Key Elements of Aristotelian Tragedy
• Evokes pity and fear in the audience.
• Hero must be admired and essentially “good.”
• Hero’s downfall comes from his own personal
  decision or mistake.
• Anagorisis – The moment in which the Hero
  clearly sees the fate and destruction that awaits
  him.
• Hamartia – The Hero’s tragic error that causes his
  own downfall.
• Hubris – Short lived moment in which the Hero
  feels false pride and gets himself into deep shit.
• Nemesis – When the Hero has to pay for his
  Hubris.
Key Elements Continued
• Peripateia – The decision made by the Hero
  that makes the situation go from okay to bad.
• Catharsis – The audience’s feeling of relief and
  resolution and the end.
Olivia’s Opinion: Things Fall Apart is an
       Aristotelian Tragedy. (1/2)
• Things Fall Apart is an Aristotelian tragedy because of the
  personal connection I feel with Okonkwo, and the book’s
  following of the key elements required for an Aristotelian
  tragedy. Throughout the book, I felt fear and pity for all the
  characters. The “Hero”, Okonkwo, is admired by his clan, and
  is meant to be admired by the reader of the story. For me, he
  was seen as essentially “good.” Okonkwo’s downfall in the
  story is when his clan begins to convert to Christianity, which
  is seen as his own fault because he left for 7 years, and
  because he is stubborn.
Olivia’s Opinion: Things Fall Apart is an
       Aristotelian Tragedy. (2/2)
• The Anagorisis is Okonkwo seeing that it is too late for his clan
  to go back to the way things were. His Hamartia would be him
  leaving. The Hubris is when Okonkwo kills the
  messenger, thinking it is okay, and that the rest of the clan
  would agree with his choice, which they didn’t. His Nemesis is
  when he kills himself, because he is paying for his mistake of
  killing his own pride, by killing himself.
Mikaela’s Opinion: Things Fall Apart is
     NOT an Aristotelian Tragedy
• The book Things Fall Apart is not an Aristotelian Tragedy for
  various reasons. First, the Hero, Okonkwo, is not a
  character that the entire audience can find to be “good.” As
  a closed minded, wife beating, powerful, and hateful
  man, there is no pity or sadness evoked when his life begins
  to spiral out of control. The decisions he makes may be
  heroic when he tries to save his culture. Yet, he goes about
  it in a destructive and ridiculous way, making almost no
  progress, so this causes you to feel no pity for him, as he
  lacks compromise and logical ways thinking. Not to
  mention, majority of the audience this book was written for
  are White Christians and Okonkwo’s actions would make
  them feel attacked or disrespected. There is no Anagorisis
  because Okonkwo is too blinded by his own pride…
Mikaela’s Opinion Continued.
• To spot the error of his ways and impending doom.
  Also, even as Okonkwo makes his own bad
  decisions, not all of his problems arise from himself
  alone, but rather the white men and other members of
  his own tribe and the traitors who become Christians.
  In the end, there is no Catharsis, because instead of
  feeling resolved at the end or even sad, the feelings are
  almost nonexistent or detached after the death of
  Okonkwo. Even though an argument can be made in
  favor of Things Fall Apart being an Aristotelian
  tragedy, it is weak when placed against the lack of
  emotional responses required for that kind of writing. I
  do not feel the author’s goal was tragedy, but rather to
  show how in a world of change, compromise is
  necessary.

Aristotelain

  • 2.
    Key Elements ofAristotelian Tragedy • Evokes pity and fear in the audience. • Hero must be admired and essentially “good.” • Hero’s downfall comes from his own personal decision or mistake. • Anagorisis – The moment in which the Hero clearly sees the fate and destruction that awaits him. • Hamartia – The Hero’s tragic error that causes his own downfall. • Hubris – Short lived moment in which the Hero feels false pride and gets himself into deep shit. • Nemesis – When the Hero has to pay for his Hubris.
  • 3.
    Key Elements Continued •Peripateia – The decision made by the Hero that makes the situation go from okay to bad. • Catharsis – The audience’s feeling of relief and resolution and the end.
  • 4.
    Olivia’s Opinion: ThingsFall Apart is an Aristotelian Tragedy. (1/2) • Things Fall Apart is an Aristotelian tragedy because of the personal connection I feel with Okonkwo, and the book’s following of the key elements required for an Aristotelian tragedy. Throughout the book, I felt fear and pity for all the characters. The “Hero”, Okonkwo, is admired by his clan, and is meant to be admired by the reader of the story. For me, he was seen as essentially “good.” Okonkwo’s downfall in the story is when his clan begins to convert to Christianity, which is seen as his own fault because he left for 7 years, and because he is stubborn.
  • 5.
    Olivia’s Opinion: ThingsFall Apart is an Aristotelian Tragedy. (2/2) • The Anagorisis is Okonkwo seeing that it is too late for his clan to go back to the way things were. His Hamartia would be him leaving. The Hubris is when Okonkwo kills the messenger, thinking it is okay, and that the rest of the clan would agree with his choice, which they didn’t. His Nemesis is when he kills himself, because he is paying for his mistake of killing his own pride, by killing himself.
  • 6.
    Mikaela’s Opinion: ThingsFall Apart is NOT an Aristotelian Tragedy • The book Things Fall Apart is not an Aristotelian Tragedy for various reasons. First, the Hero, Okonkwo, is not a character that the entire audience can find to be “good.” As a closed minded, wife beating, powerful, and hateful man, there is no pity or sadness evoked when his life begins to spiral out of control. The decisions he makes may be heroic when he tries to save his culture. Yet, he goes about it in a destructive and ridiculous way, making almost no progress, so this causes you to feel no pity for him, as he lacks compromise and logical ways thinking. Not to mention, majority of the audience this book was written for are White Christians and Okonkwo’s actions would make them feel attacked or disrespected. There is no Anagorisis because Okonkwo is too blinded by his own pride…
  • 7.
    Mikaela’s Opinion Continued. •To spot the error of his ways and impending doom. Also, even as Okonkwo makes his own bad decisions, not all of his problems arise from himself alone, but rather the white men and other members of his own tribe and the traitors who become Christians. In the end, there is no Catharsis, because instead of feeling resolved at the end or even sad, the feelings are almost nonexistent or detached after the death of Okonkwo. Even though an argument can be made in favor of Things Fall Apart being an Aristotelian tragedy, it is weak when placed against the lack of emotional responses required for that kind of writing. I do not feel the author’s goal was tragedy, but rather to show how in a world of change, compromise is necessary.