BUSI 511Research Project (Final Document Draft) Grading Rubric (
•Download as DOCX, PDF•
0 likes•2 views
BUSI 511 Research Project (Final Document Draft) Grading Rubric (60 Points) Criteria Levels of Achievement Total Points Content 70% Advanced Proficient Developing Not Present Abstract 6 points Points: 6 · All required information is included. · No extraneous information is included; formatting is correct. Points: 5 · All required information is included. · Some extraneous information is included; formatting is correct. Points: 1 to 4 · Some required information is included. · Extraneous information is included; formatting is not correct. Points: 0 · Not Present Introduction 6 points Points: 6 · Background information is engaging and leads to a clear purpose/thesis statement. · Relevance to course/topic is articulated well. · Research question(s) or purpose statement is clear and concise. · Two or 3 main discussion points of the literature review are clearly identified in the purpose statement. Points: 5 · Background information is at times unclear or uninteresting. · Relevance to course/topic could be more clearly articulated. · Research question(s) or purpose statement could be stated more clearly and concisely. · Main discussion points could be more clearly articulated. Points: 1 to 4 · Background information is not clearly articulated. · Relevance to course/topic is unclear. · Research question(s) or purpose statement is unidentifiable. · Main discussion points are not identified in the purpose statement. Points: 0 · Not Present Content 6 points Points: 6 · Thorough comparison and contrast of findings are provided and relate to the main discussion points in the order of their appearance in the purpose statement. · Focus is on research findings. · Gaps and controversies that exist in the literature are clearly discussed. Points: 5 · Comparison and contrast of the findings are provided but lack thoroughness. · Discussion of findings could relate better to the main discussion points in the purpose statement. · Gaps and controversies in the literature are discussed, but clarity could be enhanced. Points: 1 to 4 · Comparison and contrast of findings are lacking. · Discussion of findings does not relate well to the main discussion points in the purpose statement. · Gaps (what is unknown and needs to be researched) and controversies that exist in the literature are not discussed. Points: 0 · Not Present Conclusion 6 points Points: 6 · A summary of the main points is clearly articulated. · Implications or conclusions related to business practice(s) are logical, relevant, and clear. · Areas of future research are clearly identified. Points: 5 · A summary of the main points is presented, but clarity could be enhanced. · Implications or conclusions related to business practice(s) are included but lack logic, relevance, or clarity. · Areas of future research are identified but lack clarity. Points: 1 to 4 · A summary of the main points is not clearly presented. · Implications or conclusions related to business practice(s) are absent, illogical, i ...
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
BUSI 505Research Project (Final Document Draft) Grading Rubric
BUSI 505
Research Project (Final Document Draft)
Grading Rubric (75 Points)
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Points Earned
Abstract
10 points
Points: 10
· All required information is included.
· No extraneous information is included; formatting is correct.
Points: 7-9
· All required information is included.
· Some extraneous information is included; formatting is correct.
Points: 1-6
· Some required information is included.
· Extraneous information is included; formatting is not correct.
Points: 0
· Not Present
Introduction
7 points
Points: 7
· Background information is engaging and leads to a clear purpose/thesis statement.
· Relevance to course/topic is articulated well.
· Research question(s) or purpose statement is clear and concise.
· Two or 3 main discussion points of the literature review are clearly identified in the purpose statement.
Points: 6
· Background information is at times unclear or uninteresting.
· Relevance to course/topic could be more clearly articulated.
· Research question(s) or purpose statement could be stated more clearly and concisely.
· Main discussion points could be more clearly articulated.
Points: 5 to 1
· Background information is not clearly articulated.
· Relevance to course/topic is unclear.
· Research question(s) or purpose statement is unidentifiable.
· Main discussion points are not identified in the purpose statement.
Points: 0
· Not Present
Content
7 points
Points: 7
· Thorough comparison and contrast of findings are provided and relate to the main discussion points in the order of their appearance in the purpose statement.
· Focus is on research findings.
· Gaps and controversies that exist in the literature are clearly discussed.
Points: 6
· Comparison and contrast of the findings are provided but lack thoroughness.
· Discussion of findings could relate better to the main discussion points in the purpose statement.
· Gaps and controversies in the literature are discussed, but clarity could be enhanced.
Points: 5 to 1
· Comparison and contrast of findings are lacking.
· Discussion of findings does not relate well to the main discussion points in the purpose statement.
· Gaps (what is unknown and needs to be researched) and controversies that exist in the literature are not discussed.
Points: 0
· Not Present
Conclusion
7 points
Points: 7
· A summary of the main points is clearly articulated.
· Implications or conclusions related to business practice(s) are logical, relevant, and clear.
· Areas of future research are clearly identified.
Points: 6
· A summary of the main points is presented, but clarity could be enhanced.
· Implications or conclusions related to business practice(s) are included but lack logic, relevance, or clarity.
· Areas of future research are identified but lack clarity.
Points: 5 to 1
· A summary of the main points is not clearly presented.
· Implications or c ...
Strategic Organization Report Grading GuideHRM595 Version 3.docx
Strategic Organization Report Grading Guide
HRM/595 Version 3
1
Individual Assignment: Strategic Organization Report
Purpose of Assignment
In this assignment, students are expected to detect changes in organizational direction and demonstrate how HR can be a strategic partner in helping to effectuate change in an organization while considering the corporate culture. One way HR can participate in organizational change is to have a role in the mission and vision of the organization.
Resources Required
· Blossoms Up! Case Study
· Email No. 4
Grading Guide
Content
Met
Partially Met
Not Met
Comments:
The new direction the organization is going in is discussed.
HR becoming a strategic partner in management and organizational goals is demonstrated.
Corporate culture is considered.
Mission and vision statements are created to reflect the new direction and brand of the company
A minimum of five sources are used.
The paper is no more than 1,050-words in length.
Total Available
Total Earned
3.5
#/3.5
Writing Guidelines
Met
Partially Met
Not Met
Comments:
The paper—including tables and graphs, headings, title page, and reference page—is consistent with APA formatting guidelines and meets course-level requirements.
Intellectual property is recognized with in-text citations and a reference page.
Paragraph and sentence transitions are present, logical, and maintain the flow throughout the paper.
Sentences are complete, clear, and concise.
Rules of grammar and usage are followed including spelling and punctuation.
Total Available
Total Earned
1.5
#/1.5
Assignment Total
#
5
#/5
Additional comments:
Copyright © 2016 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Week 2 Individual Assignment
Content and Organization
7.0 points possible
Points Earned:
Comments:
All key elements of the assignment are covered in a substantive way.
Create a descriptive chart, outline, or graphic organizer of the critical attributes of the theory or set of principles for the ethical theory assigned by your instructor in Week 1.
The assignment must include, but is not limited to, the following attributes:
· Author and year(s) of development or publication
· Description of the theory, including any alternate titles
· Essential vocabulary in the theory
· Potential applications of the theory
· A plus–minus set of observations about the theory
· A description of a real scenario of this theory in action
Prepare to share your findings with the class to compare and contrast these theories.
Format your chart, outline, or organizer consistent with APA guidelines (as appropriate).
7 points:
· All key elements are covered in a substantive way and meets word count
· Major points are stated clearly, supported by specific details, examples, or analysis, and logically organized
· The content is comprehensive, accurate and/or persuasive
· The paper develops a central theme or idea, directed towards the appropriate audience
.
Tax Cuts Research Paper RubricCriteriaLevels of Achievement.docx
Tax Cuts Research Paper Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not Present
Total
Content
46 to 50 points:
· All key elements of the assignment are covered thoroughly and in a substantive way. Student provides a well-researched, fully developed analysis of each element of the assignment.
· Content is thoroughly, comprehensively, accurate, and exhibits a nuanced rather than superficial understanding of the terms and concepts assigned.
· Major points are thoroughly stated clearly and are supported by appropriate professional and scholarly literature and/or logic. Student employs sound, reasoned discussion, description, explanation, and evaluation of assigned terms and concepts.
.
42 to 45.5 points:
· Most key elements of the assignment are covered and in a substantive way. Student provides a mostly developed analysis of each element of the assignment.
· Most content is comprehensively, accurate, and exhibits an adequate understanding of the terms and concepts assigned.
· Most points are adequately stated and are supported by appropriate professional and scholarly literature and/or logic. Student mostly employs sound, reasoned discussion, description, explanation, and evaluation of assigned terms and concepts.
.
1 to 41.5 points:
· Inadequate coverage of key elements of the assignment. Student inadequately provides a fully developed analysis of each element of the assignment.
· Content is inadequate and not presented comprehensively, accurately, or exhibits an adequate understanding of the terms and concepts assigned.
· Major points are inadequately stated clearly and are not supported by appropriate professional and scholarly literature and/or logic. Student inadequately employs sound, reasoned discussion, description, explanation, and evaluation of assigned terms and concepts.
.
0 points
Not present
Development
36.5 to 40 points:
· Includes meaningful and thorough use of source material and analytical reasoning to elaborate upon the topics or themes.
· Research is thorough and timely for the topic.
· Thoroughly includes the required quality and quantity of cited sources to support positions.
· The context and purpose of the writing is thorough and clear.
33 to 36 points:
· Mostly includes meaningful and adequate use of source material and analytical reasoning to elaborate upon the topics or themes.
· Research is adequate and timely for the topic.
· Adequately includes the required quality and quantity of cited sources to support positions.
· The context and purpose of the writing is adequate and clear.
1 to 32.5 points:
· Includes inadequate use of source material and applies very little analytical reasoning to elaborate upon the topics or themes.
· Research is inadequate and not timely for the topic.
· Inadequately includes the required quality and quantity of cited sources to support positions.
· The context and purpose of the writing is inadequate and vague.
0 points
No.
Tax Cuts Research Paper RubricCriteriaLevels of Achievement.docx
Tax Cuts Research Paper Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not Present
Total
Content
46 to 50 points:
· All key elements of the assignment are covered thoroughly and in a substantive way. Student provides a well-researched, fully developed analysis of each element of the assignment.
· Content is thoroughly, comprehensively, accurate, and exhibits a nuanced rather than superficial understanding of the terms and concepts assigned.
· Major points are thoroughly stated clearly and are supported by appropriate professional and scholarly literature and/or logic. Student employs sound, reasoned discussion, description, explanation, and evaluation of assigned terms and concepts.
.
42 to 45.5 points:
· Most key elements of the assignment are covered and in a substantive way. Student provides a mostly developed analysis of each element of the assignment.
· Most content is comprehensively, accurate, and exhibits an adequate understanding of the terms and concepts assigned.
· Most points are adequately stated and are supported by appropriate professional and scholarly literature and/or logic. Student mostly employs sound, reasoned discussion, description, explanation, and evaluation of assigned terms and concepts.
.
1 to 41.5 points:
· Inadequate coverage of key elements of the assignment. Student inadequately provides a fully developed analysis of each element of the assignment.
· Content is inadequate and not presented comprehensively, accurately, or exhibits an adequate understanding of the terms and concepts assigned.
· Major points are inadequately stated clearly and are not supported by appropriate professional and scholarly literature and/or logic. Student inadequately employs sound, reasoned discussion, description, explanation, and evaluation of assigned terms and concepts.
.
0 points
Not present
Development
36.5 to 40 points:
· Includes meaningful and thorough use of source material and analytical reasoning to elaborate upon the topics or themes.
· Research is thorough and timely for the topic.
· Thoroughly includes the required quality and quantity of cited sources to support positions.
· The context and purpose of the writing is thorough and clear.
33 to 36 points:
· Mostly includes meaningful and adequate use of source material and analytical reasoning to elaborate upon the topics or themes.
· Research is adequate and timely for the topic.
· Adequately includes the required quality and quantity of cited sources to support positions.
· The context and purpose of the writing is adequate and clear.
1 to 32.5 points:
· Includes inadequate use of source material and applies very little analytical reasoning to elaborate upon the topics or themes.
· Research is inadequate and not timely for the topic.
· Inadequately includes the required quality and quantity of cited sources to support positions.
· The context and purpose of the writing is inadequate and vague.
0 points
No.
Limited Government and Balanced Budget Research Paper RubricCr.docx
This document provides a rubric for evaluating a research paper on the topics of limited government and a balanced budget amendment. It outlines the criteria and levels of achievement for assessing the content, development, organization, structure, formatting, grammar, readability, and overall assignment. Students must write a 5-7 page paper in APA format discussing the constitutional limits on the federal government, arguments for a balanced budget amendment, and evaluating these issues from a Judeo-Christian perspective with citations and free of plagiarism. The paper will be judged on thoroughness, accuracy, logical reasoning, and writing mechanics.
BUSI 610Literature Review Abstract Rubric(20 Points)Cr.docx
BUSI 610
Literature Review
Abstract Rubric
(20 Points)
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Abstract: Content
13 to 14 points
All key components of the Abstract are present. The Abstract for the Literature Review is clearly articulated. The Abstract has a clear, logical flow.
12 points
Most of the components of the Abstract are present. The Abstract for the Literature Review is presented in a clear manner. The Abstract flow can be followed.
1 to 11 points
The Abstract does not include all the components. The Abstract is unclear or confusing.
0 points
Not present
Structure 30%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Abstract: Grammar and Spelling, APA formatting
(30%)
6 points
Spelling and grammar are correct. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise.
The paragraph contains appropriately varied sentence structures. The Abstract is formatted per APA. A cover sheet is present that is formatted per APA.
5 points
Spelling and grammar has some errors. Sentences are presented as well. The paragraph contains some varied sentence structures. Some APA formatting issues are present. A cover sheet is present that is formatted per APA.
1 to 4 points
Spelling and grammar errors distract. Sentences are incomplete or unclear. The Paragraph is poorly formed. APA formatting is not used. There is not a cover sheet present.
0 points
Not present
BUSI 610
Literature Review
Annotated Bibliography Rubric
(80 Points)
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Annotated Bibliography: Content
52 to 56 points
All key components of the Annotated bibliography are present. The bibliography contains the fifteen scholarly sources that are three years old or less. The sources are current and relevant to the topic. An annotation exists for each source listed. Each annotation correctly summarizes/describes the corresponding source and demonstrates critical thinking skills regarding interpretation and application of material.
47 to 51 points
Most of the components of the Annotated bibliography are present. The bibliography contains at least 14 scholarly sources that are three years old or less. All the sources are current and relevant to the topic. An annotation exists for each source listed. Each annotation correctly summarizes/describes the corresponding source and demonstrates critical thinking skills regarding interpretation and application of material.
1 to 46 points
The Annotated bibliography does not include all the components. The bibliography contains less than 14 scholarly sources that are three years old or less. An annotation does not exist for each source. Each annotation does not correctly summarizes/describes the corresponding source or demonstrates critical thinking skills regarding interpretation and application of material.
0 points
Not present
Structure 30%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Annotated Bibliography: Gra.
Midterm Essay RubricCriteriaLevels of AchievementContent .docx
Midterm Essay Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
94-100%
Proficient
88-93%
Developing
1-87%
Not present
Total
Content
47 to 50 points:
· The question is clearly identified and retains focus throughout the paper.
· Introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points.
· All necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable.
· Organization emphasizes the central theme or purpose.
44 to 46.5 points:
· The question may require some clarification and/or greater prominence throughout the paper.
· Introduction may not provide adequate background on the topic and preview major points.
· Most necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable and sufficiently addressed.
· Organization may not sufficiently emphasize the central theme or purpose.
1 to 43.5 points:
· The question requires significant clarification and prominence throughout the paper.
· Introduction may be missing or ambiguous.
· Some necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable, but others may require clarification or development.
· Organization may require significant improvement.
0 points
Not present
Reasoned Analysis
47 to 50 points:
· Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning.
· Objective, reasoned analysis is employed.
· Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated.
· The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas. An authoritative, persuasive, and statesmanlike voice is used.
44 to 46.5 points:
· Most major points are stated clearly and supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support.
· Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation.
· The conclusion does not fully derive from the paper’s ideas.
· Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required.
1 to 43.5 points:
· Major points require significant clarification and scholarly support.
· Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed.
· Conclusion does not derive logically from the paper’s main ideas.
· Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required.
0 points
Not present
Scholarly Support
21.25 to 22.5 points:
Sources reflecting diverse viewpoints and research are employed to include at least 4 peer-reviewed scholarly resources (along with course materials/books). Source material is properly attributed. Resonates Christian world view supporting your themes throughout your writing.
19.75 to 21 points:
Some improvements/ additions to quality/quantity of sources are needed using at least 2 peer-reviewed scholarly resources (along with course materials/books). Clarification of source material may be needed. Further interpretation and/or support for Christian world view needed.
1 to 19.5 points.
ComponentCriteriaCommentsMaximum PointsPoints EarnedSa
Component
Criteria
Comments
Maximum Points
Points Earned
Saving document (Used Word, the correct file naming procedure of document, and followed directions for submission to the turnitin)
1= Used Word, correct file name, and followed directions for assignment and submission to turnitin.
.5 deduction for each of the following:
Using program other than Word
Incorrect/incomplete file name (not using last name)
Not following directions for assignment/ submission to turnitin
10
Title Page (Title of assignment, student name, date, institution, course name—in APA format)
1= Correct title page format with name, date, institution, course name, and title of assignment
0= no title page included
.5 deduction for each of the following:
No manuscript header (short title and page number)
Title not in Upper and Lower Case
Title information not in 12 pt font, not double spaced, and or not centered in middle of page
Title not repeated at top center of page 2
10
Mechanics of Writing (Followed rules of written English language, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Used APA format where appropriate, resources cited when references are used)
2= Excellent use of written English including sentence structure, grammar, punctuation and spelling with no errors, along with proper APA editorial format.
Deductions in increments of .25 for any of the following:
Improper sentence structure,
grammar,
punctuation, and or
spelling errors
Use of non-professional terms
APA format errors:
Deduct 1 point for not citing within text
Deductions in increments of .5 for any of the following:
· Improper/incorrect citations,
· reference page not according to APA format
20
Content
(Followed directions of assignment with relevant content and material. Used current information, showed organization and clarity in written message)
6= Exceptional
5= Excellent
4= Good
3= Weak
2= Poor
1= Unacceptable
0= Did not follow directions, or plagiarized
Note: see detailed explanation of each of these criteria in the descriptions below the rubric
60
Total Points
(Timely submission)
100
Content:
6=Exceptional: This is the highest rating. Content demonstrates exceptional knowledge and in-depth understanding of relevant and important ideas directly related to the topic. Construction of content is fully developed, and includes specific and accurate examples or facts. Paper is logically and clearly organized around major concepts or principles in the field. Content is exemplary, with detail and clarity of the written word. Exceptionally followed the directions of the assignment.
5= Excellent: Content demonstrates above average knowledge and understanding of relevant and important ideas related to this topic. Construction is nearly fully developed, and includes specific and accurate examples or facts. Paper is generally logical and organized ...
Recommended
BUSI 505Research Project (Final Document Draft) Grading Rubric
BUSI 505
Research Project (Final Document Draft)
Grading Rubric (75 Points)
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Points Earned
Abstract
10 points
Points: 10
· All required information is included.
· No extraneous information is included; formatting is correct.
Points: 7-9
· All required information is included.
· Some extraneous information is included; formatting is correct.
Points: 1-6
· Some required information is included.
· Extraneous information is included; formatting is not correct.
Points: 0
· Not Present
Introduction
7 points
Points: 7
· Background information is engaging and leads to a clear purpose/thesis statement.
· Relevance to course/topic is articulated well.
· Research question(s) or purpose statement is clear and concise.
· Two or 3 main discussion points of the literature review are clearly identified in the purpose statement.
Points: 6
· Background information is at times unclear or uninteresting.
· Relevance to course/topic could be more clearly articulated.
· Research question(s) or purpose statement could be stated more clearly and concisely.
· Main discussion points could be more clearly articulated.
Points: 5 to 1
· Background information is not clearly articulated.
· Relevance to course/topic is unclear.
· Research question(s) or purpose statement is unidentifiable.
· Main discussion points are not identified in the purpose statement.
Points: 0
· Not Present
Content
7 points
Points: 7
· Thorough comparison and contrast of findings are provided and relate to the main discussion points in the order of their appearance in the purpose statement.
· Focus is on research findings.
· Gaps and controversies that exist in the literature are clearly discussed.
Points: 6
· Comparison and contrast of the findings are provided but lack thoroughness.
· Discussion of findings could relate better to the main discussion points in the purpose statement.
· Gaps and controversies in the literature are discussed, but clarity could be enhanced.
Points: 5 to 1
· Comparison and contrast of findings are lacking.
· Discussion of findings does not relate well to the main discussion points in the purpose statement.
· Gaps (what is unknown and needs to be researched) and controversies that exist in the literature are not discussed.
Points: 0
· Not Present
Conclusion
7 points
Points: 7
· A summary of the main points is clearly articulated.
· Implications or conclusions related to business practice(s) are logical, relevant, and clear.
· Areas of future research are clearly identified.
Points: 6
· A summary of the main points is presented, but clarity could be enhanced.
· Implications or conclusions related to business practice(s) are included but lack logic, relevance, or clarity.
· Areas of future research are identified but lack clarity.
Points: 5 to 1
· A summary of the main points is not clearly presented.
· Implications or c ...
Strategic Organization Report Grading GuideHRM595 Version 3.docx
Strategic Organization Report Grading Guide
HRM/595 Version 3
1
Individual Assignment: Strategic Organization Report
Purpose of Assignment
In this assignment, students are expected to detect changes in organizational direction and demonstrate how HR can be a strategic partner in helping to effectuate change in an organization while considering the corporate culture. One way HR can participate in organizational change is to have a role in the mission and vision of the organization.
Resources Required
· Blossoms Up! Case Study
· Email No. 4
Grading Guide
Content
Met
Partially Met
Not Met
Comments:
The new direction the organization is going in is discussed.
HR becoming a strategic partner in management and organizational goals is demonstrated.
Corporate culture is considered.
Mission and vision statements are created to reflect the new direction and brand of the company
A minimum of five sources are used.
The paper is no more than 1,050-words in length.
Total Available
Total Earned
3.5
#/3.5
Writing Guidelines
Met
Partially Met
Not Met
Comments:
The paper—including tables and graphs, headings, title page, and reference page—is consistent with APA formatting guidelines and meets course-level requirements.
Intellectual property is recognized with in-text citations and a reference page.
Paragraph and sentence transitions are present, logical, and maintain the flow throughout the paper.
Sentences are complete, clear, and concise.
Rules of grammar and usage are followed including spelling and punctuation.
Total Available
Total Earned
1.5
#/1.5
Assignment Total
#
5
#/5
Additional comments:
Copyright © 2016 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Week 2 Individual Assignment
Content and Organization
7.0 points possible
Points Earned:
Comments:
All key elements of the assignment are covered in a substantive way.
Create a descriptive chart, outline, or graphic organizer of the critical attributes of the theory or set of principles for the ethical theory assigned by your instructor in Week 1.
The assignment must include, but is not limited to, the following attributes:
· Author and year(s) of development or publication
· Description of the theory, including any alternate titles
· Essential vocabulary in the theory
· Potential applications of the theory
· A plus–minus set of observations about the theory
· A description of a real scenario of this theory in action
Prepare to share your findings with the class to compare and contrast these theories.
Format your chart, outline, or organizer consistent with APA guidelines (as appropriate).
7 points:
· All key elements are covered in a substantive way and meets word count
· Major points are stated clearly, supported by specific details, examples, or analysis, and logically organized
· The content is comprehensive, accurate and/or persuasive
· The paper develops a central theme or idea, directed towards the appropriate audience
.
Tax Cuts Research Paper RubricCriteriaLevels of Achievement.docx
Tax Cuts Research Paper Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not Present
Total
Content
46 to 50 points:
· All key elements of the assignment are covered thoroughly and in a substantive way. Student provides a well-researched, fully developed analysis of each element of the assignment.
· Content is thoroughly, comprehensively, accurate, and exhibits a nuanced rather than superficial understanding of the terms and concepts assigned.
· Major points are thoroughly stated clearly and are supported by appropriate professional and scholarly literature and/or logic. Student employs sound, reasoned discussion, description, explanation, and evaluation of assigned terms and concepts.
.
42 to 45.5 points:
· Most key elements of the assignment are covered and in a substantive way. Student provides a mostly developed analysis of each element of the assignment.
· Most content is comprehensively, accurate, and exhibits an adequate understanding of the terms and concepts assigned.
· Most points are adequately stated and are supported by appropriate professional and scholarly literature and/or logic. Student mostly employs sound, reasoned discussion, description, explanation, and evaluation of assigned terms and concepts.
.
1 to 41.5 points:
· Inadequate coverage of key elements of the assignment. Student inadequately provides a fully developed analysis of each element of the assignment.
· Content is inadequate and not presented comprehensively, accurately, or exhibits an adequate understanding of the terms and concepts assigned.
· Major points are inadequately stated clearly and are not supported by appropriate professional and scholarly literature and/or logic. Student inadequately employs sound, reasoned discussion, description, explanation, and evaluation of assigned terms and concepts.
.
0 points
Not present
Development
36.5 to 40 points:
· Includes meaningful and thorough use of source material and analytical reasoning to elaborate upon the topics or themes.
· Research is thorough and timely for the topic.
· Thoroughly includes the required quality and quantity of cited sources to support positions.
· The context and purpose of the writing is thorough and clear.
33 to 36 points:
· Mostly includes meaningful and adequate use of source material and analytical reasoning to elaborate upon the topics or themes.
· Research is adequate and timely for the topic.
· Adequately includes the required quality and quantity of cited sources to support positions.
· The context and purpose of the writing is adequate and clear.
1 to 32.5 points:
· Includes inadequate use of source material and applies very little analytical reasoning to elaborate upon the topics or themes.
· Research is inadequate and not timely for the topic.
· Inadequately includes the required quality and quantity of cited sources to support positions.
· The context and purpose of the writing is inadequate and vague.
0 points
No.
Tax Cuts Research Paper RubricCriteriaLevels of Achievement.docx
Tax Cuts Research Paper Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not Present
Total
Content
46 to 50 points:
· All key elements of the assignment are covered thoroughly and in a substantive way. Student provides a well-researched, fully developed analysis of each element of the assignment.
· Content is thoroughly, comprehensively, accurate, and exhibits a nuanced rather than superficial understanding of the terms and concepts assigned.
· Major points are thoroughly stated clearly and are supported by appropriate professional and scholarly literature and/or logic. Student employs sound, reasoned discussion, description, explanation, and evaluation of assigned terms and concepts.
.
42 to 45.5 points:
· Most key elements of the assignment are covered and in a substantive way. Student provides a mostly developed analysis of each element of the assignment.
· Most content is comprehensively, accurate, and exhibits an adequate understanding of the terms and concepts assigned.
· Most points are adequately stated and are supported by appropriate professional and scholarly literature and/or logic. Student mostly employs sound, reasoned discussion, description, explanation, and evaluation of assigned terms and concepts.
.
1 to 41.5 points:
· Inadequate coverage of key elements of the assignment. Student inadequately provides a fully developed analysis of each element of the assignment.
· Content is inadequate and not presented comprehensively, accurately, or exhibits an adequate understanding of the terms and concepts assigned.
· Major points are inadequately stated clearly and are not supported by appropriate professional and scholarly literature and/or logic. Student inadequately employs sound, reasoned discussion, description, explanation, and evaluation of assigned terms and concepts.
.
0 points
Not present
Development
36.5 to 40 points:
· Includes meaningful and thorough use of source material and analytical reasoning to elaborate upon the topics or themes.
· Research is thorough and timely for the topic.
· Thoroughly includes the required quality and quantity of cited sources to support positions.
· The context and purpose of the writing is thorough and clear.
33 to 36 points:
· Mostly includes meaningful and adequate use of source material and analytical reasoning to elaborate upon the topics or themes.
· Research is adequate and timely for the topic.
· Adequately includes the required quality and quantity of cited sources to support positions.
· The context and purpose of the writing is adequate and clear.
1 to 32.5 points:
· Includes inadequate use of source material and applies very little analytical reasoning to elaborate upon the topics or themes.
· Research is inadequate and not timely for the topic.
· Inadequately includes the required quality and quantity of cited sources to support positions.
· The context and purpose of the writing is inadequate and vague.
0 points
No.
Limited Government and Balanced Budget Research Paper RubricCr.docx
This document provides a rubric for evaluating a research paper on the topics of limited government and a balanced budget amendment. It outlines the criteria and levels of achievement for assessing the content, development, organization, structure, formatting, grammar, readability, and overall assignment. Students must write a 5-7 page paper in APA format discussing the constitutional limits on the federal government, arguments for a balanced budget amendment, and evaluating these issues from a Judeo-Christian perspective with citations and free of plagiarism. The paper will be judged on thoroughness, accuracy, logical reasoning, and writing mechanics.
BUSI 610Literature Review Abstract Rubric(20 Points)Cr.docx
BUSI 610
Literature Review
Abstract Rubric
(20 Points)
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Abstract: Content
13 to 14 points
All key components of the Abstract are present. The Abstract for the Literature Review is clearly articulated. The Abstract has a clear, logical flow.
12 points
Most of the components of the Abstract are present. The Abstract for the Literature Review is presented in a clear manner. The Abstract flow can be followed.
1 to 11 points
The Abstract does not include all the components. The Abstract is unclear or confusing.
0 points
Not present
Structure 30%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Abstract: Grammar and Spelling, APA formatting
(30%)
6 points
Spelling and grammar are correct. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise.
The paragraph contains appropriately varied sentence structures. The Abstract is formatted per APA. A cover sheet is present that is formatted per APA.
5 points
Spelling and grammar has some errors. Sentences are presented as well. The paragraph contains some varied sentence structures. Some APA formatting issues are present. A cover sheet is present that is formatted per APA.
1 to 4 points
Spelling and grammar errors distract. Sentences are incomplete or unclear. The Paragraph is poorly formed. APA formatting is not used. There is not a cover sheet present.
0 points
Not present
BUSI 610
Literature Review
Annotated Bibliography Rubric
(80 Points)
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Annotated Bibliography: Content
52 to 56 points
All key components of the Annotated bibliography are present. The bibliography contains the fifteen scholarly sources that are three years old or less. The sources are current and relevant to the topic. An annotation exists for each source listed. Each annotation correctly summarizes/describes the corresponding source and demonstrates critical thinking skills regarding interpretation and application of material.
47 to 51 points
Most of the components of the Annotated bibliography are present. The bibliography contains at least 14 scholarly sources that are three years old or less. All the sources are current and relevant to the topic. An annotation exists for each source listed. Each annotation correctly summarizes/describes the corresponding source and demonstrates critical thinking skills regarding interpretation and application of material.
1 to 46 points
The Annotated bibliography does not include all the components. The bibliography contains less than 14 scholarly sources that are three years old or less. An annotation does not exist for each source. Each annotation does not correctly summarizes/describes the corresponding source or demonstrates critical thinking skills regarding interpretation and application of material.
0 points
Not present
Structure 30%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Annotated Bibliography: Gra.
Midterm Essay RubricCriteriaLevels of AchievementContent .docx
Midterm Essay Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
94-100%
Proficient
88-93%
Developing
1-87%
Not present
Total
Content
47 to 50 points:
· The question is clearly identified and retains focus throughout the paper.
· Introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points.
· All necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable.
· Organization emphasizes the central theme or purpose.
44 to 46.5 points:
· The question may require some clarification and/or greater prominence throughout the paper.
· Introduction may not provide adequate background on the topic and preview major points.
· Most necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable and sufficiently addressed.
· Organization may not sufficiently emphasize the central theme or purpose.
1 to 43.5 points:
· The question requires significant clarification and prominence throughout the paper.
· Introduction may be missing or ambiguous.
· Some necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable, but others may require clarification or development.
· Organization may require significant improvement.
0 points
Not present
Reasoned Analysis
47 to 50 points:
· Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning.
· Objective, reasoned analysis is employed.
· Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated.
· The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas. An authoritative, persuasive, and statesmanlike voice is used.
44 to 46.5 points:
· Most major points are stated clearly and supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support.
· Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation.
· The conclusion does not fully derive from the paper’s ideas.
· Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required.
1 to 43.5 points:
· Major points require significant clarification and scholarly support.
· Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed.
· Conclusion does not derive logically from the paper’s main ideas.
· Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required.
0 points
Not present
Scholarly Support
21.25 to 22.5 points:
Sources reflecting diverse viewpoints and research are employed to include at least 4 peer-reviewed scholarly resources (along with course materials/books). Source material is properly attributed. Resonates Christian world view supporting your themes throughout your writing.
19.75 to 21 points:
Some improvements/ additions to quality/quantity of sources are needed using at least 2 peer-reviewed scholarly resources (along with course materials/books). Clarification of source material may be needed. Further interpretation and/or support for Christian world view needed.
1 to 19.5 points.
ComponentCriteriaCommentsMaximum PointsPoints EarnedSa
Component
Criteria
Comments
Maximum Points
Points Earned
Saving document (Used Word, the correct file naming procedure of document, and followed directions for submission to the turnitin)
1= Used Word, correct file name, and followed directions for assignment and submission to turnitin.
.5 deduction for each of the following:
Using program other than Word
Incorrect/incomplete file name (not using last name)
Not following directions for assignment/ submission to turnitin
10
Title Page (Title of assignment, student name, date, institution, course name—in APA format)
1= Correct title page format with name, date, institution, course name, and title of assignment
0= no title page included
.5 deduction for each of the following:
No manuscript header (short title and page number)
Title not in Upper and Lower Case
Title information not in 12 pt font, not double spaced, and or not centered in middle of page
Title not repeated at top center of page 2
10
Mechanics of Writing (Followed rules of written English language, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Used APA format where appropriate, resources cited when references are used)
2= Excellent use of written English including sentence structure, grammar, punctuation and spelling with no errors, along with proper APA editorial format.
Deductions in increments of .25 for any of the following:
Improper sentence structure,
grammar,
punctuation, and or
spelling errors
Use of non-professional terms
APA format errors:
Deduct 1 point for not citing within text
Deductions in increments of .5 for any of the following:
· Improper/incorrect citations,
· reference page not according to APA format
20
Content
(Followed directions of assignment with relevant content and material. Used current information, showed organization and clarity in written message)
6= Exceptional
5= Excellent
4= Good
3= Weak
2= Poor
1= Unacceptable
0= Did not follow directions, or plagiarized
Note: see detailed explanation of each of these criteria in the descriptions below the rubric
60
Total Points
(Timely submission)
100
Content:
6=Exceptional: This is the highest rating. Content demonstrates exceptional knowledge and in-depth understanding of relevant and important ideas directly related to the topic. Construction of content is fully developed, and includes specific and accurate examples or facts. Paper is logically and clearly organized around major concepts or principles in the field. Content is exemplary, with detail and clarity of the written word. Exceptionally followed the directions of the assignment.
5= Excellent: Content demonstrates above average knowledge and understanding of relevant and important ideas related to this topic. Construction is nearly fully developed, and includes specific and accurate examples or facts. Paper is generally logical and organized ...
Criteria Ratings PointsContentThesis andIntroduction
Criteria Ratings Points
Content
Thesis and
Introduction
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
The thesis or research
statement is well constructed;
introduction provides sufficient
background on the topic and
previews major points.
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
A thesis statement is
introduced, conveys a
biblical worldview, and
aligns with the title and
body of the paper.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The thesis and/or
introduction are poorly
written or do not align
with the title and/or body
of the paper.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Content
and Focus
Content
and Focus
20 to >18.0 pts
Advanced
The content is
comprehensive, accurate, and
is related to assignment
prompt.
18 to >16.0 pts
Proficient
The content is either: not
comprehensive, not
accurate, or is not
related to the
assignment prompt.
16 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The content is not
comprehensive, not
accurate, and is not
related to assignment
prompt.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Content
Major
Points and
Support
20 to >18.0 pts
Advanced
The program theory and
components are stated
clearly; are supported by
specific details, examples of
data to be measured should
be included; and logically
organized.
18 to >16.0 pts
Proficient
The program theory and
components are not
stated clearly but are
supported by specific
details, including data to
me measured examples.
16 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The program theory and
components are not
stated clearly and are not
supported by specific
details, examples of data
to be measured.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Content
Christian
Worldview
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
Dedicated Christian worldview
section exists or is woven
throughout the paper; showing
the integration of the subject
matter, critical thinking, and
Christian worldview.
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
General tenets of a
biblical worldview are
introduced and convey a
basic understanding of
supporting literature.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Some biblical concepts
are presented but may
be narrow in scope, not
representing the most
essential principles, or
may not be congruent
with supporting literature.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Content
Conclusion
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
The conclusion is logical,
flows from the body of the
paper, and reviews the major
points.
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Conclusion is either: not
logical, does not flow
from the body of the
paper, or does not
review the major points.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Conclusion is not logical,
does not flow from the
body of the paper, and
does not review the
major points.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Anticrime/Prevention Program: Part 1 – Evaluability Assessment
Grading Rubric | CJUS801_D01_202130
Criteria Ratings Points
Structure
Spelling,
Grammar &
Format
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
• Correct spelling and
grammar are used throughout
the outline. There are 0–2
errors in grammar or spelling
that distract the reader from
the content. • There are 0–1
minor citation errors in current
APA format in the requir ...
Recording Audio In PowerPoint1. With the PowerPoint presenta.docx
Recording Audio In PowerPoint
1. With the PowerPoint presentation open, click on Slide Show on the main menu bar.
Recording Audio In PowerPoint| Page 1 of 1
©Liberty University 7/22/13 | Bb 9.1.11
2. Click Record Slide Show, then choose to start
recording from the current slide you are on or
from the first slide of the presentation.
3. A Record Slide Show pop up will appear notify-
ing you of two options. Both options should be
checked. Once Start Recording is clicked, the
audio begins recording.
4. A small Recording menu will appear in the top
left corner. This menu has the options to pause
recording, repeat, or move to the next slide.
Note: For high sound quality, headset use is
recommended.
a. Repeat: Restarts the current slide’s recording, and deletes the previous audio.
b. Pause: Pauses the current audio recording. Click Resume Recording to resume.
c. Next: Moves to the next slide and starts recording on it.
5. Press “Esc” at any time
during the recording to stop the
recording. If Next is clicked
during the last slide, the record-
ing will stop.
Note: There will be an icon like this ( ) at the bottom right of each slide once there is audio
recorded on the slide. You can also review the audio using this icon. If you select this item,
you can remove the audio of that slide by pressing delete.
Federal Research Paper or Presentation Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not Present
Total
Content
46 to 50 points:
· All key elements of the assignment are covered thoroughly and in a substantive way. Student provides a well-researched, fully developed analysis of each element of the assignment.
· Content is thoroughly, comprehensively, accurate, and exhibits a nuanced rather than superficial understanding of the terms and concepts assigned.
· Major points are thoroughly stated clearly and are supported by appropriate professional and scholarly literature and/or logic. Student employs sound, reasoned discussion, description, explanation, and evaluation of assigned terms and concepts.
.
42 to 45.5 points:
· Most key elements of the assignment are covered and in a substantive way. Student provides a mostly developed analysis of each element of the assignment.
· Most content is comprehensively, accurate, and exhibits an adequate understanding of the terms and concepts assigned.
· Most points are adequately stated and are supported by appropriate professional and scholarly literature and/or logic. Student mostly employs sound, reasoned discussion, description, explanation, and evaluation of assigned terms and concepts.
.
1 to 41.5 points:
· Inadequate coverage of key elements of the assignment. Student inadequately provides a fully developed analysis of each element of the assignment.
Content is inadequate and not presented comprehensively, accurately, or exhibits an adequate understanding of the terms and concepts assigned.
· Major points ar ...
Research PaperInstructionsThe report will be a paper of fr.docx
Research Paper
Instructions
The report will be a paper of from
eight to 12 pages
(not including the cover or reference page, and attachments), presented in APA (6th edition) format.
It should focus on developing a leadership plan for addressing the issue identified in the case study.
Information sources must be either
peer-reviewed articles, government reports, or other sources approved by your instructor
. The research paper should apply the knowledge and skills gained from the required courses of the major and your application of the leadership concepts presented in this course. All margins should be 1”, 12 point font in either Arial or New Times Roman font style.
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Research Paper Rubric
Criteria
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
Thesis or Statement of Purpose
5 points
Readily apparent to the reader; concisely stated in a single sentence, which is engaging and thought provoking.
4 points
Clear but may sometimes digresses in the paper; stated in a single sentence.
3 points
Not consistently clear; stated in a single sentence.
2 points
Generally unclear; Incomplete, unfocused, or absent.
Introduction
5 points
Relevance of Public Safety leadership is apparent. The groundwork for paper easy to predict because important topics that will be discussed are specifically mentioned.
4 points
A good attempt is made as to why the topic is pertinent but may be slightly unclear, or lacking in insight or originality. Organization for rest of the paper stated
3 points
May be unclear (contain many vague terms), appear unoriginal, or offer relatively little that is new; provides little around which to structure the paper.
2 points
No reference to the topic, audience or relevance.
Content
30 points
Can earn from 27-30 points. Clear examples to support the leadership style with clear presentation of current challenge; support of the overall purpose; reader gains important insight; analysis poses novel ways to think of the material; quoted material well integrated; depth of coverage without being redundant.
26 points
Can earn from 24-26 points. Examples support the leadership style with clear presentation of current challenge; reader gains some insight; occasional evidence of novel ways to think about the material Quotes well integrated into sentences. Topics adequately addressed but not in detail or depth.
23 points
Can earn from 21-23 points. Examples support the leadership style with clear presentation of current challenge; reader gains little insight; The essay relies on quotes and paraphrasing that are poorly connected. Examples support some topic sentences; no evidence of novel thinking and intermittent support through evidence.
20 points
Can earn from 0-20 points. The essay relies on stringing together quotes or close paraphrasing; Failure to support statements with major content omitted; Quotes not integrated, improperly.
Organization and Critical Thinking
10 points
Can earn from .
Research or Interview Paper Grading Rubric CriteriaLevels of.docx
Research or Interview Paper Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Introduction
(10 pints)
10 to 9 points
State the topic the author is going to address.
The introduction provide a clear overview of the paper’s contents.
8 to 7 points
State the topic the author is going to address.
The introduction provides an overview of the paper’s contents.
6 to 1 points
State the topic the author is going to address.
The introduction seems to provide an overview of the paper’s contents.
0 point
Does not state the topic the author is going to address.
The introduction does not provide an overview of the paper’s contents.
Analysis
(50 pints)
50 to 45 points
The issues raised in the topic are properly treated. Different viewpoints have been considered, analyzed, and treated. The author provides personal inputs
44 to 35points
The issues raised in the topic are not properly treated. Different viewpoints have been considered, analyzed, and treated. The author provides personal inputs.
34 to 1 points
The issues raised in the topic are not properly treated. Different viewpoints have been considered, analyzed, and treated. The author does not provide personal inputs.
0 point
The author does not provide any analysis.
Conclusion
(10 pints)
10 to 9 points
The conclusion offers a good summary of issues treated in the paper and does offer suggestions for future study
8 to 7points
The conclusion offers a good summary of issues treated in the paper, but does not offer any suggestions for future study
6 to 1 points
The conclusion offers a brief summary of issues treated in the paper, but does not offer any suggestions for future study
0 point
There is no conclusion
Structure
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Headings and transitions
(10 points)
10 to 9 points
The transitions between paragraphs and sections are clear. Proper headings are used.
8 to 7 points
The transitions between paragraphs and sections are clear. Proper headings are not used.
6 to 1 points
The transitions between paragraphs and sections are not clear. Proper headings are not used.
0 point
No transitions between paragraphs and sections. Headings are not used.
Spelling and grammar
(10 points)
10 to 9 points
There are no more than three spelling or grammar errors.
8 to 7 points
There are four or five spelling or grammar errors.
6 to 1 points
There are six or seven spelling or grammar errors.
0 point
There are eight or more spelling or grammar errors.
Bibliography and APA style
(10 point)
10 to 9 points
The bibliography contains at least 3 scholarly sources. The paper is in current APA style.
8 to 7 points
The bibliography contains less than 3 scholarly sources. The paper is in current APA style.
6 to 1 points
The bibliography contains less than 3 scholarly sources. The paper is not in current APA style.
0 point
The bibliography does not contain any scholarly sources. The paper is not in current APA style.
.
1. Citation Written in APA format. For more help.docx
1. Citation:
Written in APA format. For more help with formatting, see APA handout.
1. Summary:
What is purpose of the source, review article, original research? What topics are covered? This is generally 1 -3 sentences that summarize the author’s main point. For more help, see this link on paraphrasing sources.
1. Assessment:
After summarizing the article (or research paper or book) it is necessary to evaluate it and also where you found it – its source (e.g. journal, website, etc). Briefly answer the following questions:
What is the format or type of source. How reliable is the information in the article and how credible is the source and the author(s)? Is this article biased or objective?
For more help, see this handout on evaluating resources.
1. Critique
Once you've summarized and assessed a source, you need to ask how it fits into your research. Why is this source relevant to your research paper and how can you use this source in your research project? What are the strengths and weaknesses? It is biased in any way? Compare the source with other sources in your bibliography.
Source 1- http://www.mslifelines.com/what-is-ms?cmp=M_WhatIsMS_MSLLGuideToMS_Google_PS&gclid=COrwht6_ns0CFdU7gQodi7MHjg
Source 2- http://www.nationalmssociety.org/What-is-MS
Source 3- http://www.healthline.com/health/multiple-sclerosis/early-signs
Source 4- http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/37556.php
Source 5- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1069023/
Assignment 4: Research Paper Rubric
Evaluation Criteria
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Points Earned
Abstract
TOTAL: (15 points)
(10 points)
Minimum criteria:
· Topic Sentence
· Five main topics introduced: Statistics/Epidemiology, Financial Costs, Anatomy & Physiology/ Etiology, Diagnosis/Treatments/ Prognosis,
· Conclusions and Findings, Future Directions/Research
Response to Assignment 3 Feedback
(5 points)
Minimum criteria:
· Did student respond to and fix issues identified in the instructor feedback for Assignments 3?
10 points
Abstract contains all of the required criteria.
Abstract introduces the profile and outlines main topics and briefly presents conclusions.
5 points
Student responded to and fixed issues identified by the instructor feedback for
Assignment 3
~or~ There were no issues in the instructor feedback for the student to respond to in Assignment 3
~or~ Assignment 3 was not submitted by the student
9 - 8 points
Abstract contains four of the required criteria.
Abstract introduces the profile and outlines main topics and presents conclusions.
7 - 6 points
Abstract contains three of the required criteria.
Abstract is lacking in introduction sentence, information, and/or conclusion statement.
< 6 points
Abstract contains two or less of the required criteria.
Abstract is not present. (0 points)
0 points
Student did not address all the issues identified in the instructor feedback for Assignment 3
Main Body Content
TOTAL: (50 ...
Historical and Contemporary Perspectives Essay (15 points) – due
Historical and Contemporary Perspectives Essay (15 points) – due at the end of Week 4
You will be required to submit a well-written 4 page essay (not including title page or references) on the topic:
Does Alcohol use/abuse lead to dementia (Alcohol use/abuse and dementia)
. The purpose of this paper is to link historical and demographic trends to contemporary issues in gerontology. Your essay should rely on assigned class readings as well as the information you gathered as
part of your bibliography assignment (a minimum of 10 resources is required)
. Remember, you should always use in-text citations for information that you gathered from another source and include a reference list at the end of your essay. Use APA format for this assignment.
Many students leave out the historical part of this assignment. Please make sure to include substantive information on the historical aspect of your topic! Failure to do so will result in a significant reduction to your grade. Many students also leave out demographic information (the impact that age, gender, race, education, culture, etc has on your topic). Again, failure to include this information will result in a significant reduction to your grade.
Your essay should address the following items:
· Topic: (brief description)
Does Alcohol use/abuse lead to dementia (Alcohol use/abuse and dementia)
· Historical background (e.g. when did this become an issue in aging? Why?)
· Influence of demography on selected issue
· Contemporary aspects of the topic (e.g. Why is this an important issue in aging now?)
Your paper should be concise and formal (no slang, no use of "I" statements, no opinions, etc) in tone. Be sure to proofread your work prior to submission. Points will be deducted for poor writing quality or failure to use APA format.
Before submitting your work, you may wish to review the rubric provided to make sure you have addressed all of the important components of the essay.)
Grading Rubric for Historical and Contemporary Perspectives Essay
:
Component
Pt values
Point value descriptions
Total points
Topic
1 points
· Well-written, concise description of the topic
.5 points
· Adequate description of the topic
· May be overly wordy or lacking detail but topic is clear
0 points
· Lacks topic description
· Topic unclear due to poor writing or omission of important detail
Historical Background
4 points
· Excellent overview of historical perspective of the topic
· Includes examples and details to support statements
3 points
· Good overview of historical perspective
· May be missing one or two minor details
2 points
· Fair overview of historical perspective
· Missing one or two major details
1 point
· Poor overview of historical perspective
· Missing several major details
· Writing is mostly incomprehensible
0 points
· Missing historical background
· Writing is incomprehensible
Demography
...
Criteria Ratings PointsContentIntroduction19 to 1
Criteria Ratings Points
Content
Introduction
19 to >16.0 pts
Advanced
The introductory
paragraph contains a
strong thesis statement,
research question (s),
and/or statement of
research purpose and
provides an overview of
the paper.
16 to >14.0 pts
Proficient
The introductory paragraph
contains a moderately
developed thesis statement,
research question(s), and/or
statement of research
purpose.
14 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The thesis statement,
research question(s) and
overview of the paper need
improvement.
0 pts
Not
Present
19 pts
Content
Analysis
20 to >18.0 pts
Advanced
The topic is clearly
presented and
discussed in detail. Key
terms are defined as
needed. Complex issues
are navigated with
precision.
18 to >16.0 pts
Proficient
The topic is presented and
discussed appropriately.
Key terms are defined as
needed. Complex issues
are recognized.
16 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The topic is unclear or fairly
clear but discussed too
broadly or does not meet
expectations. Contextual
factors are weakly
considered and lacking in
some significant areas.
Complex issues are
overlooked or handled
without care.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Content
Research &
Support
19 to >16.0 pts
Advanced
• Sources are evaluated
critically for applicability
in the paper.
• Research may
incorporate multiple
viewpoints of complex
issues. • Arguments
are correctly supported
with research.
16 to >14.0 pts
Proficient
• Sources are used
correctly. • Research is
aware of multiple viewpoints
of complex issues.
• Research is aware of
multiple viewpoints of
complex issues.
• Arguments are correctly
supported with research.
14 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Sources are used but not
critically evaluated.
• Arguments incorporate
limited research but often
include personal opinion
without appropriate support.
• Sources are, at times,
not used appropriately.
• Research is not aware of
multiple viewpoints of
complex issues.
0 pts
Not
Present
19 pts
Content
Conclusion
15 to >13.0 pts
Advanced
The conclusion is strong
and clearly summarizes
the research presented
in the body of the paper.
13 to >11.0 pts
Proficient
The conclusion summarizes
the research presented in
the body of the paper.
11 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The conclusion does not
adequately summarize the
research presented in the
body of the paper.
0 pts
Not
Present
15 pts
Research Paper Grading Rubric | CJUS810_D02_202130
Criteria Ratings Points
Content
Christian
Worldview
15 to >13.0 pts
Advanced
Creates Christian
Worldview (CWV)
Section and applies
CWV elements and
support in explanation of
the training program with
specific biblical
references (book,
chapter, and verse).
13 to >11.0 pts
Proficient
Creates Christian
Worldview Section and
applies general CWV
elements and support in
explanation of the training
program with global
referencing to biblical
references (reference does
not have book, ...
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. Wha
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues?
2. What are the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative's five objectives for reform in the juvenile justice system?
3. How can fragmentation and tunneling be overcome?
4. What is important to consider when using a data-driven approach to decision making?
CJUS 702
Activity Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Question Content
18.5 to 20 points:
· Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning.
· Objective, reasoned analysis is employed.
· An authoritative and persuasive voice is used.
· Resonates Christian world view supporting your themes throughout your writing.
· Four fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 2 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
· Most major points are stated clearly and supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support.
· Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required.
· Further interpretation and/or support for Christian world view needed.
· Less than 4 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 1 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
1 to 16.5 points:
· Major points require significant clarification and scholarly or Christian world view support.
· Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required.
· Less than 3 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· No external peer-reviewed scholarly references other than course materials/texts.
0 points
Not present
Opposing Viewpoints
18.5 to 20 points:
Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation.
1 to 16.5 points:
Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed.
0 points
Not present
Conclusion
11.5 to 12.5 points:
The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas.
10.5 to 11.25 points:
The conclusion does not fully derive from the paper’s ideas.
1 to 10.25 points:
Conclusion does not derive logically from the paper’s main ideas.
0 points
Not present
Structure (30%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Grammar, Spelling, & Format
13.75 to 15 points:
Minimal to no errors in grammar or spelling. Formatted in current APA format.
12.5 to 13.5 points:
Minor errors in spelling and grammar. Minor adjustments needed in APA format.
1 to 12.25 points:
Numerous errors in spelling or grammar. Not formatted in current APA format.
0 points
Not present
Page Length
7 to 7.5 points:
Required page length of 4 pages is met. This does not include title-page, ...
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. Wha
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues?
2. What are the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative's five objectives for reform in the juvenile justice system?
3. How can fragmentation and tunneling be overcome?
4. What is important to consider when using a data-driven approach to decision making?
CJUS 702
Activity Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Question Content
18.5 to 20 points:
· Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning.
· Objective, reasoned analysis is employed.
· An authoritative and persuasive voice is used.
· Resonates Christian world view supporting your themes throughout your writing.
· Four fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 2 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
· Most major points are stated clearly and supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support.
· Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required.
· Further interpretation and/or support for Christian world view needed.
· Less than 4 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 1 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
1 to 16.5 points:
· Major points require significant clarification and scholarly or Christian world view support.
· Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required.
· Less than 3 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· No external peer-reviewed scholarly references other than course materials/texts.
0 points
Not present
Opposing Viewpoints
18.5 to 20 points:
Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation.
1 to 16.5 points:
Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed.
0 points
Not present
Conclusion
11.5 to 12.5 points:
The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas.
10.5 to 11.25 points:
The conclusion does not fully derive from the paper’s ideas.
1 to 10.25 points:
Conclusion does not derive logically from the paper’s main ideas.
0 points
Not present
Structure (30%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Grammar, Spelling, & Format
13.75 to 15 points:
Minimal to no errors in grammar or spelling. Formatted in current APA format.
12.5 to 13.5 points:
Minor errors in spelling and grammar. Minor adjustments needed in APA format.
1 to 12.25 points:
Numerous errors in spelling or grammar. Not formatted in current APA format.
0 points
Not present
Page Length
7 to 7.5 points:
Required page length of 4 pages is met. This does not include title-page, ...
1. what is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. wha
This document outlines criteria for evaluating a student paper on collaboration in the juvenile justice system. It discusses the importance of considering opposing viewpoints, logically deriving conclusions, and adhering to formatting standards like APA style. Key points that must be addressed include the meaning of collaboration, challenges collaborative efforts face, and how to support positions with evidence from assigned readings and a Christian worldview perspective.
Operating Budget WorksheetHCR405 Version 111University of.docx
Operating Budget Worksheet
HCR/405 Version 11
1
University of Phoenix Material
Operating Budget Worksheet
Consider the following scenario:
Imagine you are a manager of a small health care facility and in charge of developing a projected annual operating budget.
Your budgetary figures are as follows:
For fiscal year 2015 and 2016 your clinic received $3 million from the government as fee-for-services reimbursements, as well as $1.1 million from private payers. The clinic has an annual fund-raiser that historically brings in $180,000 and a grants department that brings in $1.2 million annually.
Your chief financial officer (CFO) has provided you with the following annual expenses:
ABC Health Care Annual Expenses
Annual salaries
$1.5 million
Annual benefits
$ 240,000
Annual rent
$ 960,000
Annual insurance
$ 45,000
Annual depreciation
$ 780,000
Annual overhead
$ 180,000
Annual supplies
$ 60,000
Using the ABC Health Care Operating Budget template, complete a 12-month operating budget in which you include the net profit (loss).
Write a 350- to 700-word executive summary that explains to the board of directors how you developed the budget and its importance.
Include the following in your summary:
· Explain the process for creating an operating budget and its importance.
· Explain how revenues and expenses are grouped for planning and control in the financial statements.
· Explain the differences between cash and accrual financial systems.
Cite at least 2 sources, including your textbook.
Format your assignment according to APA guidelines.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
Copyright © 2018 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
RESEARCH PAPER GRADING RUBRIC
Bio 111 Lecture Research Paper Rubric (Total 40 points)
This is the grading rubric used by the instructor for your research paper. Read this ahead of time to understand what is needed for your paper and the points that will be awarded for each area of the paper.
TO DO: 1. Learn how to use ‘end notes’ in a Word document to create your reference page (work cited). 2. Learn APA format for references.
0 - 1 point
2 points
3 points
4 points
Introduction: worth 12% (5 points)
· title page
· introduction
No title page
Introduction very weak
Title page has few mistakes
Introduction is written fair
Title page has 1 mistake
Introduction is written well
Exceptional Title page
Exceptional Introduction – captures readers attention
Instructor Comments:
Points Awarded: ___________
0 - 1 point
2 points
3 points
4 points
Body: worth 12% (5points)
· structure/organization
· flow
· Use of bullets, or automatic numbers in paper
· Use of subheadings
· No flow or no logical organization
· Too much information in one paragraph, needs to be separated into more paragraphs
· Repeated information is in paper
· No use of bullets, automatic numbers or subheadings.
· Occasional repeat of information, some not needed
· The ideas are arranged logically, a.
HSCO 511Support Group Paper Grading RubricCriteriaAdvanced
HSCO 511
Support Group Paper Grading Rubric
Criteria
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Below Expectations
Not Present
Points
Earned
Content: 70%
Content
65 to 70 points
· Addresses all required aspects of the topics in sufficient depth & detail.
· Demonstrates course-related understanding, reflection, critical thinking & analysis.
· Meets length parameters.
59 to 64 points
· Addresses most required aspects of the topics in sufficient depth & detail.
· Demonstrates some course-related knowledge, reflection, critical thinking & analysis.
· Length is acceptable.
53 to 58 points
· Addresses some required aspects of the topics; depth & detail may be lacking.
· Some course-related knowledge, reflection & analysis may be implied.
· May violate length parameters.
1 to 52 points
· Addresses required aspects of the topics to a limited extent.
· Course-related knowledge, critical thinking & analysis is lacking.
· May violate length parameters.
0 points
Sources & Support
65 to 70 points
· Provides specific observations & examples.
· Incorporates all required sources in a meaningful way.
· Integrates biblical worldview perspectives.
59 to 64 points
· Provides some observations & examples.
· Incorporates required sources in some way.
· Makes inferences based on a biblical worldview.
53 to 58 points
· Provides a few observations & examples.
· Cites sources, but without meaningful discussion.
· Biblical worldview may be implied.
1 to 52 points
· Observations & examples are vague or missing.
· Required sources may not be incorporated.
· Biblical worldview may not be evident.
0 points
Structure: 30%
Organization
19 to 20 points
· Well organized with an engaging introduction, a logic progression of ideas & transitions that are clear & maintain flow of thought.
· Focused & concise with main points sufficiently developed.
17 to 18 points
· Generally well organized with a good introduction, progression of ideas & transitions that are clear & maintain flow of thought.
· Focused & concise with main points somewhat developed.
15 to 16 points
· May lack an engaging introduction, a logic progression of ideas and/or transitions that are clear & effective to maintain flow.
· Focus may be lacking & main points needing development.
1 to 14 points
· Organization is poor.
· There may be a lack of focus; ideas may be vague, confusing or underdeveloped.
0 points
Grammar &
Mechanics
19 to 20 points
· Spelling, grammar, punctuation, & capitalization is correct.
· Sentences are coherent, complete, clear & varied.
· Choice of words, tense & tone is appropriate.
17 to 18 points
· Spelling, grammar, punctuation, & capitalization is acceptable.
· Sentences are generally coherent, complete & clear.
· Choice of words, tense & tone is acceptable.
15 to 16 points
· Spelling, grammar, punctuation, or capitalization is incorrect.
· Sentence structure needs to be developed.
· Word choice, tense, or tone may be problematic.
1 to 14 points
· Multiple writing, grammar, or sentence structu ...
DirectionsThe first step in this research process is to choose a.docx
Directions
The first step in this research process is to choose a topic. Do not feel confined to traditional topics or topics on which you already have a strong opinion. As you delve into the research, you may find your focus and understanding of the issue alters.
Some ideas to explore:
5
·
· Hacktivism
· Facial recognition technology
· Violent protest
· Sugar tax
· Supervised injection facilities
· Mental health and police wellness checks
· Abolishing the penny
· Universal basic income
· Media bias
· Racism in America
· The Electoral College
· Drones
· Social Media
Explore other topics of interest to you and then discuss the topic with your instructor. Avoid topics that have already been legislated or discussed in depth (e.g., legalization of marijuana, the death penalty, bullying, religion, abortion, same-sex marriage, etc.). The topic you choose will be your research focus for the entire class, so choose a topic you are eager to explore.
As you move through the research process, you will have the opportunity to examine the issue critically, take a position, and develop a reasoned argument in support of your position. Your Portfolio Project will take the form of a well-researched paper using reliable sources and APA formatting for citations. In the paper, you will need to interpret and intelligently discuss the issue and support your findings with evidence. There will be portions of your research process required for submission throughout the class as listed below.
Requirements and Formatting
Your Portfolio Project must be formatted as follows:
· APA formatting
· Title Page
· Times New Roman or Arial 12-point font
· 1-inch margins
· Page numbers in top right corner
ENGL101 - Portfolio Project Rubric
Criteria
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
Needs Improvement
Points
Content
40 points
32 - 40 points
· Provides an introduction to the writing and sets the context within which the argument is formed; includes a clear and focused thesis taking a position and laying out main points
· Explains clearly and thoroughly the writer’s position and why the writer believes in the argument made
· Contains specific descriptions, examples, and research to support the writer’s thesis; makes clear connection between research and the persuasive point and acknowledges counterarguments
· Presents final thoughts on the topic; persuades audience this information is important to know
· Paper meets minimum 4-page requirement
31 - 24 points
· Introduction adequately explains the topic but lacks details to create audience interest or lacks a strong, clear position
· The central purpose of the work is identified. Ideas are generally focused in a way that supports the thesis.
· Begins to offer reasons to support its points, perhaps using varied kinds of evidence. Assumes evidence speaks for itself and needs little to no application to the point being discussed.
· Conclusion is recognizable but may lack audience relevance.
· Paper is 2-3 pages in length.
PHSC 210Comparative Essay Grading RubricCriteriaLevels of Ac.docx
PHSC 210
Comparative Essay Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Good/Excellent
Fair/Competent
Deficient
Points Earned
Length of Paper
9 to 10 points
Paper falls within the 1,000–1,500-word parameter.
7 to 8 points
Paper is between 800–1,000 or 1,500–1,700 words.
0 to 6 points
Paper is fewer than 800 words or greater than 1,700 words.
Principle Content
81 to 90 points
· The old-earth viewpoint related to the topic and the young-earth viewpoint related to the topic are addressed clearly and are well-supported.
· Old-earth and young-earth perspectives are compared and contrasted with obvious evidence of analysis and critical thinking.
· Content and purpose of the writing is clear.
· The audience is clear and appropriate for the topic.
· Supportive information is strong and addresses the writing focus.
61 to 80 points
· The old-earth viewpoint related to the topic and the young-earth viewpoint related to the topic are addressed; however, there is a lack of support and/or idea development.
· Old-earth and young-earth perspectives are compared and contrasted; however, there is insufficient depth of analysis and/or little evidence of critical thinking.
· Content is inconsistent (lack of clear purpose and /or clarity).
· Supportive information needs strengthening or does not address writing concepts.
0 to 60 points
· The old-earth viewpoint related to the topic and/or the young-earth viewpoint related to the topic is/are not addressed.
· Old-earth and young-earth perspectives are not compared and/or not contrasted with one another.
· Content has unsatisfactory purpose, focus, and clarity.
· Supportive information is missing.
Criteria
Good/Excellent
Fair/Competent
Deficient
Points Earned
Organization and Structure (CCLO #1)
14 to 15 points
· Writing is well-structured, clear, and easy-to-follow.
· Introduction compellingly forecasts the topic and thesis.
· Each paragraph is unified and has a clear central idea.
· Transitional wording is present throughout the writing.
· Conclusion is a logical end to the writing.
11 to 13 points
· The writing is adequately organized with some areas difficult to follow.
· The introduction needs to provide a stronger gateway into the writing.
· Some paragraphs lack unity.
· Better transitions are needed to provide fluency of ideas.
· Conclusion is trite or barely serves its purpose.
0 to 10 points
· Organization and structure detract from the writer’s message.
· The introduction and/or conclusion is incomplete or missing.
· Paragraphs are not unified (more than 1 topic/missing or inadequate controlling and concluding sentences).
· Transitions are missing.
· Conclusion, if present, fails to serve its purpose.
Grammar and Diction (CCLO # 1, 3)
14 to 15 points
· The writing reflects grammatical, punctuation, and spelling standards.
· Language is accurate, appropriate, and effective.
· Writing’s tone is appropriate and highly effective.
11 to 13 points
· The writing contains some grammatical, punctuation, an.
BUSI 770 Grading Rubrics 07 May 2018
BUSI 770 Grading Rubrics
07 May 2018 Page 1 of 14
Discussion Board 1 Main Thread
Criteria Levels of Achievement
Content ‐ 50 Points Advanced Proficient Developing Not present
Introduction
5 Points
3.1 to 5 points
Introduction provides an complete
overview of the discussion
1.1 to 3 points
Introduction provides an partial
overview of the discussion
0.1 to 1 points
Introduction present but does not
provide an overview of the
discussion
0 points
Not completed
Process
15 Points
13.1 to 15 points
Section provides a complete
discussion of the required business
process topic. Demonstrates critical
thinking to include analysis and
evaluation of process steps. Flow is
logical and fully cited. No less than
minimum required word count.
5.1 to 13 points
Section provides a nearly complete
discussion of the required business
process. Demonstrates some
critical thinking to include analysis
of process steps. Flow is mostly
logical and partially cited. No less
than minimum required word
count.
0.1 to 5 points
Section is present but misses many
elements of the required business
process. Lacks appropriate level of
critical thinking with very little or no
analysis and evaluation.
0 points
Not completed or not related
to requirements for the
section
Strategic Thinking
15 Points
13.1 to 15 points
Section provides a complete
discussion of the required strategic
thinking topic. Demonstrates critical
thinking to include analysis,
evaluation, and synthesis of topic.
Flow is logical and fully cited. No
less than minimum required word
count.
5.1 to 13 points
Section provides a nearly complete
discussion of the required strategic
thinking topic. Demonstrates
critical thinking to include analysis
and evaluation of topic. Flow is
mostly logical and partially cited.
No less than minimum required
word count.
0.1 to 5 points
Section is present but misses many
elements of the required strategic
thinking topic. Lacks appropriate
level of critical thinking with very
little or no analysis, evaluation, or
synthesis.
0 points
Not completed or not related
to requirements for the
section
Decision Model
10 Points
8.1 to 10 points
Section provides a complete
discussion of the student’s current
decision model(s). Complete
discussion of how the model(s) aid
or hinder the student’s decision
process to include why. Flow is
3.1 to 8 points
Section provides a complete
discussion of the student’s current
decision model(s). Minimal
discussion of how the model(s) aid
or hinder the student’s decision
process to include why. Flow is
0.1 to 3 points
Section provides an incomplete
discussion of the student’s current
decision model(s). No discussion of
how the model(s) aid or hinder the
student’s decision process to
include why. No less than minimum
0 points
Not completed or not related
to requirements for the
section
BUSI 770 ...
Strategic Management Course The report should includ.docx
Strategic Management Course
The report should include the following elements in clear specific points:
1. State organization’s vision, mission and goals/objectives. Critically analyze the vision and mission as discussed in the class
2. Identify targeted market segment and customers or people the organization provide services/product to.
3. What type of products and/or services does the organization provide?
4. What is the philosophy in producing the above goods and/or services?
5. Using the Analysis matrices perform a stage-wise analysis by creating metrices for the organization.
6. From the above mentioned metrices analysis, critically identify which competitive or business strategy is considered in order
to reach your vision and goals?
Must include a PowerPoint presentation and written report, which includes:
(1) An official cover-page/slide.
(2) Introduction identifying the chosen topic and its importance (Executive Summery).
(3) A background of the chosen organization/business, and its industry.
(4) Discussion of the main 6 points mentioned above. The arguments should be based on what you have learnt in the course.
(5) Include a Conclusion which provides the organization’s way forward strategy.
General guidelines:
1- The written report should be between 2000-4000 words max.
2- Use both primary and secondary sources to collect data and information to build your report & presentation.
3- The PowerPoint presentation should take no longer than 15 mins, followed by 10 mins for questions.
4- Make sure to include visual aids such as graphs, tables, diagrams and/or pictures to highlight your points clearly, both in the
report and in the PowerPoint presentation.
5- Writing Guidelines: Paper size: A4, Line Spacing: 1.15, Margins: Normal all sides, Font: Times New Roman, Font Size: 12
for text and 14 for heading.
6- Your report and slides should be grammatically correct, well punctuated, clear, concise, neatly presented, and easy to read.
Literature Review Rubric Name: ___________________________ Date: ___________________ Score: __________________
Category Exceeds Standard Meets Standard Nearly Meets Standard Does not meet standard
Title Page Title, Your name, Course
Name, Date,
Instructor’s name,
Institution
All relevant parts of the
title page are included.
The title is appropriate but
is not be very concise
Some needed elements
are missing.
The title page is either
missing or contains
inaccuracies. The title
page does not follow APA
style.
Introduction Clearly and concisely
describes topic and its
importance, why the topic
was chosen, and questions
to be answered.
Describes topic and its
importance; fails to
describe key questions
Introduction describes the
topic and its importance
ambiguously.
Introduction is incomplete
and/or nonfocused. Does
not adequately convey
topic.
Review of Literature Succinctly summarizes .
Grading Rubric for Research PaperLevel 2 - Level 1 - Level 3 .docx
This rubric evaluates research papers on five levels from unsatisfactory to excellent. It assesses introduction and thesis statement, literature review, references, research method, results and summary, and grammar and format. For each category, it describes the criteria for the different evaluation levels from 1 to 5 in terms of structure, analysis, errors, and adherence to guidelines. The highest level receives a score ranging from 9 to 10 points for that section.
Informative EssayStudents write an informative essay that incr.docx
Informative Essay
Students write an informative essay that increases readers’ knowledge of the topic and comprehension of the thesis statement. Students are assessed on their ability to write cohesive paragraphs, a thesis statement that is fully supported throughout the essay, an introduction, and a conclusion that are free of punctuation, grammar, and spelling errors. Students write in their own words, objectively without bias, and support their statements with evidence. The essay consists of four- to five-pages, including a title page and an annotated bibliography consisting of at least three credible and/or relevant sources. At least three in-text citations from different sources are required. The essay must be formatted in APA, including a title page, an annotated bibliography (in place of a references page), page headers, document headers, one-inch page margins, and be double-spaced using Times New Roman 12-point font.
Components % of Grade
Analysis and use of course concepts 30%
Organization and coherence 30%
Style and mechanics 20%
APA Style (citations, references, formatting) 20%
TOTAL 100%
Informative Essay Rubric
Below Standard
Approaching Standard
At Standard
Exceeds Standard
DAS-U-Analysis and use of course concepts
Points Range:0 (0%) - 17.25 (17.25%)
• Does not attempt to explain how the evidence relates to topic • Superficial and poorly developed analysis • Little or no connections are made to course concepts • Uses few sources, may misunderstand them, and lacks critical thinking • No or minimal scholarly references
Points Range:17.25 (17.25%) - 22.87 (22.87%)
• Analysis of the evidence stretches its meaning to support topic • Some new ideas and insight, but lacks depth and detail • Incorporates some course concepts, but accuracy and development are not consistent • Shows basic understanding of sources but does not critically evaluate them • Incorporates few or no scholarly references
Points Range:22.88 (22.88%) - 28.12 (28.12%)
• Analysis explains how the evidence supports the topic in most cases • Analysis reflects insight but is not fully developed • Incorporates many course concepts but sometimes does not develop them • Shows careful reading of sources but little or no critical evaluation • Incorporates adequate or minimum number of scholarly references to support analysis
Points Range:28.12 (28.12%) - 30 (30%)
• Analysis shows a strong relationship between the evidence and the topic • Analysis is insightful and original • Incorporates course concepts accurately, consistently, and frequently • Critically evaluates sources • Incorporates numerous or more than the minimum number of scholarly references required to support analysis
DAS-U-Style and mechanics
Points Range:0 (0%) - 11.5 (11.5%)
• Contains spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors, so understanding is difficult • Contains numerous awkward or ungrammatical sentences, and sentence structure is simple or monotonous • Misuses words, or uses words that.
Topic that identifies characteristics of Native American Culture and.docx
Topic that identifies characteristics of Native American Culture and how it influences/contributes to contemporary cultures and/or what factors have changed perspective regarding Native American cultural practices.
resources cited, at least 3 of any format.
Cover Page.
Minimun 4 page (excluding reference and cover).
MLA formet with proper work cited on the last page
12/ Times/ Double Spacing.
.
Topic Stem Cell ResearchAPA Format I need these topics. don.docx
Topic: Stem Cell Research
APA Format
I need these topics. don't add other contents
Table of contents:
1. Overview of stem cell research -
1 Page
2. Embryonic Stem Cells -
2 Pages
3. Adult Stem Cells -
2 Pages
4. Legal issues - 1 Page
5. Conclusion- It should be a strong conclusion
References:
Use 3 Journal Articles or newspaper articles and 2 Internet site. for example .edu, .org, .gov.
another 2 references from the academically approved books.
see for more info and references in the document
.
Topic Styles of PolicingYou are a patrol officer in a middle- to .docx
Topic: Styles of Policing
You are a patrol officer in a middle- to lower-class community, which is a suburb of a much larger metropolitan city. During the past 6 months, you have noticed an increase in what might be the beginning of gang activity in your community. You have begun to see gang-style graffiti painted on walls, buildings, and street signs. You have noticed that more young adults are gathering on street corners and appear to be dressing in clothing often associated with gang involvement. While no gang violence has occurred yet, you suspect it is not far away.
As discussed in your text, there are three distinct styles of policing. They are the watchman style, the legalistic style, and the service style.
In a single posting, describe in detail how you would address this growing problem using
each
of the policing styles listed above. Explain which approach is best, using research to substantiate your postings, citing your sources following APA format
.
Topic the legalization of same sex adoptionThese same sex adopti.docx
Topic: the legalization of same sex adoption
These: same sex adoption should be legalized and be accepted by the public
attrachments: draft and suggestions from the professor
Develop this 8 pages draft to be a 15 pages final paper
APA style, double spaced, use 10 peer-review journals as sources
.
More Related Content
Similar to BUSI 511Research Project (Final Document Draft) Grading Rubric (
Criteria Ratings PointsContentThesis andIntroduction
Criteria Ratings Points
Content
Thesis and
Introduction
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
The thesis or research
statement is well constructed;
introduction provides sufficient
background on the topic and
previews major points.
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
A thesis statement is
introduced, conveys a
biblical worldview, and
aligns with the title and
body of the paper.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The thesis and/or
introduction are poorly
written or do not align
with the title and/or body
of the paper.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Content
and Focus
Content
and Focus
20 to >18.0 pts
Advanced
The content is
comprehensive, accurate, and
is related to assignment
prompt.
18 to >16.0 pts
Proficient
The content is either: not
comprehensive, not
accurate, or is not
related to the
assignment prompt.
16 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The content is not
comprehensive, not
accurate, and is not
related to assignment
prompt.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Content
Major
Points and
Support
20 to >18.0 pts
Advanced
The program theory and
components are stated
clearly; are supported by
specific details, examples of
data to be measured should
be included; and logically
organized.
18 to >16.0 pts
Proficient
The program theory and
components are not
stated clearly but are
supported by specific
details, including data to
me measured examples.
16 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The program theory and
components are not
stated clearly and are not
supported by specific
details, examples of data
to be measured.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Content
Christian
Worldview
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
Dedicated Christian worldview
section exists or is woven
throughout the paper; showing
the integration of the subject
matter, critical thinking, and
Christian worldview.
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
General tenets of a
biblical worldview are
introduced and convey a
basic understanding of
supporting literature.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Some biblical concepts
are presented but may
be narrow in scope, not
representing the most
essential principles, or
may not be congruent
with supporting literature.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Content
Conclusion
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
The conclusion is logical,
flows from the body of the
paper, and reviews the major
points.
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Conclusion is either: not
logical, does not flow
from the body of the
paper, or does not
review the major points.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Conclusion is not logical,
does not flow from the
body of the paper, and
does not review the
major points.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Anticrime/Prevention Program: Part 1 – Evaluability Assessment
Grading Rubric | CJUS801_D01_202130
Criteria Ratings Points
Structure
Spelling,
Grammar &
Format
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
• Correct spelling and
grammar are used throughout
the outline. There are 0–2
errors in grammar or spelling
that distract the reader from
the content. • There are 0–1
minor citation errors in current
APA format in the requir ...
Recording Audio In PowerPoint1. With the PowerPoint presenta.docx
Recording Audio In PowerPoint
1. With the PowerPoint presentation open, click on Slide Show on the main menu bar.
Recording Audio In PowerPoint| Page 1 of 1
©Liberty University 7/22/13 | Bb 9.1.11
2. Click Record Slide Show, then choose to start
recording from the current slide you are on or
from the first slide of the presentation.
3. A Record Slide Show pop up will appear notify-
ing you of two options. Both options should be
checked. Once Start Recording is clicked, the
audio begins recording.
4. A small Recording menu will appear in the top
left corner. This menu has the options to pause
recording, repeat, or move to the next slide.
Note: For high sound quality, headset use is
recommended.
a. Repeat: Restarts the current slide’s recording, and deletes the previous audio.
b. Pause: Pauses the current audio recording. Click Resume Recording to resume.
c. Next: Moves to the next slide and starts recording on it.
5. Press “Esc” at any time
during the recording to stop the
recording. If Next is clicked
during the last slide, the record-
ing will stop.
Note: There will be an icon like this ( ) at the bottom right of each slide once there is audio
recorded on the slide. You can also review the audio using this icon. If you select this item,
you can remove the audio of that slide by pressing delete.
Federal Research Paper or Presentation Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not Present
Total
Content
46 to 50 points:
· All key elements of the assignment are covered thoroughly and in a substantive way. Student provides a well-researched, fully developed analysis of each element of the assignment.
· Content is thoroughly, comprehensively, accurate, and exhibits a nuanced rather than superficial understanding of the terms and concepts assigned.
· Major points are thoroughly stated clearly and are supported by appropriate professional and scholarly literature and/or logic. Student employs sound, reasoned discussion, description, explanation, and evaluation of assigned terms and concepts.
.
42 to 45.5 points:
· Most key elements of the assignment are covered and in a substantive way. Student provides a mostly developed analysis of each element of the assignment.
· Most content is comprehensively, accurate, and exhibits an adequate understanding of the terms and concepts assigned.
· Most points are adequately stated and are supported by appropriate professional and scholarly literature and/or logic. Student mostly employs sound, reasoned discussion, description, explanation, and evaluation of assigned terms and concepts.
.
1 to 41.5 points:
· Inadequate coverage of key elements of the assignment. Student inadequately provides a fully developed analysis of each element of the assignment.
Content is inadequate and not presented comprehensively, accurately, or exhibits an adequate understanding of the terms and concepts assigned.
· Major points ar ...
Research PaperInstructionsThe report will be a paper of fr.docx
Research Paper
Instructions
The report will be a paper of from
eight to 12 pages
(not including the cover or reference page, and attachments), presented in APA (6th edition) format.
It should focus on developing a leadership plan for addressing the issue identified in the case study.
Information sources must be either
peer-reviewed articles, government reports, or other sources approved by your instructor
. The research paper should apply the knowledge and skills gained from the required courses of the major and your application of the leadership concepts presented in this course. All margins should be 1”, 12 point font in either Arial or New Times Roman font style.
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Research Paper Rubric
Criteria
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
Thesis or Statement of Purpose
5 points
Readily apparent to the reader; concisely stated in a single sentence, which is engaging and thought provoking.
4 points
Clear but may sometimes digresses in the paper; stated in a single sentence.
3 points
Not consistently clear; stated in a single sentence.
2 points
Generally unclear; Incomplete, unfocused, or absent.
Introduction
5 points
Relevance of Public Safety leadership is apparent. The groundwork for paper easy to predict because important topics that will be discussed are specifically mentioned.
4 points
A good attempt is made as to why the topic is pertinent but may be slightly unclear, or lacking in insight or originality. Organization for rest of the paper stated
3 points
May be unclear (contain many vague terms), appear unoriginal, or offer relatively little that is new; provides little around which to structure the paper.
2 points
No reference to the topic, audience or relevance.
Content
30 points
Can earn from 27-30 points. Clear examples to support the leadership style with clear presentation of current challenge; support of the overall purpose; reader gains important insight; analysis poses novel ways to think of the material; quoted material well integrated; depth of coverage without being redundant.
26 points
Can earn from 24-26 points. Examples support the leadership style with clear presentation of current challenge; reader gains some insight; occasional evidence of novel ways to think about the material Quotes well integrated into sentences. Topics adequately addressed but not in detail or depth.
23 points
Can earn from 21-23 points. Examples support the leadership style with clear presentation of current challenge; reader gains little insight; The essay relies on quotes and paraphrasing that are poorly connected. Examples support some topic sentences; no evidence of novel thinking and intermittent support through evidence.
20 points
Can earn from 0-20 points. The essay relies on stringing together quotes or close paraphrasing; Failure to support statements with major content omitted; Quotes not integrated, improperly.
Organization and Critical Thinking
10 points
Can earn from .
Research or Interview Paper Grading Rubric CriteriaLevels of.docx
Research or Interview Paper Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Introduction
(10 pints)
10 to 9 points
State the topic the author is going to address.
The introduction provide a clear overview of the paper’s contents.
8 to 7 points
State the topic the author is going to address.
The introduction provides an overview of the paper’s contents.
6 to 1 points
State the topic the author is going to address.
The introduction seems to provide an overview of the paper’s contents.
0 point
Does not state the topic the author is going to address.
The introduction does not provide an overview of the paper’s contents.
Analysis
(50 pints)
50 to 45 points
The issues raised in the topic are properly treated. Different viewpoints have been considered, analyzed, and treated. The author provides personal inputs
44 to 35points
The issues raised in the topic are not properly treated. Different viewpoints have been considered, analyzed, and treated. The author provides personal inputs.
34 to 1 points
The issues raised in the topic are not properly treated. Different viewpoints have been considered, analyzed, and treated. The author does not provide personal inputs.
0 point
The author does not provide any analysis.
Conclusion
(10 pints)
10 to 9 points
The conclusion offers a good summary of issues treated in the paper and does offer suggestions for future study
8 to 7points
The conclusion offers a good summary of issues treated in the paper, but does not offer any suggestions for future study
6 to 1 points
The conclusion offers a brief summary of issues treated in the paper, but does not offer any suggestions for future study
0 point
There is no conclusion
Structure
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Headings and transitions
(10 points)
10 to 9 points
The transitions between paragraphs and sections are clear. Proper headings are used.
8 to 7 points
The transitions between paragraphs and sections are clear. Proper headings are not used.
6 to 1 points
The transitions between paragraphs and sections are not clear. Proper headings are not used.
0 point
No transitions between paragraphs and sections. Headings are not used.
Spelling and grammar
(10 points)
10 to 9 points
There are no more than three spelling or grammar errors.
8 to 7 points
There are four or five spelling or grammar errors.
6 to 1 points
There are six or seven spelling or grammar errors.
0 point
There are eight or more spelling or grammar errors.
Bibliography and APA style
(10 point)
10 to 9 points
The bibliography contains at least 3 scholarly sources. The paper is in current APA style.
8 to 7 points
The bibliography contains less than 3 scholarly sources. The paper is in current APA style.
6 to 1 points
The bibliography contains less than 3 scholarly sources. The paper is not in current APA style.
0 point
The bibliography does not contain any scholarly sources. The paper is not in current APA style.
.
1. Citation Written in APA format. For more help.docx
1. Citation:
Written in APA format. For more help with formatting, see APA handout.
1. Summary:
What is purpose of the source, review article, original research? What topics are covered? This is generally 1 -3 sentences that summarize the author’s main point. For more help, see this link on paraphrasing sources.
1. Assessment:
After summarizing the article (or research paper or book) it is necessary to evaluate it and also where you found it – its source (e.g. journal, website, etc). Briefly answer the following questions:
What is the format or type of source. How reliable is the information in the article and how credible is the source and the author(s)? Is this article biased or objective?
For more help, see this handout on evaluating resources.
1. Critique
Once you've summarized and assessed a source, you need to ask how it fits into your research. Why is this source relevant to your research paper and how can you use this source in your research project? What are the strengths and weaknesses? It is biased in any way? Compare the source with other sources in your bibliography.
Source 1- http://www.mslifelines.com/what-is-ms?cmp=M_WhatIsMS_MSLLGuideToMS_Google_PS&gclid=COrwht6_ns0CFdU7gQodi7MHjg
Source 2- http://www.nationalmssociety.org/What-is-MS
Source 3- http://www.healthline.com/health/multiple-sclerosis/early-signs
Source 4- http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/37556.php
Source 5- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1069023/
Assignment 4: Research Paper Rubric
Evaluation Criteria
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Points Earned
Abstract
TOTAL: (15 points)
(10 points)
Minimum criteria:
· Topic Sentence
· Five main topics introduced: Statistics/Epidemiology, Financial Costs, Anatomy & Physiology/ Etiology, Diagnosis/Treatments/ Prognosis,
· Conclusions and Findings, Future Directions/Research
Response to Assignment 3 Feedback
(5 points)
Minimum criteria:
· Did student respond to and fix issues identified in the instructor feedback for Assignments 3?
10 points
Abstract contains all of the required criteria.
Abstract introduces the profile and outlines main topics and briefly presents conclusions.
5 points
Student responded to and fixed issues identified by the instructor feedback for
Assignment 3
~or~ There were no issues in the instructor feedback for the student to respond to in Assignment 3
~or~ Assignment 3 was not submitted by the student
9 - 8 points
Abstract contains four of the required criteria.
Abstract introduces the profile and outlines main topics and presents conclusions.
7 - 6 points
Abstract contains three of the required criteria.
Abstract is lacking in introduction sentence, information, and/or conclusion statement.
< 6 points
Abstract contains two or less of the required criteria.
Abstract is not present. (0 points)
0 points
Student did not address all the issues identified in the instructor feedback for Assignment 3
Main Body Content
TOTAL: (50 ...
Historical and Contemporary Perspectives Essay (15 points) – due
Historical and Contemporary Perspectives Essay (15 points) – due at the end of Week 4
You will be required to submit a well-written 4 page essay (not including title page or references) on the topic:
Does Alcohol use/abuse lead to dementia (Alcohol use/abuse and dementia)
. The purpose of this paper is to link historical and demographic trends to contemporary issues in gerontology. Your essay should rely on assigned class readings as well as the information you gathered as
part of your bibliography assignment (a minimum of 10 resources is required)
. Remember, you should always use in-text citations for information that you gathered from another source and include a reference list at the end of your essay. Use APA format for this assignment.
Many students leave out the historical part of this assignment. Please make sure to include substantive information on the historical aspect of your topic! Failure to do so will result in a significant reduction to your grade. Many students also leave out demographic information (the impact that age, gender, race, education, culture, etc has on your topic). Again, failure to include this information will result in a significant reduction to your grade.
Your essay should address the following items:
· Topic: (brief description)
Does Alcohol use/abuse lead to dementia (Alcohol use/abuse and dementia)
· Historical background (e.g. when did this become an issue in aging? Why?)
· Influence of demography on selected issue
· Contemporary aspects of the topic (e.g. Why is this an important issue in aging now?)
Your paper should be concise and formal (no slang, no use of "I" statements, no opinions, etc) in tone. Be sure to proofread your work prior to submission. Points will be deducted for poor writing quality or failure to use APA format.
Before submitting your work, you may wish to review the rubric provided to make sure you have addressed all of the important components of the essay.)
Grading Rubric for Historical and Contemporary Perspectives Essay
:
Component
Pt values
Point value descriptions
Total points
Topic
1 points
· Well-written, concise description of the topic
.5 points
· Adequate description of the topic
· May be overly wordy or lacking detail but topic is clear
0 points
· Lacks topic description
· Topic unclear due to poor writing or omission of important detail
Historical Background
4 points
· Excellent overview of historical perspective of the topic
· Includes examples and details to support statements
3 points
· Good overview of historical perspective
· May be missing one or two minor details
2 points
· Fair overview of historical perspective
· Missing one or two major details
1 point
· Poor overview of historical perspective
· Missing several major details
· Writing is mostly incomprehensible
0 points
· Missing historical background
· Writing is incomprehensible
Demography
...
Criteria Ratings PointsContentIntroduction19 to 1
Criteria Ratings Points
Content
Introduction
19 to >16.0 pts
Advanced
The introductory
paragraph contains a
strong thesis statement,
research question (s),
and/or statement of
research purpose and
provides an overview of
the paper.
16 to >14.0 pts
Proficient
The introductory paragraph
contains a moderately
developed thesis statement,
research question(s), and/or
statement of research
purpose.
14 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The thesis statement,
research question(s) and
overview of the paper need
improvement.
0 pts
Not
Present
19 pts
Content
Analysis
20 to >18.0 pts
Advanced
The topic is clearly
presented and
discussed in detail. Key
terms are defined as
needed. Complex issues
are navigated with
precision.
18 to >16.0 pts
Proficient
The topic is presented and
discussed appropriately.
Key terms are defined as
needed. Complex issues
are recognized.
16 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The topic is unclear or fairly
clear but discussed too
broadly or does not meet
expectations. Contextual
factors are weakly
considered and lacking in
some significant areas.
Complex issues are
overlooked or handled
without care.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Content
Research &
Support
19 to >16.0 pts
Advanced
• Sources are evaluated
critically for applicability
in the paper.
• Research may
incorporate multiple
viewpoints of complex
issues. • Arguments
are correctly supported
with research.
16 to >14.0 pts
Proficient
• Sources are used
correctly. • Research is
aware of multiple viewpoints
of complex issues.
• Research is aware of
multiple viewpoints of
complex issues.
• Arguments are correctly
supported with research.
14 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Sources are used but not
critically evaluated.
• Arguments incorporate
limited research but often
include personal opinion
without appropriate support.
• Sources are, at times,
not used appropriately.
• Research is not aware of
multiple viewpoints of
complex issues.
0 pts
Not
Present
19 pts
Content
Conclusion
15 to >13.0 pts
Advanced
The conclusion is strong
and clearly summarizes
the research presented
in the body of the paper.
13 to >11.0 pts
Proficient
The conclusion summarizes
the research presented in
the body of the paper.
11 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The conclusion does not
adequately summarize the
research presented in the
body of the paper.
0 pts
Not
Present
15 pts
Research Paper Grading Rubric | CJUS810_D02_202130
Criteria Ratings Points
Content
Christian
Worldview
15 to >13.0 pts
Advanced
Creates Christian
Worldview (CWV)
Section and applies
CWV elements and
support in explanation of
the training program with
specific biblical
references (book,
chapter, and verse).
13 to >11.0 pts
Proficient
Creates Christian
Worldview Section and
applies general CWV
elements and support in
explanation of the training
program with global
referencing to biblical
references (reference does
not have book, ...
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. Wha
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues?
2. What are the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative's five objectives for reform in the juvenile justice system?
3. How can fragmentation and tunneling be overcome?
4. What is important to consider when using a data-driven approach to decision making?
CJUS 702
Activity Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Question Content
18.5 to 20 points:
· Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning.
· Objective, reasoned analysis is employed.
· An authoritative and persuasive voice is used.
· Resonates Christian world view supporting your themes throughout your writing.
· Four fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 2 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
· Most major points are stated clearly and supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support.
· Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required.
· Further interpretation and/or support for Christian world view needed.
· Less than 4 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 1 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
1 to 16.5 points:
· Major points require significant clarification and scholarly or Christian world view support.
· Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required.
· Less than 3 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· No external peer-reviewed scholarly references other than course materials/texts.
0 points
Not present
Opposing Viewpoints
18.5 to 20 points:
Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation.
1 to 16.5 points:
Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed.
0 points
Not present
Conclusion
11.5 to 12.5 points:
The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas.
10.5 to 11.25 points:
The conclusion does not fully derive from the paper’s ideas.
1 to 10.25 points:
Conclusion does not derive logically from the paper’s main ideas.
0 points
Not present
Structure (30%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Grammar, Spelling, & Format
13.75 to 15 points:
Minimal to no errors in grammar or spelling. Formatted in current APA format.
12.5 to 13.5 points:
Minor errors in spelling and grammar. Minor adjustments needed in APA format.
1 to 12.25 points:
Numerous errors in spelling or grammar. Not formatted in current APA format.
0 points
Not present
Page Length
7 to 7.5 points:
Required page length of 4 pages is met. This does not include title-page, ...
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. Wha
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues?
2. What are the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative's five objectives for reform in the juvenile justice system?
3. How can fragmentation and tunneling be overcome?
4. What is important to consider when using a data-driven approach to decision making?
CJUS 702
Activity Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Question Content
18.5 to 20 points:
· Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning.
· Objective, reasoned analysis is employed.
· An authoritative and persuasive voice is used.
· Resonates Christian world view supporting your themes throughout your writing.
· Four fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 2 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
· Most major points are stated clearly and supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support.
· Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required.
· Further interpretation and/or support for Christian world view needed.
· Less than 4 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 1 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
1 to 16.5 points:
· Major points require significant clarification and scholarly or Christian world view support.
· Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required.
· Less than 3 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· No external peer-reviewed scholarly references other than course materials/texts.
0 points
Not present
Opposing Viewpoints
18.5 to 20 points:
Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation.
1 to 16.5 points:
Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed.
0 points
Not present
Conclusion
11.5 to 12.5 points:
The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas.
10.5 to 11.25 points:
The conclusion does not fully derive from the paper’s ideas.
1 to 10.25 points:
Conclusion does not derive logically from the paper’s main ideas.
0 points
Not present
Structure (30%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Grammar, Spelling, & Format
13.75 to 15 points:
Minimal to no errors in grammar or spelling. Formatted in current APA format.
12.5 to 13.5 points:
Minor errors in spelling and grammar. Minor adjustments needed in APA format.
1 to 12.25 points:
Numerous errors in spelling or grammar. Not formatted in current APA format.
0 points
Not present
Page Length
7 to 7.5 points:
Required page length of 4 pages is met. This does not include title-page, ...
1. what is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. wha
This document outlines criteria for evaluating a student paper on collaboration in the juvenile justice system. It discusses the importance of considering opposing viewpoints, logically deriving conclusions, and adhering to formatting standards like APA style. Key points that must be addressed include the meaning of collaboration, challenges collaborative efforts face, and how to support positions with evidence from assigned readings and a Christian worldview perspective.
Operating Budget WorksheetHCR405 Version 111University of.docx
Operating Budget Worksheet
HCR/405 Version 11
1
University of Phoenix Material
Operating Budget Worksheet
Consider the following scenario:
Imagine you are a manager of a small health care facility and in charge of developing a projected annual operating budget.
Your budgetary figures are as follows:
For fiscal year 2015 and 2016 your clinic received $3 million from the government as fee-for-services reimbursements, as well as $1.1 million from private payers. The clinic has an annual fund-raiser that historically brings in $180,000 and a grants department that brings in $1.2 million annually.
Your chief financial officer (CFO) has provided you with the following annual expenses:
ABC Health Care Annual Expenses
Annual salaries
$1.5 million
Annual benefits
$ 240,000
Annual rent
$ 960,000
Annual insurance
$ 45,000
Annual depreciation
$ 780,000
Annual overhead
$ 180,000
Annual supplies
$ 60,000
Using the ABC Health Care Operating Budget template, complete a 12-month operating budget in which you include the net profit (loss).
Write a 350- to 700-word executive summary that explains to the board of directors how you developed the budget and its importance.
Include the following in your summary:
· Explain the process for creating an operating budget and its importance.
· Explain how revenues and expenses are grouped for planning and control in the financial statements.
· Explain the differences between cash and accrual financial systems.
Cite at least 2 sources, including your textbook.
Format your assignment according to APA guidelines.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
Copyright © 2018 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
RESEARCH PAPER GRADING RUBRIC
Bio 111 Lecture Research Paper Rubric (Total 40 points)
This is the grading rubric used by the instructor for your research paper. Read this ahead of time to understand what is needed for your paper and the points that will be awarded for each area of the paper.
TO DO: 1. Learn how to use ‘end notes’ in a Word document to create your reference page (work cited). 2. Learn APA format for references.
0 - 1 point
2 points
3 points
4 points
Introduction: worth 12% (5 points)
· title page
· introduction
No title page
Introduction very weak
Title page has few mistakes
Introduction is written fair
Title page has 1 mistake
Introduction is written well
Exceptional Title page
Exceptional Introduction – captures readers attention
Instructor Comments:
Points Awarded: ___________
0 - 1 point
2 points
3 points
4 points
Body: worth 12% (5points)
· structure/organization
· flow
· Use of bullets, or automatic numbers in paper
· Use of subheadings
· No flow or no logical organization
· Too much information in one paragraph, needs to be separated into more paragraphs
· Repeated information is in paper
· No use of bullets, automatic numbers or subheadings.
· Occasional repeat of information, some not needed
· The ideas are arranged logically, a.
HSCO 511Support Group Paper Grading RubricCriteriaAdvanced
HSCO 511
Support Group Paper Grading Rubric
Criteria
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Below Expectations
Not Present
Points
Earned
Content: 70%
Content
65 to 70 points
· Addresses all required aspects of the topics in sufficient depth & detail.
· Demonstrates course-related understanding, reflection, critical thinking & analysis.
· Meets length parameters.
59 to 64 points
· Addresses most required aspects of the topics in sufficient depth & detail.
· Demonstrates some course-related knowledge, reflection, critical thinking & analysis.
· Length is acceptable.
53 to 58 points
· Addresses some required aspects of the topics; depth & detail may be lacking.
· Some course-related knowledge, reflection & analysis may be implied.
· May violate length parameters.
1 to 52 points
· Addresses required aspects of the topics to a limited extent.
· Course-related knowledge, critical thinking & analysis is lacking.
· May violate length parameters.
0 points
Sources & Support
65 to 70 points
· Provides specific observations & examples.
· Incorporates all required sources in a meaningful way.
· Integrates biblical worldview perspectives.
59 to 64 points
· Provides some observations & examples.
· Incorporates required sources in some way.
· Makes inferences based on a biblical worldview.
53 to 58 points
· Provides a few observations & examples.
· Cites sources, but without meaningful discussion.
· Biblical worldview may be implied.
1 to 52 points
· Observations & examples are vague or missing.
· Required sources may not be incorporated.
· Biblical worldview may not be evident.
0 points
Structure: 30%
Organization
19 to 20 points
· Well organized with an engaging introduction, a logic progression of ideas & transitions that are clear & maintain flow of thought.
· Focused & concise with main points sufficiently developed.
17 to 18 points
· Generally well organized with a good introduction, progression of ideas & transitions that are clear & maintain flow of thought.
· Focused & concise with main points somewhat developed.
15 to 16 points
· May lack an engaging introduction, a logic progression of ideas and/or transitions that are clear & effective to maintain flow.
· Focus may be lacking & main points needing development.
1 to 14 points
· Organization is poor.
· There may be a lack of focus; ideas may be vague, confusing or underdeveloped.
0 points
Grammar &
Mechanics
19 to 20 points
· Spelling, grammar, punctuation, & capitalization is correct.
· Sentences are coherent, complete, clear & varied.
· Choice of words, tense & tone is appropriate.
17 to 18 points
· Spelling, grammar, punctuation, & capitalization is acceptable.
· Sentences are generally coherent, complete & clear.
· Choice of words, tense & tone is acceptable.
15 to 16 points
· Spelling, grammar, punctuation, or capitalization is incorrect.
· Sentence structure needs to be developed.
· Word choice, tense, or tone may be problematic.
1 to 14 points
· Multiple writing, grammar, or sentence structu ...
DirectionsThe first step in this research process is to choose a.docx
Directions
The first step in this research process is to choose a topic. Do not feel confined to traditional topics or topics on which you already have a strong opinion. As you delve into the research, you may find your focus and understanding of the issue alters.
Some ideas to explore:
5
·
· Hacktivism
· Facial recognition technology
· Violent protest
· Sugar tax
· Supervised injection facilities
· Mental health and police wellness checks
· Abolishing the penny
· Universal basic income
· Media bias
· Racism in America
· The Electoral College
· Drones
· Social Media
Explore other topics of interest to you and then discuss the topic with your instructor. Avoid topics that have already been legislated or discussed in depth (e.g., legalization of marijuana, the death penalty, bullying, religion, abortion, same-sex marriage, etc.). The topic you choose will be your research focus for the entire class, so choose a topic you are eager to explore.
As you move through the research process, you will have the opportunity to examine the issue critically, take a position, and develop a reasoned argument in support of your position. Your Portfolio Project will take the form of a well-researched paper using reliable sources and APA formatting for citations. In the paper, you will need to interpret and intelligently discuss the issue and support your findings with evidence. There will be portions of your research process required for submission throughout the class as listed below.
Requirements and Formatting
Your Portfolio Project must be formatted as follows:
· APA formatting
· Title Page
· Times New Roman or Arial 12-point font
· 1-inch margins
· Page numbers in top right corner
ENGL101 - Portfolio Project Rubric
Criteria
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
Needs Improvement
Points
Content
40 points
32 - 40 points
· Provides an introduction to the writing and sets the context within which the argument is formed; includes a clear and focused thesis taking a position and laying out main points
· Explains clearly and thoroughly the writer’s position and why the writer believes in the argument made
· Contains specific descriptions, examples, and research to support the writer’s thesis; makes clear connection between research and the persuasive point and acknowledges counterarguments
· Presents final thoughts on the topic; persuades audience this information is important to know
· Paper meets minimum 4-page requirement
31 - 24 points
· Introduction adequately explains the topic but lacks details to create audience interest or lacks a strong, clear position
· The central purpose of the work is identified. Ideas are generally focused in a way that supports the thesis.
· Begins to offer reasons to support its points, perhaps using varied kinds of evidence. Assumes evidence speaks for itself and needs little to no application to the point being discussed.
· Conclusion is recognizable but may lack audience relevance.
· Paper is 2-3 pages in length.
PHSC 210Comparative Essay Grading RubricCriteriaLevels of Ac.docx
PHSC 210
Comparative Essay Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Good/Excellent
Fair/Competent
Deficient
Points Earned
Length of Paper
9 to 10 points
Paper falls within the 1,000–1,500-word parameter.
7 to 8 points
Paper is between 800–1,000 or 1,500–1,700 words.
0 to 6 points
Paper is fewer than 800 words or greater than 1,700 words.
Principle Content
81 to 90 points
· The old-earth viewpoint related to the topic and the young-earth viewpoint related to the topic are addressed clearly and are well-supported.
· Old-earth and young-earth perspectives are compared and contrasted with obvious evidence of analysis and critical thinking.
· Content and purpose of the writing is clear.
· The audience is clear and appropriate for the topic.
· Supportive information is strong and addresses the writing focus.
61 to 80 points
· The old-earth viewpoint related to the topic and the young-earth viewpoint related to the topic are addressed; however, there is a lack of support and/or idea development.
· Old-earth and young-earth perspectives are compared and contrasted; however, there is insufficient depth of analysis and/or little evidence of critical thinking.
· Content is inconsistent (lack of clear purpose and /or clarity).
· Supportive information needs strengthening or does not address writing concepts.
0 to 60 points
· The old-earth viewpoint related to the topic and/or the young-earth viewpoint related to the topic is/are not addressed.
· Old-earth and young-earth perspectives are not compared and/or not contrasted with one another.
· Content has unsatisfactory purpose, focus, and clarity.
· Supportive information is missing.
Criteria
Good/Excellent
Fair/Competent
Deficient
Points Earned
Organization and Structure (CCLO #1)
14 to 15 points
· Writing is well-structured, clear, and easy-to-follow.
· Introduction compellingly forecasts the topic and thesis.
· Each paragraph is unified and has a clear central idea.
· Transitional wording is present throughout the writing.
· Conclusion is a logical end to the writing.
11 to 13 points
· The writing is adequately organized with some areas difficult to follow.
· The introduction needs to provide a stronger gateway into the writing.
· Some paragraphs lack unity.
· Better transitions are needed to provide fluency of ideas.
· Conclusion is trite or barely serves its purpose.
0 to 10 points
· Organization and structure detract from the writer’s message.
· The introduction and/or conclusion is incomplete or missing.
· Paragraphs are not unified (more than 1 topic/missing or inadequate controlling and concluding sentences).
· Transitions are missing.
· Conclusion, if present, fails to serve its purpose.
Grammar and Diction (CCLO # 1, 3)
14 to 15 points
· The writing reflects grammatical, punctuation, and spelling standards.
· Language is accurate, appropriate, and effective.
· Writing’s tone is appropriate and highly effective.
11 to 13 points
· The writing contains some grammatical, punctuation, an.
BUSI 770 Grading Rubrics 07 May 2018
BUSI 770 Grading Rubrics
07 May 2018 Page 1 of 14
Discussion Board 1 Main Thread
Criteria Levels of Achievement
Content ‐ 50 Points Advanced Proficient Developing Not present
Introduction
5 Points
3.1 to 5 points
Introduction provides an complete
overview of the discussion
1.1 to 3 points
Introduction provides an partial
overview of the discussion
0.1 to 1 points
Introduction present but does not
provide an overview of the
discussion
0 points
Not completed
Process
15 Points
13.1 to 15 points
Section provides a complete
discussion of the required business
process topic. Demonstrates critical
thinking to include analysis and
evaluation of process steps. Flow is
logical and fully cited. No less than
minimum required word count.
5.1 to 13 points
Section provides a nearly complete
discussion of the required business
process. Demonstrates some
critical thinking to include analysis
of process steps. Flow is mostly
logical and partially cited. No less
than minimum required word
count.
0.1 to 5 points
Section is present but misses many
elements of the required business
process. Lacks appropriate level of
critical thinking with very little or no
analysis and evaluation.
0 points
Not completed or not related
to requirements for the
section
Strategic Thinking
15 Points
13.1 to 15 points
Section provides a complete
discussion of the required strategic
thinking topic. Demonstrates critical
thinking to include analysis,
evaluation, and synthesis of topic.
Flow is logical and fully cited. No
less than minimum required word
count.
5.1 to 13 points
Section provides a nearly complete
discussion of the required strategic
thinking topic. Demonstrates
critical thinking to include analysis
and evaluation of topic. Flow is
mostly logical and partially cited.
No less than minimum required
word count.
0.1 to 5 points
Section is present but misses many
elements of the required strategic
thinking topic. Lacks appropriate
level of critical thinking with very
little or no analysis, evaluation, or
synthesis.
0 points
Not completed or not related
to requirements for the
section
Decision Model
10 Points
8.1 to 10 points
Section provides a complete
discussion of the student’s current
decision model(s). Complete
discussion of how the model(s) aid
or hinder the student’s decision
process to include why. Flow is
3.1 to 8 points
Section provides a complete
discussion of the student’s current
decision model(s). Minimal
discussion of how the model(s) aid
or hinder the student’s decision
process to include why. Flow is
0.1 to 3 points
Section provides an incomplete
discussion of the student’s current
decision model(s). No discussion of
how the model(s) aid or hinder the
student’s decision process to
include why. No less than minimum
0 points
Not completed or not related
to requirements for the
section
BUSI 770 ...
Strategic Management Course The report should includ.docx
Strategic Management Course
The report should include the following elements in clear specific points:
1. State organization’s vision, mission and goals/objectives. Critically analyze the vision and mission as discussed in the class
2. Identify targeted market segment and customers or people the organization provide services/product to.
3. What type of products and/or services does the organization provide?
4. What is the philosophy in producing the above goods and/or services?
5. Using the Analysis matrices perform a stage-wise analysis by creating metrices for the organization.
6. From the above mentioned metrices analysis, critically identify which competitive or business strategy is considered in order
to reach your vision and goals?
Must include a PowerPoint presentation and written report, which includes:
(1) An official cover-page/slide.
(2) Introduction identifying the chosen topic and its importance (Executive Summery).
(3) A background of the chosen organization/business, and its industry.
(4) Discussion of the main 6 points mentioned above. The arguments should be based on what you have learnt in the course.
(5) Include a Conclusion which provides the organization’s way forward strategy.
General guidelines:
1- The written report should be between 2000-4000 words max.
2- Use both primary and secondary sources to collect data and information to build your report & presentation.
3- The PowerPoint presentation should take no longer than 15 mins, followed by 10 mins for questions.
4- Make sure to include visual aids such as graphs, tables, diagrams and/or pictures to highlight your points clearly, both in the
report and in the PowerPoint presentation.
5- Writing Guidelines: Paper size: A4, Line Spacing: 1.15, Margins: Normal all sides, Font: Times New Roman, Font Size: 12
for text and 14 for heading.
6- Your report and slides should be grammatically correct, well punctuated, clear, concise, neatly presented, and easy to read.
Literature Review Rubric Name: ___________________________ Date: ___________________ Score: __________________
Category Exceeds Standard Meets Standard Nearly Meets Standard Does not meet standard
Title Page Title, Your name, Course
Name, Date,
Instructor’s name,
Institution
All relevant parts of the
title page are included.
The title is appropriate but
is not be very concise
Some needed elements
are missing.
The title page is either
missing or contains
inaccuracies. The title
page does not follow APA
style.
Introduction Clearly and concisely
describes topic and its
importance, why the topic
was chosen, and questions
to be answered.
Describes topic and its
importance; fails to
describe key questions
Introduction describes the
topic and its importance
ambiguously.
Introduction is incomplete
and/or nonfocused. Does
not adequately convey
topic.
Review of Literature Succinctly summarizes .
Grading Rubric for Research PaperLevel 2 - Level 1 - Level 3 .docx
This rubric evaluates research papers on five levels from unsatisfactory to excellent. It assesses introduction and thesis statement, literature review, references, research method, results and summary, and grammar and format. For each category, it describes the criteria for the different evaluation levels from 1 to 5 in terms of structure, analysis, errors, and adherence to guidelines. The highest level receives a score ranging from 9 to 10 points for that section.
Informative EssayStudents write an informative essay that incr.docx
Informative Essay
Students write an informative essay that increases readers’ knowledge of the topic and comprehension of the thesis statement. Students are assessed on their ability to write cohesive paragraphs, a thesis statement that is fully supported throughout the essay, an introduction, and a conclusion that are free of punctuation, grammar, and spelling errors. Students write in their own words, objectively without bias, and support their statements with evidence. The essay consists of four- to five-pages, including a title page and an annotated bibliography consisting of at least three credible and/or relevant sources. At least three in-text citations from different sources are required. The essay must be formatted in APA, including a title page, an annotated bibliography (in place of a references page), page headers, document headers, one-inch page margins, and be double-spaced using Times New Roman 12-point font.
Components % of Grade
Analysis and use of course concepts 30%
Organization and coherence 30%
Style and mechanics 20%
APA Style (citations, references, formatting) 20%
TOTAL 100%
Informative Essay Rubric
Below Standard
Approaching Standard
At Standard
Exceeds Standard
DAS-U-Analysis and use of course concepts
Points Range:0 (0%) - 17.25 (17.25%)
• Does not attempt to explain how the evidence relates to topic • Superficial and poorly developed analysis • Little or no connections are made to course concepts • Uses few sources, may misunderstand them, and lacks critical thinking • No or minimal scholarly references
Points Range:17.25 (17.25%) - 22.87 (22.87%)
• Analysis of the evidence stretches its meaning to support topic • Some new ideas and insight, but lacks depth and detail • Incorporates some course concepts, but accuracy and development are not consistent • Shows basic understanding of sources but does not critically evaluate them • Incorporates few or no scholarly references
Points Range:22.88 (22.88%) - 28.12 (28.12%)
• Analysis explains how the evidence supports the topic in most cases • Analysis reflects insight but is not fully developed • Incorporates many course concepts but sometimes does not develop them • Shows careful reading of sources but little or no critical evaluation • Incorporates adequate or minimum number of scholarly references to support analysis
Points Range:28.12 (28.12%) - 30 (30%)
• Analysis shows a strong relationship between the evidence and the topic • Analysis is insightful and original • Incorporates course concepts accurately, consistently, and frequently • Critically evaluates sources • Incorporates numerous or more than the minimum number of scholarly references required to support analysis
DAS-U-Style and mechanics
Points Range:0 (0%) - 11.5 (11.5%)
• Contains spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors, so understanding is difficult • Contains numerous awkward or ungrammatical sentences, and sentence structure is simple or monotonous • Misuses words, or uses words that.
Similar to BUSI 511Research Project (Final Document Draft) Grading Rubric ( (18)
Criteria Ratings PointsContentThesis andIntroduction
Criteria Ratings PointsContentThesis andIntroduction
Recording Audio In PowerPoint1. With the PowerPoint presenta.docx
Recording Audio In PowerPoint1. With the PowerPoint presenta.docx
Research PaperInstructionsThe report will be a paper of fr.docx
Research PaperInstructionsThe report will be a paper of fr.docx
Research or Interview Paper Grading Rubric CriteriaLevels of.docx
Research or Interview Paper Grading Rubric CriteriaLevels of.docx
1. Citation Written in APA format. For more help.docx
1. Citation Written in APA format. For more help.docx
Historical and Contemporary Perspectives Essay (15 points) – due
Historical and Contemporary Perspectives Essay (15 points) – due
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. Wha
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. Wha
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. Wha
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. Wha
1. what is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. wha
1. what is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. wha
Operating Budget WorksheetHCR405 Version 111University of.docx
Operating Budget WorksheetHCR405 Version 111University of.docx
HSCO 511Support Group Paper Grading RubricCriteriaAdvanced
HSCO 511Support Group Paper Grading RubricCriteriaAdvanced
DirectionsThe first step in this research process is to choose a.docx
DirectionsThe first step in this research process is to choose a.docx
PHSC 210Comparative Essay Grading RubricCriteriaLevels of Ac.docx
PHSC 210Comparative Essay Grading RubricCriteriaLevels of Ac.docx
Strategic Management Course The report should includ.docx
Strategic Management Course The report should includ.docx
Grading Rubric for Research PaperLevel 2 - Level 1 - Level 3 .docx
Grading Rubric for Research PaperLevel 2 - Level 1 - Level 3 .docx
Informative EssayStudents write an informative essay that incr.docx
Informative EssayStudents write an informative essay that incr.docx
More from VannaSchrader3
Topic that identifies characteristics of Native American Culture and.docx
Topic that identifies characteristics of Native American Culture and how it influences/contributes to contemporary cultures and/or what factors have changed perspective regarding Native American cultural practices.
resources cited, at least 3 of any format.
Cover Page.
Minimun 4 page (excluding reference and cover).
MLA formet with proper work cited on the last page
12/ Times/ Double Spacing.
.
Topic Stem Cell ResearchAPA Format I need these topics. don.docx
Topic: Stem Cell Research
APA Format
I need these topics. don't add other contents
Table of contents:
1. Overview of stem cell research -
1 Page
2. Embryonic Stem Cells -
2 Pages
3. Adult Stem Cells -
2 Pages
4. Legal issues - 1 Page
5. Conclusion- It should be a strong conclusion
References:
Use 3 Journal Articles or newspaper articles and 2 Internet site. for example .edu, .org, .gov.
another 2 references from the academically approved books.
see for more info and references in the document
.
Topic Styles of PolicingYou are a patrol officer in a middle- to .docx
Topic: Styles of Policing
You are a patrol officer in a middle- to lower-class community, which is a suburb of a much larger metropolitan city. During the past 6 months, you have noticed an increase in what might be the beginning of gang activity in your community. You have begun to see gang-style graffiti painted on walls, buildings, and street signs. You have noticed that more young adults are gathering on street corners and appear to be dressing in clothing often associated with gang involvement. While no gang violence has occurred yet, you suspect it is not far away.
As discussed in your text, there are three distinct styles of policing. They are the watchman style, the legalistic style, and the service style.
In a single posting, describe in detail how you would address this growing problem using
each
of the policing styles listed above. Explain which approach is best, using research to substantiate your postings, citing your sources following APA format
.
Topic the legalization of same sex adoptionThese same sex adopti.docx
Topic: the legalization of same sex adoption
These: same sex adoption should be legalized and be accepted by the public
attrachments: draft and suggestions from the professor
Develop this 8 pages draft to be a 15 pages final paper
APA style, double spaced, use 10 peer-review journals as sources
.
TOPIC The Truth About Caffeine3 pages,give some statistics of neg.docx
TOPIC/ The Truth About Caffeine
3 pages,give some statistics of negative effects of caffeine
the guides to follow:
topic:
Specific Purpose:to inform ....
Introduction:(discovering +history)
Body:
I like here to give some general info about caffeine and explain the negetive effects.
conclusion:
.
Topic Media Example (article)1) as usual, do an analysis of the.docx
Topic: Media Example (article)
1) as usual, do an analysis of the logic of the article on Religion which you choose:What is the : claim, premises, whether the argument in the article is valid or sound.
2) THEN, construct FOUR valid Formal Logic argument, using information from the article. One of each of the following forms must be included:
a) Modus Ponens
b) Modus Tollens
c) Chain Argument
d) Disjunctive Argument
please link me to the essay
Pages:
1, Double spaced
.
Topic Servant LeadershipThread In our reading we explored th.docx
Topic: Servant Leadership
Thread:
In our reading we explored the concept of servant leadership. Blanchard and Hodges present Jesus Christ as the ultimate example of the servant leader, and with good cause. But consider other servant leaders found in Scripture, too, and then answer the following questions: What biblical leader would you select as another good example of a servant leader? Why? How did this leader reflect principles from both Northouse’s description and Blanchard & Hodge’s description of a servant leader?
300-500 word discussion board with APA in text citation using at least three professional sources. class text leadership theory and practice by peter g. northhouse and lead like jesus by ken blanchard and phil hodges
.
Topic Organization of Law Enforcement AgenciesDo you agree or d.docx
Topic:
Organization of Law Enforcement Agencies
Do you agree or disagree with the paramilitary style of organization of most law enforcement agencies? Defend your position. You must use current APA style. You must cite 1 scholarly-quality internet-based source/reference and 1 biblical source/reference to support your answer. Both sources must offer a specific connection to the discussion topic.
.
Topic Parents Should have a license to have childrenaprox. 500 wo.docx
Topic: Parents Should have a license to have children
aprox. 500 words
Focus on these three points
1. Childrens safety, health and happines
2. What makes a responsible parent
3.What determines a competent parent from an incompetent parent
-Include a citation page if using statistical data
.
Topic PATIENT DATA PRIVACYPerformance Improvement plan Proper an.docx
Topic: PATIENT DATA PRIVACY
Performance Improvement plan: Proper and Intense training of employees
Success of the Performance Improvement Plan
A. If this initiative is successful, what would be the financial implications for the healthcare organization?
B. How would the existing information management systems contribute to the success of your proposal?
C. What organizational processes will permit continued viability of the performance improvement initiative, if it is successful?
D. Analyze interdepartmental communication that would be necessary for continued engagement in the proposed initiative.
1.5-2 pages. APA format with references please
thank you
.
Topic Kelly’s Personal ConstructsQuestionPrompt Analyze th.docx
Topic:
Kelly’s Personal Constructs
Question/Prompt:
Analyze the 4 common elements in most human disturbance according to Kelly (threat, fear, anxiety, and guilt). Compare each of these constructs with what Scripture says regarding these particular elements.
Answer must be 300+ words and contain 2 references.
.
Topic Fingerprints.Study fingerprinting in the textbook and res.docx
Topic: Fingerprints.
Study fingerprinting in the textbook and research and discuss the topic including
–but not limited to–
fingerprint history, types and different methods used to develop and preserve prints.
In addition, research and discuss Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS).
Due Sunday
.
Topic is Domestic Violence, Both men and women being the abus.docx
Topic is:
Domestic Viole
nce
, Both men and women being the abuser
Ask a question: Identify an issue of concern or personal curiosity relating to your profession.
Identify two bodies of knowledge: Which two disciplines will be used to help answer the question?
Example: History and Sociology
Conduct a literature review: What research has been done to help answer this question?
Hint #1: Make notes in the center column (see below) as resources are identified and read.
Hint #2: Compile an annotated bibliography as you find information as this will help you keep your sources organized and references correct.
Bringing It Together: Discuss the question extensively using information from the middle column above.
Conclusion: End the discussion with a conclusion—answer the question! Please note, there are two parts to the conclusion:
Part #1: Answer your question and discuss how (if) your personal views have changed based on what you’ve learned.
Part #2: Discuss how you plan to build on this knowledge going forward.
.
Topic is regional integration .First You need to find article and re.docx
Topic is regional integration .First You need to find article and resources which is related with this topic. you should write three pages about this article, resources and topic
I told assignment's structure in link that is why please check the link(file)
my native language is not English that is why if you use more simple words in assignment, it will be better
.
Topic Human Trafficking in relation to US Border and Coastal securi.docx
Topic: Human Trafficking in relation to US Border and Coastal security.
You are to prepare your paper in a word document (Times New Roman, Font 12-double space) using APA style format ("Resources" and APA info attached below). Your research paper should be
10-12 pages of content excluding your title page and reference page
. A minimum of 1
0 outside references required.
.
Topic is AutonomyShort papers should use double spacing, 12-point .docx
Topic is Autonomy
Short papers should use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to a discipline-appropriate citation method. Page-length requirements: 1–2 pages,
APA format and properly cited.
Will be cheched for originality through Turn it in.
.
Topic Genetic connection of hypertension to cardiovascular disease .docx
Topic: Genetic connection of hypertension to cardiovascular disease in african americans?
Needs to be specific and to address better current health disparities in specific population groups as well as the prevention of selected public health issue. Clearly and properly present the material by using relevant scientific information, statistical data, and research-based evidence from identified credible external sources.
Length: The written component of this assignment should be a minimum of 8 double-spaced pages.
References: At least
eight
references
must be included from
scholarly sources
. Quoted materialsshould not exceed 10% of the total paper (since the focus of these assignments is critical thinking). Use your own words and build on the ideas of others. Materials copied verbatim from external sources must be enclosed in quotation marks. In-text reference citations are required as well as a list of references at the end of the assignment. (APA format is required.)
Organization: Subheadings should be used to organize your paper according to the questions.
Format: APA format is required for this assignment.
I have attached the annotated bibliography with sources to be used as well as an outline for reference on how to structure the paper.
.
topic Errors (medication or patient injury)in particular stra.docx
topic: Errors (medication or patient injury)
in particular strategies for reducing medication errors
Guidelines:
Guideli
n
es
f
o
r Top
i
c
S
ea
r
c
h
St
r
a
t
egy
P
aper
T
h
e
T
o
p
ic
S
e
a
rch
S
tra
t
e
g
y
P
a
p
e
r ist
h
efi
r
st
o
f
three
r
e
l
at
e
d assi
g
n
me
n
tswhich are due in Unit 3. T
h
e
pu
r
p
o
se
o
ft
h
is i
n
itial
p
a
p
e
r is
t
o
b
r
i
e
fly
d
e
scri
b
e
y
o
u
r
s
e
arch
s
tra
te
g
i
e
sw
h
e
ni
d
e
n
tif
y
i
n
gt
w
oar
t
iclest
h
at
p
e
r
t
aintoan
ev
i
d
e
n
c
e
-
b
as
e
d
p
ra
c
ticet
op
ic
o
f i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
.
C
O
U
RS
E
O
U
TC
O
M
E
S
T
h
i
sa
ss
i
gn
m
entena
b
l
es
th
e
s
tud
e
nt
t
o
m
eetthe
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
ng
c
o
u
rs
eo
u
t
c
o
m
e
s
.
CO
1
:
E
xa
m
i
n
et
h
es
o
u
r
ces
o
f k
n
o
w
l
e
dg
et
h
at
c
o
n
tri
bu
te
t
o
p
r
o
f
e
ss
i
o
n
al
nu
rsi
n
g
p
ractic
e
.(
P
O
#
7
)
CO
2
:
App
ly
r
e
s
e
a
r
ch
p
ri
n
c
i
p
l
e
s
t
ot
h
ei
n
t
e
r
p
r
e
tat
i
o
n
o
f t
h
e
c
o
n
t
e
n
t
o
f
pub
lis
h
e
d
r
e
s
e
archst
ud
i
e
s.(
P
Os
#
4
and#
8
)
D
U
E
D
A
TE
Re
f
erto
the
c
ou
rs
e
c
a
l
en
d
ar
f
ordue
d
ate.
T
he
c
o
l
l
eg
e
’
s
L
ate
A
ss
i
gn
m
entp
o
li
c
y
a
pp
li
estot
h
i
sa
c
t
iv
i
t
y
.
P
OI
N
T
S
P
OSSI
B
L
E
T
h
is assi
gnm
e
n
tis
w
o
r
t
h
1
5
0
p
o
i
n
t
s
.T
h
e
c
o
lle
g
e
’s
L
a
t
e
A
ssi
gnm
e
n
t
p
o
licya
pp
li
e
stot
h
is a
c
ti
v
i
t
y
.
R
EQ
U
IRE
M
E
N
T
S
Y
o
u
will be assigned a group in unit 2 (located in the team collaboration tab) to formulate an
ev
i
d
e
n
c
e
-
b
as
e
d
p
ra
c
ticet
op
ic
o
f i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
that will be used to complete the unit 3 and unit 5 independent assignments, as well as the group PowerPoint presentation in unit 7.
T
hepaperw
i
l
l
i
n
c
l
u
de
t
he
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
ng.
a.
C
l
i
n
i
c
a
l
Q
u
e
s
t
i
on
a.
De
scr
i
bep
r
o
b
l
em
b.
Si
g
n
i
f
i
c
an
c
eof p
r
o
b
l
em
i
n
t
e
r
m
sof out
c
o
m
esor
s
tat
i
s
t
ic
s
c.
Y
our
P
IC
O
Tque
s
t
i
on
i
n
s
u
ppo
r
tof t
h
eg
r
o
up
t
op
i
c
d.
P
u
r
po
s
eof
y
o
urp
a
per
b.
Le
v
e
l
sof
E
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
a.
T
y
peof que
s
t
i
ona
s
k
ed
b.
B
e
s
t
e
v
i
den
c
e
f
oundto
a
n
s
werque
s
t
i
o
n
c.
S
ea
rc
h
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
a.
S
ea
rc
h
t
e
r
m
s
b.
Data
b
a
s
esu
s
ed
(y
ou
m
a
yu
s
e
G
oo
g
l
e
S
c
h
o
l
ar
i
n ad
d
i
t
i
onto
t
he
li
b
r
a
r
y
d
at
a
ba
s
e
s;
s
ta
r
tw
i
th the
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
)
c.
Re
f
i
ne
m
entde
c
i
si
ons
m
ade
d.
Iden
t
i
f
i
c
at
i
onof two
m
o
s
t
r
e
l
e
v
a
n
ta
r
t
i
c
l
es
d.
F
o
r
m
at
a.
Co
rr
e
c
tg
r
a
m
m
arand
s
pe
l
l
i
ng
b.
U
s
eof hea
d
i
n
gs
f
orea
c
h
s
e
c
t
i
on
c.
U
s
eof
A
P
A
f
o
r
m
at
(
sixthed
i
t
i
on)
d.
P
a
g
e
l
en
g
th:three to fourp
a
ges
P
RE
P
A
RIN
G
T
H
E
P
AP
E
R
1.
Pl
e
a
s
e
m
a
k
e
s
u
r
e
y
o
udo
n
otd
u
p
l
i
c
atea
r
t
i
cl
es
w
i
t
h
i
n
y
ourg
r
o
u
p.
2.
P
a
p
er
s
ho
u
l
d
i
n
cl
udea
t
i
t
l
epa
g
e
a
nda
r
e
f
e
r
en
c
e
p
a
g
e.
D
IRE
CT
I
O
N
S
AN
D
A
S
SIG
N
M
E
N
T
C
R
I
T
ERIA
A
s
s
i
g
nme
n
t
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
P
o
i
n
t
s
%
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
on
Cli
n
ic
a
lQ
ue
s
t
i
o
n
45
30
1
..
Topic differences between folk guitar and classic guitar.Minimu.docx
Topic: differences between folk guitar and classic guitar.
Minimum of 1500 words. Double-spaced. Cite ALL sources appropriately. Use MLA or APA (or any other accepted publication) for citation standards.
This is a research paper. Do not plagiarize materials. Use quotes and cite other people's work whenever it is appropriate. Do your best to be creative and original with your writing style rather than "regurgitate" information to me. You may be as creative as you like (graphics, photos, audio) as long as your paper is concise, has proper flow and informs me of something about the guitar.
.
Topic Death Investigations. Review homicide investigation as de.docx
Topic: Death Investigations.
Review homicide investigation as described in the textbook and through research including
–but not limited to–
types of wrongful deaths, the preliminary investigation, dying declaration, estimating time of death, gunshot wounds, autoerotic death investigation, and suicide investigation.
Submit to the Dropbox before midnight
Sunday
.
.
More from VannaSchrader3 (20)
Topic that identifies characteristics of Native American Culture and.docx
Topic that identifies characteristics of Native American Culture and.docx
Topic Stem Cell ResearchAPA Format I need these topics. don.docx
Topic Stem Cell ResearchAPA Format I need these topics. don.docx
Topic Styles of PolicingYou are a patrol officer in a middle- to .docx
Topic Styles of PolicingYou are a patrol officer in a middle- to .docx
Topic the legalization of same sex adoptionThese same sex adopti.docx
Topic the legalization of same sex adoptionThese same sex adopti.docx
TOPIC The Truth About Caffeine3 pages,give some statistics of neg.docx
TOPIC The Truth About Caffeine3 pages,give some statistics of neg.docx
Topic Media Example (article)1) as usual, do an analysis of the.docx
Topic Media Example (article)1) as usual, do an analysis of the.docx
Topic Servant LeadershipThread In our reading we explored th.docx
Topic Servant LeadershipThread In our reading we explored th.docx
Topic Organization of Law Enforcement AgenciesDo you agree or d.docx
Topic Organization of Law Enforcement AgenciesDo you agree or d.docx
Topic Parents Should have a license to have childrenaprox. 500 wo.docx
Topic Parents Should have a license to have childrenaprox. 500 wo.docx
Topic PATIENT DATA PRIVACYPerformance Improvement plan Proper an.docx
Topic PATIENT DATA PRIVACYPerformance Improvement plan Proper an.docx
Topic Kelly’s Personal ConstructsQuestionPrompt Analyze th.docx
Topic Kelly’s Personal ConstructsQuestionPrompt Analyze th.docx
Topic Fingerprints.Study fingerprinting in the textbook and res.docx
Topic Fingerprints.Study fingerprinting in the textbook and res.docx
Topic is Domestic Violence, Both men and women being the abus.docx
Topic is Domestic Violence, Both men and women being the abus.docx
Topic is regional integration .First You need to find article and re.docx
Topic is regional integration .First You need to find article and re.docx
Topic Human Trafficking in relation to US Border and Coastal securi.docx
Topic Human Trafficking in relation to US Border and Coastal securi.docx
Topic is AutonomyShort papers should use double spacing, 12-point .docx
Topic is AutonomyShort papers should use double spacing, 12-point .docx
Topic Genetic connection of hypertension to cardiovascular disease .docx
Topic Genetic connection of hypertension to cardiovascular disease .docx
topic Errors (medication or patient injury)in particular stra.docx
topic Errors (medication or patient injury)in particular stra.docx
Topic differences between folk guitar and classic guitar.Minimu.docx
Topic differences between folk guitar and classic guitar.Minimu.docx
Topic Death Investigations. Review homicide investigation as de.docx
Topic Death Investigations. Review homicide investigation as de.docx
Recently uploaded
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit - NGV Pavilion Concept Design
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama UniversityAkanksha trivedi rama nursing college kanpur.
Natural birth techniques are various type such as/ water birth , alexender method, hypnosis, bradley method, lamaze method etcHow to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
Hindi varnamala | hindi alphabet PPT.pdf
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
BBR 2024 Summer Sessions Interview Training
Qualitative research interview training by Professor Katrina Pritchard and Dr Helen Williams
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar KanvariaCommunity pharmacy- Social and preventive pharmacy UNIT 5
Covered community pharmacy topic of the subject Social and preventive pharmacy for Diploma and Bachelor of pharmacy
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Aberdeen
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptxMohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
DRUGS AND ITS classification slide share
Any substance (other than food) that is used to prevent, diagnose, treat, or relieve symptoms of a
disease or abnormal condition
Recently uploaded (20)
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Community pharmacy- Social and preventive pharmacy UNIT 5
Community pharmacy- Social and preventive pharmacy UNIT 5
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
BUSI 511Research Project (Final Document Draft) Grading Rubric (
- 1. BUSI 511 Research Project (Final Document Draft) Grading Rubric (60 Points) Criteria Levels of Achievement Total Points Content 70% Advanced Proficient Developing Not Present Abstract 6 points Points: 6 · All required information is included. · No extraneous information is included; formatting is correct. Points: 5 · All required information is included. · Some extraneous information is included; formatting is correct. Points: 1 to 4 · Some required information is included. · Extraneous information is included; formatting is not correct. Points: 0 · Not Present Introduction 6 points Points: 6 · Background information is engaging and leads to a clear purpose/thesis statement. · Relevance to course/topic is articulated well.
- 2. · Research question(s) or purpose statement is clear and concise. · Two or 3 main discussion points of the literature review are clearly identified in the purpose statement. Points: 5 · Background information is at times unclear or uninteresting. · Relevance to course/topic could be more clearly articulated. · Research question(s) or purpose statement could be stated more clearly and concisely. · Main discussion points could be more clearly articulated. Points: 1 to 4 · Background information is not clearly articulated. · Relevance to course/topic is unclear. · Research question(s) or purpose statement is unidentifiable. · Main discussion points are not identified in the purpose statement. Points: 0 · Not Present Content 6 points Points: 6 · Thorough comparison and contrast of findings are provided and relate to the main discussion points in the order of their appearance in the purpose statement. · Focus is on research findings. · Gaps and controversies that exist in the literature are clearly discussed. Points: 5 · Comparison and contrast of the findings are provided but lack thoroughness. · Discussion of findings could relate better to the main discussion points in the purpose statement. · Gaps and controversies in the literature are discussed, but clarity could be enhanced. Points: 1 to 4
- 3. · Comparison and contrast of findings are lacking. · Discussion of findings does not relate well to the main discussion points in the purpose statement. · Gaps (what is unknown and needs to be researched) and controversies that exist in the literature are not discussed. Points: 0 · Not Present Conclusion 6 points Points: 6 · A summary of the main points is clearly articulated. · Implications or conclusions related to business practice(s) are logical, relevant, and clear. · Areas of future research are clearly identified. Points: 5 · A summary of the main points is presented, but clarity could be enhanced. · Implications or conclusions related to business practice(s) are included but lack logic, relevance, or clarity. · Areas of future research are identified but lack clarity. Points: 1 to 4 · A summary of the main points is not clearly presented. · Implications or conclusions related to business practice(s) are absent, illogical, irrelevant, or unclear. · Areas of future research are not identified. Points: 0 · Not Present Word Count 6 points Points: 6 · The word count is 4,500–6,000. Points: 5 · The word count is 2,000–4,499. Points: 1 to 4
- 4. · The word count is 1–1,999. Points: 0 · Not Present References (Number of Sources Utilized) 6 points Points: 6 · A total of 20 or more scholarly articles from peer-reviewed sources is included. Points: 5 A total of 15–19 more scholarly articles from peer-reviewed sources are included. Points: 1 to 4 · Less than 15 scholarly articles from peer-reviewed sources are included. Points: 0 · Not Present SafeAssign Score 6 points Points: 6 · Less than 10% match. Points: 5 · A match of 11–15 %. Points: 1 to 4 · More than 15% match. Points: 0 · Not Present Structure 30% Advanced Proficient Developing Not Present Title Page
- 5. 3 points Points: 3 · All required information is included. · No extraneous information is included. Points: 2 · All required information is included. · Some extraneous information is included. Points: 1 · Some required information is included. · Extraneous information is included. Points: 0 · Not Present Logical Flow 3 points Points: 3 · The reader is guided smoothly through the logically arranged paper. · Current APA level headings are used. · No headings are left alone at the bottom of a page. Points: 2 · The overall arrangement is logical but is occasionally difficult to follow. · A minor formatting error or 2 are noted in the headings. · No headings are left alone at the bottom of a page. Points: 1 · The arrangement of content is haphazard and difficult to follow. · Headings are not present or are formatted inappropriately. · One (or more) heading is alone at the bottom of a page. Points: 0 · Not Present Total Points /60 Font, Margins
- 6. and Spacing Points: 3 · Times New Roman or Arial is used. · A margin of 1 1/2 inch is used on the left border; margins of 1 inch are used on the top, right, and bottom borders. · Page number and page header are inserted at the top of each page. · Double-spacing is used between all lines. · There is only 1 space between sentences. · Paragraphs are indented 5 spaces. Points: 2 · Times New Roman or Arial is used through most of the document. · A margin of 1 1/2 inch is used on the left border; margins of 1 inch are used on the top, right, and bottom borders. · Page number and page header are absent or typed rather than inserted at the top of each page. · Double-spacing is used between most lines. · There is only 1 space between sentences. · Paragraphs are indented 5 spaces. Points: 1 · Times New Roman or Arial is not used. · A margin of 1 1/2 inch is not used on the left border; margins of 1 inch are not used on the top, right, and bottom borders. · Page number and page header are absent or typed rather than inserted at the top of each page. · Double-spacing is not used consistently between lines. · There is often more than 1 space between sentences. · Paragraphs are not indented 5 spaces. Points: 0
- 7. · Not Present References (Formatting) Points: 4 · Proper formatting is used throughout the reference list. · Each reference has a matching citation(s). Points: 3 · A minor formatting error or 2 are noted in the reference list. · Each reference has a matching citation(s). Points: 1 to 2 · Multiple formatting errors occurred in the reference list. · One or more reference does not have a matching citation. Points: 0 · Not Present Spelling/Grammar Points: 5 · Spelling and grammar are correct. Points: 4 · Spelling and grammar are mostly correct with only 1–2 errors noted. Points: 1 to 3 · Spelling and grammar require further review with 3–6 errors noted. Points: 0 · Not Present BUSI 511 Research Project - Draft Instructions Using your research and Outline, your group will work collaboratively on the Draft of the 4,500–6,000-word paper, complying with the formatting and content instructions below. Format
- 8. · 4,500–6,000 words, double-spaced, not including title and reference pages · Times New Roman, 12-point font · Left justified · One-inch margins · Current APA format · Numbered pages · At least 20 scholarly articles from peer-reviewed journals, each less than 10 years old · Block quotations for any quotes more than 40 words: · Single-spaced with a double space separating quotes · Indented 5 spaces from the left margin · No quotation marks · Reference page in current APA format including active URL links · Single spacing between references and double spacing within the reference Content · A title page that includes: · “Running head:” and page number (right aligned) · Course number and name · Case name · Group number and all group member names · Date submitted · “Respectfully submitted to: (Instructor’s Name)” · Abstract (in block format) · Content of your topic and/or paper (review the associated grading rubric) · Use concepts from the textbook that are related to your topic, including page numbers where the concepts may be found. Credit will only be earned for concepts supported by page numbers from the textbook. (Essentially, this is accomplished through integration of the relevant course content, using
- 9. properly formatted, current APA citations.) · Use in-text citations in current APA format to credit sources listed in the reference list as appropriate. · Conclusion · References Plagiarism Plagiarism will not be tolerated. Plagiarism commonly occurs when the student utilizes an author’s words without properly attributing the source. All sources must be referenced. No cutting and pasting or copying is appropriate unless quoting. Purchasing papers of any form will result in automatic failure for the course and a recommendation for expulsion. One group member must submit this assignment by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 5. Page 2 of 2