SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 42
Alaska Earthquakes
& Tsunami
Robert Butler
ANGLE Project
https://serc.carleton.edu/ANGLE
Great (M > 8) Alaska Earthquakes
In 27 years from 1938 to 1965, a series of great earthquakes
ruptured almost the entire length of the subduction zone.
How often do great earthquakes occur in eastern portion?
Land Level Changes During 1964 Alaska Earthquake
Areas in the
uplift zone were
raised as much
as 6 meters
while areas in
the subsidence
zone dropped by
more than
2 meters. Pacific Plate
Making a Ghost Forest
1. Coastal forest above high tide before earthquake.
2. Earthquake drops forest into intertidal zone.
3. Tsunami rushes ashore depositing sand on soil layer.
4. Trees die from immersion in salt water.
5. Intertidal mud & clay deposited above tsunami sand.
“Three layer cake” = buried soil, tsunami sand, intertidal mud.
What layer did we NOT see at Girdwood? Why?
Average time between earthquakes
= Recurrence time.
Recurrence time for M9
Earthquakes (e.g. 1964) in Prince
William Sound = 700 - 900 years.
(Pre)History of Great Alaska Earthquakes
8 sand sheets in ~2200 yrs
Tsunami recurrence 280–295 yrs
Girdwood Umnak Island
Cupcake
Geology
Alaska Seismicity
Since 1900:
45 M 5–6 EQs / year
6 M 6–7 EQs / year
1 M 7–8 EQs / year
8 M > 8 EQs
1 M = 9.2 EQ
USGS Estimated shaking intensity from M 7.9 Earthquake
Jan 23, 2018 Magnitude 7.9 Southeast of Kodiak
Light to moderate shaking
from this earthquake was
felt across southern Alaska.
Left-lateral strike-slip on ENE – WSW
oriented fault within the Pacific Plate.
Strike-slip faulting does not produce
vertical offset of the ocean floor so
does not generally produce a tsunami.
BUT a small tsunami was observed.
Many citizens of Kodiak appropriately evacuated
from the tsunami inundation zone to high ground.
Complicated Tsunami from a Relatively Simple Earthquake
USGS Estimated shaking Intensity from M 7.1 Earthquake
Jan 24, 2016 Magnitude 7.1 Beneath Iniskin
Moderate to strong shaking
from this earthquake was felt
within 150 km of epicenter.
Depth = 127.8 km (79.4 miles).
Ground shaking would have been
more severe if the earthquake
had occurred at shallower depth.
No reports of injuries, but four
homes lost to natural gas
explosions or fire.
Animation of Iniskin Seismic Waves
P waves reach surface at 15 seconds while S waves arrive at 25 seconds.
Seismic waves are amplified and slowed by Cook Inlet sedimentary basin.
Cross Section Through Anchorage
M7.1 Iniskin Earthquake
Iniskin earthquake occurred within Pacific Plate at 128 km depth.
Caused by bending and shearing of Pacific Plate during subduction.
Denali 2002 Crustal Fault Earthquake
Nov 3, 2002
M7.9
Depth = 5 km
90 second
rupture interval.
Largest inland
earthquake in
North America in
almost 150 years.
Denali 2002 Foreshock, Mainshock, Aftershocks
Maximum displacement > 8 m
(~30 feet). Pipeline was
designed to withstand ground
shaking and offset by
earthquakes. It did.
Denali 2002 Earthquake Effects
Seismic Landslides, Liquefaction, Triggered
EQs in Yellowstone & CA, Seiche in Lake Union.
Alaska Tectonics & Earthquakes Animation
QuickTime Animation
Alaska Earthquake Hazard Map
Alaska–Aleutian Subduction Zone
In most locations, the shallow plate boundary is “locked and loading”.
Pacific Plate
North American Plate
GPS Stations in Alaska
AK Plate Motion Poster
GPS Gumdrop
Alaska GPS Challenges
How GPS location is determined
Antenna position is determined by calculating the
distances to at least 4 satellites. This enables
the solving for 4 variables: x, y, z and time.
Demonstration: Locating Receiver With GPS
AC 79
Montague Is.
AC 20
Girdwood
AC 32
Mt. Susitna
Transect Across Prince William Sound
AC20 Girdwood
Girdwood: Horizontal Rates of Motion?
North displacement
= 136 mm
North velocity:
136 mm/12.5 yr
= 10.9 mm/yr
WEST displacement
= 122 mm
West velocity:
122 mm/12.5 yr
= 9.8 mm/yr
2005.5 2018.0
Interval: 12.5 yr
Horizontal velocities:
AC 79 48.1 mm/yr
AC20 14.7 mm/yr
AC32 4.8 mm/yr
Transect Across Prince William Sound
0 10102030
0
10
10
20
30
40
50
Velocity (mm/yr)
0 10102030
0
10
10
20
30
40
50
Velocity (mm/yr)
Velocity(mm/yr)
Velocity(mm/yr)
NorthSouth
West
West East
East
AC32 Mt Susitna
5 mm/yr
NW – SE Compression of Prince William Sound
AC79
AC20
AC32
Anchorage
Pacific Plate
25mm/yr
Earthquake Early Warning
GPS observations are critical to Earthquake Early
Warning for great subduction zone earthquakes.
Prince William Sound
Old Chenega
20 km
Prince William Sound Cross Section
Vertical Displacement from 1964 Earthquake
Uplift of seafloor was source of the “tectonic” tsunami that
affected Prince William Sound, Kenai Peninsula, and Kodiak Is.
A Fountain of Information on Effects of 1964
Earthquake & Tsunami on Communities
USGS Professional
Paper 542-A to 542-G
Seward in Resurrection Bay
March 27, 1964 Tides in Resurrection Bay
Tsunamis ride the tides. Fortunate to have a low tide (and
full moon) during 1964 Great Alaska earthquake and tsunami.
Seward Coseismic Subsidence
Land dropped 1.1 meters at Seward during 1964 earthquake.
Land subsidence will increase tsunami inundation. Not good.
Seward Before & After March 27, 1964
After 30 seconds of shaking, a landslide including part of waterfront slid into the
bay rupturing fuel tanks and igniting oil. Two under-water landslides occurred at
same time. Series of three landslide-generated waves up to 6 meters high arrived
during first 3 minutes of shaking. Tectonic tsunami, covered in burning oil, arrived
~20 minutes after ground shaking stopped. Third tectonic tsunami wave was highest
at ~8 meters height. Wind blowing toward bay prevented entire town from burning.
Highest Inundation
13 Fatalities
Seward 1964 Landslides
Detailed bathymetric
studies allow
reconstruction of sizes
of landslides.
Modeling of tsunami
generated by three
landslides at head of
bay can reproduce the
observed wave heights
and sequence.
Modeling of tectonic
tsunami reproduces
arrival times and height
of longer period waves.
Tectonic
Tsunami
Landslide-
generated
TsunamiObserved
Observed
Modeling of Tsunamis in Seward
In some areas,
tectonic tsunami
advanced
farther on land.
Whittier After 1964 Tsunami
Whittier subsided 1.6 m during the earthquake. 13 out of 70 people in
Whittier in 1964 perished in the tsunamis. Three waves generated by
landslides arrived during ground shaking to completely destroy buildings of
two lumber companies. Fire destroyed fuel-storage tanks at waterfront.
Whittier 1964 Landslides
Detailed bathymetric studies of Passage Canal allow reconstruction of
sizes of landslides. Modeling of tsunami generated by three landslides
can reproduce the observed landslide-generated tsunami.
Modeled Landslide-Generated Tsunami in Whittier
Model reasonably fits observed landslide-generated tsunami.
North shore runup
over 30 meters.
Whittier runup
~ 13 meters.
Whittier Creek
runup ~ 16 meters.
Modeled Tectonic Tsunami at Whittier
Tectonic tsunami arrived ~ 1 hour after earthquake but did not
inundate Whittier and was not even noticed by eyewitness observers.
Three meter maximum tectonic tsunami height in Whittier much
smaller than ~8 meter maximum tectonic tsunami height in Seward.
Why might that be? Let’s explore with Wave Tank Model.
Vertical Displacement from 1964 Earthquake
Vertical Displacement from 1964 Earthquake
Whittier
Seward
Wave Tank

More Related Content

What's hot

Kobe Earthquake
Kobe Earthquake Kobe Earthquake
Kobe Earthquake jerlewis
 
CEE559_Gummaraj_Bharath_FinalPresentation
CEE559_Gummaraj_Bharath_FinalPresentationCEE559_Gummaraj_Bharath_FinalPresentation
CEE559_Gummaraj_Bharath_FinalPresentationBharath Gummaraj
 
Earthquakes -its effects on environment
Earthquakes -its effects on environmentEarthquakes -its effects on environment
Earthquakes -its effects on environmentNARESH KUMAR
 
Presentation with case study on earhquake
Presentation with case study on earhquake Presentation with case study on earhquake
Presentation with case study on earhquake JatinAggrawal
 
Haiti Casestudy
Haiti CasestudyHaiti Casestudy
Haiti CasestudyRuth1618
 
Indian ocean earthquake and tsunami (2004)
Indian ocean earthquake and tsunami (2004)Indian ocean earthquake and tsunami (2004)
Indian ocean earthquake and tsunami (2004)Angelica Jane Paltogen
 
Earthquake resistance buildings
Earthquake resistance buildingsEarthquake resistance buildings
Earthquake resistance buildingsNishtha Lakdawala
 
Kashmir earthquake case study
Kashmir earthquake case studyKashmir earthquake case study
Kashmir earthquake case studyRuth1618
 
HUMANITIES YEAR 9: THE BOXING DAY TSUNAMI 2004
HUMANITIES YEAR 9: THE BOXING DAY TSUNAMI 2004HUMANITIES YEAR 9: THE BOXING DAY TSUNAMI 2004
HUMANITIES YEAR 9: THE BOXING DAY TSUNAMI 2004George Dumitrache
 
Tsunami and india
Tsunami and indiaTsunami and india
Tsunami and indiasam ran
 
Bhuj earthquake 2001 by:umang talpara
Bhuj earthquake 2001 by:umang talparaBhuj earthquake 2001 by:umang talpara
Bhuj earthquake 2001 by:umang talparaumang talpara
 
Land_slide_A_case_of_Malpa.ppt
Land_slide_A_case_of_Malpa.pptLand_slide_A_case_of_Malpa.ppt
Land_slide_A_case_of_Malpa.pptdarshilbhati1
 
Housing Presentation
Housing Presentation Housing Presentation
Housing Presentation Dhanya Pravin
 
Sichuan earthquake case study
Sichuan earthquake case studySichuan earthquake case study
Sichuan earthquake case studyRuth1618
 
Nepal Earthquake
Nepal EarthquakeNepal Earthquake
Nepal EarthquakeGraeme Eyre
 
2005 Kashmir Earthquake by James Spiteri (4.05)
2005 Kashmir Earthquake by James Spiteri (4.05)2005 Kashmir Earthquake by James Spiteri (4.05)
2005 Kashmir Earthquake by James Spiteri (4.05)geographystudents
 
2008 sichuan earthquake
2008 sichuan earthquake2008 sichuan earthquake
2008 sichuan earthquakeBruce Liu
 

What's hot (20)

Kobe Earthquake
Kobe Earthquake Kobe Earthquake
Kobe Earthquake
 
CEE559_Gummaraj_Bharath_FinalPresentation
CEE559_Gummaraj_Bharath_FinalPresentationCEE559_Gummaraj_Bharath_FinalPresentation
CEE559_Gummaraj_Bharath_FinalPresentation
 
Earthquakes -its effects on environment
Earthquakes -its effects on environmentEarthquakes -its effects on environment
Earthquakes -its effects on environment
 
BHUJ EARTHQUAKE
BHUJ EARTHQUAKEBHUJ EARTHQUAKE
BHUJ EARTHQUAKE
 
Presentation with case study on earhquake
Presentation with case study on earhquake Presentation with case study on earhquake
Presentation with case study on earhquake
 
Haiti Casestudy
Haiti CasestudyHaiti Casestudy
Haiti Casestudy
 
Indian ocean earthquake and tsunami (2004)
Indian ocean earthquake and tsunami (2004)Indian ocean earthquake and tsunami (2004)
Indian ocean earthquake and tsunami (2004)
 
Geotechnical Aspects of EQ Resistant Design
Geotechnical Aspects of EQ Resistant DesignGeotechnical Aspects of EQ Resistant Design
Geotechnical Aspects of EQ Resistant Design
 
Earthquake resistance buildings
Earthquake resistance buildingsEarthquake resistance buildings
Earthquake resistance buildings
 
Kashmir earthquake case study
Kashmir earthquake case studyKashmir earthquake case study
Kashmir earthquake case study
 
HUMANITIES YEAR 9: THE BOXING DAY TSUNAMI 2004
HUMANITIES YEAR 9: THE BOXING DAY TSUNAMI 2004HUMANITIES YEAR 9: THE BOXING DAY TSUNAMI 2004
HUMANITIES YEAR 9: THE BOXING DAY TSUNAMI 2004
 
SITE ANALYSIS
SITE ANALYSISSITE ANALYSIS
SITE ANALYSIS
 
Tsunami and india
Tsunami and indiaTsunami and india
Tsunami and india
 
Bhuj earthquake 2001 by:umang talpara
Bhuj earthquake 2001 by:umang talparaBhuj earthquake 2001 by:umang talpara
Bhuj earthquake 2001 by:umang talpara
 
Land_slide_A_case_of_Malpa.ppt
Land_slide_A_case_of_Malpa.pptLand_slide_A_case_of_Malpa.ppt
Land_slide_A_case_of_Malpa.ppt
 
Housing Presentation
Housing Presentation Housing Presentation
Housing Presentation
 
Sichuan earthquake case study
Sichuan earthquake case studySichuan earthquake case study
Sichuan earthquake case study
 
Nepal Earthquake
Nepal EarthquakeNepal Earthquake
Nepal Earthquake
 
2005 Kashmir Earthquake by James Spiteri (4.05)
2005 Kashmir Earthquake by James Spiteri (4.05)2005 Kashmir Earthquake by James Spiteri (4.05)
2005 Kashmir Earthquake by James Spiteri (4.05)
 
2008 sichuan earthquake
2008 sichuan earthquake2008 sichuan earthquake
2008 sichuan earthquake
 

Similar to Alaska Earthquakes & Tsunami Presentation

Similar to Alaska Earthquakes & Tsunami Presentation (20)

Iotsunami
IotsunamiIotsunami
Iotsunami
 
Iotsunami
IotsunamiIotsunami
Iotsunami
 
Earthquake
EarthquakeEarthquake
Earthquake
 
Tsunami
TsunamiTsunami
Tsunami
 
Earthquakes 101
Earthquakes 101Earthquakes 101
Earthquakes 101
 
Disaster Management
Disaster ManagementDisaster Management
Disaster Management
 
3.4.1 Earthquake Hazards
3.4.1 Earthquake Hazards3.4.1 Earthquake Hazards
3.4.1 Earthquake Hazards
 
Earthquake and earthquake resistant design
Earthquake   and earthquake resistant designEarthquake   and earthquake resistant design
Earthquake and earthquake resistant design
 
Earthquakes And Evs
Earthquakes And EvsEarthquakes And Evs
Earthquakes And Evs
 
Earthquakes
EarthquakesEarthquakes
Earthquakes
 
Geophysics for Civil Engineering
Geophysics for Civil EngineeringGeophysics for Civil Engineering
Geophysics for Civil Engineering
 
Tsunami Basics Presentation
Tsunami Basics PresentationTsunami Basics Presentation
Tsunami Basics Presentation
 
Earthquakes!
Earthquakes!Earthquakes!
Earthquakes!
 
Earthquakes 1228796558996940-8
Earthquakes 1228796558996940-8Earthquakes 1228796558996940-8
Earthquakes 1228796558996940-8
 
Chapter 4 Eearthquake & human activities
Chapter 4 Eearthquake & human activitiesChapter 4 Eearthquake & human activities
Chapter 4 Eearthquake & human activities
 
Earthquake and human activities
Earthquake and human activitiesEarthquake and human activities
Earthquake and human activities
 
tsunami[1].ppt
tsunami[1].ppttsunami[1].ppt
tsunami[1].ppt
 
Lesson On Earthquakes Powerpoint.Ppt
Lesson On Earthquakes Powerpoint.PptLesson On Earthquakes Powerpoint.Ppt
Lesson On Earthquakes Powerpoint.Ppt
 
EarthQuake.pptx
EarthQuake.pptxEarthQuake.pptx
EarthQuake.pptx
 
Earthquakes: An Introduction
Earthquakes: An IntroductionEarthquakes: An Introduction
Earthquakes: An Introduction
 

More from SERC at Carleton College

StatVignette03_Sig.Figs_v04_07_15_2020.pptx
StatVignette03_Sig.Figs_v04_07_15_2020.pptxStatVignette03_Sig.Figs_v04_07_15_2020.pptx
StatVignette03_Sig.Figs_v04_07_15_2020.pptxSERC at Carleton College
 
Cretaceous Coatlines and Modern Voting Patterns Presentation
Cretaceous Coatlines and Modern Voting Patterns PresentationCretaceous Coatlines and Modern Voting Patterns Presentation
Cretaceous Coatlines and Modern Voting Patterns PresentationSERC at Carleton College
 
Presentation: Unit 1 Introduction to the hydrological cycle
Presentation: Unit 1 Introduction to the hydrological cyclePresentation: Unit 1 Introduction to the hydrological cycle
Presentation: Unit 1 Introduction to the hydrological cycleSERC at Carleton College
 
KSKL_Chapter 4_ Chem Properties of Soils.pptx
KSKL_Chapter 4_ Chem Properties of Soils.pptxKSKL_Chapter 4_ Chem Properties of Soils.pptx
KSKL_Chapter 4_ Chem Properties of Soils.pptxSERC at Carleton College
 
Presentation: Unit 3 background information
Presentation: Unit 3 background informationPresentation: Unit 3 background information
Presentation: Unit 3 background informationSERC at Carleton College
 
Presentation: Unit 2 Measuring Groundwater Background Information
Presentation: Unit 2 Measuring Groundwater Background InformationPresentation: Unit 2 Measuring Groundwater Background Information
Presentation: Unit 2 Measuring Groundwater Background InformationSERC at Carleton College
 

More from SERC at Carleton College (20)

StatVignette03_Sig.Figs_v04_07_15_2020.pptx
StatVignette03_Sig.Figs_v04_07_15_2020.pptxStatVignette03_Sig.Figs_v04_07_15_2020.pptx
StatVignette03_Sig.Figs_v04_07_15_2020.pptx
 
StatVignette06_HypTesting.pptx
StatVignette06_HypTesting.pptxStatVignette06_HypTesting.pptx
StatVignette06_HypTesting.pptx
 
Unit 1 (optional slides)
Unit 1 (optional slides)Unit 1 (optional slides)
Unit 1 (optional slides)
 
Cretaceous Coatlines and Modern Voting Patterns Presentation
Cretaceous Coatlines and Modern Voting Patterns PresentationCretaceous Coatlines and Modern Voting Patterns Presentation
Cretaceous Coatlines and Modern Voting Patterns Presentation
 
Climate and Biomes PPT 2
Climate and Biomes PPT 2Climate and Biomes PPT 2
Climate and Biomes PPT 2
 
weather tracking ppt
weather tracking pptweather tracking ppt
weather tracking ppt
 
Presentation: Unit 1 Introduction to the hydrological cycle
Presentation: Unit 1 Introduction to the hydrological cyclePresentation: Unit 1 Introduction to the hydrological cycle
Presentation: Unit 1 Introduction to the hydrological cycle
 
StatVignette05_M3_v02_10_21_2020.pptx
StatVignette05_M3_v02_10_21_2020.pptxStatVignette05_M3_v02_10_21_2020.pptx
StatVignette05_M3_v02_10_21_2020.pptx
 
KSKL chapter 8 PPT
KSKL chapter 8 PPTKSKL chapter 8 PPT
KSKL chapter 8 PPT
 
KSKL chap 5 PPT
KSKL chap 5 PPTKSKL chap 5 PPT
KSKL chap 5 PPT
 
KSKL_Chapter 4_ Chem Properties of Soils.pptx
KSKL_Chapter 4_ Chem Properties of Soils.pptxKSKL_Chapter 4_ Chem Properties of Soils.pptx
KSKL_Chapter 4_ Chem Properties of Soils.pptx
 
Degraded Soil Images.pptx
Degraded Soil Images.pptxDegraded Soil Images.pptx
Degraded Soil Images.pptx
 
Educators PPT file chapter 7
Educators PPT file chapter 7Educators PPT file chapter 7
Educators PPT file chapter 7
 
Educators PPT file chapter 2
Educators PPT file chapter 2Educators PPT file chapter 2
Educators PPT file chapter 2
 
Educators PPT file chapter 6
Educators PPT file chapter 6Educators PPT file chapter 6
Educators PPT file chapter 6
 
Educators PPT chapter 3
Educators PPT chapter 3Educators PPT chapter 3
Educators PPT chapter 3
 
Unit 4 background presentation
Unit 4 background presentationUnit 4 background presentation
Unit 4 background presentation
 
Presentation: Unit 3 background information
Presentation: Unit 3 background informationPresentation: Unit 3 background information
Presentation: Unit 3 background information
 
Presentation: Unit 2 Measuring Groundwater Background Information
Presentation: Unit 2 Measuring Groundwater Background InformationPresentation: Unit 2 Measuring Groundwater Background Information
Presentation: Unit 2 Measuring Groundwater Background Information
 
Introduction to GPS presentation
Introduction to GPS presentationIntroduction to GPS presentation
Introduction to GPS presentation
 

Alaska Earthquakes & Tsunami Presentation

  • 1. Alaska Earthquakes & Tsunami Robert Butler ANGLE Project https://serc.carleton.edu/ANGLE
  • 2. Great (M > 8) Alaska Earthquakes In 27 years from 1938 to 1965, a series of great earthquakes ruptured almost the entire length of the subduction zone. How often do great earthquakes occur in eastern portion?
  • 3. Land Level Changes During 1964 Alaska Earthquake Areas in the uplift zone were raised as much as 6 meters while areas in the subsidence zone dropped by more than 2 meters. Pacific Plate
  • 4. Making a Ghost Forest 1. Coastal forest above high tide before earthquake. 2. Earthquake drops forest into intertidal zone. 3. Tsunami rushes ashore depositing sand on soil layer. 4. Trees die from immersion in salt water. 5. Intertidal mud & clay deposited above tsunami sand. “Three layer cake” = buried soil, tsunami sand, intertidal mud. What layer did we NOT see at Girdwood? Why?
  • 5. Average time between earthquakes = Recurrence time. Recurrence time for M9 Earthquakes (e.g. 1964) in Prince William Sound = 700 - 900 years. (Pre)History of Great Alaska Earthquakes 8 sand sheets in ~2200 yrs Tsunami recurrence 280–295 yrs Girdwood Umnak Island Cupcake Geology
  • 6. Alaska Seismicity Since 1900: 45 M 5–6 EQs / year 6 M 6–7 EQs / year 1 M 7–8 EQs / year 8 M > 8 EQs 1 M = 9.2 EQ
  • 7. USGS Estimated shaking intensity from M 7.9 Earthquake Jan 23, 2018 Magnitude 7.9 Southeast of Kodiak Light to moderate shaking from this earthquake was felt across southern Alaska. Left-lateral strike-slip on ENE – WSW oriented fault within the Pacific Plate. Strike-slip faulting does not produce vertical offset of the ocean floor so does not generally produce a tsunami. BUT a small tsunami was observed. Many citizens of Kodiak appropriately evacuated from the tsunami inundation zone to high ground.
  • 8. Complicated Tsunami from a Relatively Simple Earthquake
  • 9. USGS Estimated shaking Intensity from M 7.1 Earthquake Jan 24, 2016 Magnitude 7.1 Beneath Iniskin Moderate to strong shaking from this earthquake was felt within 150 km of epicenter. Depth = 127.8 km (79.4 miles). Ground shaking would have been more severe if the earthquake had occurred at shallower depth. No reports of injuries, but four homes lost to natural gas explosions or fire.
  • 10. Animation of Iniskin Seismic Waves P waves reach surface at 15 seconds while S waves arrive at 25 seconds. Seismic waves are amplified and slowed by Cook Inlet sedimentary basin.
  • 11. Cross Section Through Anchorage M7.1 Iniskin Earthquake Iniskin earthquake occurred within Pacific Plate at 128 km depth. Caused by bending and shearing of Pacific Plate during subduction.
  • 12. Denali 2002 Crustal Fault Earthquake Nov 3, 2002 M7.9 Depth = 5 km 90 second rupture interval. Largest inland earthquake in North America in almost 150 years.
  • 13. Denali 2002 Foreshock, Mainshock, Aftershocks Maximum displacement > 8 m (~30 feet). Pipeline was designed to withstand ground shaking and offset by earthquakes. It did.
  • 14. Denali 2002 Earthquake Effects Seismic Landslides, Liquefaction, Triggered EQs in Yellowstone & CA, Seiche in Lake Union.
  • 15. Alaska Tectonics & Earthquakes Animation QuickTime Animation
  • 17. Alaska–Aleutian Subduction Zone In most locations, the shallow plate boundary is “locked and loading”. Pacific Plate North American Plate
  • 18. GPS Stations in Alaska AK Plate Motion Poster GPS Gumdrop
  • 20. How GPS location is determined Antenna position is determined by calculating the distances to at least 4 satellites. This enables the solving for 4 variables: x, y, z and time.
  • 22. AC 79 Montague Is. AC 20 Girdwood AC 32 Mt. Susitna Transect Across Prince William Sound
  • 23. AC20 Girdwood Girdwood: Horizontal Rates of Motion? North displacement = 136 mm North velocity: 136 mm/12.5 yr = 10.9 mm/yr WEST displacement = 122 mm West velocity: 122 mm/12.5 yr = 9.8 mm/yr 2005.5 2018.0 Interval: 12.5 yr
  • 24. Horizontal velocities: AC 79 48.1 mm/yr AC20 14.7 mm/yr AC32 4.8 mm/yr Transect Across Prince William Sound 0 10102030 0 10 10 20 30 40 50 Velocity (mm/yr) 0 10102030 0 10 10 20 30 40 50 Velocity (mm/yr) Velocity(mm/yr) Velocity(mm/yr) NorthSouth West West East East AC32 Mt Susitna 5 mm/yr
  • 25. NW – SE Compression of Prince William Sound AC79 AC20 AC32 Anchorage Pacific Plate 25mm/yr
  • 26. Earthquake Early Warning GPS observations are critical to Earthquake Early Warning for great subduction zone earthquakes.
  • 27. Prince William Sound Old Chenega 20 km
  • 28. Prince William Sound Cross Section
  • 29. Vertical Displacement from 1964 Earthquake Uplift of seafloor was source of the “tectonic” tsunami that affected Prince William Sound, Kenai Peninsula, and Kodiak Is.
  • 30. A Fountain of Information on Effects of 1964 Earthquake & Tsunami on Communities USGS Professional Paper 542-A to 542-G
  • 32. March 27, 1964 Tides in Resurrection Bay Tsunamis ride the tides. Fortunate to have a low tide (and full moon) during 1964 Great Alaska earthquake and tsunami.
  • 33. Seward Coseismic Subsidence Land dropped 1.1 meters at Seward during 1964 earthquake. Land subsidence will increase tsunami inundation. Not good.
  • 34. Seward Before & After March 27, 1964 After 30 seconds of shaking, a landslide including part of waterfront slid into the bay rupturing fuel tanks and igniting oil. Two under-water landslides occurred at same time. Series of three landslide-generated waves up to 6 meters high arrived during first 3 minutes of shaking. Tectonic tsunami, covered in burning oil, arrived ~20 minutes after ground shaking stopped. Third tectonic tsunami wave was highest at ~8 meters height. Wind blowing toward bay prevented entire town from burning. Highest Inundation 13 Fatalities
  • 35. Seward 1964 Landslides Detailed bathymetric studies allow reconstruction of sizes of landslides. Modeling of tsunami generated by three landslides at head of bay can reproduce the observed wave heights and sequence. Modeling of tectonic tsunami reproduces arrival times and height of longer period waves.
  • 36. Tectonic Tsunami Landslide- generated TsunamiObserved Observed Modeling of Tsunamis in Seward In some areas, tectonic tsunami advanced farther on land.
  • 37. Whittier After 1964 Tsunami Whittier subsided 1.6 m during the earthquake. 13 out of 70 people in Whittier in 1964 perished in the tsunamis. Three waves generated by landslides arrived during ground shaking to completely destroy buildings of two lumber companies. Fire destroyed fuel-storage tanks at waterfront.
  • 38. Whittier 1964 Landslides Detailed bathymetric studies of Passage Canal allow reconstruction of sizes of landslides. Modeling of tsunami generated by three landslides can reproduce the observed landslide-generated tsunami.
  • 39. Modeled Landslide-Generated Tsunami in Whittier Model reasonably fits observed landslide-generated tsunami. North shore runup over 30 meters. Whittier runup ~ 13 meters. Whittier Creek runup ~ 16 meters.
  • 40. Modeled Tectonic Tsunami at Whittier Tectonic tsunami arrived ~ 1 hour after earthquake but did not inundate Whittier and was not even noticed by eyewitness observers. Three meter maximum tectonic tsunami height in Whittier much smaller than ~8 meter maximum tectonic tsunami height in Seward. Why might that be? Let’s explore with Wave Tank Model.
  • 41. Vertical Displacement from 1964 Earthquake
  • 42. Vertical Displacement from 1964 Earthquake Whittier Seward Wave Tank