SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Flexible Budgets, Standard
Costs, and Variance Analysis
CHAPTER 9
Introduction to
Managerial Accounting
Ninth edition
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
9-2
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Variance Analysis Cycle
9-3
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Learning Objective 1
Prepare a planning
budget and
a flexible budget
with one cost driver.
9-4
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
A planning budget is prepared for a single,
planned level of activity.
Performance evaluation is difficult when
actual activity differs from the planned level
of activity.
Comparing static planning budgets with
actual costs is like comparing apples and
oranges.
Planning Budget
9-5
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
A flexible budget is an estimate of what
revenues and costs should have been, given the
actual level of activity for the period.
Flexible budgets:
 May be prepared for any activity level in the
relevant range.
 Enable “apples to apples” cost comparisons.
 Help managers control costs.
 Help evaluate managerial performance.
Flexible Budget
9-6
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Larry’s Lawn Service provides lawn care in a
planned community where all lawns are
approximately the same size.
At the end of May, Larry prepared his June
budget based on mowing 500 lawns. Since all
of the lawns are similar in size, Larry felt that
the number of lawns mowed in a month would
be the best way to measure overall activity for
his business.
Illustrating the Deficiencies of
the Static Planning Budget
9-7
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Static Budget:
Larry’s Lawn Service Budget
Larry’s Planning Budget – 500 lawns
Variable
Costs
Mixed
Costs
Fixed
Costs
9-8
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Static Budget:
Larry’s Lawn Service Actual Results
Larry’s Actual Results – 550 lawns
9-9
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Static Budget:
Comparing Actual to Budget
COPYRIGHT © 2022 MCGRAW-HILL EDUCATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
NO REPRODUCTION OR DISTRIBUTION WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN
CONSENT OF MCGRAW-HILL EDUCATION.
Larry’s Actual Compared with Budget: 500 vs. 550 lawns
9-10
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Static Budget: Computing Variances
Larry’s Actual Compared with Budget: 500 vs. 550 lawns
F = Favorable variance that occurs when
actual costs are less than budgeted costs.
U = Unfavorable variance that occurs when
actual costs are greater than budgeted costs.
F = Favorable variance that occurs when actual
revenue is greater than budgeted revenue.
9-11
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Static Budget: Variance Deficiencies
Larry’s Actual Compared with Budget: 500 vs. 550 lawns
Since these variances are unfavorable, has
Larry done a poor job controlling costs?
Since these variances are favorable, has
Larry done a good job controlling costs?
9-12
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
We cannot answer the questions using a
static budget.
Actual activity is above planned activity.
Static Planning Budget:
Problems
9-13
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
The relevant question is . . .
“How much of the cost variances are
due to higher activity and how much
are due to cost control?”
To answer the question, we must flex the
budget to the actual level of activity.
Static Planning Budget: Flex
Budget
9-14
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
To flex a budget, we need to know that:
◦Total variable costs change
in direct proportion to
changes in activity.
◦Total fixed costs remain
unchanged within the
relevant range.
How a Flexible Budget Works
Fixed
fixed
9-15
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Flexible Budget: Larry’s Lawn Service
Larry’s Flexible Budget
9-16
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
What should the total wages and salaries cost
be in a flexible budget for 600 lawns?
A. $18,000
B. $20,000
C. $23,000
D. $25,000
Concept Check 1
9-17
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
What should be the total wages and salaries
cost in a flexible budget for 600 lawns?
A. $18,000
B. $20,000
C. $23,000
D. $25,000
Total wages and salaries cost
= $5,000 + ($30 per lawn  600 lawns)
= $5,000 + $18,000 = $23,000
Concept Check 1a
9-18
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Learning Objective 2
Calculate and interpret
revenue and spending
variances.
9-19
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Revenue and Spending Variances
Actual revenue Flexible budget revenue
The difference is a revenue variance.
Flexible budget cost
The difference is a spending variance.
Actual cost
9-20
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Let’s use flexible budgeting concepts to
compute revenue and spending variances
for Larry’s Lawn Service.
Computing Revenue and
Spending Variances
9-21
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Revenue Variances
Larry’s Flexible Budget Compared with the Actual Results
Revenue Variance
$1,750 favorable
9-22
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Larry’s Flexible Budget Compared with the Actual Results
Spending Variances
Spending Variances
$1,950 unfavorable
total
9-23
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Learning Objective 3
Prepare
a planning budget
and a flexible budget
with more than
one cost driver.
9-24
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
More than one cost driver may be needed to
adequately explain all of the costs in an
organization.
The cost formulas used to prepare a flexible
budget can be adjusted to recognize
multiple cost drivers.
Planning and Flexible Budgets:
Multiple Cost Drivers
9-25
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Larry’s Lawn Service will also provide an
edging and trimming service to his customers
at $30 per hour. He estimates that he will
provide 100 hours of this service.
Because the revenue earned from and time
required for edging and trimming is different for
different lawns, Larry decided to add an
additional cost driver (hours).
Let’s look at Larry’s new planning and flexible
budgets.
Planning and Flexible Budgets:
Multiple Cost Drivers
9-26
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Planning Budgets with Multiple Cost
Drivers: Larry’s Lawn Service
Larry’s Planning Budget Based on More than One Cost Driver
9-27
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Flexible Budgets with Multiple Cost
Drivers: Larry’s Lawn Service
Larry’s Flexible Budget Based on More than One Cost Driver
9-28
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Standards are benchmarks or “norms” for
measuring performance. In managerial
accounting, two types of standards are
commonly used.
◦Quantity standards specify how much of
an input should be used to make a product
or provide a service.
◦Price standards specify how much should
be paid for each unit of the input.
Standard Costs
9-29
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Setting Direct Materials Standards
Standard Price
per Unit
Summarized in
a Bill of
Materials
Final, delivered
cost of materials,
net of discounts
Standard Quantity
per Unit
9-30
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Setting Direct Labor Standards
Use time and
motion studies for
each labor operation
Standard Hours
per Unit
Often a single
rate is used that
reflects
the mix of wages
earned
Standard Rate
per Hour
9-31
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Setting Variable Manufacturing
Overhead Standards
The rate is the
variable portion of
the
predetermined
overhead
rate.
Price
Standard
The quantity is
the activity in the
allocation base for
predetermined
overhead.
Quantity
Standard
9-32
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
The Standard Cost Card
A standard cost card for one unit of product
might look like this:
A A x B
Standard Standard Standard
Quantity Price Cost
Inputs or Hours or Rate per Unit
Direct materials 3.0 lbs. 4.00
$ per lb. 12.00
$
Direct labor 2.5 hours 14.00 per hour 35.00
Variable mfg. overhead 2.5 hours 3.00 per hour 7.50
Total standard unit cost 54.50
$
B
9-33
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Standard costs per unit for
direct materials, direct labor, and
variable manufacturing overhead
can be used to compute spending variances.
However, spending variances become
more useful by breaking them down into
price and quantity variances.
Standard costs can be used to decompose
a spending variance into
its price and quantity components.
Breaking Down Spending
Variances
9-34
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
General Model for Variances
Variance Analysis
Quantity Variance
Difference between
actual quantity and
standard quantity
Price Variance
Difference between
actual price and
standard price
9-35
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Price and quantity standards are determined
separately for two reasons:
1. Different managers are usually responsible for
buying and using inputs. For example, the
purchasing manager is responsible for raw
material purchase prices and the production
manager is responsible for the quantity of raw
material used.
2. The buying and using activities occur at different
times. Raw material purchases may be held in
inventory for a period of time before being used in
production.
Price and Quantity Standards
9-36
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
General Model for Price and Quantity
Variances – An Overview
Variance Analysis
Quantity Variance
Materials quantity variance
Labor efficiency variance
VOH efficiency variance
Price Variance
Materials price variance
Labor rate variance
VOH rate variance
9-37
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
A General Model for Variance Analysis:
Formulas
Price Variance
(1) − (2)
Quantity Variance
(2) − (3)
(2)
Actual Quantity
of Input,
at Standard Price
(AQ × SP)
(1)
Actual Quantity
of Input,
at Actual Price
(AQ × AP)
Spending Variance
(1) − (3)
(3)
Standard Quantity
Allowed for Actual Output,
at Standard Price
(SQ × SP)
9-38
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
A General Model: Actual Quantity
Price Variance
(1) − (2)
Quantity Variance
(2) − (3)
(3)
Standard Quantity
Allowed for Actual Output,
at Standard Price
(SQ × SP)
(2)
Actual Quantity
of Input,
at Standard Price
(AQ × SP)
(1)
Actual Quantity
of Input,
at Actual Price
(AQ × AP)
Spending Variance
(1) − (3)
Actual quantity is the amount of direct materials, direct
labor, and variable manufacturing overhead actually used.
(The quantities pertain to input items.)
9-39
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
A General Model: Standard Quantity
Standard quantity is the standard quantity allowed
for the actual output of the period.
Price Variance
(1) − (2)
Quantity Variance
(2) − (3)
(3)
Standard Quantity
Allowed for Actual Output,
at Standard Price
(SQ × SP)
(2)
Actual Quantity
of Input,
at Standard Price
(AQ × SP)
(1)
Actual Quantity
of Input,
at Actual Price
(AQ × AP)
Spending Variance
(1) − (3)
9-40
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
A General Model: Actual Price
Actual price is the amount actually
paid for the input used.
Price Variance
(1) − (2)
Quantity Variance
(2) − (3)
(3)
Standard Quantity
Allowed for Actual Output,
at Standard Price
(SQ × SP)
(2)
Actual Quantity
of Input,
at Standard Price
(AQ × SP)
(1)
Actual Quantity
of Input,
at Actual Price
(AQ × AP)
Spending Variance
(1) − (3)
9-41
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
A General Model: Standard Price
Standard price is the amount that should
have been paid for the input used.
Price Variance
(1) − (2)
Quantity Variance
(2) − (3)
(3)
Standard Quantity
Allowed for Actual Output,
at Standard Price
(SQ × SP)
(2)
Actual Quantity
of Input,
at Standard Price
(AQ × SP)
(1)
Actual Quantity
of Input,
at Actual Price
(AQ × AP)
Spending Variance
(1) − (3)
9-42
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Learning Objective 4
Compute the
direct materials price
and quantity variances
and explain their
significance.
9-43
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Glacier Peak Outfitters has the following
direct materials standard for the fiberfill in its
mountain parka:
◦0.1 kg. of fiberfill per parka at $5.00 per
kg.
Last month 210 kgs. of fiberfill were
purchased and used to make 2,000 parkas.
The materials cost a total of $1,029.
Materials Variances – An
Example
9-44
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
210 kgs. 210 kgs. 200 kgs.
× × ×
$4.90 per kg. $5.00 per kg. $5.00 per kg.
= $1,029 = $1,050 = $1,000
Price variance
$21 favorable
Quantity variance
$50 unfavorable
Materials Variances Overall Summary
Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard Quantity
× × ×
Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price
9-45
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Materials Variances Summary:
Standard Quantity Computation
* 0.1 kg. per parka  2,000 parkas =
200 kgs.
210 kgs. 210 kgs. 200*
kgs.
× × ×
$4.90 per kg. $5.00 per kg. $5.00 per
kg.
= $1,029 = $1,050 = $1,000
Price variance
$21 favorable
Quantity variance
$50 unfavorable
Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard
Quantity
× × ×
Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price
9-46
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Materials Variances Summary:
Actual Price Computation
* $1,029  210 kgs. = $4.90 per
kg.
210 kgs. 210 kgs. 200 kgs.
× × ×
$4.90* per kg. $5.00 per kg. $5.00 per kg.
= $1,029 = $1,050 = $1,000
Price variance
$21 favorable
Quantity variance
$50 unfavorable
Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard
Quantity
× × ×
Actual Price Standard Price Standard
Price
9-47
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Materials Variances:
Using the Factored Equations
Materials price variance
MPV = (AQ × AP) − (AQ × SP)
= AQ(AP − SP)
= 210 kgs. ($4.90/kg. − $5.00/kg.)
= 210 kgs. (− $0.10/kg.) = $21 F
Materials quantity variance
MQV = (AQ × SP) − (SQ × SP)
= SP(AQ − SQ)
= $5.00/kg. (210 kgs. − (0.1 kg./parka  2,000
parkas))
= $5.00/kg. (210 kgs. − 200 kgs.)
= $5.00/kg. (10 kgs.) = $50 U
9-48
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Materials Price Variance
Materials Quantity Variance
Production Manager Purchasing Manager
The standard price is used to compute the quantity
variance so that the production manager is not held
responsible for the purchasing manager’s performance.
Responsibility for Materials Variances:
Price Variance
9-49
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
I am not responsible for
this unfavorable
materials
quantity variance.
You purchased cheap
material, so my people
had to use more of it.
Your poor scheduling
sometimes requires me to
rush order materials at a
higher price, causing
unfavorable price
variances.
Responsibility for Materials
Variances: Quantity Variance
Production Manager Purchasing Manager
9-50
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Hanson Inc. has the following direct materials
standard to manufacture one Zippy:
◦1.5 pounds per Zippy at $4.00 per
pound
Last week, 1,700 pounds of materials were
purchased and used to make 1,000 Zippies.
The materials cost a total of $6,630.
Concept Check 2
9-51
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
How many pounds of materials should
Hanson have used to make 1,000 Zippies?
A. 1,700 pounds
B. 1,500 pounds
C. 1,200 pounds
D. 1,000 pounds
Concept Check 2a
9-52
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
How many pounds of materials should
Hanson have used to make 1,000 Zippies?
A. 1,700 pounds
B. 1,500 pounds
C. 1,200 pounds
D. 1,000 pounds
Standard quantity 1,000 × 1.5 pounds per
Zippy = 1,500 pounds
Concept Check 2b
9-53
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Hanson’s materials quantity variance (MQV)
for the week was:
A. $170 unfavorable
B. $170 favorable
C. $800 unfavorable
D. $800 favorable
Concept Check 3
9-54
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Hanson’s materials quantity variance (MQV)
for the week was:
A. $170 unfavorable
B. $170 favorable
C. $800 unfavorable
D. $800 favorable
MQV = SP(AQ − SQ)
MQV = $4.00 (1,700 lbs. − 1,500 lbs.)
MQV = $800 unfavorable
Concept Check 3a
9-55
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Concept Check 3b
1,700 lbs. 1,700 lbs. 1,500 lbs.
× × ×
$3.90 per lb. $4.00 per lb. $4.00 per lb.
= $6,630 = $6,800 = $6,000
Quantity variance
$800 unfavorable
Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard Quantity
× × ×
Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price
9-56
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Hanson’s materials price variance (MPV) for
the week was:
A. $170 unfavorable
B. $170 favorable
C. $800 unfavorable
D. $800 favorable
Concept Check 4
9-57
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Hanson’s materials price variance (MPV) for
the week was:
A. $170 unfavorable.
B. $170 favorable.
C. $800 unfavorable.
D. $800 favorable.
MPV = AQ(AP − SP)
MPV = 1,700 lbs. × ($3.90 − 4.00)
MPV = $170 Favorable
Concept Check 4a
9-58
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Concept Check 4b
*Recall that the standard quantity for 1,000 Zippies is 1,000 × 1.5 pounds = 1,500
lbs.
1,700 lbs. 1,700 lbs. 1,500* lbs.
× × ×
$3.90 per lb. $4.00 per lb. $4.00 per lb.
= $6,630 = $6,800 = $6,000
Price variance
$170 favorable
Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard Quantity
× × ×
Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price
9-59
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Learning Objective 5
Compute the
direct labor rate and
efficiency variances
and explain
their significance.
9-60
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Glacier Peak Outfitters has the following
direct labor standard for its mountain
parka.
◦1.2 standard hours per parka at $10.00
per hour
Last month, employees actually worked
2,500 hours at a total labor cost of
$26,250 to make 2,000 parkas.
Labor Variances – An Example
9-61
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Rate variance
$1,250 unfavorable
Efficiency variance
$1,000 unfavorable
Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours
× × ×
Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate
Labor Variances Overall Summary
2,500 hours 2,500 hours 2,400 hours
× × ×
$10.50 per hour $10.00 per hour $10.00 per hour
= $26,250 = $25,000 = $24,000
9-62
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Labor Variances Summary: Standard
Hours Computation
*1.2 hours per parka  2,000 parkas = 2,400
hours
Rate variance
$1,250 unfavorable
Efficiency variance
$1,000 unfavorable
Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours
× × ×
Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate
2,500 hours 2,500 hours 2,400* hours
× × ×
$10.50 per hour $10.00 per hour $10.00 per hour
= $26,250 = $25,000 = $24,000
9-63
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Labor Variances Summary: Actual
Rate Computation
* $26,250  2,500 hours = $10.50 per
hour
Rate variance
$1,250 unfavorable
Efficiency variance
$1,000 unfavorable
Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours
× × ×
Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate
2,500 hours 2,500 hours 2,400 hours
× × ×
$10.50* per hour $10.00 per hour $10.00 per hour
= $26,250 = $25,000 = $24,000
9-64
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Labor Variances: Using the
Factored Equations
Labor rate variance
LRV = (AH × AR) − (AH × SR)
= AH (AR − SR)
= 2,500 hours ($10.50 per hour − $10.00 per hour)
= 2,500 hours ($0.50 per hour)
= $1,250 unfavorable
Labor efficiency variance
LEV = (AH × SR) − (SH × SR)
= SR (AH − SH)
= $10.00 per hour (2,500 hours − 2,400 hours)
= $10.00 per hour (100 hours)
= $1,000 unfavorable
9-65
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Responsibility for Labor Variances
Production Manager
Production managers are
usually held accountable
for labor variances
because they can
influence the
Mix of skill levels
assigned to work tasks.
Level of employee
motivation.
Quality of production
supervision.
Quality of training
provided to employees.
9-66
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
I am not responsible for
the unfavorable labor
efficiency variance!
You purchased cheap
material, so it took more
time to process it.
I think it took more time
to process the
materials because the
Maintenance
Department has poorly
maintained your
equipment.
Responsibility for Labor Variances:
Manager Responses
Maintenance Manager Purchasing Manager
9-67
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Hanson Inc. has the following direct labor
standard to manufacture one Zippy:
o 1.5 standard hours per Zippy at $12.00
per direct labor hour
Last week, 1,550 direct labor hours were
worked at a total labor cost of $18,910 to
make 1,000 Zippies.
Concept Checks 5 & 6
9-68
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Hanson’s labor rate variance (LRV) for the
week was:
A. $310 unfavorable
B. $310 favorable
C. $300 unfavorable
D. $300 favorable
Quick Check 5
9-69
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Hanson’s labor rate variance (LRV) for the
week was:
A. $310 unfavorable
B. $310 favorable
C. $300 unfavorable
D. $300 favorable
LRV = AH(AR − SR)
LRV = 1,550 hrs. ($12.20 − $12.00)
LRV = $310 unfavorable
Quick Check 5a
9-70
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Hanson’s labor efficiency variance (LEV) for
the week was:
A. $590 unfavorable
B. $590 favorable
C. $600 unfavorable
D. $600 favorable
Quick Check 6
9-71
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Hanson’s labor efficiency variance (LEV) for the
week was:
A. $590 unfavorable
B. $590 favorable
C. $600 unfavorable
D. $600 favorable
LEV = SR(AH − SH)
LEV = $12.00 (1,550 hrs. − 1,500 hrs.)
LEV = $600 unfavorable
Quick Check 6a
9-72
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Rate variance
$310 unfavorable
Efficiency variance
$600 unfavorable
1,550 hours 1,550 hours 1,500 hours
× × ×
$12.20 per hour $12.00 per hour $12.00 per hour
= $18,910 = $18,600 = $18,000
Quick Checks 5a & 6a
Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours
× × ×
Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate
9-73
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Learning Objective 6
Compute the
variable manufacturing
overhead rate
and efficiency variances
and explain
their significance.
9-74
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Glacier Peak Outfitters has the following
direct variable manufacturing overhead labor
standard for its mountain parka:
o 1.2 standard hours per parka at $4.00 per
hour
Last month, employees actually worked 2,500
hours to make 2,000 parkas. Actual variable
manufacturing overhead for the month was
$10,500.
Overhead Variances – An
Example
9-75
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
2,500 hours 2,500 hours 2,400 hours
× × ×
$4.20 per hour $4.00 per hour $4.00 per hour
= $10,500 = $10,000 = $9,600
Rate variance
$500 unfavorable
Efficiency variance
$400 unfavorable
Variable Manufacturing Overhead
Variances Overall Summary
Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours
× × ×
Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate
9-76
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Variable Manufacturing Overhead Variances
Summary: Standard Hours Computation
*1.2 hours per parka  2,000 parkas = 2,400
hours
2,500 hours 2,500 hours 2,400* hours
× × ×
$4.20 per hour $4.00 per hour $4.00 per hour
= $10,500 = $10,000 = $9,600
Rate variance
$500 unfavorable
Efficiency variance
$400 unfavorable
Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours
× × ×
Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate
9-77
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Variable Manufacturing Overhead Variances
Summary: Actual Rate Computation
*$10,500  2,500 hours = $4.20 per
hour
2,500 hours 2,500 hours 2,400 hours
× × ×
$4.20* per hour $4.00 per hour $4.00 per hour
= $10,500 = $10,000 = $9,600
Rate variance
$500 unfavorable
Efficiency variance
$400 unfavorable
Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours
× × ×
Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate
9-78
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Variable manufacturing overhead rate variance
VMRV = (AH × AR) − (AH − SR)
= AH(AR − SR)
= 2,500 hours ($4.20 per hour − $4.00 per hour)
= 2,500 hours ($0.20 per hour)
= $500 unfavorable
Variable manufacturing overhead efficiency variance
VMEV = (AH × SR) − (SH − SR) = SR(AH − SH)
= $4.00 per hour (2,500 hours − 2,400 hours)
= $4.00 per hour (100 hours)
= $400 unfavorable
Variable Manufacturing Overhead
Variances: Using Factored
Equations
9-79
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Hanson Inc. has the following variable
manufacturing overhead standard to
manufacture one Zippy:
o 1.5 standard hours per Zippy at $3.00 per
direct labor-hour
Last week, 1,550 hours were worked to make
1,000 Zippies, and $5,115 was spent for
variable manufacturing overhead.
Quick Checks 7 & 8
9-80
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Hanson’s rate variance (VMRV) for variable
manufacturing overhead for the week was:
A. $465 unfavorable
B. $400 favorable
C. $335 unfavorable
D. $300 favorable
Quick Check 7
9-81
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Hanson’s rate variance (VMRV) for variable
manufacturing overhead for the week was:
A. $465 unfavorable
B. $400 favorable
C. $335 unfavorable
D. $300 favorable
VMRV = AH(AR − SR)
VMRV = 1,550 hrs.($3.30 − $3.00)
VMRV = $465 unfavorable
Quick Check 7a
9-82
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Hanson’s efficiency variance (VMEV) for
variable manufacturing overhead for the week
was:
A. $435 unfavorable
B. $435 favorable
C. $150 unfavorable
D. $150 favorable
Quick Check 8
9-83
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Hanson’s efficiency variance (VMEV) for
variable manufacturing overhead for the week
was:
A. $435 unfavorable.
B. $435 favorable.
C. $150 unfavorable.
D. $150 favorable.
Quick Check 8a
VMEV = SR(AH − SH)
VMEV = $3.00 (1,550 hrs. − 1,500
hrs.)
VMEV = $150 unfavorable
1,000 units × 1.5 hrs. per unit
9-84
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Rate variance
$465 unfavorable
Efficiency variance
$150 unfavorable
1,550 hours 1,550 hours 1,500 hours
× × ×
$3.30 per hour $3.00 per hour $3.00 per hour
= $5,115 = $4,650 = $4,500
Quick Checks 7a & 8a
Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours
× × ×
Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate
9-85
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
The quantity variance is computed only on
the quantity used in production.
The price variance is computed on the
entire quantity purchased.
Materials Variances –
An Important Subtlety
9-86
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Glacier Peak Outfitters has the following
direct materials standard for the fiberfill in
its mountain parka.
◦ 0.1 kg. of fiberfill per parka at $5.00 per kg.
Last month, 210 kgs. of fiberfill were
purchased at a cost of $1,029. Glacier
used 200 kgs. to make 2,000 parkas.
Materials Variances – An Important
Subtlety: Glacier Peak Outfitters
9-87
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
210 kgs. 210 kgs. 200 kgs. 200 kgs.
× × × ×
$4.90 per kg. $5.00 per kg. $5.00 per kg. $5.00 per kg.
= $1,029 = $1,050 = $1,000 = $1,000
Price variance
$21 favorable
Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Actual Quantity
Purchased Purchased Used Standard Quantity
× × × ×
Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price Standard Price
Materials Variances – An Important
Subtlety: Materials Quantity Variance
Quantity variance
$0
Materials Quantity Variance
9-88
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Materials Variances – An Important Subtlety:
Materials Price Variance
COPYRIGHT © 2022 MCGRAW-HILL EDUCATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
NO REPRODUCTION OR DISTRIBUTION WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN
CONSENT OF MCGRAW-HILL EDUCATION.
Materials Price Variance
210 kgs. 210 kgs. 200 kgs. 200 kgs.
× × × ×
$4.90 per kg. $5.00 per kg. $5.00 per kg. $5.00 per kg.
= $1,029 = $1,050 = $1,000 = $1,000
Price variance
$21 favorable
Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Actual Quantity
Purchased Purchased Used Standard Quantity
× × × ×
Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price Standard Price
Quantity variance
$0
9-89
Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
End of Chapter 9

More Related Content

Similar to Brewer9e_Chap09_PPT.pptx

Data Science Solution.pptx
Data Science Solution.pptxData Science Solution.pptx
Data Science Solution.pptx
ANKIT915111
 
were
werewere
PowerPoint AuthorsSusan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPAJ.docx
PowerPoint AuthorsSusan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPAJ.docxPowerPoint AuthorsSusan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPAJ.docx
PowerPoint AuthorsSusan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPAJ.docx
harrisonhoward80223
 
Chap009-PPT-03032023-035024pm (1).pptx
Chap009-PPT-03032023-035024pm (1).pptxChap009-PPT-03032023-035024pm (1).pptx
Chap009-PPT-03032023-035024pm (1).pptx
MdDahri
 
Whbm04
Whbm04Whbm04
Whbm04
Whbm04Whbm04
Whbm04
Whbm04Whbm04
Whbm04
Zakir Abbas
 
Whbm04
Whbm04Whbm04
Showing ROI for Your Analytic Project
Showing ROI for Your Analytic ProjectShowing ROI for Your Analytic Project
Showing ROI for Your Analytic Project
DATAVERSITY
 
chap020.ppt
chap020.pptchap020.ppt
chap020.ppt
narman1402
 
Introduction to Small Business Federal Subcontracting
Introduction to Small Business Federal SubcontractingIntroduction to Small Business Federal Subcontracting
Introduction to Small Business Federal Subcontracting
Kristina Keeler, PMP
 
Rivian_Q3-2022_Shareholder-Letter.pdf
Rivian_Q3-2022_Shareholder-Letter.pdfRivian_Q3-2022_Shareholder-Letter.pdf
Rivian_Q3-2022_Shareholder-Letter.pdf
Rick Konkoskia Jr.
 

Similar to Brewer9e_Chap09_PPT.pptx (12)

Data Science Solution.pptx
Data Science Solution.pptxData Science Solution.pptx
Data Science Solution.pptx
 
were
werewere
were
 
PowerPoint AuthorsSusan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPAJ.docx
PowerPoint AuthorsSusan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPAJ.docxPowerPoint AuthorsSusan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPAJ.docx
PowerPoint AuthorsSusan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPAJ.docx
 
Chap009-PPT-03032023-035024pm (1).pptx
Chap009-PPT-03032023-035024pm (1).pptxChap009-PPT-03032023-035024pm (1).pptx
Chap009-PPT-03032023-035024pm (1).pptx
 
Whbm04
Whbm04Whbm04
Whbm04
 
Whbm04
Whbm04Whbm04
Whbm04
 
Whbm04
Whbm04Whbm04
Whbm04
 
Whbm04
Whbm04Whbm04
Whbm04
 
Showing ROI for Your Analytic Project
Showing ROI for Your Analytic ProjectShowing ROI for Your Analytic Project
Showing ROI for Your Analytic Project
 
chap020.ppt
chap020.pptchap020.ppt
chap020.ppt
 
Introduction to Small Business Federal Subcontracting
Introduction to Small Business Federal SubcontractingIntroduction to Small Business Federal Subcontracting
Introduction to Small Business Federal Subcontracting
 
Rivian_Q3-2022_Shareholder-Letter.pdf
Rivian_Q3-2022_Shareholder-Letter.pdfRivian_Q3-2022_Shareholder-Letter.pdf
Rivian_Q3-2022_Shareholder-Letter.pdf
 

Recently uploaded

labb123456789123456789123456789123456789
labb123456789123456789123456789123456789labb123456789123456789123456789123456789
labb123456789123456789123456789123456789
Ghh
 
5 Common Mistakes to Avoid During the Job Application Process.pdf
5 Common Mistakes to Avoid During the Job Application Process.pdf5 Common Mistakes to Avoid During the Job Application Process.pdf
5 Common Mistakes to Avoid During the Job Application Process.pdf
Alliance Jobs
 
Leave-rules.ppt CCS leave rules 1972 for central govt employees
Leave-rules.ppt CCS leave rules 1972 for central govt employeesLeave-rules.ppt CCS leave rules 1972 for central govt employees
Leave-rules.ppt CCS leave rules 1972 for central govt employees
Sreenivas702647
 
Tape Measure Training & Practice Assessments.pdf
Tape Measure Training & Practice Assessments.pdfTape Measure Training & Practice Assessments.pdf
Tape Measure Training & Practice Assessments.pdf
KateRobinson68
 
Gabrielle M. A. Sinaga Portfolio, Film Student (2024)
Gabrielle M. A. Sinaga Portfolio, Film Student (2024)Gabrielle M. A. Sinaga Portfolio, Film Student (2024)
Gabrielle M. A. Sinaga Portfolio, Film Student (2024)
GabrielleSinaga
 
一比一原版布拉德福德大学毕业证(bradford毕业证)如何办理
一比一原版布拉德福德大学毕业证(bradford毕业证)如何办理一比一原版布拉德福德大学毕业证(bradford毕业证)如何办理
一比一原版布拉德福德大学毕业证(bradford毕业证)如何办理
taqyea
 
Learnings from Successful Jobs Searchers
Learnings from Successful Jobs SearchersLearnings from Successful Jobs Searchers
Learnings from Successful Jobs Searchers
Bruce Bennett
 
Leadership Ambassador club Adventist module
Leadership Ambassador club Adventist moduleLeadership Ambassador club Adventist module
Leadership Ambassador club Adventist module
kakomaeric00
 
IT Career Hacks Navigate the Tech Jungle with a Roadmap
IT Career Hacks Navigate the Tech Jungle with a RoadmapIT Career Hacks Navigate the Tech Jungle with a Roadmap
IT Career Hacks Navigate the Tech Jungle with a Roadmap
Base Camp
 
0624.speakingengagementsandteaching-01.pdf
0624.speakingengagementsandteaching-01.pdf0624.speakingengagementsandteaching-01.pdf
0624.speakingengagementsandteaching-01.pdf
Thomas GIRARD BDes
 
A Guide to a Winning Interview June 2024
A Guide to a Winning Interview June 2024A Guide to a Winning Interview June 2024
A Guide to a Winning Interview June 2024
Bruce Bennett
 
Status of Women in Pakistan.pptxStatus of Women in Pakistan.pptx
Status of Women in Pakistan.pptxStatus of Women in Pakistan.pptxStatus of Women in Pakistan.pptxStatus of Women in Pakistan.pptx
Status of Women in Pakistan.pptxStatus of Women in Pakistan.pptx
MuhammadWaqasBaloch1
 
在线制作加拿大萨省大学毕业证文凭证书实拍图原版一模一样
在线制作加拿大萨省大学毕业证文凭证书实拍图原版一模一样在线制作加拿大萨省大学毕业证文凭证书实拍图原版一模一样
在线制作加拿大萨省大学毕业证文凭证书实拍图原版一模一样
2zjra9bn
 
Lbs last rank 2023 9988kr47h4744j445.pdf
Lbs last rank 2023 9988kr47h4744j445.pdfLbs last rank 2023 9988kr47h4744j445.pdf
Lbs last rank 2023 9988kr47h4744j445.pdf
ashiquepa3
 
thyroid case presentation.pptx Kamala's Lakshaman palatial
thyroid case presentation.pptx Kamala's Lakshaman palatialthyroid case presentation.pptx Kamala's Lakshaman palatial
thyroid case presentation.pptx Kamala's Lakshaman palatial
Aditya Raghav
 
官方认证美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书案例原版一模一样
官方认证美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书案例原版一模一样官方认证美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书案例原版一模一样
官方认证美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书案例原版一模一样
2zjra9bn
 
BUKU PENJAGAAN BUKU PENJAGAAN BUKU PENJAGAAN
BUKU PENJAGAAN BUKU PENJAGAAN BUKU PENJAGAANBUKU PENJAGAAN BUKU PENJAGAAN BUKU PENJAGAAN
BUKU PENJAGAAN BUKU PENJAGAAN BUKU PENJAGAAN
cahgading001
 
Jill Pizzola's Tenure as Senior Talent Acquisition Partner at THOMSON REUTERS...
Jill Pizzola's Tenure as Senior Talent Acquisition Partner at THOMSON REUTERS...Jill Pizzola's Tenure as Senior Talent Acquisition Partner at THOMSON REUTERS...
Jill Pizzola's Tenure as Senior Talent Acquisition Partner at THOMSON REUTERS...
dsnow9802
 
lab.123456789123456789123456789123456789
lab.123456789123456789123456789123456789lab.123456789123456789123456789123456789
lab.123456789123456789123456789123456789
Ghh
 
Switching Careers Slides - JoyceMSullivan SocMediaFin - 2024Jun11.pdf
Switching Careers Slides - JoyceMSullivan SocMediaFin -  2024Jun11.pdfSwitching Careers Slides - JoyceMSullivan SocMediaFin -  2024Jun11.pdf
Switching Careers Slides - JoyceMSullivan SocMediaFin - 2024Jun11.pdf
SocMediaFin - Joyce Sullivan
 

Recently uploaded (20)

labb123456789123456789123456789123456789
labb123456789123456789123456789123456789labb123456789123456789123456789123456789
labb123456789123456789123456789123456789
 
5 Common Mistakes to Avoid During the Job Application Process.pdf
5 Common Mistakes to Avoid During the Job Application Process.pdf5 Common Mistakes to Avoid During the Job Application Process.pdf
5 Common Mistakes to Avoid During the Job Application Process.pdf
 
Leave-rules.ppt CCS leave rules 1972 for central govt employees
Leave-rules.ppt CCS leave rules 1972 for central govt employeesLeave-rules.ppt CCS leave rules 1972 for central govt employees
Leave-rules.ppt CCS leave rules 1972 for central govt employees
 
Tape Measure Training & Practice Assessments.pdf
Tape Measure Training & Practice Assessments.pdfTape Measure Training & Practice Assessments.pdf
Tape Measure Training & Practice Assessments.pdf
 
Gabrielle M. A. Sinaga Portfolio, Film Student (2024)
Gabrielle M. A. Sinaga Portfolio, Film Student (2024)Gabrielle M. A. Sinaga Portfolio, Film Student (2024)
Gabrielle M. A. Sinaga Portfolio, Film Student (2024)
 
一比一原版布拉德福德大学毕业证(bradford毕业证)如何办理
一比一原版布拉德福德大学毕业证(bradford毕业证)如何办理一比一原版布拉德福德大学毕业证(bradford毕业证)如何办理
一比一原版布拉德福德大学毕业证(bradford毕业证)如何办理
 
Learnings from Successful Jobs Searchers
Learnings from Successful Jobs SearchersLearnings from Successful Jobs Searchers
Learnings from Successful Jobs Searchers
 
Leadership Ambassador club Adventist module
Leadership Ambassador club Adventist moduleLeadership Ambassador club Adventist module
Leadership Ambassador club Adventist module
 
IT Career Hacks Navigate the Tech Jungle with a Roadmap
IT Career Hacks Navigate the Tech Jungle with a RoadmapIT Career Hacks Navigate the Tech Jungle with a Roadmap
IT Career Hacks Navigate the Tech Jungle with a Roadmap
 
0624.speakingengagementsandteaching-01.pdf
0624.speakingengagementsandteaching-01.pdf0624.speakingengagementsandteaching-01.pdf
0624.speakingengagementsandteaching-01.pdf
 
A Guide to a Winning Interview June 2024
A Guide to a Winning Interview June 2024A Guide to a Winning Interview June 2024
A Guide to a Winning Interview June 2024
 
Status of Women in Pakistan.pptxStatus of Women in Pakistan.pptx
Status of Women in Pakistan.pptxStatus of Women in Pakistan.pptxStatus of Women in Pakistan.pptxStatus of Women in Pakistan.pptx
Status of Women in Pakistan.pptxStatus of Women in Pakistan.pptx
 
在线制作加拿大萨省大学毕业证文凭证书实拍图原版一模一样
在线制作加拿大萨省大学毕业证文凭证书实拍图原版一模一样在线制作加拿大萨省大学毕业证文凭证书实拍图原版一模一样
在线制作加拿大萨省大学毕业证文凭证书实拍图原版一模一样
 
Lbs last rank 2023 9988kr47h4744j445.pdf
Lbs last rank 2023 9988kr47h4744j445.pdfLbs last rank 2023 9988kr47h4744j445.pdf
Lbs last rank 2023 9988kr47h4744j445.pdf
 
thyroid case presentation.pptx Kamala's Lakshaman palatial
thyroid case presentation.pptx Kamala's Lakshaman palatialthyroid case presentation.pptx Kamala's Lakshaman palatial
thyroid case presentation.pptx Kamala's Lakshaman palatial
 
官方认证美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书案例原版一模一样
官方认证美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书案例原版一模一样官方认证美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书案例原版一模一样
官方认证美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书案例原版一模一样
 
BUKU PENJAGAAN BUKU PENJAGAAN BUKU PENJAGAAN
BUKU PENJAGAAN BUKU PENJAGAAN BUKU PENJAGAANBUKU PENJAGAAN BUKU PENJAGAAN BUKU PENJAGAAN
BUKU PENJAGAAN BUKU PENJAGAAN BUKU PENJAGAAN
 
Jill Pizzola's Tenure as Senior Talent Acquisition Partner at THOMSON REUTERS...
Jill Pizzola's Tenure as Senior Talent Acquisition Partner at THOMSON REUTERS...Jill Pizzola's Tenure as Senior Talent Acquisition Partner at THOMSON REUTERS...
Jill Pizzola's Tenure as Senior Talent Acquisition Partner at THOMSON REUTERS...
 
lab.123456789123456789123456789123456789
lab.123456789123456789123456789123456789lab.123456789123456789123456789123456789
lab.123456789123456789123456789123456789
 
Switching Careers Slides - JoyceMSullivan SocMediaFin - 2024Jun11.pdf
Switching Careers Slides - JoyceMSullivan SocMediaFin -  2024Jun11.pdfSwitching Careers Slides - JoyceMSullivan SocMediaFin -  2024Jun11.pdf
Switching Careers Slides - JoyceMSullivan SocMediaFin - 2024Jun11.pdf
 

Brewer9e_Chap09_PPT.pptx

  • 1. Flexible Budgets, Standard Costs, and Variance Analysis CHAPTER 9 Introduction to Managerial Accounting Ninth edition Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
  • 2. 9-2 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Variance Analysis Cycle
  • 3. 9-3 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Learning Objective 1 Prepare a planning budget and a flexible budget with one cost driver.
  • 4. 9-4 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. A planning budget is prepared for a single, planned level of activity. Performance evaluation is difficult when actual activity differs from the planned level of activity. Comparing static planning budgets with actual costs is like comparing apples and oranges. Planning Budget
  • 5. 9-5 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. A flexible budget is an estimate of what revenues and costs should have been, given the actual level of activity for the period. Flexible budgets:  May be prepared for any activity level in the relevant range.  Enable “apples to apples” cost comparisons.  Help managers control costs.  Help evaluate managerial performance. Flexible Budget
  • 6. 9-6 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Larry’s Lawn Service provides lawn care in a planned community where all lawns are approximately the same size. At the end of May, Larry prepared his June budget based on mowing 500 lawns. Since all of the lawns are similar in size, Larry felt that the number of lawns mowed in a month would be the best way to measure overall activity for his business. Illustrating the Deficiencies of the Static Planning Budget
  • 7. 9-7 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Static Budget: Larry’s Lawn Service Budget Larry’s Planning Budget – 500 lawns Variable Costs Mixed Costs Fixed Costs
  • 8. 9-8 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Static Budget: Larry’s Lawn Service Actual Results Larry’s Actual Results – 550 lawns
  • 9. 9-9 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Static Budget: Comparing Actual to Budget COPYRIGHT © 2022 MCGRAW-HILL EDUCATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NO REPRODUCTION OR DISTRIBUTION WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF MCGRAW-HILL EDUCATION. Larry’s Actual Compared with Budget: 500 vs. 550 lawns
  • 10. 9-10 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Static Budget: Computing Variances Larry’s Actual Compared with Budget: 500 vs. 550 lawns F = Favorable variance that occurs when actual costs are less than budgeted costs. U = Unfavorable variance that occurs when actual costs are greater than budgeted costs. F = Favorable variance that occurs when actual revenue is greater than budgeted revenue.
  • 11. 9-11 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Static Budget: Variance Deficiencies Larry’s Actual Compared with Budget: 500 vs. 550 lawns Since these variances are unfavorable, has Larry done a poor job controlling costs? Since these variances are favorable, has Larry done a good job controlling costs?
  • 12. 9-12 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. We cannot answer the questions using a static budget. Actual activity is above planned activity. Static Planning Budget: Problems
  • 13. 9-13 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. The relevant question is . . . “How much of the cost variances are due to higher activity and how much are due to cost control?” To answer the question, we must flex the budget to the actual level of activity. Static Planning Budget: Flex Budget
  • 14. 9-14 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. To flex a budget, we need to know that: ◦Total variable costs change in direct proportion to changes in activity. ◦Total fixed costs remain unchanged within the relevant range. How a Flexible Budget Works Fixed fixed
  • 15. 9-15 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Flexible Budget: Larry’s Lawn Service Larry’s Flexible Budget
  • 16. 9-16 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. What should the total wages and salaries cost be in a flexible budget for 600 lawns? A. $18,000 B. $20,000 C. $23,000 D. $25,000 Concept Check 1
  • 17. 9-17 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. What should be the total wages and salaries cost in a flexible budget for 600 lawns? A. $18,000 B. $20,000 C. $23,000 D. $25,000 Total wages and salaries cost = $5,000 + ($30 per lawn  600 lawns) = $5,000 + $18,000 = $23,000 Concept Check 1a
  • 18. 9-18 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Learning Objective 2 Calculate and interpret revenue and spending variances.
  • 19. 9-19 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Revenue and Spending Variances Actual revenue Flexible budget revenue The difference is a revenue variance. Flexible budget cost The difference is a spending variance. Actual cost
  • 20. 9-20 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Let’s use flexible budgeting concepts to compute revenue and spending variances for Larry’s Lawn Service. Computing Revenue and Spending Variances
  • 21. 9-21 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Revenue Variances Larry’s Flexible Budget Compared with the Actual Results Revenue Variance $1,750 favorable
  • 22. 9-22 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Larry’s Flexible Budget Compared with the Actual Results Spending Variances Spending Variances $1,950 unfavorable total
  • 23. 9-23 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Learning Objective 3 Prepare a planning budget and a flexible budget with more than one cost driver.
  • 24. 9-24 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. More than one cost driver may be needed to adequately explain all of the costs in an organization. The cost formulas used to prepare a flexible budget can be adjusted to recognize multiple cost drivers. Planning and Flexible Budgets: Multiple Cost Drivers
  • 25. 9-25 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Larry’s Lawn Service will also provide an edging and trimming service to his customers at $30 per hour. He estimates that he will provide 100 hours of this service. Because the revenue earned from and time required for edging and trimming is different for different lawns, Larry decided to add an additional cost driver (hours). Let’s look at Larry’s new planning and flexible budgets. Planning and Flexible Budgets: Multiple Cost Drivers
  • 26. 9-26 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Planning Budgets with Multiple Cost Drivers: Larry’s Lawn Service Larry’s Planning Budget Based on More than One Cost Driver
  • 27. 9-27 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Flexible Budgets with Multiple Cost Drivers: Larry’s Lawn Service Larry’s Flexible Budget Based on More than One Cost Driver
  • 28. 9-28 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Standards are benchmarks or “norms” for measuring performance. In managerial accounting, two types of standards are commonly used. ◦Quantity standards specify how much of an input should be used to make a product or provide a service. ◦Price standards specify how much should be paid for each unit of the input. Standard Costs
  • 29. 9-29 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Setting Direct Materials Standards Standard Price per Unit Summarized in a Bill of Materials Final, delivered cost of materials, net of discounts Standard Quantity per Unit
  • 30. 9-30 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Setting Direct Labor Standards Use time and motion studies for each labor operation Standard Hours per Unit Often a single rate is used that reflects the mix of wages earned Standard Rate per Hour
  • 31. 9-31 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Setting Variable Manufacturing Overhead Standards The rate is the variable portion of the predetermined overhead rate. Price Standard The quantity is the activity in the allocation base for predetermined overhead. Quantity Standard
  • 32. 9-32 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. The Standard Cost Card A standard cost card for one unit of product might look like this: A A x B Standard Standard Standard Quantity Price Cost Inputs or Hours or Rate per Unit Direct materials 3.0 lbs. 4.00 $ per lb. 12.00 $ Direct labor 2.5 hours 14.00 per hour 35.00 Variable mfg. overhead 2.5 hours 3.00 per hour 7.50 Total standard unit cost 54.50 $ B
  • 33. 9-33 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Standard costs per unit for direct materials, direct labor, and variable manufacturing overhead can be used to compute spending variances. However, spending variances become more useful by breaking them down into price and quantity variances. Standard costs can be used to decompose a spending variance into its price and quantity components. Breaking Down Spending Variances
  • 34. 9-34 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. General Model for Variances Variance Analysis Quantity Variance Difference between actual quantity and standard quantity Price Variance Difference between actual price and standard price
  • 35. 9-35 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Price and quantity standards are determined separately for two reasons: 1. Different managers are usually responsible for buying and using inputs. For example, the purchasing manager is responsible for raw material purchase prices and the production manager is responsible for the quantity of raw material used. 2. The buying and using activities occur at different times. Raw material purchases may be held in inventory for a period of time before being used in production. Price and Quantity Standards
  • 36. 9-36 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. General Model for Price and Quantity Variances – An Overview Variance Analysis Quantity Variance Materials quantity variance Labor efficiency variance VOH efficiency variance Price Variance Materials price variance Labor rate variance VOH rate variance
  • 37. 9-37 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. A General Model for Variance Analysis: Formulas Price Variance (1) − (2) Quantity Variance (2) − (3) (2) Actual Quantity of Input, at Standard Price (AQ × SP) (1) Actual Quantity of Input, at Actual Price (AQ × AP) Spending Variance (1) − (3) (3) Standard Quantity Allowed for Actual Output, at Standard Price (SQ × SP)
  • 38. 9-38 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. A General Model: Actual Quantity Price Variance (1) − (2) Quantity Variance (2) − (3) (3) Standard Quantity Allowed for Actual Output, at Standard Price (SQ × SP) (2) Actual Quantity of Input, at Standard Price (AQ × SP) (1) Actual Quantity of Input, at Actual Price (AQ × AP) Spending Variance (1) − (3) Actual quantity is the amount of direct materials, direct labor, and variable manufacturing overhead actually used. (The quantities pertain to input items.)
  • 39. 9-39 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. A General Model: Standard Quantity Standard quantity is the standard quantity allowed for the actual output of the period. Price Variance (1) − (2) Quantity Variance (2) − (3) (3) Standard Quantity Allowed for Actual Output, at Standard Price (SQ × SP) (2) Actual Quantity of Input, at Standard Price (AQ × SP) (1) Actual Quantity of Input, at Actual Price (AQ × AP) Spending Variance (1) − (3)
  • 40. 9-40 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. A General Model: Actual Price Actual price is the amount actually paid for the input used. Price Variance (1) − (2) Quantity Variance (2) − (3) (3) Standard Quantity Allowed for Actual Output, at Standard Price (SQ × SP) (2) Actual Quantity of Input, at Standard Price (AQ × SP) (1) Actual Quantity of Input, at Actual Price (AQ × AP) Spending Variance (1) − (3)
  • 41. 9-41 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. A General Model: Standard Price Standard price is the amount that should have been paid for the input used. Price Variance (1) − (2) Quantity Variance (2) − (3) (3) Standard Quantity Allowed for Actual Output, at Standard Price (SQ × SP) (2) Actual Quantity of Input, at Standard Price (AQ × SP) (1) Actual Quantity of Input, at Actual Price (AQ × AP) Spending Variance (1) − (3)
  • 42. 9-42 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Learning Objective 4 Compute the direct materials price and quantity variances and explain their significance.
  • 43. 9-43 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Glacier Peak Outfitters has the following direct materials standard for the fiberfill in its mountain parka: ◦0.1 kg. of fiberfill per parka at $5.00 per kg. Last month 210 kgs. of fiberfill were purchased and used to make 2,000 parkas. The materials cost a total of $1,029. Materials Variances – An Example
  • 44. 9-44 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. 210 kgs. 210 kgs. 200 kgs. × × × $4.90 per kg. $5.00 per kg. $5.00 per kg. = $1,029 = $1,050 = $1,000 Price variance $21 favorable Quantity variance $50 unfavorable Materials Variances Overall Summary Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard Quantity × × × Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price
  • 45. 9-45 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Materials Variances Summary: Standard Quantity Computation * 0.1 kg. per parka  2,000 parkas = 200 kgs. 210 kgs. 210 kgs. 200* kgs. × × × $4.90 per kg. $5.00 per kg. $5.00 per kg. = $1,029 = $1,050 = $1,000 Price variance $21 favorable Quantity variance $50 unfavorable Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard Quantity × × × Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price
  • 46. 9-46 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Materials Variances Summary: Actual Price Computation * $1,029  210 kgs. = $4.90 per kg. 210 kgs. 210 kgs. 200 kgs. × × × $4.90* per kg. $5.00 per kg. $5.00 per kg. = $1,029 = $1,050 = $1,000 Price variance $21 favorable Quantity variance $50 unfavorable Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard Quantity × × × Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price
  • 47. 9-47 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Materials Variances: Using the Factored Equations Materials price variance MPV = (AQ × AP) − (AQ × SP) = AQ(AP − SP) = 210 kgs. ($4.90/kg. − $5.00/kg.) = 210 kgs. (− $0.10/kg.) = $21 F Materials quantity variance MQV = (AQ × SP) − (SQ × SP) = SP(AQ − SQ) = $5.00/kg. (210 kgs. − (0.1 kg./parka  2,000 parkas)) = $5.00/kg. (210 kgs. − 200 kgs.) = $5.00/kg. (10 kgs.) = $50 U
  • 48. 9-48 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Materials Price Variance Materials Quantity Variance Production Manager Purchasing Manager The standard price is used to compute the quantity variance so that the production manager is not held responsible for the purchasing manager’s performance. Responsibility for Materials Variances: Price Variance
  • 49. 9-49 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. I am not responsible for this unfavorable materials quantity variance. You purchased cheap material, so my people had to use more of it. Your poor scheduling sometimes requires me to rush order materials at a higher price, causing unfavorable price variances. Responsibility for Materials Variances: Quantity Variance Production Manager Purchasing Manager
  • 50. 9-50 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Hanson Inc. has the following direct materials standard to manufacture one Zippy: ◦1.5 pounds per Zippy at $4.00 per pound Last week, 1,700 pounds of materials were purchased and used to make 1,000 Zippies. The materials cost a total of $6,630. Concept Check 2
  • 51. 9-51 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. How many pounds of materials should Hanson have used to make 1,000 Zippies? A. 1,700 pounds B. 1,500 pounds C. 1,200 pounds D. 1,000 pounds Concept Check 2a
  • 52. 9-52 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. How many pounds of materials should Hanson have used to make 1,000 Zippies? A. 1,700 pounds B. 1,500 pounds C. 1,200 pounds D. 1,000 pounds Standard quantity 1,000 × 1.5 pounds per Zippy = 1,500 pounds Concept Check 2b
  • 53. 9-53 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Hanson’s materials quantity variance (MQV) for the week was: A. $170 unfavorable B. $170 favorable C. $800 unfavorable D. $800 favorable Concept Check 3
  • 54. 9-54 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Hanson’s materials quantity variance (MQV) for the week was: A. $170 unfavorable B. $170 favorable C. $800 unfavorable D. $800 favorable MQV = SP(AQ − SQ) MQV = $4.00 (1,700 lbs. − 1,500 lbs.) MQV = $800 unfavorable Concept Check 3a
  • 55. 9-55 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Concept Check 3b 1,700 lbs. 1,700 lbs. 1,500 lbs. × × × $3.90 per lb. $4.00 per lb. $4.00 per lb. = $6,630 = $6,800 = $6,000 Quantity variance $800 unfavorable Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard Quantity × × × Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price
  • 56. 9-56 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Hanson’s materials price variance (MPV) for the week was: A. $170 unfavorable B. $170 favorable C. $800 unfavorable D. $800 favorable Concept Check 4
  • 57. 9-57 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Hanson’s materials price variance (MPV) for the week was: A. $170 unfavorable. B. $170 favorable. C. $800 unfavorable. D. $800 favorable. MPV = AQ(AP − SP) MPV = 1,700 lbs. × ($3.90 − 4.00) MPV = $170 Favorable Concept Check 4a
  • 58. 9-58 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Concept Check 4b *Recall that the standard quantity for 1,000 Zippies is 1,000 × 1.5 pounds = 1,500 lbs. 1,700 lbs. 1,700 lbs. 1,500* lbs. × × × $3.90 per lb. $4.00 per lb. $4.00 per lb. = $6,630 = $6,800 = $6,000 Price variance $170 favorable Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard Quantity × × × Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price
  • 59. 9-59 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Learning Objective 5 Compute the direct labor rate and efficiency variances and explain their significance.
  • 60. 9-60 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Glacier Peak Outfitters has the following direct labor standard for its mountain parka. ◦1.2 standard hours per parka at $10.00 per hour Last month, employees actually worked 2,500 hours at a total labor cost of $26,250 to make 2,000 parkas. Labor Variances – An Example
  • 61. 9-61 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Rate variance $1,250 unfavorable Efficiency variance $1,000 unfavorable Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours × × × Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate Labor Variances Overall Summary 2,500 hours 2,500 hours 2,400 hours × × × $10.50 per hour $10.00 per hour $10.00 per hour = $26,250 = $25,000 = $24,000
  • 62. 9-62 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Labor Variances Summary: Standard Hours Computation *1.2 hours per parka  2,000 parkas = 2,400 hours Rate variance $1,250 unfavorable Efficiency variance $1,000 unfavorable Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours × × × Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate 2,500 hours 2,500 hours 2,400* hours × × × $10.50 per hour $10.00 per hour $10.00 per hour = $26,250 = $25,000 = $24,000
  • 63. 9-63 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Labor Variances Summary: Actual Rate Computation * $26,250  2,500 hours = $10.50 per hour Rate variance $1,250 unfavorable Efficiency variance $1,000 unfavorable Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours × × × Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate 2,500 hours 2,500 hours 2,400 hours × × × $10.50* per hour $10.00 per hour $10.00 per hour = $26,250 = $25,000 = $24,000
  • 64. 9-64 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Labor Variances: Using the Factored Equations Labor rate variance LRV = (AH × AR) − (AH × SR) = AH (AR − SR) = 2,500 hours ($10.50 per hour − $10.00 per hour) = 2,500 hours ($0.50 per hour) = $1,250 unfavorable Labor efficiency variance LEV = (AH × SR) − (SH × SR) = SR (AH − SH) = $10.00 per hour (2,500 hours − 2,400 hours) = $10.00 per hour (100 hours) = $1,000 unfavorable
  • 65. 9-65 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Responsibility for Labor Variances Production Manager Production managers are usually held accountable for labor variances because they can influence the Mix of skill levels assigned to work tasks. Level of employee motivation. Quality of production supervision. Quality of training provided to employees.
  • 66. 9-66 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. I am not responsible for the unfavorable labor efficiency variance! You purchased cheap material, so it took more time to process it. I think it took more time to process the materials because the Maintenance Department has poorly maintained your equipment. Responsibility for Labor Variances: Manager Responses Maintenance Manager Purchasing Manager
  • 67. 9-67 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Hanson Inc. has the following direct labor standard to manufacture one Zippy: o 1.5 standard hours per Zippy at $12.00 per direct labor hour Last week, 1,550 direct labor hours were worked at a total labor cost of $18,910 to make 1,000 Zippies. Concept Checks 5 & 6
  • 68. 9-68 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Hanson’s labor rate variance (LRV) for the week was: A. $310 unfavorable B. $310 favorable C. $300 unfavorable D. $300 favorable Quick Check 5
  • 69. 9-69 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Hanson’s labor rate variance (LRV) for the week was: A. $310 unfavorable B. $310 favorable C. $300 unfavorable D. $300 favorable LRV = AH(AR − SR) LRV = 1,550 hrs. ($12.20 − $12.00) LRV = $310 unfavorable Quick Check 5a
  • 70. 9-70 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Hanson’s labor efficiency variance (LEV) for the week was: A. $590 unfavorable B. $590 favorable C. $600 unfavorable D. $600 favorable Quick Check 6
  • 71. 9-71 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Hanson’s labor efficiency variance (LEV) for the week was: A. $590 unfavorable B. $590 favorable C. $600 unfavorable D. $600 favorable LEV = SR(AH − SH) LEV = $12.00 (1,550 hrs. − 1,500 hrs.) LEV = $600 unfavorable Quick Check 6a
  • 72. 9-72 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Rate variance $310 unfavorable Efficiency variance $600 unfavorable 1,550 hours 1,550 hours 1,500 hours × × × $12.20 per hour $12.00 per hour $12.00 per hour = $18,910 = $18,600 = $18,000 Quick Checks 5a & 6a Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours × × × Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate
  • 73. 9-73 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Learning Objective 6 Compute the variable manufacturing overhead rate and efficiency variances and explain their significance.
  • 74. 9-74 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Glacier Peak Outfitters has the following direct variable manufacturing overhead labor standard for its mountain parka: o 1.2 standard hours per parka at $4.00 per hour Last month, employees actually worked 2,500 hours to make 2,000 parkas. Actual variable manufacturing overhead for the month was $10,500. Overhead Variances – An Example
  • 75. 9-75 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. 2,500 hours 2,500 hours 2,400 hours × × × $4.20 per hour $4.00 per hour $4.00 per hour = $10,500 = $10,000 = $9,600 Rate variance $500 unfavorable Efficiency variance $400 unfavorable Variable Manufacturing Overhead Variances Overall Summary Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours × × × Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate
  • 76. 9-76 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Variable Manufacturing Overhead Variances Summary: Standard Hours Computation *1.2 hours per parka  2,000 parkas = 2,400 hours 2,500 hours 2,500 hours 2,400* hours × × × $4.20 per hour $4.00 per hour $4.00 per hour = $10,500 = $10,000 = $9,600 Rate variance $500 unfavorable Efficiency variance $400 unfavorable Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours × × × Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate
  • 77. 9-77 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Variable Manufacturing Overhead Variances Summary: Actual Rate Computation *$10,500  2,500 hours = $4.20 per hour 2,500 hours 2,500 hours 2,400 hours × × × $4.20* per hour $4.00 per hour $4.00 per hour = $10,500 = $10,000 = $9,600 Rate variance $500 unfavorable Efficiency variance $400 unfavorable Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours × × × Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate
  • 78. 9-78 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Variable manufacturing overhead rate variance VMRV = (AH × AR) − (AH − SR) = AH(AR − SR) = 2,500 hours ($4.20 per hour − $4.00 per hour) = 2,500 hours ($0.20 per hour) = $500 unfavorable Variable manufacturing overhead efficiency variance VMEV = (AH × SR) − (SH − SR) = SR(AH − SH) = $4.00 per hour (2,500 hours − 2,400 hours) = $4.00 per hour (100 hours) = $400 unfavorable Variable Manufacturing Overhead Variances: Using Factored Equations
  • 79. 9-79 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Hanson Inc. has the following variable manufacturing overhead standard to manufacture one Zippy: o 1.5 standard hours per Zippy at $3.00 per direct labor-hour Last week, 1,550 hours were worked to make 1,000 Zippies, and $5,115 was spent for variable manufacturing overhead. Quick Checks 7 & 8
  • 80. 9-80 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Hanson’s rate variance (VMRV) for variable manufacturing overhead for the week was: A. $465 unfavorable B. $400 favorable C. $335 unfavorable D. $300 favorable Quick Check 7
  • 81. 9-81 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Hanson’s rate variance (VMRV) for variable manufacturing overhead for the week was: A. $465 unfavorable B. $400 favorable C. $335 unfavorable D. $300 favorable VMRV = AH(AR − SR) VMRV = 1,550 hrs.($3.30 − $3.00) VMRV = $465 unfavorable Quick Check 7a
  • 82. 9-82 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Hanson’s efficiency variance (VMEV) for variable manufacturing overhead for the week was: A. $435 unfavorable B. $435 favorable C. $150 unfavorable D. $150 favorable Quick Check 8
  • 83. 9-83 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Hanson’s efficiency variance (VMEV) for variable manufacturing overhead for the week was: A. $435 unfavorable. B. $435 favorable. C. $150 unfavorable. D. $150 favorable. Quick Check 8a VMEV = SR(AH − SH) VMEV = $3.00 (1,550 hrs. − 1,500 hrs.) VMEV = $150 unfavorable 1,000 units × 1.5 hrs. per unit
  • 84. 9-84 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Rate variance $465 unfavorable Efficiency variance $150 unfavorable 1,550 hours 1,550 hours 1,500 hours × × × $3.30 per hour $3.00 per hour $3.00 per hour = $5,115 = $4,650 = $4,500 Quick Checks 7a & 8a Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours × × × Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate
  • 85. 9-85 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. The quantity variance is computed only on the quantity used in production. The price variance is computed on the entire quantity purchased. Materials Variances – An Important Subtlety
  • 86. 9-86 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Glacier Peak Outfitters has the following direct materials standard for the fiberfill in its mountain parka. ◦ 0.1 kg. of fiberfill per parka at $5.00 per kg. Last month, 210 kgs. of fiberfill were purchased at a cost of $1,029. Glacier used 200 kgs. to make 2,000 parkas. Materials Variances – An Important Subtlety: Glacier Peak Outfitters
  • 87. 9-87 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. 210 kgs. 210 kgs. 200 kgs. 200 kgs. × × × × $4.90 per kg. $5.00 per kg. $5.00 per kg. $5.00 per kg. = $1,029 = $1,050 = $1,000 = $1,000 Price variance $21 favorable Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Purchased Purchased Used Standard Quantity × × × × Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price Standard Price Materials Variances – An Important Subtlety: Materials Quantity Variance Quantity variance $0 Materials Quantity Variance
  • 88. 9-88 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. Materials Variances – An Important Subtlety: Materials Price Variance COPYRIGHT © 2022 MCGRAW-HILL EDUCATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NO REPRODUCTION OR DISTRIBUTION WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF MCGRAW-HILL EDUCATION. Materials Price Variance 210 kgs. 210 kgs. 200 kgs. 200 kgs. × × × × $4.90 per kg. $5.00 per kg. $5.00 per kg. $5.00 per kg. = $1,029 = $1,050 = $1,000 = $1,000 Price variance $21 favorable Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Purchased Purchased Used Standard Quantity × × × × Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price Standard Price Quantity variance $0
  • 89. 9-89 Copyright © 2022 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill. End of Chapter 9

Editor's Notes

  1. The steps of the cycle The cycle begins with the preparation of performance reports in the accounting department. These reports highlight variances which are differences between actual results and what should have occurred according to the budget. The variances raise questions such as: Why did this variance occur? Why is this variance larger than it was last period? The significant variances are investigated to discover their root causes. Actions are taken to improve performance. Next period’s operations are carried out and the process is repeated.
  2. A planning budget is prepared before the period begins and is valid for only the planned level of activity.
  3. Assume the following facts with respect to Larry’s Lawn Service. Notice that Larry expects to mow 500 lawns during June.
  4. Assume that Larry prepared the planning budget for June as shown. Notice that the budget includes:   Two variable costs—gasoline and supplies, and equipment maintenance. Four fixed costs—office and shop utilities, office and shop rent, equipment depreciation, and insurance. One mixed cost—wages and salaries.
  5. Assume that Larry’s actual results for the month of June are 550 lawns.  
  6. If Larry wanted to, he could compare his actual results to the planning budget as shown on this slide. Notice:  A variance is computed for revenue and each expense item. It should be noted that the actual results and planning budget columns are based on different levels of activity (500 vs. 550 lawns).
  7. A favorable (unfavorable) revenue variance occurs when actual revenue is greater than (less than) the planning budget. A favorable (unfavorable) expense variance occurs when actual expenses are less than (greater than) the planning budget.
  8. The important question for us to consider is: —do these expense variances indicate whether Larry has done a good job controlling his costs?
  9. At this point, we cannot answer this question because the actual level of activity is greater than the planned level of activity. Therefore, actual variable costs are likely to be higher than planned variable costs regardless of Larry’s managerial efficiency
  10. To intelligently evaluate Larry’s performance, we need to flex the planning budget to accommodate the actual level of activity.
  11. Keys to understanding a flexible budget Variable costs change in direct proportion to changes in activity. Total fixed costs remain unchanged within the relevant range.
  12. Larry’s Lawn Service: preparing a flexible budget Larry’s flexible budget for an activity level of 550 lawns mowed is as shown on this slide. Notice, the “Q” in all revenue and cost formulas is 550 lawns mowed. So, for example: Revenue of $41,250 is computed by multiplying $75 × 550. Wages and salaries expense of $21,500 is computed by multiplying $30 × 550 plus $5,000 in fixed salaries. The fixed costs in Larry’s flexible budget are not sensitive to changes in the activity level.
  13. A revenue variance is the difference between what the total revenue should have been, given the actual level of activity for the period, and the actual total revenue.   A spending variance is the difference between how much a cost should have been, given the actual level of activity, and the actual amount of the cost.
  14. The revenue and spending variances for Larry’s Lawn Service would be computed as shown on this slide. Notice:   It should be noted that the actual results and flexible budget columns are both based on 550 lawns mowed. The $1,750 favorable revenue variance indicates that actual revenue exceeded the budgeted amount that would be expected for an activity level of 550 lawns mowed.
  15. The $1,950 unfavorable spending variance indicates that total expenses were $1,950 greater than would be expected for an activity level of 550 lawns mowed. Overall, net operating income was $200 less than would be expected for an activity level of 550 lawns mowed.
  16. Let’s assume that Larry also plans to provide edging and trimming services to his customers at $30 per hour. Because the revenue earned from and time required for edging and trimming is different for different-sized lawns, Larry decided to add an additional cost driver (hours).  He also determined that wages and salaries will now be driven by the number of lawns mowed and by the number of hours required for additional edging and trimming.
  17. Larry’s planning budget and his flexible budget can be easily be adjusted to accommodate the second cost driver. Notice:  The number of hours (H) is designated as the second cost driver. Larry’s planning and flexible budgets are based on 100 hours of edging and trimming. Larry adjusted the revenue formula to include $30 per hour for edging and trimming. Larry also adjusted the cost formula for wages and salaries to include $25 per hour for edging and trimming.
  18. In managerial accounting, two types of standards are commonly used by manufacturing, service, food, and not-for-profit organizations to further analyze their spending variances Quantity standards specify how much of an input should be used to make a product or provide a service. For example:  Auto service centers like Firestone and Sears set labor time standards for the completion of work tasks. Fast-food outlets such as McDonald’s have exacting standards for the quantity of meat going into a sandwich Price standards specify how much should be paid for each unit of the input. For example: Hospitals have standard costs for food, laundry, and other items. Home construction companies have standard labor costs that they apply to sub-contractors such as framers, roofers, and electricians. Manufacturing companies often have highly developed standard costing systems that establish quantity and price standards for each separate product’s material, labor, and overhead inputs.
  19. The standard quantity per unit for direct materials should reflect the amount of material required for each unit of finished product, as well as an allowance for unavoidable waste, spoilage, and other normal inefficiencies.   The standard price per unit for direct materials should reflect the final, delivered cost of the materials.
  20. The standard hours per unit reflects the labor-hours required to complete one unit of product. Standards can be determined by using available references that estimate the time needed to perform a given task, or by relying on time and motion studies.   The standard rate per hour for direct labor includes not only wages earned but also fringe benefits and other labor costs. Many companies prepare a single rate for all employees within a department that reflects the “mix” of wage rates earned.  
  21. The quantity standard for variable manufacturing overhead is expressed in either direct labor-hours or machine-hours depending on which is used as the allocation base in the predetermined overhead rate.   The price standard for variable manufacturing overhead comes from the variable portion of the predetermined overhead rate.
  22. The standard cost card is a detailed listing of the standard amounts of direct materials, direct labor, and variable overhead inputs that should go into a unit of product, multiplied by the standard price or rate that has been set for each input.
  23. Standard costs per unit for direct materials, direct labor, and variable manufacturing overhead can be used to compute spending variances as previously described in the Larry’s Lawn Service example.  
  24. A price variance is the difference between the actual price of an input and its standard price, multiplied by the actual amount of the input purchased.   iA quantity variance is the difference between how much of an input was actually used and how much should have been used and is stated in dollar terms using the standard price of the input.
  25. Price and quantity standards are determined separately because price and quantity variances usually have different causes. In addition:  
  26. Price and quantity variances can be computed for all three variable cost elements – direct materials, direct labor, and variable manufacturing overhead – even though the variances have different names as shown.
  27. Although price and quantity variances are known by different names, they are computed exactly the same way (as shown on this slide) for direct materials, direct labor, and variable manufacturing overhead
  28. The actual quantity represents the actual amount of direct materials, direct labor, and variable manufacturing overhead used.   Emphasize that the quantities in this model pertain to inputs not outputs. So, in the case of direct materials, the quantities will be stated in terms such as pounds, ounces, etc., not the number of units of finished goods produced.
  29. The standard quantity represents the standard quantity allowed for the actual output of the period.  
  30. The actual price represents the actual amount paid for the input used.
  31. The standard price represents the amount that should have been paid for the input used
  32. The materials price variance, defined as the difference between what is paid for a quantity of materials (actual price) and what should have been paid according to the standard (standard price) multiplied by the actual quantity purchased, is $21 favorable. The price variance is labeled favorable because the actual price was less than the standard price by $0.10 per kilogram. The materials quantity variance, defined as the difference between the actual quantity of materials used in production and the quantity that should have been used according to the standard (standard quantity) multiplied by the standard price per unit of material, is $50 unfavorable. The quantity variance is labeled unfavorable because the actual quantity exceeds the standard quantity allowed by 10 kilograms.
  33. The standard quantity of 200 kilograms was computed as shown
  34. The actual price of $4.90 per kilogram was computed as shown
  35. The equations that we have been using thus far can be factored as shown and used to compute quantity and price variances
  36. The purchasing manager and production manager are usually held responsible for the materials price variance, and materials quantity variance, respectively. The standard price is used to compute the quantity variance so that the production manager is not held responsible for the performance of the purchasing manager.
  37. The materials variances are not always entirely controllable by one person or department. For example: The production manager may schedule production in such a way that it requires express delivery of raw materials resulting in an unfavorable materials price variance. The purchasing manager may purchase lower quality raw materials resulting in an unfavorable materials quantity variance for the production manager.
  38. The labor rate variance, defined as the difference between the actual average hourly wage paid and the standard hourly wage multiplied by the actual number of hours worked during the period, is $1,250 unfavorable. The rate variance is labeled unfavorable because the actual average wage rate was more than the standard wage rate by $0.50 per hour. The labor efficiency variance, defined as the difference between the actual quantity of labor-hours and the quantity allowed according to the standard (standard hours) multiplied by the standard hourly rate, is $1,000 unfavorable. The efficiency variance is labeled unfavorable because the actual quantity of hours exceeds the standard quantity allowed by 100 hours.
  39. The standard quantity of 2,400 hours was computed as shown
  40. The actual price (or rate) of $10.50 per hour was computed as shown
  41. Factored equations can also be used to compute the efficiency and rate variances
  42. Labor variances are partially controllable by employees within the Production Department. For example, production managers/supervisors can influence: The deployment of highly skilled workers and less skilled workers on tasks consistent with their skill levels. The level of employee motivation within the department. The quality of production supervision. The quality of the training provided to the employees.
  43. However, labor variances are not entirely controllable by one person or department. For example: The Maintenance Department may do a poor job of maintaining production equipment. This may increase the processing time required per unit, thereby causing an unfavorable labor efficiency variance. The purchasing manager may purchase lower quality raw materials resulting in an unfavorable labor efficiency variance for the production manager.
  44. $300 favorable
  45. The variable overhead rate variance, defined as the difference between the actual variable overhead costs incurred during the period and the standard cost that should have been incurred based on the actual activity of the period, is $500 unfavorable. The rate variance is labeled unfavorable because the actual variable overhead rate was more than the standard variable overhead rate by $0.20 per hour. The variable overhead efficiency variance, defined as the difference between the actual activity of a period and the standard activity allowed, multiplied by the variable part of the predetermined overhead rate, is $400 unfavorable. The efficiency variance is labeled unfavorable because the actual quantity of the activity (hours) exceeds the standard quantity of the activity allowed by 100 hours.  
  46. The standard quantity of 2,400 hours was computed as shown
  47. The actual price of $4.20 per hour was computed as shown.
  48. Factored equations can be used to compute the efficiency and rate variances
  49. When the quantity of materials purchased differs from the quantity used in production, the quantity variance is based on the quantity used in production and the price variance is based on the quantity purchased
  50. The materials quantity variance is computed using the actual quantity used in production (200 kgs.); therefore, the materials quantity variance is $0.
  51. The materials price variance is computed using the actual quantity purchased (210 kgs.); therefore, the materials price variance is $21 favorable