8. Text
Pre-data, evidences to address the problem
What are the evidences that validate the
problem? to address the problem
Base Line Data - Before the Project
16. Literature Reviews
Number:1
Article Title:
Article Summary Information
Author(s):
Research Setting: Research Design:
Population, size, : Publication date:
Complete after appraisal
Evidence level and quality rating:
Study findings that help answer the EBP question:
Study recommendation:
Study Limitation:
17. Literature Reviews
Number:2
Article Title:
Article Summary Information
Author(s):
Research Setting: Research Design:
Population, size, : Publication date:
Complete after appraisal
Evidence level and quality rating:
Study findings that help answer the EBP question:
Study recommendation:
Study Limitation:
18. Literature Reviews
Number:3
Article Title:
Article Summary Information
Author(s):
Research Setting: Research Design:
Population, size, : Publication date:
Complete after appraisal
Evidence level and quality rating:
Study findings that help answer the EBP question:
Study recommendation:
Study Limitation:
19. Summary of appraised research studies
Citation Title ,Author and
date
Research
Design
Setting Population, size
and Sample
Intervention Method Findings that help answer the EBP
question
Evidence
level and
quality
20. Summary of appraised research studies
Citation Title ,Author and
date
Research
Design
Setting Population, size
and Sample
Intervention Method Findings that help answer the EBP
question
Evidence
level and
quality
21. EBP Question:
Strength
Number of Sources
Synthesized Findings with Article Number(s)
(critical analysis- not restating of information from each individual
evidence summary)
Level
Overall Quality Rating
(Strong, good, or low)
Level I
Experimental studies
Level II
Quasi-experimental
studies
Level III
Nonexperimental,
including qualitative
studies
• How can the evidence in each of the levels be organized to produce a more comprehensive understanding of the big picture?
• What themes do you notice?
• What elements of the intervention/setting/sample seem to influence the outcome?
• What are the important takeaways?
(Avoid repeating content and/or copying and pasting directly from the Individual Evidence Summary Tool)
22. Best evidence recommendations
5/23/2023 22
What is the strength and quantity of studies related to a
specific evidence recommendation?
Is there a sufficient number of high-strength studies to
support one recommendation over another?
Are there any recommendations that can be ruled out
based on the strength and quantity of the evidence?
Does the team feel the evidence is of sufficient strength
and quantity to be considered a best evidence
recommendation?
23. What is the strength and quantity of studies related to a
specific evidence recommendation?
Is there a sufficient number of high-strength studies to
support one recommendation over another?
Are there any recommendations that can be ruled out
based on the strength and quantity of the evidence?
Does the team feel the evidence is of sufficient strength
and quantity to be considered a best evidence
recommendation?
Best evidence recommendations
25. Assessing the best-evidence recommendations for feasibility, fit, and acceptability:
Feasibility
Fit
Acceptability
Organization-specific recommendations:
29. Based on the Translation Assessment, select the course of action:
☐ Change is indicated (system or process improvement, or practice).
☐ Consider a pilot of the change or further investigation for new evidence.
☐ No indication for change or considers further investigation for new
evidence, develop a research study or discontinue project.
30. Any challenges or obstacles: Barriers and challenges to implement the
recommendation overcome barriers to ensure the success of the change implementation:
Action Planning
overcome barriers to ensure the success of the change implementation:
Resources or Strengths Barriers
Plan to Overcome Barriers by Leveraging
Strengths as Appropriate
5/23/2023 30
35. 5/23/2023 35
Outcomes Measurement Plan
What is/are the goal(s) of
the project?
Desired completion date: / /2022
How will you know if you
are successful?
Types of Outcomes Selected Metrics Source Frequency
☐ Clinical (e.g., vital signs, infection rates, fall
rates, adverse events)
☐ Functional (e.g., activities of daily living,
quality of life, self-medication administration)
☐ Perceptual (e.g., satisfaction, care experience,
timeliness of response)
☐ Process/Intervention (e.g., care coordination,
immunization, bereavement support)
☐ Organization/Unit-Based (e.g., staffing levels,
length of stay, readmissions)
47. in AQWCH
INSERT YOUR
INSTITUTIONAL LOGO(S
What is the problem?
AA
PICO Question
Project Opjectives
Purpose
Background
Methods
Results
Conclusion
AQWCH.
Used the following data bases Pub-Med, CINAHL ,ELSEVIER
Level of Evidence Number of Studies Overall Quality
I
II
• aa
Action Plan
Based on this EBP.
AAAAA
Recommendations
From the Existing data from AQWCH,
