Uploaded bymonroesecurities
PPT, PDF2,251 views

Basel iii overview

This document discusses proposed Basel III capital rules and their potential impact on community banks. It notes that while not all rules will apply, community banks will have to comply with new regulatory capital and risk weighting requirements. This will involve higher minimum capital ratios, more common equity, and increased risk weights for assets like commercial real estate and mortgages. The new rules will also limit dividends, stock buybacks, and executive pay. Overall, the changes mean capital will be more complex and difficult to manage under the new regulations.

Embed presentation

Downloaded 41 times
Private and Confidential PROPOSED BASEL III CAPITAL RULES: WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO YOU? IMPACT ON COMMUNITY BANKS October 2012 SERVING COMMUNITY BANKS SINCE 1968 ATLANTA CHICAGO RALEIGH SAN FRANCISCO TAMPA
Private and Confidential WHAT HAS HAPPENED?  Federal banking agencies have endorsed the recommendations of BASEL III and have proposed rules to apply them to ALL US banks  Comment period ended October 22nd  While there are many rules that will not apply to community banks, two categories WILL apply to community banks: 1. Regulatory Capital Rules (involving new definitions and minimum requirements) 2. New “standardized” approach to assessing risk weightings for certain asset classes (including, importantly, residential mortgages)  These will apply to  All US banks and savings associations  All bank holding companies over $500mm in assets Only Small BHC are exempt from these ratios  These proposed rules are being vigorously lobbied against, and have had a few high-profile detractors, so the final outcome is still uncertain. -2- Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential WHY DO YOU CARE?  No matter the final outcome, these rules are more complex and will be more difficult to administer  Primary observations on what will change:  Higher overall minimum capital ratios  Increased common equity requirements, including a new ratio (“Common Equity Tier 1 Capital/Total RBC”)  Higher risk weightings for commercial RE and most mortgages  Much greater complexity around calculations  Higher volatility of regulatory capital (more market-based inputs)  New constraints on dividends, buybacks and executive compensation  Limited by new concept of “capital buffer” above minimal ratios  Currently includes tax distributions for Sub-S banks  TRUPs being phased-out as Tier 1 Capital for all banks, over 10 years beginning in 2013  The new rules will be phased in over time  Most capital rules begin in 2013 with full effect beginning in 2015  The new risk weightings being in 2015 -3- Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential WHY DO YOU CARE? CAPITAL Old Rule IS KING COMMON New Rule EQUITY IS KING Fundamental Question: What will the long-term impact on the industry be for attracting the new capital that will be required to fund these new rules? -4- Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential BASEL III REGULATORY CAPITAL RULES -5- Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential PROPOSED REGULATORY CAPITAL CHANGES Regulator y The new rules as proposed would: Capital 1.Revise the definitions of regulatory capital components and related calculations. 2.Add a new “Common Equity Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital” ratio. 3.Incorporate the revised regulatory capital requirements into the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) framework. 4.Implement a new Capital Conservation Buffer that limits certain capital actions, such as paying dividends, repurchasing stock and paying bonuses to employees. 5.Provide a transition period for several aspects of the proposed rules. -6- Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential NEW CAPITAL DEFINITIONS: THREE COMPONENTS (1) Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Regulator + Qualifying common stock instruments y + Retained earnings Capital +/- Accumulated other comprehensive income + Qualifying Common Equity Tier 1 minority interest - Regulatory deductions from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Common +/- Regulatory adjustments to Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Equity - Common Equity Tier 1 Capital deductions per the corresponding deduction approach Tier 1 - Threshold deductions = Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (2) Additional Tier 1 Capital + Additional Tier 1 Capital instruments + Tier 1 minority interest that is not included in Common Equity Tier 1 Capital + Non-qualifying Tier 1 Capital instruments subject to the transition phase-out and SBLF related instruments Additional - Investments in a banking organization’s own additional Tier 1 Capital instruments Tier 1 - Additional Tier 1 Capital deductions per the corresponding deduction approach = Additional Tier 1 Capital (3) Tier 2 Capital + Tier 2 Capital instruments + Total Capital minority interest that is not included in Tier 1 Capital + ALLL - Investments in a banking organization’s own Tier 2 Capital instruments Tier 2 - Tier 2 Capital deductions per the corresponding deduction approach + Non-qualifying Tier 2 Capital instruments subject to transition phase-out and SBLF related instruments = Tier 2 Capital Total Capital = Equity Tier 1 + Additional Tier 1 + Tier 2 -7- Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential NEW CAPITAL RATIO: COMMON EQUITY TIER 1 CAPITAL Regulator y Capital Common Accumulated Stock + Other Qualifying Adjustment Common Retained Comprehensive Minority & Equity Earnings Income Interest Deductions Tier 1 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Adjustments & Deductions Net unrealized gains/losses on available- for-sale securities Detailed on next page  Current treatment: available-for-sale equity securities losses included in Tier 1 and portion of gains included in Tier 2.  Proposed treatment: net unrealized gains/losses on available-for-sale debt and equity securities included in Common Equity Tier 1. -8- Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential DEFINITION: ADJUSTMENTS AND DEDUCTIONS Regulator Adjustments & Deductions y Capital Deductions Threshold Deductions  Goodwill Deduct Amounts > 10% (individually) or > 15% (aggregate)  Deferred Tax Assets (Carryforwards) of Common Equity Tier 1 Capital:  Other Intangibles (except for  Mortgage Servicing Assets mortgage servicing assets)  Deferred Tax Assets related to  Gain on Sale of Securitization Exposure temporary timing differences  Non-significant (<10%) investments  Significant (>10%) investments in another financial institution’s in another financial institution’s capital instruments exceeding a common stock threshold (Amounts not deducted are generally Adjustments subject to 250% Risk Weight.)  Unrealized gain/loss on cash flow hedges -9- Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential COMMON EQUITY TIER 1 RBC RATIO Regulator y Capital Common Equity Tier 1  Creates a new risk- Capital based capital measure. Common Equity Tier 1  Purpose: To ensure RBC Ratio institutions “hold high-quality Total Risk- regulatory capital weighted Assets that is available to absorb losses.” - 10 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential DEFINITION: ADDITIONAL TIER 1 CAPITAL Regulator y Capital Noncumulative Small Business Troubled Asset *Only if original bank Perpetual Lending Fund* Relief Program* issuance qualified as Preferred (Bank Issued) (Bank Issued) Tier 1 Capital. Stock Certain Investments in Another Additional Financial Tier 1 Institution’s Capital Instruments NOTE: Trust Preferred Securities Additional are subject to phase out Tier 1 from BHC Tier 1 Capital over 9 years - 11 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential DEFINITION: TIER 2 CAPITAL Regulator y Allowance Capital for Loan and Lease  Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses Losses: - Limited to 1.25% of risk- weighted assets Cumulative Preferred Would eliminate existing limits Stock/ Tier 2 on the following: Subordinated Capital Debt -Subordinated debt - Limited-life preferred stock Certain Investments - Amount of Tier 2 included in in Another Financial Total Capital Institution’s Tier 2 Capital Instruments - 12 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential NEW REGULATORY RATIO MINIMUMS Regulator Common Tier 1 RBC y Prompt Corrective Tier 1 Equity Tier Capital Total RBC Action Categories Leverage 1 RBC Current Proposed % and Ratios % (Proposed) % % % Well Capitalized > 5.0 > 6.5 > 6.0 > 8.0 > 10.0 Adequately Capitalized > 4.0 > 4.5 > 4.0 > 6.0 > 8.0 Undercapitalized < 4.0 < 4.5 < 4.0 < 6.0 < 8.0 Significantly Undercapitalized < 3.0 < 3.0 < 3.0 < 4.0 < 6.0 Critically Tangible Equity/Total Assets < 2% Undercapitalized  New Common Equity Tier 1 RBC ratio. Tangible Equity Capital would equal the revised Tier 1 Capital plus non-Tier 1 perpetual preferred stock. - 13 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential NEW CAPITAL CONSERVATION BUFFER Regulator y Maximum Payout Amount as % of Capital Eligible Retained Income  Types of payments that would be restricted if a bank does not satisfy the capital conservation Size of Buffer buffer requirement: — Dividends —Share buybacks Greater than 2.5% No Buffer Limit —Discretionary payments on Tier 1 instruments —Discretionary bonus payments to 60% > 1.875% to 2.500% senior management 40% > 1.250% to 1.875%  Eligible Retained Income: Would be defined as the most recent four quarters of net income 20% less any capital distributions and certain discretionary payments. > 0.625% to 1.250% 0%  Agencies maintain the supervisory authority to < 0.625% impose further restrictions and/or require capital commensurate with the bank’s risk profile. - 14 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential RESTRICTIONS WILL APPLY UPON LOWEST MEASUREMENT Regulator y Capital Common Equity Tier 1 Risk-Based Total Risk-Based Tier 1 Risk-Based Ratio Ratio Ratio Minus Minus Minus 4.5% 6.0% 8.0% Equals Equals Equals Common Equity Tier 1 Risk-Based Total Risk-Based Tier 1 Risk-Based Buffer Measure Buffer Measure Buffer Measure Bank’s Conservation Buffer is Lowest of the Above - 15 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential CAPITAL CONSERVATION BUFFER: EXAMPLE Regulator y Determination of Buffer and Limit Capital Conservation Buffer Basel III Calculated Maximum Example Example Minimum Buffer Payout Bank Ratios Ratios Measure Amount % % % % Common Equity Tier 1 7.50 4.50 3.00 None Risk-Based Capital Ratio Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital 8.50 6.00 2.50 60 Ratio Total Risk-Based Capital 9.00 8.00 1.00 20 Ratio Payout 1. Determine bank risk-based capital ratios. Limit: 20% of LTM 2. Subtract Basel III minimum ratios. Earnings 3. Determine calculated buffer for each ratio. 4. Apply the maximum payout limit of eligible retained income that is consistent with the lowest buffer. - 16 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential TIMELINE AND TRANSITION PERIOD Regulator Phase-in Schedule y 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Capital Item (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) Phase-in of certain deductions from Common Equity Tier 1 (including threshold deduction items that are over the limits) 20 40 60 80 100 Minimum Common Equity Tier 1 RBC 3.5 4.0 4.5 Minimum Tier 1 RBC 4.5 5.5 6.0 Minimum Total RBC 8.0 Capital Conservation Buffer 0.625 1.25 1.875 2.50 Common Equity Tier 1 Plus Capital Conservation Buffer 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.125 5.75 6.375 7.00 Minimum Tier 1 Capital Plus Capital Conservation Buffer 4.5 5.5 6.0 6.625 7.25 7.875 8.50 Minimum Total Capital Plus Conservation Buffer 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.625 9.25 9.875 10.50  Capital instruments that no longer qualify as additional Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital would be phased out over a 10 year horizon beginning in 2013. Revised PCA ratios are effective on January 1, 2015. - 17 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential “STANDARDIZED APPROACH” TO RISK WEIGHTING ASSETS - 18 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential NEW ASSET RISK WEIGHTING RULES Standardized Approach on Main Impact on Community Banks Risk 1. Revised Risk-weighting Methodology – On-Balance Sheet Assets:  1-4 Family Residential Real Estate Loans  “High Volatility” Commercial Real Estate  Past Due Assets  Structured Securities  Equity Holdings 2. Revised Risk-weighting Methodology – Off-Balance Sheet Items. 3. Allows for substitution of a wider range of financial collateral and eligible guarantors for calculating risk-weighted assets. 4. Rules begin January 1, 2015 - 19 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential STANDARDIZED APPROACH TO RISK WEIGHTING Standardized  Exposure to Sovereigns  Past Due Exposures Approach on  Exposures to Certain  Other Assets Risk Supranational Entities and  Off-Balance Sheet Items Multilateral Development Banks  Over-the-Counter Derivative  Exposures to Government- Contracts sponsored entities  Cleared Transactions  Exposures to Depository  Guarantees and Credit Derivatives Institutions, Foreign Banks, and  Collateralized Transactions Credit Unions  Unsettled Transactions  Exposures to Public Sector  Securitization Exposures Entities  Equity Exposures  Corporate Exposures  Residential Mortgage Exposures  Pre-sold Construction Loans and Statutory Multifamily Mortgages  High Volatility Commercial Real Estate Exposures - 20 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential 1-4 FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGES Standardized Category 1 Category 2 Approach on  Term < 30 years Risk  Regular Periodic payments No increases in principal, deferments, or balloons Underwriting and repayment ability based On: — Principal, Interest, Taxes, Insurance  All other residential mortgage — Maximum Interest Rate Allowed In First Five Years exposures including: —Documented Income — Certain junior liens  Interest changes limited to 2% per year and 6% over the — Nontraditional mortgage life of the loan products  HELOC qualification includes principal and interest on maximum exposure  Loans that are not 90 days past due, nonaccrual, or certain junior liens Loan to Value (%) Risk Weight (excludes PMI coverage) Category 1 Category 2 < 60 35% 100% > 60 to < 80 50% 100% > 80 to < 90 75% 150% > 90 100% 200% - 21 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential 1-4 FAMILY RISK WEIGHTS - EXAMPLES Standardized Approach on 1-4 Family Residential Risk Weights Risk Mortgages 35% 50% 75% 100% 150% 200% 30 year amortization and maturity, current, LTV < 60% 30 year amortization and maturity, current, LTV > 60% to < 80% 30 year amortization and maturity, current, LTV > 80% to < 90% 5 year balloon, 30 year amortization, current, LTV < 80% 5 year balloon, 30 year amortization, current, LTV > 80% to < 90 Stand-alone junior lien LTV > 90% - 22 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential HIGH VOLATILITY COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE Standardized High Volatility CRE (HVCRE) HVCRE means Acquisition, Development, Approach on Represents a Small Subset of or Construction Financing except: Risk the Industry’s CRE Portfolio  1-4 family residential properties Includes Projects in which: HVCRE 1. The loan-to value ratio < - maximum supervisory loan-to- Non ial value, and nt Reside 2. Borrower contributed at least ADC 15% of “as completed” appraised value, and 3. Borrower contributed the capital before the bank Other CRE advances funds, and the capital is contractually required to remain throughout the project life. The NPR would assign HVCRE loans a risk weight of 150%. - 23 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential CRE RISK WEIGHTS - EXAMPLES Standardized Approach on Risk Weights Risk Commercial Real Estate 100% 150% Owner-Occupied Office Building Non Owner-Occupied Office Building Manufacturing/Industrial Building Acquisition, Development, and Construction: 1-4 family residential properties Acquisition, Development, and Construction: non-1-4 family residential properties and LTV is 90% - 24 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential PAST DUE ASSETS RISK WEIGHTS Standardized Approach on Assets > 90 days past due or Risk Weights Risk nonaccrual 50% 100% 150% Revenue Bond Multifamily Loan Consumer Loan Commercial and Industrial Non-Farm Non-Residential Agricultural Would not apply to:  1-4 family residential exposures  HVCRE - 25 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential STRUCTURED SECURITIES Standardized Examples may include: Approach on Private Label Mortgage-Backed Securities Risk Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations (TruPS) Asset-Backed Securities Three Approaches Other Requirements/Options  Risk weight based on one of the following:  Must apply approach selected consistently. 1. Weighted average of underlying collateral (Gross UP) 1,250% option may be used regardless 2. 2. Formula based on of approach selected. subordination position and delinquencies (Simplified Requirement for comprehensive Supervisory Formula Approach understanding and due diligence. – SSFA) 3. 1,250% — If not met, 1,250% would apply. Eliminates Ratings-Based Approach. - 26 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential EQUITY RISK WEIGHTS Risk Weights Standardized Equity Exposures Approach on 0% 20% 100% 250% 300% 400% 600% Risk Federal Reserve Bank stock Federal Home Loan Bank stock CDFI and community development equity exposures An investment of common stock in an unconsolidated financial institution (unless already deducted)* A publicly traded equity exposure* An equity exposure that is not publicly traded* An equity exposure to a hedge fund or any investment firm that has greater than immaterial leverage* * To the extent that the aggregate adjusted carrying value of certain equity exposures do not exceed 10% of the bank’s total capital, a 100% risk weight may be applied. - 27 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential OFF-BALANCE SHEET: CREDIT CONVERSION Standardized Approach on Risk Credit Conversion Factors Off-Balance Sheet Items 0% 20% 50% Unused portion of commitments that are unconditionally cancelable by the bank Commitments with an original maturity of < 1 year that are not unconditionally cancelable Commitments with an original maturity of > 1 year that are not unconditionally cancelable For HELOCs, refer to the 1-4 family mortgage section of the proposal - 28 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential OFF-BALANCE SHEET: MORTGAGE BANKING Standardized Approach on Risk 1-4 Family Mortgage Loans Sold  Credit-Enhancing Representations and Warranties on Assets Sold: — Early Payment Default —Premium Refund Clause  Existing Treatment: — Provides exclusion for early payment default or premium refund clauses that are for a period of 120 days or less.  Proposed Treatment: — Eliminates existing 120-day exclusion. —All early payment default and premium refund clauses are treated as off-balance sheet guarantees for the duration of the enhancement.  Proposed Risk Weight: — Credit Conversion Factor: 100% — Risk Weight: 35% to 200% based on Category 1 or Category 2 and loan to value. - 29 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential COLLATERALIZED TRANSACTIONS EXAMPLES Under the proposal, a bank may substitute the Standardized Approach on asset’s risk weight with the collateral’s risk weight. Risk Risk Weights 0% 20% 50% 100% Cash on deposit at the bank or third party custodian* US Government Securities (proposed: must discount market value by 20%)* Government Sponsored Entity securities Money market funds Risk Weight Varies "Investment grade" securities (examples): General Obligation Municipal Revenue Municipal Corporate “Investment grade” means that “the entity to which the bank is exposed through a loan or security, or the reference entity with respect to a credit derivative, has adequate capacity to meet financial commitments for the projected life of the asset or exposure.” *Current risk weight for state nonmember banks. Current risk weight may differ for national and state member banks. - 30 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential TREATMENT OF GUARANTEES Standardized Under the proposal, a bank may substitute the risk weight of an Approach on eligible guarantor for the risk weight of the exposure. Risk Eligible Guarantors Include: Eligible Guarantees Must:  Depository institution or holding  Be written and either: company — Unconditional, or Federal Home Loan Banks —A contingent obligation of the U.S. government or its agencies Farmer Mac Also meet other requirements Entity that has “investment grade” debt - 31 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential COMMUNITY BANKS WITH HIGH MORTGAGE LOAN EXPOSURE Community banks with high mortgage loan exposure may find themselves struggling to meet the new capital requirements under Basel III. Company Information Company Information Region Midwest Region Southeast Total Assets ($000) $228,536 Total Assets ($000) $394,806 Loan Mix and Asset Quality (%) Loan Mix and Asset Quality (%) Loans/ Deposits 80% NPA + 90/Assets 1.23% Loans/ Deposits 82% NPA + 90/Assets 6.80% Total 1-4 Fam. Loans/ Loans 64% Nonaccrual+ 90 PD/ Loans 0.67% Total 1-4 Fam. Loans/ Loans 54% Nonaccrual+ 90 PD/ Loans 6.10% Total CRE Loans/Loans (1) 22% Total CRE Loans/Loans (1) 30% Risk Weighted Assets Calculation ($000) Risk Weighted Assets Calculation ($000) Old Risk Weighted Assets 138,249 138,249 Old Risk Weighted Assets 245,274 247,115 Excess ALLL - Excess ALLL 1,237 1-4 Family Risk Adj. (2) 29,752 1-4 Family Risk Adj. (2) 38,037 CRE High Volatility Adj. (3) 2,805 CRE High Volatility Adj. (3) 5,782 Past Due Loans Adj. 376 Past Due Loans Adj. 4,102 Other Adj. - Other Adj. 316 New Risk Weighted Assets 171,181 New Risk Weighted Assets 294,115 Difference 32,932 Difference 48,841 % Difference 23.8% % Difference 19.9% Capital Ratios Capital Ratios Old Calculation New Calculation Basel III Minimum Old Calculation New Calculation Basel III Minimum Leverage Ratio 6.17% 6.17% 5.00% Leverage Ratio 6.61% 6.55% 5.00% Common Equity Tier 1 Ratio NA 8.18% 7.00% Common Equity Tier 1 Ratio (5) NA 8.69% 7.00% Tier 1 Capital Ratio 10.13% 8.18% 8.50% Tier 1 Capital Ratio 10.51% 8.69% 8.50% Total Capital Ratio 11.12% 8.98% 10.50% Total Capital Ratio 11.77% 9.95% 10.50% (1). CRE Loans are defined as other construction and development, farm, multifamily and commercial real estate loans. (2). Assumes 90% of 1-4 family 1st lien loans fall under category 1. LTV breakdowns are based on the avg. LTV breakdowns found in the 10-Ks of publicly traded banks. (3). Assumes 15% of the CRE loans are highly volatile. - 32 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential COMMUNITY BANKS WITH HIGH COMMERCIAL LOAN BaselEXPOSURE requirements will also affect banks with high commercial loan exposure. III’s new capital Company Information Company Information Region Mid Atlantic Region West Total Assets ($000) $340,928 Total Assets ($000) $137,164 Loan Mix and Asset Quality (%) Loan Mix and Asset Quality (%) Loans/ Deposits 98% NPA + 90/Assets 0.02% Loans/ Deposits 87% NPA + 90/Assets 6.58% Total 1-4 Fam. Loans/ Loans 34% Nonaccrual+ 90 PD/ Loans 0.00% Total 1-4 Fam. Loans/ Loans 7% Nonaccrual+ 90 PD/ Loans 5.71% Total CRE Loans/Loans (1) 56% Total CRE Loans/Loans (1) 80% Risk Weighted Assets Calculation ($000) Risk Weighted Assets Calculation ($000) Old Risk Weighted Assets 281,667 281,770 Old Risk Weighted Assets 102,497 104,103 Excess ALLL - Excess ALLL 1,500 1-4 Family Risk Adj. (2) 36,069 1-4 Family Risk Adj. (2) 1,745 CRE High Volatility Adj. (3) 11,962 CRE High Volatility Adj. (3) 5,788 Past Due Loans Adj. - Past Due Loans Adj. 2,718 Other Adj. 1,300 Other Adj. - New Risk Weighted Assets 331,101 New Risk Weighted Assets 112,854 Difference 49,434 Difference 10,357 % Difference 17.6% % Difference 10.1% Capital Ratios Capital Ratios Old Calculation New Calculation Basel III Minimum Old Calculation New Calculation Basel III Minimum Leverage Ratio 8.94% 9.18% 5.00% Leverage Ratio 7.39% 7.44% 5.00% Common Equity Tier 1 Ratio NA 8.60% 7.00% Common Equity Tier 1 Ratio NA 5.47% 7.00% Tier 1 Capital Ratio 9.85% 8.60% 8.50% Tier 1 Capital Ratio 10.00% 9.13% 8.50% Total Capital Ratio 11.08% 9.68% 10.50% Total Capital Ratio 11.27% 10.40% 10.50% (1). CRE Loans are defined as other construction and development, farm, multifamily and commercial real estate loans. (2). Assumes 90% of 1-4 family 1st lien loans fall under category 1. LTV breakdowns are based on the avg. LTV breakdowns found in the 10-Ks of publicly traded banks. (3). Assumes 15% of the CRE loans are highly volatile. - 33 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
Private and Confidential CONCLUSION: FIGHTING THE LAST WAR  The new rules as proposed present a dramatically more conservative posture around capital requirements  Higher overall levels of capital required  Higher proportion of common equity required  Creative Tier 1 instruments are being legislated out of existence  Much more restrictive rules around shareholder distributions, buybacks and bonuses, all limited by capital levels  Much more detailed approach and conservative to weighting the risk of assets  As mentioned, these proposed rules have been vigorously lobbied against, and have had a few high-profile detractors, so the final outcome is still uncertain  We will host another webinar when the final rules are posted - 34 - Monroe Securities, Inc.

More Related Content

PDF
Alex Navab - Overview of Private Equity
byAlyson Davis
 
PDF
morgan stanley Prime Dealer Services Corp.
byfinance2
 
PPTX
Basel I
byAditya
 
PDF
Basel iii impacts on ifsi and role of the ifsb by abdullah haron
byUmer Ahmed, CIFP
 
PPTX
What is Basel III
byJay Tikam
 
PPTX
Banking sector reforms and Basel norms 1 & 2
byNayanaUK
 
PDF
EMIR - Introduction to the Redington Offering
byRedington
 
PDF
Capital Managment - Koos Timmermans (ING) voor Zanders Risicomanagement Semin...
byZanders Treasury, Risk and Finance
 
Alex Navab - Overview of Private Equity
byAlyson Davis
 
morgan stanley Prime Dealer Services Corp.
byfinance2
 
Basel I
byAditya
 
Basel iii impacts on ifsi and role of the ifsb by abdullah haron
byUmer Ahmed, CIFP
 
What is Basel III
byJay Tikam
 
Banking sector reforms and Basel norms 1 & 2
byNayanaUK
 
EMIR - Introduction to the Redington Offering
byRedington
 
Capital Managment - Koos Timmermans (ING) voor Zanders Risicomanagement Semin...
byZanders Treasury, Risk and Finance
 

What's hot

PDF
IAS 32: Presentation of Financial Instruments
bySohan Al Akbar
 
PDF
As 30 31-32-formatted
byDeepak Kar
 
PDF
IFRS 7 Financial Disclosures Overview
bySohan Al Akbar
 
PPTX
IFRS 7
byKLAX RUKATO
 
PDF
Basel Accords - Basel I, II, and III Advantages, limitations and contrast
bySyed Ashraf Ali
 
PDF
DeA Capital may 12 institutional presentation
byDeA Capital S.p.A.
 
PPTX
Basel ii norms.ppt
byKinshook Chaturvedi
 
PPTX
Basel iii capital adequacy accord
byPankaj Baid
 
PPTX
Decoding Financial Statements by Gary Trennepohl
byReynolds Center for Business Journalism
 
PDF
JPMorgan Chase Conference Call on Acquisition of Bear Stearns
byfinance2
 
PPTX
Basel norms I II III & Risk Management in Banks
byAbhijeet Deshmukh
 
PPTX
Basel committee & basel norms
byYasha Singh
 
PPTX
The regulation of banking industry (basel accord)
byAmrita Debnath
 
PPT
Basel presentation
byalblade
 
PPSX
Basel iii Compliance Professionals Association (BiiiCPA) - Part A
byCompliance LLC
 
DOC
Ifrs 7 financial instruments
byVikram Singh
 
PDF
Decoding Financial statements and Investing in a Time of Uncertainty by Gary ...
byReynolds Center for Business Journalism
 
PPTX
Basel iii (naushad chaudhary)
byNaushad Chaudhary (Equity Investment Analyst)
 
PPSX
Ifrs 7 presenting financial instruments
byKhalid Aziz
 
PDF
Understanding Basel III, January 2012 to June 2012
byCompliance LLC
 
IAS 32: Presentation of Financial Instruments
bySohan Al Akbar
 
As 30 31-32-formatted
byDeepak Kar
 
IFRS 7 Financial Disclosures Overview
bySohan Al Akbar
 
IFRS 7
byKLAX RUKATO
 
Basel Accords - Basel I, II, and III Advantages, limitations and contrast
bySyed Ashraf Ali
 
DeA Capital may 12 institutional presentation
byDeA Capital S.p.A.
 
Basel ii norms.ppt
byKinshook Chaturvedi
 
Basel iii capital adequacy accord
byPankaj Baid
 
Decoding Financial Statements by Gary Trennepohl
byReynolds Center for Business Journalism
 
JPMorgan Chase Conference Call on Acquisition of Bear Stearns
byfinance2
 
Basel norms I II III & Risk Management in Banks
byAbhijeet Deshmukh
 
Basel committee & basel norms
byYasha Singh
 
The regulation of banking industry (basel accord)
byAmrita Debnath
 
Basel presentation
byalblade
 
Basel iii Compliance Professionals Association (BiiiCPA) - Part A
byCompliance LLC
 
Ifrs 7 financial instruments
byVikram Singh
 
Decoding Financial statements and Investing in a Time of Uncertainty by Gary ...
byReynolds Center for Business Journalism
 
Basel iii (naushad chaudhary)
byNaushad Chaudhary (Equity Investment Analyst)
 
Ifrs 7 presenting financial instruments
byKhalid Aziz
 
Understanding Basel III, January 2012 to June 2012
byCompliance LLC
 

Similar to Basel iii overview

PPT
What is capital?
byVy Vu Vơ
 
PPTX
Tier 1, 2 and 3 Capital based on the Basel II accord
byNahid Anjum
 
PPTX
Ch15 bb
bySamantha Shao
 
PDF
Strengthening Our Financial System
byUnited States Department of the Treasury
 
PDF
Basel ii pillar_3_disclosures
byVikas Patro
 
PDF
KPMG-NYBA US Basel III Capital Requirement for Community Banks Presentation D...
bysarojkdas
 
PDF
Basel 3 by_khawar_nehal_18_sep_2010-2
byKhawar Nehal khawar.nehal@atrc.net.pk
 
PPTX
Financial Assistance - Copy.pptx
byRikrajPramanik
 
PPT
Community Bank Options For Raising Capital
byvamuch
 
DOCX
Long Term Financing
byShafeeq Rahi
 
DOC
Basel 3 disclosures of cub 30.09.2017 - half yearly
byAnuja Kunie Jain
 
PDF
Rob Tolley London - Financial Strategy What Are Capital Requirements
byRob Tolley
 
PDF
The basel iii capital framework a decisive breakthrough
byRaghav Garg
 
PPSX
Research on Basel 3 :New paradigm of Risk Management
byPurushottam Karna,FRM
 
PDF
fifth third bancorp InvestorUpdateFinal
byfinance28
 
PDF
Ififth third bancorp nvestorUpdateFinal
byfinance28
 
PDF
2010 september-basel-iii (1)
byArpita Gupta
 
PDF
2010 september-basel-iii
byitishree4
 
PDF
Disclosure framework dec_2010
bymdmasudrana007
 
What is capital?
byVy Vu Vơ
 
Tier 1, 2 and 3 Capital based on the Basel II accord
byNahid Anjum
 
Ch15 bb
bySamantha Shao
 
Strengthening Our Financial System
byUnited States Department of the Treasury
 
Basel ii pillar_3_disclosures
byVikas Patro
 
KPMG-NYBA US Basel III Capital Requirement for Community Banks Presentation D...
bysarojkdas
 
Basel 3 by_khawar_nehal_18_sep_2010-2
byKhawar Nehal khawar.nehal@atrc.net.pk
 
Financial Assistance - Copy.pptx
byRikrajPramanik
 
Community Bank Options For Raising Capital
byvamuch
 
Long Term Financing
byShafeeq Rahi
 
Basel 3 disclosures of cub 30.09.2017 - half yearly
byAnuja Kunie Jain
 
Rob Tolley London - Financial Strategy What Are Capital Requirements
byRob Tolley
 
The basel iii capital framework a decisive breakthrough
byRaghav Garg
 
Research on Basel 3 :New paradigm of Risk Management
byPurushottam Karna,FRM
 
fifth third bancorp InvestorUpdateFinal
byfinance28
 
Ififth third bancorp nvestorUpdateFinal
byfinance28
 
2010 september-basel-iii (1)
byArpita Gupta
 
2010 september-basel-iii
byitishree4
 
Disclosure framework dec_2010
bymdmasudrana007
 

Basel iii overview

  • 1.
    Private and Confidential PROPOSEDBASEL III CAPITAL RULES: WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO YOU? IMPACT ON COMMUNITY BANKS October 2012 SERVING COMMUNITY BANKS SINCE 1968 ATLANTA CHICAGO RALEIGH SAN FRANCISCO TAMPA
  • 2.
    Private and Confidential WHATHAS HAPPENED?  Federal banking agencies have endorsed the recommendations of BASEL III and have proposed rules to apply them to ALL US banks  Comment period ended October 22nd  While there are many rules that will not apply to community banks, two categories WILL apply to community banks: 1. Regulatory Capital Rules (involving new definitions and minimum requirements) 2. New “standardized” approach to assessing risk weightings for certain asset classes (including, importantly, residential mortgages)  These will apply to  All US banks and savings associations  All bank holding companies over $500mm in assets Only Small BHC are exempt from these ratios  These proposed rules are being vigorously lobbied against, and have had a few high-profile detractors, so the final outcome is still uncertain. -2- Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 3.
    Private and Confidential WHYDO YOU CARE?  No matter the final outcome, these rules are more complex and will be more difficult to administer  Primary observations on what will change:  Higher overall minimum capital ratios  Increased common equity requirements, including a new ratio (“Common Equity Tier 1 Capital/Total RBC”)  Higher risk weightings for commercial RE and most mortgages  Much greater complexity around calculations  Higher volatility of regulatory capital (more market-based inputs)  New constraints on dividends, buybacks and executive compensation  Limited by new concept of “capital buffer” above minimal ratios  Currently includes tax distributions for Sub-S banks  TRUPs being phased-out as Tier 1 Capital for all banks, over 10 years beginning in 2013  The new rules will be phased in over time  Most capital rules begin in 2013 with full effect beginning in 2015  The new risk weightings being in 2015 -3- Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 4.
    Private and Confidential WHYDO YOU CARE? CAPITAL Old Rule IS KING COMMON New Rule EQUITY IS KING Fundamental Question: What will the long-term impact on the industry be for attracting the new capital that will be required to fund these new rules? -4- Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 5.
    Private and Confidential BASEL III REGULATORY CAPITAL RULES -5- Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 6.
    Private and Confidential PROPOSEDREGULATORY CAPITAL CHANGES Regulator y The new rules as proposed would: Capital 1.Revise the definitions of regulatory capital components and related calculations. 2.Add a new “Common Equity Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital” ratio. 3.Incorporate the revised regulatory capital requirements into the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) framework. 4.Implement a new Capital Conservation Buffer that limits certain capital actions, such as paying dividends, repurchasing stock and paying bonuses to employees. 5.Provide a transition period for several aspects of the proposed rules. -6- Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 7.
    Private and Confidential NEW CAPITAL DEFINITIONS: THREE COMPONENTS (1) Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Regulator + Qualifying common stock instruments y + Retained earnings Capital +/- Accumulated other comprehensive income + Qualifying Common Equity Tier 1 minority interest - Regulatory deductions from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Common +/- Regulatory adjustments to Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Equity - Common Equity Tier 1 Capital deductions per the corresponding deduction approach Tier 1 - Threshold deductions = Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (2) Additional Tier 1 Capital + Additional Tier 1 Capital instruments + Tier 1 minority interest that is not included in Common Equity Tier 1 Capital + Non-qualifying Tier 1 Capital instruments subject to the transition phase-out and SBLF related instruments Additional - Investments in a banking organization’s own additional Tier 1 Capital instruments Tier 1 - Additional Tier 1 Capital deductions per the corresponding deduction approach = Additional Tier 1 Capital (3) Tier 2 Capital + Tier 2 Capital instruments + Total Capital minority interest that is not included in Tier 1 Capital + ALLL - Investments in a banking organization’s own Tier 2 Capital instruments Tier 2 - Tier 2 Capital deductions per the corresponding deduction approach + Non-qualifying Tier 2 Capital instruments subject to transition phase-out and SBLF related instruments = Tier 2 Capital Total Capital = Equity Tier 1 + Additional Tier 1 + Tier 2 -7- Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 8.
    Private and Confidential NEWCAPITAL RATIO: COMMON EQUITY TIER 1 CAPITAL Regulator y Capital Common Accumulated Stock + Other Qualifying Adjustment Common Retained Comprehensive Minority & Equity Earnings Income Interest Deductions Tier 1 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Adjustments & Deductions Net unrealized gains/losses on available- for-sale securities Detailed on next page  Current treatment: available-for-sale equity securities losses included in Tier 1 and portion of gains included in Tier 2.  Proposed treatment: net unrealized gains/losses on available-for-sale debt and equity securities included in Common Equity Tier 1. -8- Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 9.
    Private and Confidential DEFINITION:ADJUSTMENTS AND DEDUCTIONS Regulator Adjustments & Deductions y Capital Deductions Threshold Deductions  Goodwill Deduct Amounts > 10% (individually) or > 15% (aggregate)  Deferred Tax Assets (Carryforwards) of Common Equity Tier 1 Capital:  Other Intangibles (except for  Mortgage Servicing Assets mortgage servicing assets)  Deferred Tax Assets related to  Gain on Sale of Securitization Exposure temporary timing differences  Non-significant (<10%) investments  Significant (>10%) investments in another financial institution’s in another financial institution’s capital instruments exceeding a common stock threshold (Amounts not deducted are generally Adjustments subject to 250% Risk Weight.)  Unrealized gain/loss on cash flow hedges -9- Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 10.
    Private and Confidential COMMONEQUITY TIER 1 RBC RATIO Regulator y Capital Common Equity Tier 1  Creates a new risk- Capital based capital measure. Common Equity Tier 1  Purpose: To ensure RBC Ratio institutions “hold high-quality Total Risk- regulatory capital weighted Assets that is available to absorb losses.” - 10 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 11.
    Private and Confidential DEFINITION:ADDITIONAL TIER 1 CAPITAL Regulator y Capital Noncumulative Small Business Troubled Asset *Only if original bank Perpetual Lending Fund* Relief Program* issuance qualified as Preferred (Bank Issued) (Bank Issued) Tier 1 Capital. Stock Certain Investments in Another Additional Financial Tier 1 Institution’s Capital Instruments NOTE: Trust Preferred Securities Additional are subject to phase out Tier 1 from BHC Tier 1 Capital over 9 years - 11 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 12.
    Private and Confidential DEFINITION:TIER 2 CAPITAL Regulator y Allowance Capital for Loan and Lease  Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses Losses: - Limited to 1.25% of risk- weighted assets Cumulative Preferred Would eliminate existing limits Stock/ Tier 2 on the following: Subordinated Capital Debt -Subordinated debt - Limited-life preferred stock Certain Investments - Amount of Tier 2 included in in Another Financial Total Capital Institution’s Tier 2 Capital Instruments - 12 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 13.
    Private and Confidential NEWREGULATORY RATIO MINIMUMS Regulator Common Tier 1 RBC y Prompt Corrective Tier 1 Equity Tier Capital Total RBC Action Categories Leverage 1 RBC Current Proposed % and Ratios % (Proposed) % % % Well Capitalized > 5.0 > 6.5 > 6.0 > 8.0 > 10.0 Adequately Capitalized > 4.0 > 4.5 > 4.0 > 6.0 > 8.0 Undercapitalized < 4.0 < 4.5 < 4.0 < 6.0 < 8.0 Significantly Undercapitalized < 3.0 < 3.0 < 3.0 < 4.0 < 6.0 Critically Tangible Equity/Total Assets < 2% Undercapitalized  New Common Equity Tier 1 RBC ratio. Tangible Equity Capital would equal the revised Tier 1 Capital plus non-Tier 1 perpetual preferred stock. - 13 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 14.
    Private and Confidential NEWCAPITAL CONSERVATION BUFFER Regulator y Maximum Payout Amount as % of Capital Eligible Retained Income  Types of payments that would be restricted if a bank does not satisfy the capital conservation Size of Buffer buffer requirement: — Dividends —Share buybacks Greater than 2.5% No Buffer Limit —Discretionary payments on Tier 1 instruments —Discretionary bonus payments to 60% > 1.875% to 2.500% senior management 40% > 1.250% to 1.875%  Eligible Retained Income: Would be defined as the most recent four quarters of net income 20% less any capital distributions and certain discretionary payments. > 0.625% to 1.250% 0%  Agencies maintain the supervisory authority to < 0.625% impose further restrictions and/or require capital commensurate with the bank’s risk profile. - 14 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 15.
    Private and Confidential RESTRICTIONSWILL APPLY UPON LOWEST MEASUREMENT Regulator y Capital Common Equity Tier 1 Risk-Based Total Risk-Based Tier 1 Risk-Based Ratio Ratio Ratio Minus Minus Minus 4.5% 6.0% 8.0% Equals Equals Equals Common Equity Tier 1 Risk-Based Total Risk-Based Tier 1 Risk-Based Buffer Measure Buffer Measure Buffer Measure Bank’s Conservation Buffer is Lowest of the Above - 15 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 16.
    Private and Confidential CAPITALCONSERVATION BUFFER: EXAMPLE Regulator y Determination of Buffer and Limit Capital Conservation Buffer Basel III Calculated Maximum Example Example Minimum Buffer Payout Bank Ratios Ratios Measure Amount % % % % Common Equity Tier 1 7.50 4.50 3.00 None Risk-Based Capital Ratio Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital 8.50 6.00 2.50 60 Ratio Total Risk-Based Capital 9.00 8.00 1.00 20 Ratio Payout 1. Determine bank risk-based capital ratios. Limit: 20% of LTM 2. Subtract Basel III minimum ratios. Earnings 3. Determine calculated buffer for each ratio. 4. Apply the maximum payout limit of eligible retained income that is consistent with the lowest buffer. - 16 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 17.
    Private and Confidential TIMELINE AND TRANSITION PERIOD Regulator Phase-in Schedule y 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Capital Item (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) Phase-in of certain deductions from Common Equity Tier 1 (including threshold deduction items that are over the limits) 20 40 60 80 100 Minimum Common Equity Tier 1 RBC 3.5 4.0 4.5 Minimum Tier 1 RBC 4.5 5.5 6.0 Minimum Total RBC 8.0 Capital Conservation Buffer 0.625 1.25 1.875 2.50 Common Equity Tier 1 Plus Capital Conservation Buffer 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.125 5.75 6.375 7.00 Minimum Tier 1 Capital Plus Capital Conservation Buffer 4.5 5.5 6.0 6.625 7.25 7.875 8.50 Minimum Total Capital Plus Conservation Buffer 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.625 9.25 9.875 10.50  Capital instruments that no longer qualify as additional Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital would be phased out over a 10 year horizon beginning in 2013. Revised PCA ratios are effective on January 1, 2015. - 17 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 18.
    Private and Confidential “STANDARDIZED APPROACH” TO RISK WEIGHTING ASSETS - 18 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 19.
    Private and Confidential NEWASSET RISK WEIGHTING RULES Standardized Approach on Main Impact on Community Banks Risk 1. Revised Risk-weighting Methodology – On-Balance Sheet Assets:  1-4 Family Residential Real Estate Loans  “High Volatility” Commercial Real Estate  Past Due Assets  Structured Securities  Equity Holdings 2. Revised Risk-weighting Methodology – Off-Balance Sheet Items. 3. Allows for substitution of a wider range of financial collateral and eligible guarantors for calculating risk-weighted assets. 4. Rules begin January 1, 2015 - 19 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 20.
    Private and Confidential STANDARDIZEDAPPROACH TO RISK WEIGHTING Standardized  Exposure to Sovereigns  Past Due Exposures Approach on  Exposures to Certain  Other Assets Risk Supranational Entities and  Off-Balance Sheet Items Multilateral Development Banks  Over-the-Counter Derivative  Exposures to Government- Contracts sponsored entities  Cleared Transactions  Exposures to Depository  Guarantees and Credit Derivatives Institutions, Foreign Banks, and  Collateralized Transactions Credit Unions  Unsettled Transactions  Exposures to Public Sector  Securitization Exposures Entities  Equity Exposures  Corporate Exposures  Residential Mortgage Exposures  Pre-sold Construction Loans and Statutory Multifamily Mortgages  High Volatility Commercial Real Estate Exposures - 20 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 21.
    Private and Confidential 1-4 FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGES Standardized Category 1 Category 2 Approach on  Term < 30 years Risk  Regular Periodic payments No increases in principal, deferments, or balloons Underwriting and repayment ability based On: — Principal, Interest, Taxes, Insurance  All other residential mortgage — Maximum Interest Rate Allowed In First Five Years exposures including: —Documented Income — Certain junior liens  Interest changes limited to 2% per year and 6% over the — Nontraditional mortgage life of the loan products  HELOC qualification includes principal and interest on maximum exposure  Loans that are not 90 days past due, nonaccrual, or certain junior liens Loan to Value (%) Risk Weight (excludes PMI coverage) Category 1 Category 2 < 60 35% 100% > 60 to < 80 50% 100% > 80 to < 90 75% 150% > 90 100% 200% - 21 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 22.
    Private and Confidential 1-4FAMILY RISK WEIGHTS - EXAMPLES Standardized Approach on 1-4 Family Residential Risk Weights Risk Mortgages 35% 50% 75% 100% 150% 200% 30 year amortization and maturity, current, LTV < 60% 30 year amortization and maturity, current, LTV > 60% to < 80% 30 year amortization and maturity, current, LTV > 80% to < 90% 5 year balloon, 30 year amortization, current, LTV < 80% 5 year balloon, 30 year amortization, current, LTV > 80% to < 90 Stand-alone junior lien LTV > 90% - 22 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 23.
    Private and Confidential HIGHVOLATILITY COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE Standardized High Volatility CRE (HVCRE) HVCRE means Acquisition, Development, Approach on Represents a Small Subset of or Construction Financing except: Risk the Industry’s CRE Portfolio  1-4 family residential properties Includes Projects in which: HVCRE 1. The loan-to value ratio < - maximum supervisory loan-to- Non ial value, and nt Reside 2. Borrower contributed at least ADC 15% of “as completed” appraised value, and 3. Borrower contributed the capital before the bank Other CRE advances funds, and the capital is contractually required to remain throughout the project life. The NPR would assign HVCRE loans a risk weight of 150%. - 23 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 24.
    Private and Confidential CRERISK WEIGHTS - EXAMPLES Standardized Approach on Risk Weights Risk Commercial Real Estate 100% 150% Owner-Occupied Office Building Non Owner-Occupied Office Building Manufacturing/Industrial Building Acquisition, Development, and Construction: 1-4 family residential properties Acquisition, Development, and Construction: non-1-4 family residential properties and LTV is 90% - 24 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 25.
    Private and Confidential PASTDUE ASSETS RISK WEIGHTS Standardized Approach on Assets > 90 days past due or Risk Weights Risk nonaccrual 50% 100% 150% Revenue Bond Multifamily Loan Consumer Loan Commercial and Industrial Non-Farm Non-Residential Agricultural Would not apply to:  1-4 family residential exposures  HVCRE - 25 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 26.
    Private and Confidential STRUCTUREDSECURITIES Standardized Examples may include: Approach on Private Label Mortgage-Backed Securities Risk Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations (TruPS) Asset-Backed Securities Three Approaches Other Requirements/Options  Risk weight based on one of the following:  Must apply approach selected consistently. 1. Weighted average of underlying collateral (Gross UP) 1,250% option may be used regardless 2. 2. Formula based on of approach selected. subordination position and delinquencies (Simplified Requirement for comprehensive Supervisory Formula Approach understanding and due diligence. – SSFA) 3. 1,250% — If not met, 1,250% would apply. Eliminates Ratings-Based Approach. - 26 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 27.
    Private and Confidential EQUITYRISK WEIGHTS Risk Weights Standardized Equity Exposures Approach on 0% 20% 100% 250% 300% 400% 600% Risk Federal Reserve Bank stock Federal Home Loan Bank stock CDFI and community development equity exposures An investment of common stock in an unconsolidated financial institution (unless already deducted)* A publicly traded equity exposure* An equity exposure that is not publicly traded* An equity exposure to a hedge fund or any investment firm that has greater than immaterial leverage* * To the extent that the aggregate adjusted carrying value of certain equity exposures do not exceed 10% of the bank’s total capital, a 100% risk weight may be applied. - 27 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 28.
    Private and Confidential OFF-BALANCESHEET: CREDIT CONVERSION Standardized Approach on Risk Credit Conversion Factors Off-Balance Sheet Items 0% 20% 50% Unused portion of commitments that are unconditionally cancelable by the bank Commitments with an original maturity of < 1 year that are not unconditionally cancelable Commitments with an original maturity of > 1 year that are not unconditionally cancelable For HELOCs, refer to the 1-4 family mortgage section of the proposal - 28 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 29.
    Private and Confidential OFF-BALANCESHEET: MORTGAGE BANKING Standardized Approach on Risk 1-4 Family Mortgage Loans Sold  Credit-Enhancing Representations and Warranties on Assets Sold: — Early Payment Default —Premium Refund Clause  Existing Treatment: — Provides exclusion for early payment default or premium refund clauses that are for a period of 120 days or less.  Proposed Treatment: — Eliminates existing 120-day exclusion. —All early payment default and premium refund clauses are treated as off-balance sheet guarantees for the duration of the enhancement.  Proposed Risk Weight: — Credit Conversion Factor: 100% — Risk Weight: 35% to 200% based on Category 1 or Category 2 and loan to value. - 29 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 30.
    Private and Confidential COLLATERALIZEDTRANSACTIONS EXAMPLES Under the proposal, a bank may substitute the Standardized Approach on asset’s risk weight with the collateral’s risk weight. Risk Risk Weights 0% 20% 50% 100% Cash on deposit at the bank or third party custodian* US Government Securities (proposed: must discount market value by 20%)* Government Sponsored Entity securities Money market funds Risk Weight Varies "Investment grade" securities (examples): General Obligation Municipal Revenue Municipal Corporate “Investment grade” means that “the entity to which the bank is exposed through a loan or security, or the reference entity with respect to a credit derivative, has adequate capacity to meet financial commitments for the projected life of the asset or exposure.” *Current risk weight for state nonmember banks. Current risk weight may differ for national and state member banks. - 30 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 31.
    Private and Confidential TREATMENTOF GUARANTEES Standardized Under the proposal, a bank may substitute the risk weight of an Approach on eligible guarantor for the risk weight of the exposure. Risk Eligible Guarantors Include: Eligible Guarantees Must:  Depository institution or holding  Be written and either: company — Unconditional, or Federal Home Loan Banks —A contingent obligation of the U.S. government or its agencies Farmer Mac Also meet other requirements Entity that has “investment grade” debt - 31 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 32.
    Private and Confidential COMMUNITY BANKS WITH HIGH MORTGAGE LOAN EXPOSURE Community banks with high mortgage loan exposure may find themselves struggling to meet the new capital requirements under Basel III. Company Information Company Information Region Midwest Region Southeast Total Assets ($000) $228,536 Total Assets ($000) $394,806 Loan Mix and Asset Quality (%) Loan Mix and Asset Quality (%) Loans/ Deposits 80% NPA + 90/Assets 1.23% Loans/ Deposits 82% NPA + 90/Assets 6.80% Total 1-4 Fam. Loans/ Loans 64% Nonaccrual+ 90 PD/ Loans 0.67% Total 1-4 Fam. Loans/ Loans 54% Nonaccrual+ 90 PD/ Loans 6.10% Total CRE Loans/Loans (1) 22% Total CRE Loans/Loans (1) 30% Risk Weighted Assets Calculation ($000) Risk Weighted Assets Calculation ($000) Old Risk Weighted Assets 138,249 138,249 Old Risk Weighted Assets 245,274 247,115 Excess ALLL - Excess ALLL 1,237 1-4 Family Risk Adj. (2) 29,752 1-4 Family Risk Adj. (2) 38,037 CRE High Volatility Adj. (3) 2,805 CRE High Volatility Adj. (3) 5,782 Past Due Loans Adj. 376 Past Due Loans Adj. 4,102 Other Adj. - Other Adj. 316 New Risk Weighted Assets 171,181 New Risk Weighted Assets 294,115 Difference 32,932 Difference 48,841 % Difference 23.8% % Difference 19.9% Capital Ratios Capital Ratios Old Calculation New Calculation Basel III Minimum Old Calculation New Calculation Basel III Minimum Leverage Ratio 6.17% 6.17% 5.00% Leverage Ratio 6.61% 6.55% 5.00% Common Equity Tier 1 Ratio NA 8.18% 7.00% Common Equity Tier 1 Ratio (5) NA 8.69% 7.00% Tier 1 Capital Ratio 10.13% 8.18% 8.50% Tier 1 Capital Ratio 10.51% 8.69% 8.50% Total Capital Ratio 11.12% 8.98% 10.50% Total Capital Ratio 11.77% 9.95% 10.50% (1). CRE Loans are defined as other construction and development, farm, multifamily and commercial real estate loans. (2). Assumes 90% of 1-4 family 1st lien loans fall under category 1. LTV breakdowns are based on the avg. LTV breakdowns found in the 10-Ks of publicly traded banks. (3). Assumes 15% of the CRE loans are highly volatile. - 32 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 33.
    Private and Confidential COMMUNITY BANKS WITH HIGH COMMERCIAL LOAN BaselEXPOSURE requirements will also affect banks with high commercial loan exposure. III’s new capital Company Information Company Information Region Mid Atlantic Region West Total Assets ($000) $340,928 Total Assets ($000) $137,164 Loan Mix and Asset Quality (%) Loan Mix and Asset Quality (%) Loans/ Deposits 98% NPA + 90/Assets 0.02% Loans/ Deposits 87% NPA + 90/Assets 6.58% Total 1-4 Fam. Loans/ Loans 34% Nonaccrual+ 90 PD/ Loans 0.00% Total 1-4 Fam. Loans/ Loans 7% Nonaccrual+ 90 PD/ Loans 5.71% Total CRE Loans/Loans (1) 56% Total CRE Loans/Loans (1) 80% Risk Weighted Assets Calculation ($000) Risk Weighted Assets Calculation ($000) Old Risk Weighted Assets 281,667 281,770 Old Risk Weighted Assets 102,497 104,103 Excess ALLL - Excess ALLL 1,500 1-4 Family Risk Adj. (2) 36,069 1-4 Family Risk Adj. (2) 1,745 CRE High Volatility Adj. (3) 11,962 CRE High Volatility Adj. (3) 5,788 Past Due Loans Adj. - Past Due Loans Adj. 2,718 Other Adj. 1,300 Other Adj. - New Risk Weighted Assets 331,101 New Risk Weighted Assets 112,854 Difference 49,434 Difference 10,357 % Difference 17.6% % Difference 10.1% Capital Ratios Capital Ratios Old Calculation New Calculation Basel III Minimum Old Calculation New Calculation Basel III Minimum Leverage Ratio 8.94% 9.18% 5.00% Leverage Ratio 7.39% 7.44% 5.00% Common Equity Tier 1 Ratio NA 8.60% 7.00% Common Equity Tier 1 Ratio NA 5.47% 7.00% Tier 1 Capital Ratio 9.85% 8.60% 8.50% Tier 1 Capital Ratio 10.00% 9.13% 8.50% Total Capital Ratio 11.08% 9.68% 10.50% Total Capital Ratio 11.27% 10.40% 10.50% (1). CRE Loans are defined as other construction and development, farm, multifamily and commercial real estate loans. (2). Assumes 90% of 1-4 family 1st lien loans fall under category 1. LTV breakdowns are based on the avg. LTV breakdowns found in the 10-Ks of publicly traded banks. (3). Assumes 15% of the CRE loans are highly volatile. - 33 - Monroe Securities, Inc.
  • 34.
    Private and Confidential CONCLUSION:FIGHTING THE LAST WAR  The new rules as proposed present a dramatically more conservative posture around capital requirements  Higher overall levels of capital required  Higher proportion of common equity required  Creative Tier 1 instruments are being legislated out of existence  Much more restrictive rules around shareholder distributions, buybacks and bonuses, all limited by capital levels  Much more detailed approach and conservative to weighting the risk of assets  As mentioned, these proposed rules have been vigorously lobbied against, and have had a few high-profile detractors, so the final outcome is still uncertain  We will host another webinar when the final rules are posted - 34 - Monroe Securities, Inc.

Editor's Notes