DANIEL
Day 4: chapters 6–9
Daniel 6
Who is Darius?
Ugbaru (=Gobryas) –
Persian general who
captured Babylon?
Gubaru – governor of
Babylon?
Cambyses – son of Cyrus?
Cyrus?
Rubens
Briton Rivière
Daniel

7 – 12
A God vindicates his faithful servants (1)
B Nebuchadnezzar’s dream: 4 kingdoms (2)
C God rescues his faithful witnesses (3)
D Warning for king; redemption (4)
E Warning for king; judgment (5)
F God rescues his faithful witness (6)
G Daniel’s dream: 4 kingdoms (7)
H Details of post-Babylonian kingdoms (8)
I Jerusalem restored (9)
J More on post-Babylonian kingdoms (10–12)
‘‘Chapter 7 is ‘the single most
important chapter of the Book of
Daniel. Its position is pivotal, both in
terms of the architecture of the book
as a whole and in terms of the
brilliance of the vision which it
contains.’
Sibley Towner
‘‘Once convinced of the truth this
chapter is proclaiming, the reader is
in possession of the key to history.
Joyce Baldwin
1 Daniel refuses to
compromise
2 Nebuchadnezzar’s
dream: kingdoms
10–12 Writing of
truth
5 Writing on the
wall
9 Jerusalem: 

discipline/restoration
4 Nebuchadnezzar:
discipline/restoration
8 ‘None can deliver
out of his hand’
7 Daniel’s dream:
kingdoms
6 Daniel refuses to
compromise
3 ‘No god can deliver
out of his hand’
7 First year of Belshazzar (553 BC)
8 Third year of Belshazzar (551 BC)
9 First year of Darius (539 BC)
10–12 Third year of Cyrus (537 BC)
symbolic visions (7, 8)
Standard vision report
a. Introduction
b. Report of the vision
c. End of the vision
d. Prophet’s reaction

7:1
7:2–27
7:28a
7:28b

8:1
8:2–25
8:26
8:27
‘epiphany vision’ (9, 10–12)
‘Epiphany visions’ in Daniel
a. Circumstances
b. Prayer
c. Messenger
appears
d. Reassuring
message
e. Revelation
f. Charge

9:1–2
9:3–19
9:20–21

9:22–23

9:24–27
10:1
10:2–3
10:4–9

10:10 – 11:1

11:2 – 12:3
12:4
Understanding
apocalyptic
literature
‘‘It's ‘a “911” genre, for times of
emergency – not just the stress of
routine problems – times when the
ordinary means for addressing life’s
difficulties are simply not sufficient.”
Thomas Long
prophetic visions
narrative framework
revelation mediated by an
otherworldly being
concerns the interaction
between this world and a
supernatural reality
ultimately about
eschatological salvation
‘‘Apocalyptic literature draws back
the curtains and allows the reader to
see the eschatological victory of
God, which has already been
achieved over whatever forces are,
even at the moment, crippling the
community of faith.’
Thomas Long
‘‘Apocalyptic literature is ‘intended to
interpret present, earthly
circumstances in light of the
supernatural world and of the future,
and to influence both the
understanding and behaviour of the
audience by means of divine
authority.’
SBL
Eight common features
• ‘Temporal dualism’
• Pessimism about the present; optimism
about the future
• Viewing history as distinct periods
• Expectation of God’s imminent arrival
Eight common features
• Cosmic perspective
• Righteous people being vindicated
• Involvement of supernatural beings
• A messianic element
Daniel Block
‘‘The intention of apocalyptic is not to
chart out God’s plan for the future
so future generations may draw up
calendars but to assure the present
generation that — perhaps contrary
to appearance — God is still on the
throne . . . and that the future is
firmly in his hands.
Daniel Block
‘‘Apocalyptic tends to be impression-
istic, more like an abstract painting
which communicates an overall
impression. . . . Sometimes the
details in apocalyptic are for
dramatic effect; there may be no
significance other than how the
imagery of the scene is enhanced by
the details. . . .
‘‘. . . The details in apocalyptic must
not be seen as allegorical in the
sense that each detail has a
corresponding reality.
Brent Sandy and Martin Abegg
don’t interpret everything
symbolically
don’t interpret everything
spiritually
don't think it’s all

about the future
don't think it’s all

about the past
focus on the main point
‘‘The key to the interpretation of
images is to find the point of
connection [between the images and
their intended meaning] and not
push the peripheral elements of the
comparison. . . .
‘‘. . . This means we will be left with a
gray area in our interpretation. Some
of the points of comparison will be
obvious, but others will not be. At
such points we need to hold back
and not insist on our interpretation.
Tremper Longman III
identify the scenes and
characters
identify the plot line
climax
setting
description
of vision
rising tension –
request for
interpretation
interpretation
conclusion
perhaps with
prophet’s reaction
Daniel 7
sea = chaos
© Stuart McKiggan, used under a Creative Commons licence
?
What are the scenes in Daniel 7, and what
characters are involved?
Try to identify the plot line.
?
Compare the beasts in Daniel 7:3–8,19–25
with the statue in Daniel 2:31–43.
What similarities are there?
What are the differences?
If Daniel 2 is a human perspective

and Daniel 7 is God’s perspective,

how does that help us understand

the difference?
Shumma Izbu
© British Museum. Used by permission.
Four kingdoms
1. Lion = Babylonia 

(605–539 BC)
Daniel 7:4 (cf 2:37–38)
lamassu
© British Museum. Used by permission.
2. Bear = Medo-Persia

(539–331 BC)
Daniel 7:5 (cf. 2:39; 8:3)
3. Leopard = Greece

(331–63 BC)
Daniel 7:6 (cf 2:39; 8:8; 11:3–4)
4. Beast with iron teeth =
Rome (63 BC – AD 476/1453)
Daniel 7:7–8,19–25 (cf 2:40–43)
‘‘Rome showed itself to be the first
truly universal empire of antiquity.
Rome was characterized by its
conquering and crushing power and
by its ability to consolidate the
territories which it seized.
E.J. Young
10 horns
horned
crown
© British Museum. Used by permission.
little horn
the little horn in Dan. 7:7–8

is not

the little horn in Dan. 8:9–12
little horn in
Daniel 8 =
Antiochus IV
Epiphanes

(215 BC – 164 BC)
© Jniemenmaa, used under a
Creative Commons licence
little horn in Daniel 7 

= antichrist / 

man of lawlessness
1 John 2:18,22; 4:3; 2 Thessalonians 2:3–10
one like a son of man
Daniel 7:13–14
?
How is the ‘one like a son of man’
contrasted to the four beasts?
one like a son of man 

= the Son of Man
‘‘When people heard Jesus use the
term “son of man” for himself, they
had to decide which type of “son of
man” he was. Technically he was
both, but it took faith to believe he
was like the “son of man” in Daniel
ESV Study Bible
www.tonywatkins.uk

Bible + Culture 2015 4. Daniel 6–8

  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
    Ugbaru (=Gobryas) – Persiangeneral who captured Babylon?
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
    A God vindicateshis faithful servants (1) B Nebuchadnezzar’s dream: 4 kingdoms (2) C God rescues his faithful witnesses (3) D Warning for king; redemption (4) E Warning for king; judgment (5) F God rescues his faithful witness (6) G Daniel’s dream: 4 kingdoms (7) H Details of post-Babylonian kingdoms (8) I Jerusalem restored (9) J More on post-Babylonian kingdoms (10–12)
  • 12.
    ‘‘Chapter 7 is‘the single most important chapter of the Book of Daniel. Its position is pivotal, both in terms of the architecture of the book as a whole and in terms of the brilliance of the vision which it contains.’ Sibley Towner
  • 13.
    ‘‘Once convinced ofthe truth this chapter is proclaiming, the reader is in possession of the key to history. Joyce Baldwin
  • 14.
    1 Daniel refusesto compromise 2 Nebuchadnezzar’s dream: kingdoms 10–12 Writing of truth 5 Writing on the wall 9 Jerusalem: 
 discipline/restoration 4 Nebuchadnezzar: discipline/restoration 8 ‘None can deliver out of his hand’ 7 Daniel’s dream: kingdoms 6 Daniel refuses to compromise 3 ‘No god can deliver out of his hand’
  • 15.
    7 First yearof Belshazzar (553 BC) 8 Third year of Belshazzar (551 BC) 9 First year of Darius (539 BC) 10–12 Third year of Cyrus (537 BC)
  • 16.
  • 17.
    Standard vision report a.Introduction b. Report of the vision c. End of the vision d. Prophet’s reaction
 7:1 7:2–27 7:28a 7:28b
 8:1 8:2–25 8:26 8:27
  • 18.
  • 19.
    ‘Epiphany visions’ inDaniel a. Circumstances b. Prayer c. Messenger appears d. Reassuring message e. Revelation f. Charge
 9:1–2 9:3–19 9:20–21
 9:22–23
 9:24–27 10:1 10:2–3 10:4–9
 10:10 – 11:1
 11:2 – 12:3 12:4
  • 20.
  • 21.
    ‘‘It's ‘a “911”genre, for times of emergency – not just the stress of routine problems – times when the ordinary means for addressing life’s difficulties are simply not sufficient.” Thomas Long
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24.
    revelation mediated byan otherworldly being
  • 25.
    concerns the interaction betweenthis world and a supernatural reality
  • 26.
  • 27.
    ‘‘Apocalyptic literature drawsback the curtains and allows the reader to see the eschatological victory of God, which has already been achieved over whatever forces are, even at the moment, crippling the community of faith.’ Thomas Long
  • 28.
    ‘‘Apocalyptic literature is‘intended to interpret present, earthly circumstances in light of the supernatural world and of the future, and to influence both the understanding and behaviour of the audience by means of divine authority.’ SBL
  • 29.
    Eight common features •‘Temporal dualism’ • Pessimism about the present; optimism about the future • Viewing history as distinct periods • Expectation of God’s imminent arrival
  • 30.
    Eight common features •Cosmic perspective • Righteous people being vindicated • Involvement of supernatural beings • A messianic element Daniel Block
  • 31.
    ‘‘The intention ofapocalyptic is not to chart out God’s plan for the future so future generations may draw up calendars but to assure the present generation that — perhaps contrary to appearance — God is still on the throne . . . and that the future is firmly in his hands. Daniel Block
  • 32.
    ‘‘Apocalyptic tends tobe impression- istic, more like an abstract painting which communicates an overall impression. . . . Sometimes the details in apocalyptic are for dramatic effect; there may be no significance other than how the imagery of the scene is enhanced by the details. . . .
  • 33.
    ‘‘. . .The details in apocalyptic must not be seen as allegorical in the sense that each detail has a corresponding reality. Brent Sandy and Martin Abegg
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 36.
    don't think it’sall
 about the future
  • 37.
    don't think it’sall
 about the past
  • 38.
    focus on themain point
  • 39.
    ‘‘The key tothe interpretation of images is to find the point of connection [between the images and their intended meaning] and not push the peripheral elements of the comparison. . . .
  • 40.
    ‘‘. . .This means we will be left with a gray area in our interpretation. Some of the points of comparison will be obvious, but others will not be. At such points we need to hold back and not insist on our interpretation. Tremper Longman III
  • 41.
    identify the scenesand characters
  • 42.
  • 43.
    climax setting description of vision rising tension– request for interpretation interpretation conclusion perhaps with prophet’s reaction
  • 44.
  • 45.
    sea = chaos ©Stuart McKiggan, used under a Creative Commons licence
  • 46.
    ? What are thescenes in Daniel 7, and what characters are involved? Try to identify the plot line.
  • 47.
    ? Compare the beastsin Daniel 7:3–8,19–25 with the statue in Daniel 2:31–43. What similarities are there? What are the differences? If Daniel 2 is a human perspective
 and Daniel 7 is God’s perspective,
 how does that help us understand
 the difference?
  • 48.
    Shumma Izbu © BritishMuseum. Used by permission.
  • 49.
  • 50.
    1. Lion =Babylonia 
 (605–539 BC) Daniel 7:4 (cf 2:37–38)
  • 51.
    lamassu © British Museum.Used by permission.
  • 52.
    2. Bear =Medo-Persia
 (539–331 BC) Daniel 7:5 (cf. 2:39; 8:3)
  • 53.
    3. Leopard =Greece
 (331–63 BC) Daniel 7:6 (cf 2:39; 8:8; 11:3–4)
  • 54.
    4. Beast withiron teeth = Rome (63 BC – AD 476/1453) Daniel 7:7–8,19–25 (cf 2:40–43)
  • 55.
    ‘‘Rome showed itselfto be the first truly universal empire of antiquity. Rome was characterized by its conquering and crushing power and by its ability to consolidate the territories which it seized. E.J. Young
  • 56.
  • 57.
  • 58.
  • 59.
    the little hornin Dan. 7:7–8
 is not
 the little horn in Dan. 8:9–12
  • 60.
    little horn in Daniel8 = Antiochus IV Epiphanes
 (215 BC – 164 BC) © Jniemenmaa, used under a Creative Commons licence
  • 61.
    little horn inDaniel 7 
 = antichrist / 
 man of lawlessness 1 John 2:18,22; 4:3; 2 Thessalonians 2:3–10
  • 62.
    one like ason of man Daniel 7:13–14
  • 63.
    ? How is the‘one like a son of man’ contrasted to the four beasts?
  • 64.
    one like ason of man 
 = the Son of Man
  • 65.
    ‘‘When people heardJesus use the term “son of man” for himself, they had to decide which type of “son of man” he was. Technically he was both, but it took faith to believe he was like the “son of man” in Daniel ESV Study Bible
  • 66.