This document is a dissertation submitted by Amanda Elder to the Wright Institute Graduate School of Psychology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Psychology. The dissertation sought to enrich the understanding of older transgender individuals' subjective experiences in psychotherapy throughout their lifespan. Elder conducted interviews with 9 transgender-identified participants ages 60-83 to discuss their significant psychotherapy experiences. A qualitative thematic analysis was used to identify themes in the data. The dissertation aimed to offer perspectives on psychotherapy experiences that are often overlooked due to transgender marginalization and to improve psychotherapeutic care for gender variant people.
2. ii
May 2013
OLDER TRANSGENDER EXPERIENCES IN PSYCHOTHERAPY
By
AMANDA BETH ELDER, M.A.
This study sought to enrich the understanding of transgender individuals’
subjective experiences in psychotherapy throughout their lifespan, both to offer
perspectives that are often overlooked due to transgender marginalization, and to improve
the quality of psychotherapeutic care for gender variant people. Although many gender
variant people have received psychotherapy, only three studies have researched
transgender experiences in psychotherapy. This gap in the literature is significant given
the amount of harassment, discrimination and violence that transgender people
continually deal with when receiving medical and psychotherapeutic services; that
psychotherapy has been required and continues to be strongly encouraged in the
Standards of Care for transgender people during the process of obtaining gender
realignment procedures; and because in order to be multiculturally competent,
psychologists must be aware of the needs and experiences of transgender communities.
Despite the growing population of older transgender people, and more transgender people
transitioning later in life, the few studies on the experiences of psychotherapy have not
included the experiences of older transgender people. Therefore, more research is also
needed on older transgender people regarding the psychotherapy they received
throughout their lifespan.
3. iii
The researcher conducted one-hour interviews with nine transgender-identified
participants whose ages ranged between 60-83 years of age. Older transgender-identified
people offer historical perspectives that may elaborate on progression of
psychotherapeutic services for transgender people in the last several decades. A
qualitative research method using thematic analysis was used to identify and analyze
themes embedded in the data.
The results were organized into ten themes within three categories: 1) Experiences
in therapy, including healing and painful moments in therapy, and positive ways that
therapy has changed; 2) Life experiences, including transitioning and trans issues, older
trans issues, family of origin, discrimination and abuse, resiliency and activism; and 3)
Recommendations to other people of transgender experiences and to mental health
providers.
Overall, participants indicated that they found that therapists are currently more
knowledgeable about transgender experiences, are better acquainted with gender fluid
language, are less biased and more flexible and resourceful in their approaches. Negative
experiences included therapists failing to recognize and affirm their gender as well as
overt and covert judgments about gender variance. As in earlier studies on psychotherapy,
participants went beyond questions asked, leaving their legacies by relating the
challenges and joyful moments of their lives.
4. iv
Dedication
I dedicate this dissertation to the brilliant participants. I am so thankful that you
bravely stepped forward to get your voices heard. I hope I have done justice to your in-
credible life stories and experiences in therapy. Thank you so much for your recommen-
dations and contributing to the trans-affirmative psychotherapy literature.
This research also belongs to all the fabulous trans, transgender, and gender queer
researchers, providers, and activists whom I cited throughout the text. I have had the
good fortune to get to know many of you through UCSF’s Transgender Center of Excel-
lence, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, the World Professional Association for
Transgender Health, as well as through the Asian & Pacific Islander Wellness Center. I
am honored to have presented the preliminary findings of this study at the National
Transgender Health Summit this month. I am so grateful for our collaborations and your
friendship.
In particular, I dedicate this research to Tatiana Kaneholani, my sistah and kumu.
Thank you for teaching me how to be graceful and fierce.
I also dedicate this to Janetta and Nick.
5. v
Acknowledgements
I am eternally grateful to Dr. Ellen Balis, my chair, and to my readers, Dr. Amy
Walthall and Dr. Jamison Green. Thank you for believing in me and this work. Thank
you for all your hard work and perseverance through four years of a labor of love, sweat,
and tears. I am honored to share this with you.
A HUGE congrats and thanks goes to my study-buddy in crime who just gradu-
ated himself, Dr. John Michael Brown. All the hugs I could give won’t pay back the love
you have given me with Huck and Will. I can always count on you to get me to laugh,
usually at ourselves and the ridiculousness of the stress we have been under with our hard
work.
I also attribute my survival and sense of humor from Dr. Susan Guerrero, who’s
many words of wisdom she invented, like The D MONSTER. I am ever grateful for our
study time together, commiseration, and most of all your friendship.
Thank you to Dr. Kaili Moyer, another study buddy and good friend who also did
a fabulous gay dissertation that I cited.
I want to thank more of my chosen family for all your love and support. Words
cannot express, so let’s just keep being family so that I can love you up, ok? I want to
thank Ayesha Star Cammaerts, Heather Frank, Shin Yi Tsai, Ronald Pineda, Kaylene
Holvenstot, Justine Saunders, Shirin Shoai, and Valeria Velazquez.
I want to thank a few more friends and colleagues here who contributed to this
work: Maci & the hilarious article she gifted me by Dr. Sehy (Sehy, 1990), Dr. Leon
6. vi
Wann, Cole Moyer, Dr. Greg Gayle, Dr. Annalise Ophelian, Willy Wilkinson, Kelsey
Evan Rounds, Carolyn Hunt, Jean Brennan, G. Richard Bellamy, Michelle Cilia, Joseph
Nolan, Beanie, Michele Senitzer, and Megan Montgomery. There are many more who I
want to include here, so I raise a toast to you in gratitude.
I want to thank you, Deborah Dallinger, my editor-in-chief, particularly when you
got me through the first pages at my apartment while I was laid up with a healing broken
ankle.
I want to thank my clients. I am so grateful for our work together. Thank you for
helping me become a better person and therapist.
I want to thank the staff at the Wright Institute for being so friendly and patient
with my constant surprise visits, and fielding all my ridiculous questions. In particular, I
want to acknowledge Virginia Morgan, Curtis Lew, Dolores Sullivan, Ais Harvey, Mark
Abramowsky, and Jason Strauss.
Finally, I have the most to thank to my family of origin. I love you all so much.
To my sisters Veronica and Shelly, my brother David, and to Grandma Jean, Nancy, Dan,
Jim, Ann, Gale, Steve, and Elizabeth. Especially I want to thank my parents—to you
Dad, and to both of you Moms for sending me so much love and strength.
7. vii
Table of Contents
Abstract ii
Dedication iv
Acknowledgements v
Table of Contents vii
Chapter 1: Introduction 1
Statement of Purpose 1
Background and Significance of Study 1
Historic and Global Gender Variance 1
Prevalence 2
Transgender Discrimination and Resilience 3
Transgender Psychotherapy 4
Need for Study 4
Definition of Terms 5
Research Questions 9
Chapter 2: Review of the Literature 10
History of Psycho-medical Research and Treatment of Gender Variance 10
Sexologists and Early Transgender Conceptualizations 10
Early Medical Advances 14
Mid-20th
Century Psychological Perspectives on Gender Variance 17
University-affiliated Gender Identity Clinics 22
Mid-20th
Century Transgender Advocates 27
8. viii
Street Queens and Grassroots Activism 29
Development of Standards of Care 32
Gender Diagnoses in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental
Disorders 36
Gender Diagnoses in the International Classification of Diseases 40
Gender Diagnostic Reform 42
Essentialist and Social Constructionist Trans Identity and Language 46
Trans-affirmative Models of Care 49
Transgender Experiences in Psychotherapy 52
Participants’ Demographics and Study Design 52
Reasons for Seeking Therapy 53
Positive Experiences in Psychotherapy 54
Negative Experiences in Psychotherapy 55
Recommendations for Providers 56
Recommendations for Further Research 58
Issues Facing Older and Aging Transgender People 58
Invisible Minority 59
Diversity within Age Cohort 60
Transitioning Later in Life 60
Discrimination, Violence and Legal Issues 61
Social Support 65
Health Care and Access 66
End of Life Issues 68
9. ix
Areas for Further Research 70
Summary of Current Literature 71
Chapter 3: Methodology 73
Qualitative Research and Thematic Analysis 73
Participant Criteria, Recruitment, and Selection 74
Instruments 75
Procedure and Data Collection 76
Data Analysis 77
Ethical Considerations 78
Bracketing of Potential Bias 79
Chapter 4: Results 81
Research Participants and Therapy Experience 81
Table 1: Self-Reported Demographic Data 81
Table 2: Therapy Experiences 84
Table 3: Transgender Therapists’ Professional Background 85
Themes of Participant Data 86
Table 4: Results of Data Analysis 89
Category I: Experiences in Therapy 90
Theme 1: Trans-Affirmative & Healing Experiences in Therapy 90
Theme 1A: Therapist Affirming Gender and Sexuality 91
Theme 1B: Professional and Respectful Therapists 95
Theme 1C: Range in Theoretical Approach 96
Theme 1D: Range of Issues Addressed in Therapy 97
10. x
Theme 1E: Peer Support Groups 99
Theme 2: Negative or Transphobic Experiences in Therapy 102
Theme 2A: Uninformed Providers 102
Theme 2B: Unhelpful Behaviors by Therapists 103
Theme 2C: Homophobic and Transphobic Experiences 106
Theme 2D: Biased & Derogatory Psychology Literature 107
Theme 3: Positive Changes in the Way Therapy is Conducted 109
Category II: Life Experiences 110
Theme 4: Transition and Trans Issues 111
Theme 4A: Gender Identity Formation 111
Theme 4B: Gender Language 113
Theme 4C: Sex and Sexuality 115
Theme 4D: Waiting to Transition 116
Theme 4E: Passing, Stealth and Living Two Lives 118
Theme 4F: Hormone and Surgery Treatments 121
Theme 4G: Coming Out and Social Relationships 121
Theme 4H: Gender Social Roles 124
Theme 4I: Authenticity 126
Theme 5: Older Trans Issues 126
Theme 5A: Differences in Age Cohorts 127
Theme 5B: Transitioning Later in Life 127
Theme 5C: Health Issues and Disability 128
Theme 5D: Benefits of Older Age 128
11. xi
Theme 6: Family of Origin 129
Theme 6A: Family Acceptance or Non-acceptance 129
Theme 6B: Mental Health Issues in Family 131
Theme 7: Discrimination, Harassment and Abuse 132
Theme 7A: Violence and Abuse 132
Theme 7B: Employment Discrimination 135
Theme 7C: Discrimination by Spiritual Community 135
Theme 8: Resiliency, Community Activism, and Education 136
Theme 8A: Educating and Advocating for Oneself 136
Theme 8B: Teaching Others 137
Theme 8C: Volunteering and Activism 138
Theme 8D: Connecting with Spiritual Community 139
Category III: Recommendations 139
Theme 9: Recommendations to Other Trans People 139
Theme 9A: Advocate for Yourself and Do the Research 140
Theme 9B: Find a Supportive and Informed Therapist 140
Theme 10: Recommendations to Providers 141
Theme 10A: Provide trans-affirmative therapy 142
Theme 10B: Utilize consultation or co-therapy 144
Theme 10C: Research Trans Issues & Language 144
Theme 10D: Attend Community Events 145
Theme 10E: Address Co-occurring Issues in Therapy 146
Theme 10F: Recommendations for Further Research 146
12. xii
Chapter 5: Discussion 147
Discussion of Themes 148
Experiences in Therapy 149
Positive Therapy Experiences 149
Negative Experiences in Therapy 153
Positive Changes in the Way Therapy is Conducted 156
Life experiences 157
Transition and Trans Issues 158
Older Trans Issues 160
Family of Origin 161
Discrimination, Harassment, and Abuse 161
Resiliency, Community Activism, Education, and Celebration 162
Recommendations 163
Clinical Implications 165
Limitations 167
Directions for Future Research 169
Conclusion 170
References 172
Appendices 189
Appendix A: Letter of Introduction 189
Appendix B: Informed Consent 191
Appendix C: General Demographic Information and Therapy Survey 195
Appendix D: Interview Guide 197
13. xiii
Appendix E: Consultation Resources 199
Appendix F: GID Diagnoses with Full Criteria 200
Appendix G: International Bill of Gender Rights 205
Appendix H: Research Committee 208
14. 1
Chapter 1: Introduction
Statement of Purpose
The purpose of this study is to enrich the understanding of transgender
individuals’ subjective experiences in psychotherapy throughout their lifespan, both to
offer perspectives that are often overlooked due to transgender marginalization, and to
improve the quality of psychotherapeutic care for gender variant people. The researcher
conducted one-hour interviews with a diverse sample of 9 transgender-identified people
who discussed at least one significant psychotherapeutic experience, regardless of their
gender identity at the time of treatment. Participants were between 60-83 years of age.
Older transgender participants offered the historical perspectives on how
psychotherapeutic services for trans people have progressed over the last several decades.
This study may help clinicians question simplistic notions of gender, as well as address
clinical competency in service provision, particularly as discrimination towards trans
people has become much more widely understood as a civil rights issue (Bendery, 2012;
Grant et al, 2011). A qualitative research method using thematic analysis was used to
identify and analyze themes embedded in the data (Braun & Clark, 2006).
Background and Significance of Study
Historic and global gender variance. Gender variance has been found
throughout history worldwide. What is sometimes referred to as third gender is revered
in many cultures as respected shamans, representatives of goddesses, gods and
intersexual deities, or accepted as a diverse population within society which may
encompass gender role play to living full-time as another gender. Cross-culturally gender
variance has many names, for example: Okule and Agule among the Lugbara people and
15. 2
Isangoma among the Zulu people in Africa; Hijra and Jogappas in India; Baylans or
Catalonans in the Philippines; Bissu and Basaja in South Sulawesi, Indonesia; Mudang
in Korea; Shih-niang and Wingagu Nati in China; Xanith in Oman; Mahu in Hawaii and
other Polynesia societies; Two-Spirit among many Native American tribes; Vestida in
Mexico; Guevedoche in the Dominican Republic; and Gallae in Turkey (Feinberg, 1996;
Roughgarden, 2004; Wiesner-Hanks, 2011).
Prevalence. Minority groups will remain invisible in policy reports on health
care disparity and aging until additional research efforts focus on their behalf (Witten &
Eyler, 2012, p. 15). Because gender variance is still not recognized in the United States,
as an invisible minority, transgender-identified people are not reported in the census data,
and their prevalence is difficult to assess. Locating accurate data on the diversity of
transgender identity is also more difficult to find, largely due to discrimination and
stigma. Thus, it is difficult to determine the prevalence of older and aging transgender
people based on the literature. However, the broader lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender,
intersex and queer-identified population in the U.S. aged 65 and older may number three
million, perhaps expanding to as many as four million by 2030 (DeVries et al, 2006).
According to the World Professional Association for Transgender Health,
researchers who have studied prevalence of transgender people have focused
predominantly on transsexual individuals who have sought gender transition-related care
(Coleman, 2011). Combining most of the research findings in the last 39 years
internationally, prevalence ranges from 1 in 11,900 to 1 in 45,000 for male-to-female
transwomen (MtF) and 1 in 30,400 to 1 in 200,000 for female-to-male (FtM) transmen
(Coleman, 2011).
16. 3
Transgender discrimination and resilience. Transgender and gender non-
conforming people face severe harassment, discrimination and violence from numerous
aspects of society and are often denied housing, education, employment, health care,
legal assistance, and citizenship. In addition to being denied basic human rights due to
institutional transphobia, transgender people face discrimination and violence from their
partners, family members, friends and communities. As a result, transgender people must
often cope with isolation, extreme poverty, and severe health disparities; according to a
research study, nearly half of them attempt suicide at some point in their lives (Grant et
al, 2011). Despite these formidable challenges, transgender people are resilient, finding
their way toward resources and community support, and managing to live full, complete
lives. Grant et al (2011) found that 76% of the 6,450 respondents in their study involving
the largest amount of trans people ever participated in a study entitled Injustice at every
turn: A report of the national transgender discrimination survey by the National Center
for Transgender Equality and National Gay and Lesbian Task Force have been able to
receive hormone therapy, indicating a determination to endure the abuse or search for
sensitive medical providers.
In addition to the universal areas of concern associated with aging, such as health
care and income disparities, ageism, and end-of-life issues, older and aging transgender-
identified people face additional risks. Already marginalized in gay and lesbian
communities, transgender-identified people are further discriminated as older adults
(Persson, 2009; Witten & Eyler, 2012). Ageism is common in LGBT communities, and
in the psychological literature on LGBT aging, older transgender and gender non-
conforming experiences continue to be under reported (Witten & Eyler, 2012).
17. 4
Transgender psychotherapy. Given the challenges of discrimination and the
inevitable stress that institutional and personal discrimination cause, transgender people
have sought psychotherapy to support their coping strategies, strengths, and resilience as
well as to address issues that result from stress. The psychotherapeutic literature reveals
that transgender-identified peoples' psychotherapy includes self-exploration, relationship
and family dynamics, career challenges, and phase of life issues (Bess, 2006; Joy, 2008;
Lev, 2004; Witten, 2009, Rachlin, 2002).
Need for Study
Although many gender variant people have received psychotherapy, only three
studies have researched transgender experiences in psychotherapy: Bess, 2006; Joy, 2008;
Rachlin, 2002. The dearth in the literature is disturbing given the amount of harassment,
discrimination and violence that transgender people continually deal with when receiving
medical and psychotherapeutic services, and that psychotherapy has been required and
continues to be strongly encouraged during the process of obtaining gender realignment
procedures by the Standards of Care for trans people (Coleman et al, 2011). Of the three
studies, each examined various aspects of psychotherapy, including the individual reasons
for seeking therapy, positive and negative experiences in therapy, and recommendations
for mental health providers. In all three studies, researchers pointed out the need for
increased training in transgender and gender variance issues. These studies also indicated
the need for more psychological research on transgender care from the perspective of
transgender people. Many participants in the current studies were middle-aged, but only
one was 60 years of age. Although there are is a growing population of older transgender
people, and more transgender people transitioning later in life (Witten & Eyler, 2012), the
18. 5
few studies on the experiences of psychotherapy have not included the experiences of
older transgender people. Therefore, more research is also needed on older transgender
people regarding the psychotherapy they received throughout their lifespan.
Definition of Terms
The following is a list of terms and definitions used in this study. Many of the
definitions are cited by transgender researchers and activists who described themselves
and their trans communities. The power to name one’s identity is a critical issue for trans
people who face discrimination and violence. Therefore, the terminology will be further
discussed within socio-historical context in the following literature review.
Throughout the text, trans, transgender, and transgenderism are also used
interchangeably with gender variance, to represent the spectrum of gender. Transgender
and trans are used as inclusive terms to describe people whose gender identity (subjective
experience of themselves as male, female, or other gender designation) or gender
expression differs from socially constructed norms associated with the biological sex or
gender identity assigned to them at birth (Coleman et al, 2011). Transgender and trans
also refers to androgynous, bi-gendered and gender-queer people, who may view
traditional concepts of gender as restrictive (Coleman et al, 2011; Green et al, 2011). The
terms transgenderist and later transgender were coined by Virginia Prince in the 1970s
and 80s to define people who identify and live full-time in the gender opposite to the one
assigned at birth, and who may not elect for hormonal or surgical sex realignment
procedures (Keatley, 2011; Feinberg, 1996, Lev, 2007). In the 1990s, transgender
became used also as an inclusive, politically unifying term for gender variance (Lev,
2007).
19. 6
Transsexual or transsexualism describes a person who obtains sexual
reassignment or realignment surgery (SRS) and hormone treatments. The term was
popularized in the American media in 1952 by Christine Jorgensen and her doctor Harry
Benjamin who monitored her hormone treatments. Some older trans people who grew up
during that time and obtained SRS, identify strongly with transsexual identity and feel
than that the term transgender does not adequately represent their experience. Pre-op
and post-op refer to before and after sexual reassignment or realignment hormones and
surgeries.
Transvestite was a medical term initially coined in 1910 by Magnus Hirschfeld, a
German sexologist, in his text Transvestites: The Erotic Drive to Cross-Dress
(Hirschfeld, 1910). Similar to current usage of trans, Hirschfeld defined transvestite
beyond the “erotic urge for disguise” and included those whom he referred to as sexual
intermediaries including people who were gay and those with intersex bodies (Hirshfeld,
1910; Stryker, 2008). Since the mid-20th
century when psychiatrists defined transvestism
as a perversion (APA, 1952, 1968, 1975, 1980, 1987, 1994, 2000), transvestite remains a
stigmatizing term. Therefore, many people prefer to use the term crossdresser to describe
the practice of presenting as genders different from the one assigned to them at birth
(Peters, 2012). Crossdressers associated with performance may identify as drag queens
or kings, transgender or trans, or perhaps reclaim transvestite in an empowered, self-
actualized political identity.
Sex and gender are used interchangeably in the psychological literature and
colloquially, but they are not the same (APA, 1994; Stryker, 2008). Sex relates to
biological aspects as chromosomes, hormones, and reproductive capacity. Sperm-
20. 7
producing bodies tend to be designated as male, while egg-producing bodies tend to be
designated as female (Stryker, 2008). However, those who identify as intersex may have
characteristics of male and female biology or morphology or shape of the body.
Although there may some biological aspects to gender, gender is largely influenced by
culture and socialization, whereby one grows into their subjective sense of their gender
identity (Butler, 1990, 2004; Lev, 2004; Stryker, 2008).
Gender binary refers to gender identities being categorized as either male/man or
female/woman. Although there are people who identify as intersex who may be born
with characteristics of male and female biology, morphology or shape of the body, these
variances, along with the spectrum of varied cultural and psychological perceptions of
gender, are often ignored in favor of the gender binary perspective. The gender binary
view conflates biological sex and gender identity, suggesting that individual gender
identity, presentation, and performance must be congruent with physical sex
characteristics or anatomy (Tilsen et al, 2007).
Gender non-conforming or gender-queer describe people whose gender
expressions, roles, and identities varies from societal expectations and stereotypes of
gender presentation (Grant et al, 2011), or people who defy or do not accept stereotypical
gender roles and may choose to live outside expected gender norms (Green et al, 2012).
Gender non-conforming and gender-queer people may or may not avail themselves of
hormonal or surgical treatments (Green et al, 2011). Similarly, those who identify as
androgynous may include those whose appearance and identity do not conform to
conventional views of masculinity or femininity, and who may combine both aspects or
present in a way that is outside expected gender norms (Grant et al, 2011).
21. 8
Queer refers to a gender inclusive identity that may refer to gender and to
sexuality. This term is controversial due to its historical and current use as a derogatory
term for gay-identified people. In 1990 the use of queer was reclaimed by activists in
New York who called themselves Queer Nation, and would produce actions such as
sitting in bars and clubs where primarily heterosexual people were consumers.
Queen was a term coined by older grassroots activists who may also identify as
drag queen, trans, transsexual or transgender. Self-identified queens may include youth,
the homeless, sex workers, prostitutes, husslers, activists or advocates for trans rights
who may or may not live on the streets.
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex, Queer and Questioning
(LGBTIQQ), also known as alphabet soup, refers to the spectrum of gender and sexuality
(Stryker, 2008). Straight refers to heterosexual- identified people who are cisgendered or
who identify with the gender assigned to them at birth. The homosexual identification
may be used as a derogatory term due it first being used as a medical diagnosis describing
people who are sexually attracted to the same gender as pathological (APA 1952, 1968).
Homophobia describes the phenomenon by which people are afraid of LGBTIQ-
identified people. Transphobia describes the phenomenon by which people are afraid of
gender variance.
The above terminology and descriptions are not an exhaustive list. Gender
terminology continues to shift and evolve. Rarely do the definitions of these terms remain
fixed, and individuals' gender identities may not remain the same throughout their
lifespan. Trans-affirmative researchers and providers are continually learning new ways
to be more universally-minded in their approach towards inclusivity for all (Lev, 2004).
22. 9
Research Questions
By listening to trans peoples’ subjective experiences in psychotherapy, this study
hopes to capture a glimpse of the historical gender paradigm shift from a binary one to a
more inclusive one, as well as contribute to developing theories of trans-affirmative
therapy and improve service provision. Questions were asked to gain experiential
information about participant dealings with the topic. The study’s intent was to learn
about healing and negative therapy experiences, trends on how therapy is changing, and
recognize ways in which therapy can improve and be more trans-affirmative in practice.
23. 10
Chapter 2: Review of the Literature
History of Psycho-Medical Research and Treatment of Gender Variance
The literature on the psycho-medical concept and clinical approaches to
transgenderism is mainly published in Europe and the United States beginning in the
1800s (Meyerowitz, 2002; Stryker, 2008; and Lev, 2004, 2005 & 2007). Most research
and theories of gender variance emanated from a pathologizing, reparative perspective
(Lev, 2005), although some scientists advocated for human rights and promoted
acceptance through their research (Meyerowitz, 2002). The following sections trace the
history of the psycho-medical research and treatment of gender variance including: early
sexologists and their conceptualizations of transgenderism, the advent of hormonal and
sexual realignment or reassignment surgical (SRS) medical treatments in the 1930s, mid-
20th
century psychological perspectives on gender variance, and the rise of university
affiliated gender clinics, mid-20th
century transgender advocates and activism, the
development of standards of care for medical and psychological practitioners treating
gender variant individuals, the evolution of gender diagnoses and gender diagnostic
reform, trans-affirmative models of care, and transgender experiences in psychotherapy.
Sexologists and early transgender conceptualizations. In the 19th
and early
20th
centuries, Western society condemned gender variance. In parts of Europe and the
U.S., it was illegal for people to appear in public if they were wearing clothes deemed
inappropriate to their gender assigned at birth (Stryker, 2008, p. 33). However, an
increasing number of European and American scientists studying human sexuality began
to challenge the notion of separate and opposite sexes (Meyerowitz, 2002, p.22). During
the 19th
century, sexual and gender variance became the focal point of sexologists who
24. 11
were seeking to define sexual behavior within a larger cultural discourse of categorizing
madness and deviance (Foucault, 1965; Lev, 2007). While the work of some of the
clinicians and researchers described in the following sections supported societal fears
with condemnation or cures, others encouraged acceptance of difference. Along the way,
scientists developed medical terminology, labels, and criteria; however, the language they
used was often ambiguous (Lev, 2007).
Biological determinists attempted to describe gender variant people as somewhere
between a man or a woman. In 1868, naturalist Charles Darwin described “latent
hermaphroditism,” whereby males and females retained latent aspects of each other,
ready to express themselves in certain circumstances (Darwin, 1868; Meyerowitz, 2002,
p. 23).
In the 1860s, Karl Heinrich Ulrichs, a gay German lawyer fought for homosexual
rights based on his belief in the “sex of the soul” or psyche (Meyerowitz, 2002). Echoing
Ulrichs, U.S. physician William Lee Howard described a type of “sexual inversion” as
“psychical hermaphroditism” in his 1897 case study of “a female soul in a male body”
(Bullough, 1987).
In 1886, Richard von Krafft-Ebing, a prominent Austro-German psychiatrist who
wrote the definitive medical compendium, Psychopathia Sexualis, defined
“metamorphosis sexualis paranoica” as “the psychotic belief that one’s body is
transforming into the other sex” (Stryker, p.38; Krafft-Ebbing, 1886). Conflicting
accounts suggest that Krafft-Ebbing was influential in criminalizing homosexuality,
arguing that sex drive was meant for procreation, and any other sexual activities were
perverse and pathological, and therefore needed to be caught, isolated and cured
25. 12
(Meyerowitz, 2002); while other accounts suggested Krafft-Ebing “reframed sexual
deviations as a ‘disease’ and not a sin, a crime, or decadence” (Lev, 2004, p. 70).
The Cercle Hermaphroditos was a collective developed in 1895 that proclaimed
“to unite for defense against the world’s bitter persecution” against gender variance,
promoting self-identity and self-actualization (Stryker, 2008). A member of the
collective, Earl Lind, also known as Jennie June, a self-described “androgyne,”
“hermaphrodite,” and “fairy,” wrote two autobiographies, Autobiography of an
Androgyne (1918) and The Female Impersonators (1922).
In 1897, German physician Magnus Hirschfeld cofounded the Scientific
Humanitarian Committee, an international organization devoted to social reform on
behalf of sexual minorities (Stryker, p. 39). Hirschfeld, a gay, Jewish cross-dresser
(Feinberg, 1996), promoted the social acceptance of human sexuality and gender
variance, and fought against the criminalization of sexual and gender variance (Stryker,
2008). In 1899 he coined the term “sexual intermediaries” in the first scientific journal
on sexual variants, the Yearbook for Sexual Intermediaries, published from 1899 -1923
which described how every human being represents a unique combination of sex
characteristics, secondary sex-linked traits, erotic preferences, psychological inclinations,
and culturally acquired habits and practices (Stryker, 2008, p. 39). Using this definition,
he combined all aspects of a person’s gender presentation and identity.
Between 1897 and 1928, British physician Henry Havelock Ellis wrote
extensively about sexuality and gender in his highly influential body of work, The
Psychology of Sex, Volumes I-VII. In 1913, he coined the term “sexo-aesthetic
inversion,” describing the desire to look like the other sex, and in the 1920s, Ellis used
26. 13
the term “eonism” to describe Chevalier D’eon, a member of the court of Louis XVI
who, at various stages of life, lived alternately as a man or a woman (Ellis, 1928/1933;
Stryker, 2008).
In 1905, German psychiatrist Sigmund Freud described inversion or
“psychosexual hermaphroditism” as naturally occurring human sexual and gender
variance located in the psyche, rather than a biological predisposition. He acknowledged
anatomical bisexuality, but believed this did not explain cross gender behavior or same-
sex object choice (Freud, 1905; Meyerowitz, 2002). Freud described the transgender
experience as a “gender inversion” related to homosexuality (Freud, 1905). Gender
inversion was used to characterize men who were attracted to other men as acting like
women, and women who desired women as acting like men (Stryker, 2008, p. 34).
As founding members of Freud’s Vienna Psychoanalytic Society in 1908-1911,
Hirschfeld and Freud influenced each other’s work on gender variance. In 1910,
Hirschfeld wrote the first book-length treatise on transgender experience, entitled The
Transvestites: The Erotic Drive to Cross-Dress. Other researchers used different terms,
but Hirschfeld’s term “transvestite” to describe people who had the urge to wear clothing
of the opposite sex survived contemporary usage (Stryker, 2008, p.38). The term
“seelischen transsexualismus”or spiritual transsexualism, was articulated by Hirschfeld in
his 1923 paper entitled Die Intersexuelle Konstitution as a form of “inversion”
(Meyerowitz, 2002, p. 19).
In 1949, David O. Cauldwell, an American physician, surgeon, and
neuropsychiatrist used Transsexualism to describe those who identified with the opposite
sex (Bullough, 1987; Ekins & King, 2001). In his article Psychopathia Transexualis
27. 14
(1949), Cauldwell wrote that the term “transsexual” referred to "individuals who wish to
be members of the sex to which they do not properly belong" (Cauldwell, 1949, p. 275).
Cauldwell used the spellings "trans-sexual" and "transsexual" interchangeably, and
sometimes he used different terms, such as sex transmutationist, gynecomastia,
hermaphrodite, intersexual, and transvestite (Ekins & King, 2001).
Prominent American biologist and sexologist Alfred C. Kinsey was avidly
interested in researching transvestites and transsexuals (Meyerowitz, 2002). Kinsey
(1948, 1953) found enormous human diversity in sexual expression and behavior, raising
questions of heterosexual “normalcy” (Lev, 2005).
Early medical advances. Advances in medical technology in the 1930s and 40s
were accompanied by many successful sex reassignment operations and hormone
treatments (Meyerowitz, 2002). Operations would include breast removal or
enhancement and genital removal, but genital reconstructions, particularly phalloplasty
were not available in the early 1900s. Most advances taking place involved hormone
treatment by endocrinologists.
In 1919, Hirschfeld and his collaborators opened the Institut für
Sexualwissenschaft (Institute for Sexology) in Berlin (Meyerowitz, 2002; Stryker, 2008;
Wolf, 1986). A research library and archive, the Institute also included medical,
psychological, and ethnological divisions, as well as a marriage and sex counseling office
(Wolf, 1986).
In 1931, Hirschfeld supervised the operation of Dora Richter, who was one of the
first documented male-to-female to receive genital transformation surgery. She remained
in the Institute as a domestic worker and demonstration patient (Meyerowitz, 2002;
28. 15
Stryker, 2008). Danish artist Einar Wegener, who later became Lili Elbe, was another of
the first individuals reported to undergo a sex change operation (Bullough, 1975;
Meyerowitz, 2002). Elbe may have been intersex, and may have had Klinefelter's
Syndrome, a condition in which human males have an extra X chromosome (Green,
2004).
On May 6, 1933, the Nazis raided and burned the Institute’s archive of more than
10,000 books, articles, and magazines (Meyerowitz, 2002; Stryker, 2008). Hirschfeld
died in 1935, but many of his colleagues continued related work in the United States.
In 1945, Michael Dillon was the first female-to-male to receive phalloplasty
surgery in Britain (Green, 2004; Kennedy, 2007). Little was published about men of
trans experience and their SRS. This may have been due to sexism in the medical and
mental health care fields, and transmen not being able to afford such surgeries as
compared to people with male bodies who lived as cisgender men since they had the most
social and financial opportunities.
One of Hirschfeld’s most notable colleagues was German physician Harry
Benjamin who was interested in endocrinology, also supported the right of transgender
people to live their lives as they chose (Stryker, 2008). Benjamin first lectured on
transsexualism in 1953 (Ekins & King, 1996, 2001), and his most notable publication,
The Transsexual Phenomenon (1966), describes his work with 307 gender variant people
in his offices in San Francisco and New York. Benjamin felt that medical interventions
should be the main focus in working with transsexuals, with psychotherapy available for
additional support through the transition process. He stated that gender specialists should
determine whether surgery was appropriate for “true transsexuals,” who he defined as
29. 16
people with early age onset of gender dysphoria, lack of comorbid mental health issues,
intensity of desire for body modification, as well as ability to “pass” with conservative
sexual and gender presentation (Benjamin, 1966; Lev, 2007).
Christine Jorgensen was one of Benjamin’s first 10 patients (Benjamin, 1996;
Meyerowitz, 2002). Benjamin did not perform her sexual reassignment surgery (SRS),
but monitored her hormone treatment, provided emotional support, and credited her with
teaching him about the challenges facing transsexuals (Meyerowitz, 2002). In 1952,
when Jorgensen became the most widely publicized individual to undergo a “sex
change,” making the New York Daily News headlines as the “Ex-GI Blonde Beauty,”
awareness of the existence of gender variance increased throughout the broader
population (Meyerowitz, 2002; Stryker, 2008).
After Jorgensen’s public debut in 1952, U.S. medical journals began to publish
articles on sexual reassignment, including discourse about biological, sociological, and
psychological perspectives on sex, gender and sexuality (Meyerowitz, 2002). As
psychological perspectives emerged, SRS and other medical interventions began to lose
legitimacy in favor of social rehabilitation treatment via long-term analysis and behavior
modification with the aim of curing patients’ of their gender variance by conforming to
their gender assigned at birth (Meyerowitz, 2002). Medical interventions were perceived
as extreme and inappropriate treatments for an inherently psychological problem
(Meyerowtiz, 2002). Psychiatrist Joost A. M. Meerloo likened SRS with assisted suicide
or a means of collaborating with sexual delusions (Meerloo, 1967; Meyerowitz, 2002).
Meerloo described his patients as “borderline psychotics with a deep-seated depression
and a psychotic denial of self” (Meerloo, 1967; Meyerowitz, 2002, p. 266). Karl
30. 17
Bowman, psychiatrist at the University of California San Francisco’s Langley Porter
Clinic theorized that, “[SRS] plays into the patient’s illusions and does not really solve
the problem” (Meyerowitz, 2002, p. 110). Bowman and research associate Bernice Engle
(1957) debated various theories, including castration anxiety and conflicts over sexual
impulses (Meyerowitz, 2002). John K. Meyer, a psychiatrist at Johns Hopkins Gender
Identity Clinic, and his co-author Donna J. Reter, concluded that SRS provided no
objective advances or social rehabilitation, and he preferred long-term psychoanalysis for
treatment (Meyer & Reter, 1979; Meyerowitz, 2002).
Despite opposition among clinicians regarding medical treatment, there were
more requests for hormones and SRS from gender variant people in the 1950s and 60s
(Denny, 1992). Psychiatrist Richard Green and Psychologist John Money, editors of the
seminal text Transsexualism and Sex Reassignment (1969), described how SRS
interventions should be performed, while emphasizing reparative psychoanalysis
throughout the process.
Mid-20th century psychological perspectives on gender variance. The
psychological theories of sexual and gender variance developed in the mid-20th
century
were later used to justify diagnostic categorization and “reparative” treatments. Rather
than perceiving the diversity of human sexuality and gender (Freud, 1905/1914/1937;
Kinsey, 1948, 1953), many of Freud’s contemporaries argued that the etiology of gender
identity “problems” stemmed from inappropriate rearing in childhood (Bak, 1968; Green
& Money, 1969; Greenson, 1964, 1966; Money, 1971; Stoller, 1964, 1968, 1971; Ovesey
& Person, 1973). These mid-20th
century psychologists and psychiatrists sought to
correct gender and sexual variance through the talking cure and behavioral modification
31. 18
(Meyerowitz, 2002). Eventually, many of these theories took root and justified
pathologizing gender variance by psychiatrists, a practice which continues in their criteria
(APA, 2000).
Mid-century physicians, psychiatrists and psychologists who described
themselves as gender specialists were generally white men who never identified with
gender variance, and diagnosed “sexual deviations,” including hermaphroditism,
pseudohermaphroditism, transvestism, homosexuality, fetishism, and exhibitionism under
the category “Sociopathic Personality Disturbance” in the American Psychiatric
Association’s first Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM) (APA,
1952; Meyerowitz, 2002). This diagnostic category did not adequately address the needs
of transsexuals, so psychological theories were devised to distinguish transvestism and
homosexuality from transsexuality. At the time, gays and many gender non-conforming
people who were diagnosed with homosexuality were being “cured” through
institutionalization, castration, sterilization and lobotomies (Davis, 2010). California’s
Atascadero State Hospital became known as “the Dachau for queers” (Davis, 2010). The
California Sex Deviates Research Act of 1950 was created to discover the causes and
cures of homosexuality, including administering hormones and castrating male sex
offenders in CA prisons to see whether this altered their sexual behavior (Stryker, 2008).
These reparative treatments towards gay and transvestite-identified people set the
precedent for further psychological theories and treatments for all sexual and gender
variant individuals.
Transsexualism was described by mid-20th
century psychologists as a mental
illness, suggesting that the desire to change sex was caused by repressed or denied
32. 19
homosexuality, perversion, masochism, neurosis, psychosis, character or personality
disorder, or by brain trauma (Denny, 2004). Physician Robert Bak (1968) argued that
most transsexuals “showed a preponderance of obsessional symptoms, impulsive
character structures, and borderline personalities.” Bak, and his colleague Robert J.
Stoller, connected the concept of perversion with psychotic process, suggesting that a
mentally stable person would not identify with a gender other than the one they were
assigned to at birth (Bak, 1968; Stoller, 1971). However they also noted that a
transsexual is as likely to be psychotic as anyone in the general population (Bak, 1968;
Stoller, 1971).
In differentiating transvestites from transsexuals, sexologists claimed that
transvestites were sexually aroused by cross-dressing using women’s clothing as sexual
fetishes, while transsexuals were perceived to be asexual (Green & Money, 1969; Stoller,
1971). Most gender specialists struggled to understand transsexualism with little data
from a few patients who identified as transsexual, and most, if not all of whom were
male-to-female (MTF) transsexual women or trans women. Transsexual women were
thought to be asexual, a perception stemming from the sexist stereotypes that good girls
and women were shy and sexually immature, if not virginal (Green & Money, 1969;
Stoller, 1971). Psychiatrist Mortimer Ostow described Jorgensen as having “a neurotic
aversion” to sexual contact; psychiatrist George H. Wiedeman suggested that she had
“features of fetishism, homosexuality, exhibitionism and masochism,” and perhaps an
“underlying schizophrenic process” (Meyerowitz, 2002, p. 106). In 1957, psychiatrist
Karl M. Bowman and research associate Bernice Engle at the University of California
33. 20
San Francisco’s Langley Porter Clinic defined a transsexual as “the person who hates his
own sex organs and craves sexual metamorphosis” (Meyerowitz, 2002, p. 110).
The etiology of transsexual developmental stages and psychodynamic
relationships with caregivers was explored in 1971 by Robert J. Stoller, psychiatrist and
professor at the University of California at Los Angeles. Stoller refers to gender identity
as “…one’s self-image as regards to belonging to a specific sex” (Stoller, 1964, p. 220).
He theorized that children know their core gender identity by the time they are 2 or 3
years of age, and the remaining gender role development comes from parental
reinforcement of their perception of the child’s gender identity (Stoller, 1971).
Stoller considered Benjamin’s theories that gender identity was biologically
driven (Benjamin, 1966), but he suggested that gender identity was predominantly shaped
by child rearing (Stoller, 1964/1968). For most transsexual males, Stoller noted that child
rearing typically included a “pathologically intense symbiosis” with a mother who was
masculine or bisexual, and a father who was weak or absent (Stoller, 1964/1968). In this
context, “bisexual” refers to embodying both the physical masculine and feminine gender
traits, as well as playing roles deemed to belong to men and women (Money, 1971;
Stoller, 1971).
Stoller (1971) emphasized that the inappropriate playing out of these gender roles
by the parents produced gender ambiguity in children. The case example provided by
Stoller (1968) showed the bisexual mother behaving like a man or the child’s father,
which Stoller proposes is what caused the child’s transvestism or transsexuality. Ralph
R. Greenson (1964, 1966) suggested the importance of identifying and addressing the
34. 21
issue of transsexualism during childhood if only to prevent homosexuality, which was
considered an even more serious problem.
Physician Robert Bak (1968) argued that the etiology and defensive positioning of
transsexuals stemmed from the childhood identification with the phallic mother who was
masculine or bisexual, and represented a perverted denial of the castration complex. He
added that the psychological core of a mother’s bisexual identification was the revival of
the her primal fantasy of having a penis (Bak, 1968). Bak goes on to explain that her
children would become perverted by their “… mother’s ‘uncertain’ sexual identity- ‘penis
or no penis’” and thus producing the child’s paraphilia (Bak, 1968, p. 21).
American psychoanalysts Lionel Ovesey and Ethel S. Person (1973) attempted to
distinguish between core gender identity, whereby a child begins to identify with their
gender at approximately three years of age; and their gender role identity, whereby the
individual identifies more with their masculinity or femininity into adulthood and
throughout life. They stated that dependency is the “nuclear conflict” or central issue in
the major gender disorders, again emphasizing unhealthy development and improper
rearing (Ovesey & Person, 1973).
These developmental theories were the basis of a research-practitioner model used
in U.S. and Canadian gender identity clinics. Because the research designs were based
upon the theories that incorporated assumptions about the genetic causes and pathological
nature of transsexualism, the results were often devastating for gender variant
participants, many of whom were turned away without access to hormones or surgery
(Denny, 1992).
35. 22
University-affiliated gender identity clinics. More than 40 gender identity
research clinics, predominantly university-based, opened in the 1960s in the U.S. and
Canada. The first three were located at Johns Hopkins University, the University of
Minnesota, and the University of California at Los Angeles, with clinics subsequently
opened at Vanderbilt University, the University of Virginia, Stanford University, and
Duke University, among others (for a critical examination of the clinics, see Denny,
1992). These clinics assessed patients, and depending on the outcome, offered hormones
and SRS. Within a few years of opening, all but one of the clinics closed, due in large
part to the mistreatment of participants by untrained clinicians producing flawed research
(Denny, 1992). Despite their many flaws, the clinics legitimized the surgical treatment of
transsexual people (Denny, 1992). The successful clinic at the University of Minnesota
continues to provide ethically sound research, education, and advocacy for transgender
and gender non-conforming people (Bockting et al, 2004).
The gender identity clinics’ research involved extensive case-by-case analysis by
a treatment team that reviewed participants’ results from the admission criteria and
procedures. The Case Western Reserve Gender Identity Clinic provided a typical
admissions criteria for most clinics, which included at least one full battery of
psychological testing, extensive clinical interviews of patients, their partners and family,
payment of evaluation fees (based on a sliding scale), and long-term individual and group
psychotherapy (Denny, 1992). If all the requirements were met, the treatment team
would decide whether the participant was eligible for hormones and surgery; if so, the
participant would be required to complete extensive follow-up tests, procedures and
psychotherapy (Denny, 1992).
36. 23
Most “experts” in the field were inexperienced and untrained in transsexualism,
yet they were instrumental in designing and implementing the research based on arbitrary
selection criteria (Denny, 1992). Most applicants were rejected for a variety of reasons,
including age, sexual orientation, marital status, occupational choice, and inability to pass
well enough in their new gender role (Denny, 1992). For example, Kessler and McKenna
(1978) reported that a colleague admitted that his selection process for SRS was based on
sexual feelings evoked in him by his transsexual patients who were subsequently
described to be “attractive” and “passing well” (Denny, 2004; Kessler & McKenna,
1978).
Applicants were expected to become well-adjusted, attractive, heterosexual
graduates (Denny, 2004). In alignment with gender conservatism at the time (Broverman
et al, 1972), clinicians sought to instill in their clients the notion of a rigid gender male-
female binary that adhered only to heterosexual practices (Stryker, 2008); only the most
extreme masculine and feminine presentations were acceptable (Bolin, 1988; Denny,
1992).
Candidates for SRS were savvy in reading the medical literature which described
clinicians’ criteria of expected responses, behavior, and presentation (Denny, 1992 &
2004; Ophelian, 2009). These criteria were initially outlined in Benjamin’s compendium
(1966) regarding the “true transsexual” who was deemed appropriate for SRS (Denny,
1992 & 2004). The criteria included the typical story of the origin of their transsexualism
from childhood, with feelings of having been “trapped in the wrong body,” and
experiencing a psychic pain that could only be treated by body modification (Denny,
1992 & 2004).
37. 24
The case of David Reimer illustrates the harm and suffering these clinics and their
presumed experts had on many participants. The case serves as a reminder of the
potentially damaging effects of clinicians’ cultural and moral biases on practice and
research (Bess, 2006; Colapinto, 2000, 2004; Denny, 1992), and how crucial it is for
providers to de-emphasize passing, and support clients’ needs over that of the researchers’
objectives. In 1966, Reimer’s penis was irreparably damaged in a botched circumcision
procedure conducted in a hospital when he was 8-months old. In 1967, his parents
sought the help of psycho-biologist John Money and his team at the Johns Hopkins
Clinic, and were told that nothing could be done to restore their son’s penis (Green,
2004). Reimer’s parents were told he could not possibly live a satisfying life as a man
without a penis, but that he could be made into a girl and still be able to have
heterosexual sex, though would not be able to bear children. The case study of Bruce and
Brian Reimer began in their first year of life and continued through puberty (Colapinto,
2000). Brian continued to be raised as a boy, while Bruce was surgically castrated and
raised as Brenda (Colapinto, 2000). Throughout her development, however, Brenda
rejected anything feminine and did not adjust to her social role and had terrible problems
in school. During her adolescence, Brenda became depressed and refused further surgical
procedures, hormones and psychotherapy. The family refused to continue treatment in
1979, after the children were reportedly encouraged by Money to masturbate in front of
the doctors to demonstrate their psychosexual development (Colapinto, 2000). Later that
same year, the clinic stopped providing SRS treatment services. In 1980, at 15 years of
age, after being told the truth about his birth, Brenda changed her name to David and
decided to live as male.
38. 25
Green (2004) examined and reflected on how Reimer’s case is often conflated
with intersex issues and experience. This may be because Money published research on
intersex conditions and the impact of parental and social influence on gender identity
development, and was considered an expert on intersex conditions and gender
reassignment. Money studied the Reimer twins in order to prove the theory that a
person’s gender identity, or sense of their own gender is primarily socialized and not
necessarily related to biological aspects. In 1997, Milton Diamond and Keith
Sigmundson published the John/Joan case based on the case of Bruce/Brenda to promote
socialization without SRS for intersex children. David was not intersexed, nor did he
identify as transgender, but there are parallels between his story and the issues people
with trans and intersex identities face, including the ethical right to informed consent,
medical status and history, the right to be free of surgeries imposed by others, and that
their anatomy not be discussed as abnormal or “inadequate” as compared to bodies that
have reproductive capabilities (Green, 2004). However, some providers regard intersex-
related surgeries as “corrective,” and transgender-related gender affirming surgeries as
“mutilation” (Green, 2004).
Once David Reimer was allowed to express his gender, similarities arose between
his treatment and that of men of trans experiences, including being treated with
testosterone, offered phalloplasty for penis construction, and living his life continually
aware that his body was different than those of other men. (Green, 2004). Similar to the
mistreatment trans people have had to face by psychological and medical providers,
David “had to deal with the collective family stress of the slowly unraveling social
experiment of which they were all victims” (Green, 2004, p.204). In 2000, David Reimer
39. 26
collaborated with John Colapinto in their widely publicized book about David’s life, As
Nature Made Him: The Boy Who was Raised as a Girl. In 2004, David committed
suicide following his divorce from his wife and his brother’s death two years earlier
(Colapinto, 2004).
The hardship that may have led to David’s eventual suicide was due to having to
endure unethical treatment by physicians and psychologists who sexually harassed him,
lied to him, and treated him as an experiment rather than respectfully regard his right to
self-determine his gender identity and body presentation. In a more recent study of over
6,000 transgender and gender non-conforming participants, 41% reported that they had
attempted suicide (Grant et al, 2011). Many researchers and advocates recognize that
transgender patients are among the most socially stigmatized of sexual minorities who
face discrimination in health care coverage and insensitivity from ill-informed health
providers (Bockting et al, 2004).
In an effort to remedy the sordid past of many of the gender clinics, and the
transphobia in treatment centers and hospitals, the University of Minnesota has
incorporated quality controls, including direct accounts of patient satisfaction with
services (Bockting et al, 2004). Psychologist Walter Bockting and his research team in
the Program in Human Sexuality, Department of Family Practice and Community Health,
University of Minnesota reported on patient satisfaction surveys conducted from 1993-
2003 of 180 transgender and 837 other sexual health patients (Bockting et al, 2004).
Bockting recognized the difficulty in achieving patient satisfaction when mental
health professionals are the primary gatekeepers regarding access to sex reassignment
procedures. They found that in the face of this barrier, satisfaction was achieved when
40. 27
providers were non-judgmental and open to honest responses. Transgender and gender
non-conforming participants appreciated providers who de-emphasized passing, and
supported clients’ needs over that of the researchers’ objectives. While completing the
survey and during service delivery in general, Bockting (2004) found that many of the
clinic’s transgender patients strongly advocated for self-determination and challenged the
traditionally passive patient role.
Bockting (2004) reported that a shift in patient care occurred in the 1980s with
attention to the treatment of co-existing psychological problems often compounded by
living with a stigmatized identity. “In the 1990s,” Bockting noted, “…the paradigm
shifted between helping individuals to adjust within the two binary options of male
versus female toward fostering coming out as a transgender person as patients more
openly affirmed their unique gender identities in the context of a gender-diverse,
increasingly visible transgender community.”
Mid-20th century transgender advocates. In the mid- 20th
century, a few
prominent transsexual and transgender advocates created social networks with doctors
and other professionals in order to advocate for issues of profound importance to
transgender people (Stryker, 2008). These networks provided doctor and patient
referrals, as well as participant recruitment and funding for research programs.
In the 1940s, Louise Lawrence, a transgender community organizer in San
Francisco, formed a worldwide network of transgender people, and frequently lectured on
transgender topics at the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) (Stryker,
2008). She corresponded with biologist and sexologist Alfred C. Kinsey regarding her
extensive knowledge of transsexual medical history, and Kinsey introduced her to
41. 28
Benjamin (Meyerowitz, 2002). Through Lawrence, Kinsey and psychiatrist Karl
Bowman met in 1949 to discuss Benjamin’s work (Stryker, 2008). Lawrence met with
Jorgensen, and hosted many transgender friends and acquaintances who sought her
counsel and referrals for treating doctors (Meyerowitz, 2002). In 1942, she met and
mentored Virginia Prince, another transgender advocate who was studying pharmacology
at UCSF.
In the 1940s and 50s, Virginia Prince, a transgender woman with a Ph.D. in
biochemistry based in Los Angeles, began to advocate on behalf of herself and other
transgender people who were not interested in pursuing SRS (Meyerowitz, 2002; Stryker,
2008). In the 1960s, Prince opened the Hose and Heels Club and was founder and editor
of Transvestia magazine (Lev, 2007). In the late 1960s, she began living full time as a
woman (Stryker, 2008). Prince was influential in Benjamin’s treatise, The Transsexual
Phenomenon, particularly regarding the affirmation of transvestitism as a legitimate
gender presentation and downplaying the overt sexualization of transvestites (Benjamin,
1966; Lev, 2007). Prince is most noted, however, for coining the term “transgenderist”
which distinguished transvestites from transsexuals; she later modified the word to
“transgender” (JoAnne Keatley, UCSF Transgender Health Conference, April 2011;
Feinberg, 1996, Lev, 2007).
Decades following her 1952 public debut, Christine Jorgensen continued to
promote herself and advocate for transsexual people through her autobiography, Christine
Jorgensen: A Personal Autobiography (1967), book signings, live stage shows, and the
film The Christine Jorgenson Story (1970) (Jorgensen, 1967; Meyerowitz, 2002; Stryker,
2008). Although she never considered herself a political activist, Jorgenson’s life and
42. 29
work educated the general public and provided hope for many struggling transsexuals
(Meyerowitz, 2002; Stryker, 2008).
Reed Erickson, a wealthy FTM transsexual, founded the Erickson Educational
Foundation in 1964, an organization promoting research and education on transsexuality
(Meyerowitz, 2002). Erickson funded three years of Benjamin’s research (Benjamin,
1966; Meyerowitz, 2002), which was critical because Benjamin struggled to secure
grants to fund SRS research, considered a taboo medical intervention (Meyerowitz,
2002). The Erickson Education Foundation also funded research at the Johns Hopkins
Gender Identity Clinic (Lev, 2007).
These transgender advocates and their networks laid the groundwork for many
transgender organizations including Conversion Our Goal, the National Gender-Sexual
Identification Council, Street Transvestite Action Revolutionaries or STAR House, the
Queen’s Liberation Front, Transsexual Activist Organization, and the Transexual
Counseling Service which used one “s” to distinguish from the medical term transsexual
(Lev, 2007; Stryker, 2008). Their connections with gender specialists provided support
for research and medical care, as well as efforts to de-pathologize gender variance (Lev,
2007; Meyerowitz, 2002; Stryker, 2008).
Street queens and grassroots activism. While middle class transgender
advocates wielded their influence to effect change in the medical establishment, uprisings
in the streets by transgender youth protested police brutality, and legally sanctioned
racism and transphobia in all areas of service provision, including access to health care
and other basic human rights (for historical accounts, see Feinberg, 1996; Meyerowitz,
2002; Stryker, 2008). Often targeted and brutalized by the police, street queens have
43. 30
been on the front lines and the first to rise up against the paradigm of the gender binary
and fight for basic human rights of housing, employment, medical treatment and the right
to live free of discrimination, harassment, violence and stigmatizing diagnoses. Access to
proper health care, job equality, and diagnostic reform would not exist had street queens
not demanded recognition and fair treatment. Their direct actions inspired collaborations
among transgender activists, their health care providers, and police. The first transgender
organizations united to provide social support and share resources, as well as to demand
civil rights for transsexuals, transvestites, and gender non-conforming people nationally
and internationally. The following section describes the uprisings and the transgender
activists who formed the first transgender organizations.
Spontaneous protests erupted following brutal treatment of transgender people by
police who routinely raided bars and diners to humiliate, harass, and incarcerate trans
patrons on suspicion of prostitution, vagrancy, or loitering (Stryker, 2008). The first
collective resistance occurred in May 1959 at Cooper’s Donuts in Los Angeles when
police entered the coffee shop to arbitrarily arrest drag queen patrons, and the other
customers decided to resist en masse (Stryker, 2008). Fighting extended into the streets,
and many people who were arrested escaped being loaded into the police paddy wagons
(Stryker, 2008). The first organized civil disobedience took place in Philadelphia on
April 25, 1965 at Dewey’s lunch counter where more than 150 patrons staged a sit-in, but
were turned away by the management and three teenagers refused to leave (Stryker,
2008). Activists picketed and arranged a sit-in on May 2 and police were called in, but
no arrests were made, and indiscriminate denials of service ceased (Stryker, 2008).
44. 31
Historian Susan Stryker directed and produced the documentary Screaming
Queens (2005), based on the protest in 1966 when patrons of Compton’s Cafeteria in San
Francisco rioted against police and destroyed a squad car (Stryker, 2005 & 2008).
Tamara Ching, a transgender activist involved in the riot, reported that after the protest,
police stopped harassing transgender people on the streets of the Tenderloin District
where Compton’s was located (Stryker, 2005). After transgender activist Louis
Ergestrasse introduced police sergeant Elliot Blackstone to Harry Benjamin’s
Transsexual Phenomenon, Blackstone took a leading role in changing police treatment of
transgender people (Stryker, 2008, p. 75). He asked Dr. Joel Fort at the Center for
Special Problems, a radical enclave of the San Francisco Department of Public Health, to
provide services for transsexuals (Meyerowitz, 2002). Dr. Joel Fort worked with
Benjamin and his patient transgender activist Wendy Kohler, who formed the first
transgender support group, “Conversion Our Goal,” and the National Gender-Sexual
Identification Council (Meyerowtiz, 2002; Stryker, 2008). Blackstone supported Kohler
and her group which met in Glide Memorial Church, an organization dedicated to
providing social services and health care for transient and diverse populations.
Kate Davis and David Heilbroner directed the documentary film Stonewall
Uprising (2010) which describes the three days of rioting against police at the Stonewall
Inn bar in New York City’s Greenwich Village in June 1969. This action resulted in
increased community organizing. A shift occurred in gay activism in which it veered
away from attempts to mainstream with straight, gender binary dominant culture. Drag
queens, hustlers, gender non-conformists, gay men, lesbians and counterculture youth
started to collaborate with the provision of food, clothing and shelter, as well as to
45. 32
advocate for civil rights for transgender people. In 1970, veterans of the Stonewall
Uprising, Sylvia Rivera and Marsha P. Johnson, established Street Transvestite Action
Revolutionaries or STAR House, providing care for African American and Latino
transgender youth. Lee Brewster and Bunny Eisenhower founded the Queen’s Liberation
Front which instituted the commemoration of the Stonewall Uprising each June, now
known as Pride celebrations for LGBTIQQ people. In 1970 Angela K. Douglas formed
the first international transgender organization, Transsexual Activist Organization, with
chapters in seven cities across the U.S. as well as in Canada, England, and Northern
Ireland. Douglas deplored the pathologization of gender variance and fought for
institutional reform. In 1973, the Transexual Counseling Service was formed and used
one “s” to distinguish from the medical term transsexual.
The uprisings at Cooper’s Donuts, Dewey’s, Compton’s Cafeteria, and the
Stonewall Inn paved the way for street queens and other transgender activists to organize
and effect a reduction in police harassment and brutality, eventual policy change, as well
as improved quality of health care. Although more medical doctors began advocating for
their clients, others were still inclined to hold firmly to the medicalization and
pathologization of transgender people.
Development of standards of care. In 1979 the Harry Benjamin International
Gender Dysphoria Association (HBIGDA), a group of therapists and physicians, designed
guidelines for hormonal and surgical sex assignment procedures and psychotherapeutic
interventions described in their Standards of Care (SOC). These guidelines were
developed in order to improve health services for transsexual and transgender people
(Fraser, 2009). Throughout the next three decades, six additional versions of the
46. 33
guidelines were published with the seventh most recent version released in 2011. The
name of the HBIGDA changed to the World Professional Association for Transgender
Health (WPATH) in 2006, and was ratified by the members in 2009.
The original HBIGDA SOC for Gender Identity Disorders were approved at the
6th International Gender Dysphoria Symposium in San Diego, California (1979).
Although the guidelines referred to hormonal and sex reassignment, psychotherapeutic
interventions were also included in SRS service provision. The first four versions of the
SOC (1979, 1980, 1981, and 1990) focused treatment on behavioral intervention, with the
possibility of referrals for hormones and surgery. Psychotherapy was required for
approval of hormones and surgery, and thus interventions focused primarily on evaluation
and referral. Psychotherapy was required throughout the process and following SRS.
Although the SOC were intended to respond to the needs of transsexual clients,
controversy about the Standards focused on the role of psychotherapists as gatekeepers
providing access to SRS via letters of recommendation with a diagnosis (Bockting et al,
2004; Denny, 2004; Fraser, 2009; Lev, 2005). After the American Psychiatric Association
developed an official diagnostic nomenclature for gender variance distinct from
transvestitism in the third edition of the DSM published in 1980 (APA, 1980; Meyer et al,
2001), subsequent versions of the SOC included diagnoses in recommendation letters
written by mental health providers for SRS.
Although the diagnosis and letter were (and still are) advised in the SOC, the
HBIGDA recognized that assigning a specified amount of psychotherapy negatively
impacted the therapeutic alliance. Thus, the HBIGDA removed psychotherapy as a
requirement, but highly recommended it in the 5th and 6th
versions (1998 and 2001,
47. 34
respectively) (Fraser, 2009; Levine et al, 1998; Meyer et al, 2001). Psychotherapy
guidelines included in the 5th
and 6th
SOC emphasize the importance of a strong
therapeutic alliance, recognition of patients’ autonomy, and support of multiple options
for gender adaptation (Fraser, 2009; Levine et al, 1998; Meyer et al, 2001).
The SOC began to acknowledge that a person can never completely eradicate
aspects of their original sex assignment (Fraser, 2009). Rather than emphasize passing as
male or female, transgender people were, in this way, understood with “…the whole of
the person’s complexity… the goals of therapy are to help the person live more
comfortably within a gender identity and to deal effectively with non-gender issues”
(Meyer et al., 2001, p.12).
The HBIGDA changed its name to the World Professional Association for
Transgender Health (WPATH) in 2006 at a board retreat (Fraser, 2009). According to the
2006 board minutes, the new name incorporated the new vision and mission statements:
“As an international multidisciplinary professional association, the mission of HBIGDA,
(now WPATH), is to promote evidence-based care, education, research, advocacy, public
policy and respect in transgender health” (Meyer et al, 2001).
With this name change, WPATH began to acknowledge shifting cultural gender
paradigms in international medical and psychotherapeutic practice (Fraser, 2009). Eli
Coleman, former HBIGDA president, addressed this issue with the HBIGDA in 2003:
“…there has been a significant paradigm shift in how we have treated transgendered
persons…” (Fraser, 2009). He presented his Ten Steps to Promote Transgender Health:
1) Promote sexual health including elimination of the barriers to sexual health, 2) Learn
from other cultures, 3) Let old paradigms die and new ones emerge, 4) Provide access to
48. 35
optimal care, 5) Provide training to allied health professionals, 6) Provide sound and
ethical research, 7) End discrimination and stigma, 8) Change laws and public policies, 9)
Change religious views, and 10) Promote social tolerance for diversity. WPATH included
transgender in the title for “a better representation of our membership and to confirm that
full membership is for professionally trained people who work with trans-patients or
clients” (Fraser, 2009).
WPATH’s new vision incorporated Coleman’s Ten Steps, and sought to ally with
the World Health Organization definition of health as stated in the preamble to their
constitution (1949): “…a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not
merely the absence of disease or infirmity (Fraser, 2009).” Intending to steer away from
pathologizing gender variance, WPATH presented the new vision of a multidisciplinary
approach to care that promoted “…education, advocacy, training, research, quality health
care and best practice standards for service providers and policy makers regarding gender
variant individuals” (WPATH, board minutes, 2006 as cited by Fraser, 2009).
The 7th version of the SOC in press ten years later in September 2011 was a
departure from subsequent versions, particularly with regard to respecting gender fluidity.
The new SOC states that gender variance is “…a common and cultural-diverse
phenomenon that should not be judged as inherently pathological or negative” (Coleman,
et al, 2011, p. 4), and that discrimination and stigmatization are directly associated with
pathologization. Mental health care providers are urged “… to assist transsexual,
transgender, and gender nonconforming people with safe and effective pathways to
achieving lasting personal comfort with their gendered selves, in order to maximize their
overall health, psychological well-being, and self-fulfillment” (Coleman et al, 2011, p. 1).
49. 36
The SOC emphasizes that providers should not impose a binary view of gender, and that
the practice of trying to change a person’s gender to become more congruent with the sex
assigned at birth is no longer ethical.
Despite the proclamations against pathologization, the SOC continue to promote
diagnostic nomenclature in the DSM-5. WPATH proposed the term “Gender Dysphoria”
to replace “Gender Identity Disorder” in the 5th
version (Coleman et al, 2011). Rather
than using the terms intersex or intersexuality, WPATH suggests using the term “Disorder
of Sex Development (DSD),” which is controversial to intersex individuals who strongly
object to the naming of their identity as a disorder (Coleman et al, 2011).
There are still some contributors to the SOC and the DSM who continue to resist
the de-pathologization of gender variance. However, WPATH and updated versions of
the SOC for transsexual, transgender and gender-nonconforming people continue to shift
in positive ways, particularly as more transgender people and their allies direct the course
of health care.
Gender diagnoses in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders. There are four versions of the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), with three revisions (APA, 1952,
1968, 1975, 1980, 1987, 1994, 2000). Between versions and revisions, gender diagnoses
were listed under different categories with varied numeric coding.
In the first edition of the DSM (1952), under the diagnostic category of
Sociopathic Personality Disturbance (000-x60) a diagnosis of Sexual Deviations (000-
x63) included:
50. 37
… Most of the cases formerly classed as ‘psychopathic personality with
pathologic sexuality.’ This diagnosis will specify the type of pathologic behavior,
such as homosexuality, transvestism, pedophilia, fetishism, and sexual sadism
(including rape, sexual assault, mutilation). (APA, 1952, p. 39)
In the second edition of the DSM (1968), the category Personality Disorders and
Certain Other Non-Psychotic Mental Disorders maintained the same subcategory of
Sexual Deviations, which includes 302.3 Transvestitism, with a change of spelling, 302.8
Other sexual deviation, and 302.9 Unspecified sexual deviation. This subcategory was
described as:
For individuals whose sexual interests [were] directed primarily towards objects
other than people of the opposite sex, toward sexual acts not usually associated
with coitus, or toward coitus performed under bizarre circumstances as in
necrophilia, pedophilia, sexual sadism, and fetishism. Even though many [found]
their practices distasteful, they remain unable to substitute normal sexual behavior
for them. (APA, 1952, p.44)
Transsexuals and intersex individuals were presumably subsumed in the Other or
Unspecifed sexual deviation diagnoses, however, no clarifications were made regarding
diagnoses for gender variance. Homosexuality was listed as a disorder, but removed in
the DSM nosology in 1973 by the APA, and replaced with Sexual Orientation
Disturbance.
In the third edition of the DSM (1980), the category Psychosexual Disorders
included three new diagnoses: 302.5x Transsexualism, 302.60 Gender Identity Disorder
of Childhood, and 302.85 Atypical Gender Identity Disorder. Transsexualism was
defined as “a persistent sense of discomfort and inappropriateness about one’s anatomic
sex and a persistent wish to be rid of one’s genitals and to live as a member of the other
sex” (APA, 1980, p. 261-2). Transsexualism also included sexual orientation subtypes:
0= unspecified, 1= asexual, 2= homosexual, and 3= heterosexual. Doctors would refer
51. 38
these designations based on patients’ sex assigned at birth, not on the gender with which
they identified.
In the revised third edition of the DSM (1987), three new diagnoses were added,
as well as a new diagnostic category. Two of the new diagnoses—302.85 Gender Identity
Disorder of Adolescence or Adulthood, Nontranssexual Type (GIDAANT), and 302.85
Gender Identity Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (GID NOS) – shared the same coding,
and were included in Disorders Usually First Evident in Infancy, Childhood, or
Adolescence. The third new diagnosis, 302.30 Transvestic Fetishism, was the only
remaining gender-related diagnosis in the Psychosexual Disorders category, and listed in
the Paraphilia subcategory. Diagnostic criteria for GID NOS included people with
intersex conditions. The essential feature of Transvestic Fetishism was described as
“recurrent, intense, sexual urges and sexually arousing fantasies, of at least six months’
duration, involving cross-dressing” (APA, 1987, p. 288). This disorder was used
primarily to describe heterosexual males who may have engaged in homosexual
activities.
In the fourth edition of the DSM (1994), a new category of Sexual and Gender
Identity Disorders included two subcategories: Gender Identity Disorders and Paraphilias.
GID NOS is listed under Gender Identity Disorders, in addition to the two revised
diagnoses of 302.xx GID in 302.85 Adults and Adolescents, and 302.6 GID in Children.
Transvestic Fetishism continued to be listed under the Paraphilia subcategory, and specify
if With Gender Dysphoria. DSM-IV also described the possibility for a concurrent
diagnosis of GID and Transvestic Fetishism.
52. 39
There were no changes in categorizations or diagnoses in the revised edition of
the DSM-IV (2000) [see Appendix F for full diagnostic criteria]. Autogynephilia was
included as an associated feature of Transvestic Fetishism, with subtypes based on sexual
orientation and arousal. Autogynephilia is described as a phenomenon in males “who
experience sexual arousal produced by the accompanying thought or image of themselves
as females” (APA, 2000, p.574).
DSM-V proposes that the GID diagnosis change to Gender Dysphoria, defined as
“a marked incongruence between one’s experienced/expressed gender and assigned
gender, of at least 6 months duration” (APA, www.DSM5.org). This includes the
subtypes with or without the “Disorder of Sex Development,” which may indicate the
person’s intersexuality. Also specified is “Post-transition,” indicating whether the person
“… has transitioned to full-time living in the desired gender (with or without legalization
of gender change) and has undergone (or is undergoing) at least one cross-sex medical
procedure or treatment regimen, namely, regular cross-sex hormone treatment or gender
reassignment surgery confirming the desired gender (e.g., penectomy, vaginoplasty in a
natal male, mastectomy, phalloplasty in a natal female)” (APA, 2012).
In the Paraphilia subcategory, Transvestic Fetishism may be revised in DSM-V to
Transvestic Disorder, defined as a “…recurrent and intense sexual arousal from cross-
dressing, as manifested by fantasies, urges, or behaviors.” Clinicians can subsequently,
specify “With Fetishism (Sexually Aroused by Fabrics, Materials, or Garments),” or
“With Autogynephilia (Sexually Aroused by Thought or Image of Self as Female),” or
“With Autoandrophilia (Sexually Aroused by Thought or Image of Self as Male). Final
specifiers include “In Remission (No Distress, Impairment, or Recurring Behavior and in
53. 40
an Uncontrolled Environment)” with time of duration, and “In a Controlled
Environment.” The diagnostic rationale in the DSM neglects to explain the final
specifiers.
The American Psychiatric Association’s DSM criteria including gender diagnoses
are used by most mental health providers in the United States. Often diagnoses are
necessary in order for patients to receive medical benefits including gender realignment
surgeries (Green & Wilson, 2012), but providers are urging other providers to use caution
when using diagnoses, and avoid pathologizing gender and sexual variance (Coleman et
al, 2011). Internationally, gender and sexual variance has been classified in the
International Classification of Diseases discussed in the next section.
Gender diagnoses in the International Classification of Diseases. WHO
assumed leadership of the ICD in 1948 (Jette et al, 2010). The DSM was influenced by
the World Health Organization’s diagnostic nomenclature in the International
Classification of Diseases (ICD) (APA, 1968). In conjunction with the DSM, the U.S.
National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) developed its own clinical modification
(CM) to the ICD (NCHS, 1999; WHO, 1992). The Sexual Deviation classification was
introduced to the ICD-6 (1948), and was later included in the DSM-I in 1952 (APA, 1952;
Reiersøl & Skeid , 2006).
In the fifth chapter of the ICD-10 “Mental and Behavioral Disorders” the
classification of Gender Identity Disorders, (coded as F64) is listed under the Disorders
of Adult Personality and Behavior, (F60-69). This subcategory includes Transsexualism
(F64) described as:
54. 41
A desire to live and be accepted as a member of the opposite sex, usually
accompanied by a sense of discomfort with, or inappropriateness of, one's
anatomic sex, and a wish to have surgery and hormonal treatment to make one's
body as congruent as possible with one's preferred sex. (WHO, 1992, p.215)
The diagnosis Dual-role Transvestism (F64.1) is described as:
The wearing of clothes of the opposite sex for part of the individual's existence in
order to enjoy the temporary experience of membership of the opposite sex, but
without any desire for a more permanent sex change or associated surgical
reassignment, and without sexual excitement accompanying the cross-dressing.
(WHO, 1992, p.215)
The diagnosis Gender Identity Disorder of Childhood (F64.2) is described as:
A disorder, usually first manifest during early childhood (and always well before
puberty), characterized by a persistent and intense distress about assigned sex,
together with a desire to be (or insistence that one is) of the other sex. There is a
persistent preoccupation with the dress and activities of the opposite sex and
repudiation of the individual's own sex. The diagnosis requires a profound
disturbance of the normal gender identity; mere tomboyishness in girls or girlish
behaviour in boys is not sufficient. Gender identity disorders in individuals who
have reached or are entering puberty should not be classified here but in F66.
(WHO, 1992, p. 215-216)
The diagnosis Sexual Maturation Disorder (F66) is described as:
The patient suffers from uncertainty about his or her gender identity or sexual
orientation, which causes anxiety or depression. Most commonly this occurs in
adolescents who are not certain whether they are homosexual, heterosexual or
bisexual in orientation, or in individuals who, after a period of apparently stable
sexual orientation (often within a longstanding relationship), find that their sexual
orientation is changing. (WHO, 1992, p. 221)
The Gender Identity Disorders subcatory includes (without description) Other gender
Identity Disorders (F64.8), and Gender Identity Disorder Unspecified (F64.9).
Listed under the subcategory Disorders of Sexual Preference (F65) is the
diagnosis Fetishistic Transvestism (F65.1) described as:
55. 42
The wearing of clothes of the opposite sex principally to obtain sexual
excitement. Fetishistic transvestism is distinguished from transsexual
transvestism by its clear association with sexual arousal and the strong desire to
remove the clothing once orgasm occurs and sexual arousal declines. A history of
fetishistic transvestism is commonly reported as an earlier phase by transsexuals
and probably represents a stage in the development of transsexualism in such
cases. (WHO, 1992, p.218)
The classification of diseases and disorders in the World Health Organization’s
ICD mirrors much of the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual for Mental Disorders. Although there have been suggestions to universalize a
diagnostic manual internationally, other countries have come up with their own
classifications which incorporate the nuances of their cultural experiences of
psychopathology (Paoin et al, 2009).
Gender diagnostic reform. For more than three decades, medical and
psychological practitioners have worked with the gender diagnoses in the International
Classification of Diseases (ICD) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders (DSM). The controversy related to Gender Identity Disorder (GID) reform in
both texts involves multifaceted viewpoints from within the transgender human rights
movement, and psycho-medical communities. Arguments focus on whether to include or
remove the gender diagnoses.
Physicians, psychiatrists, psychologists, and legal reform advocates of the World
Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) who are in favor of including
GID in the ICD and DSM, maintain that the diagnosis serves those who suffer from
gender dyphoria, and legitimizes hormones and SRS for legal and policy reform
including insurance coverage (Coleman et al, 2011). Insurance companies rarely cover
SRS or hormone treatments (Stryker, 2008); however some state and national health
56. 43
programs provide coverage for individuals diagnosed with GID (Green & Wilson, 2012).
Ironically, health providers will continue to be untrained in schools until insurance will
reimburse for it (Green, 2012, personal communication).
Discussions regarding the DSM-V suggested revisions, include changing the
terminology to be less stigmatizing of gender variance, or changing the diagnosis to a
medical condition. Suggested terminology include: gender dysphoria (Coleman et al,
2011); gender dissonance (Winters, 2005); gender incongruity (Rochman, 2007); and
Gender Expression Deprivation Anxiety Disorder, or GEDAD (Vitale, 2005). Vitale
(2005) suggests removing GID listing GEDAD under Anxiety Disorders. Lev (2005)
suggests removing GID from the DSM and using the ICD-10 codes for Transsexuality
under Axis III medical conditions. Lev’s proposal would enable insurance companies to
reimburse the medical condition “similar to pregnancy” thereby avoiding the
stigmatization of an Axis I mental health diagnosis (Lev, 2005). However, Bockting
points out that “there is no physical marker that a person has gender dysphoria” unless a
person has begun hormone treatment, “it would be possible to physically assess if a
person’s chromosomes don’t match their genitalia. Perhaps an ICD classification could
be used for people who have transitioned and continue to need hormone therapy”
(Rochman, 2007). Accessing hormones on the street or online can be a health risk
without a doctor’s prescription and well-trained, careful observation particularly for
individuals with hormonal conditions, as well as the potential for Hepatitis C and HIV
infection for those who share injection equipment (Bockting, 2008; Coleman et al, 2011;
Grant et al, 2011).
57. 44
Some advocates urge for the complete removal of the diagnoses, due to the
medical and societal discrimination transgender people face as a result of institutionalized
transphobia inherent in the diagnosis (Bolin, 1988). Gender identity pathology assumes
that the problem resides within the person, and fails to account for societal stigma from
which the person suffers. Because of discrimination, harassment and violence faced by
transgender people on a daily basis (Grant et al, 2011), it is particularly problematic to
locate the disease within the person’s psychology. As with most disorders listed in the
DSM and ICD, disturbances are determined based on “clinically significant distress or
impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning” (APA, 2000).
Transgender people may be unable to maintain employment not because they are
distressed about their gender, but because of the pervasive stigma restricting their ability
to function in a transphobic society (Grant et al, 2011).
In addition to employment discrimination, gender variant people face inadequate
access to medical care due to discrimination, harassment and violence from providers
hospitals and nursing care facilities (Grant et al, 2011). Although proponents of the
diagnosis suggest that it legitimizes transgender people and their treatment, many health
providers are left untrained and ignorant about the complexities of transgender health
care needs. As a result, many are denied access to care if insurers refuse coverage if they
arbitrarily deem these types of basic services as related to gender transition (Rounds,
McGrath & Walsh, 2013).
Advocate Kelly Winters and other advocates and clinicians listed on their
GIDreform.org site suggest reforming GID, just as homosexuality was reformed in the
DSM because it caused harm to many people. Homosexuality was also removed, in part,
58. 45
because it was seen as a more common phenomon (Lev, 2004). Therefore, as the
prevalence of gender variance becomes more widely known, gender diagnoses may also
be removed.
The sexism inherent in descriptions of the criteria also pathologize gender-variant
masculine and feminine behaviors in children (Lev, 2005). Diagnostic criteria for GID
features detailed descriptions of masculine and feminine stereotypes of behavior and
feelings, including for children:
A strong preference for playmates of the other sex… in boys, assertions that his
penis or testes are disgusting or will disappear or … aversion toward rough-and-
tumble play and rejection of male stereotypical toys, games, and activities; in
girls, rejection of urinating in a sitting position, assertion that she has or will grow
a penis, or assertion that she does not want to grow breasts or menstruate, or
marked aversion toward normative feminine clothing.” (APA, 1994, pp. 532-538)
These over-inclusive diagnostic criteria contribute to the stigma of gender nonconforming
youth (Winters, 2007).
Involved with the DSM-IV (1994) gender diagnosis committees, Canadian
psychologist Kenneth Zucker participated in the creation of the GID diagnosis used for
children in an attempt to prevent adult onset of transsexuality (Zucker and Bradley,
1995). Zucker held similar views to his mentor John Money, who sought to cure people
of gender variance through psychological intervention. Zucker treated over 500
preadolescent gender-variant children with reparative therapy in order to conform to his
expectations for male and female behavior in children (Brown, 2006). Zucker promoted
the National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuals. According to his
colleague Michael J. Baily (2003) Zucker considers transsexual women a "bad outcome"
for gay men. Despite Zucker’s distain for sexual and gender variance, he was one of 23
59. 46
authors of the current 7th version of the WPATH Standards of Care, which states that
treatment designed to realign gender variant people with their assigned gender at birth is
unethical (Coleman et al, 2011).
Advocates for the removal of gender diagnoses in the DSM and ICD highlight the
multicultural perspectives of gender that are omitted from the medical nosology. The
psycho-medical history of gender variance in the U.S. and Canada was written by white,
heterosexual, non-transgender males (Meyerowitz, 2002; Stryker, 2008). International
and historical archives, as well as recent evidence reveal positive perspectives on gender
variance as a naturally occurring variation (Feinberg, 1996; Ophelian, 2009). In the
1990s, the term “transgender” became a more inclusive, politically unifying term for
gender variance (Lev, 2007). Psychologists who sought to avoid the stigmatization of
the diagnoses reformed their psychotherapeutic approach in order to provide more
culturally competent care (Fraser, 2009, 2009a; Lev, 2005, 2009; Tilsen et al, 2007).
Essentialist and social constructionist perspectives on trans identity and
language. For the last hundred years, medical professionals in the United States and
Europe diagnosed sexuality and gender variance (APA 1952, 1968, 1975; Benjamin,
1966; Caudwell, 1949; Ellis, 1928; Freud, 1905; Green & Money, 1969; Krafft-Ebbing,
1886; Meerloo, 1967), while transgender people sought ways to recognize and name their
sexuality and gender identity (Hirschfeld, 1910; Jorgensen, 1967, 1970; Lind, 1918,
1922). Each explored essentialist or social constructionist perspectives. Essentialists
regard sex or gender as essential features a person is born with or inherently fixed, while
social constructionists perceive sex and gender as co-constructed within one’s self and
social and cultural contexts.
60. 47
The controversy over transgender language and identity began in the mid- 18th
century, when transgender advocates attempted to describe themselves in the first wave
of transgender activism (Meyerowitz, 2002). Working with their doctors, early
transsexual-identified people introduced essentialist perspectives of having been “born in
the wrong body,” asserting themselves “true transsexuals” who successfully “passed” as
heterosexual women or men (Benjamin, 1966; Jorgensen, 1967, 1970). Many transsexual
people identify strongly with the binary view, stating that they do not simply identify
with their gender, but feel that they are male or female as a core part of themselves.
Transsexuals feel that hormones and surgery affirm their true sex, and rather than
“reassignment,” they receive sexual “realignment” procedures. Subsequently, medical
professionals and scientists categorize sex and gender using essentialist, or inherent or
fixed traits in order to universalize transgender experiences into male or female sex
characteristics and expressions (Benjamin, 1966; Broido, 2000). Many doctors, including
Magnus Hirschfeld (1910), Alfred Kinsey (1948, 1953), and Harry Benjamin (1966)
included intersex as a means to promote essential biological diversity. Doctors Richard
Green and John Money (1969) used conservative views of a two-sex system to promote
segregated ideas of masculine and female gender identity. The American Psychiatric
Association utilized essentialist perceptions of male and female sex to pathologize gender
variance in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (APA, 1952,
1968, 1975, 1980, 1987, 1994, 2000).
In the 1960s and 70s, the second wave of transgender activism focused on civil
rights and gender fluidity (Meyerowitz, 2002). During this time, transgender activists
objected to the straight, gender binary, rigid model of beauty, particularly as doctors
61. 48
rejected them regardless of how well they passed as male or female (Denny, 1992;
Stryker, 2008). Young, homeless and transgender people of color who were denied
treatment or could not afford hormones or surgery were constantly harassed by police and
incarcerated (Feinberg, 1996). Activists argued against essentialist scientific notions of
“the perfect gender” (Bornstein, 1998), utilizing social constructionist or post-modern
perspectives to promote a paradigm shift in society’s construction of gender (Butler,
1998; Wilchins, 2004). Social Constructionism or deconstructionism argues that the
language and experience of gender is a culture-bound, socially constructed phenomena
whereby those in power privilege their definitions over others (Derrida, 1974; Foucault,
1969, 1978). Social Constructionism argues that essentialism falsely universalizes
experiences, resulting in racist, transphobic, homophobic and sexist perspectives
(Arseneau, 2008). In the 1990s to early 2000s, there was a resurgence in social
constructionist perspectives related to reclaiming the terms queer and transgender in
order to promote sexual and gender variance (Blumenstein, 2003; Bornstein, 1995, 1998,
2011; Butler, 1990; Feinberg, 1993, 1996; Green, 2004; Roughgarden, 2004, 2009;
Wilchins, 2004).
In fact, both essentialist and social constructionist perspectives have been used to
justify mistreatment of trans people. On the one hand, doctors such as psychologist John
Money (1971), believing that gender was entirely socially constructed, promoted
psychosocial “cures,” conducting research experiments using “reparative” or
“rehabilitative” therapy techniques, based on the assumption that they could return people
to identifying with the gender assigned to them at birth (Colapinto, 2000; Money, 1971;
Meyerowitz, 2002). On the other hand, essentialist perspectives have been used to