Blogging for a change@andrewcareaga#hewebarJuly 22, 2011
Who am I and why am I here?
OUR UNIVERSITY: YESTERDAY …
… AND TODAY
	‘Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.’George Santayana
Remember 2006?
In 2006 there was no…Twitter (but there was twttr)Heweb backchannel.eduGuru“Open” Facebook
Judge’s choice: MySpace	“ We see MySpace as the new MTV, with one crucial difference: the users are the stars. With a MySpace page, anyone can be a celebrity, creating an online image that’s sometimes an alter-ego to their true personality.”Source: mashable.com/2006/12/24/top-social-networks-2006/
Hot for 2007: Bebo, Vox,Facebook, Facebox	“… [W]e think Bebo is the most ‘exciting’ social network right now. ... [W]e’re a little less optimistic about Facebook than we were at the start of the year: now that acquisition talks with Yahoo are off the cards, they may need to go it alone.”Source: mashable.com/2006/12/24/top-social-networks-2006/
October 9, 2006Photo by sea turtle (www.flickr.com/photos/sea-turtle/4255450013/)
John F. Carney IIIMissouri S&T ChancellorName Change Instigator
WHY A NAME CHANGE?Differentiation
WHY A NAME CHANGE?DifferentiationUniversity of Missouri-Columbia (MU)University of Missouri-Kansas City (UMKC)University of Missouri-Rolla (UMR)University of Missouri-St. Louis (UMSL)
WHY A NAME CHANGE?MissionCubicle Cartoon #22:“Mission Statement Impossible” (www.CubicleCartoon.com)
WHY A NAME CHANGE?MissionU.S. technological research universitiesCalifornia Institute of Technology
Clarkson University
Colorado School of Mines
Florida Institute of Technology
Georgia Institute of Technology
Illinois Institute of Technology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Michigan Technological University
New Jersey Institute of Technology
New Mexico Institute of Mining & Technology
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
South Dakota School of Mines & Technology
Stevens Institute of Technology
University of Alabama in Huntsville
University of Missouri-Rolla (Missouri S&T)
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
WHY A NAME CHANGE?Market share: prospective students
WHY A NAME CHANGE?Reputation“While UMR is known in the Midwest and in specialized circles for its academic excellence, it is less well known on a national and international scale. Beyond the Midwest, prospective students often view UMR as a branch campus.  …”John F. Carney III“The Case for a Name Change”chancellor.mst.edu/namechange/
WHY A NAME CHANGE?Reputation“… A more distinctive, mission-based name would more easily achieve national visibility for both our recruiting efforts and our research programs.”John F. Carney III“The Case for a Name Change”chancellor.mst.edu/namechange/
MAKING THE CASEThe communications plan
MAKING THE CASE“Let’s do a blog!”Me
“Authenticity is the core value that makes blogging such a new and different way for businesses to communicate. If authenticity is the defining feature of blogging, then credibility is its benefit.”Robert Scoble and Shel IsraelNaked Conversations
MAKING THE CASEThe communications plan, revised
WHY A BLOG?TransparencyA forum for discussionUpdates in one placeA place to ventWidespread access (Facebook was still unfamiliar to all but college students)
WHY A BLOG?To facilitatechange
‘The central issue is never strategy, structure, culture, or systems. The core of the matter is always about changing the behavior of people.’John KotterSource: David Pohl, "Change or Die," Fast Company, May 2005(www.fastcompany.com/magazine/94/open_change-or-die.html).
The only person who likes change is a wet baby.Attributed to Mark Twain
Change is inevitable – except from a vending machine.Author unknown
January 30, 2007
January 30, 2007
January 30, 2007Useful info
Discussion
 The latest scoopnamechange.mst.edu/2007/01/welcome_to_the_conversation.html
Inaugural post: comment love	I feel that any name recognition that we currently enjoy will be lost once the name changes to anything else. The Missouri Technological University? Does that not sound like some third rate school in the state?	… As an alumni [sic], if this name change is pushed through despite all of the protests, I promise that I will be first in line in sending my children to another university that does not believe in arbitrarily changing its name versus actually attempting to perform real recruiting at high schools around the nation.First of 28 comments on the inaugural post
More comment love	We have spent years trying to shed the “tech school” image to broaden our course offerings and become more like a “real” university. Changing the name to a tech name moves us backwards in this regard.	Maybe we could just go with Missouri University of science and engineering. Then technically we coulde be abbr. with MOUSE! then we could sing the mickey mouse song with pride.
More comment love	Don’t change the name. Improve the branding. “Rolla” is known where it counts. “Missouri School of Mines” is the only option if it must be changed. 	If you change the name to anything - go back to Missouri School of Mines.
Not book-jacket blurb material“… one of the worst ideas since eliminating the schools and the deans.” – Feb. 3, 2007	“Pitiful.” – March 23, 2007	“I’m against any name change for any reason.” – March 23, 2007
On the positive side…	“I like the name change idea. It seems appropriate and could have some real long term international benefits. “ – Feb. 24, 2007	“I also favor a name change, getting away from being a ‘branch.’” -  Feb, 27, 2011	“It would make me happy to have an alma mater with a name that sounds like a real school rather than an extension campus, so I am in favor of a name change.” – March 23, 2011
The first 33 days13 posts – 102 comments** Excluding spam
Off-topic topicsQuestioning the methodology behind our definition of a technological research universityQuestioning the methodology of the alumni surveyQuestioning the way we reported the survey resultsRecommending we invest more heavily in marketing, recruitment and/or public relations activitiesClarifications or rebuttals (including 16 by me)
Milestones – Phase 1Survey results – Feb. 21, 200725 commentsMedia advisory on press conference to announce proposed new name – March 22, 2007 37 comments‘Missouri S&T’ proposed as new name – March 23, 200744 commentsName change approved – April 6, 200729 comments

Blogging for a Change

  • 1.
    Blogging for achange@andrewcareaga#hewebarJuly 22, 2011
  • 2.
    Who am Iand why am I here?
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
    ‘Those who cannotremember the past are condemned to repeat it.’George Santayana
  • 6.
  • 14.
    In 2006 therewas no…Twitter (but there was twttr)Heweb backchannel.eduGuru“Open” Facebook
  • 15.
    Judge’s choice: MySpace “We see MySpace as the new MTV, with one crucial difference: the users are the stars. With a MySpace page, anyone can be a celebrity, creating an online image that’s sometimes an alter-ego to their true personality.”Source: mashable.com/2006/12/24/top-social-networks-2006/
  • 16.
    Hot for 2007:Bebo, Vox,Facebook, Facebox “… [W]e think Bebo is the most ‘exciting’ social network right now. ... [W]e’re a little less optimistic about Facebook than we were at the start of the year: now that acquisition talks with Yahoo are off the cards, they may need to go it alone.”Source: mashable.com/2006/12/24/top-social-networks-2006/
  • 17.
    October 9, 2006Photoby sea turtle (www.flickr.com/photos/sea-turtle/4255450013/)
  • 20.
    John F. CarneyIIIMissouri S&T ChancellorName Change Instigator
  • 21.
    WHY A NAMECHANGE?Differentiation
  • 22.
    WHY A NAMECHANGE?DifferentiationUniversity of Missouri-Columbia (MU)University of Missouri-Kansas City (UMKC)University of Missouri-Rolla (UMR)University of Missouri-St. Louis (UMSL)
  • 23.
    WHY A NAMECHANGE?MissionCubicle Cartoon #22:“Mission Statement Impossible” (www.CubicleCartoon.com)
  • 24.
    WHY A NAMECHANGE?MissionU.S. technological research universitiesCalifornia Institute of Technology
  • 25.
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.
    New Mexico Instituteof Mining & Technology
  • 34.
  • 35.
    South Dakota Schoolof Mines & Technology
  • 36.
  • 37.
  • 38.
  • 39.
  • 40.
    WHY A NAMECHANGE?Market share: prospective students
  • 42.
    WHY A NAMECHANGE?Reputation“While UMR is known in the Midwest and in specialized circles for its academic excellence, it is less well known on a national and international scale. Beyond the Midwest, prospective students often view UMR as a branch campus. …”John F. Carney III“The Case for a Name Change”chancellor.mst.edu/namechange/
  • 43.
    WHY A NAMECHANGE?Reputation“… A more distinctive, mission-based name would more easily achieve national visibility for both our recruiting efforts and our research programs.”John F. Carney III“The Case for a Name Change”chancellor.mst.edu/namechange/
  • 44.
    MAKING THE CASEThecommunications plan
  • 45.
  • 46.
    “Authenticity is thecore value that makes blogging such a new and different way for businesses to communicate. If authenticity is the defining feature of blogging, then credibility is its benefit.”Robert Scoble and Shel IsraelNaked Conversations
  • 47.
    MAKING THE CASEThecommunications plan, revised
  • 48.
    WHY A BLOG?TransparencyAforum for discussionUpdates in one placeA place to ventWidespread access (Facebook was still unfamiliar to all but college students)
  • 49.
    WHY A BLOG?Tofacilitatechange
  • 50.
    ‘The central issueis never strategy, structure, culture, or systems. The core of the matter is always about changing the behavior of people.’John KotterSource: David Pohl, "Change or Die," Fast Company, May 2005(www.fastcompany.com/magazine/94/open_change-or-die.html).
  • 51.
    The only personwho likes change is a wet baby.Attributed to Mark Twain
  • 52.
    Change is inevitable– except from a vending machine.Author unknown
  • 53.
  • 54.
  • 55.
  • 56.
  • 57.
    The latestscoopnamechange.mst.edu/2007/01/welcome_to_the_conversation.html
  • 58.
    Inaugural post: commentlove I feel that any name recognition that we currently enjoy will be lost once the name changes to anything else. The Missouri Technological University? Does that not sound like some third rate school in the state? … As an alumni [sic], if this name change is pushed through despite all of the protests, I promise that I will be first in line in sending my children to another university that does not believe in arbitrarily changing its name versus actually attempting to perform real recruiting at high schools around the nation.First of 28 comments on the inaugural post
  • 59.
    More comment love Wehave spent years trying to shed the “tech school” image to broaden our course offerings and become more like a “real” university. Changing the name to a tech name moves us backwards in this regard. Maybe we could just go with Missouri University of science and engineering. Then technically we coulde be abbr. with MOUSE! then we could sing the mickey mouse song with pride.
  • 60.
    More comment love Don’tchange the name. Improve the branding. “Rolla” is known where it counts. “Missouri School of Mines” is the only option if it must be changed. If you change the name to anything - go back to Missouri School of Mines.
  • 61.
    Not book-jacket blurbmaterial“… one of the worst ideas since eliminating the schools and the deans.” – Feb. 3, 2007 “Pitiful.” – March 23, 2007 “I’m against any name change for any reason.” – March 23, 2007
  • 62.
    On the positiveside… “I like the name change idea. It seems appropriate and could have some real long term international benefits. “ – Feb. 24, 2007 “I also favor a name change, getting away from being a ‘branch.’” - Feb, 27, 2011 “It would make me happy to have an alma mater with a name that sounds like a real school rather than an extension campus, so I am in favor of a name change.” – March 23, 2011
  • 63.
    The first 33days13 posts – 102 comments** Excluding spam
  • 64.
    Off-topic topicsQuestioning themethodology behind our definition of a technological research universityQuestioning the methodology of the alumni surveyQuestioning the way we reported the survey resultsRecommending we invest more heavily in marketing, recruitment and/or public relations activitiesClarifications or rebuttals (including 16 by me)
  • 65.
    Milestones – Phase1Survey results – Feb. 21, 200725 commentsMedia advisory on press conference to announce proposed new name – March 22, 2007 37 comments‘Missouri S&T’ proposed as new name – March 23, 200744 commentsName change approved – April 6, 200729 comments
  • 66.
    Milestones – Phase2New directions for this blog – April 9, 200712 commentsBrand identity team formed – April 13, 2007 5 commentsLogo design concepts - July 24, 200710 commentsThe logo unveiled – Sept. 17, 200727 comments
  • 67.
    Milestones – Phase2Alumni association name change – Oct. 27, 20072 comments‘Hello’ campaign announced – Oct. 31, 20070 commentsS&T website goes live – Dec. 29, 20074 commentsIt’s official: We are Missouri S&T – Jan. 1, 20080 comments
  • 68.
    From Jan. 30-Dec.3190 posts512 comments5.69 comments/post5.3 comments/post (minus my 35)
  • 71.
    Identity mattersPhoto: Tronidentity disc, by davecobb, www.flickr.com/photos/davecobb/5272269501/
  • 72.
    Blogging and changemanagementUrgency is importantSo is constant, consistent communicationCommunicate for understanding and buy-inWhen you screw up, ‘fess up and fix it – fast
  • 73.
    Blogging and changemanagementEmpower (give voice) to your communityProduce short-term wins – and show or talk about themDon’t let upUse other forms of communicationRealize that acceptance takes timeh/t: John Kotter, Harvard change management guru
  • 74.
  • 77.
    One more historylesson…‘Hell, I saved the school!’George E. LaddDirector of MSM1897-1907
  • 78.
    ‘Ladd always tookgreat pride in transforming an institution that “was stalled” in what he called “the bog of country academyism” into … a school of mining and metallurgy that had “reached the highest standards of excellence of any school of its character in the United States.”’Larry Gragg, Curators’ Professor & Chair of History, Missouri S&T‘Hell, I Saved The School!’: George E. Ladd and the Missouri School of Mines and Metallurgy, 1897-1907
  • 79.
    ‘That Missouri, orfor that matter any state, can benefit from having a dedicated Technology School would seem obvious. … Even though I am a graduate of Missouri School of Mines and Metallurgy, I must concede that Missouri University of Science and Technology is a more appropriate description of what the school is and should be all about in this day and age.’Richard W. Ladd, 1951 MSM graduate and grandson of George E. LaddLetter to Missouri S&T Chancellor John F. Carney IIIJune 23, 2011
  • 80.
    ‘It is notthe strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change.’Charles Darwin
  • 81.
    Andrew Careaga@andrewcareagaabout.me/andrewcareagaThis presentationwill be available online at slideshare.net/andrewcareagaThanks!