ArtPlace 2012 Portfolio
- 2. 2012 Portfolio $15.4M 47 projects 22states 33 communities
- 3.
- 4. Community Size 15% allocatedto projects in rural areas 85% allocated to projects in urban areas Aligns with 2010 Census population figures
- 5. Funding in communitiesof different sizes ArtPlace 2012 Portfolio Community Size Urban (small) Rural 5% 15% Urban (mid-sized) 9% Urban (large) 71%
- 6.
- 7. ArtPlace communities are onaverage more ethnically diverse than the metro areas or counties of which they are a part. Those that are less diverse are composed primarily of minority populations.
- 8. Community Diversity Racial &Ethnic Represents the probability that two residents drawn randomly from the census tract would be from different/racial ethnic groups Compares project census tract to its metro area or county for rural projects
- 9. Community Diversity Racial &Ethnic Significantly less = dominated by single group 32 communities more diverse 5 of the 6 least diverse are majority minority Majority of funding in diverse communities Majority of funding in minority communities
- 10. Racial & EthnicDiversity/ # of Dominant Group Projects Grant Amount Significantly less 3 1,328,195 Black 3 1,328,195 Slightly less 3 715,900 Hispanic 2 640,900 White 1 75,000 A roughly average level 7 2,263,579 Black 1 400,000 Hispanic 1 600,000 Increasing White 5 1,263,579 Diversity Slightly more 11 3,561,177 Black 3 1,025,000 Hispanic 2 710,000 White 5 1,626,177 Asian 1 200,000 Significantly more 21 6,905,000 Black 6 1,903,500 Hispanic 2 554,000 White 11 3,947,500 Asian 1 250,000 Other 1 250,000 n/a 2 625,000 n/a 2 625,000 Grand Total 47 15,398,851
- 11. Majority of fundingin diverse communities ArtPlace 2012 Portfolio Community Racial & Ethnic Diversity n/a 4% Significantly less 6% Slightly less 6% A roughly average level 15% Significantly more 45% Slightly more 24%
- 12. Majority of fundingin minority communities n/a 4.1% Predominant Racial/Ethnic Group in Project Community Other 1.6% Asian 2.9% Hispanic 16.3% Black 30.2% White 44.9% Total Minority 51.1% $0.0 $1.0 $2.0 $3.0 $4.0 $5.0 $6.0 $7.0 $8.0 $9.0 Grant Amount Millions
- 13.
- 14. ArtPlace communities have lessincome diversity than the metro areas or counties of which they are a part. These communities are typically much poorer than the metro areas or counties of which they are a part.
- 15. Community Diversity Income Measures thedegree to which there are a mix of incomes in a neighborhood, with an emphasis on families in the middle Compares project census tract to its metro area or county for rural projects
- 16. Community Diversity Income Significantly less= dominated by single level 33 predominantly lower income $11.3M for lower income communities
- 17. Income Diversity/ DominantLevel # of Projects Grant Amount Significantly less 20 6,619,891 Higher income 2 365,619 Lower income 18 6,254,272 Slightly less 10 3,727,500 Higher income 1 400,000 Increasing Lower income 9 3,327,500 A roughly average level 10 3,043,460 Diversity Lower income 5 1,393,460 Middle income 5 1,650,000 Slightly more 2 548,000 Higher income 1 275,000 Middle income 1 273,000 Significantly more 3 835,000 Lower income 1 295,000 Middle income 2 540,000 n/a 2 625,000 n/a 2 625,000 Grand Total 47 15,398,851
- 18. Majority of fundingin less income diverse communities ArtPlace 2012 Portfolio Community Income Diversity n/a 4% Significantly more 7% Slightly more 4% Significantly less 43% A roughly average level 21% Slightly less 21%
- 19. Majority of fundingin lower income communities Predominant Income Level in Project Community n/a 4.1% Higher income 6.8% Middle income 16.0% Lower income 73.2% $0.0 $2.0 $4.0 $6.0 $8.0 $10.0 $12.0 Millions Grant Amount