Children’s Response to Art Activities
Describing how a child does what helps us understand a child’s feelings. Observing art activities allows a unique insight into every child, for no two children work with materials in the same way. Observe a child during an art activity. In the following section, complete each of the applicable items you observed. Give a brief statement for each applicable item.
Age/Grade Level of Child: ___________________________________________________________ Place/Time of Observation: __________________________________________________________ Amount of Time Spent Observing: ____________________________________________________
Movement:
What is the child’s posture like? What is the rhythm of body movements? What is the tempo of the body movements? How much and what kind of effort does the child expend? What kind of freedom does the child show in his or her body movements?
Facial Expression:
Describe the eyes of the child during the activity. Describe the mouth.
Sounds and Language:
From the items observed above, what can be surmised about the child’s emotional response to the materials? About the child’s self-awareness and self-concept?
If the voice is used, what is it like? What does the child say? (Direct quotes, if possible) Does the child chant, sing, use nonsense syllables or phrases, or tell stories while working?
Summary of Observation:
Describe the child’s self-awareness and self-concept as reflected in the use of art materials.
Week 6 Part 3
Nicole Richardson
Student Demographics
Sally is an eight-year-old Caucasian female in third grade, she is an only child with a diagnosis of ASD. Sally lives at home with her mother and father, Sally parents both work and Sally spends a majority of her time with her babysitter Sara.
Sally is a sweet kid most of the time. She loves to color and likes everything Jojo Siwa!
When Sally becomes agitated her behaviors included eloping, self injury, biting, hitting and screaming.
Interfering Behavior
Sally behaviors can be presented in different ways, from avoidance, fleeing, outburst, to getting out of her seat talking out of turn, becoming aggressive, and not completing assignments. She lacks the ability to think through her actions. (inpulsive)
Preventative strategies
Providing Sally with strategies to meet her needs, and give her different ways to prevent behaviors. Give Sally positive praise, encouragement and model positive behavior. Check the often for overstimulation. Offer Sally choices in manipulative tools for the task and guidance and positive redirection. Use a token board to reward positive beahvior, getting tokens as frequenly as a minute apart at first and then in time waiting longer.
Functional assessment
According to Sally’s school record, behaviors happen for attention or to escape work that she is not interested in. Her behavior continues until she either gets the attention she desires or until she does not have to complet ...
Children’s Response to Art Activities Describing how a child
1. Children’s Response to Art Activities
Describing how a child does what helps us understand a child’s
feelings. Observing art activities allows a unique insight into
every child, for no two children work with materials in the same
way. Observe a child during an art activity. In the following
section, complete each of the applicable items you observed.
Give a brief statement for each applicable item.
Age/Grade Level of Child:
_____________________________________________________
______ Place/Time of Observation:
_____________________________________________________
_____ Amount of Time Spent Observing:
____________________________________________________
Movement:
What is the child’s posture like? What is the rhythm of body
movements? What is the tempo of the body movements? How
much and what kind of effort does the child expend? What kind
of freedom does the child show in his or her body movements?
Facial Expression:
Describe the eyes of the child during the activity. Describe the
mouth.
Sounds and Language:
From the items observed above, what can be surmised about the
child’s emotional response to the materials? About the child’s
self-awareness and self-concept?
If the voice is used, what is it like? What does the child say?
(Direct quotes, if possible) Does the child chant, sing, use
nonsense syllables or phrases, or tell stories while working?
2. Summary of Observation:
Describe the child’s self-awareness and self-concept as
reflected in the use of art materials.
Week 6 Part 3
Nicole Richardson
Student Demographics
Sally is an eight-year-old Caucasian female in third grade, she
is an only child with a diagnosis of ASD. Sally lives at home
with her mother and father, Sally parents both work and Sally
spends a majority of her time with her babysitter Sara.
Sally is a sweet kid most of the time. She loves to color and
likes everything Jojo Siwa!
When Sally becomes agitated her behaviors included eloping,
self injury, biting, hitting and screaming.
Interfering Behavior
Sally behaviors can be presented in different ways, from
avoidance, fleeing, outburst, to getting out of her seat talking
out of turn, becoming aggressive, and not completing
assignments. She lacks the ability to think through her actions.
(inpulsive)
Preventative strategies
Providing Sally with strategies to meet her needs, and give her
different ways to prevent behaviors. Give Sally positive praise,
encouragement and model positive behavior. Check the often
for overstimulation. Offer Sally choices in manipulative tools
for the task and guidance and positive redirection. Use a token
3. board to reward positive beahvior, getting tokens as frequenly
as a minute apart at first and then in time waiting longer.
Functional assessment
According to Sally’s school record, behaviors happen for
attention or to escape work that she is not interested in. Her
behavior continues until she either gets the attention she desires
or until she does not have to complete task.
Replacement behavior
We will teach Sally that she can obtain the attention desired for
staying on task completing her work and following directions.
We will reward her with positive reinforcement as well as using
the token board to allow Sally to earn preferred items, such as
iPad time JoJo Siwa videos or edibles.
Reflection
With support from the whole team, continuous work,
individualized strategies, UDL and interventions Sally will will
be able to manage her behaviors and control her outbursts. Sally
will have methods in place that will replace the behaviors at
both school and at home.
4. Teaching Students with Mild and Moderate Disabilities:
Research-Based Practices
SECOND EDITION
Libby G. Cohen
National Institute of Education, Singapore
Loraine J. Spenciner
University of Maine, Farmington
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Cohen, Libby G.
Teaching students with mild and moderate disabilities : resea
rch-based practices / Libby G. Cohen, Loraine J. Spenciner.--
2nd ed.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and indexes.
ISBN-13: 978-0-13-233138-8
ISBN-10: 0-13-233138-1
1. Children with disabilities--Education--
United States. I. Spenciner,
Loraine J. II. Title.
LC4031.C64 2009
371.92’6--
dc22 2008008700
Vice President and Executive Publisher: Jeffery W. Johnston
Executive Editor: Ann Castel Davis
Development Editor: Heather Doyle Fraser
Editorial Assistant: Penny Burleson
Senior Managing Editor: Pamela D. Bennett
6. Pearson Education Canada, Inc.
Pearson Education—Japan
Pearson Education Australia PTY. Limited
Pearson Education North Asia Ltd., Hong Kong
Pearson Educación de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
Pearson Education Malaysia, Pte. Ltd.
Pearson Education Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
ISBN 13: 978-1-323-50396-6
ISBN 10: 1-323-50396-X
Chapter 7 Methods for Teaching and Learning
OBJECTIVES
After completing this chapter, you should be able to
Describe various theories regarding how students learn.
Compare and contrast two or more research-
based teaching methods.
Discuss how educators might use learning or social networks to
facilitate teaching and learning.
Educators implement instruction in a variety of ways, referred t
o as teaching methods. A teaching method is a broad approach b
ased on theory, research, educational preparation, experiences, a
nd/or philosophy. Sometimes referred to as an instructional met
hod, a teaching method consists of a general plan that teachers f
ollow to introduce new material, assist student learning, and pro
vide feedback to students regarding their achievement. Some me
thods emphasize a teacher-
centered, structured approach to delivering instruction and high
levels of student responses, whereas other methods focus on the
importance of working and learning with peers or expert learner
s and mentors. Unfortunately, there is no simple answer as to w
hich method is best for students with disabilities. In this chapter
, we explore the characteristics of several contemporary method
s for teaching and examine the research findings related to stude
7. nts with disabilities. Before doing so, though, we begin by looki
ng at various theories of learning.
7.1 How Students Learn
Learning is the change in what students are capable of doing as
the result of formal and informal experiences (Cruickshank, Jen
kins, & Metcalf, 2005; Parsons, Hinson, & Sardo-
Brown, 2001). Through these experiences, such as teacher-
planned lessons and instructional activities, students learn new
skills, acquire new knowledge, and develop deeper understandin
gs. Teachers plan and implement learning activities using one or
more instructional methods, supported by theories of learning.
We explore several of these contemporary theories that form the
basis for methods of instruction. The major theories of learning
include cognitive, behavioral, and social learning. Each theory
views the student and the teacher through a slightly different le
ns, and each emphasizes different factors believed to be critical
for learning to occur.Cognitive Perspectives
Cognitive theories address how students think, process informat
ion, and remember (Ausubel, 1968; Ausubul, 2000; Bruner, 196
6; Byrnes, 2000; Farnham-
Diggory, 1992; Flavell, Miller, & Miller, 2001; Gagne, Wager,
Golas, & Keller, 2004; Purcell-
Gates, Jacobson, & Degener, 2004). They focus on the role of in
formation processing, or how the learner takes in knowledge, st
ores it, and retrieves information. Thus retaining information in
both short-term and long-
term memory is an important component of cognitive theories.
Short-
term memory is memory that holds information temporarily. Ind
ividuals can keep information active in short-
term memory by using various learning strategies, such as creati
ng a mnemonic, a word or phrase that helps the individual to re
member a set of steps or a series of words. The teacher’s role is
to enable students to learn by organizing and structuring new in
formation. For example, to show a student how to use a mnemon
8. ic, the teacher chunks information by grouping individual bits o
f information in a meaningful way. Chapter 8 gives further infor
mation about similar strategies that educators use to help studen
ts. Long-
term memory is memory in which information is permanently st
ored. Cognitive theorists such as David Ausubel describe how te
achers can promote classroom learning and enhance long-
term memory. We discuss the following cognitive theories:
1. Ausubel’s cognitive theory
2. Constructivism
3. Metacognition
4. Multiple intelligencesAusubel’s Cognitive Theory
Ausubel believes that teachers promote learning by planning we
ll-
organized, structured lessons and activities that selectively link
new information to familiar information. At the beginning of ea
ch class, the teacher presents lesson objectives to students so th
at they know what they will learn and do as a result of the lesso
n. This teacher-
directed instruction proceeds from general topics to specific one
s and from familiar to new information.Constructivism
Similar to Ausubel’s cognitive theory, constructivism (Fosnot, 2
005; Marlowe & Page, 2005; Pass, 2004) views learning as a pr
ocess in which students create new knowledge by building on th
eir own past experiences and constructing knowledge as they int
eract with their teachers and peers. However, the constructivist
approach focuses on student-
centered activities rather than on more structured, teacher-
directed lessons and activities.CONSTRUCTIVISM IN ACTION
.
Morgan Lindstrom, an elementary special educator, works with
a fourth-
grade teacher in planning to introduce a new science unit on ene
rgy and heat. They want the children to make discoveries and ge
nerate ideas that they can prove—or disprove—
during class time. Morgan and her colleague decide to ask the st
9. udents to consider the question, What are the characteristics of
heat? During the beginning class discussions, they encourage st
udents to draw on their past experiences to help formulate the a
nswer. Students mention that a stove, an oven, a microwave, and
a radiator give off heat. Then someone says that heat comes fro
m coats and mittens. When the other children agree, the teacher
s decide to put aside other activities and help the children const
ruct an experiment, observe the results, and correct the misconc
eption. They begin by wrapping several thermometers in a coat
and mittens. When the temperature does not rise, they discuss th
e findings and brainstorm ideas. They decide to seal the thermo
meters and clothing in plastic bags and continue to collect data.
The class analyzes the results and brainstorms possible reasons
for their findings. When there is still no change in the temperatu
re, the teacher facilitates student discussions by writing down k
ey concepts and drawing a picture to illustrate them. By organiz
ing the class discussion in this way, the teachers help the studen
ts draw the conclusion that clothing merely holds the heat in wh
en someone wears it. Through this unit, they hope that students
will develop a better understanding of energy (adapted from Wa
tson & Konicek, 1990).METACOGNITION
Metacognition involves learning how to learn and think. Flavell,
Miller, and Miller (2001) define three types of metacognitive k
nowledge. First, learners hold beliefs about themselves as learn
ers. For example, a student believes that listening to music is he
lpful when studying. Second, a learner has task knowledge, or a
n understanding of procedures that must be followed to complet
e a task. In mathematics, this type of knowledge is important wh
en completing operations (for example, to add two different frac
tions, write the fractions with a common denominator). Third, a
learner has strategic knowledge, or an understanding of selectin
g and using various approaches to solving a problem. In mathem
atics, strategic knowledge helps the student know how to begin t
o solve a word problem.
Students with disabilities often have difficulties because they d
o not know how to learn, solve problems, or complete assignme
10. nts, even though they have the facts and information. They do n
ot readily achieve proficiency in problem solving and higher ord
er thinking skills, which are characteristics of successful learner
s. Many educators feel that these metacognitive skills should be
taught along with the curriculum. Others believe that selected th
inking skills should be integrated within the curriculum.METAC
OGNITION IN ACTION.
We continue our visit with Morgan Lindstrom and her work outs
ide the fourth-
grade classroom. She explains, “Sometimes I work individually
or with small groups of students to help them gain a better unde
rstanding of some of the upcoming learning activities in which t
hey will be participating. Take, for example, the science lesson
that we just completed on energy and heat. Several of the studen
ts with learning disabilities and ADHD in this classroom have d
ifficulty in following the problem-
solving approach to science. Last week, I worked with these stu
dents to help prepare them for their classroom work. First I pres
ented a similar problem. We then talked through the steps that
we could take to solve it. Teaching students how to go about sol
ving a problem gives them some strategic knowledge. They brin
g this to their work in the general education classroom, helping
them to be more successful.”Multiple Intelligences
Some contemporary psychologists (Armstrong, 2000; Gardner, 1
983, 2006) have written that multiple intelligences (MI) play a c
ritical role in learning. Howard Gardner developed a complex th
eory of MI and described each intelligence, such as linguistic in
telligence, musical intelligence, logical-
mathematical intelligence, spatial intelligence, bodily-
kinesthetic intelligence, interpersonal and intrapersonal intellig
ence, naturalist intelligence, and possibly others.
Gardner theorized that each intelligence is relatively independe
nt of the others but that frequently more than one intelligence is
involved during the learning process. For example, a learner fir
st observes and then imitates the actions performed by the teach
er in learning a new skill. According to MI theory, a learner can
11. use spatial, bodily, and interpersonal intelligences. Linguistic i
ntelligence may be involved to a minor degree (if at all). By con
trast, when the teacher presents new information during a classr
oom lecture, the learner needs to use mostly linguistic knowledg
e and some bodily-
kinesthetic knowledge in note taking.MULTIPLE INTELLIGEN
CES IN ACTION.
The last refrain of a rap song lingers in the air as the children c
omplete the final dance step. Someone asks if they can do a repe
at performance. Tina asks the teacher assistant to take over so t
hat she can explain what is going on. “I base a lot of my teachin
g on the theory of multiple intelligences. Many of my students l
ove music, especially some of the rap by Johnny and the Kids, a
popular rap group of 8-year-
olds. We make up our own rap of the letters and their sounds an
d add some body movement. Usually we do a couple of songs as
a warm-
up activity before choosing a book to read. It’s really been amaz
ing to see the children’s interest rise and to see how their music
is helping them learn!”Behavioral Perspectives
Behavioral theory (Coleman & Webber, 2002; Kazdin, 2001; Sk
inner, 1974) examines learning in terms of observable behaviors
. Behavioral theorists believe that learning occurs by associatio
n. When two events occur together often, they are linked, and le
arning occurs. For example, when the teacher turns the lights of
f and asks the students to be quiet, they learn that turning off th
e lights means that they are to stop talking. After a few times, t
he teacher should be able to simply turn off the lights to restore
quiet.
Theorists believe that reinforcement is the primary mechanism f
or changing behavior if the type of reinforcement is desired and
meaningful. To increase desired student behaviors, educators us
e a set of rules, or principles of reinforcement (Walker, She, &
Bauer 2006). The first principle is to reinforce only the target b
ehavior, or the behavior that the student should exhibit, when it
occurs. Second, the target behavior is reinforced immediately af
12. ter it is exhibited. Third, the student receives reinforcement eve
ry time the target behavior is exhibited. Finally, as the target be
havior becomes more consistent, the student is reinforced only i
ntermittently.
Educators use various types of reinforcement, including consum
able, activity-
based, manipulative, possessional, and social reinforcement (Ma
rtin & Pear, 2002). Consumables consist of food that the student
likes, such as crackers, fruit, or juice. Activity reinforcers are o
pportunities to engage in an activity that a student enjoys, such
as listening to music, sending an e-
mail message, or talking with friends. Manipulative reinforcers
include activities that involve drawing, painting, or fixing a ma
chine, for example. Possessional reinforcers include a chance to
sit in a desired location, wear a favorite cap, or temporarily use
an item that belongs to another. Social reinforcers include verb
al praise, a high five, a smile, or a glance that indicates social a
pproval. For reinforcers to be effective, teachers must determine
what types of items a student likes or desires. This information
can be gathered by asking the student to complete a checklist or
talking informally with the student.
Positive reinforcement can be highly effective in helping studen
ts change problem behaviors. But unless educators and other sch
ool staff use the principles of reinforcement carefully, this inter
vention can have many pitfalls. Sometimes school staff inadvert
ently strengthen undesirable behaviors. In fact, many undesirabl
e behaviors are due to the social attention that they evoke from
aides, nurses, peers, teachers, parents, doctors, and others (Mart
in & Pear, 2002, p. 39).Applied Behavior Analysis
Teachers can have a dramatic effect on the way students with di
sabilities learn and behave in the classroom by understanding an
d applying concepts associated with behavior theory through ap
plied behavior analysis. Applied behavior analysis is a systemat
ic procedure that involves identifying and describing a behavior
in observable terms, assessing the frequency of the behavior, th
e antecedent conditions, and the consequences following the beh
13. avior, developing an intervention(s) designed to change the beh
avior, and observing and recording data regarding the effect of t
he intervention.APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS IN ACTION.
Lionel Roy, a resource room teacher, uses applied behavior anal
ysis in his work with students with problem behaviors. When a s
tudent is experiencing difficulties, Lionel begins by collecting c
ritical information. He looks for antecedent conditions and cons
equences. Antecedent conditions are events, or triggers, in the e
nvironment that occur just before the behavior and can be adjust
ed by the teacher, who carefully observes any changes in studen
t behavior. For example; a student came into class and slumped
in his seat, refusing to participate. As Lionel talked with the stu
dent, he found out about a confrontation in the hall just before c
lass.
Consequences are events that occur directly after the behavior a
nd, similar to antecedent events, can be adjusted by the teacher.
Both antecedent conditions and consequences directly influence
the recurrence of the behavior. As Lionel and the student contin
ued to talk, Lionel learned that another teacher had stepped in t
o break up the argument, but both students left feeling angry, no
t having resolved the problem. Lionel quickly realized that, with
out intervention, this consequence was going to affect the stude
nt for the rest of the class period and, perhaps, the rest of the da
y.Social and Affective Perspectives
Social and affective perspectives emphasize the importance of s
ocial skills, self-
awareness, and relationships with others, which in turn affect le
arning. We discuss two theories associated with these perspectiv
es:
1. Social cognitive theory
2. Emotional intelligenceSocial Cognitive Theory
Social learning theory (Bandura, 1969, 1977, 1986; Glasser, 199
0) focuses on how individuals acquire social behaviors and the e
ffects of these behaviors on learning. Teachers can be effective
models if they consider four interrelated factors (Bandura, 1986
). First, the teacher must get the students’ attention. Second, ret
14. ention of learning occurs when students rehearse or practice lear
ning. Third, students must have opportunities to perform the tas
k. Finally, motivation influences observational learning.Emotio
nal Intelligence
In additional to cognitive abilities, many researchers believe tha
t emotional intelligence plays an important part in learning and
in school success. Emotional intelligence includes the ability to
manage feelings and handle stress, empathy for others, and lear
ned optimism (Cherniss, 2000). Emerging research links emotio
nal intelligence and competence to achievement and career succ
ess (Low, Lomax, Jackson, & Nelson, 2004).
Based on emotional intelligence, Goleman (2001) defines emoti
onal competence as a learned capability that results in outstandi
ng performance. Today, more and more schools recognize the st
rong relationship between social and emotional factors and succ
essful student academic achievement (Collaborative for Academ
ic, Social, and Emotional Learning, 2003; Payton et al., 2000; Z
inns, Weissberg, Wang, & Wallberg, 2004).
Emotional competence can be viewed as a framework that inclu
des both personal and social competence. Personal competence i
ncludes self-awareness, self-regulation, and self-
motivation. Social competence includes social awareness and so
cial skills. Table 7.1 illustrates these areas and describes charac
teristics of an individual displaying emotional competence.
For all learners, emotional processes affect the cognitive proces
ses. For example, a negative mood can result in missing importa
nt details when listening to a group discussion. Educators can e
nhance their effectiveness by using interventions to improve stu
dent social-
emotional functioning (Pellitteri, Dealy, Fasano, & Kugler, 200
6). For example, a teacher carefully monitors the group dynamic
s and the emotional tone of social interactions as a small group
of students engage in small talk during recess. In the past she ha
s had to intervene quickly if a member of the group became aggr
essive with other students.
Teaching methods based on social and affective perspectives cre
15. ate ways to support peer tutors and opportunities for collaborati
ve teams of students to work together. In fact, group support an
d cooperation among students are keys to facilitating learning. S
tudents acquire social behaviors by observing and modeling oth
er students. The classroom becomes a learning community that s
upports each member, and teachers design activities to foster a s
ense of belonging.
Table 7.1 Emotional Competence
Personal Competence
People with this competence
Self-awareness
→ Know which emotions they are feeling and why
→ Remain open to new perspectives, continuous learning, and s
elf development
→ Recognize how their feelings affect their performance
Self-regulation
→ Manage their impulsive feelings
→ Are organized and careful in their work
→ Think clearly and stay focused under pressure
Self-motivation
→ Set challenging goals
→ Recognize setbacks as due to manageable circumstance rathe
r than a personal flaw
→ Learn how to improve performance
Social Awareness
→ Are attentive to emotional cues and listen well
→ Show sensitivity and understand others’ perspectives
Social Skills
→ Are effective in give and take, registering emotional cues in
attuning their message
→ Listen well, seek mutual understanding
→ Stay receptive to bad news as well as good
Adapted from the Emotional Competence Framework. Retrieved
June 15, 2007, at the Consortium for Research on Emotional Int
elligence in Organizations Web site: http://www.eiconsortium.o
rgSOCIAL-EMOTIONAL PERSPECTIVES IN ACTION.
16. Special education consultant Teo Liang encourages the develop
ment of class spirit at the beginning of the school year by askin
g students to develop a class nickname and logo. He encourages
them to think about the characteristics of their school and their
classroom that make them special. Someone asks about the old f
oundry nearby, and Liang encourages them to investigate. As th
e students seek out information, they discover interesting facts a
nd history of the old foundry. Someone creates a graphic of the
old building, and the students vote to adopt this as their class lo
go. Some students volunteer to create a short video that explains
their class nickname and logo, and Liang helps them post it to t
he Web.
Learning how to work together with others, sharing successes, a
nd belonging to a group of peers are lifetime skills that help stu
dents to be contributing members in their communities. For stud
ents with learning and behavior problems, these skills are essent
ial, yet their disabilities may have interfered with the acquisitio
n of them. Teachers who consider teaching methods based in par
t on social learning theory believe that they can assist students t
o acquire collaborative skills in working with others.Connecting
Theories to Practice
We have seen that theories of learning provide a basis for under
standing how students learn, including
• the ways that information is stored in memory;
• how students connect new information to information learned
previously;
• knowledge of how to learn, or metacognition;
• the role of multiple intelligences;
• the effects of reinforcement;
• the importance of antecedent conditions and consequences;
• the effects of group support and cooperation.
Knowledge and understanding of how students learn provide the
basis for one or more methods of instruction. Figure 7.1 illustra
tes the learning theories that we have discussed and their conne
ctions to various teaching methods discussed in the following se
ction.
17. Figure 7.1 Learning theories and their relationships to methods
of teaching
Figure 7.2 Factors that influence selection of an instructional
method
Previous section
Next section
7.2 Methods That Support Teaching and Learning
Teachers often select a teaching method compatible with their o
wn professional training, philosophy of education, or theoretical
perspectives. Other factors, such as the characteristics of the le
arners, the classroom curriculum, and the teacher’s experience,
also influence the selection of a teaching method (Figure 7.2).
Learning to be an effective teacher also includes developing kno
wledge of research supporting the method of teaching that the te
acher uses. Although a teaching method may appeal intuitively t
o a teacher, if it does not have a strong research base, there is n
o assurance that it will be effective for students with disabilities
. There are several contemporary teaching methods of interest: d
irect instruction, explicit or conspicuous instruction, affective i
nstruction, differentiated instruction, and inquiry-
based learning.Direct Instruction
Direct instruction is a systematic method that can be used to tea
ch, practice, and reinforce specific skills (Adams & Engelmann,
1996; Carlson & Francis, 2002; Kroes-
bergen & van Luit, 2003; Minskoff & Allsopp, 2003). Teachers
use well-
organized and structured lessons and activities to assist students
in learning skills or demonstrating certain knowledge. As a teac
hing method, direct instruction incorporates elements of more th
an one learning theory (Figure 7.1). In addition to cognitive the
ories, direct instruction draws from behavioral theory, including
the use of reinforcement. Educators use positive comments, hig
18. h fives, and other types of reinforcement to aid student learning.
Teachers use direct instruction to assist students in learning skil
ls and demonstrating knowledge.What It Looks Like
Educators plan direct instruction by determining the sequence o
f skills in the curriculum area. The curricula and the sets of skil
ls, sometimes referred to as a scope and sequence, are frequentl
y part of a school’s curricular guide. Criterion-
referenced assessments are good resources, too, because they pr
ovide a broad range of curricula and sequences of skills within c
urricular areas such as reading, mathematics, spelling, and writi
ng. To assess student knowledge and weaknesses in one or more
areas of the curriculum, special educators frequently use curric
ulum-based and criterion-
referenced assessments. They analyze assessment information to
determine how much students have mastered and what they do
not know within the sequence of skills. This is the point at whic
h they design and implement instruction.
When a teacher knows what students can and cannot do, he or s
he focuses on helping each one to succeed by offering instructio
n in a systematic, organized fashion (Figure 7.3). Direct instruct
ion, sometimes referred to as mastery learning, can be used in g
eneral education classrooms and settings where students receive
special education services.
Using the direct instruction method, a teacher tells students wha
t they will be learning, the reasons for each lesson, and how the
se reasons relate to previous lessons. All students use the same
materials and are involved in the same activity. The teacher serv
es as the principal source of information.
Figure 7.3 Characteristics of direct instruction
Because the purpose of direct instruction is to teach the students
specific material, lessons are highly structured. Teachers may u
se applied behavior analysis. Applied behavior analysis is a syst
ematic procedure that involves identifying and describing behav
ior in observable terms; assessing the frequency of the behavior,
19. the antecedent conditions, and the consequences following the
behavior; developing an intervention(s) designed to change the
behavior; observing; and recording data regarding the effectiven
ess of the intervention.
Monitoring the effectiveness of direct instruction through data c
ollection is sometimes referred to as precision teaching. Precisi
on teaching is a precise and systematic procedure for evaluating
instruction. Students are active participants in their progress as
they count and chart daily learning.
An additional aspect of direct instruction usually involves teach
er-
directed discussion, readings, and classroom activities. The teac
her checks frequently to make sure that each student is making
progress toward the desired outcome. The progress checks provi
de valuable information and allow the teacher to make adjustme
nts during the lesson if students are having difficulty. The teach
er can provide correction and reteach some of the lesson, allot a
dditional instructional time, or suggest extra learning materials.
Because students learn at different rates, the teacher also plans
enrichment activities. Thus, students who complete their work b
efore other students have an opportunity to deepen and extend t
heir knowledge. When students demonstrate that they have met t
he learning objectives, the class moves on to the next lesson (Fi
gure 7.4).
A teacher spends time after the class reflecting on the lesson. F
or example, he or she might ask, Were the objectives clear to th
e students? Was the lesson presented clearly? Did the students h
ave enough time to practice? How could I improve the feedback
that I gave to the students? After thinking about the instruction,
a teacher may decide to make changes for the following day. Re
flection provides a teacher with a way to improve instruction. R
eflective teaching is dynamic and powerful.What the Research S
ays About Direct Instruction
Many research studies present evidence that direct instruction is
effective in helping students with disabilities learn new skills a
nd increase academic achievement across the curriculum. Swans
20. on and Hoskyn (1998) examined 180 research studies that inclu
ded students with learning disabilities. In synthesizing their fin
dings, they reported that direct instruction was one of the perva
sive influences in remediating the academic difficulties of child
ren with learning disabilities. In a second meta-
analysis, Swanson (1999a; Swanson & Sachse-
Lee, 2000) found that direct instruction and strategy instruction
were the most effective techniques for adolescents with learning
disabilities and mental retardation.
Figure 7.4 Direct instruction in practice
Similarly, a meta-
anaylsis of mathematics instruction (Kroesbergen & Van Luit, 2
003) found that in 58 studies of mathematics instruction for ele
mentary students with disabilities, direct instruction and self-
instruction were found to be the most effective methods. Additi
onal studies describe the benefits of direct instruction on achiev
ement in reading (Engelmann, 1999; Gardill & Jitendra, 1999; S
piegel, Vickers, & Viviano, 1999; Swanson, 1999b), mathematic
s (Kroesbergen & Van Luit, 2005; Maccini, Gagnon, Mulcah, &
Leon, 2006), building social skills (Bendt & Nunan, 1999; Berto
ne, Boyle, Mitchel, & Smith, 1999), increasing listening skills (
Engraffia, Graff, Jezuit, & Schall, 1999), language (Kroeger, &
Nelson, 2006), and developing skills in language arts such as sp
elling (Berninger et al., 1998) and writing (Anderson & Keel, 2
002; Walker, Shippen, Alberto, Houchins, & Cihak, 2006).
A special educator provides scaffolded instruction during initial
learning.
Snapshot: Gabe Cerino’s Classroom
Gabe Cerino, a special educator at an elementary school, invites
us to observe a lesson in the resource room. For the next 45 mi
nutes this morning he will be working with Juan, a first grader.
One of Juan’s IEP goals is to increase reading comprehension. T
o plan and monitor his specially designed instruction in reading,
he uses a chart that lists the skills in developing phonemic awar
21. eness. Gabe keeps a daily check sheet of Juan’s progress.
When Juan comes in, he joins Gabe at the table, and together th
ey look at a short letter that his teacher has written him (Figure
7.5). Gabe reads it aloud as Juan follows along. When he comes
to a word missing the beginning or ending sound of s, he pauses
and Juan writes in the corresponding letter.
After reading the book Gabe has promised, Juan begins work on
a set of picture cards. He pronounces the name of each picture
and decides which pictures belong in the pile beginning with an
s sound. Before going back to his classroom, he completes a dra
wing of objects beginning with the s sound. Afterward, he and
Gabe go over his work together, correcting any errors.Explicit o
r Conspicuous Instruction
Explicit instruction includes the systematic procedures of direct
instruction and behavior analysis along with the design procedu
res derived from effective schools research (Hall, 2006.) Explici
t instruction includes three essential components (Dimino, 2007
):
1. Metacognition. Students know rules, concepts, and strategies.
Students understand how to apply a strategy, such as how to ide
ntify an unfamiliar word when reading.
Figure 7.5 Juan’s letter
2. Scaffolded instruction. Scaffolded instruction consists of thre
e phases: modeling, teacher-
assisted or guided practice, and independent phases.
3. Vocabulary instruction. Vocabulary instruction includes selec
ting words that are associated with a specific content area. For e
xample, in preparing a science lesson a teacher develops a defin
ition of precipitation that will be comprehensible to the student.
The teacher also plans to provide multiple meaningful exposure
s to practice the new vocabulary.
Educators often use explicit instruction in the general education
classroom to meet the diverse needs of all learners.What It Loo
ks Like
The teaching team begins with the “big idea” of the unit. This is
22. the content that all students will learn. Primed background kno
wledge includes the consideration of how the learner can access
the information. The team also addresses any special needs of t
he students. Educators teach conspicuous strategies to students s
o that they know how to go about learning and problem solving.
Knowing one or more of these effective strategies assists stude
nts to be more independent learners.
Educators also provide mediated scaffolding, or temporary supp
ort and guidance during initial learning. The degree of scaffoldi
ng is based on individual learner needs. For example, the teache
r shows students how to interpret a graph displayed in the textb
ook. Together they discuss the meaning of new vocabulary word
s. The teacher might also develop an outline of the chapter cont
ent. Chapter 8 discusses scaffolding.
Educators also use strategic instruction to help students integrat
e the big ideas and apply their knowledge to other settings. Strat
egic instruction, often used in middle and secondary programs, i
s an approach that focuses on providing students with rules or g
uidelines so that they can approach learning activities or assign
ments more effectively and efficiently and with greater indepen
dence.
Finally, judicious review requires educators to identify informat
ion that is essential and monitor student progress. Additional ac
tivities provide review of the material and contribute to retentio
n. Figure 7.6 illustrates the components essential to explicit inst
ruction.
Figure 7.6 Explicit instruction in practice
What the Research Says About Explicit Instruction
A growing body of research supports the use of explicit instruct
ion as an effective method for teaching students, including stud
ents with disabilities. A meta-
analysis of spelling interventions conducted by one group of res
earchers (Wanzek et al., 2006) indicated that explicit instruction
with multiple practice opportunities and immediate corrective f
eedback helped students consistently improve spelling. Explicit
instruction in decoding and comprehension suggests that at-
23. risk children in early elementary grades can achieve gains in co
mprehension and early reading skills (Pullen, Lane, Lloyd, Now
ak, & Ryals, 2005; Willimas, 2005). Explicit instruction in math
ematics increased student problem-
solving abilities (Fuchs, Fuchs, Hamlett, & Appleton, 2002). Fu
rther, when explicit instruction is combined with concrete to rep
resentational to abstract (CRA) in teaching algebra, Witzel (200
5) found an increase in student achievement. For social studies i
nstruction, Williams and her colleagues (Williams et al., 2007) f
ound that explicit instruction was more effective in learning soc
ial studies content than instruction that did not include explicit i
nstruction.
Considering Cultural and Linguistic Perspectives
Research-Based Teaching Methods and Latino Students
What teaching methods work best for newcomer students, or stu
dents who have recently arrived in this country, and students fro
m diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds? In an extensive r
eview of the research concerning Latino students, Fashola, Slavi
n, Claderón, and Durán (2002) found a number of replicable pro
grams for elementary and middle schools that are proven to mee
t the needs of these students. These programs include the instruc
tional methods that we discuss in this chapter, such as explicit a
nd direct instruction, and a very effective instructional strategy,
cooperative learning, that we discuss in Chapter 8. Success for
All, a program that uses cooperative learning, one-to-
one tutoring for students who have difficulties, and family supp
ort to build positive home-
school relations, shows very positive results, too. Latino student
s who participated in the program made substantial gains on sta
ndardized tests, compared to Latino students who did not partici
pate (Fashola et al., 2002). Yet Fashola et al. also found large g
aps in the knowledge base concerning the teaching of reading an
d language arts, particularly in approaches designed for Latino
or English language learners.
A research team led by Vaughn and her colleagues (Vaughn et a
l., 2006) compared the effectiveness of an explicit reading instr
24. uction for first-
grade students whose home language was Spanish and who were
at risk for reading difficulties with a group of comparison stude
nts who participated in the school’s standard instruction for at-
risk students. This study found that children who participated in
explicit instruction obtained significantly higher scores in phon
ological awareness, letter-
sound identification, word attach, reading fluency, and compreh
ension.
Questions for Reflection
1. What teaching methods do educators in other countries use?
2. What Web-based resources might a first-
year teacher find helpful for designing instruction?Affective Ins
truction
Perhaps as a result of the increase in social problems, such as b
ullying behaviors, depression, substance abuse, and violent acts
of students against other students and teachers, there is much in
terest in affective instruction. Based on social learning theory a
nd much of the work of Maslow (1999) and Rogers and Freiberg
(1994), affective instruction focuses on personal and social lear
ning as well as the academic development of each student. Educ
ators use different terms to describe one or more areas of affecti
ve education, including social and emotional learning (Elias et a
l., 1997) character education (Lickona, 1997), moral education (
Gilligan, 1993; Noddings, 2005), multicultural education (Bank
s & Banks, 2003), and values education (Huitt, 2003). Additiona
lly, some educators use specific curricula to promote personal d
evelopment such as social skills training.What It Looks Like
Affective instruction begins with careful thought and preparatio
n regarding both the physical classroom and the learning enviro
nment (Figure 7.7). The teacher nurtures feelings of self-
respect among the students as well as respect and acceptance of
others. By planning learning activities that offer a degree of stu
dent choice, the educator assists students in developing a feelin
g of control over their work. Instruction includes both academic
and personal/social development. For example, the teacher may
25. stress the importance of skills he or she wants to see a student
display in working with a partner. The teacher supports learning
by using active listening and paraphrasing student comments or
ideas. Visitors quickly observe that the teacher places a high va
lue on citizenship and respect for others. Chapters 9 and 10 look
more closely at ways educators help students develop and enha
nce social skills and positive behaviors.
Figure 7.7 Affective instruction in practice
What the Research Says About Affective Instruction
Muscott and O’Brien (1999) examined an after-
school program for 19 elementary students with emotional or be
havioral disorders. Instruction focused on one area of affective i
nstruction called character education and the use of high school
and college mentors. Through a series of interviews, the student
s reported that they learned to accept the responsibilities for the
ir actions, that they made new friends, and that they responded t
o the ideas of cooperation and teamwork.
Another study (De Cuyper, Timbremont, Braet, De Backer, & W
ullaert, 2004) reports findings in working with children with sy
mptoms of moderate depression. Twenty children between the a
ges of 10 and 12 participated in 18 sessions of affective instruct
ion. At the end of this period, the researchers found that both ch
ildren and parents reported significant improvements.
Improvements were also noted for 15 children with autism (ages
8–17 years old) who participated in a 7-
month intervention program that focused on teaching interperso
nal problem solving, affective knowledge, and social interaction
. The researcher (Bauminger, 2002) found that children were mo
re likely to initiate positive social interaction with peers, includ
ing sharing experiences with peers and showing more interest in
peers.
Snapshot: Ben Schultz’s Classroom
Ben Schultz sits on the edge of the desk, watching as students g
ather around two boys circling each other with threatening fists.
Someone shouts, “Go for it.” The crowd of students begins to s
urge closer to the two students. Watching the monitor across fro
26. m Ben, we can see a close up as the camera zeros in on one of t
he students in the background. “Cut.” Ben jumps up and provide
s suggestions to the young actors.
Later we learn that this class has been studying school citizensh
ip and how to address the problems of bullying in their building
. As a culminating project, the class is creating a series of video
clips with typical scenarios that many of the students have faced
. Later they will use these videoclips as discussion starters as th
ey visit other classes to help students find alternative ways to a
ddress common concerns. Although this project focused on affe
ctive skills and the use of problem solving as the students devel
oped the story lines, Ben found that the students also demonstra
ted increased interest in planning and writing as they developed
the scenario scripts.
We learn that this is the first of many projects the students will
complete over the school year. Ben believes that combining affe
ctive and academic education is very helpful to his students. Th
e students report that one of the most important aspects of this c
lass is the teacher’s ongoing availability to students. They are q
uick to talk about the respect that their teacher shows for each s
tudent and how they, in turn, respect him.Differentiated Instruct
ion
Designed for the general education classroom, differentiated ins
truction is an inclusive approach for working with all students.
Tomlinson (2001) identifies three assumptions underlying differ
entiated instruction. First, within any classroom, there is a wide
range of learners. Second, there is no substitute for high-
quality curriculum and instruction. Third, even with high-
quality curriculum and instruction, effective educators must buil
d bridges between the learner and learning. Teacher-
student relationships are essential, and they take time to develo
p.
Figure 7.8 Differentiated instruction
Source: Adapted from “Differentiated Instruction: Inclusive Str
ategies that Benefit the Whole Class,” by D. Lawrence-
27. Brown, 2004, American Secondary Education, 32(3), pp. 34–
62. Adapted with permission.What It Looks Like?
An educator planning for differentiated instruction tries to maxi
mize student attainment of grade-
level curriculum standards (Lawrence-
Brown, 2004). Planning differentiated instruction often begins
with the concept of universal design. Universal design in educat
ion means that physical, social, and learning environments are d
esigned so that individuals with a wide range of abilities can ha
ve meaningful access to and participation in general education.
Universal design in education involves flexibility of materials, s
trategies, approaches, and technology. It can guide teachers as t
hey work to make their teaching and learning activities appropri
ate and accessible to a wide range of learners.
Figure 7.8 illustrates the components of a differentiated classro
om. Providing supports is an important strategy for helping som
e students to obtain grade-
level proficiency. For these students with mild to moderate disa
bilities, grade-
level standards are obtainable but very challenging (Lawrence-
Brown, 2004). Supports include various types of materials, such
as manipulatives, visual aids, charts, outlines, or assistive tech
nology such as text-to-
speech software to allow students to listen to textbooks. Additio
nal supports may also include personal assistance such as peer t
utoring or help from a teacher assistant. The teacher will use a v
ariety of instructional strategies, such as a handout on the key c
oncepts of the unit or a list of the new vocabulary terms. The te
acher will help students make connections between prior knowle
dge and new learning.
Supports are also important so students with severe disabilities
can follow alternative achievement standards or a prioritized cu
rriculum. These supports enable a student to participate in the g
eneral education curriculum while following the IEP, which has
different curriculum goals. These goals are accomplished within
the context of large-group activities (Lawrence-
28. Brown, 2004, p. 48).
Figure 7.9 Differentiated instruction in practice
Students with gifts and talents engage in an enriched curriculum
. This curriculum allows students to explore concepts and ideas
that are not typically covered in the classroom. Students have o
pportunities for completing challenging and creative projects an
d sharing their work with their classmates. Figure 7.9 illustrates
these components of differentiated instruction in practice.What
the Research Says About Differentiated Instruction
Hawkins (2007) reports a longitudinal study of 100 public schoo
ls in Rhode Island that demonstrated significant improvement o
n achievement test scores between subgroups of students with I
EPs and students without IEPs. This study focuses on improvem
ents in either language arts or mathematics. School staff were as
ked to identify effective practices that contributed to the rise in
student test scores. Among the practices identified were the use
of differentiated instruction, small-
group instruction, manipulatives, teacher read-
alouds, and collaborative teaching models, among other practice
s. Additional research should lend further support to the use of
differentiated instruction.
Snapshot: Jan Browski’s Classroom
Jan Browski greets us enthusiastically outside one of the eighth-
grade classrooms. “Come on into our classroom! The students ar
e anxious to show you our semester-
long project, called ‘Exploring Our Town.’ Basically, the classr
oom teaching focuses on giving students the general skills that t
hey need while working on the project. For example, a few wee
ks ago the students heard that a local construction company was
going to build a new bridge over Temple Stream. We had heard
that the Passamoquoddy Indians had camped near the stream in
that area many years ago. As we talked, the students wondered a
bout the history of the area and what would be lost as a result of
the construction. They decided to conduct interviews with some
of the tribe elders still living in the area. In the classroom, we
29. discussed how to develop an interview and collect the data. Two
of the students had some experience in developing interview qu
estions, and they became our peer tutors for this aspect of the pr
oject. They each worked with small groups of students to help t
hem refine their questions.
“You’ll see the students working in a 2-
hour block of time today. Will Engart, the teacher assistant, is g
oing to be working with one of the smaller groups. The students
were assigned a small booklet to read. Some of the students rea
d the historical account and others listened to a copy that was sc
anned in to the computer.”
As we sit in on the group discussion, we hear students asking
What viewpoint is this written from?
How do we know this?
How is this connected to what we learned in our interviews with
the tribe elders?
Will leads the students in thinking about their interpretations. St
udents with strong higher order thinking skills are modeling var
ious ways of connecting the information. Other learners have a
mple opportunities to observe, listen, and participate in the disc
ussion. We leave the classroom realizing that differentiated inst
ruction has enabled all students to deepen their understanding of
preservation issues faced by this community.Inquiry-
Based Learning
Inquiry-
based learning relies on the teacher to create experiences from
which students derive their own knowledge and meaning. Jerom
e Bruner (1966) believed that inquiry-
based learning helps students take responsibility for their own l
earning and remember important information. Inquiry-
based learning, sometimes referred to as discovery learning, or
problem solving, is built on the theory of constructivism. Eleme
nts of social cognitive theory, such as group work and cooperati
on among students, play a role in inquiry-
based learning. But organization of student activities should not
be the only principle; inquiry is also characterized by the teach
30. er’s mode of participation (Wells, 2000).What It Looks Like
The teacher begins by planning a broad purpose, or goal, and he
lping students generate their own questions and topics. The teac
her gathers information about the topics and makes sure that stu
dents have access to needed resources. Inquiry-
based learning uses objects and ideas that encourage students to
manipulate and compare. The teacher provides questions to cap
ture students’ attention and encourage higher order thinking or
ways of knowing that were discussed in Chapter 6. Students are
encouraged to make guesses based on available information and
to find ways of solving problems. The teacher acts as a guide, p
roviding basic information and encouraging students to determi
ne the best way to organize new and familiar information, but is
careful not to provide guidance that would interfere with self-
direction and discovery (Figure 7.10). General educators often u
se inquiry-
based learning in the general education classroom in the belief t
hat students learn best through active involvement. Science edu
cators, for example, emphasize doing science by focusing on the
following student activities: designing experiments, predicting
results, manipulating materials, recording observations, and sum
marizing findings. These activities are quite different from othe
r teaching methods, such as a more direct instruction approach i
n which the educator performs the experiment while students wa
tch and then discuss the results.
Research to Practice
Teaching Methods and Specific Content Focus
Some teaching methods specific to a curriculum area also have a
wide research base that demonstrates their effectiveness for stu
dents with disabilities.
An example of a curriculum-
specific teaching method is MathWings (Madden, Slavin, & Sim
ons, 2002), tied to the national mathematics standards develope
d by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. MathWi
ngs involves students in problem solving in real situations using
cooperative groups and literature, science, art, and other subjec
31. ts as well as the students’ personal experiences. Students are en
couraged to use calculators for developing mathematical concep
ts, explain and defend their solutions orally, and write regularly
in their individual logbooks. Research studies indicate that stud
ents involved in MathWings, including students in poverty, mad
e substantial gains in mathematical achievement.
Special educators use supported inquiry-
based learning to encourage inductive thinking.
Figure 7.10 Supported inquiry-based learning in practice
Source: Adapted from “Supported Inquiry Science: Teaching for
Conceptual Change in Urban and Suburban Science Classrooms
,” by B. Dalton and C. C. Morocco, 1997, Journal of Learning D
isabilities, 30(6), pp. 670–685. Adapted with permission.
Students are required to use inductive thinking in many inquiry-
based activities. Inductive thinking requires students to consider
their observations and then develop a general rule based on thei
r findings or discoveries. Thus, the students “construct” knowle
dge as a result of their own observations and thinking.Supported
Inquiry-Based Learning
Because students with mild and moderate disabilities often have
difficulty with inductive thinking (Mastropieri & Scruggs, 1997
), special educators often support them through the use of prom
pted coaching and supported inquiry methods. In the following
dialogue (adapted from Mastropieri & Scruggs), notice how the
teacher uses questioning during prompted coaching to help a stu
dent with a disability to draw inferences:
Educator:
Anteaters have long claws on their front feet. Why does this ma
ke sense?
Student:
I don’t know.
Educator:
Well, let’s think. What do you know about anteaters? For examp
le, what do they eat?
32. Student:
Anteaters eat ants.
Educator:
Good. And where do ants live?
Student:
They live in holes in the ground.
Educator:
Now, if anteaters eat ants and ants live in holes in the ground, w
hy do you think that anteaters have long claws on their front fee
t?
Student:
To dig for ants.
Educator:
Good. To dig for ants.
Sometimes in supported inquiry-
based learning, the educator provides the general rule to the stu
dents first. Then students are prompted and questioned to apply
the rule (Woodward & Noell, 1992). Educators also embed asses
sment in instruction, including performance tasks as well as que
stions that students respond to in drawing and writing (Dalton &
Morocco, 1997).What the Research Says About Inquiry-
Based Instruction
Research studies supporting the benefits of inquiry-
based learning have focused on the importance of insight and di
scovery to learning (Parsons et al., 2001). Students report that i
nquiry-
based learning is enjoyable (Algava, 1999; Romeo & Young, 19
97). Teachers using an inquiry-based, hands-
on science curriculum have found that students with learning dis
abilities learn and comprehend more information than students t
aught from textbooks (Scruggs, Mastropieri, Bakken, & Brigha
m, 1993). Research findings suggest that coaching students with
learning disabilities to draw inferences regarding science princi
ples results in higher levels of recall and understanding (Palincs
ar, Magnusson, Collins, & Cutter, 2001) and that supported inqu
iry is more effective than an activity-
33. based science approach alone (Dalton & Morocco, 1997; Sasaki
& Serna, 1995). Use of inquiry with Web-
based activities is an effective practice in inclusive biology clas
ses (Bodzin, Waller, Santoro, & Kale, 2007). These studies are
part of a small, but growing, body of research that focuses on in
quiry-based learning and higher order thinking.
Snapshot: Kayla Hennesey’s Classroom
Kayla Hennesey, a special educator in a small K–
8 community school, has invited us to join her and her students
for the day. One of the first things we see when entering her res
ource room is a large glass terrarium on a table. Several student
s are gathered around the table this morning, some with handhel
ds (such as PDAs) and others with notebooks. The students are
using these to record their daily observations. As we move close
r, we see a cocoon hanging from a branch. On the table is a vari
ety of magnifying glasses. The students are following the life cy
cle of two caterpillars they found earlier. Each week they record
their observations and take a digital picture to add to the class
Web site.
Kayla introduced the unit by leading a discussion about two diff
erent caterpillars she had brought to class. Most of the students
knew that caterpillars metamorphosed into butterflies. But the te
acher continued to probe, hoping that the additional questions s
he posed would create interest among the students. Do you think
that all caterpillars have the same life cycle? What kinds of but
terflies will metamorphose from these caterpillars? The students
were hooked! Can we find out? Once the students had accepted
the challenge, Kayla helped them decide how to conduct their o
bservations and collect their data. She provided multiple ways, i
ncluding both text and digital formats, for drawing or sketching
and recording their observations. Working with the school librar
ian, she located resource books at different reading levels and id
entified community resource people with whom students could d
iscuss their ideas.
Previous section
34. Next section
7.3 Using TechnologyTablets and Laptops: Tools or Too Many
Obstacles?
In considering ways of teaching, tablets and laptops provide exc
iting possibilities for enhancing teaching and learning activities
because each student can access an enormous amount of informa
tion from a desktop or small-
group work area. These technology tools enable students to deve
lop skills in working with others and to enhance self-
esteem and self-
sufficiency while working on content knowledge. Students also
can use software to help them organize their school schedules a
nd assignments as well as other aspects of their daily lives. Tec
hnology tools, such as text-to-
speech software or word prediction, may allow some students wi
th disabilities to access and use information more efficiently an
d more accurately than traditional materials.
However, for some students with disabilities, using tablets and l
aptops may create major problems. Some students may not be ab
le to see text on the screen, either because it is too small or bec
ause they are not able to read text written at a specific level. La
ptops and tablets may not be compatible with specialized softwa
re that students with disabilities need to access text information
or they may not support the use of voice input as a keyboard alt
ernative. For students who have difficulty in keyboarding or wh
o are not physically able to use a keyboard, accessing the comp
uter directly using speech-
recognition software allows them to find and use information. F
or students with fine motor difficulties, the reduced keyboard si
ze of some laptops, buttons on tablets, and minikeyboards or thu
mb keyboards may be too small or too complicated or may requi
re too high a degree of fine motor control to operate. Here are s
ome questions to consider: What are some of the difficulties tha
t the keyboard or screen might present to a student with a disabi
lity? What are some advantages to using a tablet? How easy or d
35. ifficult is it to learn to use one? What problems might this tool
present to a student with a disability?
IN PRACTICE
As we learned earlier in this chapter, a method consists of a gen
eral plan that the teacher follows to introduce new material, assi
st student learning, and provide feedback to students regarding t
heir achievement. Educators typically select and use teaching m
ethods with which they are most familiar. Often an individual te
acher’s selection of a method is based on earlier training and ex
periences provided by experienced mentors.
Selection of a teaching method also should be based on research
findings. The teacher should ask which methods are most effect
ive for students with disabilities.
Classroom Focus
Sean Bellaire, a high school special educator, and Mary Wallace
, a high school social studies teacher, meet twice a week to plan
daily lessons. Today they are starting a new unit, and together t
hey decide that Sean should begin the class by discussing a gene
ral topic, familiar to the students, and then move to the specific
topic of today’s lesson.
Working Toward
Solution
s
As students settle into their seats, Sean asks, “How many of you
have ever moved to a new neighborhood or a new community?”
He encourages students to share their experiences, sometimes p
robing with questions such as, How did you prepare for the mov
e? and How long did it take to get settled? After students have a
chance to share their experiences, Sean and Mary introduce the
36. new unit, the Western Movement. Each student receives a hando
ut with a graphic that represents the overall unit and an outline
of the material to be covered today. Several new vocabulary wor
ds, such as Donner Pass, are included on the handout.
After previewing what they will be covering for today, Mary us
es her laptop and a data projector to display the outline with key
concepts on the screen while she presents the information orall
y. She also encourages students to participate in the lively discu
ssion concerning the new information. During this time, Sean as
sists several students to record notes on the outline handout. Ne
xt the teachers pass out a written follow-
up activity for each student to complete. At the end of class, Ma
ry provides a brief review of what they covered and answers any
questions about an upcoming assignment. For a student with a
mild to moderate disability, a method of instruction that is well
organized and structured helps in learning new information.
What the Research Says
Probably no other teaching method has such a wide research bas
e as direct instruction. Numerous research studies focus on the e
ffectiveness of direct instruction for students with learning disa
bilities, behavior disorders, mild to moderate mental retardation
, and autism. In fact, the effectiveness of direct instruction is no
t restricted to a particular disability, age group, or skills area (
White, 1988).
Direct instruction is one of the most effective classroom interve
37. ntions. In a review of 24 meta-
analyses concerning various types of intervention used with stu
dents with disabilities, Forness (2001) found that direct instruct
ion, mnemonic strategies, reading-
comprehension strategies, and behavior modification were the m
ost effective methods.
MyEducationLab: Your Turn
Learn more about how teachers use direct instruction—
go to MyEducationLab and select the topic Instructional Practic
es and Learning Strategies. Then watch the video entitled “Read
ing: Direct Instruction.” Compare and contrast how the teachers
in the preceding scenario and the teacher in the video used dire
ct instruction. Be prepared to discuss your ideas with members
of the class.
7.4 Emerging Concepts
What will teaching and learning look like in your classroom? E
merging concepts in the field of education as well as new techn
ologies present innovative ways of teaching and learning. As yo
u read the following section, envision how you might employ on
e or more of these concepts or technology tools in your future cl
assroom. Do you think teaching and learning would be more eff
ective?Learning and Social Networks
Technology offers new windows of opportunity for creating lear
ning networks among students. Learning portals that provide a s
38. ingle point of access, coupled with wireless and mobile technol
ogies such as laptops and cell phones, allow students to connect
with others in the classroom and in classrooms across the world
to collect data, solve problems, and create products. Moreover,
these technologies offer multiple formats for learning. Students
download multimedia content, including text, graphics, animatio
ns, video or audio clips. For many students, being “plugged in”
is not only motivating but also helps make learning fun.
For other students, networks provide opportunities for using ne
w skills. Today students build social networks beyond physical
neighborhoods and communicate regularly with individuals with
whom them have common interests but have never met face to f
ace. Educators can build social networks for students to introdu
ce and practice social skills by working with others or role playi
ng in virtual worlds. Participating in social networks, though, d
emands an understanding of certain protocols for participation a
nd a foundation of learning how to play safely.
In a synchronous learning or social environments, the students o
r the instructor and the students communicate in real time. How
ever, asynchronous environments operate continuously, and lear
ners come during times that are convenient.
Synchronous learning allows teachers to provide immediate feed
back and correct student misunderstandings. Technology tools t
hat may support this environment include student-
controlled clickers to participate in whole-
39. class quizzes, voice and video conferencing with experts across
the country, text messaging with other students across the globe
, and live Web quests.
Asynchronous learning allows teachers to extend learning beyon
d the classroom in an interactive way, providing students opport
unities to think more deeply about their activities and then parti
cipate in threaded discussions, create blogs, or produce material
s to post to a Web-
based bulletin board. Podcasts allow students to listen to materi
al once or multiple times, if needed.
Future learning networks may provide a variety of environments
, using the best features of each. In class, seat time may be aug
mented by small-
group activities in a synchronous environment; later, students m
ay post ideas and drafts of work in an asynchronous environmen
t. The 21st century is truly a time of emerging concepts, technol
ogies, and new ideas for learning networks!
Snapshot: Piper Armstrong’s Mentorship Program
Piper recently graduated from the state university with a major i
n biology and coursework in special education. In her first year
of teaching at Randall High, she is participating in an interestin
g mentorship program. She explains that this online mentoring p
roject, called Electronic Mentoring for Student Success (eMSS),
matches new teachers (first or second year of teaching middle o
r high school science) with an experienced science teacher from
40. another school district who teaches in the same content area. T
he mentoring takes place online and is focused on content and p
edagogy. Scientists from the University of California and Monta
na State University also participate to provide content support w
hen needed or share their research activities. Discussion areas a
re provided for earth, space, life, and physical science, and seve
ral modules are designed to explore different aspects of science
teaching between mentors and mentees (eMSS, 2006).
Previous section
Next sectionSummary
• Based on learning theory and research in the field, an effective
teaching method provides a general plan that the teacher follow
s in introducing material, assisting student learning, and providi
ng feedback to students regarding their achievement.
• Theories of learning offer different perspectives on how stude
nts learn and provide a framework for teaching methods.
• An integral part of any teaching method should include planni
ng and developing ways to welcome all students in the classroo
m. Educators must work to create opportunities for students to l
earn about and celebrate the unique characteristics of people in
their communities, building respect for and acceptance of others
.
• Some research suggests that particular teaching methods better
41. meet the needs of Latino students than other methods. Much ad
ditional research is needed for teaching of students whose secon
d or third language is English and for newcomer students with d
isabilities.
• Web-
based technologies, such as social and learning networks hold m
uch promise for all students, including students with disabilities
.
• As new devices and concepts emerge, educators may need to p
lay many roles, such as teacher, advocate, investigator, and lead
er to uphold the right to information access for all students.
42.
43. Chapter 6 Planning and Organizing Instruction
OBJECTIVES
After completing this chapter, you should be able to
Discuss planning classroom environments to positively affect l
earning.
Describe how special educators and other team members develo
p individualized education programs.
Discuss the process of planning and organizing instruction.
Students with and without disabilities are expected to acquire k
nowledge and skills across all areas of the school curriculum. In
fact, IDEA states that students with disabilities must have acce
ss to the general education curriculum. Today, special educators
must be familiar with the general education curriculum as well
as with specialized teaching methods and instructional strategie
s for students with disabilities. They may join general educators
as part of a teaching team, or they may work alone or with othe
r special educators to plan, organize, and implement instruction.
To begin, educators ask questions about the students with whom
they will be teaching. What do Tony, Tasha, and Juanita know?
In planning and organizing instruction, special educators begin
by assessing the academic needs of students with disabilities in
the various content areas, such as literacy (including reading an
d writing), mathematics, science, and social studies. Assessment
44. results help educators to determine where to begin planning an
d implementing instruction. Chapter 5 examined some of the ass
essment approaches that educators use to link assessment inform
ation with instruction. By using assessment information aligned
with the general education curriculum, educators can plan and d
evelop learning activities that deepen students’ understanding a
nd strengthen their skills while facilitating work toward high ac
ademic achievement.
Special educators also assess student skills and behaviors. They
consider prerequisite skills that a student may need, which is cri
tical before planning instruction. For example, the educator con
ducts a brief probe to assess whether a student is familiar with t
he meaning of new vocabulary words. Special educators also ass
ess social skills and behaviors. When students need to build app
ropriate social skills and positive behaviors, educators plan and
organize instructional activities to include a social skills compo
nent as part of the academic instruction. For example, an educat
or may plan a lesson in writing that involves working cooperati
vely with one or more other students to allow a student with a di
sability to build positive behaviors in working with peers.
If students require accommodations or modifications, educators
review the students’ IEPs to determine what accommodations or
modifications are described. If students use AT devices, educat
ors consider how they will use the devices during assessment, in
struction, and learning activities. Careful planning and organizi
45. ng of instruction create successful learning opportunities for all
students.
Planning and organizing instruction for students with disabilitie
s begins with knowing the characteristics of learners, what they
know, and what they can do. Chapters 2 and 3 discussed the cha
racteristics of students, their abilities, and their diverse needs.
Chapter 5 discussed the assessment of students to answer questi
ons about their achievement, skills, and behaviors. This chapter
discusses how teachers use assessment information to plan instr
uction and organize learning experiences.
6.1 Classroom Environments
Each classroom consists of various environments—
physical, social, and learning—
that must be considered in planning instruction. The physical en
vironment consists of the space and furnishings that make up th
e classroom. The social environment comprises the everyday act
ivities, interactions, and relationships that exist in the classroo
m and their impact on learning. The learning environment consi
sts of the content of the instruction, the methods and instruction
al strategies that a teacher uses, the learning strategies that a stu
dent uses, and the ways the student demonstrates progress and a
chievement.Physical Environment
As we discussed in Chapter 1, special educators work in various
46. settings, such as general education classrooms, resource rooms,
special-
purpose schools, and other places. The physical environment for
learning has received considerable emphasis in regard to studen
ts with disabilities. For example, the Americans with Disabilitie
s Act (ADA) ensures that all public classrooms are physically a
ccessible to students with disabilities. But simply creating ramp
s and wide doorways is not enough; students must have access t
o meaningful instruction and learning activities.
To participate fully in learning activities, students should have
physical access to appropriate classroom materials and equipme
nt. For example, a visitor to Mario Stefani’s social studies class
observes students working in small groups using a variety of m
aterials. One group of four students works together using laptop
s, whereas another group uses graph paper, pens, colored pencil
s, and various small cardboard shapes. Tony, a student with men
tal retardation, is an active participant in another group of four
students who are using wooden forms to create a model of the s
ocial structure of an ancient society. The teacher frequently pla
ns various small-group learning activities involving hands-
on use of materials that are stored in accessible locations. In his
classroom, small tables are placed throughout the room for sma
ll-group work.
Additional considerations in the physical environment include li
ghting, temperature, distractions, and noise level. The teacher s
47. hould adjust lighting so that projectors and computer screens ar
e free from glare, which can make reading difficult. The teacher
should also check that room displays are not visually distractin
g. For example, hanging mobiles help a room look attractive, bu
t materials that are visually stimulating may be distracting to so
me learners. When possible, the teacher arranges seating away f
rom a door, bulletin board, window, or other areas that could di
stract these students. To create a positive physical environment,
the teacher monitors the noise level, making sure that no studen
t work group is loud enough to distract students in other groups.
Figure 6.1 illustrates a teacher-
made form for observing the physical environment.
Special educators create positive social environments for studen
ts.Social Environment
Establishing positive relationships with peers and teachers and
building a school community are important components of the e
ducational program for all students. Yet, for many students with
disabilities, these relationships may not develop. Students with
disabilities in fourth and fifth grades report that they felt lonely
at school (Pavri & Monda-
Amaya, 2000). Murray and Greenberg (2001) found that student
s with disabilities in fifth and sixth grades are more dissatisfied
with their relationships with teachers and establish poorer bonds
with school than students without disabilities.
50. for Tony and the other students, Nelson Barnes, the social studi
es teacher, decided to design activities that would involve small
-
group work. Encouraging students to work and learn together en
ables them to grasp concepts of earlier societies in which work
was interdependent. For Tony, learning to work with peers is no
t only important for understanding these concepts but is also par
t of his IEP. One of his goals is to increase his skills in working
cooperatively with peers. Learning activities that involve both i
ndividual and group work support the diverse abilities that stude
nts bring to the classroom.
In a report that analyzed how planning instruction to meet a wid
e range of student abilities and standards-
based curricula affects students with disabilities, Jorgensen (19
97) found that several essential questions challenge and support
students both with and without disabilities. Some of these questi
ons include: What is the central unit, problem, or question? Wh
at will interest students—
for example, serve as a unit “grabber” or kick-
off activity? What are the learning experiences? What assessme
nt approaches can be used? What are the culminating projects?
Educators must consider many questions such as these in planni
ng and organizing the learning environment. Figure 6.3 illustrat
es a teacher-
made form for considering the learning environment.
52. In considering the physical, social, and learning environments, t
he teacher plans ways to enable students to connect classroom l
earning with their homes and communities. Learning experience
s and instructional activities should be culturally relevant and m
eaningful. Diversity perspectives should be embedded when pla
nning units of instruction. For example, in planning a unit on nu
trition, the teacher plans and organizes instructional activities s
o students learn about foods from various cultural groups that ar
e part of the community. Meaningful learning experiences, such
as inviting students to bring in a recipe from home to create a cl
assroom cookbook, are included in the unit.
Teachers create culturally responsive social environments, too.
They arrange collaborative groups to encourage student learning
. They work to connect prior experiences with new learning. Stu
dents engage in a variety of activities that allow them to move a
bout the classroom. What should a teacher consider in planning
and organizing instruction that is effective for all students? Afte
r extensive research, the Center for Research on Education, Div
ersity, and Excellence has developed five principles for effectiv
e pedagogy that are applicable across K–
12 grade levels (Dalton, 1998).
1. Joint productive activity The teacher designs instructional act
ivities requiring student collaboration to accomplish a joint pro
duct…. [The teacher] organizes students in a variety of groupin
gs, such as by friendship, mixed academic ability, language, pro
53. ject, or interests, to promote interaction. [The teacher] plans wit
h students how to work in groups…. (p. 11)
2. Developing language and literacy across the curriculum The t
eacher listens to students talk about familiar topics such as hom
e and community…. [The teacher] assists written and oral langu
age development through modeling, eliciting, probing, restating,
clarifying, questioning, praising, etc., in purposeful conversatio
n and writing. [The teacher] interacts with students in ways that
respect students’ preferences for speaking that may be different
from the teacher’s, such as wait-time, eye contact, turn-
taking, or spotlighting…. [The teacher] encourages students’ us
e of first and second languages in instructional activities. (p. 17
)
3. Making meaning Connecting school to students’ lives. The te
acher … designs instructional activities that are meaningful to s
tudents in terms of local community norms and knowledge…. [T
he teacher] acquires knowledge of local norms and knowledge b
y talking to students, parents, or family members, community m
embers, and by reading pertinent documents…. [The teacher] pl
ans jointly with students to design community-
based learning activities…. (p. 22)
4. Teaching complex thinking The teacher assures that students
—for each instructional topic—
see the whole picture as a basis for understanding the parts…. [
The teacher] designs instructional tasks that advance student un
54. derstanding to more complex levels…. [The teacher] gives clear
, direct feedback about how student performance compares with
the challenging standards…. (p. 26)
5. Teaching through conversation The teacher … has a clear aca
demic goal that guides conversation with students. [The teacher]
ensures that student talk occurs at higher rates than teacher talk
…. [The teacher] guides conversation to include students’ views
, judgments, and rationales using text evidence and other substa
ntive support…. (p. 30)
Questions for Reflection
1. Consider the students in your community schools. To develop
language and literacy across the curriculum (see recommendati
on 2), what children’s books and folk tales can you locate that
would help you in working with these students?
2. To become more knowledgeable about the culture and traditio
ns of the students in your community schools, what online resou
rces would be helpful?
Chapter 5 Linking Assessment and Instruction
OBJECTIVES
55. After completing this chapter, you should be able to
Discuss contemporary views regarding assessment practices an
d instruction.
Compare and contrast contemporary assessment approaches for
planning and monitoring instruction.
Discuss approaches to evaluating instruction, including state an
d federal mandates that influence practices.
Describe professional standards and ethics in assessing student
s with disabilities.
Good teaching always begins with an understanding of what the
student already knows and can do. Before special educators star
t to plan specific instruction, they identify questions and gather
information about the student’s knowledge, skills, and abilities.
Educators continue to gather information, or perform assessmen
t, during the lesson or instructional activities, in monitoring stu
dent work, and at the end of the instructional unit. When linking
assessment with instruction, an educator uses student assessme
nt information to make instructional decisions regarding introdu
cing new material, providing additional practice with supplemen
tary learning activities, or modifying lessons and using different
instructional strategies. In other words, the assessment informa
tion guides teaching practices.
Finally, assessments that are closely aligned with the curriculu
m provide a special educator with valuable help in monitoring st
udent progress. By examining this assessment information, the e
56. ducator can identify areas of proficiency and areas where the st
udent is making progress. Assessment information also indicates
areas in which the student needs attention, signaling the teacher
that adjustments should be made in instruction.
Previous section
Next section
5.1 Contemporary Views of Assessment and Instruction
Educators use an array of assessment approaches from student t
o student and from classroom to classroom. Perhaps as a student
, you have experienced some of the many different ways teacher
s (and professors) monitor and assess achievement. Contempora
ry researchers have written about the importance—
and connections—
of good assessment to effective teaching. According to Shepard
(as cited in Olson, 2002, p. 2), “We have strong evidence that hi
gh-
quality classroom assessment improves learning tremendously,
possibly more effectively than any other sort of teaching interve
ntion.” In this chapter, we look at various assessment approache
s and ways teachers construct high-
quality assessments and, link assessments with instruction to hel
p students with disabilities meet high academic standards, devel
op positive behaviors, and demonstrate competent social skills.
57. 5.2 Assessment for Planning and Monitoring InstructionPlannin
g Where to Begin Instruction
Before planning instruction, teachers use various assessment ap
proaches to identify what students know and can do. They gathe
r information about academic achievement, attainment of social
skills, and positive behaviors. Many of the traditional assessme
nt practices, such as teacher-
developed quizzes and standardized achievement tests, focus on
content knowledge. These assessment approaches require studen
ts to recall or identify information. By contrast, contemporary a
ssessments focus not only on knowledge but also on process skil
ls, learning strategies, thinking skills, acquisition of social and
personal behaviors, effective communication, and work habits.
Students may be asked to compare, analyze, and evaluate inform
ation in these types of assessments.Selecting Appropriate Asses
sment Approaches
Each of the assessment approaches discussed in this chapter has
its own strengths and limitations. Some approaches are best use
d as an integral part of instruction. Curriculum-
based assessments, criterion-
referenced assessments, probes, and observations are examples
of assessments that occur before and during instruction. These t
ypes of assessments are known as formative assessments. Forma
tive assessments provide students and teachers with ongoing inf
ormation about their work and progress. For teachers, formative
58. assessments provide information about what students can do an
d enable teachers to reflect on what methods and strategies are
most effective in supporting student learning (Darling-
Hammond & Ancess, 1996).
Other approaches, referred to as summative assessments, occur
at the end of lessons, instructional units, or marking periods to s
how student growth and progress. Student performances, portfol
ios, teacher-
made exams, and standardized tests are examples of summative
assessments. Although summative assessments provide students
time to develop understandings, sometimes students have to wai
t a long time to receive feedback. Chapter 9 presents another val
uable assessment approach, student observations, used in both f
ormative and summative assessments.
When selecting an assessment approach, teachers should be kno
wledgeable of IDEA mandates. Regarding assessment practices,
IDEA states that assessments and other evaluation materials use
d to assess a child must be provided and administered in the chil
d’s native language or other mode of communication. The assess
ment should be in the form most likely to yield accurate informa
tion about what the child knows and can do academically, devel
opmentally, and functionally, unless it is clearly not feasible to
do so.
Because teachers use a variety of assessment approaches to mak
e informed decisions, the assessment approach and the scoring p
59. rocedure must be both reliable and valid. Teachers want to have
confidence in the results. The reliability of an assessment refer
s to the “scoring procedure that enables the examiner to quantif
y, evaluate, and interpret behavior or work samples. Reliability
refers to the consistency of such measurements when the testing
procedure is repeated on a population of individuals or groups”
(American Educational Research Association, American Psycho
logical Association, & National Council on Measurement in Edu
cation, 1999).
The validity of a test or other measure refers to the “degree to w
hich evidence and theory support the interpretations of test scor
es entailed by the proposed tests” (American Educational Resear
ch Association et al., 1999, p. 9). An educator who needs infor
mation about a student’s reading comprehension or a student’s a
bility to solve a mathematical problem must have confidence tha
t the assessment approach will provide that information.Curricul
um-Based Assessment
Curriculum-
based assessment (CBA) provides valuable information to speci
al educators about what students know and are able to do. Becau
se CBAs consist of items that address specific areas of student k
nowledge or skills, a teacher can use the assessment results to p
inpoint a student’s actual skill levels. This information allows t
he teacher to develop appropriate instructional and learning acti
vities and to focus instruction on what the student needs to mast
60. er. Special educators frequently use the results of CBA to deter
mine a student’s progress toward school district or state curricul
um standards.
Developing a CBA
1. Identify the content area and performance objectives. By iden
tifying performance objectives, educators define the behaviors t
hat the student must demonstrate in order to indicate progress.
Because a CBA focuses on specific areas of the curriculum, edu
cators begin by carefully examining the curriculum area and ide
ntifying the specific information or skills they wish to assess. E
ducators consider the kind of information students should know:
facts, concepts, rules, and/or strategies (Howell & Nolet, 2000)
. Facts are pieces of information that the student has memorized
, such as the temperature at which water freezes or capitals of v
arious countries. Concepts involve more than memorizing and re
call; they require the student to understand and distinguish the a
ttributes of one concept from another. Rules and strategies invol
ve both memorizing and identifying situations in which the rule
or strategy applies. A well-
constructed CBA typically assesses two or more types of inform
ation.
2. Decide on the question and response format. Before educators
begin writing the actual test questions, they will need to decide
if the assessment will be a paper-and-
pencil assessment or if it will be available as a digital file acces
61. sible by computer. Educators can construct assessment items tha
t require students to use their laptops to respond in a text or voi
ce note or on a traditional answer sheet.
Educators address other considerations as well, including what
question formats to include in the assessment and how students
will be asked to respond (Hargrove, Church, Yssel, & Koch, 200
2). Question formats include total recall, fill in the blank, multi
ple choice, and matching. Students with cognitive disabilities an
d short-
term memory difficulties may have more difficulty with some q
uestion formats than others.
3. Write the test questions. In this step, educators develop the s
pecific test questions that correspond to the performance objecti
ves. The content of the test questions should be closely aligned
with the curriculum. This will help to ensure that the assessment
is valid.
4. Develop scoring procedures. Educators must decide how test
items will be scored and how educators will determine student p
rogress. For example, a question could be scored as right or wro
ng, or a certain number of points could be assigned based on the
student’s response.
5. Organize and interpret the information. Educators consider h
ow best to organize the assessment information so that it can be
interpreted easily. They frequently create a bar or line graph. B
y using graphs, educators and the student and family members c