The document discusses effective strategies for agricultural experts to communicate with the public about farming practices. It notes that consumers have concerns about how food is produced but experts have not adequately engaged in the conversation. The key strategies discussed are to lead conversations by emphasizing shared values like food safety and animal welfare, use personal stories to build trust, provide credible sources to back up scientific facts, and engage proactively through social media to shape the public narrative. The goal is for experts to have an open dialogue to increase understanding of new technologies and address misinformation.
Florida Food Crop industries and GMO: Talking to a Concerned PublicUniversity of Florida
Presentation for Certified Crop Advisor extension meeting on how to effectively discuss crop biotechnology with concerned clientele. How to empower producers with information to effectively communicate the information.
Florida Food Crop Industries and GMO: talking to a concerned publicUniversity of Florida
1) The document discusses communicating with the public about genetic engineering and agricultural innovations. It notes that while GE has benefits for farmers, there is significant public pushback.
2) It recommends focusing the message on shared values like food safety and the environment. Tell personal stories to establish trust. Emphasize specific innovations that could help farmers and consumers.
3) Examples discussed include virus-resistant papaya and cassava, 'Golden Rice' for vitamin A deficiency, and research on citrus greening and bacterial wilt in tomatoes. The document argues Florida producers could benefit from new technologies and greater public engagement.
New Strategies in Communicating Biotechnology Topics to Concerned ConsumersUniversity of Florida
July 29, 2015 seminar at Monsanto Company, discussing what has been learned from teaching concepts in biotechnology to farmers, dietitians and scientists.
The document discusses strategies for scientists to communicate effectively with the public about genetically modified foods and biotechnology given that public records laws have been abused by activists to intimidate and harass scientists. It provides recommendations for scientists to be transparent in their work, emphasize shared values with the public around issues like health and the environment, and highlight examples of how biotechnology has benefited farmers and consumers. The document also outlines missed opportunities from biotechnology research that has not reached the public due to opposition.
2015 Florida Farm Bureau Young Farmers and Ranchers symposium discusses how to engage public dialog in the area of transgenic (GMO) technology. Animal and plant biotech are discussed, along with ways to hone the messaging to communicate effectively with a concerned audience.
Kevin Folta speaks to the American Seed Trade Association, clarifying subjects in plant genetic improvement. What are the differences between traditional breeding, mutagenesis, transgenic crop technology and other mechanisms? What does the future hold? This talk compares and contrasts the current state of the art of plant genetic improvement.
Address to Florida Fruit and Vegetable Association 2015 annual meeting in Palm Beach, FL. Discusses the role of biotechnology in the future of the state's ag crops and how our industries and farmers can better communicate the topic to a concerned public.
A discussion of how social media is used to harm scientists' reputations. A discussion of current issues in genetic engineering. Presented as part of a night with Skeptic Society of St. Louis, 6/10/2016
Florida Food Crop industries and GMO: Talking to a Concerned PublicUniversity of Florida
Presentation for Certified Crop Advisor extension meeting on how to effectively discuss crop biotechnology with concerned clientele. How to empower producers with information to effectively communicate the information.
Florida Food Crop Industries and GMO: talking to a concerned publicUniversity of Florida
1) The document discusses communicating with the public about genetic engineering and agricultural innovations. It notes that while GE has benefits for farmers, there is significant public pushback.
2) It recommends focusing the message on shared values like food safety and the environment. Tell personal stories to establish trust. Emphasize specific innovations that could help farmers and consumers.
3) Examples discussed include virus-resistant papaya and cassava, 'Golden Rice' for vitamin A deficiency, and research on citrus greening and bacterial wilt in tomatoes. The document argues Florida producers could benefit from new technologies and greater public engagement.
New Strategies in Communicating Biotechnology Topics to Concerned ConsumersUniversity of Florida
July 29, 2015 seminar at Monsanto Company, discussing what has been learned from teaching concepts in biotechnology to farmers, dietitians and scientists.
The document discusses strategies for scientists to communicate effectively with the public about genetically modified foods and biotechnology given that public records laws have been abused by activists to intimidate and harass scientists. It provides recommendations for scientists to be transparent in their work, emphasize shared values with the public around issues like health and the environment, and highlight examples of how biotechnology has benefited farmers and consumers. The document also outlines missed opportunities from biotechnology research that has not reached the public due to opposition.
2015 Florida Farm Bureau Young Farmers and Ranchers symposium discusses how to engage public dialog in the area of transgenic (GMO) technology. Animal and plant biotech are discussed, along with ways to hone the messaging to communicate effectively with a concerned audience.
Kevin Folta speaks to the American Seed Trade Association, clarifying subjects in plant genetic improvement. What are the differences between traditional breeding, mutagenesis, transgenic crop technology and other mechanisms? What does the future hold? This talk compares and contrasts the current state of the art of plant genetic improvement.
Address to Florida Fruit and Vegetable Association 2015 annual meeting in Palm Beach, FL. Discusses the role of biotechnology in the future of the state's ag crops and how our industries and farmers can better communicate the topic to a concerned public.
A discussion of how social media is used to harm scientists' reputations. A discussion of current issues in genetic engineering. Presented as part of a night with Skeptic Society of St. Louis, 6/10/2016
A presentation to the Beef Cattle Short Course at the University of Florida, discussing the new techniques in animal and plant breeding, along with understanding the public, and how to communicate these concepts with them.
Lessons Learned in Communicating Plant Science Topics to a Concerned PublicUniversity of Florida
The current state of genetic engineering technologies and how to effectively talk about them to the public. Presented on 6/4/2016 at the annual conference of American Public Gardens.
Presentation to the Cornell Alliance for Science on the genetic engineering (GMO) innovations in fruits and vegetable crops.
Another presentation provided in an effort to demonstrate my interests in full transparency, and free distribution of my developed resources. Please use in any way that is helpful to you.
Modern Ag Tecnologies in Plants and Animals- Conversations with a Concerned P...University of Florida
A discussion of strategies to discuss modern facets of science with a concerned public, with an emphasis on biotechnology. Presented at Michigan State University for graduate students, and a group or regulators from Mexico and Costa Rica.
NACM Agricultural Suppliers Meeting, Jan 20, 2017 at the Hilton Conference Center in Gainesville, FL. The slides accompany a presentation about how to explain agricultural concepts to the public, borrowing from what has been learned from psychology, crisis communication and public service.
This was the presentation given at the Trottier Symposium in Montreal, Canada, September 27, 2015. The session was "A Question of Evidence" and discussed major scientific topics of public controversy.
This was a keynote address to Food and Farm Care in Saskatoon, SK Canada, December 14, 2016. The talk centered on strategies for ag producers to be more effective in communication at the public interface about any "hot button" issue in farming and food, issues like hormones, antibiotics, GMO or pesticides. There is a clear method to help the public understand how these technologies work, as well as their relative risk and benefit. A lot has to do with trust. This strategy speaks about these topics as well as how to be an improved voice in social media.
Presentation on science communication for scientists and ag producers, with a focus on the proper way to engage public audiences. Some of the contemporary issues in contentious-issues science communication are discussed, primarily with the use of Freedom of Information Act implementation to harm scientists that present their interpretations.
Agriculture has greatly benefited from biotech crops, yet these technologies have a poor public perception. Farmers are among the most trusted professionals in society, and they benefit from these innovations, yet they are less likely to engage a curious, concerned and sometimes critical public. This slide show was presented at InfoAg 2015 with the goal of encouraging farmers and other producers to join the conversation, and providing the tools and philosophy to discuss science in public space.
A discussion on science communication, especially around the area of plant biotechnology. Presented to officials from the Limagrain Corporation, March 12, 2015.
Communicating Concepts in Genetic EngineeringKevin Folta
This document provides guidance on effectively communicating about genetic engineering and GMOs to the general public. It begins by explaining that most people lack understanding of the science and are influenced by manufactured risk. It recommends starting discussions by establishing common ground and values, then using logic and evidence while also appealing to emotion. Key points to convey include: genetic improvement is a continuum that predates GMOs; GMOs extend precise breeding; few commercially available GMOs focus on virus/insect resistance and herbicide tolerance; strengths and limitations should be acknowledged. Lost opportunities from GMO opposition like golden rice are highlighted. Farmers are suggested as credible communicators. Overall it emphasizes understanding audiences, focusing on the unsure middle, and discussing benefits of applications like disease
This presentation is a 45 minute talk to a plant biology faculty at North Carolina State University, 4/21/2015. The presentation speaks of the mechanisms that underlie the current biotech traits, what are the new opportunities, and why there is resistance to good technology-- along with how to get past it.
Will Potato Growers be Allowed to Benefit from New Technology? Kevin Folta
The document discusses issues around new potato technologies and communicating with the public. It provides background on the speaker's research funding and department. It then discusses challenges with potato breeding, benefits of past GM potatoes, and new genetic solutions on the horizon. The rest of the document outlines strategies for effectively communicating with the public, such as appealing to shared values, personalizing the message, and discussing opportunities rather than focusing only on risks. The goal is to have more engagement from the agricultural community to provide accurate information to non-experts.
Presentation at Oregon State University to faculty, students and postdocs on January 20, 2015. The topic is a basic primer on GMO technology and how to communicate it with the public.
A talk for an agriculture audience to introduce them to new gene editing technologies and how they are changing plant and animal breeding. Presented June 6, 2016 at GCREC in Balm, FL
How to Change the Hearts and Minds of a Concerned PublicKevin Folta
Slides from 2016 Crop Connect in Winnipeg, Manitoba. The presentation talks about the current problem in the discussion of genetic engineering, and how farm producers need to be part of the solution. presented February 11, 2016
Consumer-Assisted Selection: Making New Plants that Look, Smell and Taste Be...Kevin Folta
The Plant Innovation Center at the University of Florida is an interdisciplinary group of researchers that span five colleges, conspiring to make fruits and vegetables more attractive. The work uses the model of Consumer Assisted Selection, monitoring consumer preferences and then defining breeding and production priorities based on observed outcomes. The concept is a simple one-- Use what we have learned from analysis of market segments to define what food improvements might look like, then use the best technologies to achieve those goals. (Slides created by Dr. Dave Clark for the PIC, used by Folta with permission).
Presented to the University-Industry Consortium on March 3, 2015. Kevin M. Folta speaks about his experience at the public interface of GMO education and why there is resistance to good technology.
This presentation was delivered to the American Farm Bureau National Conference in Nashville, TN. January 6, 2018. The talk covers the technology of gene editing (genome editing), its potential applications, and how farmers can communicate better about it to ensure faster use of the newest tools.
A presentation to the Beef Cattle Short Course at the University of Florida, discussing the new techniques in animal and plant breeding, along with understanding the public, and how to communicate these concepts with them.
Lessons Learned in Communicating Plant Science Topics to a Concerned PublicUniversity of Florida
The current state of genetic engineering technologies and how to effectively talk about them to the public. Presented on 6/4/2016 at the annual conference of American Public Gardens.
Presentation to the Cornell Alliance for Science on the genetic engineering (GMO) innovations in fruits and vegetable crops.
Another presentation provided in an effort to demonstrate my interests in full transparency, and free distribution of my developed resources. Please use in any way that is helpful to you.
Modern Ag Tecnologies in Plants and Animals- Conversations with a Concerned P...University of Florida
A discussion of strategies to discuss modern facets of science with a concerned public, with an emphasis on biotechnology. Presented at Michigan State University for graduate students, and a group or regulators from Mexico and Costa Rica.
NACM Agricultural Suppliers Meeting, Jan 20, 2017 at the Hilton Conference Center in Gainesville, FL. The slides accompany a presentation about how to explain agricultural concepts to the public, borrowing from what has been learned from psychology, crisis communication and public service.
This was the presentation given at the Trottier Symposium in Montreal, Canada, September 27, 2015. The session was "A Question of Evidence" and discussed major scientific topics of public controversy.
This was a keynote address to Food and Farm Care in Saskatoon, SK Canada, December 14, 2016. The talk centered on strategies for ag producers to be more effective in communication at the public interface about any "hot button" issue in farming and food, issues like hormones, antibiotics, GMO or pesticides. There is a clear method to help the public understand how these technologies work, as well as their relative risk and benefit. A lot has to do with trust. This strategy speaks about these topics as well as how to be an improved voice in social media.
Presentation on science communication for scientists and ag producers, with a focus on the proper way to engage public audiences. Some of the contemporary issues in contentious-issues science communication are discussed, primarily with the use of Freedom of Information Act implementation to harm scientists that present their interpretations.
Agriculture has greatly benefited from biotech crops, yet these technologies have a poor public perception. Farmers are among the most trusted professionals in society, and they benefit from these innovations, yet they are less likely to engage a curious, concerned and sometimes critical public. This slide show was presented at InfoAg 2015 with the goal of encouraging farmers and other producers to join the conversation, and providing the tools and philosophy to discuss science in public space.
A discussion on science communication, especially around the area of plant biotechnology. Presented to officials from the Limagrain Corporation, March 12, 2015.
Communicating Concepts in Genetic EngineeringKevin Folta
This document provides guidance on effectively communicating about genetic engineering and GMOs to the general public. It begins by explaining that most people lack understanding of the science and are influenced by manufactured risk. It recommends starting discussions by establishing common ground and values, then using logic and evidence while also appealing to emotion. Key points to convey include: genetic improvement is a continuum that predates GMOs; GMOs extend precise breeding; few commercially available GMOs focus on virus/insect resistance and herbicide tolerance; strengths and limitations should be acknowledged. Lost opportunities from GMO opposition like golden rice are highlighted. Farmers are suggested as credible communicators. Overall it emphasizes understanding audiences, focusing on the unsure middle, and discussing benefits of applications like disease
This presentation is a 45 minute talk to a plant biology faculty at North Carolina State University, 4/21/2015. The presentation speaks of the mechanisms that underlie the current biotech traits, what are the new opportunities, and why there is resistance to good technology-- along with how to get past it.
Will Potato Growers be Allowed to Benefit from New Technology? Kevin Folta
The document discusses issues around new potato technologies and communicating with the public. It provides background on the speaker's research funding and department. It then discusses challenges with potato breeding, benefits of past GM potatoes, and new genetic solutions on the horizon. The rest of the document outlines strategies for effectively communicating with the public, such as appealing to shared values, personalizing the message, and discussing opportunities rather than focusing only on risks. The goal is to have more engagement from the agricultural community to provide accurate information to non-experts.
Presentation at Oregon State University to faculty, students and postdocs on January 20, 2015. The topic is a basic primer on GMO technology and how to communicate it with the public.
A talk for an agriculture audience to introduce them to new gene editing technologies and how they are changing plant and animal breeding. Presented June 6, 2016 at GCREC in Balm, FL
How to Change the Hearts and Minds of a Concerned PublicKevin Folta
Slides from 2016 Crop Connect in Winnipeg, Manitoba. The presentation talks about the current problem in the discussion of genetic engineering, and how farm producers need to be part of the solution. presented February 11, 2016
Consumer-Assisted Selection: Making New Plants that Look, Smell and Taste Be...Kevin Folta
The Plant Innovation Center at the University of Florida is an interdisciplinary group of researchers that span five colleges, conspiring to make fruits and vegetables more attractive. The work uses the model of Consumer Assisted Selection, monitoring consumer preferences and then defining breeding and production priorities based on observed outcomes. The concept is a simple one-- Use what we have learned from analysis of market segments to define what food improvements might look like, then use the best technologies to achieve those goals. (Slides created by Dr. Dave Clark for the PIC, used by Folta with permission).
Presented to the University-Industry Consortium on March 3, 2015. Kevin M. Folta speaks about his experience at the public interface of GMO education and why there is resistance to good technology.
This presentation was delivered to the American Farm Bureau National Conference in Nashville, TN. January 6, 2018. The talk covers the technology of gene editing (genome editing), its potential applications, and how farmers can communicate better about it to ensure faster use of the newest tools.
How to Change the Hearts and Minds of a Concerned PublicKevin Folta
This document discusses strategies for communicating about agricultural biotechnology and genetically engineered crops. It begins by outlining common concerns people express about farming practices and corporate control of the food system. It then explains that the reality is our food supply is the safest and most abundant in history due to technologies like genetic engineering. The document provides tips for effective communication, such as starting discussions by emphasizing shared values like feeding the hungry and protecting the environment. It also recommends focusing on scientific facts and personal stories to build trust. Examples are given of genetically engineered crops that could help farmers and consumers but face opposition, like golden rice which could reduce vitamin A deficiency. The document concludes by discussing the promise of new technologies like gene editing.
Biokeyz is a technology company that holds the license for an advanced analysis technology in Southeast Asia called Bio-Photonic. Bio-Photonic can provide a comprehensive analysis of a person's health, intelligence, and psychological profiles using only a few strands of hair, fingernails, saliva, finger and palm scans. The analysis utilizes sampling and database techniques from the US, Germany, Russia, China, and other sources. It provides a non-invasive way to understand oneself and one's children at a deeper level in order to unlock their full potential and maximize their health, education, career opportunities, and relationships.
The document discusses a money-making opportunity combining coffee and health through a company called Organo Gold. It notes that scientific research has been conducted on ganoderma, an ingredient in Organo Gold products. People who have switched to Organo Gold coffee and tea report many health benefits. The document recommends trying the products yourself and provides contact information for the opportunity.
A presentation provided on june 13, 2017 for postdoctoral researchers and graduate students at the University of Florida. The topic covers aspects of science communication that scientists don't normally consider. We're good at talking to each other, but not to non-scientists. Here are some strategies to improve that bottleneck.
This document discusses the importance of critical thinking skills for success at Oxford and Cambridge universities. It provides definitions of critical thinking as an intellectually disciplined process of analyzing and evaluating information. A key aspect is avoiding being misdirected by assumptions and considering problems from multiple perspectives. The document uses examples to illustrate critical thinking, such as analyzing the reliability of different statements about science and health. It also discusses why misinformation exists and the importance of critically evaluating all sources of information.
Our Barn Door is Open - How Transparency and Communication Can Rebuild TrustNational Pork Board
This document discusses how transparency and communication can help rebuild trust in the pork industry. It notes that trust in major institutions like government and media is low. While the pork industry says its practices are safe and beneficial, the public often hears something different. The document advocates for transparency, storytelling over just facts, and experiences over explanations to help close the credibility gap. It outlines efforts like showcasing award-winning pig farmers, taking food bloggers on farm tours, and the #RealPigFarming social media campaign to share real stories from pig farmers. The campaign saw growth in engagement but also some negative responses, and lessons were learned about effective content.
This document provides an overview of Teri Lichtenstein's career and experience in nutrition marketing and social media. It details her various roles working for organizations like Diabetes Australia and The Food Group Australia. The bulk of the document then focuses on explaining various social media platforms and how dietitians can utilize social media to engage with clients and promote their services. Key platforms discussed include Twitter, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Instagram, blogs and more. Examples are given of how social media can be successfully used to generate interest in clinical research studies and community cooking classes.
The document discusses the importance of effective leadership in organizations through having a shared vision and strong communication. It states that a convincing vision can inspire and focus an organization, and that communicating regularly and listening are also important leadership skills. It notes that leadership skills should match the culture, and leaders need to create a culture that benefits all involved.
Reference Link: https://myassignmenthelp.com/blog/informative-speech-topics/
For Order: https://myassignmenthelp.com/Home/
Email id:
contact@myassignmenthelp.com
Oration, that conveys some specific data, comes under the category of informative speech. While delivering the lecture, your primary target must be assisting the listeners to comprehend an intricate subject through your verbal communication. Never let your topic to render disappointment amongst your addressees. Otherwise, chances prevail that they may not pay attention to your speech.
Similar to Communication Ensures Your Freedom to Operate (14)
The ability to recreate computational results with minimal effort and actionable metrics provides a solid foundation for scientific research and software development. When people can replicate an analysis at the touch of a button using open-source software, open data, and methods to assess and compare proposals, it significantly eases verification of results, engagement with a diverse range of contributors, and progress. However, we have yet to fully achieve this; there are still many sociotechnical frictions.
Inspired by David Donoho's vision, this talk aims to revisit the three crucial pillars of frictionless reproducibility (data sharing, code sharing, and competitive challenges) with the perspective of deep software variability.
Our observation is that multiple layers — hardware, operating systems, third-party libraries, software versions, input data, compile-time options, and parameters — are subject to variability that exacerbates frictions but is also essential for achieving robust, generalizable results and fostering innovation. I will first review the literature, providing evidence of how the complex variability interactions across these layers affect qualitative and quantitative software properties, thereby complicating the reproduction and replication of scientific studies in various fields.
I will then present some software engineering and AI techniques that can support the strategic exploration of variability spaces. These include the use of abstractions and models (e.g., feature models), sampling strategies (e.g., uniform, random), cost-effective measurements (e.g., incremental build of software configurations), and dimensionality reduction methods (e.g., transfer learning, feature selection, software debloating).
I will finally argue that deep variability is both the problem and solution of frictionless reproducibility, calling the software science community to develop new methods and tools to manage variability and foster reproducibility in software systems.
Exposé invité Journées Nationales du GDR GPL 2024
Or: Beyond linear.
Abstract: Equivariant neural networks are neural networks that incorporate symmetries. The nonlinear activation functions in these networks result in interesting nonlinear equivariant maps between simple representations, and motivate the key player of this talk: piecewise linear representation theory.
Disclaimer: No one is perfect, so please mind that there might be mistakes and typos.
dtubbenhauer@gmail.com
Corrected slides: dtubbenhauer.com/talks.html
What is greenhouse gasses and how many gasses are there to affect the Earth.moosaasad1975
What are greenhouse gasses how they affect the earth and its environment what is the future of the environment and earth how the weather and the climate effects.
Unlocking the mysteries of reproduction: Exploring fecundity and gonadosomati...AbdullaAlAsif1
The pygmy halfbeak Dermogenys colletei, is known for its viviparous nature, this presents an intriguing case of relatively low fecundity, raising questions about potential compensatory reproductive strategies employed by this species. Our study delves into the examination of fecundity and the Gonadosomatic Index (GSI) in the Pygmy Halfbeak, D. colletei (Meisner, 2001), an intriguing viviparous fish indigenous to Sarawak, Borneo. We hypothesize that the Pygmy halfbeak, D. colletei, may exhibit unique reproductive adaptations to offset its low fecundity, thus enhancing its survival and fitness. To address this, we conducted a comprehensive study utilizing 28 mature female specimens of D. colletei, carefully measuring fecundity and GSI to shed light on the reproductive adaptations of this species. Our findings reveal that D. colletei indeed exhibits low fecundity, with a mean of 16.76 ± 2.01, and a mean GSI of 12.83 ± 1.27, providing crucial insights into the reproductive mechanisms at play in this species. These results underscore the existence of unique reproductive strategies in D. colletei, enabling its adaptation and persistence in Borneo's diverse aquatic ecosystems, and call for further ecological research to elucidate these mechanisms. This study lends to a better understanding of viviparous fish in Borneo and contributes to the broader field of aquatic ecology, enhancing our knowledge of species adaptations to unique ecological challenges.
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...Ana Luísa Pinho
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) provides means to characterize brain activations in response to behavior. However, cognitive neuroscience has been limited to group-level effects referring to the performance of specific tasks. To obtain the functional profile of elementary cognitive mechanisms, the combination of brain responses to many tasks is required. Yet, to date, both structural atlases and parcellation-based activations do not fully account for cognitive function and still present several limitations. Further, they do not adapt overall to individual characteristics. In this talk, I will give an account of deep-behavioral phenotyping strategies, namely data-driven methods in large task-fMRI datasets, to optimize functional brain-data collection and improve inference of effects-of-interest related to mental processes. Key to this approach is the employment of fast multi-functional paradigms rich on features that can be well parametrized and, consequently, facilitate the creation of psycho-physiological constructs to be modelled with imaging data. Particular emphasis will be given to music stimuli when studying high-order cognitive mechanisms, due to their ecological nature and quality to enable complex behavior compounded by discrete entities. I will also discuss how deep-behavioral phenotyping and individualized models applied to neuroimaging data can better account for the subject-specific organization of domain-general cognitive systems in the human brain. Finally, the accumulation of functional brain signatures brings the possibility to clarify relationships among tasks and create a univocal link between brain systems and mental functions through: (1) the development of ontologies proposing an organization of cognitive processes; and (2) brain-network taxonomies describing functional specialization. To this end, tools to improve commensurability in cognitive science are necessary, such as public repositories, ontology-based platforms and automated meta-analysis tools. I will thus discuss some brain-atlasing resources currently under development, and their applicability in cognitive as well as clinical neuroscience.
The binding of cosmological structures by massless topological defectsSérgio Sacani
Assuming spherical symmetry and weak field, it is shown that if one solves the Poisson equation or the Einstein field
equations sourced by a topological defect, i.e. a singularity of a very specific form, the result is a localized gravitational
field capable of driving flat rotation (i.e. Keplerian circular orbits at a constant speed for all radii) of test masses on a thin
spherical shell without any underlying mass. Moreover, a large-scale structure which exploits this solution by assembling
concentrically a number of such topological defects can establish a flat stellar or galactic rotation curve, and can also deflect
light in the same manner as an equipotential (isothermal) sphere. Thus, the need for dark matter or modified gravity theory is
mitigated, at least in part.
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...University of Maribor
Slides from:
11th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (IcETRAN), Niš, 3-6 June 2024
Track: Artificial Intelligence
https://www.etran.rs/2024/en/home-english/
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...
Communication Ensures Your Freedom to Operate
1. The Public has Questions, How Do You Answer Them?
Communication Ensures Your
Freedom to Operate
Kevin M. Folta
Professor and Chairman
Horticultural Sciences Department
kfolta.blogspot.com
@kevinfolta
kfolta@ufl.edu
www.talkingbiotechpodcast.com
slideshare.net/kevinfolta
2. • Consumers are concerned about farming,
food, and how it is produced.
3. • Consumers are concerned about farming,
food, and how it is produced.
• 2000-2012 : “Well they just are clueless, so
if I give them information they’ll figure it out.”
4. • Consumers are concerned about farming, food,
and how it is produced.
• 2000-2012 : “Well they just are clueless, so if I
give them information they’ll figure it out.”
• 2012- present : “I understand why they feel that
way, let me share what I know and show them we
have the same core values.”
5. • Why is there a problem with acceptance of
agricultural technology?
• How do we communicate the science
effectively?
• What are our lost opportunities and costs of
non-action?
• What can you do to participate (solve this
problem)?
6. THE PROBLEM(s).
Lack of Trust
Experts and Trusted Voices Not Participating
Profits from Misinformation
Misguided Activism
Asymmetric Public Debate
Misplaced Concern About Food and Farming
Speaking to the Wrong Audience
10. Why is there even a problem?
How do we fix the
problem?
Center for Food Integrity
11. What Does the General Public Think?
There’s a backlash
against production
practices they don’t
understand.
12. Why is there even a problem?
We want to
understand
food, farming
and technology!
We’re actually
farmers, producers
and scientists, but
we’re too busy.
How can we help
you? We’re sorta
farmers, producers
and scientists.
13. Farm producers have great potential to influence
the conversation, but give up that power.
Farmers are 1.5% of the population, yet are ~0.001% of
the presence in social media.
People are interested in food and farming
They look to social media for answers
Farmers consistently are rated as most credible sources
of information
15. WHO IS YOUR AUDIENCE?
Most of the time these are
people that don’t know about
science and are concerned
about food. Share science with
them.
WHO IS NOT YOUR AUDIENCE?
Many have no interest in
understanding facts. They are not
a good investment of your time.
16. How do we talk to thatHow do we talk to that
audience?audience?
17. THE DISCUSSION IS
HAPPENING ONLINE
The internet is the home of bad
information, but is where the
conversation is taking place.
Expert voices are not being
heard.
Those with opinions contrary to
the facts about food and farming
are there, they are spreading
bad information, and getting rich
doing it!
18. Where do we find thatWhere do we find that
audience?audience?
33. GE chickens do not pass on Avian Influenza
Episode 007
X
Farmers
Consumers
Environment
Needy
X
X
X
X Animal well-being
34. AquaBounty Salmon – attains market weight in less time.
Salmon may be farmed on inland pools, generating high protein food
on fewer inputs.
Episode 008
X
Farmers
Consumers
Environment
Needy
X
X
X
X Wild populations
35. Thanks Dr. Alison Van Eenennaam for the slide!
Farmers
Consumers
Environment
Needy
X
36. Gene Editing
Not adding a gene, changing the gene that is present
so that it stops function or creates a known change.
Still strong opposition from activist NGOs
Some countries have taken stands on the issue
Stands to generate rapid improvement of crop plants,
especially where traditional breeding is long (trees)
37. Gene Editing
CRISPR/Cas9 -- a bacterial system that can be used to change DNA
sequences, with no ‘genetic engineering’ sequences left behind.
38. Gene Editing
Horn Gene Horn Gene
NO HORNS!!!
Good beef
Bad milkHORNS!!!
Bad beef
Great milk
39. Gene Editing
Horn Gene Horn Gene
NO HORNS!!!
Good beef
Bad milkHORNS!!!
Bad beef
Great milk
Cross….
Mix of bad beef, bad milk production
40. Gene Editing
Horn Gene Horn Gene
NO HORNS!!!
Good beef
Bad milkHORNS!!!
Bad beef
Great milk
Horn Gene
NO HORNS!!!
Bad beef
Good milk
43. Again, lead with values
Animal well being is important, so medicines have to
be used to protect all of them against preventable
disease.
In-feed antibiotics are thought to decrease sub-clinical
infections and therefore enhance growth.
In-feed use is tightly regulated by the FDA.
Changes in growth seem to be less profound than in
past times.
Jacela et al., 2009
44. Lead with your values.Lead with your values.
Build the case with logic.Build the case with logic.
46. Personalize Your Message
Tell your story. Start with
your concerns.
Talk about points that
everyone can agree upon
Refer to your family, your
personal goals.
My kids live on thisMy kids live on this
farm, I would notfarm, I would not
do anythingdo anything
dangerousdangerous..
Brian Scott TheFarmersLife.com
47. Your Experience and OperationYour Experience and Operation
in Social Mediain Social Media
48. Grab your e-Real Estate
Talking to public audiences – Get Involved!
1. Obtain a dedicated Gmail account- use your real name.
2. Sign up for facebook, twitter, instagram, pintrest, etc.
3. Get a blog space on blogspot.com or wordpress.
4.Answer questions in comments sections of news articles.
5. Spend >15 minutes a week. Remember your audience.
49. Know when to disengage.
1. Difficult people are everywhere. Don’t argue, state your
credentials and values (ethos) and the facts you know
that support them (logos) and the effects (pathos).
2. Use block/mute/etc.
3. Others are watching. Leave information, “Those that
want to learn more should contact me directly at
yournamehere@Gmail.com. Thank you.”
4. Don’t ever lose your cool. They take screen shots, and
they will haunt you forever.
50. Farmers taking action.
Jennie Schmidt
@FarmGirlJen
Brian Scott
www.thefarmerslife.com
@thefarmerslife
Sarah Schultz – Nurse Loves Farmer
@NurseLovesFarmr
Amanda
@farmdaughterusa
56. Others are Listening and Reading
DO DON’T
Talk about specific cases of those you
serve directly, your markets.
Use generic statements like “Feed the
world”
Talk about the things you could do
better, the things you’d like to see
changed.
Just focus on the positive
Welcome discussion, visits, etc. Walk away in disgust.
Provide references to good sources of
information, and several of them.
“Because I said so.”
Recognize the positive aspects of
‘alternative’ ideas
Criticize another avenue of thinking
without evidence.
57. Conclusion:
Farm producers are the most trusted and competent sources
of information, but are among the least likely to engage.
When engaging in conversation, lead with your ethics. Build
the argument with evidence and bring in personal impacts and
emotion.
Know how ag innovations satisfy shared values.
Get involved in the conversation. It is happening online with or
without you, and we need your experience if we are going to
control the narrative, and maintain freedom to operate.