The document discusses ethnic conflicts in the South Caucasus region. It notes that studying ethnic conflicts requires examining 5 factors: 1) the background and history of relations between groups, 2) the types of actors involved, 3) the character and nature of the parties, 4) the reasons for conflict, and 5) the context including the role of external actors. It also discusses different theories for analyzing the causes of ethnic conflicts, including domestic political factors and the role of perceptions and historical narratives in escalating tensions between groups.
Global Trend CHAPTER ONE jjjiiiuyy I iuyy.pdfseraphimkassa
This document provides an overview of key concepts in international relations, including nationalism, nation-states, and actors. It discusses how nationalism led to the emergence of nation-states after revolutions in France and the US. The Congress of Vienna in 1815 recognized some nationalist aspirations. The Treaty of Westphalia in 1648 established principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity that shaped the modern international system of states. Major actors in international relations include states, sub-state actors, transnational actors like multinational corporations and NGOs, and inter-governmental organizations like the UN. IR emerged as a field with the growth of relations between these nation-states.
Here are 3 potential classroom activities that could reflect Ibrahim's pedagogical philosophy:
1. Have students do research projects on influential figures from marginalized communities and present their findings to the class. This elevates voices that are often excluded.
2. Incorporate texts, music, films etc. from diverse cultures and communities into lesson plans to expose students to a variety of perspectives.
3. Facilitate open discussions where students are encouraged to respectfully share their own cultural experiences and backgrounds. This values multiple identities and ways of communicating.
Ibrahim is pointing out that the assumed "norm" in schools often reflects the dominant white culture and experience by default. As teachers, we need to be conscious
The politics of identity in middle eastern internationalRobert Young
This document discusses identity politics and its role in international relations in the Middle East. It begins by outlining key concepts of identity formation and how identity is defined in contrast to an "other." It then examines how constructivism best incorporates the role of identity in international relations theory. Several tensions are explored between concepts of territory and identity in the Middle Eastern context. Specifically, it analyzes how state identities are less meaningful due to arbitrarily imposed boundaries cutting across communities and histories of conflict. The conclusion discusses how Middle Eastern foreign policy is shaped by both pursuing state interests but also obligations to wider imagined communities, trapping leaders between these competing forces.
w008cxkText BoxFeagin, Joe R. 2000. Racist America Root.docxjessiehampson
w008cxk
Text Box
Feagin, Joe R. 2000. Racist America: Roots, Current Realities, and Future Reparations. New York: Routledge.
Notice: The material may be protected by copyright law
(Title 17 U.S. Code ).
't
I)
Z)
3)
Lf)
'C~)
Q~
....-~,··· 6 ................. • ••• •••••,, ......... '-.''I'
what were painful racially conflicted chapters in its national history;
(Others think that race and ethnicity are unrelated to their own lives and
should be the concern of those in barrios, ghettos, and ethnic studies pro-
grams. Wome worry about race and ethnicity but avoid talking about
them for fear of being thought racist.IYet others think that even noticing
race and ethnicity is wrong and that these concepts should not be taken
into account when someone is deciding how to interact with another
person.{Still others believe that U.S. Americans have not begun to talk
seriously about these topics and that no one can understand society with-
out analyzing how race and ethnicity are linked and deeply intertwined
with wealth, status, life chances, and well-being in general.
Given the wide range of possible reactions, we might ask, Why are
race and ethnicity so central to our lives and at the same time so difficult
and taboo?
In this essay, the authors propose an understanding of race and ethnic-
ity that, at first, may be hard to accept.tC~ntrary to what most people
believe, race and ethnicity are not things that people have or are. Rather,
they are actions that people do. 1l'R;ce and ethnicity are social, historical,.
and philosophical processes that people have done for hundreds of years
and are still doing. IThey emerge through the social ·transactions that
take place among different kinds of people, in a variety of institutional
structures (e.g., schools, workplaces, government offices, courts, media),
over time, across space, and in all kinds of situations.
Our framework for understanding them draws on the work of schol-
ars of race and ethnicity around the world, including professors asso-
ciated with the Center for Comparative Studies in Race and Ethnicity
(CCSRE) at Stanford University. Over the past several decades, the topics
ofrace and ethnicity have become increasingly central to the research and
theorizing of sociologists, psychologists, and h~rians as well as schol-
ars in the humanities, the law, and education.lPsychologists most often
focus on why people stereotype others and on the multiple negative out-
comes for those who are the target of these stereotypes (e.g., Baron and
Banaji 2006; Dovidio, Glick, and Rudman 2005; Eberhardt and Fiske
1998; Jones 1997; Steele 1992), while sociologists often concentrate on
racism as a system of beliefs that justifies the privilege of the dominant
I Although the term doing race has yet to gain wide currency either. within or outside the academy,
several ,race scholars have previously used ...
Indigenous Internationalization: What is it, and How do States Respond?Ellen Ahlness
What is indigenous internationalization? Why does it matter? And why do states respond with opposition? This presentation walks through a theoretical overview of realism, liberalism, and constructivism rationales for this phenomenon.
This document summarizes the key topics covered in a lecture on Western political thought. The lecture discusses various political and international relations theories such as realism, liberalism, constructivism, and feminism. It also covers related concepts like taxes, manifest destiny, collective security, and the declining prevalence of war. The summaries briefly outline the core ideas and assumptions of each theory or concept addressed in the lecture.
This lecture provides with an overview over the position of radicalization within International Relations. How can we approach the issue of radicalization from the perspectives of the international system?
This document outlines the agenda for a session on power, identity and global landscapes that focuses on ethnicity, nationality and identity. It includes finishing a discussion on UNESCO Cultural Heritage Sites, a lecture on ethnicity, nationality and identity, analyzing a Canadian nationalism advertisement, and a reflective group workshop using critical review papers on nationhood and identity in Australia, Canada and Great Britain. The readings are from a cultural geography textbook that discusses the social construction of identity and components of ethnicity, as well as the idea of nations.
Global Trend CHAPTER ONE jjjiiiuyy I iuyy.pdfseraphimkassa
This document provides an overview of key concepts in international relations, including nationalism, nation-states, and actors. It discusses how nationalism led to the emergence of nation-states after revolutions in France and the US. The Congress of Vienna in 1815 recognized some nationalist aspirations. The Treaty of Westphalia in 1648 established principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity that shaped the modern international system of states. Major actors in international relations include states, sub-state actors, transnational actors like multinational corporations and NGOs, and inter-governmental organizations like the UN. IR emerged as a field with the growth of relations between these nation-states.
Here are 3 potential classroom activities that could reflect Ibrahim's pedagogical philosophy:
1. Have students do research projects on influential figures from marginalized communities and present their findings to the class. This elevates voices that are often excluded.
2. Incorporate texts, music, films etc. from diverse cultures and communities into lesson plans to expose students to a variety of perspectives.
3. Facilitate open discussions where students are encouraged to respectfully share their own cultural experiences and backgrounds. This values multiple identities and ways of communicating.
Ibrahim is pointing out that the assumed "norm" in schools often reflects the dominant white culture and experience by default. As teachers, we need to be conscious
The politics of identity in middle eastern internationalRobert Young
This document discusses identity politics and its role in international relations in the Middle East. It begins by outlining key concepts of identity formation and how identity is defined in contrast to an "other." It then examines how constructivism best incorporates the role of identity in international relations theory. Several tensions are explored between concepts of territory and identity in the Middle Eastern context. Specifically, it analyzes how state identities are less meaningful due to arbitrarily imposed boundaries cutting across communities and histories of conflict. The conclusion discusses how Middle Eastern foreign policy is shaped by both pursuing state interests but also obligations to wider imagined communities, trapping leaders between these competing forces.
w008cxkText BoxFeagin, Joe R. 2000. Racist America Root.docxjessiehampson
w008cxk
Text Box
Feagin, Joe R. 2000. Racist America: Roots, Current Realities, and Future Reparations. New York: Routledge.
Notice: The material may be protected by copyright law
(Title 17 U.S. Code ).
't
I)
Z)
3)
Lf)
'C~)
Q~
....-~,··· 6 ................. • ••• •••••,, ......... '-.''I'
what were painful racially conflicted chapters in its national history;
(Others think that race and ethnicity are unrelated to their own lives and
should be the concern of those in barrios, ghettos, and ethnic studies pro-
grams. Wome worry about race and ethnicity but avoid talking about
them for fear of being thought racist.IYet others think that even noticing
race and ethnicity is wrong and that these concepts should not be taken
into account when someone is deciding how to interact with another
person.{Still others believe that U.S. Americans have not begun to talk
seriously about these topics and that no one can understand society with-
out analyzing how race and ethnicity are linked and deeply intertwined
with wealth, status, life chances, and well-being in general.
Given the wide range of possible reactions, we might ask, Why are
race and ethnicity so central to our lives and at the same time so difficult
and taboo?
In this essay, the authors propose an understanding of race and ethnic-
ity that, at first, may be hard to accept.tC~ntrary to what most people
believe, race and ethnicity are not things that people have or are. Rather,
they are actions that people do. 1l'R;ce and ethnicity are social, historical,.
and philosophical processes that people have done for hundreds of years
and are still doing. IThey emerge through the social ·transactions that
take place among different kinds of people, in a variety of institutional
structures (e.g., schools, workplaces, government offices, courts, media),
over time, across space, and in all kinds of situations.
Our framework for understanding them draws on the work of schol-
ars of race and ethnicity around the world, including professors asso-
ciated with the Center for Comparative Studies in Race and Ethnicity
(CCSRE) at Stanford University. Over the past several decades, the topics
ofrace and ethnicity have become increasingly central to the research and
theorizing of sociologists, psychologists, and h~rians as well as schol-
ars in the humanities, the law, and education.lPsychologists most often
focus on why people stereotype others and on the multiple negative out-
comes for those who are the target of these stereotypes (e.g., Baron and
Banaji 2006; Dovidio, Glick, and Rudman 2005; Eberhardt and Fiske
1998; Jones 1997; Steele 1992), while sociologists often concentrate on
racism as a system of beliefs that justifies the privilege of the dominant
I Although the term doing race has yet to gain wide currency either. within or outside the academy,
several ,race scholars have previously used ...
Indigenous Internationalization: What is it, and How do States Respond?Ellen Ahlness
What is indigenous internationalization? Why does it matter? And why do states respond with opposition? This presentation walks through a theoretical overview of realism, liberalism, and constructivism rationales for this phenomenon.
This document summarizes the key topics covered in a lecture on Western political thought. The lecture discusses various political and international relations theories such as realism, liberalism, constructivism, and feminism. It also covers related concepts like taxes, manifest destiny, collective security, and the declining prevalence of war. The summaries briefly outline the core ideas and assumptions of each theory or concept addressed in the lecture.
This lecture provides with an overview over the position of radicalization within International Relations. How can we approach the issue of radicalization from the perspectives of the international system?
This document outlines the agenda for a session on power, identity and global landscapes that focuses on ethnicity, nationality and identity. It includes finishing a discussion on UNESCO Cultural Heritage Sites, a lecture on ethnicity, nationality and identity, analyzing a Canadian nationalism advertisement, and a reflective group workshop using critical review papers on nationhood and identity in Australia, Canada and Great Britain. The readings are from a cultural geography textbook that discusses the social construction of identity and components of ethnicity, as well as the idea of nations.
Main Discussion United States CensusDefining your racial and PazSilviapm
Main Discussion: United States Census
Defining your racial and ethnic identities has to do with how you classify race and identity and how others categorize them as well. Race refers to the conception that people can be categorized into groups based on skin color, hair texture, and facial features. Japanese is an example of a racial group. Ethnicity refers to a group of people who share a sense of connectedness based on national origin, language, or religion. Irish-Catholic is an example of an ethnic group. The term
culture
also appears in discussions about race and ethnicity. Culture refers to shared attitudes and behaviors, such as customs. People of the same race and ethnicity often share culture as well, and you may notice some overlap between culture, race, and ethnicity.
There are different approaches used to define racial and ethnic identities. Your text emphasizes an approach called
constructionism
. Constructionists argue that definitions of race and ethnicity cannot be separated from social processes, such as political, legal, economic, and other outside influences. They believe that these outside influences "construct" definitions of race and ethnicity, and definitions change as social processes change. For example, black children in the 1950s may have felt they were not as valued, not as competent, and not as "good" as white children because social processes at the time supported these ideas. Political and economic influences favored white children over black children. Social processes in the current era reject favoring white children over black children. Constructionism has both benefits and limitations when you consider your own racial and ethnic identities.
To prepare for this Discussion:
Review the "Framework Essay" as well as the assigned pages in Readings 1, 4, and 7 from Section I of the course text,
The Meaning of Difference
. Pay particular attention to the concept of constructionism as it relates to race and ethnicity.
Think about how you define your own racial and ethnic identities.
Consider how the constructionist approach has influenced your racial and ethnic identities.
Reflect on the benefits and limitations of the constructionist approach as it relates to your racial and ethnic identities.
With these thoughts in mind:
By Day 3
Post
a brief description of your racial and ethnic identities; that is, how do you define your race and ethnicity? After reading about the constructionist model, explain how it influences your racial and ethnic identities. In your explanation, include specific references that are personal to your racial and ethnic identity. Finally, briefly explain what you see are the benefits and limitations of a constructionist approach to one’s identity.
Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.
ntly Reading
PSYC 3005:
Racial and Ethnic Identities in America
| Week 1
Week 1: Defining Racial and Ethnic Identities
Welcome to ...
1. Political discourse can refer to either discourse about politics or discourse that is inherently political in nature. It involves language used by politicians and political institutions to achieve political goals.
2. The analysis of political discourse examines how language constructs political realities and can be used to manipulate thoughts. Key aspects include word choice, rhetoric, and phonological features that carry political meanings.
3. Political discourse is shaped by differing ideological frameworks and can be interpreted differently depending on one's political perspective. The representation of information and description of groups can reveal underlying political biases.
This chapter introduces the field of international relations by discussing its key topics and theoretical approaches. It defines international relations as the study of interactions among various global actors including states, international organizations, NGOs, subnational groups and individuals. It outlines foundational questions in IR like the relationship between individuals and society, and between societies. It also discusses how history, philosophy and international relations theories can be used to analyze patterns in global events and state behavior. Finally, it contrasts major theoretical perspectives in IR like realism, liberalism, constructivism and radical theories.
The document discusses the key components of rhetoric and persuasive writing and speaking. It identifies the rhetorical situation as comprising the writer, purpose, genre, audience, culture/context, and limitations/conventions. Choosing strategies that effectively engage all aspects of the rhetorical situation is important for persuasive communication. Rhetorical analysis involves evaluating how well an argument addresses and responds to the specific rhetorical circumstances.
Race and Ethnicity – Part II SOCY 3720-E01 Global Perspect.docxaudeleypearl
Race and Ethnicity – Part II
SOCY 3720-E01 Global Perspectives on Social Issues
Summer 2019
Part II:
• For the second part of our lecture we will be discussing these main academic notions:
Patterns of Majority – Minority Interaction
• Genocide
• Segregation
De Jure Segregation
De Facto Segregation
• Assimilation
• Pluralism
• Prejudice and Bigotry Approaches
• Prejudice and Bigotry in Social Structures.
• Prejudice and Bigotry and their Cultural Factors:
Social Norms
Stereotyping
• Prejudice and Bigotry in the Individual:
Frustration – Aggression
Projection
Patterns of Majority - Minority Interaction
• There are many different ways that majority and minority populations interact. These interactions can
also range from positive to negative and from peaceful to deadly.
• When studying these patterns, sociologists use four models:
Genocide
Segregation
Assimilation
Pluralism
• Genocide: today this term is used to describe “the deliberate, systematic killing of an entire people or
nation.” (Schaefer, 2002).
• Genocide is murder and it has occurred again and again in human history. It has been tolerated and
sometimes even encouraged by governments and their people.
• There have been many instances of genocide throughout the ages and some of the most infamous
examples are:
• Beginning in 1500, the Spanish, Portuguese, English, French, and Dutch forcefully colonized North and
South America, resulting in the deaths of thousands of native people. (Although most native people fell
victim to diseases brought by Europeans to which they had no natural defenses, many were also killed.)
• Turkish authorities killing about one million Armenians in 1915.
• We often hear this term when discussing the Holocaust as Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany exterminated
about 6 million European Jews along with Homosexual individuals and Romani people.
• We have our own history of genocide in the United States in relation to American Indians.
• Jozef Stalin is believed to have killed approximately 7 million people.
• The more recent genocides in Rwanda and in Darfur.
• Segregation: it refers to “the physical separation of two groups in residence, workplace, and social
functions. Generally, the dominant group imposes segregation on a subordinate group.” (Schaefer,
2002).
• We have seen examples of segregation right here in the United States not only though the institution of
slavery, but legal segregation as well.
• We have also seen the government-imposed racial segregation in South Africa during apartheid.
• There are two specific types of segregation:
• De Jure segregation: derives from the Latin “by law,” this type of segregation is required by law.
• De Facto segregation: derives from the Latin “in fact,” this type of segregation results from “housing
patterns, economic inequalities, gerrymandered school districts, and the departure of midd ...
This document discusses the concepts of ethnicity and race. It defines ethnicity as being based on cultural similarities and differences within a society, and ethnic groups as sharing certain beliefs, values, customs, and origins. Race is defined as an ethnic group assumed to have a biological basis. The document examines how ethnicity and race are socially constructed, and explores related concepts like status, nation, nationality, assimilation, plural societies, multiculturalism, and the roots of ethnic conflict.
Presentation by Center for Community Journalism and Development Executive Director Red Batario at the Institute for Autonomy & Governance Community Journalism for Peace workshop, Cotabato City, 18 December 2011
This document outlines a study that uses conceptual metaphor theory and critical metaphor analysis to examine the role of gendered metaphors in American foreign policy discourse from the Cold War era to the modern post-Cold War period. It hypothesizes that gendered metaphors will not decrease after the Cold War due to feminism's limited influence, and that gender continues to inform foreign policy logic by using women and women's rights as metaphors. The study finds support for these hypotheses by analyzing presidential addresses and identifying metaphors that discuss foreign policy in gendered terms related to women, feminism, and domestic policy issues.
The document discusses several issues related to conducting research across cultures, including:
1) Sapir-Whorf's hypothesis that language shapes thought and how Western research methods can present difficulties for other cultures.
2) Contrastive rhetoric theories that suggest speakers of different languages organize information differently.
3) Cultural dimensions like individualism vs collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, and power distance that impact communication.
4) The complex experience of outsiders or marginalized groups navigating between cultures.
This document outlines key concepts for understanding history, including who makes history, what is included or excluded, when and where it takes place, and why we study it. It also discusses major themes in U.S. history like immigration, liberty, federalism vs anti-federalism, religion, economics, imperialism, civil rights, and poses important questions about nation-building, violence, interpreting the constitution, and the role of government. The purpose is to provide an overview of essential elements and debates within the study of history.
This document discusses critical discourse analysis of President Obama's political discourse and speeches. It provides background on discourse, critical discourse analysis, and key concepts like ideology, power, language, and liberal discourse. It also examines Obama's 2009 inaugural address, noting his references to American values, history, and ancestors to invoke a sense of national strength from the country's heroic past. The analysis seeks to uncover hidden meanings and power relations in political texts and language.
- Ethnicity is defined and understood in various ways by scholars. Primordialists see it as innate and ascribed at birth, instrumentalists see it as constructed for political and economic goals, and constructivists see it as negotiated and changing through social interaction.
- Barth defined ethnicity as based on the boundaries and interactions between groups, not their internal cultural characteristics. Ethnicity depends on how groups define themselves and others through social processes.
- Key aspects of ethnic identity include a shared name, ancestry, history, culture, language, and attachment to a homeland, but these aspects are negotiated and changing rather than fixed. Ethnic identity involves both objective behaviors and subjective attitudes that are fluid.
This document introduces the concepts of culture, society, politics and identity. It defines identity as the characteristics that define individuals within social groups. It describes the fields of social sciences including anthropology, sociology, and political science. Anthropology studies human biology, culture and society. Sociology examines human social life and groups. Political science focuses on values of equality, freedom and justice in governance. The document discusses how social backgrounds and identities shape views and can drive social, cultural and political change.
The document discusses several key themes related to race and ethnicity including:
1. Structural inequalities exist for some minority ethnic groups in areas like education, employment, housing that see them experience disadvantages even when well qualified.
2. Race and ethnicity are socially constructed concepts, with race based on physical criteria and ethnicity based on cultural criteria.
3. Theories around the instrumental vs. primordial nature of ethnicity and how it relates to concepts like class, capital, and power dynamics in society.
4. The representation of race in media often falls into exotic, dangerous, humorous or pitied tropes.
C-SAP teaching resources: Teaching race and ethnicity theoretical overviewCSAPSubjectCentre
This resource was produced as part of C-SAP's project "Teaching Race and Ethnicity" http://www.teachingrace.bham.ac.uk/ by Dr Stephen Spencer from Sheffield Hallam University.
This document discusses a proposed study to measure levels of patriotism among different groups in modern America. The researchers hypothesize that patriotism will be lowest among immigrants and minorities and highest among veterans and white citizens, due to current political and social unrest. They plan to survey participants of different ages, ethnicities, citizenship statuses, and military backgrounds using questions with Likert scale responses about patriotism, as well as open-ended questions. The results will analyze differences in patriotism levels between demographic groups and identify factors that influence patriotic feelings.
The document discusses concepts related to race and ethnicity. It defines race as a socially constructed category based on perceived biological differences, while ethnicity is based on shared cultural factors like language or religion. Race and ethnicity influence various life outcomes through disparities in areas like healthcare, education, income, family, and criminal justice experiences. Theoretical perspectives on understanding race in America include functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic interactionism.
Ran Greenstein Race highlights 2023.docxjudithnhlapo1
This document discusses the concept of race from a sociological perspective. It begins by defining race as a social construct rather than a biological one, noting that physical differences between human groups have been used to justify unequal treatment and access to resources throughout history. The emergence of race as a systematic concept is traced to the rise of European colonialism, capitalism, and the development of modern science from the 16th century onward. While early philosophers like Kant acknowledged both shared human descent and the consolidation of racial differences over time in response to environment, their work was open to misinterpretation and helped spread Eurocentric views of racial hierarchies. The document examines the historical and social forces that have shaped racial identities and meanings over time.
Feminism seeks to achieve equality between men and women. Feminism in international relations examines how gender stereotypes influence the field. It challenges mainstream concepts like power and security from a gender perspective. A key goal is highlighting gender inequalities often ignored in traditional theories. Feminist scholars argue that including women's voices and perspectives would provide new insights and orientations for understanding international issues.
Main Discussion United States CensusDefining your racial and PazSilviapm
Main Discussion: United States Census
Defining your racial and ethnic identities has to do with how you classify race and identity and how others categorize them as well. Race refers to the conception that people can be categorized into groups based on skin color, hair texture, and facial features. Japanese is an example of a racial group. Ethnicity refers to a group of people who share a sense of connectedness based on national origin, language, or religion. Irish-Catholic is an example of an ethnic group. The term
culture
also appears in discussions about race and ethnicity. Culture refers to shared attitudes and behaviors, such as customs. People of the same race and ethnicity often share culture as well, and you may notice some overlap between culture, race, and ethnicity.
There are different approaches used to define racial and ethnic identities. Your text emphasizes an approach called
constructionism
. Constructionists argue that definitions of race and ethnicity cannot be separated from social processes, such as political, legal, economic, and other outside influences. They believe that these outside influences "construct" definitions of race and ethnicity, and definitions change as social processes change. For example, black children in the 1950s may have felt they were not as valued, not as competent, and not as "good" as white children because social processes at the time supported these ideas. Political and economic influences favored white children over black children. Social processes in the current era reject favoring white children over black children. Constructionism has both benefits and limitations when you consider your own racial and ethnic identities.
To prepare for this Discussion:
Review the "Framework Essay" as well as the assigned pages in Readings 1, 4, and 7 from Section I of the course text,
The Meaning of Difference
. Pay particular attention to the concept of constructionism as it relates to race and ethnicity.
Think about how you define your own racial and ethnic identities.
Consider how the constructionist approach has influenced your racial and ethnic identities.
Reflect on the benefits and limitations of the constructionist approach as it relates to your racial and ethnic identities.
With these thoughts in mind:
By Day 3
Post
a brief description of your racial and ethnic identities; that is, how do you define your race and ethnicity? After reading about the constructionist model, explain how it influences your racial and ethnic identities. In your explanation, include specific references that are personal to your racial and ethnic identity. Finally, briefly explain what you see are the benefits and limitations of a constructionist approach to one’s identity.
Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.
ntly Reading
PSYC 3005:
Racial and Ethnic Identities in America
| Week 1
Week 1: Defining Racial and Ethnic Identities
Welcome to ...
1. Political discourse can refer to either discourse about politics or discourse that is inherently political in nature. It involves language used by politicians and political institutions to achieve political goals.
2. The analysis of political discourse examines how language constructs political realities and can be used to manipulate thoughts. Key aspects include word choice, rhetoric, and phonological features that carry political meanings.
3. Political discourse is shaped by differing ideological frameworks and can be interpreted differently depending on one's political perspective. The representation of information and description of groups can reveal underlying political biases.
This chapter introduces the field of international relations by discussing its key topics and theoretical approaches. It defines international relations as the study of interactions among various global actors including states, international organizations, NGOs, subnational groups and individuals. It outlines foundational questions in IR like the relationship between individuals and society, and between societies. It also discusses how history, philosophy and international relations theories can be used to analyze patterns in global events and state behavior. Finally, it contrasts major theoretical perspectives in IR like realism, liberalism, constructivism and radical theories.
The document discusses the key components of rhetoric and persuasive writing and speaking. It identifies the rhetorical situation as comprising the writer, purpose, genre, audience, culture/context, and limitations/conventions. Choosing strategies that effectively engage all aspects of the rhetorical situation is important for persuasive communication. Rhetorical analysis involves evaluating how well an argument addresses and responds to the specific rhetorical circumstances.
Race and Ethnicity – Part II SOCY 3720-E01 Global Perspect.docxaudeleypearl
Race and Ethnicity – Part II
SOCY 3720-E01 Global Perspectives on Social Issues
Summer 2019
Part II:
• For the second part of our lecture we will be discussing these main academic notions:
Patterns of Majority – Minority Interaction
• Genocide
• Segregation
De Jure Segregation
De Facto Segregation
• Assimilation
• Pluralism
• Prejudice and Bigotry Approaches
• Prejudice and Bigotry in Social Structures.
• Prejudice and Bigotry and their Cultural Factors:
Social Norms
Stereotyping
• Prejudice and Bigotry in the Individual:
Frustration – Aggression
Projection
Patterns of Majority - Minority Interaction
• There are many different ways that majority and minority populations interact. These interactions can
also range from positive to negative and from peaceful to deadly.
• When studying these patterns, sociologists use four models:
Genocide
Segregation
Assimilation
Pluralism
• Genocide: today this term is used to describe “the deliberate, systematic killing of an entire people or
nation.” (Schaefer, 2002).
• Genocide is murder and it has occurred again and again in human history. It has been tolerated and
sometimes even encouraged by governments and their people.
• There have been many instances of genocide throughout the ages and some of the most infamous
examples are:
• Beginning in 1500, the Spanish, Portuguese, English, French, and Dutch forcefully colonized North and
South America, resulting in the deaths of thousands of native people. (Although most native people fell
victim to diseases brought by Europeans to which they had no natural defenses, many were also killed.)
• Turkish authorities killing about one million Armenians in 1915.
• We often hear this term when discussing the Holocaust as Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany exterminated
about 6 million European Jews along with Homosexual individuals and Romani people.
• We have our own history of genocide in the United States in relation to American Indians.
• Jozef Stalin is believed to have killed approximately 7 million people.
• The more recent genocides in Rwanda and in Darfur.
• Segregation: it refers to “the physical separation of two groups in residence, workplace, and social
functions. Generally, the dominant group imposes segregation on a subordinate group.” (Schaefer,
2002).
• We have seen examples of segregation right here in the United States not only though the institution of
slavery, but legal segregation as well.
• We have also seen the government-imposed racial segregation in South Africa during apartheid.
• There are two specific types of segregation:
• De Jure segregation: derives from the Latin “by law,” this type of segregation is required by law.
• De Facto segregation: derives from the Latin “in fact,” this type of segregation results from “housing
patterns, economic inequalities, gerrymandered school districts, and the departure of midd ...
This document discusses the concepts of ethnicity and race. It defines ethnicity as being based on cultural similarities and differences within a society, and ethnic groups as sharing certain beliefs, values, customs, and origins. Race is defined as an ethnic group assumed to have a biological basis. The document examines how ethnicity and race are socially constructed, and explores related concepts like status, nation, nationality, assimilation, plural societies, multiculturalism, and the roots of ethnic conflict.
Presentation by Center for Community Journalism and Development Executive Director Red Batario at the Institute for Autonomy & Governance Community Journalism for Peace workshop, Cotabato City, 18 December 2011
This document outlines a study that uses conceptual metaphor theory and critical metaphor analysis to examine the role of gendered metaphors in American foreign policy discourse from the Cold War era to the modern post-Cold War period. It hypothesizes that gendered metaphors will not decrease after the Cold War due to feminism's limited influence, and that gender continues to inform foreign policy logic by using women and women's rights as metaphors. The study finds support for these hypotheses by analyzing presidential addresses and identifying metaphors that discuss foreign policy in gendered terms related to women, feminism, and domestic policy issues.
The document discusses several issues related to conducting research across cultures, including:
1) Sapir-Whorf's hypothesis that language shapes thought and how Western research methods can present difficulties for other cultures.
2) Contrastive rhetoric theories that suggest speakers of different languages organize information differently.
3) Cultural dimensions like individualism vs collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, and power distance that impact communication.
4) The complex experience of outsiders or marginalized groups navigating between cultures.
This document outlines key concepts for understanding history, including who makes history, what is included or excluded, when and where it takes place, and why we study it. It also discusses major themes in U.S. history like immigration, liberty, federalism vs anti-federalism, religion, economics, imperialism, civil rights, and poses important questions about nation-building, violence, interpreting the constitution, and the role of government. The purpose is to provide an overview of essential elements and debates within the study of history.
This document discusses critical discourse analysis of President Obama's political discourse and speeches. It provides background on discourse, critical discourse analysis, and key concepts like ideology, power, language, and liberal discourse. It also examines Obama's 2009 inaugural address, noting his references to American values, history, and ancestors to invoke a sense of national strength from the country's heroic past. The analysis seeks to uncover hidden meanings and power relations in political texts and language.
- Ethnicity is defined and understood in various ways by scholars. Primordialists see it as innate and ascribed at birth, instrumentalists see it as constructed for political and economic goals, and constructivists see it as negotiated and changing through social interaction.
- Barth defined ethnicity as based on the boundaries and interactions between groups, not their internal cultural characteristics. Ethnicity depends on how groups define themselves and others through social processes.
- Key aspects of ethnic identity include a shared name, ancestry, history, culture, language, and attachment to a homeland, but these aspects are negotiated and changing rather than fixed. Ethnic identity involves both objective behaviors and subjective attitudes that are fluid.
This document introduces the concepts of culture, society, politics and identity. It defines identity as the characteristics that define individuals within social groups. It describes the fields of social sciences including anthropology, sociology, and political science. Anthropology studies human biology, culture and society. Sociology examines human social life and groups. Political science focuses on values of equality, freedom and justice in governance. The document discusses how social backgrounds and identities shape views and can drive social, cultural and political change.
The document discusses several key themes related to race and ethnicity including:
1. Structural inequalities exist for some minority ethnic groups in areas like education, employment, housing that see them experience disadvantages even when well qualified.
2. Race and ethnicity are socially constructed concepts, with race based on physical criteria and ethnicity based on cultural criteria.
3. Theories around the instrumental vs. primordial nature of ethnicity and how it relates to concepts like class, capital, and power dynamics in society.
4. The representation of race in media often falls into exotic, dangerous, humorous or pitied tropes.
C-SAP teaching resources: Teaching race and ethnicity theoretical overviewCSAPSubjectCentre
This resource was produced as part of C-SAP's project "Teaching Race and Ethnicity" http://www.teachingrace.bham.ac.uk/ by Dr Stephen Spencer from Sheffield Hallam University.
This document discusses a proposed study to measure levels of patriotism among different groups in modern America. The researchers hypothesize that patriotism will be lowest among immigrants and minorities and highest among veterans and white citizens, due to current political and social unrest. They plan to survey participants of different ages, ethnicities, citizenship statuses, and military backgrounds using questions with Likert scale responses about patriotism, as well as open-ended questions. The results will analyze differences in patriotism levels between demographic groups and identify factors that influence patriotic feelings.
The document discusses concepts related to race and ethnicity. It defines race as a socially constructed category based on perceived biological differences, while ethnicity is based on shared cultural factors like language or religion. Race and ethnicity influence various life outcomes through disparities in areas like healthcare, education, income, family, and criminal justice experiences. Theoretical perspectives on understanding race in America include functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic interactionism.
Ran Greenstein Race highlights 2023.docxjudithnhlapo1
This document discusses the concept of race from a sociological perspective. It begins by defining race as a social construct rather than a biological one, noting that physical differences between human groups have been used to justify unequal treatment and access to resources throughout history. The emergence of race as a systematic concept is traced to the rise of European colonialism, capitalism, and the development of modern science from the 16th century onward. While early philosophers like Kant acknowledged both shared human descent and the consolidation of racial differences over time in response to environment, their work was open to misinterpretation and helped spread Eurocentric views of racial hierarchies. The document examines the historical and social forces that have shaped racial identities and meanings over time.
Feminism seeks to achieve equality between men and women. Feminism in international relations examines how gender stereotypes influence the field. It challenges mainstream concepts like power and security from a gender perspective. A key goal is highlighting gender inequalities often ignored in traditional theories. Feminist scholars argue that including women's voices and perspectives would provide new insights and orientations for understanding international issues.
13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Federal Authorities Urge Vigilance Amid Bird Flu Outbreak | The Lifesciences ...The Lifesciences Magazine
Federal authorities have advised the public to remain vigilant but calm in response to the ongoing bird flu outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza, commonly known as bird flu.
Recent years have seen a disturbing rise in violence, discrimination, and intolerance against Christian communities in various Islamic countries. This multifaceted challenge, deeply rooted in historical, social, and political animosities, demands urgent attention. Despite the escalating persecution, substantial support from the Western world remains lacking.
16062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Slide deck with charts from our Digital News Report 2024, the most comprehensive exploration of news consumption habits around the world, based on survey data from more than 95,000 respondents across 47 countries.
Youngest c m in India- Pema Khandu BiographyVoterMood
Pema Khandu, born on August 21, 1979, is an Indian politician and the Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh. He is the son of former Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh, Dorjee Khandu. Pema Khandu assumed office as the Chief Minister in July 2016, making him one of the youngest Chief Ministers in India at that time.
ग्रेटर मुंबई के नगर आयुक्त को एक खुले पत्र में याचिका दायर कर 540 से अधिक मुंबईकरों ने सभी अवैध और अस्थिर होर्डिंग्स, साइनबोर्ड और इलेक्ट्रिक साइनेज को तत्काल हटाने और 13 मई, 2024 की शाम को घाटकोपर में अवैध होर्डिंग के गिरने की विनाशकारी घटना के बाद अपराधियों के खिलाफ सख्त कार्रवाई की मांग की है, जिसमें 17 लोगों की जान चली गई और कई निर्दोष लोग गंभीर रूप से घायल हो गए।
लालू यादव की जीवनी LALU PRASAD YADAV BIOGRAPHYVoterMood
Discover the life and times of Lalu Prasad Yadav with a comprehensive biography in Hindi. Learn about his early days, rise in politics, controversies, and contribution.
projet de traité négocié à Istanbul (anglais).pdfEdouardHusson
Ceci est le projet de traité qui avait été négocié entre Russes et Ukrainiens à Istanbul en mars 2022, avant que les Etats-Unis et la Grande-Bretagne ne détournent Kiev de signer.
#WenguiGuo#WashingtonFarm Guo Wengui Wolf son ambition exposed to open a far...rittaajmal71
Since fleeing to the United States in 2014, Guo Wengui has founded a number of projects in the United States, such as GTV Media Group, GTV private equity, farm loan project, G Club Operations Co., LTD., and Himalaya Exchange.
15062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
12062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
केरल उच्च न्यायालय ने 11 जून, 2024 को मंडला पूजा में भाग लेने की अनुमति मांगने वाली 10 वर्षीय लड़की की रिट याचिका को खारिज कर दिया, जिसमें सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की एक बड़ी पीठ के समक्ष इस मुद्दे की लंबित प्रकृति पर जोर दिया गया। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति अनिल के. नरेंद्रन और न्यायमूर्ति हरिशंकर वी. मेनन की खंडपीठ द्वारा पारित किया गया
2. Introduction
• International violence is becoming less
problematic than it was during the last century -
more intrastate conflicts, than interstate
struggles.
• From 1989 to 1996 there were 69 armed
conflicts, of which only five have been between
states.
3. The concept of conf ict
• Study of each conflict requires the research of:
• 1. Background of the conflict (history of mutual
relations),
• 2. Type of actors,
• 3. Character and nature of involved parties,
• 4. Reasons of conflict and
• 5. Context (the role of external actor).
4. The concept of conf ict
• Study of each conflict requires the research of:
• 1. Background of the conflict (history of mutual
relations),
• 2. Type of actors,
• 3. Character and nature of involved parties,
• 4. Reasons of conflict and
• 5. Context (the role of external actor).
5. The concept of conf ict
• Study of each conflict requires the research of:
• 1. Background of the conflict (history of mutual
relations),
• 2. Type of actors,
• 3. Character and nature of involved parties,
• 4. Reasons of conflict and
• 5. Context (the role of external actor).
6. The concept of conf ict
• Study of each conflict requires the research of:
• 1. Background of the conflict (history of mutual
relations),
• 2. Type of actors,
• 3. Character and nature of involved parties,
• 4. Reasons of conflict and
• 5. Context (the role of external actor).
7. L
o
w High
coer- .coer-
civeness c1
♦
veness
"Pure" Promising Tryingto Threatof Nonviolent Violent
coop-
eration
areward persuade coercion coercion coercion
◄ ►◄
Noncoerciveaction Coerci
.
veacti
.
on ►
figure 2.1.CoercivenessofConflictAction
8. The concept of conf ict
• Study of each conflict requires the research of:
• 1. Background of the conflict (history of mutual
relations),
• 2. Type of actors,
• 3. Character and nature of involved parties,
• 4. Reasons of conflict and
• 5. Context (the role of external actor).
9. The concept of conf ict
• Study of each conflict requires the research of:
• 1. Background of the conflict (history of mutual
relations),
• 2. Type of actors,
• 3. Character and nature of involved parties,
• 4. Reasons of conflict and
• 5. Context (the role of external actor).
10. The concept of conf ict
• Study of each conflict requires the research of:
• 1. Background of the conflict (history of mutual
relations),
• 2. Type of actors,
• 3. Character and nature of involved parties,
• 4. Reasons of conflict and
• 5. Context (the role of external actor).
11. The concept of conf ict
• Study of each conflict requires the research of:
• 1. Background of the conflict (history of mutual
relations),
• 2. Type of actors,
• 3. Character and nature of involved parties,
• 4. Reasons of conflict and
• 5. Context (the role of external actor).
12. The concept of conf ict
• Study of each conflict requires the research of:
• 1. Background of the conflict (history of mutual
relations),
• 2. Type of actors,
• 3. Character and nature of involved parties,
• 4. Reasons of conflict and
• 5. Context (the role of external actor).
13. The concept of conf ict
• Study of each conflict requires the research of:
• 1. Background of the conflict (history of mutual
relations),
• 2. Type of actors,
• 3. Character and nature of involved parties,
• 4. Reasons of conflict and
• 5. Context (the role of external actor).
14. Level of analysis
Domestic explanations
-Focus on factors that operate primarily at the
domestic level: the effectiveness of state in
addressing the concerns of their constituents, the
impact of nationalism of nationalism on
interethnic relations and the impact of
democratization on interethnic relations.
-D. Horowitz, Arend Lijphart stressed the impact
of democratization and other domestic political
factors have on the prospects for ethnic conflict.
15. Level of analysis
Domestic explanations
-Focus on factors that operate primarily at the
domestic level: the effectiveness of state in
addressing the concerns of their constituents, the
impact of nationalism of nationalism on
interethnic relations and the impact of
democratization on interethnic relations.
-D. Horowitz, Arend Lijphart stressed the impact
of democratization and other domestic political
factors have on the prospects for ethnic conflict.
16. Levels of
analysis
Perceptual explanations
-Some explanations of ethnic conflict focus on the
false histories that many ethnic groups have of
themselves and others.
-These histories present one's own group heroic,
while other groups are demonized. Such belief and
perception create big escalatory pressures.
17. Useful Sources in Conflict
Research
Surveys
•Afrobarometer (www.afrobarometer.org)
•Households in Conflict Network - HiCV (www.hinc.org)
•World Values Survey (www.worldvaluessurvey.org)
General country information
•World Development Indicators (data.worldbank.org)
•UN Data (data.un.org)
•The Quality of Government Institute, Goteborg University
(www.qog.pol.gu.se)
•Gapminder (www.gapminder.org)
Conflict data programs
•Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University
of Maryland (www.cidcm.umd.edu)
•Correlated of War (www.correlatesofwar.org)
•Uppsala Conflict Data Program (www.ucdp.uu.se)
18. Useful Sources in Conflict
Research
Surveys
•Afrobarometer (www.afrobarometer.org)
•Households in Conflict Network - HiCV (www.hinc.org)
•World Values Survey (www.worldvaluessurvey.org)
General country information
•World Development Indicators (data.worldbank.org)
•UN Data (data.un.org)
•The Quality of Government Institute, Goteborg University
(www.qog.pol.gu.se)
•Gapminder (www.gapminder.org)
Conflict data programs
•Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University
of Maryland (www.cidcm.umd.edu)
•Correlated of War (www.correlatesofwar.org)
•Uppsala Conflict Data Program (www.ucdp.uu.se)
19. What is ethnic?
• Ethnicity as a neutral term, without any
pejorative elements. Ethnicity will be mainly
linked to habits, language, origins, collective
experiences and group solidarity.
• This means that ethnic within this course will be
understood as group who has its own culture
and shares perception about their past which
have created the sense of solidarity and
association to the certain territory.
20. What is ethnic?
• Ethnicity as a neutral term, without any
pejorative elements. Ethnicity will be mainly
linked to habits, language, origins, collective
experiences and group solidarity.
• This means that ethnic within this course will be
understood as group who has its own culture
and shares perception about their past which
have created the sense of solidarity and
association to the certain territory.
21. What is ethnic?
• Ethnicity as a neutral term, without any
pejorative elements. Ethnicity will be mainly
linked to habits, language, origins, collective
experiences and group solidarity.
• This means that ethnic within this course will be
understood as group who has its own culture
and shares perception about their past which
have created the sense of solidarity and
association to the certain territory.
22. Theories of Ethnicity
• Ethno-symbolism was initially developed by Crawford
Young (1976), it then became associated primarily with
Anthony D. Smith (1991), Walker Connor (1994) as well
as more recently, in the form of symbolic politics theory,
with Stuart Kaufman (2001). The essence of the
ethnosymbolist synthesis is well captured in Smith's
description of ethnic group as "a type of cultural
collectively, one that emphasizes the role of myths of
decent and historical memories, and that is recognized
by one or more cultural differences like religion,
customs, language, or institution."
23. Theories of Ethnicity
• Ethno-symbolism was initially developed by Crawford
Young (1976), it then became associated primarily with
Anthony D. Smith (1991), Walker Connor (1994) as well
as more recently, in the form of symbolic politics theory,
with Stuart Kaufman (2001). The essence of the
ethnosymbolist synthesis is well captured in Smith's
description of ethnic group as "a type of cultural
collectively, one that emphasizes the role of myths of
decent and historical memories, and that is recognized
by one or more cultural differences like religion,
customs, language, or institution."
24. Theories of Ethnicity
• Ethno-symbolism was initially developed by Crawford
Young (1976), it then became associated primarily with
Anthony D. Smith (1991), Walker Connor (1994) as well
as more recently, in the form of symbolic politics theory,
with Stuart Kaufman (2001). The essence of the
ethnosymbolist synthesis is well captured in Smith's
description of ethnic group as "a type of cultural
collectively, one that emphasizes the role of myths of
decent and historical memories, and that is recognized
by one or more cultural differences like religion,
customs, language, or institution."
25. What is ethnic?
• Ethnicity as a neutral term, without any
pejorative elements. Ethnicity will be mainly
linked to habits, language, origins, collective
experiences and group solidarity.
• This means that ethnic within this course will be
understood as group who has its own culture
and shares perception about their past which
have created the sense of solidarity and
association to the certain territory.
26. What is ethnic?
• Ethnicity as a neutral term, without any
pejorative elements. Ethnicity will be mainly
linked to habits, language, origins, collective
experiences and group solidarity.
• This means that ethnic within this course will be
understood as group who has its own culture
and shares perception about their past which
have created the sense of solidarity and
association to the certain territory.
27. What is ethnic?
• Ethnicity as a neutral term, without any
pejorative elements. Ethnicity will be mainly
linked to habits, language, origins, collective
experiences and group solidarity.
• This means that ethnic within this course will be
understood as group who has its own culture
and shares perception about their past which
have created the sense of solidarity and
association to the certain territory.
28. What is ethnic conflict?
• While trying to define the conflicts in Abkhazia,
South Ossetia and Nagorno-Karabakh we should
think about if we call them by the nature of their
issues (attempts of certain groups to carve out a
separate space and status) or by the nature of
participants (ethnic groups).
• To what extent ethnic conflicts in South Caucasus
are actually about ethnicity and to what extent
ethnicity is a merely suitable denominator to
organize conflict group in the struggle over political
power, territory and independence.
29. What is ethnic conflict?
• While trying to define the conflicts in Abkhazia,
South Ossetia and Nagorno-Karabakh we should
think about if we call them by the nature of their
issues (attempts of certain groups to carve out a
separate space and status) or by the nature of
participants (ethnic groups).
• To what extent ethnic conflicts in South Caucasus
are actually about ethnicity and to what extent
ethnicity is a merely suitable denominator to
organize conflict group in the struggle over political
power, territory and independence.
30. What is ethnic conflict?
• While trying to define the conflicts in Abkhazia,
South Ossetia and Nagorno-Karabakh we should
think about if we call them by the nature of their
issues (attempts of certain groups to carve out a
separate space and status) or by the nature of
participants (ethnic groups).
• To what extent ethnic conflicts in South Caucasus
are actually about ethnicity and to what extent
ethnicity is a merely suitable denominator to
organize conflict group in the struggle over political
power, territory and independence.
31. What is ethnic conflict?
• While trying to define the conflicts in Abkhazia,
South Ossetia and Nagorno-Karabakh we should
think about if we call them by the nature of their
issues (attempts of certain groups to carve out a
separate space and status) or by the nature of
participants (ethnic groups).
• To what extent ethnic conflicts in South Caucasus
are actually about ethnicity and to what extent
ethnicity is a merely suitable denominator to
organize conflict group in the struggle over political
power, territory and independence.
32. What is ethnic conflict?
• While trying to define the conflicts in Abkhazia,
South Ossetia and Nagorno-Karabakh we should
think about if we call them by the nature of their
issues (attempts of certain groups to carve out a
separate space and status) or by the nature of
participants (ethnic groups).
• To what extent ethnic conflicts in South Caucasus
are actually about ethnicity and to what extent
ethnicity is a merely suitable denominator to
organize conflict group in the struggle over political
power, territory and independence.
33. What is ethnic conflict?
• While trying to define the conflicts in Abkhazia,
South Ossetia and Nagorno-Karabakh we should
think about if we call them by the nature of their
issues (attempts of certain groups to carve out a
separate space and status) or by the nature of
participants (ethnic groups).
• To what extent ethnic conflicts in South Caucasus
are actually about ethnicity and to what extent
ethnicity is a merely suitable denominator to
organize conflict group in the struggle over political
power, territory and independence.
34. Literature:
• Bartos, 0. J., Wehr, P. (2002): Using Conflict
Theory, Cambridge University Press.
• Tesar, F. (2007): Etnicke konflikty, Praha, Portal.
• Waisova, Sarka (2005): Reseni konfliktu
v mezinarodnich vztazich. Praha: Portal.
• Wallensteen, P. (2007): Understanding Conflict
Resolution, War, Peace and Global System, SAGE,
London.
• Wolff, S. (2006): Ethnic Conflict A Global
Perspective, Oxford University Press.