Cbl Supreme Court
•Download as PPT, PDF•
1 like•341 views
Jane Roe, a pregnant single woman in Texas, wanted to have an abortion but Texas had laws banning abortion and travel to other states for abortion. She sued the district attorney, arguing the laws violated her right to privacy. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled 7-2 in favor of Roe, establishing that states could regulate but not ban abortions in the first and second trimesters, and could only ban third trimester abortions to protect the mother's life.
Report
Share
Report
Share
![[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],ROE V. WADE]()
Recommended
josh abha jeff
Meyer vs. Nebraska was a 1923 Supreme Court case that ruled against a Nebraska law banning teaching foreign languages to students who had not passed the 8th grade. The Court found this violated teachers' right to teach and parents' right to choose their child's education under the 14th Amendment. This established privacy rights in family matters and education, influencing later cases on privacy and reproductive rights.
Law Project
Mapp v. Ohio established that evidence obtained through an illegal search cannot be used in court. The police searched Dollree Mapp's home without a warrant and found pornographic materials. Although she was not hiding a bomber as suspected, she was charged with possession of obscene materials. The Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment applies to states, so evidence from an unreasonable search is inadmissible. This case extended Fourth Amendment protections against unlawful search and seizure to the state level.
Mapp v. ohio
The police searched Mapp's home without a warrant and found pornographic materials. She was charged with possession of obscene materials. Mapp argued the evidence was obtained illegally without a warrant and should not be allowed in court. The Supreme Court ruled the 4th Amendment applies to states, so evidence from unreasonable searches cannot be used in court. This established the exclusionary rule under Mapp v. Ohio in 1961.
US Case Law
1) Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier established that public school administrators can censor student newspapers if they have educational reasons. The principal's removal of articles on divorce and pregnancy from the school paper was found to be justified.
2) New Jersey v. T.L.O. determined that the Fourth Amendment applies to searches by school officials but a lower standard of "reasonable suspicion" rather than probable cause is required. A search of a student's purse that revealed marijuana was deemed reasonable.
3) Plessy v. Ferguson upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the "separate but equal" doctrine, finding that segregated facilities did not necessarily violate the 14th Amendment as long as
case law
Three public school students wore black armbands to protest the Vietnam War and were suspended. They argued this was a peaceful protest protected by the First Amendment. The school board countered that the protest disrupted learning. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled the students had a right to peaceful protest through armbands, as long as it did not disrupt the learning process.
Educational court case investigation, zelma uribe
Brown v. Board of Education was a landmark 1954 Supreme Court case that ruled racial segregation in public schools to be unconstitutional. The case was a consolidation of five separate cases challenging racial segregation in different states. It overturned the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision that allowed "separate but equal" public facilities. The unanimous decision established that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal" and required public schools to desegregate. The ruling had broad implications for dismantling racial segregation across American society.
Case law
The document summarizes three Supreme Court cases:
1) Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the "separate but equal" doctrine. Homer Plessy was arrested for sitting in the white car of a train. The Court ruled racial segregation did not violate the 13th or 14th Amendments as long as facilities were equal.
2) New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985) established the standard that school officials need reasonable suspicion, not probable cause, to conduct searches of students. A student's purse was searched for cigarettes and drugs were found.
3) Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988
36 supreme court cases
This document outlines several landmark Supreme Court cases that established important precedents on civil rights and liberties issues including: the rights of suspected criminals in Miranda v. Arizona; rights of juveniles in In re Gault; student free speech in Tinker v. Des Moines; right to abortion in Roe v. Wade; death penalty legality in Furman v. Georgia; presidential powers in US v. Nixon; religion in schools in Wallace v. Jaffree; student searches in New Jersey v. TLO; affirmative action in California v. Bakke; student free speech in Hazelwood Schools v. Kuhlmeier; flag burning free speech in Texas v. Johnson; and forced busing of students in
Recommended
josh abha jeff
Meyer vs. Nebraska was a 1923 Supreme Court case that ruled against a Nebraska law banning teaching foreign languages to students who had not passed the 8th grade. The Court found this violated teachers' right to teach and parents' right to choose their child's education under the 14th Amendment. This established privacy rights in family matters and education, influencing later cases on privacy and reproductive rights.
Law Project
Mapp v. Ohio established that evidence obtained through an illegal search cannot be used in court. The police searched Dollree Mapp's home without a warrant and found pornographic materials. Although she was not hiding a bomber as suspected, she was charged with possession of obscene materials. The Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment applies to states, so evidence from an unreasonable search is inadmissible. This case extended Fourth Amendment protections against unlawful search and seizure to the state level.
Mapp v. ohio
The police searched Mapp's home without a warrant and found pornographic materials. She was charged with possession of obscene materials. Mapp argued the evidence was obtained illegally without a warrant and should not be allowed in court. The Supreme Court ruled the 4th Amendment applies to states, so evidence from unreasonable searches cannot be used in court. This established the exclusionary rule under Mapp v. Ohio in 1961.
US Case Law
1) Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier established that public school administrators can censor student newspapers if they have educational reasons. The principal's removal of articles on divorce and pregnancy from the school paper was found to be justified.
2) New Jersey v. T.L.O. determined that the Fourth Amendment applies to searches by school officials but a lower standard of "reasonable suspicion" rather than probable cause is required. A search of a student's purse that revealed marijuana was deemed reasonable.
3) Plessy v. Ferguson upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the "separate but equal" doctrine, finding that segregated facilities did not necessarily violate the 14th Amendment as long as
case law
Three public school students wore black armbands to protest the Vietnam War and were suspended. They argued this was a peaceful protest protected by the First Amendment. The school board countered that the protest disrupted learning. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled the students had a right to peaceful protest through armbands, as long as it did not disrupt the learning process.
Educational court case investigation, zelma uribe
Brown v. Board of Education was a landmark 1954 Supreme Court case that ruled racial segregation in public schools to be unconstitutional. The case was a consolidation of five separate cases challenging racial segregation in different states. It overturned the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision that allowed "separate but equal" public facilities. The unanimous decision established that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal" and required public schools to desegregate. The ruling had broad implications for dismantling racial segregation across American society.
Case law
The document summarizes three Supreme Court cases:
1) Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the "separate but equal" doctrine. Homer Plessy was arrested for sitting in the white car of a train. The Court ruled racial segregation did not violate the 13th or 14th Amendments as long as facilities were equal.
2) New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985) established the standard that school officials need reasonable suspicion, not probable cause, to conduct searches of students. A student's purse was searched for cigarettes and drugs were found.
3) Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988
36 supreme court cases
This document outlines several landmark Supreme Court cases that established important precedents on civil rights and liberties issues including: the rights of suspected criminals in Miranda v. Arizona; rights of juveniles in In re Gault; student free speech in Tinker v. Des Moines; right to abortion in Roe v. Wade; death penalty legality in Furman v. Georgia; presidential powers in US v. Nixon; religion in schools in Wallace v. Jaffree; student searches in New Jersey v. TLO; affirmative action in California v. Bakke; student free speech in Hazelwood Schools v. Kuhlmeier; flag burning free speech in Texas v. Johnson; and forced busing of students in
Court Case 5
The document summarizes the 1968 Supreme Court case Green v. County School Board of New Kent County. It discusses how New Kent County in Virginia maintained a segregated school system with one all-white school and one all-black school, despite the Brown v. Board of Education ruling. To comply with desegregation orders, the school board implemented a freedom of choice plan that allowed students to choose which school to attend but did not result in desegregation. The Supreme Court ruled the plan unconstitutional, stating school boards must take effective steps to transition to a nondiscriminatory system.
Week 2 visual student rights
The plaintiff was an eighth grade student who created a website at home that contained profane and threatening statements about her teacher. She was suspended from school as a result. The main issue in the case was whether the school could discipline her for off-campus speech. The court ruled that the school could discipline her because the website was aimed at the school community and foreseeably spread in the school, disrupting school activities. The court found that the school's actions did not violate the student's first amendment rights.
Case law project
This document summarizes three landmark Supreme Court cases from the 1970s that involved challenges to the First and Fourteenth Amendments: Regents of the University of California v Bakke challenged affirmative action policies; Texas v Johnson protected flag burning as free speech; and Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier allowed censorship of a school newspaper for pedagogical reasons. Bakke ruled against racial quotas, Johnson ruled symbolic speech is protected, and Kuhlmeier gave school administrators control over school-sponsored publications. These cases helped define key constitutional rights and limitations.
History of brown v. board of education
The document provides background information on key court cases that challenged racial segregation in education, leading up to the landmark 1954 Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education. It discusses cases such as Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896, which upheld the doctrine of "separate but equal"; Murray v. Maryland in 1936 and Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada in 1938, which required states to provide equal educational opportunities for black students; and Sweatt v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma Board of Regents in 1950, which found that segregated graduate schools were inherently unequal. The document then summarizes the consolidation of five cases into Brown v. Board in 1952 and the Supreme Court's unanimous 1954 ruling
Important Supreme Court Cases
This document summarizes several important Supreme Court cases that impacted civil rights in the United States. It discusses the Brown v. Board of Education case in 1954 that ruled racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. It also describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford case in 1857 that ruled African Americans could not be citizens. Finally, it summarizes Roe v. Wade in 1973 that established a woman's right to an abortion as protected by the right to privacy.
Court Case 5
Dr. William Allan Kritsonis
PhD Program in Educational Leadership
PVAMU-Member of the Texas A&M University System
First amendment and you
Three public school students wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War and were suspended for refusing to remove them. They sued the school district for violating their 1st Amendment rights. The Supreme Court decided that the school had violated the students' rights by suspending them for a silent, passive expression of opinion unaccompanied by disruptive conduct.
A high school student gave a nominating speech at a school assembly that included graphic and explicit sexual metaphors. He was suspended for the speech. The Supreme Court decided that schools may restrict student speech that is lewd, indecent, or offensive.
A high school principal removed two articles from the school newspaper that discussed teen pregnancy and divorce because he found the
New Jersey V T L O Powerpoint
T.L.O., a 14-year-old girl, was accused of smoking in the girls' bathroom at her high school in violation of school rules. She was sent to the Assistant Vice Principal's office, where he searched her bag and found marijuana, drug paraphernalia, money, and notes implicating T.L.O. in drug dealing. T.L.O. argued the search violated her Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled 6-3 that the search was reasonable under the circumstances and did not require a warrant or probable cause. School officials can search students based on reasonable suspicion of rule or law violation.
C:\Fakepath\New J V Tlo
The Supreme Court case New Jersey v. T.L.O established that searches of students by school officials need only be reasonable rather than requiring probable cause. A 14-year-old student was caught smoking on school grounds, leading an assistant principal to search her purse and find drug paraphernalia. The student argued the search violated her 4th Amendment rights, but the Court ruled in a majority opinion that school officials have more flexibility in searches than police to ensure school safety. A concurring opinion noted students have less protection than adults, while a dissent argued probable cause should still be required for searches. The ruling gave school officials broader discretion to search students without warrants to maintain a safe learning environment.
Investigation of case law
The document summarizes three important US Supreme Court cases on civil rights and liberties:
- Miranda v. Arizona established that a person's confession during a police interrogation cannot be used against them if they were not informed of their 5th and 6th Amendment rights.
- Tinker v. Des Moines ruled that students retain freedom of speech rights in public schools unless there is a valid reason to limit that speech.
- Brown v. Board of Education overturned the "separate but equal" doctrine and found that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional, violating the 14th Amendment's guarantee of equal treatment under the law.
Tinkervsdesmoines
The document summarizes the 1969 Supreme Court case Tinker vs. Des Moines. Three students wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War but were suspended for violating the school's ban on armbands. The students filed a lawsuit claiming their free speech rights were violated. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled in favor of the students, establishing that students do not shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate.
Webinar ple 20_6_12
This document discusses personal learning environments (PLEs) and introduces Graasp, a PLE enabler developed at EPFL. It summarizes PLE initiatives in Europe like ROLE and Go-Lab projects and in Switzerland. Graasp allows users to create dedicated learning spaces, aggregate online resources, and use educational widgets. Case studies show how Graasp has been used to support courses at UNIGE and Tongji University. The document promotes a meta-constructionist approach using lightweight educational widgets in academic disciplines.
Company presentation
The document discusses Tori.in, a social media platform that helps companies gather continuous feedback from customers. It works by using web widgets within existing online communities to conduct ongoing surveys. The SaaS model ensures scalability and ease of use. Key benefits include new business opportunities through early customer insights, cost savings by avoiding mistakes, and brand awareness by interactive dialogue. Tori.in brings social media principles to online surveys and sees markets interested in real-time, lightweight solutions versus expensive one-time studies. It creates value by supporting the process from continuous surveys to research projects to integration with corporate processes.
EPFL Remote Lab Framework
- The document discusses the 10 year history of remote laboratories at EPFL, including various European research projects on online and flexible engineering education, professional learning, and technology enhanced learning.
- It addresses challenges and trends in moving from formal teaching and learning management systems to informal learning using personal learning environments and the integration of Web 2.0 technologies.
- The future of remote labs is discussed in the context of the Internet of Things, personal learning environments, widgets, smart devices, and the Web of People.
Web 2.0 Personal Learning Environments (PLE 2.0): From dreams to reality?
1) The document discusses personal learning environments (PLEs) in the context of Web 2.0 technologies and the shift towards self-directed learning.
2) It describes how students currently learn both formally and informally using various social media and technologies outside of traditional learning management systems.
3) The document proposes that when social media are used intentionally for learning purposes or when learning is recognized retrospectively, they can be considered "Web 2.0 Personal Learning Environments" or PLE 2.0.
Strengthening learning contexts: An introduction
This document discusses contexts and how strengthening learning contexts can improve the learning experience. It defines context as a combination of environment, competence, action, artifacts, people, purpose and devices. Context matters because understanding and accounting for context can increase awareness, motivation, cognition, interaction quality, experience quality, knowledge management and appropriation. Contexts can be strengthened by augmenting people, places, facilities, devices, networks, environments and tools through personalization, adaptation and contextualization. The document presents STELLAR's vision of contextualizing virtual learning environments and instrumentalizing real learning contexts to support novel learning experiences and the mobility of learners across distributed settings. It proposes using standards to achieve interoperability and reusability of learning resources across
Ple 2.0 ed-media
- The document discusses personal learning environments (PLEs) that utilize social media, known as PLE 2.0, and the challenges of implementing and evaluating them.
- PLE 2.0 allow for informal, social, and self-directed learning by enabling learners to aggregate various learning resources, services, and connections using social media.
- Key issues discussed include search, recommendation, and trust systems to help learners find relevant content, activities, and connections within their personalized PLEs. Evaluation of PLE 2.0 is also challenging given their personalized and uncontrolled nature.
Charlie Bit Me Presentation
Memes are ideas that spread through word of mouth or sharing online through images, videos, or phrases. The "Charlie Bit Me" video from 2007 shows one young boy biting his brother and has received over 130 million views on YouTube, making it one of the most watched videos. It went viral after being featured on other sites. Though some think it was staged, the father says it was a genuine moment between the boys he filmed to share with family. The popular video has since inspired many parodies.
Group 1 Carmo Musaschio Friedman
This document summarizes three landmark US Supreme Court cases related to constitutional rights:
1) Weems v. United States (1910) established that punishments violating the 8th Amendment's ban on "cruel and unusual punishment" are unconstitutional.
2) Carroll v. United States (1925) upheld warrantless searches of vehicles where there is probable cause, creating an exception to the 4th Amendment's warrant requirement.
3) Olmstead v. United States (1928) initially found warrantless wiretapping of a suspected bootlegger's phone calls did not violate the 4th or 5th Amendments, a decision later overturned.
Areas of Tension in Technology Enhanced Learning
The document summarizes a study conducted by the STELLAR Network of Excellence to identify key areas of tension and core research areas in technology-enhanced learning (TEL) through a multi-round Delphi study. The study involved 230 TEL experts who identified 11 core research areas and 5 areas of tension presenting opposing views on the future of TEL. Examples of areas of tension include "data tracking for personalized learning versus data privacy." The study aims to provide recommendations for a future TEL research agenda.
eResearch
This document discusses using communities of practice, online repositories, and social media to conduct collaborative research in technology enhanced learning (TEL). It describes the STELLAR Network of Excellence in TEL and its instruments for supporting researchers, including a doctoral community of practice. A survey of TEL doctoral students found they could benefit from reduced isolation and increased collaboration opportunities through such a community. The document also contrasts Science 1.0 and 2.0 approaches, noting how platforms like academic social networks, reference managers, and open archives can help researchers in the Science 2.0 model.
More Related Content
What's hot
Court Case 5
The document summarizes the 1968 Supreme Court case Green v. County School Board of New Kent County. It discusses how New Kent County in Virginia maintained a segregated school system with one all-white school and one all-black school, despite the Brown v. Board of Education ruling. To comply with desegregation orders, the school board implemented a freedom of choice plan that allowed students to choose which school to attend but did not result in desegregation. The Supreme Court ruled the plan unconstitutional, stating school boards must take effective steps to transition to a nondiscriminatory system.
Week 2 visual student rights
The plaintiff was an eighth grade student who created a website at home that contained profane and threatening statements about her teacher. She was suspended from school as a result. The main issue in the case was whether the school could discipline her for off-campus speech. The court ruled that the school could discipline her because the website was aimed at the school community and foreseeably spread in the school, disrupting school activities. The court found that the school's actions did not violate the student's first amendment rights.
Case law project
This document summarizes three landmark Supreme Court cases from the 1970s that involved challenges to the First and Fourteenth Amendments: Regents of the University of California v Bakke challenged affirmative action policies; Texas v Johnson protected flag burning as free speech; and Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier allowed censorship of a school newspaper for pedagogical reasons. Bakke ruled against racial quotas, Johnson ruled symbolic speech is protected, and Kuhlmeier gave school administrators control over school-sponsored publications. These cases helped define key constitutional rights and limitations.
History of brown v. board of education
The document provides background information on key court cases that challenged racial segregation in education, leading up to the landmark 1954 Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education. It discusses cases such as Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896, which upheld the doctrine of "separate but equal"; Murray v. Maryland in 1936 and Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada in 1938, which required states to provide equal educational opportunities for black students; and Sweatt v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma Board of Regents in 1950, which found that segregated graduate schools were inherently unequal. The document then summarizes the consolidation of five cases into Brown v. Board in 1952 and the Supreme Court's unanimous 1954 ruling
Important Supreme Court Cases
This document summarizes several important Supreme Court cases that impacted civil rights in the United States. It discusses the Brown v. Board of Education case in 1954 that ruled racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. It also describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford case in 1857 that ruled African Americans could not be citizens. Finally, it summarizes Roe v. Wade in 1973 that established a woman's right to an abortion as protected by the right to privacy.
Court Case 5
Dr. William Allan Kritsonis
PhD Program in Educational Leadership
PVAMU-Member of the Texas A&M University System
First amendment and you
Three public school students wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War and were suspended for refusing to remove them. They sued the school district for violating their 1st Amendment rights. The Supreme Court decided that the school had violated the students' rights by suspending them for a silent, passive expression of opinion unaccompanied by disruptive conduct.
A high school student gave a nominating speech at a school assembly that included graphic and explicit sexual metaphors. He was suspended for the speech. The Supreme Court decided that schools may restrict student speech that is lewd, indecent, or offensive.
A high school principal removed two articles from the school newspaper that discussed teen pregnancy and divorce because he found the
New Jersey V T L O Powerpoint
T.L.O., a 14-year-old girl, was accused of smoking in the girls' bathroom at her high school in violation of school rules. She was sent to the Assistant Vice Principal's office, where he searched her bag and found marijuana, drug paraphernalia, money, and notes implicating T.L.O. in drug dealing. T.L.O. argued the search violated her Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled 6-3 that the search was reasonable under the circumstances and did not require a warrant or probable cause. School officials can search students based on reasonable suspicion of rule or law violation.
C:\Fakepath\New J V Tlo
The Supreme Court case New Jersey v. T.L.O established that searches of students by school officials need only be reasonable rather than requiring probable cause. A 14-year-old student was caught smoking on school grounds, leading an assistant principal to search her purse and find drug paraphernalia. The student argued the search violated her 4th Amendment rights, but the Court ruled in a majority opinion that school officials have more flexibility in searches than police to ensure school safety. A concurring opinion noted students have less protection than adults, while a dissent argued probable cause should still be required for searches. The ruling gave school officials broader discretion to search students without warrants to maintain a safe learning environment.
Investigation of case law
The document summarizes three important US Supreme Court cases on civil rights and liberties:
- Miranda v. Arizona established that a person's confession during a police interrogation cannot be used against them if they were not informed of their 5th and 6th Amendment rights.
- Tinker v. Des Moines ruled that students retain freedom of speech rights in public schools unless there is a valid reason to limit that speech.
- Brown v. Board of Education overturned the "separate but equal" doctrine and found that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional, violating the 14th Amendment's guarantee of equal treatment under the law.
Tinkervsdesmoines
The document summarizes the 1969 Supreme Court case Tinker vs. Des Moines. Three students wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War but were suspended for violating the school's ban on armbands. The students filed a lawsuit claiming their free speech rights were violated. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled in favor of the students, establishing that students do not shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate.
What's hot (11)
Viewers also liked
Webinar ple 20_6_12
This document discusses personal learning environments (PLEs) and introduces Graasp, a PLE enabler developed at EPFL. It summarizes PLE initiatives in Europe like ROLE and Go-Lab projects and in Switzerland. Graasp allows users to create dedicated learning spaces, aggregate online resources, and use educational widgets. Case studies show how Graasp has been used to support courses at UNIGE and Tongji University. The document promotes a meta-constructionist approach using lightweight educational widgets in academic disciplines.
Company presentation
The document discusses Tori.in, a social media platform that helps companies gather continuous feedback from customers. It works by using web widgets within existing online communities to conduct ongoing surveys. The SaaS model ensures scalability and ease of use. Key benefits include new business opportunities through early customer insights, cost savings by avoiding mistakes, and brand awareness by interactive dialogue. Tori.in brings social media principles to online surveys and sees markets interested in real-time, lightweight solutions versus expensive one-time studies. It creates value by supporting the process from continuous surveys to research projects to integration with corporate processes.
EPFL Remote Lab Framework
- The document discusses the 10 year history of remote laboratories at EPFL, including various European research projects on online and flexible engineering education, professional learning, and technology enhanced learning.
- It addresses challenges and trends in moving from formal teaching and learning management systems to informal learning using personal learning environments and the integration of Web 2.0 technologies.
- The future of remote labs is discussed in the context of the Internet of Things, personal learning environments, widgets, smart devices, and the Web of People.
Web 2.0 Personal Learning Environments (PLE 2.0): From dreams to reality?
1) The document discusses personal learning environments (PLEs) in the context of Web 2.0 technologies and the shift towards self-directed learning.
2) It describes how students currently learn both formally and informally using various social media and technologies outside of traditional learning management systems.
3) The document proposes that when social media are used intentionally for learning purposes or when learning is recognized retrospectively, they can be considered "Web 2.0 Personal Learning Environments" or PLE 2.0.
Strengthening learning contexts: An introduction
This document discusses contexts and how strengthening learning contexts can improve the learning experience. It defines context as a combination of environment, competence, action, artifacts, people, purpose and devices. Context matters because understanding and accounting for context can increase awareness, motivation, cognition, interaction quality, experience quality, knowledge management and appropriation. Contexts can be strengthened by augmenting people, places, facilities, devices, networks, environments and tools through personalization, adaptation and contextualization. The document presents STELLAR's vision of contextualizing virtual learning environments and instrumentalizing real learning contexts to support novel learning experiences and the mobility of learners across distributed settings. It proposes using standards to achieve interoperability and reusability of learning resources across
Ple 2.0 ed-media
- The document discusses personal learning environments (PLEs) that utilize social media, known as PLE 2.0, and the challenges of implementing and evaluating them.
- PLE 2.0 allow for informal, social, and self-directed learning by enabling learners to aggregate various learning resources, services, and connections using social media.
- Key issues discussed include search, recommendation, and trust systems to help learners find relevant content, activities, and connections within their personalized PLEs. Evaluation of PLE 2.0 is also challenging given their personalized and uncontrolled nature.
Charlie Bit Me Presentation
Memes are ideas that spread through word of mouth or sharing online through images, videos, or phrases. The "Charlie Bit Me" video from 2007 shows one young boy biting his brother and has received over 130 million views on YouTube, making it one of the most watched videos. It went viral after being featured on other sites. Though some think it was staged, the father says it was a genuine moment between the boys he filmed to share with family. The popular video has since inspired many parodies.
Group 1 Carmo Musaschio Friedman
This document summarizes three landmark US Supreme Court cases related to constitutional rights:
1) Weems v. United States (1910) established that punishments violating the 8th Amendment's ban on "cruel and unusual punishment" are unconstitutional.
2) Carroll v. United States (1925) upheld warrantless searches of vehicles where there is probable cause, creating an exception to the 4th Amendment's warrant requirement.
3) Olmstead v. United States (1928) initially found warrantless wiretapping of a suspected bootlegger's phone calls did not violate the 4th or 5th Amendments, a decision later overturned.
Areas of Tension in Technology Enhanced Learning
The document summarizes a study conducted by the STELLAR Network of Excellence to identify key areas of tension and core research areas in technology-enhanced learning (TEL) through a multi-round Delphi study. The study involved 230 TEL experts who identified 11 core research areas and 5 areas of tension presenting opposing views on the future of TEL. Examples of areas of tension include "data tracking for personalized learning versus data privacy." The study aims to provide recommendations for a future TEL research agenda.
eResearch
This document discusses using communities of practice, online repositories, and social media to conduct collaborative research in technology enhanced learning (TEL). It describes the STELLAR Network of Excellence in TEL and its instruments for supporting researchers, including a doctoral community of practice. A survey of TEL doctoral students found they could benefit from reduced isolation and increased collaboration opportunities through such a community. The document also contrasts Science 1.0 and 2.0 approaches, noting how platforms like academic social networks, reference managers, and open archives can help researchers in the Science 2.0 model.
Doctoral Community of Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning (requirements)
These slides present the results of a questionnaire sent to European PhD students in Technology Enhanced Learning to elicit their needs and their current practices regarding interaction and Web 2.0 support. The idea is to better define how to build and maintain a doctoral community of practice in TEL. The original questionnaire is available here: http://www.stellarnet.eu/index.php/download_file/-/view/664
Séminaire FROTSI Midi-Pyrénées - CDT Tarn
Intervention lors du séminaire de la FROTSI Midi-Pyrénées le 7 mai 2010 à Moissac sur l'Office de Tourisme du futur.
#Et6-At7-Réussir sa stratégie etourisme
Animé par Ludovic Dublanchet (Chargé de mission - Ardesi Midi-Pyrénées), avec les interventions de Jean-Philippe Gold (Directeur - CRT Picardie), Karine Feige (Directrice du projet SITRA - Rhône-Alpes Tourisme), Jean-Luc Boulin, (Directeur - MOPA) et Karine Miron (Stratège Internet - Adviso)
Un tiers de bonne gouvernance territoriale, un tiers de parfaite gestion des données touristiques, un tiers de formation des professionnels locaux, et un gros tiers de stratégie web élaborée, venez découvrir la recette du cocktail etourisme à consommer sans modération !
C slides 11
The document discusses discretization of continuous-time linear systems. It presents:
1) The solution to the state equation as the sum of the homogeneous and particular solutions.
2) Computing the homogeneous solution using the matrix exponential, and the particular solution as a convolution integral.
3) Discretizing the system by holding inputs constant between sample times kh and kh+h, and computing the state x and output y at sample times using the matrix exponential and convolution integral.
Presentation1
A family celebrates a birthday with cake. The mother enters carrying the cake as everyone sings happy birthday. The father sets up the camera on a self-timer to take a photo of the family around the table as the birthday boy blows out the candles. The camera then flashes, taking a photo that is later seen in a photo album, providing a still image of the celebrating family.
Storyboard
A family is celebrating a birthday with cake. The mum brings in the cake as everyone sings happy birthday. The dad uses a camera to take photos of the celebration from different angles, including an over-the-shoulder shot of the kids at the table and a close-up self-timer shot of the whole family. The document ends by showing the still image photo taken earlier now in a photo album.
Viewers also liked (18)
Web 2.0 Personal Learning Environments (PLE 2.0): From dreams to reality?
Web 2.0 Personal Learning Environments (PLE 2.0): From dreams to reality?
Doctoral Community of Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning (requirements)
Doctoral Community of Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning (requirements)