The staff of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“FRB”), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), National Credit Union Administration (“NCUA”), Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”), Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”) (collectively the “Federal Financial Institution Regulatory Agencies”) and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) (collectively “Agencies”) have developed these frequently asked questions (“FAQs”) to assist financial institutions, creditors, users of consumer reports, and card issuers in complying with the final rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies implementing section 114 of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (FACT Act)
Anglo Capital Limited are Private Wealth Practitioners specializing in: International Wealth Structuring, International Wealth Solutions, Assisting US Expats, International Trusts with US Resident Benificiaries, and Israeli Regulatory Complianceproviding
China Proposes a New Foreign Investment Law: Does this Represent the Death of...Winston & Strawn LLP
Winston & Strawn Shanghai partners Brinton Scott and Matthew Durham led a roundtable discussion focused on the latest developments of the proposed new Foreign Investment Law in China. The draft law, if promulgated in its current form, would represent a major shift in China’s foreign investment regime. This presentation featured a discussion of the following hot button issues:
• Unification of Foreign Investment Laws
• Negative List Replacing the Catalogue
• Foreign Control Through a VIE Structure Will be Treated the Same as a Foreign Direct Investment
The staff of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“FRB”), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), National Credit Union Administration (“NCUA”), Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”), Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”) (collectively the “Federal Financial Institution Regulatory Agencies”) and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) (collectively “Agencies”) have developed these frequently asked questions (“FAQs”) to assist financial institutions, creditors, users of consumer reports, and card issuers in complying with the final rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies implementing section 114 of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (FACT Act)
Anglo Capital Limited are Private Wealth Practitioners specializing in: International Wealth Structuring, International Wealth Solutions, Assisting US Expats, International Trusts with US Resident Benificiaries, and Israeli Regulatory Complianceproviding
China Proposes a New Foreign Investment Law: Does this Represent the Death of...Winston & Strawn LLP
Winston & Strawn Shanghai partners Brinton Scott and Matthew Durham led a roundtable discussion focused on the latest developments of the proposed new Foreign Investment Law in China. The draft law, if promulgated in its current form, would represent a major shift in China’s foreign investment regime. This presentation featured a discussion of the following hot button issues:
• Unification of Foreign Investment Laws
• Negative List Replacing the Catalogue
• Foreign Control Through a VIE Structure Will be Treated the Same as a Foreign Direct Investment
En esta presentación se habla acerca de los distintos tipos de trastornos alimenticios que hay en la actualidad y del tratamiento que se podría emplear para solucionar el trastorno
Investment vehicles available for foreign investors in China: The wholly foreign-owned enterprise. How to set up a wholly foreign-owned enterprise (WFOE) in China. Its features, maintenance, taxation.
Contour of Investment Dispute Settlement Mechanism A Crucial Analysis of its ...ijtsrd
This paper x rays the primordial role of the investor state dispute settlement ISDS mechanisms in fostering international cooperation for economic development, especially in the extractive industries EI . As it provides a forum for investors to bring claims against States and vice versa. The ICSID Convention maintains a careful balance between the interests of the investors and those of the host States as the Convention permits the institution of proceedings by both the host States and the investors. However, the evolution of the international investment system has transformed this broadly conceived forum into a relatively unilateral forum. Since under the current system, the best a Respondent State can hope for is that the investor covers their legal costs. With the investors having much to gain, while the States have everything to lose. As such, any successful State counterclaims and claims can serve as a deterrent to any frivolous claim from the investors, thus, providing the Respondent States with a motive to bypass jurisdictional objections and move straight to the merits. In this vein, the right granted to the private parties, to effectively sue a sovereign State for breaches of “acquired rights” granted in contracts, international investment agreements IIAs , and customary international law, has been called, by both the opponents and proponents, as the pulling down of the State to the same level as a private party. Despite ICSID permission and encouragement of State counterclaims, most State counterclaims in ISDS always fail because of the narrow interpretations of the counterclaim jurisdictional requirements, as well as the lack of substantive protections for States in contracts and IIAs. On this account, the paper also considers the effectiveness of ISDS and enforcement in Cameroon, and the ISDS proceedings under the OHADA system. Which in pursuant to the global recognition of arbitration as a predominant ISDS mechanism and the concomitant growth in the normative and institutional frameworks regulating the conduct of investment arbitration, created the Common Court for Justice and Arbitration CCJA and adopted the Uniform Act on Arbitration as the lex loci arbitri for all arbitration proceedings conducted within the OHADA zone. Although investors are still sceptical about such ISDS mechanisms because they are afraid of its legal and judicial uncertainty and insecurity – thus, prompting them to anchor at the ICSID. That being the case, the paper examines these issues by first cascading the spectrum and implications of the investment dispute settlement mechanisms – by focusing on the rights and obligations of the parties of an ISDS process, and then tackling the purview and impact of investment dispute settlement and enforcement framework in Cameroon, by examining the alternative mechanisms that can enhance sustainability in its EI. Bande Gulbert Mbah Tarh "Contour of Investment Dispute Settlement Mechanism: A Crucial Analysis of its Purvie
Asia Counsel Insights provide readers an update on legal and business developments in Vietnam.
In this edition we summarise the legal changes to the minimum wage, proposed changes to the registration of foreign loans and data privacy regulations and new law on insurance business.
PRC New Foreign Investment Law--Overview and AnalysisLinjunLawrenceGUO
China's top legislator adopted the new Foreign Investment Law on 15 March 2019. This new law lays out the fundamental legal framework for FDI attraction in China. Here we present an overview of the key systems and rules, and a preliminary analysis of primary issues and questions in relation to this new law.
US Senate Financial Reform Managers Amendment Summary, March 23, 2010catelong
The law firm Davis Polk created this Managers Amendment Summary to the March Dodd bill
It details changes in the wording of the proposed law from an earlier draft
En esta presentación se habla acerca de los distintos tipos de trastornos alimenticios que hay en la actualidad y del tratamiento que se podría emplear para solucionar el trastorno
Investment vehicles available for foreign investors in China: The wholly foreign-owned enterprise. How to set up a wholly foreign-owned enterprise (WFOE) in China. Its features, maintenance, taxation.
Contour of Investment Dispute Settlement Mechanism A Crucial Analysis of its ...ijtsrd
This paper x rays the primordial role of the investor state dispute settlement ISDS mechanisms in fostering international cooperation for economic development, especially in the extractive industries EI . As it provides a forum for investors to bring claims against States and vice versa. The ICSID Convention maintains a careful balance between the interests of the investors and those of the host States as the Convention permits the institution of proceedings by both the host States and the investors. However, the evolution of the international investment system has transformed this broadly conceived forum into a relatively unilateral forum. Since under the current system, the best a Respondent State can hope for is that the investor covers their legal costs. With the investors having much to gain, while the States have everything to lose. As such, any successful State counterclaims and claims can serve as a deterrent to any frivolous claim from the investors, thus, providing the Respondent States with a motive to bypass jurisdictional objections and move straight to the merits. In this vein, the right granted to the private parties, to effectively sue a sovereign State for breaches of “acquired rights” granted in contracts, international investment agreements IIAs , and customary international law, has been called, by both the opponents and proponents, as the pulling down of the State to the same level as a private party. Despite ICSID permission and encouragement of State counterclaims, most State counterclaims in ISDS always fail because of the narrow interpretations of the counterclaim jurisdictional requirements, as well as the lack of substantive protections for States in contracts and IIAs. On this account, the paper also considers the effectiveness of ISDS and enforcement in Cameroon, and the ISDS proceedings under the OHADA system. Which in pursuant to the global recognition of arbitration as a predominant ISDS mechanism and the concomitant growth in the normative and institutional frameworks regulating the conduct of investment arbitration, created the Common Court for Justice and Arbitration CCJA and adopted the Uniform Act on Arbitration as the lex loci arbitri for all arbitration proceedings conducted within the OHADA zone. Although investors are still sceptical about such ISDS mechanisms because they are afraid of its legal and judicial uncertainty and insecurity – thus, prompting them to anchor at the ICSID. That being the case, the paper examines these issues by first cascading the spectrum and implications of the investment dispute settlement mechanisms – by focusing on the rights and obligations of the parties of an ISDS process, and then tackling the purview and impact of investment dispute settlement and enforcement framework in Cameroon, by examining the alternative mechanisms that can enhance sustainability in its EI. Bande Gulbert Mbah Tarh "Contour of Investment Dispute Settlement Mechanism: A Crucial Analysis of its Purvie
Asia Counsel Insights provide readers an update on legal and business developments in Vietnam.
In this edition we summarise the legal changes to the minimum wage, proposed changes to the registration of foreign loans and data privacy regulations and new law on insurance business.
PRC New Foreign Investment Law--Overview and AnalysisLinjunLawrenceGUO
China's top legislator adopted the new Foreign Investment Law on 15 March 2019. This new law lays out the fundamental legal framework for FDI attraction in China. Here we present an overview of the key systems and rules, and a preliminary analysis of primary issues and questions in relation to this new law.
US Senate Financial Reform Managers Amendment Summary, March 23, 2010catelong
The law firm Davis Polk created this Managers Amendment Summary to the March Dodd bill
It details changes in the wording of the proposed law from an earlier draft
Rise of Third - Party Funding and International Arbitration
Introduction
In the intricate realm of international arbitration, where various types of claims intersect with diverse jurisdictions and legal frameworks, the inclusion of third-party funding (TPF) adds a layer of complexity. Legal practitioners engaged in transactions involving TPF for international arbitration must grapple with considerations spanning multiple arbitral rules, governing laws, and treaties. This addendum aims to shed light on common issues and approaches in TPF within the context of international arbitration, offering a comprehensive analysis of the evolving landscape.
Core Concept
The core concept of TPF involves external entities providing financial support to parties engaged in dispute resolution. This support is instrumental in mitigating financial constraints and fostering access to justice, thereby ensuring a level playing field for all parties involved.
Mechanics of TPF
In the mechanics of TPF, key participants include the funded party, typically the claimant seeking financial assistance, the funder, which can range from companies to funds providing external financial backing, and legal counsel, representing the funded party. Structured agreements guide the roles and relationships among these participants.
Growing Acceptance of TPF
The landscape of TPF in international arbitration has witnessed a remarkable surge in recent times, cutting across diverse claim types and venues. Complex commercial disputes, often involving sophisticated legal counsel from premier international law firms, can impose substantial fee burdens on the parties involved. Additionally, many international arbitrations involve claimants facing capital constraints, making TPF a vital resource for those who may not have the financial means to pursue their claims independently.
Anecdotal evidence suggests that TPF has become a routine aspect of larger international arbitrations. Conversations with claimants, practitioners, and arbitration stakeholders indicate a pervasive trend towards TPF utilization. Limited public data also supports this trend. For instance, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) noted an "increased resort" to funding, with at least 20 recent ICSID cases involving TPF. This growing recognition of TPF's prevalence is evident in the amendments to various arbitration rules and treaties, reflecting the need to address the evolving dynamics of international arbitration.
Due Diligence
Due diligence plays a crucial role in the TPF process, involving a comprehensive assessment covering claim valuation, jurisdictional considerations, merits of the case, potential damages, enforceability, and estimated costs. This two-tier review, incorporating both internal and external assessments, ensures a comprehensive understanding of the case. The funding agreement, a cornerstone of TPF, governs conditions for funding, security arrangements, dispute resolution mec
Evaluation of factoring rule of bangladesh bankM S Siddiqui
Bangladesh should consider ratifying UNIDROIT Convention to facilitate the factoring services. Bangladesh may consider having a law on factoring services. BB should clarify the issues related to general rule of factoring, effective communication with edifactoring and arbitration in order to resolve the disputed and smooth transaction of factoring in domestic and international trade.
Similar to Breaking the Restrictions: The Application of VIE in China’s Cross-border M&As and IPOs 突破限制:VIE在中国企业跨境并购与上市中的应用 (20)
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
Breaking the Restrictions: The Application of VIE in China’s Cross-border M&As and IPOs 突破限制:VIE在中国企业跨境并购与上市中的应用
1. 突破限制:
Breaking the Restrictions:
VIE在中国企业跨境并购与上市中的应用
The Application of VIE in China’s Cross-border M&As and IPOs
简明指引 VIE in a Nutshell
杨乾武 律师 YANG Qianwu, Esq.
大成(深圳)律师事务所高级合伙人 Senior Partner, Dentons Shenzhen
2016年11月4日 November 4th, 2016 深圳·凯宾斯基酒店 Kempinski
www.YangQianwu.com
*有关本文的更新,欢迎浏览我们的博客
*For further update of this slideshow, please visit our blog at
http://blog.sina.com.cn/yangqianwu
4. Table of Contents
4
PART I VIE Overview: The Uncertain Mainstream
PART II Major Risks: Concealing Illegal Intentions With a Lawful Form
PART III Solutions & Strategies
PART IV Mixed Blessing: VIE After the Draft FIL & the Global Trend
PART V What’s Different About Us
PART VI Stay in Touch
6. 6
VIE:通过一系列协议安排模仿股权控制
VIE: Mimic Ownership Through a Series of Complex Contractual Arrangements
备注:商务部发布的《关于解除沃尔玛收购纽海控股33.6%股权经营者集中限制性条件的公告》(商务部公告 [2016] 第23号)已解除2012年作出的限制。
Note: The MOFCOM released “The notice of lifting the conditions on Walmart’s acquisition of 33.6% of the shares in Newheight Holdings” (MOFCOM [2016] No.23) to lift the 2012 decision.
VIE is used ONLY
to circumvent
Chinese laws on
foreign investment
restrictions or
prohibitions
VIE was declared
illegal by the
Supreme People’s
Court in 2012
The MOFCOM
expressly
prohibited
Walmart from
acquiring Yihaodian
via VIE in 2012
11. 11
Entrusting party: Chinachem Financial Services(HK)
委托方:华懋集团(香港)
(Chinachem)
Proxy: China Small and Medium Enterprise Investment Co. Ltd.
受托方:中国中小企业投资有限公司
(China SME)
China Minsheng Banking Corporation(PRC)
(Minsheng Bank / 民生银行)
Dispute of the ownership of
shares representing a 6.5%
stake of Minsheng Bank
争议事项为民生银行的6.5%
股权归属
委托投资安排:
‣ Chinachem授权给China SME投资民生银行股权
‣ Chinachem借款给China SME作为投资基金
Disputed Parities 争议双方
Entrustment arrangement 委托投资协议安排
Entrustment arrangement:
‣ China SME acted as a proxy of Chinachem to hold the shares in Minsheng Bank
‣ Chinachem lent the investment funds to China SME
Chinachem案:最高院判决VIE合同因“合法形式掩盖非法目的”无效
Chinachem Case: The Supreme People’s Court Invalidated VIE Arrangements due to “Concealing
Illegal Intentions With a Lawful Form”
资料来源 Sources:
1. 最高院民事判决书(2002)民四终字第30号(判决时间:2012年10月29日)
1. Civil Judgement of the Supreme People’s Court (Min Si Zhong Zi No.30 [2002]) (issued on 29 October,2012)
2. “In China, Concern About a Chill on Foreign Investments”, available at http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/06/02/in-china-concern-of-a-chill-on-foreign-investments/?_r=0 (last visited on 16th
November, 2016)
12. ‣ 《委托书》:“受托人China SME为全权代表……全权管理和行使委托人
Chinachem 在民生银行的900万美元资本金的各项权益。”
‣ 《借款协议》:“贷款方Chinachem同意向借款方China SME提供909万美元的借款
……借款用途为入股民生银行的资本金,其中股本金900万美元,另9万美元
为筹备费用;入股所得的股权相应抵押给贷款方......借款年利率以每年民生银
行的分红为准,所分红利即时转给贷款方。经贷款方确认,借款方可一次或提前
偿还借款,借款利息按借款方实际占用天数计收;如借款方出售民生银行股权必须
得到贷款方同意,其售卖收入全部作为贷款方本息即时转入贷方。”
12
最高院Chinachem案:无效的VIE与典型VIE不同
Chinachem Case: Invalid VIE Differs From a Typical One
资料来源:最高院民事判决书(2002)民四终字第30号(判决时间:2012年10月29日)
Source: Civil Judgement of the Supreme People’s Court (Min Si Zhong Zi No.30 [2002]) (issued on 29 October,2012)
13. ‣ …the Supreme Court to deem the relationship… as an entrustment relationship.
‣ Neither the power of attorney / voting right proxy agreement nor any of the other typical
VIE agreements provide that registered shareholders are holding equity
interests in the VIEs on behalf of the WFOE or its affiliate.
‣ …Chinachem expected to receive economic benefits in the form of loan
interests from the entrusted investment arrangement. …the loans are not used to
transfer economic interests from the VIE to the WFOE.
‣ It remains unknown based on the publicly available information whether the arrangement,
through which Chinachem expected to receive return for its entrusted investment in the form of
loan interests, had satisfied the required foreign exchange approval or registration procedures,
including the procedures for foreign currency loans.
13
最高院Chinachem案:无效的VIE与典型VIE不同(续)
Chinachem Case: Invalid VIE Differs From a Typical One (Cont’d)
资料来源 Source: “Baiduʼs response to the comments contained in the letter dated June 18, 2013 from SEC regarding the 2012 20-F”, available at
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1415016/000114420413047258/filename1.htm (last visited on 16th November, 2016)
15. 15
GigaMedia Limited(Singapore)
GigaMedia (新加坡)
T2CN Holding Limited(BVI)
T2CN 控股公司(BVI)
online gaming operations 网上游戏业务运营
(Prohibited Category of Foreign Investment)
属外商投资禁止类目录
VIEs
股权控制
协议控制
CEO / Founder of OPCO
运营公司CEO / 创始人
GigaMedia’s Board
GigaMedia董事会
wished to regain control of the OpCo by asserting that the
VIE agreements were legally invalid
想以“VIE协议没有法律效力”为理由重新获得OPCO的控制权
Disputed Parities 争议双方
wished to replace the CEO(also the Founder)
想要替换中国境内运营公司CEO(也是创始人)
境外 Offshore
境内 Onshore
GigaMedia案:CIETAC裁决VIE合同因“合法形式掩盖非法目的”无效
GigaMedia Case: The CIETAC Arbitral Decisions Invalidated the VIE Agreements due to “Concealing
Illegal Intentions With a Lawful Form”
NASDAQ上市公司
NASDAQ-listed Company
备注:关于CIETAC做出的仲裁裁决,仲裁裁决保密不对外公开且不具有判例的约束性。
Note:As for the CIETAC Cases, arbitral awards are confidential and have no binding or reference effect at all.
资料来源 Sources: 1. “Fraud Heightens Jeopardy of Investing in Chinese Companies”, available at http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/04/24/fraud-heightens-jeopardy-of-investing-in-chinese-
companies/?_r=0 (last visited on 16th November, 2016), 2. “Gigamedia And The Perils Of VIEs. Dude, Where’s My Chop?”, available at http://www.chinalawblog.com/2011/06/vie.html (last visited
on 16th November, 2016)
T2 Technology(WOFE)
16. 网游行业 Online gaming businesses is
‣ 中国外商投资产业指导目录的禁止领域,且
classified in the prohibited category of foreign investment,and
‣ 少数被明令禁止外商以协议控制方式进行投资的行业之一 (13号文)
one of few industries where there are rules specifically prohibiting foreign investors
from controlling and participating in the business indirectly through contractual or
technical support arrangements (Circular 13)
16
法律依据 Legal Framework:
1.《合同法》(主席令[1999] 第8号)
1. The Contract Law (President Order [1999] No. 8)
2.《外商产业投资指导目录(2015)》(国家发展和改革委员会、商务部令[2015] 第22号 )
2. The Catalogue of Industries for Guiding Foreign Investment (2015 Revision) (NDRC, MOFCOM [2015] No.22)
3. 新闻出版总署、国家版权局、全国“扫黄打非”工作小组办公室在2009年9月28日联合发布的《关于贯彻落实国务院<“三定”规定>和中央编办有关解释,进一步加强网络游戏前置审批和进口网络游戏审批管理的通知》(新
出联 [2009] 第13号)
3. The Notice Regarding the Consistent Implementation of the "Stipulations on 'Three Provisions'" of the State Council and the Relevant Interpretations of the State Commission Office for Public Sector Reform and the
Further Strengthening of the Administration of Pre-examination and Approval of Internet Games and the Examination and Approval of Imported Internet Games (Xin Chu Lian [2009] No. 13) published jointly by PRC
General Administration of Press and Publication, National Copyright Administration, and National Office of Combating Pornography and Illegal Publications on 28 September 2009
GigaMedia案:无效的VIE与典型VIE不同
GigaMedia Case: Invalid VIE Differs From a Typical One
17. ‣ Prohibition on indirect control in online game businesses by foreign investors is
stipulated in a circular (“Circular 13”) promulgated by the General
Administration of Press and Publication, the National Copyright
Administration, and the National Office of Combating Pornography and
Illegal Publications(“GAPP”).
‣ However, Circular 13 does NOT provide any specific views on the
consequences of using of VIE structure. The practices and impact of
Circular 13 remains uncertain…We are NOT aware of any cases where
the prohibited industries were punished under Circular 13.
17
中国政府明确禁止使用VIE的行业仍使用VIE:13号文没有明确法律后果
Industries Prohibited by GAPP Still Using VIE Structure: Circular 13 Does NOT Provide Specific
Consequences
资料来源 Source: “Baiduʼs response to the comments contained in the letter dated June 18, 2013 from SEC regarding the 2012 20-F”, available at
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1415016/000114420413047258/filename1.htm (last visited on 16th November, 2016)
18. ‣ Under the PRC Contract Law, a contract may be held invalid under limited
circumstances, including the “violation of mandatory provisions of the
laws,” which refers to “laws” as either laws promulgated by the PRC National
People’s Congress or its Standing Committee, or administrative regulations issued by
the PRC State Council.
‣ Circular 13 is not a “law” based on the definition set out above. The
Interpretation I of the PRC Supreme Court of Several Issues concerning the
Application of the Contract Law supports this interpretation by emphasizing that all
courts shall only rely on laws and administrative regulations to declare a contract
invalid, and must not make such judgments based on rules formulated by ministries
and commissions under the PRC State Council.
‣ Therefore, it remains questionable whether the contractual arrangements in the
CIETAC arbitral decision was properly deemed invalid.
18
中国政府明确禁止使用VIE的行业仍使用VIE:13号文不是“法律”
Industries Prohibited by GAPP Still Using VIE Structure: Circular 13 Is NOT a “LAW”
资料来源 Source: “Baiduʼs response to the comments contained in the letter dated June 18, 2013 from SEC regarding the 2012 20-F”, available at
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1415016/000114420413047258/filename1.htm (last visited on 16th November, 2016)
19. 中国的司法判决和仲裁裁决不具有先例约束性。
Judicial judgments and arbitration awards are not binding precedents
in China.
19
顺便提一下......
By the way…
资料来源 Source: “Baiduʼs response to the comments contained in the letter dated June 18, 2013 from SEC regarding the 2012 20-F”, available at
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1415016/000114420413047258/filename1.htm (last visited on 16th November, 2016)
21. 21
福建纵横高速执行案VIE合同有效:福州中院裁定执行HKIAC仲裁裁决
The Fujian Across Express Case: The Fuzhou Intermediate Court Enforced the HKIAC
Awards Involving Valid VIE Agreements
资料来源 :《福建纵横高速信息技术有限公司、福建分众传媒有限公司等与史带开曼投资公司申请不予执行一案的执行裁定书》([2014] 榕执监字第51号)
Source: Fujian Across Express Information Technology Co Ltd and others v China MediaExpress Holdings Inc (2014) Rong Zhi Jian Zi No 51
‣ 申请人认为
‣ VIE 协议规避外商投资限制
‣ 仲裁协议约定适用美国法规避中国法律
中国高速传媒控股有限公司、福建纵横高速信
息技术有限公司、福建分众传媒有限公司
(申请人 The applicants)
史带公司(开曼)
(被申请人 The respondent)
程征 Cheng Zheng
(申请人 The applicant)
‣ HKIAC在2012年12月19日作出两份仲裁裁决 (HKIAC/A11030 & HKIAC/A11098),裁决违约方赔偿史带公司因违反VIE协议产生的损失
The two HKIAC awards issued by HKIAC on 19th December, 2012 (HKIAC/A11030 & HKIAC/A11098) held the applicants to
compensate the losses incurred by the respondent
‣ 福州中院在2014年11月5日裁定执行HKIAC仲裁裁决
The Fuzhou Intermediate Court enforced the HKIAC awards involving valid VIE agreements on 5th November, 2014
申请人(福州中院)/ 被申请人(香港仲裁)
The applicants (the Fujian Intermediate Court) / The respondents (HKIAC)
被申请人(福州中院)/ 申请人(香港仲裁)
The respondent (the Fujian Intermediate Court) / The claimant (HKIAC)
‣ The applicants contended that
‣ the VIE structure adopted in the underlying transactions was
prohibited by mandatory provisions of Chinese law
‣ the arbitration agreement had applied US law with the purpose of
sidestepping mandatory provisions of Chinese law
‣ 投资者权利协议
Investor’s Rights Agreement (IRA)
‣ 股权购买协议
Share Purchase
Agreement (SPA)
22. 22
福州中院执行HKIAC裁决:不违反“公共利益”
The Fuzhou Intermediate Court Enforced the HKIAC Awards: NO Violation of “Public Interest”
‣ 对行政法规和部门规章中强制性规定的违反,并不当然构成对我国公共政策的违反。
A mere violation of government regulations would therefore be insufficient to
establish a case of violation of “public interest” or “public policy”.
‣ 法院应该关注执行结果或执行影响,而不是仲裁裁决的实体法律问题
The court should focus on the effect or consequences of enforcement, rather than on
the content of or substantive issues in the award.
资料来源 :《福建纵横高速信息技术有限公司、福建分众传媒有限公司等与史带开曼投资公司申请不予执行一案的执行裁定书》([2014] 榕执监字第51号)
Source: Fujian Across Express Information Technology Co Ltd and others v China MediaExpress Holdings Inc (2014) Rong Zhi Jian Zi No 51
25. ‣ 轻资产:尽量多的资产放到WOFE而不是VIE
Lighten VIE: WOFE, instead of VIE, holds assets as much as possible
‣ VIE管理委员会:独立监督VIE运行
VIE Management Committee: Supervising the VIE arrangements independently
‣ 符合《外国投资法(草案)》关于中国企业“实质控制”的承诺
Undertaking of de facto control by Chinese investors provided by the Draft FIL
25
VIE结构设计要点: 原则
Key Considerations of Structuring a VIE: Principles
26. 26
“实质控制”指符合以下条件之一的情形:
1. 权益高于50%:股份、股权、财产份额、表决权或者其他类似权益的
2. 权益低于50% 但:
‣ 有权直接或者间接任命该企业董事会或类似决策机构半数以上成员;
‣ 有能力确保其提名人员取得该企业董事会或类似决策机构半数以上席位;
‣ 所享有的表决权足以对股东(大)会或者董事会等决策机构的决议产生重大影响
3. 通过合同、信托等能够对该企业的经营、财务、人事或技术等施加决定性影响的
法律依据:《中华人民共和国外国投资法(草案征求意见稿)》第一百六十四条
Legal Framework: Article 164 of the Foreign Investment Law of the People’s Republic of China (draft for consultation)
VIE结构设计要点:中国企业“实际控制”(实质重于形式)
Key Considerations of Structuring a VIE: De Facto Control by Chinese Investors (Doctrine of Substance Over Form)
27. 27
"Control" refers to the circumstance that any of the following conditions is met:
1. Holding, directly or indirectly, not less than 50% of shares, equities, share of
properties, voting rights or other similar rights of the enterprise
2. Holding, directly or indirectly, less than 50% of shares, equities, share of properties, voting rights
or other similar rights of the enterprise, but falling under any of the following circumstances:
‣ Having the right to directly or indirectly appoint not less than half of the members of the
board of directors or other similar decision-making body of the enterprise
‣ Having the ability to ensure that its nominees occupy not less than half of the seats on
the board of directors or other similar decision-making body of the enterprise
‣ Holding voting rights sufficient to impose significant impacts on any resolution of the
board of shareholders, at the general meeting of shareholders, or of the board of directors or
other decision-making body of the enterprise
3. Imposing decisive impacts on the operation, finance, personnel or technology of the enterprise by
contract, trust, or other means
VIE结构设计要点:中国企业“实际控制”(实质重于形式)
Key Considerations of Structuring a VIE: De Facto Control by Chinese Investors (Doctrine of Substance Over Form)
法律依据:《中华人民共和国外国投资法(草案征求意见稿)》第一百六十四条
Legal Framework: Article 164 of the Foreign Investment Law of the People’s Republic of China (draft for consultation)
28. 28
‣ 股份超过50%的股东保留中国国籍承诺
Undertaking of the shareholders holding more than 50% of shares of the listing
entity for keeping PRC nationality
‣ 受让人中国国籍限制
Restriction of transferee’s PRC nationality
‣ 配偶承诺
Spouse undertaking
‣ 一致行动人决议
Resolutions of persons acting in concert
VIE结构设计要点:作出符合中国企业“实质控制”的相关承诺
Key Considerations of Structuring a VIE: Undertakings of De Facto Control by Chinese Investors Provided by the Draft FIL
30. ‣ 仲裁条款:选择法治成熟的国家或地区作为仲裁地(例如:香港)
Arbitration clause: choosing a country or region with developed rule of law
(e.g., Hong Kong) as the Seat of Arbitration
‣ 准据法:选择普通法(例如:美国)
Governing Laws: choosing common law (e.g., United State)
‣ 独立的违约金条款:不受合同整体效力的影响
Several liquidated damages clause: Survival of an invalid VIE agreement
30
VIE合同设计要点:原则
Key Considerations of Drafting a VIE Contract: Principles
31. ‣ 准据法的选择需遵守以下几个原则
The following rules shall be followed when choosing governing law
‣ 不得规避我国强制性或者禁止性法律规范
NO circumvention of mandatory provisions of laws
‣ 不得损害国家“公共利益”
NO violation of “public interest”
31
VIE合同设计要点:准据法选择
Key Considerations of Drafting a VIE Contract: Governing Laws
法律框架 Legal Framework:《最高院关于贯彻执行﹤民法通则﹥若干问题的意见(试行)》(法(办)发[1988]6号) 第194条;《民法通则》(全国人大常委[1987])第150条;《最高院关于内地与香港
特别行政区相互执行仲裁裁决的安排》(法释[2000]3号 )第7条
32. 但是,在仲裁裁决的执行中,对行政法规和部门规章强制性规定的违反并不
当然构成对我国“公共利益”或“公共政策”的违反。
However, a mere violation of government regulations would therefore
be insufficient to establish a case of violation of “public interest” or
“public policy” in the context of enforcement of an arbitral award.
32
VIE合同设计要点:准据法选择(续)
Key Considerations of Drafting a VIE Contract: Governing Laws (Cont’d)
法律框架 Legal Framework:最高院《对海口中院不予承认和执行瑞典斯德哥尔摩商会仲裁院仲裁裁决请示的复函》(民四他字 [2001] 第12号 )
34. 案例研习:阿里巴巴
Case Study: Alibaba
‣ 阿里巴巴于2014年9月19日在美国上市,募集250亿美元,迄今为止全球最大IPO
Alibaba’s blockbuster IPO was debuted on 19 September 2014 and had raised a total
amount of US$25 billion. It is ranked as the world’s biggest IPO to date.
‣ 阿里巴巴使用VIE结构上市
The Alibaba listing was operated under the VIE structure
‣ 大部分资产由WOFE持有以降低投资者的投资风险
The listing had mitigated investors’ risks by holding most of its assets in the foreign-owned
part of its business
‣ 阿里巴巴的国内运营公司(VIE)只持有集团资产7.5% 及产生11.9%的收益
Alibaba’s PRC operating companies hold only 7.5% of the group’s assets and generate
11.9% of its revenue.
‣ 减少国内OPCOs股东滥用的风险
Reduce risk of abuse by the PRC operating companies’ shareholders
34
36. 举世瞩目《外国投资法(草案)》:VIE巨变在即
The Draft FIL: VIE’s Sea Change on the Horizon
36
“That is likely to be a boon for Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and Chinese
Internet companies like it, investors, executives and lawyers say. But for foreign
shareholders of those companies as well as Western Internet firms trying to
operate in China, the rules could be a double-edged sword.”
资料来源 Source: “How China’s Draft Rules May Affect Foreign Investors”, available at http://www.wsj.com/articles/how-chinas-draft-rules-may-affect-foreign-investors-1422412416(last visited on
16th November, 2016)
38. 《外国投资法(草案)》对既存VIE的三种可能性处理
Impact on the Existing VIE Structure by the Draft FIL: 3 Possible Options
1. 实施协议控制的外国投资企业,向国务院外国投资主管部门申报其受中国投资者实
际控制的,可继续保留协议控制结构,相关主体可继续开展经营活动;或者
2. 实施协议控制的外国投资企业,应当向国务院外国投资主管部门申请认定其受中国
投资者实际控制;在国务院外国投资主管部门认定其受中国投资者实际控制后,可继
续保留协议控制结构,相关主体可继续开展经营活动;或者
3. 实施协议控制的外国投资企业,应当向国务院外国投资主管部门申请准入许可,国
务院外国投资主管部门会同有关部门综合考虑外国投资企业的实际控制人等因素作出
决定。
38
资料来源:《关于<中华人民共和国外国投资法(草案征求意见稿)>的说明》第三条
Source: Article 3 of the Notes to the Foreign Investment Law of the People's Republic of China (Draft for consultation)
39. 1. where a foreign-invested enterprise that implements VIE structure declares to the
competent authority of foreign investment under the State Council its actual control by
Chinese investors, it may continue to retain the VIE structure and the relevant subjects
may continue to carry out operating activities; or
2. a foreign-invested enterprise that implements VIE structure shall apply to the competent
authority of foreign investment under the State Council to determine its actual control by
Chinese investors; after the competent authority of foreign investment under the State
Council determines its actual control by Chinese investors, it may continue to retain the
VIE structure and the relevant subjects may continue to carry out operating activities; or
3. a foreign-invested enterprise that implements VIE structure shall apply to the competent
authority of foreign investment under the State Council for access permission and the
competent authority of foreign investment under the State Council in concert with the
relevant departments will make a decision after comprehensively considering the actual
controller of the foreign-invested enterprise and other factors.
39
《外国投资法(草案)》对既存VIE的三种可能性处理
Impact on the Existing VIE Structure by the Draft FIL: 3 Possible Options
资料来源:《关于<中华人民共和国外国投资法(草案征求意见稿)>的说明》第三条
Source: Article 3 of the Notes to the Foreign Investment Law of the People's Republic of China (Draft for consultation)
40. ‣ 本质上溯及既往
Ex post facto law in nature
‣ 剥夺公民权法案
A bill of attainder
‣ 损害合同义务
Impairs the obligation of contracts
‣ 剥夺既得权利
Divests vested rights
‣ 宪法禁止
Constitutional prohibition
40
《外国投资法(草案)》后既存VIE合法性的宪法思考:法不溯及既往及例外
Constitutional Considerations on the Possible Effect of the Draft FIL Regarding the Legality of
the Existing VIE: Strict Exceptions to Ex Post Facto Law
42. 全球态度:HKEx
The Global Attitude: HKEx
42
‣ 16A. For the avoidance of doubts, where restricted businesses are involved, the use of Structured
Contracts are permitted ONLY to address the foreign ownership
restriction, e.g. foreign investors can only operate the restricted businesses under joint
ventures with the foreign portion of the total investment and hence shareholding below 50%.
‣ Following publication of the consultation draft of the new PRC Foreign Investment Law by the
Ministry of Commerce in January 2015, concerns over the legality and validity of Structured
Contracts to hold interests in PRC businesses which are subject to foreign ownership
restrictions may be heightened. Applicants which use Structured Contracts to hold interests in
PRC businesses are encouraged to contact the Exchange at the earliest
possible opportunity to seek informal and confidential guidance.
资料来源:香港联交所上市决策(HKEx-LD43-3 )
Sources: HKEx Listing Decision (HKEx-LD43-3)
43. Refer to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange requirements
43
全球态度:UKLA
The Global Attitude: UKLA
44. 44
‣ The ASIC review highlighted concerns about the legal status of VIEs in
China and the enforceability of key contractual
arrangements by foreign investors.
‣ While the moratorium is in place NSX will refuse to accept applications
from Issuers using a VIE structure.
资料来源 Source: “IPO VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES – MORATORIUM ON IPOS”, available at https://www.nsxa.com.au/documents/practice_notes/PN11-ForeignIssuers.pdf (last visited on
16th November, 2016)
全球态度:NSX
The Global Attitude: NSX
45. 45
“The federal system is very much a non-merit based regulatory
system…It effectively takes the position that you can sell anything
you want, as long as you disclose it accurately.”
David Martin
Former head of the SEC’s division of corporation finance
全球态度:NYSE & NASDAQ
The Global Attitude: NYSE & NASDAQ
资料来源 Source: “Alibaba’s Behemoth IPO Making Few Ripples in Washington”, available at https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-07-10/alibaba-nears-sec-assent-as-biggest-ipo-
doesn-t-disturb (last visited on 16th November, 2016)
47. 47
我们的不同之处
What’s Different About Us
我们的团队来自全球最大且唯一的多中心律师事务所,我们致力于整合大成全球金融及资本市
场经验、智慧及资源,提升本土服务水平,为客户提供全球一站式金融及资本市场法律服务。
As a team from the largest and the only polycentric global law firm, our team is committed to
consolidating Dentons’ global experience, wisdom and resources in capital markets to improve
local services and provide one-stop legal services to our clients.
48. 48
余金
律师
法学硕士,爱丁堡大学
法学学士,武汉大学
会计学学士,武汉大学
YU Jin
Associate, attorney-at-law
LLM, The University of Edinburgh
LLB, Wuhan University
BACC, Wuhan University
周誓超
律师助理,实习律师
法学硕士,南京大学
法学学士,南京理工大学
英语专业学士,南京理工大学
ZHOU Shichao
Associate, trainee lawyer
LLM, Nanjing University
LLB, Nanjing University of Science and Technology
BA, Nanjing University of Science and Technology
林力斐
律师助理,实习律师
法学硕士,伦敦大学玛丽女王学院
法学学士,华南师范大学
LIN Lifei
Associate, trainee lawyer
LLM, Queen Mary University of London
LLB, South China Normal University
崔灏
律师助理,香港律师资格
法学博士,香港城市大学
法学学士,武汉大学
英语专业学士,武汉大学
CUI Hao
Associate , HK CityU PCLL
JD, City University of Hong Kong
LLB, Wuhan University
BA, Wuhan University
致谢团队成员
Acknowledgments to My Team
如下团队成员对本PPT亦有贡献
The following team members also contribute to this slideshow
49. 49
‣ 香港大学(法学硕士) LLM, The University of Hong Kong
‣ 清华大学(法学学士) LLB, Tsinghua University
‣ 东北财经大学(经济学学士)BA in Economics, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics
杨乾武律师是大成律师事务所深圳办公室的高级合伙人,主要专注于境内外上市、并购
与中外合资、新三板等境内外资本市场业务。杨律师的企业客户包括顶级世界五百强企
业和中国著名上市央企,服务过的行业包括TMT、新能源、体育、智能制造及地产。杨
律师擅长为客户提供创新的法律解决方案。
Mr. YANG Qianwu is a senior partner of Dentons Shenzhen. His practice primarily
focuses on IPO, M&A, Joint Venture, New Third Board Listing and other capital
markets matters. Mr. Yang’s corporate clients include top Fortune 500 companies and
prestigious state-owned enterprises. He has advised clients in the industries of TMT,
new energy, sports, intelligent manufacturing and real estate. Mr. Yang has pioneered
the use of state-of-the-art legal solutions for clients.
演讲者简介:杨乾武 律师(一)
About the Speaker: YANG Qianwu, Esq.(1)
51. ‣ Counsel to a prestigious public state-owned automobile enterprise in a joint venture set-up project with a
top European automobile enterprise
‣ Counsel to a two-way radio product design and manufacture company listed on GEM of Hong Kong
Stock Exchange
‣ Counsel to an apparel supply chain manage company listed on the Main Board of Hong Kong Stock
Exchange
‣ Counsel to a Shenzhen headquartered O2O e-commerce company listed on the Main Market of the
London Stock Exchange
‣ Counsel to NEEQ listing, private placement, market-making, equity incentive and other capital markets
law matters of more than 10 companies
‣ Counsel to a well-known Shenzhen A-share listed company's acquiring a Shenzhen private company
and several European companies
51
代表项目 Selected Representations
演讲者简介:杨乾武 律师(二)
About the Speaker: YANG Qianwu, Esq.(2)
53. ‣ Speaker, “Sino-German M&A: Opportunities, Challenge & Solutions”, Cross-border M&A Symposium of New Third Board Services
Center, Shenzhen, September 5, 2016
‣ Speaker, “Chinese Companies Cross-border M&A: Opportunities, Challenge & Solutions”, Huarong Dentons Cross-border M&A
Symposium, Shenzhen, July 19, 2016
‣ Speaker, “Mixed Blessing: VIE After the Draft FIL & Solutions”, PEA Capital Market Symposium, Shenzhen, January 17, 2016
‣ Speaker, “The Experience & Enlightenment of Cross-Border IPO Lawyers”,The Experience of Cross-border IPO Lawyers from
Australia, America, British and China, Shenzhen Bar Association, Shenzhen, December 31, 2016
‣ Speaker: “M&A in a Nutshell, Opportunities, Challenges & Guidance”, 2015 China M&A Advanced Training Program, China Venture
Capital Research Institute,November 19, 2015
‣ Speaker, “The Five Commandments of Due Diligence for M&A in China: Doctrines & Techniques Beyond the Checklist", Sino-
Germany M&A Forum, Shenzhen Bar Association, Shenzhen, October 17, 2014
‣ Speaker, “The Most Preferential Entrance to China for Foreign Investment: a Nutshell of the Most Special Law Environment for
Foreign Investment in Qianhai, Shenzhen", The International Institute for Management Development Business School of Switzerland
& HSBC Business School of Peking University Forum, Shenzhen, March 1, 2013
‣ Speaker, “Lawyering My Way: The Myths & Truth of China's Rule of Law”, Creating a Global Law Department: China and U.S.
Perspectives Forum, New York State Bar Association & School of Transnational Law, Peking University, Shenzhen, January 10, 2013
‣ Speaker, “The Way of an International Chinese Lawyer: The Ideal of Rule of Law From My Father”, Tsinghua Law School, Shenzhen,
September 10, 2011
‣ Speaker, “Rule of Law Is a Matter of Belief: Why I Believe in the Rule of Law in China”, Forum of School of Transnational Law of
Peking University & Shenzhen Bar Association, Shenzhen, June 11, 2011
‣ Speaker, “Guideline on Key Issues About SMEs' IPO, NEEQ Listing & Private Placement”,Shenzhen IPO Office & Longhua New
District Economic Development Bureau, Shenzhen, April 1, 2015
53
专业视角 Insight
演讲者简介:杨乾武 律师(三)
About the Speaker: YANG Qianwu, Esq.(3)