This document discusses a research study analyzing citation networks of US Court of Appeals patentability decisions post-KSR v. Teleflex. The objectives are to identify the most important factors for patent non-obviousness, strategies for claim construction, and R&D management. A two-stage study design involves a pilot analysis of 100 cases and a full study of 500 cases to map the citation network, identify significant cases and rationales, and propose strategies. The results are expected to review the legal case citation network and provide factors for R&D management consideration.
Design an experiment or series of experiments to help corporate data scientists better understand the importance of ethical considerations in their own research.
The data scientists are the subject of this experiment.
There are eight rules.
2009 BIOL503 Class 8 Supporting Document: "Patent Claim Construction: A Surve...Karol Pessin
Spring 2009 BIOL503 Class 8 Supporting document, "Patent Claim Construction:
A Survey of Federal District Court Judges,"
Rebecca N. Eyre, Joe S. Cecil, and Eric Topor
Federal Judicial Center, February 2008
Design an experiment or series of experiments to help corporate data scientists better understand the importance of ethical considerations in their own research.
The data scientists are the subject of this experiment.
There are eight rules.
2009 BIOL503 Class 8 Supporting Document: "Patent Claim Construction: A Surve...Karol Pessin
Spring 2009 BIOL503 Class 8 Supporting document, "Patent Claim Construction:
A Survey of Federal District Court Judges,"
Rebecca N. Eyre, Joe S. Cecil, and Eric Topor
Federal Judicial Center, February 2008
V Międzynarodowa Konferencja Naukowa Nauka o informacji (informacja naukowa) w okresie zmian Innowacyjne usługi informacyjne. Wydział Dziennikarstwa, Informacji i Bibliologii Katedra Informatologii, Uniwersytet Warszawski, Warszawa, 15 – 16 maja 2017
The Devolution of Voting Technology: Recent Developmentsjoebeone
Slides for a panel talk at the 2008 ABA Annual Meeting intending to 1) familiarize attorneys with the types of voting technology in the field; 2) recent scientific developments with these technologies; and, 3) implications for the 2008 election.
see: Web Page: http://sawconcepts.com/heartbeacon/index.html System of Systems Framework for a Better World: Patent Application #13,573,002: The Heart Beacon Cycle LINK Method patent application describing a procedural template framework to form, maintain trade federations among widely distributed organizations by using several key DoD / DARPA system of systems projects to derive key proedures and building block components. Main embodiment is written as to be immune to recent Supreme Court / USPTO limitations on software method process patents. Invention improves mililtary "greatest invention" system of systems situational awareness program adding metrics and meters to monitize time / space trade federation activities.
Patents on Software and Business Methods: Have the Rules Changed?Karl Larson
The standard for patentable subject matter under Bilski is a “machine-or-transformation test,” which restricts patenting to inventions that are either tied to a particular machine or apparatus, or that transform a particular article into a different state or thing.
[Case Study] CSI and fingerprinting case study and discussion assignmentRiri Kusumarani
Case study about CSI and genetic fingerprinting. I didn't do discussion part, only 2-3 number of case study. Group members : Meena Kumari, Olusola and Riri Kusumarani
Surname 2NameCourseDatePE Exam in ECE Computer En.docxmabelf3
Surname: 2
Name:
Course:
Date:
PE Exam in ECE: Computer Engineering
Part 1: Summary
Professional Engineering Licensing is an official recognition that exhibits an engineer’s devotion to a higher level of principles. It also demonstrates a person’s higher levels of responsibility and authority. Again, professional engineering licensing acts as a protection to the public by enforcing values that restrict practice to competent individuals who have met particular credentials in learning, work experience as well as in the exam. The whole process of licensure is carried out and regulated by the state government. For instance, engineers in the United States are licensed at the state level by respective professional licensing boards. Further, I have learned that the NCEES is the one responsible for developing and scoring the FE and PE exams for engineering licensure.
Part 2: Interest in PE exam
I think the PE Exam in ECE-Computer Engineering test closest to my interest is to ensure that the minimum level of competency in my engineering discipline is achieved. The state is performing a great work which helps to minimize the number of unauthorized and incompetent engineers from flooding the market as well as ensuring quality work is done in the state.
Part 3: Questions
How many attempts is one given after failing the PE test?
Is the PE license obtained in the state universal documentation?
What happens to other engineers from other countries who have gained a minimum of four years’ post-college work experience in their chosen engineering discipline or have attained a PE license from their state and want to work in California State?
Part 4: My Plan to prepare for the test
For the first criteria (Power) I can take a class in Mathematics and physics (Math 123 and phys 152).
For the second criteria (Power) I can take a class Capstone (EE 430 Analog Electronic Circuits II)
For the third criteria (Power) I can take a class in Math and Science (EE 220 Materials Science for Electrical Engineers)
For the fourth criteria (Power) I can take a class in Electronics EE 202.
Reading
There is no assigned outside reading for this week, however, you may find it helpful to look at some of the links provided in this weeks presentation.Writing the 4MATIn Part 1, summarize what you learned about Intellectual Property and its protection from the presentation. In Part 2, give your opinion on one or more issues or historical cases presented. Part 3 is questions you still have about Intellectual Property and its protection. Part 4 is a concise and specific action plan to learn more about one or more aspects of Intellectual Property and its protection that is beyond what was presented in class.
9/26/19
1
Intellectual Property Protection
• Overview
• Copyright
• Patents
• Trademarks
• Industrial Design Rights
• Trade Dress
• Trade Secrets
This presentation is for educational
purposes only and does not
constitute legal advice
Ingenuity should receive a liberal
en.
Patent Search: An important new test bed for IRGiovanna Roda
Patent Search: An important new test bed for IR
presented at the 9th Dutch-Belgian Information Retrieval Workshop (DIR 2009)
Enschede, The Netherlands
http://dir2009.cs.utwente.nl/
V Międzynarodowa Konferencja Naukowa Nauka o informacji (informacja naukowa) w okresie zmian Innowacyjne usługi informacyjne. Wydział Dziennikarstwa, Informacji i Bibliologii Katedra Informatologii, Uniwersytet Warszawski, Warszawa, 15 – 16 maja 2017
The Devolution of Voting Technology: Recent Developmentsjoebeone
Slides for a panel talk at the 2008 ABA Annual Meeting intending to 1) familiarize attorneys with the types of voting technology in the field; 2) recent scientific developments with these technologies; and, 3) implications for the 2008 election.
see: Web Page: http://sawconcepts.com/heartbeacon/index.html System of Systems Framework for a Better World: Patent Application #13,573,002: The Heart Beacon Cycle LINK Method patent application describing a procedural template framework to form, maintain trade federations among widely distributed organizations by using several key DoD / DARPA system of systems projects to derive key proedures and building block components. Main embodiment is written as to be immune to recent Supreme Court / USPTO limitations on software method process patents. Invention improves mililtary "greatest invention" system of systems situational awareness program adding metrics and meters to monitize time / space trade federation activities.
Patents on Software and Business Methods: Have the Rules Changed?Karl Larson
The standard for patentable subject matter under Bilski is a “machine-or-transformation test,” which restricts patenting to inventions that are either tied to a particular machine or apparatus, or that transform a particular article into a different state or thing.
[Case Study] CSI and fingerprinting case study and discussion assignmentRiri Kusumarani
Case study about CSI and genetic fingerprinting. I didn't do discussion part, only 2-3 number of case study. Group members : Meena Kumari, Olusola and Riri Kusumarani
Surname 2NameCourseDatePE Exam in ECE Computer En.docxmabelf3
Surname: 2
Name:
Course:
Date:
PE Exam in ECE: Computer Engineering
Part 1: Summary
Professional Engineering Licensing is an official recognition that exhibits an engineer’s devotion to a higher level of principles. It also demonstrates a person’s higher levels of responsibility and authority. Again, professional engineering licensing acts as a protection to the public by enforcing values that restrict practice to competent individuals who have met particular credentials in learning, work experience as well as in the exam. The whole process of licensure is carried out and regulated by the state government. For instance, engineers in the United States are licensed at the state level by respective professional licensing boards. Further, I have learned that the NCEES is the one responsible for developing and scoring the FE and PE exams for engineering licensure.
Part 2: Interest in PE exam
I think the PE Exam in ECE-Computer Engineering test closest to my interest is to ensure that the minimum level of competency in my engineering discipline is achieved. The state is performing a great work which helps to minimize the number of unauthorized and incompetent engineers from flooding the market as well as ensuring quality work is done in the state.
Part 3: Questions
How many attempts is one given after failing the PE test?
Is the PE license obtained in the state universal documentation?
What happens to other engineers from other countries who have gained a minimum of four years’ post-college work experience in their chosen engineering discipline or have attained a PE license from their state and want to work in California State?
Part 4: My Plan to prepare for the test
For the first criteria (Power) I can take a class in Mathematics and physics (Math 123 and phys 152).
For the second criteria (Power) I can take a class Capstone (EE 430 Analog Electronic Circuits II)
For the third criteria (Power) I can take a class in Math and Science (EE 220 Materials Science for Electrical Engineers)
For the fourth criteria (Power) I can take a class in Electronics EE 202.
Reading
There is no assigned outside reading for this week, however, you may find it helpful to look at some of the links provided in this weeks presentation.Writing the 4MATIn Part 1, summarize what you learned about Intellectual Property and its protection from the presentation. In Part 2, give your opinion on one or more issues or historical cases presented. Part 3 is questions you still have about Intellectual Property and its protection. Part 4 is a concise and specific action plan to learn more about one or more aspects of Intellectual Property and its protection that is beyond what was presented in class.
9/26/19
1
Intellectual Property Protection
• Overview
• Copyright
• Patents
• Trademarks
• Industrial Design Rights
• Trade Dress
• Trade Secrets
This presentation is for educational
purposes only and does not
constitute legal advice
Ingenuity should receive a liberal
en.
Patent Search: An important new test bed for IRGiovanna Roda
Patent Search: An important new test bed for IR
presented at the 9th Dutch-Belgian Information Retrieval Workshop (DIR 2009)
Enschede, The Netherlands
http://dir2009.cs.utwente.nl/
Citation Network Analysis for the United States Court of Appeals of Federal Circuit Decision of Patentability
1. Citation Network Analysis for
the United States Court of
Appeals of Federal Circuit
Decision of Patentability
Yu-Ching Kuo
PhD student
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology
2013 Fall
3. Motivation & Problem
Statment
• Impact of US Supreme Court KSR case
– TSM Test (Teaching, Suggestion and
Motivation) caused a widely-opened door for
patent examination.
– After 2007 supreme court KSR case, the bar
for non-obviousness examination has been
lifted.
– Several rationals for non-obviousness
examination has been introduced into
examination.
– New strategy for R&D are thus needed.
5. Overview of KSR study
Most are legal studies:
1. Rebecca S. Eisenberg, The Supreme Court and the Federal Circuit: Visitation and Custody of Patent Law, 106 Mich. L.
Rev. First Impressions 28 (2007)
2. The Honorable Timothy B. Dyk, A review of Recent Decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit,
57 AMULR 763 (2008)
3. Theodora Blanchfield, "Obviousness” Hit the Slot Machines: The Supreme Court's KSR decision cuts a wide swath through
industry, 11/1/08 IP L. & Bus. 14 (2008)
4. Andrew Moody, Patently Obvious: A Dual-Standard Solution to the Diverging Needs of the Information Technology and
Pharmaceutical Patent Industries,39 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 71-109 (2008)
5. Adam Powell, KSR Fallout: Questions of Law Based on Findings of Fact and the Continuing Problem of Hindsight Bias, 1
Hastings Sci. & Tech. L.J. 241-268 (2009)
6. Mojibi, Ali, An Empirical Study of the Effect of KSR V. Teleflex on the Federal Circuit’s Patent Validity Jurisprudence,
Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 20, No. 3, p. 101 (2010). Available at SSRN:
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1518607
7. Marian Underweiser, Presumed obvious: how KSR redefines the obviousness inquiry to help improve the public record of a
patent. 50 IDEA 247-305, (2010)
8. USPTO, Examination Guidelines Update: Developments in the Obviousness Inquiry After KSR v.Teleflex, Federal Register,
Vol. 75, No. 169 Notices, 53643(September 1, 2010)available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-21646.pdf
(last visited: 2011.4.6)
9. Rebecca Greendyke, Comment: No Patent for You!: How KSR v. Teleflex's Nonobviousness Test Conflicts with the
Scientific Method and Removes the Incentive to Innovate, 35 U. Dayton L. Rev. 413-435 (2010)
6. Overview of KSR study
About Strategy : more limited
1. Strategies for strengthening patent protection of pharmaceutical inventions in light of
federal court decisions, urr Top Med Chem. 2010 ;10(18):1929-36.
2. Isenbarger, T.A., In re Kubin's Reinvigo Rated nonobviousness standard for DNA patents,
Wisconsin Law Review, Vol. 2009, No. 6, p. 1435-1469 (2009)
3. Natalie A. Thomas, Secondary considerations in nonobviousness analysis: The use of
objective indicia following KSR v. Teleflex, New York University Law Review, Volume 86,
Issue 6, 2011, Pages 2070-2112 (2011)
4. Hao Yin, A New Formula for Analyzing Formulation-Patent Obviousness, 83 Temp. L.
Rev. 829 (2011)
8. Research Objectives
1. Find the most important factors for patent
non-obviousness
2. Provide a practical strategy for claim
construction
3. Provide a practical strategy for R&D
managing task
10. Research Design
• Formal Study
– The Research Question has been
crystalized as “the Main Factors of Patent
Non-obviousness”
• Data Collection
– Collect U.S. federal patent case from West
Law database
– Longitudinal : from 2007~
• 2-Stage Design
– pilot study for former 100 cases
– full study for all 500 cases
12. Data Analysis
1. Using citation network analysis to find the
main path of cases citing KSR
– Using social network software “Pajek”
2. Find the knowledge flow of the significant
cases in the main path
3. Find the rational inducing from the cases
4. Propose a practical strategy for R&D
activities.
18. Expected Performance
• Provide a global review for the citation
network of legal cases
• Provide the factors that should be take into
account when conduct R&D management.