SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 10
Principles of Natural Justice
Introduction
• Procedural fairness is regarded as an integral element of
administrative process and law.
• The principles of natural justice constitute an essential component of
procedural fairness.
• Natural justice comprises of two components. First is hearing, or the
doctrine of audi alteram partem, which means 'listen to the other
side'. The other is the doctrine of bias or nemo judex in re sua
meaning that a man should not be a judge in his own cause. The
maxim has come to mean that the deciding authority must be
impartial. Both are at times included in the term ‘fair hearing’.
Why Natural Justice assumes importance?
1. Natural Justice protects infringement of individual rights from
actions and inactions of administrative authorities.
2. By adhering to the principles, the administration gains a position of
fair institution.
Scenarios where P. of N.J. may be invoked
• Principles of natural justice are attracted whenever a person suffers a civil
consequence, or a prejudice is caused to him by any administrative action.
• More specifically, a person can claim fair hearing in the following cases:
i. Administrative action infringes any fundamental rights
ii. The parent statute under which the Administration proposes to take an action against a person may itself impose
expressly the requirement of hearing.
iii. Right of hearing is claimed in the residuary area, i.e. when it is not explicitly mentioned in the parent statute. (It
is here that the courts must play an active role. This is the point where the discussion over the difference
between quasi-judicial and judicial comes into play.)
iv. If the parent statute is silent / does not explicitly mention the requirement of fair hearing, then the courts need to
investigate what is the type of administrative action which has caused the infraction of civil rights of the
individual. If the administrative action is quasi-judicial (meaning of the term must be clarified) then natural
justice will become applicable. [Recent judicial approach has been that regardless of the fact whether the
administrative action is quasi-judicial or not, it must involve fairness. Reason for adopting this approach
is that difference between quasi-judicial and administrative is artificial formality.]
AUDI ALTERAM PARTEM
• It means that the party whose civil or fundamental rights are infringed is given an
opportunity to present her/his case. More importantly, the hearing should not be sham
but meaningful.
• Some of the components of fair hearing include:
i. Service of Notice, Sufficient time to Reply
ii. DISCLOSURE OF MATERIALS TO THE PARTY
iii. HEARING
iv. Right to rebut the evidence against him/Cross-examination
v. Legal representation
vi. Ex-parte evidence cannot be entertained without the knowledge of the party
vii. Right to receive evidence adduced by the other party
viii. Reasoned decision
ix. ONE WHO DECIDES MUST HEAR
x. DISCLOSURE OF THE HEARING/INQUIRY OFFICER'S REPORT
Important case laws on Audi Alterman Partem
1. R. v. University of Cambridge (also known as the Dr Bentley case), 93 ER 698
The Court of King's Bench held that the University of Cambridge could not cancel the
degree of a great but rebellious scholar without giving him an opportunity of defending
himself.
2. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of lndia, AIR 1978 SC 597
Mrs. Gandhi’s passport was impounded by the authorities. Under S. 10(5)of the Passport
Act, 1963, the authority is to record its reasons and furnish a copy of the same to the
concerned individual on demand while impounding his passport. The authority may
however refuse to give reasons in public interest among other grounds.
The SC observed that the Central Government was wholly unjustified in withholding the
reasons for impounding the passport of the petitioner, and in this way not only a breach of
statutory duty was committed but it also amounted to denial of an opportunity of hearing
to the petitioner.
NEMO JUDEX IN RE SUA
• The maxim nemo judex in re sua literally means that a man should not be a
judge in his own cause. The maxim has come to mean that the deciding
authority must be impartial. This is known as the rule against bias. The
principle that bias disqualifies an individual from acting as a judge flows
from the following two maxims:
(i) No one should be a judge in his own cause; and
(ii) Justice should not only be done but also seen to be done.
• Bias is usually of three kinds: (i) Pecuniary Bias; (ii) Personal Bias; and (iii)
Departmental or Policy Bias
Important case laws on Personal bias
1. Mineral Development Corpn. Ltd. v. State of Bihar, AIR 1960 SC 468
In this case, the petitioners were granted mining licence for 99 years in 1947. But in 1953, the Secretary of the Revenue Board sent a notice to the
petitioners to show cause within 15 days why the licence should not be cancelled for violations of Sections 10, 12 and 14 of the Mining Act, 1952.
The petitioners submitted a written reply denying the allegations. Two years later, the government issued a notification cancelling the licence. The
action of the government was challenged on the ground of personal bias. The facts relevant to personal bias before the court were
(1) that Raja Kamakhya Narain Singh, the owner of the Mineral Development Corporation Ltd., had opposed the Minister in the General Election
of 1952; and
(2) that the Minister had filed a criminal case under Section 5oo of the Penal Code, 1860 against the petitioner which was transferred by the Bihar
High Court to Delhi on the ground of political rivalry between the parties.
The court quashed the order of the government, among other grounds, on the ground of personal bias.
2. A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India, AlR 1970 SC I50
In this case, Naqishbund, who was the Acting Chief Conservator of Forests, was a member of the selection
board and also a candidate for selection to the All-India cadre of the Forest Service. Though he did not take
part in the deliberations of the board when his name was considered and approved, the Supreme Court held
that there was a real likelihood of bias, for the mere presence of the candidate on the selection board may
adversely influence the judgment of the other member.
Important case laws on Pecuniary bias
1. Jeejeebhoy v. Collector, AIR 1965 SC 1096
The Chief Justice reconstituted the Bench when it was found that one of the members of the Bench
was a member of the cooperative society for which the land had been acquired.
2. Visakapatnam Coop. Motor Transport Ltd. v. G. Bangaruraju, AIR 1953 Mad
709.
The Madras High Court also quashed the decision of the Collector who in his capacity as the
Chairman of the Regional Transport Authority had granted a permit in favour of a cooperative
society of which he was also the Chairman
Important case laws on Departmental bias
1. G. Nageswara Rao v. APSRTC, AIR 1959 SC 308
In this case, the petitioner challenged the order of the government
nationalising road transport. One of the grounds for challenge was that
the Secretary of the Transport Department who gave the hearing was
biased, being the person who initiated the scheme and also being the
head of the department, whose responsibility was to execute it.
The court quashed the order on the ground that, under the
circumstances, the Secretary was biased and, hence, no fair hearing
could be expected.

More Related Content

Similar to Powerpoint presention on Principles of Natural Justice

Public interest litigation
Public interest litigationPublic interest litigation
Public interest litigationbhagya913
 
Allahabad hc-externment-order-391628
Allahabad hc-externment-order-391628Allahabad hc-externment-order-391628
Allahabad hc-externment-order-391628sabrangsabrang
 
Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022
Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022
Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022Shreya Ganguly
 
Mardia chemicals case
Mardia chemicals case Mardia chemicals case
Mardia chemicals case Shreya Ganguly
 
Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022
Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022
Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022Shreya Ganguly
 
Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022
Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022
Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022Shreya Ganguly
 
Child protection- Social action litigation as a catalyst
Child protection- Social action litigation as a catalystChild protection- Social action litigation as a catalyst
Child protection- Social action litigation as a catalystNilendra Kumar
 
Allahabad hc wpil(a) 532 2020
Allahabad hc wpil(a) 532 2020Allahabad hc wpil(a) 532 2020
Allahabad hc wpil(a) 532 2020sabrangsabrang
 
Administrative Adjudication negates the grievance redressal under Disciplinar...
Administrative Adjudication negates the grievance redressal under Disciplinar...Administrative Adjudication negates the grievance redressal under Disciplinar...
Administrative Adjudication negates the grievance redressal under Disciplinar...Biswajit Das
 
Professional ethics contempt of courts act - re arundhati roy case
Professional ethics   contempt of courts act - re arundhati roy caseProfessional ethics   contempt of courts act - re arundhati roy case
Professional ethics contempt of courts act - re arundhati roy caseMohith Sanjay
 
Ms. Bree ppt. present.
Ms. Bree ppt. present.Ms. Bree ppt. present.
Ms. Bree ppt. present.BrendaMutuma1
 

Similar to Powerpoint presention on Principles of Natural Justice (20)

Public interest litigation
Public interest litigationPublic interest litigation
Public interest litigation
 
Mandamus
MandamusMandamus
Mandamus
 
Allahabad hc-externment-order-391628
Allahabad hc-externment-order-391628Allahabad hc-externment-order-391628
Allahabad hc-externment-order-391628
 
Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022
Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022
Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022
 
Mardia chemicals case
Mardia chemicals case Mardia chemicals case
Mardia chemicals case
 
Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022
Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022
Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022
 
Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022
Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022
Mardia chemicals case by shreya a322509022
 
Pp11
Pp11Pp11
Pp11
 
deceive the court judgement.pdf
deceive the court judgement.pdfdeceive the court judgement.pdf
deceive the court judgement.pdf
 
Child protection- Social action litigation as a catalyst
Child protection- Social action litigation as a catalystChild protection- Social action litigation as a catalyst
Child protection- Social action litigation as a catalyst
 
Allahabad hc wpil(a) 532 2020
Allahabad hc wpil(a) 532 2020Allahabad hc wpil(a) 532 2020
Allahabad hc wpil(a) 532 2020
 
Right to information and media law
Right to information and media lawRight to information and media law
Right to information and media law
 
RAM KRISHNA DALMIA v.pptx
RAM KRISHNA DALMIA v.pptxRAM KRISHNA DALMIA v.pptx
RAM KRISHNA DALMIA v.pptx
 
PIL NJAC
PIL NJACPIL NJAC
PIL NJAC
 
Administrative Adjudication negates the grievance redressal under Disciplinar...
Administrative Adjudication negates the grievance redressal under Disciplinar...Administrative Adjudication negates the grievance redressal under Disciplinar...
Administrative Adjudication negates the grievance redressal under Disciplinar...
 
LLB LAW NOTES ON ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
LLB LAW NOTES ON ADMINISTRATIVE LAWLLB LAW NOTES ON ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
LLB LAW NOTES ON ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
 
Contempt of court
Contempt of courtContempt of court
Contempt of court
 
CASES WP.pptx
CASES WP.pptxCASES WP.pptx
CASES WP.pptx
 
Professional ethics contempt of courts act - re arundhati roy case
Professional ethics   contempt of courts act - re arundhati roy caseProfessional ethics   contempt of courts act - re arundhati roy case
Professional ethics contempt of courts act - re arundhati roy case
 
Ms. Bree ppt. present.
Ms. Bree ppt. present.Ms. Bree ppt. present.
Ms. Bree ppt. present.
 

Recently uploaded

The Punjab Land Reforms AcT 1972 HIRDEBIR.pptx
The Punjab Land Reforms AcT 1972 HIRDEBIR.pptxThe Punjab Land Reforms AcT 1972 HIRDEBIR.pptx
The Punjab Land Reforms AcT 1972 HIRDEBIR.pptxgurcharnsinghlecengl
 
THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT 1872 NOTES FOR STUDENTS
THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT 1872 NOTES FOR STUDENTSTHE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT 1872 NOTES FOR STUDENTS
THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT 1872 NOTES FOR STUDENTSRoshniSingh312153
 
PPT Template - Federal Law Enforcement Training Center
PPT Template - Federal Law Enforcement Training CenterPPT Template - Federal Law Enforcement Training Center
PPT Template - Federal Law Enforcement Training Centerejlfernandez22
 
Wurz Financial - Wealth Counsel to Law Firm Owners Services Guide.pdf
Wurz Financial - Wealth Counsel to Law Firm Owners Services Guide.pdfWurz Financial - Wealth Counsel to Law Firm Owners Services Guide.pdf
Wurz Financial - Wealth Counsel to Law Firm Owners Services Guide.pdfssuser3e15612
 
Illinois Department Of Corrections reentry guide
Illinois Department Of Corrections reentry guideIllinois Department Of Corrections reentry guide
Illinois Department Of Corrections reentry guideillinoisworknet11
 
citizenship in the Philippines as to the laws applicable
citizenship in the Philippines as to the laws applicablecitizenship in the Philippines as to the laws applicable
citizenship in the Philippines as to the laws applicableSaraSantiago44
 
Hungarian legislation made by Robert Miklos
Hungarian legislation made by Robert MiklosHungarian legislation made by Robert Miklos
Hungarian legislation made by Robert Miklosbeduinpower135
 
Analysis on Law of Domicile under Private International laws.
Analysis on Law of Domicile under Private International laws.Analysis on Law of Domicile under Private International laws.
Analysis on Law of Domicile under Private International laws.2020000445musaib
 
Conditions Restricting Transfer Under TPA,1882
Conditions Restricting Transfer Under TPA,1882Conditions Restricting Transfer Under TPA,1882
Conditions Restricting Transfer Under TPA,18822020000445musaib
 
Grey Area of the Information Technology Act, 2000.pptx
Grey Area of the Information Technology Act, 2000.pptxGrey Area of the Information Technology Act, 2000.pptx
Grey Area of the Information Technology Act, 2000.pptxBharatMunjal4
 
Attestation presentation under Transfer of property Act
Attestation presentation under Transfer of property ActAttestation presentation under Transfer of property Act
Attestation presentation under Transfer of property Act2020000445musaib
 
Guide for Drug Education and Vice Control.docx
Guide for Drug Education and Vice Control.docxGuide for Drug Education and Vice Control.docx
Guide for Drug Education and Vice Control.docxjennysansano2
 
Sarvesh Raj IPS - A Journey of Dedication and Leadership.pptx
Sarvesh Raj IPS - A Journey of Dedication and Leadership.pptxSarvesh Raj IPS - A Journey of Dedication and Leadership.pptx
Sarvesh Raj IPS - A Journey of Dedication and Leadership.pptxAnto Jebin
 
Are There Any Alternatives To Jail Time For Sex Crime Convictions in Los Angeles
Are There Any Alternatives To Jail Time For Sex Crime Convictions in Los AngelesAre There Any Alternatives To Jail Time For Sex Crime Convictions in Los Angeles
Are There Any Alternatives To Jail Time For Sex Crime Convictions in Los AngelesChesley Lawyer
 
Labour legislations in India and its history
Labour legislations in India and its historyLabour legislations in India and its history
Labour legislations in India and its historyprasannamurthy6
 
RA. 7432 and RA 9994 Senior Citizen .pptx
RA. 7432 and RA 9994 Senior Citizen .pptxRA. 7432 and RA 9994 Senior Citizen .pptx
RA. 7432 and RA 9994 Senior Citizen .pptxJFSB1
 
Alexis O'Connell Arrest Records Houston Texas lexileeyogi
Alexis O'Connell Arrest Records Houston Texas lexileeyogiAlexis O'Connell Arrest Records Houston Texas lexileeyogi
Alexis O'Connell Arrest Records Houston Texas lexileeyogiBlayneRush1
 
1990-2004 Bar Questions and Answers in Sales
1990-2004 Bar Questions and Answers in Sales1990-2004 Bar Questions and Answers in Sales
1990-2004 Bar Questions and Answers in SalesMelvinPernez2
 
Understanding Cyber Crime Litigation: Key Concepts and Legal Frameworks
Understanding Cyber Crime Litigation: Key Concepts and Legal FrameworksUnderstanding Cyber Crime Litigation: Key Concepts and Legal Frameworks
Understanding Cyber Crime Litigation: Key Concepts and Legal FrameworksFinlaw Associates
 
Department order DAO 97-32. powerpoint presentation
Department order DAO 97-32. powerpoint presentationDepartment order DAO 97-32. powerpoint presentation
Department order DAO 97-32. powerpoint presentationPhillisYvonMarshBagu
 

Recently uploaded (20)

The Punjab Land Reforms AcT 1972 HIRDEBIR.pptx
The Punjab Land Reforms AcT 1972 HIRDEBIR.pptxThe Punjab Land Reforms AcT 1972 HIRDEBIR.pptx
The Punjab Land Reforms AcT 1972 HIRDEBIR.pptx
 
THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT 1872 NOTES FOR STUDENTS
THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT 1872 NOTES FOR STUDENTSTHE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT 1872 NOTES FOR STUDENTS
THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT 1872 NOTES FOR STUDENTS
 
PPT Template - Federal Law Enforcement Training Center
PPT Template - Federal Law Enforcement Training CenterPPT Template - Federal Law Enforcement Training Center
PPT Template - Federal Law Enforcement Training Center
 
Wurz Financial - Wealth Counsel to Law Firm Owners Services Guide.pdf
Wurz Financial - Wealth Counsel to Law Firm Owners Services Guide.pdfWurz Financial - Wealth Counsel to Law Firm Owners Services Guide.pdf
Wurz Financial - Wealth Counsel to Law Firm Owners Services Guide.pdf
 
Illinois Department Of Corrections reentry guide
Illinois Department Of Corrections reentry guideIllinois Department Of Corrections reentry guide
Illinois Department Of Corrections reentry guide
 
citizenship in the Philippines as to the laws applicable
citizenship in the Philippines as to the laws applicablecitizenship in the Philippines as to the laws applicable
citizenship in the Philippines as to the laws applicable
 
Hungarian legislation made by Robert Miklos
Hungarian legislation made by Robert MiklosHungarian legislation made by Robert Miklos
Hungarian legislation made by Robert Miklos
 
Analysis on Law of Domicile under Private International laws.
Analysis on Law of Domicile under Private International laws.Analysis on Law of Domicile under Private International laws.
Analysis on Law of Domicile under Private International laws.
 
Conditions Restricting Transfer Under TPA,1882
Conditions Restricting Transfer Under TPA,1882Conditions Restricting Transfer Under TPA,1882
Conditions Restricting Transfer Under TPA,1882
 
Grey Area of the Information Technology Act, 2000.pptx
Grey Area of the Information Technology Act, 2000.pptxGrey Area of the Information Technology Act, 2000.pptx
Grey Area of the Information Technology Act, 2000.pptx
 
Attestation presentation under Transfer of property Act
Attestation presentation under Transfer of property ActAttestation presentation under Transfer of property Act
Attestation presentation under Transfer of property Act
 
Guide for Drug Education and Vice Control.docx
Guide for Drug Education and Vice Control.docxGuide for Drug Education and Vice Control.docx
Guide for Drug Education and Vice Control.docx
 
Sarvesh Raj IPS - A Journey of Dedication and Leadership.pptx
Sarvesh Raj IPS - A Journey of Dedication and Leadership.pptxSarvesh Raj IPS - A Journey of Dedication and Leadership.pptx
Sarvesh Raj IPS - A Journey of Dedication and Leadership.pptx
 
Are There Any Alternatives To Jail Time For Sex Crime Convictions in Los Angeles
Are There Any Alternatives To Jail Time For Sex Crime Convictions in Los AngelesAre There Any Alternatives To Jail Time For Sex Crime Convictions in Los Angeles
Are There Any Alternatives To Jail Time For Sex Crime Convictions in Los Angeles
 
Labour legislations in India and its history
Labour legislations in India and its historyLabour legislations in India and its history
Labour legislations in India and its history
 
RA. 7432 and RA 9994 Senior Citizen .pptx
RA. 7432 and RA 9994 Senior Citizen .pptxRA. 7432 and RA 9994 Senior Citizen .pptx
RA. 7432 and RA 9994 Senior Citizen .pptx
 
Alexis O'Connell Arrest Records Houston Texas lexileeyogi
Alexis O'Connell Arrest Records Houston Texas lexileeyogiAlexis O'Connell Arrest Records Houston Texas lexileeyogi
Alexis O'Connell Arrest Records Houston Texas lexileeyogi
 
1990-2004 Bar Questions and Answers in Sales
1990-2004 Bar Questions and Answers in Sales1990-2004 Bar Questions and Answers in Sales
1990-2004 Bar Questions and Answers in Sales
 
Understanding Cyber Crime Litigation: Key Concepts and Legal Frameworks
Understanding Cyber Crime Litigation: Key Concepts and Legal FrameworksUnderstanding Cyber Crime Litigation: Key Concepts and Legal Frameworks
Understanding Cyber Crime Litigation: Key Concepts and Legal Frameworks
 
Department order DAO 97-32. powerpoint presentation
Department order DAO 97-32. powerpoint presentationDepartment order DAO 97-32. powerpoint presentation
Department order DAO 97-32. powerpoint presentation
 

Powerpoint presention on Principles of Natural Justice

  • 2. Introduction • Procedural fairness is regarded as an integral element of administrative process and law. • The principles of natural justice constitute an essential component of procedural fairness. • Natural justice comprises of two components. First is hearing, or the doctrine of audi alteram partem, which means 'listen to the other side'. The other is the doctrine of bias or nemo judex in re sua meaning that a man should not be a judge in his own cause. The maxim has come to mean that the deciding authority must be impartial. Both are at times included in the term ‘fair hearing’.
  • 3. Why Natural Justice assumes importance? 1. Natural Justice protects infringement of individual rights from actions and inactions of administrative authorities. 2. By adhering to the principles, the administration gains a position of fair institution.
  • 4. Scenarios where P. of N.J. may be invoked • Principles of natural justice are attracted whenever a person suffers a civil consequence, or a prejudice is caused to him by any administrative action. • More specifically, a person can claim fair hearing in the following cases: i. Administrative action infringes any fundamental rights ii. The parent statute under which the Administration proposes to take an action against a person may itself impose expressly the requirement of hearing. iii. Right of hearing is claimed in the residuary area, i.e. when it is not explicitly mentioned in the parent statute. (It is here that the courts must play an active role. This is the point where the discussion over the difference between quasi-judicial and judicial comes into play.) iv. If the parent statute is silent / does not explicitly mention the requirement of fair hearing, then the courts need to investigate what is the type of administrative action which has caused the infraction of civil rights of the individual. If the administrative action is quasi-judicial (meaning of the term must be clarified) then natural justice will become applicable. [Recent judicial approach has been that regardless of the fact whether the administrative action is quasi-judicial or not, it must involve fairness. Reason for adopting this approach is that difference between quasi-judicial and administrative is artificial formality.]
  • 5. AUDI ALTERAM PARTEM • It means that the party whose civil or fundamental rights are infringed is given an opportunity to present her/his case. More importantly, the hearing should not be sham but meaningful. • Some of the components of fair hearing include: i. Service of Notice, Sufficient time to Reply ii. DISCLOSURE OF MATERIALS TO THE PARTY iii. HEARING iv. Right to rebut the evidence against him/Cross-examination v. Legal representation vi. Ex-parte evidence cannot be entertained without the knowledge of the party vii. Right to receive evidence adduced by the other party viii. Reasoned decision ix. ONE WHO DECIDES MUST HEAR x. DISCLOSURE OF THE HEARING/INQUIRY OFFICER'S REPORT
  • 6. Important case laws on Audi Alterman Partem 1. R. v. University of Cambridge (also known as the Dr Bentley case), 93 ER 698 The Court of King's Bench held that the University of Cambridge could not cancel the degree of a great but rebellious scholar without giving him an opportunity of defending himself. 2. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of lndia, AIR 1978 SC 597 Mrs. Gandhi’s passport was impounded by the authorities. Under S. 10(5)of the Passport Act, 1963, the authority is to record its reasons and furnish a copy of the same to the concerned individual on demand while impounding his passport. The authority may however refuse to give reasons in public interest among other grounds. The SC observed that the Central Government was wholly unjustified in withholding the reasons for impounding the passport of the petitioner, and in this way not only a breach of statutory duty was committed but it also amounted to denial of an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
  • 7. NEMO JUDEX IN RE SUA • The maxim nemo judex in re sua literally means that a man should not be a judge in his own cause. The maxim has come to mean that the deciding authority must be impartial. This is known as the rule against bias. The principle that bias disqualifies an individual from acting as a judge flows from the following two maxims: (i) No one should be a judge in his own cause; and (ii) Justice should not only be done but also seen to be done. • Bias is usually of three kinds: (i) Pecuniary Bias; (ii) Personal Bias; and (iii) Departmental or Policy Bias
  • 8. Important case laws on Personal bias 1. Mineral Development Corpn. Ltd. v. State of Bihar, AIR 1960 SC 468 In this case, the petitioners were granted mining licence for 99 years in 1947. But in 1953, the Secretary of the Revenue Board sent a notice to the petitioners to show cause within 15 days why the licence should not be cancelled for violations of Sections 10, 12 and 14 of the Mining Act, 1952. The petitioners submitted a written reply denying the allegations. Two years later, the government issued a notification cancelling the licence. The action of the government was challenged on the ground of personal bias. The facts relevant to personal bias before the court were (1) that Raja Kamakhya Narain Singh, the owner of the Mineral Development Corporation Ltd., had opposed the Minister in the General Election of 1952; and (2) that the Minister had filed a criminal case under Section 5oo of the Penal Code, 1860 against the petitioner which was transferred by the Bihar High Court to Delhi on the ground of political rivalry between the parties. The court quashed the order of the government, among other grounds, on the ground of personal bias. 2. A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India, AlR 1970 SC I50 In this case, Naqishbund, who was the Acting Chief Conservator of Forests, was a member of the selection board and also a candidate for selection to the All-India cadre of the Forest Service. Though he did not take part in the deliberations of the board when his name was considered and approved, the Supreme Court held that there was a real likelihood of bias, for the mere presence of the candidate on the selection board may adversely influence the judgment of the other member.
  • 9. Important case laws on Pecuniary bias 1. Jeejeebhoy v. Collector, AIR 1965 SC 1096 The Chief Justice reconstituted the Bench when it was found that one of the members of the Bench was a member of the cooperative society for which the land had been acquired. 2. Visakapatnam Coop. Motor Transport Ltd. v. G. Bangaruraju, AIR 1953 Mad 709. The Madras High Court also quashed the decision of the Collector who in his capacity as the Chairman of the Regional Transport Authority had granted a permit in favour of a cooperative society of which he was also the Chairman
  • 10. Important case laws on Departmental bias 1. G. Nageswara Rao v. APSRTC, AIR 1959 SC 308 In this case, the petitioner challenged the order of the government nationalising road transport. One of the grounds for challenge was that the Secretary of the Transport Department who gave the hearing was biased, being the person who initiated the scheme and also being the head of the department, whose responsibility was to execute it. The court quashed the order on the ground that, under the circumstances, the Secretary was biased and, hence, no fair hearing could be expected.