SlideShare a Scribd company logo
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209
Please create at least 3 substantive posts.
First, describe a conflict situation that you have experienced
and evaluate your reactions. (This can be a conflict with a
family member, friend, coworker, acquaintance, etc …)
Consider questions such as:
· Did you respond appropriately/civilly?
· What Conflict Management styles were used?
· How did the other person react and how did their reactions
affect you?
· If you could, would you have changed anything about the
situation and or your reactions?
· Was the outcome positive or negative?
· What did you learn (About yourself, the other person/people)?
· Has your communication behavior changed since this
example?
· Please then also post substantive responses to at least 2
classmates' posts.
Please choose an example that is classroom appropriate. (One
that you feel comfortable sharing with the class and that the
class will feel comfortable reading.)
(800 - 1000 words)
The SPC 209 grading criteria explains expectations for
discussion posts. It can be found under Course
Materials/Content in the Introductory Materials module.
Strengths
Things your school does well. Aspects of your service that
parents and pupils particularly like. Characteristics and/or
activities that are unique to your school. Advantages of
working in or using your school.
Weaknesses
Areas in which the school could be working much more
effectively in, or things the school could be doing better.
Things the school feels it lacks that it needs to have in order to
improve.
Opportunities
Times, conditions, situations, resources, positions, external
factors, people etc the school can use and take advantage of to
improve its services.
Threats
External factors which could have a limiting effect on the
school and its quality of services now or in the future.
SWOT ANALYSIS TEMPLATE
Craig Halls. MBA, LAT/ATC, CEES, Column Editor
The SWOT Analysis: Simple, yet Effective
Chadron B, Hazelbaker, ATC, CSCS, MPE • Gonzaga
University
A ATHLETIC THERAPY companies look to review past
performance
and move toward their future, a variety of analytical tools can
be used
to help clear the muddled load of information. What information
does
the company need to move forward? Is it a good time to
expand? What
challenges lie ahead? A SWOT analysis can be an effective tool
to gather
information and help the company determine its current
situation and
develop a clear path to move forward,
SWOT is an acronym for the iriternal Strengths and Weaknesses
of
a firm and the environmental Opportunities and Threats facing
it,' The
SWOT analysis relies on the assumption that a firm's internal
resources
(strengths and weaknesses) and external situation (opportunities
and
threats) must match in order for it to develop an effective
strategy,
Goodstein and colleagues^ present the SWOT analysis as a step
of the
performance audit during the strategic planning for a company.
In order
for the company to know its current status, managers need to be
aware
of what is occurring internally and externally to effectively
plan, manage,
and lead the business in the most effective and efficient manner,
Strenqths
Identifying a company's internal strengths is the first important
step of
the SWOT analysis, A strength is a resource advantage relative
to competi-
tors and the needs of the markets that a firm serves or expects to
serve,'
It might appear to be simple or intuitive to recognize the
strengths of a
therapy setting, but it is easy for the picture to become cluttered
with
competitive drives and self-criticism. How often is the focus on
promoting
what is going well in the company versus what needs to be
improved?
Strengths need to be identified to help managers identify areas
that
are working, along with those that are not. Strengths need to be
pro-
moted (internally) and can be used as positive building points.
Promote
strengths and continue to build on them. Quite simply, do more
of what
is already being done well.
Weaknesses
A weakness is a limitation or deficiency in one or more
resources or com-
petencies relative to competitors that impedes a firm's effective
perfor-
mance,' Oftentimes, a true analysis ofthe weaknesses in an
organization
(D Z006 Human Kinetio - A H 11(6), pp, 53-55
ATHLETIC THERAPY TODAY NOVEMBER 2 0 0 6 1 5 3
is difficult. Employees fear honest discussions about
weaknesses because these are typically viewed as
negatives. Some employees connect the negatives
personally with their positions, and these individuals
feel they are viewed as failures. This might be especially
true in the athletic therapy setting, which is built on
the treatment and rehabilitation of competitive and
highly motivated clients.
Weakness does not mean failure. By truly and hon-
estly identifying the weaknesses in an organization or
section of a company, managers can create plans to
manage, control, change, or address the weak areas.
If patients come into a clinic for an initial evaluation,
but few return for follow-up care, somewhere along the
line there is a weakness that needs to be addressed.
Perhaps the athletic therapists are not communicat-
ing to the patient or office staff the need for follow -up
visits. Once this weakness has been identified the
manager can work with the athletic therapists and
office staff to improve communication, thus increas-
ing return visits.
Opportunities
A company does not work simply within the walls of
the office. There are numerous outside pressures that
exist. With this in mind, one can conduct a SWOT
analysis that not only includes the internal strengths
and weaknesses but also will be used to examine the
external opportunities and threats. These steps exam-
ine the current business environment and attempt to
predict the future in terms of competition, key trends,
technology, staff availability, state and federal health-
care regulations, and community economic issues.
An opportunity is a major favorable situation in
a firm's environment,' Opportunities are the areas
where the business can provide needed services in the
larger community. One example is the opportunity to
grow. Economic growth in an area seemingly unrelated
to athletic therapy services might produce external
opportunities for a company to grow. For example, if a
high-tech company moves to town, creating new jobs
and economic growth, an athletic therapy company
might reap the benefits by simply having more poten-
tial patients or clients. The athletic therapy provider in
the area might be ready for growth through new insur-
ance contracts, a therapy contract for worker injuries,
or even by opening a new clinic near the high-tech
company to provide services the employees can easily
access around their work schedules.
Threats
Identifying threats can help managers plan and better
handle problems that arise, A threat is a major unfavor-
able situation in a firm's environment,' Threats can
be broadly based and difficult to identify but can be
thought of in terms of "what if" in strategy-planning
sessions.
The human resources department might look at
threats to hiring qualified staff. If there is a shortage
of experienced sports-medicine professionals, how will
the clinic respond if required to hire somebody within a
short time frame? One suggestion is to develop "pool"
or "on-call" staff, but even then a back-up plan needs
to be in place.
Threats can be treated as opportunities for change
and growth. As challenges arise, a plan should be
developed to address those challenges in a way that
the company not only survives them but also grows
and prospers.
Conclusion
Figure 1 illustrates how a SWOT analysis can be
used to assist in strategic planning. Cell 1 is the most
favorable, whereas Cell IV is least desirable, T^ble 1
summarizes the key components of each cell,'
The SWOT analysis provides an ideal framework
for managers because it is a simple yet accurate por-
trayal of the firm. The best situation for a firm is to
maximize strengths and opportunities while attempt-
ing to minimize weaknesses and threats. The SWOT
analysis is an important tool as managers in both large
and small athletic therapy companies look to analyze
their current operations while at the same time plan
for the future.
Resources for additional information regarding
the SWOT analysis are located in the references cited
at the conclusion of this article, as well as in the fol-
lowing:
• http://www,mindtools,com/pages/article/newTMC_
05,htm#business
• http://www,quintcareers,com/SWOT_Analysis,html
(This provides an individual assessment through a
SWOT analysis,)
• Performing a SWOT Analysis (checklist), published
by Chartered Management Institute
• Bradford RW, Duncan PJ, T
̂ rcy B, Simplified Strategic
Planning: A No Nonsense Guide for Busy People Who
5 4 1 NOVEMBER 2 0 0 6 ATHLETIC THERAPY TODAY
Critical
internal
weaknesses
Numerous
environmental
opportunities
Cell 3:
Supports a
turnaround-
oriented
strategy
Cell 4:
Supports a
defensive
strategy
C e l l l :
Supports an
aggressive
strategy
Substantial
internal
strengths
Cell 2:
Supports a
diversification
strategy
Major
environmental
threats
figure I SWOT-analysis diagram,'
TABLE 1. KEY COMPONENTS OF THE CELLS IN THE
SWOT ANALYSIS
Cell Strategy
Growth-oriented strategy. There are several opportunities and
numerous strengths that encourage pursuit of those
opportunities.
Focus on strong resources and competencies to build long-term
opportunities in more favorable product markets.
Attempt to eiimihate iriternal weaknesses so as to more
effectively pursue the market opportunity.
Immediate strategies need to be implemented that reduce or
redirect involvement in the products or markets
examined through the SWOT analysis.
Want Results Fast. Worcester, Mass: Chandler House
Press; 2000,
Column Editor's Note
This article by Mr, Hazelbaker comes at an interesting
time as HealthSouth recently announced plans to sell
their outpatient therapy clinics,' It will be interesting to
see what, if any, effect this will have on athletic trainers
and their employment in therapy settings. As evident
throughout this article, the SWOT analysis serves as
an exceilent tool for athletic trainers who might seize
the opportunity to explore a career in the outpatient
rehabilitation setting, I
References
1. PearceJA, Robinson RB Jr. Strategic Management:
Formulation, Imple-
mentation, and Control. 7th ed. New York, NY: Irwin McGraw-
Hill;
2000.
2. Goodstein L, Nolan T, Pfeiffer JW. Applied Strategic
Planning: How
to Develop a Plan That Really Works. New York, NY: McGraw
Hill;
i993.
3. HealthSouth. Press releases page. Available at:
http://www.healthsouth.
com/medinfo/home/app/frame?2 =
article.Jsp,0,081406_repositioning.
Accessed August 20, 2006.
Chadron Hazelbaker has worked for 8 years in outpatient
physical
therapy clinics in the inland Northwest in patient care and
manage-
ment. He is currently completing his PhD in leadership studies
at
Gonzaga University.
ATHLETIC THERAPY TODAY NOVEMBER 2 0 0 6 1 5 5
Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1
APR 2017 RESEARCH
1
Leadership Educator Journeys:
Expanding a Model of Leadership Educator Professional
Identity
Development
Corey Seemiller, Ph.D.
Wright State University
Kerry L. Priest, Ph.D.
Kansas State University
Abstract
There is a great deal of literature on leadership education best-
practices (e.g., curricular
considerations, teaching strategies, assessment of learning).
Yet, to be a leadership educator is
more than having knowledge or expertise of content and
pedagogy. Perceptions, experiences,
and values of leadership educators comprise a professional
identity that is reflective of not only
what leadership educators do, but also who they are and how
they view themselves within the
profession. This qualitative study builds on Seemiller and
Priest’s (2015) Leadership Educator
Professional Identity Development (LEPID) conceptual model
by analyzing stories from
participants of a professional leadership educator development
experience. Leadership educators’
identity development reflected a consistent and linear
progression through the identity spaces
outlined in the LEPID model, and further can be viewed through
three distinct dimensional
lenses (experiential, cognitive, and emotional experiences).
Additionally, leadership educator
identities were shaped by a particular set of ongoing influences
and critical incidents; the most
prevalent incident was related to feelings of inadequacy in
leadership expertise and competence.
Findings from this study can inform educational programs and
professional associations in
efforts to train and develop leadership educators.
Introduction
Leadership education is considered a sub-field within
Leadership Studies, which is the
study of pedagogical practices that facilitate leadership learning
(Andenoro et al., 2013). The
term “leadership educator” may include a wide range of
academic disciplines and professional
practice, for example teachers (primary, secondary, and
postsecondary), community educators,
coaches, trainers, consultants, and student affairs professionals
(“About ALE,” n.d.; “LEMIG,”
n.d.). A common element across roles and contexts is a
commitment to the development of
leadership capacity of individuals, groups, organizations, and
society.
Within leadership education literature, the educator is often the
intended audience, rather
than the subject of research. As a result, educators themselves
have become the “hidden who” in
contemporary leadership education scholarship (Seemiller &
Priest, 2015, p. 132). However,
there is a small body of descriptive research exploring
leadership educator demographics
(Jenkins & Owen, 2016; Jenkins, 2012; Owen, 2012). Recently,
Jenkins and Owen (2016) asked
Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1
APR 2017 RESEARCH
2
the question, “Who teaches leadership?” to offer an emerging
picture of those engaged in
leadership education (p. 99). Comparing demographic data
across both curricular and co-
curricular contexts, their findings suggest there is a need to
better understand the “multiple roles
and identities of leadership educators” (Jenkins & Owen, 2016,
p. 99).
Beauchamp and Thomas (2009) assert that professional identity
can be used as an
analytic lens through which to examine influences on teaching
beliefs and practices, and the
ways educators explain or make sense of their professional
lives. In this qualitative study, we
used Seemiller and Priest’s (2015) Leadership Educator
Professional Identity (LEPID) model as
the lens to explore leadership educators’ identities as reflected
through stories of their
professional journeys. Two primary research questions guided
the study:
1. What do leadership educators experience within spaces of
leadership educator
professional identity development?
2. What factors affect one’s leadership educator identity?
Literature Review
Usage of the term identity often varies in conceptual meaning
and theoretical role
(Stryker & Burke, 2000). Broadly, identity is defined as one’s
“self-concept,” or the dynamic,
multifaceted, multidimensional cognitive representations that
one holds of his or her self
(Markus & Wurf, 1987). Identity also refers to identification
with social categories, groups, or
relationships (Stets & Burke, 2000) or in association to
multiple, specific roles (Stryker & Burke,
2000). Additionally, identity is considered a representation of
shared language, conventions,
codes, and values within a person’s socially, historically, and
culturally situated experience (Cote
& Levine, 2002).
Identity has also been addressed within the leadership literature.
Day, Harrison and
Halpin (2009) define a leader identity as “a sub-identity that an
individual holds regarding his or
her role as leader” (p. 183). However, this self-view is not only
related to formal leadership roles,
but also “how an individual comes to think of oneself as a
leader” (p. 183). The process of
developing a leader identity was the focus of Komives, Owen,
Longerbeam, Mainella, &
Osteen’s (2005; 2006) grounded theory study and resulting
Leadership Identity Development
Model (LID). The LID model illustrates developmental
influences on college students’ changing
view of self in relation to others that shapes their broadening
view of leadership (2006). Komives
et al. (2005) suggest that understanding the process of
leadership identity development is “central
to designing leadership programs and teaching leadership” (p.
594).
Given the importance of identity development in leadership
education processes, this
paper turns the focus from the student to the educator in order
to understand how individuals
come to think of themselves as leadership educators. Because
the construct of leadership
educator identity is not widely discussed in leadership studies
literature, we looked to the
similarly situated field of teacher education for insight into
what professional educator identity
is, and how professional educator identity is developed.
Leadership educators are similarly
situated to teachers in terms of job function; thus, teacher
identity development studies can be
useful and informative in their application to understanding
leadership educator professional
Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1
APR 2017 RESEARCH
3
identity. Beijaard, Meijer, and Verloop’s (2004) review of
studies on teacher identity highlights
a scholarly focus on the development of professional identity,
characteristics of identity, and
stories that (re)present professional identity. Across the
research, they identified four common
features that help to define teacher professional identity: (1) a
dynamic, life-long learning
process of interpretation and re-interpretation of experiences,
(2) that implies both person and
context, (3) consists of multiple sub-identities, (4) and involves
agency; that is, teachers are
active in the process of their professional development
(Beijaard et al., 2004).
Professional identity is more than taking on a teaching role or
educator position; it is how
one sees and names him or herself (self-perception), and is
recognized and regarded by others
(legitimization) (Danielwicz, 2001; Sutherland, Howard, &
Markauskaite, 2010). For example, a
person may identify as an aspiring teacher early in their career
and then after gaining experience,
identify as a practicing teacher (Danielwicz, 2001). Professional
identity serves as “a framework
for teachers to construct their own ideas of ‘how to be,’ ‘how to
act,’ and ‘how to understand
their work and their place in society’” (Sachs, 2005, p. 15). Yet,
these identity constructions are
“deeply connected to the communities in which they learn to
teach and to their interactions with
colleagues, students and families as they engage in learning
pedagogical practice” (Schultz &
Ravich, 2013, p. 37). Lave and Wenger (1991) and Wenger
(1998) conceptualize professional
identity development as a process of “becoming” within various
communities of practice.
Membership in a community of practice provides a set of
relationships and standards of practice
that define competence or expertise, and participation in those
relationships and practices
legitimizes and propels one’s trajectory of membership within
the community (1998).
Conceptual Framework. Our study positions the field of
leadership education broadly
as a community of practice, and assumes that participants are
situated as members of multiple
sub-communities within and outside of leadership education
(e.g., professional associations,
organizations, universities). Thus, their stories of experience
offer insight into relationships and
practices that have shaped their own process of “becoming.”
Seemiller and Priest’s (2015)
LEPID Model (Table 1) provides a conceptual framework to
explore leadership educators’
professional identity and serves as the lens by which to examine
stories of the professional
journeys of leadership educators.
Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1
APR 2017 RESEARCH
4
Table 1.
Leadership Educator Professional Identity Development Model
Identity Spaces
(Seemiller & Priest, 2015)
Identity Space Definition Examples
Exploration The space in which an individual
explores if, and to what extent,
he or she might take on the
professional identity of
leadership educator.
Participating in professional development
to learn about leadership, reading
leadership literature, volunteering to assist
with leadership education experiences in
addition to a main job role, and
networking with leadership educators to
learn more about and connect with the
profession
Experimentation The space in which one tries on
parts, or all, of the leadership
educator identity.
Taking on a formal leadership educator
role, getting an advanced degree that
prepares one for the field of leadership
education
Validation The space in which one
identifies as a leadership
educator, yet engages in self-
validation and/or seeks
validation from others to
maintain or enhance professional
identity.
Presenting at conferences, writing articles,
or heading up a campus based leadership
initiative
Confirmation The space in which one guides
less seasoned professionals in
developing their leadership
educator identities.
Contributing literature to the field, taking
on senior professionals roles, serving on
editorial boards or reviewing proposals,
serving on dissertation/thesis committees,
teaching other leadership educators, or
speaking at conferences
The model also highlights influences that may impact how one
moves and occupies identity
spaces. Influences are ongoing factors that persist throughout an
extended period of time and are
not single events. Table 2 provides a description of these
influences.
Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1
APR 2017 RESEARCH
5
Table 2.
Leadership Educator Professional Identity Development Model
Influences
(Seemiller & Priest, 2015)
Type Description
Personal Identities Personal identities, especially salient ones,
including those related to race,
class, gender, religion, sexual orientation, ability, etc.
Personal Agency
Personal agency (self-efficacy, confidence, or beliefs in one’s
ability to
succeed) as a leadership educator.
Perceptions of a
Leadership Educator
Acting in accordance with one’s own definition of leadership
educator.
Expertise
Expertise in leadership subject matter.
Community of
Practice
Networks of peers who provide support, guidance, collaboration
to others
in or entering the field.
Socialization Learning the values, norms, and culture of the
profession in order to act
in alignment with professional expectations.
Context Campus culture, hierarchies, reporting lines, funding
and staffing
structures, and leadership.
In addition to ongoing influences, critical incidents can play a
role in leadership educator identity
development. Critical incidents are “key events in an
individual’s life … around which pivotal
decisions revolve” (Sikes, Measor, & Woods, 1985, p. 58).
Critical incidents may elicit internal
questions that either confirm or challenge one’s leadership
educator identity. Table 3 outlines
each type of critical incident and associated internal questions.
Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1
APR 2017 RESEARCH
6
Table 3.
Leadership Educator Professional Identity Development Model
Critical Incidents
(Seemiller & Priest, 2015)
Type Internal Question
Commitment Does this identity suit me?
Congruence Do my values match those of the identity?
Credibility Do others believe I should have this identity?
Competence Do I have the knowledge to execute this identity?
Conflict Do people outside my professional identity legitimize
my identity?
Methods
The assumptions of contemporary perspectives of identity (e.g.,
Rodgers & Scott, 2008)
align with an interpretive inquiry paradigm: our realities are
constructed through social
interactions that are historically, politically, and culturally
situated, and the understanding of
reality is constructed through human perception and
interpretation (Lincoln, Lynham, & Guba,
2011). As researchers, we acknowledge that we are
simultaneously experiencing our own
professional leadership educator identity journeys along wi th
the participants. Our perceptions of
ourselves, beliefs about leadership, and experiences as
professionals in the field of leadership
education have informed the study design, and also our
interpretation and representation of the
research.
Data Collection. The study participants were attendees of a
national professional
development symposium for student affairs and faculty
leadership educators. The symposium
consisted of presentations, group discussions, activities, and a
personal narratives project, which
was the focus of this study. On the first day of the symposium,
the symposium co-chair (also a
lead investigator and author of the study), introduced the
personal narratives project, which
involved writing and sharing a story about paradigm shifting “a-
ha moments” and/or experiences
that have shaped participants’ leadership educator identities.
The co-chair shared a personal
leadership journey story to set the tone for what was expected.
Participants were given 2.5 days
to write a story that when read aloud would equal about five
minutes in length. On the third day,
participants shared and reflected on their final stories with a
small group of their peers.
Participants were not invited to participate in the study until
after they had completed the entire
activity to allow for authentic and pressure-free involvement.
Those who consented to the study
shared either their typed or handwritten stories with the co-
chair. Photocopied stories were
transcribed into text documents; all stories were then uploaded
to NVivo for analysis. Individual
stories ranged from two to four pages of single spaced text.
Twenty-two of the 48 participants at the symposium consented
to participate in the study.
For the purpose of analysis, each participant was classified as
one of four participant types based
Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1
APR 2017 RESEARCH
7
on a certain set of criteria. New professionals (NP) included
those with 0 to 2 years of
professional experience in leadership, whereas emerging
professionals (EP) included 3-7 years of
experience and seasoned professionals (SP) included more than
7 years of experience. Career
professional (CP) was a special classification for those who had
more than 10 years of
experience and a record of publications and/or extensive
professional involvement. Because we
included the criteria of publishing and/or professional
involvement, not all participants with
more than 10 years of experience were classified as career
professionals and thus were deemed
seasoned professionals. To confirm the appropriate
classification for each participant, we used
information provided in LinkedIn and/or institutional bios. In
addition to their professional
classifications, each participant was assigned a number for
analysis and reporting (e.g. NP3
references New Professional 3, a specific individual).
Participant information is outlined in Table
4.
Table 4.
Participant Information
Participant Type Criteria Number
New Professional (NP) 0-2 years experience 6
Emerging Professional (EP) 3-7 years experience 7
Seasoned Professional (SP) More than 7 years experience 4
Career Professional (CP) More than 10 years experience;
publication
record and/or professional involvement
5
Because participants’ stories reflected entire careers to date, we
opted not to use information
such as their current institution and geographic region for
analysis. It is likely that over the
course of their careers, participants worked at a variety of
institutions and lived in multiple
geographic areas.
Data Analysis. Deductive content analysis (Cho & Lee, 2014;
Klenke, 2008) was
utilized to examine and categorize these stories through the
LEPID model. We used a variety of
collaborative analytical tools to prepare for and conduct coding,
including note-taking,
questioning, and drawing from personal experience to explore
possibilities of meaning (Corbin
& Strauss, 2008). Each researcher conducted initial coding on
one story using an a priori coding
schematic informed by the themes within the LEPID model.
Codes are listed in Table 5. At the
same time, we remained open to emergent codes as one aim of
this study was to clarify and/or
expand the LEPID model. Next, an NVivo query of interrater
agreement was used as a basis for
discussing codes and establishing interpretive convergence
(Saldaña, 2009).
The remaining stories were coded using a constant comparative
approach (Glaser &
Strauss, 1967), comparing data within each story and comparing
codes and emerging themes
across stories. Two additional codes emerged from the data: the
Pre-Exploration space, which
Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1
APR 2017 RESEARCH
8
included any leadership experiences prior to becoming a
leadership educator and Opportunity as
an Influence, which included opportunities to enter the
professional field of leadership education
(also noted in Table 5). We used interpretive and reflexive
memoing, as well as peer debriefing
(Corbin & Strauss, 2008) to ensure a trustworthy process
(Lincoln & Guba, 1985), and thus
expanding on the initial LEPID model.
Table 5.
Coding Scheme
Identity Spaces Critical Incidents Influences
*Pre-Exploration
Exploration
Experimentation
Validation
Confirmation
Commitment
Congruence
Credibility
Competence
Conflict
Personal Identities
Personal Agency
Perceptions of Leadership Educator
Expertise
Community of Practice
Socialization
Context
*Opportunity
*Emergent Codes
Each story element from all 22 stories was coded by participant
type to analyze for themes as a
way to make meaning of who occupies particular identity
spaces. Quotations from 18 of the 22
stories are utilized to provide evidence of the findings in each
theme as well as highlight
participants’ own words describing their identity journeys.
Results
The analysis yielded three main findings, or themes: (1)
Previous leadership experience
plays a role in shaping leadership educator identities, (2) spaces
of identity are multi-faceted and
complex, and (3) (a) ongoing influences and (b) short-term
critical incidents impact leadership
educator identity development.
Theme 1: Pre-Exploration Leadership Experience. All 22
participants noted their
former leader experiences laid the groundwork for entering into
leadership education as a
profession. SP3 exemplifies this by saying, “Because of my
career path (military) I focused on
practice long before I ever tried to teach.” Leader experiences
differed dramatically from holding
a significant leader role to not getting a desired leader role.
Participants discussed how their
leader experiences shaped who they are and what they believe
as leadership educators, resulting
in their desire to create open access to leader experiences for
students, correct mistakes they
made as leaders, and give to students the opportunities they had
or wished they had. These
experiences are reflective of an emergent Pre-Exploration space
in the LEPID model, which
appears to be foundational for the participants before even
becoming a leadership educator.
Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1
APR 2017 RESEARCH
9
Theme 2: Complexity of Spaces of Identity. The identity spaces
from the conceptual
LEPID model were confirmed through the study; however, these
spaces appear to include
multiple dimensions that were not identified in the original
model. The dimensions include:
• Experiential: What do I do in each space? Participants’
administrative, operational, and
applied experiences;
• Cognitive: What do I know in each space? Participants’
perceptions around the concept
of leadership; and
• Emotional: How do I feel in each space? Participants’ feelings
about being a leadership
educator.
In the following section, we use participant quotes to illustrate
how these dimensions emerged
within each of the identity spaces.
Exploration Space. Exploration is the space in which an
individual explores if, and to
what extent, he or she might take on the professional identity of
leadership educator.
Experiential. In the Exploration space, two types of experiential
experiences
stood out that helped new leadership educators explore the
profession. The first was
having other leadership educators who inspired, motivated,
encouraged, and even urged
them into the profession. EP3 reflected on entering the field by
saying, “After some soul
searching and mentor conversations, I had an eureka moment! I
could ‘help students,’
just like all of my mentors and professors helped me.”
Second, exposure to leadership literature helped those exploring
leadership education as a
profession. CP4 reflected on the profound impact of discovering
theories early in their career in
saying:
With a grounding in the relational leadership model and the 5
practices, I began to
breathe more deeply. Burns. Bass. Hersey & Blanchard.
Greenleaf. So many others. And
then the point of no return: Wheatley, Rost and Heifetz. In
quick succession I found my
room in my new home.
Cognitive. The cognitive dimension demonstrates the evolving
perception of
leadership. Those who are “new” appeared to search for black
and white leadership
answers, whereas those embedded deeply in the field appeared
more okay with the ever-
changing nature of leadership and an absence of an agreed-upon
professional definition.
Two new professionals commented on their desire to know more
or have more answers
about leadership. NP6 said, “Some days I get incredibly
frustrated by the concept of
leadership education, especially on days when I feel like I have
more questions about
leadership than certain answers.” And, NP2 said, “As a
leadership educator I have a
kindergarten vocabulary and I still find that I learn as much
from my students, and they
learn as much from each other, as they learn from me.”
Emotional. Feelings emerged for many when entering the field
of leadership
education. These centered on being unsure about their career
choice and seeing if the
experience aligned with who they were and what they wanted.
NP5 noted, “I decided to
apply for a graduate teaching assistantship. I was interested in
teaching; I wasn’t sure if it
Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1
APR 2017 RESEARCH
10
was my passion, but it was something I enjoyed, and perhaps
something I would pursue
as a career if it felt right.”
Experimentation Space. Experimentation is the space in which
one tries on parts, or all,
of the leadership educator identity.
Experiential. The experiential dimension of the Experimentation
space was
mostly focused around trying out a new leadership job, which
SP1 wrote was “exciting
and little scary at the same time” upon entering the field. There
were a number of
leadership educators who came into the field, left for another
career path, and then
returned. Others had a lengthy career in another occupation and
came into their
leadership educator roles later in their careers, and still others
who were in their first
professional leadership jobs right out of a graduate program at
the time they were writing
these stories.
Cognitive. The Experimentation space was filled with comments
from
participants not questioning what leadership was and seeking
answers like those in the
Exploration space, but acknowledging how difficult it might be
to get clear-cut answers
about leadership. Many did not define leadership specifically.
EP4 noted that leadership
is “messy,” and EP6 believes that leadership is not “one size
fits all.”
Emotional. Stories in the Experimentation space reflected how
participants felt
about being a leadership educator. Many stories centered on
being able to identify as a
leadership educator after having previously done leadership
development in other roles.
So, it was not a matter of engaging in leadership education for
the first time, but
knowingly taking on a formal leadership educator role. EP6
noted:
This journey is just beginning for me, but I want to start to add
to the literature and
research, empirically and quantitatively, what I have
experienced throughout my
leadership journey and what I have witnessed with many student
experiences on a yearly
basis at the college campuses I have worked at.
Validation Space. Validation is the space in which one
identifies as a leadership
educator, yet engages in self-validation and/or seeks validation
from others to maintain or
enhance professional identity.
Experiential. Those in the Validation space highlighted
experiences with
conferred leadership. SP2 wrote about an experience in
confirmation in saying:
One of my most profound moments when it occurred to me that
I am a leader, and a
leader who is getting noticed by others, was when
[Organization] reached out, asking me
to serve as the Regional Coordinator for the largest region in
the association.
Cognitive. Comments related to leadership in the Validation
space, whether by
participants who occupied the space at the time of writing their
stories or those who
reflected on being in this space at one point in their careers,
reflected direct language
from current models and theories, as if they had put forth what
they had memorized from
the literature. They used words such as contextual, inclusive,
empowering, process-
Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1
APR 2017 RESEARCH
11
oriented, and less positional to describe leadership. These terms
are prevalent among a
variety of contemporary leadership models, such as the
Relational Leadership Model
(Komives, Lucas, & McMahon, 2013) and Emotionally
Intelligent Leadership
(Shankman, Allen, & Haber-Curran, 2015).
Emotional. The emotional dimension was prevalent with
seasoned professionals
in the Validation space who contemplated their feeling or belief
that they were truly
leadership educators. SP4 shared a view of self-validation in
saying, “[I need] to accept
that I don’t have it all figured out while still realizing that I can
provide information of
value.” Validation also came from others, as EP4 pointed out,
“They [faculty members]
were persistent, and I started to think of myself as an academic,
or at least as someone
who had the potential to become one.” However, some
participants questioned what
validation as a leadership educator might mean for them. For
example, EP3 said:
It took me a while to become comfortable with labeling myself
as a leadership educator –
I just have hesitations. Leadership educator as an identity
inherently assigns me with
authority, a position, and I would rather like to think I am a
person, along for the ride, to
learn from other while also imparting my wisdom.
Confirmation Space. Confirmation is the space in which more
seasoned professionals
guide less seasoned professionals in confirming their leadership
educator identities.
Experiential. Many career professionals and some seasoned
professionals
discussed publishing, professional involvement, and about how
they had connections to
prominent leadership scholars.
Cognitive. Both seasoned and career professionals shared views
of leadership as
far more complex than those in other spaces. Instead of just
saying leadership was
complex, they offered thoughts that reflected complexity. CP1
noted wanting to eliminate
the words “leader” and “follower”, while SP3 highlighted the
view that leadership can be
both good or bad and that leadership definitions should focus on
“inherent good vs. evil
(wickedness, depravity, etc.).”
Emotional. Some career professionals also discussed their own
sense of self in
which they had accepted who they were as professionals. CP1
commented about “feeling
comfortable in my own skin,” whereas CP2 noted being at a
place to “forgive myself for
past leadership failings.” And CP4 noted that their leadership
identity journey consisted
of “finding my own way.” These individuals did not make
reference to conferring others
but about what it felt like to finally arrive as a leadership
educator.
Theme 3a: Influences on Identity Development. Influences are
ongoing factors that
play a role in one’s leadership educator identity development.
For many participants, influences
were not singular events, but perspectives, experiences, and
external factors that continued over
time. The LEPID model outlined seven influences on one’s
professional identity including
personal identities, personal agency, context, socialization,
community of practice, perceptions
of a leadership educator, and expertise (Seemiller & Pr iest,
2015). Data from this study revealed
an additional category of influence, opportunity, indicative of
opportunities to participate in
Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1
APR 2017 RESEARCH
12
roles, experiences, and positions related to leadership
education. Although leadership educators
discussed all eight influences, the three prominent influences
included expertise, opportunity,
and community of practice.
Expertise. First, many participants felt they did not have enough
expertise to be a
leadership educator, reflecting more than just a one-time
incident in which a leadership educator
would not be able to adequately answer a question in a
particular situation. The lack of expertise
is reflective of a deeper issue: the absence of training and
preparation to adequately engage in
leadership education as a profession. Not only did many
participants feel they lacked training,
they also did not know what they did not know, including where
to find information. EP4
exemplified this feeling:
And when I'd talk to colleagues about their experiences ... They
seemed to have this
unending knowledge that I was unaware of. Where should I find
resources? Where could
I find the time to become as knowledgeable as my colleagues
seemed to be?
Another issue related to expertise is the seemingly never-ending
cycle of knowledge.
Once a participant would feel armed with content, he or she
would realize that there was so much
more to know. NP3 said, “It is the classic case of the more you
know, the more you actually
realize you don’t know.” EP7 added that every time they tried
to learn more about leadership,
they would become "an expert once again, of a wide breadth of
leadership knowledge but soon
came to realize it was lacking depth.”
The leadership educators who were deemed as campus experts
by others felt the pressure
to be the institutional leadership authority, even if they did not
believe they had the expertise.
EP3 wrote, “I was the only person on a campus of 2,000
students doing leadership programs for
‘10 hours’ a week with no leadership knowledge.” And EP4
added:
People referred to me as the "expert" on campus ... When in
reality I was the person with
limited leadership experience and some opportunities for
professional development in the
area ... I had limited experience, while everyone else had none.
In short, I was the best-
case scenario in an already bleak leadership picture.
Opportunity. Another ongoing influence that impacted
individuals’ leadership educator
journeys was simply an opportunity to be a leadership educator.
Although opportunity may
appear to be a critical incident (for example, a job opened,
someone took it, and that person was
now a leadership educator), many did not experience
opportunity in such a linear or defined way.
Opportunity was described more as ongoing experiences in
which educators veered down
different career paths to eventually get to their present position
or role. This was evident when
participants indicated that they did not initially set out to be
leadership educators. There were
alternate paths or opportunities that presented themselves to
these individuals; and for personal
and/or professional reasons, they went down a new career path.
SP3 noted, “Becoming a
leadership educator was never an explicit end goal.”
Participants described their professional journeys as fluid.
Rather than a moment of
calling, their path to becoming a leadership educator grew over
time. NP4 said:
Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1
APR 2017 RESEARCH
13
I know there was not one moment when I actively chose to
become a leadership educator
or a student affairs professional or to do leadership work. I
can’t tell you about the
weather that day, or who was with me, or the revelatory
thoughts that accompanied this
professional and personal declaration.
Some participants discussed seeking out opportunities to do
leadership education, often by
holding other jobs in student affairs and then volunteering to
staff leadership events. Having
volunteered at leadership events, some individuals liked the
leadership work better than their
“real jobs” and moved over to more prominent roles in
leadership education. CP3 indicated:
Because we always needed extra staff at retreats, I assisted with
them in my free time. It
gave me more opportunities to learn how to be a more effective
leader and think about
how to teach skills and concepts to other.
Community of Practice. The data confirmed that the presence of
a community of
practice was influential to the participants’ leadership educator
identity journeys. Peers, both on
and off campus, were identified as providing a network of
support, being especially true for
seasoned and career professionals who discussed specifically
the value of having mentors at the
onset of their careers. CP3 discussed the importance of
mentorship in saying:
I worked with two women who both were/are awesome mentors
and had a great influence
on me … They both made certain to introduce me to others in
the field of student affairs
and, particularly, to those doing leadership education. These
women are still my mentors
to this day.
These mentoring relationships contributed to a sense of
belonging in the field and influenced
participants’ perspectives of themselves and on professional
practice. CP1 recalled how a mentor
ignited passion: “[My mentor] helped me to turn my begrudging
yes to teach leadership to a
passion for leadership development and teaching leadership. I
am forever indebted to him.”
Finally, mentoring was not just seen as being helped by those
with more experience. Mentoring
was a way to ensure the sustainability of the profession and
professional development. SP1 put it
as “I’m sort of intimidated by those who have been studying
leadership for years but also
inspired to walk in their footsteps.”
Theme 3b: Critical Incidents in Identity Development. Critical
incidents also play a
role in the identity development journeys of leadership
educators. Although there were some
instances of critical incidents that were positive and led to the
support or confirmation of
participants as leadership educators, overwhelmingly their
stories reflected incidents that
challenged them to re-think if they should be in the profession
at all. Participants identified
examples of all types of critical incidents from the LEPID
model, however incidents related to
competence were overwhelmingly the most prevalent.
Competence. By far, the primary critical incident participants
identified was a fear of
being found out – that their students and/or colleagues would
discover or realize that they were
not competent to be in leadership education (whether that was
true or not). Many of the examples
related to competence were reflective of critical incidents that
had not yet occurred; rather, the
Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1
APR 2017 RESEARCH
14
leadership educators feared they might occur. Participants made
reference to the fear and anxiety
of being found out to be a fraud. The feeling of incompetence
was apparent especially with less
seasoned professionals as evidenced by comments such as EP1
saying, “I … suffered a bit from
imposter syndrome. Always waiting on someone to call me out
because I wasn't actually a
leadership person.” NP5 wrote, “I am supposed to be a ‘master’
of this thing we call leadership,
so I better fake it till I make it, I suppose!” And EP4 shared,
“When would they figure out that I
was an impostor? When would they figure out that I didn't have
all of the answers, and
sometimes didn't understand where others were getting theirs?”
When more seasoned leadership
educators reflected back on their journeys, they also pointed out
the feelings of incompetence
they had as newer professionals. CP1 noted, “What in the world
did I know about leadership that
gave me the ‘authority’ to be teaching this stuff?”
Discussion
In pursuit of our research questions of (1) What do leadership
educators experience
within spaces of leadership educator professional identity
development?, and (2) What factors
affect one’s leadership educator identity?, we were able to
examine and confirm an existing
professional identity development model for leadership
educators (LEPID model). Yet, what
emerged was far more complex and robust than initially
envisioned. Through qualitative
analysis, we uncovered additional components of leadership
educator identity, resulting in a
more holistic understanding of identity spaces and discernment
about the impact of experiences
on one’s professional identity development.
Role of Leader in Leadership Educator. Not one leadership
educator commented on
their professional journey without reflecting on their prior
leadership experience. Most discussed
the impact of holding a leadership role or being conferred by
others as a leader, while some also
described failing as a leader. These leadership experiences
served as a foundation to their
identities as leadership educators. Our findings suggest a need
to further explore the relationship
between leader identity development and leadership education
professional identity
development. The leadership educator role is unique, as other
types of educators may not readily
shape their professional identities around the content area they
teach, such as a math teacher also
identifying as a mathematician. Understanding the intersection
between leader identity and
leadership educator professional identity is critical in the sense
that leadership educators’
experiences as a leader may affect how they view and teach
leadership.
Complexity of Identity Spaces. One of the study’s initial aims
involved the application
of the LEPID model to stories shared by leadership educators
about their professional journeys to
discern the extent of the model’s accuracy. We found that the
lived experiences of the
participants reflected the proposed spaces of identity
development, and the findings
demonstrated a need to add complexity, resulting in three
dimensions that define each space.
Table 6 includes the updated LEPID model that incorporates
dimensionality into identity spaces.
Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1
APR 2017 RESEARCH
15
Table 6.
Updated Leadership Educator Professional Identity
Development Model
Identity Space Definition Experiential:
What do I do?
Emotional:
How do I feel?
Cognitive:
What do I know?
Exploration:
Will it fit for
me?
The space in
which an
individual
explores if,
and to what
extent, he or
she might take
on the
professional
identity of
leadership
educator.
Participating in
professional
development to learn
about leadership,
reading leadership
literature,
volunteering to assist
with leadership
education experiences
in addition to a main
job role, and
networking with
leadership educators
to learn more about
and connect with the
profession.
Feeling unsure
about
leadership
education as a
career,
questioning
whether
leadership
education
could be a
passion.
Searching for black
and white answers
about what leadership
is, trying to clarify an
understanding of the
ever-changing nature
of leadership and an
absence of an agreed-
upon professional
definition.
Experimentatio
n: Does it fit for
me?
The space in
which one
tries on parts,
or all, of the
leadership
educator
identity.
Taking on a formal
leadership educator
role, getting an
advanced degree that
prepares one for the
field of leadership
education.
Naming one’s
own
professional
identity as a
leadership
educator,
especially for
those having
done
leadership
education
without calling
it leadership
education.
Acknowledging how
difficult it might be to
get clear-cut answers
about what leadership
is.
Validation: Do
others think it
fits?
The space in
which one
identifies as a
leadership
educator, yet
engages in
self-validation
and/or seeks
validation
Presenting at
conferences, writing
articles, or heading
up a campus based
leadership initiative.
Contemplating
the feeling or
belief that one
is truly a
leadership
educator,
engaging in
behaviors of
self-validation
Using existing models
and theories to come to
an understanding of
what leadership is.
Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1
APR 2017 RESEARCH
16
from others to
maintain or
enhance
professional
identity.
or seeking
validation
from others to
confirm one’s
leadership
educator
identity.
Confirmation:
How do I
validate others?
The space in
which one
guides less
seasoned
professionals
in developing
their
leadership
educator
identities.
Contributing
literature to the field,
taking on senior
professional roles,
serving on editorial
boards or reviewing
proposals, serving on
dissertation/thesis
committees, teaching
other leadership
educators, or
speaking at
conferences.
Feeling a sense
of self-
acceptance as
a leadership
educator and
passing that to
others.
Offering views and
perspectives of
leadership that reflect
complex thinking
about leadership.
The complexity of spaces provides a robust framework with
which to better understand
elements of leadership educator professional identity
development and anticipate professional
development needs of both individual educators and the broader
leadership education community
of practice. Battey and Franke (2008) point out that professional
identity informs both the skills
one seeks to develop and ultimately informs professional
practice. By helping leadership
educators understand the identity development process and the
spaces they occupy, they may be
able to better make meaning of their professional identities. It
can be validating to put a name on
an experience and realize that one is not alone in thinking or
feeling certain ways throughout the
professional journey.
There is also an underlying assumption that moving toward the
Confirmation space could
lead to more complex thinking, effective practice, and a greater
feeling of self-worth as a
professional as evidenced by the seasoned and career
professionals in this study occupying the
Confirmation space. New and emerging professionals may
benefit from seeking out experiences
that advance their professional perspectives and intentionally
move them on a trajectory towards
the Confirmation space.
Process for Identity Development. There are four identity
spaces of the LEPID model,
each with three dimensions. The complexity of identity
challenges the notion that there is a direct
route for identity development and that somehow one always
brings their whole self from space
to space. It is possible that leadership educators could occupy
different dimensions and spaces of
professional identity simultaneously. For example, an educator
may be advanced in terms of
content knowledge about leadership (Cognitive dimension for
the Validation space) but novice in
Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1
APR 2017 RESEARCH
17
terms of holding a role of leadership educator (Experiential
dimension for the Experimentation
space).
Despite the fluidity that can be present across spaces and
dimensions, many participants’
stories in this study demonstrated alignment by occupying all
dimensions of the same identity
space at the same time based on their professional experience.
For example, most new
professionals’ stories reflected the Experiential, Cognitive, and
Emotional dimensions associated
with the Exploration space, whereas more seasoned
professionals reflected all three dimensions
associated with the Validation and Confirmation spaces. Our
findings indicate that leadership
educator identity development is likely a multi-dimensional
linear process in which one moves
from Exploration to Confirmation. This relatively linear
projection can be informative for
institutions, organizations, and associations in creating
professional development opportunities
that help advance new and emerging leadership educators
through the identity spaces.
Lack of Training and Expertise. Expertise is implicit to one’s
professional identity
(Kogan, 2000). Given that both expertise as an ongoing
influence and competence as a critical
incident were discussed among participants more than any other
component related to
professional identity, it appears that many of these educators
have not felt prepared or
knowledgeable enough to teach students to be effective leaders.
Nearly all participants pointed
out that they received little to no training in leadership
education, yet were thrust into a role in
which they had to serve as leadership educators, especially
early in their careers. Many suffered
from the imposter syndrome (Clance & Imes, 1978), and
approached their roles in a “fake it till
you make it” manner. But, under that facade, they feared being
found out by colleagues,
students, or administrators that they were somehow not
qualified to be teaching leadership. The
fear of being found out only added to their already existent
internal questioning of their ability to
effectively teach leadership to begin with. Although fear and
doubt can be part of the
professional developmental process, it is critical to help
leadership educators move beyond their
fear to develop the competence and confidence that can
contribute to both effective teaching and
advancing in their professional identity development. Expertise
has been linked to higher quality
level of explaining information and clarifying
misinterpretations of content with students
(Beijaard, Verloop, & Vermunt, 2000), greater confidence to
execute identity related tasks
(Seemiller & Priest, 2015), and a greater connection to the
profession (Kogan, 2000).
Some strategies for enhancing expertise and competence include
(1) increasing access to
resources such as lesson plans, curriculum, and best practices,
(2) providing training in both
leadership content and high-impact practices and pedagogy for
leadership development, and (3)
fostering connections with other professionals for networking
and idea sharing.
Mentoring as Vital to Identity Development. The importance of
mentors in the
professional lives of leadership educators was also highlighted
by the findings. Mentors included
former faculty members, colleagues, as well as more established
professionals in the field. The
seasoned and career professionals connected mentorship with
what propelled them, guided them,
and supported them in their careers. This finding is not
surprising, as mentoring can provide
great benefits for those being mentored such as increasing one’s
capacity to face new challenges
and increasing one’s effectiveness (Holloway, 2001) and
proficiency (Kilburg & Hockett, 2007;
Watson, 2006). Yet, finding a mentor can be a complex and
challenging process, especially
Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1
APR 2017 RESEARCH
18
being the only leadership educator on a campus or not being
connected to seasoned or career
professionals from other institutions. Rather than relying on an
organic mentorship process to
hopefully emerge, offering formal mentoring programs through
professional associations can
expand access to mentors and help foster connections. In
addition, hosting role-specific
communities of practice (e.g., a community solely for online
academic educators, student affairs
professionals, or corporate trainers) can help leadership
educators make meaningful connections
with others who do similar work.
Limitations
Because we sought to confirm Seemiller and Priest’s (2015)
LEPID model, we used an a
priori coding scheme. Although we remained open to emergent
data (as demonstrated in Table
6), we encourage others to engage in research using the LEPID
model so as to have an external
and comparative understanding of its accuracy. Second, the
methodology was qualitative in
nature and involved extensive storytelling. Using qualitative
data provided depth in
understanding participants’ experiences, but also required
utilizing subjectivity in interpreting
and assigning elements of stories to pre-existing components of
the LEPID model. Finally, the
sample size was small and included professionals who sought
out a professional development
experience. It is assumed that the participants represented
voices of engaged and connected
educators with a motivation to develop. This may have excluded
perspective of individuals who
are unsure in their career selection, or do not have access to or
interest in professional
development.
Future Research
Based on the findings, we suggest areas of future research.
First, leadership educators are
balancing multiple identities, so leadership educator
professional identity is likely one of many
other personal and professional identities. Better understanding
of intersecting identities may
offer insight into structures of support or barriers to
advancement as a professional leadership
educator. Second, professionals are likely navigating the
balance between public identities and
private identities. Who they let others see or believe they are
may very well be different than
how they see themselves. Future research could unveil
intersections in how leadership educators
see themselves and how they portray themselves to others.
Third, the current study showcased participants’ past or current
occupation of identity
spaces, but not movement between spaces. To better understand
how leadership educator identity
development works, it will be critical to further examine the
transition between spaces and how
educators move from space to space. Finally, utilizing
additional methodologies to study
leadership educator identity is recommended to further explore
these topics. Analysis of
participants’ stories provided a foundation for the exploration
of the LEPID model; however,
using other qualitative or quantitative methodologies could be
useful in expanding upon the
research.
Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1
APR 2017 RESEARCH
19
Conclusion
Our findings support and enhance Seemiller and Priest’s (2015)
LEPID model.
Understanding leadership educator professional identity has
benefits for leadership educators,
their students, and the field of leadership education.
Professional associations, institutions, and
organizations can develop more communities of practice that
engage and support new
professionals, create more opportunities for resource sharing,
build formalized professional
mentoring programs, and offer more professional development
opportunities that help move
leadership educators through the spaces and dimensions of the
LEPID model. Developing the
capacity of leadership educators, especially new and emerging
leadership educators, may not
only assist in their individual professional identity development
but could also result in
developing more confident, competent, and effective leadership
educators for the profession as a
whole.
References
About ALE. (n.d.) Retrieved from
http://leadershipeducators.org/
Andenoro, A. C., Allen, S. J., Haber-Curran, P., Jenkins, D. M.,
Sowcik, M., Dugan, J. P., &
Osteen, L. (2013). National leadership education research
agenda 2013‐ 2018: Providing
strategic direction for the field of leadership education.
Retrieved from
http://www.leadershipeducators.org/ResearchAgenda
Battey, D. & Franke, M. L. (2008). Transforming identities:
Understanding teachers across
professional development and classroom practice. Teacher
Education Quarterly, 127-
149. Retrieved from
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ831720.pdf
Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004).
Reconsidering research on teachers’
professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 107-
128. doi:
10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001
Beijaard, D., Verloop, N., & Vermunt, J. D. (2000). Teachers'
perceptions of professional
identity: an exploratory study from a personal knowledge
perspective. Teaching and
Teacher Education, 16, 749-764. doi: 10.1016/s0742-
051x(00)00023-8
Cho, J. Y. & Lee, E. H. (2014). Reducing confusion about
grounded theory and qualitative
content analysis: Similarities and differences. The Qualitative
Report, 19(64), 1-20.
Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR19/cho64.pdf
Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon
in high achieving women:
Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory,
Research, and Practice,
15(3), 241-247. doi: 10.1037/h0086006
http://www.leadershipeducators.org/ResearchAgenda
http://www.leadershipeducators.org/ResearchAgenda
Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1
APR 2017 RESEARCH
20
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative
research: Techniques and
procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications.
Cote, J. E., & Levine, C. G. (2002). Identity formation, agency,
and culture: Social
psychological synthesis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, Inc.
Danielwicz, J. (2001). Teaching selves: Identity, pedagogy, and
teacher education. Albany:
State University of New York Press.
Day, D. V., Harrison, M. M., & Halpin, S. M. (2009). An
integrative approach to leader
development: Connecting adult development, identity, and
expertise. New York, NY:
Psychology Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of
grounded theory: Strategies for
qualitative research. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction
Holloway, J. H. (2001). The benefits of mentoring. National
Education Association. Retrieved
from https://archive.is/1jloY
Jenkins, D. M. (2012). Exploring signature pedagogies in
undergraduate leadership education.
Journal of Leadership Education, 11(1), 1-27. doi:
10.12806/v11/i1/rf1
Jenkins, D. M., & Owen, J. E. (2016). Who teachers leadership?
A comparative analysis of
faculty and student affairs leadership educators and implications
for leadership learning.
Journal of Leadership Education, 15(2), 99-113. doi:
1012806/V15/I2/R1
Kilburg, G. & Hockett, E. (2007). E-mentoring: Providing
support for teacher education
graduates in their first year of teaching. In C. Crawford et al.
(Eds.), Proceedings of
Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education
International Conference
2007 (pp. 2021-2025). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Klenke, K. (2008). Qualitative research in the study of
leadership. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group
Publishing.
Kogan, M. (2000). Higher education communities and academic
identity. Higher Education
Quarterly, 54(3), 207–216. doi: 10.1111/1468-2273.00156
Komives, S. R., Lucas, N., & McMahon, T. R. (2013).
Exploring leadership: For college
students who want to make a difference (3rd ed.). San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Komives, S. R., Dugan, J. P., Owen, J. E., Slack, C., & Wagner,
W. (2011). The handbook for
student leadership development (2nd ed.). San Francisco:
Jossey- Bass.
Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1
APR 2017 RESEARCH
21
Komives, S. R., Owen, J. E., Longerbeam, S. D., Mainella, F.
C., & Osteen, L. (2005).
Developing a leadership identity: A grounded theory. Journal of
College Student
Development, 46, 593-611. doi: 10.1353/csd.2005.0061
Komives, S. R.. Longerbeam, S. D., Owen, J. E., Mainella, F.
C.; Osteen, L. (2006). A
Leadership identity development model: Applications from a
grounded theory. The
Journal of College Student Development, 47(4), 401-418. doi:
10.1353/csd.2006.0048
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate
peripheral participation. New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Leadership Education Member Interest Group (LEMIG) (n.d.).
Retrieved from
http://www.ila-net.org/Communities/MIGs/Education.htm
Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., Guba, E. G. (2011).
Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions,
and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S.
Lincoln (Eds.) The SAGE
handbook of qualitative research (pp. 97-128). Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
Lincoln, YS. & Guba, EG. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A
social psychological perspective.
Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337.
doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.001503
Munin, A., & Dugan, J. P. (2011). Inclusive design. In S. R.
Komives, J. P. Dugan, J. E. Owen,
C. Slack, & W. Wagner (Eds.), The handbook for student
leadership development (2nd
ed.) (pp. 157-176). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Owen, J. E. (2012). Findings from the multi-institutional study
of leadership institutional
survey: A national report. College Park, MD: National
Clearinghouse for Leadership
Programs.
Rodgers, C. R., & Scott, K. H. (2008). The development of the
personal self and professional
identity in learning to teach. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-
Nemser, & K. E. Demers
(Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring
questions in changing
contexts (pp. 756-784). New York: Routledge.
Sachs, J. (2005). Teacher education and the development of
professional identity: Learning to be
a teacher. In P. M. Denicolo & M. Kompf (Eds.), Connecting
policy and practice:
Challenges for teaching and learning in schools and universities
(pp. 5-21). New York:
Routledge.
Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative
researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Schultz, K., & Ravitch, S. M. (2013). Narratives of learning to
teach: Taking on professional
identities. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(1), 35-46. doi:
10.1177/0022487112458801
Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1
APR 2017 RESEARCH
22
Seemiller, C. & Priest, K. P. (2015). The hidden “who” in
leadership education:
Conceptualizing leader educator professional identity
development. Journal of
Leadership Education, 14(3), 132-151. doi: 1012806/V14/I3/T2
Shankman, M. L., Allen, S. J., & Haber-Curran, P. (2015).
Emotionally intelligent leadership
(2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sikes, P., Measor, L., & Woods, P. (1985). Teacher careers,
crises, and continuities. London:
Falmer Press.
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social
identity theory. Social Psychology
Quarterly, 63(3), 224-237. doi:10.2307/2695870
Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future
of identity theory. Social
Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 284-297. doi:10.2307/2695840
Sutherland, L., Howard, S., & Markauskaite, L. (2010).
Professional identity creation:
Examining the development of beginning preservice teachers'
understanding of their
work as teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 455-
465. doi:
10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.006
Watson, S. (2006). Virtual mentoring in higher education:
Teacher education and
cyber-connections. International Journal of Teaching and
Learning in Higher Education,
18(3), 168-179. Retrieved from
http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/articleView.cfm?id=104
Author Biographies
Dr. Corey Seemiller ([email protected]) is a faculty member in
Organizational
Leadership at Wright State University. She has served as the co-
chair for the National
Leadership Symposium and the co-chair for the Leadership
Education Academy. Dr. Seemiller is
the author of The Student Leadership Competencies Guidebook
and Generation Z Goes to
College.
Dr. Kerry Priest ([email protected]) is an Assistant Professor in
the Mary Lynn and
Warren Staley School of Leadership Studies at Kansas State
University. Her scholarship
explores the intersections of leadership development and
engaged teaching and learning in higher
education, with a particular interest in identity development,
leadership pedagogies/high-impact
educational practices, and critical perspectives.
Copyright of Journal of Leadership Education is the property of
Journal of Leadership
Education and its content may not be copied or emailed to
multiple sites or posted to a listserv
without the copyright holder's express written permission.
However, users may print,
download, or email articles for individual use.
1
_____________________________________________________
_________________________
Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA
Journal of Scholarship and Practice
Fall 2015/Volume 12, No. 3
Table of Contents
Board of Editors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Sponsorship and Appreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Research Articles
Principal Preparation—Revisited—Time Matters . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
by Daniel Gutmore, PhD
Principal Concerns and Superintendent Support During Teacher
Evaluation Changes. . . . . . . . . . . . .11
by Mary Lynne Derrington, EdD and John W. Campbell, PhD
Commentary
School Administrator Quality in Minority-Serving Institutions .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .23
by Mariela A. Rodriguez, PhD; Carol A Mullen, PhD;
Tawannah G. Allen, EdD
Mission and Scope, Copyright, Privacy, Ethics, Upcoming
Themes,
Author Guidelines & Publication Timeline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .36
AASA Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
2
_____________________________________________________
_________________________
Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA
Journal of Scholarship and Practice
Editorial Review Board
AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice
2012-2015
Editors
Christopher H. Tienken, Seton Hall University
Ken Mitchell, Manhattanville College
Associate Editors
Barbara Dean, AASA, The School Superintendents Association
Kevin Majewski, Seton Hall University
Editorial Review Board
Albert T. Azinger, Illinois State University
Sidney Brown, Auburn University, Montgomery
Gina Cinotti, Netcog Public Schools, New Jersey
Brad Colwell, Bowling Green University
Sandra Chistolini, Universita`degli Studi Roma Tre, Rome
Michael Cohen, Denver Public Schools
Betty Cox, University of Tennessee, Martin
Theodore B. Creighton, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
University
Gene Davis, Idaho State University, Emeritus
John Decman, University of Houston, Clear Lake
David Dunaway, University of North Carolina, Charlotte
Daniel Gutmore, Seton Hall University
Gregory Hauser, Roosevelt University, Chicago
Jane Irons, Lamar University
Thomas Jandris, Concordia University, Chicago
Zach Kelehear, University of South Carolina
Theodore J. Kowalski, University of Dayton
Nelson Maylone, Eastern Michigan University
Robert S. McCord, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Barbara McKeon, Broome Street Academy Charter High School,
New York, NY
Sue Mutchler, Texas Women's University
Margaret Orr, Bank Street College
David J. Parks, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
University
George E. Pawlas, University of Central Florida
Dereck H. Rhoads, Beaufort County School District
Paul M. Terry, University of South Florida
Thomas C. Valesky, Florida Gulf Coast University
Published by
AASA, The School Superintendents Association
1615 Duke Street
Alexandria, VA 22314
Available at www.aasa.org/jsp.aspx
ISSN 1931-6569
http://www.aasa.org/jsp.aspx
3
_____________________________________________________
_________________________
Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA
Journal of Scholarship and Practice
Sponsorship and Appreciation
The AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice would like to
thank AASA, The School
Superintendents Association, in particular the AASA Leadership
Development Office, for its ongoing
sponsorship of the Journal.
We also offer special thanks to Christopher Tienken, Seton Hall
University, and Kenneth Mitchell,
Manhattanville College, for their efforts in selecting and editing
the articles that comprise this
professional education journal.
The unique relationship between research and practice is
appreciated, recognizing the mutual benefit to
those educators who conduct the research and seek out
evidence-based practice and those educators
whose responsibility it is to carry out the mission of school
districts in the education of children.
Without the support of AASA, Christopher Tienken and
Kenneth Mitchell, the AASA Journal of
Scholarship and Practice would not be possible.
4
_____________________________________________________
_________________________
Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA
Journal of Scholarship and Practice
Research Article
_____________________________________________________
_______________
Principal Preparation—Revisited—Time Matters
Daniel Gutmore, PhD
Faculty Associate
Department of Education Leadership, Management and Policy
Seton Hall University
South Orange, NJ
Abstract
There has been both a historic and continuing interest in the
preparation process for school
administrators (principals and vice principals). Much of the
literature has been critical of how school
administrators are prepared (Achilles, 1991; Hale and Moorman,
2003; Levine, 2005; Hallinger and
Lu, 2013). Although the length of time from graduation to
hiring was explored, little attention has
been paid to the satisfaction of graduates from principal
preparation and the number of years that
transpired from graduation to job placement. An unknown
outcome in the literature on principal
preparation programs is the impact of satisfaction in relation to
the length of time in securing an
administrative position. This article attempts to provide some
insight into the relationship.
Key Words
principal preparation, career satisfaction
5
_____________________________________________________
_________________________
Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA
Journal of Scholarship and Practice
Introduction
There has been both a historic and continuing
interest in the preparation process for school
administrators (principals and vice principals).
Much of the literature has been critical of how
school administrators are prepared (Achilles,
1991; Hale and Moorman, 2003; Levine, 2005;
Hallinger and Lu, 2013). In instances where the
process has been identified as positive, it has
been characterized as an outlier under the
definition of “exemplary programs” (Orr and
Orpanos, 2011; Taylor, Pelleties, Kelly,
Trimble, Todd and Ruiz, 2014).
An interesting phenomenon of the
preparation process that has not been examined
is the elapsed time from being prepared to
become a school administrator and satisfaction
with the preparation process. Unlike many
other professions, being prepared does not
necessarily result in securing a position.
Gahungu (2008), studying an Illinois
preparation program, noted that, from 1995 to
2005, of the 503 students graduated from the
program, only 168 of the certified candidates
had held administrative positions in public
schools by 2007. Bathon and Black (2010)
found in their study of Indiana principal
placement that 59% of all graduates find
employment as either principals or assistant
principals (soon after graduation).
Although the length of time from
graduation to hiring has been explored, little
attention has been paid to the satisfaction of
graduates from principal preparation and the
number of years that transpired from
graduation to job placement. An unknown
outcome in the literature on principal
preparation programs is the impact of
satisfaction in relation to the length of time in
securing an administrative position.
Literature Review
For the last twenty-five years, there has been
the realization that effective principals are an
important variable in school improvement
(Spillane, 2003).
In spite of that assertion, until relatively
recently little attention has been paid to the
preparation process and how schools of
educational administration have designed their
preparation programs (Achilles, 2004; Hale and
Morman, 2003; Levine, 2005). The focus has
been directed at four aspects of that process;
licensure, certification and accreditation,
principal preparation and professional
development (Beck and Murphy, 1996).
There has also been a concern that
preparation programs are too theoretical and
not grounded in administrative and leadership
reality (Murphy, 1992).
Another study identified several major
concerns: the admission process for prospective
students with some among the lowest standards
in the nation; the lack of clarity of purpose; the
absence of systematic self- assessment; the
absence of a coherent curriculum; a poorly
equipped professorate; a lack of attention paid
to clinical education and mentorship; research
that is detached from practice; and insufficient
funding (Levine, 2005). These areas are
similar to the observations of Achilles (1991);
Hale and Moorman,(2003) and Elmore (2000)
who added to the litany of concerns, the lack of
an agreed - upon knowledge base to guide the
preparation of school administrators.
6
_____________________________________________________
_________________________
Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA
Journal of Scholarship and Practice
On a parallel and connected path, there
has emerged a more substantive research base
regarding effective leadership practices related
to the principal.
One of the more compelling works is
that of Waters, Marzano and McNulty (2003)
who examined thirty years of research on the
effects of leadership on student achievement. In
their meta-analysis they identified two primary
variables that determine whether or not
leadership will have a positive or negative
impact on achievement: the focus of change or
whether there is a focus on improving practices
directly related to student achievement with an
understanding by the leader of the magnitude or
order of the change. They further identified 21
leadership responsibilities and associated
practices connected to student achievement and
organized them into a taxonomy of four types
of knowledge: experiential knowledge
(knowing why it is important), declarative
(knowing what to do), procedural (knowing
how) and contextual (knowing when).
Another theme has been to review
what principal preparation programs are doing
in response to the external criticism. Hallinger
and Lu (2013) found that the influence of
business practices has become more
pronounced with specific alignment to the role
of case studies and mentoring programs.
Peck and Reitzug (2012) identified
three management concepts that tend to
permeate many preparation program designs:
management by objectives, total quality
management, and turnaround restructuring.
There has also been greater focus on field
experiences and a direct connection to
authentic inquiry (Perez, Uline, Johnson,
James-Ward, and Basom, 2010). Providing
more direct in- school experiences, where
prospective candidates could apply the skills
and concepts learned in a classroom setting,
became a pivotal focus.
Recently there has been an attempt to
connect the role of the principal and their
preparation to student outcomes (Orr and
Orphonos, 2011; Donmoyer, Donmoyer and
Galloway, 2012)). Although much of the work
was focused on so-called "exemplary
programs" and the results were mixed, the fact
that there is now an attempt to determine if
there is a connection to student outcomes and
principal behaviors in connection with their
preparation program is a significant shift in the
direction of focus on principal preparation
programs.
There has also emerged a collective sense
that principal leadership is distributed and its
foundation rests on a base of expertise rather
than hierarchical authority (Camburn, Rowan,
and Taylor, 2003; Kochan and Reed, 2005).
Leadership is viewed from the vantage point of
interdependence and operates within both a
vertical and horizontal continuum depending on
the context organizational circumstances. The
implications of the new insights emerging
regarding leadership are that the profession is
nearing the foundation level for agreement on
what constitutes a knowledge base for the
preparation of school level administrators and
the potential for a unifying approach to that
process (Brown and Flanary, 2004).
Although much has been written about
principal preparation, it has focused on
satisfaction as determined by graduates or those
who retrospectively evaluate their programs
once they acquire an administrative position.
Other thematic areas are what programs are
doing to "better" prepare their candidates.
There has also been an attempt to connect
preparation to student outcomes. Missing from
the analysis is the relationship between the
7
_____________________________________________________
_________________________
Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA
Journal of Scholarship and Practice
length of time that elapses from exiting a
preparation program and acquiring an
administrative position and satisfaction by
graduates with the preparation process. An
unknown outcome in the literature on principal
preparation programs is the impact of
satisfaction and length of time in securing an
administrative position.
The Study
To determine if there was a relationship
between satisfaction with principal preparation
programs and the number of years that elapsed
from completing a preparation program and
securing an administrative position, a
structured questionnaire was developed and
sent to 1,583 principals in a northeastern state.
The list was from a database developed
by the state education agency and was current
for the school year 2014. The survey consisted
of a limited number (3) of questions asking
respondents to rate their satisfaction with their
leadership preparation program using a 5 point
Likert rating scale with 5 indicating
exceptionally prepared and 1 not prepared at
all. Respondents were asked to indicate the
length of time that elapsed from receiving their
degree and receiving an administrative
appointment with choices ranging from
immediately on graduation to more than five
years later. Respondents were also asked to
indicate the institution or program granting
them the degree. Two hundred sixty-seven
principals responded to the survey representing
fifty-seven universities and colleges providing
principal preparation programs.
The Results
Although 267 principals responded, the
response rate represents only 16% of the
population. Caution needs to be taken in the
conclusions that are drawn, given the low
return rate. Two hundred and sixty-seven is a
number that allows statistical analysis but may
represent a population that is not representative
of the study group. To determine the
significance of the relationship between
satisfaction and the number of years elapsing
between completion of a preparation program
and receiving a principal position, Spearman
rho (r) was applied to the tabulated results.
There are many cases where
dependency between two variables can be
observed but where the distribution is unknown
(Yamane, 1967; Creswell, 2012).
Nonparametric correlation coefficients provide
the ability to determine statistical significance
in such instances and, therefore, Spearman rho
(r) was the appropriate application. The
outcome revealed a .181 statistical significance
between satisfaction and appointment to an
administrative position either immediately on
graduating or 1 to 2 years later. The outcome is
statistically significant but relatively weak in its
strength.
Discussion
This study reveals a connection with
satisfaction with the preparation process and
the number of years it took actually to receive
an administrative position.
The sooner an administrative position
was secured, the greater the satisfaction.
Although caution is needed in generalizing
beyond the scope of this study, there are
implications for both future research and the
designs of principal preparation programs. In
terms of future research, a much wider survey
of graduates of principal preparation programs
would indicate the broader significance of time
as a variable in program satisfaction.
More importantly there is a policy issue
that needs to be addressed immediately. If there
are significant gaps between preparation and
8
_____________________________________________________
_________________________
Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA
Journal of Scholarship and Practice
administrative placement and graduates feel
less prepared, as a result, what can programs do
to address the issue? The response to this
question includes both ethical and social
responsibility implications.
Principal preparation programs within
this context need to go beyond just preparation
and graduation but meet the social
responsibility to address their graduate’s needs.
One possible solution is to allow all
graduates to attend any classes they feel a need
to attend as a refresher in developing skills
introduced in previous classroom settings.
These ‘refreshers’ should be at no cost to the
students but become a part of the social, ethical
and professional responsibility of the program
provider. The idea of “no cost” is not the
financial burden it may appear to be. The
refresher could be offered when existing
classes are in session. Students who need to be
refreshed sit in on the classes and participate in
the scope and demand for their specific needs.
A second programmatic response would
be to schedule low cost or no cost seminars in
areas that improve the management and
leadership skills of graduates and keep them up
to date on the research on best practices.
These seminars could be scheduled on
weekends to allow maximum participation.
Another implication of the study is the need to
provide counseling and support to graduates as
they enter the administrative marketplace. It is
not enough to merely graduate students but to
also facilitate the employment process.
Author Biography
Daniel Gutmore is a faculty associate at Seton Hall University.
He was a teacher and practicing school
and central office administrator for over 30 years, all in an
urban school setting. His areas of interest
are organizational theory, supervision of instruction, ethical
decision making and principal preparation
process. E-mail: [email protected]
mailto:[email protected]
9
_____________________________________________________
_________________________
Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA
Journal of Scholarship and Practice
References
Achilles, C. M. (2004). Change the damn box. In Educational
Leadership: Knowing the Way,
Showing the Way, Going the Way, edited by C. Carr and C.
Fulmer. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow
Education.
Achilles, C. M. (1991). Reforming educational administration:
An agenda for the 1990’s.
Planning and Changing 22: 23-33.
Bathon, J., & Black, W. (2010). Where do our graduates go? A
five-year exploration of the
regional distribution of principal preparation graduates.
NCPEA International Journal
of Educational Leadership Preparation, 6 (1), 1-22.
Beck, L. & Murphy, J. (1996). The four imperatives of a
successful school. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Corwin Press.
Brown, F., & Flanary, D. (2004). How many principal
preparation groups does it take to
screw in the light bulb? NCPEA Educational Review, 5, 2-3.
Camburn, E., Rowan, B., & Taylor, J. E. (2003). Distributed
leadership in schools: The case
of elementary schools adopting comprehensive school reform
models. Educational
Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 347-373.
Donmoyer, R., Donmoyer, J., & Galloway, F. (2012). The
search for connections across principal
preparation, principal performance, and student achievement in
an exemplary
principal preparation program. Journal of Research on
Leadership Education, 7 (5),
5-43.
Elmore, R. (2000) Building a new structure for school
leadership. The Albert Shanker Institute.
Gahungu, A. (2008). Is a principal certificate a passport to
salary enhancement or to
administrative positions in schools? NCPEA Connexions
Module. 1-16.
Hale, E., & Moorman, N. A national perspective on policy and
program innovation.
Washington DC: Institute for Educational Leadership;
Edwardsville, IL: Education
Research Council, 2003.
Hallinger, P., & Lu, J. (2013). Preparing principals: What can
we learn from MBA and MPA
Programs? Educational Management, Administration and
Leadership, 41, (4), 435-452.
Kochan, F. K., & Reed, C. J. (2005). Collaborative leadership,
community building and
democracy in public education. In The Sage Handbook of
Educational Leadership, Advances in
Theory, Research and Practice, edited by Fenwick W. English.
Thousand Oaks, California:
Sage Publication.
10
_____________________________________________________
_________________________
Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA
Journal of Scholarship and Practice
Levine, A. (2005). Educating school leaders. New York: The
Education Schools Project.
Murphy, J. (1992). The landscape of leadership preparation.
New York: Teachers College.
Orr, T., & Orphanos, S. (2011). How graduate level preparation
influences the effectiveness of school
leaders: A comparison of the outcomes of exemplary and
conventional leadership
preparation programs for principals. Educational
Administration Quarterly, 47 (18), 18-70.
Peck, C., & Reitzug, U. C. (2012). How existing business
management concepts become school
leadership fashions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48
(2), 347-381.
Perez, L. G., Uline, C. L., Johnson J. F., James-Ward, C., &
Basom, M. R. (2011).
Foregrounding fieldwork in leadership preparation: the
transformative capacity of authentic
inquiry. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47 (1), 217-257.
Spillane, J. P.(2003). Educational leadership. Educational
Evaluation and Policy Analysis 25,
343-346.
Taylor, R., Pelletier, K., Trimble, T., & Ruiz, E. (2014). Urban
school district’s preparing new
principals program 2008-2011: Perceptions of program
completers, supervising principals and
senior levels district administrators. NCPEA International
Journal of Educational
Leadership Preparation, 9 (1), 1-13.
Waters, T., Marzano, R. J., & McNulty, B. What 30 years of
research tells us about the effect of
leadership on student achievement. MCREL, 2003.
11
_____________________________________________________
_________________________
Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA
Journal of Scholarship and Practice
Research Article
_____________________________________________________
_______________
Principal Concerns and Superintendent Support During Teacher
Evaluation Changes
Mary Lynne Derrington, EdD
Assistant Professor
Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies
University of Tennessee
Knoxville, TN
John W. Campbell, PhD
Director of Curriculum and Instruction
Alcoa City Schools
Alcoa, TN
Abstract
Teacher evaluation is a major reform initiative in public
education’s high accountability policy
environment. Principals’ effective implementation of this high-
stakes reform is challenged by time
management, policy coherence, communication with teachers,
district support, and staff development
imperatives. Effective implementation requires moving beyond
time and management concerns
towards collaborative leadership with supervisors. Although
teacher evaluation policies are often state
initiated, local level superintendents and district leaders must
understand principals’ challenges to
provide useful guidance and support.
Based on a three-year study of a southeastern state’s Race to the
Top driven implementation of
redesigned teacher evaluation policies, this article examines
principals’ concerns and need for support
plus superintendent strategies for addressing gaps that state and
federal policymakers may leave during
such mandated reform. The Stages of Concern framework from
the Concerns-Based Adoption Model
(CBAM) was used to examine principals’ concerns and
superintendents’ support. Lessons learned and
implications for superintendents are described.
Key Words
teacher evaluation, leadership, CBAM
12
_____________________________________________________
_________________________
Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA
Journal of Scholarship and Practice
Principals, Reform of Teacher
Evaluation, and Need for Support
Implementing a new and more rigorous teacher
evaluation system presents new challenges to a
principal’s already complex job, particularly in
states and districts with redesigned
accountability policy mandates. Juggling
multiple demands and expectations (Honig and
Hatch, 2004; Leithwood, Strauss, & Anderson,
2007) principals are responsible for interpreting
and implementing policy designed from afar
and making it applicable, relevant, and
effective for their teachers (Datnow, Hubbard,
& Mehan, 2002; McLaughlin, 1987; Park &
Datnow, 2009; Spillane, Diamond, Burch,
Hallett, Loyiso, & Zoltners, 2002).
Consequently, principals are the critical link for
successful policy implementation (Datnow et
al., 2002). However, they require support as
they learn the details of new, more complex
policies and more demanding accountability
driven expectations.
This article, based on a longitudinal
study (Derrington & Campbell, 2015),
describes principals’ concerns during the
implementation of a new reform-driven teacher
evaluation policy. After years of infrequent
teacher evaluation and generally meaningless
consequences, principals were required to
quickly learn and implement a demanding,
high-stakes evaluation process. This study’s
results also describes superintendent supportive
actions in response to principals’ concerns
during teacher evaluation implementation.
New Evaluation Policies
In 2010, the state discussed in this article
received approximately one-half billion federal
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 
CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 

More Related Content

Similar to CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 

Swot analysis
Swot analysisSwot analysis
Swot analysis
Misbah Ishaq
 
Encouraging Your People to Take the Long View
Encouraging Your People to Take the Long ViewEncouraging Your People to Take the Long View
Encouraging Your People to Take the Long ViewCustomer Value Foundation
 
Encouraging Your People to Take the Long View
Encouraging Your People to Take the Long ViewEncouraging Your People to Take the Long View
Encouraging Your People to Take the Long ViewTotal CVM
 
Prepare a report on how you plan to approach.docx
Prepare a report on how you plan to approach.docxPrepare a report on how you plan to approach.docx
Prepare a report on how you plan to approach.docx
write31
 
Swot analysis-for-individuals
Swot analysis-for-individualsSwot analysis-for-individuals
Swot analysis-for-individuals
Begench Soyunov
 
leadership resourceTen steps to carrying out a SWOT analysisChris Pear (1).docx
leadership resourceTen steps to carrying out a SWOT analysisChris Pear (1).docxleadership resourceTen steps to carrying out a SWOT analysisChris Pear (1).docx
leadership resourceTen steps to carrying out a SWOT analysisChris Pear (1).docx
estefana2345678
 
Mtm10 white paper (enhanced) swot analysis
Mtm10 white paper   (enhanced) swot analysisMtm10 white paper   (enhanced) swot analysis
Mtm10 white paper (enhanced) swot analysis
IntelCollab.com
 
Hrm- Training Need Analysis
Hrm- Training Need AnalysisHrm- Training Need Analysis
Hrm- Training Need Analysis
Ebony Bates
 
ASB 100Spring 2019Writing Assignment 3In this assignme.docx
ASB 100Spring 2019Writing Assignment 3In this assignme.docxASB 100Spring 2019Writing Assignment 3In this assignme.docx
ASB 100Spring 2019Writing Assignment 3In this assignme.docx
randymartin91030
 
Swot analysis
Swot analysisSwot analysis
Swot analysis
Bhavanish Singh
 
Swot Analysis
Swot AnalysisSwot Analysis
Swot Analysis
Tseringodrub Gurung
 
Running Head Talent Acquisition and ManagementTalent Acquisitio.docx
Running Head Talent Acquisition and ManagementTalent Acquisitio.docxRunning Head Talent Acquisition and ManagementTalent Acquisitio.docx
Running Head Talent Acquisition and ManagementTalent Acquisitio.docx
toltonkendal
 
SWOT for Competitive Assessment
SWOT for Competitive AssessmentSWOT for Competitive Assessment
SWOT for Competitive AssessmentGaphor Panimbang
 
Chapter 2 advanced accounting one-1.pptx
Chapter 2 advanced accounting one-1.pptxChapter 2 advanced accounting one-1.pptx
Chapter 2 advanced accounting one-1.pptx
MohamedAbdi347025
 
Mktg305 Marketing Principles Group Project Assignment H.docx
Mktg305 Marketing Principles Group Project Assignment  H.docxMktg305 Marketing Principles Group Project Assignment  H.docx
Mktg305 Marketing Principles Group Project Assignment H.docx
raju957290
 
SWOT Analysis in Strategic Management
SWOT Analysis in Strategic ManagementSWOT Analysis in Strategic Management
SWOT Analysis in Strategic Management
Md. Shamsur Rahman Heera
 
Vc world business_planguide
Vc world business_planguideVc world business_planguide
Vc world business_planguide
digbyj
 
Induction Program Case Amway
Induction Program Case AmwayInduction Program Case Amway
Induction Program Case Amwayrajesh panda
 
Assignment 2 LASA 1 Business Unit Analysis Directions Cr.docx
Assignment 2 LASA 1 Business Unit Analysis Directions Cr.docxAssignment 2 LASA 1 Business Unit Analysis Directions Cr.docx
Assignment 2 LASA 1 Business Unit Analysis Directions Cr.docx
sherni1
 
It is important to be aware of the followingMission s
It is important to be aware of the followingMission sIt is important to be aware of the followingMission s
It is important to be aware of the followingMission s
TatianaMajor22
 

Similar to CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive  (20)

Swot analysis
Swot analysisSwot analysis
Swot analysis
 
Encouraging Your People to Take the Long View
Encouraging Your People to Take the Long ViewEncouraging Your People to Take the Long View
Encouraging Your People to Take the Long View
 
Encouraging Your People to Take the Long View
Encouraging Your People to Take the Long ViewEncouraging Your People to Take the Long View
Encouraging Your People to Take the Long View
 
Prepare a report on how you plan to approach.docx
Prepare a report on how you plan to approach.docxPrepare a report on how you plan to approach.docx
Prepare a report on how you plan to approach.docx
 
Swot analysis-for-individuals
Swot analysis-for-individualsSwot analysis-for-individuals
Swot analysis-for-individuals
 
leadership resourceTen steps to carrying out a SWOT analysisChris Pear (1).docx
leadership resourceTen steps to carrying out a SWOT analysisChris Pear (1).docxleadership resourceTen steps to carrying out a SWOT analysisChris Pear (1).docx
leadership resourceTen steps to carrying out a SWOT analysisChris Pear (1).docx
 
Mtm10 white paper (enhanced) swot analysis
Mtm10 white paper   (enhanced) swot analysisMtm10 white paper   (enhanced) swot analysis
Mtm10 white paper (enhanced) swot analysis
 
Hrm- Training Need Analysis
Hrm- Training Need AnalysisHrm- Training Need Analysis
Hrm- Training Need Analysis
 
ASB 100Spring 2019Writing Assignment 3In this assignme.docx
ASB 100Spring 2019Writing Assignment 3In this assignme.docxASB 100Spring 2019Writing Assignment 3In this assignme.docx
ASB 100Spring 2019Writing Assignment 3In this assignme.docx
 
Swot analysis
Swot analysisSwot analysis
Swot analysis
 
Swot Analysis
Swot AnalysisSwot Analysis
Swot Analysis
 
Running Head Talent Acquisition and ManagementTalent Acquisitio.docx
Running Head Talent Acquisition and ManagementTalent Acquisitio.docxRunning Head Talent Acquisition and ManagementTalent Acquisitio.docx
Running Head Talent Acquisition and ManagementTalent Acquisitio.docx
 
SWOT for Competitive Assessment
SWOT for Competitive AssessmentSWOT for Competitive Assessment
SWOT for Competitive Assessment
 
Chapter 2 advanced accounting one-1.pptx
Chapter 2 advanced accounting one-1.pptxChapter 2 advanced accounting one-1.pptx
Chapter 2 advanced accounting one-1.pptx
 
Mktg305 Marketing Principles Group Project Assignment H.docx
Mktg305 Marketing Principles Group Project Assignment  H.docxMktg305 Marketing Principles Group Project Assignment  H.docx
Mktg305 Marketing Principles Group Project Assignment H.docx
 
SWOT Analysis in Strategic Management
SWOT Analysis in Strategic ManagementSWOT Analysis in Strategic Management
SWOT Analysis in Strategic Management
 
Vc world business_planguide
Vc world business_planguideVc world business_planguide
Vc world business_planguide
 
Induction Program Case Amway
Induction Program Case AmwayInduction Program Case Amway
Induction Program Case Amway
 
Assignment 2 LASA 1 Business Unit Analysis Directions Cr.docx
Assignment 2 LASA 1 Business Unit Analysis Directions Cr.docxAssignment 2 LASA 1 Business Unit Analysis Directions Cr.docx
Assignment 2 LASA 1 Business Unit Analysis Directions Cr.docx
 
It is important to be aware of the followingMission s
It is important to be aware of the followingMission sIt is important to be aware of the followingMission s
It is important to be aware of the followingMission s
 

More from AlleneMcclendon878

Explain in your own words why it is important to read a statistical .docx
Explain in your own words why it is important to read a statistical .docxExplain in your own words why it is important to read a statistical .docx
Explain in your own words why it is important to read a statistical .docx
AlleneMcclendon878
 
Explain how Matthew editedchanged Marks Gospel for each of the fol.docx
Explain how Matthew editedchanged Marks Gospel for each of the fol.docxExplain how Matthew editedchanged Marks Gospel for each of the fol.docx
Explain how Matthew editedchanged Marks Gospel for each of the fol.docx
AlleneMcclendon878
 
Explain the degree to which media portrayal of crime relates to publ.docx
Explain the degree to which media portrayal of crime relates to publ.docxExplain the degree to which media portrayal of crime relates to publ.docx
Explain the degree to which media portrayal of crime relates to publ.docx
AlleneMcclendon878
 
Explain the difference between genotype and phenotype. Give an examp.docx
Explain the difference between genotype and phenotype. Give an examp.docxExplain the difference between genotype and phenotype. Give an examp.docx
Explain the difference between genotype and phenotype. Give an examp.docx
AlleneMcclendon878
 
Explain the history behind the Black Soldier of the Civil War In t.docx
Explain the history behind the Black Soldier of the Civil War In t.docxExplain the history behind the Black Soldier of the Civil War In t.docx
Explain the history behind the Black Soldier of the Civil War In t.docx
AlleneMcclendon878
 
Explain the fundamental reasons why brands do not exist in isolation.docx
Explain the fundamental reasons why brands do not exist in isolation.docxExplain the fundamental reasons why brands do not exist in isolation.docx
Explain the fundamental reasons why brands do not exist in isolation.docx
AlleneMcclendon878
 
Explain the difference between hypothetical and categorical imperati.docx
Explain the difference between hypothetical and categorical imperati.docxExplain the difference between hypothetical and categorical imperati.docx
Explain the difference between hypothetical and categorical imperati.docx
AlleneMcclendon878
 
Explain in 100 words provide exampleThe capital budgeting decisi.docx
Explain in 100 words provide exampleThe capital budgeting decisi.docxExplain in 100 words provide exampleThe capital budgeting decisi.docx
Explain in 100 words provide exampleThe capital budgeting decisi.docx
AlleneMcclendon878
 
Explain how Supreme Court decisions influenced the evolution of the .docx
Explain how Supreme Court decisions influenced the evolution of the .docxExplain how Supreme Court decisions influenced the evolution of the .docx
Explain how Supreme Court decisions influenced the evolution of the .docx
AlleneMcclendon878
 
Explain how an offender is classified according to risk when he or s.docx
Explain how an offender is classified according to risk when he or s.docxExplain how an offender is classified according to risk when he or s.docx
Explain how an offender is classified according to risk when he or s.docx
AlleneMcclendon878
 
Explain a lesson plan. Describe the different types of information.docx
Explain a lesson plan. Describe the different types of information.docxExplain a lesson plan. Describe the different types of information.docx
Explain a lesson plan. Describe the different types of information.docx
AlleneMcclendon878
 
explain the different roles of basic and applied researchdescribe .docx
explain the different roles of basic and applied researchdescribe .docxexplain the different roles of basic and applied researchdescribe .docx
explain the different roles of basic and applied researchdescribe .docx
AlleneMcclendon878
 
Explain the basics of inspirational and emotion-provoking communicat.docx
Explain the basics of inspirational and emotion-provoking communicat.docxExplain the basics of inspirational and emotion-provoking communicat.docx
Explain the basics of inspirational and emotion-provoking communicat.docx
AlleneMcclendon878
 
Explain how leaders develop through self-awareness and self-discipli.docx
Explain how leaders develop through self-awareness and self-discipli.docxExplain how leaders develop through self-awareness and self-discipli.docx
Explain how leaders develop through self-awareness and self-discipli.docx
AlleneMcclendon878
 
Explain five ways that you can maintain professionalism in the meeti.docx
Explain five ways that you can maintain professionalism in the meeti.docxExplain five ways that you can maintain professionalism in the meeti.docx
Explain five ways that you can maintain professionalism in the meeti.docx
AlleneMcclendon878
 
Explain security awareness and its importance.Your response should.docx
Explain security awareness and its importance.Your response should.docxExplain security awareness and its importance.Your response should.docx
Explain security awareness and its importance.Your response should.docx
AlleneMcclendon878
 
Experimental Design AssignmentYou were given an Aedesaegyp.docx
Experimental Design AssignmentYou were given an Aedesaegyp.docxExperimental Design AssignmentYou were given an Aedesaegyp.docx
Experimental Design AssignmentYou were given an Aedesaegyp.docx
AlleneMcclendon878
 
Expand your website plan.Select at least three interactive fea.docx
Expand your website plan.Select at least three interactive fea.docxExpand your website plan.Select at least three interactive fea.docx
Expand your website plan.Select at least three interactive fea.docx
AlleneMcclendon878
 
Exercise 7 Use el pronombre y la forma correcta del verbo._.docx
Exercise 7 Use el pronombre y la forma correcta del verbo._.docxExercise 7 Use el pronombre y la forma correcta del verbo._.docx
Exercise 7 Use el pronombre y la forma correcta del verbo._.docx
AlleneMcclendon878
 
Exercise 21-8 (Part Level Submission)The following facts pertain.docx
Exercise 21-8 (Part Level Submission)The following facts pertain.docxExercise 21-8 (Part Level Submission)The following facts pertain.docx
Exercise 21-8 (Part Level Submission)The following facts pertain.docx
AlleneMcclendon878
 

More from AlleneMcclendon878 (20)

Explain in your own words why it is important to read a statistical .docx
Explain in your own words why it is important to read a statistical .docxExplain in your own words why it is important to read a statistical .docx
Explain in your own words why it is important to read a statistical .docx
 
Explain how Matthew editedchanged Marks Gospel for each of the fol.docx
Explain how Matthew editedchanged Marks Gospel for each of the fol.docxExplain how Matthew editedchanged Marks Gospel for each of the fol.docx
Explain how Matthew editedchanged Marks Gospel for each of the fol.docx
 
Explain the degree to which media portrayal of crime relates to publ.docx
Explain the degree to which media portrayal of crime relates to publ.docxExplain the degree to which media portrayal of crime relates to publ.docx
Explain the degree to which media portrayal of crime relates to publ.docx
 
Explain the difference between genotype and phenotype. Give an examp.docx
Explain the difference between genotype and phenotype. Give an examp.docxExplain the difference between genotype and phenotype. Give an examp.docx
Explain the difference between genotype and phenotype. Give an examp.docx
 
Explain the history behind the Black Soldier of the Civil War In t.docx
Explain the history behind the Black Soldier of the Civil War In t.docxExplain the history behind the Black Soldier of the Civil War In t.docx
Explain the history behind the Black Soldier of the Civil War In t.docx
 
Explain the fundamental reasons why brands do not exist in isolation.docx
Explain the fundamental reasons why brands do not exist in isolation.docxExplain the fundamental reasons why brands do not exist in isolation.docx
Explain the fundamental reasons why brands do not exist in isolation.docx
 
Explain the difference between hypothetical and categorical imperati.docx
Explain the difference between hypothetical and categorical imperati.docxExplain the difference between hypothetical and categorical imperati.docx
Explain the difference between hypothetical and categorical imperati.docx
 
Explain in 100 words provide exampleThe capital budgeting decisi.docx
Explain in 100 words provide exampleThe capital budgeting decisi.docxExplain in 100 words provide exampleThe capital budgeting decisi.docx
Explain in 100 words provide exampleThe capital budgeting decisi.docx
 
Explain how Supreme Court decisions influenced the evolution of the .docx
Explain how Supreme Court decisions influenced the evolution of the .docxExplain how Supreme Court decisions influenced the evolution of the .docx
Explain how Supreme Court decisions influenced the evolution of the .docx
 
Explain how an offender is classified according to risk when he or s.docx
Explain how an offender is classified according to risk when he or s.docxExplain how an offender is classified according to risk when he or s.docx
Explain how an offender is classified according to risk when he or s.docx
 
Explain a lesson plan. Describe the different types of information.docx
Explain a lesson plan. Describe the different types of information.docxExplain a lesson plan. Describe the different types of information.docx
Explain a lesson plan. Describe the different types of information.docx
 
explain the different roles of basic and applied researchdescribe .docx
explain the different roles of basic and applied researchdescribe .docxexplain the different roles of basic and applied researchdescribe .docx
explain the different roles of basic and applied researchdescribe .docx
 
Explain the basics of inspirational and emotion-provoking communicat.docx
Explain the basics of inspirational and emotion-provoking communicat.docxExplain the basics of inspirational and emotion-provoking communicat.docx
Explain the basics of inspirational and emotion-provoking communicat.docx
 
Explain how leaders develop through self-awareness and self-discipli.docx
Explain how leaders develop through self-awareness and self-discipli.docxExplain how leaders develop through self-awareness and self-discipli.docx
Explain how leaders develop through self-awareness and self-discipli.docx
 
Explain five ways that you can maintain professionalism in the meeti.docx
Explain five ways that you can maintain professionalism in the meeti.docxExplain five ways that you can maintain professionalism in the meeti.docx
Explain five ways that you can maintain professionalism in the meeti.docx
 
Explain security awareness and its importance.Your response should.docx
Explain security awareness and its importance.Your response should.docxExplain security awareness and its importance.Your response should.docx
Explain security awareness and its importance.Your response should.docx
 
Experimental Design AssignmentYou were given an Aedesaegyp.docx
Experimental Design AssignmentYou were given an Aedesaegyp.docxExperimental Design AssignmentYou were given an Aedesaegyp.docx
Experimental Design AssignmentYou were given an Aedesaegyp.docx
 
Expand your website plan.Select at least three interactive fea.docx
Expand your website plan.Select at least three interactive fea.docxExpand your website plan.Select at least three interactive fea.docx
Expand your website plan.Select at least three interactive fea.docx
 
Exercise 7 Use el pronombre y la forma correcta del verbo._.docx
Exercise 7 Use el pronombre y la forma correcta del verbo._.docxExercise 7 Use el pronombre y la forma correcta del verbo._.docx
Exercise 7 Use el pronombre y la forma correcta del verbo._.docx
 
Exercise 21-8 (Part Level Submission)The following facts pertain.docx
Exercise 21-8 (Part Level Submission)The following facts pertain.docxExercise 21-8 (Part Level Submission)The following facts pertain.docx
Exercise 21-8 (Part Level Submission)The following facts pertain.docx
 

Recently uploaded

Cambridge International AS A Level Biology Coursebook - EBook (MaryFosbery J...
Cambridge International AS  A Level Biology Coursebook - EBook (MaryFosbery J...Cambridge International AS  A Level Biology Coursebook - EBook (MaryFosbery J...
Cambridge International AS A Level Biology Coursebook - EBook (MaryFosbery J...
AzmatAli747758
 
ESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdf
ESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdfESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdf
ESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdf
Fundacja Rozwoju Społeczeństwa Przedsiębiorczego
 
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptxChapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Mohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
 
PART A. Introduction to Costumer Service
PART A. Introduction to Costumer ServicePART A. Introduction to Costumer Service
PART A. Introduction to Costumer Service
PedroFerreira53928
 
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdfSectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
Vivekanand Anglo Vedic Academy
 
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxStudents, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
EduSkills OECD
 
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxInstructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Jheel Barad
 
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
EugeneSaldivar
 
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
Sandy Millin
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
Delapenabediema
 
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideasThe geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
GeoBlogs
 
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfThe Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
kaushalkr1407
 
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
beazzy04
 
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
Celine George
 
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfWelcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
TechSoup
 
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdfspecial B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
Special education needs
 
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with MechanismOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
DeeptiGupta154
 
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.pptThesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
EverAndrsGuerraGuerr
 
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumersBasic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
PedroFerreira53928
 
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech RepublicPolish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Anna Sz.
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Cambridge International AS A Level Biology Coursebook - EBook (MaryFosbery J...
Cambridge International AS  A Level Biology Coursebook - EBook (MaryFosbery J...Cambridge International AS  A Level Biology Coursebook - EBook (MaryFosbery J...
Cambridge International AS A Level Biology Coursebook - EBook (MaryFosbery J...
 
ESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdf
ESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdfESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdf
ESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdf
 
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptxChapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
 
PART A. Introduction to Costumer Service
PART A. Introduction to Costumer ServicePART A. Introduction to Costumer Service
PART A. Introduction to Costumer Service
 
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdfSectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
 
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxStudents, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
 
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxInstructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
 
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
 
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
 
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideasThe geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
 
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfThe Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
 
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
 
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
 
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfWelcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
 
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdfspecial B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
 
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with MechanismOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
 
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.pptThesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
 
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumersBasic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
 
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech RepublicPolish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
 

CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209Please create at least 3 substantive 

  • 1. CONFLICT DISCUSSION SPC 209 Please create at least 3 substantive posts. First, describe a conflict situation that you have experienced and evaluate your reactions. (This can be a conflict with a family member, friend, coworker, acquaintance, etc …) Consider questions such as: · Did you respond appropriately/civilly? · What Conflict Management styles were used? · How did the other person react and how did their reactions affect you? · If you could, would you have changed anything about the situation and or your reactions? · Was the outcome positive or negative? · What did you learn (About yourself, the other person/people)? · Has your communication behavior changed since this example? · Please then also post substantive responses to at least 2 classmates' posts. Please choose an example that is classroom appropriate. (One that you feel comfortable sharing with the class and that the class will feel comfortable reading.) (800 - 1000 words) The SPC 209 grading criteria explains expectations for discussion posts. It can be found under Course Materials/Content in the Introductory Materials module. Strengths Things your school does well. Aspects of your service that parents and pupils particularly like. Characteristics and/or activities that are unique to your school. Advantages of working in or using your school. Weaknesses
  • 2. Areas in which the school could be working much more effectively in, or things the school could be doing better. Things the school feels it lacks that it needs to have in order to improve. Opportunities Times, conditions, situations, resources, positions, external factors, people etc the school can use and take advantage of to improve its services. Threats External factors which could have a limiting effect on the school and its quality of services now or in the future.
  • 3. SWOT ANALYSIS TEMPLATE Craig Halls. MBA, LAT/ATC, CEES, Column Editor The SWOT Analysis: Simple, yet Effective Chadron B, Hazelbaker, ATC, CSCS, MPE • Gonzaga University A ATHLETIC THERAPY companies look to review past performance
  • 4. and move toward their future, a variety of analytical tools can be used to help clear the muddled load of information. What information does the company need to move forward? Is it a good time to expand? What challenges lie ahead? A SWOT analysis can be an effective tool to gather information and help the company determine its current situation and develop a clear path to move forward, SWOT is an acronym for the iriternal Strengths and Weaknesses of a firm and the environmental Opportunities and Threats facing it,' The SWOT analysis relies on the assumption that a firm's internal resources (strengths and weaknesses) and external situation (opportunities and threats) must match in order for it to develop an effective strategy, Goodstein and colleagues^ present the SWOT analysis as a step of the performance audit during the strategic planning for a company. In order for the company to know its current status, managers need to be aware of what is occurring internally and externally to effectively plan, manage, and lead the business in the most effective and efficient manner, Strenqths Identifying a company's internal strengths is the first important step of
  • 5. the SWOT analysis, A strength is a resource advantage relative to competi- tors and the needs of the markets that a firm serves or expects to serve,' It might appear to be simple or intuitive to recognize the strengths of a therapy setting, but it is easy for the picture to become cluttered with competitive drives and self-criticism. How often is the focus on promoting what is going well in the company versus what needs to be improved? Strengths need to be identified to help managers identify areas that are working, along with those that are not. Strengths need to be pro- moted (internally) and can be used as positive building points. Promote strengths and continue to build on them. Quite simply, do more of what is already being done well. Weaknesses A weakness is a limitation or deficiency in one or more resources or com- petencies relative to competitors that impedes a firm's effective perfor- mance,' Oftentimes, a true analysis ofthe weaknesses in an organization (D Z006 Human Kinetio - A H 11(6), pp, 53-55 ATHLETIC THERAPY TODAY NOVEMBER 2 0 0 6 1 5 3
  • 6. is difficult. Employees fear honest discussions about weaknesses because these are typically viewed as negatives. Some employees connect the negatives personally with their positions, and these individuals feel they are viewed as failures. This might be especially true in the athletic therapy setting, which is built on the treatment and rehabilitation of competitive and highly motivated clients. Weakness does not mean failure. By truly and hon- estly identifying the weaknesses in an organization or section of a company, managers can create plans to manage, control, change, or address the weak areas. If patients come into a clinic for an initial evaluation, but few return for follow-up care, somewhere along the line there is a weakness that needs to be addressed. Perhaps the athletic therapists are not communicat- ing to the patient or office staff the need for follow -up visits. Once this weakness has been identified the manager can work with the athletic therapists and office staff to improve communication, thus increas- ing return visits. Opportunities A company does not work simply within the walls of the office. There are numerous outside pressures that exist. With this in mind, one can conduct a SWOT analysis that not only includes the internal strengths and weaknesses but also will be used to examine the external opportunities and threats. These steps exam- ine the current business environment and attempt to predict the future in terms of competition, key trends, technology, staff availability, state and federal health-
  • 7. care regulations, and community economic issues. An opportunity is a major favorable situation in a firm's environment,' Opportunities are the areas where the business can provide needed services in the larger community. One example is the opportunity to grow. Economic growth in an area seemingly unrelated to athletic therapy services might produce external opportunities for a company to grow. For example, if a high-tech company moves to town, creating new jobs and economic growth, an athletic therapy company might reap the benefits by simply having more poten- tial patients or clients. The athletic therapy provider in the area might be ready for growth through new insur- ance contracts, a therapy contract for worker injuries, or even by opening a new clinic near the high-tech company to provide services the employees can easily access around their work schedules. Threats Identifying threats can help managers plan and better handle problems that arise, A threat is a major unfavor- able situation in a firm's environment,' Threats can be broadly based and difficult to identify but can be thought of in terms of "what if" in strategy-planning sessions. The human resources department might look at threats to hiring qualified staff. If there is a shortage of experienced sports-medicine professionals, how will the clinic respond if required to hire somebody within a short time frame? One suggestion is to develop "pool" or "on-call" staff, but even then a back-up plan needs to be in place.
  • 8. Threats can be treated as opportunities for change and growth. As challenges arise, a plan should be developed to address those challenges in a way that the company not only survives them but also grows and prospers. Conclusion Figure 1 illustrates how a SWOT analysis can be used to assist in strategic planning. Cell 1 is the most favorable, whereas Cell IV is least desirable, T^ble 1 summarizes the key components of each cell,' The SWOT analysis provides an ideal framework for managers because it is a simple yet accurate por- trayal of the firm. The best situation for a firm is to maximize strengths and opportunities while attempt- ing to minimize weaknesses and threats. The SWOT analysis is an important tool as managers in both large and small athletic therapy companies look to analyze their current operations while at the same time plan for the future. Resources for additional information regarding the SWOT analysis are located in the references cited at the conclusion of this article, as well as in the fol- lowing: • http://www,mindtools,com/pages/article/newTMC_ 05,htm#business • http://www,quintcareers,com/SWOT_Analysis,html (This provides an individual assessment through a SWOT analysis,) • Performing a SWOT Analysis (checklist), published
  • 9. by Chartered Management Institute • Bradford RW, Duncan PJ, T ̂ rcy B, Simplified Strategic Planning: A No Nonsense Guide for Busy People Who 5 4 1 NOVEMBER 2 0 0 6 ATHLETIC THERAPY TODAY Critical internal weaknesses Numerous environmental opportunities Cell 3: Supports a turnaround- oriented strategy Cell 4: Supports a defensive strategy C e l l l : Supports an aggressive strategy Substantial internal strengths
  • 10. Cell 2: Supports a diversification strategy Major environmental threats figure I SWOT-analysis diagram,' TABLE 1. KEY COMPONENTS OF THE CELLS IN THE SWOT ANALYSIS Cell Strategy Growth-oriented strategy. There are several opportunities and numerous strengths that encourage pursuit of those opportunities. Focus on strong resources and competencies to build long-term opportunities in more favorable product markets. Attempt to eiimihate iriternal weaknesses so as to more effectively pursue the market opportunity. Immediate strategies need to be implemented that reduce or redirect involvement in the products or markets examined through the SWOT analysis. Want Results Fast. Worcester, Mass: Chandler House Press; 2000, Column Editor's Note
  • 11. This article by Mr, Hazelbaker comes at an interesting time as HealthSouth recently announced plans to sell their outpatient therapy clinics,' It will be interesting to see what, if any, effect this will have on athletic trainers and their employment in therapy settings. As evident throughout this article, the SWOT analysis serves as an exceilent tool for athletic trainers who might seize the opportunity to explore a career in the outpatient rehabilitation setting, I References 1. PearceJA, Robinson RB Jr. Strategic Management: Formulation, Imple- mentation, and Control. 7th ed. New York, NY: Irwin McGraw- Hill; 2000. 2. Goodstein L, Nolan T, Pfeiffer JW. Applied Strategic Planning: How to Develop a Plan That Really Works. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; i993. 3. HealthSouth. Press releases page. Available at: http://www.healthsouth. com/medinfo/home/app/frame?2 = article.Jsp,0,081406_repositioning. Accessed August 20, 2006. Chadron Hazelbaker has worked for 8 years in outpatient physical therapy clinics in the inland Northwest in patient care and manage- ment. He is currently completing his PhD in leadership studies
  • 12. at Gonzaga University. ATHLETIC THERAPY TODAY NOVEMBER 2 0 0 6 1 5 5 Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1 APR 2017 RESEARCH 1 Leadership Educator Journeys: Expanding a Model of Leadership Educator Professional Identity Development Corey Seemiller, Ph.D. Wright State University Kerry L. Priest, Ph.D. Kansas State University Abstract There is a great deal of literature on leadership education best-
  • 13. practices (e.g., curricular considerations, teaching strategies, assessment of learning). Yet, to be a leadership educator is more than having knowledge or expertise of content and pedagogy. Perceptions, experiences, and values of leadership educators comprise a professional identity that is reflective of not only what leadership educators do, but also who they are and how they view themselves within the profession. This qualitative study builds on Seemiller and Priest’s (2015) Leadership Educator Professional Identity Development (LEPID) conceptual model by analyzing stories from participants of a professional leadership educator development experience. Leadership educators’ identity development reflected a consistent and linear progression through the identity spaces outlined in the LEPID model, and further can be viewed through three distinct dimensional lenses (experiential, cognitive, and emotional experiences). Additionally, leadership educator identities were shaped by a particular set of ongoing influences and critical incidents; the most prevalent incident was related to feelings of inadequacy in leadership expertise and competence. Findings from this study can inform educational programs and professional associations in efforts to train and develop leadership educators. Introduction Leadership education is considered a sub-field within Leadership Studies, which is the
  • 14. study of pedagogical practices that facilitate leadership learning (Andenoro et al., 2013). The term “leadership educator” may include a wide range of academic disciplines and professional practice, for example teachers (primary, secondary, and postsecondary), community educators, coaches, trainers, consultants, and student affairs professionals (“About ALE,” n.d.; “LEMIG,” n.d.). A common element across roles and contexts is a commitment to the development of leadership capacity of individuals, groups, organizations, and society. Within leadership education literature, the educator is often the intended audience, rather than the subject of research. As a result, educators themselves have become the “hidden who” in contemporary leadership education scholarship (Seemiller & Priest, 2015, p. 132). However, there is a small body of descriptive research exploring leadership educator demographics (Jenkins & Owen, 2016; Jenkins, 2012; Owen, 2012). Recently, Jenkins and Owen (2016) asked Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1 APR 2017 RESEARCH 2 the question, “Who teaches leadership?” to offer an emerging picture of those engaged in
  • 15. leadership education (p. 99). Comparing demographic data across both curricular and co- curricular contexts, their findings suggest there is a need to better understand the “multiple roles and identities of leadership educators” (Jenkins & Owen, 2016, p. 99). Beauchamp and Thomas (2009) assert that professional identity can be used as an analytic lens through which to examine influences on teaching beliefs and practices, and the ways educators explain or make sense of their professional lives. In this qualitative study, we used Seemiller and Priest’s (2015) Leadership Educator Professional Identity (LEPID) model as the lens to explore leadership educators’ identities as reflected through stories of their professional journeys. Two primary research questions guided the study: 1. What do leadership educators experience within spaces of leadership educator professional identity development? 2. What factors affect one’s leadership educator identity? Literature Review Usage of the term identity often varies in conceptual meaning and theoretical role (Stryker & Burke, 2000). Broadly, identity is defined as one’s
  • 16. “self-concept,” or the dynamic, multifaceted, multidimensional cognitive representations that one holds of his or her self (Markus & Wurf, 1987). Identity also refers to identification with social categories, groups, or relationships (Stets & Burke, 2000) or in association to multiple, specific roles (Stryker & Burke, 2000). Additionally, identity is considered a representation of shared language, conventions, codes, and values within a person’s socially, historically, and culturally situated experience (Cote & Levine, 2002). Identity has also been addressed within the leadership literature. Day, Harrison and Halpin (2009) define a leader identity as “a sub-identity that an individual holds regarding his or her role as leader” (p. 183). However, this self-view is not only related to formal leadership roles, but also “how an individual comes to think of oneself as a leader” (p. 183). The process of developing a leader identity was the focus of Komives, Owen, Longerbeam, Mainella, & Osteen’s (2005; 2006) grounded theory study and resulting Leadership Identity Development Model (LID). The LID model illustrates developmental influences on college students’ changing view of self in relation to others that shapes their broadening view of leadership (2006). Komives et al. (2005) suggest that understanding the process of leadership identity development is “central to designing leadership programs and teaching leadership” (p. 594).
  • 17. Given the importance of identity development in leadership education processes, this paper turns the focus from the student to the educator in order to understand how individuals come to think of themselves as leadership educators. Because the construct of leadership educator identity is not widely discussed in leadership studies literature, we looked to the similarly situated field of teacher education for insight into what professional educator identity is, and how professional educator identity is developed. Leadership educators are similarly situated to teachers in terms of job function; thus, teacher identity development studies can be useful and informative in their application to understanding leadership educator professional Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1 APR 2017 RESEARCH 3 identity. Beijaard, Meijer, and Verloop’s (2004) review of studies on teacher identity highlights a scholarly focus on the development of professional identity, characteristics of identity, and stories that (re)present professional identity. Across the research, they identified four common features that help to define teacher professional identity: (1) a dynamic, life-long learning process of interpretation and re-interpretation of experiences,
  • 18. (2) that implies both person and context, (3) consists of multiple sub-identities, (4) and involves agency; that is, teachers are active in the process of their professional development (Beijaard et al., 2004). Professional identity is more than taking on a teaching role or educator position; it is how one sees and names him or herself (self-perception), and is recognized and regarded by others (legitimization) (Danielwicz, 2001; Sutherland, Howard, & Markauskaite, 2010). For example, a person may identify as an aspiring teacher early in their career and then after gaining experience, identify as a practicing teacher (Danielwicz, 2001). Professional identity serves as “a framework for teachers to construct their own ideas of ‘how to be,’ ‘how to act,’ and ‘how to understand their work and their place in society’” (Sachs, 2005, p. 15). Yet, these identity constructions are “deeply connected to the communities in which they learn to teach and to their interactions with colleagues, students and families as they engage in learning pedagogical practice” (Schultz & Ravich, 2013, p. 37). Lave and Wenger (1991) and Wenger (1998) conceptualize professional identity development as a process of “becoming” within various communities of practice. Membership in a community of practice provides a set of relationships and standards of practice that define competence or expertise, and participation in those relationships and practices legitimizes and propels one’s trajectory of membership within the community (1998).
  • 19. Conceptual Framework. Our study positions the field of leadership education broadly as a community of practice, and assumes that participants are situated as members of multiple sub-communities within and outside of leadership education (e.g., professional associations, organizations, universities). Thus, their stories of experience offer insight into relationships and practices that have shaped their own process of “becoming.” Seemiller and Priest’s (2015) LEPID Model (Table 1) provides a conceptual framework to explore leadership educators’ professional identity and serves as the lens by which to examine stories of the professional journeys of leadership educators. Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1 APR 2017 RESEARCH 4 Table 1. Leadership Educator Professional Identity Development Model Identity Spaces (Seemiller & Priest, 2015) Identity Space Definition Examples Exploration The space in which an individual explores if, and to what extent,
  • 20. he or she might take on the professional identity of leadership educator. Participating in professional development to learn about leadership, reading leadership literature, volunteering to assist with leadership education experiences in addition to a main job role, and networking with leadership educators to learn more about and connect with the profession Experimentation The space in which one tries on parts, or all, of the leadership educator identity. Taking on a formal leadership educator role, getting an advanced degree that prepares one for the field of leadership education Validation The space in which one identifies as a leadership educator, yet engages in self- validation and/or seeks validation from others to maintain or enhance professional identity. Presenting at conferences, writing articles, or heading up a campus based leadership initiative Confirmation The space in which one guides less seasoned professionals in
  • 21. developing their leadership educator identities. Contributing literature to the field, taking on senior professionals roles, serving on editorial boards or reviewing proposals, serving on dissertation/thesis committees, teaching other leadership educators, or speaking at conferences The model also highlights influences that may impact how one moves and occupies identity spaces. Influences are ongoing factors that persist throughout an extended period of time and are not single events. Table 2 provides a description of these influences. Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1 APR 2017 RESEARCH 5 Table 2. Leadership Educator Professional Identity Development Model
  • 22. Influences (Seemiller & Priest, 2015) Type Description Personal Identities Personal identities, especially salient ones, including those related to race, class, gender, religion, sexual orientation, ability, etc. Personal Agency Personal agency (self-efficacy, confidence, or beliefs in one’s ability to succeed) as a leadership educator. Perceptions of a Leadership Educator Acting in accordance with one’s own definition of leadership educator. Expertise Expertise in leadership subject matter. Community of Practice Networks of peers who provide support, guidance, collaboration to others in or entering the field. Socialization Learning the values, norms, and culture of the
  • 23. profession in order to act in alignment with professional expectations. Context Campus culture, hierarchies, reporting lines, funding and staffing structures, and leadership. In addition to ongoing influences, critical incidents can play a role in leadership educator identity development. Critical incidents are “key events in an individual’s life … around which pivotal decisions revolve” (Sikes, Measor, & Woods, 1985, p. 58). Critical incidents may elicit internal questions that either confirm or challenge one’s leadership educator identity. Table 3 outlines each type of critical incident and associated internal questions. Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1 APR 2017 RESEARCH 6 Table 3. Leadership Educator Professional Identity Development Model Critical Incidents (Seemiller & Priest, 2015) Type Internal Question Commitment Does this identity suit me?
  • 24. Congruence Do my values match those of the identity? Credibility Do others believe I should have this identity? Competence Do I have the knowledge to execute this identity? Conflict Do people outside my professional identity legitimize my identity? Methods The assumptions of contemporary perspectives of identity (e.g., Rodgers & Scott, 2008) align with an interpretive inquiry paradigm: our realities are constructed through social interactions that are historically, politically, and culturally situated, and the understanding of reality is constructed through human perception and interpretation (Lincoln, Lynham, & Guba, 2011). As researchers, we acknowledge that we are simultaneously experiencing our own professional leadership educator identity journeys along wi th the participants. Our perceptions of ourselves, beliefs about leadership, and experiences as professionals in the field of leadership education have informed the study design, and also our interpretation and representation of the research. Data Collection. The study participants were attendees of a
  • 25. national professional development symposium for student affairs and faculty leadership educators. The symposium consisted of presentations, group discussions, activities, and a personal narratives project, which was the focus of this study. On the first day of the symposium, the symposium co-chair (also a lead investigator and author of the study), introduced the personal narratives project, which involved writing and sharing a story about paradigm shifting “a- ha moments” and/or experiences that have shaped participants’ leadership educator identities. The co-chair shared a personal leadership journey story to set the tone for what was expected. Participants were given 2.5 days to write a story that when read aloud would equal about five minutes in length. On the third day, participants shared and reflected on their final stories with a small group of their peers. Participants were not invited to participate in the study until after they had completed the entire activity to allow for authentic and pressure-free involvement. Those who consented to the study shared either their typed or handwritten stories with the co- chair. Photocopied stories were transcribed into text documents; all stories were then uploaded to NVivo for analysis. Individual stories ranged from two to four pages of single spaced text. Twenty-two of the 48 participants at the symposium consented to participate in the study. For the purpose of analysis, each participant was classified as one of four participant types based
  • 26. Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1 APR 2017 RESEARCH 7 on a certain set of criteria. New professionals (NP) included those with 0 to 2 years of professional experience in leadership, whereas emerging professionals (EP) included 3-7 years of experience and seasoned professionals (SP) included more than 7 years of experience. Career professional (CP) was a special classification for those who had more than 10 years of experience and a record of publications and/or extensive professional involvement. Because we included the criteria of publishing and/or professional involvement, not all participants with more than 10 years of experience were classified as career professionals and thus were deemed seasoned professionals. To confirm the appropriate classification for each participant, we used information provided in LinkedIn and/or institutional bios. In addition to their professional classifications, each participant was assigned a number for analysis and reporting (e.g. NP3 references New Professional 3, a specific individual). Participant information is outlined in Table 4. Table 4. Participant Information
  • 27. Participant Type Criteria Number New Professional (NP) 0-2 years experience 6 Emerging Professional (EP) 3-7 years experience 7 Seasoned Professional (SP) More than 7 years experience 4 Career Professional (CP) More than 10 years experience; publication record and/or professional involvement 5 Because participants’ stories reflected entire careers to date, we opted not to use information such as their current institution and geographic region for analysis. It is likely that over the course of their careers, participants worked at a variety of institutions and lived in multiple geographic areas. Data Analysis. Deductive content analysis (Cho & Lee, 2014; Klenke, 2008) was utilized to examine and categorize these stories through the LEPID model. We used a variety of collaborative analytical tools to prepare for and conduct coding, including note-taking, questioning, and drawing from personal experience to explore possibilities of meaning (Corbin & Strauss, 2008). Each researcher conducted initial coding on one story using an a priori coding
  • 28. schematic informed by the themes within the LEPID model. Codes are listed in Table 5. At the same time, we remained open to emergent codes as one aim of this study was to clarify and/or expand the LEPID model. Next, an NVivo query of interrater agreement was used as a basis for discussing codes and establishing interpretive convergence (Saldaña, 2009). The remaining stories were coded using a constant comparative approach (Glaser & Strauss, 1967), comparing data within each story and comparing codes and emerging themes across stories. Two additional codes emerged from the data: the Pre-Exploration space, which Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1 APR 2017 RESEARCH 8 included any leadership experiences prior to becoming a leadership educator and Opportunity as an Influence, which included opportunities to enter the professional field of leadership education (also noted in Table 5). We used interpretive and reflexive memoing, as well as peer debriefing (Corbin & Strauss, 2008) to ensure a trustworthy process (Lincoln & Guba, 1985), and thus expanding on the initial LEPID model.
  • 29. Table 5. Coding Scheme Identity Spaces Critical Incidents Influences *Pre-Exploration Exploration Experimentation Validation Confirmation Commitment Congruence Credibility Competence Conflict Personal Identities Personal Agency Perceptions of Leadership Educator Expertise Community of Practice Socialization Context *Opportunity *Emergent Codes Each story element from all 22 stories was coded by participant type to analyze for themes as a way to make meaning of who occupies particular identity spaces. Quotations from 18 of the 22
  • 30. stories are utilized to provide evidence of the findings in each theme as well as highlight participants’ own words describing their identity journeys. Results The analysis yielded three main findings, or themes: (1) Previous leadership experience plays a role in shaping leadership educator identities, (2) spaces of identity are multi-faceted and complex, and (3) (a) ongoing influences and (b) short-term critical incidents impact leadership educator identity development. Theme 1: Pre-Exploration Leadership Experience. All 22 participants noted their former leader experiences laid the groundwork for entering into leadership education as a profession. SP3 exemplifies this by saying, “Because of my career path (military) I focused on practice long before I ever tried to teach.” Leader experiences differed dramatically from holding a significant leader role to not getting a desired leader role. Participants discussed how their leader experiences shaped who they are and what they believe as leadership educators, resulting in their desire to create open access to leader experiences for students, correct mistakes they made as leaders, and give to students the opportunities they had or wished they had. These experiences are reflective of an emergent Pre-Exploration space in the LEPID model, which appears to be foundational for the participants before even
  • 31. becoming a leadership educator. Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1 APR 2017 RESEARCH 9 Theme 2: Complexity of Spaces of Identity. The identity spaces from the conceptual LEPID model were confirmed through the study; however, these spaces appear to include multiple dimensions that were not identified in the original model. The dimensions include: • Experiential: What do I do in each space? Participants’ administrative, operational, and applied experiences; • Cognitive: What do I know in each space? Participants’ perceptions around the concept of leadership; and • Emotional: How do I feel in each space? Participants’ feelings about being a leadership educator. In the following section, we use participant quotes to illustrate how these dimensions emerged within each of the identity spaces. Exploration Space. Exploration is the space in which an
  • 32. individual explores if, and to what extent, he or she might take on the professional identity of leadership educator. Experiential. In the Exploration space, two types of experiential experiences stood out that helped new leadership educators explore the profession. The first was having other leadership educators who inspired, motivated, encouraged, and even urged them into the profession. EP3 reflected on entering the field by saying, “After some soul searching and mentor conversations, I had an eureka moment! I could ‘help students,’ just like all of my mentors and professors helped me.” Second, exposure to leadership literature helped those exploring leadership education as a profession. CP4 reflected on the profound impact of discovering theories early in their career in saying: With a grounding in the relational leadership model and the 5 practices, I began to breathe more deeply. Burns. Bass. Hersey & Blanchard. Greenleaf. So many others. And then the point of no return: Wheatley, Rost and Heifetz. In quick succession I found my room in my new home. Cognitive. The cognitive dimension demonstrates the evolving perception of
  • 33. leadership. Those who are “new” appeared to search for black and white leadership answers, whereas those embedded deeply in the field appeared more okay with the ever- changing nature of leadership and an absence of an agreed-upon professional definition. Two new professionals commented on their desire to know more or have more answers about leadership. NP6 said, “Some days I get incredibly frustrated by the concept of leadership education, especially on days when I feel like I have more questions about leadership than certain answers.” And, NP2 said, “As a leadership educator I have a kindergarten vocabulary and I still find that I learn as much from my students, and they learn as much from each other, as they learn from me.” Emotional. Feelings emerged for many when entering the field of leadership education. These centered on being unsure about their career choice and seeing if the experience aligned with who they were and what they wanted. NP5 noted, “I decided to apply for a graduate teaching assistantship. I was interested in teaching; I wasn’t sure if it Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1 APR 2017 RESEARCH 10
  • 34. was my passion, but it was something I enjoyed, and perhaps something I would pursue as a career if it felt right.” Experimentation Space. Experimentation is the space in which one tries on parts, or all, of the leadership educator identity. Experiential. The experiential dimension of the Experimentation space was mostly focused around trying out a new leadership job, which SP1 wrote was “exciting and little scary at the same time” upon entering the field. There were a number of leadership educators who came into the field, left for another career path, and then returned. Others had a lengthy career in another occupation and came into their leadership educator roles later in their careers, and still others who were in their first professional leadership jobs right out of a graduate program at the time they were writing these stories. Cognitive. The Experimentation space was filled with comments from participants not questioning what leadership was and seeking answers like those in the Exploration space, but acknowledging how difficult it might be to get clear-cut answers
  • 35. about leadership. Many did not define leadership specifically. EP4 noted that leadership is “messy,” and EP6 believes that leadership is not “one size fits all.” Emotional. Stories in the Experimentation space reflected how participants felt about being a leadership educator. Many stories centered on being able to identify as a leadership educator after having previously done leadership development in other roles. So, it was not a matter of engaging in leadership education for the first time, but knowingly taking on a formal leadership educator role. EP6 noted: This journey is just beginning for me, but I want to start to add to the literature and research, empirically and quantitatively, what I have experienced throughout my leadership journey and what I have witnessed with many student experiences on a yearly basis at the college campuses I have worked at. Validation Space. Validation is the space in which one identifies as a leadership educator, yet engages in self-validation and/or seeks validation from others to maintain or enhance professional identity. Experiential. Those in the Validation space highlighted experiences with
  • 36. conferred leadership. SP2 wrote about an experience in confirmation in saying: One of my most profound moments when it occurred to me that I am a leader, and a leader who is getting noticed by others, was when [Organization] reached out, asking me to serve as the Regional Coordinator for the largest region in the association. Cognitive. Comments related to leadership in the Validation space, whether by participants who occupied the space at the time of writing their stories or those who reflected on being in this space at one point in their careers, reflected direct language from current models and theories, as if they had put forth what they had memorized from the literature. They used words such as contextual, inclusive, empowering, process- Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1 APR 2017 RESEARCH 11 oriented, and less positional to describe leadership. These terms are prevalent among a variety of contemporary leadership models, such as the Relational Leadership Model (Komives, Lucas, & McMahon, 2013) and Emotionally Intelligent Leadership
  • 37. (Shankman, Allen, & Haber-Curran, 2015). Emotional. The emotional dimension was prevalent with seasoned professionals in the Validation space who contemplated their feeling or belief that they were truly leadership educators. SP4 shared a view of self-validation in saying, “[I need] to accept that I don’t have it all figured out while still realizing that I can provide information of value.” Validation also came from others, as EP4 pointed out, “They [faculty members] were persistent, and I started to think of myself as an academic, or at least as someone who had the potential to become one.” However, some participants questioned what validation as a leadership educator might mean for them. For example, EP3 said: It took me a while to become comfortable with labeling myself as a leadership educator – I just have hesitations. Leadership educator as an identity inherently assigns me with authority, a position, and I would rather like to think I am a person, along for the ride, to learn from other while also imparting my wisdom. Confirmation Space. Confirmation is the space in which more seasoned professionals guide less seasoned professionals in confirming their leadership educator identities. Experiential. Many career professionals and some seasoned professionals
  • 38. discussed publishing, professional involvement, and about how they had connections to prominent leadership scholars. Cognitive. Both seasoned and career professionals shared views of leadership as far more complex than those in other spaces. Instead of just saying leadership was complex, they offered thoughts that reflected complexity. CP1 noted wanting to eliminate the words “leader” and “follower”, while SP3 highlighted the view that leadership can be both good or bad and that leadership definitions should focus on “inherent good vs. evil (wickedness, depravity, etc.).” Emotional. Some career professionals also discussed their own sense of self in which they had accepted who they were as professionals. CP1 commented about “feeling comfortable in my own skin,” whereas CP2 noted being at a place to “forgive myself for past leadership failings.” And CP4 noted that their leadership identity journey consisted of “finding my own way.” These individuals did not make reference to conferring others but about what it felt like to finally arrive as a leadership educator. Theme 3a: Influences on Identity Development. Influences are
  • 39. ongoing factors that play a role in one’s leadership educator identity development. For many participants, influences were not singular events, but perspectives, experiences, and external factors that continued over time. The LEPID model outlined seven influences on one’s professional identity including personal identities, personal agency, context, socialization, community of practice, perceptions of a leadership educator, and expertise (Seemiller & Pr iest, 2015). Data from this study revealed an additional category of influence, opportunity, indicative of opportunities to participate in Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1 APR 2017 RESEARCH 12 roles, experiences, and positions related to leadership education. Although leadership educators discussed all eight influences, the three prominent influences included expertise, opportunity, and community of practice. Expertise. First, many participants felt they did not have enough expertise to be a leadership educator, reflecting more than just a one-time incident in which a leadership educator would not be able to adequately answer a question in a
  • 40. particular situation. The lack of expertise is reflective of a deeper issue: the absence of training and preparation to adequately engage in leadership education as a profession. Not only did many participants feel they lacked training, they also did not know what they did not know, including where to find information. EP4 exemplified this feeling: And when I'd talk to colleagues about their experiences ... They seemed to have this unending knowledge that I was unaware of. Where should I find resources? Where could I find the time to become as knowledgeable as my colleagues seemed to be? Another issue related to expertise is the seemingly never-ending cycle of knowledge. Once a participant would feel armed with content, he or she would realize that there was so much more to know. NP3 said, “It is the classic case of the more you know, the more you actually realize you don’t know.” EP7 added that every time they tried to learn more about leadership, they would become "an expert once again, of a wide breadth of leadership knowledge but soon came to realize it was lacking depth.” The leadership educators who were deemed as campus experts by others felt the pressure to be the institutional leadership authority, even if they did not believe they had the expertise.
  • 41. EP3 wrote, “I was the only person on a campus of 2,000 students doing leadership programs for ‘10 hours’ a week with no leadership knowledge.” And EP4 added: People referred to me as the "expert" on campus ... When in reality I was the person with limited leadership experience and some opportunities for professional development in the area ... I had limited experience, while everyone else had none. In short, I was the best- case scenario in an already bleak leadership picture. Opportunity. Another ongoing influence that impacted individuals’ leadership educator journeys was simply an opportunity to be a leadership educator. Although opportunity may appear to be a critical incident (for example, a job opened, someone took it, and that person was now a leadership educator), many did not experience opportunity in such a linear or defined way. Opportunity was described more as ongoing experiences in which educators veered down different career paths to eventually get to their present position or role. This was evident when participants indicated that they did not initially set out to be leadership educators. There were alternate paths or opportunities that presented themselves to these individuals; and for personal and/or professional reasons, they went down a new career path. SP3 noted, “Becoming a leadership educator was never an explicit end goal.”
  • 42. Participants described their professional journeys as fluid. Rather than a moment of calling, their path to becoming a leadership educator grew over time. NP4 said: Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1 APR 2017 RESEARCH 13 I know there was not one moment when I actively chose to become a leadership educator or a student affairs professional or to do leadership work. I can’t tell you about the weather that day, or who was with me, or the revelatory thoughts that accompanied this professional and personal declaration. Some participants discussed seeking out opportunities to do leadership education, often by holding other jobs in student affairs and then volunteering to staff leadership events. Having volunteered at leadership events, some individuals liked the leadership work better than their “real jobs” and moved over to more prominent roles in leadership education. CP3 indicated: Because we always needed extra staff at retreats, I assisted with them in my free time. It gave me more opportunities to learn how to be a more effective
  • 43. leader and think about how to teach skills and concepts to other. Community of Practice. The data confirmed that the presence of a community of practice was influential to the participants’ leadership educator identity journeys. Peers, both on and off campus, were identified as providing a network of support, being especially true for seasoned and career professionals who discussed specifically the value of having mentors at the onset of their careers. CP3 discussed the importance of mentorship in saying: I worked with two women who both were/are awesome mentors and had a great influence on me … They both made certain to introduce me to others in the field of student affairs and, particularly, to those doing leadership education. These women are still my mentors to this day. These mentoring relationships contributed to a sense of belonging in the field and influenced participants’ perspectives of themselves and on professional practice. CP1 recalled how a mentor ignited passion: “[My mentor] helped me to turn my begrudging yes to teach leadership to a passion for leadership development and teaching leadership. I am forever indebted to him.” Finally, mentoring was not just seen as being helped by those with more experience. Mentoring was a way to ensure the sustainability of the profession and
  • 44. professional development. SP1 put it as “I’m sort of intimidated by those who have been studying leadership for years but also inspired to walk in their footsteps.” Theme 3b: Critical Incidents in Identity Development. Critical incidents also play a role in the identity development journeys of leadership educators. Although there were some instances of critical incidents that were positive and led to the support or confirmation of participants as leadership educators, overwhelmingly their stories reflected incidents that challenged them to re-think if they should be in the profession at all. Participants identified examples of all types of critical incidents from the LEPID model, however incidents related to competence were overwhelmingly the most prevalent. Competence. By far, the primary critical incident participants identified was a fear of being found out – that their students and/or colleagues would discover or realize that they were not competent to be in leadership education (whether that was true or not). Many of the examples related to competence were reflective of critical incidents that had not yet occurred; rather, the Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1 APR 2017 RESEARCH
  • 45. 14 leadership educators feared they might occur. Participants made reference to the fear and anxiety of being found out to be a fraud. The feeling of incompetence was apparent especially with less seasoned professionals as evidenced by comments such as EP1 saying, “I … suffered a bit from imposter syndrome. Always waiting on someone to call me out because I wasn't actually a leadership person.” NP5 wrote, “I am supposed to be a ‘master’ of this thing we call leadership, so I better fake it till I make it, I suppose!” And EP4 shared, “When would they figure out that I was an impostor? When would they figure out that I didn't have all of the answers, and sometimes didn't understand where others were getting theirs?” When more seasoned leadership educators reflected back on their journeys, they also pointed out the feelings of incompetence they had as newer professionals. CP1 noted, “What in the world did I know about leadership that gave me the ‘authority’ to be teaching this stuff?” Discussion In pursuit of our research questions of (1) What do leadership educators experience within spaces of leadership educator professional identity development?, and (2) What factors affect one’s leadership educator identity?, we were able to examine and confirm an existing
  • 46. professional identity development model for leadership educators (LEPID model). Yet, what emerged was far more complex and robust than initially envisioned. Through qualitative analysis, we uncovered additional components of leadership educator identity, resulting in a more holistic understanding of identity spaces and discernment about the impact of experiences on one’s professional identity development. Role of Leader in Leadership Educator. Not one leadership educator commented on their professional journey without reflecting on their prior leadership experience. Most discussed the impact of holding a leadership role or being conferred by others as a leader, while some also described failing as a leader. These leadership experiences served as a foundation to their identities as leadership educators. Our findings suggest a need to further explore the relationship between leader identity development and leadership education professional identity development. The leadership educator role is unique, as other types of educators may not readily shape their professional identities around the content area they teach, such as a math teacher also identifying as a mathematician. Understanding the intersection between leader identity and leadership educator professional identity is critical in the sense that leadership educators’ experiences as a leader may affect how they view and teach leadership. Complexity of Identity Spaces. One of the study’s initial aims
  • 47. involved the application of the LEPID model to stories shared by leadership educators about their professional journeys to discern the extent of the model’s accuracy. We found that the lived experiences of the participants reflected the proposed spaces of identity development, and the findings demonstrated a need to add complexity, resulting in three dimensions that define each space. Table 6 includes the updated LEPID model that incorporates dimensionality into identity spaces. Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1 APR 2017 RESEARCH 15 Table 6. Updated Leadership Educator Professional Identity Development Model Identity Space Definition Experiential: What do I do? Emotional: How do I feel? Cognitive: What do I know? Exploration:
  • 48. Will it fit for me? The space in which an individual explores if, and to what extent, he or she might take on the professional identity of leadership educator. Participating in professional development to learn about leadership, reading leadership literature, volunteering to assist with leadership education experiences in addition to a main job role, and networking with leadership educators to learn more about and connect with the profession. Feeling unsure about leadership
  • 49. education as a career, questioning whether leadership education could be a passion. Searching for black and white answers about what leadership is, trying to clarify an understanding of the ever-changing nature of leadership and an absence of an agreed- upon professional definition. Experimentatio n: Does it fit for me? The space in which one tries on parts, or all, of the leadership educator identity. Taking on a formal leadership educator role, getting an advanced degree that
  • 50. prepares one for the field of leadership education. Naming one’s own professional identity as a leadership educator, especially for those having done leadership education without calling it leadership education. Acknowledging how difficult it might be to get clear-cut answers about what leadership is. Validation: Do others think it fits? The space in which one identifies as a leadership educator, yet engages in self-validation
  • 51. and/or seeks validation Presenting at conferences, writing articles, or heading up a campus based leadership initiative. Contemplating the feeling or belief that one is truly a leadership educator, engaging in behaviors of self-validation Using existing models and theories to come to an understanding of what leadership is. Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1 APR 2017 RESEARCH 16 from others to maintain or enhance
  • 52. professional identity. or seeking validation from others to confirm one’s leadership educator identity. Confirmation: How do I validate others? The space in which one guides less seasoned professionals in developing their leadership educator identities. Contributing literature to the field, taking on senior professional roles, serving on editorial boards or reviewing proposals, serving on dissertation/thesis committees, teaching other leadership
  • 53. educators, or speaking at conferences. Feeling a sense of self- acceptance as a leadership educator and passing that to others. Offering views and perspectives of leadership that reflect complex thinking about leadership. The complexity of spaces provides a robust framework with which to better understand elements of leadership educator professional identity development and anticipate professional development needs of both individual educators and the broader leadership education community of practice. Battey and Franke (2008) point out that professional identity informs both the skills one seeks to develop and ultimately informs professional practice. By helping leadership educators understand the identity development process and the spaces they occupy, they may be able to better make meaning of their professional identities. It can be validating to put a name on an experience and realize that one is not alone in thinking or
  • 54. feeling certain ways throughout the professional journey. There is also an underlying assumption that moving toward the Confirmation space could lead to more complex thinking, effective practice, and a greater feeling of self-worth as a professional as evidenced by the seasoned and career professionals in this study occupying the Confirmation space. New and emerging professionals may benefit from seeking out experiences that advance their professional perspectives and intentionally move them on a trajectory towards the Confirmation space. Process for Identity Development. There are four identity spaces of the LEPID model, each with three dimensions. The complexity of identity challenges the notion that there is a direct route for identity development and that somehow one always brings their whole self from space to space. It is possible that leadership educators could occupy different dimensions and spaces of professional identity simultaneously. For example, an educator may be advanced in terms of content knowledge about leadership (Cognitive dimension for the Validation space) but novice in Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1 APR 2017 RESEARCH
  • 55. 17 terms of holding a role of leadership educator (Experiential dimension for the Experimentation space). Despite the fluidity that can be present across spaces and dimensions, many participants’ stories in this study demonstrated alignment by occupying all dimensions of the same identity space at the same time based on their professional experience. For example, most new professionals’ stories reflected the Experiential, Cognitive, and Emotional dimensions associated with the Exploration space, whereas more seasoned professionals reflected all three dimensions associated with the Validation and Confirmation spaces. Our findings indicate that leadership educator identity development is likely a multi-dimensional linear process in which one moves from Exploration to Confirmation. This relatively linear projection can be informative for institutions, organizations, and associations in creating professional development opportunities that help advance new and emerging leadership educators through the identity spaces. Lack of Training and Expertise. Expertise is implicit to one’s professional identity (Kogan, 2000). Given that both expertise as an ongoing influence and competence as a critical incident were discussed among participants more than any other
  • 56. component related to professional identity, it appears that many of these educators have not felt prepared or knowledgeable enough to teach students to be effective leaders. Nearly all participants pointed out that they received little to no training in leadership education, yet were thrust into a role in which they had to serve as leadership educators, especially early in their careers. Many suffered from the imposter syndrome (Clance & Imes, 1978), and approached their roles in a “fake it till you make it” manner. But, under that facade, they feared being found out by colleagues, students, or administrators that they were somehow not qualified to be teaching leadership. The fear of being found out only added to their already existent internal questioning of their ability to effectively teach leadership to begin with. Although fear and doubt can be part of the professional developmental process, it is critical to help leadership educators move beyond their fear to develop the competence and confidence that can contribute to both effective teaching and advancing in their professional identity development. Expertise has been linked to higher quality level of explaining information and clarifying misinterpretations of content with students (Beijaard, Verloop, & Vermunt, 2000), greater confidence to execute identity related tasks (Seemiller & Priest, 2015), and a greater connection to the profession (Kogan, 2000). Some strategies for enhancing expertise and competence include (1) increasing access to
  • 57. resources such as lesson plans, curriculum, and best practices, (2) providing training in both leadership content and high-impact practices and pedagogy for leadership development, and (3) fostering connections with other professionals for networking and idea sharing. Mentoring as Vital to Identity Development. The importance of mentors in the professional lives of leadership educators was also highlighted by the findings. Mentors included former faculty members, colleagues, as well as more established professionals in the field. The seasoned and career professionals connected mentorship with what propelled them, guided them, and supported them in their careers. This finding is not surprising, as mentoring can provide great benefits for those being mentored such as increasing one’s capacity to face new challenges and increasing one’s effectiveness (Holloway, 2001) and proficiency (Kilburg & Hockett, 2007; Watson, 2006). Yet, finding a mentor can be a complex and challenging process, especially Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1 APR 2017 RESEARCH 18 being the only leadership educator on a campus or not being connected to seasoned or career professionals from other institutions. Rather than relying on an
  • 58. organic mentorship process to hopefully emerge, offering formal mentoring programs through professional associations can expand access to mentors and help foster connections. In addition, hosting role-specific communities of practice (e.g., a community solely for online academic educators, student affairs professionals, or corporate trainers) can help leadership educators make meaningful connections with others who do similar work. Limitations Because we sought to confirm Seemiller and Priest’s (2015) LEPID model, we used an a priori coding scheme. Although we remained open to emergent data (as demonstrated in Table 6), we encourage others to engage in research using the LEPID model so as to have an external and comparative understanding of its accuracy. Second, the methodology was qualitative in nature and involved extensive storytelling. Using qualitative data provided depth in understanding participants’ experiences, but also required utilizing subjectivity in interpreting and assigning elements of stories to pre-existing components of the LEPID model. Finally, the sample size was small and included professionals who sought out a professional development experience. It is assumed that the participants represented voices of engaged and connected educators with a motivation to develop. This may have excluded perspective of individuals who
  • 59. are unsure in their career selection, or do not have access to or interest in professional development. Future Research Based on the findings, we suggest areas of future research. First, leadership educators are balancing multiple identities, so leadership educator professional identity is likely one of many other personal and professional identities. Better understanding of intersecting identities may offer insight into structures of support or barriers to advancement as a professional leadership educator. Second, professionals are likely navigating the balance between public identities and private identities. Who they let others see or believe they are may very well be different than how they see themselves. Future research could unveil intersections in how leadership educators see themselves and how they portray themselves to others. Third, the current study showcased participants’ past or current occupation of identity spaces, but not movement between spaces. To better understand how leadership educator identity development works, it will be critical to further examine the transition between spaces and how educators move from space to space. Finally, utilizing additional methodologies to study leadership educator identity is recommended to further explore
  • 60. these topics. Analysis of participants’ stories provided a foundation for the exploration of the LEPID model; however, using other qualitative or quantitative methodologies could be useful in expanding upon the research. Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1 APR 2017 RESEARCH 19 Conclusion Our findings support and enhance Seemiller and Priest’s (2015) LEPID model. Understanding leadership educator professional identity has benefits for leadership educators, their students, and the field of leadership education. Professional associations, institutions, and organizations can develop more communities of practice that engage and support new professionals, create more opportunities for resource sharing, build formalized professional mentoring programs, and offer more professional development opportunities that help move leadership educators through the spaces and dimensions of the LEPID model. Developing the capacity of leadership educators, especially new and emerging leadership educators, may not
  • 61. only assist in their individual professional identity development but could also result in developing more confident, competent, and effective leadership educators for the profession as a whole. References About ALE. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://leadershipeducators.org/ Andenoro, A. C., Allen, S. J., Haber-Curran, P., Jenkins, D. M., Sowcik, M., Dugan, J. P., & Osteen, L. (2013). National leadership education research agenda 2013‐ 2018: Providing strategic direction for the field of leadership education. Retrieved from http://www.leadershipeducators.org/ResearchAgenda Battey, D. & Franke, M. L. (2008). Transforming identities: Understanding teachers across professional development and classroom practice. Teacher Education Quarterly, 127- 149. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ831720.pdf Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’
  • 62. professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 107- 128. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001 Beijaard, D., Verloop, N., & Vermunt, J. D. (2000). Teachers' perceptions of professional identity: an exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 749-764. doi: 10.1016/s0742- 051x(00)00023-8 Cho, J. Y. & Lee, E. H. (2014). Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences. The Qualitative Report, 19(64), 1-20. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR19/cho64.pdf Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 15(3), 241-247. doi: 10.1037/h0086006 http://www.leadershipeducators.org/ResearchAgenda http://www.leadershipeducators.org/ResearchAgenda Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1
  • 63. APR 2017 RESEARCH 20 Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Cote, J. E., & Levine, C. G. (2002). Identity formation, agency, and culture: Social psychological synthesis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Danielwicz, J. (2001). Teaching selves: Identity, pedagogy, and teacher education. Albany: State University of New York Press. Day, D. V., Harrison, M. M., & Halpin, S. M. (2009). An integrative approach to leader development: Connecting adult development, identity, and expertise. New York, NY: Psychology Press. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction Holloway, J. H. (2001). The benefits of mentoring. National Education Association. Retrieved
  • 64. from https://archive.is/1jloY Jenkins, D. M. (2012). Exploring signature pedagogies in undergraduate leadership education. Journal of Leadership Education, 11(1), 1-27. doi: 10.12806/v11/i1/rf1 Jenkins, D. M., & Owen, J. E. (2016). Who teachers leadership? A comparative analysis of faculty and student affairs leadership educators and implications for leadership learning. Journal of Leadership Education, 15(2), 99-113. doi: 1012806/V15/I2/R1 Kilburg, G. & Hockett, E. (2007). E-mentoring: Providing support for teacher education graduates in their first year of teaching. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (pp. 2021-2025). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Klenke, K. (2008). Qualitative research in the study of leadership. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing. Kogan, M. (2000). Higher education communities and academic identity. Higher Education
  • 65. Quarterly, 54(3), 207–216. doi: 10.1111/1468-2273.00156 Komives, S. R., Lucas, N., & McMahon, T. R. (2013). Exploring leadership: For college students who want to make a difference (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Komives, S. R., Dugan, J. P., Owen, J. E., Slack, C., & Wagner, W. (2011). The handbook for student leadership development (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass. Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1 APR 2017 RESEARCH 21 Komives, S. R., Owen, J. E., Longerbeam, S. D., Mainella, F. C., & Osteen, L. (2005). Developing a leadership identity: A grounded theory. Journal of College Student Development, 46, 593-611. doi: 10.1353/csd.2005.0061 Komives, S. R.. Longerbeam, S. D., Owen, J. E., Mainella, F. C.; Osteen, L. (2006). A Leadership identity development model: Applications from a grounded theory. The Journal of College Student Development, 47(4), 401-418. doi: 10.1353/csd.2006.0048
  • 66. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press. Leadership Education Member Interest Group (LEMIG) (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.ila-net.org/Communities/MIGs/Education.htm Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 97-128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Lincoln, YS. & Guba, EG. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.001503 Munin, A., & Dugan, J. P. (2011). Inclusive design. In S. R. Komives, J. P. Dugan, J. E. Owen, C. Slack, & W. Wagner (Eds.), The handbook for student leadership development (2nd ed.) (pp. 157-176). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Owen, J. E. (2012). Findings from the multi-institutional study of leadership institutional
  • 67. survey: A national report. College Park, MD: National Clearinghouse for Leadership Programs. Rodgers, C. R., & Scott, K. H. (2008). The development of the personal self and professional identity in learning to teach. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman- Nemser, & K. E. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (pp. 756-784). New York: Routledge. Sachs, J. (2005). Teacher education and the development of professional identity: Learning to be a teacher. In P. M. Denicolo & M. Kompf (Eds.), Connecting policy and practice: Challenges for teaching and learning in schools and universities (pp. 5-21). New York: Routledge. Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Schultz, K., & Ravitch, S. M. (2013). Narratives of learning to teach: Taking on professional identities. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(1), 35-46. doi: 10.1177/0022487112458801
  • 68. Journal of Leadership Education DOI: 1012806/V16/I2/R1 APR 2017 RESEARCH 22 Seemiller, C. & Priest, K. P. (2015). The hidden “who” in leadership education: Conceptualizing leader educator professional identity development. Journal of Leadership Education, 14(3), 132-151. doi: 1012806/V14/I3/T2 Shankman, M. L., Allen, S. J., & Haber-Curran, P. (2015). Emotionally intelligent leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Sikes, P., Measor, L., & Woods, P. (1985). Teacher careers, crises, and continuities. London: Falmer Press. Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224-237. doi:10.2307/2695870 Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 284-297. doi:10.2307/2695840 Sutherland, L., Howard, S., & Markauskaite, L. (2010). Professional identity creation: Examining the development of beginning preservice teachers' understanding of their
  • 69. work as teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 455- 465. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.006 Watson, S. (2006). Virtual mentoring in higher education: Teacher education and cyber-connections. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18(3), 168-179. Retrieved from http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/articleView.cfm?id=104 Author Biographies Dr. Corey Seemiller ([email protected]) is a faculty member in Organizational Leadership at Wright State University. She has served as the co- chair for the National Leadership Symposium and the co-chair for the Leadership Education Academy. Dr. Seemiller is the author of The Student Leadership Competencies Guidebook and Generation Z Goes to College. Dr. Kerry Priest ([email protected]) is an Assistant Professor in the Mary Lynn and Warren Staley School of Leadership Studies at Kansas State University. Her scholarship explores the intersections of leadership development and engaged teaching and learning in higher education, with a particular interest in identity development,
  • 70. leadership pedagogies/high-impact educational practices, and critical perspectives. Copyright of Journal of Leadership Education is the property of Journal of Leadership Education and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. 1 _____________________________________________________ _________________________ Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice Fall 2015/Volume 12, No. 3 Table of Contents
  • 71. Board of Editors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Sponsorship and Appreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Research Articles Principal Preparation—Revisited—Time Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 by Daniel Gutmore, PhD Principal Concerns and Superintendent Support During Teacher Evaluation Changes. . . . . . . . . . . . .11 by Mary Lynne Derrington, EdD and John W. Campbell, PhD Commentary School Administrator Quality in Minority-Serving Institutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .23 by Mariela A. Rodriguez, PhD; Carol A Mullen, PhD; Tawannah G. Allen, EdD
  • 72. Mission and Scope, Copyright, Privacy, Ethics, Upcoming Themes, Author Guidelines & Publication Timeline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .36 AASA Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 2 _____________________________________________________ _________________________ Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice Editorial Review Board AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice 2012-2015
  • 73. Editors Christopher H. Tienken, Seton Hall University Ken Mitchell, Manhattanville College Associate Editors Barbara Dean, AASA, The School Superintendents Association Kevin Majewski, Seton Hall University Editorial Review Board Albert T. Azinger, Illinois State University Sidney Brown, Auburn University, Montgomery Gina Cinotti, Netcog Public Schools, New Jersey Brad Colwell, Bowling Green University Sandra Chistolini, Universita`degli Studi Roma Tre, Rome Michael Cohen, Denver Public Schools Betty Cox, University of Tennessee, Martin Theodore B. Creighton, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Gene Davis, Idaho State University, Emeritus John Decman, University of Houston, Clear Lake David Dunaway, University of North Carolina, Charlotte
  • 74. Daniel Gutmore, Seton Hall University Gregory Hauser, Roosevelt University, Chicago Jane Irons, Lamar University Thomas Jandris, Concordia University, Chicago Zach Kelehear, University of South Carolina Theodore J. Kowalski, University of Dayton Nelson Maylone, Eastern Michigan University Robert S. McCord, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Barbara McKeon, Broome Street Academy Charter High School, New York, NY Sue Mutchler, Texas Women's University Margaret Orr, Bank Street College David J. Parks, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University George E. Pawlas, University of Central Florida Dereck H. Rhoads, Beaufort County School District Paul M. Terry, University of South Florida Thomas C. Valesky, Florida Gulf Coast University Published by
  • 75. AASA, The School Superintendents Association 1615 Duke Street Alexandria, VA 22314 Available at www.aasa.org/jsp.aspx ISSN 1931-6569 http://www.aasa.org/jsp.aspx 3 _____________________________________________________ _________________________ Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice Sponsorship and Appreciation The AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice would like to
  • 76. thank AASA, The School Superintendents Association, in particular the AASA Leadership Development Office, for its ongoing sponsorship of the Journal. We also offer special thanks to Christopher Tienken, Seton Hall University, and Kenneth Mitchell, Manhattanville College, for their efforts in selecting and editing the articles that comprise this professional education journal. The unique relationship between research and practice is appreciated, recognizing the mutual benefit to those educators who conduct the research and seek out evidence-based practice and those educators whose responsibility it is to carry out the mission of school districts in the education of children. Without the support of AASA, Christopher Tienken and Kenneth Mitchell, the AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice would not be possible.
  • 77. 4 _____________________________________________________ _________________________ Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice Research Article _____________________________________________________ _______________ Principal Preparation—Revisited—Time Matters Daniel Gutmore, PhD
  • 78. Faculty Associate Department of Education Leadership, Management and Policy Seton Hall University South Orange, NJ Abstract There has been both a historic and continuing interest in the preparation process for school administrators (principals and vice principals). Much of the literature has been critical of how school administrators are prepared (Achilles, 1991; Hale and Moorman, 2003; Levine, 2005; Hallinger and Lu, 2013). Although the length of time from graduation to hiring was explored, little attention has been paid to the satisfaction of graduates from principal preparation and the number of years that transpired from graduation to job placement. An unknown outcome in the literature on principal preparation programs is the impact of satisfaction in relation to the length of time in securing an administrative position. This article attempts to provide some
  • 79. insight into the relationship. Key Words principal preparation, career satisfaction 5 _____________________________________________________ _________________________ Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice Introduction There has been both a historic and continuing interest in the preparation process for school administrators (principals and vice principals).
  • 80. Much of the literature has been critical of how school administrators are prepared (Achilles, 1991; Hale and Moorman, 2003; Levine, 2005; Hallinger and Lu, 2013). In instances where the process has been identified as positive, it has been characterized as an outlier under the definition of “exemplary programs” (Orr and Orpanos, 2011; Taylor, Pelleties, Kelly, Trimble, Todd and Ruiz, 2014). An interesting phenomenon of the preparation process that has not been examined is the elapsed time from being prepared to become a school administrator and satisfaction with the preparation process. Unlike many other professions, being prepared does not necessarily result in securing a position. Gahungu (2008), studying an Illinois
  • 81. preparation program, noted that, from 1995 to 2005, of the 503 students graduated from the program, only 168 of the certified candidates had held administrative positions in public schools by 2007. Bathon and Black (2010) found in their study of Indiana principal placement that 59% of all graduates find employment as either principals or assistant principals (soon after graduation). Although the length of time from graduation to hiring has been explored, little attention has been paid to the satisfaction of graduates from principal preparation and the number of years that transpired from graduation to job placement. An unknown outcome in the literature on principal preparation programs is the impact of satisfaction in relation to the length of time in
  • 82. securing an administrative position. Literature Review For the last twenty-five years, there has been the realization that effective principals are an important variable in school improvement (Spillane, 2003). In spite of that assertion, until relatively recently little attention has been paid to the preparation process and how schools of educational administration have designed their preparation programs (Achilles, 2004; Hale and Morman, 2003; Levine, 2005). The focus has been directed at four aspects of that process; licensure, certification and accreditation, principal preparation and professional development (Beck and Murphy, 1996). There has also been a concern that
  • 83. preparation programs are too theoretical and not grounded in administrative and leadership reality (Murphy, 1992). Another study identified several major concerns: the admission process for prospective students with some among the lowest standards in the nation; the lack of clarity of purpose; the absence of systematic self- assessment; the absence of a coherent curriculum; a poorly equipped professorate; a lack of attention paid to clinical education and mentorship; research that is detached from practice; and insufficient funding (Levine, 2005). These areas are similar to the observations of Achilles (1991); Hale and Moorman,(2003) and Elmore (2000) who added to the litany of concerns, the lack of an agreed - upon knowledge base to guide the
  • 84. preparation of school administrators. 6 _____________________________________________________ _________________________ Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice On a parallel and connected path, there has emerged a more substantive research base regarding effective leadership practices related to the principal. One of the more compelling works is that of Waters, Marzano and McNulty (2003) who examined thirty years of research on the effects of leadership on student achievement. In their meta-analysis they identified two primary
  • 85. variables that determine whether or not leadership will have a positive or negative impact on achievement: the focus of change or whether there is a focus on improving practices directly related to student achievement with an understanding by the leader of the magnitude or order of the change. They further identified 21 leadership responsibilities and associated practices connected to student achievement and organized them into a taxonomy of four types of knowledge: experiential knowledge (knowing why it is important), declarative (knowing what to do), procedural (knowing how) and contextual (knowing when). Another theme has been to review what principal preparation programs are doing in response to the external criticism. Hallinger
  • 86. and Lu (2013) found that the influence of business practices has become more pronounced with specific alignment to the role of case studies and mentoring programs. Peck and Reitzug (2012) identified three management concepts that tend to permeate many preparation program designs: management by objectives, total quality management, and turnaround restructuring. There has also been greater focus on field experiences and a direct connection to authentic inquiry (Perez, Uline, Johnson, James-Ward, and Basom, 2010). Providing more direct in- school experiences, where prospective candidates could apply the skills and concepts learned in a classroom setting, became a pivotal focus.
  • 87. Recently there has been an attempt to connect the role of the principal and their preparation to student outcomes (Orr and Orphonos, 2011; Donmoyer, Donmoyer and Galloway, 2012)). Although much of the work was focused on so-called "exemplary programs" and the results were mixed, the fact that there is now an attempt to determine if there is a connection to student outcomes and principal behaviors in connection with their preparation program is a significant shift in the direction of focus on principal preparation programs. There has also emerged a collective sense that principal leadership is distributed and its foundation rests on a base of expertise rather than hierarchical authority (Camburn, Rowan, and Taylor, 2003; Kochan and Reed, 2005).
  • 88. Leadership is viewed from the vantage point of interdependence and operates within both a vertical and horizontal continuum depending on the context organizational circumstances. The implications of the new insights emerging regarding leadership are that the profession is nearing the foundation level for agreement on what constitutes a knowledge base for the preparation of school level administrators and the potential for a unifying approach to that process (Brown and Flanary, 2004). Although much has been written about principal preparation, it has focused on satisfaction as determined by graduates or those who retrospectively evaluate their programs once they acquire an administrative position. Other thematic areas are what programs are
  • 89. doing to "better" prepare their candidates. There has also been an attempt to connect preparation to student outcomes. Missing from the analysis is the relationship between the 7 _____________________________________________________ _________________________ Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice length of time that elapses from exiting a preparation program and acquiring an administrative position and satisfaction by graduates with the preparation process. An unknown outcome in the literature on principal preparation programs is the impact of satisfaction and length of time in securing an
  • 90. administrative position. The Study To determine if there was a relationship between satisfaction with principal preparation programs and the number of years that elapsed from completing a preparation program and securing an administrative position, a structured questionnaire was developed and sent to 1,583 principals in a northeastern state. The list was from a database developed by the state education agency and was current for the school year 2014. The survey consisted of a limited number (3) of questions asking respondents to rate their satisfaction with their leadership preparation program using a 5 point Likert rating scale with 5 indicating exceptionally prepared and 1 not prepared at all. Respondents were asked to indicate the
  • 91. length of time that elapsed from receiving their degree and receiving an administrative appointment with choices ranging from immediately on graduation to more than five years later. Respondents were also asked to indicate the institution or program granting them the degree. Two hundred sixty-seven principals responded to the survey representing fifty-seven universities and colleges providing principal preparation programs. The Results Although 267 principals responded, the response rate represents only 16% of the population. Caution needs to be taken in the conclusions that are drawn, given the low return rate. Two hundred and sixty-seven is a number that allows statistical analysis but may represent a population that is not representative
  • 92. of the study group. To determine the significance of the relationship between satisfaction and the number of years elapsing between completion of a preparation program and receiving a principal position, Spearman rho (r) was applied to the tabulated results. There are many cases where dependency between two variables can be observed but where the distribution is unknown (Yamane, 1967; Creswell, 2012). Nonparametric correlation coefficients provide the ability to determine statistical significance in such instances and, therefore, Spearman rho (r) was the appropriate application. The outcome revealed a .181 statistical significance between satisfaction and appointment to an administrative position either immediately on
  • 93. graduating or 1 to 2 years later. The outcome is statistically significant but relatively weak in its strength. Discussion This study reveals a connection with satisfaction with the preparation process and the number of years it took actually to receive an administrative position. The sooner an administrative position was secured, the greater the satisfaction. Although caution is needed in generalizing beyond the scope of this study, there are implications for both future research and the designs of principal preparation programs. In terms of future research, a much wider survey of graduates of principal preparation programs would indicate the broader significance of time as a variable in program satisfaction.
  • 94. More importantly there is a policy issue that needs to be addressed immediately. If there are significant gaps between preparation and 8 _____________________________________________________ _________________________ Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice administrative placement and graduates feel less prepared, as a result, what can programs do to address the issue? The response to this question includes both ethical and social responsibility implications. Principal preparation programs within this context need to go beyond just preparation
  • 95. and graduation but meet the social responsibility to address their graduate’s needs. One possible solution is to allow all graduates to attend any classes they feel a need to attend as a refresher in developing skills introduced in previous classroom settings. These ‘refreshers’ should be at no cost to the students but become a part of the social, ethical and professional responsibility of the program provider. The idea of “no cost” is not the financial burden it may appear to be. The refresher could be offered when existing classes are in session. Students who need to be refreshed sit in on the classes and participate in the scope and demand for their specific needs. A second programmatic response would be to schedule low cost or no cost seminars in
  • 96. areas that improve the management and leadership skills of graduates and keep them up to date on the research on best practices. These seminars could be scheduled on weekends to allow maximum participation. Another implication of the study is the need to provide counseling and support to graduates as they enter the administrative marketplace. It is not enough to merely graduate students but to also facilitate the employment process. Author Biography Daniel Gutmore is a faculty associate at Seton Hall University. He was a teacher and practicing school and central office administrator for over 30 years, all in an urban school setting. His areas of interest are organizational theory, supervision of instruction, ethical decision making and principal preparation
  • 97. process. E-mail: [email protected] mailto:[email protected] 9 _____________________________________________________ _________________________ Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice References Achilles, C. M. (2004). Change the damn box. In Educational Leadership: Knowing the Way,
  • 98. Showing the Way, Going the Way, edited by C. Carr and C. Fulmer. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education. Achilles, C. M. (1991). Reforming educational administration: An agenda for the 1990’s. Planning and Changing 22: 23-33. Bathon, J., & Black, W. (2010). Where do our graduates go? A five-year exploration of the regional distribution of principal preparation graduates. NCPEA International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 6 (1), 1-22. Beck, L. & Murphy, J. (1996). The four imperatives of a successful school. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Brown, F., & Flanary, D. (2004). How many principal preparation groups does it take to screw in the light bulb? NCPEA Educational Review, 5, 2-3. Camburn, E., Rowan, B., & Taylor, J. E. (2003). Distributed leadership in schools: The case
  • 99. of elementary schools adopting comprehensive school reform models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 347-373. Donmoyer, R., Donmoyer, J., & Galloway, F. (2012). The search for connections across principal preparation, principal performance, and student achievement in an exemplary principal preparation program. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 7 (5), 5-43. Elmore, R. (2000) Building a new structure for school leadership. The Albert Shanker Institute. Gahungu, A. (2008). Is a principal certificate a passport to salary enhancement or to administrative positions in schools? NCPEA Connexions Module. 1-16. Hale, E., & Moorman, N. A national perspective on policy and program innovation. Washington DC: Institute for Educational Leadership; Edwardsville, IL: Education
  • 100. Research Council, 2003. Hallinger, P., & Lu, J. (2013). Preparing principals: What can we learn from MBA and MPA Programs? Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 41, (4), 435-452. Kochan, F. K., & Reed, C. J. (2005). Collaborative leadership, community building and democracy in public education. In The Sage Handbook of Educational Leadership, Advances in Theory, Research and Practice, edited by Fenwick W. English. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publication. 10 _____________________________________________________ _________________________ Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice
  • 101. Levine, A. (2005). Educating school leaders. New York: The Education Schools Project. Murphy, J. (1992). The landscape of leadership preparation. New York: Teachers College. Orr, T., & Orphanos, S. (2011). How graduate level preparation influences the effectiveness of school leaders: A comparison of the outcomes of exemplary and conventional leadership preparation programs for principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47 (18), 18-70. Peck, C., & Reitzug, U. C. (2012). How existing business management concepts become school leadership fashions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48 (2), 347-381. Perez, L. G., Uline, C. L., Johnson J. F., James-Ward, C., & Basom, M. R. (2011). Foregrounding fieldwork in leadership preparation: the transformative capacity of authentic inquiry. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47 (1), 217-257. Spillane, J. P.(2003). Educational leadership. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 25,
  • 102. 343-346. Taylor, R., Pelletier, K., Trimble, T., & Ruiz, E. (2014). Urban school district’s preparing new principals program 2008-2011: Perceptions of program completers, supervising principals and senior levels district administrators. NCPEA International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 9 (1), 1-13. Waters, T., Marzano, R. J., & McNulty, B. What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement. MCREL, 2003.
  • 103. 11 _____________________________________________________ _________________________ Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice Research Article _____________________________________________________ _______________ Principal Concerns and Superintendent Support During Teacher Evaluation Changes Mary Lynne Derrington, EdD Assistant Professor Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN John W. Campbell, PhD
  • 104. Director of Curriculum and Instruction Alcoa City Schools Alcoa, TN Abstract Teacher evaluation is a major reform initiative in public education’s high accountability policy environment. Principals’ effective implementation of this high- stakes reform is challenged by time management, policy coherence, communication with teachers, district support, and staff development imperatives. Effective implementation requires moving beyond time and management concerns towards collaborative leadership with supervisors. Although teacher evaluation policies are often state initiated, local level superintendents and district leaders must understand principals’ challenges to provide useful guidance and support. Based on a three-year study of a southeastern state’s Race to the Top driven implementation of
  • 105. redesigned teacher evaluation policies, this article examines principals’ concerns and need for support plus superintendent strategies for addressing gaps that state and federal policymakers may leave during such mandated reform. The Stages of Concern framework from the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) was used to examine principals’ concerns and superintendents’ support. Lessons learned and implications for superintendents are described. Key Words teacher evaluation, leadership, CBAM 12 _____________________________________________________ _________________________ Vol. 12, No. 3 Fall 2015 AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice Principals, Reform of Teacher
  • 106. Evaluation, and Need for Support Implementing a new and more rigorous teacher evaluation system presents new challenges to a principal’s already complex job, particularly in states and districts with redesigned accountability policy mandates. Juggling multiple demands and expectations (Honig and Hatch, 2004; Leithwood, Strauss, & Anderson, 2007) principals are responsible for interpreting and implementing policy designed from afar and making it applicable, relevant, and effective for their teachers (Datnow, Hubbard, & Mehan, 2002; McLaughlin, 1987; Park & Datnow, 2009; Spillane, Diamond, Burch, Hallett, Loyiso, & Zoltners, 2002). Consequently, principals are the critical link for successful policy implementation (Datnow et al., 2002). However, they require support as they learn the details of new, more complex
  • 107. policies and more demanding accountability driven expectations. This article, based on a longitudinal study (Derrington & Campbell, 2015), describes principals’ concerns during the implementation of a new reform-driven teacher evaluation policy. After years of infrequent teacher evaluation and generally meaningless consequences, principals were required to quickly learn and implement a demanding, high-stakes evaluation process. This study’s results also describes superintendent supportive actions in response to principals’ concerns during teacher evaluation implementation. New Evaluation Policies In 2010, the state discussed in this article received approximately one-half billion federal