Central Issue: The Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) structure prevented it from effectively helping Louisiana and surrounding states prepare for Hurricane Katrina.
Major Factors: DHS was focused on terrorism prevention after 9/11. This shifted resources away from disaster preparedness. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) had its role and resources reduced after being absorbed into DHS.
Alternatives: The work group could recommend organizational changes within DHS and FEMA to refocus on disaster preparation. This could include restoring FEMA's previous role and independence or improving coordination between DHS and other agencies.
HM500 Crisis and Emergency ManagementUnit 5 DQTopic 1 PrepaSusanaFurman449
HM500 Crisis and Emergency Management
Unit 5 DQ
Topic 1: Preparedness for Terrorist Attacks
Since September 11, there has been a significant focus on preparedness for terrorist attacks. The response to Katrina highlighted significant shortcomings in response to the impact of natural disasters. Based upon your text and outside readings, what do you see as the improvements required to adequately respond to terrorist threats and attacks, as well as hurricanes like Katrina, earthquakes, and other natural disasters? Does preparing for one emergency assist in preparing for the other type of disaster? What organizations within the community would you engage in preparing an emergency response plan to both terrorist attacks and natural disasters?
Topic 1: Reply to Student #1 Below (Help the student, give advice)
Courtney Wheeler
Terrorist attacks can be different than natural disasters, there is a wide range of attacks that can happen. Emergency managers should look at preparedness needs the community needs, depending upon the consequences of the attack, what the community can do to mitigate or prevent an attack from happening, how the community should respond to attacks, and what will be needed for the long-term recovery process (Haddow, et al., 2021, pg. 405). With natural disasters, the best thing is to be prepared for any level of disaster, what I mean by this is there needs to be emergency plans for a level 4 or 5 hurricane, but a level 1 hurricane as well. I think that preparing for one emergency disaster can help in preparing for future disasters, you learn and experience things as they happen, and you can take that knowledge into plans for future emergencies. I would engage with emergency responders, neighboring communities to get extra help, local TV networks to help get information out about evacuation plans, hospitals, and the American Red-Cross.
Haddow, D.G., Bullock, A.J. & Coppola, P.D. (2021). Introduction to emergency management (7th ed). Butterworth-Heinemann.
Topic 1: Reply to Student #2 Below (Help the student, give advice)
Matthew Burdette
Several improvements will be required to adequately respond to terrorist threats and attacks, major hurricanes and earthquakes, and other natural disasters. The shift from an “all hazards approach” to a “single-hazard approach” was certain to cause issues in the future as the focus seemed to be on the threat of terrorist attacks and not on the possibility of other disasters (Haddow et al., 2021). In the first 20 years of the reorganization of DHS and FEMA, many issues arose particularly with leadership roles and the chain of command. In other words, who should be called during emergency situations and in what order, and who is in control? According to Haddow et al. (2021), Bush’s reorganization and creation of the new “Homeland Security Presidential Directive” merged approximately 179,000 employees from 22 pre-existing agencies and programs into one “cabinet-level” organization” (p. 14). ...
Organizing for Homeland Security after Katrina .docxtarifarmarie
Organizing for Homeland Security after Katrina: Is Adaptive
Management What ’ s Missing?
Th is article analyzes performance and organizational
issues revealed by the governmental response to Hurricane
Katrina. It reviews and analyzes the organizational
changes made in the federal government to address home-
land security and presents several proposals for reorgani-
zation suggested by policy makers in the aftermath of
Katrina. A management approach rooted in adaptive
management is presented for use in the ongoing process of
organizing for homeland security.
H
urricane Katrina was more than a challenge
to the capabilities of federal, state, and local
governments to respond to hurricane or
natural disaster emergencies. It was, in fact, as Secre-
tary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff ob-
served, the fi rst large-scale test of the new National
Response Plan that the U.S. Department of Home-
land Security (DHS) developed. Th is partnership with
other federal departments and state and local govern-
ment agencies was to provide for an “ all-discipline, all-
hazards plan that establishes a single, comprehensive
framework for management of domestic incidents ”
(DHS 2004a, iii). But, as President Bush declared,
“ Th e results are not acceptable, ” and he maintained
that it is important that both the administration and
Congress take a good look at what went on “ to make
sure this country is knitted up as well as it can be, in
order to deal with signifi cant problems and disasters ”
(quoted in Jackson 2005, 2 ). Only four years after
9/11 and three years after the establishment of the
DHS, the nation is confronted with the question of
whether government organization for homeland secu-
rity is suffi cient to ensure security with respect to
catastrophic incidents, whether they are the result of
natural hazards or terrorism.
Th ere is little doubt that the suboptimal governmental
performance during Katrina was the result of many
factors: organizational, management, policy, person-
nel, and political. Both the House and the Senate, as
well as the executive branch, have convened special
committees to attempt to determine what went
wrong. Th e purpose of this article is not to analyze all
the performance gaps revealed by Katrina or to at-
tempt a comprehensive analysis of all the factors con-
tributing to homeland security. Rather, it seeks to
analyze what Katrina means for the question of how
the federal government should reorganize itself to
better perform the homeland security function.
Th e events of 9/11 kicked off one of the most active
periods of reorganization in the history of the federal
government. Th e enactment of the law creating the
DHS was itself one of the largest reorganizations ever
undertaken, but the department ’ s creation is but one
milestone in an ongoing process of organizing for
homeland security — a process t.
HM501
Unit6 DQ
Part 1
Topic 1: Lessons Learned (Respond below)
As you contemplate how to restructure DHS, are there any lessons learned from the creation of FEMA that can provide guidance on how to restructure DHS?
Part 2
Topic 1: Student Response #1 (Respond to Carly)
Carly Adams
One thing that should not happen to FEMA is the taking away of their responsibilities. During DHS's creation FEMA lost some of its important agencies and mission that were put under other agencies in DHS. As we saw with Hurricane Katrina those agencies and missions are best left under FEMA. DHS has given a good portion of their funding to FEMA but has decreased FEMA's funding over the years. Allocating appropriate funding to FEMA will cause them to. be more effective in dealing with disasters.
Bullock, J.A., Haddow, G.D., Coppola, D.P. (2018). Homeland security: The essentials. (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann.
Topic 1: Student Response #2 (Respond to Diego)
Diego Salgado
Lessons Learned
Since Former President Jimmy Carter consolidated all federal programs into a single agency, The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has done an excellent job of adjusting to the never-ending natural, man-made, and terrorist threats faced by the United States every day. FEMA has encountered many issues since its creation, but one lesson learned that could provide guidance on the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) restructuring is the constant change from an all-hazards approach to a single focus. Bullock et al. (2018) stated, “With the election of President Ronald Reagan in 1980, the focus of FEMA’s policies and programs shifted dramatically from an all-hazards approach to a single focus on nuclear attack planning through its Office of National Preparedness” (p. 388). Thus, a fluctuation focus on low-probability / high-impact events was at some point FEMA’s failure to effectively and adequately respond to several disasters.
In my opinion, it would be vital for DHS to continue to focus its efforts and systems on an all-hazards approach. Hurricane Katrina is a constant reminder for all emergency management agencies across the Nation of how important it is for the United States government to focus and have an all-hazards approach. When the DHS took ownership of FEMA, it created many conflicts of interest because DHS systems were focused on a single hazard approach. Bullock et al. (2021) further explained how FEMA’s funding that supported local and state emergency plans became part of a funding reallocation requested of FEMA by DHS management to support other DHS priorities. In the end, it would be critical for DHS to continue to learn from FEMA’s struggles and not to let history repeat itself. Focus on an all-hazards approach and continue to nurture relationships to create excellent communication and an adequate response from all agencies and departments.
References
Bullock. J. A., Haddow, G.D., & Coppola, D.P. (2018). Homeland Security: The Es ...
Question 1When it comes to disasters, some contend that governme.docxmakdul
Question 1
When it comes to disasters, some contend that governments still largely play the role of arriving like the cavalry after the fact. Assuming this might be at least partially true, how can emergency management policies (local, state and/or federal) be more proactive? What barriers, if any, to such proposals might exist? (For instance, should local jurisdictions consider additional efforts to regulate building, land-use, development, and other activities that may cause hazards and/or increase risk to members of the community? What lessons should we learn from the flooding that took place in South Carolina in 2015?)
Question 2
Define in your own words the term “benchmarking” used in our textbook and compare it to the terms “lessons learned” or “best practices”, which are often used in emergency management. Include at least one example that you think represents one or more of these terms.
Question 3
Your response to each of the questions below should be at least one brief paragraph.
After reading the South Carolina Public Incident Report, consider how recent large data security breaches affects public administration.
a.) How would you recommend improving policy and practice with regard to information security? (At least one paragraph)
b.) Provide a statement of the problem and at least two recommendations; support your points with additional detail and references (in APA Style). (At least one paragraph)
Question 4 https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/ECFR website to external link
After reading Chapter 11 in the textbook, go to the online Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., which is the compendium of federal agency regulations. Explore to find regulations of one or more of the following agencies. Select one regulation that you think has an impact on or is related to the phases of emergency management. (Click on “Browse parts” links, if needed, to access regulations.) Write a short summary of the purpose of the regulation you chose, including its context (what kind of regulation is it part of and what agency enforces it) and how it is related to or could impact emergency/disaster management at the local or state level; include a citation to the CFR section (for example 9 CFR 56.10).
Other link for this question. Once you get to this page you can access the other external links listed.
https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/
· Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
· Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
· U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Material Safety Administration (PHMSA) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
· U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) Maritime Security (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
· U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
· (L ...
Emergency recovery means to engage in efforts to return disaster-imp.docxjenkinsmandie
Emergency recovery means to engage in efforts to return disaster-impacted areas back to functioning and, to the greatest appreciable extent, conditions that existed before the emergency occurred in the first place. There are a number of entities involved in emergency recovery including nonprofit organizations, private insurance companies, and myriad state and local governments. One of the most common criticisms of emergency recovery is that local agencies lose control of recovery to the hands of the federal government, or that the federal recovery infrastructure doesn’t do enough to help local governments.
It is important to remember that even in the post-9/11 era, the federal government usually does not step in to oversee or coordinate disaster recovery efforts unless the local and state governments ask for such help. It is the Stafford Act and the presidential declaration process that govern how and when federal recovery programs intervene.
For this Discussion, consider the utility of the Stafford Act and the presidential declaration process related to local disaster response. You also consider whether federal emergency recovery programs are over-used by the states and adequately provide for recovery from catastrophic events.
With these thoughts in mind:
Post
a brief explanation of the utility of the Stafford Act and the presidential declaration process related to local disaster response. Explain whether you think either or both are useful in the scheme of responding to local disasters. Defend your position. Then explain whether federal emergency recovery programs in general are over-used by the states and whether you think they are adequate in providing for recovery from catastrophic events and justify your position.
Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.
Readings
Haddow, G. D., Bullock, J. A., & Coppola, D. P. (2014).
Introduction to emergency management
(5th ed.). Waltham, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Chapter 7, “The Disciplines of Emergency Management: Recovery”
.
Discussion Topic #1 What are the two key recommendations .docxpetehbailey729071
Discussion Topic #1:
What are the two key recommendations that came out of the 9-11 Report that you think will have the most impact in challenging the process?
Additional information:Please see the attachment:
January 22, 2008
What’s New in the National Response Framework
New Name:
The
National Response Framework
supersedes the
National Response Plan
and more adequately serves as a guide to how the nation conducts incident response. The new name better aligns the document with its intent.
Purpose
: To ensure that government executives, private sector, nongovernmental organization (NGO) leaders, and emergency management practitioners across the nation understand domestic incident response roles, responsibilities and relationships in order to respond more effectively to any type of incident.
Broader Scope:
The
Framework
provides structures for implementing national-level policy and operational coordination for domestic incident response. In this document, incidents include actual or potential emergencies or all-hazard events that range from accidents and natural disasters to actual or potential terrorist attacks. Such incidents range from modest events wholly contained within a single community to others that are catastrophic in nature and national in their scope of consequences.
Wider Audience:
The
Framework
is intended for executive leadership and emergency management practitioners at all levels of government, as well as private sector, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs).
Integrated Key Concepts:
An effective, unified national response requires layered, mutually supporting capabilities, with States having the primary responsibility for public health and welfare of its citizens. Five elemental principles of operation constitute national response doctrine:
Engaged partnerships
Tiered response
Scalable, flexible and adaptable operational capabilities
Unity of effort through unified command
Readiness to act
Expanded Focus on Partnerships:
The
Framework
states that an effective national response requires layered, mutually supporting capabilities. This approach affirms that local communities, tribes and States have primary responsibility for the safety and security of their citizens; that local leaders build the foundation for response and that resilient communities begin with prepared individuals and families.
Updated Planning Section:
The
Framework
contains a section that focuses on the critical importance of planning. The intent is to lay the groundwork to:
Link planning, preparedness, resource and asset management processes, and data in a virtual environment;
Prioritize plans and planning efforts to best support homeland security strategies and allow seamless transition to execution; and
Provide parallel and concurrent planning at all levels of government.
Improved Annexes and Appendixes:
The Emergency Support Functions and Support Annexes have been updated and remain an integral part of the
Fr.
ANSWER THIS QUESTION 250 WORDS MIN EACH Discussion Que.docxRAHUL126667
****ANSWER THIS QUESTION 250 WORDS MIN EACH****
Discussion Questions:
What is the most significant vulnerability facing the emergency management discipline and why?
****REPLY TO EACH POST 100 WORDS MIN EACH****
1. For this week’s question we were asked what is the most significant vulnerability facing the emergency management discipline and why? As I contemplated various input for this question, I wanted to start with what I felt was the most important aspect of Emergency Management which is its discipline of avoiding risks and prevent the loss of life. Ideally, Emergency Management disciplines involves prepping for a crisis, responding during and after a crisis, as well as support after a disaster. From our readings I found this statement, “Emergency management is the responsibility of more than government; it involves NGOs, community groups, and individuals (Etkin, 2016).” Understanding these additional Emergency Management responsibilities, overall, I can see how personnel play a major role towards ethical choices. Dissecting more of the article from Etkin, I see how he correlated ethical theories, utilitarianism, social contract, virtue ethics, deontology, and environmental sustainability. Etkin really opened my eyes and helped me understand the relationship people have on our values to our environment. Understanding the discipline of Emergency Management is to avoid risks and prevent loss of life, I can make a better choice on what I feel is its significant vulnerability. I feel the greatest strength is its greatest vulnerability, which are people. Emergency management personnel have an important part to play and essentially, their training, ethics, goals, values, etc. can either be a part of the solution or part of the problem. Since we are talking about vulnerabilities of Emergency Management, I will stick with problem. Vulnerable populations such as people with disabilities were not part of or thought of when States/Cities were implementing measures for people with such ailments. Los Angeles, California violated Federal and State disability laws by failing to include people with disabilities in their 200 plus page emergency preparedness plan. Why do States/Cities let this occur when FEMA's Comprehensive Preparedness Guide (CPG) specifically mentions that emergency preparedness plans need to include people with disabilities (Flowers, 2016)? Therefore, this backs up my ideal of a vulnerability when it comes to Emergency Management.
2. Emergency management is the allocation of resources and responsibilities when dealing with a disaster. The primary agency dealing with disasters is the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The Federal Emergency Management Agency was created in 1979 by President Carter. Although this organization is relatively new, the federal disaster approach has been around for a longer time. When the Department of Homeland Security was created in 2003, FEMA was adopted into this o.
HM500 Crisis and Emergency ManagementUnit 5 DQTopic 1 PrepaSusanaFurman449
HM500 Crisis and Emergency Management
Unit 5 DQ
Topic 1: Preparedness for Terrorist Attacks
Since September 11, there has been a significant focus on preparedness for terrorist attacks. The response to Katrina highlighted significant shortcomings in response to the impact of natural disasters. Based upon your text and outside readings, what do you see as the improvements required to adequately respond to terrorist threats and attacks, as well as hurricanes like Katrina, earthquakes, and other natural disasters? Does preparing for one emergency assist in preparing for the other type of disaster? What organizations within the community would you engage in preparing an emergency response plan to both terrorist attacks and natural disasters?
Topic 1: Reply to Student #1 Below (Help the student, give advice)
Courtney Wheeler
Terrorist attacks can be different than natural disasters, there is a wide range of attacks that can happen. Emergency managers should look at preparedness needs the community needs, depending upon the consequences of the attack, what the community can do to mitigate or prevent an attack from happening, how the community should respond to attacks, and what will be needed for the long-term recovery process (Haddow, et al., 2021, pg. 405). With natural disasters, the best thing is to be prepared for any level of disaster, what I mean by this is there needs to be emergency plans for a level 4 or 5 hurricane, but a level 1 hurricane as well. I think that preparing for one emergency disaster can help in preparing for future disasters, you learn and experience things as they happen, and you can take that knowledge into plans for future emergencies. I would engage with emergency responders, neighboring communities to get extra help, local TV networks to help get information out about evacuation plans, hospitals, and the American Red-Cross.
Haddow, D.G., Bullock, A.J. & Coppola, P.D. (2021). Introduction to emergency management (7th ed). Butterworth-Heinemann.
Topic 1: Reply to Student #2 Below (Help the student, give advice)
Matthew Burdette
Several improvements will be required to adequately respond to terrorist threats and attacks, major hurricanes and earthquakes, and other natural disasters. The shift from an “all hazards approach” to a “single-hazard approach” was certain to cause issues in the future as the focus seemed to be on the threat of terrorist attacks and not on the possibility of other disasters (Haddow et al., 2021). In the first 20 years of the reorganization of DHS and FEMA, many issues arose particularly with leadership roles and the chain of command. In other words, who should be called during emergency situations and in what order, and who is in control? According to Haddow et al. (2021), Bush’s reorganization and creation of the new “Homeland Security Presidential Directive” merged approximately 179,000 employees from 22 pre-existing agencies and programs into one “cabinet-level” organization” (p. 14). ...
Organizing for Homeland Security after Katrina .docxtarifarmarie
Organizing for Homeland Security after Katrina: Is Adaptive
Management What ’ s Missing?
Th is article analyzes performance and organizational
issues revealed by the governmental response to Hurricane
Katrina. It reviews and analyzes the organizational
changes made in the federal government to address home-
land security and presents several proposals for reorgani-
zation suggested by policy makers in the aftermath of
Katrina. A management approach rooted in adaptive
management is presented for use in the ongoing process of
organizing for homeland security.
H
urricane Katrina was more than a challenge
to the capabilities of federal, state, and local
governments to respond to hurricane or
natural disaster emergencies. It was, in fact, as Secre-
tary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff ob-
served, the fi rst large-scale test of the new National
Response Plan that the U.S. Department of Home-
land Security (DHS) developed. Th is partnership with
other federal departments and state and local govern-
ment agencies was to provide for an “ all-discipline, all-
hazards plan that establishes a single, comprehensive
framework for management of domestic incidents ”
(DHS 2004a, iii). But, as President Bush declared,
“ Th e results are not acceptable, ” and he maintained
that it is important that both the administration and
Congress take a good look at what went on “ to make
sure this country is knitted up as well as it can be, in
order to deal with signifi cant problems and disasters ”
(quoted in Jackson 2005, 2 ). Only four years after
9/11 and three years after the establishment of the
DHS, the nation is confronted with the question of
whether government organization for homeland secu-
rity is suffi cient to ensure security with respect to
catastrophic incidents, whether they are the result of
natural hazards or terrorism.
Th ere is little doubt that the suboptimal governmental
performance during Katrina was the result of many
factors: organizational, management, policy, person-
nel, and political. Both the House and the Senate, as
well as the executive branch, have convened special
committees to attempt to determine what went
wrong. Th e purpose of this article is not to analyze all
the performance gaps revealed by Katrina or to at-
tempt a comprehensive analysis of all the factors con-
tributing to homeland security. Rather, it seeks to
analyze what Katrina means for the question of how
the federal government should reorganize itself to
better perform the homeland security function.
Th e events of 9/11 kicked off one of the most active
periods of reorganization in the history of the federal
government. Th e enactment of the law creating the
DHS was itself one of the largest reorganizations ever
undertaken, but the department ’ s creation is but one
milestone in an ongoing process of organizing for
homeland security — a process t.
HM501
Unit6 DQ
Part 1
Topic 1: Lessons Learned (Respond below)
As you contemplate how to restructure DHS, are there any lessons learned from the creation of FEMA that can provide guidance on how to restructure DHS?
Part 2
Topic 1: Student Response #1 (Respond to Carly)
Carly Adams
One thing that should not happen to FEMA is the taking away of their responsibilities. During DHS's creation FEMA lost some of its important agencies and mission that were put under other agencies in DHS. As we saw with Hurricane Katrina those agencies and missions are best left under FEMA. DHS has given a good portion of their funding to FEMA but has decreased FEMA's funding over the years. Allocating appropriate funding to FEMA will cause them to. be more effective in dealing with disasters.
Bullock, J.A., Haddow, G.D., Coppola, D.P. (2018). Homeland security: The essentials. (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann.
Topic 1: Student Response #2 (Respond to Diego)
Diego Salgado
Lessons Learned
Since Former President Jimmy Carter consolidated all federal programs into a single agency, The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has done an excellent job of adjusting to the never-ending natural, man-made, and terrorist threats faced by the United States every day. FEMA has encountered many issues since its creation, but one lesson learned that could provide guidance on the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) restructuring is the constant change from an all-hazards approach to a single focus. Bullock et al. (2018) stated, “With the election of President Ronald Reagan in 1980, the focus of FEMA’s policies and programs shifted dramatically from an all-hazards approach to a single focus on nuclear attack planning through its Office of National Preparedness” (p. 388). Thus, a fluctuation focus on low-probability / high-impact events was at some point FEMA’s failure to effectively and adequately respond to several disasters.
In my opinion, it would be vital for DHS to continue to focus its efforts and systems on an all-hazards approach. Hurricane Katrina is a constant reminder for all emergency management agencies across the Nation of how important it is for the United States government to focus and have an all-hazards approach. When the DHS took ownership of FEMA, it created many conflicts of interest because DHS systems were focused on a single hazard approach. Bullock et al. (2021) further explained how FEMA’s funding that supported local and state emergency plans became part of a funding reallocation requested of FEMA by DHS management to support other DHS priorities. In the end, it would be critical for DHS to continue to learn from FEMA’s struggles and not to let history repeat itself. Focus on an all-hazards approach and continue to nurture relationships to create excellent communication and an adequate response from all agencies and departments.
References
Bullock. J. A., Haddow, G.D., & Coppola, D.P. (2018). Homeland Security: The Es ...
Question 1When it comes to disasters, some contend that governme.docxmakdul
Question 1
When it comes to disasters, some contend that governments still largely play the role of arriving like the cavalry after the fact. Assuming this might be at least partially true, how can emergency management policies (local, state and/or federal) be more proactive? What barriers, if any, to such proposals might exist? (For instance, should local jurisdictions consider additional efforts to regulate building, land-use, development, and other activities that may cause hazards and/or increase risk to members of the community? What lessons should we learn from the flooding that took place in South Carolina in 2015?)
Question 2
Define in your own words the term “benchmarking” used in our textbook and compare it to the terms “lessons learned” or “best practices”, which are often used in emergency management. Include at least one example that you think represents one or more of these terms.
Question 3
Your response to each of the questions below should be at least one brief paragraph.
After reading the South Carolina Public Incident Report, consider how recent large data security breaches affects public administration.
a.) How would you recommend improving policy and practice with regard to information security? (At least one paragraph)
b.) Provide a statement of the problem and at least two recommendations; support your points with additional detail and references (in APA Style). (At least one paragraph)
Question 4 https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/ECFR website to external link
After reading Chapter 11 in the textbook, go to the online Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., which is the compendium of federal agency regulations. Explore to find regulations of one or more of the following agencies. Select one regulation that you think has an impact on or is related to the phases of emergency management. (Click on “Browse parts” links, if needed, to access regulations.) Write a short summary of the purpose of the regulation you chose, including its context (what kind of regulation is it part of and what agency enforces it) and how it is related to or could impact emergency/disaster management at the local or state level; include a citation to the CFR section (for example 9 CFR 56.10).
Other link for this question. Once you get to this page you can access the other external links listed.
https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/
· Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
· Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
· U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Material Safety Administration (PHMSA) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
· U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) Maritime Security (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
· U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
· (L ...
Emergency recovery means to engage in efforts to return disaster-imp.docxjenkinsmandie
Emergency recovery means to engage in efforts to return disaster-impacted areas back to functioning and, to the greatest appreciable extent, conditions that existed before the emergency occurred in the first place. There are a number of entities involved in emergency recovery including nonprofit organizations, private insurance companies, and myriad state and local governments. One of the most common criticisms of emergency recovery is that local agencies lose control of recovery to the hands of the federal government, or that the federal recovery infrastructure doesn’t do enough to help local governments.
It is important to remember that even in the post-9/11 era, the federal government usually does not step in to oversee or coordinate disaster recovery efforts unless the local and state governments ask for such help. It is the Stafford Act and the presidential declaration process that govern how and when federal recovery programs intervene.
For this Discussion, consider the utility of the Stafford Act and the presidential declaration process related to local disaster response. You also consider whether federal emergency recovery programs are over-used by the states and adequately provide for recovery from catastrophic events.
With these thoughts in mind:
Post
a brief explanation of the utility of the Stafford Act and the presidential declaration process related to local disaster response. Explain whether you think either or both are useful in the scheme of responding to local disasters. Defend your position. Then explain whether federal emergency recovery programs in general are over-used by the states and whether you think they are adequate in providing for recovery from catastrophic events and justify your position.
Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.
Readings
Haddow, G. D., Bullock, J. A., & Coppola, D. P. (2014).
Introduction to emergency management
(5th ed.). Waltham, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Chapter 7, “The Disciplines of Emergency Management: Recovery”
.
Discussion Topic #1 What are the two key recommendations .docxpetehbailey729071
Discussion Topic #1:
What are the two key recommendations that came out of the 9-11 Report that you think will have the most impact in challenging the process?
Additional information:Please see the attachment:
January 22, 2008
What’s New in the National Response Framework
New Name:
The
National Response Framework
supersedes the
National Response Plan
and more adequately serves as a guide to how the nation conducts incident response. The new name better aligns the document with its intent.
Purpose
: To ensure that government executives, private sector, nongovernmental organization (NGO) leaders, and emergency management practitioners across the nation understand domestic incident response roles, responsibilities and relationships in order to respond more effectively to any type of incident.
Broader Scope:
The
Framework
provides structures for implementing national-level policy and operational coordination for domestic incident response. In this document, incidents include actual or potential emergencies or all-hazard events that range from accidents and natural disasters to actual or potential terrorist attacks. Such incidents range from modest events wholly contained within a single community to others that are catastrophic in nature and national in their scope of consequences.
Wider Audience:
The
Framework
is intended for executive leadership and emergency management practitioners at all levels of government, as well as private sector, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs).
Integrated Key Concepts:
An effective, unified national response requires layered, mutually supporting capabilities, with States having the primary responsibility for public health and welfare of its citizens. Five elemental principles of operation constitute national response doctrine:
Engaged partnerships
Tiered response
Scalable, flexible and adaptable operational capabilities
Unity of effort through unified command
Readiness to act
Expanded Focus on Partnerships:
The
Framework
states that an effective national response requires layered, mutually supporting capabilities. This approach affirms that local communities, tribes and States have primary responsibility for the safety and security of their citizens; that local leaders build the foundation for response and that resilient communities begin with prepared individuals and families.
Updated Planning Section:
The
Framework
contains a section that focuses on the critical importance of planning. The intent is to lay the groundwork to:
Link planning, preparedness, resource and asset management processes, and data in a virtual environment;
Prioritize plans and planning efforts to best support homeland security strategies and allow seamless transition to execution; and
Provide parallel and concurrent planning at all levels of government.
Improved Annexes and Appendixes:
The Emergency Support Functions and Support Annexes have been updated and remain an integral part of the
Fr.
ANSWER THIS QUESTION 250 WORDS MIN EACH Discussion Que.docxRAHUL126667
****ANSWER THIS QUESTION 250 WORDS MIN EACH****
Discussion Questions:
What is the most significant vulnerability facing the emergency management discipline and why?
****REPLY TO EACH POST 100 WORDS MIN EACH****
1. For this week’s question we were asked what is the most significant vulnerability facing the emergency management discipline and why? As I contemplated various input for this question, I wanted to start with what I felt was the most important aspect of Emergency Management which is its discipline of avoiding risks and prevent the loss of life. Ideally, Emergency Management disciplines involves prepping for a crisis, responding during and after a crisis, as well as support after a disaster. From our readings I found this statement, “Emergency management is the responsibility of more than government; it involves NGOs, community groups, and individuals (Etkin, 2016).” Understanding these additional Emergency Management responsibilities, overall, I can see how personnel play a major role towards ethical choices. Dissecting more of the article from Etkin, I see how he correlated ethical theories, utilitarianism, social contract, virtue ethics, deontology, and environmental sustainability. Etkin really opened my eyes and helped me understand the relationship people have on our values to our environment. Understanding the discipline of Emergency Management is to avoid risks and prevent loss of life, I can make a better choice on what I feel is its significant vulnerability. I feel the greatest strength is its greatest vulnerability, which are people. Emergency management personnel have an important part to play and essentially, their training, ethics, goals, values, etc. can either be a part of the solution or part of the problem. Since we are talking about vulnerabilities of Emergency Management, I will stick with problem. Vulnerable populations such as people with disabilities were not part of or thought of when States/Cities were implementing measures for people with such ailments. Los Angeles, California violated Federal and State disability laws by failing to include people with disabilities in their 200 plus page emergency preparedness plan. Why do States/Cities let this occur when FEMA's Comprehensive Preparedness Guide (CPG) specifically mentions that emergency preparedness plans need to include people with disabilities (Flowers, 2016)? Therefore, this backs up my ideal of a vulnerability when it comes to Emergency Management.
2. Emergency management is the allocation of resources and responsibilities when dealing with a disaster. The primary agency dealing with disasters is the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The Federal Emergency Management Agency was created in 1979 by President Carter. Although this organization is relatively new, the federal disaster approach has been around for a longer time. When the Department of Homeland Security was created in 2003, FEMA was adopted into this o.
Federalism Comparing Government Response in Hurricane Katrina v.docxnealwaters20034
Federalism: Comparing Government Response in Hurricane Katrina vs. Coronavirus
You will be watching two 50 minute documentaries: The Strom and Coronavirus Pandemic in order to complete this essay.
Topic Overview
: Considered together, Hurricane Katrina and Covid-19 both produced policy disasters in the United States that were both unnecessary and linked to federalism. These challenges produced by nature raise the question of whether certain disasters are beyond the capacities of state and local government.
Objective
: While watching these films, the central theme to take away from these videos is a better and more comprehensive understanding of Federalism, through real life evidence and explanation. Critically analyze each of the elements and consequences of each different national disaster, based on different level of government’s responses, actions. Leadership, communication processes, and decision-making. Despite, both Hurricane Katrina and Corona Virus being deemed as “national emergencies”, the power organization resulted in vastly different responses by each level of government’s leadership (across all levels: federal, state and local).
Introduction to Federalism:
State and Local governments are the first line responders to crisis. The institutions encompass not only the national government and the American states, each with their own distinctive histories, but extend down to the local level of counties, cities, smaller communities, and special-purpose entities such as school districts. Support and opposition for Federalism rests on government leadership, power, decision-making, and response to national disasters. Response is a geographic and constitutional matter of design. The principles underlying federalism create a power system where multiple levels of government (local, state, and federal) coexist in an organization of power that is both exclusive and shared, depending on the event at hand. Though the federal government has a vital role to play in advancing national priorities through the powers enumerated to it by the U.S. Constitution, our founders recognized long ago that many of the challenges our citizens face can best be addressed at the state level. The Constitution set forth means for strengthening national government’s power, intended to establish a more perfect union (Preamble). Federalism would be the new organization of power, between local, state and federal U.S. government, in order to the remedy weaknesses caused by the Articles of Confederation.
Principles of Federalism
Limited government
States’ rights (10th amendment)
Goals of Federalism:
Foster cooperation
Prevent Federal Intrusion into State
Protect State’s utility as “laboratories” of democracy
Central Themes to Focus on and Think About
comparisons and discussion of struggles between local,
state and federal levels of government according to how federalism has manifested into a power tug-of-war in authority
division of power
division .
Discussion Topic #2 Compare and contrast the NIMS and the N.docxpetehbailey729071
Discussion Topic #2:
Compare and contrast the NIMS and the National Response Framework (NRF). Do we need both?
Additional Information: Please see the attachment
January 22, 2008
What’s New in the National Response Framework
New Name:
The
National Response Framework
supersedes the
National Response Plan
and more adequately serves as a guide to how the nation conducts incident response. The new name better aligns the document with its intent.
Purpose
: To ensure that government executives, private sector, nongovernmental organization (NGO) leaders, and emergency management practitioners across the nation understand domestic incident response roles, responsibilities and relationships in order to respond more effectively to any type of incident.
Broader Scope:
The
Framework
provides structures for implementing national-level policy and operational coordination for domestic incident response. In this document, incidents include actual or potential emergencies or all-hazard events that range from accidents and natural disasters to actual or potential terrorist attacks. Such incidents range from modest events wholly contained within a single community to others that are catastrophic in nature and national in their scope of consequences.
Wider Audience:
The
Framework
is intended for executive leadership and emergency management practitioners at all levels of government, as well as private sector, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs).
Integrated Key Concepts:
An effective, unified national response requires layered, mutually supporting capabilities, with States having the primary responsibility for public health and welfare of its citizens. Five elemental principles of operation constitute national response doctrine:
Engaged partnerships
Tiered response
Scalable, flexible and adaptable operational capabilities
Unity of effort through unified command
Readiness to act
Expanded Focus on Partnerships:
The
Framework
states that an effective national response requires layered, mutually supporting capabilities. This approach affirms that local communities, tribes and States have primary responsibility for the safety and security of their citizens; that local leaders build the foundation for response and that resilient communities begin with prepared individuals and families.
Updated Planning Section:
The
Framework
contains a section that focuses on the critical importance of planning. The intent is to lay the groundwork to:
Link planning, preparedness, resource and asset management processes, and data in a virtual environment;
Prioritize plans and planning efforts to best support homeland security strategies and allow seamless transition to execution; and
Provide parallel and concurrent planning at all levels of government.
Improved Annexes and Appendixes:
The Emergency Support Functions and Support Annexes have been updated and remain an integral part of the
Framework
. The Incident Annexes will be revised a.
commen on thoese 21- Richard Lennon After reviewing t.docxdivinapavey
commen on thoese 2
1- Richard Lennon
After reviewing the article “First the Flood, Now the Fight” multiple times, I was unable to find clearly defined examples of horizontal or vertical integration in the article based off the definitions and examples we learned in the assigned video. Horizontal integration is when a company or organization acquires a similar company or organization in the same industry or field. The closest example to horizontal integration in the article occurred after the storm when FEMA oversaw and managed around 700 contractors and employees during the recovery process. Vertical integration is when a company or organization acquires a company that operates either before or after the acquiring company or organization in the production process. There was no clear demonstration of vertical integration that I found in this article.
Inter-organizational coordination after Katrina was poor and inconsistent at best. It was stated in the article that “current and former officials at all levels blame FEMA workers' inexperience with eligibility rules, weaknesses in U.S. disaster laws and inconsistent treatment by Congress for much of the wrangling”. I think the biggest problem was that the destruction that Katrina caused was so geographically widespread, that FEMA had to divide their personnel and resources up amongst a much larger area then originally planned for. Spreading their personnel out like this to cover a larger area is where I believe a lot of the problems happened, because it then forced them to have less experienced personnel operate in roles/capacities that they would otherwise not normally operate in because they were the only available resources at the time. This could have been one of the causes for the repeated disputes amongst local governments and FEMA representatives due to the improper interpretation of rules and disaster laws by FEMA representatives.
Horizontal recovery is something that I believe we in Emergency Management will revisit on many occasions. A form of temporary horizontal integration is something that occurs during most disaster recoveries. After a disaster, FEMA or a local emergency management agency usually takes over coordinating and leading the recovery effort. During this time, they also take control of available rescue and recovery organizations to use in whatever way to carry out the organization’s goal and overall mission. This is different than the corporate world where a company is taken over forever, whereas in the disaster recovery setting it is appropriate for this to occur on a temporary basis
2-Doug Harper
Not having any formal education in Business Administration, but having an understanding of macro and micro economics to be honest I had heard of vertical and horizontal integration as it relates to business. Saying that the video presented really did a great job of "dumbing it down", and did make it easier for me to understand. Taking t ...
5Hurricane Katrina was a seminal catastrophic event that exp.docxtroutmanboris
5
Hurricane Katrina was a seminal catastrophic event that exposed a number of weaknesses in our disaster response and recovery capabilities for natural and man-made disasters. These weaknesses arose following 9/11, the reorganization of FEMA into the new DHS caused by 9/11, and the government focus on the terrorist threat. In this lesson, we learned that major catastrophes like Katrina require a disaster response and recovery capability that is both disciplined and agile. Recently, Hurricane Harvey, also a major Category 4 storm, impacted the Gulf Coast, not too far from where Hurricane Katrina made landfall.
How was the outcome of this hurricane response and recovery effort different from the outcome of Katrina? Based on what you have learned, would you have suggested anything about the response efforts be done differently?
must be at least 200 words.
6
The media is often a considerable factor in how the public views the relative success or failure of the disaster response to major catastrophes like Hurricane Katrina. Describe a time where you have seen the media cover a disaster in your community. It can be a smaller scale disasters, like a fire or weather damage. Do you think the media properly handled this disaster, or was it detrimental to the response and recovery efforts? What would you suggest that the media do differently in the future?
must be at least 200 words.
Essay
This involves the evolution of Federal Emergency Management from the formation of FEMA through the lessons learned from Hurricane Sandy. For this , compose an essay in which you do the following:
Discuss the formation of FEMA, then describe how the position of FEMA changed following the Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006.
Discuss the intended and unintended outcomes that emerged following FEMA’s incorporation into DHS.
Describe how Hurricane Katrina swung the pendulum back towards natural disasters from a focus on terrorism following 9/11.
Describe the subsequent lessons learned and improvements made by the Post-Katrina Emergency Reform Act of 2006 and how they affected emergency response and recovery in Hurricane Sandy.
Discuss the changes in the process for Presidential Disaster Declarations due to the lessons learned from Hurricane Katrina.
Describe how FEMA works with local and state emergency management services and community stakeholders.
Identify improvements instituted by the Post-Katrina Emergency Reform Act of 2006 and how they affected emergency response and recovery in Hurricane Sandy.
should be four pages in length, not counting title page and reference page, and you must incorporate three sources into your assignment. sources must be cited and referenced in A&P format.
7
In a major catastrophe such as the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, describe what changes to “law, policy, and doctrine” you would recommend if you were a member of a Blue Ribbon Commission.
must be at least 200 words.
8
Discuss .
HM510Week2 AssignmentAs the assistant director of emergency SusanaFurman449
HM510
Week2 Assignment
As the assistant director of emergency management for your hometown New York City, you have been given the task by the newly elected county commission to propose a hazard mitigation awareness program that can be placed on the county public-safety training website. It is the goal of the commissioners to assure that all county agencies, and especially first responders and code-enforcement officials, have an awareness of what hazard-mitigation strategies can be employed in new land-development projects and construction to mitigate the local natural and man-made hazards.
You are to propose a training plan utilizing 10 PowerPoint slides that includes the following components:
· Target audience
· Issues to be addressed
· Media type and format to be utilized
· Feedback/evaluation format for the training
· Implementation plan for the program
Directions:
· Your slide requirement is excluding your title, introduction, and reference slides.
· Use one basic slide design and layout.
· Limit slides to between 6 and 8 lines of content.
· You may use pictures, charts, and graphs to supplement your material as long as they do not take up the entire slide
· Use bullets for your main points.
· Use speaker notes to fully explain what is being discussed in the bullet points as though you are presenting to an audience, being sure to follow the Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.)
· Viewpoint and purpose should be clearly established and sustained
· Presentation should be well ordered, logical and unified, as well as original and insightful
· Your work should display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics
· Appropriate citation style should be followed
You should also make sure to:
· Use examples to support your discussion
· Cite all sources on a separate reference slide at the end of your PowerPoint and reference and cite within the body of the presentation using APA format and citation style. For more information on APA guidelines, visit Academic Tools.
HM510
Unit 2 DQ
Mitigation Planning
Mitigation planning to include funding is important to building a sustainable and hazard-resilient community. Given the three layers of governmental bureaucracy (federal, state, and local) do you believe the system is readily accessible? How do you think the process can be improved to make funding available sooner and ultimately increase the level of mitigation activity? What checks and balances should remain, and which could be removed? Share any personal experiences with the process.
Student #1: (Travis Reed)
Good morning Y’all
The funding process is among the key determinant factors for the success of any mitigation measure directed to a disaster of any nature (Smith & Vila, 2020). Without sufficient funds, the hazard mitigation strategies are rendered ineffective in restoring the status of the community following a disaster. While funding is a critical factor in hazard mitigation, it is also one area with multiple ch ...
Scenario Three The Psychology of Disaster Preparedness In Sept.docxanhlodge
Scenario Three: The Psychology of Disaster Preparedness
In September 2003 a Category Two hurricane made landfall in a town that was ill prepared for such a natural disaster. The hurricane claimed over 100 lives and caused approximately $1.4 billion in damages. This large American city had not experienced a natural disaster of this proportion for more than 100 years. Therefore, none of the current citizens had any personal knowledge of exactly what preparations might be in order to survive such an event. In the wake of the storm prosocial (helping) behaviors to aid hurricane victims were at an all-time high. Unfortunately, many lives were lost as a direct result of the lack of pre-disaster preparedness on the part of the citizens residing in the affected city.
Local and federal emergency management agencies have researched extensively what went wrong with their disaster response plans. Findings show that they were adequately prepared to respond to a disaster once it happened but that they were seriously lacking in preparing citizens to take seriously the possibility that disaster could strike at any time. In fact, in the days leading up to the approaching storm, many warnings were issued to the public to take precautions up to and including evacuation. However, public perception appeared to be that the media and local leaders were exaggerating the level of imminent danger. A recent national survey shows that even in light of this disaster and the widespread publicity it received, Americans are no more prepared for this type of catastrophe than they were in 2003 (FEMA, 2006).
These results are worrisome to federal and local authorities, and to disaster preparedness teams who attempt to warn the public of impending danger. The frustration lies in the fact that tactical plans for responding are well implemented, practiced, and executed successfully when disaster strikes. However, persuading the public to take seriously their personal responsibility has been a massive failure. Officials now realize that they need the advice of an applied social psychology expert to help them implement social marketing to raise public awareness of the need for disaster preparedness.
FEMA has retained you, an applied social psychology expert, to provide a scholarly analysis of the scientific, peer-reviewed literature on the factors related to attitude and behavior change such as risk perception, persuasion theories, persuasion techniques, motivation, and self-efficacy. You
PSY610: Applied Social Psychology Scenarios for Intervention Proposal must also render a professional opinion regarding your conclusion as to what FEMA officials can do to elicit greater public trust and participation in pre-disaster preparation particularly in towns where natural disasters are not likely to occur. Your opinion should be based on the scientific, peer-reviewed social psychology research that you reviewed. The following peer-reviewed journal articles are a good place to star.
The National Response Framework (NRF) expressly outlines roles and.docxdennisa15
The National Response Framework (NRF) expressly outlines roles and responsibilities for various levels of government; these levels include not just the political leaders and administrations but also associated agencies. At the federal level, for example, DHS, FEMA, FBI, and DOD—among others—often play a marked role in all stages of crisis-response planning and management. At state levels, one can find the following (among others): state homeland security and/or emergency management offices; state highway patrol departments; state bureaus of investigations; state environmental, labor, or hazardous materials divisions. Local communities will also have regulatory agencies, commissions created by political leaders, task forces, interagency groups, citizens committees, and much more. Importantly, these many distinct entities spread across these levels also require unique technologies and capabilities.
Remember one more thing: all disasters are local. This means that the local community is normally the initial site of a crisis, incident, or disaster. Per the NRF, communities are expected to respond to the best of their capabilities and request help only when given resources are exhausted. In many cases, these requests for assistance are specific, covering specific needs. Local communities request resources from their intrastate regions or the state; states may request resources they’ve exhausted or don’t possess from neighboring states and/or the federal level.
For this unit’s assignment, you will use the Minnesota Bridge/ I-35W Collapse of 2007 as a case study.
Assignment Guidelines
Address the following in 3–5 pages:
What are at least 3 forms of technology that made or could have made a significant difference in saving lives, lessening suffering, and/or protecting property? Explain in detail.
Describe each of the 3 technologies (specific form or class of capabilities). Discuss in detail.
Which level(s) of government did employ or should have employed this tool or capability? Explain.
Who specifically used it (or should have)? How did they use it? Explain and be specific.
How did each tool or type of technology make—or would have made—a significant impact in the management of this crisis? Explain.
Emphasize the ability to save or protect lives and property
Note the technologies you choose for this assignment may have been used or not.
They must be real, existing capabilities or tools that you will probably have to research specifically, not just “cool” ideas in need of invention or development.
Conclude your paper by arguing how and when technology is, or is not, a force multiplier for incidents such as the Minnesota Bridge Collapse, and support your arguments with evidence, not opinion.
Your final product should be well organized, well written, employ good mechanics, and be clear and persuasive. All information used that does not solely reflect original thought must be properly cited with appropriate references provided.
Be sure to reference .
Click on the following links for the Phase 4 Reading AssignmentNI.docxbartholomeocoombs
Click on the following links for the Phase 4 Reading Assignment:
NIMS Supporting Technology Evaluation Program
For this assignment, you will research and examine an actual emergency situation of your choosing (either a man-made or natural disaster) occurring within the last 8 years that required interaction among the local, state, and national levels. The research and examination should be reported in a paper written from the position of a local emergency management employee assigned to draft a report to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). This assignment will require research into the authority, responsibility, and technological capabilities of FEMA.
Within the past 8 years, there have been many catastrophes, not necessarily involving terrorist acts but requiring crisis management resources. Examples include Hurricane Katrina; the 2010 oil well explosion and oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico; the broken natural gas pipeline and resulting explosion in San Bruno, California; and major wildfires in California, Colorado, and other states, to name a few.
Assignment Guidelines
Address the following in a report of 750 words:
Briefly describe and summarize the event.
When did the event occur, and what happened?
Were there any casualties or injuries?
Was there any environmental damage? If so, explain
What was the primary cause of the event? Explain.
What intergovernmental jurisdictions were involved? How were they coordinated? Explain.
What types of technology were used during the response and recovery phases? Summarize them.
What tools, equipment, or technology could have significantly improved relief efforts? How?
Were any special technologies or scientific developments used to restore the situation back to normal? If so, explain.
Who should be responsible for funding and providing the tools, equipment, and technology—federal, state, or local governments? Why?
Were there any coordination problems, such as interagency communication or conflict? Why or why not?
What types of forecasting technologies could have been or were used in the event you selected? Explain.
Were they effective? Why or why not?
What conclusions and recommendations could you make? Explain.
Compile your responses in the final report, and submit the file to your instructor.
Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.
.
i HOW FIRE DEPARTMENTS RESPOND TO DISASTERS eve2xjazwa
i
HOW FIRE DEPARTMENTS RESPOND TO DISASTERS
by
Student X
This Thesis is being submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the
Bachelor of Science degree in Public Safety Management
Great College Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida
Fall, 2015
ii
DEDICATION
I would like to thank my wife Lindsey Perrotta for all of the help she has given
me throughout this research proposal, she was phenomenal in helping me complete this
project by answering questions for me and taking care of the children while I worked on
the project.
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to acknowledge Lindsey Perrotta for helping with the project, and
Professor Davis for providing guidance and the template for the project.
iv
ABSTRACT
This research proposal will answer the question of how prepared fire departments
are to respond to major disasters, by utilizing SOP’s SOG’s and mutual aid. It will
discuss problems that lie within these guidelines, such as communication issues, and
different equipment issues. The research proposal will also take a look at how well the
local fire department is prepared for any major incidents that arise, based on a small
population group, and a survey provided by the researcher to this group.
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Dedication ii
Acknowledgements iii
Abstract iv
Chapter 1 Introduction 6
Chapter 2 Review of Literature 8
Chapter 3 Methodology and Procedure 13
References 16
6
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
Often times disaster strikes on an extremely large scale, a scale that is too big for
one agency to handle. When these types of disasters strike multiple agencies come
together to mitigate the incident. One of the biggest challenges to mitigating incidents
when multiple agencies are brought together is finding the middle area based on how all
the agencies operate, since many agencies have different operations. Scoppetta (2008)
stated that having capability and flexibility are vital components of being prepared for
natural disasters and when multiple agencies that come together have these qualities
disasters are mitigated with relative ease.
Background Context
Often time’s major disasters are too large for one municipal fire department to
handle and these departments call upon mutual aid. The mutual aid will almost always
have different literature and training on how to respond to these incidents, which can lead
to major complications on scene. By utilizing national models and outlines on how to
respond to incidents these problems are often curbed, however the challenge is getting all
agencies to have training once and a while to cover these models. This research project
w ...
10.11770002716205285404 604MarchTHE ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN AC.docxhyacinthshackley2629
10.1177/0002716205285404 604MarchTHE ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMYAGILITY AND DISCIPLINE
For more than thirty years, the U.S. emergency manage-
ment community has been increasing its ability to struc-
ture, control, and manage a large response. The result of
this evolution is a National Response System based on
the National Response Plan and the National Incident
Management System that is perceived to have failed in
the response to Hurricane Katrina. Over the same
period, social scientists and other disaster researchers
have been documenting and describing the nonstruc-
tural factors such as improvisation, adaptability, and cre-
ativity that are critical to coordination, collaboration,
and communication and to successful problem solving.
This article argues that these two streams of thought are
not in opposition, but form orthogonal dimensions of
discipline and agility that must both be achieved. The
critical success factors that must be met to prepare for
and respond to an extreme event are described, and an
organizational typology is developed.
Keywords: response; critical success factors; agility;
improvisation; discipline
Extreme events such as the September 11,2001, attacks on the United States, the De-
cember 2004 Sumatra earthquake and Indian
Ocean Tsunami, Hurricane Katrina, and the
October 2005 Pakistan earthquake produce cat-
astrophic immediate impacts and cause long-
term disruption of economic and social systems.
With the exception of the 9/11 attacks, these
256 ANNALS, AAPSS, 604, March 2006
DOI: 10.1177/0002716205285404
Agility and
Discipline:
Critical Success
Factors for
Disaster
Response
By
JOHN R. HARRALD
John R. Harrald is the director of the George Washing-
ton University (GWU) Institute for Crisis, Disaster, and
Risk Management and a professor of engineering man-
agement in the GWU School of Engineering and Ap-
plied Science. He is the executive editor of the Journal of
Homeland Security and Emergency Management. He
has been actively engaged in the fields of emergency and
crisis management and maritime safety and port secu-
rity and as a researcher in his academic career and as a
practitioner during his twenty-two-year career as a U.S.
Coast Guard officer, retiring in the grade of captain. He
received his B.S. in engineering from the U.S. Coast
Guard Academy, an M.S. from the Massachusetts Insti-
tute of Technology where he was an Alfred P. Sloan Fel-
low, and an MBA and Ph.D. from Rensselaer Polytechnic
Institute.
events exceeded our ability to organize and execute coordinated, effective
response and relief efforts. The national response system crafted over the past
three years by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was tested for
the first time when Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf Coast. Hurricane Katrina
was a catastrophic event because it was actually two disasters. Comfort (2005, 5)
noted that “the first phase, the hurricane, could legitimately be called a natural
disaster, as it was genera.
CRJ Module 8 OverviewTerrorism and the Future of Emergency Manag.docxfaithxdunce63732
CRJ Module 8 Overview
Terrorism and the Future of Emergency Management
The September 11th (9/11) and the October 2001 Anthrax attacks together prompted dramatic changes in U.S. emergency management and have been the impetus for a reexamination of the nation’s emergency management system, its priorities, funding and practices. These changes are ongoing and will continue for the foreseeable future. In this module, you will learn how the government's hazard focus has been affected by the changing risk of terrorism. The events of September 11, 2001, the consequences of those events, and how the government responded will be discussed. You will also learn about the Department of Homeland Security along with its components and its role in emergency management.
In addition, you will investigate how the U.S. government communicates terrorist threat information to the public. You will outline how Hurricane Katrina affected terrorism preparedness and response. Lastly, the possibilities the future holds for emergency management and how the profession may be improved in the near future will be discussed and analyzed.
Learning Objectives
Upon completion of this module, you should be able to:
8I
Explain how the federal government funds first responders.
8J
Understand how the Department of Homeland Security was formed, its components, its role in the emergency management and counterterrorism efforts, and its accomplishments.
10C
Explain how the government's hazard focus has been affected by the changing risk of terrorism.
10D
Discuss the events of September 11, 2001, the consequences of those events, and how the government responded.
10E
Summarize how the U.S. government communicates terrorist threat information to the public.
10F
Understand why the 9/11 Commission was formed and what was found as a result of its investigation.
10G
Explain how state and local governments manage the risk of terrorism.
10H
Outline how Hurricane Katrina affected terrorism preparedness and response.
11A
Understand how the past has impacted emergency management as it exists today.
11B
Discuss the possibilities the future holds for emergency management, and how the profession may be improved in the near future.
Module 8 Reading Assignment
Haddow, G., Bullock, J., & Coppola, D. (2011). Introduction to emergency management. Burlington: Elsevier. Chapters 9 and 10.
Emergency Management and the New Terrorist Threat
The September 11th (9/11) and the October 2001 Anthrax attacks together prompted dramatic changes in U.S. emergency management, and have been the impetus for a reexamination of the nation’s emergency management system, its priorities, funding, and practices. These changes are ongoing and will continue for the foreseeable future. Prior to 9/11, the Nunn-Lugar legislation provided the primary authority for domestic Federal preparedness activities for terrorism. FEMA, DOJ, HHS, DOD, and the National Guard all jockeyed for leadership on terrorism. Attempts a.
1. What is one personal experience you have had with homeland se.docxchristiandean12115
1. What is one personal experience you have had with homeland security events or working with response partners within your community? If you have not had an experience, discuss one that you have heard about in the news.
2. If you had been in charge of establishing the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), would you have included the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in DHS, or would you have retained it as an independent executive branch agency reporting directly to the president? What is one ramification of moving FEMA into DHS in terms of FEMA’s mission, programs, and reporting structure? Explain.
3. Discuss the roles of the government and private sectors in protecting critical infrastructure using cybersecurity. Why do you think it is important to have cybersecurity at all levels? Explain your rationale for your position.
These are Discussion Board. 150 words.
Reference; Sauter, M. A., & Carafano, J. J. (2012). Homeland security: A complete guide (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
.
Running head PREPAREDNESS AND MITIGATION1PREPAREDNESS AND M.docxglendar3
Running head: PREPAREDNESS AND MITIGATION
1
PREPAREDNESS AND MITIGATION
2
Preparedness and Mitigation
Nathan Bailey
SEC/200
Prof. Vern Anderson
October 9, 2018
Preparedness and Mitigation
Storm Camille was the second-most extreme tropical violent wind to strike the United States on record. The most extreme tempest of the 1969 Atlantic typhoon season, Camille shaped as a tropical melancholy on August 14 south of Cuba from a since a long time ago followed tropical wave. Situated in an ideal domain for reinforcing, the tempest immediately strengthened into a Category 2 tropical storm before striking the western piece of the country on August 15. According to Buurman, Mens, & Dahm, (2017), emergency and disaster planning incorporates a sorted out, cooperated strategy of intending to facilitate the necessities with open resources. The stages are explored, forming, dispersal, testing, and revitalizing. Along these lines, an emergency plan should to be an active aspect that is irregularly adapted to changing circumstances in addition to that gives a manual for the traditions, techniques, as well as the division of obligations in emergency response.
Where the Organization Fall On the Preparedness Cycle
Rising into the Gulf of Mexico, Camille experienced another time of quick escalation and turned into a Category 5 sea tempest the following day as it moved northward towards the Louisiana– Mississippi area. In spite of debilitating marginally on August 17, the tropical storm rapidly re-increased back to a Category 5 preceding it made landfall in Pass Christian, Mississippi right off the bat August 18. The repeating idea of this model is imperative as it features that overseeing crises happens constantly, not simply amid 'the season' for instance for bushfires and tornados, It additionally demonstrates the manner in which the stages mix into one another and cover as opposed to being discrete classifications. This stage joins making gets ready for what to do, where to go, or who to call for help before an event occurs; exercises that will improve your chances of viably dealing with an emergency. For instance, posting emergency telephone numbers, and presenting smoke discoverers are all preparation measures. Diverse points of reference fuse perceiving where you would have the ability to shield your animals in a calamity. One should similarly consider setting up a disaster unit with crucial supplies for your family and animals.
The Organization's SWOT Analysis Results
With regards to mission, order and working condition, an examination of the Defense Forces' interior qualities and shortcomings, and outside circumstances and dangers have been embraced with the accompanying outcomes:
Strengths
The associations’ qualities in light of the current circumstance incorporate, the unexpected state of polished skill, devotion, and administration to the State. The flexibility of individual and aggregate confidence in the Forces. The high universal notoriety of .
If you are commenting only in this forum, then please post a brief comment on Kant's notion of the "good will." Explain whether you agree with Kant's view that "an action done from duty must wholly exclude the influence of inclination and with it every object of the will."
Explain whether you agree with Kant's view that "an action done from duty must wholly exclude the influence of inclination and with it every object of the will, so that nothing remains which can determine the will except objectively the law."
Please be sure to use proper punctuation, and to avoid words and phrases that are vague and general. Aim for precision. Use short quotations from the primary text (the reading below) to develop and support your argument. It is perfectly acceptable to discuss lines or ideas that confused you.
Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (selections)
Nothing can possibly be conceived in the world, or even out of it, which can be called good, without qualification, except a good will. Intelligence, wit, judgement, and the other talents of the mind, however they may be named, or courage, resolution, perseverance, as qualities of temperament, are undoubtedly good and desirable in many respects; but these gifts of nature may also become extremely bad and mischievous if the will which is to make use of them, and which, therefore, constitutes what is called character, is not good. It is the same with the gifts of fortune. Power, riches, honour, even health, and the general well-being and contentment with one’s condition which is called happiness, inspire pride, and often presumption, if there is not a good will to correct the influence of these on the mind, and with this also to rectify the whole principle of acting and adapt it to its end. The sight of a being who is not adorned with a single feature of a pure and good will, enjoying unbroken prosperity, can never give pleasure to an impartial rational spectator. Thus a good will appears to constitute the indispensable condition even of being worthy of happiness… A good will is good not because of what it performs or effects, not by its aptness for the attainment of some proposed end, but simply by virtue of the volition; that is, it is good in itself, and considered by itself is to be esteemed much higher than all that can be brought about by it in favour of any inclination, nay even of the sum total of all inclinations...
Now an action done from duty must wholly exclude the influence of inclination and with it every object of the will, so that nothing remains which can determine the will except objectively the law, and subjectively pure respect for this practical law, and consequently the maxim that I should follow this law even to the thwarting of all my inclinations… Thus the moral worth of an action does not lie in the effect expected from it, nor in any principle of action which requires to borrow its motive from this expected effect. For all these effects agreeableness of one’s condition and
Watch at least one of the posted videos for Week 10 below.
Dr. Leroy Little Bear connects quantum physics to the Indigenous belief in "spirit," an idea that implies each person's intense ethical relationship to the world. He also reminds us that science is as much a belief system (and value system) as any spiritual tradition. In a similar fashion, Physicist David Bohm (a student of Einstein) wrote a book called Wholeness and the Implicate Order, arguing that our measurements of the physical world provide an incomplete picture of reality, and that there is a non-local, interconnected realm in which everything is fundamentally linked to everything else.
Do you think that "infinite potential" can be left out of our discussion of ethics? You may recall that Kant, in the late 18th Century, left "noumena" outside of human cognition (which only knows "phenomena" or mental representations). In the 1920s, Whitehead questioned Kant's move to privilege reason over feeling, and to cast the metaphysical outside of human knowledge. In doing so, Whitehead offered a simpler explanation of ethics: the world itself is composed of feelings or values (prior to human cognition).
Looking at this question from your own background, tradition, and experience, do you think that we can experience the infinite (and, in it, infinite ethical interrelationship)?
Is it possible that science (as the video "Infinite Potential" suggests) is on the verge of discovering the "field" that connects all things. Ethically, this would mean that your every thought, word, and action affects the whole world. Given such confirmation, would you live any differently?
Conversely, do you think that the absence of scientific confirmation about (and interest in) the metaphysical dimensions of ethics allows us moderns to behave in questionable ways?
More Related Content
Similar to Albright College Public Hurricane Katrina and FEMA Role Case Study.pdf
Federalism Comparing Government Response in Hurricane Katrina v.docxnealwaters20034
Federalism: Comparing Government Response in Hurricane Katrina vs. Coronavirus
You will be watching two 50 minute documentaries: The Strom and Coronavirus Pandemic in order to complete this essay.
Topic Overview
: Considered together, Hurricane Katrina and Covid-19 both produced policy disasters in the United States that were both unnecessary and linked to federalism. These challenges produced by nature raise the question of whether certain disasters are beyond the capacities of state and local government.
Objective
: While watching these films, the central theme to take away from these videos is a better and more comprehensive understanding of Federalism, through real life evidence and explanation. Critically analyze each of the elements and consequences of each different national disaster, based on different level of government’s responses, actions. Leadership, communication processes, and decision-making. Despite, both Hurricane Katrina and Corona Virus being deemed as “national emergencies”, the power organization resulted in vastly different responses by each level of government’s leadership (across all levels: federal, state and local).
Introduction to Federalism:
State and Local governments are the first line responders to crisis. The institutions encompass not only the national government and the American states, each with their own distinctive histories, but extend down to the local level of counties, cities, smaller communities, and special-purpose entities such as school districts. Support and opposition for Federalism rests on government leadership, power, decision-making, and response to national disasters. Response is a geographic and constitutional matter of design. The principles underlying federalism create a power system where multiple levels of government (local, state, and federal) coexist in an organization of power that is both exclusive and shared, depending on the event at hand. Though the federal government has a vital role to play in advancing national priorities through the powers enumerated to it by the U.S. Constitution, our founders recognized long ago that many of the challenges our citizens face can best be addressed at the state level. The Constitution set forth means for strengthening national government’s power, intended to establish a more perfect union (Preamble). Federalism would be the new organization of power, between local, state and federal U.S. government, in order to the remedy weaknesses caused by the Articles of Confederation.
Principles of Federalism
Limited government
States’ rights (10th amendment)
Goals of Federalism:
Foster cooperation
Prevent Federal Intrusion into State
Protect State’s utility as “laboratories” of democracy
Central Themes to Focus on and Think About
comparisons and discussion of struggles between local,
state and federal levels of government according to how federalism has manifested into a power tug-of-war in authority
division of power
division .
Discussion Topic #2 Compare and contrast the NIMS and the N.docxpetehbailey729071
Discussion Topic #2:
Compare and contrast the NIMS and the National Response Framework (NRF). Do we need both?
Additional Information: Please see the attachment
January 22, 2008
What’s New in the National Response Framework
New Name:
The
National Response Framework
supersedes the
National Response Plan
and more adequately serves as a guide to how the nation conducts incident response. The new name better aligns the document with its intent.
Purpose
: To ensure that government executives, private sector, nongovernmental organization (NGO) leaders, and emergency management practitioners across the nation understand domestic incident response roles, responsibilities and relationships in order to respond more effectively to any type of incident.
Broader Scope:
The
Framework
provides structures for implementing national-level policy and operational coordination for domestic incident response. In this document, incidents include actual or potential emergencies or all-hazard events that range from accidents and natural disasters to actual or potential terrorist attacks. Such incidents range from modest events wholly contained within a single community to others that are catastrophic in nature and national in their scope of consequences.
Wider Audience:
The
Framework
is intended for executive leadership and emergency management practitioners at all levels of government, as well as private sector, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs).
Integrated Key Concepts:
An effective, unified national response requires layered, mutually supporting capabilities, with States having the primary responsibility for public health and welfare of its citizens. Five elemental principles of operation constitute national response doctrine:
Engaged partnerships
Tiered response
Scalable, flexible and adaptable operational capabilities
Unity of effort through unified command
Readiness to act
Expanded Focus on Partnerships:
The
Framework
states that an effective national response requires layered, mutually supporting capabilities. This approach affirms that local communities, tribes and States have primary responsibility for the safety and security of their citizens; that local leaders build the foundation for response and that resilient communities begin with prepared individuals and families.
Updated Planning Section:
The
Framework
contains a section that focuses on the critical importance of planning. The intent is to lay the groundwork to:
Link planning, preparedness, resource and asset management processes, and data in a virtual environment;
Prioritize plans and planning efforts to best support homeland security strategies and allow seamless transition to execution; and
Provide parallel and concurrent planning at all levels of government.
Improved Annexes and Appendixes:
The Emergency Support Functions and Support Annexes have been updated and remain an integral part of the
Framework
. The Incident Annexes will be revised a.
commen on thoese 21- Richard Lennon After reviewing t.docxdivinapavey
commen on thoese 2
1- Richard Lennon
After reviewing the article “First the Flood, Now the Fight” multiple times, I was unable to find clearly defined examples of horizontal or vertical integration in the article based off the definitions and examples we learned in the assigned video. Horizontal integration is when a company or organization acquires a similar company or organization in the same industry or field. The closest example to horizontal integration in the article occurred after the storm when FEMA oversaw and managed around 700 contractors and employees during the recovery process. Vertical integration is when a company or organization acquires a company that operates either before or after the acquiring company or organization in the production process. There was no clear demonstration of vertical integration that I found in this article.
Inter-organizational coordination after Katrina was poor and inconsistent at best. It was stated in the article that “current and former officials at all levels blame FEMA workers' inexperience with eligibility rules, weaknesses in U.S. disaster laws and inconsistent treatment by Congress for much of the wrangling”. I think the biggest problem was that the destruction that Katrina caused was so geographically widespread, that FEMA had to divide their personnel and resources up amongst a much larger area then originally planned for. Spreading their personnel out like this to cover a larger area is where I believe a lot of the problems happened, because it then forced them to have less experienced personnel operate in roles/capacities that they would otherwise not normally operate in because they were the only available resources at the time. This could have been one of the causes for the repeated disputes amongst local governments and FEMA representatives due to the improper interpretation of rules and disaster laws by FEMA representatives.
Horizontal recovery is something that I believe we in Emergency Management will revisit on many occasions. A form of temporary horizontal integration is something that occurs during most disaster recoveries. After a disaster, FEMA or a local emergency management agency usually takes over coordinating and leading the recovery effort. During this time, they also take control of available rescue and recovery organizations to use in whatever way to carry out the organization’s goal and overall mission. This is different than the corporate world where a company is taken over forever, whereas in the disaster recovery setting it is appropriate for this to occur on a temporary basis
2-Doug Harper
Not having any formal education in Business Administration, but having an understanding of macro and micro economics to be honest I had heard of vertical and horizontal integration as it relates to business. Saying that the video presented really did a great job of "dumbing it down", and did make it easier for me to understand. Taking t ...
5Hurricane Katrina was a seminal catastrophic event that exp.docxtroutmanboris
5
Hurricane Katrina was a seminal catastrophic event that exposed a number of weaknesses in our disaster response and recovery capabilities for natural and man-made disasters. These weaknesses arose following 9/11, the reorganization of FEMA into the new DHS caused by 9/11, and the government focus on the terrorist threat. In this lesson, we learned that major catastrophes like Katrina require a disaster response and recovery capability that is both disciplined and agile. Recently, Hurricane Harvey, also a major Category 4 storm, impacted the Gulf Coast, not too far from where Hurricane Katrina made landfall.
How was the outcome of this hurricane response and recovery effort different from the outcome of Katrina? Based on what you have learned, would you have suggested anything about the response efforts be done differently?
must be at least 200 words.
6
The media is often a considerable factor in how the public views the relative success or failure of the disaster response to major catastrophes like Hurricane Katrina. Describe a time where you have seen the media cover a disaster in your community. It can be a smaller scale disasters, like a fire or weather damage. Do you think the media properly handled this disaster, or was it detrimental to the response and recovery efforts? What would you suggest that the media do differently in the future?
must be at least 200 words.
Essay
This involves the evolution of Federal Emergency Management from the formation of FEMA through the lessons learned from Hurricane Sandy. For this , compose an essay in which you do the following:
Discuss the formation of FEMA, then describe how the position of FEMA changed following the Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006.
Discuss the intended and unintended outcomes that emerged following FEMA’s incorporation into DHS.
Describe how Hurricane Katrina swung the pendulum back towards natural disasters from a focus on terrorism following 9/11.
Describe the subsequent lessons learned and improvements made by the Post-Katrina Emergency Reform Act of 2006 and how they affected emergency response and recovery in Hurricane Sandy.
Discuss the changes in the process for Presidential Disaster Declarations due to the lessons learned from Hurricane Katrina.
Describe how FEMA works with local and state emergency management services and community stakeholders.
Identify improvements instituted by the Post-Katrina Emergency Reform Act of 2006 and how they affected emergency response and recovery in Hurricane Sandy.
should be four pages in length, not counting title page and reference page, and you must incorporate three sources into your assignment. sources must be cited and referenced in A&P format.
7
In a major catastrophe such as the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, describe what changes to “law, policy, and doctrine” you would recommend if you were a member of a Blue Ribbon Commission.
must be at least 200 words.
8
Discuss .
HM510Week2 AssignmentAs the assistant director of emergency SusanaFurman449
HM510
Week2 Assignment
As the assistant director of emergency management for your hometown New York City, you have been given the task by the newly elected county commission to propose a hazard mitigation awareness program that can be placed on the county public-safety training website. It is the goal of the commissioners to assure that all county agencies, and especially first responders and code-enforcement officials, have an awareness of what hazard-mitigation strategies can be employed in new land-development projects and construction to mitigate the local natural and man-made hazards.
You are to propose a training plan utilizing 10 PowerPoint slides that includes the following components:
· Target audience
· Issues to be addressed
· Media type and format to be utilized
· Feedback/evaluation format for the training
· Implementation plan for the program
Directions:
· Your slide requirement is excluding your title, introduction, and reference slides.
· Use one basic slide design and layout.
· Limit slides to between 6 and 8 lines of content.
· You may use pictures, charts, and graphs to supplement your material as long as they do not take up the entire slide
· Use bullets for your main points.
· Use speaker notes to fully explain what is being discussed in the bullet points as though you are presenting to an audience, being sure to follow the Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.)
· Viewpoint and purpose should be clearly established and sustained
· Presentation should be well ordered, logical and unified, as well as original and insightful
· Your work should display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics
· Appropriate citation style should be followed
You should also make sure to:
· Use examples to support your discussion
· Cite all sources on a separate reference slide at the end of your PowerPoint and reference and cite within the body of the presentation using APA format and citation style. For more information on APA guidelines, visit Academic Tools.
HM510
Unit 2 DQ
Mitigation Planning
Mitigation planning to include funding is important to building a sustainable and hazard-resilient community. Given the three layers of governmental bureaucracy (federal, state, and local) do you believe the system is readily accessible? How do you think the process can be improved to make funding available sooner and ultimately increase the level of mitigation activity? What checks and balances should remain, and which could be removed? Share any personal experiences with the process.
Student #1: (Travis Reed)
Good morning Y’all
The funding process is among the key determinant factors for the success of any mitigation measure directed to a disaster of any nature (Smith & Vila, 2020). Without sufficient funds, the hazard mitigation strategies are rendered ineffective in restoring the status of the community following a disaster. While funding is a critical factor in hazard mitigation, it is also one area with multiple ch ...
Scenario Three The Psychology of Disaster Preparedness In Sept.docxanhlodge
Scenario Three: The Psychology of Disaster Preparedness
In September 2003 a Category Two hurricane made landfall in a town that was ill prepared for such a natural disaster. The hurricane claimed over 100 lives and caused approximately $1.4 billion in damages. This large American city had not experienced a natural disaster of this proportion for more than 100 years. Therefore, none of the current citizens had any personal knowledge of exactly what preparations might be in order to survive such an event. In the wake of the storm prosocial (helping) behaviors to aid hurricane victims were at an all-time high. Unfortunately, many lives were lost as a direct result of the lack of pre-disaster preparedness on the part of the citizens residing in the affected city.
Local and federal emergency management agencies have researched extensively what went wrong with their disaster response plans. Findings show that they were adequately prepared to respond to a disaster once it happened but that they were seriously lacking in preparing citizens to take seriously the possibility that disaster could strike at any time. In fact, in the days leading up to the approaching storm, many warnings were issued to the public to take precautions up to and including evacuation. However, public perception appeared to be that the media and local leaders were exaggerating the level of imminent danger. A recent national survey shows that even in light of this disaster and the widespread publicity it received, Americans are no more prepared for this type of catastrophe than they were in 2003 (FEMA, 2006).
These results are worrisome to federal and local authorities, and to disaster preparedness teams who attempt to warn the public of impending danger. The frustration lies in the fact that tactical plans for responding are well implemented, practiced, and executed successfully when disaster strikes. However, persuading the public to take seriously their personal responsibility has been a massive failure. Officials now realize that they need the advice of an applied social psychology expert to help them implement social marketing to raise public awareness of the need for disaster preparedness.
FEMA has retained you, an applied social psychology expert, to provide a scholarly analysis of the scientific, peer-reviewed literature on the factors related to attitude and behavior change such as risk perception, persuasion theories, persuasion techniques, motivation, and self-efficacy. You
PSY610: Applied Social Psychology Scenarios for Intervention Proposal must also render a professional opinion regarding your conclusion as to what FEMA officials can do to elicit greater public trust and participation in pre-disaster preparation particularly in towns where natural disasters are not likely to occur. Your opinion should be based on the scientific, peer-reviewed social psychology research that you reviewed. The following peer-reviewed journal articles are a good place to star.
The National Response Framework (NRF) expressly outlines roles and.docxdennisa15
The National Response Framework (NRF) expressly outlines roles and responsibilities for various levels of government; these levels include not just the political leaders and administrations but also associated agencies. At the federal level, for example, DHS, FEMA, FBI, and DOD—among others—often play a marked role in all stages of crisis-response planning and management. At state levels, one can find the following (among others): state homeland security and/or emergency management offices; state highway patrol departments; state bureaus of investigations; state environmental, labor, or hazardous materials divisions. Local communities will also have regulatory agencies, commissions created by political leaders, task forces, interagency groups, citizens committees, and much more. Importantly, these many distinct entities spread across these levels also require unique technologies and capabilities.
Remember one more thing: all disasters are local. This means that the local community is normally the initial site of a crisis, incident, or disaster. Per the NRF, communities are expected to respond to the best of their capabilities and request help only when given resources are exhausted. In many cases, these requests for assistance are specific, covering specific needs. Local communities request resources from their intrastate regions or the state; states may request resources they’ve exhausted or don’t possess from neighboring states and/or the federal level.
For this unit’s assignment, you will use the Minnesota Bridge/ I-35W Collapse of 2007 as a case study.
Assignment Guidelines
Address the following in 3–5 pages:
What are at least 3 forms of technology that made or could have made a significant difference in saving lives, lessening suffering, and/or protecting property? Explain in detail.
Describe each of the 3 technologies (specific form or class of capabilities). Discuss in detail.
Which level(s) of government did employ or should have employed this tool or capability? Explain.
Who specifically used it (or should have)? How did they use it? Explain and be specific.
How did each tool or type of technology make—or would have made—a significant impact in the management of this crisis? Explain.
Emphasize the ability to save or protect lives and property
Note the technologies you choose for this assignment may have been used or not.
They must be real, existing capabilities or tools that you will probably have to research specifically, not just “cool” ideas in need of invention or development.
Conclude your paper by arguing how and when technology is, or is not, a force multiplier for incidents such as the Minnesota Bridge Collapse, and support your arguments with evidence, not opinion.
Your final product should be well organized, well written, employ good mechanics, and be clear and persuasive. All information used that does not solely reflect original thought must be properly cited with appropriate references provided.
Be sure to reference .
Click on the following links for the Phase 4 Reading AssignmentNI.docxbartholomeocoombs
Click on the following links for the Phase 4 Reading Assignment:
NIMS Supporting Technology Evaluation Program
For this assignment, you will research and examine an actual emergency situation of your choosing (either a man-made or natural disaster) occurring within the last 8 years that required interaction among the local, state, and national levels. The research and examination should be reported in a paper written from the position of a local emergency management employee assigned to draft a report to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). This assignment will require research into the authority, responsibility, and technological capabilities of FEMA.
Within the past 8 years, there have been many catastrophes, not necessarily involving terrorist acts but requiring crisis management resources. Examples include Hurricane Katrina; the 2010 oil well explosion and oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico; the broken natural gas pipeline and resulting explosion in San Bruno, California; and major wildfires in California, Colorado, and other states, to name a few.
Assignment Guidelines
Address the following in a report of 750 words:
Briefly describe and summarize the event.
When did the event occur, and what happened?
Were there any casualties or injuries?
Was there any environmental damage? If so, explain
What was the primary cause of the event? Explain.
What intergovernmental jurisdictions were involved? How were they coordinated? Explain.
What types of technology were used during the response and recovery phases? Summarize them.
What tools, equipment, or technology could have significantly improved relief efforts? How?
Were any special technologies or scientific developments used to restore the situation back to normal? If so, explain.
Who should be responsible for funding and providing the tools, equipment, and technology—federal, state, or local governments? Why?
Were there any coordination problems, such as interagency communication or conflict? Why or why not?
What types of forecasting technologies could have been or were used in the event you selected? Explain.
Were they effective? Why or why not?
What conclusions and recommendations could you make? Explain.
Compile your responses in the final report, and submit the file to your instructor.
Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.
.
i HOW FIRE DEPARTMENTS RESPOND TO DISASTERS eve2xjazwa
i
HOW FIRE DEPARTMENTS RESPOND TO DISASTERS
by
Student X
This Thesis is being submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the
Bachelor of Science degree in Public Safety Management
Great College Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida
Fall, 2015
ii
DEDICATION
I would like to thank my wife Lindsey Perrotta for all of the help she has given
me throughout this research proposal, she was phenomenal in helping me complete this
project by answering questions for me and taking care of the children while I worked on
the project.
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to acknowledge Lindsey Perrotta for helping with the project, and
Professor Davis for providing guidance and the template for the project.
iv
ABSTRACT
This research proposal will answer the question of how prepared fire departments
are to respond to major disasters, by utilizing SOP’s SOG’s and mutual aid. It will
discuss problems that lie within these guidelines, such as communication issues, and
different equipment issues. The research proposal will also take a look at how well the
local fire department is prepared for any major incidents that arise, based on a small
population group, and a survey provided by the researcher to this group.
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Dedication ii
Acknowledgements iii
Abstract iv
Chapter 1 Introduction 6
Chapter 2 Review of Literature 8
Chapter 3 Methodology and Procedure 13
References 16
6
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
Often times disaster strikes on an extremely large scale, a scale that is too big for
one agency to handle. When these types of disasters strike multiple agencies come
together to mitigate the incident. One of the biggest challenges to mitigating incidents
when multiple agencies are brought together is finding the middle area based on how all
the agencies operate, since many agencies have different operations. Scoppetta (2008)
stated that having capability and flexibility are vital components of being prepared for
natural disasters and when multiple agencies that come together have these qualities
disasters are mitigated with relative ease.
Background Context
Often time’s major disasters are too large for one municipal fire department to
handle and these departments call upon mutual aid. The mutual aid will almost always
have different literature and training on how to respond to these incidents, which can lead
to major complications on scene. By utilizing national models and outlines on how to
respond to incidents these problems are often curbed, however the challenge is getting all
agencies to have training once and a while to cover these models. This research project
w ...
10.11770002716205285404 604MarchTHE ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN AC.docxhyacinthshackley2629
10.1177/0002716205285404 604MarchTHE ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMYAGILITY AND DISCIPLINE
For more than thirty years, the U.S. emergency manage-
ment community has been increasing its ability to struc-
ture, control, and manage a large response. The result of
this evolution is a National Response System based on
the National Response Plan and the National Incident
Management System that is perceived to have failed in
the response to Hurricane Katrina. Over the same
period, social scientists and other disaster researchers
have been documenting and describing the nonstruc-
tural factors such as improvisation, adaptability, and cre-
ativity that are critical to coordination, collaboration,
and communication and to successful problem solving.
This article argues that these two streams of thought are
not in opposition, but form orthogonal dimensions of
discipline and agility that must both be achieved. The
critical success factors that must be met to prepare for
and respond to an extreme event are described, and an
organizational typology is developed.
Keywords: response; critical success factors; agility;
improvisation; discipline
Extreme events such as the September 11,2001, attacks on the United States, the De-
cember 2004 Sumatra earthquake and Indian
Ocean Tsunami, Hurricane Katrina, and the
October 2005 Pakistan earthquake produce cat-
astrophic immediate impacts and cause long-
term disruption of economic and social systems.
With the exception of the 9/11 attacks, these
256 ANNALS, AAPSS, 604, March 2006
DOI: 10.1177/0002716205285404
Agility and
Discipline:
Critical Success
Factors for
Disaster
Response
By
JOHN R. HARRALD
John R. Harrald is the director of the George Washing-
ton University (GWU) Institute for Crisis, Disaster, and
Risk Management and a professor of engineering man-
agement in the GWU School of Engineering and Ap-
plied Science. He is the executive editor of the Journal of
Homeland Security and Emergency Management. He
has been actively engaged in the fields of emergency and
crisis management and maritime safety and port secu-
rity and as a researcher in his academic career and as a
practitioner during his twenty-two-year career as a U.S.
Coast Guard officer, retiring in the grade of captain. He
received his B.S. in engineering from the U.S. Coast
Guard Academy, an M.S. from the Massachusetts Insti-
tute of Technology where he was an Alfred P. Sloan Fel-
low, and an MBA and Ph.D. from Rensselaer Polytechnic
Institute.
events exceeded our ability to organize and execute coordinated, effective
response and relief efforts. The national response system crafted over the past
three years by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was tested for
the first time when Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf Coast. Hurricane Katrina
was a catastrophic event because it was actually two disasters. Comfort (2005, 5)
noted that “the first phase, the hurricane, could legitimately be called a natural
disaster, as it was genera.
CRJ Module 8 OverviewTerrorism and the Future of Emergency Manag.docxfaithxdunce63732
CRJ Module 8 Overview
Terrorism and the Future of Emergency Management
The September 11th (9/11) and the October 2001 Anthrax attacks together prompted dramatic changes in U.S. emergency management and have been the impetus for a reexamination of the nation’s emergency management system, its priorities, funding and practices. These changes are ongoing and will continue for the foreseeable future. In this module, you will learn how the government's hazard focus has been affected by the changing risk of terrorism. The events of September 11, 2001, the consequences of those events, and how the government responded will be discussed. You will also learn about the Department of Homeland Security along with its components and its role in emergency management.
In addition, you will investigate how the U.S. government communicates terrorist threat information to the public. You will outline how Hurricane Katrina affected terrorism preparedness and response. Lastly, the possibilities the future holds for emergency management and how the profession may be improved in the near future will be discussed and analyzed.
Learning Objectives
Upon completion of this module, you should be able to:
8I
Explain how the federal government funds first responders.
8J
Understand how the Department of Homeland Security was formed, its components, its role in the emergency management and counterterrorism efforts, and its accomplishments.
10C
Explain how the government's hazard focus has been affected by the changing risk of terrorism.
10D
Discuss the events of September 11, 2001, the consequences of those events, and how the government responded.
10E
Summarize how the U.S. government communicates terrorist threat information to the public.
10F
Understand why the 9/11 Commission was formed and what was found as a result of its investigation.
10G
Explain how state and local governments manage the risk of terrorism.
10H
Outline how Hurricane Katrina affected terrorism preparedness and response.
11A
Understand how the past has impacted emergency management as it exists today.
11B
Discuss the possibilities the future holds for emergency management, and how the profession may be improved in the near future.
Module 8 Reading Assignment
Haddow, G., Bullock, J., & Coppola, D. (2011). Introduction to emergency management. Burlington: Elsevier. Chapters 9 and 10.
Emergency Management and the New Terrorist Threat
The September 11th (9/11) and the October 2001 Anthrax attacks together prompted dramatic changes in U.S. emergency management, and have been the impetus for a reexamination of the nation’s emergency management system, its priorities, funding, and practices. These changes are ongoing and will continue for the foreseeable future. Prior to 9/11, the Nunn-Lugar legislation provided the primary authority for domestic Federal preparedness activities for terrorism. FEMA, DOJ, HHS, DOD, and the National Guard all jockeyed for leadership on terrorism. Attempts a.
1. What is one personal experience you have had with homeland se.docxchristiandean12115
1. What is one personal experience you have had with homeland security events or working with response partners within your community? If you have not had an experience, discuss one that you have heard about in the news.
2. If you had been in charge of establishing the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), would you have included the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in DHS, or would you have retained it as an independent executive branch agency reporting directly to the president? What is one ramification of moving FEMA into DHS in terms of FEMA’s mission, programs, and reporting structure? Explain.
3. Discuss the roles of the government and private sectors in protecting critical infrastructure using cybersecurity. Why do you think it is important to have cybersecurity at all levels? Explain your rationale for your position.
These are Discussion Board. 150 words.
Reference; Sauter, M. A., & Carafano, J. J. (2012). Homeland security: A complete guide (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
.
Running head PREPAREDNESS AND MITIGATION1PREPAREDNESS AND M.docxglendar3
Running head: PREPAREDNESS AND MITIGATION
1
PREPAREDNESS AND MITIGATION
2
Preparedness and Mitigation
Nathan Bailey
SEC/200
Prof. Vern Anderson
October 9, 2018
Preparedness and Mitigation
Storm Camille was the second-most extreme tropical violent wind to strike the United States on record. The most extreme tempest of the 1969 Atlantic typhoon season, Camille shaped as a tropical melancholy on August 14 south of Cuba from a since a long time ago followed tropical wave. Situated in an ideal domain for reinforcing, the tempest immediately strengthened into a Category 2 tropical storm before striking the western piece of the country on August 15. According to Buurman, Mens, & Dahm, (2017), emergency and disaster planning incorporates a sorted out, cooperated strategy of intending to facilitate the necessities with open resources. The stages are explored, forming, dispersal, testing, and revitalizing. Along these lines, an emergency plan should to be an active aspect that is irregularly adapted to changing circumstances in addition to that gives a manual for the traditions, techniques, as well as the division of obligations in emergency response.
Where the Organization Fall On the Preparedness Cycle
Rising into the Gulf of Mexico, Camille experienced another time of quick escalation and turned into a Category 5 sea tempest the following day as it moved northward towards the Louisiana– Mississippi area. In spite of debilitating marginally on August 17, the tropical storm rapidly re-increased back to a Category 5 preceding it made landfall in Pass Christian, Mississippi right off the bat August 18. The repeating idea of this model is imperative as it features that overseeing crises happens constantly, not simply amid 'the season' for instance for bushfires and tornados, It additionally demonstrates the manner in which the stages mix into one another and cover as opposed to being discrete classifications. This stage joins making gets ready for what to do, where to go, or who to call for help before an event occurs; exercises that will improve your chances of viably dealing with an emergency. For instance, posting emergency telephone numbers, and presenting smoke discoverers are all preparation measures. Diverse points of reference fuse perceiving where you would have the ability to shield your animals in a calamity. One should similarly consider setting up a disaster unit with crucial supplies for your family and animals.
The Organization's SWOT Analysis Results
With regards to mission, order and working condition, an examination of the Defense Forces' interior qualities and shortcomings, and outside circumstances and dangers have been embraced with the accompanying outcomes:
Strengths
The associations’ qualities in light of the current circumstance incorporate, the unexpected state of polished skill, devotion, and administration to the State. The flexibility of individual and aggregate confidence in the Forces. The high universal notoriety of .
Similar to Albright College Public Hurricane Katrina and FEMA Role Case Study.pdf (20)
If you are commenting only in this forum, then please post a brief comment on Kant's notion of the "good will." Explain whether you agree with Kant's view that "an action done from duty must wholly exclude the influence of inclination and with it every object of the will."
Explain whether you agree with Kant's view that "an action done from duty must wholly exclude the influence of inclination and with it every object of the will, so that nothing remains which can determine the will except objectively the law."
Please be sure to use proper punctuation, and to avoid words and phrases that are vague and general. Aim for precision. Use short quotations from the primary text (the reading below) to develop and support your argument. It is perfectly acceptable to discuss lines or ideas that confused you.
Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (selections)
Nothing can possibly be conceived in the world, or even out of it, which can be called good, without qualification, except a good will. Intelligence, wit, judgement, and the other talents of the mind, however they may be named, or courage, resolution, perseverance, as qualities of temperament, are undoubtedly good and desirable in many respects; but these gifts of nature may also become extremely bad and mischievous if the will which is to make use of them, and which, therefore, constitutes what is called character, is not good. It is the same with the gifts of fortune. Power, riches, honour, even health, and the general well-being and contentment with one’s condition which is called happiness, inspire pride, and often presumption, if there is not a good will to correct the influence of these on the mind, and with this also to rectify the whole principle of acting and adapt it to its end. The sight of a being who is not adorned with a single feature of a pure and good will, enjoying unbroken prosperity, can never give pleasure to an impartial rational spectator. Thus a good will appears to constitute the indispensable condition even of being worthy of happiness… A good will is good not because of what it performs or effects, not by its aptness for the attainment of some proposed end, but simply by virtue of the volition; that is, it is good in itself, and considered by itself is to be esteemed much higher than all that can be brought about by it in favour of any inclination, nay even of the sum total of all inclinations...
Now an action done from duty must wholly exclude the influence of inclination and with it every object of the will, so that nothing remains which can determine the will except objectively the law, and subjectively pure respect for this practical law, and consequently the maxim that I should follow this law even to the thwarting of all my inclinations… Thus the moral worth of an action does not lie in the effect expected from it, nor in any principle of action which requires to borrow its motive from this expected effect. For all these effects agreeableness of one’s condition and
Watch at least one of the posted videos for Week 10 below.
Dr. Leroy Little Bear connects quantum physics to the Indigenous belief in "spirit," an idea that implies each person's intense ethical relationship to the world. He also reminds us that science is as much a belief system (and value system) as any spiritual tradition. In a similar fashion, Physicist David Bohm (a student of Einstein) wrote a book called Wholeness and the Implicate Order, arguing that our measurements of the physical world provide an incomplete picture of reality, and that there is a non-local, interconnected realm in which everything is fundamentally linked to everything else.
Do you think that "infinite potential" can be left out of our discussion of ethics? You may recall that Kant, in the late 18th Century, left "noumena" outside of human cognition (which only knows "phenomena" or mental representations). In the 1920s, Whitehead questioned Kant's move to privilege reason over feeling, and to cast the metaphysical outside of human knowledge. In doing so, Whitehead offered a simpler explanation of ethics: the world itself is composed of feelings or values (prior to human cognition).
Looking at this question from your own background, tradition, and experience, do you think that we can experience the infinite (and, in it, infinite ethical interrelationship)?
Is it possible that science (as the video "Infinite Potential" suggests) is on the verge of discovering the "field" that connects all things. Ethically, this would mean that your every thought, word, and action affects the whole world. Given such confirmation, would you live any differently?
Conversely, do you think that the absence of scientific confirmation about (and interest in) the metaphysical dimensions of ethics allows us moderns to behave in questionable ways?
Plato's Allegory of the Cave seems to suggest that only through questioning social reality, and improving ourselves intellectually, can we discover the real source of virtue (and be virtuous). Aristotle's notion of phrónesis (“practical wisdom”) seems to dismiss the notion of an intrinsic source of virtue, to emphasize instead that virtue is a practical skill that we develop through practice, which enables us to reliably choose the middle point between extremes in all situations.
Who do you agree with more, Plato or Aristotle? And why?
"Virtue is a state of character concerned with a choice, lying in a mean relative to us, this being determined by a rational principle, and by that principle by which the person of practical wisdom would determine it." (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics 2.6)
Some fun video links below.
Aristotle and Virtue Ethics
Play Video
Plato, Allegory of the Cave (Theory of Forms - flawed reflections of ideal forms. Knowledge. Representation.
Whitehead and Dr. Leroy Little Bear both emphasize the ethical implications of interconnectedness. We have seen in this course that moral frameworks from the Age of Reason emphasize knowledge/reason, while alternatives (care ethics, ecological ethics, Indigenous ethics, Buddhist ethics, nonwestern ethics) emphasize wisdom. What is wisdom? The sciences of ecology and quantum physics tell us about interconnectedness, based on careful measurements (knowledge), but can this sense of interconnectedness be accessed through contemplative wisdom?
Do we need an ethics grounded in wisdom?
As a group do you think that, as individuals, we ever experience ethical interconnectedness that is metaphysical or part of "spirit"? Are the brain and the mind the same thing?
Topic: Critically analyze celebrity politics and compare two relevant recent cases.
You have been randomly divided into X groups, each of which has X members. It accounts for 15% of your overall score! Every group has 15 minutes during class time.
1- Work together cohesively as a group.
2- Divide up responsibilities.
4- Will each member be covering a different point or subtopic, or will you alternate speaking between members?
5- Look for and eliminate overlap. Avoid having group members repeat what was already said before.
6- You can use visual aids while you give your presentation.
7- Read the rubric for group presentation.
Due Date Week 6 (Must be submitted by May 14 Sunday 11 pm)
Evaluation 10%
Grading Rubric attached to the assignment
The ArticleBook Report Assignment taps into your ability to assess a published paper's data critically.
Article reports aim to increase a reader's understanding of an article's thesis and the contents. Writing an
Article Report typically entails analyzing, classifying, summarizing, evaluating, and your own reflection.
You will select three articles from your UCW library and write reports in the format of annotated
bibliography! You will write three (3) 200-word Article Reports
About the Articles
Some current Issues You can pick one of these topics!
▪ Artificial Intelligence
▪ Gig Economy
▪ Emotional Intelligence
▪ Covid 19 and Mental Health
▪ Gender Inequality
▪ Immigration Stresses
▪ Digital currencies
Tips
1. Try to work on recent articles (From 2018 to 2023)
2. Annotate your article first and use your notes to create annotated bibliography)
3. You can watch my video on academic reading and annotation, too.
httpswww.youtube.comwatchv=vpgHOe8D6kw
4. Highlight the THREE sections in your three samples
To complete the report (annotated bibliography), consider following the steps
• Add the title reference
• Write a summary (about 60-80 words)
• Write your evaluation (about 60-80 words)
• Write your reflection (about 60-70 words)
The submission files include
• Title Page
• Report 1
• Report 2
• Report 3
• References Page
Use the APA Style (Size=12 Type Times New Romans) Spacing (1.
Question # 1
What is the significance of fur trade in the development of early European settlement in Canada? Highlight the history of the origin of New France and its impact on the development of urban centers.
Question #2
How do you view the role of Hudson Bay Company (HBC) in the expansion of English settlement in Western Canada?
Question # 3
What are the underlying factors in the speedy urbanization of Montreal? Write about the working class environment according to Joe Beef's descriptions.
Question # 4 Highlight the major factors of urbanization of Toronto. Evaluate the role of commercial activities in the urban sprawl in Toronto.
I. Introduction
A. Briefly introduce the topic of the essay and its importance.
B. Provide background information on the role of education in fighting injustice.
C. State the thesis of the essay.
II. The role of education in fighting injustice according to Marx
A. Explain Marx's theory of education as a means of social transformation.
B. Provide evidence from Marx's writings on the importance of education in the fight against social injustice.
C. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of Marx's ideas on the role of education in fighting injustice.
III. The role of education in fighting injustice according to MLK
A. Explain MLK's theory of education as a tool for social change.
B. Provide examples from MLK's speeches and writings on the importance of education in the fight against social injustice.
C. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of MLK's ideas on the role of education in fighting injustice.
IV. The role of education in fighting injustice according to Alinsky
A. Explain Alinsky's theory of education as a means of empowering marginalized communities.
B. Provide evidence from Alinsky's writings on the importance of education in the fight against social injustice.
C. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of Alinsky's ideas on the role of education in fighting injustice.
V. Comparing and contrasting the three perspectives
A. Discuss the similarities and differences between Marx, MLK, and Alinsky's views on the role of education in fighting injustice.
B. Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of each perspective and compare them to one another.
C. Explore the implications of these different views for contemporary social justice movements.
VI. Critiques of the role of education in fighting injustice
A. Discuss some of the critiques of the idea that education is the key to fighting injustice.
B. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these critiques and how they relate to the ideas of Marx, MLK, and Alinsky.
C. Offer potential responses to these critiques.
VII. Conclusion
A. Summarize the main points of the essay and restate the thesis.
B. Offer final thoughts on the role of education in fighting injustice.
C. Suggest areas for further research and reflection.
please when citing in the text use page number when possible //
PLEASE USE THE FOLLOWING REFERENCES:
Marx, K. (1867). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. (Vol. 1). Penguin Books.
Marx, K. (1848). The Communist Manifesto. Penguin Classics.
Marx, K. (1859). A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Progress Publishers.
McLellan, D. (1995). Karl Marx: A Biography. Palgrave Macmillan
Marx, K. (1845). Theses on Feuerbach. Retrieved from https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/theses/theses.htm
Marx, K. (1867). Capital: A critique of political economy. Volume 1. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Marx, K. (1888). The Communist Manifesto. London: Penguin Books.
Mettler, L. (2002). Marx, education, and the possibilities of post-capitalist futures. Educational Theory, 52(1
Week 4 Assignment - Case Study: COSO Components Principles
COSO principles are important factors in assuring a company has a reasonable structure in decision-making areas. In addition, COSO provides a framework for companies to work upon. It does not provide a functioning process—processes are established based on the company's needs, culture, and environment.
Aytaç and Çabuk (2020) discuss 17 COSO components in Assessment of the Effectiveness of Internal Control System and a Case Study. For a company of your choice, choose four components and establish processes to apply them.
• The submission should be 1–2 pages long.
• Use two sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source slide at least one time within your assignment. For help with research, writing, and citation, access the library or review library guides.
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Week 4 Assignment - Case Study: COSO Components Principles
COSO principles are important factors in assuring a company has a reasonable structure in decision-making areas. In addition, COSO provides a framework for companies to work upon. It does not provide a functioning process—processes are established based on the company's needs, culture, and environment.
Aytaç and Çabuk (2020) discuss 17 COSO components in Assessment of the Effectiveness of Internal Control System and a Case Study. For a company of your choice, choose four components and establish processes to apply them.
• The submission should be 1–2 pages long.
• Use two sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source slide at least one time within your assignment. For help with research, writing, and citation, access the library or review library guides.
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
In the book review, the student will critically assess the text book- Hurlbert, M.A. (2018). Pursuing Justice: An Introduction to Justice Studies. 2nd Eds. Fernwood Publishing.
You will consider what lessons can be drawn from the book. You may focus on the following items:
• What are the highlights? What did you learn from this book?
Would you recommend this book to someone else? Why and why not?
• Keep a section on critiquing the book. What is missing?
The book review should display good writing skills in terms of spelling, grammar, logic, and coherence. It will be marked in terms of the quality of the student's writing, their ability to draw lessons from the book, and the extent to which they can make a persuasive argument about whether they would recommend the book to others.
Format: Double spaced; 12 Font; Times New Roman, 1 inch page margins. APA 7th Format. Word document only; 2-3 pages (including title and reference page).
For this assignment, refer to your own personal Indigo TriMetrix DNA assessment report.
Write a paper starting with an introduction and then for part one, comment on your DISC style and on your top two or three Skills, Driving Forces and Motivators (refer to these sections of the assessment report). Explain what your awareness of these results means for you. What will you do differently? What do you want to improve upon or work on? Describe what you believe to be the two strongest and weakest areas of your personality, with reference to the assessment results?
If you have work experience, please use your past professional experience to provide examples of those skills, motivators and driving forces in action. If you do not have work experience, then refer to examples from school or family interactions.
In part two, explore how those traits of yours may impact your career and work performance based on your current or aspirational career path. Which traits are likely to be key to your success? Which traits will you have to be careful to work on, improve upon or regulate? How will you do this?
Finally, in part three, develop a written action plan (with actual concrete steps you’ll take) to improve in those areas you identified above as needing your attention.
At the end of the paper include a short conclusion.
Organise your paper with proper APA headings.
No abstract nor table of contents is necessary.
Support your paper with 6-8 scholarly research sources, with one being your textbook.
The paper should be between 1,600 and 1,800 words (not including cover page and references) and written using APA format. Adhering as closely as possible to the word count target is part of the exercise, requiring you to be selective with the information you include and ensuring everything you include adds value.
Before you get started, please carefully review the marking rubric below.
¢ Political Advertisement
Write an advertisement for a politician to win a
national election in a country of your own choice,
it could be a real or fictional politician.
Please read the syllabus as well as the rubric for
essays in the pre-introduction section!
Be both critical and creative. Use the theories
discussed in class to enrich your work. Use
reliable resources.
Instructions |
the report must be:
1- at least three pages
3- backed by theories (including those we have
discussed up until now)
3- areal proposal
4- consider different possible aspects of the
election (resources, national mood, type of
election, means of communication, etc.)
Please read the assignment guidelines in your
syllabus for instructions regarding font, style, etc.
Be as much critical and creative as you can. You
read about many relevant contributing factors on
the internet.
The background of the research is the personal and professional experience of the researcher, who has worked in the museum sector in Ireland for the past five years and has recently moved into the university advancement sector. Through this experience, the author has identified gaps within fundraising strategies in Irish museums, which has led to an interest in exploring similar institutions and learning from their strategies.
This background is significant because it provides context for the research question and objectives, along with a personal motivation for the researcher. It also suggests that the author has a deep understanding of the museum and higher education sectors in Ireland, which can be valuable in conducting the research and analysing the results..
Research question and objectives
The inquiry into whether museums should seek guidance from higher education on fundraising strategies presents an intriguing topic for discussion. It is worth noting that both sectors rely on government grants, trusts, and philanthropy to supplement their budgets, among other similarities. However, universities have been fundraising for considerably longer than museums and have even established development offices solely dedicated to fundraising efforts. As a result, universities have developed sophisticated strategies for identifying and engaging donors. There may be valuable insights that museums can gain by examining and adapting these strategies to their specific requirements. The choice of Trinity College Dublin and Chester Beatty as case studies reflects the authors’ personal connection and deep understanding of these institutions, which can provide a rich and nuanced understanding of their fundraising strategies.
Use British English.
Needs: introduction, a literature review, a bit of background on the zapatista movement - Women's Revolutionary Law (Ley revolucionaria de mujeres), two main parts, conclusion. Draw on some comparisons to other indigenous communities in Latin America throughout.
Two main parts: Legal pluralities and the Government. The dissertation aims to explore the different challenges experienced in legal pluralities where Indigenous people have their own set of laws, and those experienced as a result of Government laws and actions
Overarching research question:
Critically analyse whether technology-aided learning in Higher education has the potential to develop an inclusive learning environment.
Research question 1.1
Identify the factors necessary for creating an inclusive learning environment in higher education.
Research question 1.2
To analyse whether a technology-aided learning environment can enhance learners’ attainment.
In addition to the proposed research questions, the literature review will also explore the impact of technology-driven learning on;
• The challenges of creating an inclusive learning environment through technology.
An 8000 word dissertation on Stop and Search Policies in the UK.
Stop and Search Policies in the UK: A Critical Evaluation of the Impact on Reducing Gun Crime and the Perception of Racial Bias Amongst Ethnic Minorities
Advise Albert, Gloria and LAW whether they will be able to bring claims for judicial review to challenge the decisions made by LDC and, if so, the grounds of challenge they could rely on and the remedies they should seek.
As part of your answer please research at least one recent case (that is, a case decided in 2019 or later) which relates to any of the issues you identify. You should briefly explain the facts, the reasoning and the outcome of the case(s) you have researched.
Word Limit – 2,000 words, excess words will not be given credit.
I am from Ireland and am doing a hospitality based thesis. Something along the lines of hotel management or 5 star hotels, whichever title you prefer or whatever suits your research. I need someone to do this and include local research. I have had someone attempt to make me one already but only included references from India and places on the other side of the world. It must be in the Irish thesis format too. Text me if you are interested and we can discuss further, please do not waste my time
Paper detalis:
The paper should include and have the following structure:
1. Introduction
Research question, aims, and objectives, Why is your question relevant?
2. Literature Review
Brief background about your research topic. Discuss what work has already been done and
link it to your research question.
3. Proposed Methodology and Data
Whether you propose to use qualitative or quantitative methodology?
Which data source: primary or secondary?
Data collection technique?
Data analysis technique (If possible)?
More from Need Help With Your Assignments Or Essays?|| Hire Us Today||Email US: Homework1078@gmail.com (20)
Want to move your career forward? Looking to build your leadership skills while helping others learn, grow, and improve their skills? Seeking someone who can guide you in achieving these goals?
You can accomplish this through a mentoring partnership. Learn more about the PMISSC Mentoring Program, where you’ll discover the incredible benefits of becoming a mentor or mentee. This program is designed to foster professional growth, enhance skills, and build a strong network within the project management community. Whether you're looking to share your expertise or seeking guidance to advance your career, the PMI Mentoring Program offers valuable opportunities for personal and professional development.
Watch this to learn:
* Overview of the PMISSC Mentoring Program: Mission, vision, and objectives.
* Benefits for Volunteer Mentors: Professional development, networking, personal satisfaction, and recognition.
* Advantages for Mentees: Career advancement, skill development, networking, and confidence building.
* Program Structure and Expectations: Mentor-mentee matching process, program phases, and time commitment.
* Success Stories and Testimonials: Inspiring examples from past participants.
* How to Get Involved: Steps to participate and resources available for support throughout the program.
Learn how you can make a difference in the project management community and take the next step in your professional journey.
About Hector Del Castillo
Hector is VP of Professional Development at the PMI Silver Spring Chapter, and CEO of Bold PM. He's a mid-market growth product executive and changemaker. He works with mid-market product-driven software executives to solve their biggest growth problems. He scales product growth, optimizes ops and builds loyal customers. He has reduced customer churn 33%, and boosted sales 47% for clients. He makes a significant impact by building and launching world-changing AI-powered products. If you're looking for an engaging and inspiring speaker to spark creativity and innovation within your organization, set up an appointment to discuss your specific needs and identify a suitable topic to inspire your audience at your next corporate conference, symposium, executive summit, or planning retreat.
About PMI Silver Spring Chapter
We are a branch of the Project Management Institute. We offer a platform for project management professionals in Silver Spring, MD, and the DC/Baltimore metro area. Monthly meetings facilitate networking, knowledge sharing, and professional development. For event details, visit pmissc.org.
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Modern Society.pdfssuser3e63fc
Just a game Assignment 3
1. What has made Louis Vuitton's business model successful in the Japanese luxury market?
2. What are the opportunities and challenges for Louis Vuitton in Japan?
3. What are the specifics of the Japanese fashion luxury market?
4. How did Louis Vuitton enter into the Japanese market originally? What were the other entry strategies it adopted later to strengthen its presence?
5. Will Louis Vuitton have any new challenges arise due to the global financial crisis? How does it overcome the new challenges?Assignment 3
1. What has made Louis Vuitton's business model successful in the Japanese luxury market?
2. What are the opportunities and challenges for Louis Vuitton in Japan?
3. What are the specifics of the Japanese fashion luxury market?
4. How did Louis Vuitton enter into the Japanese market originally? What were the other entry strategies it adopted later to strengthen its presence?
5. Will Louis Vuitton have any new challenges arise due to the global financial crisis? How does it overcome the new challenges?Assignment 3
1. What has made Louis Vuitton's business model successful in the Japanese luxury market?
2. What are the opportunities and challenges for Louis Vuitton in Japan?
3. What are the specifics of the Japanese fashion luxury market?
4. How did Louis Vuitton enter into the Japanese market originally? What were the other entry strategies it adopted later to strengthen its presence?
5. Will Louis Vuitton have any new challenges arise due to the global financial crisis? How does it overcome the new challenges?
NIDM (National Institute Of Digital Marketing) Bangalore Is One Of The Leading & best Digital Marketing Institute In Bangalore, India And We Have Brand Value For The Quality Of Education Which We Provide.
www.nidmindia.com
Exploring Career Paths in Cybersecurity for Technical CommunicatorsBen Woelk, CISSP, CPTC
Brief overview of career options in cybersecurity for technical communicators. Includes discussion of my career path, certification options, NICE and NIST resources.
han han widi kembar tapi beda han han dan widi kembar tapi sama
Albright College Public Hurricane Katrina and FEMA Role Case Study.pdf
1. Albright College Public Hurricane Katrina and FEMA Role Case Study
Analysis 2
Question DescriptionCase Study 2Hey there, this is a case study that I have provided all
information for below. I will also attach a sample once I have chosen a tutor and I can
provide any information that is needed IF I HAVE IT!These assignments are designed to
provide you an opportunity to think about how you would handle specific public
administration issues. There is no right or wrong answer for the assignments, per se. Your
memo should have the following sections:Central IssueMajor Factors in Development of
Policy/Management ProblemAlternatives for Resolving the ProblemAuthor’s
Recommended Solution and RationaleLessons for Public AdministrationGrades will be
determined on:Ability to present the relevance of the case, main facts, key issues,
theoretical relationships, and practical lessons;Ability to adequately address the five
sections;Ability to support your arguments; andAbility to write in a professional
fashion.Case Study #2: HKS 1843.0 (Hurricane Katrina: Preparing for “The Big One” in New
Orleans)This case tells the story of the lead-up to the storm, detailing the plans that officials
would draw on to prepare for the hurricane’s onslaught, the steps that were taken to
evacuate and shelter hundreds of thousands of residents in metropolitan New Orleans, and
the communications among different agencies and levels of government as the storm drew
near; it shows officials concerned about the effects of the hurricane, but confident that their
preparations were commensurate with the challenges that Katrina would pose. The case
asks readers to consider why local, state, and federal governments all proved unready to
respond effectively to a catastrophic event which had been long predicted.Since the attacks
of September 11th, 2001 the government has shifted the focus of many agencies towards
terrorism. The reorganization of many agencies into the newly formed Department of
Homeland Security has changed the operational structure with which many have been
accustomed. The Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security has asked you to form a
work group to explain what some of the problems with DHS’s structure that were prevented
it from helping Louisiana and the surrounding states prepare for hurricane
Katrina.Recommended questions to address or to consider:What actions were taken by
local, state and federal agencies to prepare for Katrina? Was DHS involved in these? Were
they prevented from being involved?How had FEMA’s role and resources changed since
becoming part of DHS?How could FEMA have been better able to assist in