The Journey of
SPARTANS……
                Mahip Sharma
      Vikram Gangulavoipalyam
                Govind Menon
           Ramkumar Ganesan
Initial Observation

•   2 products - Soft and Solo

•   Based on our research, we decided to market Soft to the Savers segment

•   Similarly, Solo appeared to be more attractive to Shoppers segment

•   Saver’s and Shopper’s segment had the highest growth rates in the coming
    years
Decision Taken

•   Targeted Soft for savers segment and Solo for shoppers segment

•   Decreased price of both the products to meet the expectations

•   Allocated sales force according to each product’s target market

•   At the end of period 3, decided to phase out Soft and introduce a new
    product, Sobo, focused on meeting the needs of Savers segment

•   Invested on research activity to launch a new product in the Vodite market
The Descent

•   SPI decreased by 12% in the first 4 periods

•   Revenues decreased by 42.25%

•   Earnings decreased from $13 million to $7 million in 4 periods

•   Market shares decreased to 7% for Solo and 3% for Sobo
Key Learning Points: Phase 1
•   Invested on advertising and commercial teams without due diligence via
    market research reports such as experimentation

•   Increased advertising budget in spite of commanding high brand awareness
    in the market

•   Inadequate knowledge about market research reports available to us

•   Should have invested more time and capital on exploring the feature
    provided by Markstrat simulation during the initial periods. It would have
    helped us in our future decision making
Corrective Action Taken

•   Option of getting into Vodites was not feasible owing to lack of capital

•   More focus on the product offering

•   Repositioning Solo from shoppers to savers and Sobo from savers to
    shoppers

•   Using experimentation to suitably balance our advertising and commercial
    team budget
Introspective Analysis
SOLO


STRENGTH                             WEAKNESS
High brand awareness and intention   Skewed away from customer
to purchase by consumers             perception

Key characteristics of product was   Base cost was too high in
competitive in the market, such as   comparison to other products
battery and design

Low inventory cost for Solo          Advertising and marketing mix was
                                     not in proportion.
Introspective Analysis
SOBO


STRENGTHS                           WEAKNESSES
New product-launched matching the   Price was not competitive
favored characteristics

Supported by huge advertisement     Distribution strategy was poor
budget and commercial team

Launched for Savers segment-        Key characteristics were not matching
expected to be one of the fastest   the customers’ perception
growing segment.
Phase 2: The Ascent

•   Consecutive periods of SPI increase

•   Increase in revenue by 116% in 4 periods

•   Increase in earnings from $ 8M to $28M in 4 periods

•   Solo– Top selling brand by volume at the end of the period 8
Key Learning Points: Phase 2

•   Once our brand is established, we employed downstream marketing
    activities to reach out to our customers

•   Analyzed competition and developed strategies to face the products.

•   Invested effort in successfully building brand with limited resources

•   Due diligence via efficient usage of market research reports (MDS,
    Semantic scales, experimentation, etc…)
Introspective Analysis

SOLO


STRENGTHS                              WEAKNESS
Expenditure on advertisement and       High base cost
commercial team was optimum

Market capitalization in the savers’   Few characteristics were not matching
segment                                customers’ expectation

High brand contribution                High inventory at the end of period 9
Introspective Analysis
SOBO


STRENGTHS                          WEAKNESS
Product characteristics matching   High inventory cost
customer expectations
Efficient distribution system      Low impact of advertisements and
                                   commercial teams
SONITE MARKET ANALYSIS

•   The Sonite product was expected to be highly economical

•   Sonite products attracted Savers and Shoppers

•   Highly competitive market, especially in the fast-growing segment of
    Shoppers and Savers

•   Distribution strategy was very important for Sonites

•   Brand Awareness was important to survive in the market
Thoughts for the Management:

•   Solo has been a winner - Harness its market share domination.

•   Online platform is an efficient distribution channel, which we have just
    entered.

•   Focus on segments which are fast growing- Savers & Shoppers, which we
    are currently established in.

•   Huge market scope for Vodite products

•   Need for efficient inventory management system
Key Takeaways

•   Minor Hiccups for Period 9

•   Market research is critical to success

•   Competitive data is critical for strategy building

•   If provided with capital instruments we could have developed strategies for
    Vodite

•   Hands-on experience in creating real time marketing strategy
Thank You!

  Q&A

Asm final presentation

  • 1.
    The Journey of SPARTANS…… Mahip Sharma Vikram Gangulavoipalyam Govind Menon Ramkumar Ganesan
  • 2.
    Initial Observation • 2 products - Soft and Solo • Based on our research, we decided to market Soft to the Savers segment • Similarly, Solo appeared to be more attractive to Shoppers segment • Saver’s and Shopper’s segment had the highest growth rates in the coming years
  • 3.
    Decision Taken • Targeted Soft for savers segment and Solo for shoppers segment • Decreased price of both the products to meet the expectations • Allocated sales force according to each product’s target market • At the end of period 3, decided to phase out Soft and introduce a new product, Sobo, focused on meeting the needs of Savers segment • Invested on research activity to launch a new product in the Vodite market
  • 4.
    The Descent • SPI decreased by 12% in the first 4 periods • Revenues decreased by 42.25% • Earnings decreased from $13 million to $7 million in 4 periods • Market shares decreased to 7% for Solo and 3% for Sobo
  • 5.
    Key Learning Points:Phase 1 • Invested on advertising and commercial teams without due diligence via market research reports such as experimentation • Increased advertising budget in spite of commanding high brand awareness in the market • Inadequate knowledge about market research reports available to us • Should have invested more time and capital on exploring the feature provided by Markstrat simulation during the initial periods. It would have helped us in our future decision making
  • 6.
    Corrective Action Taken • Option of getting into Vodites was not feasible owing to lack of capital • More focus on the product offering • Repositioning Solo from shoppers to savers and Sobo from savers to shoppers • Using experimentation to suitably balance our advertising and commercial team budget
  • 7.
    Introspective Analysis SOLO STRENGTH WEAKNESS High brand awareness and intention Skewed away from customer to purchase by consumers perception Key characteristics of product was Base cost was too high in competitive in the market, such as comparison to other products battery and design Low inventory cost for Solo Advertising and marketing mix was not in proportion.
  • 8.
    Introspective Analysis SOBO STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES New product-launched matching the Price was not competitive favored characteristics Supported by huge advertisement Distribution strategy was poor budget and commercial team Launched for Savers segment- Key characteristics were not matching expected to be one of the fastest the customers’ perception growing segment.
  • 9.
    Phase 2: TheAscent • Consecutive periods of SPI increase • Increase in revenue by 116% in 4 periods • Increase in earnings from $ 8M to $28M in 4 periods • Solo– Top selling brand by volume at the end of the period 8
  • 10.
    Key Learning Points:Phase 2 • Once our brand is established, we employed downstream marketing activities to reach out to our customers • Analyzed competition and developed strategies to face the products. • Invested effort in successfully building brand with limited resources • Due diligence via efficient usage of market research reports (MDS, Semantic scales, experimentation, etc…)
  • 11.
    Introspective Analysis SOLO STRENGTHS WEAKNESS Expenditure on advertisement and High base cost commercial team was optimum Market capitalization in the savers’ Few characteristics were not matching segment customers’ expectation High brand contribution High inventory at the end of period 9
  • 12.
    Introspective Analysis SOBO STRENGTHS WEAKNESS Product characteristics matching High inventory cost customer expectations Efficient distribution system Low impact of advertisements and commercial teams
  • 13.
    SONITE MARKET ANALYSIS • The Sonite product was expected to be highly economical • Sonite products attracted Savers and Shoppers • Highly competitive market, especially in the fast-growing segment of Shoppers and Savers • Distribution strategy was very important for Sonites • Brand Awareness was important to survive in the market
  • 14.
    Thoughts for theManagement: • Solo has been a winner - Harness its market share domination. • Online platform is an efficient distribution channel, which we have just entered. • Focus on segments which are fast growing- Savers & Shoppers, which we are currently established in. • Huge market scope for Vodite products • Need for efficient inventory management system
  • 15.
    Key Takeaways • Minor Hiccups for Period 9 • Market research is critical to success • Competitive data is critical for strategy building • If provided with capital instruments we could have developed strategies for Vodite • Hands-on experience in creating real time marketing strategy
  • 16.