Choosing the Accurate Project Management Office Setup.pdf

Choosing the Accurate Project
Management Office Setup
Any enterprise making an investment withinside the PMO approach needs to apprehend that
one of a kind forms of PMOs clear up one of a kind troubles—there may be no one-length-fits-all
solution.
AS ORGANIZATIONS WRESTLE with etrade, a favorite silver bullet is this system control
workplace (PMO). The word itself has a reassuring experience of sanity, order, and manipulate.
Unfortunately, the meaning of “PMO” gets murky after that. In truth, “PMO” manners massively
various things to one of a kind humans with handiest this as their not unusual place thread:
“Something it's going to restore our undertaking control mess.
” Yes, there are numerous PMO answers with a purpose to remedy diverse undertaking control
pills. But genuinely prescribing the “PMO solution” might be like a health practitioner telling you
to get a few remedies without specifying what kind. Different forms of PMOs clear up one of a
kind form of troubles.
We may not spend time at the PMO. This is genuinely the workplace of a software supervisor: a
person who's responsible for pulling collectively numerous associated tasks right into an
unmarried strategic initiative. That configuration is only a count of cascading accountabilities

and government. For the maximum part, it operates (or ought to operate) like all line
organizations. We will describe the ones diverse PMOs and the troubles they clear up.
There are 3 different styles of PMO, every of which can be used both independently or in
aggregate inside an unmarried entity.
William Casey, Ph.D., and Wendi Peck are principals in Executive Leadership Group Inc., a
Colorado-primarily based totally enterprise that offers schooling and sessions to assist
corporations enforce their strategies. Executive Leadership Group Inc.combines competencies
in organizational design, undertaking control, and extrade control to provide TransFormance™:
organizational transformation and not using a transitional lack of overall performance.
Contributions on this newsletter are gratefully acknowledged, particularly to Claudia Baca, Lona
Cram, and Cindy Muir, plus the scholars of our “Building Project-Capable Organizations” class.
PMO No. 1: Weather Station
The Problem. Sometimes executives get anxious about all of the cash they are spending on
tasks without their clearly understanding what is happening. They get harassed via means of
one of a kind reporting codecs coming from one of a kind undertaking managers with one of a
kind styles of jargon, plus the sheer wide variety of sports taking place at once. To stop their
confusion, they installed a “Weather Station.”
The Solution. Like an actual climate station, this PMO tracks and reviews
activities without at once influencing them. This manner speaks to diverse
factors of undertaking development to executives and each person else
having a want to understand (for instance, the undertaking managers of
interdependent tasks).
Basic Functions. Weather Stations solution those questions on the tasks
of their purview:
imgWhat's our development? This reporting will probably be completed at the extent of
milestones, no longer tasks (even though tasks in hassle have a tendency to be micro
scrutinized).

imgHow a good deal have we paid so far? How a good deal have we budgeted for this factor in
time?
imgHow a good deal have we paid for our modern development? How much did we finance for
this stage of development?
What are the modern principal dangers and issues?
Additional Functions. More sturdy Weather Stations can also additionally
carry out such chores as:
Tracking post-undertaking success of promised MOPs (this is, enterprise results).
Authorities. Although the Weather Station's features sound minor, nearly clerical, they require
that the Weather Station set the frequency, format, approach of transport, and related
equipment for reporting and making plans. (Remember that “actuals” need to be as compared to
“plans.”)
If the Weather Station no longer has sufficient clout to make certain cooperation with its
features, then it's going to hotel to “nag authority,” making it inefficient, embittered, and disliked.
This state of affairs is an instance of the conventional illegitimate challenge: duty without
authority, that could flip mild-mannered personnel into humans you do not need to understand.
So, both deliver the Weather Station a chunk of every undertaking supervisor's overall
performance appraisal (likely via a custom designed file card that feeds the appraisal), or, whilst
the Weather Station tattles on foot-draggers, motion had higher be rapid and sure.
Another opportunity to tattling lure isn't to keep Weather Station managers chargeable for
sincerely acquiring development facts. Instead, keep them responsible handiest for soliciting for
development facts … and nicely relaying facts received, plus reporting on who failed to flip off
their facts. That manner, the hassle of enforcement lands squarely withinside the laps of the
undertaking managers and their bosses, now no longer the man or woman going for walks the
Weather Station.
Pitfall Alert: Don't assume an excessive amount of. If you're a govt who employs the Weather
Station, or in case you are the man or woman going for walks it, please do not be tempted to
apply this form of PMO to restore screwed-up tasks. The Weather Station isn't legal to inform

undertaking managers and their customers a way to do things. If you need your Weather Station
to carry out that duty, you may update or upload its features (and government). If you need your
PMO to restore tasks, do not forget the characteristic defined beneath PMO.
Another Pitfall Alert: We normally see the hassle of Weather Station managers now no longer
being given sufficient authority. But we have additionally seen the much less common mistake of
in accordance with the Weather Station supervisor an excessive amount of authority: enter on
undertaking managers’ value determinations for a way properly executed at the undertaking.
Because this judgment has not anything to do with the characteristics of a Weather Station, it
serves handiest to confuse and annoy.
PMO No. 2: Control Tower
The Problem. The undertaking control characteristic for plenty of businesses is an important
asset. But, an important asset or now no longer, a few businesses absolutely fail to manipulate it
as an asset. A few symptoms:
imgTraining—which can be copious—is neither implemented nor supported.
Expensive and voluminous “methodologies,” ransomed from hotshot specialists, do little extra
than pressure robust bookshelves.
imgExecutives with little undertaking control savvy oversee undertaking managers.
imgLessons found out on one undertaking aren't implemented to different tasks.
Project managers use some strategies and equipment to healthy their whims, and extrade them
like underwear.
Management rewards heroics whilst ignoring or penalizing quiet competence.
You get the picture. Those businesses manifestly can't enhance their transport of tasks,
irrespective of how a good deal session and schooling they throw on the hassle.
The Solution. How do you begin treating undertaking control as an asset? Consider the usage
of a PMO referred to as the “Control Tower”—a time period coined by way of means of
undertaking control representative Jan Renerts. The Control Tower treats undertaking control as
a enterprise method to be included and nurtured. Following W. Edwards Deming's conventional
dictate to lessen variability, the Control Tower makes feasible development withinside the
undertaking control method.
In our view, Control Tower features ought to be blended with the ones of the Weather Station;
there may be no want to install separate entities for those features.

An unmarried PMO can also additionally carry out diverse combos of PMO features, relying on
the circumstance. Here is one plausible approach
Exhibit 1. An unmarried PMO can also additionally carry out diverse combos of PMO features,
relying on the circumstance. Here is one plausible approach.
Basic Functions. In exercise, the Control Tower PMO plays 4 preferred features: establishes
requirements for handling tasks; consults on a way to observe the ones requirements; enforces
the requirements; and improves the requirements.
1. Establishes Standards for Managing Projects. You have been given to have fundamental
requirements for handling tasks, and the PMO would possibly as properly write them. Typical
subjects addressed via way of means of such requirements encompass:
imgRisk control—template, frequency, approach of transport
imgProject configuration—who reviews to whom need to make experience from a position and
authority standpoint
imgCommunication/escalation requirements— whilst/how to tell whom
Change-manipulate mechanisms
imgLessons found out—methods for gathering, documenting, and making use of throughout the
organization
imgThe requirements—equipment and methods— will want to scale up or down to deal with one
of a kind length tasks.
Pitfall Alert: You allow a few humans to begin writing requirements and that they simply by no
means stop. Either get them jobs in Washington or manipulate them closely. This is an area for
the eighty/20 rule: eighty percent of the best to be completed will come from 20 percent of the
policies you may assume up. Stop there and desire for intelligence and ordinary control to hold
you to the relaxation of the manner.
In desire to particular requirements, certainly considered one among our colleagues employs a
method she calls “Expectations of Project Managers.” She offers the undertaking supervisor a
report that spells out the factor of every well known fact she might have written.
Then she asks the undertaking supervisor to deal with every factor. For instance, beneath neath
“Scope” she would possibly ask the undertaking supervisor to explain the undertaking's scope,
the way it turned into determined, what's blanketed and excluded, how scope modifications
could be controlled. In this manner, she leads undertaking managers to cowl all of the bases,

whilst permitting them to do it of their personal style. Templates are furnished to individuals who
need them.
2. Consults on How to Follow Those Standards. If undertaking managers are required to
fulfill a hard and fast of requirements, then they want to apprehend the ones requirements.
Internal specialists running for a Control Tower supervisor can assist make certain that
requirements are effectively communicated and understood. Consider the usage of one-on-one
consulting, small orientation sessions, and lessons on “a way to audit yourself.”
These inner specialists also can function the conduit of instructions found from undertaking to
undertaking, therefore making sure higher organizational absorption of latest thoughts and
statistics. These new thoughts and statistics might also name for infrequent revision of the
requirements.
3. Enforces the Standards. An intrinsic detail of duty is overall
performance results. Without this detail the entire software
workplace could be dealt with as a bureaucratic nuisance—or,
worse, a joke. Of course, overall performance results aren't
feasible without overall performance auditing.
If you do plan to supply overall performance results, do not forget those opportunities amongst
others that you may really assume of. For the carrot, use hefty bonuses to the undertaking and
software managers for assembly milestones and following requirements. For the stick, do away
with the non performing undertaking supervisor from the undertaking, therefore putting off the
opportunity of the hefty bonuses.
Pitfall Alert: The philosophy of “construct it and they'll come” does now no longer paintings here.
You would possibly assume that undertaking managers might obviously be searching for well
known, demonstrated methods, and they might embody the inner representative who goals to
put in the ones requirements. Well, overlook it. This is a cross-useful entity that need to have its
government. Minimally, the Control Tower need to manipulate a chunk of every undertaking
supervisor's overall performance appraisal. Ideally, it might additionally be capable of do away
with undertaking managers from tasks. These government are vital if the Control Tower is to
make certain the best of undertaking control practices inside its scope. And this is the factor, is
not it?
Another Pitfall Alert: Unless finances constraints call for in any other case, the man or woman
from the Control Tower who audits a undertaking ought to now no longer additionally seek
advice from the undertaking. This will assist in making certain extra customer cooperation with

the inner representative, because the customer is likely to reveal discomfiting statistics to a
person who isn't retaining a stick. It will even assist make certain higher objectivity at the a part
of the auditor, who has now no longer had a hazard to expand a chummy dating with the
customer. Another factor: who prefer to keep away from confrontation, specialists who're
requested to audit will regularly procrastinate on audits, appearing a long way fewer than are
needed.
4. Improves the Standards. Once requirements have been documented and are reliably
followed, it will become feasible to enhance the requirements. Each undertaking makes the
organization smarter. “Lessons found out” are sincerely found out—and integrated into new
requirements. But withstand mightily the temptation to begin gathering a sizable tome.
After exposing executives to the variations among PMOs, their inevitable query is, “So, what is
the proper one?”
PMO No. 3: Resource Pool
The Problem. Often, the individual that hires and manages undertaking managers is aware of
much less approximately undertaking control than they do. Therefore, the asset of undertaking
control skills has a tendency now no longer to be controlled as an asset: it is not expertly
selected, improved, and retained.
The Solution. Organizations that depend upon tasks to do enterprise can't manage to pay for
inattention to this key capability. Set up a “Resource Pool” for undertaking managers. Managers
and bosses wanting tasks then “lease” an undertaking supervisor from this repository of
know-how. It makes logical experience to mix the Resource Pool with the 2 in advance PMOs.
Basic Functions. With a Resource Pool nicely in place, executives can also additionally fairly
assume:
The characteristic of the Resource Pool does now no longer encompass interfering with inside
the organization's undertaking choice method or dedication of undertaking outputs. However, if
an undertaking's sponsor insisted on no longer nicely defining the undertaker's output (or in any
other case circumventing fundamental concepts of undertaking control), then the pool
supervisor might in reality intervene. The characteristic of the Resource Pool is to make certain
that tasks are completed correctly, no longer that the appropriate tasks are completed.
Authorities. The Resource Pool is any other of these systems wherein “construct it and they'll
come” does not practice. Executive management needs to agree on a few fundamental floor
policies to leverage this critical benefit effectively. Among them:
1. The Resource Pool Manager is in Charge of Supplying Project Managers to Projects.
The pool supervisor needs to be the handiest supply from which undertaking managers are

assigned. Obviously, the concept is to make certain a uniformly excessive stage of know-how
and to observe organizational requirements. Therefore, executives ought to now no longer be
allowed to lease undertaking managers outside the Resource Pool (at least, now no longer
without a few kinds of overview to make certain adherence to the intent, if now no longer the
letter, of the law,).
2. The Pool Manager is Granted Ordinary Managerial Authorities with Respect to Pool
Employees. What guarantees the know-how of those undertaking managers? The truth that the
pool supervisor is a black-belt undertaking supervisor whose government, that are additionally
accountabilities, encompass:
The pool supervisor ought to additionally assist do away with organizational boundaries to the
exercise of proper undertaking control, running to influence and train executives and inner
customers. But do not make the error of retaining them chargeable for persuading humans over
whom they haven't any authority.
The Internal Business Arrangement. In smaller businesses, individuals of the pool can also
additionally serve the handiest one inner customer, inclusive of the president. But in large
businesses, the Resource Pool may have numerous, possibly many, inner customers. In those
cases, the inner enterprise association needs to be labored out. Some inquiries to resolve:
Will the challenge of undertaking managers be strictly as much as the pool supervisor, or will it's
a negotiated method?
imgWill the inner customer pay for the undertaking supervisor? If so, on what basis: hours, days,
or via way of means of the undertaking?
Is the connection among the undertaking supervisor and customer certainly considered one
among subordinate and supervisor, or certainly considered one among provider and customer?
(This query is spoke back in most cases via way of means of the diploma to which the customer
at once controls the undertaking supervisor's overall performance results—extra manipulate
begins off evolved to lean towards a managerial dating, wherein case accountabilities to the
customer vs. the ones to the pool supervisor need to be wonderful and one of a kind.)
Conclusions, Decisions, Suggestions
The leading device of approach implementation is the undertaking. That makes undertaking and
software control a key organizational asset. Executives wishing to hone and nurture that asset
will enforce a few shapes of PMO. However, past the selection genuinely to have a PMO,
selections remain.

What's the Right One? After exposing executives to the variations among PMOs, their inevitable
query is, “So, what is the proper one?” It's a terrific query, however a touch like asking, “Which is
higher, bacon or eggs?” Because every of the PMO sorts represents a primary characteristic,
you may have anyone or an aggregate of features, relying completely to your wishes.
We accept as true that the Weather Station can also additionally be characterized independently
or be nested in the Control Tower. If the Weather Station had been nested in the Control tower,
then the PMO might file on undertaking development and make certain that undertaking
methods met requirements.
Likewise, the Control Tower (plus Weather Station) can also additionally be characterized
independently or be nested in the Resource Pool. If the latter case had been proper then the
PMO might file on undertaking development, make certain that undertaking methods met
requirements, and manipulate the pool of undertaking control skills.
Scope of the PMO. Some “tasks” are clearly no extra than tasks. On such tasks, the equipment
of the PMO might not upload vast value. Thus you may need to restrict the attainment of the
PMO to tasks above a positive length or possibly tasks that are made bigger throughout useful
boundaries.
You also can practice the PMO's features primarily based totally on the dimensions and scope
of the undertaking. With one customer, we've advocated PMO deployment primarily based
totally on length and scope of the undertaking. Exhibit 1 illustrates.
In Exhibit 1, a full-functioned PMO might carry out all 3 principal features on cross-useful tasks.
On large, unmarried-characteristic tasks, the useful place accomplishing the undertaking might
deliver the undertaking supervisor but might be issued to the best enforcement and reporting of
the PMO. On medium tasks, the useful place might deliver the undertaking supervisor and might
handiest be issued to reporting requirements.
Of course, that is the handiest instance. Any PMO deployment approach might be issued to the
wishes and skills of the organization wherein the PMO resides.
Strategic Oversight and PMO Success
The fulfillment of any PMO will in large part rely upon oversight and involvement on the
government tiers of the organization.
Portfolio Management. Ensuring that tasks get completed correctly—the area of the PMO—is a
one of a kind to be counted on rather than making sure that the appropriate tasks get
completed. PMOs do poorly at making sure that company budgets are spent withinside the very
nice manner to increase the approach of the organization. It isn't even the PMOs’ process to
save you conflicts and overlaps among undertaking outcomes. In short, PMOs no longer make

strategic selections approximately what tasks to do and whilst to do them. That process belongs
to the portfolio supervisor.
In small businesses, one man or woman, say a COO or CEO, will carry out that characteristic. In
large businesses, several humans want to be concerned in an extra formal manner—once in a
while referred to as the “governance method.” However, the remaining selection (and duty) need
nonetheless relaxation with an unmarried man or woman.
Executive Project Sponsorship. If you have ever seen a terrific actor in a horrible film then you
definitely understand that the man or woman on the middle level does not completely
manipulate the final results of an undertaking. The exercise of proper software control does now
no longer relax entirely at the shoulders of undertaking managers and PMOs.
PMOs can handiest broach so the various capacity limitations to proper software control. Those
limitations need to be eliminated at a better stage. This is the duty of control, regularly along
with the CEO and different senior executives.
Examples encompass:
imgHas the enterprise end result of an undertaking or software been appropriately defined?
img this system and undertaking managers have everyday managerial government— lease, fire,
assign, reward—with admiration to their key crew individuals? (This sounds trivial, however it's a
primary coverage selection in lots of businesses.)
Does the organization tolerate time spent making plans and tasks? (We agree, even though,
that making plans time needs to now be briefer than ever—however now no longer nonexistent,
as a few managers appear to prefer.)
Es cash to be had for the acquisition of an ok undertaking making plans and reporting system?
imgHas an undertaking's sponsor been narrowed right all the way down to one man or woman;
withinside the proper a part of the organization; on the proper stage—neither too excessive nor,
extra normally, too low?
imgWill the sponsor's profession be stricken by the final results of the undertaking?
SO, WILL A PROJECT control workplace restore your undertaking control woes”? Will it acquire
what you need it to acquire? Understanding the diverse forms of PMOs will assist you to
determine whether or not one, an aggregate, or none can be proper for you.

Choosing the Accurate Project Management Office Setup.pdf

More Related Content

Similar to Choosing the Accurate Project Management Office Setup.pdf

More from PMO Global Institute

Recently uploaded

Choosing the Accurate Project Management Office Setup.pdf