The document discusses the stalled Doha Round trade negotiations and makes the case for completing them. It notes that while global trade has increasingly liberalized unilaterally over the past decades, multilateral negotiations have stalled. This is due to developing countries now being large economies and demanding more flexibility. The document argues that completing Doha would reinforce the rules-based trading system, provide new market access worth hundreds of billions, and act as an insurance policy against future protectionism, especially through reform of agricultural subsidies. It maintains political will is needed to finalize an agreement.
The document discusses the challenges facing the Doha Round of global trade negotiations. It identifies 3 main problems undermining the negotiations' success: 1) massive current account imbalances, especially between the US and China; 2) currency misalignments; and 3) lack of political will in key countries. It argues major currency realignments and policy changes are needed to overcome protectionist pressures and resolve economic issues fueling opposition to trade liberalization. Bold, coordinated actions are necessary to put the Doha Round back on track and prevent a reversal to widespread protectionism.
This document provides an international sales plan for TTM Healthcare to enter the Canadian market focused on Toronto. Key points include:
- Toronto is recommended as the location for market entry due to its large population and density of healthcare facilities. The initial target is 10% market share.
- Nurses should be the initial focus, with other professions phased in over time. A sales team based in Toronto will support and manage TTM healthcare workers.
- Salesforce CRM will help the sales team build and maintain customer relationships and aid management and tracking of sales activities.
- Canada and Toronto have a low-context culture similar to countries TTM has previously entered, reducing barriers to entry.
The document discusses the globalization of finance and its risks and challenges. It notes that while financial globalization has benefits like increased capital flows and more efficient allocation of resources, it also contributed to the global financial crisis. Countries with less integrated financial systems were less affected by the crisis. The document argues that truly global financial regulation would be difficult given that fiscal policy authority lies with independent governments, not global bodies, and coordinated regulation could impose the wrong models globally. Overall, the document provides an overview of financial globalization and examines its pros and cons based on the recent financial crisis experience.
The document discusses issues and policies of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in relation to developing and least developed countries. It provides background on the WTO and its functions, including administering trade agreements, facilitating negotiations, and handling disputes. It outlines categories of developing countries and least developed countries, and advantages they have as members of the WTO, such as longer timelines for implementation and technical assistance. Key policies discussed are special provisions that give preferential treatment to developing countries, and the WTO's focus on trade and development through initiatives like the Doha Development Agenda. The 2013 Bali Ministerial Conference agreement aimed to lower trade barriers and make it easier for developing countries to trade globally.
This document provides an overview of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). It discusses the history and purpose of NAFTA, signed in 1994 to eliminate trade barriers and facilitate cross-border movement of goods between the US, Canada, and Mexico. The document outlines some of NAFTA's main objectives like granting most favored nation status and eliminating barriers to trade. It also discusses both the advantages of NAFTA like increased trade and foreign investment, and the disadvantages like job losses in some US industries that moved production to Mexico to lower costs.
This document provides an overview of globalization and related topics including international organizations that facilitate global economic integration. It discusses key terms around globalization such as measures taken by India to open up its economy. It also summarizes benefits and shortcomings of globalization as well as the roles of international institutions like the IMF, World Bank, WTO, and drivers of foreign direct investment.
Foreign Takeovers & The Canadian EconomyColinbest
The document discusses foreign takeovers and ownership in Canada and its effects on the Canadian economy. It notes that foreign ownership has increased significantly over the past century as trade barriers were reduced. While some argue this "hollows out" Canadian industry, the document finds that foreign investment has actually increased productivity, wages, and head office employment in Canada. It concludes that fears over loss of national identity must be balanced with the economic benefits of foreign capital.
The 2014 Annual Report is split into three main sections. The first contains a message from the WTO Director-General. The second section provides a brief overview of 2013 and some background information on the WTO, while the third has more in-depth information.
The document discusses the challenges facing the Doha Round of global trade negotiations. It identifies 3 main problems undermining the negotiations' success: 1) massive current account imbalances, especially between the US and China; 2) currency misalignments; and 3) lack of political will in key countries. It argues major currency realignments and policy changes are needed to overcome protectionist pressures and resolve economic issues fueling opposition to trade liberalization. Bold, coordinated actions are necessary to put the Doha Round back on track and prevent a reversal to widespread protectionism.
This document provides an international sales plan for TTM Healthcare to enter the Canadian market focused on Toronto. Key points include:
- Toronto is recommended as the location for market entry due to its large population and density of healthcare facilities. The initial target is 10% market share.
- Nurses should be the initial focus, with other professions phased in over time. A sales team based in Toronto will support and manage TTM healthcare workers.
- Salesforce CRM will help the sales team build and maintain customer relationships and aid management and tracking of sales activities.
- Canada and Toronto have a low-context culture similar to countries TTM has previously entered, reducing barriers to entry.
The document discusses the globalization of finance and its risks and challenges. It notes that while financial globalization has benefits like increased capital flows and more efficient allocation of resources, it also contributed to the global financial crisis. Countries with less integrated financial systems were less affected by the crisis. The document argues that truly global financial regulation would be difficult given that fiscal policy authority lies with independent governments, not global bodies, and coordinated regulation could impose the wrong models globally. Overall, the document provides an overview of financial globalization and examines its pros and cons based on the recent financial crisis experience.
The document discusses issues and policies of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in relation to developing and least developed countries. It provides background on the WTO and its functions, including administering trade agreements, facilitating negotiations, and handling disputes. It outlines categories of developing countries and least developed countries, and advantages they have as members of the WTO, such as longer timelines for implementation and technical assistance. Key policies discussed are special provisions that give preferential treatment to developing countries, and the WTO's focus on trade and development through initiatives like the Doha Development Agenda. The 2013 Bali Ministerial Conference agreement aimed to lower trade barriers and make it easier for developing countries to trade globally.
This document provides an overview of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). It discusses the history and purpose of NAFTA, signed in 1994 to eliminate trade barriers and facilitate cross-border movement of goods between the US, Canada, and Mexico. The document outlines some of NAFTA's main objectives like granting most favored nation status and eliminating barriers to trade. It also discusses both the advantages of NAFTA like increased trade and foreign investment, and the disadvantages like job losses in some US industries that moved production to Mexico to lower costs.
This document provides an overview of globalization and related topics including international organizations that facilitate global economic integration. It discusses key terms around globalization such as measures taken by India to open up its economy. It also summarizes benefits and shortcomings of globalization as well as the roles of international institutions like the IMF, World Bank, WTO, and drivers of foreign direct investment.
Foreign Takeovers & The Canadian EconomyColinbest
The document discusses foreign takeovers and ownership in Canada and its effects on the Canadian economy. It notes that foreign ownership has increased significantly over the past century as trade barriers were reduced. While some argue this "hollows out" Canadian industry, the document finds that foreign investment has actually increased productivity, wages, and head office employment in Canada. It concludes that fears over loss of national identity must be balanced with the economic benefits of foreign capital.
The 2014 Annual Report is split into three main sections. The first contains a message from the WTO Director-General. The second section provides a brief overview of 2013 and some background information on the WTO, while the third has more in-depth information.
The Impact of International Businesses in a Global Economy: An Interdisciplin...IOSR Journals
This study is an analysis of the impact of international businesses in the world economy. It examined the effect of globalization in the economic growth of international businesses and the world economy; and the organizations that act as alliances in international business, such as the World Trade Organization and the International Monetary Fund. The study observed that while some countries may be favoured by particular changes in international business, others may be adversely affected. This does not mean that international business does not have unfavorable effects. Major changes in international business will also produce major adjustments. The process of adjustments may be a gainful one. The study concludes that in spite of the national economic policies of each country, politics and law play important role in international business, which does not tend to restrict its views to the interest of one country, but it tries to analyze the different national interests which are relevant to the national level of decision-making.
The document discusses international trade agreements and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). It provides details on the history and impact of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) between Canada, the US, and Mexico since taking effect in 1994. It also describes the founding and purpose of the IMF to foster global monetary cooperation and financial stability, though some countries feel their quotas and voting powers in the IMF are underrepresented.
The document discusses regional economic integration and cooperative agreements, using NAFTA as a case study. It outlines the key provisions and effects of NAFTA, including increased trade and foreign direct investment between the US, Canada, and Mexico. While NAFTA increased trade flows, its impact on employment was mixed, as some jobs were gained while others were lost to Mexico's lower labor costs. Overall, NAFTA established a large integrated regional market in North America.
This document provides a 19,469 word MA thesis analyzing how modern international trade agreements like the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA) may negatively impact economic development in Latin American countries, similarly to how "unequal treaties" in the 19th century underdeveloped the region. The thesis will examine the effects of market access, deregulation, intellectual property rights, and investor arbitration provisions in these agreements. It argues that aspects of dependency theory can help understand the context and motivations behind the agreements. The introduction provides background on unequal treaties, dependency theory, and relevant literature to support analyzing modern trade deals through this framework.
Canada is a country of 36M as such depends on exports
Canada’s exports are off about 25% due to many factors like lack of infrastructure to get goods to market, long drawn on regulatory process, lack of focus by all levels of government to push economic development and Liberals insistence to focus on social issues.
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is a trade agreement between Canada, Mexico, and the United States that establishes a free trade zone in North America. It was formed in 1994 to eliminate barriers to trade and investment between the three countries. NAFTA aims to promote cross-border trade and investment through establishing common rules and reducing tariffs and other trade barriers. It has significantly increased trade, investment, employment, and economic growth among the member countries over the past two decades.
Dr. Alejandro Diaz Bautista, Nafta Renegotiation, NAFTA at 15, UAM Economics ...guest9057bc
“Regional Economic Growth in North America: the Effects of the Renegotiation of the NAFTA Agreement”.
Alejandro Díaz-Bautista, Ph.D.
Professor of Economics and Researcher at
Colegio de la Frontera Norte (COLEF)
Visiting Research Fellow ,
Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, UCSD.
adiazbau@hotmail.com
March 13, 2009, 11:15 - 11:45.
Conference at
Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana, Mexico City.
Bashar H. Malkawi Dispute setttlement in eu association agreements with arab ...Bashar H. Malkawi
It is assumed that the parties to the FTA will carry out their commitments in good faith. Persons and companies would risk capital and may suffer potential loss; therefore FTAs require a strong legal foundation incentivizing stability, transparency and
compliance with obligations.
The dispute settlement mechanism in FTAs is necessary as they provide means to settle disagreements on interpretation or compliance with treaty obligations. The dispute settlement mechanism help ease tensions among FTA parties and maintain healthy relationships among trading partners.
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was implemented on January 1st, 1994 and is an agreement to remove both tariffs and investment barriers between the United States, Canada, and Mexico, as well as encourage further trade. NAFTA incorporates the previous 1989 agreement between the United States and Canada to remove tariffs on agricultural trade. Mexico and Canada had a separate agreement on agricultural products that eliminated most of the tariffs over a fifteen year period. The full provisions of the NAFTA agreement, including the elimination of all tariffs, were implemented fourteen years after the first signing of NAFTA on January 1st, 2008.
NAFTA is a trade agreement between Canada, Mexico, and the United States that aims to eliminate trade barriers and facilitate cross-border movement of goods and services. It was signed in 1992 and took effect in 1994. While NAFTA increased trade between member countries, it also resulted in job losses in some industries and has been blamed for rising inequality. Opinions on the impacts of NAFTA remain mixed among citizens of member countries.
Mercosur a new address for us investmentkikanovais
This document provides an overview of Mercosur, a regional trade bloc in South America composed of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay. It discusses the economic development trends in Latin America that led to the formation of Mercosur. It then briefly outlines the history of Mercosur, describes its institutions, and analyzes the integration of economic policies between members. Finally, it argues that Mercosur represents an attractive market for US investors and that its rules could accelerate US investment in the region.
NAFTA is a trade agreement between the US, Canada, and Mexico that took effect in 1994 and gradually eliminated tariffs and trade barriers. It has both benefits and disadvantages. It led to growing trade but also job losses in some industries as production moved to lower-cost Mexico. While it boosted economic growth and exports, it also caused trade deficits with Mexico and displaced hundreds of thousands of US jobs. It had small effects in Canada and US but larger impacts in Mexico, including a loss of over 1 million farm jobs. Overall, the agreement's impacts are still debated regarding its effects on employment, wages, and domestic industries.
NAFTA is a free trade agreement between the United States, Canada, and Mexico that came into effect in 1994. It aims to allow free movement of goods and services between the countries by eliminating tariffs and non-tariff barriers. Since its implementation, trade and investment have increased significantly in North America, bringing economic growth and better prices. However, NAFTA has also been criticized for contributing to job losses and rising inequality in some areas.
The document provides an overview of economic cooperation within the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. It discusses GCC adoption of new IT standards to control costs. Yemen aims to provide laborers to GCC to strengthen economic ties. Financial markets and banking sectors in GCC countries have grown significantly since the 1970s due to increased oil prices. However, GCC countries remain dependent on oil revenues and would benefit from further economic diversification and cooperation, particularly in petrochemical industries, to compete globally.
The document discusses Gruben and Welch's argument that NAFTA is better described as a "Hegelian dialectic" of liberalization and protectionism rather than true economic integration. The authors claim NAFTA liberalizes trade to some extent but also includes protections for sensitive industries. Critics argue the examples of protectionism are weak and NAFTA has led to more integration and liberalization in North America, weakening the Hegelian dialectic view.
This document is the first issue of a magazine published by the CARICOM Secretariat in May/June 2011. It features articles on various topics related to CARICOM such as the organization's relationship with the European Union, perspectives on Caribbean unity, and challenges and opportunities for trade within the Caribbean community. Photos accompany the text and graphics emphasize key points and quotes.
Source: http://www.gala-global.org/articles/internationalization-primer-how-helping-your-client-solve-coding-issues-can-give-you-compet
While recent industry headlines have been dominated by merger mania, I think the long term story for GALA
companies is really about how to provide better service, products and returns for our customers. Thats how we
compete for and keep customers. Within software localization, the functional emphasis is typically on words - word
counts, what they cost, when they will be received, translation memories, translation quality, localization engineering
and delivery milestones. But for our company, we get involved months, if not years, before our clients are ready to
localize. This article aims to show that you can put internationalization to work as a repeatable and successful activity
to differentiate your company further as a problem-solver, helping clients get to market faster and more efficiently.
Grenada is a small island country with a population of 104,000 people and an area of 344 square kilometers. Its main economic indicators from 2000 to 2010 show that its GDP grew between -7.7% to 11%, GDP per capita was between $4,253 to $6,264, current account balance was between -0.16 to -0.26 billion, and inflation was between -0.3% to 8%. Grenada's main exports include ships, boats, fish, coffee and spices, while its main imports are minerals, vehicles, and electronics. Its trade balance for goods was between -$265,809 to -$331,714 thousand from 2004 to 2008.
The Impact of International Businesses in a Global Economy: An Interdisciplin...IOSR Journals
This study is an analysis of the impact of international businesses in the world economy. It examined the effect of globalization in the economic growth of international businesses and the world economy; and the organizations that act as alliances in international business, such as the World Trade Organization and the International Monetary Fund. The study observed that while some countries may be favoured by particular changes in international business, others may be adversely affected. This does not mean that international business does not have unfavorable effects. Major changes in international business will also produce major adjustments. The process of adjustments may be a gainful one. The study concludes that in spite of the national economic policies of each country, politics and law play important role in international business, which does not tend to restrict its views to the interest of one country, but it tries to analyze the different national interests which are relevant to the national level of decision-making.
The document discusses international trade agreements and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). It provides details on the history and impact of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) between Canada, the US, and Mexico since taking effect in 1994. It also describes the founding and purpose of the IMF to foster global monetary cooperation and financial stability, though some countries feel their quotas and voting powers in the IMF are underrepresented.
The document discusses regional economic integration and cooperative agreements, using NAFTA as a case study. It outlines the key provisions and effects of NAFTA, including increased trade and foreign direct investment between the US, Canada, and Mexico. While NAFTA increased trade flows, its impact on employment was mixed, as some jobs were gained while others were lost to Mexico's lower labor costs. Overall, NAFTA established a large integrated regional market in North America.
This document provides a 19,469 word MA thesis analyzing how modern international trade agreements like the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA) may negatively impact economic development in Latin American countries, similarly to how "unequal treaties" in the 19th century underdeveloped the region. The thesis will examine the effects of market access, deregulation, intellectual property rights, and investor arbitration provisions in these agreements. It argues that aspects of dependency theory can help understand the context and motivations behind the agreements. The introduction provides background on unequal treaties, dependency theory, and relevant literature to support analyzing modern trade deals through this framework.
Canada is a country of 36M as such depends on exports
Canada’s exports are off about 25% due to many factors like lack of infrastructure to get goods to market, long drawn on regulatory process, lack of focus by all levels of government to push economic development and Liberals insistence to focus on social issues.
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is a trade agreement between Canada, Mexico, and the United States that establishes a free trade zone in North America. It was formed in 1994 to eliminate barriers to trade and investment between the three countries. NAFTA aims to promote cross-border trade and investment through establishing common rules and reducing tariffs and other trade barriers. It has significantly increased trade, investment, employment, and economic growth among the member countries over the past two decades.
Dr. Alejandro Diaz Bautista, Nafta Renegotiation, NAFTA at 15, UAM Economics ...guest9057bc
“Regional Economic Growth in North America: the Effects of the Renegotiation of the NAFTA Agreement”.
Alejandro Díaz-Bautista, Ph.D.
Professor of Economics and Researcher at
Colegio de la Frontera Norte (COLEF)
Visiting Research Fellow ,
Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, UCSD.
adiazbau@hotmail.com
March 13, 2009, 11:15 - 11:45.
Conference at
Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana, Mexico City.
Bashar H. Malkawi Dispute setttlement in eu association agreements with arab ...Bashar H. Malkawi
It is assumed that the parties to the FTA will carry out their commitments in good faith. Persons and companies would risk capital and may suffer potential loss; therefore FTAs require a strong legal foundation incentivizing stability, transparency and
compliance with obligations.
The dispute settlement mechanism in FTAs is necessary as they provide means to settle disagreements on interpretation or compliance with treaty obligations. The dispute settlement mechanism help ease tensions among FTA parties and maintain healthy relationships among trading partners.
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was implemented on January 1st, 1994 and is an agreement to remove both tariffs and investment barriers between the United States, Canada, and Mexico, as well as encourage further trade. NAFTA incorporates the previous 1989 agreement between the United States and Canada to remove tariffs on agricultural trade. Mexico and Canada had a separate agreement on agricultural products that eliminated most of the tariffs over a fifteen year period. The full provisions of the NAFTA agreement, including the elimination of all tariffs, were implemented fourteen years after the first signing of NAFTA on January 1st, 2008.
NAFTA is a trade agreement between Canada, Mexico, and the United States that aims to eliminate trade barriers and facilitate cross-border movement of goods and services. It was signed in 1992 and took effect in 1994. While NAFTA increased trade between member countries, it also resulted in job losses in some industries and has been blamed for rising inequality. Opinions on the impacts of NAFTA remain mixed among citizens of member countries.
Mercosur a new address for us investmentkikanovais
This document provides an overview of Mercosur, a regional trade bloc in South America composed of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay. It discusses the economic development trends in Latin America that led to the formation of Mercosur. It then briefly outlines the history of Mercosur, describes its institutions, and analyzes the integration of economic policies between members. Finally, it argues that Mercosur represents an attractive market for US investors and that its rules could accelerate US investment in the region.
NAFTA is a trade agreement between the US, Canada, and Mexico that took effect in 1994 and gradually eliminated tariffs and trade barriers. It has both benefits and disadvantages. It led to growing trade but also job losses in some industries as production moved to lower-cost Mexico. While it boosted economic growth and exports, it also caused trade deficits with Mexico and displaced hundreds of thousands of US jobs. It had small effects in Canada and US but larger impacts in Mexico, including a loss of over 1 million farm jobs. Overall, the agreement's impacts are still debated regarding its effects on employment, wages, and domestic industries.
NAFTA is a free trade agreement between the United States, Canada, and Mexico that came into effect in 1994. It aims to allow free movement of goods and services between the countries by eliminating tariffs and non-tariff barriers. Since its implementation, trade and investment have increased significantly in North America, bringing economic growth and better prices. However, NAFTA has also been criticized for contributing to job losses and rising inequality in some areas.
The document provides an overview of economic cooperation within the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. It discusses GCC adoption of new IT standards to control costs. Yemen aims to provide laborers to GCC to strengthen economic ties. Financial markets and banking sectors in GCC countries have grown significantly since the 1970s due to increased oil prices. However, GCC countries remain dependent on oil revenues and would benefit from further economic diversification and cooperation, particularly in petrochemical industries, to compete globally.
The document discusses Gruben and Welch's argument that NAFTA is better described as a "Hegelian dialectic" of liberalization and protectionism rather than true economic integration. The authors claim NAFTA liberalizes trade to some extent but also includes protections for sensitive industries. Critics argue the examples of protectionism are weak and NAFTA has led to more integration and liberalization in North America, weakening the Hegelian dialectic view.
This document is the first issue of a magazine published by the CARICOM Secretariat in May/June 2011. It features articles on various topics related to CARICOM such as the organization's relationship with the European Union, perspectives on Caribbean unity, and challenges and opportunities for trade within the Caribbean community. Photos accompany the text and graphics emphasize key points and quotes.
Source: http://www.gala-global.org/articles/internationalization-primer-how-helping-your-client-solve-coding-issues-can-give-you-compet
While recent industry headlines have been dominated by merger mania, I think the long term story for GALA
companies is really about how to provide better service, products and returns for our customers. Thats how we
compete for and keep customers. Within software localization, the functional emphasis is typically on words - word
counts, what they cost, when they will be received, translation memories, translation quality, localization engineering
and delivery milestones. But for our company, we get involved months, if not years, before our clients are ready to
localize. This article aims to show that you can put internationalization to work as a repeatable and successful activity
to differentiate your company further as a problem-solver, helping clients get to market faster and more efficiently.
Grenada is a small island country with a population of 104,000 people and an area of 344 square kilometers. Its main economic indicators from 2000 to 2010 show that its GDP grew between -7.7% to 11%, GDP per capita was between $4,253 to $6,264, current account balance was between -0.16 to -0.26 billion, and inflation was between -0.3% to 8%. Grenada's main exports include ships, boats, fish, coffee and spices, while its main imports are minerals, vehicles, and electronics. Its trade balance for goods was between -$265,809 to -$331,714 thousand from 2004 to 2008.
The document discusses several key points regarding international trade after the 2008 economic crisis:
1) Many countries introduced various trade-restrictive measures in response to the crisis, such as tariff increases, tighter standards, import licensing, and "buy local" policies.
2) Areas for new trade rulemaking include liberalizing investment and services through free trade agreements as well as developing rules on government procurement and intellectual property rights.
3) The rise of bilateral and regional free trade agreements has led to a multi-layered international trading system with over 170 agreements currently in force worldwide.
The document examines post-crisis challenges to maintaining an open trading system and opportunities for developing rules and liberalizing new areas of
CARICOM's trade is concentrated in a few member states like Trinidad and Tobago, with exports heavily focused on resources like energy products. While exports have grown significantly in recent years, CARICOM countries have seen only modest penetration of their goods in the intra-regional market and continue to run a large trade deficit. The top export markets have diversified in the past decade to include growing markets in Asia, Africa, and Latin America in addition to traditional partners in North America and Europe.
This brief covers the Special and Differential Treatment (SDT) within the CARIFORUM-EC Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA), which was concluded on December 16, 2007, and signed in October 15, 2008.
Este documento proporciona información sobre sogas fabricadas con polipropileno virgen que cumplen con normas internacionales. Se utilizan para amarrar en diversos sectores como la industria, construcción, agricultura y marítimo. Ofrece detalles técnicos sobre diámetros y longitudes disponibles, precios, beneficios como resistencia y no contaminación, así como recomendaciones para el almacenamiento y seguridad.
The Multilateral Trading System After DohaSimon Lacey
The document discusses the state of the global trading system after the Doha Round of trade negotiations. It provides background on the negotiations leading up to and following the 2001 Doha Ministerial Conference where the Doha Development Agenda was launched. Key topics covered include the agricultural, services and industrial tariff negotiations under Doha, as well as debates around special treatment for developing countries, cotton subsidies, and the eventual breakdown of negotiations at the 2003 Cancun Ministerial.
Globalization refers to the reduction of barriers between countries to facilitate the flow of goods, capital, services and labor across borders. It creates opportunities for businesses but also challenges as foreign competitors enter domestic markets. Key drivers of globalization include the decline of trade barriers after WWII, technological advances in communication and transportation, and the fall of political divisions. While some argue global consumer preferences are converging, others note local differences in culture, geography and economies still impact markets. Regional economic integration agreements like the EU and NAFTA have accelerated but most large multinationals still derive a high percentage of business from their home region. Managing international business requires recognizing differences from domestic operations.
The document discusses various topics related to international business management including globalization, trade liberalization, GATT, WTO, and foreign direct investment (FDI). Regarding globalization, it provides an overview of aspects like trade, capital flows, movement of people, and spread of knowledge across borders. It then discusses the positives of trade liberalization such as increased growth, poverty reduction, and new jobs. The summary compares GATT and WTO, noting that WTO replaced GATT and has broader coverage of trade in goods, services, and intellectual property with stronger dispute settlement procedures. It also explains that MNCs pursue different business strategies and may opt for FDI to enter foreign markets in order to gain high anticipated profits.
Wto and implications for small and developing countriesDavepres
The document provides an overview of the World Trade Organization (WTO), including its origins from the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), membership and decision-making processes, key principles like most favored nation status, and current issues being negotiated like agriculture and intellectual property rights. It also discusses challenges facing small and developing states within the WTO as well as arguments for and against the organization. The future of the long-running Doha Round negotiations remains uncertain.
The document discusses the potential for progress at the upcoming WTO Ministerial Conference in Bali in December 2013. It notes that the APEC meeting in October resulted in agreement on a framework for rural development and poverty alleviation that some see as reopening stalled WTO negotiations. However, the author questions whether structural challenges will prevent ambitious goals from being achieved in Bali, as WTO negotiations have been stalled since 2008. The US-led establishment of WTO reflected a post-WWII vision of liberal economic order, but negotiations have failed to reflect economic justice between developed and developing countries.
The document provides an organizational critique of the World Trade Organization (WTO). It discusses the influence and role of the WTO in the world. It outlines several significant dilemmas and issues faced by the WTO, including agriculture, access to patented medicines, non-agricultural market access, export subsidies, administration of tariff quotas, and dissatisfaction among developing countries. It also discusses several key criticisms of the WTO related to its lack of transparency and democracy, prioritization of corporate profits over human rights, environmental and labor protections, undermining of local decision making, and disadvantages it creates for small and poor countries. The conclusion calls for reforms to improve participation of developing countries and enhance transparency.
The document discusses several global trade and environmental issues:
1) It argues that the US should make concluding the Doha Round of trade negotiations a higher priority to boost economic growth. Completing free trade agreements with Korea, Colombia, and Panama would also help the US economy.
2) It discusses how WTO rules could be used to lower barriers on "green goods" like environmental technologies to help developing countries address climate change. Initiatives like REDD for reducing deforestation could also be building blocks for future climate agreements.
3) Rising food prices are creating food security issues and nationalist trade policies around the world that distort markets. Increased cooperation is needed to sustainably address constraints on natural resources like water
The document discusses the effects of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) on world trade. It provides background on GATT, established in 1947 to reduce trade barriers, and the WTO, established in 1995 which further liberalized trade. The analysis in the document finds that GATT increased trade among member countries more than would be predicted based on economic factors alone. It also discusses how regional trade agreements have become embedded in the larger multilateral trading system established by GATT and the WTO.
The document provides an overview of the World Trade Organization (WTO), regional trading blocs, and international business treaties. It discusses how the WTO was established in 1995 as the third pillar of global economic governance after the IMF and World Bank. The WTO aims to liberalize trade and incorporates agreements on goods, services, and intellectual property. However, it has compromised by allowing regional trade blocs and being dominated by major powers like the US, EU, and Japan in setting rules. Regionalism and concerns over developing country interests have led some like India to view WTO membership negatively.
G20: WRONG INTERNATIONAL FORUM FOR DEVELOPMENTDr Lendy Spires
On September 18-19, 2011, the “Development Working Group” of the Group of 20 met in Paris and sought to finalize its proposals for policies that the leaders of the 20 would likely adopt at their summit meeting on November 3-4 in France. It is “small beer.”Had the countries in the Group forged development-oriented compromises to end the stalemates in the main global trade, financial and environmental forums, they might have made a more convincing case for appointing themselves the leaders of global economic policy making.
They have not, but have nevertheless begun directing the international institutions to follow the G20’s own development agenda. This note is offered to help understand the actions the Group is taking, which are quite detailed, but little discussed publicly. The Group of 20 (G20), originally an intergovernmental but technical financial forum at ministerial level, was transformed into a summit of G20 leaders in November 2008, as the global financial crisis spread fear in usually confident quarters while the world plunged into economic recession.
The primary objective of the upgraded forum was to agree and act upon a coordinated economic rescue strategy. The leaders also agreed to work together to revise the international consensus on regulation of finance, whose laxness had been a prime cause of one of the worst financial crises in western history.
While the issues of macroeconomic coordination and financial regulatory reform remain at the heart of its agenda, the G20 decided in 2010 to add promotion of development of developing countries to its agenda. Its Toronto Summit of June 26-27 thus created a Development Working Group (DWG), which it asked to draft a development agenda and multi-year action plan.
The document discusses the World Trade Organization (WTO). It notes that the WTO was formed in 1995 and took over responsibilities from the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The primary objectives of the WTO are to promote multilateral trade and free trade by reducing tariffs and other trade barriers. The document also discusses the Doha Round, launched in 2001, which aimed to make globalization more inclusive and help the world's poor through reducing barriers in agriculture. Negotiations for the Doha Round have been ongoing since 2001 but have faced many delays and challenges.
The Doha Round of WTO negotiations has been ongoing for 10 years with little progress due to disagreements between major countries. While potential gains from trade liberalization exist, too much emphasis has been placed on market access alone. The WTO's role extends beyond negotiations over market access and includes establishing rules for trade policies. Given political cycles, greater focus could be placed on existing WTO bodies to enhance transparency and address regulatory issues while a dialogue on economic policies that create spillovers is launched.
The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) was created after World War II to promote international trade by reducing trade barriers through negotiated tariff reductions. While intended to be a formal international organization, GATT remained an agreement. Its purposes of reducing trade barriers and promoting standards of living have been subsumed by the World Trade Organization. The WTO establishes global trade rules through member consensus and resolves trade disputes. Its aims are to increase trade and provide a platform for trade negotiations.
Another institution in the news is the G20. Established in 1999, the.docxmelvinjrobinson2199
Another institution in the news is the G20. Established in 1999, the G20 comprises the finance ministers and central bank governors of the 19 largest economies in the world, plus representatives from the European Union and the European Central Bank. Originally established to formulate a coordinated policy response to financial crises in developing nations, in 2008 and 2009 it became the forum though which major nations attempted to launch a coordinated policy response to the global financial crisis that started in America and then rapidly spread around the world, ushering in the first serious global economic recession since 1981. G20 Established in 1999, the G20 comprises the finance ministers and central bank governors of the 19 largest economies in the world, plus representatives from the European Union and the European Central Bank. ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE G20 Relevant Statistics There have been six G20 Leaders’ Summits (Washington, London, Pittsburgh, Toronto, Seoul, and Cannes). At the Leaders’ level, this is the second time, following the Republic of Korea, that an emerging country holds the presidency of the Group. Mexico will become the first Latin American country to chair the annual presidency of the Group. According to estimates by the International Labor Organization, the G20 has created or preserved between 7 and 11 million jobs by end of 2009. G20 members represent almost 90 percent of global GDP and 80 percent of international global trade; 64 percent of the world’s population lives in G20 member countries, and 84 percent of all fossil-fuel emissions are produced by G20 countries. Source: www.g20.org/index.php/en/numeralia. QUICK STUDY 1. What is meant by the globalization of markets? Which product markets tend to be the most global? 2. What is meant by the globalization of production? Why are production systems being globalized? 3. What is the main purpose of global institutions such as the WTO, IMF, and World Bank? LEARNING OBJECTIVE 2 Recognize the main drivers of globalization. Drivers of Globalization Two macro factors underlie the trend toward greater globalization.14 The first is the decline in barriers to the free flow of goods, services, and capital that has occurred since the end of World War II. The second factor is technological change, particularly the dramatic developments in recent decades in communication, information processing, and transportation technologies. DECLINING TRADE AND INVESTMENT BARRIERS During the 1920s and 1930s, many of the world’s nation-states erected formidable barriers to international trade and foreign direct investment. International trade occurs when a firm exports goods or services to consumers in another country. Foreign direct investment (FDI) occurs when a firm invests resources in business activities outside its home country. Many of the barriers to international trade took the form of high tariffs on imports of manufactured goods. The typical aim of such tariffs was to protect domes.
Unit 1 Overview of International BusinessCharu Rastogi
This presentation deals with general introductory topics such as globalization and its impact, WTO and its impact, Role of World Bank, IMF, Special Drawing Rights, Nature, scope and significance of international finance and Use of IT in international finance.
This document discusses issues relating to global trade governance and how well they are addressed globally. It analyzes the formation of the WTO and its role in facilitating global trade negotiations compared to its predecessor GATT. It also examines challenges posed by China's rise as a trading superpower and imbalances caused by its large trade surpluses. Issues around protecting domestic industries from foreign competition are also assessed in the context of WTO agreements and trade negotiations.
CII started 2014 with its annual international flagship event – The Partnership Summit – now in its 20th year since its start in 1995, which was CII’s centenary year. Over the years the Partnership Summit has become a unique platform to exchange ideas and evolve solutions to the most urgent challenges confronting the world today. The summit highlighted investment opportunities emerging from rapid poverty alleviation in India and developing countries offered ideas for how a new class of consumers can become a new dynamic for growth.
In this issue of the newsletter the focus story highlights the importance, role and opportunities for emerging Global Value Chains. In addition, the newsletter also provides an insight of some of key happenings in various multilateral institutions.
We are putting in our best efforts to make the Multilateral Newsletter more knowledgeable, informative and industry oriented. We welcome your suggestions and feedback on the newsletter and thank you for the valuable support and the time you take out while going through the newsletter.
1) The document discusses the need for improved policy coordination in several areas including the WTO Doha Round negotiations, climate change measures, and international development aid.
2) In the WTO, a lack of leadership from the US and tensions over agricultural subsidies have stalled negotiations, but a proposal for China and the US to make concessions could provide an opportunity.
3) There is a risk of emerging climate protectionism as countries consider border carbon taxes, which developing countries view as unfair, so monitoring tools are needed.
4) The fragmented international development aid system needs restructuring to be more effective and predictable, and agreements are needed with new donors like China on transparent approaches.
This document discusses the origins and history of the Doha Round of trade negotiations at the World Trade Organization (WTO). It argues that while the launch of the Doha Round in 2001 was a well-founded response to unfinished business from previous negotiations, the negotiations have progressed very slowly over the past 8 years with little decisive action. Given the major changes in the global economy due to the financial crisis, it examines whether completing the Doha Round is still important and how it could be achieved, alternative approaches to WTO negotiations, and what a future negotiating agenda might look like.
This document discusses ways to deal comprehensively with developing countries' debt through MDG 8 Target 8D. It outlines how national debt decreases developing countries' access to credit and makes them vulnerable to economic shocks. Solutions discussed include the World Trade Organization, Doha Development Agenda, and Heavily Indebted Poor Countries initiative. The HIPC initiative has provided over $80 billion in debt relief to developing countries. Turkey is highlighted as an example of a country increasing its aid to least developed countries.
Similar to Bhagwati & Sutherland - The Doha Round: Setting a Deadline, Defining a Final Deal, 2011 (20)
The document is the 2014-2015 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. It was edited by Professor Klaus Schwab and Professor Xavier Sala-i-Martín. The report assesses the competitiveness of various countries and economies based on the Global Competitiveness Index and data from the Executive Opinion Survey. It acknowledges contributions from various partner institutes that provided important support and data.
This document provides an overview of the 20th anniversary of the Association of Caribbean States (ACS), which was established in 1994 to promote cooperation among countries in the Greater Caribbean region. It discusses the ACS's origins, achievements over its first two decades, and priority areas of focus going forward such as expanding trade and investment, reducing disaster risks, sustainable tourism, and regional transportation connectivity. The ACS Secretary-General highlights progress made in 2013, including ratification of agreements and approval of projects, and looks ahead to the upcoming 6th Summit in Mexico to further consolidate cooperation efforts across the region.
The European Commission’s assessment of the likely benefits of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
(TTIP) is based on analysis carried out by the Centre for Economic Policy Research, a leading
independent pan-European economic research organization. Given the significance of TTIP, this analysis
has been widely discussed in policy debates, in the press, on social media. The material provided in this
document attempts to answer some of the questions that have been raised in those contexts.
The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) is responsible for the preparation of this report. U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman gratefully acknowledges the contributions of all USTR staff to the writing and production of this report and notes, in particular, the contributions of Brittany Bauer, Colby Clark, and Michael Roberts. Thanks are extended to partner Executive Branch agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency and the Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Health and Human Services, Justice, Labor, State, and Treasury. In preparing the report, substantial information was solicited from U.S. Embassies around the world and from interested stakeholders. The draft of this report was circulated through the interagency Trade Policy Staff Committee. March 2014Wto2014 0918a
This document discusses trade between the CARICOM region and Ghana. It finds that while CARICOM exports a modest amount to Ghana, totaling $26.8 million USD in 2012, the trade is inconsistent and concentrated in a few products like ceramics, fish, and chemicals. Ghana's economy has grown around 6% annually in recent years due to its oil, gas, agriculture and services sectors. The document recommends CARICOM explore opportunities in Ghana's growing market, as some companies like GraceKennedy have already begun operations there.
The document discusses a meeting of the Council on Trade and Economic Development (COTED) of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) that recognized the need to address the link between trade policies, diet, and obesity in the Caribbean region. The COTED established a working group to prepare for a joint meeting in 2014 on these issues. The working group is coordinated by the Caribbean Public Health Agency, the Office of Trade Negotiations, and CARICOM. The collaboration aims to develop effective strategies to address non-communicable diseases related to poor dietary intake. The document summarizes research finding that international trade has reduced the costs of energy-dense foods high in sugars and fats, making these diets more affordable and contributing to obesity
This guide helps businesses take advantage of the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement. The agreement simplifies customs procedures, allowing businesses to become more competitive. This jargon-free guide explains the provisions with a focus on what businesses need to know to take advantage of the agreement. It will also help policy makers identify their needs for technical assistance to implement and monitor it. - See more at: http://www.intracen.org/wto-trade-facilitation-agreement-business-guide-for-developing-countries/#sthash.UA1o6V3G.dpuf
The document summarizes the Common External Tariff (CET) structure used by CARICOM member states. It describes how the CET categorizes products as either inputs into production or final goods. These products are then further divided into competing or non-competing based on whether regional production meets 75% of regional demand. Several categories of products are given special treatment in the CET rates, including selected exports, agriculture, agricultural inputs, safety items, cost of living sensitive goods, socio-economic/cultural goods, and revenue generating items like alcohol and cigarettes.
This Working Paper was published by United Nations University Maastricht Economic and social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT). It seeks to provide insights about the main characteristics of innovative firms and to gather new evidence with regard to the nature of the innovation process in the Latin American and Caribbean region. This Paper analyses data from a number of CARICOM countries.
The Caribbean Community Regional Aid for Trade Strategy 2013-2015 aims to help CARICOM member states overcome constraints to competitiveness and trade expansion through three strategic goals: 1) Upgrading key economic infrastructure, 2) Enhancing competitiveness and trade diversification, and 3) Deepening regional integration and maximizing gains from trade agreements. The strategy identifies priority areas and "anchor" projects to achieve these goals in maritime transport, ICT, energy, trade facilitation, and private sector development. It also categorizes activities as regional, national-regional, or national to coordinate aid for trade efforts across the Caribbean.
Details for persons who are interested in attending the Caribbean Festival of the Arts (CARIFESTA) scheduled for Suriname from 16-25 August 2013 under the theme “CULTURE FOR DEVELOPMENT, Celebrating our Diversity and Promoting the Central Role of Culture in Economic, Social and Human Development”
The Caribbean Community Secretariat is seeking to fill the position of Technical Advisor in Investment and Private Sector. The position is based in Barbados and requires a candidate with at least a Master's degree and 5 years experience in investment promotion, business development, or related trade matters. Key responsibilities include providing technical support and advice on investment, serving as a liaison to private sector stakeholders, conducting research and analysis, and representing CARICOM at various meetings. The position offers an attractive remuneration package including education grants for dependents and relocation assistance.
This document celebrates the 40th anniversary of CARICOM (Caribbean Community). It contains speeches and articles from political leaders and experts reflecting on the progress and achievements of CARICOM over the past 40 years as well as the continued importance of Caribbean integration and cooperation going forward. Key points made include that CARICOM has advanced economic integration, functional cooperation, and the vision of a unified Caribbean community despite ongoing challenges. The document encourages continuing efforts to deepen regional integration to address global issues and take advantage of opportunities through a shared Caribbean identity and destiny.
The document summarizes global trade in cheese and curd. It finds that in 2011, global cheese and curd imports totaled $27.4 billion, with Germany accounting for over 15% of imports. The top 10 importing countries jointly accounted for 63.3% of global imports. While global import spending grew 4% annually from 2007-2011, some individual countries like Israel and Brazil saw above average growth. The US imposed the highest average tariffs on cheese and curd imports at over 17%. The document then analyzes cheese and curd exports from CARICOM countries, finding that exports have declined in recent years and are concentrated in a few markets like the US. Jamaica dominates CARICOM exports, though prices are higher
OTN UPDATE is the flagship electronic trade newsletter of the Office of Trade Negotiations (OTN). The newsletter provides analyses of international trade policy issues and developments relevant to the Caribbean. It focuses on the OTN's work, trade negotiation topics within its mandate, and related activities. The intention is to provide stakeholders awareness of important trade policy changes affecting the Caribbean.
The document discusses innovation emerging as a new frontier in multilateral trade cooperation at the WTO. It notes that as knowledge and creative economies grow, countries are increasingly concerned with the link between innovation, trade performance, and competitiveness. While intellectual property protection is important, innovation depends on broader factors. The prospects for multilateral trade cooperation expanding beyond reducing barriers to
The Panel on Defining the Future of Trade was established in 2012. The Panel was mandated to: “….examine and analyse challenges to global trade opening in the 21st century” against the background of profound transformations occurring in the world economy, looking “at the drivers of today’s and tomorrow’s trade, […] at trade patterns and at what it means to open global trade in the 21st century, bearing in mind the role of trade in contributing to sustainable development, growth, jobs and poverty alleviation.” This is the Report of the Panel.
The document provides an overview of trade between the CARICOM region and the European Union (EU27). Some key points:
- CARICOM's exports to the EU27 grew by 11.8% annually from 2002-2011, compared to 10.2% annual growth in EU imports overall. However, CARICOM only accounted for 0.1% of the EU27's total import spending.
- The top CARICOM exports to the EU27 in 2011 included liquefied natural gas, cargo vessels, light petroleum distillates, and semi-manufactured gold. However, some major exports like raw cane sugar, aluminum oxide, and rum have not been growing in the EU27 market.
The 2013 National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers (NTE), which is prepared by the United States Trade Representative (USTR), surveys significant foreign barriers to U.S. exports. Although the emphasis is on foreign barriers to U.S exports, the information in the Report is a source of useful insights with respect to research and analysis regarding a number of issues and countries including, inter alia, Canada, the Dominican Republic, India and the European Union.
More from Office of Trade Negotiations (OTN), CARICOM Secretariat (20)
Cleades Robinson, a respected leader in Philadelphia's police force, is known for his diplomatic and tactful approach, fostering a strong community rapport.
World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4
World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4
World economy charts case
World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4
World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4
World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4
World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4study presented by a Big 4
The E-Way Bill revolutionizes logistics by digitizing the documentation of goods transport, ensuring transparency, tax compliance, and streamlined processes. This mandatory, electronic system reduces delays, enhances accountability, and combats tax evasion, benefiting businesses and authorities alike. Embrace the E-Way Bill for efficient, reliable transportation operations.
UnityNet World Environment Day Abraham Project 2024 Press ReleaseLHelferty
June 12, 2024 UnityNet International (#UNI) World Environment Day Abraham Project 2024 Press Release from Markham / Mississauga, Ontario in the, Greater Tkaronto Bioregion, Canada in the North American Great Lakes Watersheds of North America (Turtle Island).
Methanex is the world's largest producer and supplier of methanol. We create value through our leadership in the global production, marketing and delivery of methanol to customers. View our latest Investor Presentation for more details.
ZKsync airdrop of 3.6 billion ZK tokens is scheduled by ZKsync for next week.pdfSOFTTECHHUB
The world of blockchain and decentralized technologies is about to witness a groundbreaking event. ZKsync, the pioneering Ethereum Layer 2 network, has announced the highly anticipated airdrop of its native token, ZK. This move marks a significant milestone in the protocol's journey, empowering the community to take the reins and shape the future of this revolutionary ecosystem.
3. HIGH LEVEL TRADE
EXPERTS GROUP
Interim report – January 2011
Co-chairs
Pr Jagdish Bhagwati
Peter Sutherland KCMG
Members
Dr K.Y. Amoako
Pr Richard Baldwin
Dr Muhammad Chatib Basri
Dr Eckart Guth
Dr Jaime Serra
Pr Subidey Togan
Pr Jürgen Von Hagen
The present interim report focuses specifically on the Doha Development
Agenda. The final report will be released in spring 2011 and will cover other
pressing issues facing the world trading system beyond the current WTO
negotiations.
5. PREFACE
In November 2010 the heads of government of Germany, Great Britain,
Indonesia and Turkey created an Experts Group to report on the priority
actions that have to be taken to combat protectionism and to boost global
trade. The urgency of this task was underlined by a request for the
completion of an interim report on the completion of the Doha Development
Agenda by January 2011. The reason for this urgency is readily apparent.
Even by the standards of earlier trade rounds, many of which took years to
complete, the DDA has been particularly disappointing in the progress of the
negotiations taking ten years to reach this point. If the DDA is not completed
by the end of this year it will at best lie in the doldrums for a prolonged period
and such an outcome will be greatly damaging to the global economy.
This failure has occurred notwithstanding the great efforts of Pascal Lamy,
the Director General of the WTO. It reflects a failure of global leadership in
some quarters that is difficult to comprehend for various reasons. For one
thing, even though there is a real need for a final push, the finishing line is
close and much has already been achieved. Indeed what is already on offer
is a package that would provide a global economic stimulus of hundreds of
billions of dollars in new trade annually. Everyone would gain - both
developed and developing countries alike and the latter particularly so. Apart
from the opportunity that will be lost should the DDA not be satisfactorily
concluded, such a failure would cause serious damage to the credibility of
the WTO and this would damage multilateralism more generally. And yet
compromise on specifics seems to inhibit decision making in the general
national and international interest.
This state of affairs demands active intervention at head of government level.
It also demands an absolute deadline for the negotiations. As the Interim
Report states, this deadline should be the 31st December 2011.
Jagdish Bhagwati & Peter Sutherland
Co-chairs
12 January 2011
1
7. Contents
PREFACE ................................................................................................................................................1
Contents .................................................................................................................................................3
1 WHY HAS DOHA STALLED? .................................................................................................... 5
2 DOHA: THE CASE FOR COMPLETION................................................................................... 8
3 THE CASE FOR A DEADLINE ................................................................................................. 11
4 THE STRUCTURE OF A FINAL PACKAGE .......................................................................... 12
Agriculture ....................................................................................................................................12
Industrial Goods........................................................................................................................... 14
Sectoral Agreements................................................................................................................... 15
Services ........................................................................................................................................16
A package for Least Developed Countries............................................................................... 17
Trade Facilitation ......................................................................................................................... 17
Remaining loopholes must be closed in other negotiating areas .......................................... 18
5 CONCLUSION: MOVING TO A FINAL DEAL ....................................................................... 19
3
9. 1 Why has Doha stalled?
1 WHY HAS
DOHA STALLED?
1.1. One of the most striking features – arguably the defining feature -
of the global economy over the last two decades has been its progressive
liberalization. For thirty years, between 1960 and 1990, the number of people
on the planet living in economically open societies was largely steady at one
person in five. Today with China and India in the WTO and Russia partially
integrated into global trade it is more than nine in ten. For the last two
decades the ratio of global trade to global GDP, which can be taken as a
rough measure of global economic integration has not fallen below 40%, and
had risen as high as 55% before the downturn. Applied tariffs at national
borders have fallen, in many cases dramatically, and the dominant trend in
markets for services and investment has been greater access for foreign
funds and foreign competition.
Fig 1: The liberalizing decades: major economies average applied
manufacturing tariffs (%) 1990-2009
Source: UNCTAD 2004, WTO 2010
1.2. The GATT/WTO has very successfully accompanied this process,
in particular in comparison to other international cooperation efforts on
climate change, human rights, development assistance, nuclear proliferation,
etc. The GATT/WTO has established a rule-based trading system based on
norms that are almost universally accepted. Disputes are adjudicated by an
international court whose rulings are almost universally implemented. Its
membership is now almost universal and it makes decision by consensus. In
5
10. The Doha Round: setting a deadline, defining a final deal
short, the GATT/WTO achieved its mission – the establishment of an open
and rules-based trading system.
1.3. So why is it that against the backdrop of a global economy that
has been liberalizing at an unprecedented rate over the last twenty years that
a multilateral negotiation dedicated to consolidating and accelerating
precisely that process has stalled? What is regarded as sound economic
policy when it is conducted unilaterally or bilaterally becomes intensely
difficult when it is reframed as a series of political concessions of market
access to be traded in a multilateral setting. This is especially so given the
fact that this is done under the close scrutiny of both the media and defensive
domestic constituencies. This has been the basic dynamic of the Doha
Round since it was launched in 2001.
1.4. However, the reasons for Doha’s slow progress are also tied to the
changing nature of the WTO and the states it represents as much as to any
specific detail of the negotiation. From the 1960s, developing nations formed
a majority of GATT membership, but divergent views between developed and
developing nations did little to hinder progress. GATT negotiations up to the
1980s were between self-identified ‘liberalizers’, mainly industrialized nations.
Developing countries were not expected to cut their own tariffs, yet they had
a stake in success; the GATT’s MFN principle meant their exporters
benefitted ‘for free’. As these poor nations were also small economically, their
lack of tariff-cutting had little impact on the value of Rounds to the developed
nation liberalizers. This systemic free riding – which was critical to building
consensus in earlier Rounds – was justified under the legal principle of
‘special and differential treatment’ and economically under the now
discredited theory that high tariffs fostered industrialization. 21st century
economic realities, however, changed this.
1.5. The rapid growth of emerging economies – due in no small
measure to the GATT’s success at lowering industrial nations’ tariffs – has
changed the relationship between poor and small. Emerging markets are
now big enough to rule out free riding. China, for example, is the world’s
largest exporter and second largest importer, and the ranks of India, Brazil
and other emerging nations are rapidly rising.
1.6. The expansion of negotiations into areas such as agriculture –
which is important to many developing countries and highly sensitive for
many developed countries – has complicated this picture. The expectation
that in most cases developing countries should be entitled to flexibilities in
the application of tariff cuts that are not available to developed WTO states
has also followed from the widening of the membership and the development
of a body of thinking about the pace and depth of liberalization that is
appropriate for developing countries. This assumption – that a development
friendly trade deal must demand less of countries in a way that is
proportionate to their state of development - permeates the Doha Round and
the final package will rightly have to be measured against it.
6
11. 1 Why has Doha stalled?
1.7. This means that developed countries have to accept that the
outcome will be asymmetrical, even vis-à-vis large and competitive exporters
like China and Brazil who remain in development. This makes the Doha
Round a difficult proposition for some domestic constituencies, even if it does
not in itself imply a reduction in the economic value of the package for
developed economies, due to the beneficial impact of new access for
imports. The EU in particular has had to accept that the price of the Doha
Round is the complete renovation of its system of agricultural supports and
tariffs with no expectation of proportionate action from developing countries.
It also recognizes that such reform will be the price of similar reform in the
US, Japan and Switzerland, and that its competitiveness in processed
agriculture products means that reform of its primary farm goods regime can
be offset to some extent against new access to markets for these goods.
1.8. So the Doha Round’s development mandate will be delivered in
two key ways: 1) complete exclusion of all Least Developed Countries from
any obligations except binding their tariff schedules at the current level - the
so called ‘Round for Free’ and 2) the concept of agreed ‘modalities’ for tariff
cuts (and in the case of agriculture, subsidy reductions) in principle agreed by
all members, but in practice tempered by various forms of ‘flexibility’ for
developed and developing countries. Defensive interests have been
exploiting the relative imprecision of the end result due to the flexibilities to
block further progress. It was in defining one of these flexibilities – a special
safeguard mechanism for agricultural exports to developing countries – that
the last serious push to close the negotiation stalled in 2008.
1.9. The use of formulae plus flexibilities to define cuts in both
agriculture and manufactures has two key implications, one positive, one
negative. The first is that even after agreed flexibilities are employed, the
tariff landscape will be compressed across the board, with the highest tariffs
cut most. This is particularly important for farm tariffs in the developed world,
where the compressive formulae will suppress some of the highest tariffs in
the world for the first time. It is also crucial for industrial tariffs in developing
countries, some of which remain very high.
1.10. The second is that while the modalities provide a basic level of
ambition, the devil is in the detail: until it is clear where all countries will
exercise their flexibilities to shield tariff lines from cuts through exclusions or
where the special safeguard mechanism will apply, it is impossible, or at least
very difficult, to value a final package in a way that makes it possible to sell to
domestic constituencies. The formula plus flexibility system is both the
greatest potential strength of the Doha Round, and potentially its fatal
weakness.
7
12. The Doha Round: setting a deadline, defining a final deal
2 DOHA: THE CASE
FOR COMPLETION
2.1. The decision to sacrifice the gains embedded in the current Doha
texts or plausible with a final concerted push by negotiators has far-reaching
consequences for the global economy and should be treated
commensurately. At present it is largely being made by default. The Doha
Round is dying of political neglect. It is impossible to overstate the fact that
no increment in value will close the deal in the absence of political will.
Because of the political concessions involved, the Doha Round cannot be
completed solely by trade negotiators; it needs a much stronger and direct
involvement of political leaders. The protestations of commitment offered
periodically by G8 and G20 leaders have consistently translated into little
new impetus in Geneva.
2.2. The renewed leaders’ commitment during the Seoul G20 meeting
last November would have this time to translate in the coming weeks into
genuine new engagement in Geneva and concrete signs of flexibility.
2.3. So why a final effort to revive and finally complete the Round,
given the political capital it will require? There are four basic arguments for
completing the Doha Round:
· An insurance policy against future protectionism. Doha would act as
a consolidation agreement for the large amount of unilateral liberalization
that has occurred since the end of the Uruguay Round in 1994. In this
sense by binding this openness into an international agreement it acts as
an insurance policy against possible reduction of market access. The
“water”, in negotiating parlance (i.e. the difference between the current
level of tariffs and their WTO bound ceilings), is found in the tariff
schedules of developing countries, and is especially high for India and
Brazil. This water is also found in the subsidies of developed countries
and in services.
· Reform of farm trade. A Doha Agreement would have the same
constraining effect on the subsidization of farming in the developed
world. It would make the 2003 reform of the European Union’s Common
Agricultural Policy irreversible, and while it would not bite into current
levels of US counter-cyclical price support – because farm commodity
prices are high – it would seriously constrain any future US Farm Bill
from increasing supports should commodity prices fall. A Doha
agreement would also eliminate all export subsidies for agricultural
goods.
8
13. 2 Doha: The case for completion
· New market access. It would provide new market access through tariff
reductions and the contraction of market share of those countries whose
agriculture subsidies will be withdrawn. Even in its current unfinished
form the Doha Round represents the most ambitious package of trade
liberalization ever negotiated multilaterally. 1 Estimates point to $360bn
2
new trade as a result of the current Doha modalities , and this would be
substantially increased by a proper package of new market access in
3
services and trade facilitation . These numbers are small when set
against current trade volumes but they could be substantially increased
by a final and ambitious push by WTO states, and they are not
insignificant when set against the wider benefits of the Round.
· The reinforcing of the WTO system. It would protect the WTO and the
multilateral trading system itself, which could be seriously damaged by
the failure of a Round, especially a Round explicitly designed to integrate
the emerging economies into the multilateral trading system and give
many developing countries a stake in the system’s success. The
permanent collapse of the Doha Round is likely to provoke a wave of
preferential trading agreements that would fragment rather than integrate
the multilateral trading system. The WTO’s function as a legitimate
mechanism for resolving trade disputes is also to some extent contingent
on its wider credibility as a forum for trade negotiation. If it fails in this
wider mandate, it will be weakened in its judicial function.
2.4. Much of world trade is more complex than it was during the last
GATT/WTO talks (the Uruguay Round). The most dynamic part of 21st
century trade comes from the internationalization of supply chains. As today’s
WTO rules are based on the results of earlier rounds including the Uruguay
Round which started in 1986, a growing gap is emerging between 20th
century trade governance and 21st century trade. While the WTO is focused
very much on the legitimate and necessary objective of concluding the Doha
Round, this gap is being filled by advanced industrialized nations and
emerging economics. They make more and more use of the possibility in the
GATT of signing regional trade agreements with disciplines going well
beyond multilateral rules. These deals are often complemented by bilateral
investment treaties (BITs) and through the discretionary and inventive use of
the existing gaps in the multilateral rulebook to regulate bilateral trade
relations. Three sets of deep RTAs and networks of BITs have arisen – those
signed by the US (NAFTA-type agreements), those signed by Japan (EPA
like agreements) and those signed by the EU (Association Agreements and
EPAs).
1
Overall applied protection would be cut by 26% (trade weighted average based on the assumption that countries will use the
whole range of flexibilities in the most restrictive way). IFPRI Issue Brief 61 Nov. 2009, Eight Years of Doha Trade Talks -
Where Do We Stand?
2
Ibid.
3
Hoekman, Martin and Mattoo (2010), “conclude Doha – It matters!”, World Trade Review, IX 03, 505-530.
9
14. The Doha Round: setting a deadline, defining a final deal
2.5. To date, the development of the gap-filling governance seems
more like a challenge than a threat. The key players seem to believe that the
world trade system would continue to be anchored by the WTO’s shared
values. This allows each member to view its own policies as minor
derogations. Yet, at some point derogations could become the new norm. In
this case the steady erosion of the WTO’s centricity could sooner or later
bring the world to a tipping point – a point beyond which expectations
become unmoored and nations feel justified in ignoring WTO norms since
everyone else does. This would put the world trade system back to power
politics as usual – a 19th-century-style “Great Powers” trade system. The
GATT/WTO would go down in future history books as a 70-year experiment
where world trade was rules-based instead of power-based. This is an
extreme scenario that all WTO members should have an interest in avoiding.
2.6. One thing is however clear at this stage. For the time being the
momentum is behind the RTA solution. Unless the WTO membership
finishes the Doha Round and moves on to 21st century trade issues, the
WTO will find itself stuck with out-dated disciplines while deeper disciplines
are established by the EU’s, the US’s and Japan’s deep RTAs, with new sets
added when China, India and Brazil internationalize their own supply chains.
2.7. In weighing the benefits of the Doha Round it is also necessary to
attempt to assess the opportunity costs of failure at this point. Would
equivalent gains be achievable in other negotiating formats or through other
channels? The simple answer is no. Abandoning the Doha Round and
attempting to re-launch a WTO agenda around new negotiating objectives
would be extremely unlikely to succeed. The Doha negotiation represents a
delicate balance of issues and interests that make up a ‘Single Undertaking’.
Pick apart that careful balance and the chance of consensual agreement
retreats rather than advances. While tariff reductions and the dismantling of
non-tariff barriers can of course be achieved in bilateral negotiations, the
multiplier effect of a multilateral agreement is considerably higher.
Agricultural subsidy reform will be agreed multilaterally or not at all.
2.8. In time when the world is facing huge economic, social and
environmental challenges, the fate of the Doha Round can have defining
consequences on the capacity of nations to act cooperatively or not on more
difficult issues like environment, poverty and peace-keeping. These other
fields of complex international cooperation would be seriously affected by the
failure of such a crucial deal for development and global growth. The shock-
waves of the failure would be felt durably and in many different areas, with
immeasurable consequences. New multilateral trade negotiations would not
be re-opened anytime soon, leaving an increasing gap between the reality of
international economic relations and their governing rules. The WTO itself
could be dangerously affected by such a serious blow.
10
15. 3 The case for a deadline
3 THE CASE FOR
A DEADLINE
3.1. What will focus minds sufficiently to break the deadlock? The
lesson of the last two years is that the prospect of ‘deferred success’ is
clearly not enough. Political leaders are unwilling to invest the required
political capital to salvage and ultimately save the Round in part because
they do not understand or are not being asked to bear the immediate costs of
failure. No individual player is willing to be the first to declare the Round
moribund, knowing that they will then be accused of precipitating its demise.
At the same time, there is not sufficient political momentum to push for a final
deal. The only way to change this is to make the prospect of failure concrete,
collective and unavoidable. At the G20 level political leaders should set
themselves a deadline within 2011 by which the Round must be completed or
declared a failure. This deadline should be inflexible and bind all players at
the level of Heads of Government.
11
16. The Doha Round: setting a deadline, defining a final deal
4 THE STRUCTURE
OF A FINAL PACKAGE
4.1 Creation of new trade opportunities would take place in the Doha
Round as a result of the negotiations in three main chapters – agriculture,
industrial goods and services. Other areas for negotiations conceal great
potential for improving the rulebook for international trade, reducing
distortions and fostering development. The modalities of the Round accept
that the ultimate balance of the outcome, taking into account the privileged
treatment of developing countries, will be sought across the chapters, not
within individual chapters.
Agriculture
4.2 For many years the Doha negotiations were focused chiefly on the
difficult issue of reductions of world tariffs and subsidies in agriculture, as
this was rightly perceived as an area sheltered from previous trade
negotiations. It was also regarded as disproportionately important for
developing countries, many of which competed both domestically and
internationally with subsidized farm goods from the developed world. The
reality is that increased market access will benefit developed and developing
country agriculture exporters and the proposed disciplines on subsidies will
help level the playing between the two groups.
4.3 This focus has made agriculture the most developed part of the
Doha negotiation. On all criteria, negotiators have been extremely successful
in this area. To take only one example, under current draft texts the EU
would reduce its MFN duties on agricultural imports by close to 60%. 4
Because of the compressive nature of the tariff formula in the agriculture
chapter, the highest and most distorting tariffs will be cut proportionally more,
with only 4% of tariff lines treated as sensitive and therefore subject to
smaller cuts. As a compensation for these partial exemptions import quotas
amounting to 4% of domestic consumption must be opened and subjected to
zero or very low duties.
4.4 This is the most radical opening of a market of this size ever
negotiated in GATT history. It would transform the EU’s farm trade profile.
Other protected markets like Norway, Switzerland, Canada and Japan would
also undergo radical market opening. Unlike in many other negotiating areas,
these concessions constitute genuine market openings because the tariffs
effectively levied are very close to the WTO ceilings under negotiation.
Therefore, a reduction of the bound tariff will translate into real new market
access opportunities from day one of implementation.
4
Own computation using data from http://www.ifpri.org/gatt/doha/
12
17. 4 The structure of a final package
4.5 Two main groups of countries are likely to benefit the most from
this opening up of new market access: agricultural exporters in developing
countries, in particular Brazil and Argentina, and those in developed
countries, in particular Australia, New Zealand and the US. For instance, it
would mean for Brazil a reduction of 27% of agricultural tariffs levied on its
agricultural exports by all foreign governments - $2.3bn of tariffs saved
annually5. This figure is based on current export volumes, and will be even
higher when the increase in Brazilian exports triggered by tariff reform is
accounted for. US exporters would see the amount of tax levied by foreign
governments on their agricultural exports reduced by $2.2bn6. Countries
exporting farm goods into the United States would see the tariffs levied by
the US falling by $1.5bn - or 38% of current levels - to just 3% of the value of
US agricultural imports.
4.6 In the part of the negotiation focused on trade distorting
domestic support to agriculture, developed countries have accepted the
need to reduce substantially the ceilings currently applied: by up to 80% in
the case of the EU and up to 70% in the case of the US. For both countries,
the reduction in the ceiling would impact only modestly the level of support
currently granted to their farmers, but in both cases would force them to
change the design of farm policy to reduce its adverse impact on farm trade.
To be sure, additional disciplines in this area are needed given the increase
in recent years of the use of domestic price support by the US in particular. 7
4.7 More specifically, the overall level of supports to some key
products like cotton and sugar in the US would be severely constrained as a
result of the deal, in particular in the event of a fall in international food
prices. In the case of the EU, new international disciplines have the
considerable value of locking in recent reforms which could otherwise be
reversed in future. EU farm policy is due again for reform in 2013 and in the
absence of more stringent international disciplines brought by a successful
Doha Round, nothing would prevent EU policy makers from changing their
farm policy in a way detrimental to international trade.
4.8 Other areas for negotiations in agriculture have also seen
substantial progress and sizeable commitments are already included in the
draft Doha modalities. For instance, the current text foresees the complete
elimination of all forms of export subsidies by 2013 by developed countries,
and by 2016 by most developing countries, with the remainder by 2021. The
EU has been among the main offenders here. As was again experienced in
the aftermath of the financial crisis, countries tend to resort to export
subsidies when world prices are falling, accentuating the depression of
prices, increasing price volatility and harming developing world producers
and those dependent on stable food prices, chiefly the world’s urban poor.
The complete elimination of this type of particularly distorting trade
instruments would therefore constitute a very valuable legacy of the Doha
Round.
5
Ibid.
6
Ibid.
7
Blanford, Laborde and Martin (2008), “Implications for the US of the May 2008 Draft Agricultural
Modalities”, ICTSD.
13
18. The Doha Round: setting a deadline, defining a final deal
4.9 Negotiators still have to tackle the reduction of subsidies on
cotton. Work also remains on the form and functioning of the special
safeguard measure for developing countries, as well as in the designation of
where flexibilities of both developed and developing countries will apply.
4.10 What can be said is that the agriculture chapter of the Doha
Round constitutes a substantial package of considerable importance to the
global economy and to developing countries in particular.
Industrial Goods
4.11 In the industrial goods chapter negotiators have also achieved
substantial commitments to further market opening. Among developed
countries, which represent more than two third of the worlds final demand,
tariffs would be virtually eliminated, with no tariff remaining above 6%. Duties
levied by the EU on its total imports of industrial products would go down by
44%, more than in any previous round, amounting to $12.5bn saved on
exports to the EU. On the US market, the amount of duties paid on imports
would go down by $12bn 8, almost halving the current amount of duties paid.
Given the large number of preferential trade agreements that the US and the
EU have in place, the rate applied to those partners not covered by
preferential arrangements such as Japan or China would go down even more
steeply, and be proportionately even more valuable.
4.12 Here the onus is on the emerging economies to demonstrate a
willingness to make some contribution to a trading system from which they
have been key beneficiaries. To some extent this has been achieved. In the
current modalities package China would contribute substantially, largely
because the duties it currently levies are very close to those bound in its
WTO schedule. China has relatively low levels of duties – currently around
5.6% of the value of imports, well below India and Brazil at 12.9% and 8.5%
respectively. However, as the world’s largest exporter and as such one of the
largest overall beneficiaries of the Doha Round, China has a particular
responsibility here. The current draft modalities would lead to a 22%
reduction of duties levied on imports, well below the 36% cut that Chinese
exporters would face on foreign markets. 9
4.13 Other big emerging economies would undertake much less new
market opening, chiefly because their current applied tariffs are much lower
than the rates they bound into their WTO schedules in the previous Uruguay
Round. Brazil would cut its current level of duties by just 8%, from 8.5% to
7.8% of the value of imports. It would also be an 8% reduction on the part of
India, from 13% to 12% of the value of imports of industrial products. India
can argue that it has reduced its tariffs substantially over the last decade, and
it deserves some credit for this. Brazil however currently levies duties at
almost the same level as at the end of the Uruguay Round.
8
Own computation using data from http://www.ifpri.org/gatt/doha/.
9
The percentages presented in this section come from Laborde, Martin, van der Mensbrugghe
(2010), Implications of the 2008 Doha Draft Agricultural and Non-Agricultural Market Access
Modalities for Developing Countries, Mimeo.
14
19. 4 The structure of a final package
4.14 This is a critical area of the Doha negotiation, covering by far the
largest area of global trade. Developed economies understandably expect a
meaningful outcome here. Under the terms of the current package the
protection faced by EU and US exporters would be reduced by 22%, but this
is largely as a result of the reduction of other industrialized countries’
protection. This drop in duties paid to foreign governments is sizeable, but
faced with a reduction of their own duties in the range of 40% to 50%, their
need to see more new market access in other large trading nations is
understandable.
Sectoral Agreements
4.15 A further necessary complement to the current modalities package
in industrial goods should come in the form of a set of sectoral agreements.
These would further reduce or zero tariffs among the main trading partners in
key defined sectors of goods. The WTO system already includes a number of
voluntary agreements that pursue deeper levels of trade openness in
individual sectors such as this. The 1994 Chemical Tariffs Harmonization
Agreement and the 1996 Information Technology Agreement are the basic
models for this. They offer considerable potential for new market access, and
could increase the ambition and balance of the Doha Round.
4.16 14 industrial sectors are currently listed in the draft negotiating
texts. They have all received various levels of support from WTO members.
In 7 out of 14 sectors, the countries which expressly support the initiative
represent at least a third of world trade in the sector. This is the case for
chemicals, electronics and electrical products, industrial machinery,
enhanced health care, forest products, gems and jewelry and sports
equipment. For another sector (textiles, clothing and footwear), the official
sponsor countries, namely the EU countries, represent less than 25% of
world trade in the sector. Other sectoral proposals in fish and fish products,
hand tools, raw materials, toys, bicycles and parts, and vehicles and parts all
only have the official support of WTO members representing 10% of world
trade or less. Realistically, these are unlikely to succeed as part of a final
Doha package, although they may be included in the final list if sufficient
support develops.
4.17 Among the 7 sectors having received substantial support, 3
sectors (chemicals; electronic and electrical products; and industrial
machinery) cover 50% of world trade of industrial products and therefore
represent considerable potential economic gain. If these sectoral initiatives
were to go ahead the annual economic gains from the industrial goods
chapter could double to an estimated $700bn 10.
4.18 The key challenge with sectorals lies in the need to respect the
voluntary participation principle while ensuring they cover a critical mass of
participants. This high threshold inevitably means that many countries
representing a very small share of world trade in a given product would have
to buy in. That seems likely to prove very difficult or even impossible in most
10
The figures quoted in this section comes from Laborde(2011),”Sectoral initiatives in the Doha Round”,
Mimeo.
15
20. The Doha Round: setting a deadline, defining a final deal
cases. Negotiators should consider an alternative or complementary criterion
that countries representing less than 1% of world trade in a given sector
would sign up to the sectoral agreement but not be required to participate
until they account for more than 1%. This means that Chinese participation
would be required for chemicals, electronic and electrical products, enhanced
healthcare, forest products, and industrial machinery. The EU would have to
participate in electronics and electronic products; enhanced healthcare;
forestry; and sports equipment on top of the sectors the EU is already
officially supporting. Brazil would be required to participate only in the
initiative covering chemicals, and Japan in forest products and enhanced
health care, on top of the sectors this country is already promoting.
4.19 The case is also strong for Doha to include a new package on
Environmental Goods and Services. This would further reduce or zero the
tariffs for a range of goods categorized as environmentally friendly or
contributing materially to decarbonization. This would be hugely economically
valuable – the global market for environmental goods is worth more than
$150bn annually. It would also ensure that the Doha Round made a
substantial contribution to the post-Copenhagen framework for addressing
climate change. The World Bank has already defined a list of 45
Environmental Goods that can form the basis for negotiation, to be added to
if the ambition is there. This package could also be extended to cover certain
environmental services and possibly certain biofuels.
Services
4.20 The negotiations on services in Doha offer some of the largest
potential gains for both developed and developing countries. The current
public offers tabled by WTO members would improve on existing
commitments in services trade schedules but would still fall short of the
actual openness provided by states in practice, meaning that while the
Round would consolidate a new level of openness, it would create only few
new opportunities for trade. Given the fundamental role of services such as
transport, telecommunications, construction, IT and financial services in the
effective and efficient management of an economy, a strong outcome in
services has huge potential spillover benefits for both developed and
developing WTO members.
4.21 At a “signaling conference” organized in Geneva in July 2008, a
group of 31 countries exchanged indications on their own new and improved
commitments in this area, as well as the contributions expected from others.
The report made public at the end of the conference and the impressions
shared by the negotiators suggest clearly that a number of developed and
developing countries showed real willingness to contribute substantially in
this area. This ambition needs to be captured and capitalized on, and the
services negotiation now needs to be the chief focus of the energies of all
negotiators.
16
21. 4 The structure of a final package
A package for Least Developed Countries
4.22 The 49 Least Developed Countries have an accepted privileged
position at the centre of the Doha Round. They are not expected to
implement any tariff reductions, and requested only to bind their tariffs at the
level they currently apply. Because many of them currently depend on
preferential market access to economies such as the EU, multilateral
liberalization presents them with a short-term challenge. It erodes the
preferential margin for their exports, sharpening the extent to which they
compete with more advanced developing countries such as China and Brazil.
For this reason the Doha negotiation has agreed the principal that for certain
products implicated in this way tariff reductions will be staggered over
extended periods. All developed economies can and should be expected to
shoulder a share of the responsibility for generating a sizeable package. The
most important addition to this should be the granting of Duty Free Quota
Free market access for all exports from all LDCs to all OECD countries and a
set of major emerging economies. While some economies such as the EU
already offer such access, in most cases it excludes key exports or does not
cover all LDCs, as for example in the US. If all developed and major
emerging economies were to agree to eliminate all tariffs on all LDCs’
exports, it would boost those exports by 44% or $7bn a year 11.
4.23 Of crucial importance for several LDCs, the Doha Round will also
have to address trade distortions caused by subsidies to cotton farmers in
developed countries. Here the US in particular has a responsibility to take the
lead.
4.24 In addition to the Doha Round outcome for the LDCs, “Aid for
trade” should be maintained as a necessary complement to boost their
productive capacity and help them reap the benefits of the Doha Round.
Crucially, the third Aid for Trade review is to take place in Geneva in July
2011.
Trade Facilitation
4.25 The Trade Facilitation negotiation is a clear success story of the
Doha Round. WTO members have tabled more than 70 new proposals for
improving the transit of goods between markets, charges levied for transit,
penalties for minor breaches of customs regulations, the standardization of
customs documentation and prompt publication of conditions for import and
export. Even for a developed market like the US, the World Bank estimates
that the costs of shipping a standard cargo container are about 5% of the
average shipment value for exporters and 6% of average shipment value for
importers. These costs far outstrip most US industrial tariffs. Additional costs
in less efficient markets add a significant cost to trade 12.
11
Hoekman, Martin and Mattoo (2010), “Conclude Doha – It matters!”, World Trade Review, IX 03, 505-
530.
12
Portugal-Perez A., J.-S. Wilson (2010), “Export Performance and Trade Facilitation Reform – Hard and
soft infrastructure”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No5261.
17
22. The Doha Round: setting a deadline, defining a final deal
4.26 Projections for increased trade due to the proposed improvements
in trade facilitation are substantial – perhaps $130-$450billion annually 13.
These gains accrue disproportionately to developing countries. For Sub-
Saharan Africa it is worth €10bn in additional economic activity each year
(+2%), half the annual inflows of Official Development Assistance (ODA) 14. In
this area, the benefits for developing countries could by far exceed the gains
in other areas for negotiation. It will however much depend on their own
commitment to reform domestic policies and infrastructure to ease border-
crossing for goods and services and the development aid that will be
provided by developed countries to implement these reforms. These
commitments need to be explicit in a final Doha package.
Remaining loopholes must be closed in other negotiating areas
4.27 The Doha negotiation also extends to a range of issues that relate
to the WTO’s core rulebook or which touch on important aspects of the
international trading system. The discussions taking place in the negotiating
groups on rules, fishery subsidies, non-tariff barriers, intellectual property
rights, and dispute settlement understanding, are all of crucial importance to
the finalization of a balanced final deal in which all members see value.
13
Hoekman, Martin and Mattoo (2010), “Conclude Doha – It matters!”, World Trade Review, IX 03, 505-
530.
14
Decreux Y. and L. Fontagné (2009), “Economic Impact of Potential Outcome of the DDA”, CEPII
Research Report No 2009-1.
18
23. 5 Conclusion: moving to a final deal
5 CONCLUSION: MOVING
TO A FINAL DEAL
5.1. The current Doha package is substantial and a great deal has
already been achieved. However, it is incomplete. To close the remaining
gaps every member needs to be ready to make an additional contribution.
The Doha package must be measured in terms of the balance across
negotiating groups and in terms of developed, emerging, developing and
least developed countries. It must weight both bound and consolidated
unilateral liberalization and new market access. The task of achieving this is
not as substantial as it may appear and, given good faith and a little more
openness in the negotiation can undoubtedly be concluded in the first half of
the year.
5.2. While the agriculture and trade facilitation chapters are very
advanced, other chapters require either further advances or complementary
additions in order to maximize their potential outcome. In industrial goods,
the core of an ambitious agreement is already there. However, some further
work is needed. Sectoral agreements seem achievable in at least the seven
areas where momentum genuinely exists. Those should be negotiated and
closed on a voluntary basis among the countries which have a stake in each
of them. Adapted criteria could certainly be defined to accommodate the
necessity of special and differential treatment for developing countries. A
sectoral agreement covering genuine environmental goods should be added
to this outcome, all countries should be ready to show flexibility to agree an
ambitious list in an area where environmental necessity clearly aligns with
growth objectives.
5.3. In services, both developed and developing countries need to
produce a text that creates real new opportunities for exporters, building on
the constructive engagement shown during summer 2008 at the Signaling
Conference. This agreement would do more than any other element to
significantly raise the value of the Doha Round and close the deal.
Accompanied by agreement on duty free quota free access for all least
developed countries from all developed and emerging economies, Doha
would be by far the most ambitious multilateral trade deal ever negotiated
and an important element in a new framework of multilateral economic
governance. It would also help to spare the global economy at a time when
fresh impetus is badly needed.
19
24. The Doha Round: setting a deadline, defining a final deal
Fig. 2: ‘Topping Up’: completing the Doha negotiation in 2011
Final •Definition of Much greater •Extension of
determination of emerging ambition to DFQF from all
flexibilities economy create real new major economies
including special flexibilities trade for all LDCs
safeguard •Definition of opportunities except weapons
mechanism and modalities for the •Cotton package
sensitive sectoral •Aid for Trade
products initiatives package
ACCEPTABLE
DOHA
OUTCOME
Modalities on :
•Partial duty-free
•Tariff reductions Substantial
quota free for all
•Subsidy Reform package of Fisheries
LDCs from major
STATE OF •Export subsidy measures if IPR
markets
NEGOTIATION elimination successfully Antidumping
Modalities on •Preference
•Tropical products Signalling implemented Horizontal
tariff reductions erosion measures
for ACP countries conference and Disciplines on
subsequent offers Subsidies
2/2011 5:33 PM Presentation1 NTBs
AGRICULTURE INDUSTRIAL SERVICES LDC PACKAGE TRADE RULES
GOODS FACILITATION
5.4. The contours of this package will not come as a surprise to Doha
technical negotiators: something like it has been the only credible landing
zone for the Doha negotiation since 2008 or earlier. Compared to what
negotiators have already achieved, additional concessions needed are
balanced, and they would lead to an outcome that is balanced relative to the
starting point. Much of what needs to be done is of relatively small size,
involving limited political pain. The key now lies with political leaders willing to
mandate a deal on these terms. To focus their minds in a way that they have
not been focused for the last two years it is now necessary to set a genuine
deadline for completion of the Round against which the costs of failure can
we very starkly weighed. It should bind all WTO members, at the level of
Heads of Government.
5.5. Both in preparing the ground for this Doha agreement and in
defending open trade more widely, politicians must be willing to explain the
value of liberalization, not just in terms of new market access for exports but
in terms of the value of imports to widen choice and competition and drive
productivity and growth. This means breaking the habit that describes every
new import as a concession, simply because it often comes with a price in
adaptation. Without this willingness, the politics of open trade will always be
hobbled and incompletely honest. Only this explicit political leadership will
create the context in which negotiators feel able to move from defensive
positions to deal-making.
5.6. The resulting deal would lock in the liberalization of the global
economy over the last ten years and lay the framework for another decade of
liberalization. It will not be perfect, but given the inherent compromises of
negotiating multilaterally with a diverse WTO membership, and given the
opportunity costs of failure, perfect cannot be allowed to be the enemy of
unprecedentedly good.
20