SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Download to read offline
Designation: B 504 – 90 (Reapproved 2002)
Endorsed by American
Electroplaters’ Society
Endorsed by National
Association of Metal Finishers
Standard Test Method for
Measurement of Thickness of Metallic Coatings by the
Coulometric Method1
This standard is issued under the fixed designation B 504; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the Department of Defense.
1. Scope
1.1 This test method covers the determination of the thick-
ness of metallic coatings by the coulometric method, also
known as the anodic solution or electrochemical stripping
method.
1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ISO Standard:
ISO 2177 Metallic Coatings—Measurement of Coating
Thickness—Coulometric Method by Anodic Dissolution2
3. Summary of Test Method
3.1 The thickness of the coating is determined by measuring
the quantity of electricity (coulombs) required to dissolve the
coating anodically from a known and accurately defined area.
3.2 As commonly practiced, the method employs a small
metal cell which is filled with an appropriate electrolyte. The
test specimen serves as the bottom of the cell and an insulating
gasket between the cell and the specimen defines the test area
(about 0.1 cm2
). With the test specimen as anode and the cell
as cathode, a constant direct current is passed through the cell
until the coating has dissolved, at which time a sudden change
in voltage occurs.
3.3 The thickness of the coating may be calculated from the
quantity of electricity used (current multiplied by time), the
area, the electrochemical equivalent of the coating metal, the
anodic-current efficiency, and the density of the coating.
Alternatively, the equipment may be calibrated against stan-
dards with known coating thicknesses.
3.4 Commercial instruments using this principle are avail-
able. The method is rapid and versatile, but destructive to the
coating. In general, its range is considered to be between 0.75
and 50 µm. Chromium, gold, tin, and other coatings can be
measured down to 0.075 µm.
4. Significance and Use
4.1 Measurement of the thickness of a coating is essential to
assessing its utility and cost.
4.2 The coulometric method destroys the coating over a
very small (about 0.1 cm2
) test area. Therefore its use is limited
to applications where a bare spot at the test area is acceptable
or the test piece may be destroyed.
5. Factors Affecting the Accuracy of the Method
5.1 Composition of Electrolytes—Electrolytes used for cou-
lometric thickness measurements must permit the coating
metal to dissolve at a constant anodic-current efficiency (pref-
erably 100 %); they must have a negligible spontaneous
chemical effect on the coating metal and must so differentiate
electrochemically between the coating and the substrate that a
suitably sharp and large voltage change occurs at the end point
of the test.
5.1.1 Electrolytes furnished with commercial instruments
may be presumed to meet these requirements; others must be
evaluated before use by testing standards having known
thicknesses. Appendix X1 lists some electrolytes and coating-
substrate combinations that have been used with some instru-
ments.
5.2 Current Variation—For coulometric instruments em-
ploying the constant-current technique, variation of the current
during a test will result in errors. For instruments using a
current-time integrator, variation of the current during a test
will not result in error unless the current change is such as to
displace the anodic current density beyond the range of
constant or 100 % anodic-current efficiency.
5.3 Area Variation—The accuracy of the thickness measure-
ment will not be better than the accuracy with which the test
area is defined or known. Typically, this test area is defined by
a flexible, insulating gasket. Area variation is usually mini-
mized by using as large an area as practical and by using a
constant pressure device. If excessive pressure is applied to
such a gasket, the test area may be altered undesirably.
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee B08 on Metallic
and Inorganic Coatingsand is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee B08.10on
General Test Methods.
Current edition approved Feb. 23, 1990. Published April 1990. Originally
published as B 504 – 70. Last previous edition B 504 – 89.
2
Available from American National Standards Institute, 11 W. 42nd St., 13th
Floor, New York, NY 10036.
1
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
5.4 Agitation—In most, but not all, coulometric thickness
measurements, a relatively high anodic-current density is
employed to shorten the test time. It is then necessary to agitate
the electrolyte to maintain a constant anodic-current efficiency.
Where agitation is required, insufficient agitation may result in
polarization of the specimen, thereby causing a premature and
false endpoint.
5.5 Alloying Between Coatings and Metallic Substrates—
The measurement of a coating thickness by the coulometric
method implicitly assumes that a sharply defined interface
exists between the coating and the substrate. If an alloy layer
exists between the coating and the substrate as, for example, in
the case of coatings applied by hot dipping, the coulometric
end-point may occur at some point within the alloy layer, thus
giving a high value of the thickness of the unalloyed coating.
5.6 Purity of Coating—Impurities or additives that code-
posit with the coating may change the effective electrochemical
equivalent of the coating and also change the anodic current
efficiency.
5.6.1 Alloy Coating—Variations in the composition of alloy
coatings will change the effective electrochemical equivalent
of the coating.
5.7 Cleanliness of Test Surface—The surface to be tested
must be clean. Oil, grease, and organic coatings such as lacquer
must be removed with suitable solvents. Oxides, conversion
coatings, and corrosion products are preferably removed by
carefully burnishing the test surface with a clean, soft pencil
eraser. Tin and nickel surfaces, in particular, should be so
burnished prior to testing to remove passive oxide films.
5.8 Density of Coating—The coulometric method intrinsi-
cally measures coating mass per unit area, the equivalent linear
thickness being a function of the density of the coating. If the
density of the coating tested is different from the value of the
density used for the calibration, the linear thickness obtained
coulometrically will be different from the actual linear thick-
ness of the coating tested.
5.8.1 Density of Alloy Coatings—Variation in the composi-
tion of alloy coatings will change the density of the coating.
5.9 Number and Location of Tests—Since the coulometric
test method measures, essentially, a local coating thickness, a
single test may not be representative of the coating thickness
over the entire significant surface.
6. Calibration of Equipment
6.1 The equipment shall be calibrated by means of standards
having known coating thicknesses. If commercial equipment is
used, the manufacturer’s instructions shall be followed insofar
as they are compatible with this test method.
6.2 Calibration of Direct-Reading Instruments—Direct-
reading instruments shall be calibrated against standards hav-
ing known coating thicknesses, and adjusted to produce correct
readings corresponding to the coating thicknesses of the
standard.
6.3 Calibration of Nondirect-Reading Instruments:
6.3.1 Nondirect-reading instruments shall be calibrated
against standards having a known coating thickness by using a
calibration constant, C, calculated as follows:
C 5 coating thickness of the standards/instrument reading (1)
6.3.2 The instrument shall be adjusted so that where stan-
dards having known coating thicknesses are tested, the correct
thickness is obtained by multiplying the instrument reading by
the calibration constant, C.
6.4 Thickness Standards—The thickness standards shall
consist of the same type of coating and substrate as the
specimens to be measured, and they shall have an accuracy of
65 % or better.
7. Procedure for Making Measurements
7.1 If commercial equipment is used, the manufacturer’s
instructions shall be followed insofar as they are compatible
with this test method.
7.2 The test surface shall be cleaned of all foreign material
that might affect the measurement.
NOTE 1—Certain nickel deposits, frequently dull nickel, may exhibit
passivity. When such coatings are tested coulometrically, the voltage
across the specimen and test cell is markedly higher (approximately 1 V)
than normal, and the coating does not dissolve. Oxygen is evolved at the
specimen and the test may continue indefinitely.
NOTE 2—Removal of the passivity may be accomplished in some cases
by mildly abrading (as with a pencil eraser) the nickel surface prior to
testing. Alternatively, the specimen may be made cathodic in the coulo-
metric electrolyte for 10 to 20 s by applying current from an external
source. Allowing the nickel to be in contact with 10 % volume hydro-
chloric acid for approximately 1 min prior to the test may also be used
effectively.
7.3 After completion of the measurement, the test surface
shall be examined visually, and if the dissolution of the coating
is not virtually complete, the measurement shall be discarded
and repeated.
8. Precision and Bias
8.1 The equipment, its calibration, and its operation shall be
such that the coating thickness can be determined with an
uncertainty of less than 10 %.
8.2 Instruments suitable for compliance with 8.1 are avail-
able commercially. For many coating systems the instruments
are capable of making measurements with an uncertainty of
less than 4 % (95 % confidence).
8.3 Although an uncertainty of less than 10 % may be
achieved consistantly for a great number of coating-substrate
combinations, the uncertainty may be greater when the coating
thickness is less than 1µ m or exceeds 50 µm.
8.4 The bias of a coulometric measurement is the discrep-
ency remaining between the measured thickness and the true
thickness if all random errors are eliminated. It is, therefore, no
greater than, and attributable to (1), the calibration error of the
instrument and (2) the quality of the calibration standard used
to calibrate the instrument.
B 504
2
APPENDIX
(Nonmandatory Information)
X1. ELECTROLYTES
X1.1 Table X1.1 lists electrolytes that have been used for
coulometric thickness measurements; however, they are not
necessarily suitable for use with all types of coulometric
instruments.
X1.2 Use of these electrolytes is not mandatory for com-
pliance with this method, and when commercial coulometric
instruments are used, the manufacturer’s recommendations
shall be followed.
X1.3 Table X1.2 lists other coating-substrate combinations
that have been used successfully with commercially available
electrolytes.
TABLE X1.1 Typical Electrolytes for Electrodeposited CoatingsA
Coating
Substrate (Basis Metal)
Steel
Copper and
Alloys (such
as brass)
Nickel Aluminum Zinc
Cadmium 1, 10 1, 10 1 1 . . .
Chromium 2, 11 3, 4, 12 2, 13 2, 13 . . .
Copper 5, 14 . . . 5, 15 5 16
Lead 17 17 17 . . . . . .
Nickel 6, 18 6, 19 . . . 6, 18 . . .
Silver 7 8 7 . . . . . .
Tin 3, 4, 20 3, 4, 20 3, 4 2, 21 . . .
Zinc 9 9 9 9 . . .
A
The numbers in the table refer to the following aqueous solutions:
(1) 100 g KI/L, with traces of I2
(2) 100 g Na2SO4/L
(3) 175 mL HCl (sp gr 1.18)/L
(4) 150 g NaOH/L
(5) 80 g NaKC4H4O6 (sodium potassium tartrate) + 100 g NH4NO3/L
(6) 30 g NH4NO3 + 30 g NaSCN/L
(7) 100 g NaNO3 + 3 ml HNO3 (sp gr 1.42)/L
(8) 180 g KSCN/L
(9) 100 g NaCl or KCl/L
(10) 30 g KCl + 30 g NH4Cl/L
(11) 100 mL H3PO4 (sp gr 1.75) + 10 g CrO3/L
(12) 100 g Na2CO3 [for coatings up to 5 µm (0.2 mil)]/L
(13) 64 mL H3PO4 (sp gr 1.75)/L
(14) 800 g NH4NO3 + 10 mL NH4OH (sp gr 0.88)/L
(15) 100 g K2SO4 + 20 mL H3PO4 (sp gr 1.75)/L
(16) Pure H2SiF6 solution containing not less than 30 % H2SiF6 (Slightly weaker
acid may be used, if some MgSiF6 is added to the solution.)
(17) 200 g CH3COONa + 200 g CH3COONH4/L
(18) 800 g NH4NO3 + 3.8 g CS(NH2)2 (thiourea)/L
(19) 100 mL HCl (sp gr 1.18)/L
(20) 100 g KNO3 + 100 g KCl/L
(21) 50 mL H2SO4(sp gr 1.84) + 5 g KF/L
B 504
3
ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned
in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk
of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the
responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should
make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.
This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above
address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website
(www.astm.org).
TABLE X1.2 Measurable Coating-Substrate Combinations
Substrate
Coating
Alumi-
num
Copper
and
Copper
Alloys
Nickel Steel
Mag-
netic
Stain-
less
Steel
Nonme-
tallic
BrassA
X X X
Cobalt X X
Gold X X
Indium X X X
Iron X
Nickel (Electrodes)A
X X X
Nickel-IronA
X X
Tin-LeadA
X X X X
Tin-NickelA
X X
Tin-ZincA
X X X
A
The measurement accuracy of these alloy coatings is dependent on the
composition of the coating.
B 504
4

More Related Content

What's hot

Presentation on Hardness Testing
Presentation on Hardness TestingPresentation on Hardness Testing
Presentation on Hardness Testing
ReversEngineering
 

What's hot (19)

Material Technology
Material TechnologyMaterial Technology
Material Technology
 
Chapter 4 (JF302)
Chapter 4 (JF302)Chapter 4 (JF302)
Chapter 4 (JF302)
 
Impact test on metals
Impact test on metalsImpact test on metals
Impact test on metals
 
Study of sliding wear rate of hot rolled steel specimen subjected to Zirconia...
Study of sliding wear rate of hot rolled steel specimen subjected to Zirconia...Study of sliding wear rate of hot rolled steel specimen subjected to Zirconia...
Study of sliding wear rate of hot rolled steel specimen subjected to Zirconia...
 
Presentation on Hardness Testing
Presentation on Hardness TestingPresentation on Hardness Testing
Presentation on Hardness Testing
 
Review of physical vapor deposition coatings
Review of physical vapor deposition coatingsReview of physical vapor deposition coatings
Review of physical vapor deposition coatings
 
Chapter 4: Material Testing
Chapter 4: Material TestingChapter 4: Material Testing
Chapter 4: Material Testing
 
Lecture 04
Lecture 04Lecture 04
Lecture 04
 
Impact test on metals
Impact test on metals Impact test on metals
Impact test on metals
 
Topographic analysis of dental materials :A review of current devices
Topographic analysis of dental materials :A review of current devicesTopographic analysis of dental materials :A review of current devices
Topographic analysis of dental materials :A review of current devices
 
Impact test
Impact testImpact test
Impact test
 
FabricationofThin FilmUsing Modified Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD) Module
FabricationofThin FilmUsing Modified Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD) ModuleFabricationofThin FilmUsing Modified Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD) Module
FabricationofThin FilmUsing Modified Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD) Module
 
Impact test
Impact testImpact test
Impact test
 
Assessment of dental alloys
Assessment of dental alloysAssessment of dental alloys
Assessment of dental alloys
 
Ultrasonic hardness testing
Ultrasonic hardness testingUltrasonic hardness testing
Ultrasonic hardness testing
 
Testing of metal and alloy
Testing of metal and alloyTesting of metal and alloy
Testing of metal and alloy
 
Shear properties of composite materials and ASTM standards
Shear properties of composite materials and ASTM standardsShear properties of composite materials and ASTM standards
Shear properties of composite materials and ASTM standards
 
Impact test
Impact testImpact test
Impact test
 
Ch 27.11 hardness test
Ch 27.11 hardness testCh 27.11 hardness test
Ch 27.11 hardness test
 

Similar to B 504 90 r02 espesor recubrimientos metalicos

B 748 90 r01 espeso r.m microscopia electronica
B 748   90 r01  espeso r.m microscopia electronicaB 748   90 r01  espeso r.m microscopia electronica
B 748 90 r01 espeso r.m microscopia electronica
LPELABORATORIO
 
E23.33234 Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Ma...
E23.33234 Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Ma...E23.33234 Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Ma...
E23.33234 Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Ma...
mahmoodkhan77
 

Similar to B 504 90 r02 espesor recubrimientos metalicos (20)

Astm d5162
Astm d5162Astm d5162
Astm d5162
 
G95.DESPRENDIMIENTO CATODICO
G95.DESPRENDIMIENTO CATODICOG95.DESPRENDIMIENTO CATODICO
G95.DESPRENDIMIENTO CATODICO
 
ASTM E376.pdf
ASTM E376.pdfASTM E376.pdf
ASTM E376.pdf
 
Sspc pa 2-2012
Sspc pa 2-2012Sspc pa 2-2012
Sspc pa 2-2012
 
G-62.pdf
G-62.pdfG-62.pdf
G-62.pdf
 
B 748 90 r01 espeso r.m microscopia electronica
B 748   90 r01  espeso r.m microscopia electronicaB 748   90 r01  espeso r.m microscopia electronica
B 748 90 r01 espeso r.m microscopia electronica
 
Astm d4541 standard pull off test for coatings
Astm d4541 standard pull off test for coatingsAstm d4541 standard pull off test for coatings
Astm d4541 standard pull off test for coatings
 
Astm d429-03
Astm d429-03Astm d429-03
Astm d429-03
 
ASTM D2922.pdf
ASTM D2922.pdfASTM D2922.pdf
ASTM D2922.pdf
 
D1004.pdf
D1004.pdfD1004.pdf
D1004.pdf
 
G-46 (99).pdf
G-46 (99).pdfG-46 (99).pdf
G-46 (99).pdf
 
Impedance measurements
Impedance measurements Impedance measurements
Impedance measurements
 
Module ii
Module iiModule ii
Module ii
 
Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics
Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of PlasticsStandard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics
Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics
 
E23.33234 Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Ma...
E23.33234 Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Ma...E23.33234 Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Ma...
E23.33234 Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Ma...
 
Adhesion test- Pull off adhesion testings.ppt
Adhesion test- Pull off adhesion testings.pptAdhesion test- Pull off adhesion testings.ppt
Adhesion test- Pull off adhesion testings.ppt
 
IRJET- Case Study of RCC Structure with the Help of Non Destructive Testing
IRJET-  	  Case Study of RCC Structure with the Help of Non Destructive TestingIRJET-  	  Case Study of RCC Structure with the Help of Non Destructive Testing
IRJET- Case Study of RCC Structure with the Help of Non Destructive Testing
 
D638.pdf
D638.pdfD638.pdf
D638.pdf
 
Heat Exchangers inspection .pdf
Heat Exchangers inspection .pdfHeat Exchangers inspection .pdf
Heat Exchangers inspection .pdf
 
Destructive & Non Destructive Testing Of Materials
Destructive & Non Destructive Testing Of MaterialsDestructive & Non Destructive Testing Of Materials
Destructive & Non Destructive Testing Of Materials
 

Recently uploaded

Call Girls in Ramesh Nagar Delhi 💯 Call Us 🔝9953056974 🔝 Escort Service
Call Girls in Ramesh Nagar Delhi 💯 Call Us 🔝9953056974 🔝 Escort ServiceCall Girls in Ramesh Nagar Delhi 💯 Call Us 🔝9953056974 🔝 Escort Service
Call Girls in Ramesh Nagar Delhi 💯 Call Us 🔝9953056974 🔝 Escort Service
9953056974 Low Rate Call Girls In Saket, Delhi NCR
 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
ssuser89054b
 
VIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 BookingVIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
dharasingh5698
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torque
Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torqueDouble Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torque
Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torque
 
Design For Accessibility: Getting it right from the start
Design For Accessibility: Getting it right from the startDesign For Accessibility: Getting it right from the start
Design For Accessibility: Getting it right from the start
 
Double rodded leveling 1 pdf activity 01
Double rodded leveling 1 pdf activity 01Double rodded leveling 1 pdf activity 01
Double rodded leveling 1 pdf activity 01
 
Unit 2- Effective stress & Permeability.pdf
Unit 2- Effective stress & Permeability.pdfUnit 2- Effective stress & Permeability.pdf
Unit 2- Effective stress & Permeability.pdf
 
(INDIRA) Call Girl Meerut Call Now 8617697112 Meerut Escorts 24x7
(INDIRA) Call Girl Meerut Call Now 8617697112 Meerut Escorts 24x7(INDIRA) Call Girl Meerut Call Now 8617697112 Meerut Escorts 24x7
(INDIRA) Call Girl Meerut Call Now 8617697112 Meerut Escorts 24x7
 
FEA Based Level 3 Assessment of Deformed Tanks with Fluid Induced Loads
FEA Based Level 3 Assessment of Deformed Tanks with Fluid Induced LoadsFEA Based Level 3 Assessment of Deformed Tanks with Fluid Induced Loads
FEA Based Level 3 Assessment of Deformed Tanks with Fluid Induced Loads
 
data_management_and _data_science_cheat_sheet.pdf
data_management_and _data_science_cheat_sheet.pdfdata_management_and _data_science_cheat_sheet.pdf
data_management_and _data_science_cheat_sheet.pdf
 
Navigating Complexity: The Role of Trusted Partners and VIAS3D in Dassault Sy...
Navigating Complexity: The Role of Trusted Partners and VIAS3D in Dassault Sy...Navigating Complexity: The Role of Trusted Partners and VIAS3D in Dassault Sy...
Navigating Complexity: The Role of Trusted Partners and VIAS3D in Dassault Sy...
 
chapter 5.pptx: drainage and irrigation engineering
chapter 5.pptx: drainage and irrigation engineeringchapter 5.pptx: drainage and irrigation engineering
chapter 5.pptx: drainage and irrigation engineering
 
Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Pargaon 6297143586 Call Hot Indian Gi...
Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Pargaon  6297143586 Call Hot Indian Gi...Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Pargaon  6297143586 Call Hot Indian Gi...
Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Pargaon 6297143586 Call Hot Indian Gi...
 
Call Girls in Ramesh Nagar Delhi 💯 Call Us 🔝9953056974 🔝 Escort Service
Call Girls in Ramesh Nagar Delhi 💯 Call Us 🔝9953056974 🔝 Escort ServiceCall Girls in Ramesh Nagar Delhi 💯 Call Us 🔝9953056974 🔝 Escort Service
Call Girls in Ramesh Nagar Delhi 💯 Call Us 🔝9953056974 🔝 Escort Service
 
Thermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.ppt
Thermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.pptThermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.ppt
Thermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.ppt
 
Intze Overhead Water Tank Design by Working Stress - IS Method.pdf
Intze Overhead Water Tank  Design by Working Stress - IS Method.pdfIntze Overhead Water Tank  Design by Working Stress - IS Method.pdf
Intze Overhead Water Tank Design by Working Stress - IS Method.pdf
 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
 
Top Rated Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Se...
Top Rated  Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Se...Top Rated  Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Se...
Top Rated Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Se...
 
Work-Permit-Receiver-in-Saudi-Aramco.pptx
Work-Permit-Receiver-in-Saudi-Aramco.pptxWork-Permit-Receiver-in-Saudi-Aramco.pptx
Work-Permit-Receiver-in-Saudi-Aramco.pptx
 
VIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 BookingVIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
 
Call Girls Pimpri Chinchwad Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Boo...
Call Girls Pimpri Chinchwad Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Boo...Call Girls Pimpri Chinchwad Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Boo...
Call Girls Pimpri Chinchwad Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Boo...
 
(INDIRA) Call Girl Aurangabad Call Now 8617697112 Aurangabad Escorts 24x7
(INDIRA) Call Girl Aurangabad Call Now 8617697112 Aurangabad Escorts 24x7(INDIRA) Call Girl Aurangabad Call Now 8617697112 Aurangabad Escorts 24x7
(INDIRA) Call Girl Aurangabad Call Now 8617697112 Aurangabad Escorts 24x7
 
Call Girls Walvekar Nagar Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Booking
Call Girls Walvekar Nagar Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance BookingCall Girls Walvekar Nagar Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Booking
Call Girls Walvekar Nagar Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Booking
 

B 504 90 r02 espesor recubrimientos metalicos

  • 1. Designation: B 504 – 90 (Reapproved 2002) Endorsed by American Electroplaters’ Society Endorsed by National Association of Metal Finishers Standard Test Method for Measurement of Thickness of Metallic Coatings by the Coulometric Method1 This standard is issued under the fixed designation B 504; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A superscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval. This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the Department of Defense. 1. Scope 1.1 This test method covers the determination of the thick- ness of metallic coatings by the coulometric method, also known as the anodic solution or electrochemical stripping method. 1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro- priate safety and health practices and determine the applica- bility of regulatory limitations prior to use. 2. Referenced Documents 2.1 ISO Standard: ISO 2177 Metallic Coatings—Measurement of Coating Thickness—Coulometric Method by Anodic Dissolution2 3. Summary of Test Method 3.1 The thickness of the coating is determined by measuring the quantity of electricity (coulombs) required to dissolve the coating anodically from a known and accurately defined area. 3.2 As commonly practiced, the method employs a small metal cell which is filled with an appropriate electrolyte. The test specimen serves as the bottom of the cell and an insulating gasket between the cell and the specimen defines the test area (about 0.1 cm2 ). With the test specimen as anode and the cell as cathode, a constant direct current is passed through the cell until the coating has dissolved, at which time a sudden change in voltage occurs. 3.3 The thickness of the coating may be calculated from the quantity of electricity used (current multiplied by time), the area, the electrochemical equivalent of the coating metal, the anodic-current efficiency, and the density of the coating. Alternatively, the equipment may be calibrated against stan- dards with known coating thicknesses. 3.4 Commercial instruments using this principle are avail- able. The method is rapid and versatile, but destructive to the coating. In general, its range is considered to be between 0.75 and 50 µm. Chromium, gold, tin, and other coatings can be measured down to 0.075 µm. 4. Significance and Use 4.1 Measurement of the thickness of a coating is essential to assessing its utility and cost. 4.2 The coulometric method destroys the coating over a very small (about 0.1 cm2 ) test area. Therefore its use is limited to applications where a bare spot at the test area is acceptable or the test piece may be destroyed. 5. Factors Affecting the Accuracy of the Method 5.1 Composition of Electrolytes—Electrolytes used for cou- lometric thickness measurements must permit the coating metal to dissolve at a constant anodic-current efficiency (pref- erably 100 %); they must have a negligible spontaneous chemical effect on the coating metal and must so differentiate electrochemically between the coating and the substrate that a suitably sharp and large voltage change occurs at the end point of the test. 5.1.1 Electrolytes furnished with commercial instruments may be presumed to meet these requirements; others must be evaluated before use by testing standards having known thicknesses. Appendix X1 lists some electrolytes and coating- substrate combinations that have been used with some instru- ments. 5.2 Current Variation—For coulometric instruments em- ploying the constant-current technique, variation of the current during a test will result in errors. For instruments using a current-time integrator, variation of the current during a test will not result in error unless the current change is such as to displace the anodic current density beyond the range of constant or 100 % anodic-current efficiency. 5.3 Area Variation—The accuracy of the thickness measure- ment will not be better than the accuracy with which the test area is defined or known. Typically, this test area is defined by a flexible, insulating gasket. Area variation is usually mini- mized by using as large an area as practical and by using a constant pressure device. If excessive pressure is applied to such a gasket, the test area may be altered undesirably. 1 This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee B08 on Metallic and Inorganic Coatingsand is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee B08.10on General Test Methods. Current edition approved Feb. 23, 1990. Published April 1990. Originally published as B 504 – 70. Last previous edition B 504 – 89. 2 Available from American National Standards Institute, 11 W. 42nd St., 13th Floor, New York, NY 10036. 1 Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
  • 2. 5.4 Agitation—In most, but not all, coulometric thickness measurements, a relatively high anodic-current density is employed to shorten the test time. It is then necessary to agitate the electrolyte to maintain a constant anodic-current efficiency. Where agitation is required, insufficient agitation may result in polarization of the specimen, thereby causing a premature and false endpoint. 5.5 Alloying Between Coatings and Metallic Substrates— The measurement of a coating thickness by the coulometric method implicitly assumes that a sharply defined interface exists between the coating and the substrate. If an alloy layer exists between the coating and the substrate as, for example, in the case of coatings applied by hot dipping, the coulometric end-point may occur at some point within the alloy layer, thus giving a high value of the thickness of the unalloyed coating. 5.6 Purity of Coating—Impurities or additives that code- posit with the coating may change the effective electrochemical equivalent of the coating and also change the anodic current efficiency. 5.6.1 Alloy Coating—Variations in the composition of alloy coatings will change the effective electrochemical equivalent of the coating. 5.7 Cleanliness of Test Surface—The surface to be tested must be clean. Oil, grease, and organic coatings such as lacquer must be removed with suitable solvents. Oxides, conversion coatings, and corrosion products are preferably removed by carefully burnishing the test surface with a clean, soft pencil eraser. Tin and nickel surfaces, in particular, should be so burnished prior to testing to remove passive oxide films. 5.8 Density of Coating—The coulometric method intrinsi- cally measures coating mass per unit area, the equivalent linear thickness being a function of the density of the coating. If the density of the coating tested is different from the value of the density used for the calibration, the linear thickness obtained coulometrically will be different from the actual linear thick- ness of the coating tested. 5.8.1 Density of Alloy Coatings—Variation in the composi- tion of alloy coatings will change the density of the coating. 5.9 Number and Location of Tests—Since the coulometric test method measures, essentially, a local coating thickness, a single test may not be representative of the coating thickness over the entire significant surface. 6. Calibration of Equipment 6.1 The equipment shall be calibrated by means of standards having known coating thicknesses. If commercial equipment is used, the manufacturer’s instructions shall be followed insofar as they are compatible with this test method. 6.2 Calibration of Direct-Reading Instruments—Direct- reading instruments shall be calibrated against standards hav- ing known coating thicknesses, and adjusted to produce correct readings corresponding to the coating thicknesses of the standard. 6.3 Calibration of Nondirect-Reading Instruments: 6.3.1 Nondirect-reading instruments shall be calibrated against standards having a known coating thickness by using a calibration constant, C, calculated as follows: C 5 coating thickness of the standards/instrument reading (1) 6.3.2 The instrument shall be adjusted so that where stan- dards having known coating thicknesses are tested, the correct thickness is obtained by multiplying the instrument reading by the calibration constant, C. 6.4 Thickness Standards—The thickness standards shall consist of the same type of coating and substrate as the specimens to be measured, and they shall have an accuracy of 65 % or better. 7. Procedure for Making Measurements 7.1 If commercial equipment is used, the manufacturer’s instructions shall be followed insofar as they are compatible with this test method. 7.2 The test surface shall be cleaned of all foreign material that might affect the measurement. NOTE 1—Certain nickel deposits, frequently dull nickel, may exhibit passivity. When such coatings are tested coulometrically, the voltage across the specimen and test cell is markedly higher (approximately 1 V) than normal, and the coating does not dissolve. Oxygen is evolved at the specimen and the test may continue indefinitely. NOTE 2—Removal of the passivity may be accomplished in some cases by mildly abrading (as with a pencil eraser) the nickel surface prior to testing. Alternatively, the specimen may be made cathodic in the coulo- metric electrolyte for 10 to 20 s by applying current from an external source. Allowing the nickel to be in contact with 10 % volume hydro- chloric acid for approximately 1 min prior to the test may also be used effectively. 7.3 After completion of the measurement, the test surface shall be examined visually, and if the dissolution of the coating is not virtually complete, the measurement shall be discarded and repeated. 8. Precision and Bias 8.1 The equipment, its calibration, and its operation shall be such that the coating thickness can be determined with an uncertainty of less than 10 %. 8.2 Instruments suitable for compliance with 8.1 are avail- able commercially. For many coating systems the instruments are capable of making measurements with an uncertainty of less than 4 % (95 % confidence). 8.3 Although an uncertainty of less than 10 % may be achieved consistantly for a great number of coating-substrate combinations, the uncertainty may be greater when the coating thickness is less than 1µ m or exceeds 50 µm. 8.4 The bias of a coulometric measurement is the discrep- ency remaining between the measured thickness and the true thickness if all random errors are eliminated. It is, therefore, no greater than, and attributable to (1), the calibration error of the instrument and (2) the quality of the calibration standard used to calibrate the instrument. B 504 2
  • 3. APPENDIX (Nonmandatory Information) X1. ELECTROLYTES X1.1 Table X1.1 lists electrolytes that have been used for coulometric thickness measurements; however, they are not necessarily suitable for use with all types of coulometric instruments. X1.2 Use of these electrolytes is not mandatory for com- pliance with this method, and when commercial coulometric instruments are used, the manufacturer’s recommendations shall be followed. X1.3 Table X1.2 lists other coating-substrate combinations that have been used successfully with commercially available electrolytes. TABLE X1.1 Typical Electrolytes for Electrodeposited CoatingsA Coating Substrate (Basis Metal) Steel Copper and Alloys (such as brass) Nickel Aluminum Zinc Cadmium 1, 10 1, 10 1 1 . . . Chromium 2, 11 3, 4, 12 2, 13 2, 13 . . . Copper 5, 14 . . . 5, 15 5 16 Lead 17 17 17 . . . . . . Nickel 6, 18 6, 19 . . . 6, 18 . . . Silver 7 8 7 . . . . . . Tin 3, 4, 20 3, 4, 20 3, 4 2, 21 . . . Zinc 9 9 9 9 . . . A The numbers in the table refer to the following aqueous solutions: (1) 100 g KI/L, with traces of I2 (2) 100 g Na2SO4/L (3) 175 mL HCl (sp gr 1.18)/L (4) 150 g NaOH/L (5) 80 g NaKC4H4O6 (sodium potassium tartrate) + 100 g NH4NO3/L (6) 30 g NH4NO3 + 30 g NaSCN/L (7) 100 g NaNO3 + 3 ml HNO3 (sp gr 1.42)/L (8) 180 g KSCN/L (9) 100 g NaCl or KCl/L (10) 30 g KCl + 30 g NH4Cl/L (11) 100 mL H3PO4 (sp gr 1.75) + 10 g CrO3/L (12) 100 g Na2CO3 [for coatings up to 5 µm (0.2 mil)]/L (13) 64 mL H3PO4 (sp gr 1.75)/L (14) 800 g NH4NO3 + 10 mL NH4OH (sp gr 0.88)/L (15) 100 g K2SO4 + 20 mL H3PO4 (sp gr 1.75)/L (16) Pure H2SiF6 solution containing not less than 30 % H2SiF6 (Slightly weaker acid may be used, if some MgSiF6 is added to the solution.) (17) 200 g CH3COONa + 200 g CH3COONH4/L (18) 800 g NH4NO3 + 3.8 g CS(NH2)2 (thiourea)/L (19) 100 mL HCl (sp gr 1.18)/L (20) 100 g KNO3 + 100 g KCl/L (21) 50 mL H2SO4(sp gr 1.84) + 5 g KF/L B 504 3
  • 4. ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility. This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below. This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website (www.astm.org). TABLE X1.2 Measurable Coating-Substrate Combinations Substrate Coating Alumi- num Copper and Copper Alloys Nickel Steel Mag- netic Stain- less Steel Nonme- tallic BrassA X X X Cobalt X X Gold X X Indium X X X Iron X Nickel (Electrodes)A X X X Nickel-IronA X X Tin-LeadA X X X X Tin-NickelA X X Tin-ZincA X X X A The measurement accuracy of these alloy coatings is dependent on the composition of the coating. B 504 4