Nina Smidt hat unsere Methodik für semantische Analysen sozialer und journalistischer Medien genutzt, um die aktuelle Wahrnehmung und die Markenwerte Deutschlands in den USA zu untersuchen. #PVM, #PerceptionValueAnalyses, #RolandBerger
Research presented at the 9th conference on Social Media and Society (2018) examining all the cross ideological posts between each of the three campaign walls on Facebook.
Thought Leader Survey: Issues Impacting the Transatlantic RelationshipPew Research Center
On March 24, 2017 at the German Marshall Fund’s annual Brussels Forum, Bruce Stokes, the director of global economic attitudes, presented Pew Research Center findings from a survey of Brussels Forum invitees and alumni of GMF’s Marshall Memorial Fellowship, Transatlantic Inclusion Leaders Network (TILN), Manfred Wörner Seminar (MWS), and the American Political Science Association Congressional Fellowship (APSA).
This presentation examines American and German attitudes toward each other and their respective geopolitical roles. This report is based on telephone surveys in the United States and Germany. In the U.S., interviews were conducted February 26 to March 1, 2015 among a national sample of 1,003 persons, 18 years of age or older. In Germany, interviews were conducted February 24-25, 2015 among a national sample of 963 persons, 18 years of age or older.
Europe - Results of an online survey commissioned by the Association of Germa...Bankenverband
“Europe” polarises opinion. As results of an online survey commissioned by the Association of German Banks show, a good half of the respondents (52%) think “favourably” of the EU; just under four out of ten (39%), on the other hand, say they think “unfavourably” of it. This is just one of many views on the European Union from our recent survey on European affairs.
Nina Smidt hat unsere Methodik für semantische Analysen sozialer und journalistischer Medien genutzt, um die aktuelle Wahrnehmung und die Markenwerte Deutschlands in den USA zu untersuchen. #PVM, #PerceptionValueAnalyses, #RolandBerger
Research presented at the 9th conference on Social Media and Society (2018) examining all the cross ideological posts between each of the three campaign walls on Facebook.
Thought Leader Survey: Issues Impacting the Transatlantic RelationshipPew Research Center
On March 24, 2017 at the German Marshall Fund’s annual Brussels Forum, Bruce Stokes, the director of global economic attitudes, presented Pew Research Center findings from a survey of Brussels Forum invitees and alumni of GMF’s Marshall Memorial Fellowship, Transatlantic Inclusion Leaders Network (TILN), Manfred Wörner Seminar (MWS), and the American Political Science Association Congressional Fellowship (APSA).
This presentation examines American and German attitudes toward each other and their respective geopolitical roles. This report is based on telephone surveys in the United States and Germany. In the U.S., interviews were conducted February 26 to March 1, 2015 among a national sample of 1,003 persons, 18 years of age or older. In Germany, interviews were conducted February 24-25, 2015 among a national sample of 963 persons, 18 years of age or older.
Europe - Results of an online survey commissioned by the Association of Germa...Bankenverband
“Europe” polarises opinion. As results of an online survey commissioned by the Association of German Banks show, a good half of the respondents (52%) think “favourably” of the EU; just under four out of ten (39%), on the other hand, say they think “unfavourably” of it. This is just one of many views on the European Union from our recent survey on European affairs.
The document discusses sentiment analysis in social media. It makes three main points:
1. Human communication, both online and offline, is inherently subjective. Opinions and facts are often intertwined.
2. Facts and opinions expressed online have business value for consumers, marketers, competitors and managers. Sentiment analysis can turn attitudes expressed online into useful data.
3. Basic keyword searches and document-level analyses are not enough for decision support. Sentiment analysis requires techniques that can analyze features, opinion holders, semantics and propagate sentiment across multiple channels. It needs both machine and human capabilities.
4182020 Opinion Why Do People Fall for Fake News - The Ne.docxtaishao1
4/18/2020 Opinion | Why Do People Fall for Fake News? - The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/19/opinion/sunday/fake-news.html 1/2
GRAY MATTER
Why Do People Fall for Fake News?
Are they blinded by their political passions? Or are they just intellectually lazy?
By Gordon Pennycook and David Rand
Dr. Pennycook and Dr. Rand are psychologists.
Jan. 19, 2019
What makes people susceptible to fake news and other forms of strategic misinformation? And what, if anything, can
be done about it?
These questions have become more urgent in recent years, not least because of revelations about the Russian
campaign to influence the 2016 United States presidential election by disseminating propaganda through social
media platforms. In general, our political culture seems to be increasingly populated by people who espouse
outlandish or demonstrably false claims that often align with their political ideology.
The good news is that psychologists and other social scientists are working hard to understand what prevents people
from seeing through propaganda. The bad news is that there is not yet a consensus on the answer. Much of the
debate among researchers falls into two opposing camps. One group claims that our ability to reason is hijacked by
our partisan convictions: that is, we’re prone to rationalization. The other group — to which the two of us belong —
claims that the problem is that we often fail to exercise our critical faculties: that is, we’re mentally lazy.
However, recent research suggests a silver lining to the dispute: Both camps appear to be capturing an aspect of the
problem. Once we understand how much of the problem is a result of rationalization and how much a result of
laziness, and as we learn more about which factor plays a role in what types of situations, we’ll be better able to
design policy solutions to help combat the problem.
The rationalization camp, which has gained considerable prominence in recent years, is built around a set of theories
contending that when it comes to politically charged issues, people use their intellectual abilities to persuade
themselves to believe what they want to be true rather than attempting to actually discover the truth. According to
this view, political passions essentially make people unreasonable, even — indeed, especially — if they tend to be
good at reasoning in other contexts. (Roughly: The smarter you are, the better you are at rationalizing.)
Some of the most striking evidence used to support this position comes from an influential 2012 study in which the
law professor Dan Kahan and his colleagues found that the degree of political polarization on the issue of climate
change was greater among people who scored higher on measures of science literary and numerical ability than it
was among those who scored lower on these tests. Apparently, more “analytical” Democrats were better able to
convince themselves that climate change was a problem, while more “analytical” Republica.
This document discusses how sentiment analysis was used to analyze public opinion during the 2012 US Presidential debates between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney. Sentiment analysis involves evaluating subjective information in text data to determine sentiment. It can analyze large amounts of data from social media and news to classify sentiment as positive, negative, or neutral. The analysis of posts during and after the debates provided insights into how the public reacted to different moments and helped analysts understand who was perceived to have won each debate. Real-time analysis also allowed campaigns to track changes in sentiment over the course of live events.
The document outlines the crisis mitigation process for building crisis-resistant organizations. It discusses observing the environment to find red flags, orienting by collecting and analyzing information, deciding on and taking preventive action, and evaluating effectiveness. Key aspects covered include identifying external and internal risks, using tools like content analysis and threat assessments, and addressing challenges through responses like refusal, refutation, or reform. While impossible to completely avoid crises, prevention reduces their likelihood and impact through ongoing monitoring, information gathering, and responding to warning signs.
The survey examined issues in communications, public relations and public affairs based on responses from 300 professionals. It found that partisan politics makes the job harder for 72% of respondents. The top challenges shifted from budget to proving value and an executive team that doesn't understand communications. Media relations is getting more difficult according to 75% of PR professionals, as reporters receive increasing numbers of pitches each day.
PR disasters: is social media the problem or the solution?Bob Pickard
In the social media age, managing your message and communicating effectively during a crisis has never been more important for leaders and their organizations. Social media’s power to build image and to destroy reputation is making public relations more important, while many of the old methods of corporate communication have suddenly become outmoded. This presentation contains recent public opinion research on social media, fake news, and PR disasters — backed by practical recommendations for leaders who need to communicate effectively as they deal with digital disruption.
591 Final Report - Team 7 - Political IssuesTim Sawicki
This document discusses collecting and analyzing social media data related to political issues from the 2016 US presidential election. It describes scraping data from Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit to analyze what issues were most debated and contested. Location data was extracted from tweets to analyze debates by state. Issues were identified by frequency and sentiment analysis was used to measure passion around topics. The results were compiled into an interactive web application to filter issues and locations.
Trust in Communicators 2019 Study: How the general population trusts journali...Communication Monitor
The "Trust in Communicators" (TiCS) study has been conducted by researchers from Leipzig University, Leeds Beckett University, and IULM University Milan within the framework of EUPRERA, facilitated by Cision Insights and Fink & Fuchs. It is linked to the European Communication Monitor research project. The study combines representative polls of adults aged 16 to 64 from Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom with a survey of communication practitioners in the same countries.
The public poll highlighted that communication and PR professionals are trusted and recognised more highly in the UK than in Germany or Italy. However, the general public has a high-level of distrust in these professionals. A trust gap was identified between communications and PR professionals and journalists, but it was not as wide as expected and is closing.
Information about organisations is often spread by people who are not acting in a professional communication role – i.e. organisational advocates such as supportive customers (fans, brand ambassadors), experts in the field (academics, consultants) or activists with overlapping interests. The polls found that external experts are the most trusted of these advocates, but all are trusted more highly than communication and PR professionals. Efforts should be focussed on enabling these advocacy groups to promote the trust-building process. The polls also revealed that the general population has fuzzy perceptions about the goals and activities of PR professionals.
Whilst communication and PR professionals misperceive the public’s opinion about them and overestimate public trust. These professionals also misjudge their role in the trust-building process and ignore public trust in external advocates.
The full report (PDF, 38 pp.) is available for download.
Tweetfix is a visualization platform, developed for the Fix the Fixing european project, where users can explore the results of crowdsourced data analytics from Social Media on well-known Match Fixing cases.
These are my slides for a presentation to the CFUW Ontario Council for a workshop aimed at exploring political discourse in an age of misinformation/how to navigate information with a critical eye leading up to the Ontario election. More on the event available here http://cfuwontcouncil.org/standing-committees/
Team Disinformation - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Technology Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, Disinformation
The document discusses communication strategies for public figures who are obsessed with media coverage. It suggests that issues management, rather than reactive media responses, is a better approach. Regular issues monitoring and stakeholder analysis can help anticipate problems and prevent crises. Framing issues strategically and maintaining open communication with stakeholders is important for managing media attention in a controlled manner.
This document provides guidance on presenting statistics through visualization techniques. It discusses why visuals are important for communication and some key principles of effective visualization. Visualization techniques can include tables, charts, maps and other emerging methods. The document emphasizes presenting data in a clear, concise and simple manner tailored to the target audience to help them understand complex statistical concepts and relationships. It also stresses the importance of evaluating how audiences interact with and interpret statistical releases to ensure effective communication.
Increasing Voter Knowledge with Pre-Election Interventions on FacebookMIT GOV/LAB
As part of our Data Science to Solve Social Problems series, Facebook Data Scientist Winter Mason presented on efforts to increase online civic engagement.
SIEM Security: 2018 Media & Influencer AnalysisZeno Group
The document analyzes media coverage and influencer discussion around security information and event management (SIEM). It finds that Dark Reading, ZDNet, and CSO Online drove the most narrative around SIEM, while topics around security operations, data security, and data breach resonated most. The analysis also identifies top influencers in the SIEM space and their social reach, as well as trends in topics like digital transformation discussed by influencers.
Program-Level Objectives met with this assignmentCrit.docxdenneymargareta
Program-Level Objectives met with this assignment:
Critical Thinking Skills
Personal Responsibility
Social Responsibility
Communication
Course-Level Objectives met with this assignment:
Explain the origin and development of constitutional democracy in the United States.
Demonstrate knowledge of the federal system.
Describe separation of powers and checks and balances in both theory and practice.
Demonstrate knowledge of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the federal government.
Evaluate the role of public opinion, interest groups, and political parties in the political system.
Describe the rights and responsibilities of citizens
Analyze issues and policies in U.S. politics
SLO #2: Social Media and the USA Presidency. 70% of students will successfully research and evaluate how the office of the President and Vice President uses social media as a platform for their agendas. [ SLO #2 fulfills the following Program Level Outcomes: Communication, Critical Thinking, Social and Personal Responsibility, as well as the following Course Level Outcomes: 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8.]
Activity for assessment:
Is Social Media a good forum for elected leaders? How should they best communicate with the public? You’ll evaluate the President and Vice President on their use of Twitter and Facebook to implement their agendas.
Read the Pew Charitable Trust article (
http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2014/10/17/officials-urged-take-care-with-social-media
) and develop a list of best practices for elected leaders’ use of social media.
Spend two weeks (select a 14-day period,
and be sure to state the dates in your paper
) with the President and Vice President as they utilize social media:
Donald Trump
:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump
https://www.facebook.com/POTUS/
Mike Pence:
https://twitter.com/mike_pence
https://www.facebook.com/VicePresidentPence/
What message or agenda are each conveying to “followers?” Discuss three (3) themes for each official. (for example: economy, environment, guns)
Are they consistent with what’s on their “official” government pages?
https://www.whitehouse.gov
(*to follow up on more specific information associated with each individual, place your browser arrow over 'The Administration' tab and you should have the separate offices drop down*)
5. Do these elected leaders have any more personal or social responsibility to the citizens and residents of the USA than the average Facebook or Twitter user? Why?
6. If you were the social media advisor to each man, what would suggest for each? Based upon your “best practices,” are they doing it right? What can each do to try to reach out beyond their base of supporters/followers?
7.
How would you distinguish between
what is truth v what are lies?
This assignment must follow MLA guidelines, be typed in Times New Roman, 12 pt. font, and be a minimum of 1000 words with a works ...
The document discusses how news media are increasingly using analytics and audience data to help navigate the competitive battle for attention. It describes how leading organizations are developing distinct forms of "editorial analytics" tailored to their specific goals and contexts. These analytics inform both short-term decisions and longer-term strategy. While globally-focused US and UK news outlets remain ahead, market leaders in other countries are also developing their own approaches to analytics.
The document summarizes key media and technology trends from 2016, including the rise of "fake news" and declining trust in traditional media. It also discusses the financial struggles of digital publishers and growing power of tech platforms like Facebook and Google. Major developments included the expansion of distributed publishing through platforms like Instant Articles and AMP, increased focus on live and social video, and debates around the responsibilities of platforms.
Ist Ihr Unternehmen eher "Holly Golightly", "Buddenbrook" oder "Bettina Wulf"? Die semantische Big Data Analyse hilft, Inhalte UND Emotionen, Trends UND Risiken zu identifizieren und vorherzusagen. Analytical Communications bietet ein geschlossenes System für die Planung, Steuerung und Erfolgsmessung der Kommunikation.
Comprehensive approach to combine industrial excellence and digital innovation. Project for German Minister of Economicy/State Secretary Machnig, 2016/2017
More Related Content
Similar to Best friends forever nina smidt_presentation_25.6.2018_am_cham
The document discusses sentiment analysis in social media. It makes three main points:
1. Human communication, both online and offline, is inherently subjective. Opinions and facts are often intertwined.
2. Facts and opinions expressed online have business value for consumers, marketers, competitors and managers. Sentiment analysis can turn attitudes expressed online into useful data.
3. Basic keyword searches and document-level analyses are not enough for decision support. Sentiment analysis requires techniques that can analyze features, opinion holders, semantics and propagate sentiment across multiple channels. It needs both machine and human capabilities.
4182020 Opinion Why Do People Fall for Fake News - The Ne.docxtaishao1
4/18/2020 Opinion | Why Do People Fall for Fake News? - The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/19/opinion/sunday/fake-news.html 1/2
GRAY MATTER
Why Do People Fall for Fake News?
Are they blinded by their political passions? Or are they just intellectually lazy?
By Gordon Pennycook and David Rand
Dr. Pennycook and Dr. Rand are psychologists.
Jan. 19, 2019
What makes people susceptible to fake news and other forms of strategic misinformation? And what, if anything, can
be done about it?
These questions have become more urgent in recent years, not least because of revelations about the Russian
campaign to influence the 2016 United States presidential election by disseminating propaganda through social
media platforms. In general, our political culture seems to be increasingly populated by people who espouse
outlandish or demonstrably false claims that often align with their political ideology.
The good news is that psychologists and other social scientists are working hard to understand what prevents people
from seeing through propaganda. The bad news is that there is not yet a consensus on the answer. Much of the
debate among researchers falls into two opposing camps. One group claims that our ability to reason is hijacked by
our partisan convictions: that is, we’re prone to rationalization. The other group — to which the two of us belong —
claims that the problem is that we often fail to exercise our critical faculties: that is, we’re mentally lazy.
However, recent research suggests a silver lining to the dispute: Both camps appear to be capturing an aspect of the
problem. Once we understand how much of the problem is a result of rationalization and how much a result of
laziness, and as we learn more about which factor plays a role in what types of situations, we’ll be better able to
design policy solutions to help combat the problem.
The rationalization camp, which has gained considerable prominence in recent years, is built around a set of theories
contending that when it comes to politically charged issues, people use their intellectual abilities to persuade
themselves to believe what they want to be true rather than attempting to actually discover the truth. According to
this view, political passions essentially make people unreasonable, even — indeed, especially — if they tend to be
good at reasoning in other contexts. (Roughly: The smarter you are, the better you are at rationalizing.)
Some of the most striking evidence used to support this position comes from an influential 2012 study in which the
law professor Dan Kahan and his colleagues found that the degree of political polarization on the issue of climate
change was greater among people who scored higher on measures of science literary and numerical ability than it
was among those who scored lower on these tests. Apparently, more “analytical” Democrats were better able to
convince themselves that climate change was a problem, while more “analytical” Republica.
This document discusses how sentiment analysis was used to analyze public opinion during the 2012 US Presidential debates between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney. Sentiment analysis involves evaluating subjective information in text data to determine sentiment. It can analyze large amounts of data from social media and news to classify sentiment as positive, negative, or neutral. The analysis of posts during and after the debates provided insights into how the public reacted to different moments and helped analysts understand who was perceived to have won each debate. Real-time analysis also allowed campaigns to track changes in sentiment over the course of live events.
The document outlines the crisis mitigation process for building crisis-resistant organizations. It discusses observing the environment to find red flags, orienting by collecting and analyzing information, deciding on and taking preventive action, and evaluating effectiveness. Key aspects covered include identifying external and internal risks, using tools like content analysis and threat assessments, and addressing challenges through responses like refusal, refutation, or reform. While impossible to completely avoid crises, prevention reduces their likelihood and impact through ongoing monitoring, information gathering, and responding to warning signs.
The survey examined issues in communications, public relations and public affairs based on responses from 300 professionals. It found that partisan politics makes the job harder for 72% of respondents. The top challenges shifted from budget to proving value and an executive team that doesn't understand communications. Media relations is getting more difficult according to 75% of PR professionals, as reporters receive increasing numbers of pitches each day.
PR disasters: is social media the problem or the solution?Bob Pickard
In the social media age, managing your message and communicating effectively during a crisis has never been more important for leaders and their organizations. Social media’s power to build image and to destroy reputation is making public relations more important, while many of the old methods of corporate communication have suddenly become outmoded. This presentation contains recent public opinion research on social media, fake news, and PR disasters — backed by practical recommendations for leaders who need to communicate effectively as they deal with digital disruption.
591 Final Report - Team 7 - Political IssuesTim Sawicki
This document discusses collecting and analyzing social media data related to political issues from the 2016 US presidential election. It describes scraping data from Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit to analyze what issues were most debated and contested. Location data was extracted from tweets to analyze debates by state. Issues were identified by frequency and sentiment analysis was used to measure passion around topics. The results were compiled into an interactive web application to filter issues and locations.
Trust in Communicators 2019 Study: How the general population trusts journali...Communication Monitor
The "Trust in Communicators" (TiCS) study has been conducted by researchers from Leipzig University, Leeds Beckett University, and IULM University Milan within the framework of EUPRERA, facilitated by Cision Insights and Fink & Fuchs. It is linked to the European Communication Monitor research project. The study combines representative polls of adults aged 16 to 64 from Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom with a survey of communication practitioners in the same countries.
The public poll highlighted that communication and PR professionals are trusted and recognised more highly in the UK than in Germany or Italy. However, the general public has a high-level of distrust in these professionals. A trust gap was identified between communications and PR professionals and journalists, but it was not as wide as expected and is closing.
Information about organisations is often spread by people who are not acting in a professional communication role – i.e. organisational advocates such as supportive customers (fans, brand ambassadors), experts in the field (academics, consultants) or activists with overlapping interests. The polls found that external experts are the most trusted of these advocates, but all are trusted more highly than communication and PR professionals. Efforts should be focussed on enabling these advocacy groups to promote the trust-building process. The polls also revealed that the general population has fuzzy perceptions about the goals and activities of PR professionals.
Whilst communication and PR professionals misperceive the public’s opinion about them and overestimate public trust. These professionals also misjudge their role in the trust-building process and ignore public trust in external advocates.
The full report (PDF, 38 pp.) is available for download.
Tweetfix is a visualization platform, developed for the Fix the Fixing european project, where users can explore the results of crowdsourced data analytics from Social Media on well-known Match Fixing cases.
These are my slides for a presentation to the CFUW Ontario Council for a workshop aimed at exploring political discourse in an age of misinformation/how to navigate information with a critical eye leading up to the Ontario election. More on the event available here http://cfuwontcouncil.org/standing-committees/
Team Disinformation - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Technology Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, Disinformation
The document discusses communication strategies for public figures who are obsessed with media coverage. It suggests that issues management, rather than reactive media responses, is a better approach. Regular issues monitoring and stakeholder analysis can help anticipate problems and prevent crises. Framing issues strategically and maintaining open communication with stakeholders is important for managing media attention in a controlled manner.
This document provides guidance on presenting statistics through visualization techniques. It discusses why visuals are important for communication and some key principles of effective visualization. Visualization techniques can include tables, charts, maps and other emerging methods. The document emphasizes presenting data in a clear, concise and simple manner tailored to the target audience to help them understand complex statistical concepts and relationships. It also stresses the importance of evaluating how audiences interact with and interpret statistical releases to ensure effective communication.
Increasing Voter Knowledge with Pre-Election Interventions on FacebookMIT GOV/LAB
As part of our Data Science to Solve Social Problems series, Facebook Data Scientist Winter Mason presented on efforts to increase online civic engagement.
SIEM Security: 2018 Media & Influencer AnalysisZeno Group
The document analyzes media coverage and influencer discussion around security information and event management (SIEM). It finds that Dark Reading, ZDNet, and CSO Online drove the most narrative around SIEM, while topics around security operations, data security, and data breach resonated most. The analysis also identifies top influencers in the SIEM space and their social reach, as well as trends in topics like digital transformation discussed by influencers.
Program-Level Objectives met with this assignmentCrit.docxdenneymargareta
Program-Level Objectives met with this assignment:
Critical Thinking Skills
Personal Responsibility
Social Responsibility
Communication
Course-Level Objectives met with this assignment:
Explain the origin and development of constitutional democracy in the United States.
Demonstrate knowledge of the federal system.
Describe separation of powers and checks and balances in both theory and practice.
Demonstrate knowledge of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the federal government.
Evaluate the role of public opinion, interest groups, and political parties in the political system.
Describe the rights and responsibilities of citizens
Analyze issues and policies in U.S. politics
SLO #2: Social Media and the USA Presidency. 70% of students will successfully research and evaluate how the office of the President and Vice President uses social media as a platform for their agendas. [ SLO #2 fulfills the following Program Level Outcomes: Communication, Critical Thinking, Social and Personal Responsibility, as well as the following Course Level Outcomes: 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8.]
Activity for assessment:
Is Social Media a good forum for elected leaders? How should they best communicate with the public? You’ll evaluate the President and Vice President on their use of Twitter and Facebook to implement their agendas.
Read the Pew Charitable Trust article (
http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2014/10/17/officials-urged-take-care-with-social-media
) and develop a list of best practices for elected leaders’ use of social media.
Spend two weeks (select a 14-day period,
and be sure to state the dates in your paper
) with the President and Vice President as they utilize social media:
Donald Trump
:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump
https://www.facebook.com/POTUS/
Mike Pence:
https://twitter.com/mike_pence
https://www.facebook.com/VicePresidentPence/
What message or agenda are each conveying to “followers?” Discuss three (3) themes for each official. (for example: economy, environment, guns)
Are they consistent with what’s on their “official” government pages?
https://www.whitehouse.gov
(*to follow up on more specific information associated with each individual, place your browser arrow over 'The Administration' tab and you should have the separate offices drop down*)
5. Do these elected leaders have any more personal or social responsibility to the citizens and residents of the USA than the average Facebook or Twitter user? Why?
6. If you were the social media advisor to each man, what would suggest for each? Based upon your “best practices,” are they doing it right? What can each do to try to reach out beyond their base of supporters/followers?
7.
How would you distinguish between
what is truth v what are lies?
This assignment must follow MLA guidelines, be typed in Times New Roman, 12 pt. font, and be a minimum of 1000 words with a works ...
The document discusses how news media are increasingly using analytics and audience data to help navigate the competitive battle for attention. It describes how leading organizations are developing distinct forms of "editorial analytics" tailored to their specific goals and contexts. These analytics inform both short-term decisions and longer-term strategy. While globally-focused US and UK news outlets remain ahead, market leaders in other countries are also developing their own approaches to analytics.
The document summarizes key media and technology trends from 2016, including the rise of "fake news" and declining trust in traditional media. It also discusses the financial struggles of digital publishers and growing power of tech platforms like Facebook and Google. Major developments included the expansion of distributed publishing through platforms like Instant Articles and AMP, increased focus on live and social video, and debates around the responsibilities of platforms.
Similar to Best friends forever nina smidt_presentation_25.6.2018_am_cham (20)
Ist Ihr Unternehmen eher "Holly Golightly", "Buddenbrook" oder "Bettina Wulf"? Die semantische Big Data Analyse hilft, Inhalte UND Emotionen, Trends UND Risiken zu identifizieren und vorherzusagen. Analytical Communications bietet ein geschlossenes System für die Planung, Steuerung und Erfolgsmessung der Kommunikation.
Comprehensive approach to combine industrial excellence and digital innovation. Project for German Minister of Economicy/State Secretary Machnig, 2016/2017
Gutes Management ist eine Frage der Performance? Weit gefehlt: Seit der Jahrtausendwende entscheidet immer häufiger die Perception - die Wahrnehmung desse, was Top Manager tun und wie sie wirken - über deren Karrieren. 80 Prozent aller Karrieren scheitern hier. Dazu hier Informationen aus einem laufenden Forschungsprojekt des "Center of Economic Policies" (copes) und Roland Berger
13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Youngest c m in India- Pema Khandu BiographyVoterMood
Pema Khandu, born on August 21, 1979, is an Indian politician and the Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh. He is the son of former Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh, Dorjee Khandu. Pema Khandu assumed office as the Chief Minister in July 2016, making him one of the youngest Chief Ministers in India at that time.
केरल उच्च न्यायालय ने 11 जून, 2024 को मंडला पूजा में भाग लेने की अनुमति मांगने वाली 10 वर्षीय लड़की की रिट याचिका को खारिज कर दिया, जिसमें सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की एक बड़ी पीठ के समक्ष इस मुद्दे की लंबित प्रकृति पर जोर दिया गया। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति अनिल के. नरेंद्रन और न्यायमूर्ति हरिशंकर वी. मेनन की खंडपीठ द्वारा पारित किया गया
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptxPragencyuk
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
Best friends forever nina smidt_presentation_25.6.2018_am_cham
1. Best Friends Forever?
How the US thinks and feels about Germany
AmCham Germany
Dr. Nina Smidt
Berlin, June 25, 2018
2. The Task
1
> Working assumption: Germany has lost relevance in the United States.
> The “Germany Year USA 2018/2019” undertaken by the German Foreign Office and partners is an
effort to counteract this and strengthen ties.
> Question: What can Germany do, and how can transatlantic institutions help, to improve
perceptions of Germany in the US?
3. First-ever Perception Value Management (PVM)TM analysis on the perception of a country
Topline findings:
> A mismatch between general public opinion (big data analysis) and expert opinion
(survey of transatlantic experts);
> Perception of Germany’s performance in the world is strong, but that is not always positive – seen
as a threatening power;
> Perception on “Character” and “Sympathy” values is low.
2* PVM –semantic big data analytics developed by Prof. Ivo Hajnal and Prof. Torsten Oltmanns
4. Big Data
Analysis
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4
Public perceptions
reflected in social, online
and print media
> Twitter analysis over
one year (September
1, 2016 – September
1, 2017)
> 25 most prominent
print and online US
media outlets
> Standard Risk
Analysis and
specified PVM
Analysis
Evaluation and
Comparison
Recommendations
Online stakeholder
survey with a select
group of 25 transatlantic
experts from the policy,
business and think tank
sectors. Equal parts US/
German citizens.
Recommendations for
an advanced
communication strategy
to help strengthen the
perception of Germany
in the United States and
support transatlantic ties.
Stakeholder
Survey
> Analysis of findings
using Perception
Value Management
MatrixTM.
> Comparison of Big
Data Analysis and
Stakeholder Survey
Results.
3* PVM –semantic big data analytics developed by Prof. Ivo Hajnal and Prof. Torsten Oltmanns
5. Semantic Big Data Analytics: Twitter Analysis
Step 1: Analysis
Data made available by Twitter Analytics; data refers to total amount of
tweets with search criteria
4
6. Semantic Big Data Analytics: Twitter Analysis
Step 1: Analysis
Data made available by Twitter Analytics; data refers to total
amount of tweets with search criteria
5
7. Semantic Big Data Analytics: Twitter Analysis
Step 1: Analysis
Data made available by Twitter Analytics; data refers to total
amount of tweets with search criteria
6
8. Semantic Big Data Analytics: Twitter Analysis
Step 1: Analysis
Data made available by Twitter Analytics; data refers to total
amount of tweets with search criteria
7
9. Semantic Big Data Analytics: Media outlets
Step 1: Analysis
1. USA Today
2. The New York Times
3. The Wall Street Journal
4. The Los Angeles Times
5. The Washington Post
6. New York Daily News
7. The San Francisco Chronicle
8. The New York Post
9. The Chicago Tribune
10. The Star-Ledger
11. The San Jose Mercury News, Contra
Costa Times and The Oakland Tribune
12. Chicago Sun-Times
13. Philadelphia Inquirer and Philadelphia
Daily News
14. The Houston Chronicle
15. The Dallas Morning News
16. Seattle Times
17. The Arizona Republic
18. The StarTribune
19. The Denver Post
20. The Plain Dealer
21. The Oregonian
22. The Detroit Free Press
23. The Tampa Tribune
24. Newsday
25. San Diego Union-Tribune
8
10. Semantic Big Data Analytics: Perception Value Management Matrix
9
Step 1: Analysis
Key tenets:
> Measures general sentiment and attitude towards Germany;
> Measures particular perception on “Performance,” Sympathy”
and “Character”;
> Evaluates a large segment of data from print and online media,
social media, websites and blogs;
> Measures perception criteria based on over 200 selectors;
> Focuses on main traditional news and social media outlets in
the US;
> Allows for a short-term prognosis regarding trends, challenges
and potential crisis situations;
> Evaluation of results is based on the Perception Value
Management Concept;
> Results are used to design an integrated communication
strategy that will strengthen Germany’s perception in the US;
> The matrix has been used in corporate analysis but not in
“nation-branding” (use of corporate marketing techniques by
countries to enhance international reputation).
11. Perception Value Triangle (PVMTM)
1. Performance (strengthens authority) – “Logos”
a. Cognition: Is the problem understood?
b. Competence: Are the required skills for problem
solving available?
c. Reflection: Who are responsible leaders / acting
parties?
2. Sympathy (builds coalition) – “Pathos”
a. Commonalities: What are the common points of view?
b. Openness: Is there respect and tolerance for other
opinions?
c. Interaction: Are there opportunities for cooperation
and exchange?
3. Character (establishes trust) – “Ethos”
a. Legibility: Identifying positions and values
b. Integrity: Understanding deeper motives
c. Consistency: Establishing reliability
10* PVM –semantic big data analytics developed by Prof. Ivo Hajnal and Prof. Torsten Oltmanns
12. 11
Step 1: Analysis
Multiplying Factors for Risk Analysis and PVM Calculation
General psychological selectors for Risk and PVM-Analysis
Data: Nina Smidt, 2017
Sample Total Lexicon Factor
up to 100%
Factor for General
Lexicon
Total Impact Factor
Risk Print:
Media USA
72% ≈ 1,4 ≈ 8 11,2
Risk Twitter:
Twitter USA
52% ≈ 2 ≈ 8 16
PVM Print:
Medien USA
5% ≈ 20 – 20
PVM Twitter:
Twitter USA
2,8% ≈ 35 – 35
13. Positive Emotions
Negative Emotions
Anxiety
Anger
Sadness
-25 -22.5 -20 -17.5 -15 -12.5 -10 -7.5 -5 -2.5 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 27.5 30
Bad feelings cancel out good feelings.
Print and Online Media USA (September 2016 - September 2017); Search Criteria: “Germany“, “Merkel“
Step 1: Analysis
12
Data: Nina Smidt, 2017
14. Discrepancy
Difference
Implementation Skills
Power
0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 37.5 40 42.5 45 47.5 50 52.5 55 57.5 60
Germany is a powerhouse; is that good?
Print and Online Media USA (September 2016 - September 2017; Search Criteria: “Germany“, “Merkel“)
Step 1: Analysis
Data: Nina Smidt, 2017
13
15. Positive Emotions
Negative Emotions
Anxiety
Anger
Sadness
-45.00 -40.00 -35.00 -30.00 -25.00 -20.00 -15.00 -10.00 -5.00 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00
Row 1/2: USA total 17/16
Row 3/4: Texas 17/16
Row 5/6: New York 17/16
Twitter captures strong negative emotions. Texas is harsher than New York.
Twitter (September 2016 - September 2017; Search Criteria: “Germany“, “Merkel“)
Step 1: Analysis
14
Data: Nina Smidt, 2017
16. Discrepancy
Difference
Implementation Skills
Power
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00
Row 1/2: USA total 17/16
Row 3/4: Texas 17/16
Row 5/6: New York 17/16
Germany is viewed as a power both on Twitter and in news media.
Twitter (September 2016 - September 2017); Search Criteria: “Germany“, “Merkel“
Step 1: Analysis
15
Data: Nina Smidt, 2017
17. Step 1: Analysis
PVMTM-Values in journalistic media show a deficit on “sympathy“
Media
9/16-9/17
Dangerous
Be aware
No concern
7,2
10,0
4,4
1,03,4
9,0
-9,2
-7,00
-5,4
-7,2
7,2
4,5
PVMTM Analysis Media, online and print
Data: Nina Smidt, 2017;
16
* PVM –semantic big data analytics developed by Prof. Ivo Hajnal and Prof. Torsten Oltmanns
18. 17
PVMTM-Values on Twitter (USA total) show a more critical image than journalistic media
Twitter
9/16-9/17
Dangerous
Be aware
No concern
3,2
6,7
5,6
-0,74,2
6,3
-15,4
-8,4
-3,5
-9,1
5,2
3,3
PVMTM Analysis Twitter USA
Step 1: Analysis
Data: Nina Smidt, 2017 * PVM –semantic big data analytics developed by Prof. Ivo Hajnal and Prof. Torsten Oltmanns
19. Interim Results – 1
Translate findings into PVMTM Analysis
> Performance value – strong, but also seen as threat;
> Character value – weak, underdeveloped;
> Sympathy value – almost undetectable.
Interim Results
18* PVM –semantic big data analytics developed by Prof. Ivo Hajnal and Prof. Torsten Oltmanns
20. Stakeholder Survey: Germany and Merkel are perceived positively …
Strengths
Step 2: Stakeholder Survey
Data: Nina Smidt, 2017
19
21. … but problems are apparent.
Weaknesses
Step 2: Stakeholder Survey
Data: Nina Smidt, 2017
20
22. Overall relations are strong, or at least normal …
Opportunities
Step 2: Stakeholder Survey
Data: Nina Smidt, 2017
21
23. … but Germany cannot be complacent.
Threats
Step 2: Stakeholder Survey
Data: Nina Smidt, 2017
22
24. Interim Results – 2
Mismatch between Big Data Analysis and Stakeholder Survey.
Interim Results
23
There is a mismatch between the big data analysis (representing a wide US audience) and the survey of a
select group of transatlantic experts:
> Topics that the select group considers important (economy, trade, NATO, EU leadership) are not the
ones reflected in big data (Merkel, Trump, Nazi history, far-right parties in Germany).
> Big data analysis and survey agree: Germany is strong on “Performance”.
> However, ”Performance” is viewed positively by survey group and negatively by wider US population.
> “Sympathy” related values do not occur at all in big data analysis: Friendship, Fun, Sports, Music,
Culture.
> Mismatch becomes even more apparent in the comparison of New York as a blue state and Texas as a
red state.
25. SWOT Analysis
Step 3: Evaluation and Comparison
Strength
Germany perceived as strong in
performance
Weakness
Germany is weak in character and
sympathy
Threat
Strong performance viewed as
threatening
Opportunity
Turn performance perception into a
positive connotation
24
26. Perception of Germany in the US shows need for action.
Step 3: Evaluation and Comparison
> Perception of Germany in US media is relatively
negative and often reflects anger.
> Performance orientation is strong, seen as
positive in the context of a strong economy.
> However, Germany is viewed as a powerhouse,
not necessarily in a positive way.
> Perceptions expressed on Twitter reflect those
in general media.
> Perceptions more negative in conservative
states (e.g. Texas) vs. liberal (e.g. New York).
25
27. Challenges
Step 4: Recommendations
> Perception beats performance – What people
believe or feel about a brand carries more weight
than its long-term performance.
> Opinion beats factual reasoning – People are
looking for confirmation of their deeply held
views, tied to their social and cultural identity.
The answer: an advanced communication
strategy to counteract these challenges and
strengthen the perception of Germany in the US.
26
28. Where do we go from here?
> Working assumption: Germany has lost relevance in the United
States;
> Question: What can Germany do, and how transatlantic institutions
help, to improve perceptions of Germany in the US?
> Mismatch between Big Data Analytics and Stakeholder Survey;
> Strong on “Performance”, but that is not always good;
> Weak on “Sympathy” and “Character”;
> Need to re-think communication strategy for Germany;
> Along the lines of “Performance Plus”.
27