The document discusses the significance of controversial themes in contemporary society, particularly within educational settings, focusing on death and violence, and how children's fiction can foster understanding and empathy around these issues. It also touches on various controversial topics, including marketing to children, moral dilemmas such as homosexuality and abortion, and the contentious debate surrounding vaccinations and advertising ethics. Furthermore, the text highlights the evolving nature of art and its role in challenging societal norms and values.

1. Controversial Themes
Controversial issues play an important role in today's society due to increasing social and cultural
diversity, as a direct result of this diversity there is a vast array of controversial issues that may be
encountered within the modern school setting (Woolley, 2010; Mulet, 2014). It would be unfeasible
to explore all of the controversial issues encountered inside schools within this essay, therefore, the
focus of this assignment will be exploring the debates centring on death and violence. The decision
to focus on these areas is as a direct response to scenarios I have encountered within school settings
which have highlighted the importance of addressing these interconnected controversial themes.
Whilst there are many quality non–fiction texts available that centre on these issues, the emphasis of
this assignment will be on children's fiction.
A controversial issue can be defined as a subject that causes debate and dispute...show more content...
Fiction allows us to experience events vicariously (Appendix 2.3 – teacher's viewpoint), enabling us
to gain a greater depth of understanding regarding a topic, a different perspective and engender
empathy for the circumstances of our peers (Emery, 1996; Wise, no date; Mulet, 2014; Rowling,
2010; Barnett, 2014; Tomasino, Zarnowski, and Backner, 2003; Lysaker, Tonge, 2013; Medwell,
Wray, and Moore, 2014). Vygotsky's theories of cognitive development support this perspective,
stating that children develop as a direct result of encountering new experiences and from using the
new information to construct or reconstruct existing knowledge (Johnson, 2003). Arguably,
therefore, there is a link between the process of social and cultural interaction in conjunction with
life experiences and the impact upon the linguistic, cognitive, social, and emotional development of
children (Johnson,
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

2. Controversial Interests
Researching on a topic of interest can help individuals be able to learn something new and to be
able to see a side of a topic that has not been seen before. As I am an individual who is looking
forward to owing my own business one day. There comes to be many topics that interest me.
However, currently there is a topic that interests me that I feel will impact my personal, academic,
and working life, which is whether companies should market towards children or not? Hence, I find
the topic of whether companies should market towards children or not to be very interesting and
controversial. Companies will market towards children to make money in the long run. For
example, from my personal experience I will get an occasional nostalgic craving
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

3. Controversial Issues
Morailty: Acepted or Opressed
Iosif Todoran– February 21,2017 – Soc 130
ABSTRACT
How do countries feel abut controversial topics such as: Homosexuality, Abortion, Premarital Sex
and Divorce.
Controversial issues have plagued mankind since the very beginning and that is due the ideology
that without controversy you cant flourish as a race, country or simply a group of people. However,
the controversial issues we face today different from continent to continent and country to country
due to the culture, norms and moral values each person is exposed too. There are four issues in
particular that rise up again and again and they are: Homosexuality, Abortion, Premarital Sex and
Divorce. The four countries in question differ from one...show more content...
The New York Times reported a staggering 23% of adults are not affiliated to any religion. The rest
of the population is a mixture of religions such as: Christian, Catholics, Islam, and others. This
change in religious affiliations isn't affecting just the individuals who now partake in a non–religion
category but also the political parties. The Republican Party relies on the votes of those who
affiliate with the Christian faith and if those votes change due to a change in religious affiliation
then we could also see a decline in the number of morality for these issues (Cohen). For now, the
numbers seem to be close related which means that due to diversity of religion and non–religious
affiliates, the morale seems to balance itself
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

4. The Vaccine Controversy Essay examples
The Vaccine Controversy
Janira Sanchez
Intro to Biology
Professor Martin
July 22, 2010
The Vaccine Controversy
The vaccine controversy is the dispute over the morality, ethics, effectiveness, and /or safety of
vaccinations. The medical and scientific evidence is that the benefits of preventing suffering and
death from infectious diseases outweigh rare adverse effects of immunization. Since vaccination
began in the late 18th century, opponents have claimed that vaccines do not work, that they are or
may be dangerous, that individuals should rely on personal hygiene instead, or that mandatory
vaccinations violate individual rights or religious principles. And since then, successful campaigns
against vaccinations have...show more content...
Other critics argue that immunity given by vaccines is only temporarily and requires boosters,
whereas those who survive the disease become permanently immune. Lack of complete vaccine
coverage increases the risk of disease for the entire population, including those who have been
vaccinated, because it reduces herd immunity. For example, measles targets children between the
ages of 9 and 12 months, and the short window between the disappearance of maternal antibody
(before which the vaccine often fails to seroconvert) and natural infection means that vaccinated
children frequently are still vulnerable. Herd immunity lessens this vulnerability, if all the children
are vaccinated. Increasing herd immunity during an outbreak or threatened outbreak is the most
widely accepted justification for mass vaccination. Mass vaccination also helps to increase coverage
rapidly, thus obtaining herd immunity, when a new vaccine is introduced. Commonly used vaccines
are a cost – effective and preventive way of promoting good health, compared to the cost of
treatment of acute or chronic diseases. In the U.S. during the year 2001, routine childhood
immunizations against seven diseases were estimated to save over $40 billion per year, overall
social costs including $10 billion in direct health costs, and the societal benefit – cost ratio for these
vaccinations was
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

5. Controversial Advertising Essay examples
Introduction
Advertising texts and images seem to be the most visible and ubiquitous icons of consumer society.
The Advertising industry indeed has simultaneously become one of the most powerful and
apparently most uncritical institutions of today as well as this, people seemingly have accepted
billboard advertising as an usual part of their environment. Nevertheless there sometimes develop
certain advertising campaigns undergoing general ideas about what ads are supposed to show and
they hence provoke controversial public debates. So called controversial advertising has often been
claimed to somehow subvert conventional advertising's practice by the audiences, justice, advertisers
, companies, advertising industry's self regulating...show more content...
(Compare Vogel 1997) Subversion in that case characterises an aesthetic act of infiltration, that
indeed redefines certain subsystem–conventions, but that nor threatens the subsystem's existence
neither really concerns the entire order of society.
In order to answer the question, how far advertising can be subversive, I therefore suggest to
differentiate two notions of subversion. Referring to Vogel, I assume subversion as a mainly
aesthetic presumption on its low–level. Considering the notion's political connotation, even on this
stage the aesthetic redevelopment at least has in any way to be able to reflect the own subsystem.
Otherwise it only can be regarded as system's extension. As high–grade subversion I suggest to
assume the recruitment of a subsystem in order to entirely destroy it. In its most extensive
perspective that second meaning includes revolutionary subversion as the intentional destruction of
the entire society.
Since nobody would seriously claim the advertising–industry's contemporary intention was to
destroy capitalist society, the second definition of subversion can be neglected, in order to
investigate, how far controversial advertising campaigns contain subversive potentials. It is hence
necessary to analyse if and how controversial advertising manage to reflect the subsystem of
advertising by challenging its rules and aesthetic conceptions.
Commodifying or
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

6. Controversial Art
Art is the expression of human creative skills and imagination characteristically in a visual form
such as painting, drawing, photographs or sculpture producing works of arts to be valued primarily
for its beauty or emotional influence. Conceptual artists have become less interested in making
beautiful artworks that value the aesthetic, preferring instead to use the process of art to explore
ideas and challenge beliefs, whether artistic or political. Over time, this has distorted the definition of
what art is considered to be as it constantly being changed and simplified. The continual redefinition
of art has been perpetuated by artists who continually challenge what is socially and culturally
acceptable as in order to test and widen existing boundaries. As arguments continue to arise over
whether art that pushes boundaries is acceptable, many artists have been heavily criticized for their
explicit and frequently confrontational portrayal of...show more content...
This empowerment given to artists often inspires other artists and members of society to express
their values and beliefs through imagery. This in turn gives them the ability to draw from the
reflection of the society in which we live and gives them the artistic freedom to capture the reality
that merely creating artworks about their own personal beliefs and opinions. Despite the countless
number of controversial figure inhabiting the art world of the 20th century, society as a whole
should allow artists to challenge the standard and to be edgy, as over time, viewers will be able to
appreciate their artworks. Many artists from past and present continue to challenge these
conventions, with Anders Serrano and Salvador Dali being two of those who do. Many can argue
their aesthetic qualities, but each work fulfills the criteria of a work of art and more importantly
reflects on societal values and
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

7. Controversial Art
INVESTIGATE A RANGE OF ARTWORKS THAT HAVE SHOCKED OR CONFRONTED AN
AUDIENCE As values have changed with modern and postmodern thought, artists have set to
create more shocking and confronting work to distinguish themselves from the rest. Marcel
Duchamp was perhaps the first to push the boundaries with his Fountain, a urinal in an art gallery,
which was voted the most influential artwork of the 20th Century by 500 artists and forced his
audience to think for themselves. Many artists have followed Duchamp, but have had to go to more
and more extreme measures to get noticed, hence Chris Burden's Shoot and so on. If Xiao Yu had
have put his dead female fetus head in an artwork forty years ago he would have been arrested
immediately....show more content...
The piece, which had been displayed at the Venice Biennale contemporary art fair in 1999, is
comprised of a female fetus head affixed with rabbit eyes and grafted onto the body of a bird. The
entire piece is afloat in a basin of formaldehyde. The museum had posted signs warning visitors
about controversial artwork and has scheduled a symposium on Aug. 22 to discuss ethical issues
surrounding the exhibit. Xiao defended his work from Beijing after a museum visitor in
Switzerland who saw the piece filed a criminal complaint. "It's precisely because I respect all life
that I did this," Xiao, who is known for his shocking artwork, told the Associated Press. "I want it
to be displayed." The bird and fetus "died because there was something wrong with them," he said.
"I thought putting them together like this was a way for them to have another life." Xiao has also
said the piece is a statement against genetic manipulation and modifications. Cultural differences
are quite obvious here. In Beijing this kind of artwork is completely acceptable, with political art,
controversial, unlike the West where you see political satire daily in cartoons. Beijing's Imperial
Museum even has a separate section for the Chinese public with embalmed bodies of grandparents
and their grandchildren and the like. According to Xiao, he bought the human fetus head in 1999 for
the equivalent of a few dozen US dollars from someone cleaning out a scientific exhibition hall. A
sticker had
Get more content on HelpWriting.net