Just uploaded this for someone but i see that animations are broken. The slide is also not that usefull currently as it requires some more explanations.
The document discusses the evolution of a devops culture and processes at a company from previously siloed teams to a more collaborative model with empowered cross-functional teams. Key points of evolution include:
- Teams moving from specialized "rotations" to taking full ownership of applications from platform to monitoring.
- Monitoring shifting from being an ops role to one owned by application teams, who now create checks, receive alerts and respond to issues.
- Deployments becoming increasingly automated through tools that reduce manual steps and allow deploying with a single click.
- Database migrations also benefiting from automation to streamline the process.
- An emphasis on reducing feedback loops and time to production through greater collaboration
The document discusses reversing the "tests pyramid" approach to address technical debt in legacy code. It notes that unit testing is difficult for code without separation of concerns, but refactoring without tests is risky. It proposes starting with high-level tests to gain confidence for refactoring into units and writing unit tests incrementally. However, end-to-end tests are long to maintain, and if needed, the architecture may be flawed. Reversing the tests pyramid and refactoring code in this way takes time but pays back technical debt and allows for sustainable changes. Beware of refactoring just for its own sake - focus on removing duplication and improving changeability.
The document discusses DevOps, which involves continuous development, integration, testing, delivery, deployment, and monitoring. It aims to reduce issues like production chaos from frequent deliveries, manual work leading to downtime, and long lead times between development and customer delivery. DevOps is not just tools, job titles, or separating dev and ops - it integrates them. It works through system thinking to understand and improve workflow, amplifying feedback loops for continuous improvement, and encouraging continuous experimentation and learning.
This document discusses organizing QA processes within an Agile Scrum team. It describes the project structure, team structure, and work processes of a distributed Scrum team supporting newspaper sites. Key QA activities in Scrum include negotiating quality, clarifying stories/tasks, ensuring acceptance tests verify quality, and providing estimates. Some challenges faced include frequent releases, lack of demos with business, communication issues, insufficient task descriptions, and not tracking QA work in sprints. Suggested solutions involve improving processes around releases, demos, communication, knowledge sharing, task descriptions, adding QA estimates to sprints, and breaking large tasks into smaller ones.
The document describes different software development life cycle (SDLC) models including waterfall, spiral, and V-model. The waterfall model involves sequential phases from requirements to maintenance without backtracking. Spiral model allows for requirement changes and develops the software in modules. The V-model incorporates testing at each phase from requirements to validate the system works as intended.
XP is an agile software development methodology that was created between 1996-1999. It focuses heavily on quality through practices like pair programming, code review, test-driven development at all levels including acceptance tests written by customers, and continuous integration. XP works best for strong, cohesive teams and requires adopting all of its practices as a unified approach rather than individually.
The document discusses the evolution of a devops culture and processes at a company from previously siloed teams to a more collaborative model with empowered cross-functional teams. Key points of evolution include:
- Teams moving from specialized "rotations" to taking full ownership of applications from platform to monitoring.
- Monitoring shifting from being an ops role to one owned by application teams, who now create checks, receive alerts and respond to issues.
- Deployments becoming increasingly automated through tools that reduce manual steps and allow deploying with a single click.
- Database migrations also benefiting from automation to streamline the process.
- An emphasis on reducing feedback loops and time to production through greater collaboration
The document discusses reversing the "tests pyramid" approach to address technical debt in legacy code. It notes that unit testing is difficult for code without separation of concerns, but refactoring without tests is risky. It proposes starting with high-level tests to gain confidence for refactoring into units and writing unit tests incrementally. However, end-to-end tests are long to maintain, and if needed, the architecture may be flawed. Reversing the tests pyramid and refactoring code in this way takes time but pays back technical debt and allows for sustainable changes. Beware of refactoring just for its own sake - focus on removing duplication and improving changeability.
The document discusses DevOps, which involves continuous development, integration, testing, delivery, deployment, and monitoring. It aims to reduce issues like production chaos from frequent deliveries, manual work leading to downtime, and long lead times between development and customer delivery. DevOps is not just tools, job titles, or separating dev and ops - it integrates them. It works through system thinking to understand and improve workflow, amplifying feedback loops for continuous improvement, and encouraging continuous experimentation and learning.
This document discusses organizing QA processes within an Agile Scrum team. It describes the project structure, team structure, and work processes of a distributed Scrum team supporting newspaper sites. Key QA activities in Scrum include negotiating quality, clarifying stories/tasks, ensuring acceptance tests verify quality, and providing estimates. Some challenges faced include frequent releases, lack of demos with business, communication issues, insufficient task descriptions, and not tracking QA work in sprints. Suggested solutions involve improving processes around releases, demos, communication, knowledge sharing, task descriptions, adding QA estimates to sprints, and breaking large tasks into smaller ones.
The document describes different software development life cycle (SDLC) models including waterfall, spiral, and V-model. The waterfall model involves sequential phases from requirements to maintenance without backtracking. Spiral model allows for requirement changes and develops the software in modules. The V-model incorporates testing at each phase from requirements to validate the system works as intended.
XP is an agile software development methodology that was created between 1996-1999. It focuses heavily on quality through practices like pair programming, code review, test-driven development at all levels including acceptance tests written by customers, and continuous integration. XP works best for strong, cohesive teams and requires adopting all of its practices as a unified approach rather than individually.
Continuously Delivering: Compress the time from committed to consumedAtlassian
The document discusses moving from a traditional release process with long feature branches and bi-weekly releases to a continuous delivery model with short-lived branches and the ability to release software changes on a daily basis. It provides an overview of the benefits of continuous delivery such as reducing risk, increasing validation of changes, and allowing for rapid iteration. The document also shares Atlassian's experience transitioning to continuous delivery and how they were able to reduce their deployment time from 1-2 days to 25 minutes while increasing the frequency from every two weeks to up to 10 times per day. It concludes by emphasizing that continuous delivery should be a first-class feature of build tools like Bamboo and provides additional resources for learning more.
Continuous Testing for CTOs (Webinar Slides)Rainforest QA
Watch on-demand: http://info.rainforestqa.com/webinar-continuous-testing-for-ctos
Slides from the Continuous Testing for CTOs webinar with Laks Srini (CTO, Zenefits) and Russell Smith (CTO, Rainforest QA).
QA testing is often a bottleneck to true continuous deployment, and traditional processes are ill-suited for CI/CD environments. As your company grows, the cost of scaling traditional QA practices to meet the needs of a larger audience with more complex products can overextend bandwidth. With continuous testing, you can keep your growing organization's QA costs down and empower your team to test more effectively.
- How Zenefits uses continuous testing to speed up their QA cycle to match their CD environment
- How continuous testing minimizes the cost of scaling your QA team
- How to plug continuous testing into your existing Agile or CD workflow for minimal disruption
- How to speed up manual QA activities to ensure fast but comprehensive testing
The document outlines the Navyug Testing Process which includes requirements analysis, static testing, test planning and dynamic testing. Requirements are analyzed for defects and gaps. Static testing involves functional and non-functional testing. Dynamic testing then executes the test cases developed during planning and includes both manual and automated testing of functionality and non-functional areas like performance and security. Issues are logged, tracked to resolution and reporting finalizes the testing process.
This document summarizes a concise QA and testing process developed for a small startup. It includes protocols for building, testing, managing changes, and releasing software. The build protocol ensures testing receives builds and information about changes. The test cycle protocol defines different types of testing cycles. The change protocol establishes feature freezes and code freezes to control changes late in development. The release protocol details the release approval and packaging process.
After doing testing on multiple Agile projects, I have come to realize certain aspects about the process and techniques that are common across projects. Some things I have learned along the way, some, by reflection on the mistakes / sub-optimal things that I did.
I have written and published my thoughts around the "Agile QA Process", more particularly what techniques can be used to test effectively in the Iterations.
Implementing QA testing seems straightforward. However, implementing a comprehensive QA strategy can be a complex process. To ensure that your product, app, or website is bug free when it hits production, here are 7 QA tests you should be running.
Handling QA process in Agile development model. How PM, dev and QA teams should work together to bring and effective and efficient process of software validation and ensuring customer quality expectations
This document discusses continuous integration for Oracle Database objects. It defines continuous integration as integrating code changes at least daily to verify changes through automated builds. This helps detect errors quickly and reduces issues that arise from distributed teams and manual testing. The document recommends principles like source control, automated builds and testing, and making each commit trigger an integration build. It demonstrates how tools like Jenkins, Maven, UTPLSQL and SonarQube can be used together in a continuous integration pipeline to continuously build, test and analyze code changes.
The document outlines an agile QA automation process including early QA involvement in acceptance criteria, 3 or 4 amigos meetings before implementation, developing automation in parallel with code, integrating automation with CI tools like Jenkins, performing exploratory testing and recording findings, communicating post-release to stakeholders, demonstrating automation along with functionality, breaking down automation tasks with descriptions, performing sanity tests once live, creating production automation for highest priority features, learning lessons and automating important bugs, keeping automation up to date, and considering architecture, guidelines, parallel execution, and reporting when developing automation.
The document discusses testing best practices for rich client applications. It outlines the challenges of testing user interfaces and interactions. It then describes different levels of testing from ad hoc to crowdsourcing. Unit testing, continuous integration, and automated functional testing are explained. The current state of testing tools for Titanium is presented along with a demo. Future directions including more automation and crowdsourced testing are envisioned.
We have some great new enhancements that were added to qTest on Mach 28th 2016 that will help make your testing process much more efficient. We are also introducing a beta version of our new Atlassian HipChat add-on that will help your team improve collaboration while using qTest.
View the slides for the On-Demand webinar that aired on April 6th, to learn about all the new qTest features:
- Copy and paste across projects
- Data query enhancements
- Filtering tree structure
- New! Hip-Chat Add-On
View the On-Demand Webinar here: http://pi.qasymphony.com/qtest-7.4-release-webinar-lp056
Continuous integration (CI) is the practice of regularly merging code changes into a shared repository. With CI, developers merge their code changes daily, which helps prevent integration issues. Automated unit tests are run on the merged code to catch any errors or failures. If all tests pass, the changes are committed to the main codebase. As code is built on the CI server, releases are automatically deployed to test, staging, and production environments on a scheduled basis. The goals of CI are to frequently integrate changes, catch errors early, and automate testing and deployments.
Using Crowdsourced Testing to Turbocharge your Development TeamRainforest QA
Developer-owned QA testing is becoming more common as many organizations shift to leaner development processes and eschew traditional QA strategies.
This presentation discusses how crowdsourced testing can help teams offload repetitive testing work and streamline Agile testing processes. It also demonstrates how Rainforest Developer Experience (DevX) allows developers to increase productivity and minimize testing time with workflow-native crowdsourced testing.
Interested in seeing how Rainforest has helped companies save dev time and QA spend? Check out these success stories!
Guru: http://hubs.ly/H06lwC60
America's Test Kitchen: http://hubs.ly/H06lCX50
This document discusses proposed improvements to development and test infrastructure at a Q1 2016 hackfest. It outlines 6 improvements: 1) including more unit testing in verify jobs; 2) using clearer multi-scenario naming conventions; 3) allowing local testing of code changes; 4) updating dashboards automatically; 5) using a node label parameter plugin for lab resource pooling; and 6) implementing an ELK logging system.
The document discusses test driven development (TDD) in an agile environment. It covers topics like the agile manifesto, evolutionary design, TDD steps and philosophy, myths about TDD, test qualities, benefits and costs of TDD, plugins and language support. The author shares their experience with TDD, noting that it improved code quality and refactoring while requiring support from leads to be effective long-term. Acceptance TDD is recommended to ensure shared understanding of what is being built.
Getting to Continuous Deployment (Webinar Slides)Rainforest QA
The document discusses continuous deployment, which is the practice of automatically deploying code changes to production after passing automated tests. It explains that continuous deployment allows teams to ship features faster, validate assumptions more quickly, and minimize risks of each deployment. It outlines three criteria for successful continuous deployment: infrastructure like continuous integration servers and monitoring; a collaborative culture that removes barriers to code reviews; and continuous testing from unit to UI levels with production monitoring and rollbacks. The presentation takes questions on continuous deployment practices.
QA Strategies for Testing Legacy Web AppsRainforest QA
Paul Miles, Software Development Manager at NPR, discusses QA strategies and tools his team uses to address the challenge of maintaining legacy products at NPR.
In this presentation, he covers:
- How to effectively strategize what types of tests to add to legacy software
- What cost-effective tools and testing strategies you can adopt in your organization
- Approaches about how to incorporate testing into your organization’s build pipelines
- How to foster testing centric culture in your organization
The document discusses QA best practices in an Agile development environment. It describes key aspects of Agile like iterative delivery, self-organizing teams, and rapid feedback. It addresses challenges of fitting QA into short iterations and questions around testing approaches. The document advocates for testing to be collaborative, automated, and continuous throughout development. It provides recommendations for QA roles in activities like planning, stand-ups, retrospectives and acceptance testing. Overall it promotes testing practices in Agile that focus on early feedback, automation, and involvement of QA throughout the development process.
Continuously Delivering: Compress the time from committed to consumedAtlassian
The document discusses moving from a traditional release process with long feature branches and bi-weekly releases to a continuous delivery model with short-lived branches and the ability to release software changes on a daily basis. It provides an overview of the benefits of continuous delivery such as reducing risk, increasing validation of changes, and allowing for rapid iteration. The document also shares Atlassian's experience transitioning to continuous delivery and how they were able to reduce their deployment time from 1-2 days to 25 minutes while increasing the frequency from every two weeks to up to 10 times per day. It concludes by emphasizing that continuous delivery should be a first-class feature of build tools like Bamboo and provides additional resources for learning more.
Continuous Testing for CTOs (Webinar Slides)Rainforest QA
Watch on-demand: http://info.rainforestqa.com/webinar-continuous-testing-for-ctos
Slides from the Continuous Testing for CTOs webinar with Laks Srini (CTO, Zenefits) and Russell Smith (CTO, Rainforest QA).
QA testing is often a bottleneck to true continuous deployment, and traditional processes are ill-suited for CI/CD environments. As your company grows, the cost of scaling traditional QA practices to meet the needs of a larger audience with more complex products can overextend bandwidth. With continuous testing, you can keep your growing organization's QA costs down and empower your team to test more effectively.
- How Zenefits uses continuous testing to speed up their QA cycle to match their CD environment
- How continuous testing minimizes the cost of scaling your QA team
- How to plug continuous testing into your existing Agile or CD workflow for minimal disruption
- How to speed up manual QA activities to ensure fast but comprehensive testing
The document outlines the Navyug Testing Process which includes requirements analysis, static testing, test planning and dynamic testing. Requirements are analyzed for defects and gaps. Static testing involves functional and non-functional testing. Dynamic testing then executes the test cases developed during planning and includes both manual and automated testing of functionality and non-functional areas like performance and security. Issues are logged, tracked to resolution and reporting finalizes the testing process.
This document summarizes a concise QA and testing process developed for a small startup. It includes protocols for building, testing, managing changes, and releasing software. The build protocol ensures testing receives builds and information about changes. The test cycle protocol defines different types of testing cycles. The change protocol establishes feature freezes and code freezes to control changes late in development. The release protocol details the release approval and packaging process.
After doing testing on multiple Agile projects, I have come to realize certain aspects about the process and techniques that are common across projects. Some things I have learned along the way, some, by reflection on the mistakes / sub-optimal things that I did.
I have written and published my thoughts around the "Agile QA Process", more particularly what techniques can be used to test effectively in the Iterations.
Implementing QA testing seems straightforward. However, implementing a comprehensive QA strategy can be a complex process. To ensure that your product, app, or website is bug free when it hits production, here are 7 QA tests you should be running.
Handling QA process in Agile development model. How PM, dev and QA teams should work together to bring and effective and efficient process of software validation and ensuring customer quality expectations
This document discusses continuous integration for Oracle Database objects. It defines continuous integration as integrating code changes at least daily to verify changes through automated builds. This helps detect errors quickly and reduces issues that arise from distributed teams and manual testing. The document recommends principles like source control, automated builds and testing, and making each commit trigger an integration build. It demonstrates how tools like Jenkins, Maven, UTPLSQL and SonarQube can be used together in a continuous integration pipeline to continuously build, test and analyze code changes.
The document outlines an agile QA automation process including early QA involvement in acceptance criteria, 3 or 4 amigos meetings before implementation, developing automation in parallel with code, integrating automation with CI tools like Jenkins, performing exploratory testing and recording findings, communicating post-release to stakeholders, demonstrating automation along with functionality, breaking down automation tasks with descriptions, performing sanity tests once live, creating production automation for highest priority features, learning lessons and automating important bugs, keeping automation up to date, and considering architecture, guidelines, parallel execution, and reporting when developing automation.
The document discusses testing best practices for rich client applications. It outlines the challenges of testing user interfaces and interactions. It then describes different levels of testing from ad hoc to crowdsourcing. Unit testing, continuous integration, and automated functional testing are explained. The current state of testing tools for Titanium is presented along with a demo. Future directions including more automation and crowdsourced testing are envisioned.
We have some great new enhancements that were added to qTest on Mach 28th 2016 that will help make your testing process much more efficient. We are also introducing a beta version of our new Atlassian HipChat add-on that will help your team improve collaboration while using qTest.
View the slides for the On-Demand webinar that aired on April 6th, to learn about all the new qTest features:
- Copy and paste across projects
- Data query enhancements
- Filtering tree structure
- New! Hip-Chat Add-On
View the On-Demand Webinar here: http://pi.qasymphony.com/qtest-7.4-release-webinar-lp056
Continuous integration (CI) is the practice of regularly merging code changes into a shared repository. With CI, developers merge their code changes daily, which helps prevent integration issues. Automated unit tests are run on the merged code to catch any errors or failures. If all tests pass, the changes are committed to the main codebase. As code is built on the CI server, releases are automatically deployed to test, staging, and production environments on a scheduled basis. The goals of CI are to frequently integrate changes, catch errors early, and automate testing and deployments.
Using Crowdsourced Testing to Turbocharge your Development TeamRainforest QA
Developer-owned QA testing is becoming more common as many organizations shift to leaner development processes and eschew traditional QA strategies.
This presentation discusses how crowdsourced testing can help teams offload repetitive testing work and streamline Agile testing processes. It also demonstrates how Rainforest Developer Experience (DevX) allows developers to increase productivity and minimize testing time with workflow-native crowdsourced testing.
Interested in seeing how Rainforest has helped companies save dev time and QA spend? Check out these success stories!
Guru: http://hubs.ly/H06lwC60
America's Test Kitchen: http://hubs.ly/H06lCX50
This document discusses proposed improvements to development and test infrastructure at a Q1 2016 hackfest. It outlines 6 improvements: 1) including more unit testing in verify jobs; 2) using clearer multi-scenario naming conventions; 3) allowing local testing of code changes; 4) updating dashboards automatically; 5) using a node label parameter plugin for lab resource pooling; and 6) implementing an ELK logging system.
The document discusses test driven development (TDD) in an agile environment. It covers topics like the agile manifesto, evolutionary design, TDD steps and philosophy, myths about TDD, test qualities, benefits and costs of TDD, plugins and language support. The author shares their experience with TDD, noting that it improved code quality and refactoring while requiring support from leads to be effective long-term. Acceptance TDD is recommended to ensure shared understanding of what is being built.
Getting to Continuous Deployment (Webinar Slides)Rainforest QA
The document discusses continuous deployment, which is the practice of automatically deploying code changes to production after passing automated tests. It explains that continuous deployment allows teams to ship features faster, validate assumptions more quickly, and minimize risks of each deployment. It outlines three criteria for successful continuous deployment: infrastructure like continuous integration servers and monitoring; a collaborative culture that removes barriers to code reviews; and continuous testing from unit to UI levels with production monitoring and rollbacks. The presentation takes questions on continuous deployment practices.
QA Strategies for Testing Legacy Web AppsRainforest QA
Paul Miles, Software Development Manager at NPR, discusses QA strategies and tools his team uses to address the challenge of maintaining legacy products at NPR.
In this presentation, he covers:
- How to effectively strategize what types of tests to add to legacy software
- What cost-effective tools and testing strategies you can adopt in your organization
- Approaches about how to incorporate testing into your organization’s build pipelines
- How to foster testing centric culture in your organization
The document discusses QA best practices in an Agile development environment. It describes key aspects of Agile like iterative delivery, self-organizing teams, and rapid feedback. It addresses challenges of fitting QA into short iterations and questions around testing approaches. The document advocates for testing to be collaborative, automated, and continuous throughout development. It provides recommendations for QA roles in activities like planning, stand-ups, retrospectives and acceptance testing. Overall it promotes testing practices in Agile that focus on early feedback, automation, and involvement of QA throughout the development process.
The Colca Valley in Peru is one of the deepest canyons in the world, reaching depths of over 3,400 meters. It has a variety of landscapes and biodiversity, with 16 ancestral villages inhabited by descendants of the Collaguas and Cabanas tribes. Popular tourist destinations in the valley include the towns of Chivay and Cabanaconde, known for their traditional clothing, architecture, and hot springs. The valley is home to diverse wildlife like condors, falcons, and vicuñas that were raised by the Incas for their wool.
Trusted Advisors in Retained Executive SearchCharles Moore
Before you engage an executive search firm, it’s important to understand whether they are up to the task at hand. At NextGen Global Executive Search, our team of recruiters have cross-functional experience in the industries listed below. Each search includes timelines where we earn the fees only if we meet those deliverables. We design a search strategy based on the performance objectives of the role and target specific people and competitors to ensure we are attracting the best in for your industry.
Our behavioral profiling, hypothetical and situational interview techniques, the fact that we meet finalist candidates face-to-face and videotape those interviews, and perform reference checks prior to submitting finalist candidates is why we offer a full one-year replacement guarantee.
Retained Executive Search with Cross Industry Expertise
The industries we serve in executive search are complimentary and cross-functional in placing Top Talent that achieves your talent acquisition needs in:
• Defense Systems: C5ISR, UAV, Weapons, Aerospace, Cyber Security, Airborne Power
• Digital Media: Connected Devices, Mobile Apps, Mobile Banking, Semantic Web
• Enterprise Systems: Data Center, EAM, SaaS, Cloud Computing, Enterprise Mobility
• Medical Devices: Surgical, Renal, Dialysis, Plasma, Neuro, Biomedical, Pharma
• Wireless Telecom: Infrastructure Systems, 4G & LTE Networks, DAS & RF Components
• Energy: Oil & Gas, Smart Meters, Smart Grids, Power Generation, Renewable Energy
This document provides information about the Global Shapers Program application and selection process at ARCADIS. It outlines that the program aims to engage Generation Y employees and create international connections. Applicants submit a new idea for ARCADIS under 50MB in English on the website by June 15th. Selection will be made by local HR based on criteria like English ability and work experience. In September, selected Global Shapers will work virtually and then in person in France on a challenge related to ARCADIS's future. The document addresses FAQs and encourages involvement through social media.
Analytics & Reporting for Amazon Cloud LogsCloudlytics
A deep dive into the Cloudytics Reports section, with the Following reports in detail & how they can help you with your business use case:
- Geo Tracker Report
- IP Tracker Report
- Timeline Report
- ELB Tracker
- CloudFront Cost Analyzer
- Custom Function
DPACC Acceleration Progress and DemonstrationOPNFV
The session provides an update to on the DPACC project within the OPNFV with a brief discussion on APIs and implementation progress. This session will review the API definition progress and follow up with a demo highlighting a common application as the vNF running on top of the DPACC defined layers. The demo will highlight the use of both hardware and software acceleration utilizing the DPACC defined acceleration layers. The demonstrationIt will highlight the progress in optimizing performance and latency characteristics of a platform to realize the vision of NFV while meeting stringent requirements, particularly for certain workloads, required by carriers.
The document discusses IBM's BladeCenter Foundation for Cloud offering which provides a turnkey virtualization platform. It includes pre-loaded IBM BladeCenter servers, networking, storage, and management software. The solution allows customers to rapidly deploy a virtualized environment with improved efficiency and scalability. It also serves as a foundation for customers to evolve their infrastructure to cloud computing models over time.
This document summarizes a study comparing the open source hypervisors Xen and KVM. It finds that Xen performs slightly better than KVM for CPU-intensive and kernel compile tests, while KVM performs better for I/O tests due to disk caching. For performance isolation, both hypervisors show good isolation of stressed VMs from normal VMs, except Xen has little isolation for network traffic while KVM has issues with disk and network receiver tests. Scalability tests show Xen scales well with additional VMs, while KVM performance degrades and VMs crash with more than 4 VMs.
La Nostra MISSION: coniugare inscindibilmente qualità-innovazione-benfici-costi .
Attenta alle continue evoluzioni delle tecniche d’isolamento per il risparmio energetico ed alle novità tecnologiche principalmente legate alle problematiche delle superfici vetrate, InCar Service offre ad un mercato sempre più esigente in termini di estetica e funzionalità, pellicole selezionate tra i migliori produttori mondiali: da quelle omologate per i vetri degli autoveicoli a quelle certificate di sicurezza, dalle tende innovative per interno realizzate in poliestere riflettente alle vernici selettive per superfici plastiche.
Grazie alla vasta gamma delle pellicola vetri INCAR è possibile aggiungere caratteristiche fisico-ottiche a qualsiasi vetro, trasformandolo in un vetro di diverse tipologie ad alte prestazioni.
I campi d'applicazione del prodotto "film vetri" sono molteplici come molteplici sono le finalità e le varietà atte a soddisfare le esigenze di ogni cliente.
Debunking Myths & Mysteries of Retained SearchCharles Moore
Before you engage an executive search firm, it’s important to understand whether they are up to the task at hand. At NextGen Global Executive Search, our team of recruiters have cross-functional experience in the industries listed below. Each search includes timelines where we earn the fees only if we meet those deliverables. We design a search strategy based on the performance objectives of the role and target specific people and competitors to ensure we are attracting the best in for your industry.
Our behavioral profiling, hypothetical and situational interview techniques, the fact that we meet finalist candidates face-to-face and videotape those interviews, and perform reference checks prior to submitting finalist candidates is why we offer a full one-year replacement guarantee.
Retained Executive Search with Cross Industry Expertise
• Digital Media: Connected Devices, Mobile Apps, Mobile Banking, Semantic Web
• Wireless Telecom: Infrastructure Systems, 4G & LTE Networks, DAS & RF Components
• Energy: Oil & Gas, Smart Meters, Smart Grids, Power Generation, Renewable Energy
OpenStack Magnum, Containers-as-a-Service for OpenStack clouds. This talk explains how Magnum fits among other OpenStack projects, and what abstracts are available in the Magnum API. Learn how Magnum is different from other Container management software.
What's Next in OpenStack? A Glimpse At The RoadmapShamailXD
YouTube Recording: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCdqOxD5G0M
Whether you are a newbie to OpenStack looking at building your first cloud or an experienced operator with years of OpenStack success behind you, you've probably spent some time wondering what to expect from the OpenStack project over the next several releases. Will it finally support that new capability you've been waiting for? Should you plan for an upgrade in the next 6 months? While the development community is always working and planning new features, its takes a lot of time on IRC to get a complete view across the different projects. The OpenStack Product WG spent time this cycle working with the project teams and PTLs to understand their priorities for the next several OpenStack releases. Where we have always had an understanding of what's to come in the next release, we're hoping to present a long-term view of the future landscape of OpenStack. In this session, we'll present our findings across the different projects in an effort to give users a glimpse into the OpenStack roadmap
We present initial results from and quantitative analysis of two leading open source hypervisors, Xen and KVM. This study focuses on the overall performance, performance isolation, and scalability of virtual machines running on these hypervisors. Our comparison was carried out using a benchmark suite that we developed to make the results easily repeatable. Our goals are to understand how the different architectural decisions taken by different hypervisor developers affect the resulting hypervisors, to help hypervisor developers realize areas of improvement for their hypervisors, and to help users make informed decisions
about their choice of hypervisor.
The document provides an overview of the AMResorts Group Sales Team and properties. It summarizes the company's history and growth over time, from opening its first resort in 2001 to now having over 35 resorts worldwide. It also profiles the different brands (Dreams, Secrets, Zoetry, Now, Sunscape) and the amenities and experiences offered at each (e.g. unlimited-luxury, unlimited-fun). Finally, it lists the company's existing properties and those currently in development, totaling over 13,500 rooms globally.
Microsoft Windows Azure - Adslot Media & Entertainment Saves Costs Case StudyMicrosoft Private Cloud
Tradeslot and Adslot, companies that provide online auction platforms, implemented Windows Azure to address scaling and cost issues. With Windows Azure, they reduced customer capital costs from $60,000 to $1,000, improved their ability to scale up quickly without straining resources, and saved critical IT resources. This allowed them to focus on new services and chase new deals with a reliable cloud infrastructure.
This is a workshop done on codemonsters.pro technological conference.
It illustrates how you can create and deal with vm and container virtual infrastructures and combine them in a useful way.
Fast Dolphin is an ERP consulting company seeking a SAP MM Consultant. The position requires at least 2 full SAP MM implementations and 5+ years of experience in SAP MM. The ideal candidate will have strong knowledge of SAP MM, experience with offshore implementations, and be fluent in Spanish and English. Those interested should send their resume, salary requirements, availability, and contact details to Monica Tamez at Fast Dolphin.
This document compares virtual machines (VMs) to containers and discusses their differences. It notes that VMs have higher overhead than containers and can support more instances per server. Containers offer near-native performance and scale better. The document also outlines ongoing and future work to further integrate container technologies into the Linux kernel to provide capabilities like checkpoint/restore and live migration of containers across servers.
Tomas Riha presented on the principles and benefits of continuous delivery. Continuous delivery aims to have applications always ready for release through a highly automated process of continuous integration, testing, and deployment. It emphasizes automating all parts of the release process, building quality in from the start, and having all team members share responsibility for releases. Frequent releases allow for faster feedback and reduce risks from large code changes. Continuous delivery helps enable test-driven development and improves the ability to verify features continuously.
How to go beyond traditional Scrum principles and scale to globally distributed teams with Continuous Delivery and Subversion. Presented by Andy Singleton of Assembla and Scott Rudenstein of WANdisco. Presented Nov. 15, 2012. 30 minutes.
Principles and Practices in Continuous Deployment at EtsyMike Brittain
This document discusses principles and practices of continuous deployment at Etsy. It describes how Etsy moved from deploying code changes every 2-3 weeks with stressful release processes, to deploying over 30 times per day. The key principles that enabled this are innovating continuously, resolving scaling issues quickly, minimizing recovery time from failures, and prioritizing employee well-being over stressful releases. Automated testing, deployment to staging environments, dark launches, and extensive monitoring allow for frequent, low-risk deployments to production.
Linuxtag 2012 - continuous delivery - dream to realityClément Escoffier
Continuous delivery is a challenge to implement seamlessly without changing work processes. The key is to introduce automation, responsibility, and a pipeline approach. Automating builds, tests, and deployments using tools like Maven, Jenkins, Vagrant, and configuration management ensures reliable and reproducible software releases. Implementing principles like committing often, comprehensive testing, and promoting changes through stages restores trust and readiness in a project.
Continuous delivery in larger shops can run into people and technological roadblocks related to complex systems and organizational structures. This presentation looks at some of those challenges and how to overcome them.
Continuous Delivery refers to the process of releasing high quality software quickly and with confidence through the use of build, test and deployment automation. By applying Lean techniques to the development, test and deployment of software, waste is reduced and staff are freed up to work on more important tasks. By following a continuous delivery model, release cycles shift from a matter of months to weeks or days.
In this presentation, we will look at the key tools and processes involved in transitioning from a manual culture to one that embraces automation. We will look at real world examples, including the tools and architectural components. We will discuss organizational impacts, including the dramatic improvements in morale as team delivery commitments are met more easily through automation.
This document discusses the principles and benefits of continuous delivery. It defines continuous delivery as enabling an application to be built, tested, and ready for deployment to production at any time. The key principles are to automate everything, keep all code and releases in source control, and ensure quality is built in from the start. Continuous delivery provides benefits like instant feedback, low risk changes, and faster delivery of value to customers. It also impacts development practices like enabling shorter sprints in Scrum and promoting test-driven development.
This webinar presented a DevOps platform from Clarive and DBmaestro for continuous delivery of database changes. It discussed challenges with traditional database development and deployment processes. The platform provides coordination, collaboration, integration and automation capabilities to standardize processes across teams and tools. It also offers insights, approvals and release automation to safely deploy database changes.
The document discusses the roles and relationships between development (Dev) and operations (Ops) teams, and introduces the DevOps approach. It notes that traditionally there has been a disconnect between Devs and Ops that results in inefficiencies. DevOps aims to bridge this gap through a collaborative mindset and practices like automating infrastructure provisioning and deployments, implementing continuous integration/delivery, monitoring metrics, and breaking down silos between teams. Specific tools mentioned that support DevOps include Puppet for configuration management and Autobahn for continuous deployment.
The document discusses innovations that Atlassian is launching to help unlock potential in products and help customers ship code faster. Specifically, it mentions that Atlassian is launching new plugins, a universal plugin manager, and per-user plugins that allow custom JS/CSS/Zip files. It also discusses features for distributed version control, commit graphs, builds, integration and more to help customers ship code faster through agile, lean startup and DevOps approaches.
The document provides an introduction and overview of software testing concepts. It discusses software testing methodology, techniques and processes like the software development life cycle (SDLC), waterfall model, V-model and agile model. It also covers different testing types like unit testing, integration testing, system testing and acceptance testing. Key aspects covered include verification vs validation, test planning, defect management, and the software testing life cycle.
DevOps, sibling of Agile is born of the need to improve IT service delivery agility to the more stable environment.
DevOps movement emphasizes tearing the boundaries between makers (Development) & caretakers (Operations) of IT services/products.
Watch the recorded version of this Webinar here:
Curious about Continuous Integration? Tune in!
Continuous Integration (CI), which is a big part of continuous delivery, is the concept of continuously building and testing software using an automated process. We have learned that utilizing CI could help us catch bugs earlier, enable better visibility, reduce repetitive processes, enable the development team to produce deployable products at a moment's notice, and reduce risk overall.
These slides will identify the various levels of continuous integration and delivery with regards to a release maturity of the development team or parent organization.
Releasing fast code - The DevOps approachMichael Kopp
Agile makes you Develop faster, DevOps also makes you Deploy faster but how do you make your Application faster?
Many currently used Performance Management practices don’t work anymore as they are too time consuming. It takes a new approach to track performance in Continuous Integration, get more value out of Load Testing and leverage production data for performance optimization.
We will show you real world examples on how the new DevOps approach can work.
Functional Continuous Integration with Selenium and HudsonDavid Jellison
This slide deck illustrates Constant Contact's approach to running sets of regression test suites on a regular schedule using SeleniumRC and Hudson. Hudson is a continuous integration server designed for building applications and running unit test unattended, and storing run report and metric artifacts. Hudson can also process a variety of different types of jobs, including running SeleniumRC Java test cases using JUnit as the test runner. SeleniumRC can be run unattended on multiple slave computers in parallel, each running SeleniumRC, to quickly run through many test cases.
The Continuous delivery Value @ codemotion 2014David Funaro
System Crash, failure data migration, partial update: issues that no one would ever want to meet during the deploy and ... hoping for the best is not enough.
The deployment activity is important as those that precede it. The Continuous Delivery will give you low risk, cheap, fast, predictable delivery and ... soundly.
This document discusses the benefits of continuous delivery and deployment. It notes that without proper processes, deployments can fail due to crashes, failed migrations, or interrupted updates when introducing new features. Continuous delivery uses tools and methodologies to make releases low risk, fast, predictable, and ensure smooth deployments. The document outlines some of the key aspects of continuous delivery like source code management, continuous integration, automated deployments, monitoring, and root cause analysis. It discusses how these practices can help make software releases cheaper, more frequent, rapid, and reduce stress and errors compared to traditional release processes.
Continuous Delivery in the real world - techniques to reduce the developers b...Nikolai Blackie
Do you suffer from elevated stress and high blood pressure from your current software release cycles? Lost count of the 2am troubleshooting sessions trying to working out why production didn’t deploy like test? In this session you will see real life continuous delivery strategies from the field, learn some implementation techniques and demonstrations of a few tools that will assist in reducing the headache of manual software delivery.
This document discusses several anti-patterns related to manual software deployments including extensive documentation, reliance on manual testing, unpredictable releases, and lack of collaboration between development and operations teams. It advocates for automating deployments to make them repeatable and frequent in order to reduce risk and provide quick feedback. Continuous delivery of software through practices like blue-green deployments and canary releases is recommended to satisfy customers.
2. How Long does it take to Deploy?
More than a Year?
Six months to a Year? One to six months?
Two Weeks to a Month?
One day to two Weeks?
One hour to one day? One day to two Weeks?
Less than 10 Minutes?
11. Traditional Release Cycle
Timeline
1-4 Weeks
Development Release Cut Stage QA Fix Bugs Integrate Release!
Patches
12. Continuous Deployment
Release Cycle
Timeline
5-10 Minutes
Automated QA
Development x x
Release Cut Stage
x
Testing and Fix Bugs
Staging x
Integrate
Patches
Deploy
Release!
27. Destructive Database Evolution
Update the application.
//Keep this Request
Select Address Data
from Table User
//Additional Request
Select Address Data
from Table Address
29. Destructive Database Evolution
Cleanup the Application.
SQL Script to copy old data
from User table Select Address Data
to Address table from Table Address