Antepartum Haemorrhage
Guidelines
Presented by : dr Hind zainelabdeen
Registrar of obs/gyne
Introduction / Background
 Definition: bleeding from or into the genital
tract after 24+0 wk and before onset of labor
 Complicates close to 3-5% of all pregnancies
and is a MEDICAL EMERGENCY!
 Approximately 70% of cases of placental
abruption occur in low risk pregnancies
 Is one of the leading causes of antepartum
hospitalization, maternal morbidity, and
operative intervention
Severity of APH
 1. Spotting: Staining or blood spotting on
underwear.
 2. Minor Haemorrhage: Blood loss less than 50 ml.
 3. Major Haemorrhage: Blood loss of 50–1000 ml
with no signs of shock.
 4. Massive Haemorrhage: Blood loss greater than
1000 ml and/or signs of shock.
 5. Recurrent APH is the term used when there are
episodes of APH on more than one occasion.
Causes of APH
 Placenta praevia (15-26% ).
 Placental abruption (10-15%) .
 Rarely caused by vasa praevia
 rupture uterus .
 Other causes include:
 Incidental haemorrhage from a lesion of the cervix or
vagina - infection, carcinoma, polyp
 Unexplained Hge .
 Other causes to consider include:
 Rectal bleeding; bleeding diatheses; haematuria
Placenta previa
 Placenta previa is generally defined as the
implantation of the placenta over or near
the internal os of the cervix
Classification
 Minor (partial ) p.p;The placenta sited in
the LUS but does not cover the cervical
os.
 Major placenta previa : occurs when the
placenta is cover the internal os (partially
or completely).
What are the risk factors of P.previa?
 Previous placenta previa (4-8%).
 Previous caesarean sections
 Previous termination of pregnancy
 Multiparity
 Advanced maternal age (>40 years)
 Multiple pregnancy
 Smoking
 Assisted conception.
 Deficient endometrium may be a risk
factor
 history of:
◦ uterine scar,
◦ endometritis,
◦ manual removal of placenta,
◦ Curettage and submucous fibroid
Abruptio placenta
 Defined as the premature separation of
the normally implanted placenta.
 Occurs in 1-2% of all pregnancies
What are the risk factors of Aprubtio
placentae
 Abruption in a previous pregnancy.
(About 4.4% incidence of recurrence
after one & 19–25% after two)
 pre-eclampsia,
 fetal growth restriction,
 non-vertex presentations,
 advanced maternal age
 First trimester bleeding increases the risk
of abruption later in the pregnancy( 1% -
1.4%) ,specially when an intrauterine
haematoma is identified on ultrasound
scan.
 Maternal thrombophilias have been
associated with placental abruption .
 multiparity,
 low body mass index (BMI),
 pregnancy following assisted reproductive
techniques,
 intrauterine infection, premature rupture
of membranes,
 abdominal trauma,
 smoking and drug misuse (cocaine and
amphetamines)during pregnancy
Vasa Previa
 Definition: a velamentous cord
insertion occurs when the cord
inserts into the membranes .
 Diagnosis:Apt test (hemoglobin
alkaline denaturation test.
 Complications: bleeding is fetal
in origin (mortality is >75%).
 Treatment: Emergent CS if fetus
is viable.
Apt Test
 The test allows the clinician to determine
whether the blood originates from the
infant or from the mother.
 Addition of 2-3 drops of alkaline solution
to 1 ml of blood.
 Fetal erythrocyte are resistant to rupture
and the mixture will remain red.
 If the blood is maternal, erythrocytes will
rupture and the mixture will turn brow
Risk factors of Vasa Previa
 Bilobed and succenturiate placentas
 Velamentous insertion of the cord
 Low-lying placenta .
 Multiple gestation.
 Pregnancies resulting from in vitro
fertilization.
 Palpable vessel on vaginal exam
 Abruption is more likely to be related to
conditions occurring during pregnancy
and placenta praevia is more likely to be
related to conditions existing prior to
pregnancy
Can APH be predicted?
 It cannot reliably be predicted. ≈70% of
cases of placental abruption occur in low-
risk pregnancies
Can APH be prevented?
 There is limited evidence to support
interventions to prevent APH.
 Women should be advised, encouraged
and helped to change modifiable risk
factors (such as smoking and drug
misuse)
Complications of APH
 Maternal Complications:
Anaemia, infection, maternal shock, Renal
tubular necrosis consumptive coagulopathy,
postpartum Haemorrhage, prolonged
hospital stay, psychological sequelae,
complications of blood transfusion
Fetal complications:
Fetal hypoxia, small for gestational age and fetal growth
restriction, prematurity (iatrogenic and spontaneous),
fetal death.
Consideration should be made of vasa praevia as a
potential cause of APH (particularly if bleeding after
SROM/ARM) - rare (1 in 1200- 1 in 5000 births) cause
of fetal bleeding due to rupture of fetal vessels
traversing the membranes.
Fetal complications:
 Fetal hypoxia, small for gestational age and
fetal growth restriction, prematurity
(iatrogenic and spontaneous), fetal death.
 Consideration should be made of vasa
praevia as a potential cause of APH
(particularly if bleeding after SROM/ARM)
- rare (1 in 1200- 1 in 5000 births) cause
of fetal bleeding due to rupture of fetal
vessels traversing the membranes.
Clinical evaluation of pp
 The most characteristic event in placenta
previa is painless hemorrhage.
 This usually occurs near the end of or
after the second trimester.
 Pain may present as bleeding can be
precipitated by uterine contractions
 It usually ceases spontaneously, only to recur.
 placenta previa may be associated with
placenta accreta, placenta increta or percreta
 Coagulopathy is rare with placenta previa. •
Bleeding can range from spotting with no
maternal or fetal effect to massive bleeding
(shock).
 10% of women with pp will also have placental
abruption
Clinical evaluation of AP
 Placenta abruption is defined as the premature
separation of the normally-sited placenta from
 the uterus.
 The lower limit of gestational age to define
placental abruption has changed over a period of
 years, from 28 weeks down to 20 weeks'
gestation.
 Abruption is usually an unanticipated emergency.
Bleeding is often concealed
Clinical presentation of placental abruption:
 Placental abruption is a clinical diagnosis
on examination of the placenta post-
delivery.
 Ultrasound should not be used in the
diagnosis of placental abruption, but is
useful to confirm fetal viability/death and
exclude a placenta praevia.
features of placental abruption:
 Vaginal bleeding (70–80%) – usually dark blood; however, the
bleeding can be concealed, revealed or mixed.
 Abdominal pain (50%) – usually constant, in contrast to
uterine contractions due to infiltration of blood into the
myometrium.
 Uterine tenderness (70%).
 Uterine contractions (35%) – abruptions can occur in labour
or stimulate labour to begin.
 Fetal distress (65%) or intrauterine death (15%).
 Evidence of a disseminated intravascular coagulopathy – non-
clotting vaginal bleeding, bleeding from drip sites and skin
bruising.
 Maternal circulatory shock (depends on volume of blood loss,
which can be concealed).
Management of placental abruption
 The management of placental abruption will depend on
gestation, the signs and symptoms, the mother’s and fetal
status .
 When it occurs at or near term and maternal and fetal
condition is reassuring, conservative management is
reasonable.,This involves induction of labour by amniotomy
and syntocinon infusion with the goal of achieving a vaginal
delivery.
 If there is evidence of fetal compromise and delivery is not
imminent, delivery by caesarean section is recommended.
 If there is haemodynamic compromise of the mother and
evidence of DIC, a multidisciplinary approach is essential
with the use of blood products to correct coagulopathy.
Management of APH
Initial Face to Face Clinical assessment
 Initial clinical assessment in women
presenting with APH is to establish whether
urgent intervention is required to manage
maternal or fetal compromise.
 It is best practice to treat with expectation
of worse case scenario All women
presenting with APH should have their
pulse, BP,Temperature Respiration, O2
 saturation recorded on MEOWS chart.
 If there is no maternal compromise a full
history should be taken
  Risk factors for abruption and placenta
praevia should be identified.
  The woman should be asked about her
awareness of fetal movements and
attempts
 should be made to auscultate the fetal
heart.
 If the APH is associated with spontaneous
or iatrogenic rupture of the fetal
membranes, bleeding from a ruptured vasa
praevia should be considered.
• Previous cervical smear history may be
useful in order to assess the possibility of
a neoplastic lesion of the cervix as the
cause of bleeding.
The process of triage includes:
 History-taking to assess co-existing symptoms
such as pain.
 An assessment of the extent of vaginal bleeding.
 Potential causes of the bleeding.
 Cardiovascular condition of the mother.
 Assessment of fetal wellbeing.
 Examination of the woman should be performed
to assess the amount and cause of APH.
 It is important to note that bleeding can be
concealed
Abdominal palpation
 The woman should be assessed for
tenderness or signs of an acute abdomen.
 The tense or ‘woody’ feel to the uterus on
abdominal palpation indicates a significant
abruption.
 Abdominal palpation may also reveal uterine
contractions.
 A soft, non-tender uterus may suggest a
lower genital tract cause, bleeding from the
placenta or vasa praevia.
Assessment of the fetal wellbeing
 Assessment of fetal heart rate should be
performed, usually with cardiotocograph (CTG)
 Ultrasound, if fetal viability cannot be detected
using external auscultation.
 Speculum examination
 A speculum examination can be useful to
identify cervical dilatation or visualise a lower
genital tract cause for the APH. It can allow for
quantifying blood loss and identify ongoing
 active bleeding.
Digital vaginal examination
 A digital vaginal examination should not
be performed until an ultrasound has
excluded
 placenta praevia (usually 20 weeks
anomaly scan confirmed placental
localization). Digital vaginal examination
can provide information on cervical
dilatation if APH is associated with pain
or uterine activity
Investigations
 FBC.
  Blood group +/- crossmatch.
  Urea, Creatinine and Electrolytes (in
compromised state).
  Consider Coagulation screen.
  Kleihauer–Betke test in rhesus D (RhD)-
negative women in order to gauge the dose
 of anti-D immunoglobulin (anti-D Ig) required.
Subsequent management:
• Where bleeding has been spotting and has
settled, and the tests of fetal and maternal well-
being are reassuring, the woman can go home.
• She should be encouraged to contact the
maternity unit if she has any further bleeding,
pain or alteration in fetal movements
• All women with APH heavier than spotting and
women with ongoing bleeding should remain in
hospital at least until the bleeding has stopped.
• If there is a risk of preterm delivery
antenatal corticosteroids should be given
to women
 between 24+0 and 34+6.
• Consider admission if low lying placenta,
abnormal findings or major bleeding
noted (50ml to 1000ml with no signs of
shock).
Should antenatal care of women be altered following APH ?
• Pregnancy should be classified as “high risk’
and ANC should be consultant-led .
• Serial ultrasound for fetal growth should be
performed.
• Optimum timing of delivery of women
presenting with unexplained APH a and no
associated maternal or fetal compromise is
not established.A senior obstetrician should
be involved in determining the timing and
mode of delivery.
Should women presenting with APH who
are RhD-negative be given anti-D Ig?
 In the non-sensitised RhD-negative woman:
 Anti-D Ig should be given after any
presentation with APH
 Recurrent vaginal bleeding after 20+0
Weeks of gestation: antiD Ig should be
given at a minimum of 6-weekly intervals.
 After 20+0 weeks of gestation, at least 500
iu anti-D Ig should be given followed by a
test to identify FMH greater than 4
Should corticosteroids be administered to women
who present with APH before term?
 Clinicians should offer a single course of
antenatal corticosteroids to women
between 24+0 and 34+6 weeks of
gestation at risk of preterm birth.
 In women presenting with spotting, where
the most likely cause is lower genital tract
bleeding, where imminent delivery is
unlikely, corticosteroids are unlikely to be
of benefit, but could still be considered
Should tocolytic therapy be used in women
presenting with APH who have uterine activity?
 Tocolysis should not be used to delay
delivery in a woman presenting :
 With a major APH.
 Who is hemodynamically unstable.
 If there is evidence of fetal compromise
Intrapartum management
 Women in labour with active vaginal bleeding require
continuous electronic fetal heart monitoring.
 For women who have experienced one episode of
minor APH during the pregnancy, in which there
have been no subsequent concerns regarding
maternal or fetal well-being,
 intermittent auscultation is appropriate.
 Women with minor APH with evidence of placental
insufficiency (i.e. FGR or oligohydramnios) should
have continuous fetal heart monitoring.
• A senior paediatrician/neonatologist
should be involved
 Women with APH and associated
maternal and/or fetal compromise are
required to be delivered immediately.
 If the fetus is compromised, a caesarean
section is the appropriate method of
delivery
 If fetal death is diagnosed, vaginal birth is
the recommended mode of delivery for
most women (provided the maternal
condition is satisfactory), but caesarean
birth will need to be considered for
some, taking into account maternal
choice.
 The postnatal management of pregnancies
complicated by major or massive APH should
include active management of the third stage
of labour,
 Consider use of ergometrine-oxytocin
(Syntometrine) in women with APH resulting
from placental abruption or placenta praevia
in the absence of hypertension
 thromboprophylaxis, debriefing and clinical
incident reporting.
Princeples of management of massive
APH
 Blood loss greater than 1000 ml and/or signs of
clinical shock
 Personnel required:
 Call experienced midwife (in addition to midwife in
charge).
 Call obstetric middle grade and alert consultant.
 Call anaesthetic middle grade and alert consultant.
 Designate one member of the team to record
events, fluids, drugs and vital signs.
 Major Obstetric Haemorrhage (MOH) protocol
should be triggered
Initial management:
 Initial management should follow the ABCD pathway.
 A and B – assess airway and breathing
 A high concentration of oxygen (10–15 litres/minute) via
a facemask should be
 administered.
 C – evaluate circulation
 Establish two 14-gauge intravenous lines; a 20 ml blood
sample should be taken and
 sent for diagnostic tests, including full blood count and
assessment of FMH if RhDnegative, coagulation screen,
urea and electrolytes and cross match (4 units)
 D – assess the fetus and decide on delivery
 Basic measures for Haemorrhage up to
1000 ml with no clinical shock:
 Intravenous access (14-gauge cannula x
1).
 Commence crystalloid infusion.
full protocol for massive Haemorrhage
(blood loss > 1000 ml or clinical shock):
 Assess airway.
 Assess breathing.
 Evaluate circulation.
 Oxygen by mask at 10–15 litres/minute.
 Intravenous access (14-gauge cannula x 2).
 Position left lateral tilt.
 Keep the woman warm using appropriate available measures.
 Transfuse blood as soon as possible.
 Until blood is available, infuse up to 3.5 litres of warmed
crystalloid Hartmann’s solution
 (2 litres) and/or colloid (1–2 litres) as rapidly as required.
 Special blood filters should not be used, as they slow infusions
Fluid Therapy & Blood Product
Transfusion
 Fresh frozen plasma 4 units (12-15 ml/kg
or total 1 L).
 For every 6 units of PRBC or, If PT &/or
aPTT >1.5 x mean control.
 Platelets if platelet count
 Cryoprecipitate if fibrinogen less than 1
gm / L with coutinuing MOH and whilst
awaiting coagulation profile, give 4 units
FFP and 10 units of cryoprecipitate
empirically
Key Recommendations
 - Ensure early recognition of APH symptoms.
 - Multidisciplinary approach for severe cases.
 Continuous fetal heart monitoring for active
bleeding
 - Use Anti-D Ig for RhD-negative women.
 - Follow guidelines for timely delivery and
neonatal care , Immediate delivery if maternal
or fetal compromise occurs.
THANKS

Antepartum_Haemorrhage_Guidelines_2024.pptx

  • 1.
    Antepartum Haemorrhage Guidelines Presented by: dr Hind zainelabdeen Registrar of obs/gyne
  • 2.
    Introduction / Background Definition: bleeding from or into the genital tract after 24+0 wk and before onset of labor  Complicates close to 3-5% of all pregnancies and is a MEDICAL EMERGENCY!  Approximately 70% of cases of placental abruption occur in low risk pregnancies  Is one of the leading causes of antepartum hospitalization, maternal morbidity, and operative intervention
  • 3.
    Severity of APH 1. Spotting: Staining or blood spotting on underwear.  2. Minor Haemorrhage: Blood loss less than 50 ml.  3. Major Haemorrhage: Blood loss of 50–1000 ml with no signs of shock.  4. Massive Haemorrhage: Blood loss greater than 1000 ml and/or signs of shock.  5. Recurrent APH is the term used when there are episodes of APH on more than one occasion.
  • 4.
    Causes of APH Placenta praevia (15-26% ).  Placental abruption (10-15%) .  Rarely caused by vasa praevia  rupture uterus .  Other causes include:  Incidental haemorrhage from a lesion of the cervix or vagina - infection, carcinoma, polyp  Unexplained Hge .  Other causes to consider include:  Rectal bleeding; bleeding diatheses; haematuria
  • 5.
    Placenta previa  Placentaprevia is generally defined as the implantation of the placenta over or near the internal os of the cervix
  • 6.
    Classification  Minor (partial) p.p;The placenta sited in the LUS but does not cover the cervical os.  Major placenta previa : occurs when the placenta is cover the internal os (partially or completely).
  • 7.
    What are therisk factors of P.previa?  Previous placenta previa (4-8%).  Previous caesarean sections  Previous termination of pregnancy  Multiparity  Advanced maternal age (>40 years)  Multiple pregnancy
  • 8.
     Smoking  Assistedconception.  Deficient endometrium may be a risk factor  history of: ◦ uterine scar, ◦ endometritis, ◦ manual removal of placenta, ◦ Curettage and submucous fibroid
  • 9.
    Abruptio placenta  Definedas the premature separation of the normally implanted placenta.  Occurs in 1-2% of all pregnancies
  • 10.
    What are therisk factors of Aprubtio placentae  Abruption in a previous pregnancy. (About 4.4% incidence of recurrence after one & 19–25% after two)  pre-eclampsia,  fetal growth restriction,  non-vertex presentations,  advanced maternal age
  • 11.
     First trimesterbleeding increases the risk of abruption later in the pregnancy( 1% - 1.4%) ,specially when an intrauterine haematoma is identified on ultrasound scan.  Maternal thrombophilias have been associated with placental abruption .
  • 12.
     multiparity,  lowbody mass index (BMI),  pregnancy following assisted reproductive techniques,  intrauterine infection, premature rupture of membranes,  abdominal trauma,  smoking and drug misuse (cocaine and amphetamines)during pregnancy
  • 13.
    Vasa Previa  Definition:a velamentous cord insertion occurs when the cord inserts into the membranes .  Diagnosis:Apt test (hemoglobin alkaline denaturation test.  Complications: bleeding is fetal in origin (mortality is >75%).  Treatment: Emergent CS if fetus is viable.
  • 14.
    Apt Test  Thetest allows the clinician to determine whether the blood originates from the infant or from the mother.  Addition of 2-3 drops of alkaline solution to 1 ml of blood.  Fetal erythrocyte are resistant to rupture and the mixture will remain red.  If the blood is maternal, erythrocytes will rupture and the mixture will turn brow
  • 15.
    Risk factors ofVasa Previa  Bilobed and succenturiate placentas  Velamentous insertion of the cord  Low-lying placenta .  Multiple gestation.  Pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization.  Palpable vessel on vaginal exam
  • 16.
     Abruption ismore likely to be related to conditions occurring during pregnancy and placenta praevia is more likely to be related to conditions existing prior to pregnancy
  • 17.
    Can APH bepredicted?  It cannot reliably be predicted. ≈70% of cases of placental abruption occur in low- risk pregnancies
  • 18.
    Can APH beprevented?  There is limited evidence to support interventions to prevent APH.  Women should be advised, encouraged and helped to change modifiable risk factors (such as smoking and drug misuse)
  • 19.
    Complications of APH Maternal Complications: Anaemia, infection, maternal shock, Renal tubular necrosis consumptive coagulopathy, postpartum Haemorrhage, prolonged hospital stay, psychological sequelae, complications of blood transfusion
  • 20.
    Fetal complications: Fetal hypoxia,small for gestational age and fetal growth restriction, prematurity (iatrogenic and spontaneous), fetal death. Consideration should be made of vasa praevia as a potential cause of APH (particularly if bleeding after SROM/ARM) - rare (1 in 1200- 1 in 5000 births) cause of fetal bleeding due to rupture of fetal vessels traversing the membranes.
  • 21.
    Fetal complications:  Fetalhypoxia, small for gestational age and fetal growth restriction, prematurity (iatrogenic and spontaneous), fetal death.  Consideration should be made of vasa praevia as a potential cause of APH (particularly if bleeding after SROM/ARM) - rare (1 in 1200- 1 in 5000 births) cause of fetal bleeding due to rupture of fetal vessels traversing the membranes.
  • 22.
    Clinical evaluation ofpp  The most characteristic event in placenta previa is painless hemorrhage.  This usually occurs near the end of or after the second trimester.  Pain may present as bleeding can be precipitated by uterine contractions
  • 23.
     It usuallyceases spontaneously, only to recur.  placenta previa may be associated with placenta accreta, placenta increta or percreta  Coagulopathy is rare with placenta previa. • Bleeding can range from spotting with no maternal or fetal effect to massive bleeding (shock).  10% of women with pp will also have placental abruption
  • 25.
    Clinical evaluation ofAP  Placenta abruption is defined as the premature separation of the normally-sited placenta from  the uterus.  The lower limit of gestational age to define placental abruption has changed over a period of  years, from 28 weeks down to 20 weeks' gestation.  Abruption is usually an unanticipated emergency. Bleeding is often concealed
  • 26.
    Clinical presentation ofplacental abruption:  Placental abruption is a clinical diagnosis on examination of the placenta post- delivery.  Ultrasound should not be used in the diagnosis of placental abruption, but is useful to confirm fetal viability/death and exclude a placenta praevia.
  • 27.
    features of placentalabruption:  Vaginal bleeding (70–80%) – usually dark blood; however, the bleeding can be concealed, revealed or mixed.  Abdominal pain (50%) – usually constant, in contrast to uterine contractions due to infiltration of blood into the myometrium.  Uterine tenderness (70%).  Uterine contractions (35%) – abruptions can occur in labour or stimulate labour to begin.  Fetal distress (65%) or intrauterine death (15%).  Evidence of a disseminated intravascular coagulopathy – non- clotting vaginal bleeding, bleeding from drip sites and skin bruising.  Maternal circulatory shock (depends on volume of blood loss, which can be concealed).
  • 28.
    Management of placentalabruption  The management of placental abruption will depend on gestation, the signs and symptoms, the mother’s and fetal status .  When it occurs at or near term and maternal and fetal condition is reassuring, conservative management is reasonable.,This involves induction of labour by amniotomy and syntocinon infusion with the goal of achieving a vaginal delivery.  If there is evidence of fetal compromise and delivery is not imminent, delivery by caesarean section is recommended.  If there is haemodynamic compromise of the mother and evidence of DIC, a multidisciplinary approach is essential with the use of blood products to correct coagulopathy.
  • 29.
  • 30.
    Initial Face toFace Clinical assessment  Initial clinical assessment in women presenting with APH is to establish whether urgent intervention is required to manage maternal or fetal compromise.  It is best practice to treat with expectation of worse case scenario All women presenting with APH should have their pulse, BP,Temperature Respiration, O2  saturation recorded on MEOWS chart.
  • 31.
     If thereis no maternal compromise a full history should be taken   Risk factors for abruption and placenta praevia should be identified.   The woman should be asked about her awareness of fetal movements and attempts  should be made to auscultate the fetal heart.
  • 32.
     If theAPH is associated with spontaneous or iatrogenic rupture of the fetal membranes, bleeding from a ruptured vasa praevia should be considered. • Previous cervical smear history may be useful in order to assess the possibility of a neoplastic lesion of the cervix as the cause of bleeding.
  • 33.
    The process oftriage includes:  History-taking to assess co-existing symptoms such as pain.  An assessment of the extent of vaginal bleeding.  Potential causes of the bleeding.  Cardiovascular condition of the mother.  Assessment of fetal wellbeing.  Examination of the woman should be performed to assess the amount and cause of APH.  It is important to note that bleeding can be concealed
  • 34.
    Abdominal palpation  Thewoman should be assessed for tenderness or signs of an acute abdomen.  The tense or ‘woody’ feel to the uterus on abdominal palpation indicates a significant abruption.  Abdominal palpation may also reveal uterine contractions.  A soft, non-tender uterus may suggest a lower genital tract cause, bleeding from the placenta or vasa praevia.
  • 35.
    Assessment of thefetal wellbeing  Assessment of fetal heart rate should be performed, usually with cardiotocograph (CTG)  Ultrasound, if fetal viability cannot be detected using external auscultation.  Speculum examination  A speculum examination can be useful to identify cervical dilatation or visualise a lower genital tract cause for the APH. It can allow for quantifying blood loss and identify ongoing  active bleeding.
  • 36.
    Digital vaginal examination A digital vaginal examination should not be performed until an ultrasound has excluded  placenta praevia (usually 20 weeks anomaly scan confirmed placental localization). Digital vaginal examination can provide information on cervical dilatation if APH is associated with pain or uterine activity
  • 37.
    Investigations  FBC.  Blood group +/- crossmatch.   Urea, Creatinine and Electrolytes (in compromised state).   Consider Coagulation screen.   Kleihauer–Betke test in rhesus D (RhD)- negative women in order to gauge the dose  of anti-D immunoglobulin (anti-D Ig) required.
  • 38.
    Subsequent management: • Wherebleeding has been spotting and has settled, and the tests of fetal and maternal well- being are reassuring, the woman can go home. • She should be encouraged to contact the maternity unit if she has any further bleeding, pain or alteration in fetal movements • All women with APH heavier than spotting and women with ongoing bleeding should remain in hospital at least until the bleeding has stopped.
  • 39.
    • If thereis a risk of preterm delivery antenatal corticosteroids should be given to women  between 24+0 and 34+6. • Consider admission if low lying placenta, abnormal findings or major bleeding noted (50ml to 1000ml with no signs of shock).
  • 40.
    Should antenatal careof women be altered following APH ? • Pregnancy should be classified as “high risk’ and ANC should be consultant-led . • Serial ultrasound for fetal growth should be performed. • Optimum timing of delivery of women presenting with unexplained APH a and no associated maternal or fetal compromise is not established.A senior obstetrician should be involved in determining the timing and mode of delivery.
  • 41.
    Should women presentingwith APH who are RhD-negative be given anti-D Ig?  In the non-sensitised RhD-negative woman:  Anti-D Ig should be given after any presentation with APH  Recurrent vaginal bleeding after 20+0 Weeks of gestation: antiD Ig should be given at a minimum of 6-weekly intervals.  After 20+0 weeks of gestation, at least 500 iu anti-D Ig should be given followed by a test to identify FMH greater than 4
  • 42.
    Should corticosteroids beadministered to women who present with APH before term?  Clinicians should offer a single course of antenatal corticosteroids to women between 24+0 and 34+6 weeks of gestation at risk of preterm birth.  In women presenting with spotting, where the most likely cause is lower genital tract bleeding, where imminent delivery is unlikely, corticosteroids are unlikely to be of benefit, but could still be considered
  • 43.
    Should tocolytic therapybe used in women presenting with APH who have uterine activity?  Tocolysis should not be used to delay delivery in a woman presenting :  With a major APH.  Who is hemodynamically unstable.  If there is evidence of fetal compromise
  • 44.
    Intrapartum management  Womenin labour with active vaginal bleeding require continuous electronic fetal heart monitoring.  For women who have experienced one episode of minor APH during the pregnancy, in which there have been no subsequent concerns regarding maternal or fetal well-being,  intermittent auscultation is appropriate.  Women with minor APH with evidence of placental insufficiency (i.e. FGR or oligohydramnios) should have continuous fetal heart monitoring.
  • 45.
    • A seniorpaediatrician/neonatologist should be involved  Women with APH and associated maternal and/or fetal compromise are required to be delivered immediately.  If the fetus is compromised, a caesarean section is the appropriate method of delivery
  • 46.
     If fetaldeath is diagnosed, vaginal birth is the recommended mode of delivery for most women (provided the maternal condition is satisfactory), but caesarean birth will need to be considered for some, taking into account maternal choice.
  • 47.
     The postnatalmanagement of pregnancies complicated by major or massive APH should include active management of the third stage of labour,  Consider use of ergometrine-oxytocin (Syntometrine) in women with APH resulting from placental abruption or placenta praevia in the absence of hypertension  thromboprophylaxis, debriefing and clinical incident reporting.
  • 48.
    Princeples of managementof massive APH  Blood loss greater than 1000 ml and/or signs of clinical shock  Personnel required:  Call experienced midwife (in addition to midwife in charge).  Call obstetric middle grade and alert consultant.  Call anaesthetic middle grade and alert consultant.  Designate one member of the team to record events, fluids, drugs and vital signs.  Major Obstetric Haemorrhage (MOH) protocol should be triggered
  • 49.
    Initial management:  Initialmanagement should follow the ABCD pathway.  A and B – assess airway and breathing  A high concentration of oxygen (10–15 litres/minute) via a facemask should be  administered.  C – evaluate circulation  Establish two 14-gauge intravenous lines; a 20 ml blood sample should be taken and  sent for diagnostic tests, including full blood count and assessment of FMH if RhDnegative, coagulation screen, urea and electrolytes and cross match (4 units)  D – assess the fetus and decide on delivery
  • 50.
     Basic measuresfor Haemorrhage up to 1000 ml with no clinical shock:  Intravenous access (14-gauge cannula x 1).  Commence crystalloid infusion.
  • 51.
    full protocol formassive Haemorrhage (blood loss > 1000 ml or clinical shock):  Assess airway.  Assess breathing.  Evaluate circulation.  Oxygen by mask at 10–15 litres/minute.  Intravenous access (14-gauge cannula x 2).  Position left lateral tilt.  Keep the woman warm using appropriate available measures.  Transfuse blood as soon as possible.  Until blood is available, infuse up to 3.5 litres of warmed crystalloid Hartmann’s solution  (2 litres) and/or colloid (1–2 litres) as rapidly as required.  Special blood filters should not be used, as they slow infusions
  • 52.
    Fluid Therapy &Blood Product Transfusion  Fresh frozen plasma 4 units (12-15 ml/kg or total 1 L).  For every 6 units of PRBC or, If PT &/or aPTT >1.5 x mean control.  Platelets if platelet count  Cryoprecipitate if fibrinogen less than 1 gm / L with coutinuing MOH and whilst awaiting coagulation profile, give 4 units FFP and 10 units of cryoprecipitate empirically
  • 53.
    Key Recommendations  -Ensure early recognition of APH symptoms.  - Multidisciplinary approach for severe cases.  Continuous fetal heart monitoring for active bleeding  - Use Anti-D Ig for RhD-negative women.  - Follow guidelines for timely delivery and neonatal care , Immediate delivery if maternal or fetal compromise occurs.
  • 54.