SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 8
Download to read offline
Administrative Law
Case Comment Presentation
A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India,
AIR 1970 SC 150. 171
INTRODUCTION
FACTS
ISSUE
CONCLUSION
By: Aayushi G Thandassery
BA LLB(H) SEMESTER-7
180060401002
 Natural Justice is the set of fundamental rules which governs the adjudicatory functions
under the Anglo-American Jurisprudence which is also followed in India.
 This concept is so basic that every authority discharging judicial or quasi-judicial
functions must follow these rules.
 “Nemo judex in causa sua” means that no one can be judge in “one’s own case” means a
case in which one is interested i.e., a case in the outcome of which one is interested. A
person may be interested in a case in many different ways. Therefore, he will be
prejudiced in many ways. Prejudiced means arriving at a decision before hearing a case.
In other words, before hearing the case itself the person will have made up his mind to
decide the case in one way or the other instead of arriving at a decision after hearing the
case. Depending upon different type of interest a person may have in the case, there are
different types of bias which are: personal bias, pecuniary bias, bias as to subject matter,
departmental bias and pre-conceived notion bias.
 When the deciding authority himself is a party or is related to one of the parties it is called
personal bias.
INTRODUCTION
In the case of A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India , AIR1970SC150
Here in this case : A.K. Kraipak is the appellant
: Union of India is the respondent
• In 1966, a service called the Indian Forest Service was constituted, the selection for
which was to be made from among the officers serving in the forest department of the
state.
• In this case, Naquishbund, who was acting Chief Conservator of Forests, was a member
of this selection board and was also a candidate for the selection to the All India Cadre
of Forest Service.
• Though he did not take part in the deliberations of the board, when his name was
considered and approved.
• Aggrieved, the Gazetted officers association, J&K along with the interested parties
brought a petition to court challenging the selections notified as being violative of
Article 14 and 16 of constitution and further ground that the selections in question were
made in contraventions of principles of natural justice.
The question before the court was :
I. Assuming that the proceedings in the present case are
administrative in nature, whether the principles of natural justice
applied to administrative proceedings?
II. Whether there was violation of such principles of natural justice?
ANALYSIS
The court held that the selections made by the Selection Committee were in violation of the
principles of natural justice because there was a real likelihood of a bias for the mere presence
of the candidate on the Selection Board may adversely influence the judgement of other
members. Long with it court further added:
 The rules of natural justice are embodied rules and their aim is to secure justice or to
prevent miscarriage justice. If that is their purpose, there is no reason why they should not
be made applicable to administrative proceedings also.
 The Supreme court held that though the action of making selection for government service
is administrative, yet the selection committee is under a duty to act judicially.
 The court found that the power exercised by the Selection board as an administrative one
and tested the validity of the selection on that basis. It was held that the concept of rule of
law would lose its importance if the instrumentalities of the state are not charged with the
duty of discharging their functions in a fair and just manner in a welfare state like India,
where the jurisdiction of the administrative bodies is increasing at a rapid rate.
ANALYSIS
 The court held that the basic principle of “nemo judex in causa sua” was violated by
appointing Naquishband as a member of the selection board. Though he did not
participate in the deliberations of the board when his name was being considered yet the
very fact that he was a member of the selection board and that too holding the post of t
he chairman had a significant impact on the decisions of the selection board. Also he
participated in the deliberations when the claims of his rivals i.e., Basu, Baig and Kaul
were considered. He was also present when the list of selected candidates in order of
preference was being made. Hence it was very clear that from the very inception of the
selection process, at every stage of his participation in the selection process, there was a
conflict between his interest and duty. Under such circumstances, the court could not
believe that Naquishbund could have been unbiased.
 In this case, for the first time, without the assistance of any foreign judgement, the
Supreme court had decided that principles of natural justice were applicable not only to
judicial functions but also to administrative functions.
ANALYSIS
 This case makes it clear that impartiality in adjudication is required not only
in judicial decision but also in administrative matters. The principle of
natural justice would apply on administrative functions also and struck down
the selection process on ground of violation of principles of natural justice.
 It was held that the selections made by the selection committee were in
violation of principles of natural justice
The petitioners were finally entitled to the benefit and the court finally decided to set
aside the impugned selection. The court decided it on taking into consideration all
the fact and circumstances of the case. The court held that the aim of the rule of
natural justice is to secure justice and to put it negatively to prevent miscarriage of
justice. The court held that, often it is not easy to draw the line that demarcates
administrative enquiries from quasi-judicial. Enquiries which were considered
administrative at one time are now being considered as quasi-judicial in character. It
was also held that a person cannot be a judge in his own case, is a circumstance
which is abhorrent to our concept of justice. So on that very point it was said that a
person who is a member of the selection board cannot be the person considered for
selection.
‘Nemo debet esse judex propria causa’
ANALYSIS

More Related Content

What's hot

INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES - MEANING,NEED,OBJECT,KINDS AND RULES
INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES - MEANING,NEED,OBJECT,KINDS AND RULES  INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES - MEANING,NEED,OBJECT,KINDS AND RULES
INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES - MEANING,NEED,OBJECT,KINDS AND RULES KhushiGoyal20
 
Crpc - Rights of an Arrested Person
Crpc  - Rights of an Arrested PersonCrpc  - Rights of an Arrested Person
Crpc - Rights of an Arrested PersonKhyatiTongia
 
INTERPRETATION OF STATUTE
INTERPRETATION OF STATUTEINTERPRETATION OF STATUTE
INTERPRETATION OF STATUTEcpjcollege
 
APPEARANCE AND NON-APPEARANCE ppt.pptx
APPEARANCE AND NON-APPEARANCE ppt.pptxAPPEARANCE AND NON-APPEARANCE ppt.pptx
APPEARANCE AND NON-APPEARANCE ppt.pptxDalliandeepTiwana
 
Code of civil procedure 1908 miscellaneous, interest,cost, exemption from app...
Code of civil procedure 1908 miscellaneous, interest,cost, exemption from app...Code of civil procedure 1908 miscellaneous, interest,cost, exemption from app...
Code of civil procedure 1908 miscellaneous, interest,cost, exemption from app...Dr. Vikas Khakare
 
The Rules of Statutory Interpretation
The  Rules of Statutory Interpretation The  Rules of Statutory Interpretation
The Rules of Statutory Interpretation Aanchal Saxena
 
Delegated legislation
Delegated legislationDelegated legislation
Delegated legislationReshma Suresh
 
Principles of constitutional interpretation of list prepared by Rajashree J J...
Principles of constitutional interpretation of list prepared by Rajashree J J...Principles of constitutional interpretation of list prepared by Rajashree J J...
Principles of constitutional interpretation of list prepared by Rajashree J J...sundarsasane
 
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATION
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATIONDIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATION
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATIONTejinder Bhatti
 
Rules of statutory Interpretation
Rules of statutory Interpretation Rules of statutory Interpretation
Rules of statutory Interpretation sundarsasane
 
Internal aids of interpretation and construction of statutes
Internal aids of interpretation and construction of statutesInternal aids of interpretation and construction of statutes
Internal aids of interpretation and construction of statutesgagan deep
 
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908PRATHYUSHAP15
 
UNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptx
UNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptxUNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptx
UNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptxketan349068
 
Parties to suit joinder non joinder
Parties to suit joinder non joinder Parties to suit joinder non joinder
Parties to suit joinder non joinder GautamSingh226
 
The advocates act,1961
The advocates act,1961The advocates act,1961
The advocates act,1961Leo Lukose
 
Internal aids to interpretation of law
Internal aids to interpretation of lawInternal aids to interpretation of law
Internal aids to interpretation of lawTejas Shah
 

What's hot (20)

Estoppel and Its Kind
Estoppel and Its KindEstoppel and Its Kind
Estoppel and Its Kind
 
INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES - MEANING,NEED,OBJECT,KINDS AND RULES
INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES - MEANING,NEED,OBJECT,KINDS AND RULES  INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES - MEANING,NEED,OBJECT,KINDS AND RULES
INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES - MEANING,NEED,OBJECT,KINDS AND RULES
 
BAR COUNCILs
BAR COUNCILsBAR COUNCILs
BAR COUNCILs
 
Crpc - Rights of an Arrested Person
Crpc  - Rights of an Arrested PersonCrpc  - Rights of an Arrested Person
Crpc - Rights of an Arrested Person
 
INTERPRETATION OF STATUTE
INTERPRETATION OF STATUTEINTERPRETATION OF STATUTE
INTERPRETATION OF STATUTE
 
APPEARANCE AND NON-APPEARANCE ppt.pptx
APPEARANCE AND NON-APPEARANCE ppt.pptxAPPEARANCE AND NON-APPEARANCE ppt.pptx
APPEARANCE AND NON-APPEARANCE ppt.pptx
 
Code of civil procedure 1908 miscellaneous, interest,cost, exemption from app...
Code of civil procedure 1908 miscellaneous, interest,cost, exemption from app...Code of civil procedure 1908 miscellaneous, interest,cost, exemption from app...
Code of civil procedure 1908 miscellaneous, interest,cost, exemption from app...
 
The Rules of Statutory Interpretation
The  Rules of Statutory Interpretation The  Rules of Statutory Interpretation
The Rules of Statutory Interpretation
 
Delegated legislation
Delegated legislationDelegated legislation
Delegated legislation
 
Principles of constitutional interpretation of list prepared by Rajashree J J...
Principles of constitutional interpretation of list prepared by Rajashree J J...Principles of constitutional interpretation of list prepared by Rajashree J J...
Principles of constitutional interpretation of list prepared by Rajashree J J...
 
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATION
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATIONDIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATION
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATION
 
Caveat
CaveatCaveat
Caveat
 
Rules of statutory Interpretation
Rules of statutory Interpretation Rules of statutory Interpretation
Rules of statutory Interpretation
 
Internal aids of interpretation and construction of statutes
Internal aids of interpretation and construction of statutesInternal aids of interpretation and construction of statutes
Internal aids of interpretation and construction of statutes
 
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
 
UNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptx
UNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptxUNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptx
UNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptx
 
Parties to suit joinder non joinder
Parties to suit joinder non joinder Parties to suit joinder non joinder
Parties to suit joinder non joinder
 
The advocates act,1961
The advocates act,1961The advocates act,1961
The advocates act,1961
 
Internal aids to interpretation of law
Internal aids to interpretation of lawInternal aids to interpretation of law
Internal aids to interpretation of law
 
LLB LAW NOTES ON PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW
LLB LAW NOTES ON PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAWLLB LAW NOTES ON PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW
LLB LAW NOTES ON PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW
 

Similar to A.K KRAIPAK VS UOI

MAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS
MAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESSMAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS
MAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESSJamia Millia Islamia
 
Hypothesis judicial
Hypothesis judicialHypothesis judicial
Hypothesis judicialBanti Sagar
 
Nemo iudex in causa sua
Nemo iudex in causa suaNemo iudex in causa sua
Nemo iudex in causa suaVikash Kumar
 
MAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS
MAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESSMAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS
MAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESSJamia Millia Islamia
 
Admn Law Project.docx
Admn Law Project.docxAdmn Law Project.docx
Admn Law Project.docxTanishGoyal19
 
Judicial Review with a reference of Judicial Activism.
Judicial Review with a reference of Judicial Activism. Judicial Review with a reference of Judicial Activism.
Judicial Review with a reference of Judicial Activism. Sanjana Bharadwaj
 
Judicial activism in India ( Brief Notes )
Judicial activism in India ( Brief Notes )Judicial activism in India ( Brief Notes )
Judicial activism in India ( Brief Notes )sandhyakrish2
 
Principles of Natural Justice & The Indian Constitution.
Principles of Natural Justice & The Indian Constitution.Principles of Natural Justice & The Indian Constitution.
Principles of Natural Justice & The Indian Constitution.Prateek Maheshwari
 
judicial reviews and judicial activism.pptx
judicial reviews and judicial activism.pptxjudicial reviews and judicial activism.pptx
judicial reviews and judicial activism.pptxSrujanSd
 
India Legal 09 October 2017
India Legal 09 October 2017India Legal 09 October 2017
India Legal 09 October 2017ENC
 
THE ROLE OF JUDICIARY IN SOCIETY.docx
THE ROLE OF JUDICIARY IN SOCIETY.docxTHE ROLE OF JUDICIARY IN SOCIETY.docx
THE ROLE OF JUDICIARY IN SOCIETY.docxSOMOSCO1
 
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS OF INDIA A Study In The Light Of Decided Cases
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS OF INDIA A Study In The Light Of Decided CasesADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS OF INDIA A Study In The Light Of Decided Cases
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS OF INDIA A Study In The Light Of Decided CasesJody Sullivan
 
India's supreme court and the legitimacy of pi ls
India's supreme court and the legitimacy of pi lsIndia's supreme court and the legitimacy of pi ls
India's supreme court and the legitimacy of pi lsShantanu Basu
 

Similar to A.K KRAIPAK VS UOI (20)

MAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS
MAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESSMAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS
MAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS
 
Hypothesis judicial
Hypothesis judicialHypothesis judicial
Hypothesis judicial
 
Nemo iudex in causa sua
Nemo iudex in causa suaNemo iudex in causa sua
Nemo iudex in causa sua
 
MAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS
MAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESSMAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS
MAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS
 
Admn Law Project.docx
Admn Law Project.docxAdmn Law Project.docx
Admn Law Project.docx
 
Rule aginst baisnes
Rule aginst baisnesRule aginst baisnes
Rule aginst baisnes
 
Judicial Review
Judicial ReviewJudicial Review
Judicial Review
 
Judicial Review with a reference of Judicial Activism.
Judicial Review with a reference of Judicial Activism. Judicial Review with a reference of Judicial Activism.
Judicial Review with a reference of Judicial Activism.
 
Judicial activism in India ( Brief Notes )
Judicial activism in India ( Brief Notes )Judicial activism in India ( Brief Notes )
Judicial activism in India ( Brief Notes )
 
LLB LAW NOTES ON ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
LLB LAW NOTES ON ADMINISTRATIVE LAWLLB LAW NOTES ON ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
LLB LAW NOTES ON ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
 
Judicial activism
Judicial activismJudicial activism
Judicial activism
 
PIL NJAC
PIL NJACPIL NJAC
PIL NJAC
 
Law
LawLaw
Law
 
Principles of Natural Justice & The Indian Constitution.
Principles of Natural Justice & The Indian Constitution.Principles of Natural Justice & The Indian Constitution.
Principles of Natural Justice & The Indian Constitution.
 
judicial reviews and judicial activism.pptx
judicial reviews and judicial activism.pptxjudicial reviews and judicial activism.pptx
judicial reviews and judicial activism.pptx
 
India Legal 09 October 2017
India Legal 09 October 2017India Legal 09 October 2017
India Legal 09 October 2017
 
THE ROLE OF JUDICIARY IN SOCIETY.docx
THE ROLE OF JUDICIARY IN SOCIETY.docxTHE ROLE OF JUDICIARY IN SOCIETY.docx
THE ROLE OF JUDICIARY IN SOCIETY.docx
 
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS OF INDIA A Study In The Light Of Decided Cases
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS OF INDIA A Study In The Light Of Decided CasesADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS OF INDIA A Study In The Light Of Decided Cases
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS OF INDIA A Study In The Light Of Decided Cases
 
Judiciary (2).pptx
Judiciary (2).pptxJudiciary (2).pptx
Judiciary (2).pptx
 
India's supreme court and the legitimacy of pi ls
India's supreme court and the legitimacy of pi lsIndia's supreme court and the legitimacy of pi ls
India's supreme court and the legitimacy of pi ls
 

Recently uploaded

Ashutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdf
Ashutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdfAshutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdf
Ashutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdfVidit Agrawal
 
Town of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment Case
Town of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment CaseTown of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment Case
Town of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment CaseRich Bergeron
 
ENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened to
ENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened toENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened to
ENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened toirenelavilla52178
 
Amit Kumar Kachhap vs Sangeeta Toppo.pdf
Amit Kumar Kachhap vs Sangeeta Toppo.pdfAmit Kumar Kachhap vs Sangeeta Toppo.pdf
Amit Kumar Kachhap vs Sangeeta Toppo.pdfadvsudhirdhc
 
Town of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC Counterclaims
Town of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC CounterclaimsTown of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC Counterclaims
Town of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC CounterclaimsRich Bergeron
 
How to Grant the Greek Power of Attorney
How to Grant the Greek Power of AttorneyHow to Grant the Greek Power of Attorney
How to Grant the Greek Power of AttorneyBridgeWest.eu
 
Appointment of Auditors Made For Firm
Appointment  of  Auditors  Made For FirmAppointment  of  Auditors  Made For Firm
Appointment of Auditors Made For FirmEbizfilingIndia
 
Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327
Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327
Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327bariajenne
 
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...Rich Bergeron
 
Trustworthy Estate Planning in Colorado from Flatiron Legal Advisors, LLC
Trustworthy Estate Planning in Colorado from Flatiron Legal Advisors, LLCTrustworthy Estate Planning in Colorado from Flatiron Legal Advisors, LLC
Trustworthy Estate Planning in Colorado from Flatiron Legal Advisors, LLCFlatiron Legal Advisors, LLC
 
Anti-Online Sexual Abuse or Exploitation of Children (OSAEC) and Anti-Child S...
Anti-Online Sexual Abuse or Exploitation of Children (OSAEC) and Anti-Child S...Anti-Online Sexual Abuse or Exploitation of Children (OSAEC) and Anti-Child S...
Anti-Online Sexual Abuse or Exploitation of Children (OSAEC) and Anti-Child S...Diamond959916
 
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Material Facts For Declaratory Judgment Moti...
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Material Facts For Declaratory Judgment Moti...Town of Haverhill's Statement of Material Facts For Declaratory Judgment Moti...
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Material Facts For Declaratory Judgment Moti...Rich Bergeron
 
Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24
Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24
Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24Jong Hyuk Choi
 

Recently uploaded (14)

Ashutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdf
Ashutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdfAshutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdf
Ashutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdf
 
Town of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment Case
Town of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment CaseTown of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment Case
Town of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment Case
 
ENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened to
ENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened toENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened to
ENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened to
 
Nayoga Protocol by Author - Tushar Avinash Bagal A33.pptx
Nayoga Protocol  by Author - Tushar Avinash Bagal A33.pptxNayoga Protocol  by Author - Tushar Avinash Bagal A33.pptx
Nayoga Protocol by Author - Tushar Avinash Bagal A33.pptx
 
Amit Kumar Kachhap vs Sangeeta Toppo.pdf
Amit Kumar Kachhap vs Sangeeta Toppo.pdfAmit Kumar Kachhap vs Sangeeta Toppo.pdf
Amit Kumar Kachhap vs Sangeeta Toppo.pdf
 
Town of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC Counterclaims
Town of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC CounterclaimsTown of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC Counterclaims
Town of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC Counterclaims
 
How to Grant the Greek Power of Attorney
How to Grant the Greek Power of AttorneyHow to Grant the Greek Power of Attorney
How to Grant the Greek Power of Attorney
 
Appointment of Auditors Made For Firm
Appointment  of  Auditors  Made For FirmAppointment  of  Auditors  Made For Firm
Appointment of Auditors Made For Firm
 
Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327
Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327
Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327
 
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...
 
Trustworthy Estate Planning in Colorado from Flatiron Legal Advisors, LLC
Trustworthy Estate Planning in Colorado from Flatiron Legal Advisors, LLCTrustworthy Estate Planning in Colorado from Flatiron Legal Advisors, LLC
Trustworthy Estate Planning in Colorado from Flatiron Legal Advisors, LLC
 
Anti-Online Sexual Abuse or Exploitation of Children (OSAEC) and Anti-Child S...
Anti-Online Sexual Abuse or Exploitation of Children (OSAEC) and Anti-Child S...Anti-Online Sexual Abuse or Exploitation of Children (OSAEC) and Anti-Child S...
Anti-Online Sexual Abuse or Exploitation of Children (OSAEC) and Anti-Child S...
 
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Material Facts For Declaratory Judgment Moti...
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Material Facts For Declaratory Judgment Moti...Town of Haverhill's Statement of Material Facts For Declaratory Judgment Moti...
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Material Facts For Declaratory Judgment Moti...
 
Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24
Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24
Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24
 

A.K KRAIPAK VS UOI

  • 1. Administrative Law Case Comment Presentation A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India, AIR 1970 SC 150. 171 INTRODUCTION FACTS ISSUE CONCLUSION By: Aayushi G Thandassery BA LLB(H) SEMESTER-7 180060401002
  • 2.  Natural Justice is the set of fundamental rules which governs the adjudicatory functions under the Anglo-American Jurisprudence which is also followed in India.  This concept is so basic that every authority discharging judicial or quasi-judicial functions must follow these rules.  “Nemo judex in causa sua” means that no one can be judge in “one’s own case” means a case in which one is interested i.e., a case in the outcome of which one is interested. A person may be interested in a case in many different ways. Therefore, he will be prejudiced in many ways. Prejudiced means arriving at a decision before hearing a case. In other words, before hearing the case itself the person will have made up his mind to decide the case in one way or the other instead of arriving at a decision after hearing the case. Depending upon different type of interest a person may have in the case, there are different types of bias which are: personal bias, pecuniary bias, bias as to subject matter, departmental bias and pre-conceived notion bias.  When the deciding authority himself is a party or is related to one of the parties it is called personal bias. INTRODUCTION
  • 3. In the case of A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India , AIR1970SC150 Here in this case : A.K. Kraipak is the appellant : Union of India is the respondent • In 1966, a service called the Indian Forest Service was constituted, the selection for which was to be made from among the officers serving in the forest department of the state. • In this case, Naquishbund, who was acting Chief Conservator of Forests, was a member of this selection board and was also a candidate for the selection to the All India Cadre of Forest Service. • Though he did not take part in the deliberations of the board, when his name was considered and approved. • Aggrieved, the Gazetted officers association, J&K along with the interested parties brought a petition to court challenging the selections notified as being violative of Article 14 and 16 of constitution and further ground that the selections in question were made in contraventions of principles of natural justice.
  • 4. The question before the court was : I. Assuming that the proceedings in the present case are administrative in nature, whether the principles of natural justice applied to administrative proceedings? II. Whether there was violation of such principles of natural justice?
  • 5. ANALYSIS The court held that the selections made by the Selection Committee were in violation of the principles of natural justice because there was a real likelihood of a bias for the mere presence of the candidate on the Selection Board may adversely influence the judgement of other members. Long with it court further added:  The rules of natural justice are embodied rules and their aim is to secure justice or to prevent miscarriage justice. If that is their purpose, there is no reason why they should not be made applicable to administrative proceedings also.  The Supreme court held that though the action of making selection for government service is administrative, yet the selection committee is under a duty to act judicially.  The court found that the power exercised by the Selection board as an administrative one and tested the validity of the selection on that basis. It was held that the concept of rule of law would lose its importance if the instrumentalities of the state are not charged with the duty of discharging their functions in a fair and just manner in a welfare state like India, where the jurisdiction of the administrative bodies is increasing at a rapid rate.
  • 6. ANALYSIS  The court held that the basic principle of “nemo judex in causa sua” was violated by appointing Naquishband as a member of the selection board. Though he did not participate in the deliberations of the board when his name was being considered yet the very fact that he was a member of the selection board and that too holding the post of t he chairman had a significant impact on the decisions of the selection board. Also he participated in the deliberations when the claims of his rivals i.e., Basu, Baig and Kaul were considered. He was also present when the list of selected candidates in order of preference was being made. Hence it was very clear that from the very inception of the selection process, at every stage of his participation in the selection process, there was a conflict between his interest and duty. Under such circumstances, the court could not believe that Naquishbund could have been unbiased.  In this case, for the first time, without the assistance of any foreign judgement, the Supreme court had decided that principles of natural justice were applicable not only to judicial functions but also to administrative functions.
  • 7. ANALYSIS  This case makes it clear that impartiality in adjudication is required not only in judicial decision but also in administrative matters. The principle of natural justice would apply on administrative functions also and struck down the selection process on ground of violation of principles of natural justice.  It was held that the selections made by the selection committee were in violation of principles of natural justice
  • 8. The petitioners were finally entitled to the benefit and the court finally decided to set aside the impugned selection. The court decided it on taking into consideration all the fact and circumstances of the case. The court held that the aim of the rule of natural justice is to secure justice and to put it negatively to prevent miscarriage of justice. The court held that, often it is not easy to draw the line that demarcates administrative enquiries from quasi-judicial. Enquiries which were considered administrative at one time are now being considered as quasi-judicial in character. It was also held that a person cannot be a judge in his own case, is a circumstance which is abhorrent to our concept of justice. So on that very point it was said that a person who is a member of the selection board cannot be the person considered for selection. ‘Nemo debet esse judex propria causa’ ANALYSIS