A Comprehensive Case Study on the IL&FS Crisis (final).pptxShainaMaheshwari1
The document provides a comprehensive overview of the IL&FS crisis in India. It discusses that IL&FS was an infrastructure financing institution that collapsed in 2018 due to governance and liquidity issues, impacting India's financial system. The summary outlines key events of the crisis, including defaults starting in June 2018, leadership changes, and the government assuming control in October 2018. It then covers factors contributing to the turmoil, such as mismanagement, overreliance on debt, and regulatory issues. Lastly, it discusses the impact on the economy and lessons learned around transparency, accountability, and regulatory reforms.
Insider trading ( case study : HLL v/s SEBI )Hemita Dua
This document discusses insider trading and the case of Hindustan Unilever Limited vs SEBI. It provides details of the legal controversy where SEBI charged HUL with insider trading for purchasing shares in Brooke Bond Lipton India Ltd. two weeks before announcing their merger. SEBI directed HUL to pay compensation to UTI and initiated criminal proceedings against common directors, though HUL appealed and the appellate authority ruled in its favor. The document also covers advantages and disadvantages of insider trading, and the need to regulate it to maintain trust and prevent market manipulation.
SEBI introduced regulations in 1992 to govern insider trading in India and prohibit the use of unpublished price sensitive information for securities trading. Insiders such as employees who have access to such information and connected persons such as family members cannot misuse this data for financial gain. Saira and her husband Sahil would be found guilty of insider trading as she shared non-public information about her company's acquisition plans with him, and he subsequently traded on this information for profit without following necessary pre-clearance procedures. SEBI regulations aim to promote fair securities markets and prevent information asymmetries through disclosure requirements and penalties for non-compliance, including heavy fines and imprisonment.
Reasonable Security Practices And Procedures And Sensitive Personala 24 06 2...Vijay Dalmia
REASONABLE SECURITY PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES AND SENSITIVE PERSONAL DATA OR INFORMATION RULES, 2011
Under
The (Indian) Information Technology Act, 2000
Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Practical Approach For CISOsPriyanka Aash
Key Discussion Pointers:
1. Introduction to Data Privacy
- What is data privacy
- Privacy laws around the globe
- DPDPA Journey
2. Understanding the New Indian DPDPA 2023
- Objectives
- Principles of DPDPA
- Applicability
- Rights & Duties of Individuals
- Principals
- Legal implications/penalties
3. A practical approach to DPDPA compliance
- Personal data Inventory
- DPIA
- Risk treatment
The document summarizes an insider trading case involving four parties - UTI, HLL, BBLIL, and SEBI. HLL planned to merge with BBLIL, which it informed exchanges of on April 19, 1996. Before the merger, HLL bought shares of BBLIL from UTI. SEBI accused HLL of insider trading, but the finance ministry later absolved HLL of charges. The key issues were whether HLL was an insider, if it had non-public information, and if it gained unfair advantage. While SEBI argued HLL was an insider, the information was non-public, and it gained, HLL counters the information was public and it did not unfairly benefit
This compact presentation elucidates the key elements of the Public Company Accounting Reform & Investor Protection Act, and contemporary inquires related to it, such as steps the corporations should take to comply with the Act and whether or not, the Act has solved all the problems it was intended to address? DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1049.9923
This document discusses corporate governance frameworks and regulations in China. It outlines the main regulatory bodies that oversee corporate governance like the China Securities Regulatory Commission. It also describes key laws and codes related to corporate governance in China, such as the Company Law, Securities Law, and Code of Corporate Governance for listed companies. The document provides details on whistleblowing policies, accountability for disclosure, and penalties outlined in the Criminal Law Amendment Act.
A Comprehensive Case Study on the IL&FS Crisis (final).pptxShainaMaheshwari1
The document provides a comprehensive overview of the IL&FS crisis in India. It discusses that IL&FS was an infrastructure financing institution that collapsed in 2018 due to governance and liquidity issues, impacting India's financial system. The summary outlines key events of the crisis, including defaults starting in June 2018, leadership changes, and the government assuming control in October 2018. It then covers factors contributing to the turmoil, such as mismanagement, overreliance on debt, and regulatory issues. Lastly, it discusses the impact on the economy and lessons learned around transparency, accountability, and regulatory reforms.
Insider trading ( case study : HLL v/s SEBI )Hemita Dua
This document discusses insider trading and the case of Hindustan Unilever Limited vs SEBI. It provides details of the legal controversy where SEBI charged HUL with insider trading for purchasing shares in Brooke Bond Lipton India Ltd. two weeks before announcing their merger. SEBI directed HUL to pay compensation to UTI and initiated criminal proceedings against common directors, though HUL appealed and the appellate authority ruled in its favor. The document also covers advantages and disadvantages of insider trading, and the need to regulate it to maintain trust and prevent market manipulation.
SEBI introduced regulations in 1992 to govern insider trading in India and prohibit the use of unpublished price sensitive information for securities trading. Insiders such as employees who have access to such information and connected persons such as family members cannot misuse this data for financial gain. Saira and her husband Sahil would be found guilty of insider trading as she shared non-public information about her company's acquisition plans with him, and he subsequently traded on this information for profit without following necessary pre-clearance procedures. SEBI regulations aim to promote fair securities markets and prevent information asymmetries through disclosure requirements and penalties for non-compliance, including heavy fines and imprisonment.
Reasonable Security Practices And Procedures And Sensitive Personala 24 06 2...Vijay Dalmia
REASONABLE SECURITY PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES AND SENSITIVE PERSONAL DATA OR INFORMATION RULES, 2011
Under
The (Indian) Information Technology Act, 2000
Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Practical Approach For CISOsPriyanka Aash
Key Discussion Pointers:
1. Introduction to Data Privacy
- What is data privacy
- Privacy laws around the globe
- DPDPA Journey
2. Understanding the New Indian DPDPA 2023
- Objectives
- Principles of DPDPA
- Applicability
- Rights & Duties of Individuals
- Principals
- Legal implications/penalties
3. A practical approach to DPDPA compliance
- Personal data Inventory
- DPIA
- Risk treatment
The document summarizes an insider trading case involving four parties - UTI, HLL, BBLIL, and SEBI. HLL planned to merge with BBLIL, which it informed exchanges of on April 19, 1996. Before the merger, HLL bought shares of BBLIL from UTI. SEBI accused HLL of insider trading, but the finance ministry later absolved HLL of charges. The key issues were whether HLL was an insider, if it had non-public information, and if it gained unfair advantage. While SEBI argued HLL was an insider, the information was non-public, and it gained, HLL counters the information was public and it did not unfairly benefit
This compact presentation elucidates the key elements of the Public Company Accounting Reform & Investor Protection Act, and contemporary inquires related to it, such as steps the corporations should take to comply with the Act and whether or not, the Act has solved all the problems it was intended to address? DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1049.9923
This document discusses corporate governance frameworks and regulations in China. It outlines the main regulatory bodies that oversee corporate governance like the China Securities Regulatory Commission. It also describes key laws and codes related to corporate governance in China, such as the Company Law, Securities Law, and Code of Corporate Governance for listed companies. The document provides details on whistleblowing policies, accountability for disclosure, and penalties outlined in the Criminal Law Amendment Act.
The document provides an overview of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) which was passed in response to major corporate accounting scandals to increase transparency and prevent fraud. SOX established new regulations and oversight for public companies, accounting firms, and management. It created the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to regulate audits and required companies to comply with standards around financial disclosures, internal controls and corporate governance. SOX also increased penalties for financial misconduct and expanded requirements for corporate responsibility and financial disclosure.
The document discusses the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) passed in the United States in response to major corporate accounting scandals. It summarizes key provisions of SOX including those relating to internal controls, financial disclosures, auditor independence and oversight. It then compares SOX to existing regulations and standards in India established by organizations like the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. While Indian laws already addressed many issues covered by SOX, the document argues that India could benefit from stricter penalties for white collar crimes and more real-time financial disclosures as mandated by SOX.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was enacted in response to major corporate accounting scandals to increase corporate accountability and protect investors. It established new regulatory standards for public company boards, management, and accounting firms regarding issues like auditor independence, corporate governance, and financial disclosure. The Act created the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to oversee auditing of public companies and established new criminal penalties for fraudulent behavior and retaliation against whistleblowers. Supporters believe it has helped restore confidence in financial markets, while critics argue it has increased regulatory burdens on companies.
Corporations are created by laws and regulations of a jurisdiction and subject to common law in some countries. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 established corporate governance requirements in the US in response to corporate scandals. Corporate governance principles have been developed by different entities to reduce inefficiencies through internal and external monitoring systems.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was passed in 2002 in response to major corporate and accounting scandals to increase transparency and accuracy in corporate financial reporting. SOX holds CEOs and CFOs responsible for financial reports, requires external audits of public companies, and increases penalties for providing fraudulent financial information. A recent study found that CFOs of companies with strong internal financial controls saw increased compensation after SOX, while CFOs of companies reporting internal control problems incurred pay reductions. SOX also aimed to improve auditor independence and increase board oversight of executive activities.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was implemented to restore investor confidence in the wake of major corporate accounting scandals. It aims to improve corporate governance and financial disclosure. The act establishes new or enhanced standards for all U.S. public company boards, management, and public accounting firms. It requires companies and their executives to be more responsible and transparent in their financial reporting.
This document provides an overview of key US legislation designed to regulate corporate conduct and financial markets. It discusses the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) of 1977, the US Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations of 1991, revisions to the guidelines in 2004, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. The summary identifies the core focus and impact of each piece of legislation in discouraging illegal and unethical corporate behavior.
Compliance Auditing in Regulatory EnvironmentsA series of high v.docxbreaksdayle
Compliance Auditing in Regulatory Environments
A series of high visibility examples of corporate fraud motivated the federal government to step in and create laws to hold corporations more accountable to the public and to their shareholders. Two of the more well-known examples are Gramm-Leach-Bliley (GLB Act) passed in 1999 and Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) passed in 2002. Both of these laws have information security and privacy components that impact financial management and creation of financial statements within certain organizations.
The CFO of a large investment company that is publically traded on the American Stock Exchange is preparing for a significant external audit as part of preparing the organization for creation of the annual financial statements and report to shareholders. He hires you establish what obligations they have under the GLB and SOX laws that relate to creation of those financial statements.
Use the study materials and engage in any additional research needed to fill in knowledge gaps. Then discuss the following:
Describe the steps necessary to determine what specific criteria within the GLB and SOX laws pertain to this particular type of organization.
Identify the process that will identify how well the organization is in compliance with the criteria.
Explain the selection of team members and process steps from being hired to determine the relevant parts of GLB and SOX through reporting on the identification of compliance levels.
...
The dodd frank effect on information managementExterro
The document discusses the Dodd-Frank Act and its potential impact on information governance and recordkeeping requirements for financial institutions. It provides an overview of the Act and the status of agencies' responses, noting many rules have yet to be finalized. The Act gives various agencies broad authority to establish new recordkeeping and reporting rules that could significantly impact organizations.
The dodd frank effect on information managementExterro
The document discusses the Dodd-Frank Act and its potential impact on information governance and recordkeeping requirements for financial institutions. It provides an overview of the Act and the status of agencies' responses, noting many proposed rules around recordkeeping but no finalized additional requirements yet. The Act gives various agencies broad authority to establish new recordkeeping and reporting obligations for companies.
What is SEC?
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) oversees the key participants in the securities world.
Concerned with promoting disclosure of important market information, maintaining fair dealing, and protecting against fraud.
Responsibilities include:
Interpret and enforce federal securities laws
Issue new rules and amend existing rules
Oversee inspection of securities firms, brokers, investment advisers and ratings agencies
Oversee private regulatory organizations in securities, accounting, auditing fields
Coordinate U.S. securities regulation with federal, state, and foreign authorities
SEC Organization:
Division of Corporate Finance:Reviews documents required to be filed with the Commission
Division of Trading: Assists in maintaining fair, orderly and efficient markets.
Division of Investment Management: Maintains oversight of America’s $26T investment management industry
Division of Enforcement: Recommends commencement of investigations of SEC law violations
Division of Economic and Risk Analysis: Integrates robust economic analysis and data analytics
Laws Governing SEC:
Securities Act of 1933
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Trust Indenture Act of 1939
Investment Company Act of 1940
Investment Advisers Act of 1940
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010
Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012
SEC Reports:
8k - A report of unscheduled material events or corporate changes at a company that could be of importance to the shareholders or SEC
10k - Comprehensive summary report of a company's performance. Submitted annually to the SEC
10Q - A comprehensive report of a company's performance that must be submitted quarterly by all public companies to SEC. In10-Q, firms are required to disclose relevant information regarding their financial position.
18K - Use to update the SEC and investors regarding the status of a domestically traded foreign security and its issuer.
20F - A form issued by the SEC that must be submitted by all "foreign private issuers" that have listed equity shares on exchanges in the U.S.
SEC Investigations:
Can be triggered in many ways
Investigation is not the same as prosecution
Investigations involve fact finding and are usually not public
During an investigation, neither the staff nor the Commission makes any determination of wrongdoing
Following investigation, SEC staff present findings to the Commission
Commission can authorize the staff to file a case in federal court or bring an administrative action.
The document provides an overview of the proposed Indian Financial Code, which aims to consolidate and reform India's financial sector regulations. It recommends establishing seven key regulatory bodies, including a Unified Financial Agency to regulate all financial services besides banking, and subsuming 15 existing acts into the new code. The proposed code seeks to address issues in the current legislative framework like gaps between regulators and outdated laws through a principles-based approach focusing on transparency, consumer protection, and financial stability.
Unlocking the Value of Regulatory Compliance to Advance Financial Planning &...Proformative, Inc.
Call reporting, DFAST, CCAR - the amount of time and energy spent by banks to comply with cumbersome banking regulations is painful at best. You can turn this process into an advantage for your company by leveraging current advances in technology to cost-effectively streamline compliance with regulatory requirements and deliver more advanced planning and analysis that fuels company growth.
U.S. Regulation 101: Guide to U.S. Oversight of the Hedge Fund IndustryManagedFunds
Federal regulation of the U.S. financial services industry has been shaped by legislative and regulatory developments over the past century. Key regulators that oversee U.S. financial markets and investment advisers like hedge funds include the SEC, CFTC, and Treasury Department. Together these entities maintain fair and orderly markets while enforcing rules to protect investors. Hedge funds are subject to regulations including mandatory SEC registration for managers overseeing $150 million in assets and reporting requirements like Form PF.
Accounting Conventions and StandardsStandard-Setting Groups FAS.docxdaniahendric
Accounting Conventions and Standards
Standard-Setting Groups: FASB, SEC, AICPA
There are three main organizations whose work in supporting certified public accountants (CPAs) and upholding standard accounting practices are inextricably linked with the careers of professionals in this field:
· The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is a private, nonprofit organization whose primary purpose is to develop generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) within the United States in the public’s interest.
· The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is a federal agency that holds primary responsibility for enforcing the federal securities laws and regulating the securities industry, the nation’s stock and options exchanges, and other electronic securities markets in the United States.
· Founded in 1887, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) is a professional organization of CPAs in the United States. The AICPA has nearly 386,000 CPA members in 128 countries in business and industry, public practice, government, education, student affiliates and international associates.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is a private, nonprofit organization whose primary purpose is to develop generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) within the United States in the public’s interest.
Under the direction of the SEC, the Committee on Accounting Procedure was created by the AICPA in 1939. It was the first private-sector organization that had the task of setting accounting standards in the United States. In 1959, the Accounting Principles Board (APB) was formed to meet the demand for more structured accounting standards. The APB issued pronouncements on accounting principles until 1973, when it was replaced by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). The APB was disbanded in the hopes that the smaller, fully independent FASB could more effectively create accounting standards. The APB and the related SEC were unable to operate completely independently of the US government.
The FASB’s mission is to establish and improve standards of financial accounting and reporting for the guidance and education of the public, including issuers, auditors, and users of financial information.
To achieve this mission, FASB has five goals:
1. Improve the usefulness of financial reporting by focusing on the primary characteristics of relevance, reliability, comparability, and consistency.
2. Keep standards current to reflect changes in methods of doing business and in the economy.
3. Consider promptly any significant areas of deficiency in financial reporting that might be improved through standard setting.
4. Promote international convergence of accounting standards concurrent with improving the quality of financial reporting.
5. Improve common understanding of the nature and purposes of information in financial reports.
The FASB sets standards based on their conceptual framewo ...
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) was passed in response to several major corporate and accounting scandals. It aimed to increase corporate accountability and help restore investor confidence. Key provisions of SOX include the establishment of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to oversee audits of public companies, certifications of financial reports by CEOs and CFOs, restrictions on auditing and consulting services provided by accounting firms, disclosure of codes of ethics and whistleblower protections, among others. The goal of SOX was to better protect investors and improve the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has been entrusted with a significant corporate compliance regulatory function, which has been expanded by seminal legislation in the recent past such as the Sarbanes-Oxley (“SOX”) and Dodd-Frank Acts. This webinar discusses board fiduciary duties and the tension between state corporate law standards and federal law. Board composition, independence, structure and processes (including best practices in regard to committees) are analyzed. Specifically, director independence is discussed as is audit committees and related requirements, regulations and exemptions. NASDAQ and the NYSE also have similar requirements for director independence and those are also discussed. The webinar also covers disclosure matters related to SOX compliance, including timing and content of an issuer's periodic disclosures. Both the legal requirements and best practices related to disclosure procedures and internal controls under SOX are examined. Means of controlling the costs of SOX, especially for smaller public companies, are also discussed, including trends in the industry related to high regulatory compliance costs. Finally, the applicability and best practices for privately held companies and SOX are considered.
To listen to this webinar on-demand, go to: https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/securities-law-compliance-2020/
How financial reporting for public companies has changed since the E.pdfpristiegee
How financial reporting for public companies has changed since the Enron scandal in 2001.
Solution
Enron Scandal 2001
Enron a global Gas and Energy company incorporated in Omaha Nebraska and once
distinguished as the Nation’s 7th largest company. Listed on Forbs Fortune 500 as being among
the wealthiest companies listed on the stock exchange. Through this accumulation of “wealth”
Enron at one point held a robust market valuation, which was higher other large global
companies like AT&T. Many would call Enron a company that was “too big to fail”; this was
due to the company’s reported revenue milestone accomplishment of 100 billion dollars.
But what made the Enron scandal so compelling was the fact that it brought down accounting
giant Arthur Andersen too. It was a truly amazing situation, a conflation of corporate
wrongdoing which would change the accounting world forever.
Changes In Financial Reporting and Other Changes due to Enron Scandal 2001
SOX includes several gatekeeper provisions:
Requiring a company’s board of directors to have an Audit Committee composed solely of
independent directors.
Making the Audit Committee responsible for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of
the outside auditor and for establishing procedures for the confidential, anonymous submission
by company employees of concerns about accounting or auditing practices.
Creating a new agency, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), to
strengthen the outside audit function. The PCAOB sets standards involving auditing, quality
control, ethics, and audit reports and has authority to inspect, investigate, and discipline
registered public accounting firms.
Requiring attorneys who practice before the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to
report material violations of the securities laws to a company’s chief legal officer or chief
executive officer. If those officers do not respond in an appropriate manner, the attorney is then
required to report the violations to the Audit Committee of the board or to another committee
composed solely of independent directors.
Enhance Regulatory Protections
Federal and state securities regulators and self-regulatory organizations play an important and
necessary role in corporate governance. They wield a broad and powerful array of sanctions, and
their enforcement actions serve as a strong deterrent against wrongdoing. The SEC’s
enforcement priorities, reflected in public speeches by its Commissioners and staff, help shape
corporate conduct.
Increase in Regulations after Sarbanes Oxley
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act initiated stringent regulations. The Act was composed of sixty-six
sections, some long and others short. Each section dealt with a different part of the reporting
cycle (Schaeffer, 2006). These sections are contained within eleven titles, primarily dealing with
the issue of internal control. The eleven titles of SOX are as follows: Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board, auditor independence, corporate respo.
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
The document provides an overview of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) which was passed in response to major corporate accounting scandals to increase transparency and prevent fraud. SOX established new regulations and oversight for public companies, accounting firms, and management. It created the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to regulate audits and required companies to comply with standards around financial disclosures, internal controls and corporate governance. SOX also increased penalties for financial misconduct and expanded requirements for corporate responsibility and financial disclosure.
The document discusses the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) passed in the United States in response to major corporate accounting scandals. It summarizes key provisions of SOX including those relating to internal controls, financial disclosures, auditor independence and oversight. It then compares SOX to existing regulations and standards in India established by organizations like the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. While Indian laws already addressed many issues covered by SOX, the document argues that India could benefit from stricter penalties for white collar crimes and more real-time financial disclosures as mandated by SOX.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was enacted in response to major corporate accounting scandals to increase corporate accountability and protect investors. It established new regulatory standards for public company boards, management, and accounting firms regarding issues like auditor independence, corporate governance, and financial disclosure. The Act created the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to oversee auditing of public companies and established new criminal penalties for fraudulent behavior and retaliation against whistleblowers. Supporters believe it has helped restore confidence in financial markets, while critics argue it has increased regulatory burdens on companies.
Corporations are created by laws and regulations of a jurisdiction and subject to common law in some countries. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 established corporate governance requirements in the US in response to corporate scandals. Corporate governance principles have been developed by different entities to reduce inefficiencies through internal and external monitoring systems.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was passed in 2002 in response to major corporate and accounting scandals to increase transparency and accuracy in corporate financial reporting. SOX holds CEOs and CFOs responsible for financial reports, requires external audits of public companies, and increases penalties for providing fraudulent financial information. A recent study found that CFOs of companies with strong internal financial controls saw increased compensation after SOX, while CFOs of companies reporting internal control problems incurred pay reductions. SOX also aimed to improve auditor independence and increase board oversight of executive activities.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was implemented to restore investor confidence in the wake of major corporate accounting scandals. It aims to improve corporate governance and financial disclosure. The act establishes new or enhanced standards for all U.S. public company boards, management, and public accounting firms. It requires companies and their executives to be more responsible and transparent in their financial reporting.
This document provides an overview of key US legislation designed to regulate corporate conduct and financial markets. It discusses the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) of 1977, the US Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations of 1991, revisions to the guidelines in 2004, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. The summary identifies the core focus and impact of each piece of legislation in discouraging illegal and unethical corporate behavior.
Compliance Auditing in Regulatory EnvironmentsA series of high v.docxbreaksdayle
Compliance Auditing in Regulatory Environments
A series of high visibility examples of corporate fraud motivated the federal government to step in and create laws to hold corporations more accountable to the public and to their shareholders. Two of the more well-known examples are Gramm-Leach-Bliley (GLB Act) passed in 1999 and Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) passed in 2002. Both of these laws have information security and privacy components that impact financial management and creation of financial statements within certain organizations.
The CFO of a large investment company that is publically traded on the American Stock Exchange is preparing for a significant external audit as part of preparing the organization for creation of the annual financial statements and report to shareholders. He hires you establish what obligations they have under the GLB and SOX laws that relate to creation of those financial statements.
Use the study materials and engage in any additional research needed to fill in knowledge gaps. Then discuss the following:
Describe the steps necessary to determine what specific criteria within the GLB and SOX laws pertain to this particular type of organization.
Identify the process that will identify how well the organization is in compliance with the criteria.
Explain the selection of team members and process steps from being hired to determine the relevant parts of GLB and SOX through reporting on the identification of compliance levels.
...
The dodd frank effect on information managementExterro
The document discusses the Dodd-Frank Act and its potential impact on information governance and recordkeeping requirements for financial institutions. It provides an overview of the Act and the status of agencies' responses, noting many rules have yet to be finalized. The Act gives various agencies broad authority to establish new recordkeeping and reporting rules that could significantly impact organizations.
The dodd frank effect on information managementExterro
The document discusses the Dodd-Frank Act and its potential impact on information governance and recordkeeping requirements for financial institutions. It provides an overview of the Act and the status of agencies' responses, noting many proposed rules around recordkeeping but no finalized additional requirements yet. The Act gives various agencies broad authority to establish new recordkeeping and reporting obligations for companies.
What is SEC?
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) oversees the key participants in the securities world.
Concerned with promoting disclosure of important market information, maintaining fair dealing, and protecting against fraud.
Responsibilities include:
Interpret and enforce federal securities laws
Issue new rules and amend existing rules
Oversee inspection of securities firms, brokers, investment advisers and ratings agencies
Oversee private regulatory organizations in securities, accounting, auditing fields
Coordinate U.S. securities regulation with federal, state, and foreign authorities
SEC Organization:
Division of Corporate Finance:Reviews documents required to be filed with the Commission
Division of Trading: Assists in maintaining fair, orderly and efficient markets.
Division of Investment Management: Maintains oversight of America’s $26T investment management industry
Division of Enforcement: Recommends commencement of investigations of SEC law violations
Division of Economic and Risk Analysis: Integrates robust economic analysis and data analytics
Laws Governing SEC:
Securities Act of 1933
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Trust Indenture Act of 1939
Investment Company Act of 1940
Investment Advisers Act of 1940
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010
Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012
SEC Reports:
8k - A report of unscheduled material events or corporate changes at a company that could be of importance to the shareholders or SEC
10k - Comprehensive summary report of a company's performance. Submitted annually to the SEC
10Q - A comprehensive report of a company's performance that must be submitted quarterly by all public companies to SEC. In10-Q, firms are required to disclose relevant information regarding their financial position.
18K - Use to update the SEC and investors regarding the status of a domestically traded foreign security and its issuer.
20F - A form issued by the SEC that must be submitted by all "foreign private issuers" that have listed equity shares on exchanges in the U.S.
SEC Investigations:
Can be triggered in many ways
Investigation is not the same as prosecution
Investigations involve fact finding and are usually not public
During an investigation, neither the staff nor the Commission makes any determination of wrongdoing
Following investigation, SEC staff present findings to the Commission
Commission can authorize the staff to file a case in federal court or bring an administrative action.
The document provides an overview of the proposed Indian Financial Code, which aims to consolidate and reform India's financial sector regulations. It recommends establishing seven key regulatory bodies, including a Unified Financial Agency to regulate all financial services besides banking, and subsuming 15 existing acts into the new code. The proposed code seeks to address issues in the current legislative framework like gaps between regulators and outdated laws through a principles-based approach focusing on transparency, consumer protection, and financial stability.
Unlocking the Value of Regulatory Compliance to Advance Financial Planning &...Proformative, Inc.
Call reporting, DFAST, CCAR - the amount of time and energy spent by banks to comply with cumbersome banking regulations is painful at best. You can turn this process into an advantage for your company by leveraging current advances in technology to cost-effectively streamline compliance with regulatory requirements and deliver more advanced planning and analysis that fuels company growth.
U.S. Regulation 101: Guide to U.S. Oversight of the Hedge Fund IndustryManagedFunds
Federal regulation of the U.S. financial services industry has been shaped by legislative and regulatory developments over the past century. Key regulators that oversee U.S. financial markets and investment advisers like hedge funds include the SEC, CFTC, and Treasury Department. Together these entities maintain fair and orderly markets while enforcing rules to protect investors. Hedge funds are subject to regulations including mandatory SEC registration for managers overseeing $150 million in assets and reporting requirements like Form PF.
Accounting Conventions and StandardsStandard-Setting Groups FAS.docxdaniahendric
Accounting Conventions and Standards
Standard-Setting Groups: FASB, SEC, AICPA
There are three main organizations whose work in supporting certified public accountants (CPAs) and upholding standard accounting practices are inextricably linked with the careers of professionals in this field:
· The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is a private, nonprofit organization whose primary purpose is to develop generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) within the United States in the public’s interest.
· The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is a federal agency that holds primary responsibility for enforcing the federal securities laws and regulating the securities industry, the nation’s stock and options exchanges, and other electronic securities markets in the United States.
· Founded in 1887, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) is a professional organization of CPAs in the United States. The AICPA has nearly 386,000 CPA members in 128 countries in business and industry, public practice, government, education, student affiliates and international associates.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is a private, nonprofit organization whose primary purpose is to develop generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) within the United States in the public’s interest.
Under the direction of the SEC, the Committee on Accounting Procedure was created by the AICPA in 1939. It was the first private-sector organization that had the task of setting accounting standards in the United States. In 1959, the Accounting Principles Board (APB) was formed to meet the demand for more structured accounting standards. The APB issued pronouncements on accounting principles until 1973, when it was replaced by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). The APB was disbanded in the hopes that the smaller, fully independent FASB could more effectively create accounting standards. The APB and the related SEC were unable to operate completely independently of the US government.
The FASB’s mission is to establish and improve standards of financial accounting and reporting for the guidance and education of the public, including issuers, auditors, and users of financial information.
To achieve this mission, FASB has five goals:
1. Improve the usefulness of financial reporting by focusing on the primary characteristics of relevance, reliability, comparability, and consistency.
2. Keep standards current to reflect changes in methods of doing business and in the economy.
3. Consider promptly any significant areas of deficiency in financial reporting that might be improved through standard setting.
4. Promote international convergence of accounting standards concurrent with improving the quality of financial reporting.
5. Improve common understanding of the nature and purposes of information in financial reports.
The FASB sets standards based on their conceptual framewo ...
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) was passed in response to several major corporate and accounting scandals. It aimed to increase corporate accountability and help restore investor confidence. Key provisions of SOX include the establishment of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to oversee audits of public companies, certifications of financial reports by CEOs and CFOs, restrictions on auditing and consulting services provided by accounting firms, disclosure of codes of ethics and whistleblower protections, among others. The goal of SOX was to better protect investors and improve the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has been entrusted with a significant corporate compliance regulatory function, which has been expanded by seminal legislation in the recent past such as the Sarbanes-Oxley (“SOX”) and Dodd-Frank Acts. This webinar discusses board fiduciary duties and the tension between state corporate law standards and federal law. Board composition, independence, structure and processes (including best practices in regard to committees) are analyzed. Specifically, director independence is discussed as is audit committees and related requirements, regulations and exemptions. NASDAQ and the NYSE also have similar requirements for director independence and those are also discussed. The webinar also covers disclosure matters related to SOX compliance, including timing and content of an issuer's periodic disclosures. Both the legal requirements and best practices related to disclosure procedures and internal controls under SOX are examined. Means of controlling the costs of SOX, especially for smaller public companies, are also discussed, including trends in the industry related to high regulatory compliance costs. Finally, the applicability and best practices for privately held companies and SOX are considered.
To listen to this webinar on-demand, go to: https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/securities-law-compliance-2020/
How financial reporting for public companies has changed since the E.pdfpristiegee
How financial reporting for public companies has changed since the Enron scandal in 2001.
Solution
Enron Scandal 2001
Enron a global Gas and Energy company incorporated in Omaha Nebraska and once
distinguished as the Nation’s 7th largest company. Listed on Forbs Fortune 500 as being among
the wealthiest companies listed on the stock exchange. Through this accumulation of “wealth”
Enron at one point held a robust market valuation, which was higher other large global
companies like AT&T. Many would call Enron a company that was “too big to fail”; this was
due to the company’s reported revenue milestone accomplishment of 100 billion dollars.
But what made the Enron scandal so compelling was the fact that it brought down accounting
giant Arthur Andersen too. It was a truly amazing situation, a conflation of corporate
wrongdoing which would change the accounting world forever.
Changes In Financial Reporting and Other Changes due to Enron Scandal 2001
SOX includes several gatekeeper provisions:
Requiring a company’s board of directors to have an Audit Committee composed solely of
independent directors.
Making the Audit Committee responsible for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of
the outside auditor and for establishing procedures for the confidential, anonymous submission
by company employees of concerns about accounting or auditing practices.
Creating a new agency, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), to
strengthen the outside audit function. The PCAOB sets standards involving auditing, quality
control, ethics, and audit reports and has authority to inspect, investigate, and discipline
registered public accounting firms.
Requiring attorneys who practice before the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to
report material violations of the securities laws to a company’s chief legal officer or chief
executive officer. If those officers do not respond in an appropriate manner, the attorney is then
required to report the violations to the Audit Committee of the board or to another committee
composed solely of independent directors.
Enhance Regulatory Protections
Federal and state securities regulators and self-regulatory organizations play an important and
necessary role in corporate governance. They wield a broad and powerful array of sanctions, and
their enforcement actions serve as a strong deterrent against wrongdoing. The SEC’s
enforcement priorities, reflected in public speeches by its Commissioners and staff, help shape
corporate conduct.
Increase in Regulations after Sarbanes Oxley
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act initiated stringent regulations. The Act was composed of sixty-six
sections, some long and others short. Each section dealt with a different part of the reporting
cycle (Schaeffer, 2006). These sections are contained within eleven titles, primarily dealing with
the issue of internal control. The eleven titles of SOX are as follows: Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board, auditor independence, corporate respo.
Similar to Corporate Governance Framework in USA pdf (20)
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit InnovationTechSoup
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdfTechSoup
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
5. Federal Securities Laws
• The Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act)
• On the federal level, the primary sources are the
Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act), each as amended.
• The Securities Act regulates all offerings and sales
of securities, whether by public or private
companies.
6. Federal Securities Laws
• The Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and The Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)
• The Exchange Act addresses many issues, including the organisation
of the financial marketplace generally, the activities of brokers,
dealers and other financial market participants and, as to corporate
governance, specific requirements relating to the periodic
disclosure of information by publicly held, or ‘reporting’,
companies.
• A company becomes a reporting company under the Exchange Act
when its securities are listed on a national securities exchange or
when it has total assets exceeding US$10 million and a class of
securities held of record by more than 2,000 persons or a maximum
of 500 persons who are not sophisticated (‘accredited’) (with some
exclusions). Both the Securities Act and the Exchange Act have
addressed questions of corporate governance primarily by
mandating disclosure, rather than through normative regulation.
7. Federal Securities Laws
• The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
• The Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor
Protection Act of 2002 (the Sarbanes-Oxley Act) was
enacted in July 2002 in response to the corporate
failures of 2001 and 2002.
• The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which applies to all reporting
companies (whether organised in the US or elsewhere)
with US-registered equity or debt securities, amends
various provisions of the Exchange Act (and certain
other federal statutes) to provide direct federal
regulation of many matters that traditionally had been
left to state corporate law or addressed by federal law
through disclosure requirements.
8. Federal Securities Laws
• The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
• Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, many aspects of
corporate governance that were previously
addressed, if at all, through stock market listing
requirements, best practice standards, or policy
statements from the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) are now the subject of direct
binding law. Since 2002, the SEC has promulgated
a number of rules that implement provisions of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
9. Federal Securities Laws
• The Dodd-Frank Act
• The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act) was enacted in
July 2010 in response to the financial crisis in 2008 and
2009.
• The Dodd-Frank Act is intended to significantly restructure
the regulatory framework for the US financial system and
also extends federal regulation of corporate governance for
all public companies.
• The SEC has promulgated several rules that implement
provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. Ongoing rule-making by
the SEC and national securities exchanges is required for
full implementation.
10. Federal Securities Laws
• The JOBS Act
• The Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012
(the JOBS Act) was enacted in April 2012 to, inter
alia, facilitate private capital formation and ease
reporting requirements that may apply to
‘emerging growth companies’ after the initial
public offering. The JOBS Act requires the SEC to
undertake various initiatives, including rule-
making and studies touching on capital
formation, disclosure and registration
requirements.
11. Federal Securities Laws
• Listing Rules
• Listing rules provide an additional source of corporate
governance requirements. To list a security on any of
the three major listing bodies - the New York Stock
Exchange (NYSE), NYSE MKT (formerly known as the
American Stock Exchange) or the Nasdaq Stock Market
(Nasdaq) - a company must agree to abide by specific
corporate governance listing rules. In 2003, the SEC
approved significant amendments to both the NYSE
and Nasdaq corporate governance listing rules as
described below. The Dodd-Frank Act requires
amendments to corporate governance listing rules to
be made by the NYSE and Nasdaq.
12. Other Corporate Governance
Guidelines
• National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD), Key
Agreed Principles (developed in collaboration with Business
Roundtable and the Council of Institutional Investors (CII));
• NACD, Report of the NACD Blue Ribbon Commission on
Director Professionalism;
• NACD, Report of the NACD Blue Ribbon Commission on
Building the Strategic-Asset Board;
• Business Roundtable, Principles of Corporate Governance;
• The Conference Board, Commission on Public Trust and
Private Enterprise: Findings and Recommendations; and
• Commonsense Principles of Corporate Governance issued
by a coalition of high-profile representatives of leading
public companies and institutional investors.
13. Other Corporate Governance
Guidelines
• CII, Corporate Governance Policies;
• Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association -
College Retirement Equities Fund (TIAA-CREF),
TIAA-CREF Policy Statement on Corporate
Governance;
• California Public Employees’ Retirement System
(CalPERS), Global Governance Principles; and
• Proxy voting policies of large institutional
investors such as BlackRock, Vanguard, State
Street and Fidelity.
14. Whistle Blowing Laws in USA
• The Whistleblower Protection Act
• The Occupational Safety and Health Act 1970
(“OSHA”) protects those who have reported or
complained about workplace safety and health issues
• The Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act
2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley – “SOX”), as expanded by the
Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 2010
(“Dodd-Frank”), protects securities law related
whistleblowers
• The Affordable Care Act protects those blowing the
whistle on issues related to healthcare reform.