet
05.21.12 council agenda packet
cityofevanston
 
Attributes of well_performing_utilities_mv_g_0807
Attributes of well_performing_utilities_mv_g_0807Attributes of well_performing_utilities_mv_g_0807
Attributes of well_performing_utilities_mv_g_0807
Water Helpdesk
 
Water Conservation & Water Loss: What are you doing?
Water Conservation & Water Loss: What are you doing?Water Conservation & Water Loss: What are you doing?
Water Conservation & Water Loss: What are you doing?
Texas Living Waters Project
 
Citistat PPT 01.14.2016
Citistat PPT 01.14.2016Citistat PPT 01.14.2016
Citistat PPT 01.14.2016Mark Conway
 
City of College Station Revised Performance Measures
City of College Station Revised Performance MeasuresCity of College Station Revised Performance Measures
City of College Station Revised Performance MeasuresCity of College Station
 
Lean Service in the Public sector: a methodology to cut waste and to maximize...
Lean Service in the Public sector: a methodology to cut waste and to maximize...Lean Service in the Public sector: a methodology to cut waste and to maximize...
Lean Service in the Public sector: a methodology to cut waste and to maximize...
Francesco Santoro
 

Similar to Cpm report for 11 10-12 v1 (20)

Thesis final presentation.V3
Thesis final presentation.V3Thesis final presentation.V3
Thesis final presentation.V3
 
Cincinnati's Permits and Inspections Streamlining Initiative
Cincinnati's Permits and Inspections Streamlining InitiativeCincinnati's Permits and Inspections Streamlining Initiative
Cincinnati's Permits and Inspections Streamlining Initiative
 
Construction & Real Estate Sector Supplement Session
Construction & Real Estate Sector Supplement SessionConstruction & Real Estate Sector Supplement Session
Construction & Real Estate Sector Supplement Session
 
The use of evidence in performance budgeting - Paula Darville, Chile
The use of evidence in performance budgeting - Paula Darville, ChileThe use of evidence in performance budgeting - Paula Darville, Chile
The use of evidence in performance budgeting - Paula Darville, Chile
 
IPSASB Update - Ian Carruthers, IPSASB
IPSASB Update - Ian Carruthers, IPSASBIPSASB Update - Ian Carruthers, IPSASB
IPSASB Update - Ian Carruthers, IPSASB
 
Managing Third Party & Counterparty Relationship Risks
Managing Third Party & Counterparty Relationship RisksManaging Third Party & Counterparty Relationship Risks
Managing Third Party & Counterparty Relationship Risks
 
Presentation. Workshop to discuss the joint EC/SIGMA comments to the draft Bi...
Presentation. Workshop to discuss the joint EC/SIGMA comments to the draft Bi...Presentation. Workshop to discuss the joint EC/SIGMA comments to the draft Bi...
Presentation. Workshop to discuss the joint EC/SIGMA comments to the draft Bi...
 
ngo-output-funding.ppt
ngo-output-funding.pptngo-output-funding.ppt
ngo-output-funding.ppt
 
Greenwich Final Report 2014
Greenwich Final Report 2014Greenwich Final Report 2014
Greenwich Final Report 2014
 
Greenwich Final Report 2014
Greenwich Final Report 2014Greenwich Final Report 2014
Greenwich Final Report 2014
 
Presentation - OECD workshop on the performance of utilities for wastewater, WB
Presentation - OECD workshop on the performance of utilities for wastewater, WBPresentation - OECD workshop on the performance of utilities for wastewater, WB
Presentation - OECD workshop on the performance of utilities for wastewater, WB
 
Grievance Redressal Mechanism - Training Slides .pdf
Grievance Redressal Mechanism - Training Slides .pdfGrievance Redressal Mechanism - Training Slides .pdf
Grievance Redressal Mechanism - Training Slides .pdf
 
John Peters
John PetersJohn Peters
John Peters
 
05.21.12 council agenda packet
05.21.12 council agenda packet05.21.12 council agenda packet
05.21.12 council agenda packet
 
Attributes of well_performing_utilities_mv_g_0807
Attributes of well_performing_utilities_mv_g_0807Attributes of well_performing_utilities_mv_g_0807
Attributes of well_performing_utilities_mv_g_0807
 
Project @ Depaul
Project @ DepaulProject @ Depaul
Project @ Depaul
 
Water Conservation & Water Loss: What are you doing?
Water Conservation & Water Loss: What are you doing?Water Conservation & Water Loss: What are you doing?
Water Conservation & Water Loss: What are you doing?
 
Citistat PPT 01.14.2016
Citistat PPT 01.14.2016Citistat PPT 01.14.2016
Citistat PPT 01.14.2016
 
City of College Station Revised Performance Measures
City of College Station Revised Performance MeasuresCity of College Station Revised Performance Measures
City of College Station Revised Performance Measures
 
Lean Service in the Public sector: a methodology to cut waste and to maximize...
Lean Service in the Public sector: a methodology to cut waste and to maximize...Lean Service in the Public sector: a methodology to cut waste and to maximize...
Lean Service in the Public sector: a methodology to cut waste and to maximize...
 

More from cityofevanston

SBA & City of Evanston Economic Injury Webinar - 4/1/2020
SBA & City of Evanston Economic Injury Webinar - 4/1/2020SBA & City of Evanston Economic Injury Webinar - 4/1/2020
SBA & City of Evanston Economic Injury Webinar - 4/1/2020
cityofevanston
 
Zs city of evanston presentation 28 january 2015
Zs city of evanston presentation 28 january 2015Zs city of evanston presentation 28 january 2015
Zs city of evanston presentation 28 january 2015cityofevanston
 
Human services funding summit jan 27 2015 presentation
Human services funding summit jan 27 2015 presentationHuman services funding summit jan 27 2015 presentation
Human services funding summit jan 27 2015 presentation
cityofevanston
 
Age friendlyhealth summit
Age friendlyhealth summitAge friendlyhealth summit
Age friendlyhealth summit
cityofevanston
 
Divvy Community Meeting Presentation
Divvy Community Meeting PresentationDivvy Community Meeting Presentation
Divvy Community Meeting Presentation
cityofevanston
 
Human services noyes ctr successes 2014
Human services noyes ctr successes 2014Human services noyes ctr successes 2014
Human services noyes ctr successes 2014
cityofevanston
 
Hs cagngfrndlyupdte
Hs cagngfrndlyupdteHs cagngfrndlyupdte
Hs cagngfrndlyupdte
cityofevanston
 
Leathers & Associates Penny Park Presentation
Leathers & Associates Penny Park PresentationLeathers & Associates Penny Park Presentation
Leathers & Associates Penny Park Presentation
cityofevanston
 
Penny Park Renovations
Penny Park RenovationsPenny Park Renovations
Penny Park Renovations
cityofevanston
 
Sheridan Road Improvement Project
Sheridan Road Improvement ProjectSheridan Road Improvement Project
Sheridan Road Improvement Project
cityofevanston
 
FY 2014 Second Quarter Financial Review
FY 2014 Second Quarter Financial ReviewFY 2014 Second Quarter Financial Review
FY 2014 Second Quarter Financial Review
cityofevanston
 
SP1 Second Quarter Financial Review
SP1 Second Quarter Financial ReviewSP1 Second Quarter Financial Review
SP1 Second Quarter Financial Review
cityofevanston
 
A5 Chicago Ave Project Plan
A5 Chicago Ave Project PlanA5 Chicago Ave Project Plan
A5 Chicago Ave Project Plan
cityofevanston
 
P1 Sports Dome Planned Development
P1 Sports Dome Planned DevelopmentP1 Sports Dome Planned Development
P1 Sports Dome Planned Development
cityofevanston
 
Sheridan Road City Council Presentation
Sheridan Road City Council PresentationSheridan Road City Council Presentation
Sheridan Road City Council Presentation
cityofevanston
 
Sp1 2013 street resurfacing presentation
Sp1 2013 street resurfacing presentationSp1 2013 street resurfacing presentation
Sp1 2013 street resurfacing presentation
cityofevanston
 
Presentation - japanese visitors
Presentation - japanese visitorsPresentation - japanese visitors
Presentation - japanese visitors
cityofevanston
 
Evanston committee 3 5-2012
Evanston committee 3 5-2012Evanston committee 3 5-2012
Evanston committee 3 5-2012
cityofevanston
 
A8 a10 chicago main intro of ordinances 2012 12/10
A8 a10 chicago main intro of ordinances 2012 12/10A8 a10 chicago main intro of ordinances 2012 12/10
A8 a10 chicago main intro of ordinances 2012 12/10
cityofevanston
 
Council meeting 3.20.12 cross fit e-town
Council meeting 3.20.12  cross fit e-townCouncil meeting 3.20.12  cross fit e-town
Council meeting 3.20.12 cross fit e-town
cityofevanston
 

More from cityofevanston (20)

SBA & City of Evanston Economic Injury Webinar - 4/1/2020
SBA & City of Evanston Economic Injury Webinar - 4/1/2020SBA & City of Evanston Economic Injury Webinar - 4/1/2020
SBA & City of Evanston Economic Injury Webinar - 4/1/2020
 
Zs city of evanston presentation 28 january 2015
Zs city of evanston presentation 28 january 2015Zs city of evanston presentation 28 january 2015
Zs city of evanston presentation 28 january 2015
 
Human services funding summit jan 27 2015 presentation
Human services funding summit jan 27 2015 presentationHuman services funding summit jan 27 2015 presentation
Human services funding summit jan 27 2015 presentation
 
Age friendlyhealth summit
Age friendlyhealth summitAge friendlyhealth summit
Age friendlyhealth summit
 
Divvy Community Meeting Presentation
Divvy Community Meeting PresentationDivvy Community Meeting Presentation
Divvy Community Meeting Presentation
 
Human services noyes ctr successes 2014
Human services noyes ctr successes 2014Human services noyes ctr successes 2014
Human services noyes ctr successes 2014
 
Hs cagngfrndlyupdte
Hs cagngfrndlyupdteHs cagngfrndlyupdte
Hs cagngfrndlyupdte
 
Leathers & Associates Penny Park Presentation
Leathers & Associates Penny Park PresentationLeathers & Associates Penny Park Presentation
Leathers & Associates Penny Park Presentation
 
Penny Park Renovations
Penny Park RenovationsPenny Park Renovations
Penny Park Renovations
 
Sheridan Road Improvement Project
Sheridan Road Improvement ProjectSheridan Road Improvement Project
Sheridan Road Improvement Project
 
FY 2014 Second Quarter Financial Review
FY 2014 Second Quarter Financial ReviewFY 2014 Second Quarter Financial Review
FY 2014 Second Quarter Financial Review
 
SP1 Second Quarter Financial Review
SP1 Second Quarter Financial ReviewSP1 Second Quarter Financial Review
SP1 Second Quarter Financial Review
 
A5 Chicago Ave Project Plan
A5 Chicago Ave Project PlanA5 Chicago Ave Project Plan
A5 Chicago Ave Project Plan
 
P1 Sports Dome Planned Development
P1 Sports Dome Planned DevelopmentP1 Sports Dome Planned Development
P1 Sports Dome Planned Development
 
Sheridan Road City Council Presentation
Sheridan Road City Council PresentationSheridan Road City Council Presentation
Sheridan Road City Council Presentation
 
Sp1 2013 street resurfacing presentation
Sp1 2013 street resurfacing presentationSp1 2013 street resurfacing presentation
Sp1 2013 street resurfacing presentation
 
Presentation - japanese visitors
Presentation - japanese visitorsPresentation - japanese visitors
Presentation - japanese visitors
 
Evanston committee 3 5-2012
Evanston committee 3 5-2012Evanston committee 3 5-2012
Evanston committee 3 5-2012
 
A8 a10 chicago main intro of ordinances 2012 12/10
A8 a10 chicago main intro of ordinances 2012 12/10A8 a10 chicago main intro of ordinances 2012 12/10
A8 a10 chicago main intro of ordinances 2012 12/10
 
Council meeting 3.20.12 cross fit e-town
Council meeting 3.20.12  cross fit e-townCouncil meeting 3.20.12  cross fit e-town
Council meeting 3.20.12 cross fit e-town
 

Cpm report for 11 10-12 v1

  • 1. 1 City of Evanston Citywide Performance Measures 2012 CPM Report Overview November 10, 2012
  • 2. 2 2012 CPM Report Presentation • Performance Measurement Review – Background – Goals • 2012 CPM Report Overview • Next Steps • Questions
  • 3. 3 Performance Measurement Review Background: •The 2012 CPM Report was developed in accordance with the City Council’s goal of “Efficiency and Effectiveness of Services.” •The 2012 CPM Report was created using measurement and reporting guidelines provided by ICMA. •2012 represents the first year of CPM reporting for the City of Evanston.
  • 4. 4 Performance Measurement Review Background: •The draft Comprehensive Performance Measures were introduced during the May 21, 2012 City Council Meeting. •The City Council submitted comments and suggestions during the May 21, 2012 meeting and during individual meetings with staff. •City Council suggestions were incorporated into the 2012 CPM Report. •The 2012 CPM Report is available for viewing on pages 227 – 236 of the Proposed FY 2013 Budget document.
  • 5. 5 Performance Measurement Review Goals of Comprehensive Performance Measurement: •Provide elected officials with detailed information to help make informed decisions about strategic goals and resource allocation. •Provide the public with accurate data about the quality and efficiency of local government services. •Increase accountability of City staff by enhancing tracking and reporting of organizational performance. •Allow for benchmarking of City service provision against other communities.
  • 6. 6 2012 CPM Report Overview City Manager’s Office – Pg. 228 # Service Area Performance Measure Description 2012 Target Target on Track 1 Sustainability Total energy savings Citywide during a specific period of time calculated in terms of kWh and Therms 20,000 kWh 100,000 Therms 2 Sustainability Annual grant funding secured. $100,000 ✔ 3 Citizen Engagement Percentage of 311 requests completed within established service level agreement. 48 Business Hours 4 Citizen Engagement Number of administrative services assumed by 311. 4 ✔ 5 Citizen Engagement Change in number of subscribers to City communication channels annually. 24,000 ✔ 6 Events and Activities Number of citizen engagement events and/or activities. 72 ✔
  • 7. 7 2012 CPM Report Overview Law Department – Pg. 228 # Service Area Performance Measure Description 2012 Target Target on Track 7 Ordinance Prosecution Ordinance cases prosecuted during a specified period of time (animal, aggressive panhandling, curfew, disorderly conduct). 500 8 Traffic Prosecution Traffic prosecution cases during a specific period of time, including percentage of successful prosecutions. 6300 9 Ordinances and Resolutions Ordinances and resolutions written and/or reviewed during a specific period of time. 140 ✔ 10 Loss Minimization/Risk Management Cases tried to verdict. 8 ✔ 11 Administrative Adjudication Number of administrative adjudication cases tried per year (including appeals). 80 ✔
  • 8. 8 2012 CPM Report Overview Administrative Services Department - Pg. 229 # Service Area Performance Measure Description 2012 Target Target on Track 12 Purchasing Calendar days from requisition to purchase order (formal and informal bids). 3 Days 13 Human Resources - Recruitment Calendar days from requisition to hire/recruitment for internal and external hires. 60 Days ✔ 14 Human Resources - Satisfaction Percentage of employees who rate training opportunities, work environment and quality of HR services as satisfactory. 15 Human Resources - Retention Length of time that employees maintain employment with City. 12 Years ✔ 16 Telephone System and Network Problem Resolution/Repair Percentage of telephone system and network problems corrected within 48 hours during a specific period of time. 65% ✔ 17 Finance / Accounting Total number of financial reporting documents published and/or certified during a specific period of time. 21 ✔ 18 Parking - Revenue Number of parking tickets issued and parking- related revenue generated during a specific period of time. 9,484,400 ✔ 19 Parking - Compliance Number of e-mail and text alert subscribers for street cleaning notifications. 1500 ✔ TBD
  • 9. 9 2012 CPM Report Overview Community and Economic Development Department – Pg. 230 # Service Area Performance Measure Description 2012 Target Target on Track 20 Property Maintenance Compliance Total inspections performed per 1,000 population. 254 21 Property Maintenance Compliance % of compliant rental units of the Housing Code Compliance Program within a calendar year. 98% ✔ 22 Plan Reviews Average number of days to review Single Family & Accessory Structures and Commercial & Accessory Structures. Residential: 14 Days Commercial: 24 Days ✔ 23 Planning & Zoning Reviews Plan Commission: Average review time (days) of rezoning cases in committee. 120 days 24 Planning & Zoning Reviews Average review time for Subdivision cases 90 days ✔ Continued…
  • 10. 10 2012 CPM Report Overview Community and Economic Development Department – Pg. 230 Cont’d # Service Area Performance Measure Description 2012 Target Target on Track 25 Planning & Zoning Reviews Plan Commission: Average review time (days) of Plan Unit Development cases in committee. 90 days ✔ 26 Planning & Zoning Reviews Zoning Board of Appeals: Average review time (days) of Variation & Special Use permit cases in committee. 30 days 30 days ✔ 27 Planning & Zoning Reviews Historic Preservation: Average review time (days) of Certificates of appropriateness cases in committee 30 days ✔ 28 New Businesses No. of new and closing businesses in Evanston. New Business Openings: 75 Businesses Closed: 40 29 Affordable Housing Production/Rehab Number of housing units (owner and rental) improved per $100,000 of grant funding. 80 ✔
  • 11. 11 2012 CPM Report Overview Police Department – Pg. 231 # Service Area Performance Measure Description 2012 Target Target on Track 30 Crime Rates Benchmark of crime level against that of other communities. TBD 31 Calls for Service Number of police calls per 1,000 residential population compared with the percentage of dispatched police calls. TBD 32 Peacekeeping and Domestic Quarrels Number of domestic quarrels, referrals to Victim Services and follow-on services provided. TBD 33 Crimes Solved Percentage of UCR (Uniform Crime Reports) Part I Crimes Cleared. TBD 34 Response Time Response time in minutes to Top Priority Calls. TBD 35 Seizure Data Benchmark of quantity of illicit drugs and firearms seized against that of other communities. TBD 36 FTE to Population Sworn and civilian FTE's per 1,000. TBD 37 Proactive Activities by the Problem Solving Team Compare year-to-year volume and results in reduced in crime opportunities TBD 38 Complaints Compare trendlines in citizen comments at Human Services Committee TBD * Performance measures to be added after full year of data collection.
  • 12. 12 2012 CPM Report Overview Fire Department – Pg. 232 # Service Area Performance Measure Description 2012 Target Target on Track 39 Response Time Percentage of emergency fire calls with a response time of five minutes and under from dispatch to arrival on scene, compared with square miles served per fire Suppression Station, and compared with population density. 95% ✔ 40 Fire Incidents Fire Incidents confined to room of origin. 65% ✔ 41 Injuries Number of on the Job (OJI) related injuries per 100 members that resulted in time lost from duty in a 1 year period. <5 ✔ 42 Vehicle Accidents Job related vehicle crashes, deemed preventable, per 100 members in a 1 year period. <5 43 FTE to Population Sworn and civilian FTE's per 1,000 population. 1.4 ✔ 44 EMS Response Time Emergency responses (in seconds). 240 ✔ 45 Alarm Response Time Turnout Time for emergency and non-emergency alarms. Em<70 Non<100 ✔ 46 Loss Minimization Estimated property value preserved. N/A
  • 13. 13 2012 CPM Report Overview Health Department – Pg. 232 - 233 # Service Area Performance Measure Description 2012 Target Target on Track 47 Communicable Disease Epidemiological Investigations Number of investigations and complaints. 450 ✔ 48 Educational Outreach Number of individuals reached by educational activities per 1,000 population. 2,000 ✔ 49 Educational Outreach - Lead Poisoning Track local trends in testing sites for lead, childhood blood lead screening rates, and incidence in childhood lead poisoning rates. 20 ✔ 50 Health Inspections Number of restaurant, temporary food and farmer's market inspections (cont'd in comment). 1,200 ✔ 51 Dental Care Number of visits to dental clinic for preventative and restorative care. 1,500 52 Vital Records Number of birth and death certificates issued. 1,500 ✔ 53 Pediatric Oral Care Average time wait time for pediatric oral restorative and preventative care. 10 ✔
  • 14. 14 2012 CPM Report Overview Public Works Department – Pg. 233 - 234 # Service Area Performance Measure Description 2012 Target Target on Track 54 Waste Diversion Total waste diversion rate. 19% 55 Road Rehabilitation Road Rehabilitation Expenditures per paved lane mile. $407,007 ✔ 56 Timely Capital Improvements Percentage of capital improvement projects on time and under budget. Complete ✔ 57 Resident Satisfaction Survey of residents impacted by all Public Works projects. Satisfied ✔ 58 Time to complete maintenance and minor repairs Percent of minor vehicle repairs completed within 2 days and percent of preventative maintenance completed within 30 days of due date. 1.Total Vehicle downtime of 5% or less. 2. P.M. completion rate of 95% ✔ 59 Cost of maintenance and minor repairs Average maintenance and repair cost per vehicle. Less than $3.00 per mile driven ✔ 60 Snow Removal Snow and ice control expenditures per capita compared with inches of snowfall. Snow Cost Per Capita ($6.50) Annual Inches of Snow (20") 61 Timely waste and recycling collection Percent of residential and commercial waste and recycling picked up on schedule. 90% ✔ 62 Residential Street Sweeping Street-sweeping expenditures per linear mile swept. $120 ✔
  • 15. 15 2012 CPM Report Overview Library – Pg. 234 # Service Area Performance Measure Description 2012 Target Target on Track 63 Customer Satisfaction Percentage of citizens who rated library service as satisfactory. 80% 64 Customer Service Percentage of library users who rated the helpfulness and the general attitude of library staff as satisfactory. 90% 65 Collection Percentage of library users who rated the availability of library materials as satisfactory. 80% 66 Circulation Number of items circulated per resident. 13.8 67 Purchasing Costs Number of dollars spent for materials acquisition per resident. $18.12 68 Facility Usage Number of meeting room requests and estimated attendees. Requests: 4,500 Attendees: 25,000 ✔ 69 Second Visits Number of library program participants that enroll in additional programs. 60% return visits 70 Outreach Effectiveness Surveys gathering information on how they learned about programs. most cost- effective means
  • 16. 16 2012 CPM Report Overview Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department – Pg. 235 # Service Area Performance Measure Description 2012 Target Target on Track 71 Youth Employment Percentage of applicants for youth employment and vocational training opportunities who received such opportunities. 5% increase year over year ✔ 72 Facilities Management Total number and response time of completing in- house work orders. Historical Comparison ✔ 73 Forestry Response Total number and response time of completing Forestry Division requests. Historical Comparison ✔ Continued…
  • 17. 17 2012 CPM Report Overview Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department – Pg. 235 # Service Area Performance Measure Description 2012 Target Target on Track 74 Recreation User Activity Evaluate total program participation and recreation services by age and Ward. Historical Comparison 75 Youth Engagement Evaluate employee and employer satisfaction with youth employment programs. 80% ✔ 76 Park Attendance Attendance at PR&CS special events and park permits 45,700 77 Park User Experience User survey of facility conditions, safety and cleanliness. TBD 78 The Arts Number of functional aspects added to evanstonartsbuzz.com web site TBD
  • 18. 18 2012 CPM Report Overview Utilities Department – Pg. 236 # Service Area Performance Measure Description 2012 Target Target on Track 79 Reliable Distribution Number of customers experiencing an unscheduled disruption of service. 720 ✔ 80 Water Complaints Number of customer complaints for water's technical quality. 100 ✔ 81 Sewer Complaints Number of customer complaints for sewers' technical quality (seepage, backups, overflows, etc.). 200 ✔ 82 Employee Health and Safety Benchmark days lost from work due to illness or injury again. 3.6 83 Regulatory Compliance Number of EPA regulatory violations. 0 ✔ 84 Water Main Failure Rate Number of known breaks/leaks per mile of water main. 0.3 ✔ 85 Water Sales Millions of gallons of water sold to outside communities. 11,500 MG ✔
  • 19. 19 Next Steps Moving Forward with Performance Measurement: •Collect year-end performance measurement data for 2012. •Publish the 2012 Performance Measurement Report as part of the Adopted FY 2013 Budget document. •Begin tracking performance measures for 2013. •Obtain CPM information from comparable communities for benchmarking purposes.

Editor's Notes

  1. Good Morning Honorable Mayor and Members of the Council Clerk Green, City Manager Bobkiewicz I will be giving an update of the Citywide Performance Measures this morning, which were last brought to the Council on May 21st of this year.
  2. I will begin by reviewing the background of these Citywide Performance Measures and what we are trying to accomplish with them Then provide an overview of the changes that have been made since May Then complete this presentation by stating our next steps and taking any questions you may have
  3. The CPMs were developed in following with the City Council’s 2012 goal of Efficiency and Effectiveness of Service We began this process by referring to guidelines from the International City and County Management Association We kept what worked, but following the requests of Council and city staff, also modified or created new measures where we found their measures lacking These measures being presented before you will be the first year of CPM reporting
  4. As mentioned before, the initial proposed CPMs were brought to the Council on May 21 Suggestions and comments were given by the Council during that meeting as well as in individual meetings with staff City staff responded proposing new measures in line with those suggestions and submitted them to you review These proposed measures have been incorporated into the CPM section of the proposed budget being presented to you today
  5. The goal was to create thoughtful measures that could be presented in a way that would help the Council make informed decisions about strategic goals and resource allocation Provide the public with accurate data about the quality and efficiency of services we provide Increase accountability of City staff And allow for benchmarking of City services against that of other cities With that said I will now move on to review the changes to the CPM since they were last presented in May
  6. What you see before you is a truncated version of the CPMs that are presented in the proposed budget These measures are marked “on track” or not based on mid-year projections Final figures will be included in the FY 13 adopted budget document Measures that have been added or modified are seen in bold For the City Manager’s Office we removed a measure, as requested, for the intergovernmental affairs office
  7. Law Department measures have remain largely unchanged, except we will now also include a breakdown of successful to unsuccessful prosecutions for traffic violations
  8. In the area of Administrative services we have added a measures for employee satisfaction, employee retention, also parking compliance. Parking compliance is being measured by the number of e-mail and text alert subscribers we have for street cleaning notifications.
  9. For Community and Economic Development, Planning &amp; Zoning review times have been modified to include the time they also spend in committee
  10. A new measure has also been added to track the number of business openings and closings in the city
  11. Police performance measures now include proactive activities by the problem solving team as well as complaints made to the Police Department at the Human Services Committee
  12. The fire department has an added measure estimating the value of property preserved
  13. The Health Department has added two measures, one for educational outreach for lead poisoning and wait time for pediatric oral care
  14. The Public Works department has added a measure for on-time waste and recycling pick up, as well as for street sweeping expenditures per linear mile
  15. Library has added three measures Facility usage for the number of meeting room requests and estimated attendees Second visits in number of library program participants that enroll in additional programs And lastly Outreach Effectiveness, which will be gathered through surveys to be administered, asking patrons how they learned about programs available at the library
  16. Parks, Recreation and Community Services also has new measures which you will see in the next slide
  17. Parks has added two measures Park User Experience also to be measured via surveys inquiring about facility conditions, safety and cleanliness And The Arts, which will be measured via the number of functions added to the evanstonartsbuzz website
  18. Lastly, the Utilities Department remains unchanged And that concludes the review of changes made to the Citywide Performance Measures
  19. Next steps for the CPM are to collect year-end data for the entirety of 2012 and publish them into the FY 2013 adopted budget Begin tracking performance measures for 2013, and obtain CPM information from comparable communities for benchmarking purposes With that, I will be happy to take any questions.