This document provides a summary of Special Agent Andrew Bringuel's background, qualifications, and experience. It outlines his career history including management roles at Eastern Airlines and within the FBI, where he has held positions in investigations, instruction, research, and behavioral analysis. It also lists his skills, achievements, and education, demonstrating extensive experience in law enforcement, counterterrorism, leadership, and behavioral analysis.
This document proposes additional funding for counterterrorism intelligence and cooperation between the FBI, CBP, and ICE. It recommends a "triangular information network" where the agencies share intelligence to identify potential threats at borders and within the US in a proactive manner. Currently, counterterrorism efforts are too reactive; improved information sharing and watchlists could help intercept individuals earlier. The proposal analyzes historical terrorism cases like the Boston Marathon bombing to argue for more proactive domestic counterterrorism strategies.
Great Chinese Hack of the United States Government's Personnel Office in 2015Dr. Tim Dosemagen
The document discusses a major cyber attack by Chinese hackers in 2014-2015 on the US government's Office of Personnel Management. An estimated 21-25 million people had their personal information stolen, including sensitive data from SF-86 forms used for security clearances. Experts believe this was the worst breach of personally identifying information ever and that the stolen data could be used for blackmail or recruiting spies. The hack exposed vulnerabilities that OPM had been warned about previously and highlighted the need for better intrusion detection, encryption, and updated IT systems.
Nelson J. Barbosa has over 30 years of experience in law enforcement, security, and investigations. He has served as an FBI Special Agent for 23 years investigating a wide range of criminal activities internationally. He also served as the Global Security Associate Director for Novartis Pharmaceuticals, overseeing security operations in Latin America and the Caribbean. Barbosa is proficient in English and Spanish and has a BA in Business Administration and Management.
This document discusses balancing homeland security and civil liberties after 9/11. It describes how the U.S. established the Department of Homeland Security and passed the Patriot Act to increase surveillance of potential terrorists. It also discusses fusion centers created to gather and share intelligence nationwide and debates whether these security measures have made the country safer at the cost of individual privacy and freedom.
This document summarizes the history and evolution of government surveillance and data collection programs related to counterterrorism efforts since the 1960s. It discusses early programs like COINTELPRO and the development of enabling technologies like databases, data mining, and facial recognition. It then outlines several post-9/11 US government programs aimed at identifying terrorists, the privacy and legal concerns they raised, and reasons for the cancellation of some programs.
This document summarizes an investigation into how counterterrorism agencies partnered with corporations to monitor Occupy Wall Street protestors. It describes how an Arizona fusion center shared intelligence with JPMorgan Chase about planned protests during a CEO's visit. Fusion centers were established after 9/11 to share information between law enforcement agencies but have since partnered with private companies. The document alleges these partnerships criminalized citizens engaging in political dissent and that police were sometimes hired by corporations to arrest protestors. It suggests counterterrorism resources were misused to shield corporations from criticism instead of protecting national security.
The document provides an overview of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) including its mission to secure America, prevent terrorist attacks, and ensure safe borders. It summarizes the key components of DHS, including the Coast Guard, Secret Service, Transportation Security Administration, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Federal Emergency Management Agency, and Customs and Border Protection. Biographies are provided for several DHS leadership positions.
This document outlines recommended guidelines for interactions between U.S. armed forces and non-governmental humanitarian organizations (NGHOs) operating in hostile environments. It was developed through a working group facilitated by the U.S. Institute of Peace. The guidelines aim to minimize confusion over roles by distinguishing military from humanitarian activities and preserving NGHO independence. They cover issues like information sharing, coordination, and logistical support in extremis.
This document proposes additional funding for counterterrorism intelligence and cooperation between the FBI, CBP, and ICE. It recommends a "triangular information network" where the agencies share intelligence to identify potential threats at borders and within the US in a proactive manner. Currently, counterterrorism efforts are too reactive; improved information sharing and watchlists could help intercept individuals earlier. The proposal analyzes historical terrorism cases like the Boston Marathon bombing to argue for more proactive domestic counterterrorism strategies.
Great Chinese Hack of the United States Government's Personnel Office in 2015Dr. Tim Dosemagen
The document discusses a major cyber attack by Chinese hackers in 2014-2015 on the US government's Office of Personnel Management. An estimated 21-25 million people had their personal information stolen, including sensitive data from SF-86 forms used for security clearances. Experts believe this was the worst breach of personally identifying information ever and that the stolen data could be used for blackmail or recruiting spies. The hack exposed vulnerabilities that OPM had been warned about previously and highlighted the need for better intrusion detection, encryption, and updated IT systems.
Nelson J. Barbosa has over 30 years of experience in law enforcement, security, and investigations. He has served as an FBI Special Agent for 23 years investigating a wide range of criminal activities internationally. He also served as the Global Security Associate Director for Novartis Pharmaceuticals, overseeing security operations in Latin America and the Caribbean. Barbosa is proficient in English and Spanish and has a BA in Business Administration and Management.
This document discusses balancing homeland security and civil liberties after 9/11. It describes how the U.S. established the Department of Homeland Security and passed the Patriot Act to increase surveillance of potential terrorists. It also discusses fusion centers created to gather and share intelligence nationwide and debates whether these security measures have made the country safer at the cost of individual privacy and freedom.
This document summarizes the history and evolution of government surveillance and data collection programs related to counterterrorism efforts since the 1960s. It discusses early programs like COINTELPRO and the development of enabling technologies like databases, data mining, and facial recognition. It then outlines several post-9/11 US government programs aimed at identifying terrorists, the privacy and legal concerns they raised, and reasons for the cancellation of some programs.
This document summarizes an investigation into how counterterrorism agencies partnered with corporations to monitor Occupy Wall Street protestors. It describes how an Arizona fusion center shared intelligence with JPMorgan Chase about planned protests during a CEO's visit. Fusion centers were established after 9/11 to share information between law enforcement agencies but have since partnered with private companies. The document alleges these partnerships criminalized citizens engaging in political dissent and that police were sometimes hired by corporations to arrest protestors. It suggests counterterrorism resources were misused to shield corporations from criticism instead of protecting national security.
The document provides an overview of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) including its mission to secure America, prevent terrorist attacks, and ensure safe borders. It summarizes the key components of DHS, including the Coast Guard, Secret Service, Transportation Security Administration, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Federal Emergency Management Agency, and Customs and Border Protection. Biographies are provided for several DHS leadership positions.
This document outlines recommended guidelines for interactions between U.S. armed forces and non-governmental humanitarian organizations (NGHOs) operating in hostile environments. It was developed through a working group facilitated by the U.S. Institute of Peace. The guidelines aim to minimize confusion over roles by distinguishing military from humanitarian activities and preserving NGHO independence. They cover issues like information sharing, coordination, and logistical support in extremis.
Thomas C. Nicpon is an accomplished Assistant Special Agent in Charge with expertise in counterterrorism, cybercrime, and security. He has led the FBI New York Office Joint Terrorist Task Force and was responsible for counterterrorism efforts in New York. Nicpon also served as Chief Security Officer for the FBI's largest field office, overseeing security for facilities, personnel, and information systems. Currently, Nicpon works to address sensitive disciplinary matters as a Supervisory Special Agent at FBI Headquarters in Washington D.C.
Catherine G. Dachenbach has over 20 years of experience in intelligence analysis, investigations, and research. She is fluent in Arabic and Spanish with a DoD TS/SCI clearance. Her career highlights include writing a threat matrix for the President amid technical difficulties on 9/11 and leading an internal research project at Battelle. Currently she is an Intelligence Analyst at Battelle, providing counterterrorism research and assessments for government clients.
Joseph M. Bowen has over 20 years of experience as a Special Agent with the FBI. He has held several leadership roles within the FBI, including overseeing the new agent training program and managing operations for the New York Field Office. Prior to joining the FBI, he worked as a police officer in Pennsylvania.
The Homeland Security Week 2017 Event has brought together distinguished speakers from DHS, the U.S. Secret Service, TSA, FBI, FEMA and ICE - Take a look at some of them now
The document discusses the US Intelligence Community (IC), which is comprised of 17 separate agencies that work independently and collaboratively to conduct intelligence activities and protect national security. The main threats faced include terrorism, weapons proliferation, cyber attacks, and drug trafficking. Each agency has a specific role, such as the CIA providing national security intelligence or the NSA handling signals intelligence. Oversight is provided by the President, National Security Council, and congressional intelligence committees. The IC aims to address national security threats through collection, analysis, and sharing of information.
The document discusses the response of law enforcement to the 9/11 terrorist attacks over the past 10 years. It outlines key initiatives like the National Criminal Intelligence Sharing Plan and Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative that were established to improve information sharing between federal, state and local law enforcement agencies. The Criminal Intelligence Coordinating Council was also formed to advocate for state and local law enforcement needs and provide guidance on bolstering intelligence analysis and sharing capabilities.
Running head ASSIGNMENT 4ASSIGNMENT 4Assignment 4 Da.docxjoellemurphey
Running head: ASSIGNMENT 4
ASSIGNMENT 4
Assignment 4: Data Collection
Student Name
Affiliate Institution
Evidence-based researched data to indicate there is a problem
Terrorism is considered a historical and major problem for the U.S. Since 2001, the significance of the problem has increased. Therefore, several organizations and facilities collect and store terrorism data for events like attempted and occurred activities. The main data source for terrorism activities is the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The mandate of this arm of government is to protect Americans both in locally and internationally against crime activities but terrorism seems the greatest enemy of American citizen wherever they are in the world.
Numerous and most useful data for terrorism is found from the following federal agency and private databases:
· The National Security Agency (NSA)
· Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
· National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism (NCSTRT) and
· Global Terrorism Database (GTD). (FBI, 2014; GTD, 2014)
Information from the above databases are analyzed to present diverse quantitative and qualitative terrorism data that cover several years including life threats to the U.S. soil. According to these databases, terrorism is an old problem and continues to intensify due to availability of uninterrupted new technology as well as growing financial power of their organizations. The Federal Agencies data bases provide information on terrorism activities and information on several strategies that have been used in the past and are currently used to curb the vice (FBI, 2014).
The other terrorist’s data sources are the media agencies. News agencies such as online newspapers and broadcasting corporations provide terrorism data as it occurs. Although these agencies might not provide analyzed data, their role is to increase public awareness about terrorism occurrences and development.
References
Federal Bureau of Investigation (2014). Crime Statistics. Retrieved on May 22, 2015 from http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/crimestats
Global Terrorism Database (2014). Overview of the GTD. Retrieved on May 22, 2015 from http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/about/
2
Running Head: Terrorism Stakeholders
Terrorism
Terrorism Stakeholders
Student name
Affiliate Institution
Terrorism
Modern day terrorism has caused sufficient harm to the society both in the political, social and the economic sectors. External and internal forces have influenced terrorism activities within the governments therefore increasing the intensity of the terrorism acts (Chong, 2007). After the terror attack that occurred in the U.S on the 9/11, 2001, it was realised that there have been low information sharing amongst the agencies that conducts the security surveillance of the country. Various institutions and agencies directly or indirectly are linked to the terrorist attack that takes p ...
WELCOME To Introduction to Homeland SecurityCJUS254-1504A-02.docxalanfhall8953
WELCOME
To Introduction to Homeland Security
CJUS254-1504A-02
Professor Stephen E. Smith
Discussion Board: Primary Posting Due Wednesday November 4, 2015 by 11:59 PM Central Time.
Review and reflect on the knowledge you have gained from this course. Based on your review and reflection, write at least three paragraphs on the following:
What were the most compelling topics learned in this course?
How did participating in discussions help your understanding of the subject matter? Is anything still unclear that could be clarified?
What approaches could have yielded additional valuable information?
The main post should include at least 1 reference to research sources, and all sources should be cited using APA format.
Introduction To Homeland Security
History
On September 22, 2001 Pennsylvania Governor Tom Ridge was appointed as the first Director of the Office of Homeland Security in the White House
In June 2002, President George W. Bush proposed to create the new Department of Homeland Security that realigned various government activities into a single department whose primary mission is to protect our homeland
On 25 November 2002 Congress passed The Homeland Security Act (Public Law 107-296) which established a cabinet-level department
Introduction To Homeland Security
National Homeland Security Strategy
Guides, organizes, and unifies our Nation’s homeland security efforts
Prevents and disrupts terrorist attacks
Protect the American People, our critical infrastructure, and key resources
Respond to and recover from incidents that do occur
Continue to strengthen the foundation to ensure our long-term success
Introduction To Homeland Security
Department of Homeland Security Mission
Build A Resilient Nation
Safeguard and Secure Cyberspace
Strengthen the Security Enterprise
Administer Immigration Laws
Preventing terrorism and enhance security
Secure and Manage Borders
Introduction To Homeland Security
25 Homeland Security Presidential Directives
1. Organizational & Operation of the Homeland
Security Council
2. Combating Terrorism Through Immigration Policies
3. Homeland Security Advisory System
4. National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass
Destruction
5. Management of Domestic Incidents
6. Integration and Use of Screening Information to
Protect Against Terrorism
7. Critical Infrastructure Identification, Prioritization
and Protection
8. National Preparedness
9. Defense of United States Agriculture and Food
10. Biodefense for the 21st Century
11. Comprehensive Terrorist-Related Screening
Procedures
12. Policy for a Common Identification Standard for
Federal Employees and Contractors
13. Maritime Security Policy
14. Domestic Nuclear Detection
15. U.S. Strategy and Policy in the War on Terror
16. National Strategy for Aviation Security
17. Nuclear Materials Information Program
18. Medical Countermeasures Against Weapons of Mass
Destruct.
HY1020When answering the written response questions please follo.docxadampcarr67227
HY1020
When answering the written response questions please follow these requirements:
· Your answer to each question should contain a minimum 200-word response.
· Spelling and grammar will impact your grade.
· Make certain to proofread each response carefully before clicking on the submit button. General encyclopedias are not acceptable sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, Wikipedia, Encarta, and World Book.
· Make certain that all of your sources (including your textbook) are referenced at the end of your response and that the information within your response is cited to show the difference between your ideas and your sources.
Reference
Levack, B., Muir, E., & Veldman, M. (2011). The west: Encounters & transformations, vol II (Rev: 3). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Longman
Unit V Assessment
Question 1
Choose and identify one propaganda poster from two different warring nations. Describe the message each poster is trying to convey. Which is more effective, and why?
Your response should be at least 200 words in length. You are required to use at least your textbook as source material for your response. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.
Question 2
Identify and discuss three of Wilson’s Fourteen Points. Were these points fair to all parties or willingly accepted?
Your response should be at least 200 words in length. You are required to use at least your textbook as source material for your response. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.
Question 3
Assume the perspective of a newly recruited teenager in the war. Choose and identify your side; describe your experience including pressures/motivations to enlist, expectations, and experience on or near the front lines.
Your response should be at least 500 words in length. You are required to use at least your textbook as source material for your response. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.
Surveillance, Secrecy, and the
Search for Meaningful
Accountability
Su d h a Se t t y *
One o f the most intractable problems in the debate around maintaining
the rule o f law while combating the threat o f terrorism is the question o f
secrecy and transparency. In peacetime, important tenets to the nile o f law
include transparency o f the law, limits on government power, and consistency
o f the law as applied to individuals in the polity. Yet the post-9/11 decision
making by the Bush and Obama administrations has been characterized by
excessive secrecy that stymies most efforts to hold the government
accountable fo r its abuses. Executive branch policy with regard to detention,
interrogation, targeted killing, and surveillance are kept secret, and that
secrecy has been largely validated by a complia.
ANSWER EACH QUESTION 100 WORDS MIN EACH1. The terrorist .docxSHIVA101531
**ANSWER EACH QUESTION 100 WORDS MIN EACH**
1. The terrorist organizations are more likely to obtain and use a biological weapons (BW) than a nuclear weapon. Col Alfred F. Abramson III stated that both civilian and military sources foresee that over the next decade the threat from proliferation of BW will increase significantly (2012). In my opinion, BW are more dangerous than nuclear weapons because they can persist and spread through a population. BW are easy to hide and difficult to detect such as plague and anthrax. Biological weapons include any microorganism that can cause illness or death. These agents include viruses, bacteria, fungi, and toxins cultured from living organisms. They are invisible, odorless, tasteless, and can be spread silently likely go unnoticed (Abramson, 2012). Person may not experience symptoms immediately after being exposed to the agents and each agent has a different exposure period before infection. When use by terrorists it can be disseminate through a variety of means such as aerosol sprays or put into food or water. The devastating consequences of our current covid-19 pandemic for individuals, families, countries as whole offers vivid proof that microorganism could be just as destructive and terrifying; more so than the nuclear weapons. The threat of nuclear weapons by non-state actors remains low, it demands a considerable amount of time, skill sets, funding and specialized equipment or tools to handle these complex weapons (Abramson, 2012). BW possession by hostile states and terrorist groups represent one of the greatest security challenges facing the U.S. Homeland Security Enterprise (HSE). My prediction is that the modern BW can be so deadly that our immune system may response to them. From our current pandemic, developing a much more global governance of biosafety than exists at present is an urgent need for not just the U.S. government but for the international community.
2. The last major bioterrorism attack against the United States occurred in the chaotic weeks following 9/11; envelopes containing spores of Anthrax were sent around the country, killing five and sending more than a dozen into serious illness (Funk, 2018). While this was the last major attack of this kind, it certainly will not be the last, nor was it the first; the history of weaponizing biological agents stretches back to medieval times. There are four key factors in determining the effectiveness of a response to a biological attack. The first, speed of detection, deals with the government's ability to recognize an attack as such, and that it is not simply a natural outbreak of disease. The second, accuracy of identification, simply measures the accuracy with which investigators can identify what pathogen is in play. The third factor is the effectiveness of containing the contamination, while the fourth is neutralizing the effects of the pathogen (Abramson, 2012). In evaluating the possibility of terrorists using a biologic.
The document provides the schedule and speaker information for a regional preparedness training seminar and vendor show being held on September 9, 2016 in Pleasanton, CA. The training will include sessions on topics like the Wisconsin Sikh Temple massacre, the San Bernardino mass shooting, and the roles of the FBI and first responders in a WMD incident. Featured speakers include law enforcement officials from Oak Creek, WI and San Bernardino County who will provide first-hand accounts of responding to the Sikh temple and San Bernardino shootings. The seminar aims to enhance preparedness and coordination across multiple jurisdictions. It is free of cost to attend and supported by federal grant funds.
Phil Pulaski has 38 years of law enforcement experience and was the New York City Police Department’s (NYPD) Chief of Detectives where he was responsible for 3,600 personnel. During his more than 33 years serving with the NYPD, Phil Pulaski managed patrol, investigative, counterterrorism and other public safety operations. In the immediate aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, Phil Pulaski managed the NYPD’s counterterrorism and weapons of mass destruction operations. He also supervised jointly with his FBI counterpart numerous terrorism related investigations including the 9-11 World Trade Center attack and October 2001 anthrax attacks. Phil Pulaski also was responsible for NYPD’s intelligence collection and analysis operations, and the daily counterterrorism deployments in NYC involving more than 300 uniformed personnel as well as aircraft and watercraft.
Este ensayo de reflexión institucional fue desarrollado con la finalidad de discutir diferentes aspectos de las instituciones políticas americanas, incluyendo sus impactos e influencias, entre el desarrollo de las políticas públicas en los Estados Unidos. Por lo tanto, este artículo incorpora el punto de vista y argumentos de la rama ejecutiva de los Estados Unidos y la seguridad nacional, basado en pares revisión el análisis en el campo de la política pública y justicia penal. El ensayo cubrirá los aspectos de los asuntos de seguridad nacional de acción y cómo las políticas se pueden volver a dirigir hacia el incremento de la seguridad de nuestra nación. Logro final de este documento será demostrar la importancia de crear políticas y cómo cada institución política estadounidense tiene una función crucial entre el proceso de elaboración de políticas públicas.
The document provides an overview of the FBI, including:
- The FBI is an intelligence-driven national security and law enforcement agency with over 35,000 employees investigating threats like terrorism, espionage, cybercrime, and other criminal threats.
- It has both intelligence and law enforcement responsibilities and works to protect communities through investigations while also collecting and sharing intelligence.
- The FBI has grown significantly over its history dating back to 1908 and continues to adapt its capabilities to address evolving threats.
This document outlines the career history of a police sergeant spanning from 1988 to present. It details the sergeant's various assignments including overseeing juvenile offenders, gang analysis, intelligence gathering to solve crimes, supervising patrol officers and investigations involving crimes against children. Throughout their career, the sergeant has specialized in suppressing gang activity, protecting dignitaries, conducting organized crime investigations, and training new recruits.
Serial murder investigations require both reactive and proactive approaches due to their complex nature. Traditionally, police operate reactively by patrolling and responding to calls. However, serial killers cross jurisdictions and leave little evidence, making reactive measures insufficient. Proactive measures include databases that facilitate information sharing between agencies, like VICAP. A 2005 FBI symposium discussed best practices for serial murder investigations, emphasizing the importance of inter-agency communication and task force organization. Both reactive policing and proactive coordination between law enforcement are needed to successfully investigate serial murder cases.
This document compares the homeland security strategies of the United States and United Kingdom. It discusses how the US and UK intelligence structures differed prior to 9/11, with the UK having more experience with domestic terrorism due to conflicts in Northern Ireland. After 9/11, both countries restructured their intelligence agencies and counterterrorism strategies. The US created the Department of Homeland Security and refocused the FBI, while the UK modified its model to focus on prevention. Both nations also developed national preparedness strategies, though the US approach was more extensive due to its broader definition of homeland security.
The document summarizes a report on the terrorist threat to the US homeland over the next three years. It finds that:
1) The main threat comes from Islamic terrorist groups, especially al-Qaeda, driven by their continued intent to attack the US and ability to adapt.
2) Greatly increased counterterrorism efforts since 9/11 have made it harder for groups like al-Qaeda to launch attacks, but international cooperation on counterterrorism may decline over time.
3) Al-Qaeda remains the most serious terrorist threat, though homegrown violent extremists also pose a danger if inspired by al-Qaeda's ideology.
Student Name
COLL 300
Evaluating Sources: CMS (Chicago)
Bjelopera, Jerome P. "Combating Homegrown Terrorism: Enforcement Activities,"
Congressional Research Service, Report (November 15, 2011): 36-53. International
Security & Counter Terrorism Reference Center, EBSCOhost .
Credible Author: Jerome P. Bjelopera is recognized as a specialist in organized crime and terrorism by his peers. A Google search revealed numerous hits for him. The hits on the first page were for reputable sites ending with .edu and .org. Also, a search of his name on the Amazon website revealed he has authored a couple of books in addition to some other articles.
Reliable Publisher: The Congressional Research Service (CRS) is a reliable organization. The CRS falls under the Library of Congress, and they provide policy and legal analysis to Capitol Hill members. This service is provided to all parties and is unbiased in nature. The CRS has existed for almost 100 years.
Accuracy: The article appears to be accurate in its facts. I could not find any errors or conclusions that did not add up. The author had a section on the Newburgh Four case as well as the Liberty City Seven case. These cases are well known and the facts can be easily verified through other websites if a reader was not already familiar with the cases. Bjelopera’s article is reasonable and balanced, and he backs up his assertions with credible sources. He also presented the reader with some of the existing policies in this post 9/11 world. An example of this is a quote he used from Deputy Attorney General, Paul McNulty letting the reader know what the Justice Department’s policy is regarding preventive policing. . The information he has presented in this article is pretty consistent with other information I have read on the topic.
Currency: This article was published in 2011 and is therefore, very current. The author addresses topics that are very relevant in this post 9/11 world. Two examples are the section titled “The Role of State and Local Law Enforcement” and the section called “Detecting the Shift from Radical to Violent Jihadist.”
Objectivity: Jerome P. Bjelopera’s article appears to be unbiased. It is obvious he believes that we need to do everything in our power to prevent future terrorist attacks, and he writes from this perspective. However, he does bring up opposing views. An example of this is in the section called “The Capone Approach.” He acknowledges that this method has come under attack by the media.
Byman, Daniel. "Strategic Surprise and the September 11 Attacks." Annual Review Of Political Science 8, no. 1 (June 2005): 145-170. Academic Search Premier,
EBSCOhost
Credible Author: Dr. Daniel L. Byman is a professor at Georgetown University in the School of Foreign Service. He was a member of the 9/11 Commission and the Joint 9/11 Inquiry Staff of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees. He is highly respected in topics related to terrorism.
The Code of Trust audiobook is read by the author Robin Dreeke, a former FBI agent, with a forward by Joe Navarro. It explains Dreeke's system for inspiring trust, which he developed and used over 28 years in federal service, including with the FBI, to thwart spies and recruit American spies. The system is based on 5 principles and teaches how to use trust to achieve success in business and life. It took Dreeke a lifetime to develop this method but listeners just need 8-10 hours to learn from the audiobook how to build trust.
Thomas C. Nicpon is an accomplished Assistant Special Agent in Charge with expertise in counterterrorism, cybercrime, and security. He has led the FBI New York Office Joint Terrorist Task Force and was responsible for counterterrorism efforts in New York. Nicpon also served as Chief Security Officer for the FBI's largest field office, overseeing security for facilities, personnel, and information systems. Currently, Nicpon works to address sensitive disciplinary matters as a Supervisory Special Agent at FBI Headquarters in Washington D.C.
Catherine G. Dachenbach has over 20 years of experience in intelligence analysis, investigations, and research. She is fluent in Arabic and Spanish with a DoD TS/SCI clearance. Her career highlights include writing a threat matrix for the President amid technical difficulties on 9/11 and leading an internal research project at Battelle. Currently she is an Intelligence Analyst at Battelle, providing counterterrorism research and assessments for government clients.
Joseph M. Bowen has over 20 years of experience as a Special Agent with the FBI. He has held several leadership roles within the FBI, including overseeing the new agent training program and managing operations for the New York Field Office. Prior to joining the FBI, he worked as a police officer in Pennsylvania.
The Homeland Security Week 2017 Event has brought together distinguished speakers from DHS, the U.S. Secret Service, TSA, FBI, FEMA and ICE - Take a look at some of them now
The document discusses the US Intelligence Community (IC), which is comprised of 17 separate agencies that work independently and collaboratively to conduct intelligence activities and protect national security. The main threats faced include terrorism, weapons proliferation, cyber attacks, and drug trafficking. Each agency has a specific role, such as the CIA providing national security intelligence or the NSA handling signals intelligence. Oversight is provided by the President, National Security Council, and congressional intelligence committees. The IC aims to address national security threats through collection, analysis, and sharing of information.
The document discusses the response of law enforcement to the 9/11 terrorist attacks over the past 10 years. It outlines key initiatives like the National Criminal Intelligence Sharing Plan and Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative that were established to improve information sharing between federal, state and local law enforcement agencies. The Criminal Intelligence Coordinating Council was also formed to advocate for state and local law enforcement needs and provide guidance on bolstering intelligence analysis and sharing capabilities.
Running head ASSIGNMENT 4ASSIGNMENT 4Assignment 4 Da.docxjoellemurphey
Running head: ASSIGNMENT 4
ASSIGNMENT 4
Assignment 4: Data Collection
Student Name
Affiliate Institution
Evidence-based researched data to indicate there is a problem
Terrorism is considered a historical and major problem for the U.S. Since 2001, the significance of the problem has increased. Therefore, several organizations and facilities collect and store terrorism data for events like attempted and occurred activities. The main data source for terrorism activities is the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The mandate of this arm of government is to protect Americans both in locally and internationally against crime activities but terrorism seems the greatest enemy of American citizen wherever they are in the world.
Numerous and most useful data for terrorism is found from the following federal agency and private databases:
· The National Security Agency (NSA)
· Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
· National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism (NCSTRT) and
· Global Terrorism Database (GTD). (FBI, 2014; GTD, 2014)
Information from the above databases are analyzed to present diverse quantitative and qualitative terrorism data that cover several years including life threats to the U.S. soil. According to these databases, terrorism is an old problem and continues to intensify due to availability of uninterrupted new technology as well as growing financial power of their organizations. The Federal Agencies data bases provide information on terrorism activities and information on several strategies that have been used in the past and are currently used to curb the vice (FBI, 2014).
The other terrorist’s data sources are the media agencies. News agencies such as online newspapers and broadcasting corporations provide terrorism data as it occurs. Although these agencies might not provide analyzed data, their role is to increase public awareness about terrorism occurrences and development.
References
Federal Bureau of Investigation (2014). Crime Statistics. Retrieved on May 22, 2015 from http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/crimestats
Global Terrorism Database (2014). Overview of the GTD. Retrieved on May 22, 2015 from http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/about/
2
Running Head: Terrorism Stakeholders
Terrorism
Terrorism Stakeholders
Student name
Affiliate Institution
Terrorism
Modern day terrorism has caused sufficient harm to the society both in the political, social and the economic sectors. External and internal forces have influenced terrorism activities within the governments therefore increasing the intensity of the terrorism acts (Chong, 2007). After the terror attack that occurred in the U.S on the 9/11, 2001, it was realised that there have been low information sharing amongst the agencies that conducts the security surveillance of the country. Various institutions and agencies directly or indirectly are linked to the terrorist attack that takes p ...
WELCOME To Introduction to Homeland SecurityCJUS254-1504A-02.docxalanfhall8953
WELCOME
To Introduction to Homeland Security
CJUS254-1504A-02
Professor Stephen E. Smith
Discussion Board: Primary Posting Due Wednesday November 4, 2015 by 11:59 PM Central Time.
Review and reflect on the knowledge you have gained from this course. Based on your review and reflection, write at least three paragraphs on the following:
What were the most compelling topics learned in this course?
How did participating in discussions help your understanding of the subject matter? Is anything still unclear that could be clarified?
What approaches could have yielded additional valuable information?
The main post should include at least 1 reference to research sources, and all sources should be cited using APA format.
Introduction To Homeland Security
History
On September 22, 2001 Pennsylvania Governor Tom Ridge was appointed as the first Director of the Office of Homeland Security in the White House
In June 2002, President George W. Bush proposed to create the new Department of Homeland Security that realigned various government activities into a single department whose primary mission is to protect our homeland
On 25 November 2002 Congress passed The Homeland Security Act (Public Law 107-296) which established a cabinet-level department
Introduction To Homeland Security
National Homeland Security Strategy
Guides, organizes, and unifies our Nation’s homeland security efforts
Prevents and disrupts terrorist attacks
Protect the American People, our critical infrastructure, and key resources
Respond to and recover from incidents that do occur
Continue to strengthen the foundation to ensure our long-term success
Introduction To Homeland Security
Department of Homeland Security Mission
Build A Resilient Nation
Safeguard and Secure Cyberspace
Strengthen the Security Enterprise
Administer Immigration Laws
Preventing terrorism and enhance security
Secure and Manage Borders
Introduction To Homeland Security
25 Homeland Security Presidential Directives
1. Organizational & Operation of the Homeland
Security Council
2. Combating Terrorism Through Immigration Policies
3. Homeland Security Advisory System
4. National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass
Destruction
5. Management of Domestic Incidents
6. Integration and Use of Screening Information to
Protect Against Terrorism
7. Critical Infrastructure Identification, Prioritization
and Protection
8. National Preparedness
9. Defense of United States Agriculture and Food
10. Biodefense for the 21st Century
11. Comprehensive Terrorist-Related Screening
Procedures
12. Policy for a Common Identification Standard for
Federal Employees and Contractors
13. Maritime Security Policy
14. Domestic Nuclear Detection
15. U.S. Strategy and Policy in the War on Terror
16. National Strategy for Aviation Security
17. Nuclear Materials Information Program
18. Medical Countermeasures Against Weapons of Mass
Destruct.
HY1020When answering the written response questions please follo.docxadampcarr67227
HY1020
When answering the written response questions please follow these requirements:
· Your answer to each question should contain a minimum 200-word response.
· Spelling and grammar will impact your grade.
· Make certain to proofread each response carefully before clicking on the submit button. General encyclopedias are not acceptable sources. Examples include, but are not limited to, Wikipedia, Encarta, and World Book.
· Make certain that all of your sources (including your textbook) are referenced at the end of your response and that the information within your response is cited to show the difference between your ideas and your sources.
Reference
Levack, B., Muir, E., & Veldman, M. (2011). The west: Encounters & transformations, vol II (Rev: 3). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Longman
Unit V Assessment
Question 1
Choose and identify one propaganda poster from two different warring nations. Describe the message each poster is trying to convey. Which is more effective, and why?
Your response should be at least 200 words in length. You are required to use at least your textbook as source material for your response. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.
Question 2
Identify and discuss three of Wilson’s Fourteen Points. Were these points fair to all parties or willingly accepted?
Your response should be at least 200 words in length. You are required to use at least your textbook as source material for your response. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.
Question 3
Assume the perspective of a newly recruited teenager in the war. Choose and identify your side; describe your experience including pressures/motivations to enlist, expectations, and experience on or near the front lines.
Your response should be at least 500 words in length. You are required to use at least your textbook as source material for your response. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.
Surveillance, Secrecy, and the
Search for Meaningful
Accountability
Su d h a Se t t y *
One o f the most intractable problems in the debate around maintaining
the rule o f law while combating the threat o f terrorism is the question o f
secrecy and transparency. In peacetime, important tenets to the nile o f law
include transparency o f the law, limits on government power, and consistency
o f the law as applied to individuals in the polity. Yet the post-9/11 decision
making by the Bush and Obama administrations has been characterized by
excessive secrecy that stymies most efforts to hold the government
accountable fo r its abuses. Executive branch policy with regard to detention,
interrogation, targeted killing, and surveillance are kept secret, and that
secrecy has been largely validated by a complia.
ANSWER EACH QUESTION 100 WORDS MIN EACH1. The terrorist .docxSHIVA101531
**ANSWER EACH QUESTION 100 WORDS MIN EACH**
1. The terrorist organizations are more likely to obtain and use a biological weapons (BW) than a nuclear weapon. Col Alfred F. Abramson III stated that both civilian and military sources foresee that over the next decade the threat from proliferation of BW will increase significantly (2012). In my opinion, BW are more dangerous than nuclear weapons because they can persist and spread through a population. BW are easy to hide and difficult to detect such as plague and anthrax. Biological weapons include any microorganism that can cause illness or death. These agents include viruses, bacteria, fungi, and toxins cultured from living organisms. They are invisible, odorless, tasteless, and can be spread silently likely go unnoticed (Abramson, 2012). Person may not experience symptoms immediately after being exposed to the agents and each agent has a different exposure period before infection. When use by terrorists it can be disseminate through a variety of means such as aerosol sprays or put into food or water. The devastating consequences of our current covid-19 pandemic for individuals, families, countries as whole offers vivid proof that microorganism could be just as destructive and terrifying; more so than the nuclear weapons. The threat of nuclear weapons by non-state actors remains low, it demands a considerable amount of time, skill sets, funding and specialized equipment or tools to handle these complex weapons (Abramson, 2012). BW possession by hostile states and terrorist groups represent one of the greatest security challenges facing the U.S. Homeland Security Enterprise (HSE). My prediction is that the modern BW can be so deadly that our immune system may response to them. From our current pandemic, developing a much more global governance of biosafety than exists at present is an urgent need for not just the U.S. government but for the international community.
2. The last major bioterrorism attack against the United States occurred in the chaotic weeks following 9/11; envelopes containing spores of Anthrax were sent around the country, killing five and sending more than a dozen into serious illness (Funk, 2018). While this was the last major attack of this kind, it certainly will not be the last, nor was it the first; the history of weaponizing biological agents stretches back to medieval times. There are four key factors in determining the effectiveness of a response to a biological attack. The first, speed of detection, deals with the government's ability to recognize an attack as such, and that it is not simply a natural outbreak of disease. The second, accuracy of identification, simply measures the accuracy with which investigators can identify what pathogen is in play. The third factor is the effectiveness of containing the contamination, while the fourth is neutralizing the effects of the pathogen (Abramson, 2012). In evaluating the possibility of terrorists using a biologic.
The document provides the schedule and speaker information for a regional preparedness training seminar and vendor show being held on September 9, 2016 in Pleasanton, CA. The training will include sessions on topics like the Wisconsin Sikh Temple massacre, the San Bernardino mass shooting, and the roles of the FBI and first responders in a WMD incident. Featured speakers include law enforcement officials from Oak Creek, WI and San Bernardino County who will provide first-hand accounts of responding to the Sikh temple and San Bernardino shootings. The seminar aims to enhance preparedness and coordination across multiple jurisdictions. It is free of cost to attend and supported by federal grant funds.
Phil Pulaski has 38 years of law enforcement experience and was the New York City Police Department’s (NYPD) Chief of Detectives where he was responsible for 3,600 personnel. During his more than 33 years serving with the NYPD, Phil Pulaski managed patrol, investigative, counterterrorism and other public safety operations. In the immediate aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, Phil Pulaski managed the NYPD’s counterterrorism and weapons of mass destruction operations. He also supervised jointly with his FBI counterpart numerous terrorism related investigations including the 9-11 World Trade Center attack and October 2001 anthrax attacks. Phil Pulaski also was responsible for NYPD’s intelligence collection and analysis operations, and the daily counterterrorism deployments in NYC involving more than 300 uniformed personnel as well as aircraft and watercraft.
Este ensayo de reflexión institucional fue desarrollado con la finalidad de discutir diferentes aspectos de las instituciones políticas americanas, incluyendo sus impactos e influencias, entre el desarrollo de las políticas públicas en los Estados Unidos. Por lo tanto, este artículo incorpora el punto de vista y argumentos de la rama ejecutiva de los Estados Unidos y la seguridad nacional, basado en pares revisión el análisis en el campo de la política pública y justicia penal. El ensayo cubrirá los aspectos de los asuntos de seguridad nacional de acción y cómo las políticas se pueden volver a dirigir hacia el incremento de la seguridad de nuestra nación. Logro final de este documento será demostrar la importancia de crear políticas y cómo cada institución política estadounidense tiene una función crucial entre el proceso de elaboración de políticas públicas.
The document provides an overview of the FBI, including:
- The FBI is an intelligence-driven national security and law enforcement agency with over 35,000 employees investigating threats like terrorism, espionage, cybercrime, and other criminal threats.
- It has both intelligence and law enforcement responsibilities and works to protect communities through investigations while also collecting and sharing intelligence.
- The FBI has grown significantly over its history dating back to 1908 and continues to adapt its capabilities to address evolving threats.
This document outlines the career history of a police sergeant spanning from 1988 to present. It details the sergeant's various assignments including overseeing juvenile offenders, gang analysis, intelligence gathering to solve crimes, supervising patrol officers and investigations involving crimes against children. Throughout their career, the sergeant has specialized in suppressing gang activity, protecting dignitaries, conducting organized crime investigations, and training new recruits.
Serial murder investigations require both reactive and proactive approaches due to their complex nature. Traditionally, police operate reactively by patrolling and responding to calls. However, serial killers cross jurisdictions and leave little evidence, making reactive measures insufficient. Proactive measures include databases that facilitate information sharing between agencies, like VICAP. A 2005 FBI symposium discussed best practices for serial murder investigations, emphasizing the importance of inter-agency communication and task force organization. Both reactive policing and proactive coordination between law enforcement are needed to successfully investigate serial murder cases.
This document compares the homeland security strategies of the United States and United Kingdom. It discusses how the US and UK intelligence structures differed prior to 9/11, with the UK having more experience with domestic terrorism due to conflicts in Northern Ireland. After 9/11, both countries restructured their intelligence agencies and counterterrorism strategies. The US created the Department of Homeland Security and refocused the FBI, while the UK modified its model to focus on prevention. Both nations also developed national preparedness strategies, though the US approach was more extensive due to its broader definition of homeland security.
The document summarizes a report on the terrorist threat to the US homeland over the next three years. It finds that:
1) The main threat comes from Islamic terrorist groups, especially al-Qaeda, driven by their continued intent to attack the US and ability to adapt.
2) Greatly increased counterterrorism efforts since 9/11 have made it harder for groups like al-Qaeda to launch attacks, but international cooperation on counterterrorism may decline over time.
3) Al-Qaeda remains the most serious terrorist threat, though homegrown violent extremists also pose a danger if inspired by al-Qaeda's ideology.
Student Name
COLL 300
Evaluating Sources: CMS (Chicago)
Bjelopera, Jerome P. "Combating Homegrown Terrorism: Enforcement Activities,"
Congressional Research Service, Report (November 15, 2011): 36-53. International
Security & Counter Terrorism Reference Center, EBSCOhost .
Credible Author: Jerome P. Bjelopera is recognized as a specialist in organized crime and terrorism by his peers. A Google search revealed numerous hits for him. The hits on the first page were for reputable sites ending with .edu and .org. Also, a search of his name on the Amazon website revealed he has authored a couple of books in addition to some other articles.
Reliable Publisher: The Congressional Research Service (CRS) is a reliable organization. The CRS falls under the Library of Congress, and they provide policy and legal analysis to Capitol Hill members. This service is provided to all parties and is unbiased in nature. The CRS has existed for almost 100 years.
Accuracy: The article appears to be accurate in its facts. I could not find any errors or conclusions that did not add up. The author had a section on the Newburgh Four case as well as the Liberty City Seven case. These cases are well known and the facts can be easily verified through other websites if a reader was not already familiar with the cases. Bjelopera’s article is reasonable and balanced, and he backs up his assertions with credible sources. He also presented the reader with some of the existing policies in this post 9/11 world. An example of this is a quote he used from Deputy Attorney General, Paul McNulty letting the reader know what the Justice Department’s policy is regarding preventive policing. . The information he has presented in this article is pretty consistent with other information I have read on the topic.
Currency: This article was published in 2011 and is therefore, very current. The author addresses topics that are very relevant in this post 9/11 world. Two examples are the section titled “The Role of State and Local Law Enforcement” and the section called “Detecting the Shift from Radical to Violent Jihadist.”
Objectivity: Jerome P. Bjelopera’s article appears to be unbiased. It is obvious he believes that we need to do everything in our power to prevent future terrorist attacks, and he writes from this perspective. However, he does bring up opposing views. An example of this is in the section called “The Capone Approach.” He acknowledges that this method has come under attack by the media.
Byman, Daniel. "Strategic Surprise and the September 11 Attacks." Annual Review Of Political Science 8, no. 1 (June 2005): 145-170. Academic Search Premier,
EBSCOhost
Credible Author: Dr. Daniel L. Byman is a professor at Georgetown University in the School of Foreign Service. He was a member of the 9/11 Commission and the Joint 9/11 Inquiry Staff of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees. He is highly respected in topics related to terrorism.
The Code of Trust audiobook is read by the author Robin Dreeke, a former FBI agent, with a forward by Joe Navarro. It explains Dreeke's system for inspiring trust, which he developed and used over 28 years in federal service, including with the FBI, to thwart spies and recruit American spies. The system is based on 5 principles and teaches how to use trust to achieve success in business and life. It took Dreeke a lifetime to develop this method but listeners just need 8-10 hours to learn from the audiobook how to build trust.
The Rules Do Apply: Navigating HR ComplianceAggregage
https://www.humanresourcestoday.com/frs/26903483/the-rules-do-apply--navigating-hr-compliance
HR Compliance is like a giant game of whack-a-mole. Once you think your company is compliant with all policies and procedures documented and in place, there’s a new or amended law, regulation, or final rule that pops up landing you back at ‘start.’ There are shifts, interpretations, and balancing acts to understanding compliance changes. Keeping up is not easy and it’s very time consuming.
This is a particular pain point for small HR departments, or HR departments of 1, that lack compliance teams and in-house labor attorneys. So, what do you do?
The goal of this webinar is to make you smarter in knowing what you should be focused on and the questions you should be asking. It will also provide you with resources for making compliance more manageable.
Objectives:
• Understand the regulatory landscape, including labor laws at the local, state, and federal levels
• Best practices for developing, implementing, and maintaining effective compliance programs
• Resources and strategies for staying informed about changes to labor laws, regulations, and compliance requirements
1. Special Agent Andrew Bringuel, II
FBI Albany Division, Ithaca Resident Agency
171 East State Street
Ithaca, New York 14850
Contact: 703 401-7260
Clearances: Current TS/SCI
Email: andrew_bringuel@yahoo.com
Objective A challenging career managing people, conducting investigations, behavioral
consulting/analysis, product development, researching cognition, and instructing on
counterterrorism, human factors, crisis management, intelligence matters, leadership, conflict
resolution, crisis management, and evidence-based police practices.
Management –
Andrew Bringuel, II was a successful manager with Eastern Airlines before joining the
FBI. He joined Eastern in June 1978 as a college summer hire in Atlanta, Georgia. He
was promoted to Operations Manager in 1985 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin with
responsibility for all flights and cargo operations. In 1988 he was promoted to Station
Manager responsible management of 57 employees, 8 daily flights, and a 3.5 million
dollar operating budget. SA Bringuel was responsible for managing the airline operation
during an airline strike and subsequent Chapter 13 bankruptcy in April 1989 and re-
opened the airport operations in Milwaukee on July 04, 1989.
Andrew Bringuel joined the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) as a Special Agent
(SA) in February 1990 and has held multiple management positions beginning as a relief
supervisor in 1994 where he successfully engaged in a number of administrative
programs to include program manager of the Awareness of National Securities and
Response (ANSR) program which later became the InfraGard program. SA Bringuel was
also the Birmingham Special Operations Module (SOM) program manager responsible
for managing and maintaining an 18 man surveillance team of FBI Agents. In 1995 SA
Bringuel also co-authored the implemented Crisis Response Plan (CRP) for the FBI
office in Birmingham, Alabama.
2. SA Andrew Bringuel was promoted to FBI Headquarters in Washington D.C. as a FBI
Supervisory Special Agent (SSA) Program Manager in 1999 at the National Domestic
Preparedness Office (NDPO) within the FBI’s Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)
Counterterrorism Division (CTD) where he successfully managed the Information
Sharing and Outreach Program. As program manager SSA Bringuel led a team of federal,
state, and local investigators and analysts creating and publishing The Beacon newsletter
that was distributed to police and firefighters around the United States. SSA Bringuel was
the editor/publisher of the On-Scene Commanders Guide for Responding to Chemical
and Biological Threats. There were 24,000 copies published and distributed throughout
the United States. Eventually the job aid was used by Canadian first responders and later
translated into Russian. An electronic version of the guide can still be found on the
Internet. SSA Bringuel’s team received recognition including salary Quality Step
Increases (QSI) and “time-off” awards for superior work.
In May 2001 SSA Bringuel was promoted to FBI Senior Instructor at the FBI’s
Investigative Computer Training Unit (ICTU), FBI Academy at Quantico, Virginia where
he created curriculum for training new FBI Agent candidates on how to seize computers
and digital evidence, analytic tradecraft, and how to forensically examine digital evidence
for FBI investigations. He was awarded a QSI for superior service.
In May 2005 SSA Bringuel transferred to the FBI’s Behavioral Science Unit (BSU) at
Quantico, Virginia as an instructor/researcher. He successfully established two research
programs including the Terrorism Research and Analysis Program (TRAP) and the
Behavioral Informatics Technology Studies (BITS) program. Both of these research
programs produced evidence-based training curriculum in areas including countering
violent extremism, relational policing, developing human intelligence, intelligence-based
analytics, leadership science, and conflict resolution and crisis management. SSA
Bringuel became a recognized subject matter expert on the criminal radicalization
process as well as the elements of relational policing. He was asked to speak at the
International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) in Chicago as well as in Saudi
Arabia on the topic of countering radicalization. SSA Bringuel’s management of the
TRAP program led to him being awarded the Thomas Jefferson award for research by the
University of Virginia for work related to a structured professional judgment (SPJ) tool
called the Group Analysis Protocol (GAP).
SSA Andrew Bringuel successfully managed over 150 research fellows in the TRAP and
BITS programs. The research fellows came from a board range of academic fields as
well as a number of practitioners from police, intelligence, and military agencies. SSA
Bringuel’s research group consulted with the Airline Pilots Association (ALPA) and the
Transportation Security Agency (TSA) in 2010 recommending pre-board background
checks for airport security and a trusted traveler program to reduce air passenger delays.
The BITS program researched topics as diverse as the impact of 3D printers on future
policing, the impact of computer mediated communications on violent behavior, the
potential impact of nanotechnology on the collection of forensic evidence, and air–based
robotic threats to national security. The research produced a threat assessment tool known
3. as the Violent Extremist Risk Assessment (VERA) which is being field tested by the FBI
as well as international partners.
Investigations/Consultations –
SSA Bringuel has over 10 years as a field investigator and has been the Case Agent (CA)
on investigations ranging from intellectual property theft, industrial espionage, to
corruption of government officials and terrorist attacks. SSA Bringuel has received
numerous performance-based awards for his investigative work including the Attorney
General’s award for leading a criminal investigation against a La Costa Nostra associated
organized crime group operating an illegal landfill in Moody, Alabama. In 1990 SSA
Bringuel identified a key piece of forensic evidence from an improvised explosive device
which contributed to the successful investigation leading to the arrest of Walter Leroy
Moody, responsible for the assassination of Federal Judge William Vance. SSA Bringuel
testified in both the Federal and state criminal trials against Moody who was convicted
and is on death row. SSA Bringuel’s investigative work was featured in two books on the
subject.
SA Bringuel has been the FBI CA managing teams of investigators and analysts on
successful white collar, public corruption, bank fraud, environmental crimes, computer
crimes, civil rights, counterterrorism, and foreign counterintelligence investigations. SSA
Bringuel acted as both CA and undercover agent in a year-long operation targeting
intellectual property crimes that recovered over 7 million dollars worth of counterfeit
goods. The undercover operation was the first time in FBI history that third-party
contracts were used to purchase illegal contraband. SSA Bringuel worked with 13
different private sector victim companies, using 13 contracts, allowing the investigators
to route trace the contraband to the production facilities which led to their closure.
SSA Bringuel has been a first responder to several crisis scenes including the Federal
Correctional Institute (FCI) at Talladega, Alabama when Cuban prisoners rioted and took
prisoners which ended with a successful tactical response. He was a first responder to an
abortion clinic bombing in Birmingham, Alabama and was a co-author of the negotiator’s
handbook during the fugitive search for Eric Robert Rudolph. SA Bringuel was a first
responder to the Pentagon after the attacks of 9/11/2001 and collected evidence of the
criminal attack for 6 weeks. SA Bringuel was also a crisis negotiator during the 2.5
month barricade with sovereign citizens in Jordan, Montana which ended with their
peaceful surrender.
SSA Bringuel returned to the field as SA Bringuel in January 2016 to field test two SPJ
tools he developed and to finish his career working investigations. Within 7 months SA
Bringuel successfully recruited a confidential human source (CHS) who assisted in a
successful disruption operation resulting in the arrest of a subject.
SA Bringuel has over 11 years experience as a behavioral analyst at the FBI’s Behavioral
Analysis Unit 5 (BAU-5), formerly the Behavioral Science Unit (BSU). SA Bringuel
frequently assisted the Behavioral Analysis Unit 1 (BAU-1, (Counterterrorism Unit))
4. with operational consultations for FBI field office operations regarding counterterrorism
investigative and interview strategies.
In addition to FBI consultations, SA Bringuel has provided consulting services to
multiple international and domestic police partners including delegations from Romania,
Spain, Thailand, and the Philippines on how to establish an evidence-based Behavioral
Science Unit and how to implement relational policing practices.
SA Bringuel has consulted on behavioral matters with the United States Army including
Red Cell Exercises on stability operations, fighting future wars, integrating new
technologies, and protecting U.S. ports. SA Bringuel has published monographs for the
military on topics from radicalization to relationship development and disruption.
Instruction/Speaking -
From 1995-1999 while a Field Agent in Birmingham, Alabama, SA Bringuel provided
counterintelligence and counterterrorism lectures as Program Manager of the Awareness
of National Securities and Response (ANSR) program. These lectures were for private
sector companies in Huntsville, Alabama and the military at Ft. McClellan, Alabama. SA
Bringuel provided training and awareness on topics ranging from human factors, force
protection, physical security, and protecting intellectual property rights.
From 2001-2005 SA Bringuel was a Senior Investigative Instructor at the FBI’s
Investigative Computer Training Unit (ICTU) where he taught New Agent recruits and
FBI Intelligence Analysts intelligence analytic tradecraft and intelligence-led policing
practices in a digital world.
From 2005- 2016 SA Bringuel was an adjunct instructor for the University of Virginia
(UVA) and taught three highly rated graduate level courses at the FBI’s National
Academy (NA), a partnership school between the FBI and UVA for police executives.
The classes included Understanding the Terrorist Mindset which looked at how terrorist
groups form and radicalize as well as how police can disengage an individual from the
criminal group for the purposes of neutralizing the criminal group, Exploring Criminal
Enterprises and the Government’s Response which looked at police behaviors and
criminal behaviors from an ecological and developmental perspective and Conflict and
Crisis Management for Leaders: Theory and Practice which looked at leadership
principles, conflict resolution, and crisis management from a relational perspective.
Students who successfully completed the course requirements received 3 hours of
graduate school credit.
In 2013 SA Bringuel was an adjunct professor at Catholic University teaching a
successful undergraduate course on the Psychology of Terrorism. SA Bringuel has been a
frequent guest instructor for classes at the Marine War College, American University,
University of Tennessee, Air Force Academy, George Washington University, and
Cambridge University on the topic of terrorism and radicalization.
5. SA Bringuel is often asked to be a keynote speaker/lecturer around the world. SA
Bringuel has taught for the DoS in Hungary and Moldova, for DOJ in England, El
Salvador, Trinidad, Romania, Canada, and Saudi Arabia as well as around the United
States including lectures titled Policing in Multicultural Environments as well as
Criminal Radicalization: Understanding & Countering Radicalization, Disengagement,
and De-radicalization. SA Bringuel has lectured in Cleveland, Ohio during a Civil
Rights conference on the Three Functions of Relational Policing: Peace Officer,
Intelligence Officer, and Law Enforcement Officer
SA Bringuel has been a frequent guest instructor for the Army’s MISO/PsyOps program
at Ft. Bragg, Marine’s Combat Hunter course, and Marine’s MIOC at Quantico, Virginia
teaching courses on interpreting atmospherics and behavior, relationship development
and disruption techniques as well as a training course on intelligence-led policing for the
Marine’s military police at Camp Pendleton.
Research–
SA Bringuel developed a structured professional judgment (SPJ) tool called the Group
Analysis Protocol (GAP) which measures cognitive propensities based on a set of
intelligence questions. The GAP is a tool intended to help in the development of a target
audience analysis (TAA) package that can help shape the use of Tactics, Techniques, and
Procedures (TTPs) by augmenting heuristics. The SPJ is used primarily in developing
confidential human sources and has been field tested throughout 2016.
SA Bringuel was a partner in the development of a structured professional judgment
(SPJ) tool used as a threat assessment instrument. The SPJ tool is intended to augment
the heuristics of an investigator/analyst in determining the level of threat during an
investigative assessment. This SPJ has been field tested throughout 2016.
Product Development/Publications -
SA Andrew Bringuel is a published author and editor of the Terrorism Research and
Analysis Project (TRAP): A Collection of Research Ideas, Thoughts, and Perspectives, V.
1(2011).
He wrote a chapter in the book titled Policing and Preventing Terrorism around the
Globe (2013)
He wrote a chapter in the book Blood Sacrifices Violent Non-state Actors and Dark
Magico-religious Activities. N.p.: Iuniverse, 2016.
SA Bringuel has co-authored a number of essays as a member of the FBI/BSU Futures
Working Group (FWG) published online at the website for the Society of Police Futurists
International (PFI).
SA Bringuel contributed as an author to a recent white paper on ISIL’s effect on
recruiting foreign fighters published by DoD’s SOCENT in 2015.
Experience -
Eastern Airlines, Inc. (6/1978 - 2-1990)
6. Ramp Service Agent, Shift Manager, Operations Manager, Station
Manager, Corporate Sales Manager
Federal Bureau of Investigation (2/1990 - Present)
Supervisory Special Agent
Manage, consult, research, and instruct on behavioral matters dealing with individual and
group criminal behaviors
Skills-
Management/supervision, program manager, consulting behavioral-based analysis, media
representative, crisis negotiator, researcher countering terrorism, human relationships,
emerging technologies, instructor - leadership, terrorism, policing practices, conflict
resolution, crisis management, curriculum design, criminal investigation and intelligence
based analysis, public speaker, undercover agent.
Achievements-
Incentive award (1991)
Found key evidence in murder of Federal Judge, William Vance and testified at Federal and
state trials against Walter Leroy Moody.
Quality Step Increase (1995)
Sustained work performance including working as an undercover Agent for a yearlong
intellectual property crimes operation targeting counterfeit goods.
Incentive award and Attorney Generals Award (1999) was the lead investigating Agent
(Case Agent) on the Acmar landfill case which involved associates of a known organized
crime group from New York, New York.
Quality Step Increase (2001)
Sustained work performance as program manager of the Information and Outreach Unit,
National Domestic Preparedness Office (NDPO). Conceived and implemented the
“Connecting Your Community” initiative to create interoperable communications through
Law Enforcement Online (LEO) among first responders, both Crisis Managers and
Consequence Managers during terrorist attacks. Published and edited the On-Scene
Commanders Guide for Responding to Chemical and Biological Incidents.
Incentive Award (2008)
Performance as Acting Unit Chief of the Behavioral Science Unit (BSU)
University of Virginia's Jefferson Award (2009)
Developed research on group formation, dynamics, and the rationalization process leading to
criminal radicalization
Education-
Bachelor of Science (BS) (1978 - 1983) St. Leo University
Master of Arts (M.A.) (2002 -2004) University of Virginia
7. Numerous FBI certifications to including but not limited to FBI Supervisor’s Training,
FBI Media Reprehensive Certification, Basic Crisis Management Training, Behavioral
Science Unit Research Methods Certified, DoD Executive Security Terrorism Course
(Garmisch, Germany), Certified Crisis Negotiator Instructor, Certified Undercover
Agent , Reid Interview and Interrogation Training, Counterterrorism Advance Training,
SWAT Training, Surveillance Training, Basic and Advanced Foreign Counter
Intelligence Training, Basic Computer Forensics Training, Economic Espionage
Training, Certified Operational HAZMAT Training, Physical Security Training, Human
Targeting Training/Instructor Certification, Confidential Human Source Development
Training.
References -
Available upon request.